FOCUSED TRAFFIC REPORT VVSD ESCONDIDO. Escondido, California December 18, LLG Ref
|
|
- Phillip Kennedy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FOCUSED TRAFFIC REPORT VVSD ESCONDIDO Escondido, California December 18, 2014 LLG Ref
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Veterans Village of San Diego (VVSD) Escondido residential project ( Project ) is a proposed smart growth expansion of an existing multi-family residential project located east of S. Escondido Boulevard and south of W. 15 th Avenue in the City of Escondido. Current and proposed parking is located on-site. Driveway access is via two existing full-access unsignalized intersections: one to S. Escondido Boulevard and one to W. 15 th Avenue. The Project proposes to renovate the existing site containing 10 multifamily units to provide a total of 54 units in a three story building. In addition, a small retail space (1,500 SF) housing a daytime delicatessen-type land use is proposed to provide employment for residents, and to allow compliance with the City s recent General Plan update land uses for this planning area. No changes to the Project s unsignalized access to W. 15 th Avenue and S. Escondido Boulevard are proposed. Using published SANDAG trip generation rates approved for use by the City of Escondido, the net increase of 44-units due to the Project would generate 416 weekday average daily trips (ADT) with 74 inbound/ 73 outbound trips during the AM peak hour, and 78 inbound/ 78 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. This focused traffic report provides discussion and evaluation of the existing street system (specifically operations at the adjacent S. Escondido Boulevard/ W. 15 th Street intersection and Project driveways), and compliance with the City s traffic study manual requirements as the City s parking codes. A nearterm cumulative analysis was also included, compiled from other pending projects in the area. Using analysis methodologies approved by the City of Escondido, the study s results show that the adjacent signalized intersection and unsignalized driveways would continue to operate at LOS B or better with the addition of both Project and cumulative projects traffic volumes. Adjacent segments of S. Escondido Boulevard currently operate at LOS E and F, and would continue to operate at subacceptable LOS without or with the Project. The Project impacts do not exceed the City s published thresholds of significance, and no mitigation measures are required. The Project meets the City s parking code requiring 84 spaces. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref ii N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction Project Description Project Location Project Description Project Access Existing Conditions Existing Transportation Conditions Existing Traffic Volumes Analysis Approach and Methodology City of Escondido - Approach City of Escondido Methodology Significance Criteria Analysis of Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Operations Daily Street Segment Operations Trip Generation/Distribution/Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution/Assignment Near Term Conditions Description of Cumulative Projects Analysis of Near-Term Scenarios Existing + Project Intersection Analysis Daily Segment Operations Existing + Cumulative Growth Intersection Analysis Daily Segment Operations Existing + Project + Cumulative Growth Intersection Analysis Daily Segment Operations Summary of Impacts/ Mitigation Measures LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref iii N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
4 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Intersection and Segment Volume Data B. Intersection Methodology and Near-Term Analysis Sheets C. City of Escondido Roadway Classification Tables LIST OF FIGURES SECTION FIGURE # FOLLOWING PAGE Figure 1 1 Vicinity Map... 2 Figure 2 1 Site Plan... 4 Figure 3 1 Existing Conditions Diagram... 7 Figure 3 2 Existing Traffic Volumes... 8 Figure 7 1 Project Traffic Distribution Figure 7 2 Project Traffic Volumes Figure 7 3 Existing + Project Traffic Volumes Figure 8 1 Cumulative Growth Traffic Volumes Figure 8 2 Existing + Cumulative Growth Traffic Volumes Figure 8 3 Existing + Project + Cumulative Growth Traffic Volumes LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref iv N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
5 LIST OF TABLES SECTION TABLE # PAGE Table 3 1 Existing Traffic Volumes... 6 Table 4 1 Traffic Impact Analysis ADT Thresholds for Inclusion of Roadway Segments Table 4 2 Traffic Impact Analysis ADT Thresholds for Inclusion of Intersections Table 5 1 City of Escondido Traffic Impact Significance Thresholds Table 6 1 Existing Intersection Operations Table 6 2 Existing Street Segment Operations Table 7 1 Weekday Project Trip Generation Table 9 1 Near-Term Intersection Operations Table 9 2 Near-Term Street Segment Operations... Error! Bookmark not defined. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref v N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
6 FOCUSED TRAFFIC REPORT VVSD ESCONDIDO Escondido, California December 18, INTRODUCTION Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) have prepared the following focused traffic report for the residential project (Project), which proposes to expand and improve an existing veteran-oriented residential development. The Project site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of S. Escondido Boulevard and W. 15 th Avenue in the City of Escondido. Figure 1 1 shows the Project vicinity. The focused traffic report includes the following: Project Description Existing Conditions Analysis Approach and Methodology Significance Criteria Analysis of Existing Conditions Project Trip Generation/Distribution/Assignment Near-Term Conditions Analysis of Near-term Scenarios Summary of Impacts/ Mitigation Measures LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
7 OCEANSIDE VISTA Legend City PACIFIC O C E A N Boundary Incorporated Unincorporated SOLANA BEACH N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 5 CARLSBAD DEL MAR ENCINITAS } SAN DIEGO CORONADO SAN MARCOS }56 }163 }52 }75 1 }15 ESCONDIDO NATIONAL CITY [_ PROJECT SITE 15 }94 POWAY LA MESA LEMON GROVE }54 }125 }125 SANTEE }94 }67 EL CAJON 8 [ Miles Figure 1-1 Vicinity Map
8 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location The Project is located at an existing site east of S. Escondido Boulevard, south of W. 15 th Avenue in the City of Escondido. There are currently 10 existing multi-family units operated by VVSD. 2.2 Project Description VVSD is proposing the development of affordable housing with a preference towards veterans and retail at 1540 S. Escondido Blvd, The Project will consist of three stories of affordable housing for low income veteran families. Sixty percent of the units will be targeted at 50% or below area median income (AMI); forty percent of the units at 60% or below AMI. On the 2 nd and 3 rd stories, 54 apartments will be developed to house low income veteran families. All of these apartments will be reserved for veterans earning at or below 60% AMI, including 60% of the units targeted at 50% or below AMI. First floor uses are proposed to be approximately 1,500 square feet of retail space for a delicatessen-type food business (day use) that will employ graduates of the VVSD s Culinary Arts program. 2.3 Project Access The Project site is currently developed with the same land uses as proposed, and is served via two existing full-access driveways; one to S. Escondido Boulevard, and one to W. 15 th Avenue. No changes to project access are proposed. Figure 2 1 shows the Project s Site Plan. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
9 W. 15th Ave S. Escondido Blvd N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 Figure 2-1 Project Traffic Distribution
10 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Effective evaluation of the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Project requires an understanding of the existing transportation system within the Project study area. Figure 3 1 shows an existing conditions diagram, including signalized/unsignalized intersections and lane configurations. The study area was determined in accordance with the City of Escondido s published Traffic Impact Analysis Requirement Guidelines (2014). Further details on the City s guidelines for developing the study area can be found in Section 4.0 of this report. The study area includes the following three (3) intersections and three (3) street segments. Intersections: 1. S. Escondido Boulevard/ W. 15 th Avenue (signalized) 2. S. Escondido Boulevard/ Project Driveway (unsignalized) 3. W. 15 th Avenue/ Project Driveway (unsignalized) Segments: 1. S. Escondido Boulevard north of W. 15 th Avenue 2. S. Escondido Boulevard south of W. 15 th Avenue 3. W. 15 th Avenue east of S. Escondido Boulevard 3.1 Existing Transportation Conditions The following is a brief description of the streets in the Project area. Roadway classifications and operational capacities are taken from the City of Escondido s General Plan Mobility Element (2011). S. Escondido Boulevard is a north/south facility within the City of Escondido. In the immediate Project vicinity, it is constructed as a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. North of W. 15 th Avenue, S. Escondido Boulevard is classified as a Collector, and provides a two-way left-turn lane with curbside parking. South of W. 15 th Avenue, S. Escondido Boulevard is classified as a Collector, and transitions from a 2-lane roadway to a 4-lane roadway south of the Project s driveway. This 4-lane portion is divided with a striped centerline, and provides for curbside parking. Bus stops are provided in both directions, just south of W. 15 th Avenue. W. 15 th Avenue is classified as a Local Collector on the City of Escondido s General Plan Circulation Element. In the vicinity of the Project, W. 15 th Avenue is constructed as a two-lane undivided roadway with residential fronting. No speed limit is posted in the project vicinity. Parking is prohibited in both directions of W. 15 th Avenue adjacent to the Project site. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
11 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Development of this focused traffic report occurred in late November and early December, when holiday schedules and weather events occurred that negated the opportunity to collect defensible data at the S. Escondido Boulevard/ W. 15th Avenue signalized intersection. However, recent data from a nearby cumulative project was available for the adjacent S. Escondido Boulevard/ W. Felicita Avenue signalized intersection located one block south. This data was collected in September of 2014, when schools were in session and weather was clear. Both W. 15th Avenue and W. Felicita Avenue are classified as Local Collector roadways on the City of Escondido s General Plan Circulation Element, and both intersect S. Escondido Boulevard at signalized intersections. As such, volume patterns such as K and D factors at the W. Felicita Avenue intersection are considered generally representative of those at W. 15th Avenue. LLG utilized ADT volumes on S. Escondido Boulevard and W. 15th Avenue from SANDAG, and made adjustments based on known growth in the area to develop 2014 ADT volumes. The known K and D factors from the adjacent 2014 counts were utilized to develop peak hour volumes and ADTs at the W. 15th Avenue intersection. Table 3 1 is a summary of the ADTs utilized in this report. Again, these volumes account for schools in session. Figure 3 2 shows the Existing Traffic Volumes. Appendix A contains the volume sheets used to develop intersection and segment volumes. Street Segment TABLE 3 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing Classification ADT a S. Escondido Boulevard North of W. 15 th Avenue Local Collector 14,400 South of W. 15 th Avenue Local Collector 15,300 W. 15 th Avenue East of S. Escondido Boulevard Local Collector 1,700 Footnotes: a. Average Daily Traffic Volume counts based on volumes collected in September 2014 commissioned by LLG Engineers. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
12 2U!( 1!( 2!( 3 * Êe ee S. Escndido Bl * W. 15th Ave!$ S. Escndido Bl Proj Dwy!$ Proj Dwy W. 15th Ave 1 2U 2U 2U 3 2 Project Site S. Maple St Orange Pl # Number of Travel Lanes D / U Divided / Undivided Roadway Two-Way Left Turn Lane Turn Lane Configurations Intersection Control Sneaker Lane * No Parking 4U S. Escondido Bl Bus Stop N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 Figure 3-1 Existing Conditions Diagram
13 !( 1!( 2!( 3 4 / / / 30 5 / 9 5 / 2 36 / 22 S. Escndido Bl 5 / 12 5 / 2 1 / 0 71 / 44 2 / 1 81 / 58 W. 15th Ave 484 / / 1 24 / / / 52 S. Escndido Bl 471 / / 2 Proj Dwy 63 / 84 0 / 1 Proj Dwy 1 / 0 W. 15th Ave 14, , Project Site S. Maple St 15,300 Orange Pl!# Study Intersections AM / PM AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes XX,XXX Average Daily Trips S. Escondido Bl N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 Figure 3-2 Existing Traffic Volumes
14 4.0 ANALYSIS APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 4.1 City of Escondido - Approach Level of service (LOS) is the term used to denote the different operating conditions which occur on a given roadway segment under various traffic volume loads. It is a qualitative measure used to describe a quantitative analysis taking into account factors such as roadway geometries, signal phasing, speed, travel delay, freedom to maneuver, and safety. LOS provides an index to the operational qualities of a roadway segment or an intersection. LOS designations range from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F representing the worst operating conditions. LOS designation is reported differently for signalized intersections, unsignalized intersections and roadway segments. The City of Escondido s recently published Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines provide the following direction on report approach and methodology: 1. The traffic study should include a SANDAG prepared Select Zone Assignment for the project to determine the project traffic distribution. 2. The traffic study should utilize the Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) published by SANDAG, to determine the project traffic volume. 3. Traffic should utilize the following scenarios to determine project traffic impacts at intersections and along roadway segments. a. Existing Condition (based on new traffic counts) b. Existing + Project Traffic Condition c. Existing + Cumulative Projects Traffic Condition d. Existing + Cumulative Projects + Project Traffic Condition e. Year 2035 Traffic Condition 4. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM Year 2010) should be utilized to determine LOS for intersections. 5. The study area should include at least all site access points and major intersections (signalized and unsignalized) adjacent to the site. The tables below contain the trigger-points to identify if a roadway segment or intersection should be included in the Traffic Impact Analysis. Table 4 1 below contains the trigger-points for the inclusion of roadway segments within the study area for different street classifications based on ADT added to the segment. Table 4 2 below contains the trigger-points for the inclusion of intersections based on peak hour volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
15 TABLE 4 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ADT THRESHOLDS FOR INCLUSION OF ROADWAY SEGMENTS Street Classification Lanes Cross Sections (ft.) TIA Trigger-Points (ADT generation) Prime Arterial Major Road Collector (8 lanes) 116/136 (NP) 900 (6 lanes) 106/126 (NP) 800 (6 lanes) 90/110 (NP) 700 (4 lanes) 82/102 (NP) 500 (4 lanes) 64/84 (NP) 500 (4 lanes) (WP) 250 Local Collector and all other (2 lanes) 42/66 (NP) (WP) 200 TABLE 4 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ADT THRESHOLDS FOR INCLUSION OF INTERSECTIONS Intersection Classification (Minor leg of the intersection) TIA Trigger-Points (AM or PM peak hour trips added to any leg) Prime Arterial 50 Major Road 40 Collector 30 Local Collector 20 [DISCUSS SIZE OF PROJECT & CONSISTENCY W/ZONING, EXPLAIN WHY FOCUSED AND WHAT IS INCLUDED] 4.2 City of Escondido Methodology This traffic analysis includes intersections and street segments in the City of Escondido, which utilizes the published HCM methodology for evaluating signalized and unsignalized intersections. LOS criteria for Circulation Element roadways is based on published capacity tables. The following is a discussion of the these methodologies: Signalized intersections were analyzed under AM and PM peak hour conditions. Average vehicle delay was determined utilizing the methodology found in Chapter 18 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), with the assistance of the Synchro (version 8) computer software. The delay values (represented in seconds) were qualified with a corresponding intersection LOS. Signalized intersection calculation worksheets and a more detailed explanation of the methodology are attached in Appendix B. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
16 Unsignalized intersections were analyzed under AM and PM peak hour conditions. Average vehicle delay and LOS was determined based upon the procedures found in Chapters 19 and 20 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), with the assistance of the Synchro (version 8) computer software. Unsignalized intersection calculation worksheets and a more detailed explanation of the methodology are attached in Appendix B. Daily street segment analysis is based upon the comparison of daily traffic volumes (ADTs) to the City of Escondido Roadway Classification, Level of Service, and ADT Table. This table provides segment capacities for different street classifications based on traffic volumes and roadway characteristics. These tables are contained in Appendix C. 5.0 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA Project impacts to intersection and roadway segments (both daily and peak hour impacts) are assessed in accordance with the published City of Escondido Proposed Thresholds to Identify Significant Traffic Impact table. This table is also contained in SANTEC/ITE Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies in the San Diego Region. Based on these tables, Table 5 1 shows the following thresholds which shall be used to identify if a project causes a significant traffic impact under any scenario. If these values are exceeded in a roadway segment or an intersection that is operating at LOS D or worse, it is determined to be a significant impact and the project shall identify mitigation measures. Level of Service With Project TABLE 5 1 CITY OF ESCONDIDO TRAFFIC IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS Allowable Change due to Project Impact Roadway Segments Intersections V/C a Speed Reduction (mph) b Delay (sec.) c D, E, or F Footnotes: a. Volume to Capacity for daily segments analyses b. Speed in MPH for peak hour arterial operations c. Delay in seconds for signalized and unsignalized intersection analyses Intersections Traffic volume increases from public or private projects that result in one or more of the following criteria will have a significant traffic volume or LOS traffic impact on intersections: The additional or redistributed ADT generated by the proposed project will significantly increase congestion on an intersection currently operating at LOS E or LOS F, or will cause an intersection to operate at a LOS E or LOS F as identified in Table 5 1. Based upon an evaluation of existing accident rates, the signal priority list, intersection geometrics, proximity of adjacent driveways, sight distance, or other factors, the project would significantly impact the operations of the intersection. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
17 6.0 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 6.1 Peak Hour Intersection Operations Table 6 1 summarizes the existing peak hour intersection operations. As shown, the study area intersections are calculated to operate at acceptable LOS B or better in both the AM and PM peak hours. 6.2 Daily Street Segment Operations Table 6 2 summarizes the existing segment operations along the key study area roadways. As shown, the study area street segments on S. Escondido Boulevard are calculated to operate at E or worse. W. 15 th Avenue is calculated to operate at LOS A. TABLE 6 1 EXISTING INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Intersection Control Type Peak Hour Delay a Existing LOS b 1. S. Escondido Boulevard/ W. 15 th Avenue Signal 2. S. Escondido Boulevard/ Project Driveway MSSC c 3. W. 15 th Avenue/ Project Driveway MSSC AM 13.4 B PM 12.2 B AM 13.4 B PM 14.4 B AM 9.3 A PM 0.0 A Footnotes: a. Average delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. b. Level of Service. c. Minor Street Stop Controlled intersection, Minor street left-turn delay is reported. SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED DELAY/LOS THRESHOLDS DELAY/LOS THRESHOLDS Delay LOS Delay LOS A A 10.1 to 20.0 B 10.1 to 15.0 B 20.1 to 35.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 C 35.1 to 55.0 D 25.1 to 35.0 D 55.1 to 80.0 E 35.1 to 50.0 E 80.1 F 50.1 F LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
18 Street Segment TABLE 6 2 EXISTING STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS Buildout Classification Capacity (LOS E) a ADT b LOS c V/C d S. Escondido Boulevard North of W. 15 th Avenue Collector 15,000 14,400 E South of W. 15 th Avenue Collector 15,000 15,300 F W. 15 th Avenue East of S. Escondido Boulevard Local Collector 15,000 1,700 A Footnotes: a. Existing Capacities shown, based on City of Escondido Roadway Classification Table. b. Average Daily Traffic Volumes c. Level of Service d. Volume to Capacity LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
19 7.0 TRIP GENERATION/DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT 7.1 Trip Generation The Project proposes remodeling and improvements to the existing site to include an additional 44 multifamily residential units. In addition, a modest 1,500 SF of delicatessen uses are proposed. The deli use will be staffed by project residents, and is consistent with the land use zoning for this site based on the City s General Plan. Upon completion, the site will provide a total of 54 multifamily dwelling units. The weekday traffic generation calculations were conducted using the trip generation rates published in the SANDAG s Not so Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for San Diego Region (April 2002). The land uses utilized from that table were residential: apartment, and restaurant: delicatessen (7am 4pm). Table 7 1 shows a summary of weekday Project traffic generation. The Project is calculated to generate 416 daily trips with 74 inbound/ 73 outbound trips during the AM peak hour, and 78 inbound/ 78 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. As the on-site deli-use will provide exclusive employment for residents and there are transit stops located on S. Escondido Boulevard immediately adjacent the Project, standard mixed-use and transit reductions were applied (10% and 5%, respectively). As discussed in Section 2.2, the Project is not proposing typical market-rate, multifamily residential units. Rather, VVSD is proposing affordable housing with a preference towards veterans. With sixty percent of the units targeted at 50% or below AMI, and another forty percent targeted at 60% or below AMI, it is very likely that vehicle ownership and the related trip-making and parking effects will be well below the volumes analyzed in this report. Thus, the trip generation shown on Table 7 1 is considered conservative and worst-case. Actual volumes are expected to be much less. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
20 Land Use Size TABLE 7 1 WEEKDAY PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Daily Trip Ends (ADTs) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate a Volume % of ADT In:Out Volume % of In:Out Volume Split In Out ADT Split In Out Apartment 44 Units 6 /Unit 264 8% 20: % 70: Delicatessen 1,500 SF 150 /KSF 225 9% 60: % 30: Subtotal Mixed-Use Reduction (10%) b (49) (9) (9) (9) (9) Transit Reduction (5%) c (24) (4) (4) (5) (5) Net Total Trips Footnotes: a. Rates based on SANDAG s (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002, and reflect typical market-rate apartments. b. Mixed-use reduction based on SANDAG s (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April The delicatessen will be owned and operated by VVSD, and will be staffed exclusively with residents from the adjacent apartments. c. Transit reduction based on SANDAG s (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April S. Escondido Boulevard is a substantive transit corridor with bus stops immediately adjacent to the site. General Notes: 1. No reductions in trip generation were taken for the less-than AMI nature of the anticipated residents. Therefore, these volumes shown represent a higher-than-likely trip generation, and thus a conservative analysis. 7.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment Based on existing patterns at the site, the Project team has determined that 60% of residents would utilize the driveway to S. Escondido Boulevard, while 40% would utilize the driveway to W. 15 th Avenue. An initial assignment of driveway trips utilizing this distribution was made, and then refined so as not to have redundant trip through the S. Escondido Boulevard/ W. 15 th Avenue intersection. An example would include outbound trips from the S. Escondido Boulevard driveway destined for eastbound W. 15 th Avenue. These volumes were reassigned to the more proximate W. 15 th Avenue driveway. Figure 7 1 shows the Project trip distribution percentages. The volumes on Tables 7 1 and 7 2 were multiplied by the distribution on Figure 7 1 to yield the Project traffic assignment. Figure 7 2 shows the AM/PM peak hour Project traffic volumes. This was added to the existing volumes to yield Existing + Project volumes, as shown on Figure 7 3. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
21 50% 10% 2 40% % Project Site S. Maple St 40% Orange Pl S. Escondido Bl XX% X% Bidirectional RegionalTraffic Distribution Driveway Distribution N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 Figure 7-1 Project Distribution
22 !( 1!( 2!( 3 22 / / 16 S. Escndido Bl 22 / 23 W. 15th Ave 22 / / / 31 7 / 8 Proj Dwy 15 / 16 S. Escndido Bl 30 / 31 Proj Dwy 14 / 16 7 / 8 W. 15th Ave Project Site S. Maple St 166 Orange Pl!# Study Intersections AM / PM AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes XX,XXX Average Daily Trips S. Escondido Bl N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 Figure 7-2 Project Traffic Volumes
23 !( 1!( 2!( 3 4 / / / 46 5 / 9 5 / 2 36 / 22 S. Escndido Bl 5 / 12 5 / 2 71 / 44 W. 15th Ave 484 / / / / / / / 52 S. Escndido Bl 471 / / 33 Proj Dwy 63 / / 17 Proj Dwy 81 / 58 7 / 8 15 / 16 7 / 8 W. 15th Ave 14, , Project Site S. Maple St 15,466 Orange Pl!# Study Intersections AM / PM AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes XX,XXX Average Daily Trips S. Escondido Bl N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 Figure 7-3 Existing + Project Traffic Volumes
24 8.0 NEAR TERM CONDITIONS 8.1 Description of Cumulative Projects Cumulative projects are other projects in the study area that will add traffic to the local circulation system in the near future. LLG has recently coordinated with City of Escondido to determine and obtain cumulative projects traffic volume information for other projects in the general vicinity. 1. Emmanuel Faith Community Church proposes a master plan that includes a preschool that would generate 1,056 weekday ADT, with 173 total AM peak hour trips (87 inbound/ 86 outbound) and 62 trips total PM peak hour trips (92 inbound/ 92 outbound). The nature of these trips is largely pass-by, as most parents are dropping off/picking up children at the preschool as part of a to-or-from work trip. A modest 6% of these trips were forecasted on S. Escondido Boulevard in the vicinity of the project. In addition, LLG added forecasted ambient growth to account for any other projects not included above. LLG interpolated growth between Year 2035 and existing Year 2014 traffic counts. Typical annual growth ranged between 2-5% at study area intersections and segments. Location-specific growth factors were applied to each study area location for a period of five (5) years to arrive at ambient growth volumes which were added to the identified cumulative projects to set near-term baseline traffic volumes. Figure 8 1 shows the total cumulative growth traffic volumes. Figure 8 2 shows the existing + cumulative growth traffic volumes. Figure 8 3 shows the existing + project + cumulative growth traffic volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
25 !( 1!( 2!( 3 1 / 1 42 / 28 1 / 3 1 / 0 1 / 0 3 / 1 S. Escndido Bl 1 / 1 1 / 0 5 / 3 W. 15th Ave 34 / 33 0 / 1 1 / 0 0 / 1 2 / 2 28 / 32 3 / 4 S. Escndido Bl 33 / 37 1 / 0 Proj Dwy 3 / 6 0 / 1 Proj Dwy 1 / 0 5 / 4 W. 15th Ave Project Site S. Maple St 973 Orange Pl!# Study Intersections AM / PM AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes XX,XXX Average Daily Trips S. Escondido Bl N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 Figure 8-1 Cumulative Growth Traffic Volumes
26 !( 1!( 2!( 3 5 / / / 33 6 / 9 6 / 2 39 / 23 S. Escndido Bl 6 / 13 6 / 2 2 / 0 76 / 47 2 / 2 86 / 62 W. 15th Ave 518 / / 2 26 / / / 56 S. Escndido Bl 504 / / 2 Proj Dwy 66 / 90 0 / 2 Proj Dwy 2 / 0 W. 15th Ave 15, , Project Site S. Maple St 16,243 Orange Pl!# Study Intersections AM / PM AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes XX,XXX Average Daily Trips S. Escondido Bl N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 Figure 8-2 Existing + Cumulative Growth Traffic Volumes
27 !( 1!( 2!( 3 5 / / / 49 6 / 9 6 / 2 39 / 23 S. Escndido Bl 6 / 13 6 / 2 76 / 47 W. 15th Ave 518 / / / / / / / 56 S. Escndido Bl 504 / / 33 Proj Dwy 66 / / 18 Proj Dwy 86 / 62 7 / 8 16 / 16 7 / 8 W. 15th Ave 15, , Project Site S. Maple St 16,409 Orange Pl!# Study Intersections AM / PM AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes XX,XXX Average Daily Trips S. Escondido Bl N:\2404\Figures Date: 12/16/14 Figure 8-3 Existing + Project + Cumulative Growth Traffic Volumes
28 9.0 ANALYSIS OF NEAR-TERM SCENARIOS The following is a summary of the operational analyses for the street segment and intersections for the near-term traffic scenarios. All intersection analyses are contained in Appendix B. 9.1 Existing + Project Intersection Analysis Table 9 1 summarizes the peak hour intersection operations with the addition of Project traffic. Table 9 1 shows that the study area intersections continue to operate at LOS B or better Daily Segment Operations Table 9 2 summarizes the roadway segment operations with the addition of Project traffic. This table shows that while the LOS on the S. Escondido Boulevard segments remain at LOS E or worse, the Project s V/C contribution does not exceed the allowable 0.02 increase. No significant direct impacts area calculated despite the continuing poor level of service. 9.2 Existing + Cumulative Growth Intersection Analysis Table 9 1 summarizes the peak hour intersection operations with the addition of cumulative growth traffic. Table 9 1 shows that all study area intersections are calculated to continue to operate at LOS B or better Daily Segment Operations Table 9 2 summarizes the roadway segment operations with the addition of cumulative growth traffic. This table shows that the S. Escondido Boulevard segments in the study area continue to operate at LOS F with the addition of cumulative growth traffic. 9.3 Existing + Project + Cumulative Growth Intersection Analysis Table 9 1 summarizes the peak hour intersection operations for Existing + Cumulative Growth + Project conditions. The addition of Project traffic results in continued LOS B or better operations at the study area intersections Daily Segment Operations Table 9 2 summarizes the roadway segment operations for the Existing + Cumulative Growth + Project conditions. While the LOS on the S. Escondido Boulevard segments remain at LOS F as compared to Existing + Cumulative, the Project s V/C contribution still does not exceed the allowable 0.02 increase. No significant cumulative impacts area calculated despite the continuing poor level of service. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
29 TABLE 9 1 NEAR-TERM INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Intersection Control Type 1. S. Escondido Blvd./ W. 15 th Ave Signal 2. S. Escondido Blvd./ Project Dwy MSSC d 3. W. 15 th Ave./ Project Dwy MSSC Peak Hour Existing Existing + Project Existing + Cumulative Growth Existing + Cumulative Growth + Project Delay a LOS b Delay LOS Δ c Delay LOS Delay LOS Δ AM 13.4 B 14.0 B B 14.8 B 0.6 No PM 12.2 B 12.9 B B 13.3 B 0.8 No AM 13.4 B 14.7 B B 15.3 B 2.0 No PM 14.4 B 15.0 B B 15.8 B 0.8 No AM 9.3 A 9.3 A A 9.4 A 0.0 No PM 0.0 A 9.4 A A 9.4 A 9.4 No Sig Impact? Footnotes: a. Average delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. b. Level of Service. c. Δ denotes an increase in minor street delay due to project. d. MSSC Minor Street Stop Controlled intersection. SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED DELAY/LOS THRESHOLDS DELAY/LOS THRESHOLDS Delay LOS Delay LOS A A 10.1 to 20.0 B 10.1 to 15.0 B 20.1 to 35.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 C 35.1 to 55.0 D 25.1 to 35.0 D 55.1 to 80.0 E 35.1 to 50.0 E 80.1 F 50.1 F LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
30 Street Segment S. Escondido Boulevard Existing Capacity (LOS E) a Existing TABLE 9 2 NEAR-TERM STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS Existing + Project Existing + Cumulative Projects Existing + Cumulative Projects + Project ADT b LOS c V/C d ADT LOS V/C Δ e ADT LOS V/C ADT LOS V/C Δ e North of W. 15 th Avenue 15,000 14,400 E ,608 E ,373 F ,581 F No South of W. 15 th Avenue 15,000 15,300 F ,466 F ,243 F ,409 F No W. 15 th Avenue East of S. Escondido Boulevard 15,000 1,700 A ,742 A ,810 A ,852 A No Footnotes: a) Existing Capacities shown, based on the City of Escondido Roadway Classification Table (See Appendix C). b) Average Daily Traffic c) Level of Service d) Volume to Capacity ratio e) Δ denotes a Project-induced increase in the Volume to Capacity (V/C) ratio. Sig Impact? LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
31 10.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS/ MITIGATION MEASURES Addition of Project traffic volumes to the local street system does not result in significant impacts based on the City s published criteria. No mitigation measures are required. End of Report LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref N:\2404\First Submittal\2404.First Submittal.doc
32 TECHNICAL APPENDICES VVSD ESCONDIDO Escondido, California December 18, 2014 LLG Ref
33 APPENDIX A INTERSECTION AND STREET SEGMENT COUNT SHEETS LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref
34 City of Escondido Average Weekday Traffk Volumes Primani Street 1 Cross Street 2 Cross Street EL NORTE PKWY WOODLAND PKWY COUNTRY CLUB LN N N N N El NORTE PKWY COUNTRY CLUB LN BENNETT AVE N N N N EL NORTE PKWY BENNETT AVE NORDAHL RD N N N N El NORTE PKWY NORDAHL RD INTERSTATE N N N N EL NORTE PKWY INTERSTATE 15 IRIS LN (S) N N N N EL NORTE PKWY IRIS LN (S) CENTRE CITY PKWY N N N N EL NORTE PKWY CENTRE CITY PKWY ESCONDIDO BLVD N N N N El NORTE PKWY ESCONDIDO BLVD NBROADWAY N N N N EL NORTE PKWY NBROADWAY FIG ST N N N N EL NORTE PKWY FIG ST ASH ST N N N N EL NORTE PKWY ASH ST ROSE ST 1 llooo N N N N EL NORTE PKWY ROSE ST MIDWAY DR N N N N EL NORTE PKWY MIDWAY DR CITRUS AVE N N N!1400!1400 N ENCINO DR IDAHO AVE 17TH AVE 1000N 1000 N 1000 N N ENCINO DR 17TH AVE ELDORADO DR 1600N 1600 N 1600 N N ENCINO DR ELDORADO DR SEAR VALLEY PKWY N 1600 N 1600 N N ENTERPRISE ST MISSION RD VINEYARD AVE 2!!00 N 2900 N 2900 N N ENTERPRISE ST END ANDREASEN DR 1000N 1000 N 1000 N N ENTERPRISE ST ANDREASEN DR HARMONY GROVE RO 5200N 5200 N 5200 N N ESCONOIDO BLVD EL NORTE PKWY DECATIJR WY 7500N 7500 N 7500 N N ESCONDIDO Bl VD DECATUR WY llncoln AVE 9600N 9600 N 9600 N N ESCONDIDO BLVD LINCOLN AVE MISSION AVE N 9600 N 9600 N N ESCONDIDO BLVD MISSION AVE WASHINGTON AVE N N N N ESCONDIDO lllvd WASHINGTON AVE VALLEY PKWY N N N N ESCONDIDO l!l VD VALLEY PKWY GRAND AVE N N N 1S500 15SOO N ESCONOIDO BLVD GRAND AVE 2NDAVE N N N N ESCONDIDO SL VD 2ND AVE STH AVE N N N N ESCONDIDO BLVD STHAVE 9TH AVE N N N N ESCONDIDO BLVD 9THAVE 13TH AVE N N N N ESCONDIDO lllvd 13THAVE FELICITA AVE N N N N N = Link not counted in that yeal Previous year's count carried forward. E = No actual count ADT was estimated by the reporting jurisdiction.
35 City of Escondido Average Weekday Traffk Volumes Primani Street 1 Cross Street 2 Cross Street ESCONDIDO Bl VD FEUClTAAVE CENTRE CITY PKWY RAMP N N N N E5COND1DO Bl VD CENTER CITY PKWY RAMP BROTHERTON RD 4600N 4600 N 4600 N N ESCONDIDO Bl VD BROTHERTON RD CITRACADO PKWY 4100N 4100 N 4100 N N EUCALYPTUS AVE HAMILTONLN VIA RANCHO PKWY N 2700 N N FELICITA AVE JUNIPER ST ESCONDIDO BLVD N N N N FELICITA AVE ESCONDIDO BLVD CENTRE CITY PKWY N N N N FELICITA AVE CENTRE CITY PKWY REDWOOD ST N N N N FELICITA RD REDWOOD ST CITRACADO PKWY N N N N FELICITA RD CITRACADO PKWY HAMILTON LN 6100N 6100 N 6100 N 5900 S900N FIG ST El NORTE PKWY LINCOLN AVE 3300N 3300 N 3300 N N FIG ST LINCOLN AVE MISSION AVE SOOON 8000 N 8000 N N FIG ST MISSION AVE WASHINGTON AVE 7000N 7000 N 7000 N N FIG ST WASHINGTON AVE VALLEY PKWY 90001\ N 9000 N!l \1 FIG ST VALLEY PKWY GRAND AVE 2400N 2400 N 2400N N GLEN RIDGE RD BEAR VALLEY PKWY CITRUS AVE N 3900 N N GRAND AVE (EIB 1 WAY) VALLEY PKWY TULIP ST (S) \ N N N GRAND AVE (EIB 1 WAY) TULIP ST (S) QUINCE ST 22700N N N N GRAND AVE QUINCE ST CENTRE CITY PKWY 2SOON 2500 N 2500 N 2SOO 2SOON GRAND AVE CENTRE CITY PKWY ESCONDIDO Bl VD 1W90 N N N N GRAND AVE ESCOl\IOIOO BLVD BROADWAY N N N N GRAND AVE BROADWAY JUNIPER ST N N N 13SOO N GRAND AVE JUNIPER ST VALLEY BLVD N N N \1 GRAND AVE VALlEYBLVD 21\10 AVE (E.B. RAMP) 11900N N N N GRAND AVE 2ND AVE (E,B. RAMP) FIG ST N N N N GRAND AVE FIG ST DATE ST N N N SOO 1\1 GRAND AVE DATE ST ASH ST N N N l!llloo N GRAND AVE ASH ST ROSE ST 1S600 N 1S600 N N N GRAND AVE ROSE ST MIDWAY DR N N N \1 GRAND AVE MIDWAY DR BEAR \/ALlEY PKWY S100N 5100 N 5100 N N HALE AVE WASHINGTON AUTO PARK WY 1SSOO N N N N N = Link not counted in that year. Previous year's count carried forward. E = No actual count ADT was estimated by the reporting jurisdiction.
36 City of Escondido Primani Street 1 Cross Street 2ND AVE (EJB 1-WAY} ESCONDIDO BLVD 2ND AVE (E/ll 1-WAY} S BROADWAY 2ND AVE (Elll 1-WAY} JUNIPER ST 3RD AVE ESCONDIOO BLVD 3RDAVE MAPLE ST STH AVE TULIP ST STH AVE QUINCE ST STH AVE CENTRE CITY PKWY 5TH AVE ESCONDIDO BLVD STH AVE S BROADWAY STH AVE JUNIPER ST 9TH AVE HALE AVE 9TH AVE VALLEY PKWY 9TH AVE INTERSTATE 15 9TH AVE TULIP ST 9TH AVE QUINCE ST 9TH AVE CENTRE CITY PKWY!ITH AVE ESCONDIDO Ill VD 9TH AVE JUNIPER ST 11THAVE HALE AVE 13THAVE TULIP ST 13THAVE QUINCE ST 13THAVE CENTRE CITY PKWY 13THAVE ESCONDIDO Ill VD 15THAVE ESCONDIDO BLVD Average Weekday Traffk Volumes 2 Cross Street SBROADWAY N N N JUNIPER ST N N N VALLEY BLVD N N N MAPLE ST 1SOON 1SOO N 1500 N 1600 BROADWAY 32001\ N 3200N 3200 QUINCE ST 2200N 2200 N 2200 N 2300 CENTRE CITY PKWY SOOON 5000 N 5000 N 5000 ESCONDIDO BlVD!lllOO N 9000 N 9000 N 9000 SBROADWAY 5200N 5200 N 5200 N 5200 JUNIPER ST 5400N 5400 N 5400 N 5400 DATE ST 34001\ N 3400 N 3500 VALLEY PKWY N N N 9500 AUTO PARK WY 1QOOO N N N TULIP ST N N N QUINCE ST N N N CENTRE CITY PKWY N N N ESCONDIDO BLVD N N N JUNIPER ST S300N 5300 N 5300 N 5300 CHESTNUT ST 1900 N 1900 N 1900 N 2900 VALLEY PKWY 1250N 1250 N 1250 N 1300 QUINCE ST 2600 N 2600 N 2600 N 2600 CENTRE CITY PKWY 27001\ N 2700 N 2700 ESCONDIDO BLVD 4100N 4100 N 4100 N 4100 JUNIPER ST N 3800 N 3800 N 3900 JUNIPER ST 1SOON 1500 N 1500 N N N N 16001\ N 2300N SOOON 9000N S200N 5400N 3500 N 95001\ N N N N N 53001\ N BOON 2600N 2700N 4100 N 39001\1 1SOON N = Link not counted in that yeal Previous year's count carried forward E = No actual count ADT was estimated by the reporting jurisdiction.
37 Turn Count Summary Accurate Video Counts Inc (619) Location: Date of Count: Analysts: Weather: AVC Proj No: W. Felicita S. Escondido Blvd Thursday, September 18, 2014 LV/CD Sunny / 4 / / / 15 / 8 1 / / / / 144 / 17 / / / / 89 1 / 4 14 / / / / / S. Escondido Blvd W. Felicita Ave 15 5 Time Period PHF W. Felicita Ave S. Escondido Blvd 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM P.O. Box San Diego CA /25/2014
38 Vehicular Count Accurate Video Counts Inc (619) Location: Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 7:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total , ,001 AM Intersection Peak Hour : W. Felicita Ave AM Period (7:00 AM - 9:00 AM) Westbound Northbound 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM S. Escondido Blvd Eastbound Intersection PHF : 0.93 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume ,764 PHF Movement PHF PM Period (4:00 PM - 6:00 PM) Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 4:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total , , ,616 PM Intersection Peak Hour : 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM Intersection PHF : 0.95 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume PHF Movement PHF P.O. Box San Diego CA /25/2014
39 24 Hour Segment Count Accurate Video Counts Inc (619) Location: Orientation: 1. E. Felicita Ave, Maple St to Juniper St East-West Date of Count: Thursday, July 24, 2014 Analysts: Weather: DASH Sunny AVC Proj. No: Hour Segment Volume 19,492 Time Hourly Volume Hourly Volume Time EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM - 1:00 AM :00 PM - 1:00 PM ,112 1:00 AM - 2:00 AM :00 PM - 2:00 PM :00 AM - 3:00 AM :00 PM - 3:00 PM ,143 3:00 AM - 4:00 AM :00 PM - 4:00 PM ,289 4:00 AM - 5:00 AM :00 PM - 5:00 PM ,390 5:00 AM - 6:00 AM :00 PM - 6:00 PM ,489 6:00 AM - 7:00 AM ,077 6:00 PM - 7:00 PM ,443 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM ,009 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM ,120 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM :00 PM - 9:00 PM ,001 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM :00 PM - 10:00 PM :00 AM - 11:00 AM :00 PM - 11:00 PM :00 AM - 12:00 PM :00 PM - 12:00 AM Total 2,994 4,044 7,038 Total 7,683 4,771 12, Hour EB Volume 10, Hour WB Volume 8,815 EB WB Total 1,600 7:00-9:00 4:00-6:00 1,400 1,200 1, :00 AM 2:00 AM 4:00 AM 6:00 AM 8:00 AM 10:00 AM 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 8:00 PM 10:00 PM P.O. Box San Diego CA /8/2014
40 APPENDIX B PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref
41 Existing AM 1: W. 15th Ave & S. Escondido Blvd 12/16/2014 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Number Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS E D D C D A A E A A Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS D D A B Timer Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 13.4 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report N:\2404\Analysis\Synchro\Existing AM.syn Page 1
42 Existing AM 2: S. Escondido Blvd & Proj Drwy 12/16/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS - - B A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report N:\2404\Analysis\Synchro\Existing AM.syn Page 3
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY. Escondido, California June 25, LLG Ref Transportation Engineer II
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY Escondido, California June 25, 2015 LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Prepared by: Pedram Massoudi Transportation Engineer II Under the Supervision of: John Boarman, P.E.
More informationAPPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Roadway Segment Level of Service Definitions LOS V/C Congestion/Delay Traffic Description (Used for surface streets,
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 661 BEAR VALLEY. Escondido, California September 1, LLG Ref
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 661 BEAR VALLEY Escondido, California September 1, 2015 LLG Ref. 3-13-2299 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Project (Project) proposes the development of 55 residential dwelling units on 40.88
More informationAPPENDICES. Appendix R Traffic Impact Analysis (January 2017)
APPENDICES Appendix R Traffic Impact Analysis (January 2017) 661 Bear Valley Parkway EIR March 2017 APPENDICES This page intentionally left blank 661 Bear Valley Parkway EIR March 2017 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
More informationAPPENDICES. No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016)
APPENDICES Appendix T No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016) 661 Bear Valley Parkway EIR March 2017 APPENDICES This page intentionally left blank 661 Bear Valley
More informationAPPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Lake Wohlford Dam Replacement Project EIR
APPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Replacement Project EIR Appendices TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LAKE WOHLFORD DAM Escondido, California December 19,
More informationBennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017
Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,
More informationJOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: KTM Design Solutions 528 Kansas City Street, Suite 1 Rapid City, SD 57701 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse
More informationAldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH, California November 11, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-14-2334 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Project proposes the development of 550 luxury residential dwelling units, public trails,
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Update
Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
More informationWinnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis January 4, 2019 Prepared by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Active Transportation Division Winnetka Ave Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
More informationEscondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT
Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Phelps Program Management 420 Sixth Avenue, Greeley, CO 80632 Prepared by 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite
More informationMADERAS HOTEL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS MADERAS HOTEL Poway, California June 21, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-16-2602 Prepared by: Amelia Giacalone Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I Under the
More informationAldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
More informationOne Harbor Point Residential
Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE
More informationWeaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 9821 425.339.8266 Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish January 218 GTC #17-37
More informationAddendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA
Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA (St. Tammany Parish Mandeville, LA) Prepared For The Pittman Companies Michael N Pittman, MD 328 East Boston St Covington, LA 70433
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. 3853 Taylor Road,
More informationHONDA DEALERSHIP LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA. Prepared by:
LOS ANGELES 21 S. Figueroa St, Suite 24 Los Angeles, CA 912 213.337.368 Fax :213.337.3679 ONTARIO 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd, Suite 25 Ontario, CA 91764 99.481.575 Fax :99.481.5757 SAN DIEGO 6 B St, Suite
More informationBUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM
BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Prepared for: City and County of Denver Prepared by: Contact: Brian Bern, P.E., PTOE 303.572.0200 On Behalf of: Lowry Redevelopment Authority
More informationTijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center
Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center Draft Report September 2018 Prepared for: County of San Diego 5500 Overland Avenue, Suite 410 San Diego, CA 92123 Prepared by: 3900 Fifth
More informationL1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:
L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES
More informationDIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
DIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...3 2. Project Description...3 3. Existing Conditions...3 4. Forecast Traffic Demand and Analysis...12 5. Conclusions and
More informationTraffic Analysis For Approved Uses within the St. Lucie West DRI Aldi Port St. Lucie, FL Prepared for: Bohler Engineering, LLC 1000 Corporate Drive Suite 250 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 Prepared by: 10795
More informationD & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14
More informationJune 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903
LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com June 21,
More informationMEMORANDUM. Saint Edward Ballfields Traffic and Parking Analysis (Updated)
MEMORANDUM Date: May 26, 2016 To: From: Subject: Debbie Bent and Kris Overleese, City of Kenmore Kendra Breiland and Sarah Keenan, Fehr & Peers Saint Edward Ballfields Traffic and Parking Analysis (Updated)
More informationParking/Traffic Assessment Study
Brock Road Industrial Mall 985 Brock Road South City of Pickering Parking/Traffic Assessment Study Prepared by: Tranplan Associates, Toronto Toronto 416-670-2005 Sudbury 705-522-0272 Peterborough 705-874-3638
More informationSR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation
SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation Background and Project Needs SR 104 is functionally classified as a rural-principal arterial. It is a limited
More information1 st Street Intersection Study
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 1 st Street Intersection Study Prepared for: City of Independence In Cooperation With: Iowa Department of Transportation & Iowa Department of Public Safety Governor
More informationOakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills
Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna
More informationLOTUS RANCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation Engineer II
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LOTUS RANCH El Centro, California July 31, 2015February 12, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-14-2392 Prepared by: KC Yellapu, P.E Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation
More information830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality
830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Statement Final Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 www.griffininc.ca Prepared
More informationAPPENDIX D- TRAFFIC STUDY
APPENDIX D- TRAFFIC STUDY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS IMPERIAL COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION County of Imperial, California March 06, 2018 LLG Ref. 3-17-2831 Prepared by: Jose R. Nunez Transportation Planner
More informationKUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266
KUM & GO #300 PECOS STREET & 88 TH AVENUE THORNTON, COLORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVISION 1 PREPARED FOR KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 JANUARY 23, 2014 OA PROJECT NO. 013-1721
More informationLOTUS RANCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation Engineer II
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LOTUS RANCH El Centro, California April 26, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-14-2392 Prepared by: KC Yellapu, P.E Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation Engineer II Under
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT
Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT CITY OF BUENA PARK Prepared by Project No. 14139 000 April 17 th, 2015 DKS Associates Jeffrey Heald, P.E. Rohit Itadkar, T.E. 2677 North Main
More informationSweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 8 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98 45.9.8 Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish February 8 GTC #7-87 Sweetwater Landing Traffic
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Merrimack Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization FROM: James Terlizzi, P.E., Transportation Planning Engineer DATE: March 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Further analysis of the recommendations
More information10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish September 2018
More informationAlpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study
Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1
More informationProposed Pit Development
July 5, 2017 via email: sam@greenwoodconst.ca CCTA File 114239 Sam Greenwood Greenwood Aggregates 205467 County Road 109 Amaranth, ON L9W 0V1 Re: Proposed Violet Hill Gravel Pit, Town of Mono Traffic Review
More informationLOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW
LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW Prepared for: Prepared by: Broadview Developments Inc. c/o Westbrook Consulting Watt Consulting Group Our File: 2064.B01 Date: October 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
More informationMURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA
MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Prepared for: Golden Eagle Multi-Family Properties, LLC 6201 Oak Canyon Rd., Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared
More informationRyan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report
March 6, 2015 Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY 10580 RE: JMC Project 14108 Boston Post Road Roundabout Boston Post Road and Parsons Street City of Rye, NY Dear Ryan:
More informationSugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia
Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia S IGNAL W ARRANT A NALYSIS For the Intersection of: Sugarloaf Parkway / Richards Middle School Driveway / Sugarland Crossing Main Site Driveway Prepared for:
More informationVolume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.
Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064523000 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas Prepared
More informationLAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS
LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Shopko redevelopment located in Sugarhouse, Utah. The Shopko redevelopment project is located between 1300 East and
More informationMEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:
MEMO To: Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers VIA EMAIL From: Michael J. Labadie, PE Julie M. Kroll, PE, PTOE Brandon Hayes, PE, P.Eng. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: January 5, 2017 Re: Proposed
More informationTraffic Engineering Study
Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested
More informationKing Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado
Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company
More information886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study
McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com
More informationTraffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents
Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 15001714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 4 III. 2015 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...
More informationRockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality
Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Study Final Draft Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T
More informationARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: Arvada Urban Renewal Authority 5601 Olde Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 210 Arvada, Colorado 80002 (720) 898-7062 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt
More informationLacey Gateway Residential Phase 1
Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West
More informationDate: December 20, Project #:
To: Craig Rottenberg Long s Jewelers 60A South Avenue Burlington, MA 01803 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: December 20, 2018 Project #: 14416.00 Re: Burlington Mall Proposed Long
More informationAppendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation
Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation \ AECOM 71 W. 23 rd Street New York, NY 10010 www.aecom.com 212 366 6200 tel 212 366 6214 fax Memorandum To CC Subject Robert Conway Donald Tone Construction
More informationAppendix C. Traffic Study
Appendix C Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary PAGE 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Scope of Work... 1 1.2 Study Area... 2 2.0 Project Description... 3 2.1 Site Access... 4 2.2 Pedestrian
More informationHalf Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes.
Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment Full Report March 15, 2018 Prepared for: Mattamy Homes Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Table of Contents 1.0 SCREENING... 1 1.1
More informationTRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT
DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT WEST HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2013 PREPARED FOR BEVERLY BOULEVARD ASSOCIATION PREPARED BY DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899
More informationMILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND
MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared for: Department of Public Works Anne Arundel County Prepared by: URS Corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 3 Hunt Valley,
More informationMEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC
MEMORANDUM Date: November 4, 2013 To: From: Subject: Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis As requested, Fehr & Peers is providing clarification
More informationAPPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets
APPENDICES APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets Lanes, Volumes, Timings NO BUILD 2016 PM 8: 10th St & Thain Rd 10/05/2016 Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 2014 UPDATED
More informationAPPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix
More informationPrescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX 1.1: APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT TIA Report.docx
Prescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX 1.1: APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT 11897-05 TIA Report.docx Prescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis This page is intentionally left blank 11897-05
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.
Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis
More informationMERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1
MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny
More informationProposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA
Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Camp Parkway Commerce Center is a proposed distribution and industrial center to be
More informationTIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:
TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY 2014 Prepared for: Hartford Companies 1218 W. Ash Street Suite A Windsor, Co 80550 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive
More informationAppendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants TJKM Transportation Consultants Draft Report Traffic Impact Study for the Residential Development at 4659 Proctor
More informationAPPENDIX G Traffic Assessment of EIR Alternatives Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX G Traffic Assessment of EIR Alternatives Traffic Impact Analysis MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Paul Garcia Chris Moore Atkins Date: March 24, 2016 John Boarman LLG Ref: 3-15-2464 Cara Hilgesen
More informationTraffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Warrenville, Illinois Prepared For: Prepared By: April 11, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Site Location...
More informationCounty State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study
County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101
More informationFIRGROVE ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
1 FIRGROVE ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction... 3 II. Project Description... 3 III. Existing Conditions... 6 IV. Future Traffic Demand... 10 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...
More informationRESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS
RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS Proposed Gas Station 40 Arthur Street (Highway 26), Town of the Blue Mountains (Thornbury), County of Grey, Ontario AUGUST 2013 August 27, 2013 MR. REG RUSSWURM
More informationNOB HILL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NOB HILL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT San Diego, California February 18, 2014 LLG Ref. 3-13-2204 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Project Description... 2
More informationAppendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project
Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project July 25, 218 ROMF Transportation Impact Analysis Version
More informationTransportation & Traffic Engineering
Transportation & Traffic Engineering 1) Project Description This report presents a summary of findings for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed by A+ Engineering, Inc. for the Hill Country Family
More informationINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Plainfield, Illinois August 2018 Prepared for: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Existing Conditions
More informationFORT MYERS CITY COUNCIL OSCAR M. CORBIN, JR. CITY HALL, 2200 SECOND STREET FORT MYERS, FLORIDA
Agenda City Council Special Mee ng March 18, 2019 1:00 PM Historic Preserva on Commission Appeal - Virginia Avenue/ McGregor Boulevard Roundabout MAYOR Randall P. Henderson, Jr. Ward 1 Teresa Watkins Brown
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Residences at Bancroft Block 14, Lot 2 Borough of Haddonfield, Camden County, New Jersey
Traffic Impact Study Residences at Bancroft Block 14, Lot 2 April 30, 2018 REVISED: JANUARY 17, 2019 Prepared For 2 Hopkins Lane, LLC 2701 Renaissance Boulevard King of Prussia, PA 19406 Prepared By Maser
More informationZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RAYMOND VINEYARDS WINERY USE PERMIT MODIFICATION #P11-00156 AUGUST 5, 2014 PREPARED BY: OMNI-MEANS,
More informationTable 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1
Ref. No. 171-6694 Phase 2 November 23, 217 Mr. David Quilichini, Vice President Fares & Co. Developments Inc. 31 Place Keelson Sales Centre DARTMOUTH NS B2Y C1 Sent Via Email to David@faresinc.com RE:
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT Vallejo, CA Prepared For: ELITE DRIVE-INS, INC. 2190 Meridian Park Blvd, Suite G Concord, CA 94520 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road,
More informationAppendix Q Traffic Study
Appendices Appendix Q Traffic Study Crummer Site Subdivision Draft EIR City of Malibu Appendices This page intentionally left blank. The Planning Center April 2013 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Photo z here
More informationINTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange
INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange City of Broadview Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Broadview Heights Department of Engineering 9543 Broadview Road
More informationTraffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Crawford, Bunte, Brammeier May 1, 2009 MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2009 To: From: Subject:
More informationTable of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place
Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 1. Introduction... 4 2. Project Description... 4 3. Background Information... 4 4. Study Scope...
More informationTraffic Impact Statement (TIS)
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205
More informationINTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
More informationThe major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:
3.5 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.1.1 Street Network DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown
More informationAPPENDIX B Traffic Analysis
APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis Rim of the World Unified School District Reconfiguration Prepared for: Rim of the World School District 27315 North Bay Road, Blue Jay, CA 92317 Prepared by: 400 Oceangate,
More informationSUBJECT: EMERALD NECKLACE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. May 9, 2016
May 9, 2016 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. 215 North 5 th Street Redlands, CA 92374 SUBJECT: EMERALD NECKLACE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT Dear Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos:
More informationTask 5.1: Existing Conditions Review and Analysis
City of Oceanside Coast Highway Corridor Task 5.1: Existing Conditions Review and Analysis Technical Memorandum August 2014 DOCUMENT CONTROL Client: Project Name: Report Title: City of Oceanside City of
More information4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.14.1 Summary Table 4.14-1 summarizes the identified environmental impacts, proposed mitigation measures, and residual impacts of the proposed project with regard to
More informationIngraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis
Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320 Kirkland,
More information