Environmental Test Report

Transcription

1 Environmental Test Report Date: March 14, 2018 Report Number: R5597 Orbital ATK Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC 4700 Nathan Lane Plymouth, MN United States 3/14/2018 Prepared By: Jessica Tonz Date Element Portland Quality Administrator 3/14/2018 Reviewed By: Frederick Tognoli Date Element Portland Technical Writer 3/16/2018 Concurred By: Kendall Jones Date Element Seattle Lab Manager The data herein represents only the item(s) tested. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior permission of Element Materials Technology. EAR Controlled Data: This document contains technical data whose export and re-export/retransfer is subject to control by the U.S. Department of Commerce under the Export Administration Act and the Export Administration Regulations. The Department of Commerce's prior written approval is required for the export or re-export/retransfer of such technical data to any foreign person, foreign entity or foreign organization whether in the United States or abroad This project shall be governed exclusively by the General Terms and Conditions of Sale and Performance of Testing Services by Element Materials Technology. In no event shall be liable for any consequential, special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Page 1 of 45

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 3 REVISIONS INTRODUCTION SCOPE PURPOSE TEST SEQUENCE APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS SPECIFICATION GENERAL INFORMATION TEST EQUIPMENT TEST CONDITIONS TEST WITNESSING/MONITORING TEST RECORDING SALT FOG PROCEDURES TENSILE PROCEDURES AIRTIGHTNESS PROCEDURES 11 APPENDIX A TEST PHOTOGRAPHS 12 SALT FOG RUN 1 (CANS) 12 SALT FOG RUN 2 (LIDS) 24 TENSILE 29 AIRTIGHTNESS 39 APPENDIX B TEST PLOTS, CHARTS, GRAPHS 44 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 2 of 45

3 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA Prepared For: Henry Turnbill Orbital ATK 4700 Nathan Lane Plymouth, MN United States Tests Performed: Environmental testing per Table 1 on page 5 Test Facility: Test Unit Descriptions: Part Number(s): Serial Number(s): Primary Test Specification(s): Purchase Order Number(s): Element Job Number: Element Quote Number(s): Six (6) Ammo cans and two (2) ammo can lids Six (6) PA125 cans and two (2) PA125 lids A1, A2, SF1, SF2, SFL1, SFL2, T1, and T2 MIL-C MP P EPO005597Q Project Begin Date: 2/23/2018 Project Completion Date: 3/9/2018 Test Report Completion Date: March 14, 2018 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 3 of 45

4 REVISIONS Revision Description Date Approval N/A Original Release March 16, 2018 KJ Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 4 of 45

5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope This document describes procedures and performance of the Environmental Tests performed in accordance with specification: MIL-C The results described in this report relate only to the specific items tested. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this test was to demonstrate that the test specimens met or exceeded the design specification requirements during or upon completion of exposure to the stresses detailed herein. 1.3 Test Sequence The following tests were conducted during the course of Environmental Testing: Table 1 Environmental Test Sequence Test Start Date End Date Salt Fog 2/23/2018 3/9/2018 Tensile 2/28/2018 2/28/2018 Airtightness 2/28/2018 2/28/2018 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 5 of 45

6 2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 2.1 Specification MIL-C-70842, dated 15 August GENERAL INFORMATION 3.1 Test Equipment All test instrumentation was calibrated in accordance with ANSI/NCSL Z540.3 or ISO 10012, as applicable, and is traceable to a recognized National Metrology Institute (NMI). The following tables list the equipment used during the testing: Table 2 Salt Fog Equipment Test Dates: 2/23/2018 to 3/9/2018 ID# Description Mfg. Model# Last Cal Next Cal EC709 Salt Fog Chamber Harshaw Unknown 7/31/17 7/31/ Hydrometer VWR /2/16 6/2/ Scale Balance Yamato PPC-200W 5/11/17 5/11/ ph Meter Oakton ph 5 4/10/17 Cal Before Use Graduated Cylinder unknown (10 to 100) ml 3/17/16 ICO S ph 10 Buffer Cole Palmer Expires 7/1/18 S ph7 Buffer Cole Palmer Expires 7/1/18 S ph4 Buffer Cole Palmer Expires 12/1/18 Table 3 Tensile Equipment Test Dates: 2/28/2018 to 2/28/2018 ID# Description Mfg. Model# Last Cal Next Cal Stop Watch Control Company Unknown 5/25/17 5/25/ Load Cell MTS C-01 6/28/17 6/28/ Load Cell Display Futek IPM 500 6/28/17 6/28/18 H1721 Tensile Test Machine Instron 4505 Reference Only Table 4 Airtightness Equipment Test Dates: 2/28/2018 to 2/28/2018 ID# Description Mfg. Model# Last Cal Next Cal Stop Watch Control Company /25/17 5/25/ Digital Pressure Gauge Heise N40/40KPA 4/25/17 4/25/18 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 6 of 45

7 3.0 GENERAL INFORMATION (continued) 3.2 Test Conditions Unless specified herein, all tests and measurements were performed at the room ambient conditions existing at the laboratory during testing: Temperature: 10 C to 40 C Relative Humidity: Ambient to 90% 3.3 Test Witnessing/Monitoring All testing was conducted by a qualified Element Portland Environmental Test Technician under the direction and cognizance of the Lab Manager and Quality Assurance. 3.4 Test Recording Chronological logs of all significant events are maintained by test lab personnel and indicate date, times and descriptions of conditions. These logs are used as reference, retained at Element and available upon request. Test setup photographs are provided in Appendix A, with any additional charts, plots, or graphs provided in Appendix B. Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 7 of 45

8 4.0 Salt Fog Procedures 4.1 Setup Two (2) ammo cans, serial numbers SF1 and SF2, were visually inspected with no signs of damage or any other anomalies noted Note: For Run 1, the body of the ammo cans were the actual test articles, the lids were not being tested The test units were scribed with a line on each side Test units SF1 and SF2 were installed in the salt fog chamber at a 15 degree angle from horizontal. 4.2 Run 1 Steps (Ammo Cans) Began 80 hours of exposure to a 5% salt fog solution, at +35 C, with a ph from 6.5 to Salt fog fallout was collected approximately hours after start of testing specific gravity (SG), 6.77pH No fallout rate was collected due to the tubes overfilling over the weekend Completed 80 hours of salt of exposure, the test units were removed from the chamber and fallout was collected mL: 2.13 ml/80cm2/hr, 1.031SG, 6.65pH Test units were rinsed and the scribe marks were scraped and evaluated No corrosion extended past the scribe marks No blistering or flaking was visible on the ammo can sides (SF1 and SF2) The lids had paint flaked off, but there was no corrosion past the scribe noted The customer was notified and replacement lids were sent for testing Upon test completion, at ambient conditions, the units were visually inspected, then returned to customer for final analysis. Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 8 of 45

9 4.3 Run 2 Steps (Lids) Two (2) ammo can lids, serial numbers SFL1 and SFL2, were visually inspected with no signs of damage or any other anomalies noted Note: For Run 2, only ammo can lids were tested Test units SFL1 and SFL2 were installed in the salt fog chamber at a 15 degree angle from horizontal Began 80 hours of exposure to a 5% salt fog solution, at +35 C, with a ph from 6.5 to Salt fog fallout was collected approximately 24 and 48 hours after start of testing hours: 97mL: 2.02mL/80cm2/hr, 1.030SG, 6.56pH hours: 110mL: 2.29mL/80cm2/hr, 1.031SG, 6.59pH Completed 80 hours of salt of exposure, the test units were removed from the chamber and fallout was collected mL: 2.16mL/80cm2/hr, 1.031SG, 6.54pH Test units were rinsed and the scribe marks were scraped and evaluated SFL2 had minor paint flaking at scribe point Under 1/8 of an inch; unit met requirements Upon test completion, at ambient conditions, the units were visually inspected, then returned to customer for final analysis. 4.4 Results Test units SF1, SF2, and SFL1 had no corrosion beyond the scribe marks and no blistering or flaking noted Test unit SFL2 had minor paint flaking at the scribe location Under 1/8 of an inch; unit met requirements Test photographs provided in Appendix A Applicable graphs, charts, and/or plots provided in Appendix B. Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 9 of 45

10 5.0 Tensile Procedures 5.1 Setup Two (2) ammo cans, serial numbers T1 and T2, were visually inspected with no signs of damage or any other anomalies noted. 5.2 Steps Test unit T1 was setup on the test machine Applied a 600lb load for one minute on test unit T1 s latch assembly No bending or distortion observed Test unit T2 was setup on the test machine Applied a 600lb load for one minute on test unit T2 s latch assembly No bending or distortion observed Test unit T1 was setup on the test machine Applied a 600lb load for one minute on test unit T1 s wire handle assembly No bending or distortion observed Test unit T2 was setup on the test machine Applied a 600lb load for one minute on test unit T2 s wire handle assembly No bending or distortion observed Test unit T1 was setup on the test machine Applied a 1200lb load for one minute on test unit T1 s hasp assembly Slight deformation of the box and hasp assembly. No broken welds or detached components observed Test unit T2 was setup on the test machine Applied a 600lb load for one minute on test unit T2 s hasp assembly Slight deformation of the box and hasp assembly. No broken welds or detached components observed Upon test completion, at ambient conditions, the test units were visually inspected, then returned to customer for final analysis. 5.3 Results No bending or distortion observed on T1 s or T2 s latch assembly at 600lbs No bending or distortion observed on T1 s or T2 s wire handle assembly at 600lbs Slight deformation observed on both T1 s and T2 box and hasp assembly at 1200lbs No broken welds or detached components observed Test photographs provided in Appendix A. Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 10 of 45

11 6.0 Airtightness Procedures 6.1 Setup Two (2) ammo cans, serial numbers A1 and A2, were visually inspected with no signs of damage or any other anomalies noted A pressure port was installed on the bottoms of the cans. 6.2 Steps The test units were inverted and placed in a dunk tank full of room temperature water The lids and gaskets were completely submerged Applied internal pressure of 3psi for a minimum of 30 seconds Upon test completion, at ambient conditions, the test units were visually inspected, then returned to customer for final analysis. 6.3 Results No signs of damage or bubbles observed from either test unit Test photographs provided in Appendix A. Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 11 of 45

12 APPENDIX A TEST PHOTOGRAPHS Salt Fog Run 1 (Cans) Photo 1 Pre-test, sides 1 and 2 Photo 2 Pre-test, sides 2 and 3 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 12 of 45

13 Photo 3 Pre-test, sides 3 and 4 Photo 4 Pre-test, sides 1 and 4 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 13 of 45

14 Photo 5 Pre-test, sides 5 and 3 Photo 6 Pre-test, sides 6 and 3 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 14 of 45

15 Photo 7 Test units setup at approximately 15 degree angle from horizontal Photo 8 Test units setup in chamber Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 15 of 45

16 Photo 9 Post-test units in chamber Photo 10 Post-test sides 1 and 2 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 16 of 45

17 Photo 11 Post-test sides 2 and 3 Photo 12 Post-test sides 3 and 4 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 17 of 45

18 Photo 13 Post-test sides 3 and 4 Photo 14 Post-test sides 6 and 3 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 18 of 45

19 Photo 15 Post-test sides 5 and 3 Photo 16 Post-test close up Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 19 of 45

20 Photo 17 Post-test close up Photo 18 Post-test close up Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 20 of 45

21 Photo 19 Post-test close up Photo 20 Post-test close up Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 21 of 45

22 Photo 21 Post-test close up Photo 22 Post-test close up Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 22 of 45

23 Photo 23 Post-test close up Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 23 of 45

24 Salt Fog Run 2 (Lids) Photo 24 Pre-test Photo 25 Test units setup at approximately 15 degree angle from horizontal Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 24 of 45

25 Photo 26 Test units setup in chamber Photo 27 Post-test units in chamber Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 25 of 45

26 Photo 28 Post-test Photo 29 Post-test Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 26 of 45

27 Photo 30 Post-test Photo 31 Post-test Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 27 of 45

28 Photo 32 Post-test Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 28 of 45

29 Tensile Photo 33 Pre-test, unit T1 Photo 34 Pre-test, unit T1 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 29 of 45

30 Photo 35 Pre-test, unit T1 Photo 36 Pre-test, unit T1 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 30 of 45

31 Photo 37 Pre-test, unit T1 Photo 38 Pre-test, unit T1 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 31 of 45

32 Photo 39 Pre-test, unit T2 Photo 40 Pre-test, unit T2 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 32 of 45

33 Photo 41 Pre-test, unit T2 Photo 42 Pre-test, unit T2 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 33 of 45

34 Photo 43 Pre-test, unit T2 Photo 44 Pre-test, unit T2 Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 34 of 45

35 Photo 45 Test unit T1, latch testing Photo 46 Test unit T1, latch testing close up Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 35 of 45

36 Photo 47 Test unit T2, latch testing Photo 48 Test unit T1, wire handle testing Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 36 of 45

37 Photo 49 Test unit T2, wire handle testing Photo 50 Test unit T1, hasp testing Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 37 of 45

38 Photo 51 Test unit T2, hasp testing Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 38 of 45

39 Airtightness Photo 52 Pre-test Photo 53 Pre-test Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 39 of 45

40 Photo 54 Pre-test Photo 55 Pre-test Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 40 of 45

41 Photo 56 Pre-test Photo 57 Example of testing in progress Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 41 of 45

42 Photo 58 Example of testing in progress Photo 59 Example of testing in progress Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 42 of 45

43 Photo 60 Example of testing in progress Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 43 of 45

44 APPENDIX B TEST PLOTS, CHARTS, GRAPHS Figure 1 Salt Fog Run 1 Temperature Chart Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 44 of 45

45 APPENDIX B (continued) Figure 2 Salt Fog Run 2 Temperature Chart End of Report. Report Number: R5597 March 14, 2018 Page 45 of 45