Appendix J. Noise Impact Assessment Report
|
|
- Naomi McCarthy
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appendix J Noise Impact Assessment Report Appendix J
2 Sheridan Park Drive Extension Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Noise Impact Assessment Report City of Mississauga R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited 6990 Creditview Road, Unit 2 Mississauga ON L5N 8R9 CANADA
3 City of Mississauga i Distribution List No. of Hard PDF Organization Name Copies 0 Yes Yes City of Mississauga Record of Revisions Revision Date Description 0 September 7, 2017 Draft Submission to the City 1 September 25, nd Draft Submission to the City 2 3 rd Draft Submission to the City R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited Report Prepared By: Harvey Watson, P.Eng. Manager, Air & Noise KZ/HW:jtj Report Reviewed By: David Argue, P.Eng., PTOE Project Manager Jennifer Vandermeer, P.Eng. Environmental Assessment Lead
4 City of Mississauga ii Executive Summary As part of the Sheridan Park Drive Extension Environmental Assessment (EA), a noise study was undertaken to determine noise impacts as a result of the proposed Sheridan Park Drive extension. The noise study followed the Ontario Ministry of Transportation s (MTO) Environmental Guide for Noise (MTO Noise Guide) (MTO, 2006) and the City of Mississauga Policy , Noise Attenuation Barriers on Major Roadways (City Noise Policy) (CoM, March 2015). Noise levels are predicted in decibels in the A-weighted dba scale, which best approximates the human perception of sound over a specified time period. An increase of 2 to 3 decibels in noise levels is considered to be just perceivable to the average person. It should be noted that a 3 dba increase in noise equates to a doubling of traffic volumes. Based on the MTO Noise Guide, where an existing roadway is proposed to be modified / widened adjacent to a Noise Sensitive Area (NSA) or a new road is proposed, MTO requires that the future noise levels without the proposed improvements be compared to the future noise level with the proposed improvements. The assessment is done at the outdoor living area (typically backyards) of each NSA. The provision of noise mitigation is to be investigated should the future noise level with the proposed improvements result in a greater than 5 dba increase over the future noise level without the proposed improvements. If noise mitigation is provided, the objective is a minimum 5 dba reduction. Mitigation will attempt to achieve levels as close to, or lower than, the objective level. For the purpose of the noise analysis carried out for this Class EA study, the City Noise Policy state Noise barriers may be constructed by the City in conjunction with a road widening project if no noise attenuation barriers exist, and the proposed additional lanes of traffic are found to adversely affect the daytime noise level beyond the established criteria (the noise level must be greater than 60 dba (Leq daytime). (Leq means equivalent sound level and daytime means 7:00 AM to 11 PM. Leq daytime means daytime average.) The STAMSON 5.0 computer modelling program, which is approved for use in Ontario by the MTO, was used to assess existing and future noise levels on Sheridan Park Drive. This program is used to predict noise levels generated from the road at the outdoor living areas (typically backyards) of NSA s. The Sheridan Homelands neighbourhood to the north of the Study Area is considered an NSA. The outdoor living areas of three residential houses adjacent to the utility corridor as well as the Homelands Senior Public School yard were selected as representative
5 City of Mississauga iii Points of Reception (PORs) for the purposes of assessing future noise levels within the NSA. The future sound levels at the four PORs were predicted based on the traffic forecast for 2031 calendar year for three scenarios: Current, Future No Build, and Future Build. Future No Build scenario represents conditions in the future without proposed road extension; while Future Build scenario includes proposed road extension in the future. Based on the Future Build Scenario, the future sound level is reduced at two of the PORs (POR2 and POR4) because the traffic that currently drives on the closest road will be reduced if the extension is built. For instance, at POR4 during the day, the traffic on Homelands Drive will be 6,100 vehicles per day without the extension but only 5,200 vehicles per day if the extension is built. Based on the noise analysis, the difference between the projected future noise levels with and without the Sheridan Park Drive extension was determined to be less than 1 dba. Therefore the extension has negligible impact on the noise levels in the neighbourhood and the consideration of noise mitigation is not warranted based on the Provincial guidelines and City Noise Policy.
6 City of Mississauga iv Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Study Area Noise Assessment Sensitive Receptors Existing Sound Levels Noise Impact Assessment Criteria Noise Impact Assessment Methodology Results Conclusions References Tables Table 1: Mitigation Effort Required for the Projected Noise Level with the Proposed Improvements above the Current Noise Levels... 7 Table 2: Traffic Volumes... 8 Table 3: Predicted (Modelled) Sound Levels for Future No Build and Future Build Scenarios... 8 Figures Figure 1: Study Area... 3 Figure 2: Sensitive Receptors... 5 Appendices Appendix A Sample Noise Modelling Printout Appendix B Background Measurements Appendix C Weather Conditions
7 City of Mississauga v Glossary of Terms and Acronyms AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic Burnside R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited City Noise Policy City of Mississauga Policy , Noise Attenuation Barriers on Major Roadways, March 2015 EA Environmental Assessment MOECC Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change MTO Ontario Ministry of Transportation MTO Noise Guide Ontario Ministry of Transportation Environmental Guide for Noise, October 2006 OLA Outdoor Living Area POR Point of Reception
8 City of Mississauga vi Disclaimer Other than by the addressee, copying or distribution of this document, in whole or in part, is not permitted without the express written consent of R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited.
9 City of Mississauga Introduction The City of Mississauga (City) has undertaken a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) to investigate the proposed extension of Sheridan Park Drive between Homelands Drive and Speakman Drive in the southwestern area of Mississauga. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited (Burnside) has facilitated the EA on behalf of the City. The EA Study has followed a comprehensive planning and design process in order to explore the opportunity to connect the east and west sections of Sheridan Park Drive, improve the road network connectivity in the residential neighborhood and business area, create options for alternative routes and improve multi-modal network connectivity. The EA Study has been completed in accordance with the requirements of a Schedule B Undertaking as outlined in the Municipal Engineers Association Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Document (October 2000, as amended 2007, 2011 & 2015), which is an approved process under the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act. As part of the EA Study, Burnside has completed a Noise Impact Assessment to identify whether the proposed Sheridan Park Drive extension will change noise levels within the Study Area and determine if any potential mitigation measures are required.
10 City of Mississauga Study Area The Study Area is generally bordered by a utility corridor to the north, Winston Churchill Boulevard to the west, Speakman Drive/Homelands Drive to the east and naturalized private lands to the south. The Study Area is illustrated on Figure 1. The proposed extension of Sheridan Park Drive falls within the existing City of Mississauga owned right-of-way (ROW), which runs through the centre part of the Study Area. The Study Area includes a unique combination of uses including the Sheridan Park Corporate Centre (Sheridan Park), a utility corridor that includes a multi-use trail and the Sheridan Homelands residential neighbourhood. Sheridan Park is a 340 acre corporate centre, which is primarily designated Business Employment in the City of Mississauga s Official Plan (MOP). The majority of the Park is occupied by private industries and businesses, which include in their landholdings significant natural areas on the north side of the corporate centre, within the Study Area. These naturalized areas include two wooded areas that are identified as Significant Natural Areas in the City s Natural Areas Survey (2016 Update). Sheridan Park is also identified as one of the City s cultural landscape due to its scenic and distinct visual qualities. The City maintains a paved multi-use trail through the utility corridor from Winston Churchill Boulevard to Homelands Drive/Speakman Drive. The trail then continues east along the south side of Sheridan Park Drive to Erin Mills Parkway. To the west of Winston Churchill Boulevard, the trail continues through the hydro corridor in Oakville. The trail provides recreational opportunities to the local residents and commuter cyclists.
11 City of Mississauga 3 Figure 1: Study Area
12 City of Mississauga Noise Assessment 3.1 Sensitive Receptors Noise sensitive land use, as described by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC, 2013), means: A property of a person that accommodates a dwelling and includes a legal nonconforming residential use; or A property of a person that accommodates a building used for a noise sensitive commercial purpose; or A property of a person that accommodates a building used for a noise sensitive institutional purpose. There are residential land uses to the north of the Study Area which are part of the Sheridan Homelands neighbourhood that would be a sensitive land use. The only institutional purpose sensitive land use in the Study Area is Homelands Sr. Public School. There are no commercial purpose sensitive land uses within the Study Area. The residential dwelling at 2536 Barcella Crescent north of the proposed road extension was determined to be the location where the impact from the proposed roadway would result in the largest change in sound level and so was designated as one of the points of reception (POR1) and selected for the purpose of this assessment. This dwelling is the closest building to the proposed road extension alignment and furthest from all other existing road noise. The distance is 70 m from the centre of the proposed road alignment to the backyard (3 m from the building). The rest of the buildings along the road corridor including Homelands Sr. Public School are the same distance or further away from the proposed Sheridan Park Drive extension. Since the road noise decreases with the distance, all other dwellings are expected to experience the same or lower sound levels than POR1 as a result of the proposed road extension. In addition to POR1, the following receptors were also assessed: POR Hollington Crescent POR3 - Homelands Sr. Public School POR Pyramid Crescent
13 City of Mississauga 5 Figure 2: Sensitive Receptors The most exposed side of the dwelling must be assessed according to the Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Environmental Guide for Noise (Noise Guide) (MTO, 2006). The most exposed side refers to the closest side of the dwelling unit even if there is no Outdoor Living Area (OLA) associated with this side and without the shielding of the building. However, required mitigation measures (if applicable) should be based on sound levels predicted at the OLA. In the case of POR1, the most exposed side and OLA are located on the same side of the building (i.e., the backyard side). 3.2 Existing Sound Levels Measurements of the existing acoustical environment were performed by taking sound level measurements at the backyard of the sensitive receptor POR1. A noise meter was placed within the utility corridor, close to the backyard fenceline. The location was 4.1 m south east of the property line and 1.4 m northeast of the southwest corner of the property for 2536 Barcella Crescent. This location is closer to the proposed road extension corridor than the rear of the house or OLA and also closer to the QEW. Therefore, the sound levels measured at this location are expected to be louder than experienced at the OLA of 2536 Barcella Crescent. This provides for a more conservative approach than the Noise Guide recommendation that existing sound levels to be measured at locations approximately 3 m away from the dwelling wall.
14 City of Mississauga 6 The sound level is measured by a sound level meter collecting measurements 20,000 times every second for an entire hour. At the end of the hour, the Leq-1h is calculated as the average of all the measurements within that hour (Leq means equivalent sound level and 1h means one hour. Leq-1h one hour average). When deciding the background noise level for a location, a proponent must measure the sound level for at least 48 hours and then use the lowest Leq-1h measured for both daytime and nighttime. The measured level is compared to the default level and the higher level is used. The longer the measurement, the more likely a lower number will be measured. Sound level measurements were collected from 11:42 AM on Thursday, April 13, 2017 through 8:07 AM on Friday, April 21, This time period corresponded to the Easter weekend and following week, during which time existing sound levels were expected to measure the lowest in relation to impact from traffic on local roads. This was a more conservative approach since the sound levels during this period would be lower than the typical weekday levels and lower than the default levels. The measured background average 1-h Leq sound levels during daytime period (between 7 AM and 11 PM) were between 47 dba and 61 dba. Nighttime period (between 11 PM and 7 AM) sound levels were measured to be between 40 dba and 56 dba. The background sound levels take into account any noise sources that were active and audible during the measurement period and include all the traffic on surrounding roads and all the industrial operations that were running during that time. The minimum hour recorded during the monitoring was screened for airplane impacts. No airplanes were found so the minimum 1h-Leq was not reduced below the measured value. Current noise levels experienced by residents is noise from the adjacent arterial and collector roads, the Sheridan Park to the south, and the QEW, which is approximately 1 km away. Standard practice is to use the higher of default noise values taken from the Ontario Ministry of Transportation s (MTO) Environmental Guide for Noise (MTO Noise Guide) (MTO, 2006) or the lowest of the noise levels measured for each time period. The higher of the two is selected. As a result of these measurements, it was confirmed that the default background values applied to the project. Those default background values are 50 dba during the day and 45 dba during the night. 3.3 Noise Impact Assessment Criteria The noise impact due to the proposed road extension was assessed based on MTO Noise Guide criteria and the City of Mississauga Policy , Noise Attenuation Barriers on Major Roadways (City Noise Policy)(CoM, March 2015).
15 City of Mississauga 7 According to the MTO Noise Guide, where an increase in sound level is predicted, mitigation measures may be required as summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Mitigation Effort Required for the Projected Noise Level with the Proposed Improvements above the Current Noise Levels Change in Noise Level Above Current / Projected Mitigation Effort Required Noise Levels with Proposed Improvements < 5 dba 1 change AND < 65 dba 5 dba change OR 65 dba None Investigate noise control measures on right-of-way. Introduce noise control measures within right-of-way and mitigate to current noise level if technically, economically and administratively feasible. Noise control measures, where introduced, should achieve a minimum of 5 dba attenuation, over first row receivers. Mitigation measures, if applicable, must attempt to achieve levels that otherwise would be experienced without the proposed project if technically, economically, and administratively feasible. For this project, the change noted in Table 1 is the difference between the default background and the predicted sound level. According to the City Noise Policy, the installation of new noise attenuation barriers is subject to the following: The noise level must be greater than 60 dba (LEQ daytime). (LEQ means equivalent sound level and daytime means 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. LEQ daytime means daytime average.), and The residential area must be adjacent to arterial and major collector roads. Note that this policy indicates a noise wall will be installed at a lower sound level than required by the MTO Noise Guide. 3.4 Noise Impact Assessment Methodology The noise impact assessment was performed following the MTO Noise Guide. In order to determine the potential noise impact, future predicted sound levels with and without the proposed road extension were compared for the OLA, which coincides with the most exposed side of each POR. Sound levels were predicted using traffic noise prediction 1dBA (A-weighted decibel) is an expression of the relative loudness of sounds in air as perceived by the human ear.
16 City of Mississauga 8 model ORNAMENT (Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method), implemented through the STAMSON (version 5.04) computer program as required by MTO. The future sound levels were predicted based on the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) value forecast for 2031 calendar year for three scenarios: Current, Future No Build, and Future Build. Future No Build scenario represents conditions in the future without proposed road extension; while Future Build scenario includes proposed road extension in the future. The AADT and percentages of commercial vehicles are summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Traffic Volumes Road Time Frame AADT Max Hourly % of Medium Trucks % of Heavy Trucks Sheridan Park Drive Extension Present Sheridan Park Drive Extension Future No Build Sheridan Park Drive Extension Future Build 2, % 1.36 % Homelands Drive Present 5, % 1.36 % Homelands Drive Future No Build 6, % 1.36 % Homelands Drive Future Build 5, % 1.36 % Winston Churchill Blvd Present 26,000 2, % 1.36 % Winston Churchill Blvd Future No Build 36,350 3, % 1.36 % Winston Churchill Blvd Future Build 37,000 3, % 1.36 % 3.5 Results Current and predicted sound levels including calculated change in sound levels due to the proposed road extension in the Future No Build Scenario and Future Build Scenario are summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Predicted (Modelled) Sound Levels for Future No Build and Future Build Scenarios Receiver Location Current Levels (dba) Future Sound Levels for No Build Scenario (dba) Future Sound Levels for Build Scenario (dba) Change due to Proposed Road Extension (dba) 2 POR1 Daytime 50 (default) POR1 Nighttime 45 (default) POR2 Daytime POR2 Nighttime POR3 Daytime 3 50 (default) POR4 Daytime POR4 Nighttime Negative values indicate that the sound level will decrease if the extension is built. 3 POR3 is a school so nighttime impacts were not assessed.
17 City of Mississauga 9 As shown in Table 3, the predicted sound levels for the Future Build Scenario are low and the increase due to the undertaking is expected to be well below 5 dba; therefore, no mitigation measures are required at these receptors. Further, the Future Sound Level will be below 60 dba so the City Noise Policy indicates a noise wall is not required and will not be installed. Based on the Future Build Scenario, the future sound level is reduced at POR2 and POR4 because the traffic that currently drives on the closest road will be reduced if the extension is built. For instance, at POR4 during the day, the traffic on Homelands Drive will be 6,100 vehicles per day without the extension but only 5,200 vehicles per day if the extension is built (see Table 2 above). The predicted future sound levels were performed for a variety of locations throughout the Study Area and none of the locations meet the criteria for a noise wall so noise mitigation is not required at any location within the Study Area.
18 City of Mississauga Conclusions If the Sheridan Park Drive extension is constructed, the increase in sound levels expected throughout the area will be less than 5 dba therefore noise mitigation is not warranted.
19 City of Mississauga References Computer Program STAMSON Version Ministry of the Environment. Environmental Guide for Noise. Ministry of Transportation, October 2006 (MTO, 2006). Noise Attenuation Barriers on Major Roadways, City of Mississauga, Policy Number: March 2015 (CoM, March 2015) Environmental Noise Guideline. Stationary and Transportation Sources Approval and Planning. Publication NPC-300.Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, August 2013 (MOECC, 2013). ORNAMENT Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environment and Transportation. Technical Document. Ministry of the Environment, October Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Office of Planning and Environment Federal Transit Administration, May 2006 (FTA, 2006).
20 Appendix A Appendix A Sample Noise Modelling Printout
21 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :06:43 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: por01.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: POR01 AADT4,400vpd Road data, segment # 1: ShrdPrkwy (day/night) Car traffic volume : 3762/418 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 144/16 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 54/6 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 4400 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 5.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 3.64 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 1.36 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: ShrdPrkwy (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: ShrdPrkwy (day) Source height = 1.08 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: ShrdPrkwy (night) Source height = 1.08 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba
22 TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): AADT double to avoid <40 vph at night so subtract 3 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 38.28
23 Appendix B Appendix B Background Measurements
24 65.0 Sheridan Park Drive POR Impact Prior to Construction 8:00 am Thursday April 13, 2017to 8:00 am Friday April 21, :00 16:00 00:00 08:00 16:00 00:00 08:00 16:00 00:00 08:00 16:00 00:00 08:00 16:00 00:00 08:00 16:00 00:00 08:00 16:00 00:00 08:00 16:00 00:00 Values collected duringrain or high wind have been removed as required by the MOECC. 1-h Leq Limit
25 Appendix C Appendix C Weather Conditions
26 Weather Station Records Project No.: Station Name TORONTO INTL A Province ONTARIO Latitude Longitude Elevation Climate Identifier WMO Identifier TC Identifier YYZ All times are specified in Local Standard Time (LST). Add 1 hour to adjust for Daylight Saving Time where and when it is observed. Legend E Estimated M Missing NA Not Available Partner data that is not subject to review by the National Climate Archives Date/Time Year Temp ( C) Dew Point TRel Hum (%Wind Dir (1Wind Spd (Visibility (kmstn Press ( Weather 13Apr2017 0: NA 13Apr2017 1: Mainly Clear 13Apr2017 2: NA 13Apr2017 3: NA 13Apr2017 4: Cloudy 13Apr2017 5: NA 13Apr2017 6: NA 13Apr2017 7: Mainly Clear 13Apr2017 8: NA 13Apr2017 9: NA 13Apr : Mostly Cloudy 13Apr : NA 13Apr : NA 13Apr : Mostly Cloudy 13Apr : NA 13Apr : NA 13Apr : Mostly Cloudy 13Apr : NA 13Apr : NA 13Apr : Mostly Cloudy 13Apr : NA 13Apr : NA 13Apr : Mostly Cloudy 13Apr : NA 14Apr2017 0: NA 14Apr2017 1: Mostly Cloudy 14Apr2017 2: NA 14Apr2017 3: NA 14Apr2017 4: Mostly Cloudy 14Apr2017 5: NA 14Apr2017 6: NA 14Apr2017 7: Mostly Cloudy 14Apr2017 8: NA 14Apr2017 9: NA 14Apr : Clear 14Apr : NA 14Apr : NA 14Apr : Clear 14Apr : NA 14Apr : NA 14Apr : Clear 14Apr : NA 14Apr : NA 14Apr : Mainly Clear 14Apr : NA 14Apr : NA 14Apr : Clear 14Apr : NA 15Apr2017 0: NA 15Apr2017 1: Mainly Clear 15Apr2017 2: NA 15Apr2017 3: NA 15Apr2017 4: Mostly Cloudy 15Apr2017 5: NA 15Apr2017 6: NA 15Apr2017 7: Mostly Cloudy 15Apr2017 8: Rain 15Apr2017 9: Rain 15Apr : Rain 15Apr : Rain 15Apr : Rain 15Apr : Mostly Cloudy 15Apr : NA 15Apr : NA 15Apr : Mostly Cloudy 15Apr : NA R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited Weather 1 of Sheridan Noise Tables.xlsm
27 Weather Station Records Project No.: Station Name TORONTO INTL A Province ONTARIO Latitude Longitude Elevation Climate Identifier WMO Identifier TC Identifier YYZ All times are specified in Local Standard Time (LST). Add 1 hour to adjust for Daylight Saving Time where and when it is observed. Legend E Estimated M Missing NA Not Available Partner data that is not subject to review by the National Climate Archives Date/Time Year Temp ( C) Dew Point TRel Hum (%Wind Dir (1Wind Spd (Visibility (kmstn Press ( Weather 15Apr : NA 15Apr : Clear 15Apr : NA 15Apr : NA 15Apr : Mostly Cloudy 15Apr : NA 16Apr2017 0: NA 16Apr2017 1: Clear 16Apr2017 2: NA 16Apr2017 3: NA 16Apr2017 4: Mostly Cloudy 16Apr2017 5: NA 16Apr2017 6: NA 16Apr2017 7: Mostly Cloudy 16Apr2017 8: NA 16Apr2017 9: NA 16Apr : Mostly Cloudy 16Apr : NA 16Apr : NA 16Apr : Mostly Cloudy 16Apr : NA 16Apr : Rain Showers 16Apr : Mostly Cloudy 16Apr : NA 16Apr : NA 16Apr : Mostly Cloudy 16Apr : NA 16Apr : NA 16Apr : Mainly Clear 16Apr : NA 17Apr2017 0: NA 17Apr2017 1: Mostly Cloudy 17Apr2017 2: NA 17Apr2017 3: NA 17Apr2017 4: Mainly Clear 17Apr2017 5: NA 17Apr2017 6: NA 17Apr2017 7: Mainly Clear 17Apr2017 8: NA 17Apr2017 9: NA 17Apr : Mainly Clear 17Apr : NA 17Apr : NA 17Apr : Mainly Clear 17Apr : NA 17Apr : NA 17Apr : Mainly Clear 17Apr : NA 17Apr : NA 17Apr : Mainly Clear 17Apr : NA 17Apr : NA 17Apr : Clear 17Apr : NA 18Apr2017 0: NA 18Apr2017 1: Clear 18Apr2017 2: NA 18Apr2017 3: NA 18Apr2017 4: Clear 18Apr2017 5: NA 18Apr2017 6: NA 18Apr2017 7: Mainly Clear 18Apr2017 8: NA 18Apr2017 9: NA 18Apr : Mainly Clear 18Apr : NA R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited Weather 2 of Sheridan Noise Tables.xlsm
28 Weather Station Records Project No.: Station Name TORONTO INTL A Province ONTARIO Latitude Longitude Elevation Climate Identifier WMO Identifier TC Identifier YYZ All times are specified in Local Standard Time (LST). Add 1 hour to adjust for Daylight Saving Time where and when it is observed. Legend E Estimated M Missing NA Not Available Partner data that is not subject to review by the National Climate Archives Date/Time Year Temp ( C) Dew Point TRel Hum (%Wind Dir (1Wind Spd (Visibility (kmstn Press ( Weather 18Apr : NA 18Apr : Mostly Cloudy 18Apr : NA 18Apr : NA 18Apr : Mostly Cloudy 18Apr : NA 18Apr : NA 18Apr : Mostly Cloudy 18Apr : NA 18Apr : NA 18Apr : Mostly Cloudy 18Apr : NA 19Apr2017 0: NA 19Apr2017 1: Mostly Cloudy 19Apr2017 2: NA 19Apr2017 3: Rain Showers 19Apr2017 4: Cloudy 19Apr2017 5: NA 19Apr2017 6: NA 19Apr2017 7: Cloudy 19Apr2017 8: Rain Showers 19Apr2017 9: NA 19Apr : Mostly Cloudy 19Apr : NA 19Apr : NA 19Apr : Cloudy 19Apr : NA 19Apr : NA 19Apr : Mostly Cloudy 19Apr : NA 19Apr : NA 19Apr : Mostly Cloudy 19Apr : NA 19Apr : NA 19Apr : Mostly Cloudy 19Apr : NA 20Apr2017 0: NA 20Apr2017 1: Mostly Cloudy 20Apr2017 2: NA 20Apr2017 3: NA 20Apr2017 4: Cloudy 20Apr2017 5: NA 20Apr2017 6: NA 20Apr2017 7: Cloudy 20Apr2017 8: NA 20Apr2017 9: Rain 20Apr : Moderate Rain Showers,Fog 20Apr : Rain Showers,Fog 20Apr : Rain Showers 20Apr : Cloudy 20Apr : Rain Showers 20Apr : Rain Showers 20Apr : Rain Showers 20Apr : Rain Showers 20Apr : Rain Showers 20Apr : Moderate Rain Showers 20Apr : NA 20Apr : Rain Showers 20Apr : Rain Showers 20Apr : Rain 21Apr2017 0: NA 21Apr2017 1: Fog 21Apr2017 2: Drizzle,Fog 21Apr2017 3: Drizzle,Fog 21Apr2017 4: Fog 21Apr2017 5: Drizzle,Fog R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited Weather 3 of Sheridan Noise Tables.xlsm
29 Weather Station Records Project No.: Station Name TORONTO INTL A Province ONTARIO Latitude Longitude Elevation Climate Identifier WMO Identifier TC Identifier YYZ All times are specified in Local Standard Time (LST). Add 1 hour to adjust for Daylight Saving Time where and when it is observed. Legend E Estimated M Missing NA Not Available Partner data that is not subject to review by the National Climate Archives Date/Time Year Temp ( C) Dew Point TRel Hum (%Wind Dir (1Wind Spd (Visibility (kmstn Press ( Weather 21Apr2017 6: NA 21Apr2017 7: Cloudy 21Apr2017 8: NA 21Apr2017 9: NA 21Apr : Rain Showers 21Apr : NA 21Apr : NA 21Apr : Cloudy 21Apr : NA 21Apr : NA 21Apr : Mostly Cloudy 21Apr : NA 21Apr : NA 21Apr : Cloudy 21Apr : NA 21Apr : NA 21Apr : Mostly Cloudy 21Apr : NA R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited Weather 4 of Sheridan Noise Tables.xlsm
Appendix I: Noise and Vibration Assessment Report
Appendix I: Noise and Vibration Assessment Report London Bus Rapid Transit Transit Project Assessment Process Environmental Project Report DRAFT April 2018 P R E PA R E D BY RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDORS ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationMississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project
Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE OCTOBER 2008 WELCOME The Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project Thank you for attending this Public Information Centre.
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment Stonebridge Golf & Country Club Maintenance Facility. Nepean, Ontario
Environmental Noise Assessment Stonebridge Golf & Country Club Maintenance Facility Nepean, Ontario REPORT: GmE 09-042-Noise Prepared For: Rob Pierce 3584 Jockvale Road Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H2 Prepared
More informationFLAMBOROUGH QUARRY HAUL ROUTE STUDY HAUL ROUTE VIBRATION REPORT. itrans Consulting Inc 100 York Boulevard Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1J8
FINAL REPORT FLAMBOROUGH QUARRY HAUL ROUTE STUDY HAUL ROUTE VIBRATION REPORT Project Number: #W08-5107A August 28, 2008 SUBMITTED TO: Tara Erwin itrans Consulting Inc 100 York Boulevard Richmond Hill,
More informationEnvironmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection
Air and Noise Study Environmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection Project 11-4295 City of Mississauga, Region of Peel October 17, 2014 1 Region of Peel Environmental Assessment for
More informationClean Harbors Canada, Inc.
Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Proposed Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Transportation Assessment St. Clair Township, Ontario September 2009 itrans Consulting Inc. 260
More informationTraffic Impact Statement (TIS)
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205
More information105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited
105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited December 2016 Project Summary Project Number 162060 December 2016 Client Zelinka Priamo Ltd 318
More informationAttachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update
Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update 1. Introduction In July 2016, City Council approved an Eglinton West LRT with between 8 and 12 stops between Mount Dennis and Renforth Gateway, and up to
More informationTraffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph)
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph) Prepared By: 332 Lorne Avenue East Stratford ON N5A 6S4 Prepared for: Paul Kemper, President
More informationReport Addendum. Terry Keller, SDDOT. Noise Study Technical Report I-29 from Tea Interchange to Skunk Creek Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Report Addendum To: Terry Keller, SDDOT From: HDR Project: Noise Study Technical Report I-29 from Tea Interchange to Skunk Creek Sioux Falls, South Dakota cc: file Date: May 28, 2010; rev July 16, July
More informationBUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) MISSISSAUGA SEGMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
APPENDIX 1 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) MISSISSAUGA SEGMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Executive Summary McCORMICK RANKIN May 2003 Introduction This executive summary highlights the findings and
More informationDowntown Lee s Summit Parking Study
Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study As part of the Downtown Lee s Summit Master Plan, a downtown parking and traffic study was completed by TranSystems Corporation in November 2003. The parking analysis
More informationAPPENDIX D NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
APPENDIX D NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT AURORA ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANTS Inc. 745 Warren Drive East Aurora, New York 14052 716-655-2200 info@auroraacoustical.com NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF NIGHTTIME PARKING LOT
More informationDUFFERIN AGGREGATES ACTON QUARRY EXTENSION PROJECT
DUFFERIN AGGREGATES ACTON QUARRY EXTENSION PROJECT Noise Impact Study Project#: 06183 Prepared By: Steven Titus, B.A.Sc. P.Eng. Bob Rimrott, M.A.Sc, P.Eng AERCOUSTICS ENGINEERING LIMITED 50 Ronson Drive
More informationTable of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...
Crosshaven Drive Corridor Study City of Vestavia Hills, Alabama Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA... 3 Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...
More informationRe: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario
April 18 th, 2017 Mr. Kevin Yemm Vice President, Land Development Richraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa, Ontario (Tel: 613.739.7111 / e-mail: keviny@richcraft.com) Re:
More informationCreditview Road Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Traffic Operations Analysis Final Report
Capability City of Mississauga Creditview Road Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Traffic Operations Analysis Final Report Prepared by: AECOM 5080 Commerce Boulevard 905 238 0007 tel Mississauga,
More informationGTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1
GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1 Draft Development Strategy Presentation to Peel Goods Movement Task Force April 8 2011 Study Areas 2 Unique Approach Unprecedented two-stage EA process:
More informationAppendix I Noise Background and Modeling Data
SERRANO II RESIDENTIAL PROJECT REVISED INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF CLAREMONT Appendix Appendix I Noise Background and Modeling Data March 2015 SERRANO II RESIDENTIAL PROJECT REVISED
More informationPrepared for: Ontario Inc. CHICKADEE GROVE COMMUNITY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION OPINION LETTER
Prepared for: 2414176 Ontario Inc. CHICKADEE GROVE COMMUNITY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION OPINION LETTER 1616095-001-T01 October 2016 October 06, 2016 16-16095-001 Mr.
More informationDATE: March 21, 2017 REPORT NO. PW TYPE OF REPORT CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION [ X ] 2.0 TOPIC
PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DATE: March 21, 2017 REPORT NO. PW2017-022 TO: FROM: Chair and Members Committee of the Whole Operations and Administration E. (Beth) Goodger, General Manager
More informationWOLVERINE TO BHP JANSEN NEW TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FALL 2017
WOLVERINE TO BHP JANSEN NEW TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FALL 2017 TODAY WE LL TALK ABOUT Our challenges and how we re meeting them Why we re building this project Our planning process and considerations
More informationBackground. Request for Decision. Pedestrian Lighting Standards for Road Right-of-ways. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Mar 17, 2014
Presented To: Operations Committee Request for Decision Pedestrian Lighting Standards for Road Right-of-ways Presented: Monday, Mar 17, 2014 Report Date Thursday, Mar 06, 2014 Type: Presentations Recommendation
More informationWest Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study
West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study Prepared for: Armel Corporation January 2015 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. 22 King Street South, Suite 300 Waterloo ON N2J 1N8
More informationNovember 14, 2016 Reference No
November 14, 2016 Reference No. 11115752 Mr. Andrew Booth Engineering Services City Service Centre 9505-112 Grande Prairie, Alberta T8V 6H8 Dear Mr. Booth: Re: 2016 Arterial Traffic Noise Survey City of
More informationAPPENDIX C: TECHNICAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS APPENDIX C-9: NOISE AND VIBRATION REPORT
City of Hamilton and Metrolinx Hamilton Light Rail Transit (LRT) Environmental Project Report (EPR) Addendum APPENDIX C: TECHNICAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS APPENDIX C-9: NOISE AND VIBRATION REPORT PART 1/1
More informationOPERATIONS NOISE STUDY FOR A PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH IN THE SHERMAN OAKS DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES
OPERATIONS NOISE STUDY FOR A PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH IN THE SHERMAN OAKS DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES October 12, 2017 PREPARED FOR: Ms. Chantly Banayan 4822 Van Nuys Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 PREPARED
More informationWelcome to Open House #5 Scarborough Rapid Transit
Welcome to Open House #5 Scarborough Rapid Transit Welcome to the Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) Conversion and Extension Study, including Kennedy Station improvements. Tonight s event provides details
More informationRE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road
James J. Copeland, P.Eng. GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 May 31, 2018 Ellen O Hara, P.Eng. Project Engineer DesignPoint Engineering & Surveying Ltd. 200 Waterfront
More informationTHE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO
THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS SITUATED AT N/E/C OF STAUDERMAN AVENUE AND FOREST AVENUE VILLAGE OF LYNBROOK NASSAU COUNTY, NEW YORK TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO. 2018-089 September 2018 50 Elm Street,
More informationVanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study
Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study Final Report (Revised) March 2011 Submitted to: Groupe Lépine Ottawa Project No. 09-1613 Submitted by: Groupe Lépine
More information5 VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN CENTRE AND SURROUNDING AREAS TRANSPORTATION STUDY PROGRESS
5 VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN CENTRE AND SURROUNDING AREAS TRANSPORTATION STUDY PROGRESS The Transportation Services Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained in the following report
More informationOFF-PEAK DELIVERIES. Ontario Trucking Association June 26 th, Goods Movement Office Transportation Policy Branch Ministry of Transportation
OFF-PEAK DELIVERIES Ontario Trucking Association June 26 th, 2015 Goods Movement Office Transportation Policy Branch Ministry of Transportation 2 Outline Off-Peak Deliveries Pilot Background Phase One
More informationAPPENDIX VMT Evaluation
APPENDIX 2.7-2 VMT Evaluation MEMORANDUM To: From: Mr. Jonathan Frankel New Urban West, Incorporated Chris Mendiara LLG, Engineers Date: May 19, 2017 LLG Ref: 3-16-2614 Subject: Villages VMT Evaluation
More informationANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS
ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS Introduction The Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) initiated a feasibility study in the fall of 2012 to evaluate the need for transit service expansion
More information1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON 1. INTRODUCTION This report summarizes traffic impacts of the proposed CUBES Self-Storage Mill Creek project in comparison to the traffic currently
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: David J. Decker Decker Properties, Inc. 5950 Seminole Centre Ct. Suite 200 Madison, Wisconsin 53711 608-663-1218 Fax: 608-663-1226 www.klengineering.com From: Mike Scarmon, P.E.,
More informationDirectivity of the CoRTN road traffic noise model
Proceedings of th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 10 23-27 August 10, Sydney, Australia Directivity of the CoRTN road traffic noise model Simon Moore, Matthew Stead and Jonathan Cooper AECOM,
More informationRed Wing US 63 Bridge and Approach Roadways
Traffic Noise Analysis Report Red Wing US 63 Bridge and Approach Roadways TH 63 over the Mississippi River Red Wing, MN MN State Project Number: 2515-21 WI Project ID Number: 7210-00-06 June 2015 Red Wing
More informationTraffic Engineering Study
Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested
More informationCommunity Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015
Community Advisory Committee October 5, 2015 1 Today s Topics Hennepin County Community Works Update Project Ridership Estimates Technical Issue #4:Golden Valley Rd and Plymouth Ave Stations Technical
More informationD. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation Engineers
D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation Engineers August 24, 2015 File: 115-622 Mr. R. Baumann, President The RGB Group 277 Kirchoffer Avenue Ottawa, ON K2A 1Y1 RE: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
More informationPROPOSED HELICOPTER LANDING PAD 85 MILL ROAD LARA
PROPOSED HELICOPTER LANDING PAD 85 MILL ROAD LARA Assessment of Helicopter Noise A report Prepared on behalf of: JamCo Constructions Pty Ltd PO Box 631 Yarraville Victoria 3013 Ref: 11573-3jg March 2015
More informationAPPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix
More informationAlberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999
&+$37(5Ã)Ã Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999 &+$37(5) 52$'6,'()$&,/,7,(6 7$%/(2)&217(176 Section Subject Page Number Page Date F.1 VEHICLE INSPECTION STATIONS... F-3 April
More informationMILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND
MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared for: Department of Public Works Anne Arundel County Prepared by: URS Corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 3 Hunt Valley,
More informationParks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology
City of Sandy Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology March, 2016 Background In order to implement a City Council goal the City of Sandy engaged FCS Group in January of 2015 to update
More informationAlpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study
Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1
More informationMore persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway
Author(s): Liva Vågane Oslo 2009, 57 pages Norwegian language Summary: More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway Results from national travel surveys in
More informationLacey Gateway Residential Phase 1
Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West
More informationAlberta Electric System Operator Needs Identification Document Application. Mowat 2033S Substation
Decision 21781-D01-2016 Alberta Electric System Operator Needs Identification Document Application Facility Applications September 7, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 21781-D01-2016: Alberta
More informationTORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: October 24, 2012 SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN RAPID TRANSIT EXPANSION STUDY (DRTES) PHASE 1 STRATEGIC PLAN ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS
More informationTechnical Memorandum. To: From: Date: October 14 th, 2018 Project #: 1302 Project Name: Subject: Distribution:
Technical Memorandum To: Tom Hanrahan Jeff Sharp From: Date: October 14 th, 2018 Project #: 1302 Project Name: Subject: Distribution: Barrie Lockhart Road LP Conformity Review Scott Young Sorbara Group
More informationNOISE ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT for the Duke Perris Boulevard Warehouse Project Perris, California
NOISE ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT for the Duke Perris Boulevard Warehouse Project Perris, California Prepared for: Albert A. Webb Associates 3788 McCray Street Riverside, CA 92506 Prepared by: 605 Third
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...
Transportation Impact Fee Study September 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS......4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...7 PROPOSED
More informationCITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6
2016 2019 CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6 STRATEGIC AREA OF FOCUS: SUB-PRIORITY: STRATEGY: INITIATIVE: INITIATIVE LEAD(S): BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE CITY
More informationEnvironmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre
Waste Management of Canada Corporation Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATE MATTER EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Prepared
More informationREVISED NOISE ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT for the Duke Patterson Avenue Warehouse Project Perris, California
REVISED NOISE ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT for the Duke Patterson Avenue Warehouse Project Perris, California Prepared for: Albert A. Webb Associates 3788 McCray Street Riverside, CA 92506 Prepared by:
More informationTrafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study Ontario Inc.
Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study 1255723 Ontario Inc. Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study 1255723 Ontario Inc. 1465 Pickering Parkway Suite 200 Pickering ON L1V 7G7
More informationBroward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA
Project Development & Environment Study Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA Background P D & E Study Regional
More informationSilverado Village Project
Environmental Noise Assessment Silverado Village Project Elk Grove, California BAC Job # 2011-053 Prepared For: Vintara Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. Paul Eblen 140 Diamond Creek Place Roseville, CA 95747 Prepared
More information886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study
McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com
More informationAttachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach
Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach ATTACHMENT D Environmental Justice and Outreach Indicate whether the project will have disproportionately high and adverse impacts on minority or low income
More informationAPPENDIX E. Noise Data and Environmental Noise Assessment
APPENDIX E Noise Data and Environmental Noise Assessment Environmental Noise Assessment Rocklin Crossings Retail Center Rocklin, California BAC Job # 2006-004 Prepared For: Rocklin Crossings, LLC. Attn:
More information1.1 Purpose of This Environmental Impact Report EIR Process Use of This Report Report Organization...
Table of Contents SUMMARY PAGE S.1 Project Location and Project Characteristics... S-1 S.2 Project Objectives... S-9 S.3 Project Approvals... S-11 S.4 Impacts and Mitigation Measures... S-12 S.5 Alternatives...
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 24 UPDATED
More informationLocation Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan
Valley Line West LRT Concept Plan Recommended Amendments Lewis Farms LRT Terminus Site Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan Lewis Farms LRT terminus site, 87 Avenue/West
More informationLower River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Noise Analysis
Lower River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Noise Analysis This project is not anticipated to create additional noise beyond the current background levels. Although Towne Road
More informationTurnpike Mitigation Program Application
Ohio Department of Transportation - Ohio Turnpike Infrastructure Commission Turnpike Mitigation Program Application The application has been improved to enable project sponsors to save the application
More informationUS 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting March 14, 2013 Introductions ODOT FHWA SAIC Meeting Purpose Present need for bypass Provide responses to 10/04/11 public meeting comments
More informationTo: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015
Memo To: From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON : 165620021 Date: Reference: E.C. Row Expressway, Dominion Boulevard Interchange, Dougall Avenue Interchange, and Howard 1. Review of Interchange Geometry
More informationEscondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT
Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Phelps Program Management 420 Sixth Avenue, Greeley, CO 80632 Prepared by 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite
More informationAirport Road Improvements
Airport Road Improvements October 2015 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT Airport Road from 1.0 km north of Mayfield to 0.6 km north of King Street Town of Caledon D TRAFFIC STUDY & ROUNDABOUT EVALUATIONS Airport
More informationBi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis
Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis Prepared for: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Planning and Project Development May 2005 Prepared by: in conjunction
More informationAcoustics Noise Vibration
Acoustics Noise Vibration Grand Bend Wind Farm Page 2 of 17 Environmental Noise Impact Assessment April 15, 2014 Executive Summary The purpose of this environmental noise impact assessment, prepared for
More informationJAMES DICK CONSTRUCTION LIMITED
JAMES DICK CONSTRUCTION LIMITED HAUL ROUTE STUDY Eramosa Quarry, Township of Guelph-Eramosa Project No.: TR12-0013 COLE ENGINEERING GROUP LTD. [ Month Year ] MARCH 2015 HEAD OFFICE GTA WEST OFFICE 70 Valleywood
More informationMississauga Transit 2009 Budget
Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget Budget Committee Presentation December 2, 2008 Revenue Ridership Forecasted 2008 Total Rides Including transfers 11% growth in the last 24 months Transit Service Area Business
More informationMajor Widening/New Roadway
Revised Evaluation s Major Widening/New Roadway This page provides a summary of any revisions made to the draft scores presented at the October th Attributable Funds Committee meeting. The information
More informationAppendix J Traffic Impact Study
MRI May 2012 Appendix J Traffic Impact Study Level 2 Traffic Assessment Limited Impact Review Appendix J [This page was left blank intentionally.] www.sgm-inc.com Figure 1. Site Driveway and Trail Crossing
More informationARTICLE 8 OFF-STREET PARKING AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY STANDARDS
ARTICLE 8 OFF-STREET PARKING AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY STANDARDS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 8.1 GENERAL STANDARDS...8-2 8.2 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY PROVISIONS...8-4 8.3 OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS...8-5 8.4 OFF-STREET
More informationRICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.
RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited June 16, 2016 116-638 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting
More informationDriveway Entrance Policy for Residential Properties - District 3 - All Wards
Driveway Entrance Policy for Residential Properties - District 3 - All Wards (City Council on August 1, 2, 3 and 4, 2000, adopted this Clause, without amendment.) The North York Community Council recommends
More informationForm Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, 2006 SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Commission: 1. Endorse
More informationExecutive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Parking Issues Trenton Downtown Parking Policy and Sidewalk Design Standards E.S. Page 1 Final Report 2008
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A walkable environment that accommodates market demand while minimizing the negative impacts of growth is an important element in promoting the City s downtown revitalization. There are
More informationAcoustics Noise Vibration
Acoustics Noise Vibration environmental noise impact assessment project number: 11167 Grand Bend Wind Farm Grand Bend, ON Grand Bend Wind Limited Partnership Northland Power Inc., as agent Prepared for:
More informationDesignation of a Community Safety Zone in Honey Harbour in the Township of Georgian Bay
TO: FROM: Chair and Members Engineering and Public Works Committee Mark Misko, C.E.T. Manager, Roads Maintenance and Construction DATE: March 23, 2016 SUBJECT: REPORT NO: Designation of a Community Safety
More informationExecutive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1
Executive Summary Introduction The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project is a vital public transit infrastructure investment that would provide a transit connection to the existing Metro Gold Line
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VICDOM BROCK ROAD PIT EXPANSION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VICDOM BROCK ROAD PIT EXPANSION TOWNSHIP OF UXBRIDGE P/N 05-1993 June 2011 Revised -August 2011 Prepared by: Skelton, Brumwell & Associates Inc. 93 Bell Farm Road, Suite 107 Barrie,
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
THE PROJECT Last updated on 2/19/16 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What s happening on Highway 169? The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning to rebuild and repair the infrastructure on
More informationDEPUTATION TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE of the TOWN OF THE BLUE MOUNTAINS. ANDREA MACECEK AND GLENN BIER for the RESIDENTS OF WOODLAND PARK ROAD
DEPUTATION TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE of the TOWN OF THE BLUE MOUNTAINS ANDREA MACECEK AND GLENN BIER for the RESIDENTS OF WOODLAND PARK ROAD MAY 15, 2017 Woodland Park Road residents and the Board
More informationTable Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily
5.8 TRAFFIC, ACCESS, AND CIRCULATION This section describes existing traffic conditions in the project area; summarizes applicable regulations; and analyzes the potential traffic, access, and circulation
More information2405 Mer Bleue Orleans, (Ottawa), ON Community Transportation Study Mattamy Homes. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Version 2
2405 Mer Bleue Orleans, (Ottawa), ON Community Transportation Study Mattamy Homes Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Version 2 April 2014 Stantec Consulting Ltd. 400-1331 Clyde Avenue, Ottawa ON K2C
More informationwelcome to the BC Hydro community open house
welcome to the BC Hydro community open house Dawson Creek/ Chetwynd Area Transmission ProjecT Open House welcome Dawson Creek/Chetwynd Area Transmission Project (DCAT) The purpose of this open house is
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following analysis summarizes the findings and conclusions of the Traffic Analysis (Traffic Study), prepared by The Mobility Group,
More informationMEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson
McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (95)823-85 Fax: (95) 823-853 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: FROM: File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah
More informationIllinois Route 60/83 Widening and Reconstruction IL Route 176 to IL Route 60 P Traffic Noise Analysis Technical Report FINAL
Illinois Route 60/83 Widening and Reconstruction IL Route 176 to IL Route 60 P-91-084-97 Traffic Noise Analysis Technical Report FINAL August 2017 Prepared for Prepared by IL Route 60/83 IL 176 to IL 60
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
THE PROJECT Last updated on 9/8/16 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What s happening on Highway 169? The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning to rebuild and repair the infrastructure on
More informationRight-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001
Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001 Revised April 5, 2005 Revised January 27, 2006 Prepared by: Steve Collin, Engineer 2.5 Revised by Douglas
More informationTrip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254
Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254 Introduction The Brigham Young University Institute of Transportation Engineers (BYU ITE) student chapter completed a trip generation
More information