City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session"

Transcription

1 City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session Agenda Item # City Council Meeting 8g 9/29/2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ISSUE(S): SUMMARY: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Robert Sisson, City Manager Public hearing and Council action on the University Drive Road Diet one-year pilot program in an effort to improve multimodal connectivity between George Mason University and Old Town. Conduct the Public Hearing to seek input from the public on the proposed one- year pilot for the University Drive Road Diet and direct staff to consider changes consistent with the public comments prior to implementation of the one-year pilot project. In an effort to improve multimodal connectivity between George Mason University and Old Town, one of the recommendations from the November charrette was to repurpose the pavement on University Drive to provide bicycle lanes. Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. has conducted an evaluation for the City to determine feasible project limits and the potential impact to traffic flow, emergency operations and bicycle movements on University Drive. The proposed project would modify the configuration of University Drive between Armstrong Street and South Street by providing three travel lanes instead of four (one lane in each direction plus a center turn lane), and bicycle lanes on both sides of the roadway. The transition area from the existing four lane configuration to the proposed three lane configuration would occur between South Street and Sager Avenue. This change is proposed as a one-year pilot project. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to apply thermoplastic in the new, road diet configuration and add associated signage would be approximately $10,000. If, after one year, the road diet is determined to be unsuccessful, the cost to remove the thermoplastic markings and apply replacement markings in original configuration would be approximately $10,000. RECOMMENDATION: ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF ACTION: RESPONSIBLE STAFF/ POC: COORDINATION: ATTACHMENTS: Seek input from the public to implement a one year pilot project; direct staff to consider changes consistent with the public input, and proceed to implementation. Keep University Drive in existing configuration. Wendy Block Sanford, Transportation Director and Brooke Hardin Community Development and Planning Director Public Works, Planning Road Diet Technical Memorandum, Proposed Conceptual Plan, Sample Motion

2 MEMORANDUM From: Paul Silberman, P.E., PTOE Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. Brian Laverty, AICP Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. To: Ms. Wendy Block Sanford Transportation Director, City of Fairfax Subject: University Drive Road Diet Date: September 22, 2015 A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memorandum is to document the progress and recommendations of the University Drive Road Diet Analysis and Concept Development (Road Diet Project), conducted by Sabra, Wang and Associates (SWA) in July and August, The aim of the project is to identify, develop and test conceptual engineering elements of a road diet plan for University Drive between Main Street and Armstrong Street, a distance of roughly onethird of a mile (1,750 ft.). University Drive s posted speed limit is 25 mph in the study area; and its annual average daily traffic (AADT) in 2014 was 12,000 between Main Street and South Street, and 14,000 between South Street and Armstrong Street. Figure 1 shows the project corridor, with the following signalized intersections highlighted: 1. University Drive and Main Street 2. University Drive and Sager Avenue 3. University Drive and Fire Station 3 entrance (signal activates only in emergencies) 4. University Drive and Armstrong Street Figure 1: University Drive Road Diet Study Area, with Signalized Intersections Highlighted TRANSPORTATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The Road Diet Project is focused on defining a concept for re striping University Drive to achieve the following objectives: 101 West Broad Street, Suite 301, Falls Church, Virginia Tel (703) wang.com Fax (703)

3 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 2 A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation on University Drive, identified as a bike friendly street in the City s bicycle plan. C. Ensure that the new roadway configuration will not have unacceptable negative impacts to traffic or to transit bus operations. REVIEW OF COMPARABLE ROAD DIET IMPLEMENTATIONS SWA identified three completed road diet installations featuring an existing condition similar to that of University Drive, namely a suburban arterial roadway with a configuration of two travel lanes in either direction. Each of the comparable projects were motivated by both safety concerns stemming from perceived excessive speeds, as well as a desire to provide bicycle accommodation as part of a redesign. The comparable road diet case studies included Lawyers Road in Reston, Virginia; Battery Lane in Bethesda, Maryland; and Cordova Street in Pasadena, California. Reston, Virginia: Lawyers Road The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) repaved a two mile section of Lawyers Road in 2009, and took advantage of the opportunity to reconfigure the roadway to curtail speeding and to provide improved connectivity for bicyclists. Lawyers Road is a suburban roadway in an area of low density residential development, although it provides a key eastwest connection between busy arterials that run north south (Reston Parkway, Hunter s Mill Road). Average daily traffic is approximately 10,000 vehicles. Despite its residential surroundings, Lawyers Road had a relatively high 45 mph speed limit before the road diet was implemented, and other factors contributed to a high incidence of speeding in the corridor. There are long stretches between intersections, only two of which are signalized within the two mile road diet corridor. While numerous neighborhoods branch off of Lawyers Road over the course of the two mile road diet segment, no houses front on Lawyers Road in this stretch, there are no curbs or sidewalks, and for the most part the roadway is bounded by wooded land. Figure 2: Lawyers Road after implementation of road diet VDOT implemented a roadway configuration of one through lane in either direction, with a center two way left turn lane throughout the two mile segment. Five foot wide bike lanes were striped on either side of the roadway. The implementation of the road diet has produced marked reductions in vehicle speeds, prompting VDOT to lower the speed limit from 45 mph to 40 mph, and in the first five years after implementation, crashes in the corridor were reduced by roughly 70 percent. In spite of the reduction in automobile speeds, 69 percent of respondents to a 2010 road user survey did not perceive that travel times had increased. 69 percent of respondents to the survey also indicated that the road felt safer, and 74 percent indicated that the road diet was an improvement to Lawyers Road. Bethesda, Maryland: Battery Lane September 2015

4 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 3 Montgomery County reconfigured a 0.85 mile section of Battery Lane in 2011, with a primary emphasis on providing improved connectivity for bicyclists. Battery Lane is a relatively urban roadway in an area of highdensity residential development, and is characterized by large apartment buildings. Battery Lane has sidewalks on either side throughout and generally features landscaped areas of feet between the street edge and buildings. Both sides of the roadway have numerous curb cuts and driveway entrances. Battery Lane provides a connection between the two primary arterial streets in Bethesda (Old Georgetown Road, Wisconsin Ave), and average daily traffic is approximately 5,000 vehicles. Figure 3: Battery Lane prior to road diet implementation The County implemented a roadway configuration of one through lane in either direction, with bike lanes in both directions. Parallel parking was also included on the south side of the roadway for most of the length of Battery Lane, although there are a handful of sidewalk bulb outs designed to accommodate transit stops, a bikeshare station, and a busy pedestrian crossing. At these locations the parking lane is interrupted. Figure 4: Battery Lane after road diet implementation The road diet implementation resulted in little to no change in level of service (LOS) on Battery Lane. Pasadena, California: Cordova Street The City of Pasadena repaved a 0.5 mile section of Cordova Street in 2010, affording the opportunity to reconfigure the roadway to reduce vehicular speeds and provide a bike friendly corridor. The width of the roadway led to issues of excessive speeding on Cordova Street, and residents had requested that additional traffic signals be installed to slow traffic and provide for safer pedestrian crossings. The road diet was implemented in part as an alternative to additional traffic signals. The section of Cordova Street that was reconfigured is a relatively urban roadway characterized by multifamily housing and relatively dense single family housing. Cordova Street has sidewalks on either side throughout and buildings are generally set back less than twenty feet from the roadway. Both sides of the roadway have numerous curb cuts and driveway entrances. Cordova Street provides a connection between the central business district of Pasadena and Pasadena City College, and average daily traffic is approximately 11,000 vehicles. The City implemented a roadway configuration of one through lane in either direction, with a center turn lane throughout the half mile segment. The road diet design also included bike lanes in both directions and parallel parking on both sides of the roadway. A before and after study completed in 2011 revealed that the road diet implementation resulted in little to no change in pedestrian and vehicular LOS on Cordova Street, but led to an improvement in bicycle LOS. The study also showed some reduction in collisions and injuries, and greater rates of compliance with the posted speed limit. September 2015

5 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 4 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions were documented through conversations with City staff and through field visits. SWA has documented the corridor s role in the citywide bike connectivity plan, the physical characteristics of the roadway, and the traffic conditions experienced with the existing four lane roadway configuration. ROADWAY CONFIGURATION AND LAND USE University Drive has two foot travel lanes in either direction throughout the study corridor. In two locations, however, the width of the lanes varies considerably. Between Breckinridge Lane and the firehouse, the roadway shifts to the west by several feet, and the travel lanes widen out to feet temporarily. In the block between Sager Avenue and Main Street, the travel lanes become considerably narrower, with the overall width of the roadway (not including gutters) reduced to 36.5 feet. See Appendix A for detailed diagrams of the existing roadway. The area between Sager Avenue and South Street is the crest of a hill, and the roadway slopes gently downward both to Main Street and to the firehouse. Beyond the firehouse, University Drive is level to the intersection with Armstrong Street. The study corridor is characterized primarily by office buildings, which are generally set back at least twenty feet from the roadway behind a screen of street trees and landscaping. The northern half of the block between Sager Avenue and Main Street features mixed use commercial buildings separated from the street by only a narrow (~5 ft) sidewalk. The east side of University Drive north and south of Breckinridge Lane is occupied by a townhouse neighborhood, while the area on the opposite side of the roadway is screened by dense foliage and a brick wall screening a parking lot. Figure 5: University Drive sloping down from South Street to the firehouse The entire corridor has well maintained sidewalks, with the exception of a 200 foot section on the east side of University Drive opposite Breckinridge Lane. The City is in the process of designing a new sidewalk to eliminate this gap in the sidewalk network, and should complete construction in the next year. The firehouse is of a similar scale as the office Figure 6: The firehouse facade and entranceway buildings it is adjacent to, with a similar setback from the roadway. Its entrance forms a very large intersection with University Drive, roughly 120 feet from curb edge to curb edge. September 2015

6 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 5 BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE The City s bicycle network consists primarily of off street trails and bike friendly roads, which are termed on street trails in the City s bike trails map. Relatively few streets feature bike lanes or sharrows, although two notable exceptions are immediately adjacent to the study corridor. George Mason Boulevard, immediately south of the study area, has sharrows; and Breckinridge Lane, which branches off of University Drive to the East, features a 500 ft section of bike lanes. Figure 7 shows the entire Fairfax City bicycle network. In the Old Town area, there are only two bike routes, both running north south. University Drive, designated as an on street trail, is one of the two. The other bike route in the Old Town area is the Mason to Metro Bike Route, which is considered of primary importance within the City s bike network. For a short distance between Breckinridge Lane and City Hall, those two routes converge on University Drive/George Mason Boulevard. As such, University Drive is a critical connection for overall bicycle connectivity within the City, a fact that was underscored when Vision Fairfax Mason Workshop attendees made the implementation of bike lanes on University one of their primary recommendations in the Fall of Figure 7: Map of City of Fairfax Bicycle Infrastructure (Existing and Planned) EXISTING TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Capacity analyses were performed for the University Drive Road Diet study corridor under existing conditions and under proposed conditions. Table 1 provides a summary of the results of the capacity analysis performed using Synchro 8 and September 2015

7 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 6 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology. The delay, level of service, and 95 th percentile queue lengths in feet are shown for each approach and the overall intersection. Existing timings were used for existing and future conditions. Under existing conditions, the study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service: LOS C or better. Figure 8: Existing Intersection LOS at Study Intersections SWA conducted a speed study on University Drive during the AM Peak period, beginning at 7:07 AM on a Thursday morning, in order to gauge the typical vehicle speeds in the corridor and the incidence of speeding. All speed readings were taken from a location just south of the firehouse entrance, which is the center of the longest unsignalized section of the study corridor (when emergency signal is not activated). Of the 159 vehicles observed, only five were travelling at or below the posted speed limit of 25 mph. The average speed of northbound vehicles was 32 mph, while the average speed of southbound vehicles was 33 mph. 14 percent of northbound vehicles and 20 percent of southbound vehicles were travelling 11 or more mph above the speed limit, a difference that is probably due in part to the downward slope of the roadway from South Street to the firehouse. Full detail of the speed study data collection is included as Appendix C. September 2015

8 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 7 Table 1: Summary of Existing Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 HCM Results Intersection University Drive and Main Street University Drive and Sager Avenue University Drive and South Street (unsignalized) University Drive and Fire Station #3 University Drive and Armstrong Street Approach Delay (sec/veh) v/c Ratio Level of Service 95th Percentile Queues (feet) AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Overall B B Eastbound B C m86 m102 Westbound A A Northbound C C Southbound B B 80 m101 Overall A A Eastbound C C Westbound C C Northbound A A Southbound A A Overall A A Westbound B C 8 16 Northbound A A 0 0 Southbound A A 0 0 Overall A A Eastbound C B 0 4 Westbound C C 6 11 Northbound A A 206 #326 Southbound A A #325 #445 Overall C B Eastbound C C Westbound C C Northbound B B 215 #418 Southbound D B #546 #622 Note: m = metered; # = 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. September 2015

9 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 8 C. RECOMMENDED ROAD DIET IMPLEMENTATION CONFIGURATION The recommended road diet implementation consists of a reduction from two travel lanes in either direction, with center two way left turn lane, between Armstrong Street and South Street. Ten foot lanes are recommended in order to reduce speeding, and to provide buffering where possible between vehicular lanes and bike lanes. With 10.5 foot travel lanes and a 12 foot turning lane, between 11 and 20 feet of additional width would be available, including 18 of gutter on either side of the roadway. The recommended road diet configuration utilizes this space as 5.5 foot bike lanes, with any additional space in the wider portion of the roadway striped as a buffer between the travel lanes and bike lanes. The gutter on either side of the roadway would be included in the 5.5 width of the bike lanes, and all lane widths would be measured from center of lane marking to center of lane marking. The lines separating the bike lanes from the travel lanes would be double standard thickness (10 ). No physical modifications are expected outside of the current roadway pavement or curb and gutter. All modifications would be accomplished through changes to the roadway markings. Transit stops would remain in their current locations, with bike lanes temporarily interrupted for a span of 100 feet at each stop (70 behind the bus stop flag and 30 beyond it). The left hand southbound travel lane at South Street would become a left turn only lane, with the right hand travel lane leading into the single travel lane beyond this intersection. Sharrows would be added in the northbound travel lane in the block north of South Street. ROAD DIET TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Under proposed conditions, each of the study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS C or better) overall. The queue lengths shown at the Fire Station in the southbound direction exceed the link distance; however, these conditions are not expected to be seen in the field. The traffic signal is coded in Synchro with a 105 second cycle length, but in the field, the red light on University Drive is only activated by an emergency vehicle or a pedestrian. Therefore, queuing should be minimal under typical circumstances. Table 2 provides a summary of the results of the proposed capacity analysis. September 2015

10 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 9 Figure 9: Intersection LOS with Road Diet Implementation Table 2: Summary of Proposed Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 HCM Results Intersection Approach Delay (sec/veh) v/c Ratio Level of Service 95th Percentile Queues (feet) AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Overall B B University Drive and Main Street Eastbound B C m86 m102 Westbound A A Northbound C C Southbound B B 80 m101 Overall A A University Drive and Sager Avenue Eastbound C C Westbound C C Northbound A A Southbound A A University Drive and South Street (unsignalized) Overall A A Westbound B B 6 14 Northbound A A 0 0 Southbound A A 0 0 Overall A A University Drive and Fire Station #3 Eastbound C B 0 4 Westbound C C 6 11 Northbound A A #542 #730 Southbound B A #797 #942 Overall C B University Drive and Armstrong Street Eastbound C C Westbound C C Northbound B B 215 #418 Southbound D B #546 #622 September 2015

11 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 10 Note: m = metered; # = 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. SWA also conducted an iterative analysis to determine what level of future traffic growth would result in a failing level of service. Increasing traffic volumes throughout the corridor in increments of two percent, and reviewing model results after each increase, SWA noted the levels of future growth that would result in a failing intersection approach and failing intersection overall. It was determined that in all cases, the intersection of University Drive and Armstrong Street would fail before other intersections in the corridor: An 8% increase in traffic would result in a failing condition (LOS F) for the southbound approach of the intersection of University Drive and Armstrong Street in the AM Peak Period. A 22% increase in traffic would result in a failing condition (LOS F) for the intersection of University Drive and Armstrong Street as a whole in the AM Peak Period. Traffic levels for University Drive have fluctuated considerably, peaking in 2007 with an AADT of 15,000 in the portion of the study corridor between South and Armstrong Streets (see Figure 11). Traffic levels fell between 2010 and 2013, but rebounded sharply in Forecasting future traffic levels is difficult given recent fluctuations. Figure 10: Intersection LOS with 22% Growth in Traffic Volumes September 2015

12 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 11 AADT 16,000 15,000 14,000 13,000 12,000 11,000 10, South to Armstrong Main to South Figure 11: Trend in Annual Average Daily Traffic on University Drive, (Source: VDOT) September 2015

13 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 12 APPENDIX A UNIVERSITY DRIVE EXISTING CONDITIONS BASE MAP September 2015

14 SHARE THE ROAD SPEED LIMIT 25 NOPARKING xxxxx xxxxx D NO PARKING ANY TIME INNS OF COURT CONDOMINIUM DB 6416 PG 639 NOPARKING BETWEEN SIGNS CONC UTILITY PADS IPF BEGIN EX. ASPHALT CURB SHARE THE ROAD S15 21'31"W ' END EX. ASPHALT CURB EX. CONC S/W D D F&M BANK NORTHERN VIRGINIA DB 9896 PG 237 PIN CONC S/W N ARMSTRONG STREET S66 29'38"E ' N66 29'51"W ' (VARIABLE WIDTH R/W) ARMSTRONG STREET D D BLIND PEDESTRIAN AREA HOPE C. DAVIES BANKHEAD T. DAVIES WB 49 PG ,305 SQ.FT. OR ACRES (RECORD) PIN D ZONE: R-2 #4131 CHAIN BRIDGE ROAD OPERATOR: ckeler - PLOTTED: Tuesday, Septem ber 15, 2015 AT 01:44 PM FILE NAME: R:\2014\17 City of Fairfax Transportation Engineering_14-007_$500K\Task 07 University Drive Road Diet\dwg\Print_Sheet_UniDr.dgn TRAIL GEORGE MASON BVLD. 15.5' D 3' 12' 13.5' ARMSTRONG STREET D D D D 11.5' S S 10' 10' 10' 12.5' D CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX BENCHMARK - PK NAILIN SIDEWALK BRICK S/W E UNIVERSITY DRIVE University Drive Road Diet Existing Conditions OHW TIME NO PARKING ANY S OHW COURTHOUSE SQUARE RESERVED PARKING FOR 12.5' 10' 12.5' CRIMEWATCH NEIGHBORHOOD WARNING OUTLET NO TW O-W AY BIKE TRAIL UNIVERSITY DRIVE (VARIABLE WIDTH R/W) BRECKINRIDGE LANE D BENCHMARK - PK NAILIN SIDEWALK D WV NEIGHBORHOOD CRIME WATCH WARNING TIME ANY NO PARKING 12.5' 13' 12' 14.5' D S MATCHLINE TO SHEET 2 30' 0 30' 60' SCALE: 1"=30' Sheet No. 1

15 PARKING ANY TIME NO CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXX m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE m etrobus call us for inform ation XXXXXXX XXXX XX.. m etrobus call us for inform ation XX.. NOPARKING BETWEEN SIGNS NOPARKING BETWEEN SIGNS NOPARKING BETWEEN SIGNS N OPERATOR: ckeler - PLOTTED: Tuesday, Septem ber 15, 2015 AT 01:47 PM FILE NAME: R:\2014\17 City of Fairfax Transportation Engineering_14-007_$500K\Task 07 University Drive Road Diet\dwg\Print_Sheet_UniDr.dgn MATCHLINE TO SHEET 1 UNIVERSITYDRIVE 14.5' 12' 12' 14.5' 11.5' 10' 10' 12.5' FIRE STATION University Drive Road Diet Existing Conditions SOUTH STREET MATCHLINE TO SHEET 3 30' 0 30' 60' SCALE: 1"=30' Sheet No. 2

16 CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX m etrobus call us for inform ation XX.. CUE XXXXXXX XXXX m etrobus call us for inform ation XX.. OLD LEE HWY RIGHT AT SECOND LIGHT NO PARKING ANY TIME m etrobus call us for inform ation XX.. m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. SPEED LIMIT 25 P FREE P FREE m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX. m etrobus call us for inform ation XX.. CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. NO PARKING HERE TO CORNER NO PARKING XXXXX XXXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX HR ALL 2PARKING OTHER TIMES N SAGER AVENUE MAIN STREET OPERATOR: ckeler - PLOTTED: Tuesday, Septem ber 15, 2015 AT 01:50 PM FILE NAME: R:\2014\17 City of Fairfax Transportation Engineering_14-007_$500K\Task 07 University Drive Road Diet\dwg\Print_Sheet_UniDr.dgn MATCHLINE TO SHEET ' 10' 10' 11.5' UNIVERSITY DRIVE 12.5' 10' 9' 10.5' SAGER AVENUE 10.5' 10' 9' 10.5' University Drive Road Diet Existing Conditions 10' 10' 9' 10.5' MAIN STREET UNIVERSITY DRIVE 30' 0 30' 60' SCALE: 1"=30' Sheet No. 3

17 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 13 APPENDIX B RECOMMENDED ROAD DIET CONFIGURATION DRAWINGS September 2015

18 SHARE THE ROAD SPEED LIMIT 25 NOPARKING xxxxx xxxxx NO PARKING ANY TIME INNS OF COURT CONDOMINIUM DB 6416 PG 639 NOPARKING BETWEEN SIGNS CONC UTILITY PADS IPF BEGIN EX. ASPHALT CURB SHARE THE ROAD S15 21'31"W ' END EX. ASPHALT CURB EX. CONC S/W D D F&M BANK NORTHERN VIRGINIA DB 9896 PG 237 PIN CONC S/W PARKING ANY TIME NO PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION: UNIVERSITY DRIVE N 44' CURB-TO-CURB ARMSTRONG STREET CURB & GUTTER 5.5' BIKE LANE 10.5' SOUTHBOUND S66 29'38"E ' 12' TURN LANE 10.5' NORTHBOUND 5.5' BIKE LANE CURB & GUTTER N66 29'51"W ' (VARIABLE WIDTH R/W) ARMSTRONG STREET D D BLIND PEDESTRIAN AREA HOPE C. DAVIES BANKHEAD T. DAVIES WB 49 PG 39 OPERATOR: ckeler - PLOTTED: Monday, Septem ber 21, 2015 AT 10:05 AM FILE NAME: R:\2014\17 City of Fairfax Transportation Engineering_14-007_$500K\Task 07 University Drive Road Diet\dwg\Print_Sheet_Concept_UniDr.dgn LEGEND: EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ELECTRICAL OVERHEAD INLET MANHOLES EXISTING SIGNS PROPOSED SIGN TRAIL GEORGE MASON BVLD. D D S 15.5' 3' 12' 13.5' D D ARMSTRONG STREET D D R "X30" 5 SF R3-17c 12"X30" 5 SF D D BEGINS D ENDS S S 5.5' 12"X30" 10.5' R3-17b D CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX BENCHMARK - PK NAILIN SIDEWALK BRICK S/W E 11' OHW TIME NO PARKING ANY S OHW COURTHOUSE University Drive Road Diet Proposed Concept SQUARE RESERVED PARKING FOR CRIMEWATCH NEIGHBORHOOD WARNING OUTLET 116,305 SQ.FT. OR ACRES (RECORD) NO PIN ZONE: R-2 #4131 CHAIN BRIDGE ROAD 12' 12' 12' 10.5' 5.5 R "X30" 5 SF 5 SF UNIVERSITY DRIVE EXISTING BUS STOP 5.5' 11' 5.5' R "X30" 5 SF TW O-W AY BIKE TRAIL UNIVERSITY DRIVE (VARIABLE WIDTH R/W) BRECKINRIDGE LANE R "X30" 5 SF W "X30" 6.25 SF D BENCHMARK - PK NAILIN SIDEWALK NEIGHBORHOOD WV CRIME WATCH WARNING D TIME ANY NO PARKING 5.5 4' 10.5' 10.5' 4' 5.5 D S MATCHLINE TO SHEET 2 30' 0 30' 60' SCALE: 1"=30' Sheet No. 1

19 CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX XXXXXXX CUE XXXX m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX m etrobus call us for inform ation XX.. CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX CITY OF FAIRFAX XXXX CUE XXXXXXX XXXX m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. m etrobus call us for inform ation XX.. m etrobus cal us for inform ation XX.. NOPARKING BETWEEN SIGNS NOPARKING BETWEEN SIGNS NOPARKING BETWEEN SIGNS SPEED LIMIT 25 P FREE P FREE OLD LEE HWY RIGHT AT SECOND LIGHT PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION: UNIVERSITY DRIVE N 44' CURB-TO-CURB CURB & GUTTER 5.5' BIKE LANE 10.5' SOUTHBOUND 12' TURN LANE 10.5' NORTHBOUND 5.5' BIKE LANE CURB & GUTTER OPERATOR: ckeler - PLOTTED: Monday, Septem ber 21, 2015 AT 10:20 AM FILE NAME: R:\2014\17 City of Fairfax Transportation Engineering_14-007_$500K\Task 07 University Drive Road Diet\dwg\Print_Sheet_Concept_UniDr.dgn SAGER AVENUE MATCHLINE TO SHEET 1 UNIVERSITYDRIVE LEGEND: EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ELECTRICAL OVERHEAD INLET MANHOLES EXISTING SIGNS PROPOSED SIGN D D S R "X30" 5 SF 5.5' 10.5' 12' 10.5' 5.5 EXISTING BUS STOP EXISTING BUS STOP FIRE STATION R "X30" 5 SF R "X30" 5 SF R3-17b 12"X30" 5 SF ENDS BEGINS R3-17c 12"X30" 5 SF 5.5' 11' 10.5' 10.5' 10.5' 12' 10' 10.5' 5.5' R "X30" 5 SF SOUTH STREET University Drive Road Diet Proposed Concept ROAD THE 5 SF SHARE W "X30" W "X30" 6.25 SF W "X30" 6.25 SF 11' R3-7(2)L 30"X48" 10 SF SOUTH ST. 10.5' UNIVERSITY DRIVE EXISTING BUS STOP SAGER AVENUE 9' 10.5' R3-7(2)L MOD 30"X48" 10 SF BEYOND INTERSECTION 30' 0 30' 60' SCALE: 1"=30' Sheet No. 2

20 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 14 APPENDIX C SPEED STUDY DATA COLLECTION DETAIL September 2015

21 University Drive Road Diet Analysis VEHICLE SPOT SPEED STUDY SPEED RANGES NUMBER OF VEHICLES PERCENT OF TOTAL PERCENT ACCUMULATION RECORDER: CH % 0.0% % 0.0% LOCATION: % 0.0% University Drive btwn Armstrong and Fire Sta % 0.0% % 0.0% APPROACH: NB % 0.0% % 0.0% SURFACE: Dry % 0.0% % 0.0% WEATHER: Pt Cloudy % 0.0% % 0.0% DATE: 8/6/ % 0.0% % 0.0% TIME: 7:07 AM % 0.0% % 0.0% % 0.0% % 1.2% SURVEY STATISTICS % 2.4% % 2.4% % 3.6% POSTED SPEED: 25 MPH POSTED SPEED % 3.6% % 9.6% AVERAGE SPEED: 32 MPH % 12.0% % 18.1% MEDIAN SPEED: 31 MPH % 24.1% % 34.9% MODAL SPEED: 32 MPH % 47.0% % 61.4% 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 35 MPH % 72.3% % 79.5% 10 MPH PACE: MPH % 85.5% % 89.2% PERCENT IN PACE: 82% % 94.0% % 96.4% PERCENT ENFORCEABLE: 14% % 98.8% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% COMMENTS: % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% TOTAL VEHICLES: 83 WorkSheet (NB) Speed Study 3 of 4

22 University Drive Road Diet Analysis VEHICLE SPOT SPEED STUDY SPEED RANGES NUMBER OF VEHICLES PERCENT OF TOTAL PERCENT ACCUMULATION RECORDER: CH % 0.0% % 0.0% LOCATION: % 0.0% University Drive btwn Armstrong and Fire Sta % 0.0% % 0.0% APPROACH: SB % 0.0% % 0.0% SURFACE: Dry % 0.0% % 0.0% WEATHER: Pt Cloudy % 0.0% % 0.0% DATE: 8/6/ % 0.0% % 0.0% TIME: 7:07 AM % 0.0% % 0.0% % 0.0% % 0.0% SURVEY STATISTICS % 0.0% % 1.3% % 2.6% POSTED SPEED: 25 MPH POSTED SPEED % 2.6% % 6.6% AVERAGE SPEED: 33 MPH % 7.9% % 11.8% MEDIAN SPEED: 31 MPH % 15.8% % 23.7% MODAL SPEED: 31 MPH % 38.2% % 51.3% 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 35 MPH % 59.2% % 72.4% 10 MPH PACE: MPH % 80.3% % 88.2% PERCENT IN PACE: 82% % 89.5% % 92.1% PERCENT ENFORCEABLE: 20% % 93.4% % 94.7% % 97.4% % 98.7% % 98.7% % 98.7% % 98.7% % 98.7% COMMENTS: % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% % 100.0% TOTAL VEHICLES: 76 WorkSheet (SB) Speed Study 4 of 4

23 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 15 APPENDIX D EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON UNIVERSITY DRIVE AM Peak Period Existing Volumes PM Peak Period Existing Volumes September 2015

24 DRAFT University Drive Road Diet Analysis Memorandum Page 16 APPENDIX E SYNCHRO INTERSECTION REPORTS REPORT 1 Existing AM Operations September 2015

25 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: University Drive & South St 9/9/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Old Town Fairfax 7:00 am 9/25/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report SWA Page 1

26 Queues 13: University Drive & Main Street 9/9/2015 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Total Split (s) Total Lost Time (s) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS A B A A C B Approach Delay Approach LOS B A C B Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) m3 m Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Cycle Length: 140 Actuated Cycle Length: 140 Offset: 5 (4%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of 1st Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 13: University Drive & Main Street Old Town Fairfax 7:00 am 9/25/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report SWA Page 2

27 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: University Drive & Main Street 9/9/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 1% 0% 3% 2% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 2% 3% Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.32 c0.02 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm c v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service B B A A C B Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A C B HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Old Town Fairfax 7:00 am 9/25/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report SWA Page 3

28 Queues 51: University Drive & Sager Avenue 9/9/2015 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Total Split (s) Total Lost Time (s) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS C C B A A Approach Delay Approach LOS C B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 10 (14%), Referenced to phase 2:NBSB, Start of 1st Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.38 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 51: University Drive & Sager Avenue Old Town Fairfax 7:00 am 9/25/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report SWA Page 4

29 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 51: University Drive & Sager Avenue 9/9/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 3% 5% 3% 3% 4% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c c0.27 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service C C C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C C A A HCM 2000 Control Delay 7.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Old Town Fairfax 7:00 am 9/25/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report SWA Page 5

30 Queues 52: George Mason Blvd/University Drive & Armstrong Street 9/9/2015 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Total Split (s) Total Lost Time (s) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS C B A B A D Approach Delay Approach LOS C B B D Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) #546 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 62.8 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 30.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 52: George Mason Blvd/University Drive & Armstrong Street Old Town Fairfax 7:00 am 9/25/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report SWA Page 6

31 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 52: George Mason Blvd/University Drive & Armstrong Street 9/9/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 8% 7% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 5% 5% 4% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot c c0.47 v/s Ratio Perm c v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service C C A B A D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C C B D HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 66.1 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Old Town Fairfax 7:00 am 9/25/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report SWA Page 7

32 Queues 58: University Drive & Fire Station #3 9/9/2015 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm Prot Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Total Split (s) Total Lost Time (s) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS A C A B B Approach Delay Approach LOS A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) #325 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 42.7 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.28 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 58: University Drive & Fire Station #3 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service G Old Town Fairfax 7:00 am 9/25/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report SWA Page 8

33 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 58: University Drive & Fire Station #3 9/9/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 5% 0% 0% 5% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Prot Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c c0.24 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service C C B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C C A A HCM 2000 Control Delay 4.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.33 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.4 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Old Town Fairfax 7:00 am 9/25/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report SWA Page 9

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) 116 20 8 405 137 56 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.67 0.67 0.89 0.89 Hourly flow

More information

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com

More information

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for: L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES

More information

Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;

Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes; December 19, 2013 File: 163600935 Attention: Troy Elliott Carl Elliott Limited 15-1831 Robertson Road PO Box 11117 Nepean, Ontario K1H 7T8 Dear Mr. Elliott, Reference: 2235 and 2265 Robertson Road Transportation

More information

Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief

Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief Barrhaven Honda Dealership Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 September, 2015 File: 115136 Ref: R-2015-152

More information

4131 Chain Bridge Road

4131 Chain Bridge Road Traffic Impact Study 4131 Chain Bridge Road City of Fairfax, VA 05/04/16 May 4, 2016 Prepared for: Paradigm 1415 North Taft Street Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 This report is printed on environmentally

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Upper Broadway Road Diet Summary of Findings

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Upper Broadway Road Diet Summary of Findings TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Summary of Findings Date: June 17, 2014 Project #: 17121.15 To: Si Lau, P.E.; City of Oakland, CA From: Erin Ferguson, P.E.; Aaron Elias, P.E.; Daphne Dethier; and Mark Bowman, P.E.;

More information

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia S IGNAL W ARRANT A NALYSIS For the Intersection of: Sugarloaf Parkway / Richards Middle School Driveway / Sugarland Crossing Main Site Driveway Prepared for:

More information

Village of Richmond Transportation Brief

Village of Richmond Transportation Brief Village of Richmond Transportation Brief GENIVAR Project Number 111-18482-00 June 21 st, 2011 www.genivar.com GENIVAR 15 Fitzgerald Road, Suite 100 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA K2H 9G1 Telephone: 613-829-2800

More information

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 KUM & GO #300 PECOS STREET & 88 TH AVENUE THORNTON, COLORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVISION 1 PREPARED FOR KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 JANUARY 23, 2014 OA PROJECT NO. 013-1721

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village

Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village Route 4 (Farmington Avenue) Farmington, Connecticut Prepared for: The Town of Farmington, CT Prepared By: BL Companies Meriden, Connecticut December 2016

More information

MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC

MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC MEMORANDUM Date: November 4, 2013 To: From: Subject: Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis As requested, Fehr & Peers is providing clarification

More information

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Crawford, Bunte, Brammeier May 1, 2009 MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2009 To: From: Subject:

More information

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1 Ref. No. 171-6694 Phase 2 November 23, 217 Mr. David Quilichini, Vice President Fares & Co. Developments Inc. 31 Place Keelson Sales Centre DARTMOUTH NS B2Y C1 Sent Via Email to David@faresinc.com RE:

More information

Traffic Analysis For Approved Uses within the St. Lucie West DRI Aldi Port St. Lucie, FL Prepared for: Bohler Engineering, LLC 1000 Corporate Drive Suite 250 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 Prepared by: 10795

More information

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS Proposed Gas Station 40 Arthur Street (Highway 26), Town of the Blue Mountains (Thornbury), County of Grey, Ontario AUGUST 2013 August 27, 2013 MR. REG RUSSWURM

More information

APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets

APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets APPENDICES APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets Lanes, Volumes, Timings NO BUILD 2016 PM 8: 10th St & Thain Rd 10/05/2016 Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR

More information

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: Arvada Urban Renewal Authority 5601 Olde Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 210 Arvada, Colorado 80002 (720) 898-7062 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt

More information

Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois

Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study 1714-1720 Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois Prepared For: HOLABIRD & ROOT, LLC Prepared by: Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd. 145 Commerce Drive, Ste A,

More information

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RAYMOND VINEYARDS WINERY USE PERMIT MODIFICATION #P11-00156 AUGUST 5, 2014 PREPARED BY: OMNI-MEANS,

More information

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com March 28, 2012 OUR REF: TO3088TOY Barry J. Hobin & Architects 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, ON K1S 3K7

More information

LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW

LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW Prepared for: Prepared by: Broadview Developments Inc. c/o Westbrook Consulting Watt Consulting Group Our File: 2064.B01 Date: October 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

More information

(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals

(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals February 14th, 2014 BY E-MAIL: wally.dubyk@ottawa.ca City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Branch 110 Laurier Ave. W., 4 th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Attention: Wally Dubyk, C.E.T (A) Project

More information

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com February 25, 2013 OUR REF: TO3098TOE Mark Motors of Ottawa 611 Montreal Road Ottawa, ON K1K 0T8 Attention:

More information

APPENDIX G. Traffic Data

APPENDIX G. Traffic Data APPENDIX G Traffic Data HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Duanesburg Road & I-88 Ramps 10/7/2004 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl)

More information

Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet)

Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet) Market Street Road Diet Wilmington, NC 2016 Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet) Wilmington, NC Parsons Brinckerhoff January 2016 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT US 17 Corridor

More information

Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use

Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use Transportation Impact Study City of Guelph Prepared for: Armel Corporation August 2018 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...

More information

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 9821 425.339.8266 Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish January 218 GTC #17-37

More information

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT US 460 Bypass Interchange and Southgate Drive Relocation State Project No.: 0460-150-204, P101, R201, C501, B601; UPC 99425

More information

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th Ref. No. 151-00564 Task 3 April 28, 2015 Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th 3480 Joseph Howe Drive, 5 Floor HALIFAX NS B3L 4H7 Sent via Email to ceasr.saleh@wmfares.com

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 2014 UPDATED

More information

April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief

April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief April 26 Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief prepared for: The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd.

More information

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 15001714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 4 III. 2015 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...

More information

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Prepared for: Golden Eagle Multi-Family Properties, LLC 6201 Oak Canyon Rd., Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared

More information

Wellington Street West

Wellington Street West Transportation Brief prepared for: 185 Davenport Road Suite 300 Toronto, ON M5R 1J1 prepared by: 1223 Michael Street Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 November 5, 2013 TO3131TOH Transportation Brief November

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers

Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers Traffic Impact Study For Eastern Springs A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY April 2018 Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers Table of Contents 1) Executive Summary... 2 2) Study Purpose...

More information

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR I-96 AT LATSON RD INTERCHANGE Livingston County CS 47065 JN 101622C Submitted to: Michigan Department

More information

JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3

JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3 March 2015 Prepared for Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3 JRL consulting JRL consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 BACKGROUND... 2 2 EXISTING

More information

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017 Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A7 519-591-0426 November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017 Laurie Wills, PEng Deputy Director of Public Works Town of Cobourg 740 Division

More information

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish September 2018

More information

267 O Connor Street Residential Development

267 O Connor Street Residential Development M a y 2014 267 O Connor Street Residential Development Transportation Brief Google 2014 Bing 2014 Prepared for: MASTERCRAFT STARWOOD Prepared by: Study 267 O'Connor Type Street May 2014 Study Residential

More information

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida Summary Report June 2008 Prepared by: 12909 N 56 th Street # 201 Tampa, FL 33617 Ph: (813) 988-3180 Fax: (813) 343-6854 Morgan Road

More information

Appendix B: Traffic Reports

Appendix B: Traffic Reports Appendix B: Traffic Reports 407 TRANSITWAY - KENNEDY ROAD TO BROCK ROAD MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION Report Markham Road Station Traffic Study Prepared for Ministry of Transportation, Ontario

More information

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by:

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by: 700 Hunt Club Road Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1 Submitted by: 14 June 2013 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com 14 June 2013

More information

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO: McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February

More information

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017 Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,

More information

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace December 217 112 & 124 McGarry Terrace Transportation Impact Study 112 & 124 McGarry Terrace Transportation Impact Study prepared for: Lépine Corporation 32 March Road Kanata, ON K2K 2E3 prepared by: 1223

More information

Interstate 80 Corridor Study

Interstate 80 Corridor Study Interstate 80 Corridor Study Final Technical Memorandum 5: Traffic Volumes, Accident Locations and Operational Deficiencies West Verdi (SR 425) Interchange to West McCarran Boulevard (SR 651) and East

More information

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 8 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98 45.9.8 Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish February 8 GTC #7-87 Sweetwater Landing Traffic

More information

MEMORANDUM November 19, 2012

MEMORANDUM November 19, 2012 COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS CENTRAL NAUGATUCK VALLEY 60 NORTH MAIN ST 3RD Floor WATERBURY, CT 06702-1403 (203)757-0535 Web Site: www.cogcnv.org E-Mail: cogcnv@cogcnv.org November 19, 2012 MEMORANDUM 111912

More information

Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality

Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Study Final Draft Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T

More information

One Harbor Point Residential

One Harbor Point Residential Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE

More information

LEMON FLATS SECOND ACCESS

LEMON FLATS SECOND ACCESS LEMON FLATS SECOND ACCESS RECONNAISSANCE STUDY SEPTEMBER 2007 APPENDIX A Synchro Analysis Worksheets HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2005 - Background 3: Anka Street & Lemon Flats Second

More information

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

More information

STANDARD LIMITATIONS

STANDARD LIMITATIONS STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared by MMM Group (MMM) for the account of Spire Construction Inc. (the Client). The disclosure of any information contained in this report is the sole responsibility

More information

1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief

1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief 1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief October 2013 Study 1140 Wellington Type Street West October 2013 Study Transportation Name Brief February 2011 TB Check List TIS / TB/ CTS Check List prepared

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Traffic Impact Analysis Update Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS

More information

Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment

Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment MEMORANDUM Date: June 22, 2018 Project #: 21562 To: Colin McArthur, AICP From: Project: Subject: Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit

More information

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands

More information

Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID

Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 5731 Hazeldean Road Transportation Impact Study Ottawa, Ontario Project ID 160401195 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. March 2016 WELLINGS

More information

Date: December 20, Project #:

Date: December 20, Project #: To: Craig Rottenberg Long s Jewelers 60A South Avenue Burlington, MA 01803 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: December 20, 2018 Project #: 14416.00 Re: Burlington Mall Proposed Long

More information

BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM

BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Prepared for: City and County of Denver Prepared by: Contact: Brian Bern, P.E., PTOE 303.572.0200 On Behalf of: Lowry Redevelopment Authority

More information

Lakeside Terrace Development

Lakeside Terrace Development Lakeside Terrace Development City of Barrie, County of Simcoe Traffic Brief for: Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1617 Date Submitted: April 29 th, 216 4/29/16 John Northcote, P.Eng.

More information

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive. Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc.

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive. Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Project Description... 1 Estimated Daily Project Traffic... 3 Estimated

More information

CastleGlenn Consultants Inc.

CastleGlenn Consultants Inc. CastleGlenn Consultants Inc. Engineers, Project Managers & Planners March 11 th, 2013 Domenic Idone, P. Eng Planning Manager R.W. Tomlinson Ltd. 5597 Power Road Ottawa, Ontario K1G 3N4 Dear Mr. Idone:

More information

MEMORANDUM BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. DATE March 1, 2012

MEMORANDUM BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. DATE March 1, 2012 BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION State Transportation Building Ten Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116-3968 Tel. (617) 973-7100 Fax (617) 973-8855 TTY (617) 973-7089 www.bostonmpo.org

More information

MMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure

MMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure MMM Group Limited Traffic Study CASA MIA Community Care Facility Vancouver, BC Communities Transportation Buildings Infrastructure February 2013 5011001-033 STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared

More information

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands

More information

Appendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations

Appendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations Derr Road and Home Road Conversion Feasibility Study Springfield, OH Appendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations Derr Road and Home Road Conversion Feasibility Study Springfield, OH Emission Reduction

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Merrimack Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization FROM: James Terlizzi, P.E., Transportation Planning Engineer DATE: March 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Further analysis of the recommendations

More information

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...

More information

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report As part of the City s Transportation Master Plan, this report reviews the technical feasibility of the proposed conversion of the current

More information

C. iv) Analysis/Results

C. iv) Analysis/Results The Pettengill Road project is located outside the borders of the model in an external zone. As a result, inserting all Pettengill Road trip generation assumptions into the NRPC model and running a new

More information

Traffic Engineering Study

Traffic Engineering Study Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested

More information

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903 LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com June 21,

More information

Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis

Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis January 4, 2019 Prepared by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Active Transportation Division Winnetka Ave Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis

More information

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101

More information

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange City of Broadview Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Broadview Heights Department of Engineering 9543 Broadview Road

More information

Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA

Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA (St. Tammany Parish Mandeville, LA) Prepared For The Pittman Companies Michael N Pittman, MD 328 East Boston St Covington, LA 70433

More information

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS... Crosshaven Drive Corridor Study City of Vestavia Hills, Alabama Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA... 3 Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

More information

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1

More information

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Traffic Impact Study Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Marbledale Road Tuckahoe, NY PREPARED FOR BILLWIN DEVELOPMENT AFFILIATES, LLC 365 WHITE PLAINS ROAD EASTCHESTER, NY. 10709 PREPARED BY Engineering

More information

Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants

Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants TJKM Transportation Consultants Draft Report Traffic Impact Study for the Residential Development at 4659 Proctor

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis

More information

Critical Movement* Delay (sec/veh) Critical Movement* LOS 8 a.m. 9 a.m. B 25.2 C. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. B 17.3 B

Critical Movement* Delay (sec/veh) Critical Movement* LOS 8 a.m. 9 a.m. B 25.2 C. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. B 17.3 B Memorandum DATE: AUGUST 1, 2013 TO: PAUL TILTON, P.E., SANDWICH DPW DIRECTOR/TOWN ENGINEER FROM: LEV MALAKHOFF, SR. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER RE: ROUTE 130/QUAKER MEETINGHOUSE ROAD INTERSECTION Paul: Per

More information

Minto Mahogany Stage 2

Minto Mahogany Stage 2 Minto Mahogany Stage 2 Transportation Impact Study prepared for: Minto Developments Inc 200-180 Kent Street Ottawa, ON K1P 0B6 prepared by: 1223 Michael Street Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 June 27, 2017

More information

SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation

SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation Background and Project Needs SR 104 is functionally classified as a rural-principal arterial. It is a limited

More information

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1 Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West

More information

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (95)823-85 Fax: (95) 823-853 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: FROM: File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah

More information

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320 Kirkland,

More information

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Barrhaven Fellowship CRC 3058 Jockvale Road Ottawa, ON K2J 2W7 December 7, 2016 116-649 Report_1.doc D. J.

More information

JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: KTM Design Solutions 528 Kansas City Street, Suite 1 Rapid City, SD 57701 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse

More information

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639 INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY Prepared for: Virginia Department of Transportation Central Region Operations Traffic Engineering (UPC #81378, TO 12-092) DAVENPORT Project Number: 13-368 / /2014 RTE. 1 at RTE.

More information

830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality

830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality 830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Statement Final Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 www.griffininc.ca Prepared

More information

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna

More information

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014. King County Metro Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis Downtown Southend Transit Study May 2014 Parametrix Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Methodology... 1 Study Area...

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA Prepared For: McDonald s USA, LLC Pacific Sierra Region 2999 Oak Road, Suite 900 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared By:

More information

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14

More information

Intersection LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5

Intersection LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5 Intersection No- LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5 Ü Intersection No- LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive S C 32.6 D 43.0 Intersection No- LOS Delay

More information