D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
|
|
- Sheena Newman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14 Appendix LIST OF TABLES 1. Project Trip Generation Project Trip Generation Existing Use Project Trip Generation Summary Level of Service...14 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Vicinity Map and Roadway System Site Plan Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes Trip Distribution & Assignment PM Peak Hour Volumes Without Project PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project
3 D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I. INTRODUCTION This study serves to investigate traffic impacts related to the proposed D & B Commercial development. The primary goals of this study concentrate on the assessment of existing roadway conditions and intersection congestion, forecasts of newly generated project traffic, and estimations of future delay. Preliminary tasks include the collection of roadway information, road improvement information, and peak hour traffic counts. A detailed level of service analysis of the existing volumes is then made to determine the present degree of congestion on the network. Based on this analysis, forecasts of future traffic levels on the surrounding street system are determined. Following this forecast, the future service levels for the key intersections are investigated. As a final step, applicable conclusions and possible mitigation measures are defined. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This report summarizes anticipated traffic impacts related to the D & B Commercial development. The project is located on the south side of Yelm Avenue (SR-510), just northwest of the Bald Hill Road intersection. The proposed project consists of one 3,400 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive-thru, a 17,896 square foot retail building, and another 4,800 square foot building for retail space. Existing on site is a 19 unit mobile home park. The area surrounding the project is a mix of commercial and residential land uses. Access to the site will be provided by the two accesses, as shown in Figure 2, onto Yelm Avenue. Buildout of the project is expected by 2016/2017. Figure 1 shows the general site location with the surrounding street network and primary arterials. A site plan illustrating the overall configuration of the project is given in Figure 2. III. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Surrounding Roadway Network The street network serving the proposed project consists of a variety of roadways. Streets near the site mainly consist of primarily two-lane arterials. Characteristics for these roadways vary with respect to lane widths, grades, speeds, and function. Differences are based on specific designations and proximity to major employment areas in the region. The major roadways and arterials surrounding the site are listed and described on page 6. 3
4 4
5 5
6 Yelm Avenue (SR-510) is a multi-lane state route that borders the north side of the project with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. The typical cross section is one through lane in each direction, a center two-way left turn lane, and turn lanes provided at major intersections. Bike lanes are also provided in the area. Shoulders are curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Lane widths are around 12 feet and paving is asphalt. Grades are mild. B. Peak Hour Volumes and Travel Patterns Field data for this study was collected in June of The traffic count used in this report was taken during the evening peak period between the hours of 4 PM and 6 PM. This specific peak period was targeted for analysis purposes since it generally represents a worst case scenario with respect to traffic conditions for commercial developments. This is primarily due to the common 8 AM to 5 PM work schedule. Most commuters return to their dwellings at the same time of day which translates to a natural peak in intersection traffic loads, especially when combined with the relatively large number of personal trips during the PM peak. Figure 3 on the following page shows the weekday PM peak volumes at the central Autozone entrance on Yelm Avenue located across from the project. Turning movement count data can be found in the appendix. D. Pedestrian and Bicycle Traffic Observations for pedestrian and bicycle activity were made at the key arterials and intersections of interest. During the evening peak hour moderate pedestrian volumes were noted. The availability of pedestrian facilities in the form of sidewalks and crosswalks help alleviate any potential conflict between motorist and non-motorist traffic. E. Transit Service A review of the Intercity Transit regional route map indicates service is provided near the project. Route 94 runs from Olympic Transit Center to the Yelm Wal-Mart between 5:34 AM to 9:45 PM. Stops are provided on Yelm Avenue near the site. Given the nature of the site, minor transit usage may be expected by project patrons. F. Sight Distance Analysis was made of the existing roadways near the site. According to AASHTO guidelines for the 35 mph design speed on Yelm Avenue, approximately 390 feet of entering sight distance is needed to ensure safety for project traffic exiting the site. Based on established standards and field notes, sight distance is acceptable at all project access driveways. The area has no vertical curvature and only minor horizontal curvature. With no other sight distance hindrances present requirements are easily met. 6
7 7
8 G. Roadway Improvements A review of the City of Yelm s Six Year Transportation Improvement Program indicates improvements are planned in the vicinity of the project. Project number Y9 shows Bald Hill Road is scheduled for reconstruction from the city limits to the 5 corners. IV. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation Trip generation is used to determine the magnitude of project impacts on the surrounding street system. Data presented in this report was taken from the Institute of Transportation Engineer's publication Trip Generation, Ninth Edition. The designated land uses for this project are defined as Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru and Specialty Retail Center (LUC 826). Table 1 below shows the trip generation values expected with the project. Included is the Average Daily Weekday Trips (AWDT) and AM and PM peak hour trips. TABLE 1 Project Trip Generation Fast-Food Restaurant Time Period Primary Pass-By Total Retail AWDT Total 843 vpd 844 vpd 1687 vpd 1006 vpd AM Peak Inbound 40 vph 39 vph 79 vph 0 vph AM Peak Outbound 37 vph 38 vph 75 vph 0 vph AM Peak Total 77 vph 77 vph 154 vph 0 vph PM Peak Inbound 29 vph 29 vph 58 vph 27 vph PM Peak Outbound 26 vph 27 vph 53 vph 35 vph PM Peak Total 55 vph 56 vph 111 vph 62 vph The PM peak hour volumes in Table 1 represent the trips the project accesses will support. As shown, the PM peak hour will have 85 inbound trips and 88 outbound trips accessing the site. Of these, 29 inbound trips and 27 outbound trips will be in the form of pass-by trips. A pass-by trip is defined as an intermediate stop on the way to a primary destination. Such a trip is attracted from traffic passing by a site on an adjacent street which contains direct access to the generator. A second traffic volume element associated with this use but to a lesser degree is the diverted trip. The diverted trip is a vehicle already on the traffic network which decides to divert to the project site from a neighboring roadway. In both cases, the trip to and from the project is in some sense spur of the moment and convenience based. Typically, to give a conservative estimate of project impacts, pass-by trips and diverted trips should be examined exclusively. Pass-by trips become transparent or not detectable at outlying intersections while diverted trips will cause a reduction in movements in one direction while increasing the trips in another 8
9 direction at an intersection. ITE pass-by/diverted trip information can be found in the appendix. This report makes only pass-by reductions; diverted trips were included as primary trips. Pass-by trips for Fast-Food Restaurants are estimated at 50 percent based on the ITE manual. Existing land use on the site will be removed as a part of this project. The designated land use for the existing use on site is defined as Mobile Home Park (LUC 240). The trip generation shown in Table 2 would be subtracted from volumes in Table 1 to determine net new trips to the roadway network. TABLE 2 Project Trip Generation Existing Use Time Period AWDT AM Peak Inbound AM Peak Outbound AM Peak Total PM Peak Inbound PM Peak Outbound PM Peak Total Volume 95 vpd 2 vph 6 vph 8 vph 7 vph 4 vph 11 vph The net new trips during the PM peak hour, found by subtracting the new project volumes in Table 1 from the existing volumes in Table 2, shows the site will generate an estimated 162 PM peak trips, 56 of those being pass-by. These represent the trips that will impact the surrounding roadway system outside the project entrances. A summary of the total net new trips is given on page 8 in Table 3. TABLE 3 Project Trip Generation Summary Net New Time Period Primary Trips Pass-By Trips Total Trips AWDT Total 1754 vpd 844 vpd 2598 vpd AM Peak Inbound 38 vph 39 vph 77 vph AM Peak Outbound 31 vph 38 vph 69 vph AM Peak Total 69 vph 77 vph 146 vph PM Peak Inbound 49 vph 29 vph 78 vph PM Peak Outbound 57 vph 27 vph 84 vph PM Peak Total 106 vph 56 vph 162 vph B. Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution describes the process by which project generated trips are dispersed on the street network surrounding the site. The specific destinations and origins of the generated traffic primarily influences the key intersections, which will effectively receive 9
10 the bulk of project impacts. The trips generated by the project are expected to follow the general trip pattern as shown in Figure 4 on the following page. Figure 4 gives a best guess estimate of how traffic is likely to travel to and from the site during the critical peak hour. Distribution percentages are based on existing travel patterns and the location of nearby major roadways. The trip distribution was done in a conservative manner by dividing project traffic between 2 entrances. In practice each driveway will likely serve an even distribution of inbound and outbound trips. By splitting traffic evenly each entrance studied is supporting 50 percent of total trips to analyze a potential worse case scenario in regards to turning movements into and out of the site. D. Future Traffic Volumes With and Without the Project For this project a 2017 horizon analysis year was used for future LOS analysis. Future traffic volumes without the project built out were derived by applying a flat 1 percent background growth rate per year to the existing traffic volumes shown in Figure 3. This is conservative based on data available in the 2014 WSDOT Annual Traffic report which shows no growth along Yelm Avenue (SR-507) in the area. Future 2017 intersection volumes without project traffic are given in Figure 5. Figure 6 shows with project traffic volumes. E. Level of Service Peak hour delays were determined through the use of the Highway Capacity Manual Capacity analysis is used to determine level of service (LOS) which is an established measure of congestion for transportation facilities. LOS is defined for a variety of facilities including intersections, freeways, arterials, etc. A complete definition of level of service and related criteria can be found in the HCM. The methodology for determining the LOS at unsignalized intersections strives to determine the potential capacities for the various vehicle movements and ultimately determines the average total delay for each movement. Potential Capacity represents the number of additional vehicles that could effectively utilize a particular movement, which is essentially the equivalent of the difference between the movement capacity and the existing movement volume. Total delay is described as the elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. Average total delay is simply the mean total delay over the entire stream. A number of factors influence potential capacity and total delay including the availability/usefulness of gaps. The range for intersection level of service is LOS A to LOS F with the former indicating the best operating conditions with low control delays and the latter indicating the worst conditions with heavy control delays. The below LOS results in Table 2 were calculated using the computer analysis program Synchro. Detailed descriptions of intersection LOS are given in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. 10
11
12 12
13 13
14 TABLE 4 Level of Service Delays given in Seconds Per Vehicle Existing Without With Intersection Control Geometry LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Yelm Av/Autozone Stop Eastbound LT A 9.9 A 10.0 B 10.1 Southbound C 17.4 C 17.7 C 18.3 Yelm Av/W Ent Stop Westbound LT A 10.0 Northbound C 22.7 Yelm Av/E Ent Stop Westbound LT A 9.8 Northbound C 21.6 As shown, existing delays are generally mild to moderate. Future LOS results show delays will continue at LOS C or better. Note that the increase in with project LOS for the eastbound movement at the Yelm Avenue & Autozone entrance has in associated increase in delay of only 0.1 seconds. Overall the local roadway system has the available capacity for project traffic. F. Queue Lengths The intersection queues at the entrances at Autozone access were checked for potential conflicts. Data was used for 2017 volumes with project traffic included. According to the Synchro output the maximum 95th percentile queue length on Yelm Avenue at the Autozone access is 0.2 car lengths, or 5 feet, for eastbound left turns. The northwestern most project access has a westbound left turn queue length of 0.1 vehicles (3 feet). With of 150 feet of space (about 6 car lengths) between these two accesses, no safety issues due to queued vehicles in the center turn lane are expected. V. CONCLUSIONS AND MITIGATION The D & B Commercial project proposes to build a 3,400 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive-thru and two retail buildings totaling 22,696 square feet in the City of Yelm. Access will be provided by two entrances onto Yelm Avenue. The site will be a mild generator of traffic with an estimated 106 new primary PM peak trips expected. Analysis of LOS and queuing at the two project entrances and the Autozone entrance opposite the project shows the roadway has the available capacity for project traffic. There is a Transportation Facility Charge per City of Yelm requirements collected at $1,612 per new PM peak hour trip. The total fee for the 106 new primary PM peak hour trips comes to: 106 x $1,612 = $170,872 No other mitigation is identified at this time. 14
15 D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX 15
16 LEVEL OF SERVICE The following are excerpts from the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual - Transportation Research Board Special Report 209. Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. Level of service (LOS) is a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience. Six LOS are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters designate each level, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions and the driver s perception of those conditions. Level-of-Service definitions The following definitions generally define the various levels of service for arterials. Level of service A represents primarily free-flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free-flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles are seldom impeded in their ability to maneuver in the traffic stream. Delay at signalized intersections is minimal. Level of service B represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free-flow speed for the arterial classification. The ability to maneuver in the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and delays are not bothersome. Level of service C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the average free-flow speed for the arterial classification. Level of service D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free-flow speed. Level of service E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of onethird the free-flow speed or less. Such operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. 16
17 Level of service F characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds, from less than onethird to one-quarter of the free-flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with long delays and extensive queuing. These definitions are general and conceptual in nature, and they apply primarily to uninterrupted flow. Levels of service for interrupted flow facilities vary widely in terms of both the user's perception of service quality and the operational variables used to describe them. For each type of facility, levels of service are defined based on one or more operational parameters that best describe operating quality for the subject facility type. While the concept of level of service attempts to address a wide range of operating conditions, limitations on data collection and availability make it impractical to treat the full range of operational parameters for every type of facility. The parameters selected to define levels of service for each facility type are called measures of effectiveness or MOE's, and represent available measures that best describe the quality of operation on the subject facility type. Each level of service represents a range of conditions, as defined by a range in the parameters given. Thus, a level of service is not a discrete condition, but rather a range of conditions for which boundaries are established. The following tables describe levels of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of average control delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time, as well as time from movements at slower speeds and stops on intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of an intersection. Level of service for unsignalized intersections is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is determined for each minor movement. Signalized Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Control Delay per Vehicle (sec) and and and and
18 Unsignalized Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Average Total Delay per Vehicle (sec) and and and and As described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, level of service breakpoints for allway stop controlled (AWSC) intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from distinct kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an AWSC intersection. Thus a higher level of control delay is acceptable at a signalized intersection for the same level of service. AWSC Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Average Total Delay per Vehicle (sec) and and and and
19 Detailed Average Rate Trip Calculations For 3.4 Th.Sq.Ft. GFA of Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru(934) - [R] Project: D & B Commercial Yelm Phase: Open Date: Analysis Date: Description: Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Factor Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume AM Peak Hour Enter AM Peak Hour Exit AM Peak Hour Total PM Peak Hour Enter PM Peak Hour Exit PM Peak Hour Total AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total Saturday 2-Way Volume Saturday Peak Hour Enter Saturday Peak Hour Exit Saturday Peak Hour Total Sunday 2-Way Volume Sunday Peak Hour Enter Sunday Peak Hour Exit Sunday Peak Hour Total Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012 TRIP GENERATION 2013, TRAFFICWARE, LLC 19
20 20
21 Detailed Average Rate Trip Calculations For Th.Sq.Ft. GFA of Specialty Retail Center(826) - [R] Project: D & B Commercial Yelm Phase: Open Date: Analysis Date: Description: Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Factor Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume AM Peak Hour Enter AM Peak Hour Exit AM Peak Hour Total PM Peak Hour Enter PM Peak Hour Exit PM Peak Hour Total AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total Saturday 2-Way Volume Saturday Peak Hour Enter Saturday Peak Hour Exit Saturday Peak Hour Total Sunday 2-Way Volume Sunday Peak Hour Enter Sunday Peak Hour Exit Sunday Peak Hour Total Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012 TRIP GENERATION 2013, TRAFFICWARE, LLC 21
22 Detailed Average Rate Trip Calculations For 19 Occupied Dwelling Units of Mobile Home Park(240) - [R] Project: D & B Commercial Phase: Open Date: Analysis Date: Description: Existing Use Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Factor Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume AM Peak Hour Enter AM Peak Hour Exit AM Peak Hour Total PM Peak Hour Enter PM Peak Hour Exit PM Peak Hour Total AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total Saturday 2-Way Volume Saturday Peak Hour Enter Saturday Peak Hour Exit Saturday Peak Hour Total Sunday 2-Way Volume Sunday Peak Hour Enter Sunday Peak Hour Exit Sunday Peak Hour Total Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012 TRIP GENERATION 2013, TRAFFICWARE, LLC 22
23 Heath & Associates, Inc Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA File Name : 3604a Site Code : 3604 Start Date : 6/24/2015 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Group 1 Autozone Access Yelm Avenue Yelm Avenue Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total Factor :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Autozone Access Out In Total Right 7 Left Yelm Avenue Out In Total Left 1511 Thru 6/24/2015 4:00:00 PM 6/24/2015 5:45:00 PM Group 1 North Right Thru Out In Total Yelm Avenue 23
24 Heath & Associates, Inc Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA File Name : 3604a Site Code : 3604 Start Date : 6/24/2015 Page No : 2 Autozone Access Southbound Yelm Avenue Westbound Northbound Yelm Avenue Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left App. App. App. App. Int. Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:30 PM Volume Percent : Volume Peak Factor High Int. 04:45 PM 04:30 PM 3:45:00 PM 04:30 PM Volume Peak Factor Autozone Access Out In Total Right 4 Left Yelm Avenue Out In Total Left 761 Thru 6/24/2015 4:30:00 PM 6/24/2015 5:15:00 PM Group 1 North Right Thru Out In Total Yelm Avenue 24
25 $ % } } } } No Growth 25
26 HCM 2010 TWSC D & B COMMERCIAL 1: Yelm Avenue & Retail Access EXISTING PM PEAK Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, /hr Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS A C C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 26
27 HCM 2010 TWSC D & B COMMERCIAL 1: Yelm Avenue & Retail Access 2017 PM PEAK WITHOUT PROJECT Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, /hr Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS A C C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 27
28 HCM 2010 TWSC D & B COMMERCIAL 1: Yelm Avenue & Retail Access 2017 PM PEAK WITH PROJECT Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, /hr Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS B C C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 28
29 HCM 2010 TWSC D & B COMMERCIAL 2: W Entrance & Yelm Avenue 2017 PM PEAK WITH PROJECT Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, /hr Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS C - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 29
30 HCM 2010 TWSC D & B COMMERCIAL 8: E ENTRANCE & Yelm Avenue 2017 PM PEAK WITH PROJECT Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, /hr Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS C - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 30
DIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
DIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...3 2. Project Description...3 3. Existing Conditions...3 4. Forecast Traffic Demand and Analysis...12 5. Conclusions and
More informationBennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017
Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,
More informationOne Harbor Point Residential
Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Update
Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
More informationFIRGROVE ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
1 FIRGROVE ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction... 3 II. Project Description... 3 III. Existing Conditions... 6 IV. Future Traffic Demand... 10 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...
More informationWeaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 9821 425.339.8266 Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish January 218 GTC #17-37
More information830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality
830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Statement Final Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 www.griffininc.ca Prepared
More informationParking/Traffic Assessment Study
Brock Road Industrial Mall 985 Brock Road South City of Pickering Parking/Traffic Assessment Study Prepared by: Tranplan Associates, Toronto Toronto 416-670-2005 Sudbury 705-522-0272 Peterborough 705-874-3638
More informationLOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW
LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW Prepared for: Prepared by: Broadview Developments Inc. c/o Westbrook Consulting Watt Consulting Group Our File: 2064.B01 Date: October 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
More informationTraffic Analysis For Approved Uses within the St. Lucie West DRI Aldi Port St. Lucie, FL Prepared for: Bohler Engineering, LLC 1000 Corporate Drive Suite 250 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 Prepared by: 10795
More informationSweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 8 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98 45.9.8 Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish February 8 GTC #7-87 Sweetwater Landing Traffic
More informationJune 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903
LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com June 21,
More informationKUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266
KUM & GO #300 PECOS STREET & 88 TH AVENUE THORNTON, COLORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVISION 1 PREPARED FOR KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 JANUARY 23, 2014 OA PROJECT NO. 013-1721
More informationProposed Pit Development
July 5, 2017 via email: sam@greenwoodconst.ca CCTA File 114239 Sam Greenwood Greenwood Aggregates 205467 County Road 109 Amaranth, ON L9W 0V1 Re: Proposed Violet Hill Gravel Pit, Town of Mono Traffic Review
More informationRyan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report
March 6, 2015 Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY 10580 RE: JMC Project 14108 Boston Post Road Roundabout Boston Post Road and Parsons Street City of Rye, NY Dear Ryan:
More informationAPPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Roadway Segment Level of Service Definitions LOS V/C Congestion/Delay Traffic Description (Used for surface streets,
More informationOakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills
Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna
More information10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish September 2018
More informationL1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:
L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES
More informationAPPENDICES. No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016)
APPENDICES Appendix T No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016) 661 Bear Valley Parkway EIR March 2017 APPENDICES This page intentionally left blank 661 Bear Valley
More informationAldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
More informationRockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality
Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Study Final Draft Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T
More informationHalf Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes.
Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment Full Report March 15, 2018 Prepared for: Mattamy Homes Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Table of Contents 1.0 SCREENING... 1 1.1
More informationAPPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets
APPENDICES APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets Lanes, Volumes, Timings NO BUILD 2016 PM 8: 10th St & Thain Rd 10/05/2016 Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
More information1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON 1. INTRODUCTION This report summarizes traffic impacts of the proposed CUBES Self-Storage Mill Creek project in comparison to the traffic currently
More information886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study
McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Shopko redevelopment located in Sugarhouse, Utah. The Shopko redevelopment project is located between 1300 East and
More informationKing Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado
Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company
More informationJOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: KTM Design Solutions 528 Kansas City Street, Suite 1 Rapid City, SD 57701 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse
More informationDate: December 20, Project #:
To: Craig Rottenberg Long s Jewelers 60A South Avenue Burlington, MA 01803 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: December 20, 2018 Project #: 14416.00 Re: Burlington Mall Proposed Long
More informationAlpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study
Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1
More informationAldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
More informationTijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center
Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center Draft Report September 2018 Prepared for: County of San Diego 5500 Overland Avenue, Suite 410 San Diego, CA 92123 Prepared by: 3900 Fifth
More informationMEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC
MEMORANDUM Date: November 4, 2013 To: From: Subject: Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis As requested, Fehr & Peers is providing clarification
More informationAPPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix
More informationSugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia
Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia S IGNAL W ARRANT A NALYSIS For the Intersection of: Sugarloaf Parkway / Richards Middle School Driveway / Sugarland Crossing Main Site Driveway Prepared for:
More informationRESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS
RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS Proposed Gas Station 40 Arthur Street (Highway 26), Town of the Blue Mountains (Thornbury), County of Grey, Ontario AUGUST 2013 August 27, 2013 MR. REG RUSSWURM
More informationINTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
More informationTraffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents
Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 15001714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 4 III. 2015 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...
More informationMERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1
MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Residences at Bancroft Block 14, Lot 2 Borough of Haddonfield, Camden County, New Jersey
Traffic Impact Study Residences at Bancroft Block 14, Lot 2 April 30, 2018 REVISED: JANUARY 17, 2019 Prepared For 2 Hopkins Lane, LLC 2701 Renaissance Boulevard King of Prussia, PA 19406 Prepared By Maser
More informationARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: Arvada Urban Renewal Authority 5601 Olde Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 210 Arvada, Colorado 80002 (720) 898-7062 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.
Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis
More informationTraffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Crawford, Bunte, Brammeier May 1, 2009 MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2009 To: From: Subject:
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald
More informationTraffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For:
Appendix B SRF Traffic Study (Revised November 2005) Draft Environmental Impact Statement University Commons Town of Allegany, Cattaraugus County, NY December 2005 Traffic Impact Study for the proposed
More informationINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Plainfield, Illinois August 2018 Prepared for: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Existing Conditions
More informationTable 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1
Ref. No. 171-6694 Phase 2 November 23, 217 Mr. David Quilichini, Vice President Fares & Co. Developments Inc. 31 Place Keelson Sales Centre DARTMOUTH NS B2Y C1 Sent Via Email to David@faresinc.com RE:
More informationLacey Gateway Residential Phase 1
Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West
More informationCounty State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study
County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT Vallejo, CA Prepared For: ELITE DRIVE-INS, INC. 2190 Meridian Park Blvd, Suite G Concord, CA 94520 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road,
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis
Traffic Impact Analysis Congregate Care Facility Billerica, Massachusetts Prepared For: Hawthorn Development, LLC 35 Kettle Court Salem, OR 973 Prepared By: Sebago Technics, Inc. 75 John Roberts Road,
More informationProposed Hotel and Restaurant Development
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Marbledale Road Tuckahoe, NY PREPARED FOR BILLWIN DEVELOPMENT AFFILIATES, LLC 365 WHITE PLAINS ROAD EASTCHESTER, NY. 10709 PREPARED BY Engineering
More informationBARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Barrhaven Fellowship CRC 3058 Jockvale Road Ottawa, ON K2J 2W7 December 7, 2016 116-649 Report_1.doc D. J.
More informationProposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA
Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Camp Parkway Commerce Center is a proposed distribution and industrial center to be
More informationLATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI
LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR I-96 AT LATSON RD INTERCHANGE Livingston County CS 47065 JN 101622C Submitted to: Michigan Department
More informationLakeside Terrace Development
Lakeside Terrace Development City of Barrie, County of Simcoe Traffic Brief for: Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1617 Date Submitted: April 29 th, 216 4/29/16 John Northcote, P.Eng.
More informationAppendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation
Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation \ AECOM 71 W. 23 rd Street New York, NY 10010 www.aecom.com 212 366 6200 tel 212 366 6214 fax Memorandum To CC Subject Robert Conway Donald Tone Construction
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA Prepared For: McDonald s USA, LLC Pacific Sierra Region 2999 Oak Road, Suite 900 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared By:
More informationMURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA
MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Prepared for: Golden Eagle Multi-Family Properties, LLC 6201 Oak Canyon Rd., Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared
More informationMEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:
MEMO To: Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers VIA EMAIL From: Michael J. Labadie, PE Julie M. Kroll, PE, PTOE Brandon Hayes, PE, P.Eng. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: January 5, 2017 Re: Proposed
More information2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017
Movin Out June 2017 1.0 Introduction The proposed Movin Out development is a mixed use development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of West Broadway and Fayette Avenue in the City of Madison.
More informationTraffic Engineering Study
Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested
More informationQuantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:
6.1 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 6.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the EIR presents the results of TJKM s traffic impact analysis of the proposed Greenbriar Development. The analysis includes consideration
More informationVolume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.
Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064523000 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas Prepared
More informationBarrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief
Barrhaven Honda Dealership Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 September, 2015 File: 115136 Ref: R-2015-152
More informationTraffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida
Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida Summary Report June 2008 Prepared by: 12909 N 56 th Street # 201 Tampa, FL 33617 Ph: (813) 988-3180 Fax: (813) 343-6854 Morgan Road
More informationMemorandum. Megan Costa, SOCPA Sam Gordon, Town of DeWitt Jeanie Gleisner, CNYRPDB Meghan Vitale DATE: April 20, 2017
TO: FROM: Megan Costa, SOCPA Sam Gordon, Town of DeWitt Jeanie Gleisner, CNYRPDB Meghan Vitale DATE: April 20, 2017 RE: Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council 100 Clinton Square 126 N. Salina Street,
More informationProposed CVS/pharmacy
Traffic Impact and Access Study Proposed CVS/pharmacy West Main Street (Route 1) at Hull Street Clinton, Connecticut PREPARED FOR Arista Development LLC 520 Providence Highway, Suite 9 Norwood, Massachusetts
More informationMEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson
McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (95)823-85 Fax: (95) 823-853 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: FROM: File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village
Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village Route 4 (Farmington Avenue) Farmington, Connecticut Prepared for: The Town of Farmington, CT Prepared By: BL Companies Meriden, Connecticut December 2016
More informationTRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis
Appendix E NJ TRANSIT Pennsauken Junction Transit Center and Park & Ride RiverLINE and Atlantic City Line Pennsauken Township, Camden County, New Jersey TRAFFIC DATA Background Traffic Information for
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT
Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT CITY OF BUENA PARK Prepared by Project No. 14139 000 April 17 th, 2015 DKS Associates Jeffrey Heald, P.E. Rohit Itadkar, T.E. 2677 North Main
More informationDowntown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report
Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report As part of the City s Transportation Master Plan, this report reviews the technical feasibility of the proposed conversion of the current
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 2014 UPDATED
More informationLAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS
LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
More informationJRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3
March 2015 Prepared for Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3 JRL consulting JRL consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 BACKGROUND... 2 2 EXISTING
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Merrimack Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization FROM: James Terlizzi, P.E., Transportation Planning Engineer DATE: March 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Further analysis of the recommendations
More informationSTANDARD LIMITATIONS
STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared by MMM Group (MMM) for the account of Spire Construction Inc. (the Client). The disclosure of any information contained in this report is the sole responsibility
More informationProvide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;
December 19, 2013 File: 163600935 Attention: Troy Elliott Carl Elliott Limited 15-1831 Robertson Road PO Box 11117 Nepean, Ontario K1H 7T8 Dear Mr. Elliott, Reference: 2235 and 2265 Robertson Road Transportation
More informationWinnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis January 4, 2019 Prepared by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Active Transportation Division Winnetka Ave Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
More informationINTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange
INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange City of Broadview Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Broadview Heights Department of Engineering 9543 Broadview Road
More informationTraffic Impact Statement (TIS)
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois
Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Submitted by April 9, 2009 Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona,
More informationApril Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief
April 26 Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief prepared for: The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd.
More informationVillage of Richmond Transportation Brief
Village of Richmond Transportation Brief GENIVAR Project Number 111-18482-00 June 21 st, 2011 www.genivar.com GENIVAR 15 Fitzgerald Road, Suite 100 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA K2H 9G1 Telephone: 613-829-2800
More informationZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RAYMOND VINEYARDS WINERY USE PERMIT MODIFICATION #P11-00156 AUGUST 5, 2014 PREPARED BY: OMNI-MEANS,
More informationTraffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Warrenville, Illinois Prepared For: Prepared By: April 11, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Site Location...
More information(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals
February 14th, 2014 BY E-MAIL: wally.dubyk@ottawa.ca City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Branch 110 Laurier Ave. W., 4 th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Attention: Wally Dubyk, C.E.T (A) Project
More informationAppendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project
Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project July 25, 218 ROMF Transportation Impact Analysis Version
More informationCastleGlenn Consultants Inc.
CastleGlenn Consultants Inc. Engineers, Project Managers & Planners March 11 th, 2013 Domenic Idone, P. Eng Planning Manager R.W. Tomlinson Ltd. 5597 Power Road Ottawa, Ontario K1G 3N4 Dear Mr. Idone:
More informationKing County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.
King County Metro Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis Downtown Southend Transit Study May 2014 Parametrix Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Methodology... 1 Study Area...
More informationDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.
DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava July 9, 2015 115-620 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation
More informationProposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois
Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study 1714-1720 Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois Prepared For: HOLABIRD & ROOT, LLC Prepared by: Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd. 145 Commerce Drive, Ste A,
More informationTraffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development
Traffic Impact Study for Proposed 11330 Olive Boulevard Development Creve Coeur, Missouri July 7, 2017 Prepared For: 11330 Olive Boulevard Development 11330 Olive Boulevard Creve Coeur, Missouri 63141
More informationDecember 5, Red Bank Planning Board Municipal Building 90 Monmouth Street Red Bank, NJ 07701
Dynamic Traffic, LLC www.dynamic-traffic.com 1904 Main Street Lake Como, NJ 07719 T. 732.681.0760 December 5, 2016 Red Bank Planning Board Municipal Building 90 Monmouth Street Red Bank, NJ 07701 Re: Traffic
More informationIngraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis
Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320 Kirkland,
More informationTRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA
TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA PREPARED FOR: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM 34 CIVIC CENTER BOULEVARD PHILADELPHIA, PA 1987 (61)
More informationAppendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants TJKM Transportation Consultants Draft Report Traffic Impact Study for the Residential Development at 4659 Proctor
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 24 UPDATED
More information