PARMER RANCH NORTHWEST WILLIAMSON COUNTY MUD #2

Transcription

1 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT PARMER RANCH NORTHWEST WILLIAMSON COUNTY MUD #2 October 215 Project No Prepared by STEGER BIZZELL Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-181 Consulting Engineers - Georgetown, Texas NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 1 of 28

2 Parmer Ranch Northwest Williamson County MUD #2 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT October 21, 215 Prepared By: Steger Bizzell 18 South Austin Avenue Georgetown, Texas (512) voice JOB NO. 287 NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 2 of 28

3 Parmer Ranch - Northwest Williamson County MUD #2 Scope The intent of this report is to fulfill the requirements of Section of the city of Georgetown Unified Development Code. This includes providing a preliminary water availability study, preliminary wastewater treatment availability, preliminary drainage study, preliminary identification of roads for bond reimbursement, preliminary cost estimates for the water, wastewater, drainage, and roadway reimbursement, emergency services protection measures, development buildout schedule, and preliminary traffic study. Each of these topics is discussed in this report. Introduction The proposed site of Parmer Ranch, a portion of Northwest Williamson County MUD #2, is located in the City of Georgetown ETJ at the intersection of Ronald Reagan Blvd. and Williams Drive (RM 2338). The site will be developed with single family and multi-family, as well as commercial tracts. A general location map of the site is shown in Figure 1, which depicts the district boundary and a vicinity map in accordance with G. A master development plan showing the general layout of the proposed land uses, major streets, roads, and drainage facilities in accordance with C is shown in Figure 2.. Preliminary Water Availability The proposed site of Parmer Ranch is located within the CCN boundary of Chisholm Trail SUD (CTSUD) which is currently being acquired by the City of Georgetown. The water transmission facilities at the intersection of Ronald Reagan Blvd. and Williams Drive have recently been upgraded with a 16-inch diameter main. In addition, transmission system improvements have been identified along Ronald Reagan Blvd. The City s CIP shows that a 24-inch diameter transmission main is planned, which will provide improved service for the property. This infrastructure is planned to support the expected development of the Ronald Reagan Blvd./Williams Drive area as well as the western City of Georgetown ETJ. The MUD reimbursement cost estimate for the water infrastructure is included in Attachment 1. Preliminary Wastewater Treatment Availability The proposed Parmer Ranch will receive wastewater treatment from the City of Georgetown. This will be accomplished with the construction of offsite improvements including collection and pumping facilities that will send water to the City s proposed North Lands WWTP. The wastewater reimbursement cost estimate is included in Attachment 2. NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 3 of 28

4 \\sbserver\projects\ \22223 Joe Owen NW WMCO MUD#2\Drawings\Plans\General Location Map.dwg, Layout 2, 9/8/215 4:12:21 PM These drawings are the sole property of STEGER & BIZZELL ENGINEERING, INC. The use of these drawings is hereby restricted to the original site for which they were prepared. Reproduction or reuse of these drawings in whole or in part without written permission of STEGER & BIZZELL ENGINEERING, INC. is strictly prohibited. CR 248 RONALD REAGAN BLVD. INDIAN SPRINGS ROAD GEORGETOWN ISD RANCH ROAD 2338 CR 249 PARMER RANCH NW WILLIAMSON COUNTY MUD#2 RANCH ROAD 2338 FIGURE 1 GENERAL LOCATION MAP NORTHWEST WILLIAMSON COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT No.2 ADDRESS METRO SERVICES 18 S. AUSTIN AVENUE Co Rd 258 Seward Junction Co Rd 26 Co Rd 257 Co Rd 258 Co Rd 266 Ronald W. Reagan SH 29 GEORGETOWN, TX TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS Co Rd 248 Co Rd 247 Indian Springs Rd. Co Rd 267 WEB 1 STEGERBIZZELL.COM :48.19 Co Rd SH 29 Proposed Ronald W. Reagan Project Number: SCALE: Project Path: "=2' SH 195 Shell Road L:\Projects 26\287 Northwest Williamson County MUD 1 IH 35 Georgetown NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 4 of 28 Co Rd 151 SH 29

5 LAND USE SUMMARY det. 99 1,163 units AC. Sub-Total: DENSITY(A) UNITS 4. du/ac 1,18 units 145 units 6. du/ac ACRES AC AC. 95 RESIDENTIAL Single Family Cluster Product detention AC. 1,688 UNITS TOTAL 92 Notes: AC OPEN SPACE* PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 35 units PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 18 units units 88.2 AC. 4. AC AC MIXED USE** AMENITY CENTERS MAJOR ROW * Open space includes detention/water quality, parks, greenbelts, enhanced lakes, easements and buffers PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 52 units MIXED USE PARCEL AC. 1 TRAILS, TYP. 99 detention PARK L 1 S 95 1 S 99 P O PARK MIXED USE PARCEL AC PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 22 units ** Up to 3% of the gross land may be used for multi family units PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 56 units PARK 12 E PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 13 units PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 144 units PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 57 units ule li amenity center am iv e PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 85 units detention PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 76 units cr CLUSTER PARCEL AC. 6. du/ac 6 units dr AC. 92 s MIXED USE PARCEL AC il w PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 9 units det. PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 71 units MIXED USE PARCEL AC PARCEL AC. 4. du/ac 118 units rd CR MIXED USE PARCEL AC CR CLUSTER PARCEL AC. 6 du/ac 84 units va bo d reagan ronal MIXED USE PARCEL AC MIXED USE PARCEL AC ian rd. d in gs rin p s SEC Planning, LLC Land Planning + Landscape Architecture + Community Branding AUSTIN, TEXAS t f info@secplanning.com EXHIBIT D LAND PLAN PARMER RANCH GEORGETOWN, TEXAS NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Scale: 1" = 8' North October 1, 215 SHEET FILE: R:\1492-PARP\Cadfiles\PLANNING\Concept Plan D_revised Oct 215.dwg Base mapping compiled from best available information. All map data should be considered as preliminary, in need of verification, and subject to change. This land plan is conceptual in nature and does not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change. Exhibit F, Page 5 of 28

6 Preliminary Drainage Study It is anticipated that a development agreement for the tract would be negotiated to allow development with the same intensity as currently allowed in the City of Georgetown Unified Development Code. Therefore, it is assumed that the single family portions would be developed to 45 percent impervious cover. Multi-family development would be allowed to develop to 5% impervious cover and commercial would be allowed to develop to 56% in accordance with A.1. This site is generally located along the watershed divide between Berry Creek to the north and Cowan Creek to the south. Very little flow is generated offsite because it is located along the divide. This report does not analyze the impact of offsite flow on conveyance or detention facilities. A drainage area map with two foot contours (minimum) and Qs for the 25 and 1 year storms under existing and developed conditions is shown in Attachment 3. Drainage calculations for the 25 and 1-year frequency storms for both existing and developed conditions are included in this report. The Rational Method was utilized to determine runoff. The runoff coefficients (C) were determined using Table 3-1 from the City of Georgetown Drainage Criteria Manual (24). Existing Conditions were assumed to be Pasture/Range, -2% slopes with a coefficient of.41 for the 1-year storm and.35 for the 25-year storm. Impervious cover in developed conditions was assumed to be.. Coefficients were weighted based on the percentage of impervious cover for the various development intensities, commercial or residential. Manning s n values were taken from Table 3-2 of the same drainage manual. For the existing conditions, a n value of.2 was used. This value is representative of 5-9% vegetative ground cover. The vegetation on the site is closer to the 9% value. A composite n of.12 was used for developed conditions in sheet and shallow concentrated flow. This is representative of 56% impervious cover and 44% ground cover in good condition. The composite Runoff Coefficient (C) for proposed developed conditions was obtained by adding the proposed value of 56% impervious cover times a C value of. plus 44% pervious cover times a C value of.41. This resulted in a composite C of.66 for the 25-year return period. A composite C value of.72 was computed for the 1-year return period utilizing the same method. For developed conditions, a slope of -2% was assumed. The results of the Rational Method analysis of drainage areas with the limits of Parmer Ranch predict that there will be an increase in flow due to the development of the subdivision. The peak flow in the Berry Creek watershed for the 25-year Storm will increase by approximately 238 cfs, while the peak flow in the Cowan Creek watershed for the 25-year Storm will increase by approximately 421 cfs. The peak flow in the Berry Creek watershed for the 1-year Storm will increase by approximately 285 cfs, while the peak flow in the Cowan Creek watershed for the 25-year Storm will increase by approximately 499 cfs. The time of concentration calculations and rational method runoff calculations are shown in Attachment 4. NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 6 of 28

7 Preliminary Traffic Study The Parmer Ranch Development consists of approximately 1163 single family lots, 88.2 acres of mixed use development, including mult-family, as well as commercial, retail, restaurant, and convenience use. It is recommended that trip generation for land use areas that do not have a site plan that identifies specific land uses and development intensities is accomplished by using the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. Chapter 6 of the handbook, titled Estimating Trip Generation for Generalized Land Uses suggests that an order of magnitude analysis can be calculated based on the potential mix of land uses, gross square footage of commercial or dwelling units/acre for multi-family, and estimating the number of trips generated for each use. The multi-family site of 21 acres is estimated at a development intensity of 25 units/acre for a total of 525 units in the development. Based on a FAR of.35, which is similar to nearby planned projects, 15,246 sf/acre is assumed for the gross floor area (GFA) for the commercial/retail/ restaurant/convenience use. This equates to a total commercial development of 1,24,532 s.f. Based on similar commercial/retail/restaurant/convenience uses in the Georgetown area, the following development mixes are anticipated for this development: Use Percentage GFA (s.f.) Shopping Center 7% 717,172 Supermarket 2% 24, Drive-In Restaurant 2% 2,491 High Turnover Restaurant 4% 4,1 Quality Restaurant 2% 2,491 Convenience Market 2% 2,491 Total 1% 1,24,532 The ITE Technical Council Committee 6A6 Information Report suggests the following average weekday vehicle trip end rates: Use Trips Generated Units Total Trips Residential 1./Unit 1,163 11,63 Multi-family 6.1/Unit 525 3,23 Shopping Center 116./1 GSF 717,172 83,192 Supermarket 125./1 GSF 24, 25,613 Drive-In Restaurant 553./1 GSF 2,491 11,332 High Turnover Restaurant 164.4/1 GSF 4,1 6,737 Quality Restaurant 56.3/1 GSF 2,491 1,154 Convenience Market 578./1 GSF 2,491 11,844 TOTAL 154,75 Based on these assumptions, the estimated trips generated by the development is 154,75 trips/day. The adjacent roadway network consists of Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Williams Drive. These roads are capable of supporting this level of development. NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 7 of 28

8 Attachments Attachment 1- Preliminary Cost Estimates for Water Facilities Attachment 2- Preliminary Cost Estimates for Wastewater Facilities Attachment 3- Drainage Area Map Attachment 4- Rational Method Runoff calculations Attachment 5- Preliminary Cost Estimates for Drainage Facilities Attachment 6- Preliminary Cost Estimates for Road Facilities Attachment 7- Gas Utility Improvements Attachment 8- Preliminary Cost Summary/Bond Proforma NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 8 of 28

9 ATTACHMENT 1 Preliminary Cost Estimates for Water Facilities NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 9 of 28

10 ATTACHMENT 1 PARMER RANCH PARTNERS, L.P. PARMER RANCH - NORTHWEST WILLIAMSON COUNTY M.U.D. No. 1 Water Improvements Preliminary Cost Estimate Date: September 8, 215 Item No. Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price Description 1. 12" Water Line ,143, " Water Line ,685, " Gate Valve 39 4,2. 163, " Gate Valve 79 2,2. 173, " Gate Valve 119 2,8. 333,2. 6. Fire Hydrant 11 5,5. 65, " Road Bore , " Wet Connection 2 5,. 1,. 9. 2" Wet Connection 1 7,5. 7,5. 1. Master Meter Ductile Iron Fittings ,. 12. Double Service 43 1,7. 731,. 13. Single Service 43 1,5. 645,. 14. Georgetown Water Impact Fees 122 7,39. 8,587,58. Total Water Improvements $ 15,858,84. NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 1 of 28

11 ATTACHMENT 2 Preliminary Cost Estimates for Wastewater Facilities NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 11 of 28

12 ATTACHMENT 2 PARMER RANCH PARTNERS, L.P. PARMER RANCH - NORTHWEST WILLIAMSON COUNTY M.U.D. No. 1 Wastewater Improvements Preliminary Cost Estimate Date: September 8, 215 WASTEWATER COLLECTION IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price 1. 15" Wastewater Line , " Wastewater Line , " Wastewater Line , " Wastewater Line ,, Manhole 219 5,5. 1,24, " Road Bore , gpm Lift Station 1 45,. 45, gpm Lift Station 1 25,. 25,. Northeast Lift Station ( gpm) 1 75,. 412, " Force Main , " Force Main , " Road Bore ,. 13. Double Service , Single Service , Erosion Control/Revegetation , Georgetown WW Impact Fees 122 2,9. 3,656,34. Total Wastewater Collection Improvements $ 8,414,.75 WASTEWATER OFFSITE GRAVITY SEWER AND LIFT STATION Item No. Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price Description 1. 18" Gravity Sewer ,16,. 2. 4' Manholes 44 6,. 264,. 3. 3" Road Bore (Reagan & RM ,. 4. Erosion Control/Revegetation , Offsite Lift Station/FM 1 1,7,. 1,7,. Total Wastewater Treatment Plant $ 4,669,85. Total Wastewater Improvements $ 13,84, NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 12 of 28

13 ATTACHMENT 3 Drainage Area Map NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 13 of 28

14 NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 14 of 28

15 ATTACHMENT 4 Rational Method Runoff Calculations NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 15 of 28

16 Attachment 4 Existing Conditions - Time of Concentration Parmer Ranch - Northwest Williamson County MUD#1 Area No. Area (ac.) SF Length SF "n" Upgradient Elevation Downgradient Elevation SF Slope Tc-sf (min) SCF Length Upgradient Elevation Downgradient Elevation SCF Slope Tc-scf (min) Conc Length Concentrated n Upgradient Elevation Downgradient Elevation Conc. Slope Cross Sectional Area Wetted Perimter Hydraulic Radius Tc-conc (min) Tc (min) BC-Res BC-Comm CC-Res , , CC-Comm BC - Berry Creek CC-Cowan Creek NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 16 of 28

17 Attachment 4 Developed Conditions - Time of Concentration Parmer Ranch - Northwest Williamson County MUD#1 Area No. Area (ac.) SF Length SF "n" Upgradient Elevation Downgradient Elevation SF Slope Tc-sf (min) SCF Length Upgradient Elevation Downgradient Elevation SCF Slope Tc-scf (min) Conc Length Concentrated n Upgradient Elevation Downgradient Elevation Conc. Slope Cross Sectional Area Wetted Perimter Hydraulic Radius Tc-conc (min) Tc (min) BC-Res BC-Comm CC-Res , , CC-Comm NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 17 of 28

18 Attachment 4 Existing Conditions - Rational Method Analysis Parmer Ranch - Northwest Williamson County MUD#1 Q = C*i*A 25 1 EXISTING.41 Scale Factor.86 1 Time Conc., tc Total Area Imp. Cover % Imp. Area,. % Remainder,.41 Area (mins.)** (Acres) (Acres) run-off coef. run-off coef. In. (25 Yr) Int. (1 Yr) Q(25 Yr) Q(1 Yr) BC-Res % 1.% BC-Comm % 1.% CC-Res % 1.% CC-Comm % 1.% Total BC Total CC TOTAL NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 18 of 28

19 DEVELOPED Area Time Conc., tc (mins.)** Total Area (Acres) Attachment 4 Existing Conditions - Rational Method Analysis Parmer Ranch - Northwest Williamson County MUD#1 Imp. Cover (Acres) % Imp. Area,. run-off coef. % Remainder,.47 run-off coef. In. (25 Yr) Int. (1 Yr) Q(25 Yr) Q(1 Yr) BC-Res % 55.% BC-Comm % 44.% CC-Res % 55.% CC-Comm % 44.% % Total BC Total CC ** Minimum 5 Minute Tc TOTAL NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 19 of 28

20 ATTACHMENT 5 Preliminary Cost Estimates for Drainage Facilities NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 2 of 28

21 ATTACHMENT 5 PARMER RANCH PARTNERS, L.P. PARMER RANCH - NORTHWEST WILLIAMSON COUNTY M.U.D. No. 1 Drainage Improvements Preliminary Cost Estimate Date: September 8, 215 Item No. Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price Description 1. 18" RCP , " RCP ,. 3. 3" RCP , " RCP , " RCP , " RCP , 'x4' Concrete Box , 'x8' Concrete Box , ' Inlet 142 3,5. 4,. 1. Junction Box/Manhole 12 7,5. 9,. 11. Entrance Culvert 4 2,. 8,. 12. Equalizer Culvert 1 15,. 15,. 13. Subgrade Excavation , Storm/Detention 8. Ac. 1 1,,. 1,,. 15. Storm/Detention 4.6 Ac. 1 6,. 6,. 16. Storm/Detention 2. Ac. 1 45,. 45,. 17. Storm/Detention 4. Ac. 1 55,. 55,. 18. Storm/Detention 3. Ac. 1 5,. 5,. 19. Storm/Detention 1. Ac. 1 1,2,. 1,2,. Total Drainage Improvements $ 7,738,695. NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 21 of 28

22 ATTACHMENT 6 Preliminary Cost Estimates for Road Facilities NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 22 of 28

23 ATTACHMENT 6 PARMER RANCH PARTNERS, L.P. PARMER RANCH - NORTHWEST WILLIAMSON COUNTY M.U.D. No. 1 Roadway Improvements Preliminary Cost Estimate Date: September 8, 215 Item No. 1. Description Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price Roadway Excavation & Subgrade Preparation 77, , " Crushed Limestone Base 77, ,389, /2" HMAC 59, , Curb and Gutter 53, , Street Signage & Pavement Marking 1 75,. 75,. Total Roadway Improvements $ 3,957, NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 23 of 28

24 ATTACHMENT 7 Gas Utility Improvements NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 24 of 28

25 ATTACHMENT 7 PARMER RANCH PARTNERS, L.P. PARMER RANCH - NORTHWEST WILLIAMSON COUNTY M.U.D. No. 1 Gas Utility Improvements Date: September 8, 215 Item No. 1. Description Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price Offsite Gas Extension to Property 1 3,,. 3,,. Total Gas Utility Improvements $ 3,,. NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 25 of 28

26 ATTACHMENT 8 Preliminary Cost Summary/Bond Proforma NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 26 of 28

27 SUMMARY PARMER RANCH PARTNERS, L.P. PARMER RANCH - NORTHWEST WILLIAMSON COUNTY M.U.D. No. 1 Total $ 43,639, % Contingencies $ 4,363,8.33 1% Engineering $ 4,363,8.33 Parkland Fees $ 12,. MUD Park/Trail/Amenities $ 4,455,. Sub-Total M.U.D. No. 2 Improvements $ 56,2,619. Inflation Factor 3% Years of Inflation 1 Future Capital Costs $ 76,526, City Consent/District Creation/Administration/Bond Costs (1%) $ 7,652,611. TOTAL MUD BONDS $ 84,178, NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 27 of 28

28 Georgetown ETJ MUD Bond Capacity Proforma - for Discussion Purposes Only Case: Full Build Out 1% Reimbursement Proforma Maximum Bond Tax Rate $.92 Proforma Maximum Total Tax Rate $. Bond Capacity: $ 84,, Interest Rate On Proposed Bonds 6.% Collection % 95.% Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed $ 4,3, $ 4,, $ 4,15, $ 1,, $ 1,, $ 1,, $ 14,75, $ 14,8, $ 12,, Total Projected % of Proforma Estimated Available Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Projected Ending Debt Next Proforma Proforma Tax Projected Taxable Bond Tax Tax Capitalized for Debt Debt Service Fund Year's Maintenance Maintenance Year Assessed Valuation (1) Rate Collections Interest Service Bonds (2) Bonds (2) Bonds (2) Bonds (2)(3) Bonds (2)(3) Bonds (2)(3) Bonds (2)(3) Bonds (2)(3) Bonds (2)(3) Service (D/S) Balance D/S Tax Rate Tax Levy ,, $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - %. $ 129, ,26, , , 772, , , 514,487 13% , ,749, ,283 48, 1,487,77 258, 24, , 9,77 118% , ,57, ,286 4, 2,363,56 349,4 24, 249, ,4 1,524,558 1% , ,6, ,388,95 1,2, 4,113,58 349,4 325, , 6, ,523,611 2,589,8 117%.12 1, ,242,.92 1,2,44 1,2, 5,732,3 349,4 325, ,36 6, 6, ,211,917 3,52, %.5 15, ,6, ,446,993 9, 6,867, ,4 325, ,36 812,785 6, 6, ,24,72 3,842,674 93%.5 132, ,64, ,522, , 8,25, ,4 325, ,36 812, ,785 6, 885, - - 4,122,487 4,127,9 79%.5 191, ,165, ,257, , 9,273,7 349,4 325, ,36 812, , , , 888, - 5,223,272 4,5,522 65%.5 231, ,782, ,6,121 36, 9,416, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1, , 72, 6,257,129 3,159,514 48%.5 272, ,, ,795,483-8,954,9 349,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 72, 6,572,51 2,382,7 35%.5 314, ,439, ,392,785-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 347, ,225, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 39, ,665, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 422, ,, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 463, ,4,349, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 477, ,34,48, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 491, ,65,514, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 56, ,,48, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 521, ,13,44, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 536, ,164,316, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 553, ,164,316, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 553,5 24 1,164,316, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 553, ,164,316, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 553, ,164,316, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 29%.5 553, ,164,316, ,827,393-8,775, ,4 325, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,827,393 1,8,339 3%.5 553, ,164,316, ,477,895-8,426, , ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,477,895 1,8,339 32%.5 553, ,164,316, ,152,781-8,11, ,36 812, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 6,152,781 1,8,339 34%.5 553, ,164,316, ,815,476-7,763, , , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 5,815,476 1,8,339 39%.5 553, ,164,316, ,2,691-6,951, , ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 5,2,691 1,8,339 47%.5 553, ,164,316, ,5,828-5,543, ,785 1,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 4,189, 1,353,261 4%.5 553, ,164,316, ,41,777-4,395, ,1,858 1,22,922 5,342 3,377,121 1,17,917 47%.5 553,5 25 1,164,316, ,935,676-2,953, ,22,922 5,342 2,178, ,33 79%.5 553, ,164,316, ,525-1,51, ,342 5,342 76,513 N/A.5 553, ,164,316, , ,513 N/A - - $ 6,927, $ 8,554,442 $ 7,957,621 $ 8,256,31 $ 19,8,51 $ 19,8,51 $ 19,8,51 $ 29,343,726 $ 29,443,1 $ 23,872,862 $ 167,11,32 (1) Represents Developer forecast. PRELIMINARY, SUBJECT TO CHANGE. (2) Bonds assumed to be issued 1/1 of year shown. Actual amounts and timing subject to final TCEQ approval. (3) Bonds assumed to be able to be issued as investment grade. NWWCMUD2 Consent Agreement Exhibit F, Page 28 of 28