TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:"

Transcription

1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT Vallejo, CA Prepared For: ELITE DRIVE-INS, INC Meridian Park Blvd, Suite G Concord, CA Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road, Suite G Loomis, California (916) June 8, Sonic Vallejo doc Transportation Engineers

2 SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Vallejo, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 Study Purpose and Project Description... 1 Overall Analysis Approach... 1 EXISTING SETTING... 4 Study Area... 4 Level of Service Analysis Procedures... 5 Public Transit... 7 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities... 7 Existing Traffic Conditions and Levels of Service... 8 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT IMPACTS Trip Generation Trip Distribution / Assignment Level of Service Analysis Intersection Queues NEAR TERM (PROJECT OPENING) - NO PROJECT CONDITIONS Background Traffic Volume Forecasts Intersection Levels of Service Intersection Queues NEAR TERM PLUS PROJECT IMPACTS Level of Service Analysis Intersection Queues CUMULATIVE (2030) CONDITIONS Background Traffic Volume Forecasts Background Roadway Improvements Intersection Levels of Service Intersection Queues CUMULATIVE (2030) PLUS PROJECT IMPACTS Level of Service Analysis Intersection Queues SITE ASSESSMENT / TRUCK ACCESS FINDINGS / RECOMMENDATIONS / MITIGATIONS REFERENCES APPENDIX... 42

3 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT Vallejo, CA INTRODUCTION Study Purpose and Project Description This traffic impact study presents an evaluation of the traffic-related effects of the proposed Sonic Drive-In Restaurant to be located in the southwest quadrant of the State Route (SR) 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection; SR 29 is also identified as Sonoma Blvd. The project includes a 2,308 square foot restaurant with drive-in parking stalls and a 3,600 square foot retail building. The project proposes a new 34-foot wide street (New Street) with a new intersection on SR 29 about 350 feet south of the SR 29 / SR 37 intersection. Full access to the site is proposed for this new intersection with stop control along the minor leg approach. The existing two-way-left-turn-lane along SR 29 Street would be modified to include a northbound left turn lane. Figure 1 presents a vicinity map of the area and the project s location while Figure 2 presents the proposed site plan. Overall Analysis Approach This traffic impact study presents an analysis of traffic operations under the following six scenarios: Existing Conditions, Existing plus Project, Near Term (NT) No Proposed Project, Near Term plus Project, Cumulative No Project, and Cumulative plus Project. The Near Term conditions are intended to analyze the traffic conditions in the year the project is slated to open (2018). Cumulative conditions are a long-term background condition which includes future year forecasts of traffic volumes in The analysis of NT plus Project and Cumulative plus Project conditions assumes completion of the proposed project. The near-term impacts of the proposed project may be identified by comparing traffic operations under NT plus Project conditions to baseline NT No Project conditions. The long-term impacts of the proposed project may be identified by comparing traffic operations under Cumulative plus Project conditions to baseline Cumulative No Project conditions. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 1 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

4 PROJECT LOCATION KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 VICINITY MAP figure 1

5 KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 SITE PLAN figure 2

6 EXISTING SETTING Study Area This traffic impact study presents analyses of traffic operating conditions at five existing intersections or driveways in the study area. The quality of traffic flow is often governed by the operation of the local intersections. To quantitatively evaluate traffic conditions and to provide a basis for comparison of operating conditions with and without traffic generated by the proposed project, traffic operations at the following five study area intersections or driveways were determined for the six analysis scenarios: The SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection is a major access intersection for motorists traveling through and past the City of Vallejo. The intersection is a four-way signalized intersection and provides ramp access to eastbound SR 37. The northbound SR 29 approach includes two through lanes and a right turn lane. Access to eastbound SR 37 is provided north of the intersection. The southbound approach includes a dedicated left turn lane, two through lanes and a right turn ramp onto eastbound SR 37. The eastbound approach is the off-ramp from eastbound SR 37. The approach includes a dedicated left turn lane, a combination left-through lane and a right turn lane. The westbound Lewis Brown Drive approach includes two left turn lanes and a short free right turn lane under yield control. Right turning vehicles are constrained due to the bulb-out geometry in the northeast quadrant and the striping along Lewis Brown Drive that reduces the queuing area for this movement. This movement, therefore, was treated as a permitted right turn as opposed to a free right turn. Access to eastbound SR 37 is north of the intersection. The intersection is signalized and includes a protected left turn for southbound traffic and split phasing for the SR 37 off-ramp and Lewis Brown Drive. Pedestrian access is available across the east and south approaches. The SR 29 / Vallejo Village driveway intersection provides right-in, right-out access to the Vallejo Village retail center in the southeast quadrant of the SR 29 / SR 37-Lewis Brown Drive intersection. Access is limited to northbound entry and exit only. SR 29 has two lanes of traffic at the driveway. The entrance is a free right turn ramp, allowing a higher entry speed than a standard driveway. The exit onto SR 29 is also a ramp, with yield access control. The SR 29 / Denny s driveway intersection is a full access tee intersection. The southbound approach includes a through lane and a through-right lane while the southbound approach includes a through-left lane and a through lane. A painted median is present with the striping configured as a two way left turn lane for about 100 feet north of the driveway and a left turn lane configured for southbound traffic south of the driveway. The intersection is stop controlled at the driveway. The SR 29 / Ifland Way intersection is a minor leg stop controlled intersection. The northbound and southbound approaches include a left turn lane, a through lane and a throughright lane. The westbound approach from Ifland Way includes a single lane for all movements. The eastbound approach is a driveway slightly offset to the south of Ifland Way which provides access to the Kia Motors car lot. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 4 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

7 The SR 29 / Yolano Drive intersection provides access to a mobile home park and commercial/light industrial uses to the west and retail and medical office to the east. The intersection is a four-way signalized intersection. The northbound approach includes a left turn lane, two through lanes and a right turn lane while the southbound approach includes a left turn lane, a through lane and a through-right lane. The eastbound Yolano Drive approach includes a left turn lane and a through-right lane while the westbound approach includes a left-through lane and a right only lane. The signal provides protected left turn movements along SR 29 and permissive movements along Yolano Drive. Pedestrian access is available along all approaches. The locations of these study intersections are presented in Figure 3. Level of Service Analysis Procedures Level of service (LOS) analysis provides a basis for describing existing traffic conditions, and for evaluating the significance of project-related traffic impacts. Level of service measures the quality of traffic flow and is represented by letter designations from A to F, with a grade of A referring to the best conditions, and F representing the worst conditions. The following describes the LOS analysis procedures applied for this traffic impact study. Intersections. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) was the basis for operational delay calculations for signalized and unsignalized intersections. The characteristics associated with the various LOS for unsignalized intersections (i.e., those controlled by stop signs) and signalized intersections are presented in Table 1. The City of Vallejo identifies LOS D or better as acceptable operation at an intersection. A traffic impact at an intersection is considered significant when any of the changes in volume to capacity (v/c) ratios, shown in Table 2, occur between the no project and plus project conditions. The 2000 HCM is not the latest version; rather the 2010 HCM is the most recent version. However, one component of the City s significance threshold criteria is the comparison of a signalized intersection s volume to capacity (v/c) ratios under No Project and Plus Project conditions. The HCM 2010 methodology identifies v/c ratios for each movement but does not identify an overall intersection v/c ratio. The v/c ratio for a specific movement could indicate the movement may operate at an unacceptable level while the overall intersection continues to operate acceptably. The 2000 HCM, though, does identify an overall v/c ratio and was therefore used. Traffic Signal Warrants. The extent to which existing or projected traffic volumes may justify signalization at un-signalized intersections has been determined based on consideration of traffic signal warrant presented in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, For this analysis the volume thresholds associated with Warrant 3 (Peak Hour Volume) were assessed for all unsignalized intersections other than right-in, right-out only. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 5 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

8 TABLE 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS (INTERSECTIONS) Level of Service Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Roadway (Daily) "A" Uncongested operations, all queues Little or no delay. Completely free flow. clear in a single-signal cycle. Delay < 10 sec/veh Delay < 10.0 sec "B" "C" "D" "E" Uncongested operations, all queues clear in a single cycle. Delay > 10.0 sec and < 20.0 sec Light congestion, occasional backups on critical approaches. Delay > 20.0 sec and < 35.0 sec Significant congestion of critical approaches but intersection functional. Cars required to wait through more than one cycle during short peaks. No long queues formed. Delay > 35.0 sec and < 55.0 sec Severe congestion with some long standing queues on critical approaches. Blockage of intersection may occur if traffic signal does not provide for protected turning movements. Traffic queue may block nearby intersection(s) upstream of critical approach(es). Delay > 55.0 sec and < 80.0 sec "F" Total breakdown, stop-and-go operation. Delay > 80.0 sec Short traffic delays. Delay > 10 sec/veh and < 15 sec/veh Average traffic delays. Delay > 15 sec/veh and < 25 sec/veh Long traffic delays. Delay > 25 sec/veh and < 35 sec/veh Very long traffic delays, failure, extreme congestion. Delay > 35 sec/veh and < 50 sec/veh Intersection blocked by external causes. Delay > 50 sec/veh Sources: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board (TRB). Free flow, presence of other vehicles noticeable. Ability to maneuver and select operating speed affected. Unstable flow, speeds and ability to maneuver restricted. At or near capacity, flow quite unstable. Forced flow, breakdown. TABLE 2 VOLUME TO CAPACITY (V/C) THRESHOLDS FOR PROJECT IMPACTS LOS without project Increase in V/C with project C >0.04 D >0.02 E or F >0.01 Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 6 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

9 Intersection Queues. Intersection queues were evaluated at study intersections at the 95 th percentile length. The 95 th percentile queue length represents a condition where the queue during the peak period will be at or less than the queue length determined by the analysis 95 percent of the time, i.e. the queue will exceed the calculated queue 5 percent of the time. Queues extending beyond the available storage can block through traffic in adjacent travel lanes. These queues are typically associated with left-turn movements as right turning traffic typically proceeds concurrently with through traffic. For purposes of this analysis, queues that extend beyond the turn pocket by 25 feet or more (i.e., the length of one vehicle) into an adjacent traffic lane that operates separately from the left turn lane are identified. For intersections where the left turn lane is operating under a permitted movement with the through lane, a queue extending beyond the turn lane is not considered significant. If the vehicle queue already exceeds that turn pocket length under No Project conditions, a project impact would occur if project traffic lengthens the queue by 25 feet or more. Public Transit The Solano County Transit Authority offers local fixed route, regional commuter route and paratransit services. One local fixed route passes the site. The Number 1 Broadway route provides service between Northwest Vallejo and the Vallejo Transit Center (VTC). The northbound route from the VTC to northwest Vallejo uses Solano Blvd (SR 29) past the project site. The return southbound route uses Broadway Street in the project vicinity while heading back to the VTC. The route also includes a stop at the Sereno Transit Center located on Sereno Drive south of Yolano Drive. The first bus northbound bus departs the VTC at 6:30 a.m. Monday through Friday with a stop at the SR 29 / SR 37 intersection about 20 minutes later. The last bus departs VTC at 7:00 p.m. The first southbound route departs the Mini Drive / Elliott Drive intersection at 5:42 a.m. arriving at the VTC about 25 minutes later. The last bus to VTC departs at 7:02 p.m. The route operates at about 30 minute headways. Route 1 also operates on Saturday and Sunday. On Saturday the first bus departs the VTC at 7:30 a.m. The route operates at one-hour headways with the last northbound bus departing VTC at 6:30 p.m. The first southbound bus departs the Mini Drive / Elliott Drive intersection at 6:59 a.m. The last bus back to the VTC departs at 5:59 p.m. On Sunday the first bus departs the VTC at 8:30 a.m. The route operates at one-hour headways until 10:30 a.m. The route operates again between 4:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. at one-hour headways. The southbound buses to the VTC depart at hourly headways between 8:59 a.m. and 10:59 a.m. and from 4:50 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Few designated bicycle facilities exist in the vicinity of the project. Class II bike lanes are present along Lewis Brown Drive. The Solano Countywide Bicycle Transportation Plan proposes Class 2 bike lanes along SR 29 south of Georgia Street to the City of Napa. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 7 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

10 Additionally, a Class 1 bike path is proposed along Broadway Street between Mini Drive and Springs Road. Sidewalk is also present intermittently along SR 29, between Lewis Brown Drive and Yolano Drive as well as along Lewis Brown Drive between SR 29 and Broadway Street. The Solano Countywide Pedestrian Transportation Plan proposes to undertake a planning study to develop a plan to improve bicycle / pedestrian and transit facilities on Sonoma Blvd. Existing Traffic Conditions and Levels of Service Traffic Volume Counts. This analysis makes use of peak hour traffic volume counts conducted during the last week of July An additional peak hour count was conducted at the SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection in the last week of October The traffic counts at this intersection were compared to the July counts and found to be nominally higher. The remaining study intersections were adjusted based on these counts. The October count was conducted while schools were in session. The counts are included in the Appendix, and the intersection turning movements are presented in Figure 3. Intersection Levels of Service. Table 3 summarizes current operating Levels of Service at the study area intersections. All study intersections currently operate at Levels of Service (LOS) C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Intersection Queues. Table 4 presents information regarding current peak period queuing in lanes at signalized study intersections. In each case, the available storage has been presented along with current peak hour traffic volumes and the 95 th percentile queue length. Two turn lanes exceed the available storage in the p.m. peak hour. These include the westbound throughleft lane at the SR 29 / Yolano Drive intersection which has a 104 foot queue and the westbound right turn lane at the SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection which has a queue of 158 feet. The queue along Lewis Brown Drive exceeds the available turn lane length and vehicles will queue in the outside left turn lane. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 8 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

11 1 FREE (171) 131 (880) 866 (846) (318) 110 (122) 4 (4) 1 (15) 2 (1070) 1055 (5) 11 R1-1 3 (4) 0 (0) 1 (0) (319) 172 (110) 81 (106) 97 SR 29/ SR 37 EB Offramp/ Lewis Brown Dr (1062) (144) 531 (1170) R (34) 5 (10) 5 (0) 0 (6) 1 (16) 10 (153) 217 (884) 779 (47) 53 2 (5) 582 (1298) 4 (5) 8 (9) SR 29/Ifland Way 74 (173) 6 (10) 47 (103) 15 (60) 583 (1265) (49) 26 (11) 8 (30) (130) 468 (1016) 11 (25) 2 (8) 3 SR 29/ Vallejo Village Access (1080) 1043 (29) 19 6 SR 29/Yolano Dr (1109) XX (XX) R1-1 Legend AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume Stop Sign (16) 16 (12) 13 R (1311) 12 (12) 586 (1327) Signalized Intersection SR 29/ Denny s Access SR 29/ New St KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS figure 3

12 TABLE 3 EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE AT INTERSECTIONS Location 1. SR 29 / SR 37 EB Off-Ramp- Lewis Brown Dr 2. SR 29 / Vallejo Vista Driveway WB Stop WB Right 3. SR 29 / Denny s Driveway EB Stop NB Left EB 4. SR 29 / Ifland Way EB/WB NB Left Stop SB Left EB WB AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Traffic Control LOS Average Delay v/c ratio LOS Average Delay v/c ratio Signal Warranted? Signal B C N/A B 10.5 N/A B 14.8 N/A A B B A C B 5. SR 29 / Yolano Dr Signal B B N/A N/A N/A A C B B C A N/A N/A No No No TABLE 4 EXISTING TERM PEAK HOUR QUEUES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Location 1. SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive Capacity (feet) AM Peak Hour Queue (Feet) PM Peak Hour Queue (feet) SB left turn EB left turn 665 (2) WB left turn >800 (2) WB right turn SR 29 / Yolano Drive NB left turn 225 <25 44 SB left turn EB left turn WB left-through Highlighted values indicate queue length in excess of available storage by 25 or more Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 10 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

13 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT IMPACTS The development of the Sonic Drive-In Restaurant would attract new traffic to the local area site. The amount of additional traffic on a particular section of the street network depends on two factors: Trip Generation, the number of new trips generated by the project, and Trip Distribution and Assignment, the specific routes that the new traffic uses. Trip Generation Development of the Sonic Drive-In Restaurant project would generate new vehicle trips and affect traffic operations at the study intersections. The number of vehicle trips that are expected to be generated by development of the proposed project has been estimated using typical trip generation rates that have been developed based on the nature and size of project land uses. Data compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and presented in the publication Trip Generation, 9 th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers 2013) is the source of trip generation rates for midweek traffic generation. In addition to the 2,300 square foot restaurant the project also includes 3,600 square feet of retail uses. The trip generation of the project was computed using trip generation rates published in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 9th Edition, 2013) based on the projected use. For this project, Land Use 934, Fast Food with Drive-Through and Land Use 820, Retail was used to establish projected trip generation for the site. Trips generated by commercial projects fit into two categories. Some trips will be made by patrons who would not otherwise be on the local street system and who go out of their way to reach the site. These are "new" trips. Other trips will be made by patrons who are already in the roadway network, and are therefore not adding new trips to the overall system. These trips fall into one of two categories. Pass-By Trips. Pass-by trips are made by motorists who are already driving by the site as part of another trip. Peak hour pass-by trips are common on commuter routes as motorists stop on their way home, for example, to visit the neighborhood grocery. Pass-by trips occur along the project frontage. For this project pass-by trips would occur at the driveway entrance along SR 29. ITE research has suggested typical pass-by percentages for various land uses where appreciable background traffic occurs. The share of project trips falling into each category varies over the day. Internal Capture. Internally captured trips are trips within the boundaries of a mixed-use development. These trips do not leave or enter the project driveways. For this project a 5% internal capture rate was used consistent with Caltrans standards identified in their Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 11 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

14 Table 5 presents the projected trip generation for the project. The table provides a breakdown of the projected overall trips generated by each land use, the projected internally captured trips and the pass-by trips. After accounting for internally captured and pass-by trips, the project is expected to generate 1,298 new daily trips, 70 new a.m. peak hour trips and 97 new p.m. peak hour trips. Trip Distribution / Assignment The distribution of project traffic was developed based on traffic conditions in the vicinity of the proposed project. Table 6 presents the trip distribution for the site. Twenty-five percent of project-related trips are expected to travel both north and south on SR 29 and east along SR 37 while 5% is expected to travel east along Lewis Brown Drive. The remaining 20% is projected to travel west along SR 37. The resulting project-related traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 12 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

15 TABLE 5 SONIC DRIVE-IN AND RETAIL SHOPS PROJECT TRIP GENERATION AM PM Land Use Size Daily Total In Out Total In Out Retail (LU 820) 3.60 ksf * 5.70** 62% 38% % 52% Fast Food with Drive Through (LU 934) 2.31 ksf % 49% % 48% Retail (LU 820) Fast Food with Drive Through (LU 934) 1, Sub-Total Trips 1, Internal Capture Δ Retail (LU 820) (39) (1) (1) (0) (3) (2) (2) Fast Food with Drive Through (LU 934) (57) (5) (3) (3) (4) (2) (2) Pass-By Trips Total Internal Capture Trips (96) (6) (3) (3) (7) (4) (3) Retail (LU 820) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Fast Food with Drive-Through (LU 934) (49% Daily, 49% AM, 50% PM) (533) (49) (25) (24) (36) (19) (17) Total Pass-By Trips (533) (49) (25) (24) (36) (19) (17) Net New Trips 1, Notes: trips may not equal the sum of the components due to rounding Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation 9 th edition * Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln (X) ** Ln(T) = 0.61 Ln (X) Ln(T) = 0.67 Ln (X) Δ 5% - Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook 2 nd edition average of a.m. and p.m. pass-by rates Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 13 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

16 TABLE 6 SONIC DRIVE-IN AND RETAIL SHOPS TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES Direction Percent Distribution North of SR 29 25% East on SR 37 25% East on Lewis Brown Drive 5% South on SR 29 25% West on SR 37 20% Total 100% Level of Service Analysis Project-related traffic was added to Existing background volumes to calculate Existing plus Project (EPP) conditions traffic volumes. Figure 5 displays the resulting EPP traffic volumes anticipated for each study intersection in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 7 compares the a.m. and p.m. peak hour LOS at each study intersection under Existing and EPP conditions. Under this scenario all intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better during each time period. The signalized intersections will also operate within the acceptable v/c ratio differences. Intersection Queues Table 8 presents information regarding Existing plus Project peak period queuing in lanes at the two signalized study intersections and the New Street intersection. The westbound through-left lane queue at the SR 29 / Yolano Drive intersection will continue to exceed the storage by four feet in the p.m. peak hour. This is not considered significant as the movement operates under a permitted signal phasing. The westbound right turn lane along Lewis Brown Drive will have a queue of 159 feet. This queue exceeds the turn pocket length by 59 feet; however, under No Project conditions the queue is 158 feet. A project impact occurs if the project traffic lengthens the existing queue by 25 feet or more; therefore, this is not considered significant. The proposed New Street will be constructed about 75 feet north of the existing Denny s driveway. A two-way-left-turn lane (TWLTL) exists from the Denny s driveway north to the Vallejo Village right-in driveway. The project will add northbound left turns into the TWLTL. The queue results indicate that a single vehicle is expected to queue turning left onto the new street. This should allow sufficient length in the TWLTL to allow outbound vehicles exiting the Denny s driveway to perform a two-stage turn to enter northbound SR 29 where vehicles enter the TWLTL, queue, and then merge into the SR 29 flow as appropriate. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 14 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

17 1 FREE (0) 0 (22) 17 (0) 0 0 (0) 2 (2) 4 (0) 0 (0) 0 (-12) (12) (0) 0 R1-1 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) (0) 0 (0) 0 (12) 10 SR 29/ SR 37 EB Offramp/ Lewis Brown Dr (36) 29 R1-1 2 (2) 22 (34) 0 (0) 5 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 SR 29/Ifland Way (0) 14 0 (0) 0 (12) 8 (-12) (0) (0) 10 4 (12) (8) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) (0) 0 24 (37) (-12) (0) -9 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 10 4 (12) (8) 0-4 (0) (-8) 0 (0) SR 29/ Vallejo Village Access SR 29/Yolano Dr Legend 3 (-12) (11) (0) 0 6 (-12) (-11) (12) (47) XX (XX) XX R1-1 AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume Diverted Traffic Stop Sign Signalized Intersection (0) 0 (0) 0 R (12) (2) 0 0 (0) (0) SR 29/ Denny s Access (12) (44) 9 36 (0) (22) (-8) (0) 22 4 (20) (8) SR 29/ New St KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS INCLUDING DIVERSION OF EXISTING TRAFFIC TO NEW STREET figure 4

18 1 FREE (171) 131 (902) 883 (846) (318) 112 (124) 4 (4) 1 (15) 2 (1070) 1049 (5) 11 R1-1 3 (4) 0 (0) 1 (0) (319) 172 (110) 81 (118) 107 SR 29/ SR 37 EB Offramp/ Lewis Brown Dr (1098) (146) 553 (1204) R (34) 5 (10) 5 (0) 0 (6) 1 SR 29/Ifland Way (16) 10 (153) 217 (896) 787 (35) 39 2 (5) 596 (1318) 4 (5) 8 (9) 74 (173) 6 (10) 47 (103) 15 (60) 607 (1302) (37) 17 (11) 8 (30) (130) 482 (1036) 7 (17) 2 (8) 3 SR 29/ Vallejo Village Access (1079) 1036 (29) 19 6 SR 29/Yolano Dr (1086) 1035 (59) 56 5 XX (XX) R1-1 Legend AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume Stop Sign (16) 16 (12) 13 R (1145) 12 (12) (56) 45 (22) 20 R (1319) 26 (28) Signalized Intersection SR 29/ Denny s Access SR 29/ New St KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS figure 5

19 TABLE 7 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Intersection Control LOS Existing Existing plus Project AM PM AM PM Delay v/c Delay v/c Delay v/c Delay (sec) ratio LOS (sec) ratio LOS (sec) ratio LOS (sec) 1. SR 29 / SR 37 EB Off-Ramp- Lewis Brown Dr Signal B C B C SR 29 / Vallejo Vista Driveway WB Right 3. SR 29 / Denny s Driveway NB Left EB 4. SR 29 / Ifland Way NB Left SB Left EB WB WB Stop EB Stop EB/WB Stop v/c ratio B 10.5 N/A B 14.8 N/A B 10.6 N/A C 15.1 N/A A B B A C B SR 29 / Yolano Dr Signal B B B B SR 29 / New Street NB Left EB EB Stop N/A N/A A C B B C A N/A N/A A C B A C B B C N/A N/A N/A A C B B C A B C N/A N/A N/A Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 17 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

20 TABLE 8 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR QUEUES AT SIGNALIZED AND NEW STREET INTERSECTIONS Capacity Location (feet) 1. SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive AM Peak Hour Queue (Feet) Existing PM Peak Hour Queue (feet) Existing plus Project AM Peak Hour Queue (Feet) PM Peak Hour Queue (feet) SB left turn EB left turn 665 (2) WB left turn >800 (2) WB right turn SR 29 / Yolano Drive NB left turn 225 <25 44 <25 36 SB left turn EB left turn <25 43 WB left-through turn SR 29 / New Street NB left turn 75 N/A N/A <25 <25 Eastbound 250 N/A N/A <25 40 Highlighted values indicate queue length in excess of available storage by 25 or more Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 18 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

21 NEAR TERM (PROJECT OPENING) - NO PROJECT CONDITIONS Background Traffic Volume Forecasts Near Term (NT) conditions were studied based on a projected opening in The Near Term conditions analyzed the study intersections so that a base line condition could be established to evaluate project impacts. The Near Term volumes were developed though the interpolation of existing and cumulative traffic volumes at the study intersections and addition of any approved projects. The only project identified by City staff was an automotive repair facility located north of Lewis Brown Drive. According to City staff the project has not been approved; therefore, this project was excluded from the Near Term forecasts. Figure 6 presents the interpolated 2018 Near Term traffic volumes. Intersection Levels of Service Table 9 summarizes current operating Levels of Service at the study area intersections. All study intersections will operate at LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Intersection Queues Table 10 presents information regarding Near Term peak period queuing in turn lanes at signalized study intersections and the New Street intersection. One location will have a left turn queue that exceeds the turn pocket by more than 25. The queue will exceed the westbound right turn lane at the SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection for the p.m. peak hour where the queue is projected to be 211 feet. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 19 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

22 1 FREE (188) 161 (891) 891 (772) (348) 112 (122) 4 (4) 1 (15) 2 (1081) 1080 (5) 12 R1-1 3 (4) 0 (0) 1 (0) (357) 184 (121) 91 (108) 95 SR 29/ SR 37 EB Offramp/ Lewis Brown Dr (1082) (145) 552 (1186) R (35) 5 (10) 5 (0) 0 (6) 1 (16) 10 (154) 220 (900) 789 (46) 56 2 (5) 611 (1299) 4 (5) 8 (9) SR 29/Ifland Way 77 (170) 6 (10) 47 (102) 15 (61) 612 (1283) (48) 26 (11) 8 (29) (130) 498 (1033) 12 (25) 2 (8) 3 SR 29/ Vallejo Village Access (1093) 1069 (29) 19 6 SR 29/Yolano Dr (1122) XX (XX) R1-1 Legend AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume Stop Sign (16) 16 (12) 13 R (1329) 12 (12) 617 (1345) Signalized Intersection SR 29/ Denny s Access SR 29/ New St KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 NEAR TERM (2018) TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS figure 6

23 TABLE 9 NEAR TERM INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Intersection Control LOS Near Term Near Term plus Project AM PM AM PM Delay v/c Delay v/c Delay v/c Delay (sec) ratio LOS (sec) ratio LOS (sec) ratio LOS (sec) 1. SR 29 / SR 37 EB Off-Ramp- Lewis Brown Dr Signal B C B C SR 29 / Vallejo Vista Driveway WB Right 3. SR 29 / Denny s Driveway NB Left EB 4. SR 29 / Ifland Way NB Left SB Left EB WB WB Stop EB Stop EB/WB Stop B 10.6 A B B A C B N/A N/A C 15.0 A C N/A N/A B 10.7 A B N/A N/A C SR 29 / Yolano Dr Signal B B B B SR 29 / New Street NB Left EB EB Stop N/A B B C A N/A B A C B B C N/A N/A A C B B C A B C v/c ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 21 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

24 TABLE 10 NEAR TERM PEAK HOUR QUEUES AT SIGNALIZED AND NEW STREET INTERSECTIONS Capacity Location (feet) 1. SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive AM Peak Hour Queue (Feet) Near Term PM Peak Hour Queue (feet) Near Term plus Project AM Peak Hour Queue (Feet) PM Peak Hour Queue (feet) SB left turn EB left turn 665 (2) WB left turn >800 (2) WB right turn SR 29 / Yolano Drive NB left turn 225 <25 44 <25 36 SB left turn EB left turn <25 42 WB left-through lane SR 29 / New Street NB left turn 75 N/A N/A <25 <25 Eastbound 250 N/A N/A <25 40 Highlighted values indicate queue length in excess of available storage by 25 or more Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 22 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

25 NEAR TERM PLUS PROJECT IMPACTS Project-related traffic was added to Near Term background volumes to calculate NT plus Project (NTPP) conditions traffic volumes. Figure 7 displays the resulting NTPP traffic volumes anticipated for each study intersection in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Level of Service Analysis Table 9 compares the a.m. and p.m. peak hour LOS at each study intersection under NT and NTPP conditions. All intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods and each signalized intersection will operate within the acceptable v/c ratio differences. Intersection Queues Table 10 presents information regarding Near Term and NTPP peak period queuing in lanes at signalized study intersections. Two turn lanes will continue to exceed the available storage in the p.m. peak hour. The westbound through-left lane at the SR 29 / Yolano Drive intersection will continue to have a queue of 103 feet while the westbound right turn lane along Lewis Brown Drive will have a queue of 213 feet. The Yolano Drive approaches operate under a permitted signal phasing; therefore, the queue is not considered significant. The queue along Lewis Brown Drive exceeds the turn pocket length; however, under the NT conditions the queue is 211 feet. Since the additional queue with the project is less than 25 feet when compared to the No Project conditions this is not considered a significant impact. The northbound queue into the new street will continue to be a single vehicle. As identified in the Existing plus Project scenario this should allow sufficient length in the TWLTL to allow outbound vehicles exiting the Denny s driveway. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 23 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

26 1 FREE (188) 161 (913) 908 (772) (348) 114 (124) 4 (4) 1 (15) 2 (1081) 1074 (5) 12 R1-1 3 (4) 0 (0) 1 (0) (357) 184 (121) 91 (120) 105 SR 29/ SR 37 EB Offramp/ Lewis Brown Dr (1118) (147) 574 (1220) R (35) 5 (10) 5 (0) 0 (6) 1 SR 29/Ifland Way (16) 10 (154) 220 (912) 797 (46) 42 2 (5) 617 (1303) 4 (5) 8 (9) 77 (170) 6 (10) 47 (102) 15 (61) 636 (1320) (36) 17 (11) 8 (29) (130) 504 (1053) 8 (17) 2 (8) 3 SR 29/ Vallejo Village Access (1092) 1062 (29) 19 6 SR 29/Yolano Dr (1070) 1061 (59) 56 5 XX (XX) R1-1 Legend AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume Stop Sign (16) 16 (12) 13 R (1343) 12 (12) (56) 45 (22) 20 R (1337) 26 (28) Signalized Intersection SR 29/ Denny s Access SR 29/ New St KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 NEAR TERM (2018) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS figure 7

27 CUMULATIVE (2030) CONDITIONS Background Traffic Volume Forecasts The City of Vallejo s current General Plan extends to The Napa Solano travel demand model was reviewed and used to develop 2030 intersection turning movement counts at the study intersections. Traffic volumes along SR 29 were developed based on the projected growth on SR 29 and the adjacent intersections. Figure 8 presents the projected Cumulative turning movement volumes. Background Roadway Improvements KDA obtained the most recent Solano Transportation Authority (STA) Travel Demand Forecast Model information, which includes anticipated development within the City of Vallejo and remaining areas of Solano County. Peak hour roadway volumes were obtained from the STA 2030 model. Turning movements at the study intersections were developed using the Furness forecasting methodology for a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods. The City s General Plan, the STA s Countywide Plans and Studies website ( and the Caltrans System Planning Documents for State Route 29 did not identify any roadway improvements other than pedestrian, bicycle and transit projects previously noted. No changes in roadway geometry or signal timing were made. Intersection Levels of Service Table 11 summarizes operating Levels of Service at the study area intersections under Cumulative conditions. All intersections will operate at LOS D or better except the SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection which will decline to LOS F with a delay of 97.1 seconds. Intersection Queues Table 12 presents information regarding Near Term peak period queuing in lanes at signalized study intersections and the New Street intersection. Two locations will have turn queues that exceed the turn pockets by more than 25 feet. The queues will exceed the southbound left turn lane and the westbound right turn lane at the SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection for both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 25 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

28 1 FREE (287) 342 (960) 1038 (328) (525) 127 (123) 4 (5) 1 (17) 2 (1145) 1231 (6) 15 R1-1 4 (5) 0 (0) 1 (1) (583) 253 (189) 152 (118) 83 SR 29/ SR 37 EB Offramp/ Lewis Brown Dr (1201) (148) 678 (1279) R (40) 5 (11) 6 (0) 0 (7) 1 (16) 11 (157) 236 (993) 846 (43) 71 2 (6) 787 (1304) 4 (6) 9 (10) SR 29/Ifland Way 93 (154) 7 (7) 46 (93) 17 (66) 785 (1388) (39) 29 (8) 7 (24) (133) 680 (1132) 15 (23) 3 (7) 3 SR 29/ Vallejo Village Access (1169) 1228 (32) 21 6 SR 29/Yolano Dr (1201) XX (XX) R1-1 Legend AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume Stop Sign (18) 18 (13) 14 R (1436) 13 (13) 802 (1454) Signalized Intersection SR 29/ Denny s Access SR 29/ New St KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS figure 8

29 TABLE 11 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 2030 PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Intersection Control LOS plus Project AM PM AM PM Delay v/c Delay v/c Delay v/c Delay (sec) ratio LOS (sec) ratio LOS (sec) ratio LOS (sec) 1. SR 29 / SR 37 EB Off-Ramp- Lewis Brown Dr Signal D F D F SR 29 / Vallejo Vista Driveway WB Right 3. SR 29 / Denny s Driveway NB Left EB 4. SR 29 / Ifland Way NB Left SB Left EB WB WB Stop EB Stop EB/WB Stop B 11.5 A B B A C B N/A N/A C 16.2 A C N/A N/A B 11.6 A C N/A N/A C SR 29 / Yolano Dr Signal B B B B SR 29 / New Street NB Left EB EB Stop N/A B B C B N/A B A C B B C N/A N/A A C B B C B B C v/c ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 27 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

30 TABLE PEAK HOUR QUEUES AT SIGNALIZED AND NEW STREET INTERSECTIONS Capacity Location (feet) 1. SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive AM Peak Hour Queue (Feet) plus Project PM Peak AM Peak Hour Queue Hour Queue (feet) (Feet) PM Peak Hour Queue (feet) SB left turn EB left turn 665 (2) WB left turn >800 (2) WB right turn SR 29 / Yolano Drive NB left turn 225 <25 40 <25 32 SB left turn EB left turn <25 37 WB left-through lane SR 29 / New Street NB left turn 75 N/A N/A <25 <25 Eastbound 250 N/A N/A Highlighted values indicate queue length in excess of available storage by 25 or more Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 28 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

31 CUMULATIVE (2030) PLUS PROJECT IMPACTS The development of the Sonic Drive-Through and accompanying retail shops would attract additional traffic to the project vicinity, and the project would add traffic to the long-term 2030 background conditions. Level of Service Analysis Project-related traffic was added to 2030 background volumes to develop 2030 plus Project traffic volumes. Figure 9 displays the resulting traffic volumes anticipated for each study intersection in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 11 compares the a.m. and p.m. peak hour LOS at each study intersection under 2030 and 2030 plus Project conditions. All intersections except the SR 29 / SR 37-Lewis Brown Drive intersection will operate at LOS D or better during each time period. The SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection will operate at LOS F with a delay of 98.6 seconds. The difference in v/c ratios between Cumulative No Project and Cumulative plus Project conditions is This is within the City s v/c ratio differences; therefore, this is not considered significant. Intersection Queues Table 12 presents information regarding Cumulative plus Project peak period queuing in turn lanes at signalized study intersections. Two locations will have left turn queues that exceed the turn pockets by more than 25. The queues will exceed the southbound left turn lane and the westbound right turn lane at the SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The queue in the southbound left turn lane will have an increase of less than 25 feet compared to the Cumulative No Project scenario; therefore, this is not considered a significant impact. The queue in the westbound right turn lane will also have an increase of less than 25 feet compared to the Cumulative No Project scenario. This is also not considered a significant impact. The northbound queue into the new street will continue to be a single vehicle. As identified in the Existing plus Project scenario this should allow sufficient length in the TWLTL to allow outbound vehicles exiting the Denny s driveway. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 29 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

32 1 FREE (287) 342 (982) 1055 (328) (525) 129 (125) 4 (5) 1 (17) 2 (1145) 1225 (6) 15 R1-1 4 (5) 0 (0) 1 (1) (583) 253 (189) 152 (130) 83 SR 29/ SR 37 EB Offramp/ Lewis Brown Dr (1237) (150) 700 (1313) R (40) 5 (11) 6 (0) 0 (7) 1 SR 29/Ifland Way (16) 11 (157) 236 (1005) 854 (31) 57 2 (6) 801 (1324) 4 (6) 9 (10) 93 (154) 7 (7) 46 (93) 17 (66) 809 (1425) (27) 20 (8) 7 (24) (133) 694 (1152) 11 (15) 3 (7) 3 SR 29/ Vallejo Village Access (1168) 1221 (32) 21 6 SR 29/Yolano Dr (1178) 1222 (59) 56 5 XX (XX) R1-1 Legend AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume Stop Sign (18) 18 (13) 14 R (1428) 13 (13) (56) 45 (22) 20 R (1446) 26 (28) Signalized Intersection SR 29/ Denny s Access SR 29/ New St KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS figure 9

33 SITE ASSESSMENT / TRUCK ACCESS Access to the site is proposed through the New Street intersection along SR 29. Full access is proposed. A secondary access is available via the SR 29 / Yolano Drive intersection; however, this route requires motorists to travel about ¾ mile from the proposed New Street intersection to Yolano Drive and Enterprise Street to reach the project site. While providing a secondary access it is expected that this route would rarely be used by customers as it requires out of direction travel to and from the north and would require directional signing due to the circuitous route. An assessment of vehicle turning movements was conducted using AutoTURN software prepared by Transoft. This software implements procedures described in the American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) document A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, and the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. The program is a CADD based program that simulates low speed turning maneuvers for highway vehicles. The program is used to define vehicle tire tracking and sweep paths in order to design roadway features to meet minimum design vehicle constraints. The New Street intersection would provide access to the existing Denny s Restaurant and Motel 6 properties located on the south side of New Street; the existing driveway to these properties along SR 29 would be closed. The proposed layout would maintain the existing driveway along Enterprise Street and motorists would using New Street would have to make a 180 turn into and out of the driveway as shown in Figure 10. While the inbound turn is feasible the 180 outbound right turn would require passenger cars to oversteer into the opposing lane. Two driveways along New Street are proposed for the project. The first is located at the end of Enterprise Street and will provide full access for the site. The second driveway is inbound only and will be located about 60 feet from the SR 29 intersection. CA-Legal Trucks CA-Legal trucks were analyzed to determine accessibility to the new street. Inbound turns from SR 29 can be completed by CA-Legal trucks without turning into the opposing lane and without overtopping the adjacent proposed curb. This is illustrated in Figures 11 and 12. Outbound turns can also be completed from the new street onto SR 29. Eastbound to northbound trucks were assumed to use a two-phase left turn with queuing in the center turn lane and then entering the through lane. Right turning eastbound to southbound movements will also need to use the center turn lane to complete a turn; however, it would appear unlikely that this movement would occur as truck traffic from Enterprise Street would be expected to depart via Yolano Drive. Figures 13 and 14 illustrate the outbound movements. Motorhome Motorhomes were also evaluated with the vehicle approaching from the north and turning into the inbound driveway adjacent to SR 29. Figure 15 illustrates the turning movement required to enter the site and maneuver through the project site. Outbound movements onto SR 29 were not evaluated as the CA-Legal truck templates indicate that larger vehicles can be accommodated. Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 31 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

34 KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 PASSENGER CAR ACCESS figure 10

35 KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 CA LEGAL figure 11

36 KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 CA-LEGAL figure 12

37 KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 CA-LEGAL figure 13

38 KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 CA-LEGAL figure 14

39 KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers RA 6/8/2017 MOTORHOME figure 15

40 FINDINGS / RECOMMENDATIONS / MITIGATIONS The preceding analysis has identified project impacts that may occur without mitigation. The text that follows identifies a strategy for mitigating the impacts of the proposed project. Recommendations are identified for facilities that have deficiencies in the roadway network without the project. If the project causes a significant impact, mitigations are identified for the facility. Existing Conditions All intersections will operate at LOS C or better. The queue along the westbound left-through lane of the SR 29 / Yolano Drive intersection is 104. The queue along the westbound right turn lane of the SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection is 158 feet. This queue exceeds the available turn lane length of about 100 feet. Existing plus Project Mitigations. All intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better. The change in v/c ratios at the signalized intersections is 0.01 or less which is below than the 0.04 threshold identified in the City guidelines. The queue along the westbound left-through lane of the SR 29 / Yolano Drive intersection will remain at 104. This approach operates under a permitted movement; therefore, the queue is not considered a significant impact. The queue along the westbound right turn lane of the SR 29 / SR 37 Lewis Brown Drive intersection is projected to be 159 feet. The additional queue length is less than 25 feet, and since the vehicle queue already exceeds the turn pocket length this is not considered a significant impact. The project applicant should pay applicable TIM fees. While a full access driveway along the east side New Street is proposed this driveway should be limited to inbound traffic only. This driveway serves all inbound traffic and while it can serve opposing passenger vehicles simultaneously any larger vehicles would have to wait for the outbound vehicle to clear. This could result in vehicles blocking the outside lane along southbound SR 29. Under the current site design vehicles parked along the southbound drive-in spaces would have to circle the restaurant when departing. The applicant shall restripe SR 29 at the New Street intersection and install a left turn pocket back to back with the existing southbound left turn pocket at Ifland Way. Near Term In the Near Term scenario all intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service, at LOS C or better. The queue along the westbound left-through lane of the SR 29 / Yolano Drive Traffic Impact Analysis for Sonic Drive-In Page 38 Vallejo, CA (June 8, 2017)

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company

More information

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA Prepared For: McDonald s USA, LLC Pacific Sierra Region 2999 Oak Road, Suite 900 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared By:

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Shopko redevelopment located in Sugarhouse, Utah. The Shopko redevelopment project is located between 1300 East and

More information

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...

More information

D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA. Prepared For:

D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA. Prepared For: D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA Prepared For: ASIAN PACIFIC GROUP 18000 Van Karman Avenue, Suite 500 Irvine, CA 92612 Prepared By: KD Anderson &

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR YUBA CROSSINGS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Yuba City, CA Prepared For: Yuba Crossings LLC 1825 Del Paso Blvd Sacramento, CA 95815 Prepared By: KDAnderson & Associates, Inc. 3853 Taylor

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald

More information

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Plainfield, Illinois August 2018 Prepared for: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Existing Conditions

More information

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014. King County Metro Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis Downtown Southend Transit Study May 2014 Parametrix Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Methodology... 1 Study Area...

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. Prepared For: Din/Cal 3, Inc Richmond Avenue, Suite 200 Houston, Texas Prepared By:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. Prepared For: Din/Cal 3, Inc Richmond Avenue, Suite 200 Houston, Texas Prepared By: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR STERLING 5 th STREET APARTMENTS PROJECT Davis, CA Prepared For: Din/Cal 3, Inc. 3411 Richmond Avenue, Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77046 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

More information

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report APPENDIX E Traffic Analysis Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK EAGLE RIVER TRAFFIC MITIGATION PHASE I OLD GLENN HIGHWAY/EAGLE RIVER ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Eagle River, Alaska

More information

Traffic Engineering Study

Traffic Engineering Study Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested

More information

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To Kumar Neppalli Traffic Engineering Manager Town of Chapel Hill From Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. Cc HNTB Project File: 38435 Subject Obey Creek TIS 2022

More information

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D MEMORANDUM Date: To: Liz Diamond, Dokken Engineering From: Subject: Dave Stanek, Fehr & Peers Western Placerville Interchanges 2045 Analysis RS08-2639 Fehr & Peers has completed a transportation analysis

More information

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Warrenville, Illinois Prepared For: Prepared By: April 11, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Site Location...

More information

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Memorandum Date: February 7, 07 To: From: Subject: John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Introduction Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

More information

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Camp Parkway Commerce Center is a proposed distribution and industrial center to be

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. STERLING FIFTH STREET APARTMENTS PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. STERLING FIFTH STREET APARTMENTS PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR STERLING FIFTH STREET APARTMENTS PROJECT Davis, CA Prepared For: Din/Cal 3, Inc. 3411 Richmond Avenue, Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77046 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates,

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis

More information

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis Rim of the World Unified School District Reconfiguration Prepared for: Rim of the World School District 27315 North Bay Road, Blue Jay, CA 92317 Prepared by: 400 Oceangate,

More information

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 9 V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Throughout the study process several alternative alignments were developed and eliminated. Initial discussion

More information

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Prepared for: Submitted by: 299 Lava Ridge Ct. Suite 2 Roseville, CA. 95661 June 212 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 Project Location

More information

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT Delcan Corporation Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT APPENDIX D Microsimulation Traffic Modeling Report March 2010 March 2010 Appendix D CONTENTS 1.0 STUDY CONTEXT... 2 Figure 1 Study Limits... 2

More information

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By: TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Sacramento, CA Prepared For: MBK Homes Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road, Suite G Loomis, California 95650 (916) 660-1555

More information

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS NAPA FLEA MARKET COUNTY OF NAPA Prepared for: Tom Harding Napa-Vallejo Flea Market 33 Kelly Road American Canyon, CA 9453 Prepared by: 166 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 21 Walnut Creek,

More information

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017 Movin Out June 2017 1.0 Introduction The proposed Movin Out development is a mixed use development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of West Broadway and Fayette Avenue in the City of Madison.

More information

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for: TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY 2014 Prepared for: Hartford Companies 1218 W. Ash Street Suite A Windsor, Co 80550 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive

More information

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios: 6.1 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 6.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the EIR presents the results of TJKM s traffic impact analysis of the proposed Greenbriar Development. The analysis includes consideration

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT CITY OF BUENA PARK Prepared by Project No. 14139 000 April 17 th, 2015 DKS Associates Jeffrey Heald, P.E. Rohit Itadkar, T.E. 2677 North Main

More information

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for: L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES

More information

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared for: Department of Public Works Anne Arundel County Prepared by: URS Corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 3 Hunt Valley,

More information

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064523000 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas Prepared

More information

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report As part of the City s Transportation Master Plan, this report reviews the technical feasibility of the proposed conversion of the current

More information

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1 Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West

More information

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project July 25, 218 ROMF Transportation Impact Analysis Version

More information

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna

More information

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants 2802 Wetmore Avenue Suite 220 Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: Renton School District Jurisdiction: City of Newcastle

More information

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development Traffic Impact Study for Proposed 11330 Olive Boulevard Development Creve Coeur, Missouri July 7, 2017 Prepared For: 11330 Olive Boulevard Development 11330 Olive Boulevard Creve Coeur, Missouri 63141

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. 3853 Taylor Road,

More information

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Barrhaven Fellowship CRC 3058 Jockvale Road Ottawa, ON K2J 2W7 December 7, 2016 116-649 Report_1.doc D. J.

More information

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.14.1 Summary Table 4.14-1 summarizes the identified environmental impacts, proposed mitigation measures, and residual impacts of the proposed project with regard to

More information

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Transportation & Traffic Engineering Transportation & Traffic Engineering 1) Project Description This report presents a summary of findings for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed by A+ Engineering, Inc. for the Hill Country Family

More information

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis Appendix E NJ TRANSIT Pennsauken Junction Transit Center and Park & Ride RiverLINE and Atlantic City Line Pennsauken Township, Camden County, New Jersey TRAFFIC DATA Background Traffic Information for

More information

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017 Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Submitted by April 9, 2009 Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona,

More information

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Section 5.0 Traffic Information Section 5.0 Traffic Information 10.0 TRANSPORTATION MDM Transportation Consultants, Inc. (MDM) has prepared an evaluation of transportation impacts for the proposed evaluation for the expansion of the

More information

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Proposed Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Transportation Assessment St. Clair Township, Ontario September 2009 itrans Consulting Inc. 260

More information

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1. DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava July 9, 2015 115-620 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation

More information

Traffic Impact Study for the Maria Drive Apartment Complex

Traffic Impact Study for the Maria Drive Apartment Complex Traffic Impact Study for the Maria Drive Apartment Complex Prepared for the City of Petaluma Submitted by Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. 490 Mendocino Avenue Suite 201 Santa Rosa, CA 95401

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary... xii 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Study Area... 2 1.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios... 4 1.3 Study Area - City of Orange... 4 2.0 Project Description

More information

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RAYMOND VINEYARDS WINERY USE PERMIT MODIFICATION #P11-00156 AUGUST 5, 2014 PREPARED BY: OMNI-MEANS,

More information

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Phelps Program Management 420 Sixth Avenue, Greeley, CO 80632 Prepared by 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite

More information

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis for 2171 Rosecrans Avenue

Traffic Impact Analysis for 2171 Rosecrans Avenue Traffic Impact Analysis for 2171 Rosecrans Avenue Prepared for: Continental Development Corporation Revised May 2016 LA16-2831 Prepared by: Fehr & Peers 600 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90017

More information

Appendix Q Traffic Study

Appendix Q Traffic Study Appendices Appendix Q Traffic Study Crummer Site Subdivision Draft EIR City of Malibu Appendices This page intentionally left blank. The Planning Center April 2013 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Photo z here

More information

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 1. Introduction... 4 2. Project Description... 4 3. Background Information... 4 4. Study Scope...

More information

Traffic Feasibility Study

Traffic Feasibility Study Traffic Feasibility Study Town Center South Robbinsville Township, Mercer County, New Jersey December 19, 2017 Prepared For Robbinsville Township Department of Community Development 2298 Route 33 Robbinsville,

More information

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS... Crosshaven Drive Corridor Study City of Vestavia Hills, Alabama Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA... 3 Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 24 UPDATED

More information

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited 105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited December 2016 Project Summary Project Number 162060 December 2016 Client Zelinka Priamo Ltd 318

More information

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results NDSU Dept #2880 PO Box 6050 Fargo, ND 58108-6050 Tel 701-231-8058 Fax 701-231-6265 www.ugpti.org www.atacenter.org Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area 2025 Simulation Results

More information

Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By:

Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE TTC MCNICOLL BUS GARAGE CITY OF TORONTO Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2 Prepared By: Canada Inc. 4th Floor, 3 Leek Crescent

More information

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below: 3.5 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.1.1 Street Network DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown

More information

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Invecta Development (Ottawa) Corporation 758 Shanks Height Milton, ON L9T 7P7 May

More information

Revised Report. Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center. In The City of Petaluma.

Revised Report. Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center. In The City of Petaluma. Revised Report Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center In The Pleasanton Fresno Sacramento Santa Rosa TJKM www.tjkm.com Revised Report Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel

More information

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA PREPARED FOR: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM 34 CIVIC CENTER BOULEVARD PHILADELPHIA, PA 1987 (61)

More information

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways. 4.2 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This section presents the key assumptions, methods, and results of analysis for the transportation and circulation impacts of the proposed project. This section is based on

More information

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc. IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc. February 6, 2013 Mr. David Weil Director of Finance St. Matthew s Parish School 1031 Bienveneda Avenue Pacific Palisades, California 90272 RE: Trip

More information

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639 INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY Prepared for: Virginia Department of Transportation Central Region Operations Traffic Engineering (UPC #81378, TO 12-092) DAVENPORT Project Number: 13-368 / /2014 RTE. 1 at RTE.

More information

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output NDSU Dept #2880 PO Box 6050 Fargo, ND 58108-6050 Tel 701-231-8058 Fax 701-231-6265 www.ugpti.org www.atacenter.org Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area 2015 Simulation Output Technical

More information

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph)

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph) Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph) Prepared By: 332 Lorne Avenue East Stratford ON N5A 6S4 Prepared for: Paul Kemper, President

More information

Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study Ontario Inc.

Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study Ontario Inc. Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study 1255723 Ontario Inc. Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study 1255723 Ontario Inc. 1465 Pickering Parkway Suite 200 Pickering ON L1V 7G7

More information

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study Prepared for: Armel Corporation January 2015 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. 22 King Street South, Suite 300 Waterloo ON N2J 1N8

More information

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited. RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited June 16, 2016 116-638 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting

More information

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW TRANSPORTATION REVIEW - PROPOSED MIX OF LAND USES IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY S UNDER THE GRANVILLE BRIDGE POLICIES THAT AIM TO MEET NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS SHOPPING NEEDS AND REDUCE RELIANCE ON AUTOMOBILE

More information

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

MEMO VIA  . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To: MEMO To: Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers VIA EMAIL From: Michael J. Labadie, PE Julie M. Kroll, PE, PTOE Brandon Hayes, PE, P.Eng. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: January 5, 2017 Re: Proposed

More information

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: September 10, 2014 PROJECT 5861.03 NO: PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis TO: Steve Holroyd - District

More information

Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement

Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Traffic Study PHA Transportation Consultants 12-05-359 October 2012 Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Traffic Study For EBMUD October 2012 PHA Transportation

More information

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Teichert Boca Quarry Expansion Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for Teichert Aggregates Prepared by TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

More information

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015 Memo To: From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON : 165620021 Date: Reference: E.C. Row Expressway, Dominion Boulevard Interchange, Dougall Avenue Interchange, and Howard 1. Review of Interchange Geometry

More information

Appendix C. Traffic Study

Appendix C. Traffic Study Appendix C Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary PAGE 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Scope of Work... 1 1.2 Study Area... 2 2.0 Project Description... 3 2.1 Site Access... 4 2.2 Pedestrian

More information

Traffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For:

Traffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For: Appendix B SRF Traffic Study (Revised November 2005) Draft Environmental Impact Statement University Commons Town of Allegany, Cattaraugus County, NY December 2005 Traffic Impact Study for the proposed

More information

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1

More information

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14

More information

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California DRAFT REPORT Prepared By Tulare County Association of Governments (TCAG) April 2013 Table of Contents Introduction:... 3 Project

More information

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo APPENDIX C-2 Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo The Mobility Group Transportation Strategies & Solutions Memorandum To: From: Subject: Tomas Carranza, LADOT Matthew Simons Traffic Review - Revised

More information

One Harbor Point Residential

One Harbor Point Residential Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE

More information

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com

More information

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange City of Broadview Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Broadview Heights Department of Engineering 9543 Broadview Road

More information

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

More information

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT for Sunrise Elementary School Replacement PREPARED FOR: Puyallup School District PREPARED BY: 6544 NE 61 st Street, Seattle, WA 98115 ph: (26) 523-3939 fx: (26) 523-4949

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE. PANORAMA PD Shasta County, California. Prepared For: Enplan 3179 Bechelli Lane, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE. PANORAMA PD Shasta County, California. Prepared For: Enplan 3179 Bechelli Lane, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PANORAMA PD Shasta County, California Prepared For: Enplan 3179 Bechelli Lane, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. 3853 Taylor Road,

More information

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1 Ref. No. 171-6694 Phase 2 November 23, 217 Mr. David Quilichini, Vice President Fares & Co. Developments Inc. 31 Place Keelson Sales Centre DARTMOUTH NS B2Y C1 Sent Via Email to David@faresinc.com RE:

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION Chapel Hill, North Carolina FINAL REPORT Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill, NC Prepared by: Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc. December 2010

More information

APPENDIX G TRAFFIC STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX G TRAFFIC STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM APPENDIX G TRAFFIC STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Jerry Flores - AECOM Brian A. Marchetti, AICP September 9, 5 DRAFT Traffic Study LABOE Channel 5 Studio Relocation

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Traffic Impact Analysis Update Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS

More information

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY for USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site Prepared by: Jason Hoskinson, PE, PTOE BG Project No. 16-12L July 8, 216 145 Wakarusa Drive Lawrence, Kansas 6649 T: 785.749.4474 F: 785.749.734

More information

Traffic Analysis for Bon Air Bridge Mitigation Magnolia Storm Water Quality Project

Traffic Analysis for Bon Air Bridge Mitigation Magnolia Storm Water Quality Project Memo To: Paul DiDonato, ATI Architects and Engineers From: David Parisi, PE and Ashley Tam, EIT Date: February 23, 216 Subject: Traffic Analysis for Bon Air Bridge Mitigation Magnolia Storm Water Quality

More information