Power from the Sea. 1. Aims of RWE Innogy 2. Advantages offshore 3. Business Conditions 4. Implementation offshore

Transcription

1 Power from the Sea 1. Aims of RWE Innogy 2. Advantages offshore 3. Business Conditions 4. Implementation offshore North Hoyle in the UK with 30 x 2MW Vetas V80, constructed in 2003

2 Company structure RWE Innogy Wind onshore Wind offshore Hydro Biomass New technologies RWE Innogy plans, builds and operates facilities for renewable power generation and energy production (1,300MW in 2008). Aim is to develop power generation quickly on this basis in Germany, the UK, France, Benelux, Spain, Italy and Eastern Europe. Our focus is clearly on wind power projects in the European on- and offshore sector. RWE Innogy will also grow in the areas of hydroelectricity and biomass. Other areas of the company s activities are solar and geothermal energy as well as wave and tidal power plants.

3 Renewables within RWE's capacity and generation mix Power plant capacity by primary energy source (as of 12/2008, under IFRS) Electricity production by primary energy source (2008, under IFRS) 14,183 MW, 31.4% Hard Coal 62.0 TWh, 27.7% 10,828 MW, 24.0% Lignite 73.9 TWh, 33.0% 2008: 45,196 MW 2008: TWh 5,152 MW, 11.4% Pumped storage, oil, other 2.4 TWh, 1.1% 1,515 MW, 3.4% Renewable energies 5.3 TWh, 2.4% 7,223 MW, 16.0% Gas 31.2 TWh, 13.9% 6,295 MW, 13.9% Nuclear 49.3 TWh, 22.0%

4 Less CO 2 : Our vision for RWE s fuel mix 2020 Fuel mix 2007 (capacity in %) Total generation capacity 2007: 45 GW Lignite & hard coal 56% Vision fuel mix 2020 (capacity in %)* ) Total generation capacity 2020e: ca GW Lignite & hard coal (including CCS) 35% Gas 16% Gas 30% Nuclear 14% Nuclear 11% Pumped storage, oil, other 11% Renewable energies 3% Pumped storage, other 6% Renewable energies 17% High proportion of CO 2 -intensive coal (56%). Low proportion of CO 2 -free stations (17%) and low CO 2 gas-fired stations (16%). Almost doubling CO 2 -free capacity to ca. 30%. Almost doubling low CO 2 gas-fired capacity to ca. 30%. *) General underlying assumptions: extension of nuclear lifetime in Germany and realising new nuclear projects in UK and CSEE markets.

5 Our aims Capacity growth targets (in GW) Market growth till MW 2000 MW 1500 MW 1500 MW 4,5 >10 Strategy > We plan to more than quadruple our capacity in operation to 4,500MW by 2012 (1,100MW at the start of the company). > To achieve that, we invest more than 1bn throughout Europe per year till > We even want to exceed 10,000MW by > Our focus is clearly on organic growth. 1, e 2020e 1 RWE Innogy with MW capacity in operation and approx. 200 MW in construction (pro-rata).

6 Power from the Sea 1. Aims of RWE Innogy 2. Advantages offshore 3. Business Conditions 4. Implementation offshore North Hoyle in the UK with 30 x 2MW Vetas V80, constructed in 2003

7 Advantages offshore: fossil flues free of charge Wind speed offshore 50 m ms m ms -1 > 9.0 > < 5.5 < 6.0 Quelle: Risö, Dk

8 Advantages offshore: wind potentials Kinetic energy: E = 1 2 * m* v² Air flow: dx m & = A* ρ * = A* ρ * v dt area density flow Power: 1 ( ) = * A* ρ * v³ 2 P Wind

9 Advantages offshore: wind speed Higher middle wind speed: - measured on FINO I: 10.0 m/s in 100m height, - compared to: 6.0 to 6.5 m/s in 100m height onshore, - approx. 4,000h full load hours. Good for the company but tough regarding construction!

10 Advantages offshore: heights and power growth of wind turbines Increased efficiency In not more than 20 years the benefit of wind turbines has been increased a hundredfold. The 5 MW turbine will further multiply that by 5. No echo and shadow! Rotor diameter Hub height Nominal capacity 30 kw 80 kw 250 kw 600 kw 1,500 kw 3,000 kw 6,000 kw Rotor diameter 15 m 20 m 30 m 46 m 70 m 90 m 126 m Hub height 30 m 40 m 50 m 78 m 100 m 105 m 135 m Electricity output p.a. 35,000 kwh 95,000 kwh 400,000 kwh 1,250,000 kwh 3,500,000 kwh ca. 6,900,000 kwh ca.20,000,000 kwh Source: Bundesverband Windenergie, BTM Consult World Market Update 2008 (March 2009)

11 Frame contract: REpower 5M/6M > Rotor: ~ 18 to. > Gondola (incl. Rotor): ~ 425 to. > Tower (120 m): 750 to. > Rated power: 6 MW > Rotor diameter: 126 m > Hub height: 100 m, 117 m > Cut out speed: 10,5 m/s > After IEC 1b, GL Offshore TK1

12 Power from the Sea 1. Aims of RWE Innogy 2. Advantages offshore 3. Business Conditions 4. Implementation offshore ore North Hoyle in UK mit 30 x 2MW Vetas V80, errichtet in 2003

13 EEG compensation* (Offshore 15 cents/kwh until 2015) (1) The compensation is 3.5 cents per kwh for energy from offshore plants is 3.5 cents per kwh (basic compensation) (2) During the last twelve years, beginning at the commissioning of the turbine, the compensation is 13.0 cents per kwh (initial compensation). The initial compensation rises by 2.0 cents per kwh for plants that have been installed before 1st January 2016 according to clause 1. According to clause 1 and 2 the period of initial compensation for energy from turbines that have been created in a distance of at least twelve sea miles and a water depth of at least 20m, every sea mile above that is extended by 0.5 months per full sea mile distance and by 1.7 months per every additional full meter water depth. *Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2008 Teil 1 Nr. 49, published 31 October 2008, in Bonn Remark: In the UK model of quotas with approximately 19 cents/kwh for offshore until 2027

14 Planned electric supply in Germany (Infrastrukturplanungsundbeschleunigungsgesetz) Quelle: E.ON Netz

15 Overview grid connection Gwynt y Môr Existing 400kV line land sea Offshore substations with transformers, 33kV switchgear 250MW 400kV substation 250MW On-shore substation with transformers, SVCs etc. 6 x 132kV cable circuits 250MW 33kV array cables 15

16 Overhead line Gwynt y Môr 400 kv Overhead Line New Substation

17 Cable route on shore Gwynt y Môr 40.0m Wide Services Corridor EXCLUSION ZONE No deep digging No Trees No buildings/footing 27.0m Wide Buried Services Area C L Circuit 1 Circuit 2 Circuit 3 Circuit 4 Circuit 5 Circuit 6 6.5m 6.5m 7.0m 4.0m 4.0m 2.5m 2.5m 4.0m 4.0m 7.0m 17

18 Layout Gwynt y Môr Project Area

19 Electrotechnical calculation

20

21 Project introduction in Germany

22 Development in wind energy (estimation from 2002) National aim: Germany 12,5% renewable in 2010 Reached parts: 2002: 8,1%; 2003: 8,75%; 2004: 9,3% [source: J.P. Molly, C. Ender, Windenergie-Studie (Dewi)]

23 Forecasted development of the offshore market in Europe 2800 Rated power output per year [MW] in operation BTM 1) MAKE 2) EWEA 3) Immature market: 1.1 GW installed, typical up and downs in the past driven by single projects Industry faced with bottlenecks (turbines, vessels) 1) BTM Consult, World Market Update ) MAKE Consulting, The Wind Forecast Market Outlook (September 2007) and updated figures from )EWEA, Delivering Offshore Wind Power in Europe, December 2007

24 Alpha ventus Offshore testing area Alpha Ventus (Borkum west) source: > Operating Company: DOTI (EWE, E.ON and Vattenfall each 1/3 ) > Area: 45 km north of Borkum (54 00,0 N 6 34,4 E) > Water depth: ca. 30m > 6 x Multibrid M x REpower 5M 60 MW > Foundation: 6 x Tripod + 6 x Jacket-sructure > Commissioning is planned for 2009

25 Specific investment costs offshore (in /kw) 5,000 4,500 4,000 Avg. Onshore Capex (Source: Dexia) Avg. Offshore Capex (diverse individual projects) Avg. Onshore Capex (diverse individual projects) 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1, Sources: DEXIA, RWE Innogy, diverse internet sources the chart shows the average cost per kw capacity, the deviation from project to project is significant, also due to other project and location specific factors such as underlying wind regime, construction costs in difficult areas as well as regulatory issues.

26 Historical, current and projected future capital costs for offshore wind projects 4 Alpha Ventus Thornton Bank London Array Sheringham Shoal 3 Project CapEx ( M/MW) Princess Amalia (Q7) Greater Gabbard Rhyl Flats Robin Rigg LID Walney Thanet Gunfleet Phase I Nordsee Ost Innogy Nordsee1 Tromp Binnen Inch Cape Gwynt y Mor Triton Knoll 2 1 Horns Rev Blyth Middelgrunden Utgrunden Yttre Stengrund Nysted Samsö North Hoyle Egmond Scroby Sands Lillgrund Kentish Flats Gunfleet Phase II Horns Rev II Year (main contract signed) Bubble area represents project capacity RWE E.ON Dong Vattenfall others

27 Bottleneck in value added chain Wind turbine Specification Tender Production Transport Construction Commissioning Foundation -Project Development -Financing Basic Design Detailed Engineer. Tender Production Transport Construction -Operation -Service -Deconstruction Grid connection Design, Simulation Tender Production Transport Laying/ Installation Construction bottleneck

28 Power from the Sea today 1. Aims of RWE Innogy 2. Advantages offshore 3. Business Conditions 4. Implementation offshore North Hoyle in UK mit 30 x 2MW Vetas V80, errichtet in 2003

29 Project development in the UK RWE Innogy assets UK North Hoyle 60 MW, in operation since 2003 Rhyl Flats 90 MW, implementing in 2009 Gwynt y Môr Rhyl Flats North Hoyle Gwynt y Mor 750 MW, approved in 2008 Greater Gabbard 504 MW, start of construction in 2009 Greater Gabbard

30 Project development Rhyl Flats and Gwynt y Môr Gwynt y Môr offshore wind farm (Under construction) 750 MW Applied for building permit application in 2005 Building permit Grid connection approval Installation in three stages Construction ) Prevention of 0.86 t CO 2 /MWh.

31 Innogy Nordsee 1 40 km north of the North Sea Island Juist Water depth m Average tide: 2,7 m Project area: 146 km² Annual average wind speed ~10 m/s (approx. 18 km from FINO test feld) ~ MW ~ x REpower 6M

32 Two met mast 1 med mast 100 m height in 35m depth 1 med mast 160 m height in 27m depth Ship secure foundation! (e.g. Monopile) Platform, Latticeboom

33 Wind met mast Rhyl Flats, (measurements since 2005)

34 Wind and wave Main wind direction: Southwest Average wind speed at 100 m: 10 m/s

35 In-situ Sub-Soil Samples + CPT, Status 06/09

36 Simplified subsoil cross section -26 to -34 m LAT 1 to 2 m S, modern Moving Sediment 0,5 to 1,5 m O, Peatc 8 to 15 m S, Sand holozaen? m, Transient Layer O & S 0,5 to 1,5 m O, Peatc 1 to 2 m T, Clay 2 to 4 m U, Silt? m, Transient Layer U & S S, Sand pleistozaen Glacier canyon, very heterogeneous sites

37 In-situ Sub-Soil Cross Section, Status 06/09

38

39 First park layout Met mast Area: NW: NO: SO: SW: 54 05,55 N 6 44,86 E 54 05,55 N 6 56,04 E 53 58,76 N 6 56,04 E 53 57,14 N 6 44,86 E Planned WEA: 165 Installed capacity: 990 MW Met mast

40 Options for foundations Jacket: 420 t Crib: 400 t (40 m long) Gravity foundation made out off concrete: 4.000t Root area: 40 m x 40 m Height: 60 m

41

42

43 Preparation in Mostyn harbour

44 Installation foundation in Rhyl Flats

45 Foundations Rhyl Flats

46

47

48 Foundations Rhyl Flats

49 Offshore logistic current market situation Operating Company A2Sea MPI Siemens Smit Gerätebezeichnung Sea Energy Sea Power Sea Worker Sea Jack Resolution Titan 2 Lisa max. Turbinengröße (Kran) 3 MW 3 MW 3,6 MW 5 MW 3,6 MW 3,6 MW 3,6 MW max. Wassertiefe (Jack-Up) 24 m 24 m 40 m 35 m 35 m > 40 m 33 m A2Sea Sea Energy (source A2Sea) A2Sea Sea Jack (source A2Sea) MPI Resolution (source MPI) Smit Lisa (source Smit) A2Sea Sea Power (source A2Sea) A2Sea Sea Worker (source A2Sea) Siemens Titan 2 (source KS Energy)

50 Offshore logistic current market situation graphical 50 m 45 m water depth 40 m 35 m 30 m 25 m 20 m Current offshore wind market Only one tool is ready for us for water depth >35m or 5 MW-site 15 m 10 m 5 m m 0,0 MW 1,0 MW 2,0 MW 3,0 MW 4,0 MW 5,0 MW 6,0 MW asset class maximum deployable radius installation gear Offshore wind park (in operation or under construction)

51 Offshore logistic RWE Innogy Portfolio 50 m 45 m 40 m Future offshore wind projects RWE Innogy 35 m water depth 30 m 25 m 20 m 15 m 10 m 5 m m 0,0 MW 1,0 MW 2,0 MW 3,0 MW 4,0 MW 5,0 MW 6,0 MW asset class maximum deployable radius installation gear Offshore wind park (in operation or under construction)

52 Offshore logistic required installation equipment till 2012 Newbuilds needed in total RWE Innogy Analysis 2009 < 3 < 5 < 9 < 12 Up to 12 new installation equipments only for the installation of wind turbines and foundations are required till 2012 in offshore wind markets! Many concepts but only a few are in construction! Hochtief Thor 2010 (Source Hochtief Construction) Bard Windlift (Source Bard) GeoSea Goliath 2009 (Source Deme/GeoSea) MPI MV Discovery 2011 (Source Vroon)

53 Strategy Basis for managing unplanned Maintenance Offshore Supply Vessel (OSV) m mono-hull mother ship, based at Wind Farm Accommodation 30 technicians (1 shift) Helideck Multi Access System Access vessels on board Offshore Access System Helicopter Comments Components proven in Offshore Oil & Gas industry 24hr access highly possible No offshore cultural issues Vessel could be well equipped for containerised maintenance e.g. crane, spares store, compensating decks, tool rooms etc,. Consider provisions vessel to support OSV based at wind farm Source: WindCat Workboats Ltd.

54 Strategy Basis for managing unplanned Maintenance Mother-ship evaluation 15-24m mono hull or catamaran vessels envisaged Comments Launch / Retrieval systems not envisaged to be an issue Vessel technology proven, however further design evolution required Weight is prohibitive: retrieval and running costs Optimisation of the sea conditions Current RWE Innogy target area Low lease rates max 1500 /day Only a personnel and light spares transfer system Max. significant wave height will drive vessel choice Close stand-by during helicopter missions Source: South Boats Ltd.

55 Strategy for managing planned Maintenance Project justifies full time Jack-up Barge support 12 months charter costs prohibitive Wave climate likely to restrict Charter may not be viable solution Deck crane 30 t Workboat lifting capability Main crane 95 t For main components e.g. Gearbox, Generator, Blades Accommodation for 30 technicians + Crew Source: A2SEA A/S Plus extra Accommodation for planned scheduled services in the summer

56 Helicopter for crew and spare transfer Medium helicopter e.g. Agusta Westland AW139 Capacity for 15 Pax Crew and technician transfer to OSV Reducing the transfer time Comfortable transfer Secondary Access solution for WTG During bad weather Search and Rescue Spare part transfer from Mother ship to the WTG Source: AgustaWestland

57 Optional basic harbour Planning basic harbour, alternative quayside

58 Option basic harbour Bremerhaven Distance to the wind park Innogy Nordsee 1 : About 145 km (Seaway) Big harbor which is well connected to the hinterland Good infrastructure within the entire harbor region and easily accessed by roads, rails and inlet waterways Manufacturing plant of REpower, Powerblades and others Source: Google Earth ( ) => Development of a new harbor region for offshore wind energy!

59 Optimized logistic concept (construction + O&M) Helicopter transport with Sikorsky S-76 RWEI jack-up barge Docking station with WindCat Harbour plan Offshore supply vessel

60

61 Thanks for your attention! DREHEN

62 Onshore Portfolio under Operation Up to End of 2009 Installed Power by Country* (Including acquired assets of Essent) Σ 943,3 MW 447,8 MW 424,5 MW 11,5 MW 18 MW 41,5 MW Spain UK Germany France Poland 447,8 MW 424,5 MW 418,8 MW 18 MW 41,5 MW Σ 1551 MW Netherlands 200,6 MW Number of Turbines by Country* Σ 924 Turb. 472 Turb. 406 Turb. 16 Turb. 12 Turb. 18 Turb. Spain UK Germany France Poland Netherlands 472 Turb. 406 Turb. 285 Turb. 12 Turb. 18 Turb. 161 Turb. Σ 1354 Turb. * Inclusive Windfarms under Construction

63 Onshore Turbines under Operation Up to End of 2009 (Including acquired assets of Essent) Number of Turbines by Manufacturer* Σ 924 Turb. 8 Turb. 2 Turb. 97 Turb. 439 Turb. 45 Turb. 27 Turb. 274 Turb. 32 Turb. Enercon GE Made NEG Micon Nordex REpower Siemens Vestas Lagerwey Mitsubischi Windmaster 292 Turb. 2 Turb. 97 Turb. 439 Turb. 45 Turb. 28 Turb. 274 Turb. 98 Turb. 26 Turb. 1 Turb. 52 Turb. Σ 1354 Turb. * Inclusive Windfarms under Construction