TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Upper Broadway Road Diet Summary of Findings
|
|
- Malcolm Melton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Summary of Findings Date: June 17, 2014 Project #: To: Si Lau, P.E.; City of Oakland, CA From: Erin Ferguson, P.E.; Aaron Elias, P.E.; Daphne Dethier; and Mark Bowman, P.E.; Kittelson & Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION Kittelson and Associates, Inc. (KAI) evaluated the traffic operations, crash history, bicycle travel experience, and pedestrian crossing experiences along Broadway from College Avenue to Ocean View Drive. The results of the analysis indicate the road diet will improve conditions for pedestrians and traffic operations performance thresholds. The enhanced conditions for pedestrians include: Less delay in crossing Broadway; Improved access for a wider range of pedestrians (e.g., younger and older pedestrians will be able to cross Broadway at more locations and in two-stages, if desired); and Reduced exposure to conflicts with vehicles. Improved conditions for bicyclists include: Reduced exposure to vehicles with the provision of a bicycle lane; Reduced levels of stress (e.g., increased comfort) due to fewer vehicle lanes and designated space for bicyclists; and Similar crossing benefits as pedestrians. The expected changes in delay for motorists in the weekday AM and PM peak hour is less than five seconds at the majority of intersections within the study area. Based on research documented in the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Highway Safety Manual (HSM), road diets converting a four-lane undivided roadway to a three-lane roadway reduce total crashes (i.e., crashing involving motorists, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists) by approximately 29%. FILENAME: H:\PROJFILE\ OAKLAND ON CALL\ UPPER BROADWAY ROAD DIET\REPORT\DRAFT\17121_15_SUMMARYMEMO_ DOCX
2 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 2 The analysis documented in this memorandum focused on evaluating and comparing existing conditions and planned road diet conditions. Within the study limits, Broadway has a four-lane crosssection (two vehicles lanes in each direction) with on-street parking on both sides of the street. Under the road diet conditions, Broadway will have a three-lane cross-section (one vehicle lane in each direction with a center two-way left turn lane), bicycle lanes in each direction, and on-street parking on both sides of the street. Exhibit 1 illustrates the study location. Exhibit 1 Study Location Source: City of Oakland, CA The road diet also includes crossing improvements for pedestrians crossing Broadway at the Lawton Avenue, Kales Avenue, Taft Avenue, and Ada Street intersections. The crossing improvements at these locations include treatments such as adding high-visibility marked crosswalks, crossing signs, pedestrian refuge islands where feasible, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) at the Taft Avenue crossing, and a pedestrian hybrid beacon (i.e., HAWK signal) at the Lawton Avenue crossing. This technical memorandum summarizes the traffic operations, crash history, bicycle travel experience, and pedestrian crossing experience analysis findings. The analysis results were also presented to the community at a public meeting on Thursday, May 29, 2014 held at 7:00 p.m. at the Rockridge Library in Oakland, CA. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
3 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 3 METHODOLOGIES AND DATA This section presents the study intersections and location specific crossing improvements. It also summarizes the methodologies and data used to conduct traffic operations analysis, crash history review, bicycle analysis, and pedestrian analysis. Study Intersections Table 1 summarizes the study intersections and the numbering system used for this analysis. Table 1 also summarizes the crossing improvements incorporated into the road diet project. Table 1 Study Intersections and Crossing Improvements Number Intersection Crossing Improvements 1 Broadway/College Avenue - 2 Broadway/Clifton Street - 3 Broadway/Broadway Terrace - 4 Broadway/Napa Street - 5 Broadway/ Ada Street High-visibility crosswalk Pedestrian refuge island Crossing signs 6 Broadway/Manila-Monroe Avenue - 7 Broadway/Kales Avenue High-visibility crosswalk Pedestrian refuge island Pedestrian crossing signs Bulbout a (i.e., extending curb on eastbound Kales Avenue) 8 Broadway/Virmar Avenue - 9 Broadway/Taft Avenue 10 Broadway/Lawton Avenue High-visibility crosswalk Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) Pedestrian crossing signs Bulbout a (i.e., extending on eastbound Taft Avenue) Median refuge High visibility crosswalk Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (i.e., HAWK signal) Bulbouts a (i.e., extending curb on Broadway and Lawton Avenue) 11 Broadway/Rockridge Boulevard - 12 Broadway/Ocean View Drive Bulbout a (i.e., extending curb on eastbound Ocean View Drive) Notes: - a Purpose of extending curbs further across minor street approaches is to shorten crossing distance, slow vehicle turning speeds, and improve visibility of pedestrians. At the public meeting held on May 29, 2014, the City of Oakland received a request from a community member to eliminate the pedestrian refuge islands from the crossing improvements to create additional space for left-turn movements by vehicles. The City of Oakland staff is considering this request on a location-by-location basis and will make the decision on where to include pedestrian Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
4 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 4 Traffic Operations KAI used the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 traffic operations methodology, as implemented by the Synchro traffic analysis software. The HCM methodology was used to determine automobile delay and level of service (LOS) at the study intersections. KAI evaluated the weekday AM and PM peak hours using turning movement traffic volume data collected on March 11, For signalized intersections, the HCM methodology bases the LOS on the total average delay motorists are expected to experience at the intersection. The City of Oakland uses LOS D for signalized intersections as the threshold for acceptable operations at a signal. Signalized intersections with LOS D or better (i.e., LOS A, LOS B, or LOS C) are considered to operate acceptably by the City of Oakland. For unsignalized intersections, the HCM methodology bases LOS on the average delay experienced by the critical movement at the intersection. Within this analysis conducted for Broadway, the critical movement at the unsignalized intersections is the through and/or left-turning movements from the minor streets. intersections is based on the number of new vehicles added to the intersection and therefore is not applicable to this road diet analysis as traffic volumes are assumed to remain the same with or without the road diet in place. Table 2 summarizes the delay ranges and brief description associated with each LOS category. Table 2 Intersections Level-of-Service Categories per HCM Crash History Average Delay (sec/veh) LOS Signalized Unsignalized Description A < 10.0 < 10.0 Low Delay: Most vehicles at signalized intersection do not stop. Vehicles controlled by stop signs experience little to no delay. B Minimal Delays: More vehicles stop than at LOS A, creating higher levels of >10.0 & >10.0 & average delay at signals. Vehicles controlled by stop signs need to wait <20.0 <15.0 slightly longer for a gap in traffic. C D E >20.0 & <35.0 >35.0 & <55.0 >55.0 & <80.0 >15.0 & <25.0 >25.0 & <35.0 >35.0 & <50.0 F >80.0 >50.0 Acceptable Delay: The number of vehicles stopping increases at signals; many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Vehicles controlled by stop signs wait a notable amount of time for a gap. Approaching Unstable/Tolerable Delays: The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Many vehicles stop at signals. Average stop controlled delay approaches or slightly exceeds half a minute. Unstable Operation/Significant Delays: Some vehicles have to wait for more than one green light to proceed through signal. Average stop control delay approaches 1 minute. Excessive Delays: Considered unacceptable to most drivers. Volume of Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C, KAI obtained collision data System (SWITRS) database. KAI reviewed a three-year period of crash data from January 1, 2010 through December 31, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
5 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 5 Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress he Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) methodology documented in the Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity report produced in 2012 by the Mineta transportation Institute (MTI). The Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress is determined based on the number of vehicle lanes, speed limit, the presence of onstreet parking, presence and width of a bicycle lane, separation between the bicycle lane and motor vehicles. There are four Levels of Traffic Stress: LTS 1 represents ideal bicycle conditions, while LTS 4 is an unfriendly bicycling environment. Table 3 defines the bicyclist experience per LTS and suitability of the facility for different segments of the population. Table 3 Levels of Traffic Stress and Bicyclist Experience Level of Traffic Stress Description Represents little traffic stress and requires little attention, so is suitable for all cyclists, including children. Traffic speeds are low, volumes are low, and there is no more than one lane in each direction. Intersections are easy to cross by children and adults. Typical locations include residential local streets and separated bike paths/cycle tracks. Represents little traffic stress but requires more attention than children can handle; therefore tend to be suitable for adult cyclists. Traffic speeds are slightly higher but speed differentials are still low and roadways can be up to three lanes wide. Intersections are not difficult to cross for most adults. Typical locations include collector-level streets with bike lanes or a central business district. Represents moderate stress and suitable for most cyclists. Traffic speeds are moderate but can be on roadways up to five lanes wide. Intersections are still perceived to be safe by most adults. Typical locations include low-speed arterials with bike lanes or moderate speed non-multilane roadways. Represents high stress and suitable for a few cyclists. Traffic speeds are moderate to high and can be on roadways from two to over five lanes wide. Intersections can be perceived as unsafe by most adults and are difficult to cross. Typical locations include most arterials and other high-speed or multilane roadways with or without bicycle lanes. Suitability of Roadway/Facility Everyone All adults Most adults Experienced adults Pedestrian Level of Service KAI used pedestrian level-of-service (pedestrian LOS) to evaluate pedestrian experience at the unsignalized intersections with proposed crossing improvements. We evaluated the existing crossing experience and the expected crossing experience with the road diet and crossing treatments in-place. The pedestrian LOS was calculated using the methodology in Chapter 19 of the HCM Pedestrian LOS is categorized by the estimated delay a pedestrian is expected to experience crossing a roadway an uncontrolled (i.e., a traffic signal is not present) location. The average delay for a pedestrian is calculated based on the crossing distance measured in feet, number of vehicle lanes to cross, number of motor vehicles during the time period being evaluated, and the rate at which motorists yield to pedestrians waiting to cross. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
6 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 6 The yield rates used to evaluate the existing conditions were based on observations made during a site visit on Tuesday, March 25, 2014 during the AM and PM peak conditions. The yield rates used to evaluate the road diet conditions were based on research documented in Chapter 19 of HCM 2010 that summarizes the expected yields rates at uncontrolled crossings depending on the treatments (e.g., signs, pavement markings RRFB) present and roadway cross-section. Table 4 summarizes the pedestrian LOS ranges based on the average delay a pedestrian is expected to experience. Table 4 Pedestrian Levels of Service LOS A B C D E F Estimated Pedestrian Delay (seconds/crossing) Less than 5 seconds 5 to 10 seconds 10 to 20 seconds 20 to 30 seconds 30 to 45 seconds 45 seconds or longer The estimated delay represents the average amount of time a pedestrian would need to wait on the curb or sidewalk for: 1)A gap in traffic of sufficient length to walk across the roadway; or 2) Motorists to yield to create a gap in traffic of sufficient length to walk across the roadway. Locations that experience higher levels of pedestrian crossing delay can result in pedestrians not crossing at that location and/or pedestrians exhibiting risky behavior such as stepping into the vehicle lanes forcing motorists to yield to them and/or running across vehicle lanes to use a shorter gap in traffic than what is necessary to walk across the roadway. RESULTS The following subsections summarize the results from the traffic operations analysis, crash history review, bicycle level of traffic stress analysis, and pedestrian level-of-service analysis. Traffic Operations Overall the traffic operations results indicate the road diet has minimal impact on delay for motorists; the majority of the study intersections are expected to have changes in average delay of less than five seconds or a reduction in average delay of greater than 5 seconds in the weekday AM and PM peak conditions. The traffic operations results also indicate the study intersections will continue to operate an acceptable level-of- Exhibits 2 and 3 summarize the intersection analysis comparison between existing and road diet conditions. Appendix 1 contains figures illustrating the turning movement volumes and lane configurations at each intersection under existing and road diet conditions. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
7 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 7 Exhibit 2 Mid-Week Weekday AM Peak Hour Estimated Changes in Delay INCREASE < 5 secs/veh (LOS at Intersection) 10. Lawton Avenue (B to C) 8. Virmar Avenue (B) 6. Manila /Monroe (B) (signal) 4. Napa Street (B) 1. College Avenue (B) (signal) DECREASE < 5 secs/veh (LOS at Intersection) 7. Kales Avenue (C to B) 5. Ada Street (B) 3. Broadway Terrace (B) (signal) 2. Clifton Street (B) DECREASE > 5 secs/veh (LOS at Intersection) 12. Ocean View Drive secs (E to C) 11. Rockridge Boulevard 5-10 secs (D to C) 9. Taft Avenue secs (F to C) Estimated changes in delay at the intersections are shown above as potential ranges to reflect that daily traffic operations vary as daily traffic volumes vary. Precise delay estimates per intersection are presented in Appendix 1. Exhibit 2 illustrates that nine (9) of the 12 intersections within the study area will experience less than a five second change in average delay during the weekday AM peak hour; these nine intersections are noted by the black circles. The three (3) other study intersections, Ocean View Drive, Rockridge Boulevard, and Taft Avenue, are expected to experience a decrease in delay greater than five seconds during the weekday AM peak hour with the road diet implemented. These intersections are noted by the green circles in Exhibit 2. The estimated reduced delay can be attributed to the presence of the two-way center left-turn lane that can be used for vehicles turning onto or off of Broadway from the minor streets. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
8 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 8 Exhibit 3 Mid-Week Weekday PM Peak Hour Estimated Changes in Delay INCREASE < 5 secs/veh (LOS at Intersection) 12. Ocean View Drive (C) 5. Ada Street (B) 3. Broadway Terrace (B) (signal) 1. College Avenue (B) (signal) INCREASE > 5 secs/veh (LOS at Intersection) 10. Lawton Avenue secs (B to D) 9. Taft Avenue secs (D to E) 8. Virmar Avenue 5-10 secs (C) 7. Kales Avenue 5-10 secs (B) 4. Napa Street 5-10 secs (B to C) 6. Manila-Monroe secs (B to D) (signal) DECREASE > 5 secs/veh (LOS at Intersection) 11. Rockridge Boulevard 5-7 secs (D to C) No Change (LOS at Intersection) 2. Clifton Street (B) Estimated changes in delay at the intersections are shown above as potential ranges to reflect that daily traffic operations vary as daily traffic volumes vary. Precise delay estimates per intersection are presented in Appendix 1. Exhibit 3 illustrates five (5) of the 12 intersections within the study area will experience less than a five second change in average delay in the weekday PM peak hour; these five intersections are noted by the black circles. One intersection, Rockridge Boulevard, will experience a decrease in average delay of five to seven seconds in the weekday PM peak hour. Five intersections will experience an increase in average delay; these are noted by the blue, purple and orange circles in Exhibit 3. Four of those five intersections are estimated to have an average delay increase of 20 seconds or less in the weekday PM peak hour. The Broadway/Manila-Monroe Avenue intersection is estimated to have an increased average delay of 30 to 40 seconds in the weekday PM peak hour. While there is an estimated increase in delay at the Broadway/Manila-Monroe Avenue intersection, the intersection better. City staff recognizes the increased delay at the Broadway/Manila-Monroe Avenue intersection is undesirable and continues to explore opportunities to reduce average delay as the road diet project moves into the next design phase. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
9 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 9 Appendix 2 contains traffic operations analysis worksheets for the existing and road diet conditions analyses. Crash History KAI reviewed crash data for a three-year period from January 1, 2010 through December 31, During this three-year period there were a total of 19 collisions on Broadway between College Avenue and Keith Avenue. Five of the 19 collisions involved resulted in one or more injuries. The remaining 14 collisions were reported as property damage only (PDO) crashes. There were no fatal collisions reported from January 1, 2010 through December 31, There was one pedestrian injury and four other crashes resulting in injuries of auto occupants. The crash resulting in a pedestrian injury occurred at the Broadway/Broadway Terrace intersection. The motorist was cited as failing to give the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk. The crash occurred at 8:20 AM on a rainy day. Table 5 summarizes the injury severities from the reported crash data. Table 5 Injury Severities Reported in Crash Data Severity Auto-Auto Crashes Auto-Bike Crashes Auto-Pedestrian Crashes Fatal Injury Property Damage Only Source: SWITERS Data In addition to considering crash severity, KAI also reviewed crash locations. Intersection collisions are identified in the database as collisions occurring within 50 feet of an intersection. Intersection collisions accounted for 14 of the 19 collisions or 74% of reported crashes. Midblock collisions were the remaining 26% of reported crashes or five collisions. Exhibit 4 presents the collision locations. Exhibit 4 Summary of Collision Locations Crash Frequency Injury PDO Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
10 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 10 Review of the crash data indicated a higher frequency of crashes tended to occur near or at the intersections with higher traffic volumes and those that are closely spaced (i.e., College Avenue, Clifton Street and Broadway Terrace). The higher traffic volume represents a higher level of exposure or risks for crashes due to the more prevalent presence of vehicles. Closely spaced intersections require motorists to make decisions within a shorter time period and can result in more frequent crashes as motorists misjudge or are unable to react to a situation. Appendix 3 contains the crash data from SWITERS database. With respect to anticipated safety with the road diet implemented, road diets in which a roadway is converted from four-lane undivided facility such as existing Broadway to a three-lane cross-section have been found to reduce total crashes by approximately 29%. This is based on research documented in the Highway Safety Manual. The crash reduction is associated with shorter crossing distances for pedestrians, slower vehicle speeds providing more time for motorists to react, left-turn lane for motorists turning onto and off of the major roadway to use, and fewer lane changing maneuvers. Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress KAI evaluated the bicyclist experience using the Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) methodology. The methodology indicates the road diet will improve LTS from LTS 4 under existing conditions to a combination of LTS 2 and LTS 3. The segment of Broadway from Broadway Terrace to Ada Street that is posted at 30 mph would be LTS 2 with the road diet implemented. Broadway from Ada Street to Ocean View Drive would be LTS 3 with the road diet implemented; this segment has a posted speed of 35 mph. The posted speed of 35 mph is the difference between LTS 2 and LTS 3 under the road diet condition. Figure 1 compares the LTS of the existing and road diet conditions on Broadway. The primary reasons the LTS improves from the existing to the road diet condition are the reduced vehicle lanes and providing designated and separate space for bicyclists (e.g., bicycle lanes). The road diet has the potential to result in LTS 2 for Broadway from Broadway Terrace to Ocean View Drive if the road diet results in 85 th percentile speeds of 30 mph enabling the City to change the current portion of Broadway posted as 35 mph speed limit to a 30 mph speed limit. Slower vehicle speeds tend to result in lower severity crashes, which is beneficial to road users regardless of their mode. Pedestrian Level of Service As discussed above, crossing improvements at Lawton Avenue, Taft Avenue, Kales Avenue and Ada Street will be incorporated into the road diet project. KAI evaluated the existing and road diet conditions for pedestrians crossing at those four locations in the weekday AM and PM peak period. The existing conditions analysis indicates that pedestrians crossing at these four locations experience LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours. This means pedestrians waiting for a gap in traffic long enough to walk across Broadway or for vehicles to yield to create a gap would wait longer than 45 seconds. Based on KAI analysis, the existing pedestrian delay is greater than two minutes at the Lawton Avenue, Taft Avenue, Kales Avenue and Ada Street crossing locations. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
11 Existing 2014 Conditions Proposed Road Diet Conditions June 2014 LTS 4 2 lanes Parking on both sides 30 MPH 35 MPH 2 lanes LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 2 1 lane 6 bike lane Parking on both sides 30 MPH 35 MPH 5 bike lane Legend LTS 4 LTS 3 LTS 2 Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress Key Features Influencing Bicycle LTS 0 1,000 Feet Copyright: 2013 Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress Figure 1
12 Project #: June 17, 2014 Page 12 The road diet configuration combined with the crossing improvements at those specific locations improves the pedestrian level-of-service (pedestrian LOS) by several letter grades. Pedestrian LOS at: Ada Street improves from LOS F to LOS C in the weekday AM and PM peak hours; Kales Avenue improves from LOS F to LOS C in the weekday AM peak hour and LOS B in the weekday PM peak hour; Taft Avenue improves from LOS F to LOS C in the weekday AM and PM peak hours; and Lawton Avenue improves from LOS F to LOS A in the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The reduced delay for pedestrians and corresponding improved pedestrian LOS are due to the increased yield rate induced by the treatments to be installed (e.g., high visibility crosswalk, RRFB, Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon), fewer vehicle lanes to cross due to the road diet, and pedestrian refuge islands that will enable pedestrians to cross in two stages. This means pedestrians will be able to use shorter gaps in traffics and focus on crossing one conflicting traffic stream at a time. Appendix 4 contains a more detailed summary of the pedestrian LOS results. SUMMARY The results of the analysis indicate the road diet will improve conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists, performance thresholds. The enhanced conditions for pedestrians include: Less delay in crossing Broadway; Improved access for a wider range of pedestrians (e.g., younger and older pedestrians will be able to cross Broadway at more locations and in two-stages, if desired); and Reduced exposure to conflicts with vehicles. Improved conditions for bicyclists include: Reduced exposure to vehicles with the provision of a bicycle lane; Reduced levels of stress (e.g., increased comfort) due to fewer vehicle lanes and designated space for bicyclists; and Similar crossing benefits as pedestrians. The expected changes in delay for motorists in the weekday AM and PM peak hour is less than five seconds at the majority of intersections within the study area. Per the HSM, similar past road diet projects were found to reduce total crashes by approximately 29%. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
13 Project #: June 17, 2014 Appendix 1 Figures Summarizing Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Operations Results Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
14 Appendix 1 June 2014
15 June 2014 Appendix 1
16 Appendix 1 June 2014
17 Appendix 1 June 2014
18 Appendix 1 June 2014
19 Appendix 1 June 2014
20 Project #: June 17, 2014 Appendix 2 Synchro Worksheets Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
21 Queues Existing AM 11: Broadway & College Ave 2014/03/11 Lane Group EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
22 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 11: Broadway & College Ave 2014/03/11 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 79 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 7% 4% 3% 1% 4% Turn Type Over Prot NA NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service B B A B Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A B HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.4 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.2% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2
23 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 12: Broadway & Clifton Street 2014/03/11 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.6% ICU Level of Service A Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3
24 Queues Existing AM 13: Broadway & Broadway Terrace 2014/03/11 Lane Group WBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4
25 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 13: Broadway & Broadway Terrace 2014/03/11 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 5% 2% 4% 9% 2% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot c c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service C B B F A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B B HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.8% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 5
26 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 14: Broadway & Napa Street 2014/03/11 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians 17 5 Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage 1 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked 0.98 vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.4% ICU Level of Service A Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 6
27 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 15: Broadway & Ada Street 2014/03/11 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.9% ICU Level of Service A Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 7
28 Queues Existing AM 16: Manila Avenue & Broadway & Monroe Avenue 2014/03/11 Lane Group WBL NBT SBT NET SWT Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 8
29 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 16: Manila Avenue & Broadway & Monroe Avenue 2014/03/11 Movement WBL2 WBL WBR WBR2 NBL NBT NBR NBR2 SBL2 SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 25% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 5% Turn Type Perm Prot Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C A A HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 67.7 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.8% ICU Level of Service D c Critical Lane Group Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 9
30 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 16: Manila Avenue & Broadway & Monroe Avenue 2014/03/11 Movement NEL NET NER NER2 SWL SWT SWR Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 1 1 Permitted Phases 1 1 Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm c v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service C C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C C Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 10
31 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 17: Broadway & Kales Avenue 2014/03/11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 415 px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 11
32 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 18: Broadway & Virmar Avenue 2014/03/11 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians 22 1 Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage 2 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 674 px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.2% ICU Level of Service A Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 12
33 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 19: Broadway & Taft Avenue 2014/03/11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 896 px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS F B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F B Average Delay 4.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.8% ICU Level of Service A Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 13
34 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 20: Broadway & Lawton Avenue 2014/03/11 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage 3 5 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service B Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 14
35 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 21: Broadway & Rockridge Boulevard 2014/03/11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 904 px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C D A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C D Average Delay 1.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.2% ICU Level of Service B Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 15
36 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 22: Broadway & Ocean View Drive 2014/03/11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage 2 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 462 px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS E B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS E B Average Delay 1.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.8% ICU Level of Service B Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 16
37 Queues Existing AM 23: Broadway & Keith Avenue 2014/03/11 Lane Group EBL EBR NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 17
38 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 23: Broadway & Keith Avenue 2014/03/11 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 1% 2% 0% Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot c0.20 c v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service B B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A A HCM 2000 Control Delay 12.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 56.2 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.0% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 18
39 Queues Existing PM 11: Broadway & College Avenue 03/11/2014 Lane Group EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
40 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing PM 11: Broadway & College Avenue 03/11/2014 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 143 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 3% 0% 2% 2% Turn Type Over Prot NA NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.19 c v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service B B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A A HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.4 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.3% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009
6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) 116 20 8 405 137 56 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.67 0.67 0.89 0.89 Hourly flow
More information886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study
McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com
More informationMEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC
MEMORANDUM Date: November 4, 2013 To: From: Subject: Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis As requested, Fehr & Peers is providing clarification
More informationVillage of Richmond Transportation Brief
Village of Richmond Transportation Brief GENIVAR Project Number 111-18482-00 June 21 st, 2011 www.genivar.com GENIVAR 15 Fitzgerald Road, Suite 100 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA K2H 9G1 Telephone: 613-829-2800
More informationZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RAYMOND VINEYARDS WINERY USE PERMIT MODIFICATION #P11-00156 AUGUST 5, 2014 PREPARED BY: OMNI-MEANS,
More informationAPPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets
APPENDICES APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets Lanes, Volumes, Timings NO BUILD 2016 PM 8: 10th St & Thain Rd 10/05/2016 Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
More information(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals
February 14th, 2014 BY E-MAIL: wally.dubyk@ottawa.ca City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Branch 110 Laurier Ave. W., 4 th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Attention: Wally Dubyk, C.E.T (A) Project
More informationBarrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief
Barrhaven Honda Dealership Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 September, 2015 File: 115136 Ref: R-2015-152
More informationSugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia
Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia S IGNAL W ARRANT A NALYSIS For the Intersection of: Sugarloaf Parkway / Richards Middle School Driveway / Sugarland Crossing Main Site Driveway Prepared for:
More informationWeaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 9821 425.339.8266 Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish January 218 GTC #17-37
More informationTraffic Analysis For Approved Uses within the St. Lucie West DRI Aldi Port St. Lucie, FL Prepared for: Bohler Engineering, LLC 1000 Corporate Drive Suite 250 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 Prepared by: 10795
More informationL1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:
L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES
More informationProvide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;
December 19, 2013 File: 163600935 Attention: Troy Elliott Carl Elliott Limited 15-1831 Robertson Road PO Box 11117 Nepean, Ontario K1H 7T8 Dear Mr. Elliott, Reference: 2235 and 2265 Robertson Road Transportation
More informationAPPENDIX G. Traffic Data
APPENDIX G Traffic Data HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Duanesburg Road & I-88 Ramps 10/7/2004 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl)
More informationRESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS
RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS Proposed Gas Station 40 Arthur Street (Highway 26), Town of the Blue Mountains (Thornbury), County of Grey, Ontario AUGUST 2013 August 27, 2013 MR. REG RUSSWURM
More informationTraffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents
Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 15001714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 4 III. 2015 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...
More informationLEMON FLATS SECOND ACCESS
LEMON FLATS SECOND ACCESS RECONNAISSANCE STUDY SEPTEMBER 2007 APPENDIX A Synchro Analysis Worksheets HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2005 - Background 3: Anka Street & Lemon Flats Second
More informationKUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266
KUM & GO #300 PECOS STREET & 88 TH AVENUE THORNTON, COLORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVISION 1 PREPARED FOR KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 JANUARY 23, 2014 OA PROJECT NO. 013-1721
More informationTable 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1
Ref. No. 171-6694 Phase 2 November 23, 217 Mr. David Quilichini, Vice President Fares & Co. Developments Inc. 31 Place Keelson Sales Centre DARTMOUTH NS B2Y C1 Sent Via Email to David@faresinc.com RE:
More informationZachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment
MEMORANDUM Date: June 22, 2018 Project #: 21562 To: Colin McArthur, AICP From: Project: Subject: Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit
More informationOne Harbor Point Residential
Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE
More informationRef. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th
Ref. No. 151-00564 Task 3 April 28, 2015 Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th 3480 Joseph Howe Drive, 5 Floor HALIFAX NS B3L 4H7 Sent via Email to ceasr.saleh@wmfares.com
More informationLATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI
LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR I-96 AT LATSON RD INTERCHANGE Livingston County CS 47065 JN 101622C Submitted to: Michigan Department
More informationLOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW
LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW Prepared for: Prepared by: Broadview Developments Inc. c/o Westbrook Consulting Watt Consulting Group Our File: 2064.B01 Date: October 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
More informationSweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 8 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98 45.9.8 Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish February 8 GTC #7-87 Sweetwater Landing Traffic
More information10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish September 2018
More informationInterstate 80 Corridor Study
Interstate 80 Corridor Study Final Technical Memorandum 5: Traffic Volumes, Accident Locations and Operational Deficiencies West Verdi (SR 425) Interchange to West McCarran Boulevard (SR 651) and East
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 2014 UPDATED
More informationProposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois
Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study 1714-1720 Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois Prepared For: HOLABIRD & ROOT, LLC Prepared by: Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd. 145 Commerce Drive, Ste A,
More informationMURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA
MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Prepared for: Golden Eagle Multi-Family Properties, LLC 6201 Oak Canyon Rd., Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared
More informationJRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3
March 2015 Prepared for Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3 JRL consulting JRL consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 BACKGROUND... 2 2 EXISTING
More informationBennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017
Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,
More informationTraffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Crawford, Bunte, Brammeier May 1, 2009 MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2009 To: From: Subject:
More informationMMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure
MMM Group Limited Traffic Study CASA MIA Community Care Facility Vancouver, BC Communities Transportation Buildings Infrastructure February 2013 5011001-033 STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared
More informationApril Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief
April 26 Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief prepared for: The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd.
More informationTRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT US 460 Bypass Interchange and Southgate Drive Relocation State Project No.: 0460-150-204, P101, R201, C501, B601; UPC 99425
More informationMEMORANDUM BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. DATE March 1, 2012
BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION State Transportation Building Ten Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116-3968 Tel. (617) 973-7100 Fax (617) 973-8855 TTY (617) 973-7089 www.bostonmpo.org
More informationSTANDARD LIMITATIONS
STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared by MMM Group (MMM) for the account of Spire Construction Inc. (the Client). The disclosure of any information contained in this report is the sole responsibility
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village
Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village Route 4 (Farmington Avenue) Farmington, Connecticut Prepared for: The Town of Farmington, CT Prepared By: BL Companies Meriden, Connecticut December 2016
More informationDate: December 20, Project #:
To: Craig Rottenberg Long s Jewelers 60A South Avenue Burlington, MA 01803 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: December 20, 2018 Project #: 14416.00 Re: Burlington Mall Proposed Long
More informationWellington Street West
Transportation Brief prepared for: 185 Davenport Road Suite 300 Toronto, ON M5R 1J1 prepared by: 1223 Michael Street Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 November 5, 2013 TO3131TOH Transportation Brief November
More informationLakeside Terrace Development
Lakeside Terrace Development City of Barrie, County of Simcoe Traffic Brief for: Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1617 Date Submitted: April 29 th, 216 4/29/16 John Northcote, P.Eng.
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Merrimack Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization FROM: James Terlizzi, P.E., Transportation Planning Engineer DATE: March 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Further analysis of the recommendations
More informationTraffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida
Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida Summary Report June 2008 Prepared by: 12909 N 56 th Street # 201 Tampa, FL 33617 Ph: (813) 988-3180 Fax: (813) 343-6854 Morgan Road
More information267 O Connor Street Residential Development
M a y 2014 267 O Connor Street Residential Development Transportation Brief Google 2014 Bing 2014 Prepared for: MASTERCRAFT STARWOOD Prepared by: Study 267 O'Connor Type Street May 2014 Study Residential
More informationMEMORANDUM November 19, 2012
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS CENTRAL NAUGATUCK VALLEY 60 NORTH MAIN ST 3RD Floor WATERBURY, CT 06702-1403 (203)757-0535 Web Site: www.cogcnv.org E-Mail: cogcnv@cogcnv.org November 19, 2012 MEMORANDUM 111912
More informationARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: Arvada Urban Renewal Authority 5601 Olde Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 210 Arvada, Colorado 80002 (720) 898-7062 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt
More informationRockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality
Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Study Final Draft Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T
More informationAddendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA
Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA (St. Tammany Parish Mandeville, LA) Prepared For The Pittman Companies Michael N Pittman, MD 328 East Boston St Covington, LA 70433
More informationAppendix B: Traffic Reports
Appendix B: Traffic Reports 407 TRANSITWAY - KENNEDY ROAD TO BROCK ROAD MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION Report Markham Road Station Traffic Study Prepared for Ministry of Transportation, Ontario
More informationFinal Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet)
Market Street Road Diet Wilmington, NC 2016 Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet) Wilmington, NC Parsons Brinckerhoff January 2016 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT US 17 Corridor
More informationCity of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session
City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session Agenda Item # City Council Meeting 8g 9/29/2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ISSUE(S): SUMMARY: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Robert Sisson, City
More informationPaisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use
Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use Transportation Impact Study City of Guelph Prepared for: Armel Corporation August 2018 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers
Traffic Impact Study For Eastern Springs A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY April 2018 Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers Table of Contents 1) Executive Summary... 2 2) Study Purpose...
More informationWinnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis January 4, 2019 Prepared by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Active Transportation Division Winnetka Ave Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
More informationAldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
More informationAppendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants TJKM Transportation Consultants Draft Report Traffic Impact Study for the Residential Development at 4659 Proctor
More informationCastleGlenn Consultants Inc.
CastleGlenn Consultants Inc. Engineers, Project Managers & Planners March 11 th, 2013 Domenic Idone, P. Eng Planning Manager R.W. Tomlinson Ltd. 5597 Power Road Ottawa, Ontario K1G 3N4 Dear Mr. Idone:
More information700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by:
700 Hunt Club Road Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1 Submitted by: 14 June 2013 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com 14 June 2013
More informationWellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID
Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 5731 Hazeldean Road Transportation Impact Study Ottawa, Ontario Project ID 160401195 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. March 2016 WELLINGS
More information1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief
1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief October 2013 Study 1140 Wellington Type Street West October 2013 Study Transportation Name Brief February 2011 TB Check List TIS / TB/ CTS Check List prepared
More informationRe: Cyrville Road Car Dealership
1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com February 25, 2013 OUR REF: TO3098TOE Mark Motors of Ottawa 611 Montreal Road Ottawa, ON K1K 0T8 Attention:
More informationC. iv) Analysis/Results
The Pettengill Road project is located outside the borders of the model in an external zone. As a result, inserting all Pettengill Road trip generation assumptions into the NRPC model and running a new
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Update
Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
More informationRe: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview
1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com March 28, 2012 OUR REF: TO3088TOY Barry J. Hobin & Architects 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, ON K1S 3K7
More informationTRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive. Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc.
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Project Description... 1 Estimated Daily Project Traffic... 3 Estimated
More informationCounty State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study
County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101
More informationINTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
More informationSR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation
SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation Background and Project Needs SR 104 is functionally classified as a rural-principal arterial. It is a limited
More informationAlpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study
Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1
More informationAldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
More informationSalvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017
Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A7 519-591-0426 November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017 Laurie Wills, PEng Deputy Director of Public Works Town of Cobourg 740 Division
More informationMEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:
McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February
More informationINTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange
INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange City of Broadview Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Broadview Heights Department of Engineering 9543 Broadview Road
More informationMinto Mahogany Stage 2
Minto Mahogany Stage 2 Transportation Impact Study prepared for: Minto Developments Inc 200-180 Kent Street Ottawa, ON K1P 0B6 prepared by: 1223 Michael Street Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 June 27, 2017
More informationJune 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903
LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com June 21,
More informationCritical Movement* Delay (sec/veh) Critical Movement* LOS 8 a.m. 9 a.m. B 25.2 C. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. B 17.3 B
Memorandum DATE: AUGUST 1, 2013 TO: PAUL TILTON, P.E., SANDWICH DPW DIRECTOR/TOWN ENGINEER FROM: LEV MALAKHOFF, SR. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER RE: ROUTE 130/QUAKER MEETINGHOUSE ROAD INTERSECTION Paul: Per
More informationMERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1
MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny
More informationD & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14
More informationAppendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations
Derr Road and Home Road Conversion Feasibility Study Springfield, OH Appendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations Derr Road and Home Road Conversion Feasibility Study Springfield, OH Emission Reduction
More informationJOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: KTM Design Solutions 528 Kansas City Street, Suite 1 Rapid City, SD 57701 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse
More informationIntersection LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5
Intersection No- LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5 Ü Intersection No- LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive S C 32.6 D 43.0 Intersection No- LOS Delay
More informationDowntown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report
Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report As part of the City s Transportation Master Plan, this report reviews the technical feasibility of the proposed conversion of the current
More information1 st Street Intersection Study
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 1 st Street Intersection Study Prepared for: City of Independence In Cooperation With: Iowa Department of Transportation & Iowa Department of Public Safety Governor
More informationProposed Hotel and Restaurant Development
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Marbledale Road Tuckahoe, NY PREPARED FOR BILLWIN DEVELOPMENT AFFILIATES, LLC 365 WHITE PLAINS ROAD EASTCHESTER, NY. 10709 PREPARED BY Engineering
More informationTRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis
Appendix E NJ TRANSIT Pennsauken Junction Transit Center and Park & Ride RiverLINE and Atlantic City Line Pennsauken Township, Camden County, New Jersey TRAFFIC DATA Background Traffic Information for
More informationAPPENDICES. No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016)
APPENDICES Appendix T No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016) 661 Bear Valley Parkway EIR March 2017 APPENDICES This page intentionally left blank 661 Bear Valley
More information1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace
December 217 112 & 124 McGarry Terrace Transportation Impact Study 112 & 124 McGarry Terrace Transportation Impact Study prepared for: Lépine Corporation 32 March Road Kanata, ON K2K 2E3 prepared by: 1223
More informationDIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
DIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...3 2. Project Description...3 3. Existing Conditions...3 4. Forecast Traffic Demand and Analysis...12 5. Conclusions and
More informationAPPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Roadway Segment Level of Service Definitions LOS V/C Congestion/Delay Traffic Description (Used for surface streets,
More informationDartmouth, NS B3B 1X7 Tel: WSP. Canada Inc.
Traffic Impact Study: Proposed Residential Development Herring Cove Road Halifax, NS Presented to: FH Construction Ltd. 1 Spectacle Lake Drive Dartmouth, NS B3B 1X7 Tel: 902 835 9955 Fax: 902 835 1645
More informationCENTRAL VIRGINIA LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Appendix F
Data Collection Traffic turning movement data were obtained from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Southwestern Region Lynchburg District Traffic Engineering Section. However, 12-hour traffic
More informationParking/Traffic Assessment Study
Brock Road Industrial Mall 985 Brock Road South City of Pickering Parking/Traffic Assessment Study Prepared by: Tranplan Associates, Toronto Toronto 416-670-2005 Sudbury 705-522-0272 Peterborough 705-874-3638
More informationOakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills
Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna
More information830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality
830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Statement Final Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 www.griffininc.ca Prepared
More informationProposed Pit Development
July 5, 2017 via email: sam@greenwoodconst.ca CCTA File 114239 Sam Greenwood Greenwood Aggregates 205467 County Road 109 Amaranth, ON L9W 0V1 Re: Proposed Violet Hill Gravel Pit, Town of Mono Traffic Review
More informationAppendix A City of Sammamish Town Center Sub-Area Plan FEIS September 2007
Appendix A City of Sammamish Town Center Sub-Area Plan FEIS September 2007 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 phone 206.789.9684 fax www.adolfson.com Memorandum date March
More informationLAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS
LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
More informationMEMORANDUM. Saint Edward Ballfields Traffic and Parking Analysis (Updated)
MEMORANDUM Date: May 26, 2016 To: From: Subject: Debbie Bent and Kris Overleese, City of Kenmore Kendra Breiland and Sarah Keenan, Fehr & Peers Saint Edward Ballfields Traffic and Parking Analysis (Updated)
More informationBUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM
BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Prepared for: City and County of Denver Prepared by: Contact: Brian Bern, P.E., PTOE 303.572.0200 On Behalf of: Lowry Redevelopment Authority
More information