Archive version: For the most recent information, see extension. missouri.edu.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Archive version: For the most recent information, see extension. missouri.edu."

Transcription

1 Archive version: For the most recent information, see extension. missouri.edu.

2 PREFACE Our motto is We test the best and that is exactly what we do. Each year, the best seed companies and organizations select several of their best varieties for evaluation by the MU Variety Testing Program. We use the latest scientific principles and procedures to provide farmers and others with an interest in soybean variety performance with accurate and unbiased information. We respect the seed companies and organizations that put their varieties to the test. We are honored that they entrust us with their valuable products. It takes courage to allow their varieties to be compared with all of the others. Not every company participates in our program for various reasons. Those companies that do participate deserve your consideration when purchasing seed for the next growing season. Please view the table at the back of our book for names and addresses of participating seed companies. Thank them for their courage and tell them you saw their variety in our program. The MU Variety Testing Program has provided Missouri farmers with unbiased variety comparisons for more than 75 years, first with corn, then soybean and wheat. Current staff members have a total of over 100 years of experience with testing crop yield performance. Our plots are placed where you farm. They have the soils and weather conditions your fields have. The MU Variety Testing Program is on-farm research in the truest sense of the word. Fifteen of our locations are on farmer fields in your communities. The other four locations are MU farms. These CAFNR owned and operated research centers sample the north, central and southeast regions of Missouri and combined with the private farm locations provide you with the diversity of environments you need to select the best varieties for your farm. View the map in our procedures section to see the placement of our locations and the cooperators that are so important to the quality of our information. Evaluating yield and making decisions based on that evaluation are difficult because yield is highly affected by environment even the small differences that exist across a field. We use replication, plot size, and plot placement to minimize the noise. Please read the procedures section of this book to better understand what we do and the tools we provide you to make variety selection decisions. Our data tables are arranged to help you quickly see how varieties compare. We strongly suggest that you use information from more than one location. Our tables of region means provide you comparisons across multiple locations. Although yield is extremely important please see our variety characteristics table located near the back of the book to view additional information that you might find helpful during variety selection. Thank you for your interest and support. Please support the companies that participate in our program. If you have suggestions on how we can improve our program please contact me directly (wieboldw@missouri.edu; ). The MU Variety Testing Program exists to serve your needs. We want to provide you with the best information possible. William Bill Wiebold

3 PROCEDURES Regions and Locations The MU Variety Testing Program divides the soybean growing region of Missouri into four regions: North, Central, Southeast, and Southwest. Each region contains five locations, and the same varieties are tested in all locations within a region. Locations for 2013 are as follows: 1. Craig (Holt County); Steve Cunningham Farm 2. Albany (Gentry Counth); Hundley-Whaley Research Center 3. Mooresville (Livingston County.); Beetsma farm 4. Novelty (Knox County); Greenley Research Center 5. LaGrange (Lewis County; Roger Tiemann Farm 6. Henrietta (Ray County); John Williams Farm 7. Grand Pass (Saline County); Ryland and Fred Utlaut Farm 8. Columbia (Boone County); Bradford Research and Extension Center. 9. Truxton (Montgomery County); Roy Cope Farm 10. Annada (Pike County.); Bob Burkemper Farm 11. Harrisonville (Cass County); Roth Farm 12. Adrian (Bates County); Darrel Tenholder Farm 13. Urich (Henry County); Kurt Gretzinger Farm 14. Nevada (Vernon County); Steve Cubbage Farm 15. Lamar (Barton County); Wally Norton Farm 16. Chaffee (Scott County); Martin Eftink Farm 17. Morehouse (New Madrid County); Tom Jennings Farm 18. New Madrid (New Madrid County) Peter Rost Farm 19. Portageville Loam (Pemiscot County); Delta Research Center 19. Portageville Clay (Pemiscot County); Delta Research Center Entries All seed companies and organizations were eligible to enter the 2013 soybean test. Participation was voluntary and the MU Variety Testing Program exercised no control over which or how many varieties were entered. The MU Variety Testing Program receives no Missouri tax dollars, so a fee was collected for each entry to fund the program. All soybean varieties, regardless of herbicide trait, were entered into a single test. Varieties were separated by Maturity Group e.g. MG 3, MG 4, and MG 5. Maturity Group information was provided by seed companies. Field Plot Design and Plot Management Varieties were randomly arranged in the field according to a lattice design with three replications. Row spacing for all locations was 30 inches and seeding rate was 160,000 seeds/acre. Plots were two rows wide (5 feet) and 27 feet long. All rows of each plot were harvested to determine yield. Plots were planted and harvested with commercial equipment modified for small plot work. Fertilizer was applied at each location at the discretion of the farmer or the station manager. Weed control was achieved with preplant herbicides and various conventional post-emergence herbicides. Additional hand weeding was done as required. Management details varied among locations and are specified in the regional crop management summaries. Data Recorded Lodging and height were determined immediately before harvest. A scale of 1 to 5 was used to score lodging where 1 = less than 20% plants lodged, 3 = all plants leaning moderately or 40% - 60% plants

4 down, 5 = more than 80% plants down. During harvest, plot grain weights were measured and an electronic moisture tester was used to determine the moisture content of the grain. Yields were corrected to a moisture content of 13% and expressed as bushels/acre. The MU Variety Testing program attempted to locate sites in fields of low to moderate levels of SCN. Comparing Varieties The performance of a variety cannot be measured with absolute precision. Uncontrolled variability is involved in the determination of each plot s yield. This variability exists in all field experiments and in farmer fields. Statistics are used to account for this variability and to assist farmers in selecting superior varieties. The statistical tool used by the MU Variety Testing Program is called least significant difference (LSD). The LSD is simple to use. When two varieties are compared and the difference between them is greater than the LSD, the entries are considered to be significantly different. Differences between two varieties that are smaller than the LSD may have occurred by chance and are considered to be not significant. In other words, the two varieties might have the same yield, grain moisture or other characteristics of interest. The LSD can be found at the bottom of each table. The MU Variety Testing Program arranges varieties within each table from highest yield to lowest yield. The "top yielding variety in each test is identified by a double asterisk (**) placed next to its yield. Varieties that did not yield significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test are denoted in the tables by a single asterisk (*). Thus, by reading down the yield column, readers can readily identify the highest yielding varieties in a test. Variety performance may seem inconsistent from location to location and from year to year. These differences are caused by differences among environments for rainfall, temperatures, soil fertility, diseases, insects, and many other factors. To obtain an improved estimate of relative variety performance, readers should consider results from more than one environment (locations and/or years). The vast majority of varieties are entered into our tests for only one year, so comparing varieties across multiple locations becomes even more important. The MU Variety Testing Program facilitates variety comparisons across locations by publishing Region Means. Region Means tables contain yield data from all individual locations in the region with yields averaged across the locations. The variety with the highest average yield and varieties that do not differ for yield from that variety are designated with double (**) and single (*) asterisks. Although yield usually receives first consideration, other agronomic characteristics may be equally important when selecting a soybean variety. Standability, maturity, herbicide tolerance and disease resistance are among the characteristics that deserve careful consideration. We provide a table that contains several important characteristics of varieties entered into the MU Variety Testing Program. This information was provided by seed companies. Please contact seed company representatives for the latest information. Seed entered into the MU Variety Testing Program is usually treated with one or more seed treatments. These seed treatments are identified in the table listing the variety characteristics. Accessibility of Data Results of the 2013 crop performance tests are available in print format and online at varietytesting.missouri.edu. If you need assistance in accessing the web site or would like to receive a printed copy please call Authors William J. Wiebold is a Professor of Plant Sciences and State Extension Specialist; Howard L. Mason is a Research Associate in Plant Sciences; Delbert Knerr, David M. Schwab, Jeremy Angotti, and William Schelp are Research Specialists in Plant Sciences.

5 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 North Region: Craig Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Midland 3983NR2 86.3** emerge e3692s 83.7* Power Plus 36J3 81.8* HS 38A * NuTech/G2 Genetics * Merschman Adams 1434LL 79.4* NuTech/G2 Genetics * MorSoy R2 36X63N 79.1* NK S38-W4 Brand 79.0* NK S39-U2 Brand 78.9* HS 39A * Kruger K * NK S35-C3 Brand 78.2* Merschman Exp 28P39RR Merschman Garfield 1439RR NK S34-Z1 Brand Willcross WX2384N Power Plus 39B SS 14L.36N Dyna-Gro S38RY Merschman Washington 1438RR NuTech/G2 Genetics Power Plus 36CO Power Plus 34T Willcross WX2364N emerge e Kruger K MorSoy R2 38X83N Power Plus 38D Lewis 374R Mycogen 5N373R MorSoy R2 38X52N Merschman Coolidge 1234RR2Y HS 38A LG C3650R Kruger K Dyna-Gro 36RY Midland 3884NRS Green Valley GV Willcross WX2365N

6 MorSoy R2 37X92N Hoblit 372LL Kruger K ProHarvest 3666CR2Y Kruger K ProHarvest 3971CR2Y Channel 3905R Mycogen 5N393R Willcross WX2385NS Lewis 381R Kruger K LG C3989R Channel 3801R Mycogen 5N385R Merschman Hoover 1433R HS 35A Channel 3303R emerge e3782s Kruger K ProHarvest 3835CR2Y Merschman Jefferson 1436LL Merschman Arthur 1431RR Channel 3701R SS 14L.37N Midland 3824NRS MorSoy LL 3973N Green Valley GV Merschman Roosevelt 1435RR Mycogen 5N360R Merschman Grant 1236LL Merschman Truman 1438LL Midland 3633NR Dyna-Gro S36RY NuTech/G2 Genetics Merschman Kennedy 1436RR NuTech/G2 Genetics Mycogen 5N372R MPG 3714 R2N Hoblit 343LL SS 14L.38N HS 37A Power Plus 37F emerge 389F.YC Channel 3907R ABG ABG

7 ABG ABG GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 8.4 CV (%) 8.8 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

8 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 4 North Region: Craig Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Midland 4373NR2 80.5** Lewis 414R2 74.8* Kruger K * Lewis 412R2 74.6* NuTech/G2 Genetics * Dyna-Gro 39RY * NuTech/G2 Genetics MorSoy R2 42X53N Midland 4044NR NK S41-J6 Brand HS 40A NuTech/G2 Genetics Kruger K MorSoy R2 42X21N Kruger K NK S42-W9 Brand NK S43-K1 Brand MPV 4100N MorSoy LL 4222N GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 7.9 CV (%) 8.3 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

9 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 North Region: Albany Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Mycogen 5N393R2 55.9** Power Plus 36J3 54.2* Midland 3983NR2 53.6* NuTech/G2 Genetics * NK S38-W4 Brand 52.9* HS 39A * Willcross WX2364N 52.6* Dyna-Gro 36RY * Merschman Washington 1438RR2 51.9* NK S34-Z1 Brand 51.8* MorSoy R2 38X52N 51.5* NK S39-U2 Brand 51.5* SS 14L.36N 51.5* Power Plus 34T3 51.1* Mycogen 5N360R2 51.0* NuTech/G2 Genetics * HS 38A * Merschman Garfield 1439RR2 50.0* Lewis 374R Power Plus 38D Power Plus 39B Channel 3303R Kruger K Green Valley GV emerge e Power Plus 36CO emerge e3692s Merschman Exp 28P39RR Merschman Jefferson 1436LL Channel 3801R MorSoy R2 36X63N Mycogen 5N373R Kruger K Merschman Coolidge 1234RR2Y Midland 3633NR Willcross WX2384N Merschman Hoover 1433R Channel 3905R Mycogen 5N385R Kruger K

10 LG C3989R Kruger K NuTech/G2 Genetics Midland 3884NRS ProHarvest 3666CR2Y ProHarvest 3835CR2Y emerge 389F.YC Merschman Roosevelt 1435RR Channel 3701R Merschman Arthur 1431RR HS 38A Dyna-Gro S38RY emerge e3782s LG C3650R Dyna-Gro S36RY ProHarvest 3971CR2Y Willcross WX2385NS Merschman Grant 1236LL Kruger K Green Valley GV Merschman Truman 1438LL Kruger K Merschman Adams 1434LL Merschman Kennedy 1436RR MorSoy R2 38X83N Power Plus 37F HS 35A NK S35-C3 Brand MorSoy LL 3973N NuTech/G2 Genetics Mycogen 5N372R Hoblit 372LL MorSoy R2 37X92N Willcross WX2365N Kruger K HS 37A Hoblit 343LL ABG Lewis 381R SS 14L.38N NuTech/G2 Genetics Midland 3824NRS MPG 3714 R2N SS 14L.37N ABG Channel 3907R

11 ABG ABG GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 5.9 CV (%) 9.3 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

12 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 4 North Region: Albany Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Kruger K ** HS 40A * Midland 4373NR2 47.7* NuTech/G2 Genetics * NuTech/G2 Genetics * Midland 4044NR2 47.1* NK S42-W9 Brand 46.8* Dyna-Gro 39RY * MorSoy R2 42X53N 46.5* Kruger K * NuTech/G2 Genetics * Kruger K Lewis 414R MorSoy R2 42X21N Lewis 412R MorSoy LL 4222N MPV 4100N NK S41-J6 Brand NK S43-K1 Brand GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 5.0 CV (%) 8.1 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

13 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 North Region: Mooresville Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Mycogen 5N393R2 63.6** NK S39-U2 Brand 63.0* Dyna-Gro 36RY * Merschman Coolidge 1234RR2Y 60.9* Merschman Washington 1438RR2 60.8* Merschman Garfield 1439RR2 60.5* Midland 3983NR2 60.5* Merschman Exp 28P39RR 60.4* Lewis 374R2 60.2* Kruger K * Mycogen 5N360R2 60.0* Power Plus 36J3 59.8* Kruger K * MorSoy R2 36X63N 59.4* Willcross WX2384N 58.9* HS 38A * HS 38A * NK S38-W4 Brand 58.3* NuTech/G2 Genetics * Midland 3824NRS2 57.9* Merschman Hoover 1433R2 57.6* Mycogen 5N372R2 57.6* MorSoy R2 38X52N 57.4* ProHarvest 3971CR2Y 57.3* NK S34-Z1 Brand 57.0* Merschman Kennedy 1436RR2 56.9* Kruger K * ProHarvest 3666CR2Y 56.8* Willcross WX2364N emerge e3692s NK S35-C3 Brand ABG NuTech/G2 Genetics Kruger K Midland 3633NR Merschman Arthur 1431RR Channel 3801R HS 39A Kruger K Merschman Roosevelt 1435RR

14 Channel 3303R Midland 3884NRS NuTech/G2 Genetics Green Valley GV HS 35A NuTech/G2 Genetics SS 14L.36N Dyna-Gro S38RY MorSoy R2 38X83N Merschman Adams 1434LL LG C3650R HS 37A Kruger K NuTech/G2 Genetics Hoblit 372LL Lewis 381R Mycogen 5N385R Willcross WX2365N Kruger K Power Plus 36CO Power Plus 34T Power Plus 39B SS 14L.37N ProHarvest 3835CR2Y Power Plus 38D emerge 389F.YC MorSoy LL 3973N LG C3989R Dyna-Gro S36RY emerge e MPG 3714 R2N Channel 3701R Willcross WX2385NS Mycogen 5N373R MorSoy R2 37X92N Channel 3905R Merschman Jefferson 1436LL Merschman Truman 1438LL Power Plus 37F emerge e3782s Merschman Grant 1236LL Green Valley GV SS 14L.38N ABG Hoblit 343LL Channel 3907R

15 ABG ABG GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 6.8 CV (%) 9.1 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

16 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 4 North Region: Mooresville Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Dyna-Gro 39RY ** HS 40A * Kruger K * MorSoy R2 42X21N 58.2* Midland 4373NR2 58.0* Kruger K * Kruger K * MorSoy R2 42X53N 53.7* Midland 4044NR2 53.5* Lewis 412R2 53.4* NuTech/G2 Genetics NuTech/G2 Genetics Lewis 414R NK S41-J6 Brand NK S42-W9 Brand NK S43-K1 Brand NuTech/G2 Genetics MorSoy LL 4222N MPV 4100N GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 6.4 CV (%) 8.6 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

17 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 North Region: Novelty Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in NK S38-W4 Brand 45.5** Mycogen 5N393R2 44.7* Mycogen 5N385R2 42.9* Merschman Arthur 1431RR2 42.8* Mycogen 5N360R2 42.8* Power Plus 36CO 42.5* Merschman Coolidge 1234RR2Y LG C3650R HS 35A Merschman Adams 1434LL Willcross WX2364N Dyna-Gro S36RY Power Plus 34T Kruger K Midland 3983NR Power Plus 39B SS 14L.38N Dyna-Gro 36RY NuTech/G2 Genetics MorSoy R2 38X52N Power Plus 36J NK S34-Z1 Brand NK S39-U2 Brand Channel 3303R MorSoy R2 36X63N Power Plus 38D Kruger K Kruger K Lewis 374R Midland 3884NRS MorSoy R2 38X83N Merschman Washington 1438RR Green Valley GV Midland 3824NRS SS 14L.37N Merschman Kennedy 1436RR MorSoy R2 37X92N NuTech/G2 Genetics NK S35-C3 Brand MorSoy LL 3973N

18 HS 39A Kruger K Power Plus 37F Kruger K Midland 3633NR Willcross WX2385NS Merschman Roosevelt 1435RR SS 14L.36N Dyna-Gro S38RY Merschman Exp 28P39RR ProHarvest 3666CR2Y LG C3989R Willcross WX2384N HS 38A Willcross WX2365N Channel 3801R HS 38A emerge e3782s emerge e Merschman Truman 1438LL HS 37A Mycogen 5N372R NuTech/G2 Genetics Green Valley GV Hoblit 372LL Merschman Jefferson 1436LL Mycogen 5N373R Channel 3905R Channel 3907R Channel 3701R Merschman Garfield 1439RR Merschman Hoover 1433R ProHarvest 3971CR2Y ProHarvest 3835CR2Y Lewis 381R NuTech/G2 Genetics MPG 3714 R2N emerge e3692s Kruger K Kruger K emerge 389F.YC Hoblit 343LL Merschman Grant 1236LL NuTech/G2 Genetics ABG ABG

19 ABG ABG GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 3.3 CV (%) 6.4 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

20 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 4 North Region: Novelty Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in HS 40A ** MorSoy R2 42X21N 40.0* Midland 4044NR2 39.9* Kruger K * Lewis 414R2 39.6* Kruger K * MorSoy R2 42X53N 38.7* Dyna-Gro 39RY * NK S42-W9 Brand 38.5* NuTech/G2 Genetics * Midland 4373NR2 37.2* Lewis 412R NK S41-J6 Brand MorSoy LL 4222N Kruger K NK S43-K1 Brand NuTech/G2 Genetics NuTech/G2 Genetics MPV 4100N GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 5.3 CV (%) 10.1 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

21 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 North Region: LaGrange Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Mycogen 5N372R2 68.9** HS 37A * NK S38-W4 Brand 68.4* HS 39A * MorSoy R2 37X92N 68.1* Willcross WX2364N 67.1* Dyna-Gro 36RY * ProHarvest 3971CR2Y 66.6* Merschman Garfield 1439RR2 66.4* Kruger K * Channel 3801R2 66.0* Willcross WX2384N 65.9* Midland 3983NR2 65.7* Power Plus 38D2 65.5* Power Plus 36J3 65.3* Merschman Washington 1438RR2 64.8* Kruger K * LG C3989R Willcross WX2385NS Kruger K ProHarvest 3666CR2Y Channel 3905R MPG 3714 R2N Merschman Arthur 1431RR HS 38A Mycogen 5N385R NK S39-U2 Brand Power Plus 39B Kruger K Midland 3884NRS Mycogen 5N373R Dyna-Gro S36RY Green Valley GV NuTech/G2 Genetics Mycogen 5N360R Merschman Exp 28P39RR Mycogen 5N393R Power Plus 36CO LG C3650R MorSoy R2 36X63N

22 NuTech/G2 Genetics Lewis 374R Lewis 381R NK S35-C3 Brand MorSoy R2 38X52N Channel 3303R Dyna-Gro S38RY Merschman Hoover 1433R Green Valley GV Merschman Coolidge 1234RR2Y Merschman Kennedy 1436RR Power Plus 37F Merschman Adams 1434LL Kruger K NK S34-Z1 Brand Kruger K HS 38A Midland 3824NRS emerge e3782s NuTech/G2 Genetics HS 35A Channel 3907R emerge e Willcross WX2365N Merschman Roosevelt 1435RR Midland 3633NR SS 14L.36N NuTech/G2 Genetics Channel 3701R Kruger K MorSoy LL 3973N Merschman Grant 1236LL MorSoy R2 38X83N ProHarvest 3835CR2Y emerge e3692s Power Plus 34T Merschman Truman 1438LL emerge 389F.YC NuTech/G2 Genetics SS 14L.38N Hoblit 343LL Hoblit 372LL SS 14L.37N Merschman Jefferson 1436LL ABG ABG

23 ABG ABG GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 4.3 CV (%) 5.2 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

24 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 4 North Region: LaGrange Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Dyna-Gro 39RY ** Kruger K * Lewis 414R2 71.0* Midland 4373NR2 70.7* MorSoy R2 42X21N 70.3* Kruger K * MorSoy R2 42X53N 69.6* NuTech/G2 Genetics * NK S41-J6 Brand 68.6* NuTech/G2 Genetics * Midland 4044NR Lewis 412R Kruger K NuTech/G2 Genetics NK S43-K1 Brand MorSoy LL 4222N HS 40A NK S42-W9 Brand MPV 4100N GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 4.9 CV (%) 5.3 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

25 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 North Region Summary Brand-Variety Craig Albany Mooresville Novelty LaGrange Mean Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Midland 3983NR2 86.3** 53.6* 60.5* * 61.5** NK S38-W4 Brand 79.0* 52.9* 58.3* 45.5** 68.4* 60.8* Power Plus 36J3 81.8* 54.2* 59.8* * 60.4* NK S39-U2 Brand 78.9* 51.5* 63.0* * Mycogen 5N393R ** 63.6** 44.7* * HS 39A * 52.7* * 58.9* Dyna-Gro 36RY * 61.2* * 58.9* Merschman Washington 1438RR * 60.8* * 58.8 Willcross WX2364N * * 58.8 NuTech/G2 Genetics * 53.0* 58.2* Merschman Garfield 1439RR * 60.5* * 58.4 Kruger K * * 57.8 Willcross WX2384N * * 57.8 MorSoy R2 36X63N 79.1* * Merschman Exp 28P39RR * NK S34-Z1 Brand * 57.0* Lewis 374R * Merschman Coolidge 1234RR2Y * MorSoy R2 38X52N * 57.4* HS 38A * 58.6* Power Plus 39B Power Plus 38D * 56.7 HS 38A * * NuTech/G2 Genetics * 50.4* Power Plus 36CO * Kruger K * 56.4 Mycogen 5N360R * 60.0* 42.8* emerge e3692s 83.7* Merschman Adams 1434LL 79.4* SS 14L.36N * NK S35-C3 Brand 78.2* Midland 3884NRS LG C3650R Power Plus 34T * ProHarvest 3666CR2Y * Kruger K * ProHarvest 3971CR2Y * * 55.6 Channel 3801R * 55.5 Kruger K * Mycogen 5N385R * Dyna-Gro S38RY Green Valley GV

26 Merschman Arthur 1431RR * Mycogen 5N373R MorSoy R2 37X92N * 55.0 Channel 3303R NuTech/G2 Genetics emerge e Kruger K Kruger K * LG C3989R Merschman Hoover 1433R * MorSoy R2 38X83N Willcross WX2385NS Channel 3905R Mycogen 5N372R * ** 54.1 HS 35A Willcross WX2365N Dyna-Gro S36RY Kruger K Midland 3633NR Merschman Kennedy 1436RR * Merschman Roosevelt 1435RR Lewis 381R Midland 3824NRS * Hoblit 372LL HS 37A * 52.5 ProHarvest 3835CR2Y emerge e3782s NuTech/G2 Genetics Channel 3701R Green Valley GV Merschman Jefferson 1436LL MorSoy LL 3973N Merschman Truman 1438LL MPG 3714 R2N Power Plus 37F SS 14L.37N Merschman Grant 1236LL NuTech/G2 Genetics emerge 389F.YC SS 14L.38N Hoblit 343LL Channel 3907R ABG ABG ABG ABG GRAND MEAN LSD (10%)

27 CV (%) **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

28 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 4 North Region Summary Brand-Variety Craig Albany Mooresville Novelty LaGrange Mean Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Bu/Ac Midland 4373NR2 80.5** 47.7* 58.0* 37.2* 70.7* 58.8** Kruger K * 50.3** 58.3* 39.8* 69.7* 58.5* Dyna-Gro 39RY * 46.6* 59.5** 38.5* 73.0** 58.2* HS 40A * 58.7* 42.5** MorSoy R2 42X53N * 53.7* 38.7* 69.6* 56.0 Lewis 414R2 74.8* * 71.0* 55.6 MorSoy R2 42X21N * 40.0* 70.3* 55.5 NuTech/G2 Genetics * 47.4* * 55.5 Midland 4044NR * 53.5* 39.9* Kruger K * * 54.9 Kruger K * 55.4* 39.4* NuTech/G2 Genetics * * Lewis 412R2 74.6* * NuTech/G2 Genetics * * 53.1 NK S41-J6 Brand * 52.4 NK S42-W9 Brand * * NK S43-K1 Brand MorSoy LL 4222N MPV 4100N GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) CV (%) **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

29 North Region Crop Management Summary for 2013 The Soybean Test was conducted at five locations in the North Region (Craig, Albany, Mooresville, Novelty, LaGrange). The LaGrange location received 7 inches of rain in seven days in late May causing localized flooding. So, LaGrange was replanted on June 20. Characteristics of Soybean Test Locations North Region Soil test Precipitation Location Soil type ph OM P K May Jun Jul Aug Sep Season a Craig Blencoe Silt Clay % Albany Grundy silt loam % Mooresville Grundy silt loam % Novelty Putnam silt loam % LaGrange Westerville silt loam % a Region average season precipitation (May through September) = 17.1, 4.0 below normal Crop Management Practices at the Soybean Test Locations North Region Dates Fertilizer Herbicides Location Planting Harvest N P 2O 5 K 2O Tillage Pre- Post Craig May 17 Oct Conv. Dual II Magnum, Sonic, none Roundup PowerMax Albany May 17 Oct Min. Dual II Magnum, Sonic, Select, Basagran Roundup PowerMax Mooresville May 15 Oct Min. Dual II Magnum, Sonic, Roundup PowerMax none Novelty May 16 Oct Conv. Dual II Magnum, Sonic, Roundup PowerMax none LaGrange June 20 Nov Conv. Dual II Magnum, Sonic, Roundup PowerMax none

30 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 Central Region: Henrietta Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Power Plus 36CO 81.3** Power Plus 39B3 80.3* NK S35-C3 Brand 77.8* MorSoy R2 36X63N 77.6* NK S39-U2 Brand 77.2* LG C3989R2 76.4* Power Plus 36J3 76.0* Mycogen 5N373R2 75.8* NK S38-W4 Brand 75.8* NuTech/G2 Genetics * Hoblit 372LL 75.3* Lewis 394R2 75.2* Merschman Kennedy 1436RR2 75.2* NK S34-Z1 Brand 74.9* Merschman Jefferson 1436LL 74.7* Yieldmax ML * Hoegemeyer LL3716N 74.6* MorSoy LL 3973N 73.8* Midland 3884NRS2 73.1* Mycogen 5N372R2 72.9* Midland 3633NR Power Plus 34T Merschman Exp 28P39RR Merschman Garfield 1439RR SS 14L.36N Merschman Truman 1438LL Hoegemeyer 3997NRR Dyna-Gro 36RY Power Plus 38D Merschman Grant 1236LL Midland 3983NR Merschman Roosevelt 1435RR Channel 3701R Hoegemeyer 3811NRR MorSoy R2 39X93N Dyna-Gro S38RY Channel 3801R Merschman Washington 1438RR NuTech/G2 Genetics Power Plus 37F

31 NuTech/G2 Genetics SS 14L.38N MorSoy R2 38X52N Lewis 392R SS 14L.37N Yieldmax ML Mycogen 5N385R MorSoy R2 38X83N Channel 3303R Mycogen 5N393R Channel 3907R Dyna-Gro S39RY Midland 3824NRS MorSoy R2 37X92N ProHarvest 3835CR2Y Channel 3905R Stine 38RD MPG 3714 R2N GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 8.6 CV (%) 9.1 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

32 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 4 Central Region: Henrietta Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in NK S43-K1 Brand 77.3** Mycogen 5N431R2 75.9* MorSoy R2S 47X12N 74.7* Dyna-Gro 39RY * Merschman Memphis 1243RR2Y 72.7* Midland 4373NR2 72.7* Merschman Richmond 1442RR2 72.0* Lewis 423R2 71.9* Hoegemeyer 4822NRR 71.8* Merschman Nashville 1347RR2Y 71.8* Midland 4703NR2 71.7* NuTech/G2 Genetics * Merschman Houston 1444RR2 70.2* MorSoy R2 43X43N 70.2* Merschman Tulsa 1345LL 70.0* MorSoy LL 4222N 69.5* MorSoy R2 42X53N 69.4* Power Plus 41M4 68.3* ProHarvest 4366CR2Y 68.1* ProHarvest 4235CR2Y 67.8* ABG * Mycogen 5N451R2 67.5* Merschman Austin 1342LL Merschman Atlanta 1443RR Mycogen X53413R NuTech/G2 Genetics Power Plus 43D Merschman Phoenix 1245RR2Y Lewis 412R Midland 4543NRS NuTech/G2 Genetics Midland 4044NR Midland 4580RS MPV 4100N Merschman Denver 1442RR Hoegemeyer 4124NRR LG C4211R NK S45-V8 Brand Yieldmax ML

33 MorSoy LL 4653N Stine 44LD Merschman Orlando 1346LL NK S42-W9 Brand MPV 4400N NuTech/G2 Genetics Stine 42LD Merschman Tampa 1345LL emerge e4510s Mycogen 5N423R SS 14L.46N MorSoy R2 42X21N NK S46-L2 Brand Midland 4792RS Stine 42RE emerge e4310s ABG GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 10.0 CV (%) 11.1 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

34 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 Central Region: Grand Pass Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in NuTech/G2 Genetics ** NK S38-W4 Brand 59.5* Mycogen 5N393R2 58.1* NK S39-U2 Brand 58.0* Power Plus 38D2 57.3* Hoegemeyer 3997NRR 55.3* Power Plus 36J3 54.9* MorSoy R2 36X63N 54.6* SS 14L.36N 54.6* MorSoy R2 38X83N 54.2* Power Plus 39B3 53.8* Midland 3824NRS2 53.6* MorSoy R2 38X52N 53.6* NuTech/G2 Genetics * MorSoy LL 3973N Dyna-Gro 36RY Power Plus 37F NK S35-C3 Brand Dyna-Gro S38RY Hoegemeyer 3811NRR Merschman Garfield 1439RR Midland 3884NRS Lewis 394R MorSoy R2 39X93N Merschman Washington 1438RR Lewis 392R SS 14L.37N Hoegemeyer LL3716N Merschman Exp 28P39RR NK S34-Z1 Brand Mycogen 5N373R Power Plus 36CO Hoblit 372LL Channel 3701R MorSoy R2 37X92N Stine 38RD Yieldmax ML Midland 3983NR Merschman Roosevelt 1435RR Yieldmax ML

35 Merschman Grant 1236LL Power Plus 34T Midland 3633NR MPG 3714 R2N Channel 3907R Dyna-Gro S39RY NuTech/G2 Genetics Merschman Jefferson 1436LL Channel 3905R Channel 3303R LG C3989R Mycogen 5N372R SS 14L.38N Merschman Kennedy 1436RR Merschman Truman 1438LL Mycogen 5N385R Channel 3801R ProHarvest 3835CR2Y GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 6.1 CV (%) 9.1 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

36 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 4 Central Region: Grand Pass Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Lewis 423R2 52.6** Power Plus 41M4 50.2* Midland 4792RS2 49.6* Merschman Nashville 1347RR2Y 48.9* MorSoy R2 42X53N 48.3* Merschman Orlando 1346LL 48.1* MorSoy R2 43X43N 47.9* Mycogen 5N451R2 47.6* Midland 4703NR2 47.5* NuTech/G2 Genetics * Merschman Memphis 1243RR2Y 46.5* ProHarvest 4366CR2Y NK S45-V8 Brand Midland 4543NRS Midland 4580RS MorSoy R2S 47X12N Mycogen X53413R Midland 4044NR Merschman Phoenix 1245RR2Y Mycogen 5N431R Dyna-Gro 39RY Power Plus 43D NK S46-L2 Brand MorSoy LL 4222N emerge e4310s Merschman Denver 1442RR Stine 42RE Hoegemeyer 4822NRR Merschman Tampa 1345LL Mycogen 5N423R Stine 42LD Merschman Tulsa 1345LL ProHarvest 4235CR2Y Hoegemeyer 4124NRR NuTech/G2 Genetics Lewis 412R Merschman Austin 1342LL Midland 4373NR NuTech/G2 Genetics

37 LG C4211R NuTech/G2 Genetics MorSoy R2 42X21N Merschman Atlanta 1443RR Stine 44LD NK S43-K1 Brand Yieldmax ML MorSoy LL 4653N Merschman Houston 1444RR Merschman Richmond 1442RR ABG emerge e4510s MPV 4400N NK S42-W9 Brand ABG MPV 4100N SS 14L.46N GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 6.1 CV (%) 10.4 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

38 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 Central Region: Columbia Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Mycogen 5N373R2 53.5** Power Plus 36CO 53.2* Merschman Garfield 1439RR2 52.9* Power Plus 34T3 52.7* SS 14L.36N 52.0* Merschman Washington 1438RR2 51.9* MorSoy R2 37X92N 51.4* NuTech/G2 Genetics * Mycogen 5N393R2 51.1* NK S39-U2 Brand 51.1* NK S38-W4 Brand 51.0* Power Plus 36J3 50.9* Hoegemeyer 3997NRR 50.9* MorSoy R2 39X93N 50.7* Midland 3983NR2 50.6* Power Plus 39B3 50.2* Lewis 394R2 49.7* Dyna-Gro 36RY * Midland 3884NRS2 49.3* Mycogen 5N372R2 49.2* NK S34-Z1 Brand 48.9* NK S35-C3 Brand 48.2* Dyna-Gro S38RY * Power Plus 38D2 47.5* Stine 38RD Channel 3801R Dyna-Gro S39RY MorSoy R2 38X52N LG C3989R NuTech/G2 Genetics Merschman Exp 28P39RR Midland 3633NR Merschman Grant 1236LL Merschman Roosevelt 1435RR Yieldmax ML Hoegemeyer 3811NRR Hoblit 372LL Power Plus 37F SS 14L.38N Lewis 392R

39 Merschman Truman 1438LL Mycogen 5N385R Channel 3905R Channel 3701R NuTech/G2 Genetics Merschman Kennedy 1436RR Hoegemeyer LL3716N MorSoy LL 3973N Yieldmax ML Merschman Jefferson 1436LL MorSoy R2 36X63N Channel 3907R ProHarvest 3835CR2Y Channel 3303R MPG 3714 R2N MorSoy R2 38X83N SS 14L.37N Midland 3824NRS GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 6.1 CV (%) 9.9 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

40 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 4 Central Region: Columbia Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in Lewis 423R2 57.0** Dyna-Gro 39RY * ProHarvest 4366CR2Y 52.7* Merschman Tampa 1345LL 52.5* Lewis 412R2 52.3* Midland 4373NR2 51.7* Power Plus 41M4 50.9* Merschman Memphis 1243RR2Y Midland 4703NR NuTech/G2 Genetics Hoegemeyer 4822NRR Merschman Phoenix 1245RR2Y NK S43-K1 Brand NK S42-W9 Brand ProHarvest 4235CR2Y Mycogen 5N431R MorSoy R2 42X53N MorSoy R2 42X21N LG C4211R Mycogen X53413R Merschman Orlando 1346LL Midland 4044NR NuTech/G2 Genetics Merschman Tulsa 1345LL NK S46-L2 Brand MorSoy LL 4222N emerge e4310s NK S45-V8 Brand Midland 4580RS Merschman Richmond 1442RR Midland 4792RS MPV 4100N NuTech/G2 Genetics Merschman Nashville 1347RR2Y Midland 4543NRS Stine 44LD ABG NuTech/G2 Genetics Mycogen 5N451R

41 Stine 42LD Merschman Houston 1444RR MorSoy R2S 47X12N MPV 4400N Merschman Denver 1442RR Mycogen 5N423R Merschman Austin 1342LL Hoegemeyer 4124NRR Yieldmax ML Power Plus 43D MorSoy LL 4653N Merschman Atlanta 1443RR SS 14L.46N Stine 42RE emerge e4510s MorSoy R2 43X43N ABG GRAND MEAN LSD (10%) 6.2 CV (%) 10.1 **Highest yielding variety in test *Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the test

42 2013 Missouri Soybean Maturity Group 3 Central Region: Truxton Brand-Variety Yield Maturity Lodging Plant Height Bu/Ac group 1 to 5 in LG C3989R2 43.3** MorSoy R2 39X93N 40.2* Mycogen 5N385R2 39.6* Dyna-Gro 36RY MorSoy R2 38X83N Power Plus 39B Power Plus 34T Hoegemeyer LL3716N SS 14L.36N Power Plus 36CO Power Plus 36J Channel 3801R Dyna-Gro S39RY Midland 3824NRS MorSoy R2 36X63N Channel 3905R Merschman Exp 28P39RR Mycogen 5N372R Mycogen 5N393R Midland 3633NR MorSoy R2 37X92N NK S38-W4 Brand Yieldmax ML Dyna-Gro S38RY Midland 3983NR NK S39-U2 Brand Merschman Washington 1438RR Power Plus 38D Merschman Jefferson 1436LL Merschman Grant 1236LL Merschman Garfield 1439RR Channel 3701R NuTech/G2 Genetics ProHarvest 3835CR2Y Hoegemeyer 3997NRR MorSoy R2 38X52N Hoblit 372LL Stine 38RD Power Plus 37F Merschman Kennedy 1436RR

Archive version: For the most recent information, see extension. missouri.edu.

Archive version: For the most recent information, see extension. missouri.edu. Archive version: For the most recent information, see extension. missouri.edu. PREFACE Our motto is We test the best and that is exactly what we do. Each year, the best seed companies and organizations

More information

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Matthew Hankinson, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION

More information

2014 Soybean Performance Tests

2014 Soybean Performance Tests Arkansas 2014 Soybean Performance Tests R.D Bond D.G. Dombek J.A. Still ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2014 Research Series 622 This publication is available on the internet at: http://arkansasagnews.uark.edu/1356.htm

More information

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes Victor M. Green 302-275-1445 vmgreen@udel.edu Special thanks and appreciation is extended to the following people for whom this research would not have

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Information DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 - (301) 405-6244 Agronomy Facts No. 32 MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Maryland soybean variety tests are conducted

More information

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Table 1. Corn Hybrid Performance for Silage, Combined Sites (Adair and Mason counties), KY, 2010 Beck's 5675 HXR 22.9 3380 27000 0.81 0.55 7.4 21 37

More information

2013 Soybean Performance Tests

2013 Soybean Performance Tests Arkansas 2013 Soybean Performance Tests R.D Bond D.G. Dombek J.A. Still R.M. Pryor ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2013 Research Series 614 This publication is available on the internet

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Information DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 - (301) 405-6244 MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Maryland soybean variety tests are conducted each year by the Maryland

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Information DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 - (301) 405-6244 Agronomy Facts No. 32 MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Maryland soybean variety tests are conducted

More information

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Extension Series No. E-10-2 November, 2010 2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences NYS

More information

Summary of Dryland Soybean Variety Performance at Four Locations, 2014

Summary of Dryland Soybean Variety Performance at Four Locations, 2014 Griffin 2 Midville Plains Tifton Statewide Avg Company/Brand Variety 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg ---------------------------------------------------- bu/acre ----------------------------------------------------

More information

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown*** Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown*** Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp May 2.47 67.4 1.24 66.5 2.56 66.3 1.59 67.4 June 5.9 73.5 6.58 73.1 4.45 72.8 12.24

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy 2013-2014 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2013-2014 wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Humboldt,

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results 2014-2015 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2014-2015 winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Auburn, Kentucky; Humboldt, Tennessee;

More information

Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee

Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee 2005 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing

More information

Tifton, Georgia: Dryland Soybean Variety Performance, 2013

Tifton, Georgia: Dryland Soybean Variety Performance, 2013 Tifton, Georgia: 2-Year 2013 Data Company or Average Plant Wt of Seed Brand Name Variety Yield Rank Yield 1 Maturity Ht Lodg. 2 100 Seed Quality 3 Shatt. 4 bu/acre bu/acre date in rating gm rating rating

More information

Arkansas Soybean. Performance Tests. R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek. ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2015 Research Series 630

Arkansas Soybean. Performance Tests. R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek. ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2015 Research Series 630 Arkansas Soybean 2015 Performance Tests R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2015 Research Series 630 This publication is available on the internet at: http://arkansasagnews.uark.edu/1356.htm

More information

Arkansas Soybean. Performance Tests. R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek. ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2016 Research Series 640

Arkansas Soybean. Performance Tests. R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek. ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2016 Research Series 640 Arkansas Soybean 2016 Performance Tests R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2016 Research Series 640 This publication is available on the internet at: http://arkansasagnews.uark.edu/1356.htm

More information

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT The 2011 Shelby County State Bank Corn Plot was a replicated trial with each variety planted three times. Each variety had six rows and the rows were approximately

More information

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... 2014 2014 CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM.................................................... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA.............................................. 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES............................

More information

2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results

2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results 2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy Research and Development Division www.wheattech.com 270-586-1776 Data provided by Wheat Tech Agronomy R&D Division 270-586-1776 Table of

More information

Arkansas Soybean Performance Tests 2017

Arkansas Soybean Performance Tests 2017 Arkansas Soybean Performance Tests 2017 R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2017 Research Series 647 This publication is available on the internet at: https://arkansas-ag-news.uark.edu/research-series.aspx

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 173 Title: Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, E. Cullen, P.J. Flannery, and K.D. Kohn Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Corn Rootworm Hybrid Comparison Trial Experiment: 10 Corn

More information

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils Manjula Nathan, Robert Kallenbach, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri

More information

Arkansas Soybean Performance Tests

Arkansas Soybean Performance Tests Arkansas Soybean Performance Tests 2006 D.G. Dombek R.D. Bond L. Coffee I.L. Eldridge ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Division of Agriculture University of Arkansas System December 2006 Research

More information

Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003

Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003 107 Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003 R. Jay Goos and Brian Johnson, Department of Soil Science, NDSU, Fargo, ND 58105 e-mail: rj.goos@ndsu.nodak.edu Field studies were

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 156 FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: The Ability of Nitrification Inhibitor (SuperU) ratios to Increase Corn Grain Yield in WI Soils. Experiment: 12Fertilizer Trial ID: 5932 Year: 2014 Personnel: Location:

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Harness, Halex GT Early-Season Test

More information

2017 Corn Grain Field Crop Trials Results

2017 Corn Grain Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences The Minnesota Corn Evaluation Program was conducted by the University

More information

2016 Kansas Performance Tests with. Soybean Varieties. standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional. Report of Progress 1130

2016 Kansas Performance Tests with. Soybean Varieties. standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional. Report of Progress 1130 Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional Report of Progress 1130 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension

More information

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM.................................................... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA.............................................. 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES............................

More information

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date). Comparison of PRE/POST and POST only Weed Control Systems in Liberty Link Soybeans at Rochester, MN, in 2011. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Adam Hazel and Bo Beyer The objective

More information

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment Evaluation of the Impact of Herbicide Tank Mix Partners with MON76980 (Xtendimax) herbicide in Xtend Soybeans at Rochester, MN in 2017. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Amelia Welter and Matthew

More information

1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests

1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Progress Report 394 1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Eugene Lacefield, Charles Tutt, J.M. Wood, and Todd Pfeiffer Tables 1. Location, Planting Date, and Climatic Data for the 1996 Soybean Performance

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. MSR, Inc., Columbia, MO Early-Season Test Maturity Group 3.2-3.8 Top 30 of 42 S2018MONOa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University   Web: Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org First of of all, all, let s let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Genetic modification of corn has been

More information

SOYBEAN VARIETY PERFORMANCE TESTS IN TENNESSEE

SOYBEAN VARIETY PERFORMANCE TESTS IN TENNESSEE SOYBEAN VARIETY PERFORMANCE TESTS IN TENNESSEE 2014 AGRESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTERS AND COUNTY STANDARD TESTS Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Virginia R. Sykes,

More information

2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials

2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials 2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials Prepared by: Tom Hoverstad, Matt Bickell, Jeff Coulter, George Nelson, Steve Quiring and Mark Hanson University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Results

More information

Selecting Hybrids Wisely

Selecting Hybrids Wisely First of of all, let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org Genetic modification of corn has been occurring

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 24 Title: Personnel: Location: Supported By: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Corn Hybrid Growth and Development Experiment: 01GD Trial ID: 6048 Year: 2016

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014 Company or Brand Name Hybrid Name Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 lbs/ton

More information

Ohio Corn Performance Test Sites for 2018.

Ohio Corn Performance Test Sites for 2018. 2018 OHIO CORN PERFORMANCE TEST R.J. Minyo, A.B. Geyer, P.R. Thomison, Horticulture and Crop Science, and D.G. Lohnes, Information Technology Ohio State University Extension/Ohio Agricultural Research

More information

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013 Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013 Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 331 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station William Batchelor, Director Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, November

More information

A R K A N S A S D.G.DOMBEK D.K. AHRENT R.D. BOND I.L. ELDRIDGE DECEMBER 2000 VARIETY TESTING PUBLICATION 2110

A R K A N S A S D.G.DOMBEK D.K. AHRENT R.D. BOND I.L. ELDRIDGE DECEMBER 2000 VARIETY TESTING PUBLICATION 2110 A R K A N S A S D.G.DOMBEK D.K. AHRENT R.D. BOND I.L. ELDRIDGE Agricultural Experiment Station FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701 www.uark.edu/depts/agronomy/dombek/vartest.html DECEMBER 2000 VARIETY TESTING

More information

2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results

2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results 2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy Research and Development Division www.wheattech.com 270-586-1776 Data provided by Wheat Tech Agronomy R&D Division 270-586-1776 Table of

More information

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015. Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ellen Sheehan, and Brent Breitenbach

More information

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2009

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2009 VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2009 David L. Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Patsy Lewis, & Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 657

More information

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Oat Tifton, Georgia: An oat variety grain trial was planted at this location on September 23, 2015. However, crown rust disease and lodging during the growing season resulted in some very low grain yields

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205 Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Roundup, atrazine,

More information

Arkansas. Performance Tests 2001

Arkansas. Performance Tests 2001 Arkansas Performance Tests 2001 D.G. Dombek D.K. Ahrent R.D. Bond I.L. Eldridge ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Division of Agriculture University of Arkansas December 2001 Research Series 489

More information

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida 2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida Libbie Johnson and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2017 field corn small plot replicated variety trial (OVT) and large plot demonstration

More information

GEORGIA Soybean, Sorghum Grain and Silage, and Summer Annual Forages Performance Tests. J. LaDon Day, Anton E. Coy and John D.

GEORGIA Soybean, Sorghum Grain and Silage, and Summer Annual Forages Performance Tests. J. LaDon Day, Anton E. Coy and John D. The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations Annual Publication 103-3 College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences December 2011 The University of Georgia Reviewed December 2014 GEORGIA 2011 Soybean,

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season:

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season: 2017-2018 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2017-2018 soft red winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Tenton,

More information

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center General Trial Information Investigator: Daniel A Ball Title: Professor Affiliation: Columbia Basin Ag. Research Postal Code: 97801 E-mail: daniel.ball@oregonstate.edu Trial Location City: Pendleton Trial

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 007 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

Missouri Soybean Facts

Missouri Soybean Facts Missouri Soybean Facts $1,929,659,800: Five-year average value of Missouri soybean production between 2006 and 2010 a Top Soybean Production Regions, 2010 a Rank United States Rank Missouri Counties 1

More information

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2015

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2015 VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2015 David Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Billy Taylor, & Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 657-6450

More information

G E O R G I A Soybean, Sorghum Grain and Silage, Summer Annual Forages, and Sunflower Performance Tests

G E O R G I A Soybean, Sorghum Grain and Silage, Summer Annual Forages, and Sunflower Performance Tests The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations Annual Publication 103-2 College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences December 2010 The University of Georgia G E O R G I A 2010 Soybean, Sorghum Grain

More information

Weather conditions in May were relatively dry, and affected activation of the PRE herbicides.

Weather conditions in May were relatively dry, and affected activation of the PRE herbicides. 1 Soybean Herbicide Standards Trial (S0933) A field study was initiated near Clay Center, Nebraska to compare weed control programs. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications.

More information

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015 Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015 Behnken, Lisa M., Fritz R. Breitenbach, Dillon Welter and Brent Breitenbach The objective of this trial was to evaluate

More information

December Purdue Corn and Soybean Performance Trials

December Purdue Corn and Soybean Performance Trials December 2014 2014 Purdue Corn and Soybean Performance Trials Department of Agronomy Agricultural Research Programs Purdue Univeristy West Lafayette, IN CORN TABLE OF CONTENTS Corn Hybrid Performance and

More information

Soybean Variety Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research & Development Division

Soybean Variety Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research & Development Division 2015 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Research & Development Division Table of Contents General & Growing Season Information. 1 Growing Season Information & Data Interpretation. 2 Acknowledgements.

More information

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2016 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / SureStart Early-Season Test SOIL

More information

Triticale and Rye Forage

Triticale and Rye Forage Brand-Variety 12/21/15 1/20/16 2/19/16 3/11/16 3/31/16 2016 2-Yr Avg -------------------------------------------- lb/acre -------------------------------------------- Triticale 154 1143 556 1460 2200 1154

More information

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2010

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2010 VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2010 David L. Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Patsy Lewis, & Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 657

More information

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Behnken, Lisa M., Fritz R. Breitenbach, Ryan P. Miller and Kira Stearns The objective of this trial was

More information

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials C253 Revised Annually 2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials Agricultural Experiment Station South Dakota State University U.S. Department of Agriculture This report is available on the World-Wide-Web

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / SureStart, Callisto

More information

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012 A3868 Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012 Shawn Conley, Adam Roth, John Gaska, and Mark Martinka The Wisconsin Winter Wheat Performance Tests are conducted each year to give growers information

More information

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial. Evaluation of the performance of Halex GT compared to other glyphosate and conventional herbicide programs in field corn at Rochester, MN, in 2007. Behnken, Lisa M., Fritz R. Breitenbach, Ryan P. Miller,

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017 Page 26 revised data as of Nov. 29, 2017. Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017 Quality Factors 1 Dry Matter Yield Milk Production

More information

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2017

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2017 VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2017 David Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Billy Taylor, Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 807-6541

More information

Virginia Tech Corn Silage Testing 2010

Virginia Tech Corn Silage Testing 2010 Virginia Tech Corn Silage Testing 2010 2010 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 3011-1518 Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of race, color,

More information

Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee

Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION Soybean Disease Ratings for Frogeye Leaf Spot, SDS & Stem Canker with Yields Maturity Group V (Late) 2003 Trial ID: 03SBFE5L Investigator: Dr. Melvin Newman Crop

More information

Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance Results

Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance Results South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange SDSU Extension Circulars SDSU Extension 12-2006 Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance

More information

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 Erik B.G. Feibert, Clinton C. Shock, Peter Sexton, Lamont D. Saunders, and Rhonda Bafus Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon Introduction

More information

Arkansas Soybean. Performance Tests. D.G. Dombek D.K. Ahrent R.D. Bond I.L. Eldridge ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

Arkansas Soybean. Performance Tests. D.G. Dombek D.K. Ahrent R.D. Bond I.L. Eldridge ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Arkansas Soybean Performance Tests 2002 D.G. Dombek D.K. Ahrent R.D. Bond I.L. Eldridge ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Division of Agriculture University of Arkansas December 2002 Research Series

More information

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1 Tifton, Georgia: Average Average Rank Wt Ht Lodg. Survival Date Horizon 201 139.9 132.2 1 155.9 30.5 54 0 100 04/11 Horizon 270 128.8 119.4 4 138.0 32.2 42 0 100 04/13 Plot Spike LA9339 124.4 115.5 9 127.3

More information

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton. 11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton. Trial ID: C18 2009 Location: Macon County Study Director: Stanley Culpepper Investigator: Stanley Culpepper

More information

WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS 2018

WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS 2018 WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS 2018 Crop Sciences Special Report 2018-01 Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois July 2018 WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS - 2018 Crop Sciences Special

More information

Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri

Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center Pengyin Chen University of Missouri Facility Improvement With New Challenges New Cold Storage With New Challenges The Master and Legend Pengyin Chen Chenpe@missouri.edu

More information

LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE

LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE 2004 Minnesota Hybrid Corn Performance Trials Tom Hoverstad, Dale Hicks, George Nelson, and Steve Quiring (University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station) Results of the Minnesota Corn Hybrid

More information

Lancaster Farming Readers. Read each edition each week for 1 hour & 39 minutes Take 3.2 days to complete reading each edition

Lancaster Farming Readers. Read each edition each week for 1 hour & 39 minutes Take 3.2 days to complete reading each edition 2017 F.I.R.S.T. Corn Report - Pa. Pennsylvania Southeast [ PASE ] ELVERSON Dave Mast, Chester County, PA 19520 PREV. CROP/HERB: Soybean / glyphosate SOIL DESCRIPTION: All-Season Test SOIL CONDITION: No-till,

More information

Virginia Soybean Variety Evaluation Tests 2004

Virginia Soybean Variety Evaluation Tests 2004 Virginia Soybean Evaluation Tests 2004 Virginia Soybean Evaluation Tests 2004 David L. Holshouser, Soybean Specialist, Virginia Tech Michael Ellis, Agricultural Technician, Virginia Tech Patsy Lewis,

More information

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011 1 CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 211 TEST 1 of 2 Test Name and Location: Corn Rootworm Small Plot Assay, Throckmorton-Purdue Agricultural Center, Lafayette, IN. Cooperator: Christian Krupke/Larry

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 111 Title: Corn - Soybean - Wheat Response to Rotation: Nrate Experiment: 09CSW Trial ID: 5950 Year: 2015 Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn, Location: Supported By: Site Information Field:

More information

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida 2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida Libbie Johnson and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2015 field corn small plot replicated variety trial (OVT) and large plot demonstration

More information

Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A

Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A bstract Spring wheat breeding lines from the Oregon State University (OSU) and other regional breeding

More information

PROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS

PROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS PROJECT TITLE: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Dr. Michael Giroux, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: mgiroux@montana.edu Phone: (406) 994-7877 Andy Hogg, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: ahogg@montana.edu

More information

SOYBEAN Iowa Crop Performance Tests Department of Agronomy

SOYBEAN Iowa Crop Performance Tests Department of Agronomy SOYBEAN Iowa Crop Performance Tests Department of Agronomy A summary of replicated research by Iowa Crop Improvement Association, Iowa s Official Variety Trials. Iowa Crop Improvement Association Iowa

More information

2000 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Tables Methods Web site Feature: Yield Lodging Maturity date Location of the 2000 Kentucky Soybean Tests

2000 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Tables Methods Web site Feature: Yield Lodging Maturity date Location of the 2000 Kentucky Soybean Tests 1. Location, Planting, and Climatic Data for the Soybean Performance Tests...2 2. Soybean Planting Guide...3 3. Company Disease-Resistance Specifications...6 4. Summary: Variety Test Tables 5-10...8 5.

More information

SOYBEAN Iowa Crop Performance Tests. Department of Agronomy

SOYBEAN Iowa Crop Performance Tests. Department of Agronomy SOYBEAN 2017 Iowa Crop Performance Tests Department of Agronomy A summary of replicated research by Iowa Crop Improvement Association, Iowa s Official Variety Trials. Iowa Crop Improvement Association

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 22 Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, P.J. Flannery, and K.D. Kohn Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity Experiment: 01 Growth and Development

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025 2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Surpass, atrazine, Impact SOIL

More information

Test Weight. Plant Height**

Test Weight. Plant Height** Introduction In ten short years sunflowers have become an important crop in eastern Colorado with acreage surpassing a record 300,000 acres in 1999 and a crop value of over $30 million. Statewide, sunflowers

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 006 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

2003 Maryland Corn Hybrid Performance Tests

2003 Maryland Corn Hybrid Performance Tests Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture? H.J. Patterson Hall College Park, MD 20742? (301) 405-6241? FAX (301) 314-9041 Agronomy Facts No. 54 Revised November 2003 2003 Maryland

More information

North Georgia Region

North Georgia Region North Georgia Region Short-Season Corn Performance, 2010, Nonirrigated s/ DeKalb DKC64-69(GENVT3P) 117.5.. 0.29 1.5 20.9 24612 99 NK N77P3000GT 103.8 129.7. 98 0.25 1.5 18.7 24285 DeKalb DKC62-97(GENVT3P)

More information