**AGENDA** Open Discussion/Announcements/Introductions. III. Consent Agenda 9:40 *A. Approve the March 18, 2014 Meeting Minutes pages 2-3

Transcription

1 Interagency Consultation Committee April 15, :30 a.m. 10:30 a.m. Community Planning Association 700 N. East 2nd Street, 2nd Floor Large Conference Room, Meridian NOTICE: This packet contains only the documents listed with an asterisk (*) in the agenda. The entire packet, including all attachments is available at The online document requires Adobe Acrobat to read it; COMPASS homepage contains a free download link if you need a copy. The online document includes bookmarks at the left of the screen that are named to correspond to agenda items with attachments. Clicking on a bookmark will take you directly to the named document. I. Agenda Additions/Changes 9:30 **AGENDA** II. 9:35 Open Discussion/Announcements/Introductions III. Consent Agenda 9:40 *A. Approve the March 18, 2014 Meeting Minutes pages 2-3 IV. Action Items 9:45 *A. Approve the Emissions Analysis MaryAnn Modeling Assumptions for Draft Waldinger FY Transportation Improvement Program pages :00 *B. Approve the Project List for the MaryAnn Draft FY Transportation Waldinger Improvement Program pages 6-17 V. Other 10:25 A. Next Meeting June 10, 2014 Chair VI. Adjournment 10:30 *Enclosures Times are approximate. Agenda is subject to change T:\FY14\800 System Maintenance\820 Committee Support\ICC\Agendas\Agenda docx 1

2 ITEM III-A INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION COMMITTEE March 18, 2014 COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION **MEETING NOTES** ATTENDEES: Beth Baird, City of Boise Jen Cole, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Vice Chair Matt Edmond, Ada County Highway District, Chair Scott Frey, Highway Administration Maureen Gresham, ACHD - Commuteride Greg Vitley, Idaho Transportation Department District 3 MaryAnn Waldinger, COMPASS OTHERS PRESENT: Michele Fikel, Idaho Transportation Department Brian Shea, Idaho Transportation Department Jessica Wilson, COMPASS CALL TO ORDER: Chair Edmond called the meeting to order at 9:40 a.m. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES Scott Frey added information Item IV-C, CMAQ handouts. OPEN DISCUSSION/ANNOUNCEMENTS/INTRODUCTIONS Introductions were made of all attendees. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve January 9, 2014 Meeting Minutes Jen Cole moved and Greg Vitley seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Motion was unanimously approved. INFORMATION/DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Review the Emissions Analysis Modeling Assumptions for Draft FY Transportation Improvement Program MaryAnn Waldinger stated that ICC is required to review and approve the assumptions and emissions estimation methodologies used in regional emissions analyses. These analyses are conducted for transportation conformity purposes per state and federal regulations. Any northern Ada County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or long-range transportation plan must demonstrate conformity to the motor vehicle emissions budgets for particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter (PM 10 ), nitrogen oxides (NO X ), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 2

3 established Northern Ada County PM 10 State Implementation Plan, Maintenance Plan: Ten- Update. A regional emissions analysis is not federally required for carbon monoxide (CO). However, northern Ada County s Limited Maintenance Plan for CO requires COMPASS to conduct a build/no build emissions analysis for local planning purposes. Budget tests will be performed for: Base year of the draft FY TIP Last year of the TIP Intermediate analysis year, as there can be no more than 10 years between analysis years Intermediate analysis year, as there can be no more than 10 years between analysis years Horizon year for the regional long-range transportation plan (draft Communities in Motion ) B. Review the Project List for the Draft FY Transportation Improvement Program MaryAnn Waldinger stated that ICC is required to review and approve the assumptions and emissions estimation methodologies used in regional emissions analyses per 40CFR93 and IDAPA The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) inclusive of northern Ada County and long-range transportation plan must demonstrate conformity to the motor vehicle emissions budgets established in the Northern Ada County PM 10 State Implementation Plan, Maintenance Plan: Ten- Update. COMPASS staff prepared the listing of projects to make up the build travel demand model networks for use in the draft FY TIP conformity demonstration for northern Ada County. The model networks include projects listed in Ada County Highway District s Capital Improvement Plan as of April 2012, FY Integrated Five- Work Program, Idaho Transportation Investment Program, draft FY Transportation Improvement Program, and funded project list approved by the COMPASS Board on November 18, C. CMAQ Information Scott Frey handed out MAP-21 / CMAQ informational documents. OTHER Matt Edmond discussed the possibility of removing travel and adding bike in the Downtown Boise core. MaryAnn and Jen Cole discussed the possibility of running MOVES to evaluate sensitivity of such changes on emission estimates. Next Meeting: April 15, ADJOURNMENT Jen Cole moved and Maureen Gresham seconded adjournment at 10:40 a.m. Motion was unanimously approved. T:\FY14\800 System Maintenance\820 Committee Support\ICC\Minutes\minutes docx 2 3

4 INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM IV-A Date: April 15, 2014 Topic: Approve the Emissions Analysis Modeling Assumptions for draft FY Transportation Improvement Program Background: The Interagency Consultation Committee (ICC) is required to review and approve the assumptions and emissions estimation methodologies used in regional emissions analyses. These analyses are conducted for transportation conformity purposes per state and federal regulations. Any northern Ada County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or longrange transportation plan must demonstrate conformity to the motor vehicle emissions budgets for particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter (PM 10 ), nitrogen oxides (NO X ), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) established in the Northern Ada County PM 10 State Implementation Plan, Maintenance Plan: Ten- Update. A regional emissions analysis is not federally required for carbon monoxide (CO). However, northern Ada County s Limited Maintenance Plan for CO requires COMPASS to conduct a build/no build emissions analysis for local planning purposes. Budget tests will be performed for: Base year of the draft FY TIP Last year of the TIP Intermediate analysis year, as there can be no more than 10 years between analysis years Intermediate analysis year, as there can be no more than 10 years between analysis years Horizon year for the regional long-range transportation plan (draft Communities in Motion ) Request: COMPASS staff seeks review of the Emissions Analysis Modeling Assumptions for use in the air quality conformity demonstration of draft FY TIP. Implication: A finding of nonconformance of a TIP or long-range transportation plan would prevent the implementation of certain federally funded and/or regionally significant transportation projects. More Information: 1) Attachment 1 2) For detailed information contact: MaryAnn Waldinger, Principal Planner, at mwaldinger@compassidaho.org mw:jw T:\FY14\800 System Maintenance\820 Committee Support\ICC\Packets\031814\REA_fy1519TIP.docx 4

5 Attachment 1 Emission Analysis Modeling Assumptions Source type population and fleet age distribution: DEQ decoded individual Idaho Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) registration records of vehicles registered in the Treasure Valley using the Polk vehicle identification number (VIN) decoding system. The decoded VINs provide information regarding the vehicle make, model, age, and fuel types. This information was then used to develop the MOVES input. Inspection Maintenance Program June 1, future Ada County: 1) Two speed test (idle and 2500 RPM) for pre 1996 vehicles only. 2) Exhaust OBD check for 1996 and newer vehicles. 3) Evaporative system OBD check for 1996 and newer vehicles. 4) Compliance rate = 98.0%. 5) Waiver rate = 1.0% 6) Four-year grace period for new vehicles 7) Biennial testing effective January 1, Canyon County: 1) Two speed test (idle and 2500 RPM) for pre 1996 vehicles only. 2) Evaporative gas cap check for 1996 and newer vehicles. 3) Exhaust OBD check for 1996 and newer vehicles. 4) Evaporative system OBD check for 1996 and newer vehicles. 5) Compliance rate = 98.0%. 6) Waiver rate = 1.0% 7) Five-year grace period for new vehicles 8) Biennial testing effective January 1, Meteorology The meteorology input compiles the average hourly temperature and relative humidity data for each county. Baseand future-year inventories were modeled using average hourly temperature and relative humidity data by county for each month from a representative weather station for each county. Ada County is represented by the National Weather Service station at the Boise Air Terminal and Canyon County is represented by the data set from the Caldwell Industrial Airport. Fuel-Related Inputs Alternative Vehicle Fuels and Technology (AVFT): Ada and Canyon Counties were modeled using a custom AVFT input file derived from VIN-decoded registration data. The same AVFT input was used for base and future years. Fuel Supply: National default fuel supply inputs were used for all source types except transit buses. A large portion of the transit bus fleet in the Treasure Valley operates on compressed natural gas (CNG). For this reason, CNG fuels were included in base- and future-year modeling. Fuel Formulation: With the exception of 10% ethanol in gasoline (E10), MOVES national default fuel formulations were used as base-year inputs for each county. These default values were judged to be reasonable based on local knowledge, except for the E10 market share. The base-year E10 market share was updated with information provided by fuel suppliers. Average Speed Distribution The average speed distribution allocates the different source types (vehicles) for each roadway type to 16 speed bins ranging from 0 to >75 miles per hour. Average speed distributions were developed from the regional travel demand model average daily estimates or forecasts for each roadway segment and hourly traffic count statistics developed from detailed automatic traffic recorder (ATR) traffic count data provided by Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). The hourly ATR-based traffic count profiles for each roadway type were used to estimate hourly volume on each segment and the modified Bureau of Public Roadways volume/capacity curve was used to develop the average speed distribution database for each hour. 1 Where A and B are local coefficients used in the regional travel demand model as provided by COMPASS. Base- and future-year average speed distributions were developed for all four MOVES road types using travel demand model base and future-year outputs developed by COMPASS for the Treasure Valley and detailed ATR data provided by ITD. T:\FY14\800 System Maintenance\820 Committee Support\ICC\Packets\041514\A1 Emission Analysis Modeling Assumptions.docx 5

6 INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM IV-B Date: April 15, 2014 Topic: Approve the Project List for Draft FY Transportation Program Demonstration Background: The Interagency Consultation Committee (ICC) is required to review and approve the assumptions and emissions estimation methodologies used in regional emissions analyses per 40CFR93 and IDAPA The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) inclusive of northern Ada County and long-range transportation plan must demonstrate conformity to the motor vehicle emissions budgets established in the Northern Ada County PM 10 State Implementation Plan, Maintenance Plan: Ten- Update. COMPASS staff prepared the listing of projects to make up the build travel demand model networks for use in the draft FY TIP conformity demonstration for northern Ada County (attachment 1). The model networks include projects listed in Ada County Highway District s Capital Improvement Plan as of April 2012, FY Integrated Five- Work Program, Idaho Transportation Investment Program, draft FY Transportation Improvement Program, and funded project list approved by the COMPASS Board on November 18, The information is on page 25 of the Board packet and can be accessed by clicking on the following link Item V1-B-/Unfunded Project List for CIM. Request: COMPASS staff seeks approval of the project list for use in the air quality conformity demonstration of the draft FY TIP. Implication: A finding of nonconformance of a transportation improvement program or long-range transportation plan would prevent the implementation of certain federally funded and/or regionally significant transportation projects. More Information: 1) Attachment 1 2) For detailed information contact: MaryAnn Waldinger, Principal Planner, at mwaldinger@compassidaho.org mw:jw T:\FY14\800 System Maintenance\820 Committee Support\ICC\Packets\031814\Projectlist_fy1519TIP.docx 6

7 Attachment 1 Draft FY Transportation Improvement Program Emissions Analysis Model Networks As of April 1, 2014 Current Network The following table lists the transportation projects recently completed or under construction. Projects under construction are expected to be open to the motoring public by December 31, No. Project Location No. of 1. Eagle (SH 55) River Valley to I-84 (Southbound from River Valley to Franklin may be delayed) 2. Five Mile Franklin - Fairview Ave 3. Ustick Locust Grove Leslie Dr 4. Ustick Cloverdale Five Mile Source Key# - IFYWP, CIP, ITD 6 ITIP / IFYWP/CIP/ ITIP/TIP 5 IFYWP/CIP/ draft CIM F038/ RD /11582 RD205-05/ RD IFYWP/CIP RD220/ RD ly Exempt from Yes No No Under construction/ 2015 Yes Yes No Under construction Yes No No Under construction No No Yes Under construction 1 7

8 2015 Network The 2015 network uses 2015 demographics and includes the construction year networks for 2014 plus the following list of projects. The network is built for planning purposes only. No. Project Location No. of 5. Broadway Ave IC Reconstruct interchange 6. Lake Hazel Connect existing Extension Lake Hazel to Cole 7. Five Mile Fairview Ave - Ustick 8. Gowen IC Reconstruct interchange 9. Hill Extension State St - Horseshoe Bend 10. I-84 Broadway Ave IC to Gowen IC 11. Meridian IC Reconstruct interchange 12. McMillan Locust Grove - Eagle 13. SH 16 River Crossing Connect SH 16 from SH 44 to US 20/ Ten Mile Cherry Ln - Ustick NA Source Key# - IFYWP, CIP, ITD ITIP/ draft CIM 2 IFYWP/draft CIM ly Exempt from Yes Yes Yes - (40CFR 2015/ ) RD Yes No No 2015/ 5 IFYWP/CIP RD195a/ RD No No Yes 2015/2015 NA ITIP/ draft Yes Yes Yes - (40CFR 2015/ CIM ) 3 IFYWP / CIP RD308 No No Yes ITIP/ draft CIM Yes Yes No 2015/ NA ITIP/ draft Yes Yes Yes - (40CFR 2015/ CIM ) 5 IFYWP/ CIP RC0240/ No No Yes 2015 RD CIM 2035/ Yes Yes No / TIP/ITIP construction started in IFYWP/CIP RD188/ No No Yes 2015/2015 RD

9 2019 Network The 2019 network uses 2019 demographics and includes the construction year networks for 2014, 2015 and the following list of projects. No. Project Location No. of 15. Broadway Bridge Replacement Front St to University Dr 16. Cloverdale Franklin Fairview Ave 17. Cloverdale Fairview Ave Ustick 18. Cole I-84 WB ramps Franklin 19. Franklin Black Cat Ten Mile 20. Pine Ave/ Executive St Parkdale Ave President Dr 21. Ustick Linder - Meridian 22. Ustick Meridian Locust Grove Source Key# - IFYWP, CIP, ITD ly Exempt from 6 ITIP/draft CIM Yes Yes No / 5 IFYWP/CIP RD202-14/ No No Yes 2016/2016 RD / RC IFYWP/CIP RD202-14/ No No Yes 2017/2016 RD / RC IFYWP/CIP/ RD207-16/ Yes No No 2018/2017- draft CIM RD / 5 IFYWP/CIP/ draft CIM RC0152/ RD / IFYWP/CIP UB212-07/ RD IFYWP/CIP/ RD205-05/ draft CIM RD IFYWP/CIP/ draft CIM RD202-37/ RD Yes Yes No 2016/2016/ No No Yes 2016/2016 Yes TBD No 2018/ / Yes No No 2017/ / 3 9

10 2025 Network The 2025 network uses 2025 demographics and includes the construction year networks for 2014, 2015, 2019 and the following list of projects. No. Project Location No. of Source Key# - IFYWP, CIP, ITD ly Exempt from 23. Black Cat Overland - 5 CIP RD No No Yes Franklin (no widening of the overpass) 24. Black Cat Franklin 5 CIP RD No No Yes Cherry Ln 25. Black Cat Cherry Ln Ustick 5 CIP RD No No Yes Cloverdale Overland - 5 CIP RD No No Yes Franklin (no widening of the overpass) 27. Cloverdale Overland Victory 5 CIP RD No No Yes / 28. Cloverdale Amity Victory 5 CIP RD No No Yes / 29. Cloverdale Lake Hazel Amity 5 CIP RD No No Yes / 30. Cloverdale Columbia Lake Hazel 5 CIP RD No No Yes / 31. Eagle SH 44 to Plaza Dr 5 CIP RD No No Yes Emerald St Five Mile 5 CIP RD2012- No No No Curtis 41/42/ Executive St / Presidential 1000 east of Cloverdale Five Mile (3 ln couplet with Presidential) 5 CIP RD No No Yes Fairview Ave Access Management Linder to Orchard St 35. Fairview Ave Meridian - Locust Grove 36. Fairview Ave Locust Grove Eagle 37. Five Mile Victory Amity 5 IFYWP/CIP RD No No Yes PD/ CIP/ draft CIM RD Yes No No / 7 CIP/ draft CIM RD Yes No No / 5 CIP RD No No No

11 2025 Network No. Project Location No. of 38. Five Mile Overland - Franklin (no widening of the overpass) 39. Hill Horseshoe Bend Seaman s Gulch 40. Linder Chinden Blvd SH Linder McMillan to Chinden Blvd (eastside of road only) 42. Linder SH 44 Floating Feather 43. Linder Floating Feather Beacon Light 44. Linder Franklin Pine Ave 45. Linder Pine Ave Cherry Ln 46. Locust Grove Amity Victory 47. Locust Grove Fairview Ave Ustick 48. Locust Grove Ustick - McMillan 49. Maple Grove Fairview Ave - McMillan 50. Maple Grove Victory to Overland 51. Maple Grove Amity Victory 52. McMillan Star - McDermott 53. McMillan McDermott Black Cat Source Key# - IFYWP, CIP, ITD ly Exempt from 5 CIP RD No No No CIP RD No No No CIP/draft CIM 5 IFYWP/ CIP/draft CIM RD Yes TBD No / RD Yes No No / RD Yes TBD No / RD Yes TBD No / RD Yes No No PD/ / RD Yes No No / 3 CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD /95 No TBD Yes IFYWP/ CIP RD207-22/ No No Yes PD/ RD IFYWP/ CIP RD207-21/ No No Yes PD/ RD CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes

12 2025 Network No. Project Location No. of Source Key# - IFYWP, CIP, ITD ly Exempt from 54. McMillan Black Cat Ten 3 CIP RD No No Yes Mile 55. Meridian Cherry Ln Ustick 5 IFYWP/CIP RD207-23/ No No Yes PD/ RD Meridian Ustick 3 CIP RD No No Yes McMillan 57. SH 44 SH 16 Linder 4 Draft CIM TBD Yes TBD No Star McMillan 5 CIP RD No No Yes Chinden Blvd 59. Star Chinden Blvd SH 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes State St Glenwood St Peirce Park Ln 7 IFYWP/ CIP/ draft CIM RD208-04/ RD Yes TBD No Unfunded / / 61. State St Peirce Park Ln Collister Dr 62. State St Collister Dr 36 th St 7 IFYWP/ CIP/ draft CIM 7 IFYWP/ CIP/ draft CIM 63. State St 36 th St 27 th St 7 IFYWP/ CIP/ draft CIM 64. Ten Mile Victory Overland 5 IFYWP/ CIP/draft CIM RD208-05/ RD RD208-06/ RD RD208-07/ RD RC0299/ RD Yes TBD No Unfunded / / Yes TBD No Unfunded / / Yes TBD No Unfunded / / Yes TBD No Unfunded/ / No TBD Yes Unfunded/ Ten Mile Ustick McMillan 5 IFYWP/ CIP RD202-32/ RD Ustick Ten Mile RD Yes TBD No Linder / 67. Ustick Cole - Curtis 5 CIP RD No No Yes Victory Meridian Locust Grove 69. Victory Locust Grove Eagle 70. Victory Cloverdale Five Mile 71. Victory Five Mile Maple Grove 3 CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes

13 The 2035 and networks include the construction year networks for 2014, 2015, 2019, 2025, and the following list of projects. The 2035 network uses the 2035 demographics and the network uses the demographics. No. Project Location No. of Source IFYWP #/ ITD Key # ly Exempt from th St Extension Bison Dr to 2 CIP RD No No Yes Cartwright th St Extension Cartwright and 2 CIP RD No No Yes Bogus Basin 74. Amity Black Cat Ten Mile RD Yes TBD No / 75. Amity Ten Mile 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes Linder 76. Amity Linder 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes Meridian 77. Amity SH 69 Locust Grove 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes / 78. Amity Locust Grove Eagle 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes / 79. Avalon (Kuna Linder - Orchard 3 CIP RD No No Yes ) St 80. Beacon Light SH 16 Palmer Ln 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes / Unfunded 81. Beacon Light Palmer - Linder 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes / Unfunded 82. Beacon Light Linder 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes Ballantyne 83. Beacon Light Ballantyne 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes Eagle 84. Beacon Light Eagle SH 55 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes Cloverdale Ustick 5 IFYWP/CIP RC0092/ No No Yes PD/ McMillan RD Deer Flat Linder SH 69 5 CIP RD No No Yes Eagle Lake Hazel Amity 88. Eagle Amity Victory 89. Eisenmann New Lake Hazel I-84 IC RD Yes No No / 5 IFYWP/CIP/ RD Yes No No Unfunded/ draft CIM / 5 CIP RD No No Yes

14 No. Project Location No. of Source IFYWP #/ ITD Key # ly Exempt from 90. Eisenmann New Lake Hazel 3 CIP RD No No Yes Gowen 91. Fairview Ave Eagle Cloverdale 7 CIP/draft CIM RD Yes TBD No / 92. Fairview Ave Maple Grove - Cole 7 CIP/draft CIM RD Yes TBD No / 93. Fairview Ave Cole - Orchard St (or e/o Curtis 7 CIP/draft CIM RD Yes No No / ) 94. Fairview Ave Cloverdale - Five Mile 7 CIP/draft CIM RD Yes No No / 95. Fairview Ave Five Mile - Maple Grove 7 CIP/draft CIM RD Yes No No / 96. Five Mile Lake Hazel 5 CIP RD No No Yes Amity 97. Five Mile Ustick - McMillan 5 CIP RD No No Yes Franklin McDermott - Black Cat RD Yes No No / 99. Glenwood St / Cole couplet Two way couplet - Mountain View Dr 3 CIP/ draft CIM RD Yes TBD No / 100. Lake Hazel Linder SH 69 RD Yes TBD No / 101. Lake Hazel SH 69 Locust Grove RD Yes TBD No / 102. Lake Hazel Locust Grove Eagle RD Yes TBD No / 103. Lake Hazel Eagle Cloverdale RD Yes TBD No / 104. Lake Hazel Cloverdale Five Mile RD Yes TBD No / 105. Lake Hazel Five Mile Maple Grove RD Yes TBD No / 106. Lake Hazel Maple Grove Cole RD Yes TBD No / 107. Lake Hazel Ext Cole Orchard RD Yes No / 1 St 108. Lake Hazel Ext Orchard Ext 1 RD Yes TBD No / 2 Pleasant Valley 8 14

15 No. Project Location No. of 109. Lake Hazel Ext Pleasant Valley 3 Eisenmann 110. Linder Cherry Ln Ustick 111. Linder Ustick McMillan 112. Linder Overland - Franklin (new overpass is NOT included) 113. Locust Grove Victory Overland 114. McMillan Can Ada - Star 115. McMillan Cloverdale - Maple Grove 116. Meridian McMillan Chinden Blvd 117. Orchard Ext 1 Lake Hazel Orchard Ext 118. Orchard Ext 2 Pleasant Valley Orchard Ext 119. Orchard Ext 3 Orchard Ext 1 Gowen 120. Orchard Ext 4 Gowen Victory 121. Overland New Black Cat Ten Extension Mile 122. Pine Ave Meridian Locust Grove 123. Ten Mile McMillan Chinden Bvld 124. Ten Mile Lake Hazel - Victory 125. Ten Mile Columbia - Lake Hazel Source IFYWP #/ ITD Key # ly Exempt from RD Yes TBD No / RD Yes No No / RD Yes No No / RD Yes TBD No / Unfunded 3 CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No TBD Yes / funded 5 CIP RD No TBD Yes / funded RD Yes TBD No / funded 7 CIP/draft CIM RD Yes TBD No / funded 3 South Meridian No TBD Yes Development Study / Airport Dependent Overland Extension Study 3 CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes RD2012- Yes TBD No /129 / 5 CIP RD No No Yes

16 No. Project Location No. of 126. US 20/26 Locust Grove Eagle 127. Ustick Black Cat Ten Mile 128. Ustick McDermott Black Cat 129. Victory McDermott Black Cat 130. Victory Black Cat Ten Mile 131. Victory Ten Mile Linder 132. Victory Linder Meridian 133. Victory Eagle - Cloverdale Source IFYWP #/ ITD Key # ly Exempt from 4 Draft CIM TBD Yes TBD No 2030 RD Yes TBD No / RD Yes TBD No / 3 CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No No Yes CIP RD No TBD Yes Source of Projects: IFYWP = Ada County Highway District s Integrated Five Work Plan FY CIP = ACHD 2012 Draft Capital Improvements Plan FY ITIP = Idaho Transportation Department s Idaho Transportation Investment Program FY TIP = draft FY Transportation Improvement Program list CIM 2035 = Communities in Motion 2035 Project List Current Long Range Transportation Plan Draft CIM = draft Communities in Motion Unfunded = Unfunded projects listed in the ACHD s 2012 Draft Capital Improvements Plan FY and draft Communities in Motion FYWP #/ITD Key #: FYWP# = ACHD GIS Numbers are alpha numeric identification numbers (ex. RD169) ITD Key# = ITD Key Numbers are from the Transportation Improvement Program and the State Transportation Improvement Program and are strictly numeric (ex. 6299) ly : Yes = Represents functional classification on the 2015 Functional Classification Map

17 ly Roadway Project Definition: emissions analyses, for the purposes of demonstrating transportation conformity of a TIP or long-range plan, must include all regionally significant and/or federally funded projects in the nonattainment or maintenance area. On January 30, 2002, the ICC developed the following definition of a ly project: "A transportation project in Ada County, Idaho is designated 'ly ' if: (a) the project is for the improvement of either: (i) a principal arterial or higher functional classification; or (ii) a minor arterial which will have a twenty (20) year projected traffic volume of at least 45,000 vehicles a day after completion of the project; and (b) the project will add at least one new continuous vehicular lane which either: (i) extends from one intersecting principal or minor arterial to another intersecting principal or minor arterial; or (ii) in the case of an interstate, extends from the on ramp of one interstate interchange to a point beyond the off ramp of the next adjacent interstate interchange. Despite these definitions, the ICC maintains discretionary authority in interpreting and applying them to the area s transportation programs, plans, and projects. For the purposes of this conformity determination, all applicable roadway projects, despite their significance, were included in the travel demand model networks. Exempt: Pursuant to 40CFR (Exempt Projects), certain projects listed in a long-range transportation plan or TIP may proceed even in the absence of a conformity finding/demonstration. Exempt projects include highway safety or mass transit projects, landscaping projects, roadway rehabilitation and repair, transportation enhancement projects, and transportation planning activities that do not lead directly to construction. Pursuant to 40CFR (Exempt Projects from the Emissions Analyses), certain projects listed in a long-range transportation plan or TIP may proceed even in the absence of a conformity finding/demonstration. Exempt projects include intersection channelization or signalization at individual intersections, interchange reconfiguration, changes in vertical and horizontal alignment, truck size and weight stations, bus terminals and transfer points. However, the exempt projects listed in 40CFR or 40CFR are not considered exempt if the ICC concludes that they may have an adverse impact on air quality or has potential regional impacts. Status: Based on project information provided by ITD or ACHD. The regional model covers two counties Ada and Canyon. The projects in Ada and Canyon County are included in the appropriate model network year. Air quality conformity is required for northern Ada County only therefore, only the projects within Ada County are listed above. T:\FY14\800 System Maintenance\820 Committee Support\ICC\Packets\041514\A1_fy1519projectlist.docx 17 11