Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT"

Transcription

1 Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Phelps Program Management 420 Sixth Avenue, Greeley, CO Prepared by 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite 260, Carlsbad, CA CONTACT: ROBERT DAVIS Revised: April 17, 2006 JN

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Analysis Methodology... 7 Existing Conditions Proposed Project Existing Plus Project Conditions - Without and With Maple Street Closure Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions Without and With Project Horizon Year 2030 Conditions Without and With Project Peak Hour Intersection Operations During Cruising Grand Event Peak Hour Intersection Operations During Farmers Market Significant Impacts and Mitigation Project Impact on Valley Parkway from I-15 to North Tulip Street Pedestrian Activity at Valley Parkway and Maple Street Conversion of Maple Street to Pedestrian Alley Conclusions APPENDICES Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Appendix F: Appendix G: Appendix H: Appendix I: City of Escondido Roadway Segment Capacity and LOS Criteria Traffic Count Sheets Existing Conditions HCM Worksheets SANDAG Trip Generation Rates Displaced Parking Redistribution Exhibits Existing Plus Project Conditions HCM Worksheets Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions Without Maple Street Closure HCM Worksheets Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions With Maple Street Closure HCM Worksheets Horizon Year 2030 Conditions Without Maple Street Closure HCM Worksheets

3 Appendix J: Horizon Year 2030 Conditions With Maple Street Closure HCM Worksheets Appendix K: Cruising Grand Revised Trip Distribution, Trip Assignment, Cumulative Project Trips Exhibits Appendix L: Cruising Grand Existing Conditions HCM Worksheets Appendix M: Cruising Grand Existing Plus Project Conditions HCM Worksheets Appendix N: Cruising Grand Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions Without Maple Street Closure HCM Worksheets Appendix O: Cruising Grand Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions With Maple Street Closure HCM Worksheets Appendix P: Peak Hour Counts During Farmers Market Appendix Q: Farmers Market Revised Trip Distribution, Trip Assignment, Cumulative Project Trips Exhibits Appendix R: Farmers Market Existing Conditions HCM Worksheets Appendix S: Farmers Market Existing Plus Project Conditions HCM Worksheets Appendix T: Farmers Market Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions Without Maple Street Closure HCM Worksheets Appendix U: Farmers Market Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions With Maple Street Closure HCM Worksheets Appendix V: HCM Worksheets With Recommended Mitigation Improvements Appendix W: HCM Worksheets With Recommended Mitigation Improvements For Cruising Grand and Farmers Market Scenarios LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Regional Project Vicinity... 2 Exhibit 2: Project Concept Plan... 4 Exhibit 3: Project Study Area... 6 Exhibit 4: Existing Intersection Lane Geometries Exhibit 5: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Volumes Exhibit 6: Existing ADT Volumes Exhibit 7A: Project Trip Distribution Hotel Land Use (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 7B: Project Trip Distribution Condominium Land Use (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 8A: Project Trip Distribution Hotel Land Use (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 8B: Project Trip Distribution Condominium Land Use (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 9: Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 10: Daily Project Trip Assignment (Without Maple Street Closure)... 24

4 Exhibit 11: Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 12: Daily Project Trip Assignment (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 13: Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 14: Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 15: Existing Plus Project ADT Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 16: Existing Plus Project ADT Volumes (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 17: Cumulative Project Locations Exhibit 18: Peak Hour Cumulative Project Volumes Exhibit 19: Daily Cumulative Project Volumes Exhibit 20: Existing Plus Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 21: Existing Plus Cumulative Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 22: Existing Plus Cumulative ADT Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 23: Existing Plus Cumulative Plus Project ADT Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 24: Existing Plus Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 25: Existing Plus Cumulative Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 26: Existing Plus Cumulative ADT Volumes (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 27: Existing Plus Cumulative Plus Project ADT Volumes (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 28: Horizon Year Without Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 29: Horizon Year With Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 30: Horizon Year Without Project ADT Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 31: Horizon Year With Project ADT Volumes (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 32: Horizon Year Without Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 33: Horizon Year With Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (With Maple Street Closure)... 64

5 Exhibit 34: Horizon Year Without Project ADT Volumes (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 35: Horizon Year With Project ADT Volumes (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 36: Existing Intersection Lane Geometries During Cruising Grand Event Exhibit 37: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Cruising Grand Event Exhibit 38: Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Cruising Grand Event (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 39: Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Cruising Grand Event (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 40: Existing Plus Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Cruising Grand Event (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 41: Existing Plus Cumulative Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Cruising Grand Event (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 42: Existing Plus Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Cruising Grand Event (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 43: Existing Plus Cumulative Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Cruising Grand Event (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 44: Existing Intersection Lane Geometries During Farmers Market Exhibit 45: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Farmers Market Exhibit 46: Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Farmers Market (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 47: Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Farmers Market (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 48: Existing Plus Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Farmers Market (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 49: Existing Plus Cumulative Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Farmers Market (Without Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 50: Existing Plus Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Farmers Market (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 51: Existing Plus Cumulative Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes During Farmers Market (With Maple Street Closure) Exhibit 52: Daily Project Trips on Valley Parkway and Couplet from I-15 to Centre City Parkway

6 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Level of Service & Delay Range... 8 Table 2: Daily Level of Service Thresholds for Roadway Segments... 9 Table 3: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Table 4: Existing Daily Roadway Segment Conditions Table 5: Proposed Project Trip Generation Rates Table 6: Proposed Project Trip Generation Table 7: Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Without and With Maple Street Closure Table 8: Existing Plus Project Daily Roadway Segment Conditions Without Maple Street Closure Table 9: Existing Plus Project Daily Roadway Segment Conditions With Maple Street Closure Table 10: Cumulative Projects Trip Generation Table 11: Existing Plus Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Without Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 12: Existing Plus Cumulative Daily Roadway Segment Conditions Without Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 13: Existing Plus Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Conditions With Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 14: Existing Plus Cumulative Daily Roadway Segment Conditions With Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 15: Horizon Year 2030 Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Without Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 16: Horizon Year 2030 Daily Roadway Segment Conditions Without Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 17: Horizon Year 2030 Peak Hour Intersection Conditions With Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 18: Horizon Year 2030 Daily Roadway Segment Conditions With Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 19: Existing P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions During Cruising Grand Event Table 20: Existing Plus Project P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions During Cruising Grand Event Without and With Maple Street Closure Table 21: Existing Plus Cumulative P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions During Cruising Grand Event Without Maple Street Closure Without and With Project... 79

7 Table 22: Existing Plus Cumulative P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions During Cruising Grand Event With Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 23: Existing P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions During Farmers Market Table 24: Existing Plus Project P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions During Farmers Market Without and With Maple Street Closure Table 25: Existing Plus Cumulative P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions During Farmers Market Without Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 26: Existing Plus Cumulative P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions During Farmers Market With Maple Street Closure Without and With Project Table 27: Summary of Recommended Intersection Mitigation Measures Table 28: Summary of Intersection LOS Without and With Recommended Improvements Table 29: Summary of Intersection LOS Without and With Recommended Improvements Cruising Grand and Farmers Market Scenarios Table 30: Summary of Horizon Year 2030 With Project Roadway Segment LOS Without and With Mitigation Measures Table 31: Daily Project Trips on Valley Parkway and Couplet from I-15 to Centre City Parkway

8 INTRODUCTION This study analyzes the forecast traffic impact of the proposed Escondido Marriott Hotel and multi-story mixed-use condominium, retail and parking structure project, located on the northwest and southeast corners of the intersection of Valley Parkway at Maple Street in the City of Escondido. Exhibit 1 shows the regional project vicinity. As required by the City of Escondido, this traffic impact study has been prepared in accordance with the City General Plan Circulation Element and the SANDAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) traffic impact study guidelines. The threshold to determine the need for traffic studies is 500 daily trips for non-conforming land uses and 1,000 daily trips for projects consistent with the City s General Plan land use. The proposed hotel, condominium and retail project is forecast to generate approximately 2,327 trips per day, with 150 trips occurring in the a.m. peak hour and 200 trips occurring in the p.m. peak hour. Project traffic was distributed on the roadway network based on a select zone analysis run conducted by SANDAG. A total of 15 intersections and 16 roadway segments are included in the study area. The City of Escondido is considering a project that would convert Maple Street to a pedestrian alley between Grand Avenue and the mid-block alley to the north. The City has requested that the traffic impact analysis evaluate each study scenario without and with the closure of this segment of Maple Street to vehicular traffic (with the exception of existing conditions). The City has also requested for two additional study scenarios to be added to the analysis during the p.m. peak period: during the Cruising Grand event, which takes place every Friday evening from early April to late September; and during the Farmer s Market, which takes place every Tuesday afternoon all year around. During the Cruising Grand event, Broadway between Valley Parkway and Second Avenue is closed to traffic from 4 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., and during the weekly Farmer s Market, Grand Avenue between Maple Street and Broadway is closed to traffic from 1:45 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. These additional scenarios will evaluate the peak hour operations of the intersections that are impacted by the two events under existing and existing plus cumulative conditions, without and with the proposed project. This traffic impact analysis includes the following study scenarios without and with the Maple Street closure (no Maple Street closure under existing conditions): Existing Conditions (includes Cruising Grand and Farmers Market scenarios) Existing Plus Project (includes Cruising Grand and Farmers Market scenarios) Existing Plus Cumulative Without Project (includes Cruising Grand and Farmers Market scenarios) Existing Plus Cumulative With Project (includes Cruising Grand and Farmers Market scenarios) Horizon Year 2030 Without Project (does not include Cruising Grand and Farmers Market scenarios) Horizon Year 2030 With Project (does not include Cruising Grand and Farmers Market scenarios) 1

9

10 Project Description The proposed Escondido Marriott Hotel and mixed-use multi-story condominium, retail and parking structure project is located on the northwest and southeast corners of the intersection of Valley Parkway at Maple Street in the City of Escondido. Exhibit 2 shows the project site plan for the proposed Marriott Hotel and condominium/retail project. As shown in the project site plan, the proposed project includes 196 hotel rooms, 127 condominium units, and 2,900 square-feet of specialty retail located on the ground floor of the condominium building. A 488-stall parking structure will be constructed beneath the ground floor of the condominium/retail building, which will provide 248 parking stalls for the condominium uses, 19 shared parking stalls for condominium/retail uses, and 221 parking stalls for public uses. The hotel site will provide 209 parking spaces. The condominium/retail building will displace 119 public parking spaces, and the hotel site will displace 75 public parking spaces. The provision of the 221 public parking stalls in the proposed parking structure will compensate for the loss of public parking as a result of construction of the project. Primary access to the hotel site will be provided on Valley Parkway at the intersection of Maple Street. Secondary access to the hotel will be provided on Valley Parkway, west of Maple Street. Access to the multi-story condominium/retail site will be provided from Maple Street, south of Valley Parkway. Study Area According to the SANDAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) guidelines, intersections and roadway segments where 50 or more peak hour trips are forecast to be added shall be selected for inclusion in this analysis. The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 150 a.m. peak hour and 200 p.m. peak hour trips. Project-generated trips were assigned to the roadway network based on a select zone model run produced by the SANDAG Series 10 traffic model. A total of 15 intersections and 16 roadway segments were identified for inclusion in this traffic study. Based on the threshold set by the SANDAG CMP guidelines, the study area consists of the following intersections and roadway segments: Intersections 1) Valley Parkway / Centre City Parkway 2) Valley Parkway / Orange Street 3) Valley Parkway / Escondido Boulevard 4) Valley Parkway / Maple Street 5) Valley Parkway / Broadway 6) Grand Avenue / Centre City Parkway 7) Grand Avenue / Orange Street 8) Grand Avenue / Escondido Boulevard 3

11

12 Intersections (continued) 9) Grand Avenue / Maple Street 10) Grand Avenue / Broadway 11) Second Avenue / Centre City Parkway 12) Second Avenue / Orange Street 13) Second Avenue / Escondido Boulevard 14) Second Avenue / Maple Street 15) Second Avenue / Broadway Roadway Segments 1) Valley Parkway, Centre City Parkway to Orange Street 2) Valley Parkway, Orange Street to Escondido Boulevard 3) Valley Parkway, Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street 4) Valley Parkway, Maple Street to Broadway 5) Grand Avenue, Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street 6) Grand Avenue, Maple Street to Broadway 7) Second Avenue, Centre City Parkway to Orange Street 8) Second Avenue, Orange Street to Escondido Boulevard 9) Second Avenue, Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street 10) Second Avenue, Maple Street to Broadway 11) Escondido Boulevard, Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue 12) Escondido Boulevard, Grand Avenue to Second Avenue 13) Maple Street, Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue 14) Maple Street, Grand Avenue to Second Avenue 15) Broadway, Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue 16) Broadway, Grand Avenue to Second Avenue The project study area is shown in Exhibit 3. According to the SANDAG CMP, Valley Parkway, Centre City Parkway, and SR-78 (Broadway, Washington Avenue, Ash Street, and San Pasqual Valley Road) are classified as Regionally Significant Arterials (RSA). Therefore, all signalized intersections and roadway segments where 50 or more peak hour trips or 200 or more daily trips were added along these arterials were included in the analysis. 5

13

14 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY In accordance with the SANDAG CMP traffic impact study guidelines and City of Escondido requirements, this study analyzes the followings study scenarios: Existing Conditions Analysis of existing traffic count volumes, intersection geometry and existing roadway network. Existing Plus Project Analysis of existing traffic volumes overlaid with the forecast project-generated traffic. The existing intersection geometry and roadway network were used in this analysis Existing Plus Cumulative Analysis of existing traffic volumes overlaid with traffic associated with approved or pending projects anticipated to be constructed by the projectopening year. Existing Plus Cumulative With Project Analysis of existing traffic volumes overlaid with cumulative project traffic and traffic generated by the proposed project. Horizon Year 2030 Without Project Analysis of Horizon Year 2030 conditions was conducted using the SANDAG Series 10 North San Diego County subarea traffic model. The Horizon Year 2030 volumes were post-processed and refined for the peak hours based on the forecast daily volumes in the traffic model provided by SANDAG. All build-out roadway improvements in the project study area are included in the analysis of Horizon Year 2030 Conditions. Horizon Year 2030 With Project Analysis of Horizon Year 2030 conditions with the proposed project uses the forecast volumes derived from the SANDAG Series 10 North San Diego County subarea traffic model plus the addition of project-generated traffic. All buildout roadway improvements in the project study area are included in the analysis of Horizon Year 2030 Conditions. The City of Escondido is considering a project that would convert Maple Street to a pedestrian alley between Grand Avenue and the mid-block alley to the north. The City has requested that the traffic impact analysis evaluate each study scenario (with the exception of existing conditions) without and with the closure of this segment of Maple Street. The traffic analysis includes this network change as an alternative in all future scenarios, and the traffic that would otherwise occur on this segment of Maple Street has been redistributed accordingly to the adjacent intersections. At the request of the City, two additional study scenarios were added during the p.m. peak period: during the Cruising Grand event, which takes place every Friday evening from early April to late September; and during the Farmer s Market, which takes place every Tuesday afternoon all year around. During the Cruising Grand event, Broadway between Valley Parkway and Second Avenue is closed to traffic from 4 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., and during the weekly Farmer s Market, Grand Avenue between Maple Street and Broadway is closed to traffic from 1:45 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. These additional scenarios will evaluate the peak hour operations of the intersections that are impacted by the two events under existing and existing plus cumulative conditions, without and with the proposed project. 7

15 Analysis of all intersections and roadway segments in the project study area is based on the guidelines set forth in the City of Escondido General Plan Circulation Element and the SANDAG CMP guidelines. As required, the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) operation methodology for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections was used to determine the operating Levels of Service (LOS) of the study intersections. The TRAFFIX software package was used to evaluate the study intersections using the HCM methodology. The HCM methodology describes the operation of an intersection using a range of levels of service (LOS) from LOS A (free-flow conditions) to LOS F (severely congested conditions), based on corresponding delay per vehicle thresholds for signalized and unsignalized intersections shown in Table 1. The City of Escondido considers mid-range LOS D or better to be acceptable intersection operating conditions. Table 1 Level of Service & Delay Ranges LOS Signalized Intersections Delay (seconds/vehicle) Unsignalized Intersections A < 10.0 < 10.0 B > 10.0 to < 20.0 > 10.0 to < 15.0 C > 20.0 to < 35.0 > 15.0 to < 25.0 D (mid-range threshold) D (high-range threshold) > 35.0 to < 45.0 > 25.0 to < 30.0 > 35.0 to < 55.0 > 25.0 to < 35.0 E > 55.0 to < 80.0 > 35.0 to < 50.0 F > 80.0 > 50.0 Source: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. A daily roadway segment analysis was conducted for all study area roadways, which was based upon the 1993 City of Escondido Circulation Element and the Escondido LOS Criteria for street segments. The roadway segment level of service criteria is included in Table 2. The LOS thresholds and roadway classification table from the City of Escondido Circulation Element is provided in Appendix A. 8

16 Table 2 Daily Level of Service Thresholds for Roadway Segments Classification / Lanes Level of Service A B C Mid-Range D D E Prime Arterial / 6 15,000 30,000 42,000 46,500 51,000 60,000 Major Arterial / 4 14,800 24,700 29,600 31,500 33,400 37,000 One-Way / 5 (1) 18,600 28,000 37,300 39,600 41,900 46,600 One-Way / 3 (1) 14,000 21,000 28,000 29,750 31,500 35,000 / 4 (2) 13,700 22,800 27,400 29,100 30,800 34,200 / 4 (3) 5,000 10,000 14,000 15,500 17,000 20,000 Local / 2 (4) 2,500 5,000 7,000 11,250 8,500 10,000 Source: City of Escondido General Plan Circulation Element Update, (1) Valley Parkway from Centre City Parkway to Escondido Boulevard is constructed with five one-way travel lanes; other segments of Valley Parkway and the Second Avenue half of the couplet are constructed with three one-way travel lanes. (2) Parking prohibited. (3) Parking permitted. (4) The City Circulation Element does not include an Urban with permitted on-street parking, so the LOS thresholds and LOS E capacity for a Rural Two-Lane with on-street parking permitted was used in this case. According to the 1993 City of Escondido Circulation/Transportation Plan, the City s goal for acceptable service standards during daily and peak hour periods is LOS C for all roadway segments and intersections. General Plan Circulation Policy D2.3 of the 1993 Circulation/Transportation Plan contains the following excerpt describing the limitations of the City s goal for LOS C: Due to the physical design characteristics, environmental resource considerations, existing development, freeway interchange impacts and incomplete system improvements, level of service C may not be feasible in all areas at all times. However, level of service C should be pursued in the ultimate implementation of the circulation system. Notwithstanding the City s goal of providing LOS C or better, it is acknowledged that the provision may not need to be satisfied in all cases, particularly in the short term. The Citywide Facilities Plan, which implements the growth management element of the aforementioned Circulation/Transportation General Plan, contains the following excerpt taken from the June 1995 City of Escondido Environmental Quality Regulations Sec , for determining if the violation of the LOS C threshold is allowable, and a negative declaration is acceptable for environmental purposes. After mitigation, a proposed project, or combination of proposed projects, do not cause the Level of service of a circulation element street to fall below the mid-range of level of service D. 9

17 Within the City of Escondido, a significant impact is forecast to occur if project-generated traffic increases the peak hour intersection delay by 2.0 seconds or more for intersections operating at deficient levels of service (mid-range LOS D or worse). A significant impact is forecast to occur on a roadway segment if it is projected to operate at a deficient level of service (mid-range LOS D or worse) and if the addition of project-generated traffic results in an increase in the V/C ratio by or more. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Roadway Circulation System A detailed field review was conducted to determine the existing intersection geometry, traffic control devices, signal phasing and other factors, which may affect intersection or roadway segment capacity. The existing intersection geometry is illustrated in Exhibit 4. The following is a detailed description of roadways in the study area. Interstate 15 (I-15) provides regional access to Escondido as a major freeway facility, generally oriented in a north-south direction. Regional project access is provided at the Valley Parkway interchange with I-15. State Route 78 (SR-78) provides regional access to Escondido as a major freeway and highway facility, generally oriented in an east-west direction. Regional project access from the west is provided at the Centre City Parkway interchange with SR-78, and the intersection with Broadway, where SR-78 transitions from a freeway to a highway facility. As a highway facility, SR-78 extends southeast from Broadway on surface streets through the city and into the unincorporated areas of San Diego County. Valley Parkway is a three-lane to six-lane roadway extending in a southwest-northeast direction from Citracado Parkway to Valley Center Road. Valley Parkway is built as a four-lane Major Arterial from Citracado Parkway to Auto Park Way, and changes to a six-lane Prime Arterial from Auto Park Way to the western limit of the couplet with Second Avenue just east of Tulip Street. Between Tulip Street and Hickory Street, Valley Parkway is constructed as a three-lane, one-way extending in a westbound direction through downtown Escondido. East of Hickory Street, Valley Parkway is constructed as a two-way, four-lane Major Arterial. Valley Parkway is a Regionally Significant Arterial (RSA), as classified by the SANDAG CMP. Grand Avenue is located between Second Avenue and Valley Parkway and is a four-lane, two-way roadway. Grand Avenue begins as part of the eastbound couplet with Valley Parkway as a threelane, one-way collector, and then transitions to a four-lane, two-way street just west of Quince Street. The intersection of Grand Avenue/Centre City Parkway has recently been improved to allow left, through, and right turn movements at all four approaches of the intersection. Grand Avenue is generally oriented in an east-west direction and extends into the eastern portion of the city. Grand Avenue is included in the General Plan Circulation Element as a four-lane. 10

18

19 Second Avenue is a three-lane, one-way collector extending eastbound from Grand Avenue to Valley Parkway. Second Avenue is located two blocks south of Valley Parkway and forms the southern half of the couplet through downtown Escondido. Centre City Parkway is a four-lane Major Arterial generally oriented in a north-south direction, and extends from the northern to the southern limits of the city. Centre City Parkway is a Regionally Significant Arterial (RSA), as classified by the SANDAG CMP. Escondido Boulevard is a two-lane to four-lane generally oriented in a north-south direction, and extends from El Norte Parkway to Centre City Parkway at the southern end of the city. Maple Street is a two-lane local street oriented in a north-south direction, and extends from Valley Parkway to Felicita Avenue. Maple Street is not included as a City Circulation Element roadway. Broadway is built as a two-lane to four-lane roadway extending in a north-south direction from unincorporated areas north of the city to its southern terminus at 15 th Avenue. Broadway is a fourlane Major Arterial from Jesmene Dene Road at the north end of the city to Second Avenue in Escondido s downtown district. South of Second Avenue, Broadway is constructed as a two-lane local street. Between Lincoln Parkway and Washington Avenue, Broadway is part of State Route 78 and is classified by the SANDAG CMP as a Regionally Significant Arterial (RSA). Existing Level of Service Analysis To determine the existing operation of the study intersections, intersection movement counts were taken on a typical weekday during the a.m. (7:00 to 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) peak period. Exhibit 5 shows the existing a.m. and p.m. peak one-hour volumes at each of the study intersections based on the traffic count data collected for this study in April Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes collected for this project are illustrated in Exhibit 6. Detailed count data is contained in Appendix B. Table 3 summarizes the existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour intersection LOS of the study intersections based on the existing peak hour intersection volumes and existing intersection geometry. Detailed HCM calculation sheets are contained in Appendix C. As shown in Table 3, all study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS (mid-range D or better) during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours except for the following unsignalized minor-street stop-controlled intersections: Valley Parkway/Maple Street (LOS E: p.m. peak hour); Grand Avenue/Orange Street (LOS F: p.m. peak hour); and Second Avenue/Maple Street (LOS F: p.m. peak hour). 12

20

21

22 Study Intersection Table 3 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Conditions AM Delay LOS (sec.) PM Delay LOS (sec.) Valley Parkway / Centre City Parkway 25.4 C 25.3 C Valley Parkway / Orange Street 5.4 A 12.7 B Valley Parkway / Escondido Boulevard 17.7 B 19.4 B Valley Parkway / Maple Street (1) 38.6 E 22.8 C Valley Parkway / Broadway 16.6 B 17.1 B Grand Avenue / Centre City Parkway 16.9 B 22.4 C Grand Avenue / Orange Street (1) 16.8 C 55.1 F Grand Avenue / Escondido Boulevard 15.0 B 16.5 B Grand Avenue / Maple Street (2) 9.0 A 11.4 B Grand Avenue / Broadway 15.9 B 17.1 B Second Avenue / Centre City Parkway 21.4 C 24.5 C Second Avenue / Orange Street 3.5 A 7.8 A Second Avenue / Escondido Boulevard 18.4 B 20.9 C Second Avenue / Maple Street (1) 26.5 D 78.7 F Second Avenue / Broadway 12.1 B 13.6 B Note: Deficient intersection operation shown in bold. (1) Indicates an unsignalized two-way stop-controlled intersection, in which the highest approach delay, rather than the average delay, is reported for two-way stop-controlled intersections. (2) Indicates an unsignalized all-way stop-controlled intersection. Daily roadway segment levels of service were calculated based on the capacity of the roadway determined based on classification and ADT volumes. Table 4 presents the results of the existing conditions daily roadway segment level of service analysis. Valley Parkway and Second Avenue are both one-way streets, classified as collector roadways. One-way, three lane collector roadways are not included in the City Circulation Element; therefore capacity thresholds were not provided by the City. Using the Highway Capacity Manual saturation flow calculation methodology, the capacity of the roadway was calculated to be approximately 35,000 vpd for the LOS E (capacity) condition. As shown in Table 4, all of the study roadway segments currently operate at acceptable levels of service (mid-range D or better). 15

23 Table 4 Existing Daily Roadway Segment Conditions Roadway Location #Lanes/Class Valley Parkway Grand Avenue Second Avenue Escondido Boulevard Maple Street Centre City Parkway to Orange Street Orange Street to Escondido Boulevard Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street Maple Street to Broadway 5/One-Way 5/One-Way 3/One-Way 3/One-Way Daily Capacity Existing ADT V/C LOS 46,600 19, B 46,600 19, B 35,000 22, C 35,000 19, B Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street 4/ (1) 20,000 12, C Maple Street to Broadway 4/ (1) 20,000 12, C Centre City Parkway to Orange Street Orange Street to Escondido Boulevard Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street Maple Street to Broadway 3/One-Way 3/One-Way 3/One-Way 3/One-Way 35,000 17, B 35,000 18, B 35,000 18, B 35,000 18, B Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue 4/ 34,200 17, B Grand Avenue to Second Avenue 4/ 34,200 14, B Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue Grand Avenue to Second Avenue 2/Local (2) 10,000 2, A 2/Local (2) 10,000 1, A Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue 4/ (1)(3) 20,000 10, C Broadway 2/Local Grand Avenue to Second Avenue (2)(3) 10,000 6, C Note: Deficient roadway segment operation shown in bold. (1) Indicates a four-lane with on-street parking permitted. (2) Indicates a two-lane with on-street parking permitted. The City Circulation Element does not include an Urban with permitted on-street parking, so the LOS thresholds and LOS E capacity for a Rural Two-Lane with on-street parking permitted was used in this case. (3) The City of Escondido Circulation Element classifies Broadway as a four-lane Major Arterial from Second Avenue to the north end of the city. However, the segment from Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue is constructed with four travel lanes with permitted on-street parking, and the segment from Grand Avenue to Second Avenue is constructed with two travel lanes with permitted on-street parking. PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed Escondido Marriott Hotel and mixed-use multi-story condominium, retail and parking structure project is located on the northwest and southeast corners of the intersection of Valley Parkway at Maple Street in the City of Escondido. The proposed project includes 196 hotel rooms, 127 condominium units, and 2,900 square-feet of specialty retail located on the ground floor of the condominium building. A 488-stall parking structure will be constructed beneath the ground floor of the condominium/retail building, which will provide 248 parking stalls for the condominium uses, 19 shared parking stalls for condominium/retail uses, and 221 parking stalls for public uses. The hotel site will provide 209 parking spaces. 16

24 Project Trip Generation To determine the trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project, April 2002 SANDAG Trip Generation rates were utilized in accordance with the City of Escondido guidelines. The SANDAG (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) showing the trip generation rate for the proposed land use is provided in Appendix D. Tables 5 and 6 summarize the project trip generation. As summarized in Table 6, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 2,327 trips per day, which includes approximately 150 a.m. peak hour trips and approximately 200 p.m. peak hour trips. It should be noted that based on the proximity of the proposed project to the downtown area and adjacent entertainment and commercial uses, a significant portion of the trips are likely to be pedestrian trips rather than vehicle trips. As such, the pedestrian mode-split used is conservative. Land Use Units Table 5 Proposed Project Trip Generation Rates Daily Rate (per unit) AM Peak Hour Rate Total (of daily) In Out PM Peak Hour Rate Total (of daily) Hotel (1) rooms 8 6% 60% 40% 8% 60% 40% Condominium (2) DU 6 8% 20% 80% 10% 70% 30% Specialty Retail KSF 40 3% 60% 40% 9% 50% 50% Source: SANDAG (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002). (1) The trip generation rate for the hotel land use is based on 80% occupancy of the hotel, which has been approved by City of Escondido staff. (2) The density of the condominium building site is more than 20 units per acre; therefore a rate of 6 trips per acre is used for highdensity multi-family dwelling units as recommended by SANDAG. Land Use Table 6 Proposed Project Trip Generation Intensity In Out Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Total In Out Total In Out Hotel Building Hotel 196 rooms 1, Hotel Pedestrian Mode-Split Reduction (1) Net Hotel Trips 1, Multi-Story Condominium/Retail Building Condominium 127 DU Specialty Retail 2.9 KSF Condominium/Retail Subtotal Mixed-Use Trip Reduction (2) Net Condominium/Retail Trips Total Net Project Trips 2, (1) Due to the proximity of the hotel to the downtown district, a 2% pedestrian mode-split reduction was applied to the hotel trip calculations. (2) As suggested by SANDAG, a trip reduction of up to 10% can be applied to mixed-use developments where residential and commercial are combined. 17

25 Project Trip Distribution Project traffic was distributed on the roadway network based on a Select Zone Assignment model run conducted by SANDAG. The project trip distribution was adjusted for the alternative that includes the closure of Maple Street between Grand Avenue and the mid-block alley to the north. Exhibits 7A and 7B show the project trip distribution percentages for the proposed hotel and condominium land uses, respectively, without the Maple Street closure. Exhibits 8A and 8B show the project trip distribution percentages for the proposed hotel and condominium land uses, respectively, with the Maple Street closure. Project Trip Assignment Utilizing the project trip distribution shown in Exhibits 7A through 8B, the forecast project-generated trips were assigned to the roadway network. Exhibits 9 and 10 illustrate the forecast assignment of project-generated peak hour and daily trips, respectively, without the Maple Street closure. Exhibits 11 and 12 illustrate the forecast assignment of project-generated peak hour and daily trips, respectively, with the Maple Street closure. Displaced Parking Traffic Redistribution The proposed hotel and condominium/retail/parking structure building will displace two public parking lots. The proposed Marriott Hotel will displace the California Center for the Arts and Entertainment (CCAE) parking lot, which consists of 75 public parking stalls. The multi-story condominium/retail/parking structure building will displace Public Lot 1, which consists of 119 public parking stalls. The proposed parking structure underneath the ground floor of the condominium/retail building will accommodate the displaced public parking. Daily and peak hour trips have been estimated for both the CCAE lot and Public Lot 1, which have been derived from existing peak hour counts entering and exiting the CCAE lot access driveway (north of Maple Street at Valley Parkway). The estimated trips from both public parking lots have been redistributed accordingly to enter and exit the proposed parking structure on Maple Street south of Valley Parkway. Exhibits illustrating the redistributed public parking trips are provided in Appendix E. 18

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS WITHOUT AND WITH MAPLE STREET CLOSURE To determine the existing plus project operating conditions at the study intersections, the projectgenerated trips were added to the existing conditions volumes. Exhibit 13 shows the existing plus project a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes without the Maple Street closure. Exhibit 14 shows the existing plus project a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes with the Maple Street closure. Table 7 summarizes the existing plus project a.m. and p.m. peak hour intersection LOS. Detailed HCM calculation sheets are contained in Appendix F. As shown in Table 7, the following intersections are projected to operate at deficient levels of service (mid-range LOS D or worse) under existing plus project conditions without the Maple Street closure: Valley Parkway/Maple Street (AM/PM: LOS F); Grand Avenue/Orange Street (PM: LOS F); and Second Avenue/Maple Street (PM: LOS F). With the closure of Maple Street to vehicular traffic, the following intersections are projected to operate at mid-range LOS D or worse under existing plus project conditions: Valley Parkway/Maple Street (AM: LOS E; PM: LOS F); Grand Avenue/Orange Street (PM: LOS F); and Second Avenue/Maple Street (PM: LOS F). The addition of peak hour project trips to existing peak hour volumes increases the overall intersection approach delay by more than the significance threshold (2.0 seconds) for locations operating at deficient levels of service (worse than mid-range LOS D). Therefore, the addition of project traffic results in significant impacts at these locations for both Maple Street alternatives and mitigation measures are required. The results of the existing plus project daily roadway segment analysis, without and with the Maple Street closure, are presented in Tables 8 and 9, respectively. Existing plus project ADT volumes without and with the Maple Street closure are illustrated in Exhibits 15 and 16, respectively. As shown in Tables 8 and 9, all of the study roadway segments are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service (mid-range LOS D or better) under existing plus project conditions. 27

35

36

37 Study Intersection Table 7 Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Without and With Maple Street Closure AM Delay (1) LOS Existing PM Delay (1) LOS Existing Plus Project Without Maple Street Closure AM Delay (1) LOS PM Delay (1) LOS Change in Delay AM PM AM Delay (1) LOS Existing Plus Project With Maple Street Closure PM Delay (1) LOS Change in Delay Valley Parkway / Centre City Parkway 25.4 C 25.3 C 25.5 C 25.3 C C 25.3 C Valley Parkway / Orange Street 5.4 A 12.7 B 5.5 A 12.7 B A 12.7 B Valley Parkway / Escondido Boulevard 17.7 B 19.4 B 17.7 B 19.6 B B 20.2 C Valley Parkway / Maple Street (2) 38.6 E 22.8 C F F E F Valley Parkway / Broadway 16.6 B 17.1 B 16.7 B 17.3 B B 18.9 B Grand Avenue / Centre City Parkway 16.9 B 22.4 C 16.9 B 22.4 C B 22.4 C Grand Avenue / Orange Street (2) 16.8 C 55.1 F 17.0 C 68.1 F C 68.1 F Grand Avenue / Escondido Boulevard 15.0 B 16.5 B 15.1 B 16.6 B B 16.9 B Grand Avenue / Maple Street (3) 9.0 A 11.4 B 9.4 A 12.1 B A 11.5 B Grand Avenue / Broadway 15.9 B 17.1 B 15.9 B 17.0 B B 16.9 B Second Avenue / Centre City Parkway 21.4 C 24.5 C 21.5 C 24.6 C C 24.6 C Second Avenue / Orange Street 3.5 A 7.8 A 3.5 A 7.8 A A 7.8 A Second Avenue / Escondido Boulevard 18.4 B 20.9 C 18.5 B 21.1 C B 21.3 C Second Avenue / Maple Street (2) 26.5 D 78.7 F 29.1 D F D 98.4 F Second Avenue / Broadway 12.1 B 13.6 B 12.1 B 13.6 B B 13.6 B Maple Street / Parking Structure Access (2) 10.0 B 11.0 B 8.7 A 9.0 A Note: Deficient intersection operation shown in bold. Change in delay shown in bold indicates a project significant impact. (1) Seconds of delay per vehicle. (2) Indicates an unsignalized two-way stop-controlled intersection, in which the highest approach delay, rather than the average delay, is reported for two-way stop-controlled intersections. (3) Indicates an unsignalized all-way stop-controlled intersection. AM PM 30

38 Roadway Location #Lanes/Class Valley Parkway Grand Avenue Second Avenue Escondido Boulevard Maple Street Centre City Parkway to Orange Street Orange Street to Escondido Boulevard Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street Maple Street to Broadway Table 8 Existing Plus Project Daily Roadway Segment Conditions Without Maple Street Closure 5/One-Way 5/One-Way 3/One-Way 3/One-Way Daily Capacity Existing Without Project Existing Plus Project ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS Change In V/C 46,600 19, B 19, B ,600 19, B 19, B ,000 22, C 23, C ,000 19, B 19, B 0.01 Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street 4/ (1) 20,000 12, C 13, C 0.03 Maple Street to Broadway 4/ (1) 20,000 12, C 13, C 0.03 Centre City Parkway to Orange Street Orange Street to Escondido Boulevard Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street Maple Street to Broadway 3/One-Way 3/One-Way 3/One-Way 3/One-Way 35,000 17, B 18, B ,000 18, B 19, B ,000 18, B 18, B ,000 18, B 18, B 0.00 Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue 4/ 34,200 17, B 18, B 0.01 Grand Avenue to Second Avenue 4/ 34,200 14, B 14, B 0.00 Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue Grand Avenue to Second Avenue 2/Local (2) 10,000 2, A 4, B /Local (2) 10,000 1, A 2, A 0.03 Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue 4/ (1)(3) 20,000 10, C 10, C 0.01 Broadway 2/Local Grand Avenue to Second Avenue (2)(3) 10,000 6, C 6, C 0.00 Note: Deficient roadway segment operation shown in bold. (1) Indicates a four-lane with on-street parking permitted. (2) Indicates a two-lane with on-street parking permitted. The City Circulation Element does not include an Urban with permitted on-street parking, so the LOS thresholds and LOS E capacity for a Rural Two-Lane with on-street parking permitted was used in this case. (3) The City of Escondido Circulation Element classifies Broadway as a four-lane Major Arterial from Second Avenue to the north end of the city. However, the segment from Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue is constructed with four travel lanes with permitted on-street parking, and the segment from Grand Avenue to Second Avenue is constructed with two travel lanes with permitted on-street parking. 31

39 Roadway Location #Lanes/Class Valley Parkway Grand Avenue Second Avenue Escondido Boulevard Maple Street Centre City Parkway to Orange Street Orange Street to Escondido Boulevard Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street Maple Street to Broadway Table 9 Existing Plus Project Daily Roadway Segment Conditions With Maple Street Closure 5/One-Way 5/One-Way 3/One-Way 3/One-Way Daily Capacity Existing Without Project Existing Plus Project ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS Change In V/C 46,600 19, B 19, B ,600 19, B 19, B ,000 22, C 23, C ,000 19, B 21, C 0.06 Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street 4/ (1) 20,000 12, C 13, C 0.08 Maple Street to Broadway 4/ (1) 20,000 12, C 13, C 0.07 Centre City Parkway to Orange Street Orange Street to Escondido Boulevard Escondido Boulevard to Maple Street Maple Street to Broadway 3/One-Way 3/One-Way 3/One-Way 3/One-Way 35,000 17, B 18, B ,000 18, B 19, B ,000 18, B 18, B ,000 18, B 18, B 0.01 Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue 4/ 34,200 17, B 19, B 0.05 Grand Avenue to Second Avenue 4/ 34,200 14, B 14, B 0.00 Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue Grand Avenue to Second Avenue 2/Local (2) 10,000 2, A 4, B /Local (2) 10,000 1, A 1, A 0.00 Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue 4/ (1)(3) 20,000 10, C 12, C 0.10 Broadway 2/Local Grand Avenue to Second Avenue (2)(3) 10,000 6, C 6, C 0.03 Note: Deficient roadway segment operation shown in bold. (1) Indicates a four-lane with on-street parking permitted. (2) Indicates a two-lane with on-street parking permitted. The City Circulation Element does not include an Urban with permitted on-street parking, so the LOS thresholds and LOS E capacity for a Rural Two-Lane with on-street parking permitted was used in this case. (3) The City of Escondido Circulation Element classifies Broadway as a four-lane Major Arterial from Second Avenue to the north end of the city. However, the segment from Valley Parkway to Grand Avenue is constructed with four travel lanes with permitted on-street parking, and the segment from Grand Avenue to Second Avenue is constructed with two travel lanes with permitted on-street parking. 32

40

41

42 EXISTING PLUS CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS WITHOUT AND WITH PROJECT To determine the existing plus cumulative conditions in the project study area, forecast project traffic associated with City of Escondido approved or pending projects was added to existing traffic volumes. This formed the base conditions upon which traffic generated by the proposed project was added. The City of Escondido provided a list of sixteen (16) cumulative projects, summarized in Table 10. City staff provided cumulative project traffic data through the study area based on information from traffic impact studies prepared for some of the cumulative projects. Exhibit 17 shows the location of the cumulative projects. Exhibit 18 shows the peak hour cumulative project volumes at the study intersections, and Exhibit 19 shows the daily cumulative project volumes on the study roadway segments. As presented in Table 10, the cumulative projects are forecast to generate approximately 19,522 ADT, which includes approximately 1,160 a.m. peak hour trips and approximately 1,744 p.m. peak hour trips. Existing Plus Cumulative Level of Service Analysis Without Maple Street Closure, Without and With Project To determine the existing plus cumulative operating conditions with the proposed project, the forecast project-generated trips were added to the existing plus cumulative traffic volumes. Exhibits 20 and 21 show the existing plus cumulative a.m. and p.m. peak hour study intersection volumes without the Maple Street closure, without and with the project, respectively. Table 11 summarizes the existing plus cumulative peak hour intersection LOS without the Maple Street closure, without and with the proposed project. Detailed HCM calculation sheets are contained in Appendix G. 35

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT CITY OF BUENA PARK Prepared by Project No. 14139 000 April 17 th, 2015 DKS Associates Jeffrey Heald, P.E. Rohit Itadkar, T.E. 2677 North Main

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 661 BEAR VALLEY. Escondido, California September 1, LLG Ref

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 661 BEAR VALLEY. Escondido, California September 1, LLG Ref TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 661 BEAR VALLEY Escondido, California September 1, 2015 LLG Ref. 3-13-2299 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Project (Project) proposes the development of 55 residential dwelling units on 40.88

More information

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis Rim of the World Unified School District Reconfiguration Prepared for: Rim of the World School District 27315 North Bay Road, Blue Jay, CA 92317 Prepared by: 400 Oceangate,

More information

APPENDICES. Appendix R Traffic Impact Analysis (January 2017)

APPENDICES. Appendix R Traffic Impact Analysis (January 2017) APPENDICES Appendix R Traffic Impact Analysis (January 2017) 661 Bear Valley Parkway EIR March 2017 APPENDICES This page intentionally left blank 661 Bear Valley Parkway EIR March 2017 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

More information

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH, California November 11, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-14-2334 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Project proposes the development of 550 luxury residential dwelling units, public trails,

More information

APPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Lake Wohlford Dam Replacement Project EIR

APPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Lake Wohlford Dam Replacement Project EIR APPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Replacement Project EIR Appendices TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LAKE WOHLFORD DAM Escondido, California December 19,

More information

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT WEST HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2013 PREPARED FOR BEVERLY BOULEVARD ASSOCIATION PREPARED BY DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899

More information

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017 Movin Out June 2017 1.0 Introduction The proposed Movin Out development is a mixed use development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of West Broadway and Fayette Avenue in the City of Madison.

More information

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street IV.J TRANSPORTATION 1. INTRODUCTION This section presents an overview of the existing traffic and circulation system in and surrounding the project site. This section also discusses the potential impacts

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY. Escondido, California June 25, LLG Ref Transportation Engineer II

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY. Escondido, California June 25, LLG Ref Transportation Engineer II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY Escondido, California June 25, 2015 LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Prepared by: Pedram Massoudi Transportation Engineer II Under the Supervision of: John Boarman, P.E.

More information

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064523000 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas Prepared

More information

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for: TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY 2014 Prepared for: Hartford Companies 1218 W. Ash Street Suite A Windsor, Co 80550 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive

More information

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna

More information

Section 5.8 Transportation and Traffic

Section 5.8 Transportation and Traffic Section 5.8 Transportation and Traffic 5.8 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC Generous This Section is based on the Topgolf Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, Inc., October 31, 2016);

More information

Appendix Q Traffic Study

Appendix Q Traffic Study Appendices Appendix Q Traffic Study Crummer Site Subdivision Draft EIR City of Malibu Appendices This page intentionally left blank. The Planning Center April 2013 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Photo z here

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Shopko redevelopment located in Sugarhouse, Utah. The Shopko redevelopment project is located between 1300 East and

More information

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1

More information

LOTUS RANCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation Engineer II

LOTUS RANCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation Engineer II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LOTUS RANCH El Centro, California July 31, 2015February 12, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-14-2392 Prepared by: KC Yellapu, P.E Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation

More information

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below: 3.5 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.1.1 Street Network DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary... xii 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Study Area... 2 1.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios... 4 1.3 Study Area - City of Orange... 4 2.0 Project Description

More information

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.14.1 Summary Table 4.14-1 summarizes the identified environmental impacts, proposed mitigation measures, and residual impacts of the proposed project with regard to

More information

Appendix C. Traffic Study

Appendix C. Traffic Study Appendix C Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary PAGE 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Scope of Work... 1 1.2 Study Area... 2 2.0 Project Description... 3 2.1 Site Access... 4 2.2 Pedestrian

More information

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205

More information

APPENDIX D- TRAFFIC STUDY

APPENDIX D- TRAFFIC STUDY APPENDIX D- TRAFFIC STUDY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS IMPERIAL COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION County of Imperial, California March 06, 2018 LLG Ref. 3-17-2831 Prepared by: Jose R. Nunez Transportation Planner

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA Prepared For: McDonald s USA, LLC Pacific Sierra Region 2999 Oak Road, Suite 900 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared By:

More information

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily 5.8 TRAFFIC, ACCESS, AND CIRCULATION This section describes existing traffic conditions in the project area; summarizes applicable regulations; and analyzes the potential traffic, access, and circulation

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis

More information

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...

More information

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS SITUATED AT N/E/C OF STAUDERMAN AVENUE AND FOREST AVENUE VILLAGE OF LYNBROOK NASSAU COUNTY, NEW YORK TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO. 2018-089 September 2018 50 Elm Street,

More information

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: City of Berkeley Prepared by: REVISED JANUARY 9, 2009 Berkeley Downtown Area Plan Program EIR Traffic

More information

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1 Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West

More information

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study APPENDIX H Transportation Impact Study BUENA VISTA LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: San Diego Association of Governments Prepared by: VRPA Technologies, Inc. 9520 Padgett

More information

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios: 6.1 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 6.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the EIR presents the results of TJKM s traffic impact analysis of the proposed Greenbriar Development. The analysis includes consideration

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 1.1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 2 1.2 Executive Summary... 3 1.2.1 Site Location and Study Area... 3 1.2.2 Development Description... 3 1.2.3

More information

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Plainfield, Illinois August 2018 Prepared for: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Existing Conditions

More information

Perris Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis City of Perris, California

Perris Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis City of Perris, California Perris Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis City of Perris, California Prepared for: JD Pierce Company, Inc. 2222 Martin St., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 Prepared by: TJW ENGINEERING, INC. 540 N. Golden Circle

More information

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Camp Parkway Commerce Center is a proposed distribution and industrial center to be

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 24 UPDATED

More information

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study Prepared for: Armel Corporation January 2015 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. 22 King Street South, Suite 300 Waterloo ON N2J 1N8

More information

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By: TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Sacramento, CA Prepared For: MBK Homes Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road, Suite G Loomis, California 95650 (916) 660-1555

More information

MADERAS HOTEL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I

MADERAS HOTEL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS MADERAS HOTEL Poway, California June 21, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-16-2602 Prepared by: Amelia Giacalone Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I Under the

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald

More information

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA PREPARED FOR: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM 34 CIVIC CENTER BOULEVARD PHILADELPHIA, PA 1987 (61)

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This Section summarizes the information provided in the Traffic Study for the Santa Monica College Bundy Campus Master Plan (Traffic Study),

More information

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS... Crosshaven Drive Corridor Study City of Vestavia Hills, Alabama Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA... 3 Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

More information

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for: L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES

More information

Appendix G: Transportation/Traffic

Appendix G: Transportation/Traffic City of Irvine - William Lyon Homes: Vista Verde Draft EIR Appendix G: Transportation/Traffic Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client (PN-JN)\0006\00060034\EIR\3 - DEIR\00060034 Sec99-00 Appendix Dividers

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC INTRODUCTION The following section summarizes the information provided in the traffic report entitled Traffic Impact Analysis for a Proposed

More information

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015 5500 New Albany Road Columbus, Ohio 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Fax: 614.775.4800 Toll Free: 1-888-775-EMHT emht.com 2015-1008 MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES September 2, 2015 Engineers

More information

Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report 3.13 TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC

Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report 3.13 TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC 3.13 TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC As a result of the analysis undertaken in the Initial Study for the Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan, the (LACCD) determined that the proposed project may

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 1. INTRODUCTION This section is based on the technical report, Traffic Study for 10131 Constellation Boulevard Residential Project, prepared

More information

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo APPENDIX C-2 Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo The Mobility Group Transportation Strategies & Solutions Memorandum To: From: Subject: Tomas Carranza, LADOT Matthew Simons Traffic Review - Revised

More information

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways. 4.2 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This section presents the key assumptions, methods, and results of analysis for the transportation and circulation impacts of the proposed project. This section is based on

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS N. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS N. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS N. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC The following section summarizes the information provided in the traffic report entitled Traffic Impact Analysis for a Proposed Residential

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill, NC Prepared by: Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc. November 2009 Traffic Impact

More information

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report APPENDIX E Traffic Analysis Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK EAGLE RIVER TRAFFIC MITIGATION PHASE I OLD GLENN HIGHWAY/EAGLE RIVER ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Eagle River, Alaska

More information

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Administrative Draft Report Prepared For Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Moss

More information

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix

More information

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: September 10, 2014 PROJECT 5861.03 NO: PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis TO: Steve Holroyd - District

More information

Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project

Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project July 2004 Prepared for: The City of Berkeley 1031-1925 F EHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS 3685 Mt. Diablo Blvd. #301 Lafayette, CA 94549 925-284-3200 Fax:

More information

Section 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Section 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Section 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 5.2 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION/PARKING This section evaluates potential traffic-related and parking impacts associated with the proposed project. The following discussion

More information

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards 9.00 Introduction and Goals 9.01 Administration 9.02 Standards 9.1 9.00 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS City streets serve two purposes that are often in conflict moving traffic and accessing property. The higher

More information

LOTUS RANCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation Engineer II

LOTUS RANCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation Engineer II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LOTUS RANCH El Centro, California April 26, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-14-2392 Prepared by: KC Yellapu, P.E Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation Engineer II Under

More information

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 9 V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Throughout the study process several alternative alignments were developed and eliminated. Initial discussion

More information

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road James J. Copeland, P.Eng. GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 May 31, 2018 Ellen O Hara, P.Eng. Project Engineer DesignPoint Engineering & Surveying Ltd. 200 Waterfront

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION Chapel Hill, North Carolina FINAL REPORT Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill, NC Prepared by: Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc. December 2010

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Traffic Impact Analysis Update Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS

More information

Existing Traffic Conditions

Existing Traffic Conditions May 14, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss City of San Mateo 330 West 20 th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 Subject: Traffic Operational Study for the Proposed Tilton Avenue Residential Development in San Mateo, California

More information

Appendix B Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization

Appendix B Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization Appendix B Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization REPORT Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization Prepared for City of Los Angeles

More information

5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This section evaluates transportation- and traffic-related impacts that have the potential to result from the construction and operation of the Project. Information and analysis

More information

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study Final Report (Revised) March 2011 Submitted to: Groupe Lépine Ottawa Project No. 09-1613 Submitted by: Groupe Lépine

More information

Traffic Study for Barstow 2014 General Plan Amendment. Prepared for: The City of Barstow. Prepared by: ADVANTEC Consulting Engineers

Traffic Study for Barstow 2014 General Plan Amendment. Prepared for: The City of Barstow. Prepared by: ADVANTEC Consulting Engineers Traffic Study for Barstow 2014 General Plan Amendment Prepared for: The City of Barstow Prepared by: June 20, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary... 1 2. Project Background & Description... 3 2.1

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following analysis summarizes the findings and conclusions of the Traffic Analysis (Traffic Study), prepared by The Mobility Group,

More information

Appendix B Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization

Appendix B Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization Appendix B Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization DRAFT REPORT Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization Prepared for City of Los Angeles

More information

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Memorandum Date: February 7, 07 To: From: Subject: John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Introduction Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

More information

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Proposed Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Transportation Assessment St. Clair Township, Ontario September 2009 itrans Consulting Inc. 260

More information

Traffic Feasibility Study

Traffic Feasibility Study Traffic Feasibility Study Town Center South Robbinsville Township, Mercer County, New Jersey December 19, 2017 Prepared For Robbinsville Township Department of Community Development 2298 Route 33 Robbinsville,

More information

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared for: Department of Public Works Anne Arundel County Prepared by: URS Corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 3 Hunt Valley,

More information

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Prepared for: Submitted by: 299 Lava Ridge Ct. Suite 2 Roseville, CA. 95661 June 212 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 Project Location

More information

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited 105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited December 2016 Project Summary Project Number 162060 December 2016 Client Zelinka Priamo Ltd 318

More information

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan Valley Line West LRT Concept Plan Recommended Amendments Lewis Farms LRT Terminus Site Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan Lewis Farms LRT terminus site, 87 Avenue/West

More information

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Transportation & Traffic Engineering Transportation & Traffic Engineering 1) Project Description This report presents a summary of findings for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed by A+ Engineering, Inc. for the Hill Country Family

More information

LCPS Valley Service Center

LCPS Valley Service Center Traffic Impact Study LCPS Valley Service Center Loudoun County, Virginia November 4, 2015 Prepared For: Loudoun County Public Schools 21000 Education Court Ashburn, VA 20148 Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut

More information

Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center

Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center Draft Report September 2018 Prepared for: County of San Diego 5500 Overland Avenue, Suite 410 San Diego, CA 92123 Prepared by: 3900 Fifth

More information

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To Kumar Neppalli Traffic Engineering Manager Town of Chapel Hill From Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. Cc HNTB Project File: 38435 Subject Obey Creek TIS 2022

More information

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Warrenville, Illinois Prepared For: Prepared By: April 11, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Site Location...

More information

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study MRI May 2012 Appendix J Traffic Impact Study Level 2 Traffic Assessment Limited Impact Review Appendix J [This page was left blank intentionally.] www.sgm-inc.com Figure 1. Site Driveway and Trail Crossing

More information

700 University Avenue Mixed-Use Development. Traffic Impact Analysis

700 University Avenue Mixed-Use Development. Traffic Impact Analysis 700 University Avenue Mixed-Use Development Traffic Impact Analysis January 20, 2006 Prepared by 700 UNIVERSITY AVENUE MIXED- USE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary...

More information

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output NDSU Dept #2880 PO Box 6050 Fargo, ND 58108-6050 Tel 701-231-8058 Fax 701-231-6265 www.ugpti.org www.atacenter.org Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area 2015 Simulation Output Technical

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS M. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS M. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS M. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC INTRODUCTION This section of the (Draft EIR) addresses the subject of traffic and transportation with respect to the proposed (Project or

More information

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited. RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited June 16, 2016 116-638 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting

More information

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County. Subarea Study Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project Final Version 1 Washington County June 12, 214 SRF No. 138141 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Forecast Methodology

More information

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1 Executive Summary Introduction The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project is a vital public transit infrastructure investment that would provide a transit connection to the existing Metro Gold Line

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT Vallejo, CA Prepared For: ELITE DRIVE-INS, INC. 2190 Meridian Park Blvd, Suite G Concord, CA 94520 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road,

More information

7359 WISCONSIN AVENUE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

7359 WISCONSIN AVENUE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND 7359 WISCONSIN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND September 1, 2017 7359 Wisconsin Avenue September 2017 7359 WISCONSIN Local Area Transportation Review Montgomery County, Maryland September 1, 2017 Prepared

More information

DRAFT WATERMAN GARDENS MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

DRAFT WATERMAN GARDENS MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DRAFT WATERMAN GARDENS MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PREPARED FOR: Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino Pyatok Architects The Planning Center/DCE PREPARED BY: 3850 Vine Street, Suite 140

More information

Mineola Village Green

Mineola Village Green Traffic Impact Analysis Report Mineola Village Green 199 2 nd Street Mineola, New York Prepared for Mineola Metro LLC c/o Lalezarian Properties 1999 Marcus Avenue, Suite 310 Lake Success, NY 11042 Prepared

More information

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report #233087 v3 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report Washington County Public Works Committee Meeting September 28, 2016 1 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Hartford Area Development

More information

D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA. Prepared For:

D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA. Prepared For: D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA Prepared For: ASIAN PACIFIC GROUP 18000 Van Karman Avenue, Suite 500 Irvine, CA 92612 Prepared By: KD Anderson &

More information