DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Transcription

1 DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Prepared for: Submitted by: 299 Lava Ridge Ct. Suite 2 Roseville, CA June 212

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 Project Location and Description... 1 Analysis Scenarios... 1 Study Facilities... 1 Data Collection... 1 Traffic Forecasts... 3 Methodology... 3 Significance Criteria and Impacts Existing Conditions... 5 Intersection Operations... 5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Project Conditions... 8 Trip Generation... 8 Trip Distribution Existing Plus Project Conditions Intersection Operations Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Cumulative Conditions Cumulative No Project Conditions Cumulative Plus Project Conditions APPENDICES Appendix A: Traffic Volume Count Data Appendix B: Level of Service Calculations Sheets

3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location and Study Intersections... 2 Figure 2 Existing Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations... 6 Figure 3 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Figure 4 Existing Plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations Figure 5 Cumulative No Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations Figure 6 Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Level of Service Definitions Signalized Intersections... 4 Table 2 Intersection Delay / Level of Service Existing Conditions... 5 Table 3 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes... 7 Table 4 Trip Generation Rates Per Resident... 8 Table 5 Trip Generation Estimates... 9 Table 6 Intersection Delay / Level of Service Existing Plus Project Conditions Table 7 Intersection Delay / Level of Service Cumulative No Project Conditions Table 8 Intersection Delay / Level of Service Cumulative Plus Project Conditions... 15

4 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential transportation impacts of the Castilian Redevelopment Project, and identify improvements needed to mitigate deficiencies caused by the project. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Castilian Redevelopment Project will replace the vacant Castilian North and Castilian South student housing, a 5 unit complex for incoming freshman and transfer students being demolished due to seismic deficiencies, with housing for up to 275 graduate students. The proposed project is located north of Russell Boulevard, between State Route (SR) 113 and Wake Forest Drive - West 8 th Street, on the UC Davis campus. The project location is shown on Figure 1. ALYSIS SCERIOS The following scenarios were analyzed as part of this study: Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project Conditions Cumulative No Project Conditions Cumulative Plus Project Conditions STUDY FACILITIES Vehicle level of service was analyzed at the following study intersections (shown on Figure 1): 1. Russell Boulevard/State Route (SR) 113 Southbound () Ramps 2. Russell Boulevard/State Route (SR) 113 Northbound () Ramps 3. Russell Boulevard/Sycamore Lane 4. Russell Boulevard/Anderson Road La Rue Road DATA COLLECTION Study Intersections Intersection counts including vehicle turning movements, bicycle volumes, and pedestrian volumes were collected at the study intersections on October 26, 211 as part of the UC Davis Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) Mitigation Monitoring Program Update (Fehr & Peers, 211). The counts were collected during the AM (7: AM to 9: AM) and PM (4: PM to 6: PM) peak periods when school was in session. The counts show that the AM and PM vehicle peak hours occur from 8: AM to 9: AM and 5: PM to 6: PM, respectively. 1

5 Oeste Dr Mulberry Ln Linden Ln Anderson Rd S C am p u s W ay! 1! 2! 3! 4 H aw thor n L n Parkway Cir W ake Fo re st D r Oxford Cir Castilian Redevelopment Project PROJECT VICINITY FIGURE 1 8th St Sycamore Ln Orchard Park Dr Orchard Park Cir Guava Ln Acacia Ln Arthur St Barkley St Adams St Buchanan St Cleveland St Coolidge St C:\Projects\Castillian\GIS\MXD\fig1_vicinity.mxd Project Location Not to Scale

6 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June 212 Trip Generation Counts Traffic volumes data was collected at the driveways of the Colleges at La Rue student housing complex at UC Davis to develop trip generation rates for the proposed project. The Colleges at La Rue has three driveways serving its designated parking spaces. Residents also park along Orchard Park Drive adjacent to the housing complex. Video cameras recorded vehicles entering and exiting the driveways and on-street parking spaces on Orchard Park Drive for a 24-hour period on May 15, 212. Manual counts (recorded by a person) were conducted during the AM (7: AM to 9: AM) and PM (4: PM to 6: PM) peak periods as well, to verify and calibrate the video data. The camera recording the on-street parking spaces did not capture the all of the traffic entering and exiting the spaces and was adjusted based on the manual count data. TRAFFIC FORECASTS Cumulative intersection turning movement forecasts were developed for the study locations using an updated version of the Davis Travel Demand Model. The assumed cumulative land uses for UC Davis were consistent with those assumed for the UC Davis 23 Long Range Development Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (23 LRDP EIR). The horizon year for the 23 LRDP EIR is the 215/16 academic year; however, it is unlikely that full buildout of the 23 LRDP EIR land uses will occur by the 215/16 academic year. The model included the most recent land use assumptions for the City of Davis based on the City of Davis General Plan. The difference method, which adds the difference between the base and future year model runs to existing counts, was used to develop the cumulative turning movement forecasts. METHODOLOGY Transportation engineers and planners commonly use the term level of service (LOS) to measure and describe the operational status of the local roadway network. An intersection or roadway segment s level of service can range from LOS A (indicating free-flow traffic conditions with little or no delay), to LOS F (representing oversaturated conditions where traffic flows exceed design capacity, resulting in long queues and delays). The study intersections were analyzed using the methodology presented in the Transportation Research Board s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2. The 21 Highway Capacity Manual includes minor updates to the HCM 2 methodologies for signalized intersections; however, these updates do not affect the analysis results for intersections in this study. Therefore, at signalized intersections, the HCM 2 methodology was used. Signalized Intersection Analysis The HCM 2 methodology determines the level of service (LOS) at signalized intersections by comparing the average control delay (i.e. delay resulting from initial deceleration, queue move-up time, time actually stopped, and final acceleration) per vehicle at the intersection to the thresholds shown in Table 1. 3

7 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June 212 TABLE 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS SIGLIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Control Delay (seconds per vehicle) A 1. B C D E F >8. Source: 2 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2) SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA AND IMPACTS Based on the UC Davis 23 LRDP EIR, the following significance criteria was used to identify operational deficiencies, if the proposed project would: Cause the LOS to change from an acceptable level to an unacceptable level. The following LOS thresholds apply to the study intersections: o o LOS D is the minimum acceptable LOS for UC Davis LOS C is the minimum acceptable LOS for SR 113 and its associated interchanges Add 1 or more vehicles to the volume of a study intersection that is currently operating at an unacceptable level For this analysis, LOS C was used as the standard for the Russell Boulevard/SR 113 Ramps and Russell Boulevard/SR 113 Ramps intersections (i.e. LOS A, B, and C are considered acceptable operations, while LOS D, E, and F are considered unacceptable operations), and LOS D was used as the standard for the Russell Boulevard/Sycamore Lane and Russell Boulevard/Anderson Road intersections (i.e. LOS A, B, C, and D are considered acceptable operations, while LOS E and F are considered unacceptable operations). 4

8 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June EXISTING CONDITIONS This section describes the existing conditions of the roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities in the study area. INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Existing conditions intersection level of service analysis was performed using SimTraffic microsimulation software which utilizes HCM 2 methodology. SimTraffic results are a product of a simulation that is designed to represent real-life drivers to the best extent possible; therefore, each simulation run represents a unique set of data. The results are based on an average of 1 runs. Figure 2 shows the existing, peak hour, vehicle traffic volumes and lane configurations at the study intersections. All of the study intersections are signalized. Table 2 shows the existing delay and level of service at the study intersections. TABLE 2 INTERSECTION DELAY / LEVEL OF SERVICE EXISTING CONDITIONS Intersection Control AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS 1 Delay LOS 1./SR 113 Ramps Signal 9 A 7 A./SR 113 Ramps Signal 13 B 19 B./Sycamore Ln. Signal 19 B 22 C./Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd. Signal 23 C 26 C Notes: 1 Intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle, and is based on the average of all approaches signalized intersections per HCM methodology. Bold text indicates unacceptable operations. Source: Fehr & Peers, 212 As shown in Table 2, the study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 5

9 Mulberry Ln Acacia Ln 8th St Linden Ln Adams St Project Location Sycamore Ln Hawthorn Ln Anderson Rd Cleveland St Buchanan St Arthur St Guava Ln Wake Forest Dr Oxford Cir! 1! 2! 3! 4 Orchard Park Dr Parkway Cir Orchard Park Cir 1. /SR 113 Ramps 2. /SR 113 Ramps 3. /Sycamore Ln 4. /Anderson Rd 485 (431) 449 (18) 38 (72) () 186 (117) bf ccf ccf 21 (178) 36 (875) 51 (44) 62 (54) ce acc 51 (29) 419 (635) bf 151 (418) 3 (2) 225 (174) 18 (191) 617 (521) 214 (178) 75 (87) af ce acc 37 (6) 38 (67) 66 (59) 29 (183) 144 (171) 82 (75) 58 (463) 12 (7) ace èìëí èìëí èìëí èìëí SR 113 On-Ramp SR 113 Off-Ramp Sycamore Ln Anderson Rd aaccf accf accf 49 (154) 6 (38) 111 (37) 44 (16) 219 (66) 187 (212) LEGEND a Turn Lane AM (PM)! 1 èìëí Peak Hour Traffic Volume Study Intersection Traffic Signal Path: S:\GIS_Library\IntersectionVolume\MXD\Letter_Portrait_4INT.mxd Castilian Redevelopment Project PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS - EXISTING CONDITIONS FIGURE 2

10 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June 212 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Class I shared-use paths exist on the south side of Russell Boulevard through the entire study area, on the north side of Russell Boulevard between Orchard Circle Park and Sycamore Lane, and on the west side of La Rue Road south of Russell Boulevard. Class II bicycle lanes exist on Sycamore Lane and Anderson Road north of Russell Boulevard. Sidewalks exist on the north side of Russell Boulevard through entire study area with the exception of the section between Orchard Circle Park and Sycamore Lane, which has a shared-use path. Sidewalks also exist on both sides of Sycamore Lane and Anderson Road-La Rue Road. The Russell Boulevard/SR 113 Ramps and Russell Boulevard/SR 113 Ramps intersections have crosswalks on the north and south legs of the intersections (eastbound and westbound). Crosswalks are also located on all vehicle approaches of the Russell Boulevard/Sycamore Lane and Russell Boulevard/Anderson Road intersections. Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes Bicycle and pedestrian volumes were collected at the study intersections during the AM and PM peak periods. Table 3 shows the volumes at each study intersection. TABLE 3 EXISTING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES Intersection Bicycle Volume Pedestrian Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour./SR 113 Ramps /SR 113 Ramps /Sycamore Ln /Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd Source: Fehr & Peers, 212 The Russell Boulevard/Sycamore Lane intersection provides direct access to the shared-use path on the south side of Russell Boulevard, and has a bicycle only signal phase. The Russell Boulevard/Anderson Road-La Rue Road intersection has a dedicated southbound left turn lane for cyclists that connects to the southeast corner of the intersection, allowing access to the shared-use path on the south side of Russell Boulevard. 7

11 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June PROJECT CONDITIONS TRIP GENERATION Vehicle trip generation estimates were developed for the proposed Castilian Redevelopment Project based on 275 graduate student residents. The Colleges at La Rue is another student housing complex on the UC Davis campus with similar characteristics to the proposed project. Vehicle trip generation counts were conducted at the Colleges at La Rue to develop trip generation rates for the Castilian project. The Colleges at La Rue has three driveways that serve its designated parking spaces. Residents also park along Orchard Park Drive adjacent to the housing complex. Video cameras recorded vehicles entering and exiting the driveways and on-street parking spaces on Orchard Park Drive for a 24-hour period. Manual counts (recorded by a person) were conducted during the AM and PM peak periods to verify and calibrate the video data. Table 4 shows the trip generation rates developed based on the count data. TABLE 4 TRIP GENERATION RATES PER RESIDENT Time Total Rate Percent In Percent Out Daily % 5% AM Peak Hour.7 52% 48% PM Peak Hour.16 49% 51% Notes: Trip generation rates were developed based on count data collected at the Colleges at La Rue student housing. Source: Fehr & Peers, 212 The trip rates shown in Table 4 are reflective of the fact that UC Davis has a high percentage of travelers who use alternative modes of travel (e.g. walking, bicycling, transit, etc.) Based on surveys conducted in the fall of 211, the following percentages of students/faculty/staff living in the City of Davis or on the UC Davis campus use alternatives modes of travel: Bicycle 7% Transit 19% Auto Driver 11% The trip generation rates in Table 3 were developed using data from a student housing complex at UC Davis, and therefore inherently account for alternative modes of travel. The rates shown above provide trip generation estimates for vehicle trips only. Table 5 shows the daily, AM, and PM peak hour trip generation estimates based on 275 residents. 8

12 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June 212 TABLE 5 TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use Size Daily Trips Total AM Trips AM Trips In/Out Total PM Trips PM Trips In/Out Student Housing 275 Residents / / 23 Notes: Trip generation estimates account for vehicle trips only. The trip generation rates were developed based on count data collected at the Colleges at La Rue student housing and inherently account for alternative mode reductions. Source: Fehr & Peers, 212 The proposed Castilian student housing is expected to generate approximately 6 daily, 2 AM peak hour, and 45 PM peak hour vehicle trips. Based on the alternative mode percentages from the travel survey collected in fall 211, the project is estimated to generate the following bicycle, pedestrian, and transit trips: Bicycle: AM 12, PM 18, Daily 3,78 Transit: AM 3, PM 75, Daily 1,3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Project generated traffic volumes were distributed to the surrounding roadway network based on existing travel patterns in the area and the locations of complimentary land uses. The Davis Travel Demand Model was used to develop an initial trip distribution assignment for the project and adjustments were made based on existing traffic volume data and local knowledge of the area. Project generated trips were distributed to the study intersections based on the following: 1% to/from north of SR 113 3% to/from south on SR 113 1% to/from Russell Boulevard west of SR % to/from north on Sycamore Lane toward Covell Boulevard 5% to/from north on Anderson Road toward Covell Boulevard 5% to/from east on 8th Street toward F Street 35% to/from east on Russell Boulevard toward F Street 25% to/from south on La Rue Road 9

13 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June 212 1% to/from the shopping center north of Russell Boulevard between Sycamore Lane and Anderson Road (Trader Joe s) Figure 3 shows the project trip distribution and assignment. 1

14 Adams St å ST 1% Acacia Ln Project Location å ST 15% Sycamore Ln 8th St Hawthorn Ln Mulberry Ln Linden Ln å ST 5% Anderson Rd åst 5% Cleveland St Buchanan St Arthur St å ST 1%! 1! 2 Guava Ln Wake Forest Dr Oxford Cir! 3 å ST 1% ST 35%! 4 å Orchard Park Dr Parkway Cir å ST 25% å ST 3% Orchard Park Cir 1. /SR 113 Ramps 2. /SR 113 Ramps 3. /Sycamore Ln 4. /Anderson Rd () () () () () bf ccf ccf èìëí èìëí èìëí èìëí SR 113 On-Ramp (1) () () () ce acc SR 113 Off-Ramp () (1) bf () () (1) (1) () (1) 6 (11) af Sycamore Ln ce acc 8 (12) () () (1) (2) () 3 (6) 3 (5) ace Anderson Rd aaccf accf accf 3 (5) (1) () (2) 4 (5) () LEGEND a Turn Lane AM (PM)! 1 èìëí å Project Peak Hour Traffic Volume Study Intersection Traffic Signal Trip Distribution Path: S:\GIS_Library\IntersectionVolume\MXD\Letter_Portrait_4INT.mxd Castilian Redevelopment Project PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 3

15 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Project generated traffic volumes were added to the existing traffic volumes at the study intersections for existing plus project conditions analysis. Table 6 shows the intersection level of service results. Figure 4 shows the existing plus project conditions traffic volumes. TABLE 6 INTERSECTION DELAY / LEVEL OF SERVICE EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Existing Existing Plus Project Intersection Control AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS 1 Delay LOS 1 Delay LOS 1 Delay LOS 1./SR 113 Ramps Signal 9 A 7 A 1 A 7 A./SR 113 Ramps Signal 12 B 19 B 12 B 2 B./Sycamore Ln. Signal 19 B 22 C 19 B 25 C./Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd. Signal 23 C 26 C 25 C 28 C Notes: 1 Intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle, and is based on the average of all approaches signalized intersections per HCM methodology. Source: Fehr & Peers, 212 As shown in Table 6, the proposed project is not expected to change the level of service at the study intersections. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The proposed Castilian Redevelopment Project will increase traffic on roadways. Where bicyclists share the road with vehicles, increased traffic will impact conditions for bicyclists. Added roadway traffic will impact conditions for pedestrians, especially at uncontrolled crossings. However, because the amount of traffic added by the project is small, the impact is considered less-than-significant. 12

16 Mulberry Ln Acacia Ln 8th St Linden Ln Adams St Project Location Sycamore Ln Hawthorn Ln Anderson Rd Cleveland St Buchanan St Arthur St Guava Ln Wake Forest Dr Oxford Cir! 1! 2! 3! 4 Orchard Park Dr Parkway Cir Orchard Park Cir 1. /SR 113 Ramps 2. /SR 113 Ramps 3. /Sycamore Ln 4. /Anderson Rd 485 (431) 449 (18) 38 (72) () 186 (117) bf ccf ccf èìëí èìëí èìëí èìëí SR 113 On-Ramp 21 (179) 36 (875) 51 (44) 62 (54) () ce acc SR 113 Off-Ramp 51 (29) 419 (636) bf 151 (418) 3 (2) 225 (175) 18 (192) 617 (521) 214 (179) 81 (98) af Sycamore Ln ce acc 45 (72) 38 (67) 66 (59) 29 (184) 144 (173) 82 (75) 511 (469) 15 (75) ace Anderson Rd aaccf accf accf 52 (159) 6 (39) 111 (37) 44 (18) 223 (611) 187 (212) LEGEND a Turn Lane AM (PM)! 1 èìëí Peak Hour Traffic Volume Study Intersection Traffic Signal Path: S:\GIS_Library\IntersectionVolume\MXD\Letter_Portrait_4INT.mxd Castilian Redevelopment Project PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS - EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS FIGURE 4

17 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS Two cumulative conditions scenarios were analyzed: Cumulative No Project Cumulative Plus Project CUMULATIVE NO PROJECT CONDITIONS Traffic Forecasts Traffic volume forecasts for the cumulative no project scenario were prepared using the Davis Travel Demand Model via the difference method, which adds the difference between the base and future year model runs to the existing traffic volumes at the study intersections. The land use data in the travel demand model assumes that the existing Castilian buildings are operational and generate traffic. To provide an accurate estimate of cumulative no project conditions forecasts, the land use values associated with the existing Castilian buildings were removed before the model was run to represent the vacant buildings. Figure 5 shows the cumulative no project peak hour traffic volumes and lane configurations. Roadway Network No changes are expected on the study roadway segments or intersections for the cumulative conditions analysis. Intersection Operations Intersection level of service analysis was performed for the study intersections based on the cumulative no project traffic volume forecasts. Table 7 shows the results. 14

18 Transportation Impact Study - Draft Castilian Redevelopment Project June 212 TABLE 7 INTERSECTION DELAY / LEVEL OF SERVICE CUMULATIVE NO PROJECT CONDITIONS Intersection Control AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS 1 Delay LOS 1./SR 113 Ramps Signal 1 A 7 A./SR 113 Ramps Signal 14 B 33 C./Sycamore Ln. Signal 22 C 36 D./Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd. Signal 33 C 5 D Notes: 1 Intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle, and is based on the average of all approaches signalized intersections per HCM methodology. Bold text indicates unacceptable operations. Source: Fehr & Peers, 212 As shown in Table 7, the study intersections are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service under cumulative no project conditions. CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Intersection Operations Project generated traffic volumes were added to the cumulative no project forecasts for cumulative plus project conditions intersection level of service analysis. Table 8 shows the results. Figure 6 shows the cumulative plus project conditions traffic volumes. TABLE 8 INTERSECTION DELAY / LEVEL OF SERVICE CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Intersection Control Cumulative No Project Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS 1 Delay LOS 1 Delay LOS 1 Delay LOS 1./SR 113 Ramps Signal 9 A 7 A 9 A 7 A./SR 113 Ramps Signal 14 B 33 C 14 B 35 C./Sycamore Ln. Signal 22 C 36 D 23 C 43 D./Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd. Signal 33 C 5 D 38 D 53 D Notes: 1 Intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle, and is based on the average of all approaches signalized intersections per HCM methodology. Bold text indicates unacceptable operations. Source: Fehr & Peers, 212 As shown in Table 8, the proposed project is not expected to change the level of service at the study intersections under cumulative plus project conditions. 15

19 Mulberry Ln Acacia Ln 8th St Linden Ln Adams St Project Location Sycamore Ln Hawthorn Ln Anderson Rd Cleveland St Buchanan St Arthur St Guava Ln Wake Forest Dr Oxford Cir! 1! 2! 3! 4 Orchard Park Dr Parkway Cir Orchard Park Cir 1. /SR 113 Ramps 2. /SR 113 Ramps 3. /Sycamore Ln 4. /Anderson Rd 65 (515) 45 (295) 4 (95) 225 (15) bf ccf ccf èìëí èìëí èìëí èìëí SR 113 On-Ramp 32 (635) 425 (9) 55 (45) 82 (62) ce acc SR 113 Off-Ramp 65 (28) 585 (1,1) bf 16 (435) 5 (5) 42 (36) 19 (22) 1,3 (85) 215 (235) 75 (9) af Sycamore Ln ce acc 45 (6) 555 (1,35) 75 (7) 395 (23) 145 (175) 12 (165) 78 (7) 25 (75) ace Anderson Rd aaccf accf accf 7 (23) 8 (41) 165 (55) 45 (11) 43 (815) 345 (345) LEGEND a Turn Lane AM (PM)! 1 èìëí Peak Hour Traffic Volume Study Intersection Traffic Signal Path: S:\GIS_Library\IntersectionVolume\MXD\Letter_Portrait_4INT.mxd Castilian Redevelopment Project PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS - CUMULATIVE NO PROJECT CONDITIONS FIGURE 5

20 Mulberry Ln Acacia Ln 8th St Linden Ln Adams St Project Location Sycamore Ln Hawthorn Ln Anderson Rd Cleveland St Buchanan St Arthur St Guava Ln Wake Forest Dr Oxford Cir! 1! 2! 3! 4 Orchard Park Dr Parkway Cir Orchard Park Cir 1. /SR 113 Ramps 2. /SR 113 Ramps 3. /Sycamore Ln 4. /Anderson Rd 65 (515) 45 (295) 4 (95) () 225 (15) bf ccf ccf èìëí èìëí èìëí èìëí SR 113 On-Ramp 32 (636) 425 (9) 55 (45) 82 (62) ce acc SR 113 Off-Ramp 65 (28) 585 (1,11) bf 16 (435) 5 (5) 42 (361) 19 (221) 1,3 (85) 215 (236) 81 (11) af Sycamore Ln ce acc 53 (72) 555 (1,35) 75 (7) 395 (231) 145 (177) 12 (165) 783 (76) 28 (8) ace Anderson Rd aaccf accf accf 73 (235) 8 (411) 165 (55) 45 (112) 434 (82) 345 (345) LEGEND a Turn Lane AM (PM)! 1 èìëí Peak Hour Traffic Volume Study Intersection Traffic Signal Path: S:\GIS_Library\IntersectionVolume\MXD\Letter_Portrait_4INT.mxd Castilian Redevelopment Project PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS - CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS FIGURE 6

21 APPENDIX A: TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT DATA

22 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SR 113 Ramps -- QC JOB #: CITY/STATE: Davis, CA DATE: Wed, Oct Peak-Hour: 8: AM -- 9: AM Peak 15-Min: 8:35 AM -- 8:5 AM Min Count SR 113 Ramps SR 113 Ramps Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly Beginning At Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 7: AM :5 AM :1 AM :15 AM :2 AM :25 AM :3 AM :35 AM :4 AM :45 AM :5 AM :55 AM : AM :5 AM :1 AM :15 AM :2 AM :25 AM :3 AM :35 AM :4 AM :45 AM :5 AM :55 AM Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Pedestrians 4 4 Bicycles 1 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 11/21/211 4:19 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (

23 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SR 113 Ramps -- QC JOB #: CITY/STATE: Davis, CA DATE: Wed, Oct Peak-Hour: 5: PM -- 6: PM Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:3 PM Min Count SR 113 Ramps SR 113 Ramps Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly Beginning At Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4: PM :5 PM :1 PM :15 PM :2 PM :25 PM :3 PM :35 PM :4 PM :45 PM :5 PM :55 PM : PM :5 PM :1 PM :15 PM :2 PM :25 PM :3 PM :35 PM :4 PM :45 PM :5 PM :55 PM Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Pedestrians 4 4 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 11/21/211 4:19 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (

24 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SR 113 Ramps -- QC JOB #: CITY/STATE: Davis, CA DATE: Wed, Oct Peak-Hour: 7:5 AM -- 8:5 AM Peak 15-Min: 8:35 AM -- 8:5 AM Min Count SR 113 Ramps SR 113 Ramps Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly Beginning At Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 7: AM :5 AM :1 AM :15 AM :2 AM :25 AM :3 AM :35 AM :4 AM :45 AM :5 AM :55 AM : AM :5 AM :1 AM :15 AM :2 AM :25 AM :3 AM :35 AM :4 AM :45 AM :5 AM :55 AM Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Pedestrians Bicycles 1 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 11/21/211 4:19 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (

25 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SR 113 Ramps -- QC JOB #: CITY/STATE: Davis, CA DATE: Wed, Oct Peak-Hour: 4:55 PM -- 5:55 PM Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:3 PM Min Count SR 113 Ramps SR 113 Ramps Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly Beginning At Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4: PM :5 PM :1 PM :15 PM :2 PM :25 PM :3 PM :35 PM :4 PM :45 PM :5 PM :55 PM : PM :5 PM :1 PM :15 PM :2 PM :25 PM :3 PM :35 PM :4 PM :45 PM :5 PM :55 PM Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Pedestrians Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 11/21/211 4:19 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (

26 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Sycamore Ln -- QC JOB #: CITY/STATE: Davis, CA DATE: Wed, Oct Peak-Hour: 8: AM -- 9: AM Peak 15-Min: 8:3 AM -- 8:45 AM Min Count Sycamore Ln Sycamore Ln Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly Beginning At Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 7: AM :5 AM :1 AM :15 AM :2 AM :25 AM :3 AM :35 AM :4 AM :45 AM :5 AM :55 AM : AM :5 AM :1 AM :15 AM :2 AM :25 AM :3 AM :35 AM :4 AM :45 AM :5 AM :55 AM Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Pedestrians Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 11/21/211 4:19 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (

27 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Sycamore Ln -- QC JOB #: CITY/STATE: Davis, CA DATE: Wed, Oct Peak-Hour: 5: PM -- 6: PM Peak 15-Min: 5:1 PM -- 5:25 PM Min Count Sycamore Ln Sycamore Ln Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly Beginning At Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4: PM :5 PM :1 PM :15 PM :2 PM :25 PM :3 PM :35 PM :4 PM :45 PM :5 PM :55 PM : PM :5 PM :1 PM :15 PM :2 PM :25 PM :3 PM :35 PM :4 PM :45 PM :5 PM :55 PM Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Pedestrians Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 11/21/211 4:19 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (

28 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Anderson Rd/La Rue Rd -- QC JOB #: CITY/STATE: Davis, CA DATE: Wed, Oct Peak-Hour: 8: AM -- 9: AM Peak 15-Min: 8:45 AM -- 9: AM Min Count Anderson Rd/La Rue Rd Anderson Rd/La Rue Rd Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly Beginning At Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 7: AM :5 AM :1 AM :15 AM :2 AM :25 AM :3 AM :35 AM :4 AM :45 AM :5 AM :55 AM : AM :5 AM :1 AM :15 AM :2 AM :25 AM :3 AM :35 AM :4 AM :45 AM :5 AM :55 AM Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Pedestrians Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 11/21/211 4:19 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (

29 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Anderson Rd/La Rue Rd -- QC JOB #: CITY/STATE: Davis, CA DATE: Wed, Oct Peak-Hour: 5: PM -- 6: PM Peak 15-Min: 5:1 PM -- 5:25 PM Min Count Anderson Rd/La Rue Rd Anderson Rd/La Rue Rd Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly Beginning At Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4: PM :5 PM :1 PM :15 PM :2 PM :25 PM :3 PM :35 PM :4 PM :45 PM :5 PM :55 PM : PM :5 PM :1 PM :15 PM :2 PM :25 PM :3 PM :35 PM :4 PM :45 PM :5 PM :55 PM Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Pedestrians Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 11/21/211 4:19 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (

30 APPENDIX B: LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS SHEETS

31 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour Intersection 1 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % C % 8..4 A % C % A % A % A % A % A % A Total % 9..5 A Intersection 2 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % C % C % C % C % C % A % A % A % A % A Total % B Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

32 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour Intersection 3 Sycamore Ln./. Signalized % D % A % B % C % B % B % C % C % C Total % B Intersection 4 Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd./. Signalized % D % C % A % B % D % B % B % C % D % C % A % C % D % B % A % C Total % C Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

33 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour Intersection 1 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % C % B % C % A % 6..2 A % A % A % A % A Total % A Intersection 2 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % C % D % C % C % C % A % A % B % B % B Total % B Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

34 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour Intersection 3 Sycamore Ln./. Signalized % D % A % C % D % B % B % C % C % C Total % C Intersection 4 Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd./. Signalized % D % C % A % C % D % C % B % C % D % C % A % C % D % C % A % C Total % C Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

35 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Intersection 1 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % C % A % C % A % A % A % A % A % A Total % A Intersection 2 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % C % C % C % C % C % A % A % A % B % B Total % B Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

36 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Intersection 3 Sycamore Ln./. Signalized % D % A % B % C % B % B % C % C % C Total % B Intersection 4 Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd./. Signalized % D % C % A % B % D % B % B % C % D % C % 7..9 A % C % D % B % A % C Total % C Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

37 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Existing Plus Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Intersection 1 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % C % B % C % A % A % A % A % A % A Total % A Intersection 2 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % D % B % C % C % C % A % 8..6 A % B % C % B Total % C Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

38 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Existing Plus Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Intersection 3 Sycamore Ln./. Signalized % D % A % C % D % B % C % C % C % C Total % C Intersection 4 Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd./. Signalized % E % C % A % C % D % C % B % C % D % C % A % C % D % C % B % C Total % C Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

39 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Cumulative No Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Intersection 1 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % C % A % 2..7 B % A % B % A % A % A % A Total % A Intersection 2 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % B % B % C % C % C % A % A % B % B % B Total % B Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

40 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Cumulative No Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Intersection 3 Sycamore Ln./. Signalized % D % A % B % D % B % C % C % C % C Total % C Intersection 4 Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd./. Signalized % D % C % A % C % D % C % B % C % E % D % B % D % D % C % A % C Total % C Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

41 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Cumulative No Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Intersection 1 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % C % A % C % A % 7..2 A % A % A % A % A Total % A Intersection 2 SR 113 Ramps/. Signalized % D % E % D % D % D % A % A % C % D % D Total % C Fehr & Peers 6/13/212

42 SimTraffic Post-Processor Average Results from 1 Runs Volume and Delay by Movement Castilian Redevlopment Project Cumulative No Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Intersection 3 Sycamore Ln./. Signalized % D % B % C % E % B % C % D % D % D Total % D Intersection 4 Anderson Rd.-La Rue Rd./. Signalized % E % D % C % D % D % C % C % D % E % D % C % D % E % E % C % E Total % D Fehr & Peers 6/13/212