Michigan Plug-in Electric Vehicle Preparedness Taskforce

Transcription

1 Michigan Plug-in Electric Vehicle Preparedness Taskforce Wisconsin Public Utility Institute Utilities as Transportation Fuel Providers June 14, 2011 Michael Moore, Steering Committee Member Wisconsin Public Service/ UPPCO

2 MPSC PEV Preparedness Taskforce Objectives Overall objective: Facilitate and Support Implementation of PEVs Throughout Michigan How: Communicate and educate key audiences Monitor and anticipate industry trends to identify, share and implement best practices within Michigan, regionally and nationally Create and foster partnerships with regional and national efforts (including EEI & EPRI) Identify and make recommendations for rates, infrastructure issues, incentives and code changes 2

3 Taskforce Structure-Current Steering Committee Communications Best Practices Non Residential Charging Infrastructure* T&D Infrastructure Steering Committee meets monthly Multiple updates provided by each sub committee throughout the year to all key stakeholders Other committees will meet as frequently as needed based on targeted deadlines * This subcommittee will lead DOE grant implementation priorities 3

4 Members MPSC PEV Preparedness Taskforce Automotive Manufacturers Clean Cities Coalition Dept. of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (formerly DELEG) Electrical Contractors Environmental Groups Michigan Public Service Commission Not for Profit Corporations Utilities (both regulated and public) Other Interested Parties (NextEnergy) 4

5 MPSC PEV Preparedness Taskforce Key Milestones February 2010 Taskforce initiated by MPSC Chairman Orjiakor Isiogu Invite all key stakeholders to participate March August 2010 Biweekly meetings with learning and definition Supported passage of MI building code rules regulating charging station installations Installed Level 2 charging stations at MPSC September 2010 Utilities submit matrix of PEV plans via MEGA House Energy & Technology Committee hearings MPSC Press Conference Chairman Isiogu 5

6 MPSC PEV Preparedness Taskforce Key Milestones October 2010 Rep. Clemente introduced bill- tax credit for EVSE installs UP Energy Summit Volt press conference December 2010 Transitioned to Taskforce member-led group March 2011 Launched revised website May 2011 Hosted presentations/ride and Drive event with MI House and Senate energy committees June 2011 Partnered with Clean Energy Coalition on application for DOE grant for PEV education and infrastructure preparation 6

7 Challenges/Opportunities Barriers being removed by the MPSC PEV Preparedness Taskforce Over 5,000 free residential EVSEs for PEV customers in MI Challenges: Target cost reductions for the customer by removing purchase, ownership and operation barriers: Install residential charging with favorable utility, smart PEV charging options Streamline permitting, inspection and electrical contractor training Educate the broader public and policy making entities on the activities of the state/nation regarding PEV/Smart Grid Planning (MI Smart Grid Collaborative)- Grid Interface will require standardization Develop on-line tools empowering purchase choice for the customer Customer acceptance will depend on availability of infrastructure 7

8 Challenges/Opportunities Opportunities: Early notification process Volt customers opt in to inform utilities where they live assists future local grid planning Vehicle to Grid (V2G) Communications Demonstrations OnStar, EPRI, Dodge Ram PHEV Secondary Battery Use Community Energy Storage, power quality/reliability & frequency regulation for the grid, back up storage, etc. Battery Technology Cost, size, weight, energy density, aging, thermal management. Business and research R&D = Jobs DOE Grant(s) Partnerships to spread the word and promote the adoption of EV technology Support the creation of Green Technology jobs and advance the state of Plug-in technology for future production integration 8

9 What are we learning? (GM) Early Adopters Influence and Drive Mainstream Adoption: Volt early launch markets targeted early adopter markets Many Volt customers are former Prius owners 90% of current Volt customers previously from outside the brand Early Volt customers include: the environmentally/energy security conscious; the electrical contractors/inspectors who play an integral role in safely and cost effectively installing level two charging at the home; and early technology adopters Prospective customers are motivated by current customers blogging of experiences with their Volt to date: (5 months of real data) fun to drive; exceeds expectations; experiencing over 1,000 miles per 9 gallon tank of fuel; great ride and handling on snowy roads; and safe (IIHS highest safety pick) 9

10 What are we learning? (Ford) HEV Electric power for launch /urban speed Fuel Use by Engine in Hybrid Mode Urban and Highway (highest volume and best FE/$) PHEV Short Trip Battery Power Long Trip Primarily Urban and Some Highway (promotes energy diversity) Battery Power Fuel Use by Engine in Hybrid Mode BEV Up to 100 Mile Range Urban (zero emissions but with range limitations) Battery Power Electrified Vehicle Alternatives are Customer Driven 10

11 Vehicle generated CO2 Reduction % Overall Fuel Economy % What are we learning? (Chrysler) Technology Choices Degrees of Electrification ReEV BEV 50 PHEV 30 HEV 10 Mild HEV & Stop Start 0 miles Mild HEV : Stop-Start, KERS (Kinetic Energy Recovery) HEV : Hybrid Electric Vehicles ReEV : Range Extended Electric Vehicles ~ 2 miles ~20 miles ~ 40 miles ~ 75 miles e-drive Range PHEV : Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles BEV : Battery Electric Vehicles 11

12 1:00 4:00 7:00 10:00 13:00 16:00 19:00 22:00 1:00 4:00 7:00 1:00 4:00 7:00 10:00 13:00 16:00 19:00 22:00 1:00 4:00 7:00 Demand (MW) Demand (MW) What are we learning? (Detroit Edison) Overall, our grid is ready to handle PEV load % PEV Adoption On-Peak Charging % PEV Adoption Off-Peak Charging Time DTE System Load 3.3 kw (240V) DTE System Load Time (EST) 3.3 kw (240V)

13 # of Predicted Disturbances What are we learning? (Detroit Edison) We anticipate clusters of plug-in electric vehicles, but there are ways to manage impact on the distribution system. PEV Impacts on the Distribution System Level 2 On-Peak vs. Off-Peak Charging % 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% PEV Adoption Rate (%) Trf. Overloads (On) Trf. Overloads (Off) How can we mitigate the risk? Create incentives to promote off-peak charging Educate customers of the advantages of offpeak charging Chevrolet Volt : Programming for Delay Charge

14 Public Charging Stations 14

15 Customer Outreach & Education Many paths to reach Michigan s customers Website & Calculator Auto Dealerships 15

16 Questions? 16

17 Thank you! 17

18 Supplementary Slides 18

19 Committee Participation Committee participation is voluntary Certain committees will require knowledge-based representation Annually review committee leadership and membership (including steering committee) Current recommendations are not all-inclusive, IF YOU ARE INTERESTED in joining a sub committee, please contact the Subcommittee Chair 19

20 Committee and Priorities Steering Committee Lead: Seth Gerber, Consumers Energy (co-chair) Ana Medina, DTE (co-chair) Members: Kellee Christensen, Angie Goodman, LBWL Jeff Lebrun, DTE Energy Saudia Santure, Terrance Daniels, Consumers Energy Mike Byrne, Chrissie Pearce, MPSC Mike Moore, WPS/UPPCO Autos (GM, Ford, Nissan, Toyota and Chrysler Reps) State of Michigan (Member TBD in 2011) MEGA (TBD) Priorities: Provide priorities for committees Coordinate sharing of results between committees Drive implementation and results Communicate successes 20

21 Committee and Priorities Communications Subcommittee Lead: Saudia Santure, Consumers Energy Members: Judy Palnau, MPSC Kellee Christensen, Angie Goodman, LBWL Dan Gretzner, Consumers Energy Kristin Zimmerman, GM Joe Malcoun, Andrea Elkins, DTE Energy Ryan Cavanaugh, NextEnergy Ruben Bernardino, Renewable Energy Education Laboratory Dave Forsberg, Integrys Others (TBD) Priorities: Website content revision and maintenance Coordinate and support news and media events Coordinate education/training specific to audiences Leverage communication efforts of other national initiatives (NPVI/EDTA, EEI) 21

22 Committee and Priorities Best Practices Lead: Ana Medina, DTE Energy Members: Angie Goodman, Chad Taylor, BWL Jeffery Lebrun, DTE Energy Seth Gerber, Saudia Santure, Terrance Daniels, Consumers Energy Michael Crawford, MINECA Charles Griffith, Eco Center Autos (GM, Ford, Nissan, Toyota and Chrysler Reps) MEGA (TBD) Others (TBD) Priorities: Charging station experiences Recommend EEI/EPRI best practices Planning for March Volt implementation Make recommendations for grants and funding Incentives/ Rates 22

23 Committee and Priorities Non Residential Charging Infrastructure Lead: Kellee Christensen, BWL Members: Angie Goodman, BWL Jeff Lebrun, David Ellis, DTE Energy Terrance Daniels, Seth Gerber, Consumers Energy Jon Walter, I&M Mike Moore, WPS/UPPCO Chris Detjen, NextEnergy Michael Crawford, MINECA Autos (GM, Ford, Nissan, Toyota and Chrysler Reps) State of Michigan (Member TBD in 2011) Electrical Contractors Others (TBD) Priorities: Municipal Best Practices Commercial/ Public Best Practices Right of Way Best Practices Recouping the cost of public charging Public/ private business model options Regulated and non regulated utility treatment for charging station owners 23

24 Committee and Priorities T & D Infrastructure Lead: Seth Gerber, Consumers Energy Members: Kellee Christensen, Tim Rowden, BWL Ana Medina, Hawk Asgeirsson, DTE Brian Bushey, Consumers Energy Jon Walter, I&M Michael Crawford, MINECA Charles Griffith, Eco Center MEGA (TBD) State of Michigan (Member TBD in 2011) Others (TBD) Priorities: Grid impacts (models) Charging data collection and analysis Cluster identification and mitigation plan Residential charging station (installation and equipment) analysis Utility standards Permitting process 24