2014 Soybean Field Crop Trials Results

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "2014 Soybean Field Crop Trials Results"

Transcription

1 Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Each year Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists conduct performance tests of appropriately adapted public and private soybean entries. Companies are charged a fee for each entry to partially cover the costs of conducting these tests. A stipulation of the testing program is that the company is marketing or intends to begin marketing the entry in the next growing season. This information is also available electronically at the website www1.extension.umn.edu/agriculture/ soybean/ or The 2014 growing season was wetter than normal, especially during the early part of the season. Most soybeans matured late due to late planting. Harvest was accomplished with little delay and was finished by late October. Plots at Waseca had hail in late September, so no yields were obtained. Some plots at Danvers, Fairfax and Westbrook were stunted due to excess water soon after planting. Plots were not harvested at Kent due to herbicide damage. The SCN test at Thief River Falls was not planted due to excessive water at the test location. Tables 1 to 4 provide results from specific tests of available conventional, special-purpose and transgenic entries adapted to the far northern, northern, central and southern production zones. The map shows test locations and zone boundaries. All tests were planted between May 6 and June 11 at planting rates of 160,000 seeds/acre. Herbicides were used as necessary for good weed control. Row spacings were 12 inches at Crookston, 10 inches at Roseau, and 30 inches at all other locations. Plot combines were used to harvest the plots. Tables 5 to 10 provide performance and characteristics data from specialuse soybean entry tests. These tests were conducted to provide reliable data for growers who are interested in producing special-use soybeans, which are typically grown under contract. Table 11 provides important characteristics of publicly developed entries in the 2014 tests. Tables 12 to 14 provide results from the performance tests of soybean cyst nematode resistant entries in infested field sites near Danvers, Fairfax, Gary, Lamberton, Mahnomen and Rosemount. Tables 15 to 17 present SCN information from greenhouse tests conducted by the nematology laboratory at the University of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center-Waseca, and soil analysis for SCN counts conducted by MVTL Laboratories, Inc., New Ulm. Greenhouse data are from evaluations of entries from the zone trials in soil with an HG type 0 (race 3) population of soybean cyst nematode. The level of SCN reproduction at the trial sites from each entry is shown as a field reproductive index and egg index, as well as a resistance rating. Comparisons are best made relative to the susceptible check entry within a 1 column. HG types for the fields were not available at time of publication. To better understand and use the data provided in these tables, please read the following additional information very carefully. Relative and Calendar Dates of Soybeans are photoperiod sensitive; that is, they respond to changing day length, so the actual calendar date of maturity achievement is affected by latitude. Each entry has a narrow range (about 100 miles) of north-south adaptation. Soybean yield and quality are best achieved when physiological maturity occurs before a season-ending freeze occurs. is determined visually by noting the actual date when 95% of the pods show their genetically programmed mature color. The dates for 2014 are provided in the tables. Harvest dates typically are 7 to 14 days later, depending upon drying Locations of 2014 soybean trials.

2 conditions. Nearly all entries were essentially mature before frost. Relative maturity ratings also are provided for each entry. These ratings consist of a number for the maturity group designations (000, 00, 0, 1, 2) followed by a decimal and another number, ranging from 0-9, which indicates a ranking within each maturity group. For example the entry MN0101 indicates a 0.1, making it an early group 0, while MN0901, with a 0.9 rating, is the latest group 0. Values for public entries are developed after observing them for several years in many locations. Relative maturity ratings for private entries in these tables, provided by their owners, were developed in a similar manner. Yield Because maturity is a very important attribute, entries are arranged in the tables in order of their actual or estimated 2014 calendar date of maturity and not yield performance. Later-maturing entries usually can be expected to have higher yields than earlier-maturing types. If you wish to compare yields correctly, do so only between entries with similar calendar dates of maturity, usually within 3 to 5 days. More-reliable comparisons can be made using yields from several consecutive years. All yield determinations were made from replicated tests harvested with a plot combine. Yield information is presented as a percent of the mean of the test. The actual mean value is given at the bottom of each table. Values over 100 indicate the entry had a yield greater than the mean, those less than 100 have a yield less than the mean. LSD values associated with data in these tables are measures of variability within the trials. The LSD numbers beneath the yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in the environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value, the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. The LSD values are given on the percent of mean data, not the actual yields. A 20% level of significance is used in all of these tables, which means that yield differences exceeding the stated LSD value are real 80% of the time. Chlorosis Chlorosis is a yield-limiting condition in soybeans grown in alkaline soils with high calcium carbonate or calcium sulfate ions present, making iron unavailable and causing the soybean plants to turn yellow. This yellowing is visually scored on a 1 to 5 scale, where 1 shows no yellowing and 5 has severe yellowing that may even include death of the plant. Research has shown that for every unit increase in chlorosis, for example going from a 2 to a 3, a 20% reduction in yield may occur. All iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) ratings in tables are from tests conducted on high-lime (high ph) soils near Danvers in Comparing chlorosis scores of entries permits you to estimate how well they perform relative to each other. Actual chlorosis ratings can vary depending on the specific site and year of test. Because of this high level of variability it is usually very difficult to identify the best-performing entries. Producers with a known history of IDC problems may find it more useful to avoid entries with the most severe (4 or 5) IDC ratings. Different organizations may use different scales or descriptions. A comparison of three different chlorosis-rating systems follows. Numerical Score Rating 1-5 scale 1-9 scale 1 to 2 1 to 2.5 Tolerant (T) 2.1 to to 5 Moderately Tolerant (MT) 3.1 to to 7.5 Moderately Susceptible (MS) 4.1 to to 9 Susceptible (S) Protein and Oil Protein and oil values were determined from mature seed using near infrared reflectance analysis equipment. The table values are for the 2014 season only. Protein and oil information is presented on a percent of the mean for each test. The actual mean values, expressed on a 13% moisture basis, are given at the bottom of each table. Values over 100 indicate the protein and/or oil contents of the entry are greater than the mean value while those less than 100 have protein and/or oil contents less than the mean. Absolute values of protein and oil can vary from year to year. The following formula is used to adjust the protein and oil values to another moisture basis. 100-desired moisture X protein or oil value 87 given in the table The value of a bushel of soybeans (APV) based on its oil and protein content can be calculated by: APV = 60 [Po (X) + Pm (Y)].44 Where: APV = Approximate value of a bushel of soybeans Po = soybean oil price (in $ per pound) Pm = price of 44% meal (in $ per pound)* X = oil content at 13% moisture (in decimals) Y = protein content at 13% moisture (in decimals) And: *price of meal $ / ton = $ / pound 2,000 The value of an acre of soybeans can be calculated by multiplying the APV by the yield in bushels per acre. Phytophthora Phytophthora root rot is a soil-borne disease that occurs in heavy wet soils. Infection generally occurs during germination. Phytophthora root rot can cause significant yield reductions if susceptible varieties are planted in poorly drained, infested fields. Variety selection is the best defense against this yield reducing pathogen. There are 2

3 several known races of this fungus, so it is important to know which are present in a particular field. Genes can be incorporated into varieties to provide resistance to specific races of this disease. Genes for resistance to various races of Phytophthora root rot are listed in the table below. Some published information refers to Phytophthora tolerance or field resistance, which is not race-specific and should not be confused with racespecific resistance as indicated in the table below. Reliable tests for tolerance have not yet been fully developed. Data tables in this report indicate which Phytophthora gene or genes is/ are present in each entry. Soybean Cyst Nematode Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) is a microscopic round worm that infects and reproduces in soybean roots. It was first identified in Minnesota in 1978 and is now known to occur in most Minnesota counties where soybeans are grown. Both the area of infestation and number of nematodes per unit of soil appear to be increasing. Several HG types (or races) of this pest are known to occur in Minnesota. When SCN numbers are high (> than 5,000 eggs/100 cc soil), significant yield losses can occur. Rotations to non-host crops and planting of resistant entries can assist in reducing nematode populations as well as reducing its impact on yield. Yield performance results of susceptible (S), low-resistant (LR), moderately resistant (MR) and resistant (R) entries planted in infested fields in northern, central and southern Minnesota are provided in Tables 12 to 14. The entrants supplied the source for SCN resistance in these tables. In Tables 15 to 17 the resistance ratings are based on a greenhouse bioassay using an HG Type 0 (Race 3) SCN population. The reproductive index is calculated as the number of nematodes at the end of the season (Pf) divided by the number of nematodes at the beginning of the season (Pi) in soil samples collected from the field plots. The field egg count index (Ei) is the number of SCN eggs expressed as a percent of the average of the susceptible check entries (Pf). Both the reproductive index and the field egg count index are useful indicators of an entry s ability to suppress SCN reproduction. Data are less reliable if initial SCN egg counts are < 500 or >8,000/100 cc soil. Graphs at the end show reproductive indexes at individual locations. Green indicates fewer eggs at the end of the season compared to the beginning. Yellow indicates the egg counts were essentially the same. Red indicates there were more eggs at the end of the season compared to the beginning. Red is an undesirable SCN management result. For proper management of fields with SCN, it is recommended that entries with an R rating be planted. If the SCN population numbers are relatively low (<1500) an entry with an MR rating might be considered. LR and S rated entries should not be considered for planting in fields where SCN is present. Some entries are rated as tolerant, however no data from the Genes for resistance to various races of Phytophthora root rot. Gene Races Rps1, 1-a 1, 2, 10, 11, 13, 15-18, 24, 26, 27 Rps1-b 1, 3-9, 13-15, 17, 18, 21, 22 Rps1-c 1-3, 6-11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 24, 26 Rps1-k 1-11, 13-15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 26 Rps3-a 1-5, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 18, 23, 25 Rps4 1-4, 10, 12-16, 18-21, 25 Rps6 1-4, 10, 12, 14-16, 18-21, 25 northern United States has verified the usefulness of tolerant entries in maintaining yield and reducing SCN numbers. The graphs on pages show the results for the field reproductive index for the individual SCN locations. Entries are listed by maturity from earliest to latest. The length of the bars indicates the yield of the entries in bushel per acre. The shading (color) of the bars indicates the ability of the entry for that SCN field population to reduce the SCN numbers during the growing season: Green indicates SCN numbers decreased during the growing season under that entry the reason for using SCN-resistant entries. Yellow indicates that the SCN numbers were essentially the same over the growing season not the desired reduction, but not an increase in numbers. Red bars indicate that the SCN numbers increased during the growing season under that entry an undesirable outcome for managing SCN. These entries would not be recommended for fields with this race/hg type SCN population. Management information is available from web site or from the Minnesota Soybean Research and Promotion Council, 151 St. Andrews Court, Suite 710, Mankato, MN 56001, or www. mnsoybean.org. White Mold White mold, also known as Sclerotinia stem rot, develops in infested fields when high relative humidity and moderate temperatures occur during soybean flowering. Planting less-susceptible entries in wider row spacings or at lower populations is the most effective method of reducing the severity of white mold. Accurate ratings for resistance to white mold are difficult to obtain 3

4 because both infection and disease development are dependent on weather conditions. Because of this variability, performance can change significantly among locations and years depending on the interaction of plant development, precipitation, relative humidity, and temperature. White mold severity also tends to be greater if lodging occurs. Growers concerned about performance in the presence of white mold should select varieties that show consistently less white mold during several years of testing. MN0091 and MN0701 are public varieties with better than average white mold resistance. Brown Stem Rot Brown stem rot (BSR) is a fungal disease that can cause yield losses in certain situations. The disease occurs most frequently when soybeans follow soybeans but can occur where soybeans are planted every other year. Resistant rotations or longer rotations assist in the management of this disease. MN0304, MN0902CN, MN1302, Freeborn and IA2008R are available public entries with resistance to BSR. Entrants in 2014 trials and their addresses. Dairyland Seed Co. rmorgan@dairylandseed.com Hyland Seeds cs@hylandseeds.com Monsanto david.heimkes@monsanto.com Mustang Seeds dalenelson@mustangseeds.com Mycogen Seeds bfdue@dow.com NuSeed nmeyer@seeds2000.net NuTech Seed LLC stevesict@nutechseed.com Peterson Farms Seed johng@petersonfarmsseed.com Pioneer Hi-Bred mike.johnston@pioneer.com Prairie Brand Seeds ben@prairiebrandseed.com Richland IFC, Inc. matt@richlandorganics.com SK Food International joel@skfood.com Sodak Genetics jack.ingemansen@sdstate.edu Soyko International howardhoven@arvig.net SunOpta Grains and Foods Group gene.leach@sunopta.com Thunder Seed Inc. jeff@thunderseed.com Titan Pro SCI marcneuman@titanprosci.com Viking Seed jake@alseed.com Some information refers to tolerance or field resistance. Reliable tests for tolerance or field resistance have not yet been developed. Special-Use Entries There continues to be increased interest in producing soybeans with special characteristics important to specialty food product manufacturers, such as tofu, natto, miso, and soy milk. Soybean scientists previously developed some of these special-use entries, which were general releases, but more recently entries have been released under exclusive or nonexclusive licenses to specific companies who then contract with growers for production. For further information contact Minnesota Crop Improvement Association at web site or telephone number Seed Treatments Entrants were allowed to enter treated seed in The type of seed treatment, as provided by the originator, is designated as follows: AC = Acceleron AM = ApronMax AGE = Apron + Gaucho + Evergol CM = Cruiser Maxx CMG = Cruiser Maxx + Gaucho CMV = Cruiser Maxx + Vibrance GAT = Gaucho+Apron+Trilex CR = Cruiser SCE = SmartCote Extra T5000 = Trilex 5000 Research indicates that under some conditions seed treatments can affect the final yield. The exact situations are not always clear, but when comparing entries note if a seed treatment was used on the seed being tested. In some tables the entry type is indicated in a separate column. The designations are: CV, conventional variety (non-transgenic); LL, LibertyLink (glufosinate resistant); R1, Roundup Ready (glyphosate resistant); R2, Round Ready 2 Yield (glyphosate resistant); and ST, (Sulfonylura tolerant). Project Leaders J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, A. Killam, G. Decker and D. Weston. Test Plot Research Bob Bouvette, Ron Faber, Dave Grafstrom, Mark Hanson, Gerald Holz, Tom Hoverstad, George Nelson and Steve Quiring. Soybean Planting Rate and Date Bushel Weight, Pounds...60 Seeds/Pound...2,800 Planting Rate, Seeds/Ft. of Row 7-inch rows inch rows inch rows inch rows inch rows...9 Planting Date...May 1 to May 10 4

5 Table 1. Performance and characteristics of conventional, special-purpose and transgenic soybean entries, far northern zone; Crookston, Roseau and Thief River Falls, Yield, % of Mean % of Mean Entry Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Phyto. Gene Chlorosis Score 0074 RR2YN Nuseed Rps1c 1.0 R2 PB-00766R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 1.4 R2 5B005R2 Mycogen Seeds Rps1c 1.0 CCMVA R2 Integra 20076N Wilber-Ellis Co Rps1c 1.3 R2 MN0071 Minnesota AES Rps1a 1.9 CV R2YN Thunder Seed S 1.8 CMP R2 LS00734N Legacy Seeds Rps1c 1.5 MPP R2 H007R4 Hefty Seed Co Rps1c 1.3 IS R2 DSR-C905/R2Y Dairyland Seed Co Rps1c 1.8 CMO R2 HS 006RYS24 Hyland Seeds Rps1k 1.5 CMV R NuTech - G Rps1k 1.8 SCE RR MN0095 Minnesota AES Rps1k 1.8 CV X54G007R2 Mycogen Seeds Rps1c 1.8 CCMVA R2 Cavalier N. Dakota AES Rps6 1.9 CV H008R3 Hefty Seed Co Rps1c 1.3 IS R R2Y Thunder Seed Rps1c 1.3 CMP R2 HS 007RY32 Hyland Seeds Rps1c,k 1.3 CMV R2 Integra Wilber-Ellis Co Rps1c 1.8 R2 PB-00844R2 Prairie Brand Research S 1.5 R R2YN Thunder Seed Rps3a 1.8 CMP R2 MN0107 Minnesota AES Rps1k 1.8 CV PB-00950R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 1.5 R2 5G009R2 Mycogen Seeds Rps1c 1.5 CCMVA R2 Integra Wilber-Ellis Co Rps1c 2.0 R2 P01T23R Dupont Pioneer Rps1c 1.5 IMMP R1 DSR-C918/R2Y Dairyland Seed Co Rps1k 1.3 CMO R2 Astro Thunder Seed S 1.3 CMP R NuTech - G Rps1k 1.8 SCE RR P01T06R Dupont Pioneer Rps1c,6 1.5 IMMP R1 HS 01RY02 Hyland Seeds Rps1k 1.3 CMV R2 MN0208CN Minnesota AES Rps1a 1.2 CV MN0404CN Minnesota AES Rps1k 2.0 CV H009R3 Hefty Seed Co Rps3a 1.5 IS R2 5B012R2 Mycogen Seeds S 1.5 CCMVA R2 MN0302 Minnesota AES Rps1k 2.1 CV PB-0131R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 2.3 R2 H01R4 Hefty Seed Co Rps1c+3a 1.5 IS R2 PB-0291R2 Prairie Brand Research S 2.0 R2 LS 00833N Legacy Seeds Rps1c 1.5 MPP R2 Mean bu/a 38.7 bu/a 37.4 bu/a 32.7% 16% LSD 20% 3% 3% 2% 1 Greenhouse test results do not agree with originator s designation. *Designates Special-Purpose variety. LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. Seed Treat Trans Trait 5

6 Table 2. Performance and characteristics of conventional, special-purpose and transgenic soybean entries, northern zone; Crookston, Moorhead and Shelly, Yield, % of Mean % of Mean Phyto. Chlorosis Seed Trans Entry Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Gene Score Treat Trait H008L3 Hefty Seed Co Rps1k 3.0 Ino Sys LL MN0095 Minnesota AES Rps1a 2.4 CV MN0208CN Minnesota AES Rps1a 2.5 CV PO3T68R2 Dupont Pioneer Rps1c 2.0 IMMP R2 HS 01RY02 Hyland Seeds Rps1k 2.0 CMV R2 Integra Wilber-Ellis Co Rps3a 1.8 R2 MN0404CN Minnesota AES Rps1k 3.1 CV H0212L Hefty Seed Co Rps1k 3.3 Ino Sys LL LS 0214 Legacy Seeds Rps3a 2.8 MPP R2 MK0249* Richland IFC Inc Rps1 3.5 CV DST02-001/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 3.0 CMO R2 02RE03 Stine Seed S 2.0 R RR2YN Nuseed Rps1c 1.5 R LL Thunder Seed Rps1k 3.3 CMP LL MK0205* Richland IFC Inc Rps1 3.0 CV DST-0305/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 2.5 CMO R2 5B033R2 Mycogen Seeds Rps1k 2.0 CPNCMVA R2 HX 01RY41 Hyland Seeds Rps1k CMV R R2Y Thunder Seed S 2.3 CMP R NuTech - G Rps1c 1.8 SCE R LLN Thunder Seed Rps1k 3.3 CMP LL 6021 NuTech - G S 1.8 SCE R1 DSR-0514/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps3a,1c CMO R2 PB-0131R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 3.3 R2 P05T24R Dupont Pioneer Rps1k 2.5 IMMP R1 H02R3 Hefty Seed Co Rps3a 2.3 Ino Sys R2 LS 0334 Legacy Seeds Rps1k 2.3 MPP R NuTech - G Rps1k 2.0 SCE R LLN Thunder Seed Rps1k 3.5 CMP LL MK0508* Richland IFC Inc Rps1 3.3 CV DSR-0404/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps3a 2.5 CMO R2 HS 05RYS25 Hyland Seeds S 3.0 CMV R2 PB-0441R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 2.5 R2 15R05N Peterson Farm Seed S 2.5 R2 X54050NR2 Mycogen Seeds Rps3a 2.3 CPNCMVA R2 15R04 Peterson Farm Seed S 2.8 R2 PB-0524R2 Prairie Brand Research S 2.8 R2 Integra Wilber-Ellis Co Rps3a 3.3 R RR2Y Nuseed S 1.8 R2 5B040R2 Mycogen Seeds Rps3a 2.0 CPNCMVA R2 Integra Wilber-Ellis Co Rps3a 2.5 R2 P06T28R Dupont Pioneer Rps1k 2.0 IMMP R R2Y Thunder Seed S 2.8 CMP R2 5B066R2 Mycogen Seeds S 3.0 CPNCMVA R2 HS 06RY26 Hyland Seeds S 2.8 CMV R2 H06Y12 Hefty Seed Co S 1.8 Ino Sys R2 14R06N Peterson Farm Seed S 2.8 R2 3406R2YN Thunder Seed S 2.0 R R2YN Thunder Seed S 2.3 CMP R2 PB-0609R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 2.3 R2 07RF33 Stine Seed Rps3a 2.3 R2 X14061R2 Prairie Brand Research S 2.3 R2 15R07N Peterson Farm Seed S 1.8 R2 PB-0777R2 Prairie Brand Research S 3.8 R2 Mean bu/a 44.5 bu/a 44.1 bu/a 33.6% 16.9% LSD 20% 3% 3% 5% 1 Greenhouse test results do not agree with originator s designation. *Designates Special-Purpose Variety. LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. 6

7 7 Table 3. Performance and characteristics of conventional, special-purpose and transgenic soybean entriess, central zone; Becker, Morris and Rosemount, Yield, % of Mean % of Mean Entry Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Phyto. Gene Chlorosis Score P05T24R Dupont Pioneer S 1.5 IMMP R1 MN0404CN Minnesota AES Rps1k 2.7 CV 3506 R2YN Thunder Seed S 1.8 CMP R2 DSR-0514/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1c 1, 3a 1.3 CMO R2 LS 0834N Legacy Seeds Rps1k 1.3 MPP R2 LS 0633N Legacy Seeds Rps1k MPP R2 MN0808CN Minnesota AES Rps1c 2.9 CV MN0606CN Minnesota AES S 3.0 CV HS 06RY26 Hyland Seeds S 1.3 CMV R LLN Thunder Seed S 2.5 CMP LL P06T28R Dupont Pioneer S 1.8 IMMP R1 LS 0634N Legacy Seeds Rps1k MPP R RR2YN Nuseed Rps1k 1.0 R2 HS 09RYS12 Hyland Seeds Rps1k 1.3 CMV R2 MN0702CN Minnesota AES Rps1k 2.4 CV SURGE Minnesota AES Rps1a 2.9 CV 6084R2 NuTech - G Rps1k 1.8 SCE R2 MK1016* Richland IFC Inc S 2.5 CV DSR-0904/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps3a 2.3 CMO R R2YN Thunder Seed S 1.5 CMP R2 P10T02R Dupont Pioneer S 1.5 IMMP R1 DSR-0711/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 2.0 CMO R RR2YN Nuseed Rps1c 1.5 R2 AG0934 Monsanto-Asgrow S 1.5 R2 SD2101R2Y Sodak Genetics S 2.0 R2 ROBERTS Sodak Genetics S 2.8 CV MK0508* Richland IFC Inc Rps1 2.5 CV TP-08R53 Titan Pro Sci S 1.5 CM R2 P10T91R Dupont Pioneer S 1.8 IMMP R1 CODINGTON Sodak Genetics S 3.0 CV AG0835 Monsanto-Asgrow S 1.8 R2 14R11N Peterson Farm Seed S 1.8 R2 MN1611CN Minnesota AES S 2.2 CV 5411 LLN Thunder Seed Rps1k 2.0 CMP LL MK9101* Richland IFC Inc S 1.8 CV 20915N Wilber-Ellis Seed S 1.5 R RR2YN Nuseed Rps1k 1.5 R2 11R33 Titan Pro Sci S 2.0 CM R2 14R09N Peterson Farm Seed S 1.8 R2 1234R2N Viking Seed Rps1k 2.0 R NuTech - G Rps1k, SCE R R2YN Thunder Seed S 1.5 CMP R2 HX 08RY51 Hyland Seeds Rps1k 2.0 CMV R2 DSR-1120/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 2.5 CMO R2 PB-1234R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 1.5 R2 AG1135 Monsanto-Asgrow S 1.5 R2 P15T83R Dupont Pioneer S 1.8 IMMP R1 AG1435 Monsanto-Asgrow S 1.5 R2 15R14N Peterson Farm Seed S 1.5 R2 DSR-1340/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1c 1.8 CMO R2 DSR-1515/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 1.5 CMO R2 LS 1134N Legacy Seeds Rps1c 1.8 MPP R NuTech - G Rps1c, SCE R1 AG1733 Monsanto-Asgrow S 2.0 R2 PB-1566R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 1.8 R2 P19T60R Prairie Brand Prog Yield S 2.0 IMMP R1 PB-1466R2 Prairie Brand Prog Yield S 1.5 R2 SD2172R2Y Sodak Genetics S 1.8 R2 1707R2N Viking Seed S 1.5 R2 Seed Treat Trans Trait Continued on page 8

8 Continued from page 7 Table 3. Performance and characteristics of conventional, special-purpose and transgenic soybean entriess, central zone; Becker, Morris and Rosemount, Yield, % of Mean % of Mean Phyto. Chlorosis Seed Trans Entry Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Gene Score Treat Trait 15M22 Titan Pro Sci S 1.8 CM R R2Y Thunder Seed S 1.8 CMP R2 1522R2N Viking Seed Rps1c 1.8 R2 162R2Y Anderson Seeds S 1.3 R2 MN1410 Minnesota AES Rps1k 3.2 CV O.1922N Viking Seed S 2.8 R1 20M1 Titan Pro Sci S 1.8 CM R2 Brookings Sodak Genetics S 3.0 CV 1422 Viking Seed S 3.0 R1 204R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1c 1.5 R2 PB-1794R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 1.0 R2 TP-17R54 Titan Pro Sci S 2.0 CM R2 P22T61R Dupont Pioneer S 2.0 IMMP R1 DSR-1990/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 1.5 CMO R2 2000R2N Viking Seed S 2.0 R2 PB-1947R2 Prairie Brand Research S 1.5 R2 TP-20R44 Titan Pro Sci S 1.3 CM R2 15R18N Peterson Farm Seed S 1.5 R2 184R2Y Anderson Seeds S 2.0 R2 7204R2 NuTech - G Rps1c 1.8 SCE R2 PB-1956R2 Prairie Brand Research S 1.8 R2 L1968R2 Latham Hi-Tech Seeds Rps1c 1.5 SSP R2 PB-1822R2 Prairie Brand Research S 1.8 R2 TP-18R24 Titan Pro Sci S 1.8 CM R2 1909R2N Viking Seed Rps1k 1.8 R2 TP-21R63 Titan Pro Sci S 2.0 CM R2 L2058R2 Latham Hi-Tech Seeds Rps1c 1.8 SSP R2 PB-2188R2 Prairie Brand Research S 2.0 R2 P22T69R Dupont Pioneer S 1.5 IMMP R1 22M12 Titan Pro Sci S 1.8 CM R2 P19T01R Dupont Pioneer S 2.3 IMMP R1 DSR-2250/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 1.8 CMO R2 TP-23R04 Titan Pro Sci S 1.8 CM R2 Mean bu/a 47.1 bu/a 56.6 bu/a 34.6% 18.2% LSD 20% 3% 4% 3% 1 Greenhouse test results do not agree with originator s designation. 2 Mixture of susceptible and Rps1k. *Designates Special-Purpose Variety. LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. 8

9 Table 4. Performance and characteristics of conventional and transgenic soybean entries, southern zone; Lamberton and Westbrook, Yield,% of Mean % of Mean Entry Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Phyto. Gene Chlorosis Score SD2172R2Y Sodak Genetics S 2.5 R2 DSR-1515/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 3.0 CMO R2 LS 1314N Legacy Seed S 3.0 R2 PB-1466R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 2.5 R R2Y Thunder Seed Rps1c 2.3 CMP R2 P15T83R Dupont Pioneer Rps1k 2.8 IMMP R1 DSR-1340/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1c 3.5 CMO R2 AG1835 Monsanto-Asgrow S 3.5 R2 PB-1822R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 2.5 R2 175R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1k 3.3 R2 185R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1k 3.0 R2 2000R2N Viking seed S 2.3 R2 MN1610CN Minnesota AES Rps1a 3.2 CV 15M22 Titan Pro Sci Rps1c 2.8 CM R2 PB-1566R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 3.5 R2 TP-17R54 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 2.5 CM R2 Brookings Sodak Genetics S 3.0 CV P19T60R Dupont Pioneer Rps1c 2.8 IMMP R1 1909R2N Viking seed Rps1k 3.5 R2 153R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1c 3.5 R2 205R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1k 3.8 R2 PB-1947R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 2.5 R2 20M1 Titan Pro Sci Rps1c 3.3 CM R2 PB-1956R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 3.0 R2 O.1706N Sodak Genetics S 3.0 CV TP-20R44 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 2.3 CM R2 PB-1794R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 0.5 R2 DSR-2411/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1c 2.5 CMO R2 L2253R2 Latham Hi-Tech Seeds Rps1k 2.0 SSP R2 AG1935 Monsanto-Asgrow S 3.3 R2 TP-18R24 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 3.3 CM R2 DSR-1990/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 3.5 CMO R NuTech - G Rps1k 3.5 SCE R1 2144R2N Viking seed Rps1k 3.3 R2 PB-2024R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 3.0 R2 2301R2N Viking seed Rps1c 2.5 R2 PB-2230R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 3.3 R2 DSR-2250/R2Y Dairyland Seed Rps1k 3.5 CMO R2 PB-2319R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 2.5 R NuTech - G Rps1k 3.3 SCE R1 TP-21R63 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 3.3 CM R2 P22T69R Dupont Pioneer Rps1k 2.3 IMMP R1 PB-X14201R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 2.8 R2 22M12 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 3.3 CM R2 P19T01R Dupont Pioneer Rps1k 3.5 IMMP R1 P22T61R Dupont Pioneer Rps1k 3.5 IMMP R1 TP-23R04 Titan Pro Sci Rps1c 3.5 CM R2 P25T51R Dupont Pioneer Rps1c, 3a 3.3 IMMP R1 PB-2188R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 3.5 R2 7204R2 NuTech - G Rps1c 3.6 SCE R2 O.2265 Viking Seed S 2.8 CV AG2035 Monsanto-Asgrow S 2.5 R2 24M21 Titan Pro Sci Rps3a 3.8 CM R2 O.2299N Viking Seed S 3.3 CV AG2433 Monsanto-Asgrow S 2.8 R2 L2384R2 Latham Hi-Tech Seeds Rps1c 3.3 SSP R NuTech - G Rps1k 3.5 SCE R1 Mean bu/a 55.4 bu/a 58.4 bu/a 34.7% 16.9% LSD 20% 3% 3% 3% LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. Seed Treat Trans Trait 9

10 Table 5. Characteristics of special-use soybean entries, northern zone; Crookston and Moorhead, Special Phyto. Chlorosis Entry Originator Rating Characteristics Hilum Color Gene Score Seeds/Lb. 10 MN0071 (00) Harmony x OT Early Brown Rps1a 2.8 3,220 CV MN0083 M x MN SSR Yellow Rps ,691 CV MN0095 M x M Early Imperfect Black Rps1a 2.0 4,127 CV Traill M X KG Early Yellow Rps1a 1.8 3,027 CV M MN0201 X MN1105SP 9-23 Protein Yellow Rps1a 2.8 3,290 CV MN0107 MN0302 X Daksoy 9-23 Early Yellow Rps1k 2.8 2,987 CV M MN1701CN X M Small SCN Yellow Rps1a 3.5 4,018 CV MN0208CN MN0902CN X MN SCN Yellow Rps1a 2.0 3,466 CV M M x MN1106CN 9-26 SCN Yellow S 1.8 3,466 CV M UM3 X PI Small Yellow Rps1a 2.3 4,540 CV MN0082SP MN0202SP X UM Small Yellow Rps1a 2.8 7,094 CV MN0091 Glacier X S SSR Yellow Rps1c 3.5 3,047 CV MN0302 M84-93 X Archer 9-26 Early Buff Rps1k ,439 CV MN0404CN MN0902CN X MN Early Brown Rps1k ,632 CV MK0205* Richland IFC Inc 9-26 Small Yellow Rps ,053 CV M Lambert X M Small Buff S 2.0 3,815 CV M M x Sheyenne 9-27 Yield Yellow Rps1a 2.0 3,197 CV MN0304 Archer X Glacier 9-27 Early Imperfect Black Rpsq 2.5 3,338 CV MK0249* Richland IFC Inc 9-27 Small Yellow Rps ,680 CV M M X M SCN Yellow S 2.3 4,054 CV M SDX X M Protein Yellow S 3.3 2,948 CV MK0508* Richland IFC Inc 9-29 Small Yellow Rps ,974 CV M MN1806SP X M Protein Yellow Rps1a 2.5 2,467 CV M UM3 X MN Small Yellow Rps1a 2.5 4,495 CV M SDX X M Protein Yellow S 2.8 2,929 CV M UM3 X Black Kato 10-3 Small Black Black Rps1a 3.0 4,054 CV *Special-Purpose Lines from Table 2. Table 6. Performance of special-use soybean varieties, northern zone; Crookston and Moorhead, Yield 2014 % of Mean Entry Originator Date % of Mean Protein Oil MN0071 (00) Harmony x OT MN0083 M x MN MN0095 M x M Traill M X KG M MN0201 X MN1105SP MN0107 MN0302 X Daksoy M MN1701CN X M MN0208CN MN0902CN X MN M M x MN1106CN M UM3 X PI MN0082SP MN0202SP X UM MN0091 Glacier X S MN0302 M84-93 X Archer MN0404CN MN0902CN X MN MK0249* Richland IFC Inc M Lambert X M M M x Sheyenne MN0304 Archer X Glacier MK0205* Richland IFC Inc M M X M M SDX X M MK0508* Richland IFC Inc M MN1806SP X M M UM3 X MN M SDX X M M UM3 X Black Kato Mean bu/a 34.9% 17.2% LSD 20% 2% LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. *Special-Purpose Lines from Table 2. Trans Trait

11 Table 7. Characteristics of special-use soybean entries, central zone; Becker and Rosemount, Special Hilum Phyto. Chlorosis Entry Originator Rating Characteristics Color Gene Score Seeds/Lb. M UM3 X M Small Yellow Rps1a 2.0 6,879 CV M MN1306SP X MN SSR Small Yellow Rps1a 3.3 4,324 CV MK0508* Richland IFC Inc 9-18 Small Yellow Rps1a 2.5 4,451 CV M2B11-17Y054 Black Weber X MN0303SP 9-19 Small Black Black Rps1a 3.0 4,283 CV M MN1003SP X PI Wilt Yellow S 2.5 2,929 CV M MN0201 X MN1105SP 9-19 Protein Brown Rps1a 2.8 2,838 CV M IA1008 X MN1011CN 9-19 SCN Yellow S 3.0 3,027 CV M UM3 X PI Small Yellow Rps1a 3.8 4,495 CV M UM3 X PI Small Yellow Rps1a 3.3 4,680 CV MN0702CN MN0902CN X ND SCN Yellow Rps1k 3.3 3,575 CV MN0808CN M X MN0902CN 9-19 SCN Yellow Rps1c 3.8 3,266 CV MK1016* Richland IFC Inc 9-19 Small Yellow Rps1a 2.5 4,989 CV M UM3 X MN Small Yellow Rps1a 2.8 6,219 CV M MN0205SP X MN0082SP 9-20 Small Yellow Rps1a 3.0 6,486 CV M M X MN1310SP 9-20 Large Black Rps1c 3.5 2,027 CV M MN1701CN X M SCN Small Yellow Rps1a 2.8 4,779 CV 91M10 Pioneer 9-21 General Purpose Yellow S 3.5 2,802 CV M UM3 X Black Kato 9-21 Small Black Black Rps1a 2.5 4,586 CV M MN0082SP X MN0902CN 9-21 SCN Small Yellow Rps1a 2.8 5,896 CV M MN0902CN X MN1011CN 9-21 SCN Yellow Rps1a 3.3 3,220 CV M M x MN1011CN 9-21 SCN Yellow Rps1a 3.3 3,068 CV M M x MN1806SP 9-21 SCN/Protein Yellow S 2.8 2,686 CV M MN0605SP X M Protein Yellow Rps1a 3.0 3,027 CV MN0404CNBL MN0902CN X MN SCN Black Seed Black Rps1k 3.8 2,929 CV Sheyenne Pioneer 9071 X A General Purpose Yellow Rps1c 2.8 3,220 CV MK9101* Richland IFC Inc 9-21 Black Seed Yellow Rps1a 1.8 2,064 CV M UM3 X Heinong Small Yellow S 3.3 5,101 CV M M X MN0804SP 9-22 Protein Yellow Rps1a 3.0 2,316 CV M M X MN1310SP 9-22 Fatty Acid Black Rps1k 4.0 2,892 CV M UM3 X MN0606CN 9-22 SCN Small Yellow S 3.5 5,279 CV MN0907 M X OAC General Purpose Yellow Rps1k 4.0 2,655 CV M M X MN1608SP 9-23 Protein Yellow Rps1c 3.8 2,785 CV M MN0902CN x LD SCN Brown S 3.3 3,414 CV M MN1308SP X M Large Buff Rps1c 3.0 2,281 CV MN1014 IA2052 X MN Yield Buff Rps1k 3.0 3,220 CV M MN0902CN x LD SCN Yellow S 2.0 3,007 CV M MN1308SP X M Large Buff Rps1c 2.3 2,340 CV M MN1308SP X M Large Buff Rps1c 3.3 2,193 CV MN1309SP AX X MN Protein Black Rps1k 3.8 3,153 CV M MN0207SP X MN Small Yellow Rps1a 4.0 4,729 CV MN0908CN MN0902CN X M SCN Yellow S 3.0 3,007 CV MN1611CN M X M SCN Yellow S 2.3 3,027 CV 1 Greenhouse test results do not agree with originator s designation. *Special-Purpose lines from Table 3. Trans Trait 11

12 Table 8. Performance of special-use soybean entries, central zone; Becker and Rosemount, Yield 2014 % of Mean Entry Originator Date % of Mean Protein Oil M UM3 X M M MN1306SP X MN MK1016* Richland IFC Inc M2B11-17Y054 Black Weber X MN0303SP M MN1003SP X PI M MN0201 X MN1105SP M IA1008 X MN1011CN M UM3 X PI M UM3 X PI MN0702CN MN0902CN X ND MN0808CN M X MN0902CN MK0508* Richland IFC Inc M UM3 X MN M MN0205SP X MN0082SP M M X MN1310SP M MN1701CN X M M10 Pioneer M UM3 X Black Kato M MN0082SP X MN0902CN M MN0902CN X MN1011CN M M x MN1011CN M M x MN1806SP M MN0605SP X M MN0404CNBL MN0902CN X MN Sheyenne Pioneer 9071 X A MK9101* Richland IFC Inc M UM3 X Heinong M M X MN0804SP M M X MN1310SP M UM3 X MN0606CN MN0907 M X OAC M M X MN1608SP M MN0902CN x LD M MN1308SP X M MN1014 IA2052 X MN M MN0902CN x LD M MN1308SP X M M MN1308SP X M MN1309SP AX X MN M MN0207SP X MN MN0908CN MN0902CN X M MN1611CN M X M Mean bu/a 36.1% 17.4% LSD 20% 2% LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. *Special-Purpose Lines from Table 3. 12

13 Table 9. Characteristics of special-use soybean entries, southern zone; Lamberton and Westbrook, Chlorosis Entry Originator Rating Special Characteristics Hilum Color Phyto. Gene Score Seeds/Lb. M M X SDX Protein Yellow S 3.3 2,248 CV MN1311 NE1900 X MN Yield Yellow Rps1k 2.0 2,686 CV M MN0902CN X M SCN Yellow Rps1a 2.8 2,640 CV M M x Sheyenne 9-25 Yield Yellow Rps1k 3.3 2,873 CV M M X M % LIN Black Rps1c 4.0 2,428 CV M IA1008 X MN1011CN 9-26 SCN Yellow Rps ,259 CV M M X M SCN Yellow S 3.3 2,640 CV M MN1503SP X MN1608SP 9-27 Large Buff Rps1k 2.3 1,991 CV M M X M SCN Buff Rps1a 3.3 2,752 CV M MN1505SP X M Large Yellow Rps1a 3.0 1,853 CV MN1410 Minnesota AES 9-27 Yield Buff S 4.0 2,536 CV M MN0801SP X M Protein Buff Rps1a 2.5 2,236 CV M MN0902CN x LD SCN Grey S 2.5 2,987 CV MN1701CN M X MN0902CN 9-28 SCN Yellow S 3.5 3,338 CV Parker A X Dawson 9-28 General Purpose Buff Rps1a 3.0 2,281 CV M MN1605SP X MN0093SP 9-29 Small Yellow Rps1a 2.5 3,752 CV MN1610CN MN0902CN X B00497B SCN Yellow Rps1a 3.0 2,735 CV M Gardensoy 02 X MN2001SP 9-30 Edamame Yellow Rps1k 3.3 1,884 CV M Lambert X IA Oil FA HI Protein Brown Rps1a 2.8 2,495 CV M MN0403SP X A SCN Small Yellow S 3.3 4,408 CV M MN1602SP X MN1806SP 9-30 Large Yellow Rps1a 3.3 1,948 CV M MN1009 X M SCN Yellow Rps1k 3.5 2,467 CV M MN0902CN x LD SCN Black S 2.5 3,068 CV Trans Trait Table 10. Performance of special-use soybean entries, southern zone; Lamberton and Westbrook, Yield 2014 % of Mean Entry Originator Date % of Mean Protein Oil M M X SDX MN1311 NE1900 X MN M MN0902CN X M M M x Sheyenne M M X M M IA1008 X MN1011CN M M X M M MN1503SP X MN1608SP M M X M M MN1505SP X M MN1410 Minnesota AES M MN0801SP X M M MN0902CN x LD MN1701CN M X MN0902CN Parker A X Dawson M MN1605SP X MN0093SP MN1610CN MN0902CN X B00497B M Gardensoy 02 X MN2001SP M Lambert X IA M MN0403SP X A M MN1602SP X MN1806SP M MN1009 X M M MN0902CN x LD Mean bu/a 36.7% 16.6% LSD 20% 3% LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. 13

14 Table 11. Characteristics of publicly developed, general-use soybean entries entered in 2014 tests. Entry Originator Rating Hilum Color Phyto. Gene BSR Reaction SCN Reaction Chlorosis Score Cavalier No. Dakota AES 00.7 Yellow Rps6 S 2.5 CV Jim No. Dakota AES 00.7 Yellow S S S 2.8 CV MN0083 Minnesota AES 00.8 Yellow Rps6 S 2.5 CV MN0095 Minnesota AES 00.9 Imperfect Black Rps1a S 1.8 CV Traill No. Dakota AES 0.0 Yellow S S S 2.8 CV MN0107 Minnesota AES 0.1 Yellow Rps1k S 4.0 CV MN0404CN Minnesota AES 0.4 Black Rps1k R 2.0 CV Ashtibula No. Dakota AES 0.5 Yellow Rps6 S 3.0 CV Sheyenne No. Dakota AES 0.7 Yellow Rps1c S 1.8 CV MN0806CN Minnesota AES 0.8 Yellow S R 2.8 CV MN1011CN Minnesota AES 1.0 Yellow Rps1a R 2.5 CV Surge Minn. & S.D. AES 1.0 Imperfect Black Rps1a S S 2.9 CV MN1311 Minnesota AES 1.3 Yellow Rps1k S 2.7 CV MN1401BL Minnesota AES 1.4 Black Rps1a S 3.8 CV MN1701CN Minnesota AES 1.7 Yellow S R 3.3 CV IA1022 Iowa AES 1.8 Yellow S S S 4.8 CV IA1010 Iowa AES 2.1 Yellow S 3.5 CV Deuel So. Dakota AES 1.1 Black Rps1k R 2.2 CV Brookings So. Dakota AES 1.7 Brown Rps1k S 2.5 CV Davison So. Dakota AES 2.2 Black Rps1a S 3.8 CV IA2053 Iowa AES 2.0 Black Rps1a S 4.5 CV MN1505SP Minnesota AES 1.5 Yellow Rps1a S 3.5 CV MN1012SP Minnesota AES 1.2 Yellow Rps1a S 3.7 CV MN0208 Minnesota AES 0.3 Yellow Rps1a R 2.4 CV MN0606CN Minnesota AES 0.6 Yellow S R 2.4 CV MN1410 Minnesota AES 1.4 Buff Rps1k S 2.3 CV MN0702CN Minnesota AES 0.7 Yellow Rps1k R 2.0 CV MN0808CN Minnesota AES 0.8 Yellow Rps1c R 2.8 CV MN0404CN Minnesota AES 0.4 Black Rps1k R 3.0 CV MN1611CN Minnesota AES 1.6 Yellow S R 2.2 CV MN0302 Minnesota AES 0.3 Buff Rps1k S 2.3 CV MN1204RRCN Minnesota AES 1.2 Yellow S R 3.2 R1 MN0908CN Minnesota AES 0.9 Yellow S R 2.3 CV Trans Trait Table 12. Performance and characteristics of soybean entries, northern zone at soybean cyst nematode infested sites; Gary and Mahnomen, Maturiy Yield, % of Mean % of Mean Entry Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Phyto. Gene Chlorosis Score PB-00766R2 Prairie Brand S 1.5 MR R2 MN0071 Minnesota AES Rps1a 1.7 S CV R2YN Thunder Seed Rps3a 1.5 S CMP R2 MN0095 Minnesota AES Rps1a 1.9 S CV R2YN Thunder Seed S 1.8 MR CMP R2 MN0107 Minnesota AES Rps1k 2.8 S CV MN0208CN Minnesota AES Rps1a 2.2 R CV MN0404CN Minnesota AES Rps1k 1.9 R CV MN0302 Minnesota AES Rps1k 2.3 S CV 7063 NuTech - G Rps1c 1.5 S SCE R1 PB-0524R2 Prairie Brand S 1.5 MR R2 AG0835 Monsanto - Asgrow S 1.5 MR R R2YN Thunder Seed Rps1c 2.0 MR CMP R R2YN Thunder Seed S 2.5 MR CMP R2 PB-0777R2 Prairie Brand S 1.5 MR R2 Mean bu/a 31.3 bu/a 25.7 bu/a 34.8% 16% LSD 20% 5% 7% 2% 1 Greenhouse test results do not agree with originator s designation. LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. SCN Rating Seed Treat Trans Trait 14

15 Field reproductive index of soybean entries, northern zone at soybean cyst nematode infested site, Gary Yield (bu/acre) > 6.0 *Susceptible check R2YN R2YN PB-00766R2 MN0095* MN0071* MN0107* MN0302* MN0208CN MN0404CN 7063 PB-0524R2 AG R2YN 3408 R2YN PB-0777R2 Pi (spring) counts were low (50-1,200 eggs/100cc), as were Pf (fall) counts (50-3,500 eggs/100cc), thus data on the reproductive index are of limited value. Race or HG type not yet determined. Field reproductive index of soybean entries, northern zone at soybean cyst nematode infested site, Mahnomen < 0.8 Yield (bu/acre) > 1.0 *Susceptible check R2YN PB-00766R2 MN0095* MN0107 MN0071* R2YN MN0208CN 7063 MN0404CN MN0302* PB-0524R2 AG R2YN 3408 R2YN PB-0777R2 Pi (spring) counts were low (50-3,500 eggs/100cc), as were Pf (fall) counts (50-3,500 eggs/100cc), thus data on the reproductive index are of limited value. Race or HG type not yet determined. 15

16 Table 13. Performance and characteristics of soybean entries, central zone at soybean cyst nematode sites; Rosemount and Danvers, Yield, % of Mean % of Mean Entry Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Phyto. Gene Chlorosis Score 6084R2 NuTech - G Rps1k 2.2 S SCE R2 MN0702CN Minnesota AES Rps1k 2.0 R CV AG0835 Monsanto - Asgrow Rps1k 1.9 MR R R2YN Thunder Seed Rps1c 2.1 MR CMP R2 SURGE Minnesota AES S 2.4 S CV MN0606CN Minnesota AES S 2.4 R CV MN0808CN Minnesota AES Rps1c 2.8 R CV AG0934 Monsanto - Asgrow S 1.9 R R NuTech - G Rps1k,6 1.8 MR SCE R1 PB-1466R2 Prairie Brand Prog Yield S 1.7 MR R2 AG1733 Monsanto - Asgrow S 1.9 MR R2 AG1435 Monsanto - Asgrow S 2.0 MS R2 S12-H2 Syngenta Rps1c 2.0 MS ClarivaC R R2YN Thunder Seed S 1.7 MR CMP R2 AG1135 Monsanto - Asgrow S 1.8 MR R2 MN0908CN Minnesota AES S 2.3 MR CV MN1410 Minnesota AES S 2.3 S CV 7157 NuTech - G Rps1c,6 2.0 MR SCE R1 PB-1794R2 Prairie Brand Seeds S 1.9 MR R2 PB-1822R2 Prairie Brand Research S 1.6 MR R2 204R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1c 2.7 MR R2 162R2Y Anderson Seeds S 2.0 R R2 7204R2 NuTech - G S 2.9 MR R2 S20-T6 Syngenta Rps1c 1.6 S ClarivaC R2 184R2Y Anderson Seeds S 2.6 MR R2 MN1204RRCN Minnesota AES S 3.2 R R1 PB-1956R2 Prairie Brand Research S 1.7 MS R2 PB-X14201R2 Prairie Brand Prog Yield S 1.6 MR R2 PB-1947R2 Prairie Brand Research S 2.5 MR R2 PB-2230R2 Prairie Brand Prog Yield S 2.5 MR R2 S19-Z9 Syngenta S 2.0 MR ClarivaC R2 Mean bu/a 47.2 bu/a 39.3 bu/a 33.4% 17.4% LSD 20% 3% 3% 1 Greenhouse test results do not agree with originator s designation. 2 Mixture of susceptible and Rps1k. LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. SCN Rating Seed Treat Trans Trait 16

17 Field reproductive index of soybean entries, central zone at soybean cyst nematode infested site, Rosemount Yield (bu/acre) R2 MN0702CN MN0606CN MN0808CN 3408 R2YN Surge* AG0835 AG PB-1466R S12-H2 MN0908CN 3511 R2YN AG1135 AG1435 MN1410* PB-1794R2 162R2Y AG1733 MN1204RRCN PB-1822R2 184R2Y 204R2Y 7204R2 P1 (spring) counts were very low (<50 eggs/100cc), as were Pf (fall) counts, thus data are of very limited value. Race or HG type not yet determined. PB-1947R2 PB-1956R2 S20-T6 PB-X14201R2 S19-Z9 PB-2230R2 < > 5.0 *Susceptible check Field reproductive index of soybean entries, central zone at soybean cyst nematode infested site, Danvers < Yield (bu/acre) R2 AG R2YN 3511 R2YN 7104 MN0606CN MN0702CN PB-1466R AG0934 AG1135 AG1435 AG1733 S12-H2 MN1410* MN0808CN MN0908CN Surge* 7204R2 PB-1822R2 PB-1794R2 162R2Y 184R2Y S20-T6 MN1204RRCN PB-1947R2 PB-1956R2 PB-X14201R2 PB-2230R2 204R2Y S19-Z9 > 2.3 *Susceptible check P1 (spring) counts were low ( eggs/100cc), as were Pf (fall) counts (375-2,120 eggs/100cc), thus data should be used with caution. Race or HG type not yet determined. 17

18 Table 14. Performance and characteristics of soybean entries in southern zone soybean cyst nematode infested sites; Lamberton and Fairfax, Yield, % of Mean % of Mean Entry Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Phyto. Gene Chlorosis Score PB-1466R2 Prairie Brand S 1.8 MR R2 153R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1c 2.8 MR R2 MN1701CN Minnesota AES S 3.3 R CV TP-17R54 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 2.5 MR CM R2 175R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1k 2.3 MR R2 20M1 Titan Pro Sci Rps1c 2.5 MR CM R2 P19T60R Dupont Pioneer Rps1c 2.3 MR IMMP R1 TP-20R44 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 3.0 MR CM R2 205R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1k 2.5 MR R NuTech - G Rps1k 3.0 MR SCE R1 P22T61R Dupont Pioneer Rps1k 2.3 MR IMMP R1 PB-2188R2 Prairie Brand S 1.8 MR R2 PB-X14201R2 Prairie Brand S 2.3 MR R2 TP-18R24 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 2.3 MR CM R2 AG1835 Monsanto - Asgrow S 2.0 MR R2 15M22 Titan Pro Sci Rps1c 2.5 MR CM R2 185R2Y Anderson Seeds Rps1k 2.0 MR R2 7204R2 NuTech -G Rps1c 2.0 MR SCE R2 22M12 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 2.3 MR CM R2 AG1935 Monsanto - Asgrow S 2.8 MR R2 PB-2230R2 Prairie Brand S 3.3 MR R2 PB-2319R2 Prairie Brand Prog Yield S 3.5 MR R NuTech - G Rps1k 3.3 MR SCE R1 P19T01R Dupont Pioneer Rps1k 2.3 MR IMMP R1 P22T69R Dupont Pioneer Rps1k 2.0 R IMMP R1 AG2035 Monsanto - Asgrow S 1.8 MR R2 TP-21R63 Titan Pro Sci Rps1k 2.8 MR CM R2 AG2433 Monsanto - Asgrow S 3.0 MR R2 TP-23R04 Titan Pro Sci Rps1c 3.3 MR CM R NuTech - G Rps1k 2.8 R SCE R1 24M21 Titan Pro Sci Rps3a 3.0 S CM R2 Mean bu/a 46.4 bu/a 42.9 bu/a 34.5% 16.5% LSD 20% 4% 3% 1 Greenhouse test results do not agree with originator s designation. LSD numbers beneath yield columns indicate whether the difference between yields is due to genetics or other factors, such as variations in environment. If yield difference between two entries equals or exceeds the LSD value the higher-yielding entry probably was superior in yield. A difference less than the LSD value probably is due to environmental factors. SCN Rating Seed Treat Trans Trait 18

19 Field reproductive index of soybean entries, southern zone at soybean cyst nematode infested site, Lamberton Yield (bu/acre) PB-1466R2 153R2Y TP-17R54 175R2Y MN1701CN 20M1 205R2Y P19T60R 7233 TP-20R R2 P19T01R 15M AG1835 AG M12 185R2Y PB-2188R2 PB-X14201R2 P22T61R PB-2230R2 TP-18R24 PB-2319R2 TP-21R63 P22T69R TP-23R04 AG AG M21* P1 (spring) counts were low to moderate (50-2,100 eggs/100cc), and Pf (fall) counts were low to moderate (520-5,150 eggs/100cc), thus reasonable data for this field population were obtained. Field was HG type (race 1). < > 1.1 *Susceptible check Field reproductive index of soybean entries, central zone at soybean cyst nematode infested site, Fairfax Yield (bu/acre) < > 17.0 *Susceptible check PB-2188R2 7204R2 PB-1466R2 PB-X14201R2 PB-2230R2 P19T01R P19T60R P22T61R P22T69R 15M22 TP-17R54 TP-18R24 20M1 TP-20R44 TP-21R63 22M12 TP-23R R2Y 175R2Y 185R2Y 205R2Y AG1835 AG2035 AG2035 AG M21* PB-2319R2 MN1701CN P1 (spring) counts were low ( eggs/100cc), as were Pf (fall) counts (500-9,100 eggs/100cc), thus reasonable data were obtained. Race or HG type not yet determined. 19

Varietal Trials Results January 2008

Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Soybean Jim Orf, Seth Naeve, Phil Schaus and Art Killam Minnesota Experiment Station scientists conduct tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties annually.

More information

SOYBEAN. Soybean Maturity Zones.

SOYBEAN. Soybean Maturity Zones. Northern Central Southern Soybean Maturity Zones. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists annually conduct these tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties. Companies are charged

More information

SOYBEAN. Soybean maturity zones. Far Northern. Zone. Northern. Zone. Central. Zone. Southern. Zone. Roseau Kennedy Thief River Falls

SOYBEAN. Soybean maturity zones. Far Northern. Zone. Northern. Zone. Central. Zone. Southern. Zone. Roseau Kennedy Thief River Falls Each year Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists conduct tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties. Companies are charged a fee for each variety they enter; these fees partially

More information

2017 Corn Grain Field Crop Trials Results

2017 Corn Grain Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences The Minnesota Corn Evaluation Program was conducted by the University

More information

Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists annually conduct these tests of adapted public and private

More information

Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam

Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Each year Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists conduct tests of adapted public and private

More information

To better understand and use the data provided in these tables, please read the following additional information very carefully:

To better understand and use the data provided in these tables, please read the following additional information very carefully: Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists annually conduct these tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties. Companies are charged a fee for each variety they enter and these fees

More information

2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials

2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials 2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials Prepared by: Tom Hoverstad, Matt Bickell, Jeff Coulter, George Nelson, Steve Quiring and Mark Hanson University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Results

More information

Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003

Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003 107 Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003 R. Jay Goos and Brian Johnson, Department of Soil Science, NDSU, Fargo, ND 58105 e-mail: rj.goos@ndsu.nodak.edu Field studies were

More information

Varietal Trials Results January 2011

Varietal Trials Results January 2011 Varietal Trials Results January 2011 Corn Grain Tom Hoverstad, Jeff Coulter, George Nelson, Steve Quiring and Mark Hanson Corn Planting Rate and Date Bushel Weight, Pounds...56 Planting Rate, Seeds/Acre...33,000

More information

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Matthew Hankinson, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Harness, Halex GT Early-Season Test

More information

2013 MINNESOTA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

2013 MINNESOTA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS 2013 MINNESOTA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS Prepared by Tom Hoverstad, Matt Bickell, Jeff Coulter, George Nelson, Steve Quiring and Mark Hanson University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Minnesota

More information

Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance Results

Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance Results South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange SDSU Extension Circulars SDSU Extension 12-2006 Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance

More information

LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE

LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE 2004 Minnesota Hybrid Corn Performance Trials Tom Hoverstad, Dale Hicks, George Nelson, and Steve Quiring (University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station) Results of the Minnesota Corn Hybrid

More information

2017 SOYBEAN VARIETY GUIDE

2017 SOYBEAN VARIETY GUIDE 2017 SOYBEAN VARIETY GUIDE This publication features the results from MPSG-sponsored trials. Contents of this publication can only be reproduced with the permission of MPSG. KEY FOR SOYBEAN VARIETY TABLES

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.5-1.8 Top 30 of 42 S2017MNSCa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205 Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Roundup, atrazine,

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / SureStart Early-Season Test SOIL

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South [ MNSO ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South [ MNSO ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South [ MNSO ] Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.6-1.9 Top 30 of 48 S2017MNSOa For Gross Income (Sorted by Yield),

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North Central [ IANC ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North Central [ IANC ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North Central [ IANC ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.1-2.5 Top 30 of 60 S2018IANCa For Gross Income

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.1-2.4 Top 30 of 54 S2017IANWa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 Erik B.G. Feibert, Clinton C. Shock, Peter Sexton, Lamont D. Saunders, and Rhonda Bafus Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon Introduction

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.1-2.4 Top 30 of 54 S2018IANWa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.7-2.1 Top 30 of 54 S2017IANOa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WABASSO Leon Plaetz, Redwood County, MN 56293

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WABASSO Leon Plaetz, Redwood County, MN 56293 2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WABASSO Leon Plaetz, Redwood County, MN 56293 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / TripleFlex, atrazine, Laudis,

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.3-2.7 Top 30 of 45 S2017IASCa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

2003 UNIFORM SOYBEAN TESTS REGIONAL SUMMARIES

2003 UNIFORM SOYBEAN TESTS REGIONAL SUMMARIES 2003 UNIFORM SOYBEAN TESTS REGIONAL SUMMARIES Data Complied by: Wad D. Crochet Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907-1150 Office phone 765-583-2952 FAX 765-496-3452

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.7-2.1 Top 30 of 60 S2018IANOa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

Varietal Trials Results

Varietal Trials Results Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Wheat, Hard Red Spring Jim Anderson, Jochum Wiersma, Gary Linkert, Catherine Springer and Susan Reynolds differ for their response to each of those diseases, the rating

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.3-2.7 Top 30 of 45 S2018IASCa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Corvus Early-Season Test SOIL

More information

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Spring wheat varieties are compared in trial plots at Waseca, Lamberton, Morris, Crookston, Stephen,

More information

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results 01 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial

More information

Wilson Genetics, LLC, P.O. Box 391, Harlan IA 51537

Wilson Genetics, LLC, P.O. Box 391, Harlan IA 51537 The Minnesota Corn Hybrid Evaluation Program is conducted by the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station to provide unbiased information for use by corn growers when they choose hybrids

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / SureStart, Callisto

More information

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee 1992 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Conducted in 1989-91 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE This organization is made up of representatives

More information

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Extension Series No. E-10-2 November, 2010 2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences NYS

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Klint Cork, Ida County, IA 51020

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Klint Cork, Ida County, IA 51020 2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Klint Cork, Ida County, IA 51020 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Halex GT SOIL DESCRIPTION: Galva

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025 2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Surpass, atrazine, Impact SOIL

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Acuron, atrazine SOIL DESCRIPTION:

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] WATERLOO Rottinghaus Farms, Black Hawk County, IA 50703

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] WATERLOO Rottinghaus Farms, Black Hawk County, IA 50703 2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] WATERLOO Rottinghaus Farms, Black Hawk County, IA 50703 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Corvus, atrazine,

More information

Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri

Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center Pengyin Chen University of Missouri Facility Improvement With New Challenges New Cold Storage With New Challenges The Master and Legend Pengyin Chen Chenpe@missouri.edu

More information

Company Brand Variety Herb Trait MG SCN PRR Seed Trt Hilum Color Agventure 38E8LL LL C CMXVI BL Agventure 38H4R RR 3.

Company Brand Variety Herb Trait MG SCN PRR Seed Trt Hilum Color Agventure 38E8LL LL C CMXVI BL Agventure 38H4R RR 3. Company Brand Variety Herb Trait MG 1 2 3 4 5 SCN PRR Seed Trt Hilum Color Agventure 38E8LL LL 3.8 4 5 2 C CMXVI BL Agventure 38H4R RR 3.8 4 5 0 U CMXVI BL Agventure 38W5X RRX 3.8 4 5 0 C CMXVI Ib Agventure

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] NEW HAMPTON Mark Bruening, Chickasaw County, IA 50659

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] NEW HAMPTON Mark Bruening, Chickasaw County, IA 50659 2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] NEW HAMPTON Mark Bruening, Chickasaw County, IA 50659 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Acuron, Halex GT SOIL

More information

2017 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2017 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

Soybeans Iowa Crop Performance Test. Iowa Crop Improvement Association

Soybeans Iowa Crop Performance Test. Iowa Crop Improvement Association 2007 Iowa Crop Performance Test Soybeans Photo by Rich Pope, Corn and Soybean Initiative location (see Table 1). Planting-time soybean cyst nematode egg counts at all locations were less than 1,000 eggs

More information

Selecting Hybrids Wisely

Selecting Hybrids Wisely First of of all, let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org Genetic modification of corn has been occurring

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 007 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 006 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University   Web: Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org First of of all, all, let s let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Genetic modification of corn has been

More information

2015 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2015 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2017

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2017 A supplement to Iowa Farmer Today. Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2017 View of the northeast Iowa location. Gregory L. Tylka, Gregory D. Gebhart, Christopher

More information

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide NDSU EXTENSION A1105-18 North Dakota Flax Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide Hans Kandel (NDSU Main Station); Greg Endres, Mike Ostlie, Blaine Schatz and Steve Zwinger (Carrington Research

More information

2010 SCN PRELIM TEST IV

2010 SCN PRELIM TEST IV Gen. FPhlm Parentage Comp. Traits 1 LD00-3309 PTbl Maverick x Dwight F5 2 IA4004 PLty Dairyland 99433 x A01-409003 F4 3 LD00-2817P PGibl Ina x Dwight F5 4 LD02-9050 PTbl LN97-24270 x LS93-0375 F5 5 JTN-3109

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. MSR, Inc., Columbia, MO Early-Season Test Maturity Group 3.2-3.8 Top 30 of 42 S2018MONOa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

OILSEED CROPS CANOLA. Canola Variety Name Changes. Canola Planting Rate and Date

OILSEED CROPS CANOLA. Canola Variety Name Changes. Canola Planting Rate and Date OILSEED CROPS Canola (Brassica napus and B. rapa) is a crop developed from oilseed rape by Canadian plant breeders; the first canola variety was licensed in 1974. Canola is used for edible oil extraction

More information

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes Victor M. Green 302-275-1445 vmgreen@udel.edu Special thanks and appreciation is extended to the following people for whom this research would not have

More information

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown*** Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown*** Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp May 2.47 67.4 1.24 66.5 2.56 66.3 1.59 67.4 June 5.9 73.5 6.58 73.1 4.45 72.8 12.24

More information

CORN GRAIN. Test zones, locations and maturities are: Companies participating in the 2000 hybrid corn grain trials.

CORN GRAIN. Test zones, locations and maturities are: Companies participating in the 2000 hybrid corn grain trials. Test zones, locations and maturities are: Southern Zone: Lamberton, Waseca, and Plainview. Early Maturity Trial - 105 Relative Maturity (RM) and earlier. Late Maturity Trial - 110 and 115 RM. Central Zone:

More information

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Md. Rasel Parvej, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech David L. Holshouser, Extension

More information

Canola P.M. Porter and D.G. LeGare Varietal Trials Results, January 2006

Canola P.M. Porter and D.G. LeGare Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Canola P.M. Porter and D.G. LeGare Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Canola (Brassica napus and B. rapa) is a crop developed from oilseed rape by Canadian plant breeders; the first canola variety was

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Information DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 - (301) 405-6244 Agronomy Facts No. 32 MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Maryland soybean variety tests are conducted

More information

2017 Michigan Soybean Performance Report. Putting Your Checkoff To Work

2017 Michigan Soybean Performance Report. Putting Your Checkoff To Work **Jan and Scott: Wording for front Cover of the 2016 Performance Report. The logo embedded here is the most current logo to use. The attached mailing list is for 7,538. MSPC will want 300 extras not sure

More information

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT The 2011 Shelby County State Bank Corn Plot was a replicated trial with each variety planted three times. Each variety had six rows and the rows were approximately

More information

FUNDED BY GROWERS FOR GROWERS SMALL PLOT AND FIELD SCALE DATA

FUNDED BY GROWERS FOR GROWERS SMALL PLOT AND FIELD SCALE DATA FUNDED BY GROWERS FOR GROWERS SMALL PLOT AND FIELD SCALE DATA For more information visit canolaperformancetrials.ca THE NEXT GENERATION IN VARIETY EVALUATION Canola Performance Trials (CPT) represent the

More information

2017 South Dakota Conventional Soybean Variety Trial Results

2017 South Dakota Conventional Soybean Variety Trial Results Beresford Location: Cooperator: Soil Type: Fertilizer: Previous crop: Tillage: Row spacing: Seeding Rate: Herbicide: Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Production Associate Kevin Kirby Agricultural

More information

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date). Comparison of PRE/POST and POST only Weed Control Systems in Liberty Link Soybeans at Rochester, MN, in 2011. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Adam Hazel and Bo Beyer The objective

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy 2013-2014 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2013-2014 wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Humboldt,

More information

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow Managing Glyphosate (Group-9) and ALS (Group-2) Resistant Common Waterhemp with Different Systems and Herbicide Rates in LibertyLink Soybean in S Minnesota in 2016. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken,

More information

2000 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Tables Methods Web site Feature: Yield Lodging Maturity date Location of the 2000 Kentucky Soybean Tests

2000 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Tables Methods Web site Feature: Yield Lodging Maturity date Location of the 2000 Kentucky Soybean Tests 1. Location, Planting, and Climatic Data for the Soybean Performance Tests...2 2. Soybean Planting Guide...3 3. Company Disease-Resistance Specifications...6 4. Summary: Variety Test Tables 5-10...8 5.

More information

Soybean Variety Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research & Development Division

Soybean Variety Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research & Development Division 2015 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Research & Development Division Table of Contents General & Growing Season Information. 1 Growing Season Information & Data Interpretation. 2 Acknowledgements.

More information

Corn Grain T.R. Hoverstad, D.R. Hicks, G.A. Nelson and S.R. Quiring Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

Corn Grain T.R. Hoverstad, D.R. Hicks, G.A. Nelson and S.R. Quiring Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Corn Grain T.R. Hoverstad, D.R. Hicks, G.A. Nelson and S.R. Quiring Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 The Minnesota Corn Hybrid Evaluation Program is conducted by the University of Minnesota Agricultural

More information

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015. Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ellen Sheehan, and Brent Breitenbach

More information

2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results

2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results 2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy Research and Development Division www.wheattech.com 270-586-1776 Data provided by Wheat Tech Agronomy R&D Division 270-586-1776 Table of

More information

INFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS.

INFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS. 2016 PERFORMANCE TRIALS INFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS. 2016 Small Plot and Field Scale Data This version has been revised to include both small plot and field scale data. For more information visit www.canolaperformancetrials.ca

More information

Section 4: Wheat Varieties

Section 4: Wheat Varieties Section 4: Wheat Varieties 49 Wheat trials were planted in seven-inch rows at Blackstone, Orange, Holland, Painter, and Shenandoah Valley. They were planted in six-inch rows at Blacksburg. They were planted

More information

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Table 1. Corn Hybrid Performance for Silage, Combined Sites (Adair and Mason counties), KY, 2010 Beck's 5675 HXR 22.9 3380 27000 0.81 0.55 7.4 21 37

More information

2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results

2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results 2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy Research and Development Division www.wheattech.com 270-586-1776 Data provided by Wheat Tech Agronomy R&D Division 270-586-1776 Table of

More information

CORN BRAND DEMONSTRATION REPORT Central Lakes College Agricultural and Energy Center *** LISTED AS PLANTED ***

CORN BRAND DEMONSTRATION REPORT Central Lakes College Agricultural and Energy Center *** LISTED AS PLANTED *** Date Planted: May 5 & 6, 2014 Previous Crop: Corn Date Harvested: October 28 & 29, 2014 Tillage: Spring plowed, spring disked, 1x Starter Fertilizer: 35-15-35-10 at 175#/acre Irrigated: 5.1" Linear System

More information

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Oat Tifton, Georgia: An oat variety grain trial was planted at this location on September 23, 2015. However, crown rust disease and lodging during the growing season resulted in some very low grain yields

More information

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT LEADER: PROJECT PERSONNEL: Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred D. M. Wichman, Agronomist,

More information

2004 Precision Planted Performance Trials: Corn

2004 Precision Planted Performance Trials: Corn South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Agricultural Experiment Station Circulars SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station

More information

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM.................................................... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA.............................................. 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES............................

More information

Soybean Variety Selection-A soybean in no longer a soybean.

Soybean Variety Selection-A soybean in no longer a soybean. Soybean Variety Selection-A soybean in no longer a soybean................................ Dennis Lange Industry Development Specialist-Pulses Topic s for Today Growth of Manitoba Acres/SK -success (Yield/

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results 2014-2015 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2014-2015 winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Auburn, Kentucky; Humboldt, Tennessee;

More information

1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests

1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Progress Report 394 1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Eugene Lacefield, Charles Tutt, J.M. Wood, and Todd Pfeiffer Tables 1. Location, Planting Date, and Climatic Data for the 1996 Soybean Performance

More information

2015 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

2015 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Performance Testing (CPT) Director Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Shaukat Ali SDSU Small Grains Pathologist, Brookings Kevin Kirby Ag Research

More information

2014 Soybean Performance Tests

2014 Soybean Performance Tests Arkansas 2014 Soybean Performance Tests R.D Bond D.G. Dombek J.A. Still ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2014 Research Series 622 This publication is available on the internet at: http://arkansasagnews.uark.edu/1356.htm

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 111 Title: Corn - Soybean - Wheat Response to Rotation: Nrate Experiment: 09CSW Trial ID: 5950 Year: 2015 Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn, Location: Supported By: Site Information Field:

More information

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials C253 Revised Annually 2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials Agricultural Experiment Station South Dakota State University U.S. Department of Agriculture This report is available on the World-Wide-Web

More information

1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF]

1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF] SECTION E SOYBEAN HERBICIDE TRIALS New Soybean Herbicides for 2010 found in the 2009 Reports 1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF] Performance

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Information DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 - (301) 405-6244 MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Maryland soybean variety tests are conducted each year by the Maryland

More information

Southern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual.

Southern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual. Trial Status: F one-year/final Initiation Date: 4-25-16 Completion Date: 7-6-16 City: De Soto Country: USA State/Prov.: Illinois IL Postal Code: 62924 Trial Location Objectives: Evaluate control of glyphosate-resistant

More information

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1 PP310 2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1 Darcy E. P. Telenko, John Atkins, Nick Dufault, 2 This report includes a summary of the 2013 in-furrow

More information

2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 2009 VARIETAL RECOMMENDATION

2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 2009 VARIETAL RECOMMENDATION 2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 1) A motion to remove AgriPro Norpro from the spring wheat variety recommendation list, effective February 2009. Mr. Joe Smith of AgriPro has asked us to

More information

December Purdue Corn and Soybean Performance Trials

December Purdue Corn and Soybean Performance Trials December 2014 2014 Purdue Corn and Soybean Performance Trials Department of Agronomy Agricultural Research Programs Purdue Univeristy West Lafayette, IN CORN TABLE OF CONTENTS Corn Hybrid Performance and

More information

2002 Iowa Experimental Corn Trials

2002 Iowa Experimental Corn Trials 2002 Iowa Experimental Corn Trials Estherville Canon Falls, MN Calumet Kanawha Nashua Pocahontas Clarion Stanhope Conrad Carroll Ames Tekamah, NE Rippey Harlan Atlantic Lewis Ankeny Pella Williamsburg

More information

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee. Web Site:

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee. Web Site: 0022 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Conducted in 1999-2001 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE This organization is made up of representatives

More information