PROJECT CONCEPT REPORT

Transcription

1 Project Concept Report page _1_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) State of Georgia Department of Transportation P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF GEORGIA PROJECT CONCEPT REPORT Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) County: CHATHAM P. I. Number: 869 Federal Route Number: NA State Route Number: NA Jimmy Deloach Connector from Bourne Avenue/SR 37 to existing Jimmy Deloach Parkway See Page 2 for Project Location map Recommendation for approval: DATE DATE Project Manager Innovative Program Delivery The concept as presented herein and submitted for approval is consistent with that which is included in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTP) and the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE State Transportation Planning Administrator State Transportation Financial Management Admin. State Environmental/Location Engineer State Traffic Safety & Design Engineer State Urban Design Engineer District Engineer Project Review Engineer State Bridge & Structural Engineer

2 KEY MAP I-95 Savannah River Middle River Knoxboro Creek State Route 25 State Route 21 State Route 21 CSX Railroad Monteith Road Drakie Road END PROJECT Project Location Jimmy Deloach Parkway CSX Railroad Bonnybridge Road/SR 3 F r o n t R i v e r Norfolk Southern Railroad Crossgate Road Gulfstream Road CSX Railroad S a v a n n a h Savannah International Airport Grange Road State Route 25 R i v e r Bourne Avenue State Route 37 Bourne Avenue State Route 37 BEGIN PROJECT. PROJECT LOCATION MAP CSMSL-8-(69), PI NO. 869 CHATHAM COUNTY Miles

3 Project Concept Report page _3_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation NEED AND PURPOSE Introduction Project CSMSL-8-(69) proposes the construction of the Jimmy Deloach Connector, a new roadway alignment that would begin at Bourne Avenue/SR 37 and terminate at the existing eastern end of Jimmy Delaoch Parkway in Savannah, Chatham County, Georgia. New interchanges would be constructed at both Grange Road and Jimmy Deloach Parkway. The proposed project would be approximately 3.1 miles in length. The typical section of the proposed limited access roadway would consist of four 12-foot wide travel lanes (two in either direction) separated by a 24 foot-wide raised median and 6.5 foot wide paved outside shoulders on both sides of the roadway. An exception to this typical section would begin just south of Crossgate Road and continue to the existing Jimmy Deloach Parkway and would include a median barrier with 4-foot wide inside shoulders. The posted speed limit would be 55 mph. In the vicinity of the proposed project, SR 21 is a four-lane divided highway (two lanes in either direction) with a variable foot wide median, and 1-foot paved outside shoulders. The existing right-of-way varies from approximately 175 to 2 feet. The new location roadway would bypass approximately three miles of existing SR 21 mainline beginning at Jimmy Deloach Parkway and allow direct access into the Savannah Port gates. The purpose of the project is to improve travel time from the Savannah Port to I-95 and accommodate the increasing truck traffic entering and exiting the Savannah Port. The proposed project is primarily needed to provide faster truck movement into and out of the Savannah Port from I-95 and SR 21. The project is also needed to accommodate the increase in truck traffic that will result from the expansion of the Savannah Port and the deepening of the Savannah River Channel, and maintain the economic viability of the Port and southeast region. Planning Basis for the Action The proposed project stemmed from the Georgia DOT s Statewide Truck Lanes Identification Study (27). Within this study, Savannah, a sub-area of Chatham County was studied for potential truck lanes and other truck travel improvements due to the Savannah Port. The Georgia Ports Authority was interested in the construction of a project from the I-95/Jimmy Deloach interchange south to the Savannah Port gates that would provide direct access to the Port. As a result, the Georgia DOT and the Georgia Ports Authority have been working together to develop a project that would bypass SR 21 and provide direct truck access into the Savannah Port.

4 Project Concept Report page _4_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation Deficiencies in the System Traffic Volumes Along SR 21 in the vicinity of the proposed project, traffic volumes are currently estimated at 24,4 vehicles per day of which 65 percent are passenger vehicles and 35 percent are trucks. Approximately 76 percent of the trucks are destined for the Savannah Port. Table 1 shows the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) and percentage of trucks on the corridors that connect to SR 21 and the Savannah Port. Table 1: Traffic Volume on Side Streets - Existing Conditions (Year 28) ADT Truck Volume Percentage of Roadway Names (vpd) (vpd) Trucks EB WB EB WB EB WB Bourne Avenue % 59 % Grange Road % 35 % Crossgate Drive % 4 % Bonnybridge Road % 39 % Jimmy Deloach Pkwy % 47 % The build year 212 traffic volumes on SR 21 without the Jimmy Deloach Connector project would be 31,68 vehicles per day, 61 percent passenger vehicles and 39 percent trucks. In the design year 232, traffic volumes are projected to be 45,25 vehicles per day, 61 percent passenger vehicles and 39 percent trucks. By constructing the Jimmy Deloach Connector project, 4,89 vpd in the build year and 6,98 vpd in the design year would be shifted from SR 21 to the proposed facility, thereby reducing the AADT of SR 21 from 31,68 vpd to 26,79 vpd in the build year and from 45,25 vpd to 38,27 vpd in the design year (see Table 2 below). This represents an overall reduction in traffic on SR 21 of 15%, with a reduction in truck traffic of 76%, for both the build year and design year.

5 Project Concept Report page _5_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation Year Table 2: Traffic Volume Summary for SR-21 ADT (vpd) Truck Traffic (vpd) Existing Conditions (Year 28) 24,4 8,54 Build Year (Year 212) Without Project (vpd) 31,68 12,31 With Project (vpd) 26,79 2,95 Reduction in (vpd) 4,89 9,36 Traffic (%) 15% 76% Design Year (Year 232) Without Project (vpd) 45,25 17,58 With Project (vpd) 38,27 4,21 Reduction in (vpd) 6,98 13,37 Traffic (%) 15% 76% Level of Service As shown in Table 3 below, SR 21 is currently operating at a Level of Service (LOS) C in the AM peak period and LOS B in the PM peak period, respectively. Table 3: Existing Arterial LOS (Level of Service) Summary for SR 21 A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Year Speed (mph) LOS Speed (mph) LOS C 33. B As shown in Table 4 below, the intersection of SR 21 and Bourne Avenue (which is the main road currently used to access the Savannah Port from SR 21) fails (LOS F) in the AM peak. Therefore, without improvements to SR 21 (which does not provide direct access to and from the Savannah Port from I-95) or the construction of the Jimmy Deloach Connector, the intersection LOS shown below in Table 4 would further deteriorate.

6 Project Concept Report page _6_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation Table 4: Intersections LOS Summary for Existing Conditions for the Year 28 A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Intersection Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) LOS SR 21 at Bourne Avenue F 56. E SR 21 at Grange Road 46.9 E 28.6 D SR 21 at Crossgate Drive 53.7 D 28.8 C SR 21 at Bonnybridge Road 19. B 15.3 B SR 21 at Jimmy Deloach Parkway 22.3 C 14.5 B SR 21, without additional improvements, would not accommodate the projected traffic increase of 2,85 passenger vehicles and trucks per day in the design year (232). Therefore, the LOS on SR 21 would be F during the AM peak period in both the build year and design year, and LOS C and E during the PM peak period in build year and design year respectively as shown in Table 5 below. Year No-Build Conditions Table 5: Arterial LOS for SR 21 A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Speed (mph) LOS Speed (mph) LOS F 27.8 C F 14.5 E Safety Safety analysis parameters, including total accident rates, fatality rates, and injury rates, were developed for the proposed limits near SR 21. A comparison was made of the rates along SR 21 with corresponding statewide averages for similar corridors. Table 6 below shows the accident and injury rates as compared to a similar facility for the years 24-26, the most recent data available.

7 Project Concept Report page _7_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation Table 6: Accident Data Analysis SR 21 Year Item/Year Crash Type Angle Rear-End Sideswipe Same Direction Sideswipe Opposite Direction Not a Collision with a Motor Vehicle Head-On Total Accidents Total Non-Fatal Injuries Total Fatalities 1 1 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) 32,176 26,9 27,36 Accident Rate (per 1 million vehicle miles traveled [mvmt]) Statewide Accident Rate (per 1 mvmt) Non-Fatality Injury Rate (per 1 mvmt) Statewide Non-Fatality Injury Rate (per 1 mvmt) Fatality Rate (per 1 mvmt) Statewide Fatality Rate (per 1 mvmt) Table 6 above shows the following: The overall accident, injury, and fatality rates in the project area are higher than the corresponding statewide averages; On average, 234 accidents, 12 injuries, and.67 fatalities per year were observed in the project area; Rear-end crashes are the most predominant crashes in the project area, constituting 61 percent of the total accidents; and Angle crashes and sideswipe crashes account for approximately 16 percent and 14 percent of the total accidents, respectively; Decreasing the mix of truck and passenger vehicle traffic on SR 21 within the project limits would facilitate improved traffic flow and therefore provide safer conditions along SR 21.

8 Project Concept Report page _8_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation Travel Time The primary benefit of implementing a congestion project is a reduction in delay. Reduction in delay, or delay benefit, can be defined as the difference between the peak hour travel time through the corridor without the proposed improvement and the peak hour travel time through the corridor with the proposed improvement. This delay benefit was factored to calculate the time benefit, which takes the value of time into account, and the commercial benefit, which takes the cost of delay to commercial vehicles into account. The travel time was estimated between Bourne Avenue east of the Jimmy Deloach Connector and the north end of Jimmy Deloach Parkway. Travel time was calculated for both corridors (SR 21 and the Jimmy Deloach Connector) individually, and then weighted average travel time was calculated taking volumes into account for both corridors. Travel time savings was determined for each alternative as listed in Table 7 below, by taking the difference between the weighted average travel time for each alternative and the travel time for the no-build conditions. Table 7: Travel Time Savings Travel Time (min/veh) Scenario SR 21 JDC Wt. Average Travel Time (min/veh) Time Savings (min/veh) No-Build Conditions Alternate 2A (T-Intersection at SR 37) Alternate 2B (Half-diamond interchange at SR 37) Alternate 2C (Flyover ramp at SR 37 interchange) Alternate 2D (3 mph loop ramp at SR 37 interchange) Economic Vitality Georgia s deepwater ports and inland barge terminals support more than 275, jobs throughout the state annually and contribute $1.8 billion in income, $35.4 billion in revenue and some $1.4 billion in state and local taxes to Georgia s economy. The Savannah Port is the fourth largest container port in the nation and the sixth largest automobile port in the nation. In 27, 2.6 million Twenty-Equivalent Unit containers (TEU s) were handled through the Port of Savannah, a 2.6 percent increase from previous years. Widening of the Savannah River channel from 42 feet to 48 feet (to accommodate larger ships) will increase the throughput capacity of the port from 2.6 million TEU s to 6 million TEU s by 218. The roadway network must be able to keep up with the growth of the port.

9 Project Concept Report page _9_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation The Savannah Port is serviced by approximately 1 trucking companies. The Georgia Ports Authority has two aggressive capital investment programs, one to increase the capacity of an intermodal container transfer facility and the second to construct 42 acres of additional container storage within the Ports Authority property. Both of these improvement projects, according to the Ports Authority, will continue to stimulate the growth of businesses throughout the state for many years to come. With this projected growth within the Savannah Port, freight transfer via trucks will greatly increase. The Jimmy Deloach Connector is needed to make ingress and egress of truck traffic to the Savannah Port efficient and be able to keep up with the increasing freight that will need to be distributed. Without the connector, congestion along SR 21 would further slow the ultimate distribution of goods from Georgia s port and potentially decrease the desirability of this port for the shipping industry. Logical Termini Approximately 3-35% percent of the truck traffic heading for the Savannah Port is coming from the I-95 and the Jimmy Deloach interchange. Therefore, beginning the project at the SR 21 and existing Jimmy Deloach Parkway would allow for a continuous direct access to the Savannah Port without placing truck traffic onto SR 21. The terminus of Bourne Avenue was selected because this is the destination point at which the trucks head east into the Savannah Port gates. The proposed project would not require improvement to any other cross roads in the project corridor. This project would function with independent utility. Benefit/Cost (B/C) A benefit/cost (B/C) analysis was performed to determine the total benefit of the project compared to the total cost incurred by the project. A B/C ratio, which is the ratio of the congestion benefit to the congestion cost, was determined for each alternative. A B/C ratio greater than 1. indicates that the calculated dollar value of congestion benefits exceeds the estimated dollar cost of the project. Table 8 below indicates that B/C ratios for all of the alternatives is comparable and range from 6.4 to 7.4.

10 Project Concept Report page _1_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham Table 8: Time Savings and Benefit to Cost Ratios Travel Time (min/veh) Scenario SR 21 JDC No-Build Conditions Alternate 2A (T-Intersection at SR 37) Alternate 2B (Half-diamond interchange at SR 37) Alternate 2C (Flyover ramp at SR 37 interchange) Alternate 2D (3 mph loop ramp at SR 37 interchange) Wt. Average Travel Time (min/veh) State of Georgia Department of Transportation Time Savings (min/veh) Benefit ($) Cost ($) B/C ,372, ,194, ,444,57 122,577, ,478, ,194, ,852, ,194, Description of the proposed project: Project CSMSL-8-(69) proposes the construction of Jimmy Deloach Connector, a new roadway alignment that would begin at Bourne Avenue/SR 37 and terminate at the existing eastern end of Jimmy Deloach Parkway in Savannah, Chatham County, Georgia. New diamond interchanges would be constructed at Grange Road and Jimmy Deloach Parkway. The proposed project would be approximately 3.1 miles in length. Typical section of the proposed limited access roadway would consist of four 12-foot wide travel lanes (two in either direction) separated by a 24-foot wide raised median and 6.5-foot wide paved outside shoulders on both sides of the roadway. An exception to this typical section will begin just south of Crossgate Road and continue to the end of the project and will include a median barrier with 4-foot wide inside shoulders. The posted speed limit would be 55 mph. Two diamond ramps are proposed at Bourne Avenue one southbound exit ramp from Jimmy Deloach Connector and one northbound entrance ramp from Bourne Avenue. Is the project located in a Non-attainment area? Yes X No PDP Classification: Major X Minor Federal Oversight: Full Oversight (X), Exempt ( ), State Funded ( ), or Other ( )

11 Project Concept Report page _11_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation Functional Classification: Urban Freeway U. S. Route Number(s): NA State Route Number(s): NA Traffic (AADT): Current Year: (28) 24,4 Design Year: (232) 45,25 Existing design features: State Route 21 Typical Section: Four 12 foot travel lanes with variable foot depressed median and 1 foot paved outside shoulders. Posted speed: 55 mph Minimum radius for curve: 1,8 ft. Maximum super-elevation rate for curve: 6. % Maximum grade: Mainline: 3.5 %, Cross Roads: N/A, Driveways: N/A Width of right of way: varies from 175 ft. to 2 ft.. Major structures: Bridge carrying Jimmy Deloach Parkway over SR 21 (Structure ID ) Length = 273 ft, Width = 82.7 ft, Suff. Rating = Major interchanges or intersections along the project: SR 21 at Bourne Avenue/SR 37 signalized intersection SR 21 at Grange Road unsignalized intersection SR 21 at Crossgate Road signalized intersection SR 21 at Bonnybridge Road/SR 3 signalized intersection SR 21 at Jimmy Delaoch Parkway signalized intersection Existing length of roadway segment: 2.7 miles along SR 21 Proposed Design Features: Jimmy Deloach Connector Proposed typical section(s) o From begin project to south of Crossgate Road: Four 12-foot wide travel lanes with a 24-foot raised median and 6.5-foot wide paved outside shoulders. An urban median is recommended for this section as opposed to a 44-foot depressed median to minimize right-of-way impacts.

12 Project Concept Report page _12_ State of Georgia Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) Department of Transportation P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham o From south of Crossgate Road to Jimmy Deloach Parkway: Four 12-foot wide travel lanes separated by a median barrier, 4-foot wide inside shoulders and 6.5- foot wide paved outside shoulders. Proposed Design Speed Mainline: 55 mph Proposed Maximum grade Mainline: 3.5 % Maximum grade allowable: 5 % Proposed Maximum grade Side Street: 4. % Maximum grade allowable: 6 % Proposed Maximum grade driveway: 1 % Proposed Minimum radius for curve: 96 ft Minimum radius allowable: 96 ft Proposed Maximum degree of curve: 5.97 Maximum degree allowable: 5.97 Proposed Maximum super-elevation rate for curve: 8. % Ramps Proposed typical section o Bourne Avenue/SR 37 Interchange: (3) 12-foot wide travel lanes, 1-foot wide paved outside shoulder and 4-foot wide paved inside shoulder. o Grange Road Interchange: (1) 16-foot wide travel lane on each ramp, additional (1) 12-foot wide right turn lane at each exit ramp-head, 1-foot wide paved outside shoulders and 4-foot wide paved inside shoulders. o Jimmy Deloach Parkway Interchange: (1) 16-foot wide travel lane on each ramp, additional (1) 12-foot wide right turn lane at each exit ramp-head, 1-foot wide paved outside shoulders and 4-foot wide paved inside shoulders. Proposed design speed Ramp : 45 mph Proposed Maximum grade Ramp: 5 % Maximum grade allowable: 8 % Proposed Minimum radius for curve: 6 ft Minimum radius allowable: 587 ft Proposed Maximum degree of curve: 9.55 Maximum degree allowable: 9.76 Proposed Maximum super-elevation rate for curve: 8. % Right of Way: o Width: Varies from 2 feet along mainline, up to 8 feet at interchange locations o Easements: Temporary ( X ), Permanent ( X ), Utility ( X ), Other ( ). o Type of access control: Full (X), Partial ( ), By Permit ( ), Other ( ).

13 Project Concept Report page _13_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation o Number of parcels: 38 Number of displacements: o Businesses: 6 o Residences: 5 Structures: o Bridge carrying proposed Jimmy Deloach Connector over Grange Road will approximately be 194 feet long by 88 feet wide, 3 spans, concrete bridge with PSC Bulb-T 63 beams. o Bridge carrying proposed Jimmy Deloach Connector over Crossgate Road will approximately be 2 feet long by 74.5 feet wide, 3 spans, concrete bridge with PSC Bulb-T 63 beams. o Bridge carrying proposed Jimmy Deloach Connector over Norfolk Southern Railroad will approximately be 138 feet long by 74.5 feet wide, single span, concrete bridge with PSC Bulb-T 72 beams. o Bridge carrying proposed Jimmy Deloach Connector over Bonnybridge Road/SR 3 an approximately 235 feet long by 86.5 feet constant width, 3 spans, concrete bridge with Bulb-T PSC beams is proposed to carry this varying width roadway. o Bridge carrying proposed Jimmy Deloach Connector (southbound lanes) over wetlands will approximately be 56 feet long by 61.7 feet constant width, 7 spans, concrete bridge with PSC Bulb-T 54 beams. o Bridge carrying proposed Jimmy Deloach Connector (northbound lanes) over wetlands the proposed concrete bridge will approximately be 56 feet long by 36 feet wide, 7 spans with PSC Bulb-T 54 beams. o Bridge carrying proposed Jimmy Deloach Connector (southbound lanes) over existing Jimmy Deloach Parkway will approximately consist of 14 feet long by 36 feet wide, single span, concrete bridge with PSC Bulb-T 72 beams and MSE wall end bents. o Bridge carrying proposed Jimmy Deloach Connector (northbound lanes) over existing Jimmy Deloach Parkway will approximately consist of 13 feet long by 36 feet wide, single span, concrete bridge with PSC Bulb-T 72 beams and MSE wall end bents. o The existing Jimmy Deloach Parkway over SR 21 and CSX railroad will be widened in kind to accommodate proposed roadway width. Major intersections and interchanges: o Jimmy Deloach Connector southbound exit ramp at Bourne Avenue/SR 37 signalized intersection. o Jimmy Deloach Connector northbound entrance ramp at Bourne Avenue/SR 37 signalized intersection. o Jimmy Deloach Connector at Grange Road grade separated, full diamond interchange with two signalized intersections. o Jimmy Deloach Connector at Jimmy Deloach Parkway grade separated, full diamond interchange with two signalized intersections.

14 Project Concept Report page _14_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation Traffic control during construction: No detours are anticipated. Traffic will be maintained on existing alignments during construction. Design Exceptions to controlling criteria anticipated: UNDETERMINED YES NO HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT: ( ) ( ) (X) ROADWAY WIDTH: ( ) ( ) (X) SHOULDER WIDTH: ( ) ( ) (X) VERTICAL GRADES: ( ) ( ) (X) CROSS SLOPES: ( ) ( ) (X) STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE: ( ) ( ) (X) SUPERELEVATION RATES: ( ) ( ) (X) HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE: ( ) ( ) (X) SPEED DESIGN: ( ) ( ) (X) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ( ) ( ) (X) BRIDGE WIDTH: ( ) ( ) (X) BRIDGE STRUCTURAL CAPACITY: ( ) ( ) (X) Design Variances: None anticipated. Environmental concerns: USACE individual permit for wetland impacts. Level of environmental analysis: o Are Time Savings Procedures appropriate? Yes ( ), No ( X ), o Categorical Exclusion ( ) o Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) ( X ), or o Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ( ). Utility involvements: Communications, power, gas and railroads Utility Owners on the corridor: o Atlanta Gas and Light o BellSouth/AT&T o Comcast o City of Savannah o City of Port Wentworth o Georgia Power - Distribution o Georgia Power - Transmission o Level 3 Communications o Southern Natural Gas Company VE Study Required: Yes ( X ) No ( )

15 Project Concept Report page _15_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation Project responsibilities: Concept Design: Georgia Ports Authority (Parsons as consultant) Preliminary & Final Design: To be determined Right of Way Acquisition: To be determined Relocation of Utilities: To be determined Letting to contract: GDOT Supervision of construction: GDOT Providing material pits: Contractor Providing detours: N/A Coordination: Initial concept team meeting date: March 25, 28. Meeting minutes attached Concept team meeting date: Concept team meeting to be scheduled PAR meetings, dates and results: PAR meeting to be scheduled FEMA, USCG, and/or TVA: Not anticipated Public involvement: Public Information Open House (PIOH) held on April 23, 29 at Groves High School in Garden City, Georgia. A total of 7 people attended the PIOH. Of the comments received, 11 were in support of the project, none opposed, one was uncommitted and five expressed conditional support for the project. Local government comments: None Other projects in the area: o Project HPP--(345), P.I. No. 345, SR 37 overpass over New Port Authority Rail Line. o Project CSMLP-8-(275), P.I. No. 8275, CR 9/Gulfstream Road at Robert Miller Road intersection improvement. o Project CSSTP-7-(141), P.I. No. 7141, SR 21 at Crossgate Road/Gulfstream Road intersection improvement o Project CSNHS-7-(885), PI No. 7885, CS 65/Grange Road Widening/Reconstruction from SR 21 to SR 25 o Project BRST-64-1(49), PI No , Bridge replacement on SR 25 Ocean Highway over Norfolk Southern Railroad

16 Project Concept Report page _16_ State of Georgia Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) Department of Transportation P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham o Project CSMSL-6-(7), PI No. 67, Effingham Parkway from SR 119 to SR 3 Other coordination to date: o Georgia Ports Authority o Georgia Department of Transportation o Georgia State Road & Tollway Authority Railroads: CSX Railroad and Norfolk Southern Railroad Scheduling Responsible Parties Estimate Time to complete the environmental process: 12 Months. Time to complete preliminary construction plans: TBD Months. Time to complete right of way plans: 6 Months. Time to complete the Section 44 Permit: 12 Months. Time to complete final construction plans: TBD Months. Time to complete to purchase right of way: TBD Months. List other major items that will affect the project schedule: N/A. Other Alternates considered: Alternate 1 this alternate proposes the construction of Jimmy Deloach Connector, a new roadway alignment from State Route 21 (SR 21) near Smith Avenue to SR 21 near Interstate 95 in Savannah, Chatham County, Georgia. New interchanges would be constructed at SR 21 near Smith Avenue, Bourne Avenue/SR 37, Grange Road, Jimmy Deloach Parkway, and SR 21 near I-95. The proposed project would be approximately 5.6 miles in length. Construction of this alternative is expected to attract commuter traffic in large numbers in addition to truck traffic. Since the immediate need of the project is to ensure faster truck movement between the port s Garden City terminal and I-95, the two connections to SR 21 on the north & south ends are largely determined as unnecessary. Higher wetland impacts, impacts to cultural resources and project costs eliminated this alternative from consideration. Alternate 2A this alternate proposes the construction of the Jimmy Deloach Connector, a new roadway alignment that would begin at Bourne Avenue/SR 37 and terminate at the existing eastern end of Jimmy Deloach Parkway in Savannah, Chatham County, Georgia. New interchanges would be constructed at Grange Road and Jimmy Deloach Parkway. The proposed project would be approximately 3.1 miles in length and allow for future connections to SR 21. This alternate proposes a T type intersection at Bourne Avenue. It was not selected as the preferred alternate due to impacts to cultural resources and smaller travel time savings in comparison to the preferred alternate. Alternate 2C this alternate is similar to Alternate 2A above, except that it proposes a flyover ramp from southbound Jimmy Deloach Connector to eastbound Bourne Avenue/SR 37. This alternate does not offer any additional travel time savings when compared to the preferred alternate and has higher construction costs associated with the flyover ramp. In addition it would cause impacts to cultural resources. Therefore, it is not selected as the preferred alternate.

17 Project Concept Report page _17_ Project Number: CSMSL-8-(69) P. I. Number: 869 County: Chatham State of Georgia Department of Transportation Alternate 2D this alternate is similar to Alternate 2A above, except that it proposes a 3 mph loop ramp from southbound Jimmy Deloach Connector to eastbound Bourne Avenue/SR 37 in the southwest quadrant of the interchange. This alternate does not offer any additional travel time savings when compared to the preferred alternate and has higher overall cost. In addition, it would cause impacts to cultural resources. Therefore, it is not selected as the preferred alternate. No Build Alternate this alternate was not selected because it does not satisfy the project need and purpose. Existing SR 21 corridor does not have the capacity to support growth in traffic volumes projected as a result of the ongoing port expansion. High truck traffic and commuter traffic along this route has resulted in safety concerns along this corridor. Comments: None. Attachments: 1. Cost Estimates: a. Construction including E&C b. Asphalt/Fuel Price Index Spreadsheet c. Right of Way d. Utilities 2. Typical Sections 3. Traffic Figures 4. Bridge Inventory Data 5. Initial Concept Team Meeting Minutes 6. Concept Team Meeting Minutes (To be added) Prepared by: Parsons

18 ATTACHMENT 1 Cost Estimates

19 Print Form DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF GEORGIA INTERDEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE FILE PROJECT No. CSMSL-8-(69), Chatham County OFFICE Innovative Program Delivery Jimmy Deloach Connector from SR 37 to Jimmy Deloach Parkway DATE 1/9/29 P.I. No. 869 FROM Darryl D. VanMeter, P.E., Acting Administrator TO Ronald E. Wishon, Project Review Engineer SUBJECT REVISIONS TO PROGRAMMED COSTS PROJECT MANAGER Mike Dover, P.E. MNGT LET DATE MNGT R/W DATE TBD TBD PROGRAMMED COST (TPro W/OUT INFLATION) LAST ESTIMATE UPDATE CONSTRUCTION $ DATE RIGHT OF WAY $ UTILITIES $ DATE DATE REVISED COST ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION $ 82,959,475.3 RIGHT OF WAY $ 31,229,3. UTILITIES $ 8,388,43. Costs contain 5 % Engineering and Inspection and 3 % Construction Contingencies. Costs contain 3 % contingency. REASON FOR COST INCREASE Revised: February 9, 29

20 CONTINGENCY SUMMARY Construction Cost Estimate: $ 68,291,988. (Base Estimate) Engineering and Inspection: $ 3,414,599.4 (Base Estimate x 5 %) Construction Contingency: $ 2,48, (Base Estimate x 3 %) (The Construction Contingency is based on the Project Improvement Type in TPro.) Total Fuel Adjustment $ 6,155, (From attached worksheet) Total Liquid AC Adjustment $ 3,48, (From attached worksheet) Construction Total: $ 82,959,475.3 Utility Cost Estimate: $ 6,452,618 Utility Contingency: $ 1,935,785 3 % Utility Total: $ 8,388,43. REIMBURSABLE UTILITY COST Utility Owner Reimbursable Cost City of Savannah 5, Georgia Power Transmission 598, Southern Natural Gas 5,354,618 Attachments c: Genetha Rice-Singleton, State Program Control Administrator

21 Detail Estimate: Cost Estimate Report Page 1 of 1 Estimate Report for file "CSMSL-8-(69)" Section Section 1 - Roadway Items Item Number Quantity Units Unit Price Item Description Cost LF 52. GUARDRAIL, TP T LF 18. GUARDRAIL, TP W GL 2. BITUM TACK COAT SY 146. REINF CONC APPROACH SLAB EA 96. RIGHT OF WAY MARKERS TN 15. ASPH CONC 12.5 MM SMA, GP 2 ONLY, INCLPOLYMER-MODIFIED BITUM MATL & H LIME SY 65. PLAIN PC CONC PVMT, CL 1CONC, 12 INCH THK LS CLEARING & GRUBBING - CSMSL-8-(69) CY 4. UNCLASS EXCAV CY 8. BORROW EXCAV, INCL MATL TN 8. ASPH CONC 12.5 MM PEM, GP 2 ONLY, INCL POLYMER-MODIFIED BITUM MATL & H LIME EA 675. GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, TP LF 43. CONCRETE BARRIER LS TRAFFIC CONTROL - CSMSL-8-(69) EA FIELD ENGINEERS OFFICE TP TN 2. GR AGGR BASE CRS, INCL MATL TN 75. RECYCLED ASPH CONC 25 MM SUPERPAVE, GP 1 OR 2, INCL BITUM MATL & H LIME TN 75. RECYCLED ASPH CONC 19 MM SUPERPAVE, GP 1 OR 2,INCL BITUM MATL & H LIME EA GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, TP Section Sub Total: $46,87,49. Section Section 2 - Grading & Drainage Item Number Quantity Units Unit Price Item Description Cost LF 86. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 42 IN, H LF 84. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 42 IN, H LF 14. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 48 IN, H LF 33. SIDE DRAIN PIPE, 18 IN, H LF 32. SIDE DRAIN PIPE, 18 IN, H EA 551. SAFETY END SECTION 18 IN, STORM DRAIN, 4:1 SLOPE EA 881. SAFETY END SECTION 24 IN, STORM DRAIN, 4:1 SLOPE EA SAFETY END SECTION 3 IN, STORM DRAIN, 4:1 SLOPE EA SAFETY END SECTION 36 IN, STORM DRAIN, 4:1 SLOPE EA 545. SAFETY END SECTION 18 IN, SIDE DRAIN, 4:1 SLOPE EA 413. FLARED END SECTION 18 IN, SIDE DRAIN EA 53. FLARED END SECTION 24 IN, SIDE DRAIN EA 5. FLARED END SECTION 3 IN, SIDE DRAIN EA FLARED END SECTION 42 IN, STORM DRAIN EA 17. METAL DRAIN INLET - COMPLETE ASSEMBLY SY 119. SAND-CEMENT BAG RIP RAP, 6 IN EA DROP INLET, GP EA DROP INLET, GP 1, MODIFIED TP M EA JUNCTION BOX SF 52. SAFETY GRATE, TP EA 234. CONC SPILLWAY, TP EA 191. CONC SPILLWAY, TP CY 294. CLASS A CONCRETE CY 554. CLASS B CONCRETE, RETAINING WALL LB 1. BAR REINF STEEL LF 38. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 18 IN, H LF 45. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 24 IN, H LF 48. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 24 IN, H LF 59. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 3 IN, H LF 58. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 3 IN, H LF 47. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 3 IN, H LF 66. STORM DRAIN PIPE, 36 IN, H CY 55. FOUND BKFILL MATL, TP II 165.

22 Detail Estimate: Cost Estimate Report Page 2 of 2 Section Sub Total:$2,634,26. Section Section 3 - Erosion Control Item Number Quantity Units Unit Price Item Description Cost AC 375. TEMPORARY GRASSING TN 165. MULCH EA 122. CONSTRUCTION EXIT EA 454. CONSTRUCT AND REMOVE SILT CONTROL GATE, TP LF 15. CONSTRUCT AND REMOVE TEMPORARY PIPE SLOPE DRAIN EA 93. CONSTRUCT AND REMOVE TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS - TYPE A SILT FENCE EA 144. CONSTRUCT AND REMOVE TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS - TYPE C SILT FENCE EA 29. CONSTRUCT AND REMOVE INLET SEDIMENT TRAP LF 1. MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE, TP A LF 1. MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE, TP C EA 55. MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL CHECKDAMS/DITCH CHECKS LF 1. MAINTENANCE OF SILT RETENTION BARRIER LF 2. MAINTENANCE OF BALED STRAW EROSION CHECK EA 112. MAINTENANCE OF SILT CONTROL GATE, TP EA 5. MAINTENANCE OF CONSTRUCTION EXIT EA 85. MAINTENANCE OF INLET SEDIMENT TRAP EA 559. WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND SAMPLING MO 746. WATER QUALITY INSPECTIONS LF 13. FLOATING SILT RETENTION BARRIER LF 2. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE, TYPE A LF 3. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE, TYPE C SY 43. STN DUMPED RIP RAP, TP 1, 18 IN SY 25. STN DUMPED RIP RAP, TP 3, 12 IN SY 35. STN DUMPED RIP RAP, TP 3, 18 IN SY 4. PLASTIC FILTER FABRIC LF 2. BARRIER FENCE (ORANGE), 4 FT SY 38. PLAIN CONC DITCH PAVING, 4 IN AC 824. PERMANENT GRASSING TN 65. AGRICULTURAL LIME GL 22. LIQUID LIME TN 458. FERTILIZER MIXED GRADE LB 2. FERTILIZER NITROGEN CONTENT SY 2. BITUMINOUS TREATED ROVING, WATERWAYS SY 1. EROSION CONTROL MATS, SLOPES Section Sub Total:$2,736,14. Section Section 4 - Signing & Marking Item Number Quantity Units Unit Price Item Description Cost LS 6. TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION NO EA 75. THERMOPLASTIC PVMT MARKING, ARROW, TP EA 1. THERMOPLASTIC PVMT MARKING, ARROW, TP LF 1. THERMOPLASTIC SOLID TRAF STRIPE, 5 IN, WHITE LF 1. THERMOPLASTIC SOLID TRAF STRIPE, 5 IN, YELLOW GLF 1. THERMOPLASTIC SKIP TRAF STRIPE, 5 IN, WHITE SY 2. THERMOPLASTIC TRAF STRIPING, WHITE SF 3. HIGHWAY SIGNS, ALUM EXTRUDED PANELS, REFL SHEETING, TP LF 12. GALV STEEL POSTS, TP LF 9. GALV STEEL POSTS, TP LS 696. STR SUPPORT FOR OVERHEAD SIGN, TP I, STA LS 18. STR SUPPORT FOR OVERHEAD SIGN, TP VII, STA EA 3. RAISED PVMT MARKERS TP LF 5. PREFORMED PLASTIC SOLID PVMT MKG, 8 IN, CONTRAST (BLACK-WHITE), TP PB LF 19. PREFORMED PLASTIC SOLID PVMT MKG, 24 IN, 3876.

23 Detail Estimate: Cost Estimate Report Page 3 of GLF LF 5. WHITE, TP PB PREFORMED PLASTIC SKIP PVMT MKG, 8 IN, CONTRAST (BLACK-WHITE), TP PB PREFORMED PLASTIC SOLID PVMT MKG, 8 IN, CONTRAST (BLACK-YELLOW), TP PB Section Sub Total: $92,788. Section Section 5 - Bridges & Walls Item Number Quantity Units Unit Price Item Description Cost SF 11. BRIDGE NO. 1 - GRANGE ROAD INTERCHANGE SF 11. BRIDGE NO. 2 - CROSSGATE ROAD OVERPASS SF 11. BRIDGE NO. 3 - NORFOLK SOUTHERN RR OVERPASS SF 11. BRIDGE NO. 4 - BONNYBRIDGE ROAD OVERPASS SF 11. BRIDGE NO. 5 - SB JIMMY DELOACH CONN. OVER WETLANDS SF 11. BRIDGE NO. 6 - NB JIMMY DELOACH CONN. OVER WETLANDS SF 65. MSE WALL FACE, 1-2 FT HT, WALL NO SF 11. BRIDGE NO. 7 - SB JIMMY DELOACH PKWY. INTERCHANGE SF 65. MSE WALL FACE, - 1 FT HT, WALL NO SF 11. BRIDGE NO. 8 - NB JIMMY DELOACH PKWY. INTERCHANGE SF 15. BRDIGE NO. 9 - BRIDGE WIDENING JDC OVER SR Section Sub Total: $15,13,49. Total Estimated Cost: $68,291,988.

24 P.I. Number 869 County Chatham Project Number CSMSL-8-(69) Date 1/12/29 Special Provision, Section 19-Measurement and Payment FUEL PRICE ADJUSTMENT (ENGLISH 125% MAX) ENTER FPL DIESEL ENTER FPM DIESEL ENTER FPL UNLEADED ENTER FPM UNLEADED INCREASE ADJUSTMENT INCREASE ADJUSTMENT 125.% 125.% ROADWAY ITEMS Excavations paid as specified by Sections 25 (CUBIC YARD) Excavations paid as specified by Sections 26 (CUBIC YARD) QUANTITY DIESEL FACTOR GALLONS DIESEL UNLEADED FACTOR GALLONS UNLEADED REMARKS GAB paid as specified by the ton under Section 31 (TON) Hot Mix Asphalt paid as specified by the ton under Sections 4 (TON) Hot Mix Asphalt paid as specified by the ton under Sections 42 (TON) PCC Pavement paid as specified by the square yard under Section 43 (SY).25.2 BRIDGE ITEMS Bridge Excavation (CY) Section 211 Quantity Unit Price QF/1 Diesel Factor Gallons Diesel Unleaded Factor Gallons Unleaded 1. 1,963, REMARKS Bridge No. 1 Class Concrete (CY) Section ,727, Class Concrete (CY) Section ,191, Bridge No. 3 Class Concrete (CY) Section ,339, Bridge No. 2 Bridge No. 4 Superstru Con Class (CY) Section ,819, Bridge No. 5 Superstru Con Class (CY) Section ,34, Bridge No. 6 Superstru Con Class (CY) Section , Bridge No. 7 Concrete Handrail (LF) Section , Bridge No. 8 Concrete Barrier (LF) Section , Bridge No. 9 BRIDGE ITEMS Page 1 of 4 Quantity Unit Price QF/1 Diesel Factor Gallons Diesel Unleaded Factor Gallons Unleaded REMARKS

25 Stru Steel Plan Quantity (LB) Section 51 Stru Steel Plan Quantity (LB) Section PSC Beams (LF) Section 57 PSC Beams (LF) Section 57 PSC Beams (LF) Section Stru Reinf Plan Quantity(LB) Section 511 Stru Reinf Plan Quantity(LB) Section Bar Reinf Steel (LB) 511 Section Piling inch (LF) 52 Piling inch (LF) 52 Piling inch (LF) 52 Piling inch (LF) 52 Piling inch (LF) 52 Piling inch (LF) 52 Section Section Section Section Section Section Drilled Caisson, (LF) Section 524 Drilled Caisson, (LF) Section 524 Drilled Caisson, (LF) Section Pile Encasement, (LF) Section 547 Pile Encasement, (LF) Section SUM QF DIESEL= SUM QF UNLEADED= DIESEL PRICE ADJUSTMENT($) UNLEADED PRICE ADJUSTMENT($) $4,42, $1,734, Page 2 of 4

26 ASPHALT CEMENT PRICE ADJUSTMENT (BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 125% MAX) APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS/PROJECTS CONTAINING THE 413 SPECIFICATION, SECTION ADJUSTMENTS ASPHALT PRICE ADJUSTMENT FOR BITUMINOUS TACK COAT ENTER APL 393 ENTER APM L.I.N. TYPE % TACK (GALLONS) TACK (TONS) INCREASE ADJUSTMENT REMARKS TMT = PRICE ADJUSTMENT($) $41, / 42 ASPHALT CEMENT PRICE ADJUSTMENT 125% MAX ENTER APL 393 ENTER APM % INCREASE ADJUSTMENT L.I.N. / Spec Number MIX TYPE HMA JMF AC% AC REMARKS mm PEM 25 mm SP 19 mm SP 12.5 mm SMA TMT = PRICE ADJUSTMENT($) $3,7,18.98 Page 3 of 4

27 ASPHALT CEMENT PRICE ADJUSTMENT FOR BITUMINOUS TACK COAT(Surface Treatment 125% MAX) APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS CONTAINING THE 413 SPEC. SECTION ADJUSTMENTS ASPHALT PRICE ADJUSTMENT FOR BITUMINOUS TACK COAT ENTER APL 393 ENTER APM % INCREASE ADJUSTMENT Use this side for Asphalt Emulsion Only Use this side for Asphalt Cement Only L.I.N. TYPE ASPHALT EMULSION (GALLONS) L.I.N. TYPE TACK (GALLONS) TMT = TMT = REMARKS: REMARKS: MONTHLY PRICE ADJUSTMENT($) ADJUSTMENT SUMMARY FUEL PRICE ADJUSTMENT (ENGLISH 125% MAX) DIESEL PRICE ADJUSTMENT($) UNLEADED PRICE ADJUSTMENT($) $4,42, $1,734, ASPHALT CEMENT PRICE ADJUSTMENT (BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 125% MAX) $41, / 42 ASPHALT CEMENT PRICE ADJUSTMENT 125% MAX $3,7,18.98 ASPHALT CEMENT PRICE ADJUSTMENT FOR BITUMINOUS TACK COAT(Surface Treatment 125% MAX) REMARKS: TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $9,24, DWM 1/8 Page 4 of 4

28

29

30 ATTACHMENT 2 Typical Sections

31

32

33

34 ATTACHMENT 3 Traffic Figures

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42 ATTACHMENT 4 Bridge Inventory Data

43 District: Bridge Inspector: Location ID: Structure ID: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Inspection Report 5 Inspection Date: 7/11/26 Gene Palmer Over: SR X-8.25E County: Chatham Road Name: JIMMY DELOACH PKY EVALUATION & DEFICIENCIES Inspection Area: 5 Bridge Status: 1 SubStructure: Year Painted: 4 concrete caps, abutment foundation is sitting on Ga. Earth Wall. Bents 2 & 3 have four columns per bent. Deficiencies noted: 1-none SuperStructure: Year Painted: 3 spans, spans 1 & 3 has 1 Type IV and span 2 has 1 type V PSC I beams. Deficiencies noted: 1- Abutment 4 between beams 4 & 5, and beams 6 & 7, back wall spalling, hasn't fell off yet. ( 14"X14") Deck: 8" Cast in place deck with metal stay in place forms. Deficiencies noted: 1- None General: Bridge built in Approach slabs, both in good condition. Design load HS2+. This bridge is over SR. 21 and 2 R/R tracks. Bridge has Ga. Earth Walls on both abutments. Recommended repairs: 1- Repair back wall at abutment 4. Ladder used. Condition Rating Temp Shored: No Component Material Rating Truck Type Gross/H-Mod HSMod Tand 3-S-2 Log Piggy Substructure Concrete 8 Calculated Posting Superstructure Concrete 8 Posting Required No No No No No No Deck Concrete 8 Existing Posting School Bus Route. Structure Does Not Require Posting Report Date: 12/2/27 B.I. - 1

44 SIA Structure ID: Location & Geography Structure I.D.No: 2 Bridge Information 6A Feature Int: 6B Critical Bridge: BRIDGE INVENTORY DATA LISTING GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SR 21 7A Route Number Carried: CR984 7B Facility Carried: JIMMY DELOACH PKY 9 Location: PORT WENWORTH C L 2 DOT District: 5 27 Year Photo: Inspection Frequency: 24 Date: 7/11/26 92A Fract Crit Insp Freq: Date: 2/1/191 92B Underwater Insp Freq: Date: 2/1/191 92C Other Spc. Insp Freq: Date: 2/1/191 4 Place Code: Inventory Route (O/U): 1 Type: 4 Designation: 6 Number: 984 Direction: 16 Latitude: MMS Prefix: 17 Longitude: MMS Suffix: 98 Border Bridge: %Shared: 99 ID Number: 1 STRAHNET: 12 Base Highway Network: 13A LRS Inventory Route: 13B Sub Inventory Route: 11 Parallel Structure: 12 Direction of Traffic: 264 Road Inventory Mile Post: 28 Inspection Area: Engineer's Initial: sgm Location I.D. No.: N Initials: EEP X-8.25E MP: Chatham Highway System: Functional Classification: Federal Route Type: Federal Lands Highway: Truck Route: School Bus Route: Benchmark Elevation: Datum: Bypass Length: Toll: Maintenance: Owner: Design Load: Historical Significance: Congressional District: Year Constructed: Year Reconstructed: Bridge Median: Skew: Structure Flared: Navigation Control: Special Steel Design: Type of Paint: Type of Service on: 14 No.: Movable Bridge: Type Bridge: Pile Encasement: D-O-O-O 3 Structure Type Main: No. Spans Main: Structure Type Appr: No. Spans Appr: Bridge Curve Horz: Vert: Pier Protection: Deck Structure Type: Wearing Surface Type: Me P N Signs & Attachments SUFF. RATING Expansion Joint Type: Deck Drains: Parapet Location: Curb: Handrail: Height: Median Barrier Rail: Bridge Median Height: Width: Guardrail Loc Dir Rear: Approach Slab: Retaining Wall: Fwrd: Oppo Dir Rear: Posted Speed Limit: Warning Sign: Delineator: Hazard Boards: Utilities Gas: W Elec Telephone: Se Lighting Street: Naviagtion: Aerial: Fwrd: County Continuity No.: Report Date: 12/2/27

45 Structure ID: Programming Data Project No.: Plans Available: Prop. Proj. No. Approval Status: P.I. No.: Contract Date: Seismic No.: Type Work: Bridge Imp. Cost: Roadway Imp. Cost: Total Imp Cost: Imp. Length: Imp. Year: TSAP-21 (58) C1 Future ADT: Year: 22 Hydraulic Data 215 Waterway Data Highwater Elev.: Area Of Opening: 113 Scour Critical: Slope Protection: Fender System: 22 Dolphin: 223 Culvert Cover: Type: No. Barrels: BRIDGE INVENTORY DATA LISTING GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION /1/191 $ $ $. Year: 19 Avg. Streambed Elev.: Drainage Area:. Freq.: N Water Depth:. Br. Height:. Spur Dikes Rear: Fwrd: Width:. Height:. Length: Apron: 265 U/W Insp. Area: Diver: ZZZ Location I.D. No.: X-8.25E Measurements ADT: % Trucks: Lanes On: No. Tracks On: Max. Span Length: Structure Length: Br. Rwdy. Width: Deck Width: Tot. Horz. Cl: Curb/Sdewlk Width: Approach Rdwy Width: Shoulder Width: Rear Lt: Fwrd Lt: Pavement Width: Rear: 24.7 Fwrd: 24.5 Intersection Rear: Safety Features Br. Rail: Transition: App. G. Rail: App. Rail End: Minimum Cl.Over: Under: Min. Vertical Cl Act. Odm Dir: Oppo. Dir: Posted Odm. Dir: Oppo. Dir: Lateral Undercl. Rt: Lateral Undercl. Lt: Max Min Vert Cl: Nav Vert Cl: Nav Vert Cl Closed: Deck Thickness Main: Deck Thick Approach: Overlay Thickness: Year Last Painted: Chatham 1437 Year: Under: 4 Under: / Type: 3 Rt: Type: 3 Rt: Type: Type: Fwrd: ' ' 99 ' ' H ' 99 " Dir: Horz: 99 ' 99 " H 25 ' " " " " " 8... Sup: Sub: Ratings SUFF. RATING Inventory Rating Method: 2 Rating: 27 Rating: 43 H-Modified: 2 HS-Modified: 25 Type 3: 28 Type 3s2: 4 Timber: 36 Piggyback: N N N 9 8 N 2 63 Inventory Rating Method: 66 Inventory Type: 2 64 Operating Type: Calculated Loads 261 H Inventory Rating: H Operating Rating: Structural Evaluation: 58 Deck Condition: 59 Superstructure Condition: 227 Collision Damage: 6A Substructure Condition: 6B Scour Condition: 6C Underwater Condition: 71 Waterway Adequacy: 61 Channel Protection Cond: 68 Deck Geometry: N 9 69 UnderClr. Horz/Vert: 72 Appr. Alignment: 62 Culvert: Posting Data 7 Bridge Posting Required: 41 Struct Open, Posted, Cl: 13 Temporary Structure: 232 Posted Loads 253 Notification Date 253 Fed Notify Date: H-Modified: HS-Modified: Type 3: Type3s2: Timber: Piggyback: 5 A 2/1/191 2/1/191 Report Date: 12/2/27 SIA- 2