Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2017
|
|
- Leslie Ryan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A supplement to Iowa Farmer Today. Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2017 View of the northeast Iowa location. Gregory L. Tylka, Gregory D. Gebhart, Christopher C. Marett, and Mark P. Mullaney Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology Iowa State University This report is available online at IPM 52 Revised December 2017
2 Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa in 2017 Gregory L. Tylka, Gregory D. Gebhart, Christopher C. Marett, and Mark P. Mullaney Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology Introduction Use of resistant soybean varieties is a very effective strategy for managing soybean cyst nematode (SCN), and numerous SCN-resistant soybean varieties are available for Iowa soybean farmers. Each year, SCNresistant soybean varieties are evaluated in SCN-infested fields throughout Iowa by Iowa State University personnel. The research described in this report was performed to assess the agronomic performance of maturity group (MG) I, II, and III SCN-resistant soybean varieties and to determine the effects of the varieties on SCN numbers or population densities. Materials and Methods SCN-resistant soybeans were studied in northern, central, and southern Iowa based upon maturity group. The northern trials were located near Newell (northwest Iowa), Mason City (north central Iowa) and Lawler (northeast Iowa). The central trials were located near Moorhead (west central Iowa), Ames (central Iowa), and Urbana (east central Iowa). The southern trials were located near Glenwood (southwest Iowa), Leighton, (south central Iowa), and Fruitland (southeast Iowa). Location-specific details. Initial SCN Location Population HG Type 1 Planting Date Harvest Date (eggs / 100 cc soil) Newell (NW) May 30 th October 17 th Mason City (NC) May 12 th October 20 th Lawler (NE) 2, May 15 th October 19 th Moorhead (WC) 1, May 8 th October 23 rd Ames (C) 1, May 31 st October 26 th Urbana (EC) May 16 th October 18 th Glenwood (SW) May 8 th October 24 th Leighton (SC) May 5 th October 25 th Fruitland (SE) May 3 rd October 3 rd 1 In the SCN HG type test results, 1 indicates >10% reproduction on Peking (PI ), and 2 indicates >10% reproduction on PI indicates an incomplete HG type test; populations were tested only on Peking, PI 88788, PI 90763, and PI SCN-susceptible varieties also were planted in the experiments for comparison purposes. All plots were four 17-foot-long rows spaced 30 inches apart and were planted at 10 seeds per foot, with four replications per variety. Seed companies were encouraged to treat their seed with fungicide and insecticide. Seeds that were received untreated were treated with CruiserMaxx by Iowa State University personnel. A complete list of the seed treatments used on the varieties tested is included at the end of the report. Pre-plant herbicides were applied to each location. Soybean varieties resistant/tolerant to glyphosate or glyphosate + dicamba were sprayed with glyphosate and Flexstar to control weeds during the growing season. Varieties with glufosinate resistance/tolerance were sprayed with Flexstar, FirstRate, and Select Max to control weeds during the growing season. The Moorhead and Lawler locations were planted using notill methods. At all other locations, the seed bed was tilled prior to planting. 2
3 Herbicide resistance/tolerance of the SCN-resistant varieties tested. District Glyphosate Glyphosate + dicamba Glufosinate Total North Central South At growth stage R6 all locations were scouted for foliar symptoms of sudden death syndrome (SDS). None of the locations had sufficient foliar disease to warrant rating the plots. All plots were end trimmed to a length of 14 feet during September. For each location, the center two rows of each four-row plot were harvested with a plot combine, total seed weight per plot and seed moisture were determined, and total plot seed weights subsequently were converted to bushels per acre. Resistant varieties and susceptible check varieties are grouped separately and are listed in the report in order of descending yield. At the beginning of the growing season, plots were sampled for the presence of SCN. Soil samples, consisting of 10 one-inch-diameter, six- to eight-inch-deep soil cores were collected from the center 14 feet of the center two rows of each plot immediately after planting. SCN cysts were extracted from each soil sample, and SCN eggs were extracted from the cysts and counted. SCN egg population densities also were determined for each plot at the end of the growing season in an identical manner. Because of the consistent relationship between higher soil ph and high SCN population densities, all varieties also were field tested for tolerance to iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC). Each variety was planted in a hill plot consisting of five seeds per hill, with four replications per variety, at two high ph field locations. Notes were taken for IDC symptoms at each location approximately four weeks after planting and again at five weeks after planting. Varieties were rated on a scale of 1 to 5 with a 1 indicating no symptoms of IDC present and a 5 indicating plant death due to IDC. The scores from each location were averaged together and an overall rating was assigned to each variety. One variety highly resistant to IDC and one variety susceptible to IDC also were included in the experiments as checks. The highly resistant variety scored an average of 1.1 and the susceptible variety scored an average of 3.5. The scores from these IDC field tests are listed in each location table in the report for reference. 3
4 Data Presentation In the report, soybean yield and SCN reproduction are displayed graphically in addition to numerically in the tables. Yield is represented by the length of the green bars. SCN reproduction is represented by the length of the blue bars. SCN reproduction was determined by calculating the reproductive factor (RF) for each variety. RF is calculated by dividing the average final SCN population density by the average initial SCN population density for each variety. If a variety has an RF value of 5.0, the SCN population density for those plots was 5 times greater at harvest than it was at planting. And an RF value of 0.5 means the SCN population density for those plots at harvest was one half the population density at planting. The RF value is location specific and may vary substantially under different environmental conditions, soil types, and nematode populations. Summary The results of the experiments illustrate the benefits of growing SCN-resistant soybean varieties for management of this important soybean pest. At locations with the most significant SCN reproduction, many of the soybean varieties with SCN resistance had greater yields than susceptible varieties, although some resistant varieties had greater yields than others. At most locations, end-of-season SCN population densities were significantly greater in plots where susceptible varieties were grown relative to plots planted with resistant varieties. Nematode control is an extremely important aspect of growing SCN-resistant soybean varieties that must be considered when selecting soybean varieties. Growing soybean varieties in SCN-infested fields solely to maximize soybean yields in the short term without any consideration of the effect of the varieties on SCN population densities will seriously reduce the productivity of the land for soybean production in the future. The results of these experiments illustrate that SCN-resistant varieties can suppress SCN reproduction and provide increased soybean yields relative to using susceptible varieties. Currently, there are three main genetic sources for SCN resistance genes in commercial soybean varieties, namely PI 88788, Peking, and PI (also known as Hartwig). Each of these sources of SCN resistance contains several genes that confer resistance to the nematode. Consequently, soybean varieties developed from the various sources of resistance may not all contain the same genes in the same combinations. All of these sources of resistance allow some limited reproduction of SCN. Resistant varieties must be used in an integrated management program, along with the use of nonhost crops, seed treatments, and scouting for early detection of SCN, to maximize yields and minimize reproduction of the pest on a long-term basis. The data presented in this report are from a limited number of locations and should be used only as a beginning point for developing a SCN management program for any specific field. Performance of individual SCN-resistant soybean varieties in SCN-infested fields will vary among locations and years. Growers are encouraged to evaluate several SCN-resistant soybean varieties at their own locations to determine the best varieties for their local conditions. Acknowledgments Appreciation is expressed to the staff of the Iowa State University Research and Demonstration Farms. Gratitude also is expressed to Kermit Grote of Newell, Randy and Jess Lutz of Mason City, Donnie Blazek of Lawler, John Melby of Moorhead, Ed McKinley of Urbana, Matt Biermann of Glenwood, Mark Groenendyk of Leighton, and Ron Shepard of Fruitland for use of land for some of the experiments. Supported, in part, by soybean checkoff funds from the Iowa Soybean Association and also by the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station. 4
5 Table 1. Newell (NW Iowa) Glyphosate-treated Jacobsen 761NR2X 2.1 PI , Pioneer P21A28X 2.1 Peking Legacy Seeds LS-2037N RR2X 2.0 PI , Stine 21RI PI , Pioneer P19A14X Peking 3.4 1, Dyna-Gro S21XT PI , Pioneer P22T69R 2.2 Peking Cornelius CB22R PI , LG Seeds C2255R2 2.2 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2511 NRR 2.5 Peking ASGROW AG20X7 2.0 PI , Cornelius CB20R PI , Merschman Navaho 1820GT 2.0 PI , FS HiSOY 24X PI , ASGROW AG23X8 2.3 PI , NuTech 7198 Peking 2.2 1, Pfister 18R PI , Prairie Brand PB-1947R2 PI , NK S21-W8X 2.1 PI , Dyna-Gro S23XT PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-2330/R2Y 2.3 PI , NuTech Peking 2.8 1, LATHAM L2368R2X 2.3 PI , Stine 19RF32 PI , Mycogen 5N194R2 PI , STAR 3X PI , Stine 20RD PI , LATHAM L2228R2 2.2 PI , NK S20-J5X 2.0 PI , Cornelius CB19R71 PI , Merschman Apache 1823GT 2.3 PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-2110/R2Y 2.1 PI , Prairie Brand PB-2197R2 2.1 PI , Legacy Seeds LS-1838N RR2X 1.8 PI , NK S18-G4X 1.8 PI , LG Seeds C2441R2 2.3 PI , Kruger K2X PI , ASGROW AG19X8 PI , Pioneer P16A35X 1.6 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2190 NR 2.1 PI , FS HiSOY 23X Peking 2.7 4, Jacobsen 669NR2 19 PI , ASGROW AG17X8 PI , Pfister 20R PI , Wensman W1218NRX 2.1 PI , Dyna-Gro S20XT PI , FS HiSOY 25X PI , Federal Hybrids F2080N R2X 2.0 PI , Kruger K2X-1952 PI , Champion 20X98N 2.0 PI , Federal Hybrids F2280N R2X 2.2 PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Kruger K None , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (30% on PI 88788, 5% on Peking). 5
6 Table 2. Newell (NW Iowa) Non-glyphosate-treated NuTech 3174L PI , Merschman Ute 1821LL 2.1 PI , LATHAM L1958L PI , Merschman Chippewa 1523LL 2.3 PI , Merschman Osage 1824LL 2.4 PI , LATHAM L2358L 2.3 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL2300 N 2.3 PI , NuTech 3236L 2.3 PI , NuTech 3205L 2.0 PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) ,122 - NS Dyna-Gro 39RY None , NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Kruger K None , Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (30% on PI 88788, 5% on Peking)
7 Table 3. Mason City (NC Iowa) Glyphosate-treated Stine 21RI PI , Jacobsen 669NR2 19 PI Stine 20RD PI , Merschman Navaho 1820GT 2.0 PI , Stine 19RF32 PI , Pfister 18R PI , Legacy Seeds LS-2037N RR2X 2.0 PI , Wensman W1218NRX 2.1 PI , LG Seeds C2255R2 2.2 PI , Mycogen 5N194R2 PI , NK S20-J5X 2.0 PI Prairie Brand PB-1947R2 PI , Prairie Brand PB-2197R2 2.1 PI ,625 FS HiSOY 24X PI , Cornelius CB20R PI , ASGROW AG20X7 2.0 PI ,600 DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-2330/R2Y 2.3 PI , Cornelius CB22R PI , NK S21-W8X 2.1 PI , ASGROW AG23X8 2.3 PI , LATHAM L2228R2 2.2 PI Cornelius CB19R71 PI , LG Seeds C2441R2 2.3 PI , Pfister 20R PI , Pioneer P19A14X Peking Dyna-Gro S21XT PI , Pioneer P21A28X 2.1 Peking ASGROW AG17X8 PI , Champion 20X98N 2.0 PI , Jacobsen 761NR2X 2.1 PI , Pioneer P22T69R 2.2 Peking LATHAM L2368R2X 2.3 PI , NuTech 7198 Peking NuTech Peking Hoegemeyer HPT 2190 NR 2.1 PI ASGROW AG19X8 PI , Dyna-Gro S23XT PI , Legacy Seeds LS-1838N RR2X 1.8 PI , FS HiSOY 25X PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-2110/R2Y 2.1 PI ,125 Hoegemeyer HPT 2511 NRR 2.5 Peking Dyna-Gro S20XT PI ,525 Federal Hybrids F2080N R2X 2.0 PI , Kruger K2X PI , NK S18-G4X 1.8 PI ,900 4 STAR 3X PI , FS HiSOY 23X Peking 2.7 1, Merschman Apache 1823GT 2.3 PI , Pioneer P16A35X 1.6 PI , Federal Hybrids F2280N R2X 2.2 PI , Kruger K2X-1952 PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) Dyna-Gro 39RY None 3.6 3, Kruger K None 3.4 4, NK S24-K2 2.4 None 2.6 4, Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (18% on PI 88788, 3% on Peking)
8 Table 4. Mason City (NC Iowa) Non-glyphosate-treated LATHAM L1958L PI NuTech 3174L PI , Merschman Osage 1824LL 2.4 PI , NuTech 3236L 2.3 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL2300 N 2.3 PI , NuTech 3205L 2.0 PI , LATHAM L2358L 2.3 PI , Merschman Ute 1821LL 2.1 PI , Merschman Chippewa 1523LL 2.3 PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) NS Kruger K None 3.4 2, Dyna-Gro 39RY None 3.6 5, NK S24-K2 2.4 None 2.6 4, Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (18% on PI 88788, 3% on Peking)
9 Table 5. Lawler (NE Iowa) Glyphosate-treated LG Seeds C2255R2 2.2 PI Pfister 18R PI , Pioneer P21A28X 2.1 Peking Prairie Brand PB-1947R2 PI DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-2330/R2Y 2.3 PI Jacobsen 669NR2 19 PI Stine 21RI PI , ASGROW AG23X8 2.3 PI , LATHAM L2228R2 2.2 PI , NK S20-J5X 2.0 PI , Pioneer P22T69R 2.2 Peking Legacy Seeds LS-1838N RR2X 1.8 PI Federal Hybrids F2280N R2X 2.2 PI ,300 NK S21-W8X 2.1 PI , Stine 20RD PI Jacobsen 761NR2X 2.1 PI Stine 19RF32 PI ,000 Legacy Seeds LS-2037N RR2X 2.0 PI , Wensman W1218NRX 2.1 PI , STAR 3X PI ,225 Prairie Brand PB-2197R2 2.1 PI ,425 LG Seeds C2441R2 2.3 PI ,150 Merschman Navaho 1820GT 2.0 PI ,050 Mycogen 5N194R2 PI ASGROW AG19X8 PI Pioneer P16A35X 1.6 PI , NuTech 7198 Peking FS HiSOY 24X PI Pfister 20R PI , Cornelius CB22R PI Champion 20X98N 2.0 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2190 NR 2.1 PI LATHAM L2368R2X 2.3 PI , NK S18-G4X 1.8 PI Cornelius CB19R71 PI Cornelius CB20R PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2511 NRR 2.5 Peking ASGROW AG17X8 PI ,350 Dyna-Gro S20XT PI ASGROW AG20X7 2.0 PI NuTech Peking Federal Hybrids F2080N R2X 2.0 PI ,325 Dyna-Gro S21XT PI ,125 Kruger K2X-1952 PI ,025 Merschman Apache 1823GT 2.3 PI , Kruger K2X PI , Dyna-Gro S23XT PI , FS HiSOY 23X Peking Pioneer P19A14X Peking FS HiSOY 25X PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-2110/R2Y 2.1 PI Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) NS Dyna-Gro 39RY None 3.6 3, Kruger K None 3.4 4,675 NK S24-K2 2.4 None 2.6 2, Mean , ,295 eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (35% on PI 88788, 1% on Peking)
10 Table 6. Lawler (NE Iowa) Non-glyphosate-treated. Merschman Osage 1824LL 2.4 PI , NuTech 3174L PI NuTech 3236L 2.3 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL2300 N 2.3 PI , LATHAM L2358L 2.3 PI , Merschman Chippewa 1523LL 2.3 PI , LATHAM L1958L PI NuTech 3205L 2.0 PI Merschman Ute 1821LL 2.1 PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) NK S24-K2 2.4 None 2.6 2, Kruger K None 3.4 1, Dyna-Gro 39RY None 3.6 4, Mean , ,623 eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (35% on PI 88788, 1% on Peking). 10
11 Table 7. Moorhead (WC Iowa) Glyphosate-treated Pioneer P25A70R 2.5 Peking NuTech PI , NK S33-T8X 3.3 PI , Federal Hybrids F2480N R2X 2.4 PI , NK S27-M8X 2.7 PI , LG Seeds C2888RX 2.8 PI , Prairie Brand PB-2486R2 2.4 PI , Pioneer P24T93R 2.4 PI ,500 Stine 21RI PI , ASGROW AG26X8 2.6 PI ,475 Champion 24R87N 2.4 PI , Legacy Seeds LS-2638N RR2X 2.6 PI ,000 Cornelius CB22R PI , Dyna-Gro S28XT PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2721 NR 2.7 PI , FS HiSOY 28X PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3028/R2Y 3.0 PI , Pfister 24R PI , Mycogen 5N287R2 2.8 PI , Stine 26XB PI Stine 24RH PI , LG Seeds C2520R2 2.5 PI ,900 Cornelius CB24R PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2811 NR 2.8 PI , Jacobsen 774NR2X 2.4 PI ,000 NuTech Peking NK S29-K3X 2.9 PI ,050 Pioneer P24A99X 2.4 PI , Dyna-Gro S26RS PI , Jacobsen 876NR2X 2.6 PI , Stine 27RIO2 2.7 PI , Kruger K2X PI , Federal Hybrids F2880N R2X 2.8 PI , LATHAM L2682R2X 2.6 PI , LATHAM L3184R2 3.1 PI , Merschman Mohawk 1825GT 2.5 PI ,750 Pfister 26R PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-2909/R2Y 2.9 PI , Pioneer P28T08R 2.8 PI , ASGROW AG29X8 2.9 PI , ASGROW AG24X7 2.4 PI , Merschman Shawnee 1826GT 2.6 PI , NK S21-W8X 2.1 PI ,425 Wensman W1220NRX 2.2 PI , Prairie Brand PB-2876R2 2.8 PI , FS HiSOY 31X PI , ASGROW AG27X7 2.7 PI , Pioneer P31A22X 3.1 PI ,250 FS HiSOY 29X PI , STAR 3X PI , ASGROW AG30X8 3.0 PI ,325 Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , Kruger K None , NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Mean , ,115 eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (37% on PI 88788, 0% on Peking)
12 Table 8. Moorhead (WC Iowa) Non-glyphosate-treated LATHAM L3187L 3.1 PI , NuTech 3309L 3.0 PI , LATHAM L2684L 2.6 PI , NuTech 3252L 2.5 PI , Champion 26L16N 2.6 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL PI ,600 NuTech 3236L 2.3 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , Kruger K None , NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (37% on PI 88788, 0% on Peking)
13 Table 9. Ames (C Iowa) Glyphosate-treated Pioneer P31A22X 3.1 PI , Federal Hybrids F2480N R2X 2.4 PI , Jacobsen 774NR2X 2.4 PI , NK S27-M8X 2.7 PI ,425 Mycogen 5N287R2 2.8 PI , LATHAM L3184R2 3.1 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2721 NR 2.7 PI , LG Seeds C2520R2 2.5 PI ,725 Stine 27RIO2 2.7 PI ,000 Stine 21RI PI , Champion 24R87N 2.4 PI ,200 Federal Hybrids F2880N R2X 2.8 PI , Cornelius CB22R PI , Stine 24RH PI ,100 NK S21-W8X 2.1 PI ,800 Pioneer P24T93R 2.4 PI , LG Seeds C2888RX 2.8 PI ,350 Pioneer P28T08R 2.8 PI ,700 Dyna-Gro S28XT PI ,225 NK S33-T8X 3.3 PI ,875 DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-2909/R2Y 2.9 PI , NuTech PI , ASGROW AG29X8 2.9 PI ,625 Stine 26XB PI ,525 Pioneer P25A70R 2.5 Peking 2.5 1,300 NuTech Peking 2.6 1, Prairie Brand PB-2876R2 2.8 PI ,550 Legacy Seeds LS-2638N RR2X 2.6 PI ,625 ASGROW AG30X8 3.0 PI ,550 Pfister 24R PI ,600 ASGROW AG24X7 2.4 PI , Wensman W1220NRX 2.2 PI , FS HiSOY 28X PI , FS HiSOY 31X PI , Prairie Brand PB-2486R2 2.4 PI , Kruger K2X PI ,850 DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3028/R2Y 3.0 PI ,850 Cornelius CB24R PI , NK S29-K3X 2.9 PI , Jacobsen 876NR2X 2.6 PI ,475 Pioneer P24A99X 2.4 PI , FS HiSOY 29X PI ,450 4 STAR 3X PI ,775 LATHAM L2682R2X 2.6 PI , Merschman Mohawk 1825GT 2.5 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2811 NR 2.8 PI , Dyna-Gro S26RS PI , ASGROW AG26X8 2.6 PI , ASGROW AG27X7 2.7 PI , Merschman Shawnee 1826GT 2.6 PI ,375 Pfister 26R PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , Kruger K None 3.4 7, Mean , ,974 eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (33% on PI 88788, 0% on Peking)
14 Table 10. Ames (C Iowa) Non-glyphosate-treated NuTech 3309L 3.0 PI ,400 LATHAM L2684L 2.6 PI , LATHAM L3187L 3.1 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL PI , Champion 26L16N 2.6 PI , NuTech 3252L 2.5 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL PI , NuTech 3236L 2.3 PI ,025 1 Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Kruger K None , Mean , ,577 eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (33% on PI 88788, 0% on Peking)
15 Table 11. Urbana (EC Iowa) Glyphosate-treated Jacobsen 774NR2X 2.4 PI , Pfister 24R PI , Cornelius CB24R PI ,550 Federal Hybrids F2480N R2X 2.4 PI , Mycogen 5N287R2 2.8 PI , NK S21-W8X 2.1 PI , Pioneer P24A99X 2.4 PI , Stine 21RI PI , Prairie Brand PB-2486R2 2.4 PI , LG Seeds C2520R2 2.5 PI , Merschman Shawnee 1826GT 2.6 PI , Dyna-Gro S26RS PI , Cornelius CB22R PI , Stine 24RH PI , Stine 27RIO2 2.7 PI , Merschman Mohawk 1825GT 2.5 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2721 NR 2.7 PI , ASGROW AG24X7 2.4 PI , NK S27-M8X 2.7 PI , Pioneer P25A70R 2.5 Peking 2.5 2, Legacy Seeds LS-2638N RR2X 2.6 PI , Champion 24R87N 2.4 PI , ASGROW AG26X8 2.6 PI ,375 NuTech Peking 2.6 1, Pioneer P24T93R 2.4 PI , LG Seeds C2888RX 2.8 PI , FS HiSOY 28X PI , Pioneer P28T08R 2.8 PI , Wensman W1220NRX 2.2 PI ,675 Pioneer P31A22X 3.1 PI , LATHAM L2682R2X 2.6 PI , Stine 26XB PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 2811 NR 2.8 PI ,425 Federal Hybrids F2880N R2X 2.8 PI , Jacobsen 876NR2X 2.6 PI ,325 Pfister 26R PI , Dyna-Gro S28XT PI , NuTech PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-2909/R2Y 2.9 PI , ASGROW AG27X7 2.7 PI , NK S33-T8X 3.3 PI , FS HiSOY 31X PI , NK S29-K3X 2.9 PI , Prairie Brand PB-2876R2 2.8 PI , Kruger K2X PI , ASGROW AG30X8 3.0 PI , LATHAM L3184R2 3.1 PI ,725 ASGROW AG29X8 2.9 PI , STAR 3X PI ,600 FS HiSOY 29X PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3028/R2Y 3.0 PI ,400 Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) NS NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , Kruger K None ,125 1 Mean , ,052 eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (33% on PI 88788, 8% on Peking)
16 Table 12. Urbana (EC Iowa) Non-glyphosate-treated LATHAM L2684L 2.6 PI , Champion 26L16N 2.6 PI , NuTech 3309L 3.0 PI , NuTech 3252L 2.5 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL PI Hoegemeyer HPT LL PI , NuTech 3236L 2.3 PI , LATHAM L3187L 3.1 PI Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Kruger K None , Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (33% on PI 88788, 8% on Peking). 16
17 Table 13. Glenwood (SW Iowa) Glyphosate-treated DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3630/R2Y 3.6 PI , LG Seeds C3550RX 3.5 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 3422 NR 3.4 PI , NK S33-T8X 3.3 PI , Pfister 32R PI , ASGROW AG36X6 3.6 PI , Kruger K2X PI , Prairie Brand PB-2917R2 2.9 PI , Federal Hybrids F3080N R2X 3.0 PI , FS HiSOY 34X PI , ASGROW AG33X8 3.3 PI , Pioneer P31T11R 3.1 PI ,450 2 LG Seeds C3489RX 3.4 PI , LATHAM L3448R2X 3.4 PI , NuTech 7352X 3.5 PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3555/R2Y 3.5 PI , Kruger K2X PI , Dyna-Gro S34XT PI , Cornelius CB28R PI , Merschman Washington 1839GT 3.9 PI , STAR 3X PI , Pioneer P38T20X 3.8 PI , Champion 34R87N 3.4 PI ,975 6 Jacobsen 878NR2X 2.8 PI , FS HiSOY 37X PI , Dyna-Gro S33XT PI , NuTech PI , Stine 38RE PI , Merschman Kennedy 1835GT 3.5 PI ,200 4 Pioneer P36T36X 3.8 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 3149 NX 3.1 PI , Jacobsen 960NR2X 3.0 PI , Morsoy 3747 RXT 3.7 PI , FS HiSOY 35X PI , NK S35-K9X 3.5 PI , Pioneer P32T16R 3.2 PI , ASGROW AG29X8 2.9 PI , Morsoy 3357 RXT 3.3 PI , NK S29-K3X 2.9 PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3745/R2Y 3.7 PI , Pioneer P36A18X 3.6 PI , ASGROW AG32X6 3.2 PI , Mycogen 5N327R2 3.2 PI , NK S37-H5X 3.7 PI , Cornelius CB29R PI , Prairie Brand PB-3186R2 3.1 PI , Pfister 34R PI , LATHAM L3278R2X 3.2 PI , Mycogen 5N342R2 3.4 PI , Dyna-Gro S31XT PI , ASGROW AG30X8 3.0 PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , Kruger K None , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , ASGROW AG None , Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 1.2- (59% on PI 88788, 16% on Peking)
18 Table 14. Glenwood (SW Iowa) Non-glyphosate-treated Merschman Grant 1537LL 3.7 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL3201 N 3.2 PI , Merschman Monroe 1736LL 3.6 PI , LATHAM L3384L 3.3 PI , Merschman Truman 1438LL 3.8 PI , NuTech 3309L 3.0 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL3813 N 3.8 PI , LATHAM L3178L 3.1 PI ,200 2 Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) NS - NS Dyna-Gro 39RY None , Kruger K None , NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 1.2- (59% on PI 88788, 16% on Peking)
19 Table 15. Leighton (SC Iowa) Glyphosate-treated Pioneer P36A18X 3.6 PI ,300 1 Jacobsen 878NR2X 2.8 PI , Stine 38RE PI , NuTech 7352X 3.5 PI , LATHAM L3448R2X 3.4 PI , NuTech PI , Morsoy 3747 RXT 3.7 PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3745/R2Y 3.7 PI , ASGROW AG33X8 3.3 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 3422 NR 3.4 PI , NK S35-K9X 3.5 PI ,400 2 LATHAM L3278R2X 3.2 PI , Pfister 32R PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 3149 NX 3.1 PI , ASGROW AG36X6 3.6 PI , ASGROW AG30X8 3.0 PI , LG Seeds C3550RX 3.5 PI , FS HiSOY 34X PI , Pioneer P31T11R 3.1 PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3630/R2Y 3.6 PI , Kruger K2X PI , Merschman Washington 1839GT 3.9 PI , FS HiSOY 37X PI , Pioneer P32T16R 3.2 PI , Champion 34R87N 3.4 PI , Pioneer P38T20X 3.8 PI , Kruger K2X PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3555/R2Y 3.5 PI , Federal Hybrids F3080N R2X 3.0 PI , Prairie Brand PB-3186R2 3.1 PI , Pioneer P36T36X 3.8 PI , Morsoy 3357 RXT 3.3 PI , Pfister 34R PI , Dyna-Gro S31XT PI , NK S29-K3X 2.9 PI , NK S33-T8X 3.3 PI , NK S37-H5X 3.7 PI , Dyna-Gro S33XT PI , Dyna-Gro S34XT PI , ASGROW AG32X6 3.2 PI , Merschman Kennedy 1835GT 3.5 PI , LG Seeds C3489RX 3.4 PI , STAR 3X PI , Mycogen 5N342R2 3.4 PI , Cornelius CB28R PI , Jacobsen 960NR2X 3.0 PI , ASGROW AG29X8 2.9 PI , Mycogen 5N327R2 3.2 PI , Prairie Brand PB-2917R2 2.9 PI , FS HiSOY 35X PI , Cornelius CB29R PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) NS Kruger K None 3.4 9, Dyna-Gro 39RY None 3.6 8, ASGROW AG None 2.4 8, Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 1.2- (43% on PI 88788, 19% on Peking)
20 Table 16. Leighton (SC Iowa) Non-glyphosate-treated Merschman Monroe 1736LL 3.6 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL3201 N 3.2 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL3813 N 3.8 PI , Merschman Grant 1537LL 3.7 PI , Merschman Truman 1438LL 3.8 PI , NuTech 3309L 3.0 PI , LATHAM L3178L 3.1 PI , LATHAM L3384L 3.3 PI ,200 1 Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , Dyna-Gro 39RY None 2.5 5, NK S24-K2 2.4 None 2.4 9, Kruger K None 2.3 7, Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 1.2- (43% on PI 88788, 19% on Peking)
21 Table 17. Fruitland (SE Iowa) Glyphosate-treated Pioneer P31T11R 3.1 PI , Mycogen 5N327R2 3.2 PI , Kruger K2X PI , NK S33-T8X 3.3 PI , Pioneer P32T16R 3.2 PI , Jacobsen 878NR2X 2.8 PI , NuTech PI , FS HiSOY 34X PI , Jacobsen 960NR2X 3.0 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 3422 NR 3.4 PI , Dyna-Gro S34XT PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3555/R2Y 3.5 PI , Merschman Kennedy 1835GT 3.5 PI , LG Seeds C3550RX 3.5 PI , NuTech 7352X 3.5 PI , FS HiSOY 35X PI , Pfister 32R PI , ASGROW AG36X6 3.6 PI , ASGROW AG32X6 3.2 PI , Cornelius CB28R PI , LG Seeds C3489RX 3.4 PI , Morsoy 3357 RXT 3.3 PI , LATHAM L3278R2X 3.2 PI , ASGROW AG33X8 3.3 PI , Pioneer P36A18X 3.6 PI , Kruger K2X PI , LATHAM L3448R2X 3.4 PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3630/R2Y 3.6 PI , Merschman Washington 1839GT 3.9 PI , Dyna-Gro S31XT PI , NK S29-K3X 2.9 PI , NK S37-H5X 3.7 PI , Pioneer P38T20X 3.8 PI , Prairie Brand PB-3186R2 3.1 PI , ASGROW AG30X8 3.0 PI , Prairie Brand PB-2917R2 2.9 PI , Stine 38RE PI , Champion 34R87N 3.4 PI , Pioneer P36T36X 3.8 PI ,525 1 NK S35-K9X 3.5 PI , Mycogen 5N342R2 3.4 PI , ASGROW AG29X8 2.9 PI , Morsoy 3747 RXT 3.7 PI , DAIRYLAND SEED DSR-3745/R2Y 3.7 PI , Pfister 34R PI , FS HiSOY 37X PI , STAR 3X PI , Cornelius CB29R PI , Dyna-Gro S33XT PI , Federal Hybrids F3080N R2X 3.0 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT 3149 NX 3.1 PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , Kruger K None , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , ASGROW AG None , Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (56% on PI 88788, 0% on Peking)
22 Table 18. Fruitland (SE Iowa) Non-glyphosate-treated NuTech 3309L 3.0 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL3201 N 3.2 PI , LATHAM L3178L 3.1 PI , Merschman Grant 1537LL 3.7 PI , Hoegemeyer HPT LL3813 N 3.8 PI , Merschman Monroe 1736LL 3.6 PI , Merschman Truman 1438LL 3.8 PI , LATHAM L3384L 3.3 PI , Mean , LSD 3 (P = 0.10) , Kruger K None , Dyna-Gro 39RY None , NK S24-K2 2.4 None , Mean , eggs per 100 cc soil; HG type 2- (56% on PI 88788, 0% on Peking)
23 Table 19. Seed treatments used on varieties evaluated in Brand Seed Treatment Brand Seed Treatment Brand Seed Treatment 4 Star Acceleron Jacobsen Acceleron FI Mycogen CruiserMaxx ASGROW Acceleron FI Hoegemeyer HPT Right Stand NK CruiserMaxx Champion* Acceleron Kruger Acceleron FI NuTech SmartCote Extra Cornelius CruiserMaxx Vibrance LATHAM* SoyShield Plus Pfister CruiserMaxx Dairyland Seed CruiserMaxx Optimize Legacy Seeds L-Coat Total Pioneer PPST 2030 Dyna-Gro Equity VIP LG Seeds CruiserMaxx Prairie Brand CruiserMaxx Federal Hybrids* Maximum ArmourGuard Merschman Bonus Coated + Stine CruiserMaxx FS HiSOY Acceleron FI MorSoy CruiserMaxx Vibrance Wensman* CruiserMaxx *Some varieties were sent untreated. Seeds of those varieties, listed below, were treated with CruiserMaxx by Iowa State University personnel. Federal: F2080N R2X, F2880N R2X, F2280N R2X, F3080N R2X Champion: 20X98N LATHAM: L3448R2X, L2682R2X, L3278R2X, L2368R2X, L3187L Wensman: W1220NRX Table 20. Contact information for companies represented in 2017 variety trials. Champion Seed - Rob Thomas phone: robthomas@championseedofiowa.com website: Cornelius Seed - Will Cornelius phone: cornelius.seed@corneliusseed.com website: Crop Production Services (Dyna-Gro)- Valerie Oberbroeckling phone: valerie.oberbroeckling@cpsagu.com website: Dairyland Seed phone: cs@dairylandseed.com website: Federal Hybrids - Dan Swalla phone: dan.swalla@federalhybrids.com website: Four Star Seed Company - Dennis Kenealy phone: dkenealy@loganet.net website: GROWMARK, Inc. (FS HiSOY) - Eric West phone: ewest@growmark.com website: Hoegemeyer Hybrids - Ryan Spurgeon phone: r.spurgeon@hoegemeyer.com website: Jacobsen Seed Nora Schultz phone: nora@jacobsenseed.com website: Kruger Seed - Neal Borgmeyer phone: neal.borgmeyer@krugerseed.com website: Latham Hi-Tech Seeds -Mark Grundmeier phone: markg@lathamseeds.com website: Legacy Seeds, Inc. - Jim Wold phone: jimwold@legacyseeds.com website: LG Seeds - Greg Peters phone: greg.peters@lgseeds.com website: Merschman Seeds - Brian McKillip phone: bmckillip@merschmanseeds.com website: MFA Incorporated (MorSoy) - Brian Anderson phone: banderson@mfa-inc.com website: Monsanto (ASGROW) - George Kadrmas phone: george.kadrmas@monsanto.com website: Mycogen Seeds - Josh Enderson phone: jtenderson@dow.com website: NuTech Seed, LLC - Steve Sick phone: steve.sick@nutechseed.com website: Pfister Seeds - Brad Johnson phone: bjohnson@pfisterseeds.com website: Pioneer Hi-Bred Int. Inc. - Troy Bauer phone: troy.bauer@pioneer.com website: Prairie Brand Seeds - Mike Carr phone: mike.carr@prairiebrandseed.com website: Stine Seed Company - Brian Hartman phone: bmhartman@stineseed.com website: Syngenta Seeds (NK) - Austin Hively phone: austin.hively@syngenta.com website: Wensman Seed Company - Kyle Kepner phone: kyle.kepner@wensmanseed.com website: and justice for all The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC , or call (voice) or (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Cathann A. Kress, director, Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa. 23
2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ]
2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.3-2.7 Top 30 of 45 S2017IASCa For Gross Income (Sorted
More information2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North Central [ IANC ]
2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North Central [ IANC ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.1-2.5 Top 30 of 60 S2018IANCa For Gross Income
More information2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ]
2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.3-2.7 Top 30 of 45 S2018IASCa For Gross Income (Sorted
More information2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205
2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205 Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Roundup, atrazine,
More information2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ]
2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.1-2.4 Top 30 of 54 S2018IANWa For Gross Income (Sorted
More information2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ]
2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.1-2.4 Top 30 of 54 S2017IANWa For Gross Income (Sorted
More information2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ]
2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.7-2.1 Top 30 of 60 S2018IANOa For Gross Income (Sorted
More information2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South [ MNSO ]
2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South [ MNSO ] Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.6-1.9 Top 30 of 48 S2017MNSOa For Gross Income (Sorted by Yield),
More information2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ]
2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.7-2.1 Top 30 of 54 S2017IANOa For Gross Income (Sorted
More information2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ]
2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.5-1.8 Top 30 of 42 S2017MNSCa For Gross Income (Sorted
More information2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461
2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Corvus Early-Season Test SOIL
More information2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126
2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / SureStart, Callisto
More information2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Klint Cork, Ida County, IA 51020
2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Klint Cork, Ida County, IA 51020 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Halex GT SOIL DESCRIPTION: Galva
More information2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025
2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Surpass, atrazine, Impact SOIL
More information2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WABASSO Leon Plaetz, Redwood County, MN 56293
2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WABASSO Leon Plaetz, Redwood County, MN 56293 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / TripleFlex, atrazine, Laudis,
More information2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083
2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / SureStart Early-Season Test SOIL
More informationTHE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS
THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Matthew Hankinson, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION
More information2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] NEW HAMPTON Mark Bruening, Chickasaw County, IA 50659
2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] NEW HAMPTON Mark Bruening, Chickasaw County, IA 50659 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Acuron, Halex GT SOIL
More information2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461
2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Acuron, atrazine SOIL DESCRIPTION:
More information2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ]
2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. MSR, Inc., Columbia, MO Early-Season Test Maturity Group 3.2-3.8 Top 30 of 42 S2018MONOa For Gross Income (Sorted
More information2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175
2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Harness, Halex GT Early-Season Test
More informationSOYBEAN Iowa Crop Performance Tests Department of Agronomy
SOYBEAN Iowa Crop Performance Tests Department of Agronomy A summary of replicated research by Iowa Crop Improvement Association, Iowa s Official Variety Trials. Iowa Crop Improvement Association Iowa
More information2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] WATERLOO Rottinghaus Farms, Black Hawk County, IA 50703
2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] WATERLOO Rottinghaus Farms, Black Hawk County, IA 50703 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Corvus, atrazine,
More informationSOYBEAN Iowa Crop Performance Tests. Department of Agronomy
SOYBEAN 2017 Iowa Crop Performance Tests Department of Agronomy A summary of replicated research by Iowa Crop Improvement Association, Iowa s Official Variety Trials. Iowa Crop Improvement Association
More information2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results
2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy Research and Development Division www.wheattech.com 270-586-1776 Data provided by Wheat Tech Agronomy R&D Division 270-586-1776 Table of
More informationScreening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003
107 Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003 R. Jay Goos and Brian Johnson, Department of Soil Science, NDSU, Fargo, ND 58105 e-mail: rj.goos@ndsu.nodak.edu Field studies were
More informationThe 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green
The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes Victor M. Green 302-275-1445 vmgreen@udel.edu Special thanks and appreciation is extended to the following people for whom this research would not have
More information2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results
2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy Research and Development Division www.wheattech.com 270-586-1776 Data provided by Wheat Tech Agronomy R&D Division 270-586-1776 Table of
More informationCompany Brand Variety Herb Trait MG SCN PRR Seed Trt Hilum Color Agventure 38E8LL LL C CMXVI BL Agventure 38H4R RR 3.
Company Brand Variety Herb Trait MG 1 2 3 4 5 SCN PRR Seed Trt Hilum Color Agventure 38E8LL LL 3.8 4 5 2 C CMXVI BL Agventure 38H4R RR 3.8 4 5 0 U CMXVI BL Agventure 38W5X RRX 3.8 4 5 0 C CMXVI Ib Agventure
More informationSoybeans Iowa Crop Performance Test. Iowa Crop Improvement Association
2007 Iowa Crop Performance Test Soybeans Photo by Rich Pope, Corn and Soybean Initiative location (see Table 1). Planting-time soybean cyst nematode egg counts at all locations were less than 1,000 eggs
More informationPredicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia
Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Md. Rasel Parvej, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech David L. Holshouser, Extension
More informationCONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...
2018 2018 CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES... 2 2018 TEST FIELDS... 3 2018 GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... 4 SOURCES OF SEED... 4 2018 SOYBEAN VARIETIES...
More informationWheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results
Wheat Tech Agronomy 2013-2014 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2013-2014 wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Humboldt,
More information2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Extension Series No. E-10-2 November, 2010 2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences NYS
More informationVIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2017
VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2017 David Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Billy Taylor, Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 807-6541
More informationArchive version: For the most recent information, see extension. missouri.edu.
Archive version: For the most recent information, see extension. missouri.edu. PREFACE Our motto is We test the best and that is exactly what we do. Each year, the best seed companies and organizations
More informationFats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, Consumption and Stocks
ISSN: 2379-9862 Fats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, and Released August 1, 2017, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department
More informationFats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, Consumption and Stocks
ISSN: 2379-9862 Fats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, and Released September 1, 2017, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department
More informationCONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...
CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM.................................................... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA.............................................. 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES............................
More informationArkansas Soybean Performance Tests 2017
Arkansas Soybean Performance Tests 2017 R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2017 Research Series 647 This publication is available on the internet at: https://arkansas-ag-news.uark.edu/research-series.aspx
More informationComparison of 1½- and 2-Inch Suction Hose When Used With Portable Pumps. David V. Haston, P.E., Mechanical Engineer
Fire Management Tech Tips United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Technology & Development Program December 2006 5100 0651 1308 SDTDC Comparison of 1½- and 2-Inch Suction Hose When Used
More information2017 Corn Grain Field Crop Trials Results
Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences The Minnesota Corn Evaluation Program was conducted by the University
More informationLEAST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE
2004 Minnesota Hybrid Corn Performance Trials Tom Hoverstad, Dale Hicks, George Nelson, and Steve Quiring (University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station) Results of the Minnesota Corn Hybrid
More information2014 Soybean Field Crop Trials Results
Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Each year Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists conduct
More informationArkansas Soybean. Performance Tests. R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek. ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2016 Research Series 640
Arkansas Soybean 2016 Performance Tests R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2016 Research Series 640 This publication is available on the internet at: http://arkansasagnews.uark.edu/1356.htm
More informationQuarterly Hogs and Pigs
Quarterly Hogs and Pigs ISSN: 19-11 Released September 26, 2014, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). United
More informationVarietal Trials Results January 2011
Varietal Trials Results January 2011 Corn Grain Tom Hoverstad, Jeff Coulter, George Nelson, Steve Quiring and Mark Hanson Corn Planting Rate and Date Bushel Weight, Pounds...56 Planting Rate, Seeds/Acre...33,000
More informationCONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...
2014 2014 CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM.................................................... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA.............................................. 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES............................
More information2011 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey. Final
2011 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey Final Survey Overview Illinois Indiana U.S. Wheat Class Production Areas Gulf Tributary SRW States and Areas Surveyed East Coast Tributary Weather and Harvest:
More informationWheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results
2014-2015 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2014-2015 winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Auburn, Kentucky; Humboldt, Tennessee;
More informationQuarterly Hogs and Pigs
Washington, D.C. Quarterly Hogs and Pigs Released March 26, 2010, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on call Nick Streff at 202-720-3,
More information2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1
PP310 2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1 Darcy E. P. Telenko, John Atkins, Nick Dufault, 2 This report includes a summary of the 2013 in-furrow
More informationCONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...
2016 2016 CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES... 3 2016 TEST FIELDS... 3 2016 GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... 4 SOURCES OF SEED/ SEED TREATMENTS... 5 2016 SOYBEAN
More informationQuarterly Hogs and Pigs
Quarterly Hogs and Pigs ISSN: 949-92 Released September 27, 208, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). United
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS
Information DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 - (301) 405-6244 Agronomy Facts No. 32 MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Maryland soybean variety tests are conducted
More informationSHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT
SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT The 2011 Shelby County State Bank Corn Plot was a replicated trial with each variety planted three times. Each variety had six rows and the rows were approximately
More informationFats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, Consumption and Stocks
ISSN: 23799862 Fats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, and Released February 1, 2018, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department
More informationSoybeans: 2006 Crop Performance Results
South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange SDSU Extension Circulars SDSU Extension 12-2006 Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance
More informationSOYBEAN. Soybean maturity zones. Far Northern. Zone. Northern. Zone. Central. Zone. Southern. Zone. Roseau Kennedy Thief River Falls
Each year Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists conduct tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties. Companies are charged a fee for each variety they enter; these fees partially
More informationSequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.
Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ellen Sheehan, and Brent Breitenbach
More informationSoybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri
Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center Pengyin Chen University of Missouri Facility Improvement With New Challenges New Cold Storage With New Challenges The Master and Legend Pengyin Chen Chenpe@missouri.edu
More informationFayette County Bluegrass C. Venard, J. Gantt & B. Roberts 5/10/2017 No till MG II, III: 10/05/2017
Table 1. Locations, planting and harvest dates for the 2016 Kentucky Soybean Variety Performance Tests TEST SITE REGION COLLABORATORS PLANTING DATE(S) AG. PRACTICE HARVEST DATES Breckinridge Lincoln Trail
More information"Double Colored Man Tou" steamed buns, photo by Roy Chung Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey
"Double Colored Man Tou" steamed buns, photo by Roy Chung 2014 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey Survey Overview Hard Red Winter Hard Red Spring Soft White Hard White U.S. Wheat Class Production Areas
More informationFats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, Consumption and Stocks
ISSN: 2379-9862 Fats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, and Released November 1, 2018, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department
More information1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF]
SECTION E SOYBEAN HERBICIDE TRIALS New Soybean Herbicides for 2010 found in the 2009 Reports 1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF] Performance
More information2014 Soybean Performance Tests
Arkansas 2014 Soybean Performance Tests R.D Bond D.G. Dombek J.A. Still ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2014 Research Series 622 This publication is available on the internet at: http://arkansasagnews.uark.edu/1356.htm
More informationMerv Eriksson Project Leader. Sharon Kosmalski Project Assistant. July 2006
James Scott Groenier Project Leader Merv Eriksson Project Leader Sharon Kosmalski Project Assistant USDA Forest Service Technology and Development Program Missoula, MT 7E72H69 FHWA Fiber-Reinforced Polymer
More informationGeorgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***
Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown*** Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp May 2.47 67.4 1.24 66.5 2.56 66.3 1.59 67.4 June 5.9 73.5 6.58 73.1 4.45 72.8 12.24
More informationEvaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013
Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013 Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 331 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station William Batchelor, Director Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, November
More informationFats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, Consumption and Stocks
ISSN: 2379-9862 Fats and Oils: Oilseed Crushings, Production, and Released October 1, 2018, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department
More informationTable 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee
Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION Soybean Disease Ratings for Frogeye Leaf Spot, SDS & Stem Canker with Yields Maturity Group V (Late) 2003 Trial ID: 03SBFE5L Investigator: Dr. Melvin Newman Crop
More informationGiant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).
Comparison of PRE/POST and POST only Weed Control Systems in Liberty Link Soybeans at Rochester, MN, in 2011. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Adam Hazel and Bo Beyer The objective
More informationSmall generators frequently are used in remote sites and
Fire, Safety and Health United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Technology & Development Program April 2006 5100/6700 0651 2323P MTDC Safe Use of Small Generators Dennis Davis, Project Leader
More informationVIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2010
VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2010 David L. Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Patsy Lewis, & Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 657
More informationEvaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016.
Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016. Behnken, Lisa M., Fritz R. Breitenbach, Reed Searcy and Jared Liebenow The objective
More informationCONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...
2017 2017 CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES... 3 2017 TEST FIELDS... 3 2017 GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... 4 SOURCES OF SEED... 5 2017 SOYBEAN VARIETIES...
More informationWilson Genetics, LLC, P.O. Box 391, Harlan IA 51537
The Minnesota Corn Hybrid Evaluation Program is conducted by the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station to provide unbiased information for use by corn growers when they choose hybrids
More information2016 Kansas Performance Tests with. Soybean Varieties. standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional. Report of Progress 1130
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional Report of Progress 1130 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension
More informationCorn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006
Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 006 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.
More informationSOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999
SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 Erik B.G. Feibert, Clinton C. Shock, Peter Sexton, Lamont D. Saunders, and Rhonda Bafus Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon Introduction
More informationSheep and Goats. Final Estimates United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service
United s Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Sheep and Goats Final Estimates 994-98 Statistical Bulletin Number 954 a Sheep and Goats: Final Estimates by, 994-98, U.S. Department
More information2017 Michigan Soybean Performance Report. Putting Your Checkoff To Work
**Jan and Scott: Wording for front Cover of the 2016 Performance Report. The logo embedded here is the most current logo to use. The attached mailing list is for 7,538. MSPC will want 300 extras not sure
More informationSoybean Variety Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research & Development Division
2015 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Research & Development Division Table of Contents General & Growing Season Information. 1 Growing Season Information & Data Interpretation. 2 Acknowledgements.
More information2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley Central [ RRCE ] HUNTER Henry Burchill, Cass County, ND 58048
2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley Central [ RRCE ] HUNTER Henry Burchill, Cass County, ND 58048 Test by: Brendemuhl Seed Research, LLC, Moorhead, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Soybean / Roundup,
More informationArkansas Soybean. Performance Tests. R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek. ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2015 Research Series 630
Arkansas Soybean 2015 Performance Tests R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2015 Research Series 630 This publication is available on the internet at: http://arkansasagnews.uark.edu/1356.htm
More informationDate 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn
Weed Control and Crop Tolerance with SureStart Herbicide Programs in Field Corn Breitenbach, Fritz R, Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Nicole Behnken and Katherine Sheehan The objective of this trial was
More informationBusey Ag Services On-Farm Research. The Latest in: Commercial Corn Varieties, Replicated Hybrid Testing, and Commercial Soybeans.
On-Farm Research 0 The Latest in: Commercial Corn Varieties, Replicated Hybrid Testing, and Commercial Soybeans. FEATURING - CORN Commercial Corn Plot Stonington IL (Carls) Commercial Corn Plot Lexington
More informationVIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2009
VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2009 David L. Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Patsy Lewis, & Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 657
More informationTable 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment
Evaluation of the Impact of Herbicide Tank Mix Partners with MON76980 (Xtendimax) herbicide in Xtend Soybeans at Rochester, MN in 2017. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Amelia Welter and Matthew
More informationKentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010
Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Table 1. Corn Hybrid Performance for Silage, Combined Sites (Adair and Mason counties), KY, 2010 Beck's 5675 HXR 22.9 3380 27000 0.81 0.55 7.4 21 37
More informationVariety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide
NDSU EXTENSION A1105-18 North Dakota Flax Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide Hans Kandel (NDSU Main Station); Greg Endres, Mike Ostlie, Blaine Schatz and Steve Zwinger (Carrington Research
More informationWisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012
A3868 Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012 Shawn Conley, Adam Roth, John Gaska, and Mark Martinka The Wisconsin Winter Wheat Performance Tests are conducted each year to give growers information
More informationVIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2015
VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2015 David Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Billy Taylor, & Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 657-6450
More information2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials
2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials Prepared by: Tom Hoverstad, Matt Bickell, Jeff Coulter, George Nelson, Steve Quiring and Mark Hanson University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Results
More informationQuarterly Hogs and Pigs
Quarterly Hogs and Pigs ISSN: 19-1921 Released December 28, 2012, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). United
More informationCorn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007
Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 007 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.
More informationSouthern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual.
Trial Status: F one-year/final Initiation Date: 4-25-16 Completion Date: 7-6-16 City: De Soto Country: USA State/Prov.: Illinois IL Postal Code: 62924 Trial Location Objectives: Evaluate control of glyphosate-resistant
More informationAirtanker. Drop Guides. Ground Pattern Performance of the Western Pilot Services Dromader. Figure 1 39% 4 7/8 x 3 Original Photo 9.25 x 6.
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Technology & Development Program Airtanker 57-2834-MTDC April 5/57 Drop Guides Ground Pattern Performance of the Western Pilot Services Dromader Gregg
More informationVarietal Trials Results January 2008
Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Soybean Jim Orf, Seth Naeve, Phil Schaus and Art Killam Minnesota Experiment Station scientists conduct tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties annually.
More informationAirtanker. Drop Guides. Ground Pattern Performance of the Erickson Air Crane Paul Solarz, Program Leader, and Cammie Jordan, Project Assistant
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Technology & Development Program Airtanker 57-285-MTDC September 2 51/57 Drop Guides Ground Pattern Performance of the Erickson Air Crane Paul Solarz,
More information