Appendix D. Airway Highway Clearance

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Appendix D. Airway Highway Clearance"

Charlene Pitts
6 years ago
Views:

1 Preliminary Engineering Study Lakefront West (CUY ) Appendix D Airway Highway Clearance December 2009 Appendix D Airway Highway Clearance D-1

2 December 17, 2009 Michael Kubek Production Administrator District 12 Ohio Department of Transportation 5500 Transportation Boulevard Garfield Heights, Ohio Michael Baker Jr., Inc. A unit of Michael Baker Corporation The Halle Building 1228 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1050 Cleveland, OH (216) FAX (216) Figure 2: St. Vincent Charity Hospital Heliport Notification Triangle Figure 3: Lutheran Hospital Heliport Notification Triangle Please feel free to contact me at or knbowen@mbakercorp.com if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, MICHAEL BAKER JR., INC. Subject: Airway/Highway Clearance Analysis CUY PID Kirsten N. Bowen, P.E. Project Manager Dear Mr. Kubek: We have reviewed the above mentioned project for three airways within the project area: Burke Lakefront Airport, St. Vincent Charity Hospital Heliport and Lutheran Hospital Heliport. Through our analysis and the FAA Notification Criteria website we have determined that the Burke Lakefront Airport 100:1 notification surface will be violated. This calculation is based on an airport elevation of 583, as provided by the FAA, with a distance of 8,500 feet between the airport and the project location. As a result, any construction equipment on the project site that exceeds 33 feet in height will require FAA Notification. This project will require Form to be filed at least 30 days prior to the proposed start of construction. For the two heliports, St. Vincent Charity Hospital and Lutheran Hospital, we have determined that the project will not encroach into the 25:1 notification surface. This determination for St. Vincent Charity Hospital is based on a heliport elevation of 675 feet, with a distance of 9,526 feet between the helipad and the nearest project location. The study has also determined that a height of 424 feet exists between the 25:1 notification surface and the project. The analysis conducted for Lutheran Hospital is based on a heliport elevation of 780 feet, with a distance of 1,440 feet between the helipad and the nearest project location. The analysis has also determined that a height of 205 feet exists between the 25:1 notification surface and the project. The following figures are attached: Figure 1: Burke Lakefront Airport Notification Triangle D-2

3 Figure 1: Burke Lakefront Notification Triangle Note: Notification Necessary D-3

4 Figure 2: St. Vincent Charity Hospital Helipad Notification Triangle Note: Notification Not Necessary Figure 3: Lutheran Hospital Helipad Notification Triangle Note: Notification Not Necessary D-4

5 Preliminary Engineering Study Lakefront West (Cuy ) Appendix E Pavement Design December 2009 Appendix E Pavement Design E-1

6 E-2

7 inter-office communication Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Planning Office of Pavement Engineering Date: December 15, 2006 To: From: By: Subject: Kathleen Sarli, Project Manager David J. Humphrey, Administrator, Office of Pavement Engineering Dave Miller, Pavement Engineer CUY (PID 77330) Pavement Design The Pavement Selection Committee has determined that it is appropriate to defer the pavement type selection to the City of Cleveland, in part because they are the maintaining agency. The City had previously indicated a preference for concrete pavement. The following design is provided for your use: Non-Reinforced Concrete Pavement Aggregate Base You may alternately use 9 of Item 451 Reinforced Concrete Pavement on the aggregate base but we recommend non-reinforced. Nothing in this letter changes any subgrade or earthwork recommendations provided by the Office of Geotechnical Engineering. If you have any questions, please contact Dave Miller. DJH:DWM c: File - efile X:\P-Info\Distr-12\CUY\6\12.20\CUY Pave Des doc E-3

8 From: To: Cc: Bowen, Kirsten N. Subject: Lakefront West; PID 77330; Pavement Selection Process - Results Date: Thursday, December 21, :10:05 PM Attachments: 77330_ IOC - Pavement Selection Recommendation CUY Pave Des pdf 77330_ CLEVELAND-Pavement Selection preference-lakefrontwest #77330.pdf Randy/Bob, Please see the below IOC, dated from ODOT's Office of Pavement Engineering. As noted in the IOC, the Pavement Selection Committee has concurred with your preference of full depth concrete pavement. They recommend the use of 452 pavement, which our District has been using for the past few years, in lieu of 451 pavement. As you know, the District office doesn't necessarily agree with the use of 8" curb reveal. We can discuss this issue further as the plans move into detail design. Finally, with respect to your suggestion to use a concrete sealer. In talking to our construction department, there are some contractors that use a curing compound which includes a sealer. At this time though, our specifications do not require the use of a sealer on 452 (or 451) pavement. Again, we can discuss this item further during the later stages of the detail design phase of the project. If our current practice does not change, the City always has the option to add a concrete sealer to the project at 100% City cost. If you have any questions, you can contact me, or Kathy Sarli, our interim project manager. Our regular project manager, Natalie Conley, is currently off on leave. Dave David Lastovka, P.E. ODOT D-12 Production 5500 Transportation Blvd Garfield Hts, Ohio FAX dave.lastovka@dot.state.oh.us E-4

9 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Bowen, Kirsten Svilar, Alexander; Re: Lakefront Pavement Design Tuesday, August 11, :34:01 AM Kirsten, we see no reason as to why this would change. Please follow the standard 6" curb, we are not aware of an 8" requirement. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Natalie Conley Ohio Department of Transportation - District Twelve v: f: e: natalie.conley@dot.state.oh.us =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "Bowen, Kirsten" <Knbowen@mbakercorp.com> 07/14/ :09 PM To "Natalie.Conley@dot.state.oh.us" <Natalie.Conley@dot.state.oh.us>, "craig.hebebrand@dot.state.oh.us" <craig.hebebrand@dot.state.oh.us> cc "Svilar, Alexander" <asvilar@mbakercorp.com> Subject Lakefront Pavement Design Natalie, Can you confirm that the project will still be using the pavement design as stated in the attached IOC? In addition, there were some discussions early in the project that the City prefers 8 curb instead of 6 curb. Can you provide some direction on this or is this something that needs to be coordinated through Rob Mavec? Thanks, Kirsten[attachment "77330_ IOC - Pavement Selection Recommendation CUY Pave Des pdf" deleted by Natalie Conley/Production/D12/ODOT] E-5

10 Preliminary Engineering Study Lakefront West (CUY ) Appendix F Maintenance of Traffic December 2009 Appendix F Maintenance of Traffic (as submitted in 2007) F-1

11 F-2

12 F-3

13 F-4

14 F-5

15 F-6

16 F-7

17 F-8

18 F-9

19 F-10

20 F-11

21 F-12

22 F-13

23 F-14

24 F-15

25 F-16

26 F-17

27 F-18

28 F-19

29 F-20

30 F-21

31 F-22

32 F-23

Turnpike Mitigation Program Application

Ohio Department of Transportation - Ohio Turnpike Infrastructure Commission Turnpike Mitigation Program Application The application has been improved to enable project sponsors to save the application