National Highways Authority of India (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways)

Transcription

1 National Highways Authority of India (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways) Monthly Progress Report (MPR) March 2016 Independent Engineering Services for the work of four Laning of Tirupati- Tiruthani-Chennai Section of NH-205 from km to km: in the State of Andhra Pradesh and from km: km: in the State of Tamil Nadu on Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) Toll Basis TIRUPATI TIRUTHANI CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205. Site Office : 1-4/8 Srinivasapuram, Padmavathipuram Panchayat, Tirupati Andhra Pradesh. India Phone: , wsapltirupatiic@gmail.com Bangalore Office : #8, 2 nd Floor, 80 Feet Road, R.T.Nagar Bangalore Karnataka. India Phone:

2 Sl. No. INDEX CONTENT Page Nos. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. SCOPE OF THE PROJECT 1 3. PROJECT MILESTONES 2 4. SALIENT FEATURES 3 5. PROJECT HIGHWAY PAVEMENT CONFIGURATIONS PROJECT LOCATION MAP STATUS OF MOBILIZATION OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEER Independent Engineer s Organization Chart. 10 INSPECTION AND MONITORING OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORKS 8.1. Progress up to Achievement Of Physical Targets For Annual Plan for Review of Drawings / Documents / Designs / Temporary Drawings Construction Program Construction Safety Method adopted in construction Conformity of Construction work Defects & Deficiencies Non Conformance Report (NCR) Maintenance of the existing 2 lane highway Road Accident Report Survey works Review & concurrence of Material Request for Inspection (RFI) Physical Works Programme Planned Weightage Physical Progress Progress Report from the Concessionaire Dignitary s Site Visit Completed Bituminous Concrete IE Factory Visit Supply of Video Recording Toll Plazas (Schedule-C, Project facilities) 37

3 INDEX Sl. No. CONTENT Page Nos. 9. PROGRESS OF ROAD WORKS A.P & T.N. Sections LAND ACQUISITION AND UTILITY SHIFTING PROGRESS OF STRUCTURES PROGRESS OF QUALITY CONTROL- A.P. & T.N Sections WEATHER REPORTS OF A.P. & T.N. Sections PLANTS AVAILABLE AT SITE COMMENTS OF TEAM LEADER ANNEXURES : 63 (i) Strip charts A.P. & T.N. Section ii) PCC Status on (iii) Summary of completed Four lane and Two lane stretches up to March ( A.P.& T.N. Section) (iv) Reinforced Earth Wall (RE Wall) and Project Facilities work Progress (v) Accident data (vi) Summary of NCRs (vii) Status of ROB A.P. sections 101 (viii) Status of Structures A.P. & T.N. sections (ix) Progress Photographs (x) Consolidated statue of Shifting of Utilities in AP Section 117 (xi) Abstract of Electrical Estimates in TN Section. (TNEB) (xii) Water Pipe line Estimates in TN Section. 120

4 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of India (GOI) through Ministry of Shipping Road Transport & Highways (MOSRT & H) is contemplating to enhance the traffic capacity and safety for efficient transportation of goods as well as passenger traffic on the heavily trafficked National Highways. The Government of India had entrusted National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) for the development, maintenance and management of National Highway No.205 including section from Km to Km (63.23 Km) in the state of Andhra Pradesh and from Km to Km (61.47 Km) in the state of Tamil Nadu. In order to provide a better level of service to the vehicular traffic and to augment the capacity of NH 205 by widening the existing 2 lane to 4 lanes divided carriageway facility including strengthening of the existing 2 lane, it has been decided to carry out the works on Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) Toll Basis Under NHDP, Phase- III. 2. SCOPE OF THE PROJECT The scope of the project shall include the following during the concession period: Construction of the project highway on site as set forth in Schedule A and as specified in Schedule B together with provision of Project Facilities as specified in Schedule C and standards as set forth in Schedule D of the Concession agreement. Operation and Maintenance of the project highway in accordance with the provisions of the concession agreement. Performance and fulfillment of all other obligations in accordance with the provisions and matters incidental thereto or necessary for the performance of any or all of the obligations of the concession agreement by the Concessionaire. [IE s MPR, March ] Page 1

5 3. PROJECT MILE STONES (SCHEDULE-G) 1 st Mile Stone: 180 days from appointed date i.e % of the Project Cost Rs Crores. MILE STONE ACHIEVED Comment of IE: Expended Rs. 65 Crores (11.38%) Crossed the mile stone. 2nd Mile Stone: 365 days from appointed date i.e % of Project Cost Rs. 200 Crores, shall have started all bridges. MILE STONE NOT ACHIEVED Comment of IE: Expended Rs.217 Crores (38%) but works on some bridges yet to start. 3 rd Mile Stone: 640 days from appointed date i.e To be expended 70% of the Project Cost i.e. 400 Crores and shall have commenced all Project facilities. MILE STONE NOT ACHIEVED Comment of IE: Crossed the 3 rd Mile stone. Expended Rs. 500 Crores (87.56%) upto December 2012 but all project facilities yet to start as per schedule-c of Concession Agreement. Scheduled Two lane with Paved Shoulders/Four-Laning Completion Date: The Scheduled Four Laning date i.e., shall occur on the [910 th (Nine Hundred and Ten) day from the appointed date. On or before the Scheduled Four laning date, the Concessionaire shall have completed Four laning and also the sections where two lane with Paved Shoulders are allowed in accordance with this agreement. Comment of IE: Completion date crossed-mile STONE NOT ACHIEVED Extension of Time (EOT) : The EOT is granted upto excluding the stretches where making available unencumbered land is delayed due to land Acquisition or Court Intervention where the work will be completed within 12 months from the date of such unencumbered land made available. However, there shall be no extension in Concession Period on account of this extension of time and it shall remain as 30 years from the Appointed Date i.e. from to [IE s MPR, March ] Page 2

6 4. SALIENT FEATURES AS PER C.A. The Authority Name of the Project Independent Engineer (IE) National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) Four laning of Tirupati-Tiruthani-Chennai Section of NH-205 from km to km: in the State of Andhra Pradesh and from km: km: in the State of Tamil Nadu on Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) Toll Basis, under NHDP, Phase-III. Agreement No. of IE NHAI/TECH/TTC/IC/2011 Date of start as per contract of IE The Concessionaire M/s Transstroy Tirupati-Tiruthani-Chennai Tollways Private Limited. Hyderabad (AP) The EPC Contractor M/s Transstroy India Limited. Hyderabad (AP) Date of agreement 12 th July 2010 Period of Construction 30 Months (910 days from the appointed date) Date of Commencement of Construction (appointed date) 7 th April rd Oct 2013 ( Supplementary agreement was signed by the Date of Completion of Construction Concessionaire on for completion of balance works within 12 months after unencumbered Land is Handed over by Authority in balance stretches) The Concession Period 30 Years(Including Construction period) Project Cost 571 Crores Total Financial Package cost Crores EPC Cost Crores Project Length Kms Financial close date Execution of Escrow agreement Date of submission of Performance Security (Amount: Crores.) Lenders Name Consortium Company Lenders Contribution Crores Grant from NHAI (Equity support) 51.39Crores. (1 st Tranche 27.92Cr and 2 nd Tranche 15.19Cr.Total Paid so far 43.11Crores) Contribution by Concessionaire Crores Date of Appointment of Safety Consultant Safety Consultant HAKS Engineering, Architect s and Land Surveyors, P.C in association with Info Trans Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (for Package No.39). ROB 1 No Vehicular Under Passes 4 Nos Pedestrian Under Passes 1 No Toll Plaza 2 Nos Major Bridges 6 Nos (1 is repair) Minor Bridges 23 Nos (New : 19 Nos., Widening : 2 Nos. & Repair: 2 Nos.) Box Culverts 291 Nos Slab Culverts 2 Nos Pipe Culverts 8 nos At grade Intersections 11 Nos Length of Service Road 2.4 kms Bus Lay Byes 60 Nos Bypasses 8 Nos [IE s MPR, March ] Page 3

7 5. PROJECT HIGHWAY PAVEMENT CONFIGURATIONS Scope of Work and Cross Sections Design (km) Description Scope From To Length Section 1 4 lane Section 2 Section 3 2 lane with paved shoulders (4 lane by March 2025) 2 lane with paved shoulders (4 lane by March 2031) Section 4 4 lane Pavement Configurations Main Carriageway Section 1 (Km to Km Four lane divided carriageway) Design Period Design Traffic Design CBR Pavement Composition, mm For 10 Years ( year 2023) 24 10% Section 2 (Km to Km Two lane carriageway) Design Period Design Traffic Design CBR Pavement Composition, mm For 10 Years ( year 2023) 31 10% Note: This section will be upgraded to four laning by year 2025 as per concession agreement. Section 3 (Km to Km Two lane carriageway) Design Period Design Traffic Design CBR Pavement Composition, mm For 10 Years ( year 2023) 31 10% Note: This section will be upgraded to four laning by year 2031 as per concession agreement. Section 4 (Km to Km Four lane divided carriageway) Design Pavement Composition, mm Design Period Design CBR Traffic For 10 Years ( year 2023) 16 10% [IE s MPR, March ] Page 4

8 Service Road S. No. Pavement Composition Design Thickness (mm) Total Thickness (mm) 1 Semi Dense Bituminous Concrete (SD) 25 2 Dense Bituminous Macadam () 50 3 Wet Mix Macadam () Granular Sub-base () Sub grade with min 10% CBR Rigid Pavement for Toll Plaza Rigid Payment design submitted by Concessionaire and IE has reviewed & commented about the report. The length of Toll Plaza is 600 m each as per the IRC:SP: Pavement composition details for Rigid pavement in AP & TN Section: Sl.No. Parameters Pavement composition 1 PQC(M-40) 320 mm 2 DLC (M-10) 150 mm 3 Polythene sheet 125 micron mm 5 Sub grade with 10% CBR 500 mm 6 Contraction & Longitudinal spacing 4.0 m 7 Dowel Bar Diameter 32 mm 8 Length of dowel bar 500 mm 9 Spacing of dowel bar 270 mm 10 First dowel bar from pavement edge 150 mm 11 Diameter of tie bar (Deformed) 12 mm 12 Spacing of tie bar (Deformed) 490 mm 13 Length of tie bar (Deformed) 640 mm 14 Maximum Panel size considered in the design 4m x4m Future Overlay Intervention during the operation Period Section 1 (Km to Km ) Pavement Composition, mm Year Operation 2018 Functional Overlay Strengthening of existing pavement Functional Overlay Strengthening of existing pavement Functional Overlay Remarks Every 5 years overlay proposed. [IE s MPR, March ] Page 5

9 Section 2 (Km to Km ) Pavement Composition, mm Year Operation 2018 Functional Overlay Remarks Every 5 years overlay proposed 2025 Strengthening of existing pavement New construction of additional 2 lane Design MSA Functional Overlay Strengthening of existing pavement Functional Overlay Section 3 (Km to Km ) Pavement Composition, mm Year Operation 2018 Functional Overlay Remarks Every 5 years overlay proposed 2023 Strengthening of existing pavement Strengthening of existing pavement New construction of additional 2 lane Design MSA Functional Overlay Functional Overlay Section 4 (Km to Km ) Pavement Composition, mm Year Operation 2018 Functional Overlay Remarks Every 5 years overlay proposed Strengthening of existing pavement Functional Overlay Strengthening of existing pavement Functional Overlay [IE s MPR, March ] Page 6

10 TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS ADOPTING (Following at site): TCS TYPE Cross section details Drawing No. Revision TYPE I 4 lane divided carriageway for right side widening TTTCTPL/TCS-01 1 TYPE IIA 4 lane divided carriageway for left side widening TTTCTPL/TCS-02 1 TYPE-III 4 lane divided carriageway for concentric widening in rural area TTTCTPL/TCS-03 1 TYPE-IV 4 lane divided carriageway for bypass / realignment/reconstruction TTTCTPL/TCS-04 1 TYPE-V Underpass with service / slip roads / road approaches TYPE V-A Underpass without service / slip roads / road approaches TTTCTPL/TCS-05 1 TYPE VI 4 lane divided carriageway for concentric widening in urban area (4.5m median) with service roads TTTCTPL/TCS-06 1 TYPE VII 2 lane carriageway with paved shoulder for bypass / realignment - Right TYPE-VII-A Future 4 lane carriageway with paved shoulder for bypass / realignment Right TTTCTPL/TCS-07 1 TYPE-VIII TCS of 4 lane road for approach of ROB TTTCTPL/TCS-08 1 TYPE IX Present 2 lane carriageway with paved shoulder eccentric widening TYPE IX-A Future 4 lane carriageway with paved shoulder eccentric widening TTTCTPL/TCS-09 1 TYPE X Present 2 lane carriageway with paved shoulder symmetrical widening-right side TYPE X-A Future 4 lane carriageway with paved shoulder left side widening TTTCTPL/TCS-10 1 Present 2 lane carriageway with paved shoulder TYPE-XI symmetrical widening-left side TTTCTPL/TCS-11 1 TYPE-XI- Future 4 lane carriageway with paved shoulder right A side widening TYPE-XII Line Diagram of two to four lane TTTCTPL/TCS-12 1 TYPE-XIII TCS for super elevation for right curve TTTCTPL/TCS-13 1 TYPE-XIV TCS for super elevation for left curve TTTCTPL/TCS-14 1 TYPE-XV Overlay treatment to the existing pavement TTTCTPL/TCS-15 1 TYPE-XVI Avenue and median plantation TTTCTPL/TCS-16 1 TYPE- XVII TCS in hill cutting section TTTCTPL/TCS-17 1 TYPE- XVIII TCS approach cross section for high embankment TTTCTPL/TCS-18 1 [IE s MPR, March ] Page 7

11 CDM Smith India Pvt.Ltd 6. PROJECT LOCATION MAP Start of the Project Km KALUR KLM Hospital Km A.P. Border & T.N. Border Km AP, Km.0.0 TN End of the Project Km TIRUNINRAVUR [IE s MPR, March ] Page 8

12 7. STATUS OF MOBILIZATION OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEER (IE) SI No. Name Designation Key Personnel (Professional Staffs) Date Mobilized Remarks 1 Mr. Venkata Rama Rao Kaza Team Leader Mrs. Padmaja Jayakumar Sr. Bridge Design Engineer Mr. Gagan Trivedi Highway Design Engineer Mr.Gazi Muhammad Badruddoza Sr. Pavement Specialist Mr. Vittal Puvvada Traffic & Transportation Expert Mr. R. Krishna Murthy Road Safety Expert Mr. M. Shankar Narayanan Financial Expert Mr. J. Dhanvandh Legal Expert Sub-Professionals 1 Mr. K.Vasuram Asst. Highway Engineer Mr. J. Abilash CAD Expert Mr. Rajesh Varghese Environmental Engineer Mr. R. Anbarasan Asst. Quality cum Material Engineer Mr. Shashi Kanth Joshi Electrical Engineer Mr. V. Rangarajan HTMS/ Toll Expert Mr. G. Senthil Kumar Quantity Surveyor Dr. K. Malla Reddy Horticulture cum Landscaping Expert [IE s MPR, March ] Page 9

13 Independent Engineer [IE s MPR, March ] Page 10

14 8.0 INSPECTION AND MONITORING OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORKS. 8.1 Progress up to as per MIS Data collected from Concessionaire S No Description Target % Achieved % Ahead /- Behind % 1 Physical Progress Cumulative Physical Progress as per MIS: Data collected from Concessionaire Nov-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 July-12 Oct-12 Jan-13 Apr-13 July-13 Physical to Dec- to Mar- to June- to Sep to Dec- to Mar- to Jun- to Sep - Progress Oct-13 to Dec Jan-14 to Mar Oct-14 to Jan-15 to Dec-2014 Mar-2015 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 During this month (%) Cumulative Physical Progress (%) achieved Apr-14 to June July-14 to Sep Apr-15 to June July-15 to Sep Oct-15 to Dec Cumulative Financial Expenditure as per MIS: Data collected from Concessionaire (as per Statutory Auditors certificate) Capital Cost : Crores Nov-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 July-12 Oct-12 Jan-13 Apr-13 July-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Financial to Dec- to Mar- to June- to Sep to Dec- to Mar- to Jun- to Sep - to Dec- to Mar- to June- Expenditure July-14 to Sep - Oct-14 to Jan-15 to 2014 Dec-2014 Mar-2015 Apr-15 to June July-15 to Sep Oct-15 to Dec Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Monthly Expenditure (Rs.in Crores) Cumulative Expenditure (Rs.in Crores) Cumulative Financial Progress(%) Note: % 38.00% 52.54% 78.98% 87.57% 91.94% 94.92% 96.50% 98.07% 99.47% % % % % % % % % % % Expenditure for maintenance from Sep 15 to Mar 16 = 0.415Cr Cr= 0.435Crs.

15 Details of Completion of works in the entire Project Stretch. Cumulative Length 4 & 2 lane completed as per site: (See Page no-38) Lane wise AP Section Km. TN Section Km. Total 2 Lane Lane Total Total (B/S) Length Km. Progress in % % Details of Completion of Bituminous Concrete() works in the entire Project Stretch Cumulative Length 4 & 2 lane completed as per site: (See Page nos.39&41) Lane wise AP Section Km. TN Section Km. Total 2 Lane Lane Total Total (B/S) Length Km. Progress in % % [IE s MPR, March ] Page 12

16 8.2. ACHIEVEMENT OF PHYSICAL TARGETS FOR Sl. No Annual Plan Targets Target up to March-2016 for Annual Plan = 2.610Km Annual Plan Targets Total Sl. No Stretch NH No Length (in Km.) 1 Stretch 4/2 laning Tirupati- Chennai Section NH No Total Length (in Km.) Completed Length as on (in Km) 1 4/2 laning Tirupati- Chennai Section Completed Length as on (in Km) UI Length as on (in Km.) UI Length as on (in Km.) Item As per IE status Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Target Total 2.610Kms Achieve ment Ahead/ Behind Achieved = 0.000Km Item Target up to March-2016 for Annual Plan = 2.610Km As per Concessionaire MIS status Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Target Total 2.610Kms Achieve ment Ahead/ Behind Achieved = 0.000Km Target Vs. Achievement (Length in Km.) Target Vs. Achievement (Length in Km.) Total Up to Mar Total Up to Mar Remarks Completed 4/2 lane upto is Km. Remarks Completed 4/2 lane upto is Km. Page 13

17 STATUS OF DESIGN & DRAWINGS OF STRUCTURES AS ON Required by the Consultants Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/2133 dt General : 1.10: Cross section of VUP adopted is not in line with schedule D of CA/IRC and the same shall be suitably modified : Un mountable Krebs are to be modified Geotechnical Report 2.10: Bore holes shall be taken at all foundation locations as per IRC 78. S calculations, bore hole locations, Geological sections, Modified Geotechnical investigation report. Parameters for rock designation like RQD and core recovery are not presented 3.0 Design of abutment and pier GLS adopted in design and drawings, dead load reaction on abutment and pier, basis of vehicular load arrangement, base width of retaining structures, wind loads, live load surcharge, summary showing all load cases, effect of gap slab, reinforcement provided on non earth face of dirt wall, seismic zone, transverse reinforcement, estimation of steel in abutment Pedestal Typical design calculations for pedestals, Details of mesh below pedestals 5.0 Sub structures, foundation design drawings GLS, Type of bearings, steel provided on earth face of dirt wall, clear cover, dowel bars of pedestal reinforcement. 5.40: Minimum 100 MM gap is required between dirt wall and pedestal : Anti corrosive treatment bars 5.10 : Bore holes are to be taken at all foundation locations Items attended by the Concessionaire Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawings /2013/291 dt The concessionaire states that cross sections for Major bridges at and have been approved by the PD and hence the same were provided for VUP also Kerbs are provided as per the approval given by the PD for Major km and Only 2 bore holes were taken by the Concessionaire for which locations were also not mentioned. Attended by the Concessionaire Not furnished by the Concessionaire Attended by the Concessionaire Attended by the Concessionaire Furnished by the Concessionaire Concessionaire states that a gap of around 93 mm is provided and 100 mm gap is not required The Concessionaire gave reply on enclosing the NHAI circular Only 2 bore holes were taken by the Concessionaire for which locations were also not mentioned. Status of Review by Head office (1) The IE vide Ltr. No. CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /Design/0442, dt: has reviewed the Designs and drawings for substructure and foundations and returned the same to the Concessionaire with comments marked in RED. GFC drawings are to be submitted by the Concessionaire duly attending to these comments. Pending with the concessionaire. (2) CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/551, dt: The IE has reviewed the designs and drawings for super structure and returned the drawings to the Concessionaire with remarks marked in Red. GFC drawings are to be submitted duly attending to the comments. Pending with the Concessionaire. Page 14

18 Required by the Consultants Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/2133 dt Minimum no. of expansion joints, distance between expansion joints and bearings, transverse reinforcement for abutment, soil layers, founding strata, S calculations, bore hole location plan, Geotechnical investigation report, grade of concrete, dead load reaction on abutment, length of abutment, basis for vehicular load arrangement, base width of retaining wall, wind load calculations, foundation of abutment, development length, enforcement provided for heel slab, estimation of steel for abutment, design of pedestal, ground profile, thickness of wearing coat, minimum distance between two structures As per clause of IRC Sp Schedule D of CA " suitable permanent arrangements should be made for inspection of bearings from bridge deck". The same shall be incorporated Treatment for protecting structures shall be mentioned in the drawings Un-mountable kerbs are to be modified as per schedule-d IRC SP 84 of CA. 2.60: Parameters for rock designation like RQD and core recovery not presented 3.80 : Live load surcharge shall be included in span loaded condition 5.10 : Cross section of VUP Is not as per Sp and as per schedule-d of CA : Service roads are to be provided on both sides Replies furnished by the Concessionaire Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawings /2013/291 dt The concessionaire has furnished replies. The Concessionaire states that it is not mandatory and hence they have not provided the same. The Concessionaire states that the project site is more than 15 km. away from sea coast and hence the same is not required. 2 Major bridges at Ch and 310x095 were approved by the PD and the same are adopted here also. Not attended by the concessionaire Designs not modified. It is stated that the reason for not considering the same were explained in the meeting from to The cross section provided are as per the drawings approved by the PD for Major bridges at and Service roads not shown as they are not approved. Status of Review by Head office (1) The IE vide Ltr.No. CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /Design/0443, dt: has reviewed the Designs and drawings for substructure and foundations and returned the same to the Concessionaire with comments marked in RED. GFC drawings are to be submitted by the Concessionaire duly attending to these comments. Pending with the concessionaire. (2)CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design /551,dt: The IE has reviewed the designs and drawings for super structure and returned the drawings to the Concessionaire with remarks marked in Red. GFC drawings are to be submitted duly attending to these comments. Pending with the Concessionaire. Page 15

19 Required by the Consultants Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/2129 dt : Un-mountable kerbs are to be modified as per IRC SP 84 Km : Cross sections of VUPs not in line with the one mentioned in schedule D of CA and IRC SP Geotechnical Reports 2.10 : Bore holes are to be taken for the entire length Items attended by the Concessionaire Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawings /2013/291 dt Kerbs are provided as per the drawings approved by PD for Minor and Cross sections approved by the PD for Major and have been adopted. Only 2 bore holes, one at Pier and another at abutment A2 were taken. The Concessionaire mentioned that these are sufficient as per general practice. 2.40: Parameters for rock designation like RQD and core recovery are not Not attended by the Concessionaire presented. The same shall be included 3.30: Coefficient of friction considered for rock is Correction is required : Dead load reaction as abutment, length of abutment, vehicular load arrangement, stability of RCC retaining structure, vertical reaction due to breaking, wind load calculations, development length, design of footing, reinforcement Attended to by the Concessionaire. provided for heel slab, thickness of dirt wall, thickness of abutment cap, Transverse reinforcement provided for abutments, estimation of steel, slab provided on non earth face of dirt wall. 3.11: Lever arm for longitudinal seismic force not correct. Concessionaire says that it is correct. 4.00: RFL, GLS, Ground profile, Thickness of wearing coat, 20 mm gap between two structures. RCC girders, Dimension of abutments, type of bearings, shape and the thickness of abutment cap, mesh reinforcement for Jack, cover, development length, Dowel bars of pedestal reinforcement : Distance between inner face of dirt wall and pedestal shall be 100 mm (Min.) 4.16: Hooks shown for stirrups of vertical bars are not correct. 4.18: Anti corrosive treatment for reinforcement bars. 4.19: Additional bore holes are to be taken at A2 and in the approach portions of VUP. The Concessionaire states that Correction not required as per IRC Attended by the Concessionaire. Concessionaire provided 93 mm distance and states that it is not necessary to provide 100 mm. The concessionaire states that hooks provided are correct and that he has explained the same in the meeting held from to in Transstroy site office. Concessionaire gave the reply attaching NHAI circular on Not taken by the Concessionaire Status of Review by Head office (1) The IE vide Ltr.No. CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /Design/ 0444, dt: has reviewed the Designs and drawings for substructure and foundations and returned the same to the Concessionaire with comments marked in RED. GFC drawings are to be submitted by the Concessionaire duly attending to these comments. Pending with the concessionaire. (2) CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/551, dt: The IE has reviewed the designs and drawings for super structure and returned the drawings to the Concessionaire with remarks marked in Red. GFC drawings are to be submitted duly attending to these comments. Pending with the Concessionaire. Page 16

20 I. Major Bridges : Km & Required by the Consultants Compliance by Concessionaire Status of Review by Head office Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/2645 dt Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawings /2013/264 dt Designs and drawings were proof checked by IIT Chennai, reviewed by the PD and GFC drawings were issued. 1 copy of the drawings are required. 1 set of GFC drawings were submitted by the Concessionaire to the IE Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/2645 dt Designs and drawings not submitted Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/1662 dt ) Longitudinal and cross cut of walls 2) S of soil 3) Supporting calculation for spring constrains 4) Earth cushion 5) STAAD output 6) BMD 7) Shear check 8) Live load position Drawings: 1) Water Table 2) of bridges 3) Modifying of notes II. ROB : Km Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/ROB SS Design & Drawings/2013/332 dt Sub structure drawing were approved by Southern Railways vide letter no.w352/m165 dated Super Structure Drawings were approved by Southern Railway vide letter no W352/M/165 dated Minor Bridges : Km ( ) & ( ) Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawings /2013/290 dt Items (1) to (8) are attended by the Concessionaire. Items (1) to (3) under drawings are not attended by the Concessionaire Status of Review by Head office 1) The IE. (vide Ltr.No. CEI-PJ/ NHAI/ /Design/0433 dt has reviewed and returned the drawings to the concessionaire with comments marked in red and GFC drawings are to be submitted duly attending to the comments. (2) The Concessionaire has submitted GFC drawings vide Ltr.No. TTTCTPL/SPV/GFC drawings/2012/449, dt: (3) The Ho vide mail dated 04/12/2013 has informed that the Concessionaire has not submitted drawing No. TTTCTPL/STR/MISC /1004 which was said to be included in the GAD of Box minor Bridges. So far the Concessionaire has not submitted the drawing. Pending with the Concessionaire. Page 17

21 Minor Bridges : Km Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawings Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/1769 dt /2012/289 dt Observations on Hydrological report such as catchment area map, bed slope of review, HFL considered, Linear water way silt factor were sent to the Concessionaire. Minor Bridges : Km & Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/2244 dt ) Cross section of bridge is not in line with that suggested in schedule D of Concession Agreement. 2) Un-mountable kerbs are to be modified 3) Bore holes are to be taken for the entire length of the bridge 4) Typical wind load calculations 5) Live load surcharge 6) Estimation of steel in abutment, stress check for abutment shall be redone. Design and drawings were submitted. Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawings /2013/289 dt Major bridges at Km and were approved by the PD and the same are being followed. Only one bore hole is taken at A1 and Concessionaire states that additional bores are not required as per General practice. Concessionaire states that new wind load calculations were submitted, which do not govern the design. Hence there is no need for modification of design and drawings Not considered by the concessionaire. The concessionaire informed that the reasons for not considering the LL surcharge were explained in the meeting held from to The concessionaire states that these are not required. The concessionaire has submitted Geo technical reports vide Letter No TTTCTPL/SPV/Geotechnical/2014/758 Dated The designs and drawings are to be reviewed by IE Status of Review by Head office (1) The Ho vide Ltr.No. CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /Design/0434, dt: has returned the Design and drawings for substructure and foundation with comments marked in Red. GFC drawings are to be submitted by the Concessionaire duly attending these comments. Pending with the Concessionaire. (2) The HO vide Ltr. No. CEI- PJ/NHAI/ /Design/0478, dt: has returned the designs and drawings for super structure with comments marked in RED. The concessionaire has to submit the GFC drawings duly attending to these comments. Pending with the concessionaire. Page 18

22 Minor Bridge : Km Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/2446 dt Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawings /2013/289 dt ) Cross section of bridge is not as per IRC SP-84 Cross section of and which were approved by the PD have been adopted 2) un-mountable kerbs are to be modified Cross section of and which were approved by the PD have been adopted 3) Substantiation of HFL Not attended by the concessionaire 4) Bore holes shall be taken at all foundation locations. But only 1 bore hole is taken at abutment. Additional bore holes are to be taken. 5) Live load surcharge shall be included in span loaded condition 6) Reinforcement provided for toe slab to be modified. 7) Estimation of steel in abutment, stress check for abutment etc. shall be redone. Not complied with. Not attended by the Concessionaire stating that the reasons for not including LL surcharge were explained in the meeting held from to The Concessionaire states that as per IRC Cl minimum reinforcement to be provided is 0.15%, whereas they have provided 0.12% as per Cl of IRC Concessionaire states that it is not required as per design para meters are not changing. Status of Review by Head office 1) The Ho vide Ltr.No. CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /Design/0436, dt: has returned the Designs and drawings for substructure and foundations with comments marked in Red. GFC drawings are to be submitted by the Concessionaire duly attending to these comments. Pending with the Concessionaire. (2) The HO vide Lr. no. CEI- PJ/NHAI/ /Design/0478,dt has returned the drawings pertaining to super structure to the concessionaire with comments marked in RED. These comments are to be incorporated and GFC drawings are to be submitted by the concessionaire. Pending with the concessionaire. Page 19

23 Required by the Consultants Minor Bridge : Km & Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/1662 dt , Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/101013/Design/2259 dt ) Longitudinal and cross cut off walls 2) Hydrological report & scour depth calculations 3) S of Soil 4) Supporting calculations for spring constants 5) STAAD output shall be submitted 6) Values of SFD & BMD 7) BMD for dead load 8) Shear check 9) Live load position Drawings Notes shall be modified as per point 5. Replies furnished by the Concessionaire Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawings /2013/290 dt Items (1) to (9) were attended by the Concessionaire. Not attended by the concessionaire Status of Review by Head office 1) The HO vide Lr. no. CEI-PJ/NHAI / /Design/0433, dt has reviewed the designs and drawings for substructure and foundations and returned the drawings to the concessionaire with comments marked in RED and GFC drawings are to be submitted by the concessionaire duly attending to these comments. (2) The Concessionaire has submitted GFC drawings vide Ltr. No. TTTCTPL/SPV/GFC drawings/2012/449, dt: (3) The Ho vide mail dated 04/12/2013 has informed that the Concessionaire has not submitted drawing No. TTTCTPL/STR/MISC/1004 which was said to be included in the GAD of Box Minor Bridges. So far the Concessionaire has not submitted the drawing. Pending with the Concessionaire. Page 20

24 Box Culverts Ltr No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/549 dt Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPVGFC drawings/2012/448 dt. 05/09/ The IE has reviewed the design notes and drawings submitted as GFC 1. The concessionaire has submitted GFC drawings for the Box Culverts (161 No s) drawings and forwarded a copy to the Concessionaire. 2. Box Ch and The Concessionaire has not submitted designs and drawings. RE- WALLS 1 RE wall for RE wall for RE wall for RE wall for LHS Required by the Consultants Revised Drawings and Bearing & sliding analysis submitted vide L.No TTTCTPL/SPV/RE Wall/2013/382 dt Revised Plan, Elevation & Cut panel details, C/S of RE wall for VUP at Ch: with Compliance report submitted vide L.No. TTTCTPL/SPV/RE Wall/2013/408 dt Revised Drawings and Bearing & sliding analysis submitted vide L.No TTTCTPL/SPV/RE Wall/2013/382 dt Design and drawings for Maccaferri ParaWeb (Polymeric)Reinforced Soil wall for ROB approaches at Km LHS Gabion wall for Major Km Gabion wall for Major The revised design & drawings for the Gabion wall were submitted by the concessionaire vide Lr. No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Gabion wall/2013/407 dt Items attended by the Concessionaire The completed review of design and drawing during the design review meeting held in CDM Smith Office,Bangalore on andreturned the drawings to the Concessionaire with comments marked in RED,with a request to submit GFC drawings vide Lr.no.CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/0249 dated The Concessionaire has not submitted GFC drawings so far. The Concessionaire has submitted GFC drawings vide Ltr.no. TTTCTPL/SPV/RE Wall/2014/585, dt: Completed review during the Design Review Meeting held on CDM Smith Office, Bangalore on , and observation were communicated to the concessionaire vide Lr.No. CEI-Pj/NHAI / /Design/266,dt: , 2. The concessionaire has submitted Geotechnical report vide Lr. No. TTTCTPL/ SPV/ Geotechnical/2013/509, dt: and the Concessionaire has to furnish replies to the balance observations. The IE has reviewed the designs and drawings of RE wall and Communicated the observation to the Concessionaire vide letter no CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2014/942 dt: The Concessionaire has not yet submitted the compliance report. 1. The revised designs & drawings were reviewed and the observations were sent to the concessionaire vide Lr.No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/0428 dt: The concessionaire has submitted the designs and drawings of curtain wall vide Ltr. No. TTTCTPL/SPV/Curtain Wall/2013/505, dt: The IE has reviewed the designs and drawing for the curtain wall and forward the drawing to the Concessionaire for submission of GFC drawings vide Lr. CEI-Pj/ NHAI/TRP/ /2014/926 DT PENDING WITH THE Concessionaire. Page 21

25 Required by the Consultants Items attended by the Concessionaire Status of Reviewby Head office Major Ch Concessionaire has made revised submission without fully complying IE's observation discussed during the meeting held at CDM Smith office, Bangalore on a) Geotechnical Investigation report was submitted for 4 locations and report is to be submitted for 3 balance locations. b) Vide This Office Lr.no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ / 2014/954 dated , NCR STR No.28 was issued due to lesser thickness of deck slab and Concessionaire have to submit revised designs. a) Geotechnical Investigation report was submitted for 5 locations and report is to be submitted for 3 balance locations. b) Vide This Office Lr.no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ / 2014 /948 dated , NCR STR No.27 was issued due to lesser thickness of deck slab and Concessionaire have to submit revised designs. Concessionaire has not yet submitted compliance report. Major Ch a) i) Concessionaire submitted Geotechnical Investigation Report for balance 3 locations vide Lr. no. TTTCTPL/SPV/Geotechnical/2013/521 dated ii) Concessionaire submitted Design & drawings for Sub structure and Super structure vide Lr. no. TTTCTPL/SPV/Design & drawings/2013/531 dated b) Nil Major Ch a) i) Concessionaire submitted Geotechnical Investigation Report for balance 3 locations vide Lr. no. TTTCTPL/SPV/Geotechnical/2013/493 dated ii) Concessionaire submitted Designs and Drawings for Sub structure and Super structure vide Lr. no. TTTCTPL/SPV/PUP Drawings/2013/466 dated b) Nil Pending with Concessionaire. a) IE reviewed Designs and Drawings and observations were communicated vide CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/990 dated Modified Designs and Drawings are not yet submitted by Concessionaire. Pending with Concessionaire. b) N.A IE reviewed Designs and Drawings and observations were communicated vide CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/990 dated Modified Designs and Drawings are not yet submitted by Concessionaire. Pending with Concessionaire. b) N.A Page 22

26 Minor Ch , , , , , ) IE reviewed Designs and Drawings and informed Concessionaire to submit GFC drawings duly incorporating the comments MARKED IN RED vide Lr. no. CEIpj/NHAI/ /Design/0433 dated ) Concessionaire submitted GFC drawings vide Lr. no. TTTCTPL/SPV/GFC drawings/2012/449 dated ) Concessionaire has also submitted Typical drawing for Profile Corrective Course vide Lr. no. TTTCTPL/SPV/Drawing/2013/534 dated GFC drawings are to be issued by IE. Minor Ch , , HO vide mail dated as informed the Concessionaire that Designs and Drawings were with held for want of Geotechnical Investigation Reports. Concessionaire has submitted Geotechnical Investigation Reports vide Lr. no. TTTCTPL/SPVGeotechnical/2014/758 dated Designs and Drawings are to be reviewed by IE Minor Ch Concessionaire has not submitted Designs and Drawings. Pending with Concessionaire. Minor Ch Concessionaire has made revised submission without fully complying IE's observation discussed during the meeting held at CDM Smith office, Bangalore on Concessionaire has not yet submitted compliance report Pending with Concessionaire. Page 23

27 Ch ) IE has conveyed preliminary observations on the revised GAD of VUP vide Lr. no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/1767 dated ) After subsequent discussion during the review meeting on 30th and 31st October and 01st November 2012 at Tirupati, IE reviewed the revised GAD and geotechnical report of the above Ch , and informed the Concessionaire to submit modified Geotechnical Report justifying the recommended S as per relevant IS/IRC Codes. The Concessionaire has not submitted Compliance report so for. Pending with Concessionaire. Ch IE vide Lr. no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /Design/1483 dated has informed the Concessionaire that Designs and Drawings for the PUP were not submitted by the Concessionaire. The Concessionaire has not submitted Designs and Drawings so for. Pending with Concessionaire. Box Culverts Nos. Designs & Drawings submitted by the Concessionaire were reviewed by IE and comments were communicated vide Lr. no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2012/69 dated Revised drawings along with design notes for Box Culverts were submitted by Concessionaire vide Lr. no. TTTCTPL/SPV/Drawings/464 dated Drawings are to be approved by IE. Page 24

28 Highway (Designs & Drawings) up to March From Concessionaire From IE Reply from Concessionaire Letter No Dated Details Receiving date at IE office, Bangalore / Site office Concurred/ Not Concurred Letter No. Reply by IE Reply Status Compliance statement if any Letter Date Details No Reply/ Compliance Statement Letter No Dated Hard copies 1. Alignment Plan km to km Typical Cross Sections Mail Ltr No. TTTCTPL /SPV/Pave ment Design/20 12/167 Soft Copies via mail 1. AP-Junctions (Dwg No. : TTTCTPL/JN-001( ), , , , , , , , , , , , )-Rev R0 2. Pavement Design for existing Pavement 3. Pavement Report_New CW TTC 4. AP Final Through Visibility-SSD 5. AP section Through Visibility-SSD 6. AP section- Through Visibility for ISD 7. AP Section-Horizontal Alignment report 8. report-ap section 9. Curve details -AP 10. Median openings-ttc AP 11. Utility Duct-AP_ Vertical Alignment Report-AP 22/6/2012 6/7/ /7/12 Rigid Pavement design report Submission 30/7/12 Not Concurred Not Concurred Not Concurred CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2 012/ CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2 012/DRH CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2 012/1216 CEI- Pj/NHAI / /2012/D RH /7/12 1)18/7/12 2) 27/7/12 (pvmt report) 8/8/12 Compared the following details of Alignment Plan a. Horizontal Alignment b. At grade junctions c. Levels at random locations ( 1 per km ) d. Structure list with the Concession Agreement Reviewed: 1. Junction Drawings 2. Median Openings 3. Through Visibility 4. Pavement report Reviewed Rigid Pavement Design Report Compliance Statement Compliance Statement for Pavement Design Compliance Statement Ltr No TTTCTPL/ SPV/Drawing s/2012/168 Lr. No. TTTCTPL/ SPV/PDR/201 2/173 Ltr No. TTTCTPL/ SPV/PDR/2 012/19 28/7/2012 8/8/ /10/12 Page 25

29 From Concessionaire From IE Reply from Concessionaire Lr. No Dated Details Ltr No. TTTCTPL/ SPV/ 28/7/12 Drawings/2 012/168 Ltr No. TTTCTPL/ SPV/ profile/ie/2 012/1 Ltr No. TTTCTPL/ SPV/PDR/ 2012/173 2/7/12 8/8/12 Hard Copies of : 1. Design Standards 2. Details (RHS and LHS) AP section 3. Curve Details: AP Section 4. Junction Details : AP section 5. Utility Duct Crossing Details: AP Section 6. Through Visibility Report: AP Section 7. Plan and Profile Drawings: km to km (Dwg No. TTTCPL/PP-002 to PP-063)- 3 copies 8. Typical Cross sections - 3 copies a. Type I to Type XI :( EGIS/TTCP/EDR/TCS-01 to TCS-11) b. TCS for utility ducts: (TTTCTPL/UD-01) 9. Typical Drawings:- 3 copies a. Layout for Wayside Amenities: (TTTCTPL/AP- WAY/001) b. Layout of Toll Plaza: (TTTCTPL/AP-TOLL/001) Soft copies by Mail: 1. Replies to IE Comments Submission of Profile drawings from Km in Tiruchanur and from km km in Puttur for service roads on both sides in the state of AP. Clarification on pavement design for existing carriageway and new carriageway reg Receivin g date at IE office, Bangalo re/site office 28/7/12 30/7/12 27/8/12 Conc urred /Not Conc urred Not Conc urred Not Conc urred Not Conc urred Letter No. 0. CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2012/ CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2012/D RH CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2012/D RH CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2012/1 237 CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2012/D RH Reply by IE Letter Date 0) 31/7/12 1) 1/8/12 2) 8/8/12 31/7/12 28/8/12 Compliance statement if any No Reply/ Compliance Details Statement Ltr.No. Date Reviewed: 1. Curve Details: AP Section 2. Junction Details : AP section 3. Through Visibility Report: AP Section 4. Plan and Profile Drawings: km to km Typical Cross sections - 3 copies 6. Typical Drawings:- 3 copies 7. Replies to IE Comments 8. Replies to IE Compliance Report Reviewed Service Road Profile Clarifying the IE comments sent via IE Letter No. CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2012/1 216, Compliance statement Compliance statement Ltr No. TTTCTPL /SPV/PDR /2012/19 Ltr No. TTTCTPL /SPV/PDR /2012/19 10/10/12 10/10/12 No reply - - Page 26

30 From Concessionaire From IE Reply from Concessionaire Lr. No Dated Details Receiving date at IE office, Bangalore/ Site office Concurred/ Not Concurred Not Concurred Not Concurred Not Concurred Not Concurred Not Concurred Not Concurred Not Concurred Not Concurred Letter No. Reply by IE Letter Date CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2012/183 8/9/12 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2012/184 8/9/12 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2012/185 8/9/12 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2012/189 11/9/12 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2012/190 11/9/12 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2012/DRH /9/12 CEI-PJ-NHAI-TRP /9/12 No Reply/ Compliance Statement Compliance statement if any Details Letter No Dated Design of high embankment - height > 6m. Providing Metal beam crash barrier Providing 3.5m shelter lane at median opening locations Submission of TCS for 4-Lane to 2-Lane section from km to km Submission of road cross sections for 50m interval as per CA Review of Highway designs (Pending submissions) Providing 3.5m shelter lane at median opening location km Reg No reply - - No reply - - No reply - - No reply - - No reply - - Compliance not received Ltr No. TTTCTPL /SPV/PD R/2012/19 10/10/12 No reply - - CEI-PJ-NHAI-TRP DRH /9/12 Safety Audit Report Reg No reply - - Page 27

31 Ltr. No. Waiting official letter Ltr No. TTTC TPL/S PV/PD R/2012 /19 Date Received by mail from Transstroy on 1st Oct /10/12 From Concessionaire From IE Reply from Concessionaire Details Soft copies 1. Reply to IE letter No: CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2012/DRH dated August 8, Auto CAD Drawings: Plan and profile drawings from km to km (AP Section) 3. ECL to PCL distance 4. Copy of IE letter no CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2012/27 ( Regarding Pavement design Comments sent from site office) 5. Through Visibility Report 6. Busbay Locations 7. Vertical curve details 8. Median Opening Locations 9. HT line Details 10. Underpass Soffit Details 11. Summary of Letter numbers from IE that Concessionaire states that concurrence has been given Hard Copies 1. Plan and Profile Drawings to a. TTTCTPL/PP , , , (R3) b. TTTCTPL/PP-012,013, 018, 019, 021, (R5) c. TTTCTPL/PP-020, , , (R1) d. EGIS/TTCP/EDR/PP (R1) 2. Plan and Profile Drawings Service Road Profiles a. TTTCTPL/PP/SR-01,02, 037, 038 (R0) 3. TCS: a. TTTCTPL/TCS-01-07,07B,08,08B,09,10 (R1) 4. Layout of Median Opening: TTTCTPL/STD-MO-01 (R0) 5. Layout of Bus Shelter: TTTCTPL/STD-BS-01 (R0) 6. Layout of Toll Plaza: TTTCTPL/AP-TOLL/001 (R0) 7. Detailed Junction Layout at TTTCTPL/JN (R0) 8. Detailed Junction Layout at (No drawing No.) Receiving date at IE office, Bangalore/ Site office Waiting 12/10/12 Concurred/ Not Concurred Not Concurred Not Concurred Letter No. To Send CEI-PJ- NHAI- TRP DRH To send 1. CEI-PJ- NHAI- TRP DRH Reply by IE Lette r Date Details Reply for submissions received by mail on Oct 1st and reply for compliance statements made by EGIS for IE Letter No. CEI/Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/1238 and 1237 dated Reply for compliance statements No Reply/ Complianc e Statement No reply Compliance statement if any Lett er No Dated - - No reply - - Page 28

32 Ltr. No. TTTCTPL/SPV/ P&P/2012/221 dt TTTCTPL/SPV/ revised TCS/225 dt TTTCTPL/SPV/ P&P/2012/212 dt TTTCTPL/SPV/ GFC drawings /2012/269 dt TTTCTPL/SPV/ Design report& Gantry /2013/273 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Junction /2012/270 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Metallic crash barrier/2012/275 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Bus Bay /2012/277 From Concessionaire From IE Reply from Concessionaire Compliance Receiving Reply by IE Statement date No Reply/ if any Date Details at IE office, Compliance Bangalore / Letter Concurred/Not Letter No. Details Statement Letter No Dated Site office Date Concurred Plan & Profile drawings in TN Section Reviewed with comments TCS Drawings Approved Plan & Profile drawings in AP Section GFC drawings for AP section, P&P and TCS Over Head Gantry Design report & drawings Junction layout drawing in AP section Submission details of Metal Beam crash barrier` Bus Bay layout drawings for Two lane section Concurred Reviewed with comments Reviewed with comments Reviewed with comments CEI- Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/385, CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /HO/ 2461 CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /Desi gn/2282 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /HO/3048 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /HO/3716 CEI- Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/1011 CEIpj/NHAI/ /HO/ Compliance Submitted Compliance Submitted TTTCTPL/SP V/Compliance /2013/310 TTTCTPL/SP V/P&P/ /2013 / Reviewed with comments CEIpj/NHAI/ /HO/ Page 29

33 Ltr. No. TTTCTPL/SPV/co mpliance/2013/ 310 dt TTTCTPL/SPV/ Bus shelter/2013/324 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Signage plan/2013/326 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Median drain/2013/327 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Signage plan/2013/336 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Bus shelter design/2013/387 TTTCTPL/SPV/TC S/2013/540 TTTCTPL/SPV/Bo ards/2014/604 From Concessionaire From IE Reply from Concessionaire Compliance Receiving Reply by IE Statement date No Reply/ if any Date Details at IE office, Compliance Bangalore / Concurred/Not Letter No. Letter Date Details Statement Letter No Dated Site office Concurred P&P drawings compliance report TCS for Bus shelter (Drg.No. HIPL/ TRA/HYD/01) Signage location plan in AP section Median drain calculation in AP section Signage location plan in TN section Design calculation for Bus Shelter Submission of TCS- 18A Drawing drainage of with height above 3 m.(turffing) Drawings of Cantilever structures and pedestal boards for Toll plaza locations Reviewed with comments Reviewed with comments Reviewed with comments Reviewed with comments Reviewed with comments Reviewed with comments Reviewed with comments Reviewed with comments CEI-Pj/NHAI/HO/ CEI-Pj/NHAI/ / Design/0319 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ / Design/1075 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /HO/0043 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /HO/0001 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ TRP/ /2014/959 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /HO/0319 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2014/853 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2014/886 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2014/ Compliance statement Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV /Bus Shelter/ 2014/ CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2014/ Compliance statement Compliance statement Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV /Bus Shelter/ 2014/ Ltr No. TTTCTPL/SPV /Boards/ 2014/ Page 30

34 Ltr. No. TTTCTPL/SPV/ Toll plaza /2013/387 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Toll plaza /2013/401 TTTCTPL/SPV/ GFC Drawings/2012 /441 TTTCTPL/SPV/ GFC Drawings/2012/ 450 TTTCTPL/SPV/ PQC/2013/ 474 TTTCTPL/SPV/ at grade intersection/2013 /473 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Design & Drawing /2013/ 522 From Concessionaire From IE Reply from Concessionaire Receiving Compliance date Reply by IE Statement at IE if any No Reply/ Details office, Compliance Bangalore Letter Concurred/Not Letter No. Statement / Date Concurred Site office Date Submission of electric requirements for Toll Plazas New work details of Toll Plazas AP Section: GFC Drawings Submission of Revised P&P drawings of Highway in TN section Submission of PQC design for Toll plazas locations without reinforcement Submission of at Grade intersection drawings of Highway Submission of Drawing of Canopy for Toll Plaza at Km in AP Section Reviewed with Comments Review under progress Review under progress GFC issued Reviewed with Comments Reviewed completed Reviewed with Comments Reviewed with Comments CEI- Pj/NHAI/ /2014/ 870 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2014/877 CEI-Pj/NHAI/ /2014/ CDM/CEI/ / CDM/CEI/ / CDM/CEI/ / CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ / 2013/738 & CDM/CEI/ /114 CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ / 2014/852 Details Letter No Dated - Compliance Submitted TTTCTPL/ SPV/ electric requirement s/2014/ & Considerations enclosed in compliance Statement. TN Section Alignment Review Completed. Review Completed, Revised final report to the submitted for approval Comments for Grade intersection drawing for TN section Page 31

35 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Safety manual /2013/ 694 TTTCTPL/SPV/Ele ctrical requirements/2014/ 701 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Lighting Design /2014/ 707 TTTCTPL/SPV/ Highmast and Street light /2014/ 709 TTTCTPL/HO- CM/Bus shelter/ /2015/ Submission of electrical safety manual for toll plaza at Km ,Km and Temporary toll plaza at Km Submission of electrical requirements for temporary toll plaza in TN section at Km Submission of Illumination Design for Highmast lights, street lights for toll plazas, junctions and built up areas Submission of foundation details of Highmast poles, street lights pole of 12m height and brochure of Philips company for incorporating in locations of Toll plazas, junctions and built up areas. Submission of revised layout of Bus shelter Reviewed with Comments Reviewed with Comments Reviewed with Comments CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ / 2014/1041 CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ / 2014/1041 CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ / 2014/ Highmast lighting locations, street lighting found OK. Highmast lighting locations, street lighting found OK. Compliance Submitted Compliance Submitted TTTCTPL/ SPV/ electric requirement s/2014/ 719 TTTCTPL/ SPV/ electric requirement s/2014/ Page 32

36 8.4 Construction Program. Construction Program submitted to IE by the Concessionaire. IE requested clarifications regarding the programme vide Lr.no CEI-PJ/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/421 Dt , Compliance yet to be received. 8.5 Construction Safety Authority appointed M/s. HAKS Engineers as Road Safety Consultant. Reports for Dec-2011, Jan- 2012, Feb 2012, May 12, June 12, Aug 2012, Sept 2012, Oct 2012, Nov 2012, Dec-12 & Jan-13, April-2013,June-2013 and September-2013were submitted to the Project Director, PIU, Chennai. Road Safety Consultant also submitted 8th Construction Stage Safety Audit Report which was forwarded to Concessionaire by mail dated for compliance. Road Safety Consultant (RSC) conducted 9 th Construction Safety Work Zone Audit on and report is submitted and forwarded to the Concessionaire for compliance. The 5 th Cycle of Traffic Volume Count Survey was conducted by M/s HAKS Road Safety Consultant, from to at Km and Speed & Delay was conducted from Km to and to of this Project.IE reviewed the Traffic volume count and Speed and Delay Reports and observation were communicated to PD.NHAI vide letter no CDM/CEI/ /097 dt RSC conducted 10 th work zone audit on and report is submitted and report is forwarded to Concessionaire for Compliance. Compliance is not yet received so far. Authority forwarded the 10 th work zone audit report to IE for comments and compliance vide letter no: NHAI/18011/97/PIU.Chennai/1837 dated IE has submitted the comments on this report to Authority vide letter no:cei-pj/nhai/trp/ /2014/1023 dated RSC has submitted the Accident Analysis Report#2 during construction stage covering the period Oct 13 to May 14,PD has forward this report to IE vide letter no: NHAI/18011/97/PIU.Chennai/1835 dated IE has submitted the comments on this report to Authority vide letter no:cei- Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/1056 dated Accident Analysis Report#2 has been forwarded to Concessionaire, no compliance is received from Concessionaire so far. Concessionaire has not submitted Compliance for RSC observations for Work Zone Audits Oct-2011 to May-2014 (Total #10 Audit reports) and Accident Analysis report 2 audit reports. M/s HAKS RSC conducted Comprehensive Road safety Audit in PCC stretches on and submitted the report vide Lr no NHAI/18011/97/09/PIU. Chennai/112,dt IE submitted the observations on RSC Audit report to Authority vide Lr.no CEI-Pj/NHAI/ TRP/ /2015 /1197,dt Concessionaire submitted the compliance report on road Safety Audit vide Lr.no Lr.no TTTCTPL /SPV/Safety Report/2015/815, dt IE forwarded the Concessionaire compliance report with IE comments to Authority vide Lr.no CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015 /1209,dt IE and Concessionaire conducted the 27 th Road Safety week 2016 successfully in the Project Highway with slogan of Road Safety Time for Action The report with all activities conducted during celebration submitted to Authority vide Lr.no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2016 /1419, dt

37 8.6 Method Adopted in Construction. The method of construction adopted is being regularly checked and reviewed by the IE duly conducting field and laboratory tests on compaction and whether materials used are in compliance with specifications and standards. IE regularly checking the works through RFI s raised by Concessionaire. IE attending minimum 10% RFI s for checking the works. 8.7 Conformity of Construction Works The source of materials used for construction works are being regularly checked by IE for conformity with the specifications and standards. Routine checks are being regularly conducted by the IE field team. The Team Leader and Key Personnel have also attended some tests like Concrete Cube strengths testing, Core thickness, Gradations, Bituminous Extractions tests etc. during their site visits. Castings of RCC/PSC girders are in progress at bridge locations and regularly inspected by IE field team. 8.8 Defects and Deficiencies The IE supervising staff are regularly visiting site and Laboratory. Any major defects in respect of materials/construction when noticed are being reported in the MPR.

38 8.9. Non Conformance Reports (NCRs) (Refer Pg No ) Month Wise status of NCRs (started from May-2012) Month Issued Closed Balance May' June' Jul' Aug' Sept' Oct' Nov' Dec' Jan' Feb' Mar' Apr' May' June' July' Aug' Sept' Oct' Nov' Dec' Jan' Feb' Mar' Apr' May' June' July' Aug' Sept' Oct' Nov' Dec' Jan' Feb' Mar' Apr' May' June' July' Aug Sept' Oct' Nov' Dec' Jan' Feb' Mar' Total

39 8.10. Maintenance of the Existing 2- lane highway The Competent Authority of NHAI has approved the proposal for handing over the Existing Lanes of Bypassed stretches of NH-205 in the State of Tamil Nadu to Highways Deportment, Govt.of Tamil Nadu and the same has been Complied by PD,PIU,NHAI.vide Letter no NHAI/18011/97X/09/ PIU. Chennai/698 dt The Authority vide Lr.no.NHAI/18011/97/PIU.Chennai/2316 dt informed the Superintending Engineer (R&B), Chittoor Circle that the Existing old Vadamalapeta Road was deemed to be handed over to R&B Dept. with effect from as the traffic is plying on the bypass road. Regarding the balance existing stretches, proposals are awaited from Concessionaire for handing over to R&B Dept. Govt. of AP Road Accident Report Concessionaire is neither obtaining Accident occurring Reports from Police Stations nor submitting to IE in FIR reporting format. The Concessionaire is reporting about the accidents whichever noticed during their inspection (See Annexure-v, Pg No.95) Survey Works 1. Checking of GPS points and Reference Pillars from Km to Km is completed in TN Section. Balance checking in remaining Kms. is in progress. 2. Checking of Top level of all layers is being done (, Sub-grade,,,, & DLC). 3. Checking of layouts for all structures is being done 4. Layout checking of Toll plaza, VUP, ROB/ RE walls. 5. Checking of utility, collecting and updating of LA details of AP & TN section Review and Concurrence of Materials in March No Review and Concurrence of Materials in this month Requests for Inspection (RFI) RFIs are being taken care of by field staff of IE regularly Physical Works Programme The concessionaire has submitted the physical work programme without S-curve and target and achievements. IE is continuously pursuing for incorporation of same. Concessionaire is advised to submit the work programme with break up particulars in details at the earliest Planned Weightage Physical Progress. The Concessionaire has not submitted the weightage of physical progress Progress Report from the Concessionaire The Concessionaire not submitted their Monthly Progress Report from July-2014 to March

40 8.18 Dignitary s Site Visit: On Shri D.SurendraNath Dy. General Manager (Tech) & Project Director, NHAI Chennai visited AP and TN Section Completed Bituminous Concrete () March Kms Bituminous Concrete is completed (LHS/RHS) of AP & TN sections up to the month of March (The details are enclosed in page no.39 & 41) IE Factory Visit Report: No IE Factory visit during the month Supply of Video Recording As per Concessionaire Agreement Clause: 13.6, Concessionaire has to take Video Recordings for the 13 th, 14 th,15 th,16 th and 17 th Quarter ending with March ,covering the activities during the 13 th, 14 th,15 th,16 th & 17 th Quarter. Video recording not submitted by concessionaire in AP Section and TN section. Concessionaire vide Lr.no.CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1287,dt , Lr.no. CEI- Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1358,dt , CEI-Pj/ NHAI/TRP/ /2016 /1409,dt and CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2016 /1472,dt was reminded to furnish the same on top priority Toll Plazas : Toll Plaza Drawing for Km (A.P. Section) and Canopy Designs submitted to IE. Drawings reviewed and commented and communicated. Compliance is yet to be received from the Concessionaire. Temporary Toll Plaza in TN Section: No drawings were submitted for Construction of Temporary Toll Plaza. However, Concessionaire proceeded with execution.

41 9.0 Progress of Road Works The Concessionaire continued road work in all areas at different stages, where the land is available without encumbrances. With regard to road works upto the end of March , the length of completed is Km. and completed is Km of A.P & T.N. Sections. PROGRESS OF ROAD WORK UPTO ( AP & TN SECTION) 4 Lane Section :- Total length of AP & TN = Km = Km. AP SECTION TN SECTION Total Total S.n Completed Completed Completed Completed Length Length Description o Length Length Length Length RHS Completed Completed LHS (Km) RHS (Km) LHS (Km) (Km) LHS (Km) RHS (Km) % % 60.47% 2 top % 64.07% 3 top % 64.21% 4 top % 65.48% 5 Sub Grade % 65.48% % 65.65% 2 Lane Section :- Total length of AP & TN = Km = Km. S.n o Description AP SECTION Completed Length LHS (Km) Completed Length RHS (Km) TN SECTION Completed Length LHS (Km) Completed Length RHS (Km) Total Length Completed LHS (Km) Total Length Completed RHS (Km) Up to Mar-16 Progress in LHS Up to Mar-16 Progress in LHS % Up to Mar -16 Progress in RHS % Up to Mar -16 Progress in RHS % % 97.93% 2 top % 98.02% 3 top % 98.15% 4 top % 98.16% 5 Sub Grade % 98.23% % 98.26%

42 9.1 A.P. SECTION: PROGRESS UPTO MARCH Laning: Section 1 (Km: to Km: ) A.P. Section This Total Cumulative Cumulative S.n o Description Up to Month Length in length LHS Progress Feb- 16 LHS Km (Km) LHS (Mar-16) Up to Feb- 16 This Month RHS (Mar-16) Cumulative Length RHS (Km) Cumulative Progress RHS % % 2 top % % 3 top % % 4 top % % 5 Sub Grade % % % % 2 Laning: Section 2 (Km: to Km: ) A.P. Section S.n o Description Total Length in Km Up to Feb- 16 This Month LHS (Mar-16) Cumulative length LHS (Km) Cumulative Progress LHS Up to Feb- 16 This Month RHS (Mar-16) Cumulative Length RHS (Km) Cumulative Progress RHS % % 2 top % % 3 top % % 4 top % % 5 Sub Grade % % % % Completed Stretches A.P. Section (LHS/RHS) Upto March 2016 Length : Km. S.no 4 Laning LHS/RHS Length 2 Laning LHS/RHS Length From To (Km.) From To (Km.) Total (Km.) Total (Km.) & 2 Laning LHS/RHS Total length Km %

43 Service Road Progress A.P. Section S.n o Description Total Length in Km Up to Feb- 16 This Month LHS (Mar-16) Cumulative length LHS (Km) Cumulative Progress LHS Up to Feb- 16 This Month RHS (Mar-16) Cumulative Length RHS (Km) Cumulative Progress RHS 1 SD % % 2 top % % 3 top % % 4 top % % 5 Sub Grade % % % % 9.1 T.N. SECTION: PROGRESS UPTO MARCH Laning: Section 3 (Km: to Km: ) T.N. Section This Total Cumulative S.n o Description Up to Month Length in length LHS Feb- 16 LHS Km (Km) (Mar-16) Cumulative Progress LHS Up to Feb- 16 This Month RHS (Mar-16) Cumulative Length RHS (Km) Cumulative Progress RHS % % 2 top % % 3 top % % 4 top % % 5 Sub Grade % % % % 4 Laning: Section 4 (Km: to Km: ) T.N. Section This Total Cumulative S.n o Description Up to Month Length in length LHS Feb- 16 LHS Km (Km) (Mar-16) Cumulative Progress LHS Up to Feb- 16 This Month RHS (Mar-16) Cumulative Length RHS (Km) Cumulative Progress RHS % % 2 top % % 3 top % % 4 top % % 5 Sub Grade % % % %

44 2 Laning full width (LHS/RHS): (Km: to ) T.N. Section S.no Description Total Length in Km Up to Feb - 15 This Month BHS (Mar-16) Cumulative Length BHS (Km) Cumulative Progress BHS % 2 top % 3 top % 4 top % 5 Sub Grade % % Completed Bituminous Concrete () Stretches TN Section upto March Length = Km Sl. no From 2-Laning LHS / RHS To Laning LHS / RHS Length in Km From To Length in Km Total Total & 2 Laning LHS/RHS Total length Km %

45 10. LAND ACQUISITION and UTILITY SHIFTING Data collected from Concessionaire Concerned AP Ha. Departmen Activity Month Total area required for the Project : Hect. TN Ha. Cummulative Possession Handed over area in Sqm Possession % of Land Andhra Pradesh Tamil Nadu Total in Ha. (a+b) Handed over area in Sqm. Handed over Apr % May % June % Remarks Appointed dt Revenue Department Landacquisition June % July % Aug % Sep % Oct % Nov % Dec % Jan % Feb % Mar % Apr % May % June % July % Aug % Sept % Oct % Nov % Dec % Jan % Feb % Mar % Apr % May % June % July % Aug % Sep % Oct % Nov % Dec % Jan % Feb % Mar % Apr % May % June % July % Aug % Sep % Oct % Nov % Dec % Jan % Feb % Mar % Apr % May % June % July % Aug % Sep % Oct % Nov % Dec % Jan % Feb % May % Total Sqm Total Ha End of 90days

46 Land Pending issues in AP section (from Km to = Km) Sl. No. 1 AP State Details of Notification Village Name 3D published on Award is pending Extent of Area proposed for Acquisition (Sqm) Effected length in Km Gajulamandyam Remarks This includes Gajulamandyam built up area of 650m totally affected of the total length from Km which is 3.75 Km. Includes Entry junction of 2 AP Vadamala Vadamalapeta bypass of 300 m in length (Km) From To AP Award is approved. Kadirimangalam Disbursement of 4 AP compensation to land Padiredu owners is to be expedited This includes way side 5 AP S.V.Puram amenities length of 200m and Toll plaza length of 600m and exit ramp of Vadamalapet Village Sub Total (a) Kms (or) say Ha 6 TN Patterai Perumbudur-B TN Tirupatchur TN Vedanginallur TN Perumalpattu TN 3A Published Ayathur TN Veppamputtu TN Pakkam TN Thiruninravur TN Thaneerkulam TN Kakkalur TN Thozhur LPS under progress 17 TN Sirukadal TN Survey for Additional land to be taken up Land Pending issues in TN section (from Km0+000 to = Km) Sevvapet Sub Total (b) Kms (or) say Ha Grand Total (a+b) (or) say Kms Ha Water Bodies 1 TN Pullarampakkam Tank Km Km TN NOC from Govt. of Ekkadu Tank Km Km TN Tamilnadu is awaited. Km Km Thaneerkulam Km Km TN Pakkam Tank Km Km Sub Total Km (or) say Ha Abstract AP section Land TN section (a) Land TN section (b) Water bodies Total Ha Kms

47 Toll Plaza Sl. No. From To Length in m Village Name m S.V.Puram(AP) Remarks The additional land required for Toll plaza at km in AP is yet to be handed over. Award is approved and disbursement of compensation is in progress (CA location) m Sevapet(TN) The additional land required for Tollplaza at Km in TN is yet to be acquired PattaraiPerum budur A(TN) Temporary Toll plaza location is published in Gazette S.O.2776(E) dated Operation of Toll Plaza: The Concessionaire completed the project except certain outstanding items shown under Punch List. All the tests as per Schedule-I of Concessionaire Agreement are successful and the Project Highway can be safely and reliably placed in commercial operation. Accordingly Independent Engineer issued Provisional Certificate for the stretch between Tirupati-Tiruthani-Chennai Section on NH-205 on Vide Lr.no CDM/CEI/ /865 date All the items in the Punch List shall be completed by the Concessionaire within 90 (ninety) days of the date of issue of the Provisional Certificate. The Toll Plaza at Km (AP) and Km (TN) are operational w.e.f 07.00hrs of 01st March The Concessionaire has not commenced any Punch list items till Wayside Amenities Sl. No. From Area (Hect) Village Name (RHS) - 2 S.V.Puram To Reason Award is approved. Disbursement of compensation to land owners is in progress 2 CA: Km LHS (Nabalur Village) - 2 Ayathur Village (IOCL location) Proposed by NHAI to utilize the land already acquired in the IOCL Km pipe line stretch- LHS. Approval for Change of location from CA location (Km LHS) is awaited from Competent Authority,NHAI.

48 Status of Estimates pending for shifting of various utilities and payment of supervision charges. See Annexure x : Consolidated statue of Shifting of Utilities in AP Section.(Page no 117) See Annexure xi : Abstract of Electrical Estimates in TN Section. (TNEB) (Page no ) See Annexure xii: Water Pipe line Estimates in TN Section. (Page no 120) LIST OF RELIGIOUS STRUCTURES IN A.P SECTION. SL. NO Proposed LHS Sai baba Temple Types of Structure RHS Radhagovidha Swamy Temple Mandal Renigunta Renigunta Status Yet to be removed Yet to be removed Snake Den Renigunta Removed Ganapathi Renigunta Yet to be removed Temple Manamma Temple Renigunta Yet to be removed Angaramma Temple Puttur Yet to be removed Vinayaka Temple Sri Rama Temple Mariyamma Temple Puttur Puttur Puttur Yet to be removed Removed Removed Vinayaka Temple Puttur Yet to be removed Sri Rama Puttur Yet to be removed Temple Vinayaka Temple Puttur Removed Muttu Marriyamma Temple Nagari Yet to be removed Kanamma Temple Nagari Yet to be removed Vinayaka Temple Nagari Yet to be removed Local God Removed Old Mandapam Old Mandapam Nagari Yet to be removed Dandu Marriyamma Temple Nagari Removed Hanuman Temple Nagari Yet to be removed Bethel Sharon Church Nagari Yet to be removed Total Structures 20nos. (LHS side -9nos RHS side-11nos)

49 LIST OF RELIGIOUS STRUCTURES IN T.N SECTION SL.N Types of Structure O Proposed LHS RHS Status Annapurnamma Temple Yet to be removed Easwar Temple Yet to be removed Mandapam Yet to be removed Temple Yet to be removed Navagraha Temple Removed Temple Removed Durgamma Temple Yet to be removed Ammavari Temple Removed Maaramma Temple Yet to be removed Angalamma Temple Yet to be removed Vinayak & Perumal Yet to be removed Mahakalia Temple Yet to be removed Church Yet to be removed Church Yet to be removed Total Structures 14nos. (LHS side -8nos RHS side-6nos)

50 11. Progress of Structures up to March The Concessionaire continued to work on structures both in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu sections. The Concessionaire has to put in extra concentration on the structural works. (The details of progress of works are in Annexure viii, page nos ) 4-LANE AP Section 2 LANE Total Completed In progress Yet to start In Yet to Description LHS RHS LHS RHS LHS RHS LHS RHS Total Completed progress start Box Culvert Slab Culverts (widening) Pipe Culverts (widening) Minor Bridges Major Bridges ROB VUP PUP LANE TN Section 2 LANE Total Completed In progress Yet to start In Yet to Description LHS RHS LHS RHS LHS RHS LHS RHS Total Completed progress start Box Culvert Slab Culverts Minor Bridges Major Bridges ROB VUP PUP

51 2.1 Progress of Quality Control Report of March : A.P-Section Monthly Progress Report March ( I.E. Witnessed) (A.P SECTION) No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed OGL/ Emb/ Subgrade/Borrow Area/Shoulder/Median Filling No.of Tests Failed No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Faile No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed A GSA 1 Test/1500M B L.L & P.L 1 Test/1500M C Proctor 1 Test/1500M D FSI 1 Test/1500M E CBR 1 Test/3000M F FDD ( OGL) 1 Test/1000M G FDD(Emb) 1 Test/3000M H FDD(Sub) 1 Test/3000M I RE Wall 1 Test/3000M A Gradation 1 Test/200M B L.L & P.L 1 Test/200M C 10% Fines value 1 Test/Source D Proctor As Required E CBR As Required F WA As Required G FDD 1 Test/500M A Gradation 1 Test/100M B L.L & P.L 1 Test/100M C AIV 1 Test/200M D EI & FI 1 Test/200M E Proctor As Required F Specific Gravity 1 Test/Source g FDD 1 Test/500M Prime coat 4 A Quality of Binder No.of samples B Rate of Spray 1 Test/500M Tack coat 5 Sl.no Description of Test Up to February This Month (March ) Cumulative Total (Up to March ) A Quality of Binder No.of samples B Rate of Spray 1 Test/500M No.of Tests Failed

52 Bitumen (VG30) / (CRMB-60) No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Faile No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed A Softening point B Ductility No.of samples C Sp..Gravity per Lot D Penetration / A Gradation 2 Test/Day /Plant B Marshall 2 Test/Day Stability /Plant C Control of Binder 2 Test/ Day content /Plant D AIV 1 Test/50M E EI & FI 1 Test/50M F Stripping value As Required G Soundness As Required H Sand Equivalen As Required I Sp..Gravity& 1 Test/Source J Core Density 1 Test/250M Cement Tests 8 Sl.no A Fineness No.of samples B Consistency No.of samples C Initial & Final No.of samples Compressive Strength of Cement Cubes A 3 Days B 7 Days C 28 Days Coarse Aggregates Description of Test A Gradation One Test for everydays B AIV work of each fraction of coarse aggregate and fine C EI & FI aggregate initially : may be relaxed later at the Up to February This Month (March ) Cumulative Total (Up to March ) D Sp..Gravity& WA discretion of the Engineer No.of Tests Failed

53 Sl.no Fine Aggregates Description of Test Up to February No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed (March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Test Conducted This Month No.of Tests Faile Cumulative Total (Up to March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Failed 11 B A Gradation Sp..Gravity& WA Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes 12 One Test for everydays work of each fraction of coarse aggregate and fine aggregate initially : may be relaxed later at the discretion of the Engineer M M M M Days M M M M M M M M Days M M M M

54 Sl.no Monthly Progress Report March ( I.E. Witnessed) (T.N SECTION) Description of Test OGL a GSA 1 Test/ 1500 M3 b LL & PL 1 Test/ 1500 M3 1 c Proctor 1 Test/ 1500 M3 d FSI 1 Test/ 1500 M3 e CBR 1 Test/ 3000 M3 f FDD 1 Test/ 1000 M2 Emb/Subgrade/Borrow Area/Median Filling a GSA 1 Test/ 1500 M3 b LL & PL 1 Test/ 1500 M3 c Proctor 1 Test/ 1500 M3 2 d FSI 1 Test/ 1500 M3 e CBR 1 Test/ 3000 M3 f FDD(Emb) 1 Test/ 1000 M2 g FDD(Sub) 1 Test/ 500 M2 a Gradation 1 Test/ 200 M3 b LL & PL 1 Test/ 200 M3 c 10 % 1 Test/ Fines Value Source 3 d Proctor As Required e CBR As Required f WA 1 Test/ Source g FDD 1 Test/ 500 M2 Up to February No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed No.of Test Conducted This Month (March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed (Up to March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Test Conducted Cumulative Total No.of Tests Failed

55 Sl.no a b c d e f g Description of Test Gradation LL & PL AIV EI & FI Proctor Specific Gravity FDD Prime Coat 1 Test/ 100 M3 1 Test/ 100 M3 1 Test/ 200 M3 1 Test/ 200 M3 As Required 1 Test/ Source 1 Test/ 500 M2 No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed No.of Test Conducted (March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed (Up to March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Failed a Quality of No of Sample Binder per Lot b Rate of Spray 1 Test/ of Binder 500 M Tack Coat a Quality of No of Sample Binder per Lot b Rate of Spray 1 Test/ of Binder 500 M Bitumen Test(VG-30) a Softening Point b Ductility No of Sample per Lot c 25 C Bitumen Test(CRMB) a Softening Point b Elastic No of Sample recovery per Lot c 25 C Up to February This Month Cumulative Total

56 Sl.no a b c d e 9 f Description of Test Gradation Marshall Stability Control of Binder content and grading of mix AIV EI & FI Stripping Value 2 Test/Day/ Plant 2 Test/Day/ Plant 2 Test/Day/ Plant 1 Test/ 50 M3 1 Test/ 50 M3 Up to February No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed No.of Test Conducted This Month (March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed (Up to March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Test Conducted Cumulative Total No.of Tests Failed As Required g Soundness As Required h i j a b c d e f g h i j Sand Equvalent Specific Gravity Density of Compacted Gradation Marshall Stability Control of Binder content and AIV EI & FI Stripping Value Soundness Sand Equvalent Specific Gravity Density of Compacted As Required Test/ Source Test/ 250 M2 2 Test/ Day/Plant 2 Test/ Day/ Plant 2 Test/ Day/ Plant 1 Test/ 50 M3 1 Test/ 50 M3 As Required As Required As Required 1 Test/ Source 1 Test/ 250 M

57 Sl.no No.of Test Conducted No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed No.of Test Conducted (March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Tests Failed (Up to March ) No.of Tests Passed No.of Test Conducted Cement-Test a Fineness No of Sample per Lot b Consistency No of Sample per Lot c Initial & No of Sample Final setting per Lot Compressive Strength of Cement mortar cubes 12 a 3 Days b Cement 7 Days c Morter Cubes 28 Days a Gradation b Description of Test Specific Gravity WA Up to February This Month Cumulative Total Coarse Aggreegate One test for a Gradation every day's work of each fraction b AIV of coarse and fine agg c FI initially:may be d relaxed later at Specific the discretion of Gravity the Engineer Fine Aggreegate One test for every day's work of each fraction of coarse and fine agg initially:may be relaxed later at the discretion of the Engineer Compessive Strength of Concrete No.of Tests Failed Cubes a M b M c M c M30 7 Days d M e M f M a M b M b M c M30 28 Days d M e M f M

58 13. Weather Report of March AP Section Data collected from Concessionaire. Temperature S.No. Date Max ( o C) Min ( o C) Humidity (%) Rain Fall in mm Sunny day Sunny day Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny day Sunny day Sunny day Sunny day Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny day Sunny day Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny and very warm Sunny day Sunny day Sunny and very warm Sunny day Sunny day Sunny day Sunny day Total Rainfall (mm) 0 Weather

59 Weather Report of March T.N. Section Data collected from Concessionaire. Temperature Humidity S.No. Date Max ( o C) Min ( o C) (%) Rain Fall in mm Sunny day Sunny day Sunny Sunny Sunny Sunny Sunny Sunny Sunny day Sunny day Sunny day Sunny day Sunny Sunny Sunny Sunny day Sunny day Sunny Sunny Sunny Sunny Sunny Sunny Sunny and very warm Sunny day Sunny day Sunny and very warm Sunny day Sunny day Sunny day Sunny day Total Rainfall (mm) 0 Weather Remarks

60 14. PLANTS AVAILABLE AT SITE: PLANTS IN ANDHRA SECTION Sl. No. Description Nos. Status 1 Puzzulona Crusher Plant -200 TPH 1 In Operation 2 Mobile Crusher Plant -200 TPH 1 In Operation 3 Apollo Wet Mix Plant -200 TPH 1 In Operation 4 Speco Hot Mix Plant 160 TPH 1 In Operation 5 Schwing Stetter Batching Plant -60 cum/hr 1 In Operation Sl. No. PLANTS IN TAMILNADU SECTION Description Nos. Status 1 Puzzulona Crusher Plant -200 TPH 1 In Operation 2 Puzzulona Crusher Plant -200 TPH - 3 Metso Crusher Plant 240 TPH - 4 Hot Mix Plant Linnhoff 160 TPH - 5 Plant Mac Mix 200 TPH - 6 Batching Plant Stetter 60cum/Hr - 1 no - Removed from site on no. removed from site on no - Removed from site on no - Removed from site on no - Removed from site on

61 15. COMMENTS OF TEAM LEADER: 1. Progress: The cumulative financial progress reported by Concessionaire up to March is % (Rs Crores). Break up details are not submitted by the Concessionaire in spite of several reminders. Concessionaire completed Kms (80.85%) of and Kms (79.60%) of. Concessionaire commenced and completed the Service Road Works up to level (Not covered in CA but recommended by IE to the Client as Change of Scope for an extra width of Thiruchanoor VUP at Ch Puttur VUP at Ch Punch list items: There is no initiative from Concessionaire for commencement of punch list items. Regular pursuation with Concessionaire vide Letter no CDM/CEI/ /865 dt and CEI- Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/ 1265 dt does not yield any result. An amount of Rs 3,42,60,000/- is worked out towards recovery of damages from the Concessionaire for the period from to ie for 120 days which period is allowable, beyond the initial period of 90 days as per Clause of CA and reported to the Authority vide lr.no CEI-Pj/ NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1351 dt with a request to recover damages from Concessionaire and also to issue an intention of Termination Notice to the Concessionaire under Clause of CA. As no notice was issued to the Concessionaire, the Authority was once again requested to take necessary action against the Concessionaire vide Lr.no CEI-Pj/ NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1370 dt Since there is no response from the Concessionaire for commencement of Punch list items, and also as no action is taken by the Authority against to Concessionaire an amount of Rs8,82,19,500/- is worked out towards damages for the Period from to ,for not complying the Punch list items beyond the admissible period and informed the Authority to recover the damages from the Concessionaire vide Lr no CEI-Pj/ NHAI/TRP/ /2016/1469 dt In addition to it, the IE strongly recommended to the Authority to issue Termination notice to the Concessionaire. 3.Non Submission of MPRs: Concessionaire stopped submission of MPRs since July There is no response to IE s Letter no CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/1082dt , Letter no CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP / /2015/1220 dt and Letter no CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/ 1235 dt and Letter.no CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/ 1286 dt ,cei-pj/nhai/ TRP/ /2015/1321 dt ,cei-pj/nhai/trp/ /2015/1342.dt , CEI-Pj/ NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1356.dt ,CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1376.dt , CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1386.dt , CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2016/ dt , CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP / /2016/ dt ,CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP / / 2016/1446. dt and CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP / / 2016/1470. dt Authority is requested to direct the Concessionaire for submission of same to the IE. 4. Non-Closure of NCRs: 15 Nos. are still pending for closure by Concessionaire. Even though sufficient time lapsed, there is lukewarm response from the Concessionaire for attending to the same.

62 5.Utility Shifting: Concessionaire reported that Utilities Shifting is to be done in some stretches and Land Acquisition is to be done by NHAI in some stretches. Both activities are kept in progress by NHAI & Concessionaire. 6. Extension of Time: Concessionaire has submitted representation for Revision of Mile Stones and for completion of works. Details were called for by IE vide Lr.no CEI-PJ/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/ 792. dt Concessionaire has submitted the desired details for Revision of Mile stones and Interim Extension of time vide Lr.no:TTTCTPL/SPV/Milestone/2014/685.dt: for 719 days i.e., up to IE recommended interim EOT for 384 days ie., up to vide Lr.no.CEI- Pj/NHAI/TRP / /2014/995.dt duly considering the delays attributable to Authority for not handing over of the land within 90 days from the appointed date. The EOT is granted upto excluding the stretches where making available unencumbered land is delayed due to land Acquisition or Court Intervention where the work will be completed within 12 months from the date of such unencumbered land made available. However, there shall be no extension in Concession Period on account of this extension of time and it shall remain as 30 years from the Appointed Date i.e. from to Change of scope: IE recommended the COS for service roads with rough cost estimate to Authority vide letter No. CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/812 dt authority vide letter no. NHAI/1801/97/09/ PIU. Chennai/2952 dated sought clarifications on this issue. Replies submitted to Authority vide Lr.No: CEI/CDM/ /1275 dated: duly recommending for an extra width of 1.50M Service Road as COS. Regarding junctions COS, compliance to be received from Concessionaire. Regarding Major Bridges, Minor Bridges, VUP and Box Culverts COS, the proposals are not tenable. Hence not recommended duly informing to Authority vide letter no: CEI- Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013 /743 dt: The Project Highway crosses the State Highway (SH 57) which is 4 lane width at Km Hence it is proposed to increase the span length of VUP at Km from 11.60m to 25.00m.Net financial implication involved due to increase in length of span and also for providing extra width of 1.50m of Service road worked out to Rs.3.59 Crores and the Authority vide Lr.no. CEI/CEI/ /1497dt: was informed to consider the same under Change of Scope to the Concessionaire. Based on the representation of Public of Ayathur Village and also due to necessity, one VUP at Km costing about Rs Crores was reported to the Authority vide Lr.no. CEI-Pj/NHAI /TRP/ /2016/1417 dt: On the representation of Public of Veppampattu Panchayat and also due to necessity, one PUP at Km costing above Lakhs was reported to the Authority for considering it under change of Scope vide Lr.no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2016/ 1418 dt: During site visit on by Chairman, NHAI, New Delhi, it was orally directed to initiate proposals for construction of VUP at Km ie., near KLM Junction. It is costing about Rs Crores (approximately) and report was submitted to the Authority vide Lr.no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ TRP/ /2016/1442 dt: As per directions of PD, PIU, NHAI, Chennai, a report was submitted to Authority for Construction of Km vide this Office Lr.no CEI-Pj/NHAI/ TRP/ /2016/1465 dt: under COS.

63 8.Provisional Completion Certificate: Authority conveyed In-principle approval of Executive Committee (EC) during 196 th meeting on at Delhi vide letter no:nhai/18011/97/piu.chennai/1900 dated: for issue of PCC for the completed operational length of Km(76.97%) only subject to completion of balance works listed in Annexure-A. Concessionaire has completed all balance works. IE issued the recommendation for issue of Provisional Completion Certificate vide letter no: CDM/CEI/ /806 dt: Authority conveyed to IE for issue of Provisional completion Certificate vide Lr.no. NHAI/18011/97/09/PIU.Chennai/555 dt and IE issued Provisional Certificate vide Lr.no. CDM/ CEI/ /865 dt Tests: No test were conducted for Construction items during the month due to no progress. 10. Design & Drawings: The status of Review of Designs & Drawings furnished by IE Head Office & Site office are given vide page numbers from GFC drawings, Cross sections and Compliance to IE s comments are pending since a long time. Concessionaire failed to submit the same in time. 11. Force Majeure Event: Force Majeure Event notice has been given by Concessionaire vide Lr.no.. TTTCTPL/SPV /Bandh/2013.dt However, the Concessionaire has been informed to furnish the details as per the requirements of CA vide Lr.no CEI-PJ/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/706. dt details are awaited. Concessionaire vide Lr.no TTTCTPL/SPV/Toll Operations/2015/821,dt received in the office on reported, about stoppage of Toll operations by local Public at Toll Km without following the procedure setback for Force Majeure Event vide Clause of CA. 12. Road Safety: Concessionaire has not submitted Compliance for RSC observations for Work Zone Audits Oct-2011 to May-2014 (Total #10 Audit reports) and Accident Analysis report 2 audit reports. M/s HAKS RSC conducted Comprehensive Road safety Audit in PCC stretches on and submitted the report vide Lr no NHAI/18011/97/09/PIU. Chennai/112,dt IE submitted the observations on RSC Audit report to Authority vide Lr.no CEI-Pj/NHAI/ TRP/ /2015 /1197,dt Concessionaire submitted the compliance report on audit vide Lr.no TTTCTPL/SPV /Safety Report/2015/815, dt IE forwarded the Concessionaire compliance report on Safety Audit with IE comments to Authority vide Lr.no CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015 /1209,dt IE vide Mail dt has informed the Concessionaire to submit detailed report regarding compliance on the observations made by M/s HAKS, Road safety consultant vide Lr.no. 2015/HAKS/CSAR#F/RSC_39/NHAI/2625.dt But till today the Concessionaire has not submitted action taken report. IE vide Lr.no.CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015 /1209,dt /1264.dt has informed the Concessionaire that one Black spot exists at Km (Curve Portion) in TN section and requested to take up remedial action to avoid Accidents. But there is no response from the Concessionaire till to date.

64 IE and Concessionaire conducted the 27 th Road Safety week 2016 successfully in the Project Highway with slogan of Road Safety Time for Action The report with all activities conducted during celebration submitted to Authority vide Lr.no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ / 2016/1419, dt CGM (PQ) Compliance Testing: Concessionaire conducted the tests for, layers by extracting cores and by collecting sample through the agency engaged Anna University, Chennai on in compliance to CGM (PQ) observations during their visit on Oct Test Report was submitted by Concessionaire to IE for review. IE forward the test reports to Authority vide Lr.no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/1168 dated for necessary action. 14. ETC Lanes, WIM, Static Weigh Bridge: CGM (RO) Chennai conducted meeting at Chennai on regarding provision and implementation of ETC lanes at Toll Plazas. Concessionaire is directed to provide ETC lanes, WIM at each lane and Static Weigh Bridge vide IE Letter no CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/1085 dated ETC lanes work not started in AP&TN section so far. Regarding non provision of weigh in motion systems in each lane, a detailed Justification Report was submitted to Authority vide Lr.no.CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/1182 dated Inspite of continuous pursuation, Concessionaire is not coming forward for completion of ETC Lanes, Weigh in Motion Systems in all lanes (4nos provided in AP section but not functioning) and installation of Static Weigh Bridges 2 nos. in AP section and 2 nos. in TN section. Concessionaire was informed about Non functioning of 4 Nos. WIM at Toll Plaza at Km and Non functioning of 2 Nos. Static Weigh Bridges at Temporary Toll Plaza at vide Lr.no.CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP / /2016/1406 dated But, there is no response from the Concessionaire. 15. Traffic Aid Posts/Vehicle Rescue Posts/Mobile Police Squad/Highway Patrol Units/Cranes and Medical Aid Posts : As per Article 20 & 21 of CA, Concessionaire is directed to provide Traffic Aid Post, Medical Aid Post, Vehicle Rescue Post, Mobile Patrol Squads, Cranes vide IE Lr.no. CEI-Pj/ NHAI/RP/ /2014/1083 dated & IE Lr.no. CEI-Pj/NHAI/ TRP/ /2014/ 1084 dated Temporary Posts for Traffic Aid, Medical Aid are completed at AP & TN Toll plazas. Concessionaire mobilized 2 nos Route Patrol Vehicles,2nos Ambulances and 2 nos Cranes at Toll plazas on the date of PCOD. O&M centre also made available at the base camp Km at AP Section. Concessionaire not taken any action for replacement of substitute Vehicle provided in TN section with Standard Route Patrol Vehicle as pointed out vide our Lr no CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1308 dt Crane is not available at Temporary Toll Plaza at Km and hence a report was submitted to Authority vide this Office Lr.no CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2016/1475 dt to issue notice to the Concessionaire. 16. Maintenance of PCOD stretches, Existing lanes, Diversion roads, etc., Concessionaire stopped all maintenance activities and no machinery and no Maintenance Manpower is available at site. There is no response from the Concessionaire to the notices served by IE and to the instructions issued during site visits except attending some minor repair works in half way condition during the periods from to and from to , from to , from to , from to , from to ,from to , from to , from to , and that too not to the specifications.

65 17. Flood damages in the month of November and action taken by Concessionaire during March : Due to heavy and uninterrupted rains from 14 th to 16 th of November, the existing old Major Km and the existing old Cause Km were over flown with flood water and the traffic was completely stopped on & After receding of flood water, it is observed that many of the vents of Bridge & Causeway were blocked with large bushes and parapet walls of the Bridge and Cause way were washed away for a length of 4M and 24.00M respectively. Wearing coat over the deck slabs of these structures was damaged at some places. The District Administration has informed the Concessionaire not to allow traffic on the Km till furnishing of Assurance Certificate by the Authority to the effect that this Bridge is fit to allow traffic. Hence, traffic was diverted to ply from Km.25/6 to Km.343/6(Arakonam Junction) via Thiruvalangadu. As per the arrangement made by the Concessionaire Mr.Nageswara Rao, Professor, IIT, Chennai has inspected the Bridge on The Professor has given report on recommending for plying of vehicular traffic over the Bridge as no damage occurred to the Bridge and the Bridge is in sound condition. Based on the recommendation of the Professor, traffic was restored with effect from Am on However due to sudden release of flood water from Ammapalle tank near pallipattu on upstream side, these structures were again over flown on and the traffic was stopped. The flood water receded at 9.00 AM on and as per the instructions of the District Administration, only Light vehicles were being allowed over these 2 structures. All types of vehicles are allowed since During the rainy period, nowhere in the AP & TN sections of Project Stretch, Highway breached except formation of Pot Holes and also except at the above 2 locations, traffic was not interrupted at any other place. Due to heavy rains, the sides of deep cut portions from Km to Km were collapsed and earth was fallen on MCW and affected the free passage of traffic. Earth on MCW and Shoulders was removed and traffic restored. Slope protection works are not yet attended. Minor erosions in the berms and slopes of the embankment occurred at some places and the same are yet to be attended by Concessionaire. The Concessionaire attended reconstruction of damaged parapet walls for the Bridge and Causeway. Patches in the damaged portions of wearing coat are not yet attended by Concessionaire. Concessionaire completed filling up of Pot holes and carried out patch works at some locations during the month Feb General: There are no rains in A.P. and T.N. sections of the Project. Good weather in the month of March

66 16. ANNEXURES: (i) Strip Chart Highway (ii) PCC Annexure - A Status on (iii) Summary of completed 4-lane & 2-Lane(B/S) Up to March (iv) RE wall work progress and Project facilities work Progress. (v) Accident data for March (vi) Summary of NCRs for March (vii) Status of ROB AP. Section (viii) Status of Structures (ix) Progress Photographs.

67 Annexure i: Strip Charts A.P. Section CDM Smith India Pvt.Ltd FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS- LAYER CHART UPTO-31 MARCH LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (4-Lane) KERB Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) VUP (2 x 16.85) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.2) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 2.2) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.1) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.25) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.8) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.7) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.2) Pipe Culvert (1 x 1.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.2) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) VUP (2 x 16.85) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.2) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 2.2) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.1) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.25) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.8) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.7) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.2) Pipe Culvert (1 x 1.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.2) Kerb FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (4-Lane) KERB Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.0) Pipe Culvert (1 x 1.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.7) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.0) Pipe Culvert (1 x 1.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.7) Kerb LEGEND: OGL Emb Top SG Top Top Top Kerb Page 64

68 FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (4-Lane) KERB Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.2) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.1) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.2) Pipe Culvert (1 x 1.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) VUP (2 x 12) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.5 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 2.35) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 1.5) Pipe Culvert (2.0 x 1.0) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.2) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.1) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.2) Pipe Culvert (1 x 1.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) VUP (2 x 12) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.5 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 2.35) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 1.5) Pipe Culvert (2.0 x 1.0) Kerb FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (4-Lane) KERB Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Pipe Culvert (1.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.2) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.1) Pipe Culvert (1.0 x 1.0) ROB (1 x x x Pipe Culvert (2.0 x 1.0) Pipe Culvert (2.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.3) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Pipe Culvert (1.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.2) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.1) Pipe Culvert (1.0 x 1.0) ROB (1 x x x Pipe Culvert (2.0 x 1.0) Pipe Culvert (2.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.3) Kerb LEGEND: OGL Emb Top SG Top Top Top Kerb Page 65

69 FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (4-Lane) KERB Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL EXISTING MAB (10x 18.6) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.3) Temporary Diversion- CONNECTIVITY ROAD COMPLETED Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.7) Temporary Diversion- CONNECTIVITY ROAD COMPLETED Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.8 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.0) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 2.0) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x x 1.5) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Kerb MAB (10x 18.6) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.3) Temporary Diversion- CONNECTIVITY ROAD COMPLETED Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.7) Temporary Diversion- CONNECTIVITY ROAD COMPLETED Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.8 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.0) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 2.0) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x x 1.5) FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (4-Lane) KERB Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (2.0 x 2.0) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 4.0) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.5) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (1 x 6.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (1 x 6.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (2.0 x 2.0) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 4.0) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.5) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (1 x 6.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) MIB (1 x ) Box Culvert (1 x 6.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Kerb LEGEND: OGL Emb Top SG Top Top Top Kerb Page 66

70 FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (4-Lane) PQC KERB Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Box Culvert ( 1 x 6.0 x 1.5) PQC PQC T U N N E L Box Culvert (1 x 6.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.0) MAB (3x ) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Kerb Box Culvert ( 1 x 6.0 x 1.5) Temporary Diversion- CONNECTIVITY ROAD COMPLETED PQC T U N N E L PQC PQC Box Culvert (1 x 6.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.0) MAB (3x ) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (4-Lane) KERB Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.3) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.2) MIB (1 x ) MIB (1 x ) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.3) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.2) MIB (1 x ) MIB (1 x ) Kerb LEGEND: OGL Emb Top SG Top Top Top Kerb Page 67

71 FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (Km to Km Lane to 2-Lane Portion) KERB Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Box Culvert (1 x 3.0x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0x 1.5) RE-WALL BACK FILLING L BACK Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) VUP (2 x 11.50) RE-WALL BACK FILLING IN PROGRESS Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 2.5) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 2.2) Box Culvert (1 x 1.7 x 1.7) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.8) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 5.8 x 1.5) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) VUP (2 x 11.50) RE-WALL BACK FILLING IN PROGRESS Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 2.5) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 2.2) Box Culvert (1 x 1.7 x 1.7) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.8) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 5.8 x 1.5) Kerb/ FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (2-Lane) Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL MIB (1 x 18.00) MIB (1 x 18.00) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.2) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top MIB (1 x 18.00) MIB (1 x 18.00) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.2) LEGEND: OGL Emb Top SG Top Top Top Kerb Page 68

72 FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (2-Lane) Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) MIB (1 x 15.00) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.3) Box Culvert (1 x 1.2 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) MAB (10x x 19.40) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) MIB (1 x 15.00) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.3) Box Culvert (1 x 1.2 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) MAB (10x x 19.40) FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (2-Lane) Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.1) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.2) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.4) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.2) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.1) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 2.8) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 3.5) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 2.5) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 2.5) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.1) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.2) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.4) Box Culvert (1 x 5.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.2) Box Culvert (1 x 1.5 x 1.1) Box Culvert (2 x 3.0 x 2.8) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 2.0) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 3.0) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.5) Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 3.5) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 2.5) Box Culvert (1 x 4.0 x 2.5) LEGEND: OGL Emb Top SG Top Top Top Kerb Page 69

73 FOUR LANNING OF TIRUPATI - TIRUTANI - CHENNAI SECTION OF NH-205 FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND FROM KM TO KM IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU ON DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (DBFOT) TOLL BASIS. LAYER TYPE LAYER NO. KM: TO (2-Lane) Top 1 SG Top SG 2 SG 1 EMB Top OGL Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.0) CHAINAGE OGL EMB Top SG 1 SG 2 SG Top 1 Top Box Culvert (1 x 2.0 x 1.0) Box Culvert (1 x 3.0 x 1.0) TN SECTION LEGEND: OGL Emb Top SG Top Top 1st&Top KERB IN PROGRESS RE-WALL BACK FILLING IN PROGRES Page 70

74 Annexure i: Strip Charts T.N. Section CDM Smith India Pvt.Ltd PROGRESS STATUS OF WORKS ON PACKAGE No.TTC-Project(TN Section)) Status As on KM: TO RHS LHS SG SG MIB ( 2x7) MIB ( 2x7) (1x2.5x1.6) (1x2.5x1.6) ( 1x4x1.5) ( 1x4x1.5) KM: TO SG (1x4x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x2x1.7) ( 1x1.5x1.1) ( 1x2x2) ( 1x2x2) RHS SG (1x4x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x2x1.7) ( 1x1.5x1.1) ( 1x2x2) ( 1x2x2) KM: TO LHS SG (1x2x1.6) (2x3x1.7) ( 1x2.5x1.5) RHS SG (1x2x1.6) (2x3x1.7) ( 1x2.5x1.5) Page 71

75 KM: TO RHS LHS RHS LHS RHS LHS SG SG SG SG SG SG (1x1.5x1.9) (1x1.5x1.9) (1x4x2) (1x4x2) (1x3x1) (1x3x1) (1x1.5x2) (1x1.5x2) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) (2x3x1.5) (2x3x1.5) KM: TO (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) KM: TO (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x2x3) ( 1x2x3) (1x1.5x1) (1x1.5x1) ( 1x2x2.3) ( 1x2x2.3) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.5) MIB ( 4x9) MIB ( 4x9) (1x4x2.5) (1x4x2.5) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x2x1.5) (1x2x1.5) (1x1.5x1.3) (1x1.5x1.3) (1x3x1.3) (1x3x1.3) (1x1.5x1.9) (1x1.5x1.9) Page 72

76 Page 73 SG SG SG SG SG SG PROGRESS STATUS OF WORKS ON PACKAGE No.TTC-Project(TN Section)) KM: TO KM: TO KM: TO (1x2x1.5) (1x1.9x1.3) (1x1.9x1.3) (2x3x3) (2x3x3) (1x2) (1x2x1.5) LHS RHS (1x2.5x1.8) (1x2x2) (1x2x2.4) (1x2x2) (1x4x1.5) (1x4x1.5) (1x2x2.4) LHS RHS LHS (1x2.5x1.8) (1x2) RHS (1x4x1.5) (2x3x2.1) (1x4x1.5) (2x3x2.1)

77 KM: TO LHS SG (2x3x2.6) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x3x1.5) MJB (2x16.6+8x18.6) (1x1x1.5) (1x3x3) RHS SG (2x3x2.6) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x3x1.5) MJB (2x16.6+8x18.6) (1x1x1.5) (1x3x3) KM: TO D B M LHS SG (1x3x1.3) (1x3x1.5) (1x3x3) (1x2x1.2) (1x1.5x1) RHS SG (1x3x1.3) (1x3x1.5) (1x3x3) (1x2x1.2) (1x1.5x1) KM: TO LHS RHS SG SG ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1) ( 1x1.5x1) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.6) ( 1x1.5x1.6) Page 74

78 PROGRESS STATUS OF WORKS ON PACKAGE No.TTC-Project(TN Section)) KM: TO LHS SG ( 1x1.5x1.7) MIB (3X3.8 ) ( 1x3x3) MIB ( 1X ) RHS SG ( 1x1.5x1.7) MIB (3X3.8 ) ( 1x3x3) MIB ( 1X ) KM: TO LHS G S B SG (1x1.5x2.4) ( 1x4x3.2) (1x2x1.3) MIB (6X2.5) RHS SG (1x1.5x2.4) ( 1x4x3.2) (1x2x1.3) MIB (6X2.5) KM: TO LHS SG Top MIB (2x13.619) ( 1x2x1) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x2x2) RHS SG MIB (2x13.619) ( 1x2x1) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x2x2) Page 75

79 KM: TO D B M RHS LHS RHS LHS RHS LHS SG SG D B M SG SG W M M G S B SG SG W M M MIB (4x5.8 ) MIB (4x5.8 ) ( 1x4x2.1) ( 1x4x2.1) (1x4.0x1.4) ( 1x1.5x1.5) (1x4.0x1.4) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.5) ( 1x1.5x1.5) MIB (1x8) ( 1x2x1.5) MIB (1x8) ( 1x2x1.5) KM: TO KM: TO ( 1x1.5x2.1) ( 1x1.5x2.3) ( 1x1.5x2.1) ( 1x1.5x2.3) (1x3x2.6) (1x3x2.6) ( 1x3x1.5) ( 1x3x1.5) MJB ( 2x25 +5x30 ) MJB ( 2x25 +5x30 ) ( 1x2x1.4) ( 1x2x1.4) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x3x1.5) (1x3x1.5) MJB ( 2x25+2x30 ) MJB ( 2x25+2x30 ) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) Page 76

80 Page 77 SG SG D B M G S B SG SG DB M G S B SG SG (1x1.5x1.4) (1x1.5x1.4) RHS (1x3x2.1) (1x2.0x1.1) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x2x1.9) MIB (5x4) LHS (1x3x2.1) (1x2.0x1.1) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x2x1.9) MIB (5x4) (1x1.5x1.5) RHS (2x3x1.4) (1x1.5x1.8) (1x1x2.8) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) LHS (2x3x1.4) (1x1.5x1.8) (1x1x2.8) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x2x2.4) (1x1.5x2.6) (1x1.5x3.1) (1x1.5x2.8) RHS (1x1.5x1.5) (1x2x2.4) (1x1.5x2.6) (1x1.5x3.1) (1x1.5x2.8) PROGRESS STATUS OF WORKS ON PACKAGE No.TTC-Project(TN Section)) KM: TO (1x3.0x3.0) (1x3.0x1.5) KM: TO LHS (1x3.0x3.0) (1x3.0x1.5) (1x1.5x1.5) KM: TO MIB (2x5.25) MIB (2x5.25)

81 Page 78 SG SG SG SG SG SG LHS RHS VUP (2x14.585) (1x3x3) LHS RHS (1x3x3) (1x3x3) (1x3x2.9) (1x3x2.1) (1x3x3) KM: TO (1x3x3) (1x3x3) (1x3x2.9) (1x3x2.1) VUP (2x14.585) (1x3x3) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x2.1) (2x2.5x2.5) (1x3x1.8) (1x5.8x2.8) (1x3x3) (4 Lane Starting) (1x1.5x2.1) (2x2.5x2.5) (1x5.8x2.8) (1x2x1.5) (1x1.5x1.2) (1x1.5x1.6) (1x2x1.5) (1x1.5x1.2) (1x1.5x1.6) RHS (2x3x3) (1x1x1.5) LHS (2x3x3) (1x1x1.5) KM: TO KM: TO (1x3x1.8) (1x1.5x1.5)

82 Page 79 SG SG SG SG SG SG RHS (1x3x1) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.0) (2x3.0x1.8) (1x3.0x1.2) KM: TO LHS (1x3x1) (1x1.5x1.5) (1x1.5x1.0) (2x3.0x1.8) (1x3.0x1.2) (1x1.5x3.0) PUP (7x3.5) KM: TO RHS (2x3x2.9) (2x3x2.1) (1x1.5x3.0) PUP (7x3.5) RHS (1x4x2.9) (1x3x3.2) LHS (2x3x2.9) (2x3x2.1) LHS (1x4x2.9) (1x3x3.2) PROGRESS STATUS OF WORKS ON PACKAGE No.TTC-Project(TN Section)) KM: TO

83 Page 80 SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG KM: TO LHS (1x4x1.5) (1x2) RHS (1x2) MIB (1x10) MIB (1x10) (1x4x1.5) KM: TO LHS (1x3.0x1.7) (1x1.5x1.5) RHS (1x3.0x1.7) (1x1.5x1.5) KM: TO LHS (1x1.5x1.8) (1x3.0x1.4) (1x6x2) RHS (1x1.5x1.8) (1x3.0x1.4) (1x6x2) KM: TO LHS (1x3.0x3.0) MIB(1x41.667(25.075)) RHS (1x3.0x3.0) MIB (1x41.667(25.075))

84 Name of Project : Four Laning of Tirupati - Tiruthani - Chennai Section of NH-205 from Km to Km in the State of Andhra Pradesh and from Km 0.00 to Km in the State of Tamil Nadu on Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) Toll Basis AP TN REVISED PCC STRETCHES FOR Km AS PER NHAI, HQ. 4-Lane 2-Lane Lengrh in Lengrh in From To Km From To Km AP TN Total in Km Total in Km Total = Km (76.97%)

85 Annexure III Summary of Completed 4 Lane & 2 Lane Stretches (Both sides) Up to March AP section 4-Laning LHS / RHS 2-Laning LHS / RHS Length in Length in Sl.no From To Km From To Km Total Total & 2 Laning LHS/RHS Total length Km % Summary of Completed 4 Lane & 2 Lane Stretches (Both Sides) Upto March TN section 2-Laning LHS / RHS 4-Laning LHS / RHS Sl.no From To Length in Km From To Length in Km Total Km Total & 2 Laning LHS/RHS Total length Km %

86 Annexure - IV Reinforced Earth Wall (RE Wall) Work Progress Up to (AP Section 1) Location : VUP Km RE Wall Agency : RE Wall Agency : Z Tech Pvt. Ltd W1 LHS - A1 Side (Km to Km ) Sl. Status to Back filling 42 nd layer completed to Back filling 48 th layer completed W3 LHS - A2 Side (Km to Km ) to Back filling 14 th layer completed to Back filling 43 rd layer completed W2 RHS - A1 Side (Km to Km ) to Back filling 43 rd layer completed to Back filling 48 th layer completed W4 RHS - A2 Side (Km to Km ) to Back filling 8 th layer completed to Back filling 43 rd layer completed Cross Wall (W3 to W4) A2 side Km Backfilling 12 th Layer completed. Cross Wall (W1 to W2) A1 side Km Backfilling 48 th Layer completed. RE panels and Geo grid of various grades fixing in progress. Reinforced soil total quantity consumed up to March is 70,170 Cum. No work in progress during March month. 2)Location : VUP Km RE Wall Agency : Maccaferri Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (W1 & W3) LHS - A1 Side & A2 Side (Km to Km ) Sl. Status to Completed. Work Completed (W2 & W4) RHS - A1 Side & A2 Side (Km to Km ) to Completed. Work Completed Reinforced soil total quantity consumed is 1,78,291 Cum. RE panels erection completed.

87 1) Location : VUP Km RE Wall Agency : RE Wall Agency : Z Tech Pvt. Ltd W1 LHS - A1 Side Sl.No Status to Back filling 10 th layer completed to Back filling 14 th layer completed to Back filling 16 th layer completed to Back filling 21 st layer completed to Back filling 24 th layer completed to Back filling 27 th layer completed to Back filling 28 th layer completed W3 LHS - A2 Side Sl.No Status to SG top completed W2 RHS - A1 Side Sl.No Status to Back filling 10 th layer completed to Back filling 13 th layer completed to Back filling 16 th layer completed to Back filling 18 th layer completed to Back filling 24 th layer completed to Back filling 21 st layer completed to Back filling 27 th layer completed to Back filling 21 st layer completed to Back filling 25 th layer completed W4 RHS - A2 Side Sl.No Status to SG top completed RE panels and Geo grid of various grades fixed in all RE Walls portion. Reinforced soil total consumed quantity up to March is 1,45,889 Cum. No work in progress during March month.

88 Progress of RE wall Reinforcement fixing: Sl.No Location Agency Total Area for RE Wall in Sqm Total Area Erected at site in Sqm Percentage of Progress in RE wall % 1 Km Maccaferri Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd % Erection Completed 2 Km Z Tech Pvt. Ltd % 3 Km Z Tech Pvt. Ltd % Maccaferri Km Environmental Yet to start LHS Solutions Pvt. Ltd Toll Plazas : Sl.No In AP section at Toll Plaza site Km , PQC (M40) Rigid Pavement Panels casting. Location Total No of Paneals Paneals casting in Nos Percentage of Progress % 1 Toll Km % Toll Plazas : In TN section at Toll Plaza site Km Toll Km Canopy work Completed and booth fixing Completed. TMS work is completed. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES/ROAD SAFETY DEVICES/ROAD SIDE FURNITURE : THERMOPLASTIC ROAD MARKING : Total Length :-63.23Km AP Section. Sl.No From To Total Length :-61.47Km TN Section. Length in m Remarks Sl.No From To Length in m RHS Remarks Total % Total %

89 TRAFFIC ROAD SIGNS: AP Section: Hazard Marking signs at culverts, Cluster signs at median openings and warning / cautionary signs erection under progress in MCW and Crossing roads from Km to Km LHS/RHS, Total Length = Km. Total Sign Boards Erected=983. TN Section :Hazard marking signs at culverts, cluster signs at median openings and warning / cautionary signs erection under progress in MCW and crossing roads from Km : to LHS/RHS, Total length = Km. Total sign boards Erected = 675. MEDIAN PLANTATION - AP SECTION: Length in m Sl.no From To Total Length Total Length Completed = Km. Total Length = 43.5 Km; Percentage of Progress = 82.83% STONE PITCHING- AP SECTION LHS Length RHS Length in Sl.No From To in m From To m Remarks Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Total LHS 1742 Total RHS 1060 Total Completed Length in m (LHS+RHS) 2802

90 W METAL BEAM CRASH BARRIER LOCATIONS FIXED UPTO MARCH : A.P.Section : Side - LHS Side - RHS Sl.n (Km) (Km) Length Length (m) Remarks o From To From To (m) Remarks Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed

91 Side - LHS Side - RHS Sl.n (Km) (Km) Length Length (m) Remarks o From To From To (m) Remarks Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Total Length in m Total Length in m Description Total Length in m Completed Length in m Balance Length in m % Completed Length LHS RHS Total(BHS) % 58.52% 61.62%

92 Curve Details in AP Section (Radius 1800m) Sl.no From To Length Radius Remarks Total Length in m

93 BUSBAYS STATUS - AP SECTION : Bus Bay status in AP-Section Bus Shelter in AP-Section S.N LHS RHS S.N LHS RHS o s Status s Status o s Status s Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Not provided Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Total No of Bus Bay 34 nos Total No of Bus Shelter 34 nos Completed 23 nos Progress : 22 nos Balance 11 nos Balance 12 nos BUSBAYS STATUS TN. SECTION : Bus Bay status in TN-Section LHS RHS LHS RHS S.N S.N s Status s Status o o s Status s Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Not yet started Completed Not yet started Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Completed Not yet started Completed Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Not yet started Total No of Bus Bay : 24 nos Total No of Bus Shelter 24 nos Completed : 14 nos Completed : 14 nos Balance : 10 nos Balance : 10 nos 2-Lane Over Head Gantry Sign boards Erected AP Section: 1. Km LHS -1no. 2. Km RHS - 1no. 3. Km RHS - 1no. 4. Km RHS - 1no. 2-Lane Over Head Gantry Sign boards Erected TN Section: 1. Km no. 2. Km no. Bus Shelter in TN-Section

94 DETAILS OF WATER BODIES EXISTING ON PROJECT HIGHWAY AP- SECTION: Sl.no Length Description From To (Km) 1 Peruru Tank (Tirupati Bypass) Thummalagunta Tank Avilala Tank Oteru Tank Daminedu Tank Tukivakam Tank Vadamalpeta Tank Thorur Tank Govindapalem Tank Tadukupeta Tank Tadukupeta Tank Total Length in Km TN- SECTION: Sl.no Length Description From To (Km) 1 Pullarampakkam Big Tank EKKadu Big Tank Tannerkullam Tank Pakkam Big Tank Total Length in Km Total Length (AP.TN) = ( ) = Km.

95 W METAL BEAM CRASH BARRIER LOCATIONS FIXED UPTO MARCH : T.N.Section : Side - LHS Side - RHS Sl. (Km) Length (Km) Length Remarks no From To (m) From To Remarks Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed

96 Side - LHS Side - RHS Sl. (Km) Length (Km) Length Remarks no From To (m) From To Remarks Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Total Length in m Total Length in m Description Total Length in m Completed Length in m Balance Length in m % Completed Length LHS RHS Total(BHS) % 76.32% 69.73%

97 TURFING ON EMBANKMENT SLOPES: Turfing Completed s - AP SECTION: LHS RHS Length in m Sl.no From To From To Length in m Total LHS 1960 Total RHS 1850 Total (LHS + RHS) 3810 Turfing Completed s - TN SECTION: LHS RHS Length in m Sl.no From To From To Length in m Total LHS 3440 Total RHS 3380 Total (LHS + RHS) 6820 LHS Stone Pitching TN Section RHS Sl.No From To Length From To Length Remarks Completed Completed Completed Completed Total Total Total (LHS + RHS) 0.720

98 Annexure - V ACCIDENT DATA FOR MARCH A.P. Section Sl. No Date/ Month/ Year Time of Accident (am/pm) A Accident Location LHS/ Urban/ RHS Rural B C D E F G H 1 3-Mar-16 05:30pm RHS Rural Vehicle responsible Two Car's collide each other Yes Puttur GH 2 4-Mar-16 05:30am RHS Rural Car Yes 3 5-Mar-16 07:00pm RHS Rural Car ran through Pedestrian Narayandri Hospital Yes Nagari GH 4 6-Mar-16 07:00pm LHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes 5 10-Mar-16 02:05pm RHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes 6 13-Mar-16 07:10pm LHS Rural Car-Two Wheeler Renigunta Hospital SVIMS Hospital- TPT Yes Puttur GH 7 18-Mar-16 02:30pm RHS Rural Auto Yes 8 22-Mar-16 11:00am LHS Rural Car-Two Wheeler Narayandri Hospital Yes 108 Service 9 25-Mar-16 03:55pm RHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes Mar-16 04:30pm LHS Rural Nature of Accident Classification of Accident Cause Road Features Road condition Interested on Type and control Weather condition Car-Two Wheeler Fata l No. of affected persons Grievous Minor Non Injury No. of animals killed if any Help provided by Ambulanc e/patrol vehicle Remarks Ramadevi Hospital Yes Puttur GH T.N. Section Date/ Month/ Time of Accident A Accident Location B C D E F G H Nature of Accident Classificatio n of Accident Sl. LHS/ Urban/ Vehicle Fata Non No Year (am/pm) RHS Rural responsible l Grievous Minor Injury any vehicle Remarks 1 2-Mar-16 10:10am RHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes Thiruvallur GH 2 3-Mar-16 05:10pm LHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes Pattaraiper umbudur GH 3 4-Mar-16 07:00pm LHS Rural Car Yes Kanakamm achatram GH Cause Road Features Road condition Interested on Type and control Weather condition No. of affected persons 4 5-Mar-16 07:35pm LHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes Thiruvallur GH 5 5-Mar-16 08:29pm LHS Rural Car Yes Thiruvallur GH No. of animals killed if Help provided by Ambulance /Patrol Page 95

99 T.N. Section A Accident Location B C D E F G H Nature of Accident Classification of Accident Cause Road Features Road condition Interested on Type and control Weather condition No. of affected persons Date/ Time of Sl. Month/ Accident LHS/ Urban/ Vehicle Fata Non No Year (am/pm) RHS Rural responsible l Grievous Minor Injury any vehicle Remarks 6 8-Mar-16 10:00pm RHS Urban Two Wheeler Yes Thiruttani GH 7 10-Mar-16 07:00pm LHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes Thirupachur GH 8 10-Mar-16 08:30pm RHS Rural Car Yes Thiruvallur GH 9 10-Mar-16 07:55pm LHS Rural Car Yes Thiruvallur GH Mar-16 09:35am LHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes Thiruvallur GH Mar-16 12:10pm LHS Rural Car Yes Pattaraiper umbudur GH Mar-16 11:50pm LHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes Thirupachur GH Mar-16 07:15pm RHS Rural Two Wheeler Yes Thiruvallur GH Mar-16 02:30pm LHS Rural Car Yes Thiruvallur GH No. of animals killed if Help provided by Ambulance /Patrol Note: A: Urban/Rural and details of surrounding land use. B: 1-Over turning, 2-Head on collision, 3-Rear end collision, 4-Collision brush/side wipe, 5-Right turn collision, 6-Skidding,7-Right turn collision, 8- Others. C: 1-Fata, 2-Greavious Injury, 3-Minor Injured, 4-Non-Injury D: 1-Drunken, 2-Over speeding, 3-Vehicle out of control, 4-Fault of driver of Motor vehicle/driver of other vehicle/cyclist/pedestrian/passenger, 5-Defect in mechanical condition of motor vehicle/road condition. E: 1-Single lane, 2-Two lanes, 3-Three lanes or more without control divider (median), 4-Four lanes for more with control divider. F: 1-Straight road, 2-Slight curve, 3-Sharp curve, 4-Flat Road, 5-Gentle incline, 6-Steep incline, 7-Hump, 8-Dip. G: 1-T junction, 2- Y Junction, 3-Four arm Junction, 4-Staggered junction, 5-junction with more than 4 arms, 6-Roundabout Junction, 7-Manned rail crossing, 8-Unmanned rail crossing. H: 1-Fine, 2-Mist/Fog, 3-Cloudy, 4-Light rain, 5-Heavy rain, 6-Hail/sleet, 7-Snow, 8-Strong wind, 9-Dust storm, 10-Very hot, 11-Very cold, 12-Other extraordinary weather condition. Page 96

100 Annexure - VI SUMMARY OF NCR UP TO MARCH-2016: Sl.no IE Ltr no. & Date NCRs No NCR date Subject Closing date Closing Letter No Remarks 1 Highway- 01/ AP section soil contains over size concrete material TO CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/251 Closed Ltr No. 330 dt Ltr No. 476 dt Ltr No. 476 dt Ltr No. 477 dt Ltr No. 477 dt Ltr No. 526 dt Ltr No. 527 dt Ltr No. 528 dt Ltr No. 529 dt Highway- 02/ AP section Highway- 03/ AP section Highway- 04/ AP section Highway- 05/ AP section Highway- 06/ AP section Highway- 07/ AP section Highway- 08/ AP section Highway- 09/ AP section Highway- 10/ AP section Highway- 11/ AP section Absence of sign boards - safety issues laid without application of tack coat & less thick ness found to mm Notification of Non Compliance Regarding Temporary Diversion roads as per MORTH Notification of Non Compliance Regarding Temporary Diversion roads as per MORTH Notification of Non Compliance Regarding Temporary Diversion roads safety measures as per MORTH Notification of Non Compliance Regarding Temporary Diversion roads safety measures as per MORTH Notification of Non Compliance Regarding Temporary Diversion is not finished with Bituminous layer in AP section as per MORTH Notification of Non Compliance Regarding Temporary Diversion is not finished with Bituminous layer in AP section as per MORTH TO TO VUP at Km Km RHS Km Km to LHS LHS Notification of Non Compliance Regarding Diversion is not finished Km with Bituminous layer in AP section as per MORTH Notification of Non Compliance Regarding Diversion is not finished with Bituminous layer in AP section as per MORTH Km & /02/2014 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/307 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/605 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/795 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/510 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/491 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/546 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/838 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/860 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/837 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/871 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Ltr No. 530 dt Ltr No. 531 dt Ltr No. 576 dt Ltr No. 577 dt Ltr No. 578 dt Highway-12/ AP section Highway-13/ AP section Highway-14/ AP section Highway-15/ AP section Highway-16/ AP section Notification of Non Compliance Regarding RE Wall location - Key concrete laid in AP section Notification of Non Compliance Regarding Stone Pitching in AP section as per MORTH Km to LHS Km to RHS & to RHS /02/2014 Notification of Non Compliance Regarding the existing Old bridge at Km LHS the foot path slab Km LHS and the approach slab has caved in (Safety) AP Section Notification of Non Compliance Regarding As pre standard specifications Cl.12 Arrangement of Traffic during Construction is not implemented at the site at Km diversion is not paved (Safety) AP Section Notification of Non Compliance Regarding W-Beam crash barrier (Safety) AP Section Km Km RHS, LHS CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/571-A CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/872 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/794 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/857 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/1187 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Ltr No. 616 dt Ltr No. 622 dt Highway-17/ AP section Highway-18/ AP section Notification of Non Compliance for PQC panels cast-slump of mix higher than design mix regarding at Km to LHS B.C. laying progress. The work has been carried out by the Concessionaire 2.30 AM (Dt early hours) while raining. Also without submitting RFI for the work, no intimation was made by the concessionaire to the IE. Km to Km RHS Km to Km LHS 28/02/ CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/874 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/793 Closed Closed

101 Sl.no IE Ltr no. & Date NCRs No NCR date Subject Closing date Closing Letter No Remarks 19 Ltr No.1112 dt Notification of non compliance Highway-19/ regarding balance works as part of AP section Km safety at Km KLN junction in AP section-reg. CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/1186 Closed 20 Ltr.no. 358 dt HW-1/ TN section Not providing of sign boards , , , , , CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/557 Closed Ltr.no. 476-A dt Ltr.no. 476-A dt Ltr.no. 478 dt Ltr.no. 478 dt Ltr.no. 485 dt Ltr.no. 522 dt Notification of Non Compliance Highway- 02/ Regarding Temporary Diversion Km TN section roads safety measures in TN section as per MORTH Notification of Non Compliance Highway- 03/ TN section Regarding Temporary Diversion Km roads safety measures in TN section as per MORTH Notification of Non Compliance Highway- 04/ TN section Regarding Temporary Diversion Km roads safety measures in TN section as per MORTH Notification of Non Compliance Highway- 05/ TN section Regarding Temporary Diversion Km roads safety measures in TN section as per MORTH Highway- 06/ TN section Highway- 07/ TN section Over size material in layer Notification of Non Compliance regarding Stone Pitching for portion in TN section Km to B/S Km to RHS CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/558 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/559 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/560 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/561 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/562 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/914 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed 27 Ltr.no. 145 dt STR- 01 PSC girder, cracks in Vehicular under pass CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/596 Closed Ltr.no. 146-A dt Ltr.no. 146-B dt Ltr.no. 325 dt CEI-PJ/NHAI/TRP/ STR not maintaining concrete cover /2014/1107 not maintaining spacing of vertical CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ STR reinforcement /2014/1108 STR not using standard size Hume Pipes , , Closed Closed The Concessionaire has not given reply 31 Ltr.no. 346 dt STR Initial pile load test The justification given by Concessionaire is not acceptable and the same was conveyed to the Concessionaire vide ltr.no.cei- Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/936 dated 04/04/ Ltr.no. 398 dt Ltr.no. 399 dt Ltr.no. 400 dt Ltr.no. 581 dt RHS wall 1 st lift concrete work is in STR progress without making line and plumb Reinforcement cover varies from STR mm to 130mm LHS STR Box culvert PCC work STR- 12 working condition at VUP,the poor status of working at heights without proper ladder arrangement and hand rails and a steep climbing without proper support is against to professional way of working for which immediate steps are to be taken to set right all defective and unconventional method of working CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/431 CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/421-A CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1195 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/937 Closed Closed Closed Closed [IE s MPR, March ] Page 98

102 Sl.no IE Ltr no. & Date Ltr.no. 630-A dt Ltr.no. 677 dt Ltr.no. 927 dt Ltr.no. 938 dt NCRs No NCR date Subject Closing date Closing Letter No Remarks STR- 19 In the approach slab (towards Chennai) of Major Bridge at Km straight cracks have been developing at almost equal intervals Ch /03/2014 Further, on the Deck slab almost near to the same approach slab cracks have been developed in the form of a grid Methodology for rectification of STR crackes on Major & Minor Bridges in AP section Construction of Curtain wall for STR median wall of Km reg STR-26 Providing stip seal Expansion joints for Major Minor bridges and VUP's Ch (MA) Ch , , (Min) 17/03/2014 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/900 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/900 Closed Closed Ch /01/2015 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2015/1208 Closed 40 Ltr.no. 324 dt STR- 05 Honey combing in concrete works (Minor bridge) MIB 18/03/2014 CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014/907 Closed Ltr.no. 347 dt Ltr.no. 348 dt Ltr.no. 588 dt Ltr.no. 589 dt Ltr No. 608 dt Ltr No. 609 dt STR Initial pile load test Not yet Closed STR Initial pile load test Not yet Closed STR-13 loose embankment with excavated during the formation level of pile cap P2 at ch Major Bridge from the earthen bund made in the back water of Poondi reservoir is not protected properly from sliding resulting unsafe zone for workers working at low levels MJB - - loose embankment with excavated earth during the formation level of piles at ch Major Bridge & at the location of bridge portion STR from the earthen bund made in the MJB - - back water of Poondi reservoir is not protected properly from sliding resulting unsafe zone for workers working at low levels. specifications are not maintained at Ch In addition to that curtain walls are not constructed. The enclosed photographs 1 & 2 STR depicts non confirmation of the CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /03/2014 stipulated specification. You are /2014/906 required to furnish explanation for the short fall in specification and remedial action proposed to rectify the same. specifications are not maintained at Ch BHS. In addition to that curtain walls are not constructed. The enclosed photographs 1 & 2 STR-16 depicts non confirmation of the CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /03/2014 stipulated specification. You are /2014/908 required to furnish explanation for the short fall in specification and remedial action proposed to rectify the same. Compliance yet to receive Compliance yet to receive Closed Closed [IE s MPR, March ] Page 99

103 Sl.no IE Ltr no. & Date Ltr No.508 dr Ltr No.508 dr Ltr No.661 dr Ltr No.662 dr Ltr No.744 dr Ltr No.745 dr Ltr.no. 948 dt: 12/04/2014 Ltr.no. 954 dt: 19/04/2014 Ltr.no. 66 dt: 23/05/2012 Ltr.no. 499 dt: 09/05/2013 Ltr.no. 543 dt: 17/06/2013 NCRs No NCR date Subject Closing date Closing Letter No Remarks STR-17 Concessionaire s attention is invited to last para of his letter reference cited (1) above. Stating that the revised Design and Drawings for the Major Bridges at Km and Km are ready for submission, which will be submitted in due course. In this context our letter CEI-Pj/NHAI/TRP /2013/571 dt requesting to expedite submission of revised Design and Drawing to IE may be referred. Even after a lapse of 96 days Concessionaire has not submitted the Design and Drawing to IE and though the Design and Drawing has been obtained from their Design consultant as per his own statement. Please note Design and Drawings are done to use the same at site after review of IE and keeping the same with him defeats the purpose and falls in the ambient and non conformance. Therefore NCR is being issued to Concessionaire to give the reason for non conformance and consequential problems STR Compliance yet to receive STR Major Bridge at Km STR Major Bridge at Km STR Major Bridge at Km STR Major Bridge at Km Non- Conformance of deck STR Major Bridge at Ch in TN section Rectification of hogging occurred in STR PSC girders at Ch in TN section QC- 01 (AP section) QC- 02 (AP Section) QC- 03 (TN section) nd layer gradation failed TO RE wall back filling contains coarse material of size more than 75 mm (Boulders in AP Section. 1st layer dry mix dumped at site and gradation and combined flakiness and Elongation Km to Km LHS TN section Total NCRs issued = Closed NCRs = Balance not closed NCRs as on = to LHS Km to Km LHS CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/604 CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ /2012/509 CEI- PJ/NHAI/TRP/ /2013/599 Closed Closed Closed [IE s MPR, March ] Page 100

104 S.no State NH Section PIU: Chennai 1 AP Chennai- Tirupatti NHDP Phase Project Status (Awarded Progress) III Awarded / Work in Progress Status of ROB - AP Section Construct ion Agency M/s. Transstroy Tirupati- Tiruthani Chennai Tolllways Private Limited NH No. NH KM PIU DESCRIPTION OF ROB/RUB Chennai Proposed 3-lane ROB on NH Km crossing Railway line between Pudi Renigunta Km 132/16-18 on Renigunta-Chennai section of Southern Railway Chennai. Zonal RLY SR RLY Div. Works Branch Chennai RLY KM 132/16-18 LC NO. RLY Block 194 A - GAD STATUS OF APPROVALS PENDING WITH RAILWAYS (Not Submitted NS & Not Required/NR) STRUCTURAL CRS DESIGN & DRAWING TAD (Launching Programme ) Traffic Block/ Speed Restrictio n L-xing Shiftin g RLY Utility Shifted STATUS OF APPROVALS PENDING WITH NHAI P.E/D&G/ Maint./ Charges Deposited (Yes/No) Acquisitio n of Land (Yes/No) Agmt Signed (Yes/ No) Progress of Bridge (%) Likely Completion of ROB Detailed Remark of NHAI Approve d on Sub structure drawing were approved vide letter no.w352/m165 dated Super Structure Drawings were approved vide letter no W352/M/165 dated NS Not Applie d - Yes No No lakhs deposited by the Concessiona ire. Yes 60% Work under progress A) For abutment A1, abutment cap and Pedestals are laid. B) For pier P1 Pier cap Pedestals are laid. C) For pier P2, Concrete is laid up to top of tie beam. D) For abutment A2, all the piles are cast and pile cap is to be laid. E) Casting of all the 18 girders is completed. All the works will be completed within 9 months of such unencunbran ce. GAD approved by Southern Railway. Substructure & Superstructure drawings were approved by Southern Railways. Concessionaire has been informed to deposit Rs.3,59,100 for obtaining permission for disconnecting the jumper connection and lowering of traction line vide NHAI Lr.no: NHAI/18011/97E /2009/ PIU Chennai/1642 ;dt and the same is not yet paid by the Concessionaire. [IE s MPR, March ] Page 101

105 Annexure - VIII STATUS OF STRUCTURES UPTO MARCH :- A.P. Section Major Bridge (AP Section) S. No. Vent/Span Details Side Status of work Remarks x18.6 RHS Work completed x B/S Work completed ROB (AP Section) x x x7.50 1x25 + 1x x25 B/S Work completed Work under progress A) For abutment A1, abutment cap and Pedestals are laid. B) For pier P1 Pier cap Pedestals are laid. C) For pier P2, Concrete is laid up to top of tie beam. D) For abutment A2, all the piles are cast and pile cap is to be laid. E) Casting of all the 18 girders is completed. only repair Minor Bridge (AP Section) x7 B/S Completed x8 B/S Completed x17 B/S Completed x12.8 B/S Completed x B/S Abutment A1 is completed on LHS & RHS. Abutment A2 is completed RHS only. Deck slab is laid on RHS. For Abutment A2, work on LHS is to be taken up x B/S Work Completed (except expansion joint) x5.5 B/S Completed x5.5 B/S Completed x6 Completed (Except approach slabs) R&W x6 Completed (Except approach slabs) R&W x15 Completed Only repair VUP (AP Section) x16.85 B/S All the deck slabs are laid on both LHS and RHS x B/S Work completed x 11.5 B/S PUP (AP Section) Work completed (except expansion joints wearing coat and approach slabs. NIL [IE s MPR, March ]

106 Sl. No [IE s MPR, March ] Widening of Pipe Culverts As per Schedule A Proposed in Schedule B As per actual execution at site Existing (1) Type of structure (2) Sl. No Design (3) Type of structure (4) Sl. No. (5) Type of structure (6) Page 103 Remarks (7) Status of work (8) PC PC Widening PC Widening - Completed Proposed for deletion and (-)ve COS Proposals submitted to Authority vide Lr.no.CEI PC PC Widening PC Widening - Pj/NHAI/TRP/ /2014 /1157 dt PC PC Widening PC Widening - Widening not done PC PC Widening PC Widening - Completed PC PC Widening PC Widening - Completed PC PC Widening PC Widening - Widening not done PC PC Widening PC Widening - Widening not done PC PC Widening PC Widening - Widening not done PC Widening Additional Work Widening done on LHS Widening of Slab Culverts As per Schedule A Proposed in Schedule B As per actual execution at site Sl. Existing Type of Design Type of Span Span Sl. Sl. Type of structure No structure structure arrangement arrangement No No. (7) (8) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (9) SC 2.00x x SC SC SC Widening SC Widening SC Widening SC Widening 1x SC Widening 1x x1.50 1x SC Widening Remarks (10) New Box Culvert Constructed Status of work (11) Completed 1x4.00 Not done Yet to Start New Box Culvert Constructed Completed 1x2.00 Not done Yet to Start

107 BOX CULVERTS IN AP SECTION : Sl.No (1) As per Schedule A Existing (2) Type of structure (3) Sl. No Design (4) Proposed in Schedule B Type of structure (5) Span arrangeman (6) Sl. No. As per actual execution at site (7) Type of structure (8) Span arrangeman (9) x x2.00 Completed x x3.00 Completed x x3.00 Completed x x3.00 Completed x x3.00 Completed x x3.00 Completed x x2.20 Shifted from Completed (+) x x3.00 Shifted from Completed (+) x3.00x x3.00x2.20 Shifted from Completed (+) x x1.50 Completed PC x x1.50 Completed (-) x x1.10 Completed PC x x1.50 Completed (-) PC x x1.00 Completed (+) PC x x1.25 Completed (+) PC x x1.20 Completed (-) PC x x1.80 Completed (+) PC x x1.70 Completed (-) PC x x1.20 Completed (+) PC x x1.50 Completed PC x x1.50 Completed (+) PC x x2.20 Completed (+) 5 - PC x x2.00 Completed PC x x1.50 Completed PC x x2.00 Completed (-) PC x x2.00 Not Constructed x x1.50 Completed PC x x2.00 Completed (+) PC x x2.00 Completed PC x x1.70 Completed (-) x x2.50 Not Constructed PC x x1.20 Completed (+) PC x x1.00 Completed (+) PC x x1.20 Completed (+) PC x x2.00 Completed (-) PC x x1.50 Completed PC x x3.00 Completed (+) 39 Remarks (10) Status of work (11) Distance by which culvert is shifted in meter's [IE s MPR, March ] Page 104

108 Sl.No (1) As per Schedule A Existing (2) Type of structure (3) Sl. No Design (4) Proposed in Schedule B Type of structure (5) Span arrangeman (6) Sl. No. As per actual execution at site (7) Type of structure (8) Span arrangeman (9) PC x x3.00 Completed PC x x3.00 Completed PC x x3.00 Completed (+) PC x x1.00 Completed (+) PC x x1.50 Completed PC SC 1.00x x1.50 Completed PC x x1.00 Completed x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed x x2.35 Shifted from Completed (-) PC x x1.50 Completed (+) PC x3.00x x3.00x1.50 Completed (+) PC x x1.00 Completed (+) PC SC 1.00x x1.50 Completed (-) SC 1.00x x1.50 Completed PC x x1.20 Completed (-) PC SC 1x x1.00 Completed PC x x1.10 Completed (+) PC x x1.50 Not Constructed (+) x x0.80 Not Constructed Culvert Ch and informed by the concessionar vide Lr.No. TTCTPL/SPV/Design & Drawing/2013/286/Dt x3.00x2.00 Additional Culvert Completed SC x x1.30 Completed (-) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed PC x x1.20 Completed (-) PC x x2.30 RHS Completed, LHS in progress (+) 8 Remarks (10) Status of work (11) Distance by which culvert is shifted in meter's [IE s MPR, March ] Page 105

109 Sl.No (1) As per Schedule A Existing (2) Type of structure (3) Sl. No Design (4) Proposed in Schedule B Type of structure (5) Span arrangeman (6) Sl. No. As per actual execution at site (7) Type of structure (8) Span arrangeman (9) SC x x1.70 Not Constructed Gajulamandyam Village Limits (+) SC x x1.00 Not Constructed Gajulamandyam Village Limits (-) PC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) SC x x1.10 Completed (-) x1.00 Additional Culvert Completed x x2.00 Completed (-) x x2.00 Completed (-) PC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) PC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) x x3.00 Completed (-) PC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) x2.00 Additional Culvert Completed x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed x3.00x x3.00x4.00 Completed x3.00x x3.00x3.00 Completed x x1.50 Not Constructed Shifted from (+) x x1.50 Completed (-) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed SC 1x x2.20 Completed (+) x x3.00 Not Constructed SC 1x x1.50 Completed (-) x x2.00 Shifted from Completed (+) SC SC 1x x1.50 Not Constructed LA Problem (+) PC SC 1x x1.50 Completed x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) x x2.00 Completed (-) x x2.00 Completed (-) SC x x1.10 Completed (-) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed PC x x2.00 Completed (+) PC x x3.00 Completed (-) PC x x3.00 Completed (-) PC x x3.00 Completed (-) PC x x2.00 Completed (+) SC x x1.30 Completed (+) PC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) 20 Remarks (10) Status of work (11) Distance by which culvert is shifted in meter's [IE s MPR, March ] Page 106

110 Sl.No (1) As per Schedule A Existing (2) Type of structure (3) Sl. No Design (4) Proposed in Schedule B Type of structure (5) Span arrangeman (6) Sl. No. As per actual execution at site (7) Type of structure (8) Span arrangeman (9) SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed x1.20 Additional Culvert Completed - 66 Puttur Bypass x x1.50 Completed (+) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed - 67 Puttur Bypass x x3.00 Completed 0 LHS Completed, x x1.50 Shifted from RHS to be (+) 8 strated x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed x x3.00 Shifted from Completed (-) x3.00x x3.00x2.50 Shifted from Completed (+) Puttur Bypass x x2.20 Completed (+) SC x x1.70 Completed (+) SC x x1.80 Completed (+) PC x x2.00 Completed (+) SC x x2.00 Completed (-) MIB SC 1x x1.50 Completed (-) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (-) SC x x1.50 Completed (-) SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) x x1.00 Completed SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (-) SC x x1.20 Completed (-) SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (-) SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (-) PC x x1.30 Completed (-) PC x x1.00 Completed (-) SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) PC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) PC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (-) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed PC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (-) SC x x1.10 Completed (+) 36 Remarks (10) Status of work (11) Distance by which culvert is shifted in meter's [IE s MPR, March ] Page 107

111 Sl.No (1) As per Schedule A Existing (2) Type of structure (3) Sl. No Design (4) Type of structure (5) Span arrangeman (6) Sl. No. (7) Type of structure (8) Span arrangeman (9) SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (+) SC x x1.20 Completed (+) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed - 93 Taduku Bypass SC x x1.50x1.40 Completed (+) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed - 94 Taduku Bypass SC x x5.00x1.00 Completed (+) Taduku SC x x1.20 Completed (+) x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed x1.50 Additional Culvert Completed - 96 Taduku Bypass SC x x1.10 Completed (+) Taduku Bypass SC x3.00x x3.00x2.80 Completed 98 Taduku Bypass SC x x1.50 Completed (+) 4 99 Taduku Bypass SC x x3.00 Not Constructed Taduku PC x x3.00 Completed (-) 3 Bypass Proposed in Schedule B As per actual execution at site x x2.00 Completed x x3.00 Completed x x1.50 Shifted from Completed (-) 20 Taduku Bypass PC x x5.50 Completed (+) x2.50 Additional Culvert Completed x2.50 Additional Culvert Completed x x1.00 Completed (+) SC SC 1x x1.50 Shifted from Completed (-) SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed SC SC 1x x1.50 Completed (-) SC x x1.00 Completed (+) 7 Remarks (10) Status of work (11) Distance by which culvert is shifted in meter's [IE s MPR, March ] Page 108

112 STATUS OF STRUCTURES UPTO MARCH T.N. Section Major Bridge (TN Section) S.No Vent/Span Details Side Status of Work x16.6+8x18.6 RHS Work completed Work in progress (65 piles completed out of 65, x25+2x30+2x10 RHS 16 girders casted out of 1x6), Launching of Girder 8 Nos completed out of 16 Nos, ( 2 slab completed out of 6slab ) x25+5x30 LHS Minor Bridge (TN Section) S.no Vent/Span Details Side Structure work Completed (Except Expansion joint & Wearing coat and Crash barrier) Status of Work Remarks & Crash Barrier Structure Total Width (m) Completed Work in progress Work in progress Remarks & Crash Barrier Structure Total Width (m) X7 RHS Completed Completed X9 LHS Completed Completed X3.8 LHS Completed Completed X LHS Completed Completed X2.5 RHS Work in progress (Repair) Work in progress X LHS Completed Completed x4 RHS Completed Completed X5.8 RHS Completed Completed X6 LHS Completed Completed X5.25 LHS Completed Completed x (25.075) X10 B/S VUP (TN Section) B/S Yet to Start (Krishna canal) Yet to Start Structure work Completed (Except Expansion joint & Wearing coat and Crash barrier) Work in progress X B/S Yet to Start Yet to Start PUP (TN Section) X3.5 B/S Structure work Completed (Except Wearing coat and Crash barrier) Work in progress [IE s MPR, March ] Page 109

113 BOX CULVERTS IN TN SECTION Sl.N o (1) BOX CULVERTS IN TN SECTION As per Schedule A Proposed in Schedule B As per actual execution at site Existing (2) Type of structire (3) Sl.N o Design (4) Type of structure (5) Span arrangeman (6) Sl. No. (7) Type of structire (8) Span arrangeman (9) Remarks (10) Status of work (11) Structure Total Width (m) SC Box 2.5X Box 1X2.5X1.6 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X4X1.5 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X4X1.5 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X1.7 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.1 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X2 Completed PC Box 3.0X Box 1X3X2 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X1.6 Completed SC Box 2X3.0X Box 2X3X1.7 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X2.5X1.5 Completed SC Box 3.0X Box 1X3X1 Completed PC Box 2X3.0X Box 2X3X1.5 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.3 Completed PC Box 4.0X Box 1X4X2 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X2X1.5 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.9 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.9 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X2 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X2X3 Completed SC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X2.3 Completed PC Box 4.0X Box 1X4X2.5 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X3X1.3 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X4X1.5 Completed SC Box 2X3.0X Box 2X3X2.1 Completed SC Box 2.5X Box 1X2.5X1.8 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X2 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X2X1.5 Completed SC Box 1.9X Box 1X1.9X1.3 Completed [IE s MPR, March ] Page 110

114 Sl.N o (1) Existing (2) Type of structire (3) Sl.N o Design (4) Type of structure (5) Span arrangeman (6) Sl. No. (7) Type of structire (8) Span arrangeman (9) SC Box 4.0X Box 1X4X1.5 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X2.4 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X2 Completed Box 2X3.0X Box 2X3X3 Completed Box 2X3.0X Box 2X3X2.6 Completed Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed Box 1X3X1.5 Completed Box 1X1X1.5 Completed Box 3.0X Box 1X3X3 Completed Box 3.0X Box 1X3X1.3 Completed Box 3.0X Box 1X3X1.5 Completed Box 3.0X Box 1X3X3 Completed SC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X1.2 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1 Completed Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.6 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.7 Completed Box 3.0X Box 1X3X3 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X2.4 Completed As per Schedule A Proposed in Schedule B As per actual execution at site SC Box 4.0X Remarks (10) Status of work (11) Box 1X4X3.2 Completed Structure Total Width (m) PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.1 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X1.3 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.6 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X2X1 Completed Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X2 Completed Box 1X2.0X1.5 Completed Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed Box 1X3.0X1.5 Completed SC Box 2.0X Box 1X2.0X1.4 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 work in Progress Box 1X1.5X1.5 work in Progress PC Box 4.0X Box 1X4X2.1 Completed [IE s MPR, March ] Page 111

115 Sl.N o (1) As per Schedule A Proposed in Schedule B As per actual execution at site Existing (2) Type of structire (3) Sl.N o Design (4) Type of structure (5) Span arrangeman (6) Sl. No. (7) Type of structire (8) Span arrangeman (9) Remarks (10) Status of work (11) Structure Total Width (m) SC Box 4.0X Box 1X4.0X1.4 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X2.1 Yet to Start (L.A) _ PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X2.3 Yet to Start (L.A) _ 60 PC 67 Box 3.0X Box Yet to Start (L.A) _ X3.0X PC Box 3.0X Box 1X3.0X1.5 Completed PC Box 3X Box 1X3.0X3.0 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X3.0X1.5 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X2.4 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X2.6 Not Constructed Deleted and informed by the concessionar vide Lr.No. TTCTPL/SPV/C ulvert/2013/512/ Dt Not Constructed Deleted and informed by the Concessionaire vide Lr.No. TTCTPL/SPV/ Culvert/2013/512/Dt _ PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X3.1 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X2.8 Completed PC Box 2X3X Box 2X3X1.4 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.8 Completed SC SC 1X Box 1X2.8X1 Completed Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.4 Completed SP Box 3.0X Box 1X3X2.1 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2.0X1.1 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X1.9 Completed SC Box 2X3.0X Box 2X2X3 Completed PC SC 1X Box 1X1X1.5 Completed [IE s MPR, March ] Page 112

116 Sl.N o (1) As per Schedule A Proposed in Schedule B As per actual execution at site Existing (2) Type of structire (3) Sl.N o Design (4) Type of structure (5) Span arrangeman (6) Sl. No. (7) Type of structire (8) Span arrangeman (9) Remarks (10) Status of work (11) Structure Total Width (m) PC Box 2.0X Box 1X2X1.5 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.2 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.6 Completed SC Box 3.0X Box 1X3X1.8 Completed Box 1X1.5X1.5 Completed PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X2.1 Completed PC Box 2.0X Box 2.0X2.2 Completed Box 1X5.8X2.8 Completed Box 3.0X Box 1X3X3 Completed Box 3.0X Box 1X3X3 work in Progress Box 3.0X Box 1X3X3 work in Progress Box 3.0X Box 1X3X2.9 work in Progress Box 3.0X Box 1X3X2.1 work in Progress Box 3.0X Box 1X3X3 Yet to Start (L.A) _ Box 4.0X Box 1X4X2.9 work in Progress Box 8.0X Box 1X3X3.2 Yet to Start (L.A) _ Box 2X3X Box 2X3X2.9 work in Progress Box 2X3X Box 2X3X2.1 Yet to Start (L.A) _ SC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X3.0 work in Progress PC SC 1X Box 1X1.5X1.5 work in Progress PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.0 work in Progress Box 3.0X Box 1X3X1 work in Progress Box 2X3X Box 2X3.0X1.8 work in Progress Box 3.0X Box 1X3.0X1.2 work in Progress Box 3.0X Box 1X3.0X3.0 Yet to Start (L.A) _ PC Box 1.5X Box 1X1.5X1.8 Yet to Start (L.A) _ Box 3.0X Box 1X3.0X1.4 Yet to Start (L.A) _ Box 1X6X2 work in Progress Box 3.0X Box 1X3.0X1.7 work in Progress Box 1X1.5X1.5 work in Progress SC 1X Box 1X4X1.5 work in Progress SC SC 1X Box 1X2 Yet to Start (L.A) _ [IE s MPR, March ] Page 113

117 PHOTOGRAPHS: Annexure - IX Incomplete VUP and its Km (Tirupati Side) in AP section. Incomplete VUP and its Km (Chennai Side) in AP section. [IE s MPR, March ]

118 Incomplete VUP and its Km (Chennai Side) in AP section. Incomplete ROB and its Km (Chennai Side) in AP section. [IE s MPR, March ] Page 115

119 Incomplete Major Bridge and its Approach on Tirupati Km in TN section. Incomplete Major Bridge and its Approach on Chennai Km in TN section. [IE s MPR, March ] Page 116