Traffic Impact Study. Chicago, Illinois. May 2017 RETAIL UPPER N COLUMBUS US DRIVE. Parcel O, LLC. Prepared for: EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING PLA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Traffic Impact Study. Chicago, Illinois. May 2017 RETAIL UPPER N COLUMBUS US DRIVE. Parcel O, LLC. Prepared for: EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING PLA"

Transcription

1 0F 0E LAKESHORE EAST PARCEL O Traffic Impact Study EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING PLA Chicago, Illinois May 2017 NEW PLANTER NEW PLANTERS Prepared for: Parcel O, LLC UPPER N COLUMBUS US DRIVE RETAIL NEW PLANTERS

2 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) was retained by Parcel O, LLC, to perform a traffic impact study for Parcel O at Lakeshore East in Chicago, Illinois. The proposed site is located in the western portion of the Lakeshore East development, between Columbus Drive and Park Drive, immediately south of the Aqua building and north of the Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) building. An aerial view of the study location and the surrounding roadway network is presented in Exhibit 1. The subject development plan includes apartments, a micro/pod hotel, a full-service hotel, two restaurants, an event space, and ground-floor retail. As part of the development, the existing Aqua parking garage would be expanded south into Parcel O, adding 180 parking spaces. Access would be provided to the site via existing access driveways serving the Aqua garage located on South Plaza Drive (the access road north of Aqua), Intermediate Columbus Drive, Intermediate Wacker Drive, and Lower Wacker Drive. Additionally, an entrance-only access serving the residential parking is planned on Park Drive. This report presents and documents Kimley-Horn s data collection, summarizes the evaluation of traffic conditions on the surrounding roadways, identifies recommendations to address operational impacts, details the potential impact of site-generated traffic on the adjacent roadway network, and offers comments regarding site access and circulation. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 1 June Updated May 2017

3 LEGEND NORTH Proposed Site SOUTH WATER STREET LAKE SHORE DRIVE SOUTH PLAZA SOUTH WATER STREET BENTON PLACE ONE-WAY SITE LOCATION EXHIBIT 1 HARBOR DRIVE WESTSHORE DRIVE FIELD BLVD WACKER DRIVE AQUA PARK DRIVE SITE (PARCEL O) BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD PARCEL C RANDOLPH STREET COLUMBUS DRIVE STETSON DRIVE

4 Existing Conditions Kimley-Horn referenced recent studies for the area to collect relevant information pertaining to existing land uses in the surrounding area, the adjacent street system, current traffic volumes and multimodal conditions, lane configurations and traffic controls at nearby intersections, on-street parking and other curbside regulations, transit service, and other key roadway characteristics. This section of the report details information on these existing conditions. Area Land Uses As shown in Exhibit 1, Parcel O is located immediately south of the Aqua building, in the western portion of the Lakeshore East development. The site is bound by Columbus Drive on the west and Park Drive on the east. The surrounding Lakeshore East development includes a variety of land uses and densities throughout several buildings including hotel, office, commercial retail/restaurant, and high- and low-rise residential uses. Roadway Characteristics The following information regarding the existing roadway network is documented within the Lakeshore East study area. All study area roadways are under the jurisdiction of the City of Chicago. Upper Wacker Drive is a divided east-west major arterial that generally provides two lanes in each direction. The roadway provides access to Intermediate Wacker Drive in the eastbound direction and from Intermediate Wacker Drive in the westbound direction prior to terminating approximately 800 feet east of Columbus Drive. Parking is prohibited along the majority of the roadway; however, approximately six metered parking spots are provided along the eastern portion of the roadway on the north and south sides of the roadway. Additionally, a taxi stand, accommodating approximately four vehicles is provided just east of Columbus Drive. At its signalized intersection with Upper Columbus Drive the east leg provides an exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes, and two receiving lanes. The west leg provides a shared left-turn/through lane, a shared through/right-turn lane and two receiving lanes. Upper Columbus Drive is a north-south roadway that terminates at Wacker Drive and generally provides three lanes in each direction. The east and west sides of the roadway accommodate a variety of curbside activity, including metered parking, taxi stands, fire department use, loading zones, and CTA bus stops. At its signalized intersection with Upper Wacker Drive the south leg provides dual left- and right-turn lanes with two receiving lanes. At its all-way stop-controlled intersection with Upper South Water Street, the north leg provides a shared left-turn/through lane, a shared through/right-turn lane, a raised center median, and two receiving lanes. The south leg provides an exclusive left-turn lane, a through lane, a shared through/right-turn lane, a raised center median, and two receiving lanes. At its intersection with the Aon Center Drop-off/Pick-Up Area, the north leg provides a shared left-turn/through lane, a shared through/right-turn lane, a raised center median, and two receiving lanes. The south leg provides a striped out area for a future/potential left-turn lane, a shared left-turn/through lane, a shared through/right-turn lane, a raised center median, and two receiving lanes. At its signalized T-intersection with Upper Randolph Street, the north leg provides an exclusive left- and two receiving lanes. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 3 June Updated May 2017

5 Upper Randolph Street is an east-west roadway that terminates at Harbor Drive and generally provides two lanes in each direction through the study area. A bike lane provided in each direction between Columbus Drive and Field Drive. Metered parking is provided along the south side of the roadway between Columbus and Field, while parking is generally prohibited along the north side of the roadway and east of Field Drive. CTA bus stops, loading zones, and a taxi stand area also provided. At its signalized T-intersection with Upper Columbus Drive, the east leg provides a through lane, a shared through/right-turn lane, and two receiving lanes, while the west leg provides an exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes, and two receiving lanes. Intermediate Columbus Drive is a north-south major arterial roadway generally providing three lanes in each direction through the study area and provides a connection over the Chicago River. At its signalized intersection with Intermediate South Water Street/303 East Wacker Drive parking garage/aon parking garage, the north and south legs provide a single left-turn lane, two through lanes, a right-turn lane, and three receiving lanes. Parking is prohibited along both sides of the roadway. South of Wacker Drive the roadway reduces from three to two southbound lanes. Upper South Water Street is an east-west local street that provides a connection between the upper and intermediate level roadways (via a bi-directional ramp) as well as between Columbus Drive and Stetson Avenue on the upper level (through one-way roadway pairs). All-way stop-control is provided at its intersection with Upper Columbus Drive. The eastbound-only roadway and ramp up from the intermediate level provides a shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane and the westbound-only roadway and ramp down to the intermediate level provide a single receiving lane. Parking is prohibited along the two-lane ramp. Intermediate South Water Street is an east-west local street that provides a connection between the intermediate and sub level roadways (via a bi-directional ramp) as well as between Columbus Drive and Stetson Avenue on the intermediate level (through one-way roadway pairs). At its signalized intersection with Intermediate Columbus Drive, the eastbound-only roadway provides an exclusive left-turn lane, and a shared/right-turn lane, the eastbound-only ramp up from the intermediate level provides a shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane, the westbound-only roadway and ramp down to the intermediate level provide a single receiving lane. Parking is prohibited along the two-lane ramp and one-way roadways. Park Drive is a north-south segment of a local one-way street on the west side of the Park at Lakeshore East and adjacent to the site. This 21-foot wide street circulates counterclockwise around the park with a single travel lane and room to bypass curbside activity. No Parking signas are posted along Park Drive and three marked crosswalks with continental striping are provided on this street segment. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 4 June Updated May 2017

6 Non-Motorized Transportation System Facilities and services accommodating numerous transportation mode choices are available within the vicinity of the Lakeshore East development. Rail The following rail transportation options are located within an approximately ten- to fifteen-minute walk to/from the site: CTA State/Lake Station: Access to the CTA Brown, Green, Orange, Pink, Red, and Purple Line CTA Wabash/Randolph Station: Access to the CTA Brown, Green, Orange, Pink, and Purple Line CTA Dearborn/Washington Station: Access to the CTA Blue Line CTA State/Lake Station: Access to the CTA Red Line Millennium Station: Access to the Metra Electric District (ME) and the Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District (NICTD) South Shore (SS) Line Bus Additionally, the surrounding area is served by multiple CTA bus routes with stops located within a five- to ten-minute walk to/from the site: Route 6: Jackson Park Express Provides service between 79 th /South Shore to Wacker/Columbus Nearest stop located at Upper Wacker/Columbus Drive Route 124: Navy Pier Provides service between Union/Ogilvie State and Navy Pier Nearest stop located at Upper Wacker/Columbus Drive Route 20: Columbus Provides service between Madison/Austin and Randolph/Columbus Drive Nearest stop located at Columbus/Randolph Route 4: Cottage Grove Provides service between 95 th /St. Lawrence and Columbus/South Water Nearest stop located at Columbus/Randolph Route 60: Blue Island/26th Provides service between Cicero/24 th Place and Harbor/Randolph Nearest stop located at Columbus/Randolph Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 5 June Updated May 2017

7 DIVVY Three DIVVY bike share stations are located within reasonable walking distance of the subject site such that people will likely consider making a shared bike trip. These station locations are outlined below: Upper Randolph Street/Columbus Drive (in front of the Blue Cross Blue Shield building) Stetson Avenue/South Water Street (west side of intersection) South Water Street/Field Boulevard (Lower level, just south of South Water Street within the Lake Shore East Park) Since taxi and walking trips make up nearly 50 percent of the mode spilt for trips to work in this area, the bike share system offers increased travel options and convenience. The nearby stations are an enticing draw for residents within the site and hotel guests looking to explore the City. The bike share stations are reasonably expected to facilitate some degree of mode shift from walking and taxi to biking for those traveling to other destinations in the Loop, along the lakefront, or north of the Chicago River. Pedestrian/Bike Connections Existing connections are also provided within the vicinity to the following pedestrian/bike features: Riverwalk - Access is provided via Lower-level Wacker/Field Boulevard Lakefront Trail - Access is provided via the Riverwalk (Lower-level Wacker/Field Boulevard) and the Harbor Service Drive under Lakeshore Drive Pedway System - Access is available north of the site at Aqua, south of the site at the Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) pedway access, and east of the site at the Village Market pedway access. Existing Traffic Volumes To establish existing turning movement volumes at the study intersections, volumes included in a December 2013 Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA) draft study titled, Transportation Study for Lakeshore East Planned Development Parcel O, were supplemented with count data provided by CDOT for the Upper Columbus Drive/South Water Drive intersection (collected by Fish Transportation Group in June 2016). The KLOA data indicates that peak traffic conditions take place within the study area from 8:00-9:00AM and 4:45-5:45PM. These turning movement volumes are shown for the study intersections on the upper-, and intermediate-level roadways on Exhibits 2A and 2B, respectively. Non-vehicular volumes (pedestrians and bikes) are shown on Exhibits 3A and 3B. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 6 June Updated May 2017

8 UPPER WACKER DRIVE 490 (150) 200 (105) 30 (25) N NOT TO SCALE (40) 40 (230) 450 (115) (15) 55 (25) 280 (165) 20 (15) (-) 10 (110) 95 (160) 260 ONE-WAY SOUTH WATER STREET ONE-WAY (30) 25 (60) 45 (10) 5 (200) (25) 5 (-) 10 (10) xx (xx) - LEGEND Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday PM Peak Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection Existing Stop Sign Less than Five Vehicles (30) 20 (10) 5 (25) 40 (5) - (125) (15) LAKE STREET 465 (455) 45 (5) 15 (15) (15) 35 (5) (165) 305 (310) (5) - (55) 160 (265) (-) UPPER COLUMBUS DRIVE (45) 25 (35) 110 (5) 5 (5) 15 (200) (30) 5 (10) (5) 10 (220) (180) 240 (290) 5 (10) SITE UPPER RANDOLPH STREET EXHIBIT 2A EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES (UPPER)

9 N NOT TO SCALE 25 (10) 55 (25) 755 (960) 10 (5) 25 (5) ONE-WAY WB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS ONE-WAY EB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS (15) 15 (60) 20 (-) 10 (145) 60 (10) 20 (25) 15 (-) 5 (5) 20 (95) 50 (35) 85 (55) (35) - (5) - (10) 10 (30) - (5) 5 (35) (-) 5 (5) 90 (1305) E. WACKER GARAGE AQUA PARKING GARAGE xx (xx) - LEGEND Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday PM Peak Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection Less than Five Vehicles INTERMEDIATE COLUMBUS DRIVE NOTE: The intersection of Intermediate-Level Columbus Drive with South Water Street and the parking garages for 303 E. Wacker Drive and Aqua operate with one controller as a single traffic signal. EXHIBIT 2B EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES (INTERMEDIATE)

10 UPPER WACKER DRIVE (0) (103) 216 (237) 0 (1) N NOT TO SCALE 115 (210) SOUTH WATER STREET 2 (2) (2) 5 86 (167) ONE-WAY 334 (223) ONE-WAY UPPER COLUMBUS DRIVE 157 (179) 190 (266) LEGEND xx LEGEND (xx) xx (xx) - Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak Hour (8:00 9:00am) Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Weekday PM Peak Existing Signalized Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Intersection Existing Signalized Existing Stop Sign Intersection Crossing Existing Pedestrians Stop Sign Less Bicycle than Volumes Five Vehicles LAKE STREET (0) 0 (19) (285) 116 (133) 150 (147) 0 (1) (7) (281) 277 (298) 149 (89) 0 (1) 0 (3) SITE UPPER RANDOLPH STREET EXHIBIT 3A EXISTING NON-VEHICULAR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (UPPER)

11 N NOT TO SCALE ONE-WAY WB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS 0 (0) SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS 13 (28) 22 (37) 303 E. WACKER GARAGE ONE-WAY EB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS AQUA PARKING GARAGE 2 (1) LEGEND xx LEGEND (xx) (xx) - Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday AM PM Peak Hour (8:00 (4:45-9:00am) 5:45pm) Weekday Existing Signalized PM Peak Hour Intersection (4:45-5:45pm) Existing Crossing Signalized Intersection Pedestrians Less Bicycle than Volumes Five Vehicles INTERMEDIATE COLUMBUS DRIVE NOTE: The intersection of Intermediate-Level Columbus Drive with South Water Street and the parking garages for 303 E. Wacker Drive and Aqua operate with one controller as a single traffic signal. EXHIBIT 3B EXISTING NON-VEHICULAR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (INTERMEDIATE)

12 FUTURE CONDITIONS This section of the report outlines the proposed site plan, summarizes site-specific traffic characteristics, and develops future traffic projections for analysis. Development Characteristics & Site Access The proposed development plan for Parcel O includes the following uses: Apartments 643 units Micro/Pod Hotel 322 rooms Full-Service Hotel 247 rooms Restaurant 8,765 square feet Retail 14,102 square feet As part of the development, a garage with 180 parking spaces would be provided. Access to the garage would be provided to the site via existing access driveways serving the Aqua garage located on South Plaza Drive, the access road north of Aqua, Intermediate Columbus Drive, Intermediate Wacker Drive, and Lower Wacker Drive. Additionally, an entrance-only access serving residents is planned on Park Drive. The access and circulation features of Parcel O are illustrated on Exhibit 4 and include the following key components: Apartments The residential lobby, serving as the primary pedestrian entrance for the apartment portion of the site, would be located on the intermediate level providing access to the existing Lakeshore East Park. A publicly accessible elevator would be provided to link the residential lobby to Upper Columbus Drive and South Plaza Drive. Residential pick-up/drop-off activity (e.g., drop-off/pick-up, taxis, food delivery, etc.) is planned occur on Park Drive along the site frontage. A supplemental access driveway to the parking garage is being considered via Park Drive. This entrance-only access would serve residential traffic only. While the access is not necessary to mitigate traffic impacts elsewhere, this driveway would provide additional ease and circulation options for residents. Residential pick-up and drop-off patterns are shown on Exhibit 4. Hotels At this time, a 322-room micro/pod hotel and a 248-room full-service hotel are planned to be included as part of Parcel O. Micro/Pod-style hotels, such as the one proposed, offer relatively small, but wellappointed rooms that are generally geared for urban travelers focusing their experiences more on exploring the city and less on their accommodations. The full-service hotel would be an upscale, fourstar hotel with luxury accommodations. Hotel guest pick-up/drop-off activity would occur along the south curb of South Plaza Drive. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 11 June Updated May 2017

13 Aqua Event PARK DRIVE Event Attendant Parking for Radisson BLU and Parcel O Event Spaces (up to 4 cars) COLUMBUS DRIVE TO AQUA PEDWAY THE PARK AT LA K E SH O RE E AS T RADISSON BLU BALLROOM SO U TH PL A Z A Residential LEGEND Hotel Route POTENTIAL VALET OR CAB STAGING AREA BENTON PLACE Residential Event Route To/From Attendant Parking TO BCBS PEDWAY Pedway Elevator Hotel, Events, and Restaurant Guest TO VILLAGE MARKET PEDWAY (up to 6 cars) PARCEL O: HOTEL / RESIDENTIAL / EVENT ACCESS ROUTES EXHIBIT 4

14 Event Space Event space is proposed to be included as part of the hotel component of the development. Typically, events in this type of space would occur during evenings and on weekends. Thus, the peak event activity is not anticipated to coincide with peak hour traffic in the area; however, event activity could coincide with hotel guest arrival and restaurant activity. During major events at the proposed event space, as well as at the Aqua Radisson Blu Hotel event space, attendant parking drop-off and retrieval activity is planned to occur within the Aqua/Parcel O parking garage. Guest vehicles would be routed to the garage from South Plaza Drive and leave their car with an attendant within the garage. Approximately 890 feet (+/- 36 cars) of vehicle stacking would be available for vehicles using attendant parking for events at Parcel O and approximately 490 feet (+/- 20 cars) of vehicle stacking would be provided for vehicles using attendant parking for an event at the Aqua Radisson Blu Hotel. Additional vehicle stacking capacity would also be available (approximately two cars) on South Plaza Drive prior to extending back to Upper Columbus Drive. Guests would receive their vehicles from an attendant within the garage and exit using any of the five existing Aqua garage access locations. Pedway Connections The proposed plan for Parcel O includes connections to the existing Pedway system in order to link both Parcel O and Aqua to the south and improve overall pedestrian circulation through the Lakeshore East area. The proposed plan includes extending the Pedway via an open, but marked and dedicated route, through the Aqua/Parcel O parking garage with connections to the BCBS Pedway (located on the southwest corner of Parcel O) and to the Village Market Pedway (located on the southeast corner of the site). In addition to the connections to the existing Pedway, vertical circulation/access is planned via a new elevator near the southwest corner of the site to connect the intermediate and upper levels of Columbus Drive (the only such connection between Randolph Street and Wacker Drive). Trip Generation Typically, traffic impact studies include trip generation estimates based on rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) manual titled Trip Generation, Ninth Edition. It is worth noting, however, that these rates generally represent, and are derived from, data collected in largely auto-oriented areas that exhibit few, if any, non-auto modes of transportation (such as transit, walking, and biking). Due to the urban context, availability of multiple convenient public transportation options, and nature of the land uses in the site area, it is assumed that more non-auto activity would occur within Lakeshore East than in typical auto-oriented suburban locations. Therefore, for hotel, retail and restaurant uses, this study references data from the River East Area Traffic and Parking Operation Review, prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. for the City of Chicago in 1997, which directly reflects the use of non-auto trips. For the apartment component, mode share adjustments are applied to the conventional Trip Generation data to incorporate these non-auto factors. Specific peak hour trip generation information is not included for the proposed event space/ballroom as the peak hour trips generated by these spaces is assumed to be included in the trip generation rates for the hotel use. It should be noted that peak event activity primarily occurring on Friday evenings and weekends, is not anticipated to occur during the peak hour of the surrounding roadway network. The trip generation equations/rates for each proposed land use is shown in Table 1. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 13 June Updated May 2017

15 Table 1. ITE/River East Trip Generation Data by Land Use ITE Land Use Apartments (LUC 220) 1 Hotel 2 AM Peak Ln(T) = 0. 8 Ln(X) % in/83% out % in/42% out Restaurant 2 N/A 3 Retail % in/38% out Weekday T - Site-generated trips X - Dwelling units 1 - Based upon ITE trip generation data 2 - Based upon River East Area Traffic and Parking Operation Review trip generation data for auto only trips 3 - Restaurant is not anticipated to be open during the morning peak period. PM Peak Ln(T) = Ln(X) % in/33% out % in/51% out % in/47% out % in/50% out The mode split characteristics for the census tract that includes Lakeshore East are presented in Table 2. Table 2. Mode Split Characteristics 1 Mode of Transportation Population Percent Automobile Car 1,814 30% Subtotal 1,814 30% Other Methods Public Transportation (excluding taxi) % Taxicab 339 6% Bicycle 43 1% Walk 2,627 43% Other Means 67 1% Worked at Home 195 3% Subtotal 4,226 64% Total 6, % 1 Includes data referenced from American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates for census tract 3201, which is bound by the Chicago River to the north, Monroe and Madison Street to the south, Dearborn Street to the west, and Lakeshore Drive to the east. Based upon the census data, it is apparent that walking (43 percent) is the primary mode of transportation for those traveling to work from within the Lakeshore East community and residents in the northeastern portion of the Loop. Due to the 30 percent mode share attributed to personal autos, a reduction of 70 percent was applied to ITE data for the apartment. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 14 June Updated May 2017

16 In the River East study, data indicates that taxis were identified to represent 81 percent of hotel autotrips, 27 percent of the restaurant auto-trips, and 32 percent of retail auto-trips. All other hotel, retail, and restaurant trips were assumed to be personal auto trips. For the purposes of this study, all personal auto trips to the hotel and restaurant were assumed to utilize the attendant parking service located on South Plaza Drive. Per these assumptions and the calculations detailed previously, sitegenerated traffic projections are presented in Table 3. Table 3. Site-Generated Traffic Projections Land Use Unit Weekday AM Peak PM Peak In Out Total In Out Total Total Trips Apartment 643 units Hotel units Restaurant 2 8,765 sq. ft Retail 14,102 sq. ft Less 70% for Non-Auto Modes of Transportation Total New Auto Trips Personal Auto Trips Apartment 94% Hotel 19% Restaurant 73% Retail 68% Total New Personal Auto Trips Cab Trips Apartment 6% Hotel 81% Restaurant 27% Retail 32% Total New Cab Trips Applied to Apartment use only 2 - Based upon River East trip generation data for auto only trips 3 - Volumes adjusted to account for rounding and minimum volumes of cab trips. Directional Distribution The estimated distribution of site-generated traffic for the subject site on the surrounding roadway network as it approaches and departs the site is a function of several variables, such as site access locations, characteristics of the street system, the ease with which motorists can travel over various sections of the system (to/from the Upper, Intermediate, and Lower-Level roadways), and prevailing traffic volumes/patterns. As such, the directional distribution shown in Table 4 identifies the anticipated direction from which vehicles will travel to and from the site. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 15 June Updated May 2017

17 Table 4. Estimated Trip Distribution To/From Portion of Site Traffic Hotel/Restaurant/Retail Residential Apartment Personal Auto Cab Personal Auto Upper-Level 100% 100% 0% West via Upper Wacker Drive 25% 30% 0% East via Upper Wacker Drive 5% 10% 0% West via Upper South Water Street 10% 0% 0% West via Lower South Water Street 10% 0% 0% West via Upper Randolph Drive 50% 60% 0% Intermediate -Level 0% 0% 100% West via Lower South Water Street 0% 0% 20% North via Intermediate Columbus Drive 0% 0% 40% South via Intermediate Columbus Drive 0% 0% 40% Total 100% 100% 100% Site Traffic Assignment The site traffic assignment, representing traffic volumes associated with the proposed development at the study intersections and the access driveways, is a function of the estimated trip generation (Table 3) and the directional distribution (Table 4). The peak hour site traffic assignment for the upperand intermediate -level roadways is presented in Exhibits 5A and 5B, respectively. All residential trips were assumed to park within the garage and enter on the Intermediate-Level, while all restaurant, hotel, and retail trips were assumed to arrive and depart the site on the Upper-Level. It should be noted that guests traveling via taxi to/from the restaurant, hotel, and retail portion of the development will generate two separate trips for each arrival and departure. For arriving guests, one trip as their taxi pulls up to drop them off and one trip as the taxi departs the site to pick up another fare. Similarly, when guests leave, one trip is generated as the taxi pulls up to retrieve the guest and another as the taxi departs towards the guest s destination. Taxi trips were assumed to originate outside of the study area, drop-off or pick-up their passenger at the South Plaza Drive curbside, and then continue to their destination. This is a conservative approach to the analysis as many times a taxi picks up a new fare while dropping one off and fewer trips would be realized. Also, the analysis assumes that all taxis are new to the surrounding area when practically speaking, several taxis are already driving through the study area in search of a fare, would already be included in the existing traffic counts, and would not be additional traffic. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 16 June Updated May 2017

18 UPPER WACKER DRIVE 10 (10) N NOT TO SCALE (50) 50 (45) 40 (10) (60) ONE-WAY SOUTH WATER STREET ONE-WAY (5) 5 xx (xx) - LEGEND Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday PM Peak Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection Existing Stop Sign Less than Five Vehicles (5) 5 LAKE STREET 70 (70) 75 (90) (90) 80 UPPER COLUMBUS DRIVE (5) - (5) - (55) (65) 75 (90) (90) 80 SITE UPPER RANDOLPH STREET EXHIBIT 5A SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT (UPPER)

19 N NOT TO SCALE 5 (25) ONE-WAY WB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS (10) E. WACKER GARAGE ONE-WAY EB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS 25 (10) 10 (5) 20 (10) AQUA PARKING GARAGE (20) 5 xx (xx) - LEGEND Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday PM Peak Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection Less than Five Vehicles INTERMEDIATE COLUMBUS DRIVE NOTE: The intersection of Intermediate-Level Columbus Drive with South Water Street and the parking garages for 303 E. Wacker Drive and Aqua operate with one controller as a single traffic signal. EXHIBIT 5B SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT (INTERMEDIATE)

20 Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic volumes were developed in order to understand impacts related to parcels yet to be constructed, but planned within the Lakeshore East community. As such, site-generated traffic volumes were referenced from three studies previously completed for planned sites within the Lakeshore East development. For Lakeshore East parcels I, J, K, and L, site-generated volumes were referenced from a May 2014 study prepared by KLOA titled, Transportation Study for Lakeshore East Planned Development Amendment. Traffic volumes related to GEMs and Coast were referenced from a May 23, 2012 memorandum completed by KLOA with the subject: Traffic Study, Proposed GEMS School with assumptions for extending traffic projections from its study area through the study intersections of this study. To account for traffic volumes related to the Wanda Vista development, the November 2015 study completed by Kimley-Horn was referenced. The peak hour traffic volumes for each individual site were combined at each of the study intersections to develop the background traffic volumes for the upper- and intermediate-level roadways and are presented in Exhibits 6A and 6B, respectively. Total Traffic Assignment The total traffic assignment represents future anticipated traffic volumes at the study intersections upon construction and full occupancy of the proposed development. The total traffic assignment consists of the existing traffic (Exhibits 2A and 2B), background traffic (Exhibits 6A and 6B) plus the site traffic assignment (Exhibits 5A and 5B). To be conservative, trips were not assigned to the entryonly driveway from Park Drive. The total traffic volumes for the upper- and intermediate-level roadways are illustrated in Exhibits 7A and 7B, respectively. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 19 June Updated May 2017

21 UPPER WACKER DRIVE 75 (25) 30 (35) 45 (50) N NOT TO SCALE (45) 20 (45) (35) ONE-WAY SOUTH WATER STREET ONE-WAY 25 (45) xx (xx) - LEGEND Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday PM Peak Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection Existing Stop Sign Less than Five Vehicles LAKE STREET 30 (35) 15 (20) 15 (15) (35) 15 (130) 200 UPPER COLUMBUS DRIVE (45) 25 (45) (10) 210 (100) SITE UPPER RANDOLPH STREET EXHIBIT 6A BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES (UPPER)

22 N NOT TO SCALE 15 (5) ONE-WAY WB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS ONE-WAY EB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS (30) 60 (30) 60 (40) 75 (10) E. WACKER GARAGE AQUA PARKING GARAGE xx (xx) - LEGEND Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday PM Peak Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection Less than Five Vehicles INTERMEDIATE COLUMBUS DRIVE NOTE: The intersection of Intermediate-Level Columbus Drive with South Water Street and the parking garages for 303 E. Wacker Drive and Aqua operate with one controller as a single traffic signal. EXHIBIT 6B BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES (INTERMEDIATE)

23 UPPER WACKER DRIVE 565 (175) 240 (150) 75 (75) N NOT TO SCALE (40) 40 (275) 470 (165) (15) 55 (25) (-) 10 (155) 135 (215) (260) 20 (15) ONE-WAY SOUTH WATER STREET ONE-WAY (30) 25 (60) 45 (10) 5 (205) (60) 10 (10) xx (xx) - LEGEND Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday PM Peak Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection Existing Stop Sign Less than Five Vehicles (30) 20 (10) 5 (25) 40 (5) - (130) (15) LAKE STREET 495 (490) 115 (75) (15) 35 (5) (15) 290 (275) 320 (325) (5) - (180) 255 (395) (-) UPPER COLUMBUS DRIVE (1) 1 (5) 65 (5) 15 (5) 5 (45) 25 (340) (95) 80 (100) (95) 90 (265) (190) 450 (390) 5 (10) SITE UPPER RANDOLPH STREET EXHIBIT 7A TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (UPPER)

24 N NOT TO SCALE 25 (10) 55 (25) 775 (990) 10 (5) 25 (5) ONE-WAY WB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS ONE-WAY EB SOUTH WATER STREET RAMPS (15) 15 (105) 95 (10) 15 (175) 120 (10) 20 (25) 15 (-) 5 (5) 20 (95) 50 (35) 85 (95) (35) - (5) - (10) 35 (40) 10 (5) - (5) 25 (45) (-) 5 (1315) 1000 (25) E. WACKER GARAGE AQUA PARKING GARAGE xx (xx) - LEGEND Weekday AM Peak Hour (8:00-9:00am) Weekday PM Peak Hour (4:45-5:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection Less than Five Vehicles INTERMEDIATE COLUMBUS DRIVE NOTE: The intersection of Intermediate-Level Columbus Drive with South Water Street and the parking garages for 303 E. Wacker Drive and Aqua operate with one controller as a single traffic signal. EXHIBIT 7B TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (INTERMEDIATE)

25 ANALYSES This section of the report evaluates the proposed site access/circulation and summarizes the analysis of the base and future traffic conditions at the study intersections. Site Access/Circulation Evaluation The proposed site plan was reviewed with regards to site access and circulation for the proposed development. Key characteristics of the plan and its transportation attributes are detailed on Exhibit 4 and are summarized below. Pick-Up/Drop-Off Areas Hotel/Restaurant It is recommended that an attendant or other appropriate employee be placed on South Plaza Drive at the garage ramps to sort and guide guests to their appropriate location while events are taking place and event attendant parking traffic is directed into the Aqua garage. During these times, attendant parking activity for events would occur within the garage and for hotel guests along the curb on South Plaza Drive near the hotel entrances. If conditions become congested, hotel attendant parking retrieval could also occur within the garage, so that the only arrival attendant parking service is provided for hotel and restaurant guests along the South Plaza Drive curbside. With the existing plan, the available vehicle stacking within the parking garage (approximately 890 feet or 36 cars for the proposed event space and approximately 490 feet or 20 cars for the Aqua Radisson Blu Hotel event space) is sufficient. Additionally, prior to reaching the garage ramps, at least two vehicles would be able to queue on South Plaza Drive before extending onto Upper Columbus Drive. It should be noted that, if needed, additional vehicle queueing could occur in the outside lane along Upper Columbus Drive without significantly impacting traffic during peak event arrival periods. The available stacking for Aqua Radisson Blu Hotel and Parcel O events, combined with the potential to actively manage the garage ramps with two inbound lanes (diverting any exiting traffic to four other existing exits), and an employee guiding traffic on South Plaza Drive, is expected to adequately handle hotel, restaurant, and event traffic conditions on site and limit any impacts on Upper Columbus Drive. Residential Park Drive is currently wide enough (21 feet) to accommodate a standing zone along the site frontage to accommodate residential activities such as pick-up/drop-off (cab or otherwise), loading/unloading, and delivery services while maintaining adequate width for vehicles to comfortably bypass curbside activity. Based on observations of curbside activity around Lakeshore East Park (including in front of Parcel O), and a preference to maintain the existing landscaped parkway by avoiding a curb setback, residential-oriented curbside activity could be accommodated along Park Drive within the existing roadway width. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 24 June Updated May 2017

26 Pedestrian Connections The proposed improvements to the existing pedway system will help to provide additional circulation options and access for pedestrians within the Lakeshore East area. The new vertical circulation/access planned will provide the first vertical connection along Columbus Drive between Randolph Street and Wacker Drive. Capacity Analysis Capacity analyses were conducted to assess the base and future operating conditions of the study intersections during the weekday peak hours. The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS) according to the average delay per vehicle passing through the intersection. Levels of service range from A to F with LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at-capacity conditions, and LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). Due to the traffic characteristics and physical constraints of urban neighborhoods in Chicago, it is not uncommon for select intersections or approaches to operate at LOS E or LOS F during peak periods. The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in the Transportation Research Board s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), quantify and categorize the driver s discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating can be found in Table 5. Table 5. Level of Service Grading Descriptions1 Level of Service A B C Description Minimal control delay; traffic operates at primarily free-flow conditions; unimpeded movement within traffic stream. Minor control delay at signalized intersections; traffic operates at a fairly unimpeded level with slightly restricted movement within traffic stream. Moderate control delay; movement within traffic stream more restricted than at LOS B; formation of queues contributes to lower average travel speeds. D E Considerable control delay that may be substantially increased by small increases in flow; average travel speeds continue to decrease. High control delay; average travel speed no more than 33 percent of free flow speed. F Extremely high control delay; extensive queuing and high volumes create exceedingly restricted traffic flow. 1 Highway Capacity Manual 2010 The range of control delay for each rating (as detailed in the HCM) is shown in Table 6. Because signalized intersections are expected to carry a larger volume of vehicles and stopping is required during red time, note that higher delays are tolerated for the corresponding LOS ratings. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 25 June Updated May 2017

27 Table 6. Level of Service Grading Criteria 1 Level of Service Unsignalized Intersections Average Control Delay (s/veh) at: Signalized Intersections A B > > C > > D > > E > > F 2 > 50 > 80 1 Highway Capacity Manual All movements with a Volume to Capacity (v/c) ratio greater than 1 receive a rating of LOS F. Synchro software was utilized to evaluate capacity of the study intersections (reported overall and by approach) for the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Table 7 summarizes the capacity analysis results for base and future peak hour traffic conditions. Additional capacity analysis details are included in the attached appendix. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 26 June Updated May 2017

28 Table 7. Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection Existing Conditions Future Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Upper Columbus Drive / Randolph Drive Eastbound Approach 15 B 13 B 26 C 17 B Westbound Approach 14 B 16 B 18 B 18 B Southbound Approach 12 B 13 B 15 B 14 B Overall Intersection 14 B 14 B 20- B 16 B Upper Columbus Drive / South Water Street / Radisson 1 Eastbound Approach (South Water Street Ramps) 12 B 11 B 13 B 14 B Eastbound Approach (EB South Water Street) 11 B 10+ B 12 B 11 B Westbound Approach 10- A 9 A 11 B 10+ B Northbound Approach 15 B 12 B 24 C 18 C Southbound Approach 11 B 10- A 13 B 11 B Upper Columbus Drive / Lake Street / South Plaza Drive 2 Eastbound Approach >120 F >120 F >120 F >120 F Westbound Approach 61 F 40 E >120 F >120 F Northbound (Left-Turn) / Approach 2 <1 A <1 A <1 A <1 A Southbound (Left-Turn) / Approach 2 3 A <1 A 3 C 2 A - Signalized Intersection - All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection - Minor-Leg Stop-Controlled Intersection 1 - HCM methodology does not support the analysis of intersections with more than four legs or greater than two lanes on an individual approach. As such, the intersection is modeled as three individual intersections. Where more than three lanes are provided due to the turn lane available for north- and southbound traffic, the available two through lanes are reduced to one. The delay is compared for the north- and southbound approaches at each intersection and the worst delay is reported for the approach. 2 - If analyzed as an all-way stop-controlled intersection, all approaches operate at LOS B. However, results may be skewed in areas with high pedestrian activity, such as this intersection since the methodology for all-way stop control capacity does not consider pedestrian volumes. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 27 April Updated May 2017

29 Table 7. Intersection Capacity Analysis (continued) Intersection Existing Conditions Future Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Upper Columbus Drive / Wacker Drive Eastbound Approach 6 A 4 A 9 A 4 A Westbound Approach 10- A 7 A 20- B 9 B Northbound Approach 12 B 15 B 14 B 19 B Overall Intersection 9 A 8 A 15 B 10+ B Intermediate Columbus Drive / South Water Street / 303 East Wacker 3 Eastbound Approach (EB South Water Street) 38 D 23 C 34 C 24 C Eastbound Approach (South Water Street Ramp) 28 C 38 D 53 D 49 D Westbound Approach (303 E Wacker) 34 C 17 B 35 D 18 B Westbound Approach (Aqua Garage) 29 C 5 A 23 C 35 D Northbound Approach 14 B 18 B 21 C 23 C Southbound Approach 7 A 14 B 20 C 34 C - Signalized Intersection - All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection - Minor-Leg Stop-Controlled Intersection 3 - For the future scenario, the analysis includes the recommended improvement of installing a northbound left-turn phase from Intermediate-Level Columbus Drive to South Water Street. This signal modification improves the northbound left-turn capacity from LOS F to LOS D during the AM and PM peak hours. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 28 April Updated May 2017

30 Existing Conditions Based upon the analysis results, many of the study intersections and key approaches operate well at LOS B or C with little delay during the existing analysis period. The eastbound and westbound approaches at the Upper Columbus Drive/Lake Street/South Plaza Drive intersection are shown to operate at LOS F. This poor level of service is primarily due to the conflict between vehicles and high pedestrian volumes. For the Intermediate Columbus Drive/South Water Street intersection, the northbound left-turn movement is shown to operate with significant delay during the morning and evening peak hours. In addition, the eastbound left-turn movement from Eastbound South Water Street is shown to operate at LOS E during the morning peak hour. Future Conditions Review of future condition capacity analysis (including traffic associated with the proposed development as well as growth in non-site traffic related to other nearby development sites that are planned or under construction), relative to current conditions, indicates little change of intersection and approach delay and level of services for the majority of the study intersections. However, two intersections experience increased delay in future conditions. Issues at for the northbound left-turn movement at the Intermediate Columbus Drive/South Water Street intersection are expected to worsen due to anticipated growth in non-site traffic. The identified relates to the Upper Columbus Drive/Lake Street/South Plaza Drive intersection. To mitigate changes to the intersection operations and to improve intersection capacity at both intersections, the following improvements are recommended. Intermediate Columbus Drive/South Water Street The volumes at the intersection satisfy CDOT warrants for installation of protected left-turn phasing. In addition, the northbound left-turn from Intermediate-Level Columbus Drive to both the South Water Street Ramps and Westbound Intermediate Level would operate at LOS F if no changes are implemented. To address this capacity issue, a northbound left-turn arrow should be installed with protected-permitted signal phasing. This improvement would improve the level of service for the northbound left-turn from LOS F to LOS D during the morning and evening peak hours. Upper Columbus Drive/Lake Street/South Plaza Drive Capacity analysis indicates that converting the intersection from two-way stop-control to an all-way stop improves the levels of service for the eastbound and westbound approaches of Lake Street and South Plaza Drive (Site Access) from LOS F to LOS B while maintaining acceptable levels of service for the northbound and southbound approaches of Upper-Level Columbus Drive. However, it should be noted that methodology for all-way stop control does not consider pedestrian volumes. At this location, the intersection experiences high levels of pedestrian activity and vehicles would be expected to experience higher delay than what is represented in the capacity analysis. Thus, this improvement should be considered in with Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 29 April 2016 Updated May 2017

31 CDOT in coordination with other factors (e.g., multi-lane approach under stop control, other traffic calming features, vehicle speeds between intersections, etc.) along this upper-level corridor. RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS The proposed development for Parcel O consists of a mix of apartment units, hotel, retail, restaurant, and event space. The site will have a pick-up/drop-off area along South Plaza Drive, opposite the Aqua building, to support attendant parking, taxi, and loading/unloading activity for hotel guests, restaurant patrons, and residents. The multi-level roadway system and use of five existing Aqua parking garage access points help to distribute the auto traffic to/from the site, particularly for residents and event parking egress. Located in the southwestern portion of the Lakeshore East development, multiple non-auto commuting options are available, including convenient access to bike-share stations, CTA Bus routes, and nearby access to CTA/Metra/NICTD Rail stations. These options are reflected in the current census mode share data for the community and immediately surrounding area and help to limit auto-generated impacts of the site and other nearby buildings on the surrounding roadways. Observations of existing traffic conditions, review of previous studies for the Lakeshore East Development, analysis of existing and future condition intersection capacity, and an evaluation of proposed transportation elements of the plan suggest that the proposed development for Parcel O is not anticipated to create a significant negative impact to the existing operations on the surrounding roadway network, provided the following recommendations are incorporated into the plan. Consider Converting Upper Columbus Drive/Lake Street/South Plaza Drive to All-Way Stop Control The concept of installing stop signs at all legs of the intersection to facilitate traffic movements to/from the site and is shown to improve intersection capacity. However, the high-level of pedestrian activity along Columbus Drive and crossing at this location would likely result in less benefit than indicated in the capacity analysis. Thus, installation of an all-way stop should be coordinated with CDOT. One possible option includes monitoring how the intersection functions for both vehicle and pedestrian/bicycle traffic with the current two-way stop control after construction. If the conditions warrant after occupancy, all-way stop control could be easily installed at a low cost. Installation of a Protected Northbound Left-Turn Phase at Intermediate Columbus Drive/South Water Street Modify the traffic signal at Intermediate-Level Columbus Drive/South Water Street to add a northbound left-turn signal head with protected-permitted signal phasing. This improvement would address an anticipated traffic issue due to background traffic growth unrelated to the development of Parcel O. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 30 April 2016 Updated May 2017

32 Attendant Parking for Event Drop-off/Pick-up within the Aqua Garage Establishing an attendant parking drop-off and pick-up operation within the garage for events provides significant queuing capacity (36 vehicles for Parcel O and 20 vehicles for the Aqua Radisson Blu Hotel) during event conditions. In addition, attendants would also be helpful to directing exiting vehicles to intermediate-level garage exits to limit traffic volumes on the upper-level roadway system. Pedestrian Connections Parcel O will establish a new Pedway connection (open-air and unfinished) through the garage between Aqua on the north and both BCBS and Village Market properties on the south. A publicly accessible elevator in the southwest corner of Parcel O will create an additional vertical circulation option between intermediate and upper-level Columbus Drive with a connection to the Pedway. Event Traffic Control on South Plaza Drive During events hosted at Parcel O or the Aqua Radisson Blu Hotel, personnel should be posted on South Plaza Drive at the garage driveway to sort/direct event and hotel traffic to the appropriate locations. The main objective of the personnel would be to maintain traffic circulation for vehicles entering and exiting South Plaza Drive, guide event guests to the attendant parking within the garage, and limit the potential for vehicle queues onto Upper Columbus Drive. Utilize Two Garage Entry Lanes During Event Arrival The garage ramps at South Plaza Drive will provide reversible parking access control equipment to facilitate the use of both lanes in either direction. During peak event arrival periods, both lanes of the garage ramp may be utilized to increase attendant parking stacking capacity, if needed. With the four other garage access locations currently available to all three levels of the surrounding street system, exiting traffic could easily be diverted to multiple alternative access points. This temporary condition during the event arrival period could help to manage traffic flow and queues, if needed, without significantly impacting the ability of nonevent traffic to exit the garage. Delineate South Plaza Drive Pavement Incorporate various pavement colors, textures, and/or materials to provide better delineation zones for pedestrian and vehicular traffic along South Plaza Drive. The current configuration is somewhat uniform and tends to blend the auto and pedestrian zones, even with the use of planters. With additional traffic and curbside functions introduced with the proposed site development, visually clarifying the auto and pedestrian zones would help guide all modes through South Plaza Drive. South Plaza Drive Median Profile The proposed plan includes creating a median along South Plaza Drive east of the garage ramps to separate the eastbound and westbound travel lanes and Parcel O/Aqua dropoff/pick-up areas. While the median helps to delineate traffic flows (as recommended above), Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 31 April 2016 Updated May 2017

33 a mountable median, rather than a raised planter or barrier profile, is recommended in order to accommodate emergency vehicles or potential maneuvers of other larger vehicles. Potential Modifications to Columbus Drive Curbside Designation Adjacent to Parcel O, the east side of Columbus Drive (from north to south) is currently designated for one (1) food truck, three (3) metered parking spaces with a CTA bus stop extending south to Randolph Street. Consider coordinating with the Alderman s Office to reconfigure the curbside to potentially provide two to three taxi stand spaces closest to South Plaza Drive and shifting the food truck space south. This re-designation and shuffling of spaces would allow taxis to wait on-street adjacent to the site to serve hotel guests and residents at the upper level while keeping the off-street drop-off/pick area clear for guest loading. Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 32 April 2016 Updated May 2017

34 APPENDIX Site Plan Existing Capacity Reports Future Capacity Reports Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 33 April 2016 Updated May 2017

35 SITE PLAN Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 34 April 2016 Updated May 2017

36 EXISTING CAPACITY REPORTS Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 35 April 2016 Updated May 2017

37 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBU NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 5 Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4% 29.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS A B A C A Approach Delay Approach LOS A A B Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 1

38 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBU NBL NBR Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 85 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay: 8.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 2

39 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT WBU WBT WBR SBU SBL SBR ø2 ø11 ø12 ø15 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) 10% Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom NA Perm NA custom Perm D.P+P pm+ov Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 8.6% 37.1% 37.1% 10.5% 38.1% 38.1% 8.6% 37% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max None None None None None Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS B B C A B A Approach Delay Approach LOS B B B Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 3

40 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT WBU WBT WBR SBU SBL SBR ø2 ø11 ø12 ø15 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 55.7 Natural Cycle: 135 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service B Splits and Phases: 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 4

41 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 3 7! 2 4! Permitted Phases 3 3 7! 2 4! 2 4! Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 21.9% 21.9% 21.9% 21.9% 21.9% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS C C F A Approach Delay Approach LOS C C F Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 5

42 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group SBL SBT SBR SBR2 ø2 ø4 ø6 ø8 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 73 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 465 Travel Time (s) 10.6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom NA custom Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 11.4% 11.4% 53% 13% 53% 13% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS A A A Approach Delay 7.4 Approach LOS A Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 6

43 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 22 1 ~264 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) #438 8 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 95.6 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 3.32 Intersection Signal Delay: Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 7

44 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group SBL SBT SBR SBR2 ø2 ø4 ø6 ø8 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) 385 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 8

45 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA NA custom NA Protected Phases 4! ! Permitted Phases 4! 8 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 53.3% 11.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS E C C B A A Approach Delay Approach LOS D C B A Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 9

46 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group ø3 ø6 ø7 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 22% 53% 22% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 10

47 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 95.6 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 3.32 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 11

48 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group ø3 ø6 ø7 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 12

49 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 200: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Water WB 6/15/2016 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A Intersection Summary Delay 9.9 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 1

50 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 300: Upper Columbus Drive & Water Street Ramp 6/15/2016 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A B B Intersection Summary Delay 12.7 Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Movement SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Traffic Volume (vph) 55 Future Volume (vph) 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 58 Direction, Lane # Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 2

51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 400: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Water EB 6/15/2016 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B B Intersection Summary Delay 10.8 Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 3

52 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 500: Upper Columbus Drive & Lake Street 6/15/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (Veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 515 px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS F F A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F F Intersection Summary Average Delay 47.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 4

53 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 500: Upper Columbus Drive & Lake Street 6/15/2016 Movement SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (Veh/h) Sign Control Free Grade 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians 190 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 Percent Blockage 18 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing AM Peak Hour K-H Page 5

54 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBU NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4% 29.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS A A A C A Approach Delay Approach LOS A A B Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 1

55 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBU NBL NBR Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 85 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.31 Intersection Signal Delay: 8.0 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 2

56 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBU EBL EBT WBU WBT WBR SBL SBR ø2 ø11 ø12 ø15 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1 Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom custom NA Perm NA custom D.P+P pm+ov Protected Phases ! Permitted Phases 14! Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 8.6% 8.6% 37.1% 37.1% 10.5% 38.1% 8.6% 37% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max None None None None Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS B B C A B A Approach Delay Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 3

57 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBU EBL EBT WBU WBT WBR SBL SBR ø2 ø11 ø12 ø15 Approach LOS B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 56.1 Natural Cycle: 135 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.6% Analysis Period (min) 15! Phase conflict between lane groups. Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service B Splits and Phases: 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 4

58 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 3 7! 2 4! Permitted Phases 3 3 7! 2 4! 2 4! Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D B F A Approach Delay Approach LOS D B B Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 5

59 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group SBL SBT SBR SBR2 ø2 ø4 ø6 ø8 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 73 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 465 Travel Time (s) 10.6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom NA custom Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 7.6% 7.6% 46% 14% 46% 14% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS B B A Approach Delay 13.8 Approach LOS B Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 6

60 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 78 9 ~70 23 Queue Length 95th (ft) # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 91.1 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.31 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 7

61 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group SBL SBT SBR SBR2 ø2 ø4 ø6 ø8 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) 385 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 8

62 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA NA custom NA Protected Phases 4! ! Permitted Phases 4! 8 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 45.7% 7.6% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D B A B A A Approach Delay Approach LOS C A B A Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 9

63 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group ø3 ø6 ø7 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 32% 46% 32% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 10

64 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) m1 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 91.1 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.31 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 11

65 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group ø3 ø6 ø7 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 12

66 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 200: Upper Columbus Drive & Water Street WB 6/15/2016 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS A A Intersection Summary Delay 8.4 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 17.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 1

67 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 300: Upper Columbus Drive & Water Street Ramp/FD/Radisson 6/15/2016 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A B A Intersection Summary Delay 10.8 Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Movement SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 2

68 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 400: Upper Columbus Drive & Water Street EB 6/15/2016 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A A Intersection Summary Delay 9.5 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 3

69 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 500: Upper Columbus Drive & Lake Street 6/15/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (Veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 515 px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS F E A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F E Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 4

70 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 500: Upper Columbus Drive & Lake Street 6/15/2016 Movement SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (Veh/h) Sign Control Free Grade 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians 265 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 Percent Blockage 25 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Existing PM Peak Hour K-H Page 5

71 FUTURE CAPACITY REPORTS Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Lakeshore East Parcel O Chicago, Illinois Page 36 April 2016 Updated May 2017

72 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBU NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 5 Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4% 29.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio 5.90dl Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS A D A C A Approach Delay Approach LOS A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 95 # Internal Link Dist (ft) Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 1

73 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBU NBL NBR Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 85 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane. dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 2

74 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT WBU WBT WBR SBU SBL SBR ø2 ø11 ø12 ø15 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) 10% Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom NA Perm NA custom Perm D.P+P pm+ov Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 8.6% 37.1% 37.1% 10.5% 38.1% 38.1% 8.6% 37% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max None None None None None Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D B C A C A Approach Delay Approach LOS C B B Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 3

75 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT WBU WBT WBR SBU SBL SBR ø2 ø11 ø12 ø15 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # m201 m80 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 63.9 Natural Cycle: 135 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 4

76 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 3 7! 2 4! Permitted Phases 3 3 7! 2 4! 2 4! Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 21.9% 21.9% 21.9% 21.9% 21.9% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS F D F A Approach Delay Approach LOS F D F Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 5

77 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group SBL SBT SBR SBR2 ø2 ø4 ø6 ø8 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 73 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 465 Travel Time (s) 10.6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom NA custom Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 11.4% 11.4% 53% 13% 53% 13% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS A B A Approach Delay 10.8 Approach LOS B Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 6

78 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Queue Length 50th (ft) ~380 2 ~559 8 Queue Length 95th (ft) # #755 8 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 105 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 6.17 Intersection Signal Delay: Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 7

79 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/15/2016 Lane Group SBL SBT SBR SBR2 ø2 ø4 ø6 ø8 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) 385 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 8

80 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA NA custom NA Protected Phases 4! ! Permitted Phases 4! 8 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 53.3% 11.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D C C B A A Approach Delay Approach LOS D C B A Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 9

81 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group ø3 ø6 ø7 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 22% 53% 22% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 10

82 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) m9 m20 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 105 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 6.17 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 11

83 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/15/2016 Lane Group ø3 ø6 ø7 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 12

84 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 200: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Water WB 6/15/2016 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A Intersection Summary Delay 11.9 Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 1

85 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 300: Upper Columbus Drive & Water Street Ramp 6/15/2016 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B C B Intersection Summary Delay 17.4 Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Movement SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Traffic Volume (vph) 55 Future Volume (vph) 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 58 Direction, Lane # Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 2

86 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 400: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Water EB 6/15/2016 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B B Intersection Summary Delay 12.4 Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 3

87 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 500: Upper Columbus Drive & Lake Street 6/15/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B B C Intersection Summary Delay 14.2 Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Movement SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future AM Peak Hour K-H Page 4

88 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive 6/17/2016 Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBU NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4% 29.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS A B A C B Approach Delay Approach LOS A A B Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 1

89 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive 6/17/2016 Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBU NBL NBR Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 85 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 100: Upper Columbus Drive & Upper Wacker Drive Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 2

90 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive 6/17/2016 Lane Group EBU EBL EBT WBU WBT WBR SBL SBR ø2 ø11 ø12 ø15 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1 Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom custom NA Perm NA custom D.P+P pm+ov Protected Phases ! Permitted Phases 14! Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 8.6% 8.6% 37.1% 37.1% 10.5% 38.1% 8.6% 37% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max None None None None Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS C B C A B A Approach Delay Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 3

91 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive 6/17/2016 Lane Group EBU EBL EBT WBU WBT WBR SBL SBR ø2 ø11 ø12 ø15 Approach LOS B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 59.7 Natural Cycle: 135 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 600: Upper Randolph & Upper Columbus Drive Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 4

92 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/17/2016 Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 3 7! 2 4! Permitted Phases 3 3 7! 2 4! 2 4! Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS E B F A Approach Delay Approach LOS E B F Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 5

93 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/17/2016 Lane Group SBL SBT SBR SBR2 ø2 ø4 ø6 ø8 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 73 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 465 Travel Time (s) 10.6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom NA custom Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 7.6% 7.6% 46% 14% 46% 14% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS B C A Approach Delay 20.2 Approach LOS C Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 6

94 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/17/2016 Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Queue Length 50th (ft) ~ Queue Length 95th (ft) # # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 73.7 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 7

95 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1200: Water Street Ramps/300 E Wacker Garage & WB Water Street & Mid Columbus 6/17/2016 Lane Group SBL SBT SBR SBR2 ø2 ø4 ø6 ø8 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) 385 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 8

96 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/17/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA NA custom NA Protected Phases 4! ! Permitted Phases 4! 8 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 45.7% 7.6% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D B D C A A Approach Delay Approach LOS C D C A Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 9

97 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/17/2016 Lane Group ø3 ø6 ø7 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 32% 46% 32% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 10

98 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/17/2016 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # m5 21 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 11

99 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2300: EB Water Street/Aqua Parking Garage 6/17/2016 Lane Group ø3 ø6 ø7 Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 12

100 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 200: Upper Columbus Drive & Water Street WB 6/17/2016 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A Intersection Summary Delay 9.8 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 1

101 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 300: Upper Columbus Drive & Water Street Ramp/FD/Radisson 6/17/2016 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B C B Intersection Summary Delay 14.5 Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Movement SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 2

102 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 400: Upper Columbus Drive & Water Street EB 6/17/2016 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B B Intersection Summary Delay 10.8 Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 3

103 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 500: Upper Columbus Drive & Lake Street 6/17/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS A B B B Intersection Summary Delay 12.2 Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Movement SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # Lakeshore East - Parcel O 8:00 am 6/6/2016 Future PM Peak Hour K-H Page 4

104 0 0D 0C 0B A B C D EXISTING AQUA BUILDING RS EXISTIN ACCESS EXISTING TO PARK PARKING ISTING SIDEWALK K EXISTING DRIVEWAY NEW PLANTER R EXISTING SIDEWALK K NEW SIDEWALK K UP HOTEL B 111 West Jackson Blvd. I Suite 700 I Chicago, IL I EXISTING BCBS PLAZA

Traffic Study. Chicago, IL. June Lendlease. Prepared for:

Traffic Study. Chicago, IL. June Lendlease. Prepared for: LAKESHORE EAST PARCELS I, J, K, & L Traffic Study Chicago, IL June 2017 Prepared for: Lendlease INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) was retained by Lendlease to perform a traffic

More information

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Plainfield, Illinois August 2018 Prepared for: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Existing Conditions

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Submitted by April 9, 2009 Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona,

More information

ENGINE COMPANY 42. Traffic Study. Chicago, Illinois. March 2018 FRIEDMAN PROPERTIES. Prepared for:

ENGINE COMPANY 42. Traffic Study. Chicago, Illinois. March 2018 FRIEDMAN PROPERTIES. Prepared for: ENGINE COMPANY 42 Traffic Study Chicago, Illinois March 2018 Prepared for: FRIEDMAN PROPERTIES INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) was retained by Friedman Properties to perform

More information

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Warrenville, Illinois Prepared For: Prepared By: April 11, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Site Location...

More information

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company

More information

Planned Development Application 1450 Sherman Avenue Evanston, IL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPACT STUDY

Planned Development Application 1450 Sherman Avenue Evanston, IL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPACT STUDY Planned Development Application 1450 Sherman Avenue Evanston, IL 60201 14 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPACT STUDY Traffic Impact Study 1454 Sherman Mixed-Use Development Evanston, Illinois Prepared for Prepared

More information

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014. King County Metro Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis Downtown Southend Transit Study May 2014 Parametrix Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Methodology... 1 Study Area...

More information

Construction Realty Co.

Construction Realty Co. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM : Jeff Pickus Construction Realty Co. Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 f: 847-518-9987 DATE: May 22, 2014 SUBJECT:

More information

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017 Movin Out June 2017 1.0 Introduction The proposed Movin Out development is a mixed use development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of West Broadway and Fayette Avenue in the City of Madison.

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis

More information

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development Traffic Impact Study for Proposed 11330 Olive Boulevard Development Creve Coeur, Missouri July 7, 2017 Prepared For: 11330 Olive Boulevard Development 11330 Olive Boulevard Creve Coeur, Missouri 63141

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald

More information

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix

More information

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064523000 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas Prepared

More information

Traffic Engineering Study

Traffic Engineering Study Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested

More information

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report APPENDIX E Traffic Analysis Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK EAGLE RIVER TRAFFIC MITIGATION PHASE I OLD GLENN HIGHWAY/EAGLE RIVER ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Eagle River, Alaska

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Shopko redevelopment located in Sugarhouse, Utah. The Shopko redevelopment project is located between 1300 East and

More information

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan Traffic and Parking Analysis HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan in Glen Ridge Borough and Montclair Township PREPARED FOR H2M 119 Cherry Hill Road, Suite 110 Parsippany, NJ 07054 862.207.5900

More information

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for: TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY 2014 Prepared for: Hartford Companies 1218 W. Ash Street Suite A Windsor, Co 80550 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive

More information

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW TRANSPORTATION REVIEW - PROPOSED MIX OF LAND USES IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY S UNDER THE GRANVILLE BRIDGE POLICIES THAT AIM TO MEET NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS SHOPPING NEEDS AND REDUCE RELIANCE ON AUTOMOBILE

More information

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna

More information

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation Chapter 4 : THEME 2 Strengthen connections to keep the Central Area easy to reach and get around 55 Figure 4.2.1 Promote region-wide transit investments. Metra commuter rail provides service to the east,

More information

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1. DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava July 9, 2015 115-620 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation

More information

Traffic Feasibility Study

Traffic Feasibility Study Traffic Feasibility Study Town Center South Robbinsville Township, Mercer County, New Jersey December 19, 2017 Prepared For Robbinsville Township Department of Community Development 2298 Route 33 Robbinsville,

More information

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis Appendix 5 Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis 20 MEMORANDUM To: From: Rick Pylman Gary Brooks Bill Fox Date: September 15, 2016 Project: Subject: Haymeadow Evaluation of interim access configuration Currently

More information

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT Vallejo, CA Prepared For: ELITE DRIVE-INS, INC. 2190 Meridian Park Blvd, Suite G Concord, CA 94520 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road,

More information

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Traffic Impact Study Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Marbledale Road Tuckahoe, NY PREPARED FOR BILLWIN DEVELOPMENT AFFILIATES, LLC 365 WHITE PLAINS ROAD EASTCHESTER, NY. 10709 PREPARED BY Engineering

More information

THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO Traffic Impact Study

THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO Traffic Impact Study THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO Traffic Impact Study Chicago, Illinois March 2013 Prepared for: The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Prepared by: TADI 233 S. Wacker Drive - Suite 8400 Chicago,

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 24 UPDATED

More information

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road James J. Copeland, P.Eng. GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 May 31, 2018 Ellen O Hara, P.Eng. Project Engineer DesignPoint Engineering & Surveying Ltd. 200 Waterfront

More information

Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study Ontario Inc.

Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study Ontario Inc. Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study 1255723 Ontario Inc. Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study 1255723 Ontario Inc. 1465 Pickering Parkway Suite 200 Pickering ON L1V 7G7

More information

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Section 5.0 Traffic Information Section 5.0 Traffic Information 10.0 TRANSPORTATION MDM Transportation Consultants, Inc. (MDM) has prepared an evaluation of transportation impacts for the proposed evaluation for the expansion of the

More information

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS SITUATED AT N/E/C OF STAUDERMAN AVENUE AND FOREST AVENUE VILLAGE OF LYNBROOK NASSAU COUNTY, NEW YORK TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO. 2018-089 September 2018 50 Elm Street,

More information

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1

More information

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Invecta Development (Ottawa) Corporation 758 Shanks Height Milton, ON L9T 7P7 May

More information

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Administrative Draft Report Prepared For Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Moss

More information

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 9 V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Throughout the study process several alternative alignments were developed and eliminated. Initial discussion

More information

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA Prepared For: McDonald s USA, LLC Pacific Sierra Region 2999 Oak Road, Suite 900 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared By:

More information

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo APPENDIX C-2 Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo The Mobility Group Transportation Strategies & Solutions Memorandum To: From: Subject: Tomas Carranza, LADOT Matthew Simons Traffic Review - Revised

More information

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study Prepared for: Armel Corporation January 2015 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. 22 King Street South, Suite 300 Waterloo ON N2J 1N8

More information

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment Town of Hyde Park Dutchess County, New York Prepared for: T-Rex Hyde Park Owner LLC 500 Mamroneck Avenue, Suite 300 Harrison, NY 10528 June 21, 2017

More information

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Memorandum Date: February 7, 07 To: From: Subject: John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Introduction Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

More information

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To Kumar Neppalli Traffic Engineering Manager Town of Chapel Hill From Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. Cc HNTB Project File: 38435 Subject Obey Creek TIS 2022

More information

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology City of Sandy Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology March, 2016 Background In order to implement a City Council goal the City of Sandy engaged FCS Group in January of 2015 to update

More information

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA PREPARED FOR: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM 34 CIVIC CENTER BOULEVARD PHILADELPHIA, PA 1987 (61)

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 1.1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 2 1.2 Executive Summary... 3 1.2.1 Site Location and Study Area... 3 1.2.2 Development Description... 3 1.2.3

More information

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D MEMORANDUM Date: To: Liz Diamond, Dokken Engineering From: Subject: Dave Stanek, Fehr & Peers Western Placerville Interchanges 2045 Analysis RS08-2639 Fehr & Peers has completed a transportation analysis

More information

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015 5500 New Albany Road Columbus, Ohio 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Fax: 614.775.4800 Toll Free: 1-888-775-EMHT emht.com 2015-1008 MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES September 2, 2015 Engineers

More information

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited. RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited June 16, 2016 116-638 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting

More information

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015 Memo To: From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON : 165620021 Date: Reference: E.C. Row Expressway, Dominion Boulevard Interchange, Dougall Avenue Interchange, and Howard 1. Review of Interchange Geometry

More information

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

MEMO VIA  . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To: MEMO To: Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers VIA EMAIL From: Michael J. Labadie, PE Julie M. Kroll, PE, PTOE Brandon Hayes, PE, P.Eng. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: January 5, 2017 Re: Proposed

More information

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015 Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z145-235 2720 Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015 Introduction: The Lakehill Preparatory School is located on the northeast

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following analysis summarizes the findings and conclusions of the Traffic Analysis (Traffic Study), prepared by The Mobility Group,

More information

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1 Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West

More information

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: City of Berkeley Prepared by: REVISED JANUARY 9, 2009 Berkeley Downtown Area Plan Program EIR Traffic

More information

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Camp Parkway Commerce Center is a proposed distribution and industrial center to be

More information

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways. 4.2 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This section presents the key assumptions, methods, and results of analysis for the transportation and circulation impacts of the proposed project. This section is based on

More information

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily 5.8 TRAFFIC, ACCESS, AND CIRCULATION This section describes existing traffic conditions in the project area; summarizes applicable regulations; and analyzes the potential traffic, access, and circulation

More information

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT WEST HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2013 PREPARED FOR BEVERLY BOULEVARD ASSOCIATION PREPARED BY DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899

More information

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis Rim of the World Unified School District Reconfiguration Prepared for: Rim of the World School District 27315 North Bay Road, Blue Jay, CA 92317 Prepared by: 400 Oceangate,

More information

Mineola Village Green

Mineola Village Green Traffic Impact Analysis Report Mineola Village Green 199 2 nd Street Mineola, New York Prepared for Mineola Metro LLC c/o Lalezarian Properties 1999 Marcus Avenue, Suite 310 Lake Success, NY 11042 Prepared

More information

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards 9.00 Introduction and Goals 9.01 Administration 9.02 Standards 9.1 9.00 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS City streets serve two purposes that are often in conflict moving traffic and accessing property. The higher

More information

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for: L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES

More information

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II A4-1 A4-2 Eastlake Parking Management Study Final Phase 2 Report Future Parking Demand & Supply January 6, 2017 Submitted by Denver Corp Center III 7900 E.

More information

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017 Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,

More information

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan Parking Stalls Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan June 15, 2016 This Parking Management Plan (P) covers all tenants at the Mercer Island Center for the Arts (MICA) campus, including

More information

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Proposed Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Transportation Assessment St. Clair Township, Ontario September 2009 itrans Consulting Inc. 260

More information

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited 105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited December 2016 Project Summary Project Number 162060 December 2016 Client Zelinka Priamo Ltd 318

More information

Traffic and Parking Study for an Athletic Recreation Center Janes Avenue Shopping Plaza Site Woodridge, Illinois

Traffic and Parking Study for an Athletic Recreation Center Janes Avenue Shopping Plaza Site Woodridge, Illinois Traffic and Parking Study for an Athletic Recreation Center Janes Avenue Shopping Plaza Site Woodridge, Illinois N 83 rd Street Janes Avenue Soccer Fields Janes Avenue Shopping Plaza Cypress Cove Family

More information

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By: TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Sacramento, CA Prepared For: MBK Homes Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road, Suite G Loomis, California 95650 (916) 660-1555

More information

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared for: Department of Public Works Anne Arundel County Prepared by: URS Corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 3 Hunt Valley,

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: David J. Decker Decker Properties, Inc. 5950 Seminole Centre Ct. Suite 200 Madison, Wisconsin 53711 608-663-1218 Fax: 608-663-1226 www.klengineering.com From: Mike Scarmon, P.E.,

More information

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com

More information

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation APPENDIX 2.7-2 VMT Evaluation MEMORANDUM To: From: Mr. Jonathan Frankel New Urban West, Incorporated Chris Mendiara LLG, Engineers Date: May 19, 2017 LLG Ref: 3-16-2614 Subject: Villages VMT Evaluation

More information

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS... Crosshaven Drive Corridor Study City of Vestavia Hills, Alabama Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA... 3 Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

More information

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT for Sunrise Elementary School Replacement PREPARED FOR: Puyallup School District PREPARED BY: 6544 NE 61 st Street, Seattle, WA 98115 ph: (26) 523-3939 fx: (26) 523-4949

More information

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Barrhaven Fellowship CRC 3058 Jockvale Road Ottawa, ON K2J 2W7 December 7, 2016 116-649 Report_1.doc D. J.

More information

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: September 10, 2014 PROJECT 5861.03 NO: PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis TO: Steve Holroyd - District

More information

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph)

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph) Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph) Prepared By: 332 Lorne Avenue East Stratford ON N5A 6S4 Prepared for: Paul Kemper, President

More information

Proposed CVS/pharmacy

Proposed CVS/pharmacy Traffic Impact and Access Study Proposed CVS/pharmacy West Main Street (Route 1) at Hull Street Clinton, Connecticut PREPARED FOR Arista Development LLC 520 Providence Highway, Suite 9 Norwood, Massachusetts

More information

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS NAPA FLEA MARKET COUNTY OF NAPA Prepared for: Tom Harding Napa-Vallejo Flea Market 33 Kelly Road American Canyon, CA 9453 Prepared by: 166 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 21 Walnut Creek,

More information

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario April 18 th, 2017 Mr. Kevin Yemm Vice President, Land Development Richraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa, Ontario (Tel: 613.739.7111 / e-mail: keviny@richcraft.com) Re:

More information

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY FM # 42802411201 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2012 GOBROWARD Broward Boulevard Corridor Transit Study FM # 42802411201 Executive Summary Prepared For: Ms. Khalilah Ffrench,

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill, NC Prepared by: Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc. November 2009 Traffic Impact

More information

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Phelps Program Management 420 Sixth Avenue, Greeley, CO 80632 Prepared by 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite

More information

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis Appendix E NJ TRANSIT Pennsauken Junction Transit Center and Park & Ride RiverLINE and Atlantic City Line Pennsauken Township, Camden County, New Jersey TRAFFIC DATA Background Traffic Information for

More information

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS for the South Novato Transit Hub Study Prepared by: January 11, 2010 DKS Associates With Wilbur Smith Associates IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1. INTRODUCTION The strategic

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY for USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site Prepared by: Jason Hoskinson, PE, PTOE BG Project No. 16-12L July 8, 216 145 Wakarusa Drive Lawrence, Kansas 6649 T: 785.749.4474 F: 785.749.734

More information

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

More information

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project July 25, 218 ROMF Transportation Impact Analysis Version

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Traffic Impact Analysis Update Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS

More information

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions. Mr. David Jorschumb Project Manager Boulder Valley School District Re: Review of proposed school access improvements at the Foothills Elementary School in Boulder Dear Mr. Jorschumb, At your request, the

More information

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan Valley Line West LRT Concept Plan Recommended Amendments Lewis Farms LRT Terminus Site Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan Lewis Farms LRT terminus site, 87 Avenue/West

More information

Transportation Land Development Environmental S e r v i c e s

Transportation Land Development Environmental S e r v i c e s Transportation Land Development Environmental S e r v i c e s Memorandum To: Ms. Kristin E. Kassner Planning Director Town Hall Annex 25 Center Street Burlington, MA 01803 Date: September 23, 2013 Project

More information

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Prepared for: Submitted by: 299 Lava Ridge Ct. Suite 2 Roseville, CA. 95661 June 212 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 Project Location

More information

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below: 3.5 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.1.1 Street Network DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown

More information

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14

More information