Presentation To: HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force
|
|
- Aldous Perry
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Presentation To: HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force HRTPO Norfolk-Richmond Passenger Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasts Presentation By December 17, 2013 Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc.
2 COMPASS Forecasting Process Data Requirement Stated Preference Survey Origin- Destination Data Transport Network Trip Matrices Economic Scenarios Base Year Socio- Economics Demand Model Calibration Total Demand Induced Demand Modal Split Base Year Matrix Model System Development Travel Demand Forecasts Forecasting Assumptions Transportation Strategies Travel Demand Model Run Forecast Year Trip Matrices Revenue Analysis Financial Analysis User Benefit Analysis Economic Rent Analysis Evaluation Process 1
3 Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecast Study Area Zone System Number of State Zones Connecticut 5 Delaware 1 District of Columbia 10 Maryland 70 Massachusetts 7 New Jersey 16 New York 9 North Carolina 43 Pennsylvania 5 Rhode Island 5 Virginia 162 Total Number of Zones 333 PETERSBURG JAMES CITY GLOUCESTER COUNTY WILLIAMSBURG YORK COUNTY NEWPORT NEWS POQUOSON HAMPTON ISLE OF WIGHT NORFOLK PORTSMOUTH VIRGINIA SUFFOLK BEACH CHESAPEAKE 2
4 Hampton Roads Region Zones Zoom-In WILLIAMSBURG JAMES CITY COUNTY GLOUCESTER COUNTY YORK COUNTY NEWPORT NEWS HAMPTON ROADS ISLE OFWIGHT POQUOSON HAMPTON NORFOLK PORTSMOUTH SUFFOLK VIRGINIA BEACH CHESAPEAKE 3
5 Sources for Socioeconomic Database U.S. Census Bureau Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Richmond Regional Planning District Commission Crater Planning District Commission Virginia Employment Commission Metropolitan Washington County of Governments Baltimore Metropolitan Council Bureau of Economic Analysis Woods & Poole Economics, Inc. 4
6 Socioeconomic Growth Projection for the Whole Study Area that Extends from Boston to Charlotte 5
7 Attributes Included in COMPASS Transportation Networks Time Costs Schedule Public Modes In-Vehicle Time Access/Egress Time Transfer Time Wait Time Fare Access/Egress Costs Parking Cost Service Frequency Auto Travel Time Congestion Delay Operating Costs* Tolls* Parking Costs* * Divided by occupancy 6
8 Sources of Transportation Networks Transportation networks were based on: State and Local Departments of Transportation highway databases National Highway System (NHS) database Amtrak schedules Airline schedules The ten percent sample of airline tickets Greyhound schedules Megabus schedules 7
9 COMPASS Networks The COMPASS Networks include the following networks from Charlotte, NC to Boston, MA (including the Hampton Roads area, Richmond, VA, Washington, DC, and New York, NY): Intercity Highway Passenger Rail Air Intercity Bus 8
10 Sources of Base Year Trip Database The Airline Origin and Destination Survey (DB1B) Air Ticket Database T-100 Air Market and Segment Database Greyhound and Megabus Schedules Previous travel origin-destination surveys State department of transportation (Virginia, Maryland, Washington, DC, North Carolina, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts) highway traffic volume Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) data Amtrak passenger rail ridership data Amtrak station volume data TEMS 2012 Virginia Travel Survey 9
11 Base Year 2012 Annual Intercity Travel Market for the Whole Study Area that Extends from Boston to Charlotte Person Trips by Mode (million) Travel Market Share by Mode Total Base Year 2012 Annual Person Trips: Million 10
12 Values of Time, Frequency, and Access Time VOT (2012 $/Hour) Air Bus Car Rail Business $44.45 $11.07 $19.42 $22.51 Commuter - $7.15 $14.80 $18.80 Social $31.76 $8.54 $16.88 $17.88 VOF (2012 $/Hour) Air Bus Rail Business $28.81 $7.33 $18.58 Commuter $6.50 $13.67 Social $26.28 $7.75 $16.13 VOA (2012 $/Hour) Air Bus Rail Business $ $42.73 Commuter - $8.89 $29.15 Social $47.94 $10.77 $37.66 Intercity value of time is larger than intraurban value of time due to longer trip length, this explains why commuters have lower value of time, which have more intraurban trips than other trip purposes 11
13 Future Crude Oil Price Projections * EIA projections go to 2040, projections beyond 2040 were extrapolated Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 12
14 Future Gasoline Price Projections * EIA projections go to 2040, projections beyond 2040 were extrapolated Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 13
15 Automobile Highway Fuel Efficiency Projections Estimated based on Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Center for Transportation Analysis (CTA) historical automobile highway energy intensities data 14
16 Gasoline Price Projections Adjusted by Fuel Efficiency Improvement * EIA projections go to 2040, projections beyond 2040 were extrapolated Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 15
17 Highway Congestion Estimates Corridor Highway Travel Time Projection 2025 Estimated 2012 Travel Time Travel Time Norfolk, VA - Richmond, VA 1Hour 40Min 1Hour 55Min Norfolk, VA - Petersburg, VA 1Hour 35Min 1Hour 43Min 16
18 COMPASS Hierarchical Travel Demand Model Structure Total Demand Public Modes Auto LEVEL 4 Air Surface Modes LEVEL 3 Rail Bus LEVEL 2 Southside/Norfolk Route Peninsula Route LEVEL 1 17
19 Travel Utility Estimation Process Step 1: Compute Utilities for Rail and Bus Rail Southside/Norfolk Route: U = α + β Rail South Rail South Rail South GC Rail South Rail Peninsula Route: U = β Rail Peninsula Rail Peninsula GC Rail Peninsula Step 2: Compute Utilities for Rail and Bus Rail: U = α + β Ln U ) + exp( U Rail Rail Rail [exp( Rail South Rail Peninsula )] Bus: U Bus = β Bus GC Bus Step 3: Compute Utilities for Surface and Air Surface: U = α + β Ln[exp( U ) + exp( U Surface Surface Surface Rail Bus )] Air: U Air = β Air GC Air Step 4: Compute Utilities for Public and Auto Public: U = α + β Ln[exp( U ) + exp( U Public Public Public Surface Air )] Auto: U Auto = β Auto GC Auto Step 5: Compute Total Utility Total: U = Ln[exp( U ) + exp( U Total Auto Public )] Reference: Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Moshe Ben-Akiva and Steven R. Lerman, The MIT Press
20 Study Area Travel Market Forecast Annual Person Trips for the Whole Study Area that Extends from Boston to Charlotte Average annual travel demand growth: 0.9% 19
21 130 MPH High-Speed Passenger Rail Ridership Forecast- Annual Person Trips for the Whole Study Area that Extends from Boston to Charlotte Southern Option 1 via Petersburg Northern Option 2 via Hopewell Option 3 Richmond Direct Southside/Norfolk Route has 13 daily roundtrips, Peninsula Route has three daily roundtrips 20
22 220 MPH High-Speed Passenger Rail Ridership Forecast- Annual Person Trips for the Whole Study Area that Extends from Boston to Charlotte Southern Option 1 via Petersburg Northern Option 2 via Hopewell Option 3 Richmond Direct Southside/Norfolk Route has 22 daily roundtrips, Peninsula Route has three daily roundtrips 21
23 130 MPH High-Speed Passenger Rail Revenue Forecast- Annual Revenue for the Whole Study Area that Extends from Boston to Charlotte Southern Option 1 via Petersburg Northern Option 2 via Hopewell Option 3 Richmond Direct Southside/Norfolk Route has 13 daily roundtrips, Peninsula Route has three daily roundtrips Only revenues within the Hampton Roads-Washington Corridor are included 22
24 220 MPH High-Speed Passenger Rail Revenue Forecast- Annual Revenue for the Whole Study Area that Extends from Boston to Charlotte Southern Option 1 via Petersburg Northern Option 2 via Hopewell Option 3 Richmond Direct Southside/Norfolk Route has 22 daily roundtrips, Peninsula Route has three daily roundtrips Only revenues within the Hampton Roads-Washington Corridor are included 23
25 Intercity Travel Market Share Forecast Southern Option 1 via Petersburg MPH HSR 220 MPH HSR 24
26 Intercity Travel Market Share Forecast Northern Option 2 via Hopewell MPH HSR 220 MPH HSR 25
27 Intercity Travel Market Share Forecast Option 3 Richmond Direct MPH HSR 220 MPH HSR 26
28 Sources of HSR Trips- Southern Option 1 via Petersburg MPH HSR 220 MPH HSR Natural Growth refers to changes in travel demand related to changes in socioeconomic factors that contribute to growth in demand Induced Demand refers to changes in travel demand related to improvements in a transportation system, as opposed to changes in socioeconomic factors that contribute to growth in demand 27
29 Sources of HSR Trips- Northern Option 2 via Hopewell MPH HSR 220 MPH HSR Natural Growth refers to changes in travel demand related to changes in socioeconomic factors that contribute to growth in demand Induced Demand refers to changes in travel demand related to improvements in a transportation system, as opposed to changes in socioeconomic factors that contribute to growth in demand 28
30 Sources of HSR Trips- Option 3 Richmond Direct MPH HSR 220 MPH HSR Natural Growth refers to changes in travel demand related to changes in socioeconomic factors that contribute to growth in demand Induced Demand refers to changes in travel demand related to improvements in a transportation system, as opposed to changes in socioeconomic factors that contribute to growth in demand 29
31 2025 Annual Station Volumes 130 MPH Southern Option 1 via Petersburg Northern Option 2 via Hopewell Option 3 Richmond Direct 30
32 2025 Annual Station Volumes 220 MPH Southern Option 1 via Petersburg Northern Option 2 via Hopewell Option 3 Richmond Direct 31
33 2025 Annual Segment Loadings 130 MPH Southern Option 1 via Petersburg Northern Option 2 via Hopewell Option 3 Richmond Direct 32
34 2025 Annual Segment Loadings 220 MPH Southern Option 1 via Petersburg Northern Option 2 via Hopewell Option 3 Richmond Direct 33
35 Comparison to AECOM 2009 Study Option 1 Time Daily Round Trips 2025 Annual Hampton Road- Based Rail Trips (million) 2025 Annual Hampton Road- Based Rail Revenue (million $) AECOM Option 1 90 MPH 1: $69.12 TEMS Southern Option via Petersburg Assuming AECOM Option 1 Levels of Service 1: $76.7 Source: Richmond/Hampton Roads Passenger Rail Project Alternative Analysis and Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement by AECOM,
36 Contribution of Service and Market Factors to TEMS Forecast of 2025 Annual Rail Trips 35
37 Apples-to-Apples Comparison to Amtrak NEC Master Plan and Next-Gen HSR (Internal Intercity Trips Only) 2025 Hampton Roads- Washington Corridor MPH 2025 Hampton Roads- Washington Corridor MPH 2030 NEC Master Plan (Constrained Acela) 2030 NEC Next-Gen HSR (220 MPH) 2030 NEC Master Plan 2030 NEC NYC-DC Next-Gen Corridor HSR NYC-DC (Constrained Corridor (220 Acela) MPH) Rail Trip Rate (trips per 10,000 person per day)
38 Appendix 37
39 Stated Preference Survey Deployment TEMS conducted the stated preference survey in order to Update Value of Time (VOT), Value of Frequency (VOF), and Value of Access/Egress (VOA) in the study area Update the modal choice model and total demand model for the passenger rail ridership and revenue forecasts On-Site Survey Team Actual Deployment & Online Survey 38
40 Stated Preference Survey Counts Actual Survey Counts Location Field & Online Count (Actual) DMV 1,377 TOTAL of VOT s, VOF s & VOA s for all modes = 3,792 Airport 573 Amtrak 690 Bus 96 TOTAL 2,736 39
41 VOT Calculation Results 40
42 VOF Calculation Results 41
43 VOA Calculation Results 42
44 Thank You 43
45 Presentation To HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force HRTPO Norfolk-Richmond Passenger Rail Operations Plan and Costs Presentation By December 17, 2013 Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc.
46 PHASE 2B WORK PLAN # Tasks 1 Project Management 2 Rail Alternatives 3 Ridership and Revenue - Forecasts Sensitivity Analysis 4 Rail Service Analysis 5 Operating and Capital Costs 6 Financial and Economic Analysis - Financial - Economic 7 Environmental Scan 8 Implementation Plan 9 Report M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 MEETINGS PRESENTATIONS MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORTS 1
47 BACKGROUND/CONTEXT FOR THE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 2
48 HAMPTON ROADS CORRIDOR AS PART OF SEHSR 3
49 HOWEVER, THERE IS A GAP IN THE MIDDLE OF SEHSR Very Low Population Area 4
50 ... AS A RESULT, IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT HAMPTON ROADS IS MORE FUNCTIONALLY DEPENDENT ON THE NEC THAN ON SEHSR The Hampton Roads Corridor has been divided into three segments for analysis purposes: 1. Washington DC to Richmond 2. Richmond to Newport News - Peninsula 3. Richmond to Norfolk - Southside 5
51 ORIGINALLY, DEVELOPMENT STEPS WERE DEFINED FOR BOTH THE PENINSULA AND SOUTH SIDE ROUTES Steps Route Max Speed No. of Trains Infrastructure Station Step 1 I-64/CSXT 79 mph 2 Shared Track Schedule Enhancement Main Street Newport News (existing) Route 460/ Norfolk Southern 79 mph 1-3 Shared Track NS Staples Mill Only Norfolk Step 2 (DEIS Alt 1) DRPT Focus I-64/CSXT 79 mph 3 Shared Track Route 460/ Norfolk Southern mph * 4-6 Shared Track V Line Main Street Newport News (existing) Main Street Bowers Hill Step 3 HRTPO Focus I-64/CSXT 90 mph 4-6 Shared Track Route 460/ Norfolk Southern 110 mph 8-12 Dedicated Track V Line Main Street Newport News Downtown/Airport Main Street Bowers Hill Step 4 I-64/CSXT 110 mph 6-9 Dedicated Track Route 460/ Norfolk Southern 150 mph Dedicated Electric Track V Line Main Street Newport News Downtown/Airport Main Street Bowers Hill *Note: Norfolk Southern (NS) does not permit passenger train maximum authorized speed in excess of 79-mph on any NS track. Where the V-line (former Virginian Railway) has existing freight services, maximum authorized speed for passenger trains will be 79-mph. Along the Algren Kenyon portion of the V-line (over which NS freight rail service has been formally abandoned), passenger rail planners may consider speeds above 79-mph. 6
52 SCHEDULES WERE DEVELOPED FOR THE WHOLE CORRIDOR FROM HAMPTON ROADS TO WASHINGTON D.C. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 79-mph 79-mph 79-mph 90-mph 90-mph 110-mph 110-mph 150-mph Washington to Richmond 2:45 1 2:15 2 2:20 3 2:05 2:20 1:30 1:30 1:05 Richmond to Norfolk 1:48 1:48 5 1:10 0:55 Richmond to Newport News 1:25 1:25 1:13 0:52 Total 4:10 4:03 3:45 3:53 3:33 2:40 2:22 2: :45 current Amtrak time to Main Street, 1:35 to Newport News 2 2:15 current Amtrak time to Staples Mill Road Station only, does not go to Main Street 3 2:20 to Main Street, train operates at 90 mph north of Richmond 4 2:00 proposed schedule objective for HSR electric service 5 1:48 at 79-mph Richmond to Norfolk Source: Exhibit B-6, Progress Report B, page B-13, 2010 study 7
53 BUT, RECENTLY THE FOCUS HAS BEEN ON REFINING PLAN FOR THE SOUTHSIDE SERVICE TO NORFOLK Steps Route Max Speed No. of Trains Infrastructure Station Step 3 Norfolk-Richmond along Route mph 8-12 Dedicated Track V Line Main Street Bowers Hill Step 4 Norfolk-Richmond along Route mph Dedicated Electric Track V Line Main Street Bowers Hill Focus of the Study 8
54 TRAIN TECHNOLOGY HAS ADVANCED SINCE 2010! Diesel HrST mph Business Model of the MWRRS Speeds up to 130-mph on dedicated high speed tracks; Tier I Compliant trains for Shared tracks in urban areas Low Center of Gravity Diesel Locomotives Passive Tilting Existing +New Alignment Because of Alternative Tier 1 Compliance, High Speed 220- mph electric trains can now share freight tracks at speeds under 125-mph the California Blended Operations model has also been adopted by Amtrak for the NEC. There is now only a single generic High Speed electric train and it can operate at 220-mph. The diesel train can operate up to 130-mph. NS policy prohibits shared operations above 79- mph, and a dedicated track could support 130-mph, so it makes sense to evaluate the diesel operation at that speed. Electric HST mph Business Model of California HSR Speeds up to 220-mph on dedicated high speed tracks; Tier I Compliant trains for Shared tracks in urban areas Low Center of Gravity Electric Locomotives Passive Tilting Existing +New Alignment 9
55 HAMPTON ROADS TO WASHINGTON D.C. RAIL SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS* Washington D.C. to Richmond, 109 miles (Current Time 2:00, 79 mph): Assumes a new conceptual greenfield due to capacity and geometric limitation of existing ROW 130-mph diesel could easily achieve 1:30 on a greenfield an aggressive tilt train could achieve this time on the existing CSX alignment 220-mph electric could achieve 0:55 based on a high quality greenfield from Lorton to Richmond Richmond to Norfolk, miles (Current Time 2:00, 79 mph): 13 daily round trips at 130-mph; 1:00 to 1:10 schedule times 22 daily round trips at 220-mph; 0:45 to 0:55 schedule times Richmond to Newport News, 75 miles (Current Time 1:25, 79 mph): 3 daily round trips at 79-mph; 1:25 schedule time OVERALL Cut Norfolk-Washington DC Time in half: 4 hours to 2 hours, 220 mph *Source: Proposed Detailed Operating Schedules follow in this presentation 10
56 SOUTHSIDE NORFOLK SERVICE: ROUTE OPTIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT 11
57 SOUTHSIDE ROUTE OPTIONS COVER ALL THE BASES Route Options Under Analysis Existing Rail Northern and Southern Greenfields, via Petersburg and Hopewell Richmond Direct Greenfield Speeds Under Analysis 130-mph and 220-mph 12
58 COMMON SEGMENTS TO ALL OPTIONS Richmond Station All High Speed Options (either East Shore or I-295) approach from the East on an elevated Viaduct. Common Segment: Fulton Gas Works to Main Street Station Bowers Hill to Norfolk Harbor Park Common Segment: V Line and NS Main into downtown Norfolk 13
59 ROUTE OPTIONS UNDER ANALYSIS 14
60 ROUTE OPTION 1 VIA PETERSBURG Staples Mills Richmond-Main St. Hopewell-Fort Lee Williamsburg Petersburg-Ettrick Newport News-Airport Newport News-Amtrak Newport News-Downtown Bowers Hill Norfolk Suffolk 15
61 ROUTE OPTION 2 - VIA HOPEWELL Staples Mills Richmond-Main St. Hopewell-Fort Lee Williamsburg Petersburg-Ettrick Newport News-Airport Newport News-Amtrak Newport News-Downtown Bowers Hill Norfolk Suffolk 16
62 ROUTE OPTION 3 - RICHMOND DIRECT Staples Mills Richmond-Main St. Hopewell-Fort Lee Williamsburg Petersburg-Ettrick Newport News-Airport Newport News-Amtrak Newport News-Downtown Bowers Hill Norfolk Suffolk 17
63 SOUTHSIDE NORFOLK SERVICE: OPERATIONS PLAN DEVELOPMENT 18
64 INTERACTIVE INPUT INTERACTIVE ANALYSIS OUTPUT ANALYSIS APPROACH Service Plan Trains LOCOMOTION Scheduling & Operations Operating Costs Methodology for developing an optimized plan Infrastructure TRACKMAN Terminal Facilities Capital Costs Using the data that has already been collected in Phase 2A Market Analysis COMPASS Ridership & Fares Revenues Financial & Economic Feasibility 19
65 RICHMOND-WASHINGTON SCHEDULE TIMES Part of All Route Options Station 130-mph Diesel Super Express Express Local Richmond Main St 0:00 0:00 0:00 Ashland 0:12 Fredericksburg 0:40 0:45 Quantico 1:08 Alexandria 1:20 1:25 1:35 Washington Union 1:30 1:35 1:45 Station 220-mph Electric Super Express Express Local Richmond Main St 0:00 0:00 0:00 Ashland 0:10 Fredericksburg 0:25 0:30 Quantico 0:45 Alexandria 0:43 0:48 0:58 Washington Union 0:53 0:58 1:08 These times are consistent with the Step 4 times of 1:30 and 1:05 for Diesel and Electric options, respectively, from 2010 Progress Report B The 1:30 Diesel time can be done on the CSX alignment using aggressive tilt technology. The other times are based on conceptual route options only between Richmond and Washington DC 20
66 ROUTE OPTION 1: NORFOLK-WASHINGTON SCHEDULE TIMES VIA PETERSBURG Station 130-mph Diesel Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:12 0:12 0:12 Suffolk 0:17 Petersburg 0:53 0:58 Richmond Main St 1:04 1:09 1:14 Washington Union 2:36 2:46 3:01 Station 220-mph Electric Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:10 0:10 0:10 Suffolk 0:15 Petersburg 0:40 0:45 Richmond Main St 0:50 0:55 1:00 Washington Union 1:45 1:55 2:10 * Allowing 2 minutes for Richmond Station Stop Same time for Southern Greenfield or dedicated NS Option 21
67 LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 1: Lorton-Richmond + East Shore + Southern Greenfields 1:40:36 unimpeded at 220-mph Speed(mph) Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line 50 Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton Milepost Richmond/ Petersburg Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 22
68 LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 1: Lorton-Richmond + East Shore + Southern Greenfields 2:08:25 unimpeded at 130-mph 140 Speed(mph) Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line Richmond/ Petersburg Milepost Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 23
69 ROUTE OPTION 2: NORFOLK-WASHINGTON SCHEDULE TIMES VIA HOPEWELL 130-mph Diesel 220-mph Electric Station Super Express Express Local Station Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:12 0:12 0:12 Suffolk 0:17 Hopewell 0:50 0:53 Richmond Main St 1:04 1:09 1:14 Washington Union 2:36 2:46 3:01 Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:10 0:10 0:10 Suffolk 0:15 Hopewell 0:37 0:42 Richmond Main St 0:50 0:55 1:00 Washington Union 1:45 1:55 2:10 * Allowing 2 minutes for Richmond Station Stop Same time for Northern Greenfield or dedicated NS Option 24
70 LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 2: Lorton-Richmond + I Northern Greenfields 1:40:30 unimpeded at 220-mph Speed(mph) Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line 50 Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton Milepost Richmond/ I-295 / Hopewell Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 25
71 LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 2: Lorton-Richmond + I Northern Greenfields 2:07:19 unimpeded at 130-mph 140 Speed(mph) Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton Richmond/ I-295 / Hopewell Milepost Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 26
72 ROUTE OPTION 3: NORFOLK-WASHINGTON SCHEDULE TIMES VIA RICHMOND DIRECT 130-mph Diesel 220-mph Electric Station Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:12 0:12 0:12 Suffolk 0:17 Richmond Main St 0:59 0:59 1:04 Washington Union 2:31 2:36 2:51 Station Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:10 0:10 0:10 Suffolk 0:15 Richmond Main St 0:43 0:43 0:48 Washington Union 1:38 1:43 1:58 * Allowing 2 minutes for Richmond Station Stop These times are consistent with the Step 3 and 4 times of 2:40 and 2:00 for Diesel and Electric options, respectively, from 2010 Progress Report B Times are based on conceptual route options only between Richmond and Washington DC 27
73 LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 3: Lorton-Richmond + Richmond Direct Greenfields 1:31:10 unimpeded at 220-mph Speed(mph) Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line 50 Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton Milepost Richmond Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 28
74 LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 3: Lorton-Richmond + Richmond Direct Greenfields 1:59:57 unimpeded at 130-mph 140 Speed(mph) Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton Richmond Milepost Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 29
75 SUMMARY OF NORFOLK TO WASHINGTON D.C. HIGH SPEED TRAIN SCHEDULE RESULTS Stations Super Express Express Local Norfolk Bowers Hill Suffolk Petersburg/Hopewell* Richmond Main St Ashland Fredericksburg Quantico Alexandria Washington Union 130-mph Total Trains 4 trains 5 trains 4 trains 130-mph Time via Petersburg/Hopewell 2:36 2:46 3: mph Time Richmond Direct 2:31 2:36 2: mph Total Trains 6 trains 12 trains 4 trains 220-mph Time via Petersburg/Hopewell 1:45 1:55 2: mph Time Richmond Direct 1:38 1:43 1:58 * Stations Bypassed by Richmond Direct 30
76 SUMMARY OF NORFOLK TO WASHINGTON D.C. HIGH SPEED TRAIN SCHEDULE COMPARISON The performance of the 130-mph and 220-mph options both depend on the characteristics of the option that is ultimately developed between Richmond and Washington D.C. The 130-mph diesel would likely operate between 1:05 and 1:30 The 220-mph electric would likely operate between 0:55 and 1:30 The schedule times of all four route options are very close. The results of this more detailed assessment support the findings of the earlier 2010 study, Progress Report B. Petersburg and Hopewell route options have the same times. These route options are 5 minutes slower than Richmond Direct, plus an additional 5 minutes if they add a stop. This time difference is not enough to drive major differences in ridership between the options. The route selection will likely be made based on cost, environmental factors and route synergies. 31
77 OPERATING COSTS 32
78 OPERATING COST CATEGORIES Drivers Train Miles Cost Categories Equipment Maintenance Energy and Fuel Train and Engine Crews Onboard Service Crews Passenger Miles Insurance Liability Ridership and Revenue Sales and Marketing Fixed Cost Service Administration Track and ROW Maintenance Station Costs Costs were developed for four rail technologies 79-mph convention diesel 130-mph High Speed diesel 150-mph and 220-mph High Speed electric 33
79 SUMMARY OF OPERATING COSTS Unit Cost Driver Greenfield 130-mph diesel Greenfield 220-mph electric Equipment Maintenance Train-Miles $12.70 $14.08 Train Crew* Train-Miles $4.92 $4.60 Fuel or Energy* Train-Miles $8.71 $2.80 On Board Services (Labor)* Train-Miles $2.56 $2.41 On Board Services (Goods Sold) * % of OBS 50% 50% Revenue Insurance Passenger-Mile Track (Shared) Train-Miles over N/A N/A Shared Track Track and Electrification (Dedicated) Dedicated Track Miles $27,924 plus Cyclic Capital $54,783 plus Cyclic Capital Operations and Dispatch* Train-Miles Stations* Staffed and $6.45 mill $6.45 mill Unstaffed Stations Administration and Management (Fixed)* Fixed $14.35 mill $14.35 mill Administration and Management Train-Miles $1.84 $1.84 (Call Center: Variable Train-Miles)* Administration and Management Riders (Call Center: Variable Riders) Credit Card and Travel Agency Commissions* Percent of 2.8% 2.8% Revenue Operator Profit Markup Selected (*) Costs 10% 10% *This cost is included in the operator profit 10 percent markup 34
80 FIRST CUT CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS Financial 2025(mill. 2012$) Southern Option 1 - Via Petersburg Northern Option 2 - Via Hopewell Southern Option 1A - Greenfield Southern Option 1B - Norfolk Southern Northern Option 2A - Greenfield Northern Option 2B - Norfolk Southern Option 3 - Richmond Direct 130 mph 220 mph 130 mph 220 mph 130 mph 220 mph 130 mph 220 mph 130 mph 220 mph REVENUE Ticket Revenue $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ OBS Revenue 8% $15.58 $26.48 $15.58 $26.48 $15.27 $25.80 $15.27 $25.80 $16.21 $26.74 Total Revenue $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ COSTS Train Crew $10.83 $15.67 $10.83 $15.67 $10.71 $15.26 $10.71 $15.26 $11.10 $15.69 OBS $13.42 $21.45 $13.42 $21.45 $13.21 $20.90 $13.21 $20.90 $13.88 $21.59 Equipment $27.96 $47.95 $27.96 $47.95 $27.65 $46.72 $27.65 $46.72 $28.65 $48.03 Fuel $19.57 $8.92 $19.57 $8.92 $19.35 $8.69 $19.35 $8.69 $20.06 $8.94 Track $11.95 $23.45 $11.95 $23.45 $11.78 $23.12 $11.78 $23.12 $11.56 $22.68 Insurance $7.40 $11.44 $7.40 $11.44 $7.32 $11.15 $7.32 $11.15 $7.58 $11.46 Call Ctr Variable $2.65 $3.82 $2.65 $3.82 $2.62 $3.71 $2.62 $3.71 $2.77 $3.94 T-Agent and CC Comm $5.45 $9.27 $5.45 $9.27 $5.35 $9.03 $5.35 $9.03 $5.67 $9.36 Stations $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $5.91 $5.91 Admin and Mgt $18.40 $20.62 $18.40 $20.62 $18.36 $20.46 $18.36 $20.46 $18.50 $20.63 Operation & Dispactch $1.09 $1.70 $1.09 $1.70 $1.07 $1.67 $1.07 $1.67 $1.05 $1.64 Operator Profit 10% selected items $7.79 $8.79 $7.79 $8.79 $7.71 $8.62 $7.71 $8.62 $7.89 $8.77 Total Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Operating Surplus $77.35 $ $77.35 $ $74.60 $ $74.60 $ $84.16 $ Operating Ratio
81 THANK YOU 36
Presentation To HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force. HRTPO Norfolk-Richmond Passenger Rail Operations Plan and Costs.
Presentation To HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force HRTPO Norfolk-Richmond Passenger Rail Operations Plan and Costs Presentation By December 17, 2013 Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. PHASE
More informationHRTPO Strategic Campaign. Passenger Rail. Agenda Item #11. Presentation To. May 19, Presentation By
Presentation To HRTPO Board Meeting Agenda Item #11 HRTPO Strategic Campaign and Vision Plan for Passenger Rail Presentation By May 19, 2010 Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. Study Timeline
More informationThe Northeast Corridor Master Plan Amtrak s Next Generation High-Speed Rail and Northeastern Maryland
The Northeast Corridor Master Plan Amtrak s Next Generation High-Speed Rail and Northeastern Maryland Chesapeake Science & Security Corridor Regional Rail Committee Meeting October 20, 2010 Drew Galloway
More informationThe Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix
The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix Prepared by HDR August 5, 2010 The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project
More informationRocky Mountain. Corridor Input Team. Alternatives Overview. TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC
Rocky Mountain Rail Authority (RMRA) Corridor Input Team Meeting #2 Alternatives Overview December 2008 TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC 0 Agenda Introductions Study Overview Alternatives Overview
More informationThe Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor
A Long-Term Vision is Needed The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has released the Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement
More informationPHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)
PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL) October 2003 The Philadelphia commuter rail service area consists of 5.1 million people, spread over 1,800 square miles at an average population
More informationNaval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. October 2014
Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study October 2014 1 Employment by Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Naval Station Legend Norfolk is Hampton Roads Region s largest employer C or with better PM
More informationMeeting the Transportation Challenge in the Northeast
Meeting the Transportation Challenge in the Northeast Corridor Frank VACCA Chief Engineer, Amtrak, United States Drew GALLOWAY AVP, NEC Infrastructure and Investment Development, Amtrak, United States
More informationGeorgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at
Overview Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at www.garail.com Commuter rail service between Lovejoy and Atlanta is ready for implementation:
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY
APPENDIX 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY INTRODUCTION: This Appendix presents a general description of the analysis method used in forecasting
More information4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS
4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS 4.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes the estimated capital and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs for the Modal and High-Speed Train (HST) Alternatives evaluated in this
More informationAn Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service
An Overview of High Speed Rail David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service 1 Defining High Speed Rail in the U.S. What is High Speed Rail? Allusions to world-class European and Asian systems
More informationProposal for September 2006 Start of Commuter Rail from Lovejoy on the Macon Line to Atlanta
Proposal for September 2006 Start of Commuter Rail from Lovejoy on the Macon Line to Atlanta Overview Commuter rail service between Lovejoy and Atlanta is ready for implementation: $87.08 Million is in
More informationAppendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017
Appendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 2 2 Model Review and Updates... 2 2.1 Overview of Smart Moves Model ( City of London Model )... 2 2.1.1 Network and Zone
More informationAMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 28, 2010 ATK-10-130a Contact: Media Relations 202 906.3860 AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)
More informationNEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)
NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL) October 2003 New York: The New York commuter rail service area consists of 20.3 million people, spread over 4,700 square miles at an average
More informationProposed HRTAC FY2018 FY2023 Plan of Finance Update
Chair, MICHAEL J. HIPPLE Vice Chair, LINDA T. JOHNSON Executive Director, KEVIN B. PAGE Proposed HRTAC 2018 2023 Plan of Finance Update HRTAC 2018 2023 Six Year Operating and Capital Program of Projects
More informationRegional Transit Extension Studies. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013
Regional Transit Extension Studies Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013 Topics Virginia Beach Transit Extension Study (VBTES) Naval Station
More informationExecutive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1
Executive Summary Introduction The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project is a vital public transit infrastructure investment that would provide a transit connection to the existing Metro Gold Line
More informationAction 6A: HRTAC FY2018 FY2023 Funding Plan
Action 6A: HRTAC 2018 2023 Funding Plan Presentation to: HRTAC Finance Committee Kevin Page, HRTAC Liang Shan, PFM June 5, 2017 PFM Financial Advisors LLC 300 S. Orange Avenue Ste 1170 Orlando, Florida
More informationTravel Time Savings Memorandum
04-05-2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Background 3 Methodology 3 Inputs and Calculation 3 Assumptions 4 Light Rail Transit (LRT) Travel Times 5 Auto Travel Times 5 Bus Travel Times 6 Findings 7 Generalized Cost
More informationDevelopment of the Preferred Option and Implementation Plan
Presentation To RMRA Peer Panel Day #1 Preferred Option and Risk Assessment August 25, 2009 TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC 0 Development of the Preferred Option and Implementation Plan 1 1 Results
More informationTRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS
Jiangxi Ji an Sustainable Urban Transport Project (RRP PRC 45022) TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS A. Introduction 1. The purpose of the travel demand forecasts is to assess the impact of the project components
More informationTransit Access Study
West of Hudson Regional Transit Access Study Open House presentation July 20, 2010 1 Agenda Progress To date Summary of Level 2 Alternatives and Screening Service Plans Bus and Rail Operating and Capital
More informationDRAFT Subject to modifications
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M DRAFT To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 7A From: Date: Subject: Staff September 17, 2010 Council Meeting High Speed Rail Update Introduction The
More informationWaco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study Chris Evilia, Director of Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Allen Hunter, General Manager Waco Transit System Jimi Mitchell, Project Manager AECOM
More informationI-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis
I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis Steering & Technical Advisory Committees Joint Meeting January 15, 2016 @ 10:00 AM SC/TAC Meeting Winter 2016 Agenda I. Welcome & Introductions II. III. Project
More informationUS 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting March 14, 2013 Introductions ODOT FHWA SAIC Meeting Purpose Present need for bypass Provide responses to 10/04/11 public meeting comments
More informationFeasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
Feasibility Study Community Meeting March, 2017 1 Agenda 1. Welcome / Introductions 2. Background / Meeting Purpose 3. Progress to Date Options Evaluated Capital/Operating Costs Ridership 4. Financial
More information2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT
2 VALUE PROPOSITION The purpose of the Value Proposition is to define a number of metrics or interesting facts that clearly demonstrate the value of the existing Xpress system to external audiences including
More informationU.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST
U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST Arizona/Southwest High-Speed Rail System (Source: Texas A&M Transportation Institute) The Arizona/Southwest high-speed rail system described in this summary groups
More informationExpanding Capacity for the Northeast Corridor The Gateway Program
Expanding Capacity for the Northeast Corridor The Gateway Program Petra Todorovich Messick March 4, 2013 Raritan Valley Rail Coalition Somerville, NJ The Northeast Corridor Mainline and Branches 899 Route-miles
More informationTORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: October 24, 2012 SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN RAPID TRANSIT EXPANSION STUDY (DRTES) PHASE 1 STRATEGIC PLAN ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS
More informationSupporting Information
Supporting Information Strauss et al. 10.1073/pnas.1511186112 7 Antarctic Contribution (BASELINE) 7 Antarctic Contribution (TRIGGERED) Sea Level Rise (m) 6 5 4 3 2 1 SLR sensitivity to warming held constant
More informationDevelopment of 220 mph High Speed Rail Service for Illinois. Mark C. Walbrun, PE TranSystems Corporation
Development of 220 mph High Speed Rail Service for Illinois Mark C. Walbrun, PE TranSystems Corporation 1 Study Purpose Worldwide Use of High Speed Rail Technology Japan, France, Italy, Germany, Spain,
More informationKenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)
Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM) Commuter Rail #147925 November 6, 2009 1 Guidance of KRM Commuter Rail Studies Intergovernmental Partnership Technical Steering Committee Temporary and Limited Authority
More informationSTH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report
#233087 v3 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report Washington County Public Works Committee Meeting September 28, 2016 1 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Hartford Area Development
More informationNaval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. January 7, 2015
Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study January 7, 2015 1 Naval Station Norfolk is Hampton Roads Region s largest employer with approximately 60-70,000 jobs and employees from the entire Region Higher
More informationBi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis
Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis Prepared for: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Planning and Project Development May 2005 Prepared by: in conjunction
More informationLeadership NC. November 8, 2018
v Leadership NC November 8, 2018 Planning for our region s growth The Triangle is one of the fastestgrowing regions in the nation. More than 2 million people are already part of the equation, and the
More informationNeeds and Community Characteristics
Needs and Community Characteristics Anticipate Population and Job Growth in the City Strongest density of population and jobs in Ann Arbor are within the Study Area Population expected to grow 8.4% by
More informationCITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6
2016 2019 CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6 STRATEGIC AREA OF FOCUS: SUB-PRIORITY: STRATEGY: INITIATIVE: INITIATIVE LEAD(S): BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE CITY
More information6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
June 7, 2018 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 TRAC GOALS, FRAMEWORK & AGENDA REVIEW 2 COMMITTEE GOALS Learn about Southern Nevada s mobility challenges, new developments
More informationPoint A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017
Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017 Master Plan Overview Phase 1 Community Vision and Existing Transit Conditions Phase 2 Scenario Development Phase 3 Transit Master
More informationCaltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary
Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary presented to Transbay Joint Powers Authority presented by Cambridge Systematics date: March 12, 2009 Transportation leadership you can trust.
More informationPolicy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.
Policy Note Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost Recommendations 1. Saturate vanpool market before expanding other intercity
More informationA Business Case for Southeast High-Speed Rail
A Business Case for Southeast High-Speed Rail Terry Chastam Abstract As the Southeastern region of the United States continues to experience increasing levels of congestion on the regional highways, the
More informationTravel Forecasting Methodology
Travel Forecasting Methodology Introduction This technical memorandum documents the travel demand forecasting methodology used for the SH7 BRT Study. This memorandum includes discussion of the following:
More informationBroward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA
Project Development & Environment Study Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA Background P D & E Study Regional
More informationElectric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses
Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses Results of plug-in electric vehicle modeling in five Northeast & Mid-Atlantic states Quick Take With growing interest in the electrification of transportation in
More informationTRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS
Page 1 U. S. Department Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office Highway Policy Information TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS September Travel on all roads and streets changed by +2.5 (5.8 billion vehicle
More informationOverview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region
Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region Presentation to PACTS Transit Committee and Federal Transit Administration Representatives February 8, 2018 Transit Agencies Agency Communities
More informationPortland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service
Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service HNTB Corporation April 2018 Table of Contents 4.1 Overview... 4-1 4.2 Key Assumptions...
More informationTransit Access to the National Harbor
Transit Access to the National Harbor December 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Introduction and Project Purpose... 6 Methodology.. 9 Definition of Alternatives..... 9 Similar Project Implementation
More informationBCA Benefits and Assumptions Summary
2016 TIGER Application - Plymouth Multimodal BCA Benefits and Assumptions Summary The Plymouth Multimodal generates a variety of benefits, ranging from monetary such as increased transit fare revenue,
More informationElectric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses
Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses Results of plug-in electric vehicle modeling in eight US states Quick Take M.J. Bradley & Associates (MJB&A) evaluated the costs and States Evaluated benefits of
More informationBedford/Franklin Regional Rail Initiative (BFRRI) Rationale for a Bedford Amtrak Station June 30, 2015
Bedford/Franklin Regional Rail Initiative (BFRRI) Rationale for a Bedford Amtrak Station June 30, 2015 SUBJECT: Bedford Amtrak Station Why an Amtrak station in Bedford makes sense. I. BACKGROUND: In January
More informationProposed Downtown Miami Link
March 30, 2016 Proposed Downtown Miami Link A PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP Presented to: Secretary Boxold, FDOT Presented by: Jack Stephens, Executive Director, SFRTA March 30, 2016 Downtown Miami Link Costs
More informationStatus of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Status of Plans March 2011 Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Transit project update Project rationale The system New Britain Hartford Busway New Haven/Hartford/ Springfield Passenger Rail
More informationSTRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016 Shift Rapid Transit Initiative Largest infrastructure project in the city s history. Rapid Transit initiative will transform London s public transit
More informationRocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation
2020 Transportation Plan Developed by the Transportation Planning Division of the Virginia Department of Transportation in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
More informationDFW HSR Station Plans People Movers Hyperloop
DFW HSR Station Plans People Movers Hyperloop Transit-Oriented Development Task Force Meeting May 1, 2018 Automated Transportation Systems (People Movers) Traditional People Movers Fixed, Closed Guideways
More informationREPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES
TRANSIT GRADE: C- WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT TRANSIT FACILITIES California needs robust, flexible and reliable transit systems to reduce peak congestion on our highways, provide options for citizens who
More informationTPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario Streamlined Variably Priced Lane Network Sensitivity Test Ron Kirby Erin Morrow Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board October
More informationHalifax Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
Halifax Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Open House Halifax Regional Municipality February 26, 2015 Study Team The team is led by CPCS: A global management consulting firm (formerly the consulting arm of
More informationCentral Maryland Transit Development Plan
Central Maryland Transit Development Plan Planning the Future of Transit in Our Region Anne Arundel County Transportation Commission December 13, 2017 Anne Arundel County Howard County Prince George s
More informationBROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY
BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY FM # 42802411201 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2012 GOBROWARD Broward Boulevard Corridor Transit Study FM # 42802411201 Executive Summary Prepared For: Ms. Khalilah Ffrench,
More informationUTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018
UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis Board Workshop January 6, 2018 1 Executive Summary UTA ranks DART 6 th out of top 20 Transit Agencies in the country for ridership. UTA Study confirms
More informationFunding Scenario Descriptions & Performance
Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance These scenarios were developed based on direction set by the Task Force at previous meetings. They represent approaches for funding to further Task Force discussion
More informationNew Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England. Program Update March 14, 2011 Revised & Updated March 31, 2011
New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England Program Update March 14, 2011 Revised & Updated March 31, 2011 1 New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Corridor Glory Days: 1925-1955 22
More informationTravel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG
Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG Arash Mirzaei North Central Texas Council Of Governments for Southern Methodist University The ASCE Student Chapter October 24, 2005 Contents NCTCOG DFW Regional Model
More informationGreen Line Long-Term Investments
Enhancements Short-term improvements to keep Austin moving. Investments Long-term projects to support our future. Mobility Hubs MetroRapid MetroRail MetroExpress Connectors Circulators Project Connect
More informationThe Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation
The Case for Business investment in Public Transportation Introduction Public transportation is an enterprise with expenditure of $55 billion in the United States. There has been a steady growth trend
More informationHelp shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary
Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary Wake County, growth and transit The Triangle is one of the fastest-growing regions in the nation. Wake County
More informationProposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10
I 35 ROADWAY Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10 The existing I 35 facility from State Highway 195 (SH 195) north of Georgetown to Interstate 10 (I 10) in San Antonio varies from four
More informationSubarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.
Subarea Study Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project Final Version 1 Washington County June 12, 214 SRF No. 138141 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Forecast Methodology
More informationPublic Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1266 205 Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito JACOB GREENSTEIN, Lours BERGER, AND AMIRAM STRULOV Quito, the capital of Ecuador,
More informationRail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005
Rail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005 Public Transit District Utah Transit Authority Linear Geographic Area - 130 miles by
More informationThe Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future
The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future In late 2006, Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville jointly initiated the Eastern Connector Corridor Study. The Project Team
More informationHAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PRIORITIES FOR THE 2034 LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PRIORITIES FOR THE 2034 LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Prepared By: HRTPO Staff June 16, 2011 2 COMMITTED PROGRAMMED PROJECTS List of and Studies Committed are fully
More informationRMRA Feasibility Study Steering Committee
Presentation To RMRA Feasibility Study Steering Committee Feasibility Study Update October 24, 2008 TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC 1 Study Work Schedule: Tasks 1 thru 4.3.3 2 Study Work Schedule:
More informationChapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle
Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis Chapter 8 Plan Scenarios LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle 164 Chapter 8: Plan Scenarios Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP
More informationRegional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner Presentation Outline Transit System Facts Economic Challenges in the Truckee Meadows RTC Transit
More informationHigh Speed Rail Conference
High Speed Rail Conference Denver, October 23, 2012 FAST START PROJECT FOR PENINSULA HIGH-SPEED RAIL Kern Jacobson InfraConsult LLC Objective Evaluate incremental approach to expedite high-speed rail to
More informationRoma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts
DMU Implementation on Existing Commuter Rail Corridors: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons Learned Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner Boston, Massachusetts
More informationA REGIONAL CONTEXT FOR INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE NORTHEAST
A REGIONAL CONTEXT FOR INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE NORTHEAST AUGUST 24, 2009 Prepared For: CONEG Policy Research Center, Inc. By: Matthew Coogan, Consultant in Transportation, in Association
More informationMonthly Biodiesel Production Report
Monthly Biodiesel Production Report With data for June 2017 August 2017 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S.
More informationCEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update
CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update EECUTIVE SUMMARY DECEMBER 2015 Executive Summary In 2013, the Twin Cities metropolitan area s first bus rapid transit (BRT) line, the METRO Red Line,
More informationSouthern California - CHSRA
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL Michael Gillam, Deputy Program Director Southern California - CHSRA CMAA - Construction Management Association of America July 19, 2012 CALIFORNIA S HIGH-SPEED TRAIN SYSTEM Largest
More informationChicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor
Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Past, Present, and Future Arun Rao, Passenger Rail Manager Wisconsin Department of Transportation Elliot Ramos, Passenger Rail Engineer Illinois Department
More informationOverview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013
Overview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013 2013, All Rights Reserved. 1 The Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) is the designated metropolitan planning organization
More informationEconomic Viability and Environmental Sustainability Dimensions of Passenger Rail Service Integration for Commuter and Casino Traffic on the Gulf Coast
Economic Viability and Environmental Sustainability Dimensions of Passenger Rail Service Integration for Commuter and Casino Traffic on the Gulf Coast ITS 3C Summit: Mobile, Alabama, September 14-17, 2014
More informationCharlotte Gateway Station A State & City Partnership June 24, 2015
Charlotte Gateway Station A State & City Partnership June 24, 2015 Paul C. Worley, Director NCDOT Rail Division John M. Muth, Interim CEO City of Charlotte/CATS NCDOT Rail Improvements Currently under
More informationUPGRADING THE AMTRAK KEYSTONE CORRIDOR
UPGRADING THE AMTRAK KEYSTONE CORRIDOR Mark A. Wurpel Director Project Initiation & Development Amtrak 2005 AREMA Conference & Exposition Chicago, Illinois ABSTRACT: Upgrading the Amtrak Keystone Corridor
More informationPlanning of the HSR Network
Engineering Services Department A Global Solution in Public Works Project China s High Speed Rail Network Susan Pan, P.E., Manager of Engineering County of Ventura, Planning of the HSR Network Planning
More informationPark & Ride Lot Investment Strategies
Park & Ride Lot Investment Strategies Hampton Roads Transportation Technical Advisory Committee May 7, 2014 Carl E. Jackson, AICP Transportation Planning Specialist Hampton Roads District VDOT Park & Ride
More informationFINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit
Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link Prepared for: Sound Transit Prepared by: Quade & Douglas, Inc. FINAL March 2005 Foreword This issue paper
More informationSpace holder to add drone footage/movie
RALEIGH OVERVIEW Space holder to add drone footage/movie 2 Raleigh, North Carolina 3 Raleigh is centrally located on the eastern seaboard approximately midway between Maine and Miami, Florida 4 Capturing
More informationMPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017
MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017 RECOMMENDED ACTION: 2 nd TAC Meeting with Kimley-Horn/WSB in Updating the Street/Highway Element of 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Matter
More information