Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Varietal Trials Results, January 2007"

Transcription

1 Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists annually conduct these tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties. Companies are charged a fee for each variety they enter and these fees partially cover the costs of conducting these tests. One of the stipulations of the testing program is that the company is marketing or intends to begin marketing the variety in the next growing season. The 2006 growing season was drier than normal early then adequate moisture occurred during pod filling. It was also warmer than normal in The locations in the northern zone were affected to a greater degree than locations in the southern zone. In contrast to 2004 even the latest recommended varieties matured. Tables 1 to 3 present data from the regular public and private variety tests that are conducted annually at various locations within the northern, central and southern production zones. The map shows test locations and zone boundaries. All of these tests were planted between May 4 and June 6 at planting rates of 160,000 plants/acre. Herbicides were used as necessary for good weed control. Row spacings were 30 inches at Becker and Jackson and 10 inches at other locations. Plot combines were used to harvest the plots. The 2005 data from Becker were not included due to a late season hailstorm. Table 4 provides results of the very early (northern Minnesota) Minnesota Variety tests. These locations were added to provide data for environments not represented by the other location tests. Tables 4 to 7 provide results from specific tests of available Roundup Ready varieties adapted to the far northern, northern, central, and southern production zones. Data from 2005 from Becker was not included due to a late season hailstorm. Tables 8 and 9 provide results from the special performance tests of soybean cyst nematode resistant varieties in infested field sites near Lamberton, Waseca, and Otisco in the southern zone; and Gaylord, Atwater and Hector in the central zone. Non-infested field sites were located near Lamberton, Jackson, and Waseca in the southern zone and Morris, Becker and Rosemount in the central zones. Planting techniques were the same as the regular performance tests. Tables 10 to 12 provide performance and characteristics data from special-use soybean variety tests. These tests were conducted to provide reliable data for growers who are interested in producing these types of soybeans, which are typically grown under contract. Table 13 provides important variety characteristics of publicly developed varieties entered in the 2006 tests. To better understand and use the data provided in these tables, please read the following additional information very carefully. Relative Maturity and Calendar Dates of Maturity Soybeans respond to changing day length, so the actual calendar date of maturity achievement is affected 54 by latitude. Each variety has a narrow range of north-south adaptation. Soybean yield and quality are assured if a variety arrives at physiological maturity before a season ending freeze occurs. This date is determined visually by noting the actual date when 95 percent of the pods show their genetically programmed mature color. These dates for 2006 are provided in the tables. Harvest dates are typically 7 to 14 days later, depending upon drying conditions. Relative maturity ratings are also provided for each variety. These ratings consist of a number for the maturity group designation (000, 00, 0, 1, 2) followed by a decimal and another number, ranging from 0-9, which indicates a ranking within each maturity group. For example the variety MN0302 indicated as 0.3, making it an early group 0 variety, while MN0901, with a 0.9 rating, is the latest. These values for public varieties are developed after observing them for several years in many locations. Relative maturity ratings for private varieties in these tables were provided by their owners, and were developed in a similar manner. Yield Because maturity is a very important attribute, varieties are arranged in the tables in order of their actual 2006 calendar date of maturity and not yield performance. Later-maturing varieties can usually be expected to have higher yields than earlier maturing types. If you wish to correctly compare yields, do so only between varieties with similar calendar dates of maturity, usually within 3 to 5 days. More reliable comparisons can be made using variety yields from several consecutive years. All yield determinations were made from replicated tests harvested with a plot combine.

2 Roseau Thief River Falls Crookston Shelly Moorhead Grand Rapids Northern Zone Morris Central Becker Atwater Zone Hector Rosemount Gaylord Lamberton Waseca Otisco Jackson Madelia Hayward Soybean maturity zones. Far Northern Zone Southern Zone In 2006 the yield information is presented as a percent of the mean of the test. The actual mean value is given at the bottom of each table. Values over 100 indicate the variety had a yield greater than the mean while those less than 100 have a yield less than the mean. LSD values associated with data in these tables are measures of variability within the trials. The LSD values are given on the percent of mean data not the actual yields. If a yield difference between two varieties within a single column exceeds this LSD value you can assume that the higher-yielding variety was truly better yielding. A 20% level of significance is used in all tables, which means that yield differences exceeding the stated LSD value are real 80% of the time. Chlorosis These ratings are based on how much of the leaf area was yellowing in tests conducted on high-lime (high ph) soils near Granite Falls in Comparing chlorosis scores of varieties permits you to estimate how well they perform relative to each other. Actual chlorosis ratings can vary depending on the specific site and year of test. Specific scores and evaluation dates from the 2006 tests are provided at the web site Sometimes chlorosis tolerance is described with numerical scores rather than word descriptors. These systems are compared below. Numerical Score Word Description 1-5 scale 1-9 scale Rating 1to2 1to2.5 Tolerant(T) 2.1 to to 5 Moderately Tolerant (MT) 3.1 to to 7.5 Moderately Susceptible (MS) 4.1 to to 9 Susceptible (S) Protein and Oil Protein and oil values were determined from mature seed using near infrared reflectance analysis equipment. The table values are for the 2006 season only. The protein and oil information is presented on a percent of the mean of the test. The actual mean values are given at the bottom of each table. Values over 100 indicate the protein and/or oil contents of the variety were greater than the mean value while those less than 100 have protein and/or oil contents less than the mean. Absolute values of protein and oil can vary from year to year. The mean protein and oil values are expressed on a 13% moisture basis. This formula converts the protein and oil values to another moisture basis: 100-desired moisture x The value of an acre of soybeans can be calculated by multiplying the APV by the yield in bushels per acre. Phytophthora Phytophthora root rot can cause significant yield reductions if susceptible varieties are planted in poorly drained, infested fields. There are several known races of this fungus, so it is important to know which are present in your field. Genes can be incorporated into varieties to provide resistance to specific races of this disease. Some published information refers to Phytophthora tolerance or field resistance, which is not race specific and should not be confused with race-specific resistance. Reliable tests for tolerance have not yet been developed. Data tables in this report indicate which Phytophthora gene or genes is/are present in each variety. An N indicates the information was either not provided by the entering company or not verified by greenhouse evaluation. The above listing tells you which resistance genes provide resistance to the various races. Soybean Cyst Nematode Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) was first identified in Minnesota in 1978 and is now known to occur in many Minnesota counties where the soybean is grown. Both the area of infestation and numbers of nematodes per unit of soil appear to be increasing. Several races of this pest are known to occur in Minnesota. When SCN numbers are high, significant yield losses can occur. Rotations to non-host crops and planting of resistant varieties can assist in reducing nematode populations as well as reducing its impact on yield. Yield performance of susceptible (S), and resistant (R) varieties planted in infested and non-infested fields in central and southern Minnesota are provided in tables 8 and 9. Genes for resistance to various races of Phytophthora root rot. Gene Races Rps1,1a Rps1b Rps1c Rps1k Rps3 Rps4 Rps6 87 protein or oil value given in the table The value of a bushel of soybeans (APV) based on its oil and protein content can be calculated by: APV = 60 [Po (X) + Pm (Y)].44 Where: APV = Approximate value of a bushel of soybeans Po = soybean oil price (in $ per pound) Pm = price of 44% meal (in $ per pound)* X = oil content at 13% moisture (in decimals) Y = protein content at 13% moisture (in decimals) And: * price of meal $/ton = $/pound 2,000 The value of an acre of soybeans can be calculated by multiplying the APV by the yield in bushels per acre

3 For proper management of fields with SCN it is recommended that varieties with an R rating be planted. If the SCN population numbers are relatively low (<3000) a variety with an MR rating might be considered. Even though SCN reproduction is less on MS-rated varieties than S-rated varieties, for practical purposes these varieties should not be considered for planting in fields where SCN is present and being managed. Management information is available from this web site, or from the Minnesota Soybean Research and Promotion Council, 360 Pierce Avenue, Suite 110, North Mankato, MN 56003, , web site White Mold White mold, also known as Sclerotinia stem rot, develops in infested fields when high relative humidity and moderate temperatures occur during soybean flowering. Planting less susceptible varieties in wider row spacings or at lower populations is the most effective method of reducing white mold severity. Accurate ratings for soybean variety resistance to white mold are difficult to obtain because both infection and disease development are dependent on weather conditions. Because of this variability, a variety s performance can change significantly among locations and years depending on the interaction of plant development, precipitation, relative humidity, and temperature. White mold severity also tends to be greater if lodging occurs. Growers concerned about variety performance in the presence of white mold should select varieties that show consistently less white mold during several years of testing. Brown Stem Rot Brown stem rot (BSR) is a fungal disease that can cause yield losses in certain situations. The disease occurs most frequently when soybeans follow soybeans but can occur where soybeans are planted every other year. Resistant varieties, or longer rotations, assist in the management of this disease. MN0304, MN0902CN, MN1302, Freeborn, IA1006, and IA2008R are available public varieties with resistance to BSR. Gold Country 8716RR, SOI 0574RR, SOI 1540RR, SOI 1430RR, SOI 1534RR, Viking 1574RR, and Viking 1776RR are privately developed varieties reported to be resistant to BSR. Some information refers to tolerance or field resistance. Reliable tests for tolerance or field resistance have not yet been developed. Special Use Varieties There continues to be increased interest in producing soybeans with special characteristics important to specialty food product manufacturers. Soybean scientists previously developed some of these special-use varieties, which were general releases, but more recently varieties have been released under exclusive or nonexclusive licenses to specific companies who then contract with growers for production. For further information contact MCIA at web site and telephone number Brand Names Versus Variety Names Brand names and variety names are different and are meant to be used for different purposes. Brand names refer to the seed source or, i.e. the person labeling and selling the seed. Brand does not refer to the genetic makeup of the seed. Variety names refer to the genetic makeup of seed and they may only refer to a specific genetic makeup. Plant breeders are constantly improving varieties but whenever the genetic makeup is changed a new variety is created and it must have a new variety name. The rate at which new varieties are being developed has dramatically increased in recent years. Branding is a useful way for companies to market products without having to constantly redo the identification and promotional information they offer. If a farmer wishes to spread risk by planting products with different genetic makeup, the variety name must be used to determine if two products are truly different. Relying on a brand name alone to make this determination may not result in different varieties being planted. Contact addresses and brand names for varieties entered in Advantage Brand Soybean Seed (Advantage) Highway 22, Good Thunder, MN Adv@myclearwave.net Garst Seed Company th St Box 500, Slater, IA GO-GARST Albert Lea Seed House (Viking) P.O. Box, 127, 1414 W. Main, Albert Lea, MN brian@alseed.com Anderson Seeds (Anderson) County Rd 63, St. Peter, MN njandrsn@myclearwave.net Bluestem Farm Supply LLC th St, Mountain Lake, MN ericksonlee@earthlink.net Dairyland Seed Co., Inc. (Dairyland) 3570 Hwy H, P.O. Box 958, West Bend, WI Dyna-Gro (Dyna-Gro) 104 Harrison, Emmetsburg, IA al.schmitz@uap.com SunOpta-Earthwise (Earthwise) th Ave S., Moorhead, MN Jay.rehder@sunopta.com Farm Advantage 1275 Hwy 69, Belmond, IA jmeints@kalnet.com Gold Country Seed, (GCS) Hwy. 15 N, P.O. Box 604, Hutchinson, MN dschwartz@goldcountryseed.com Hyland Seeds (Hyland) 2 Hyland Drive, Blenheim, Ontario, Canada NOP1A0 jolmsted@hylandseeds.com Kaltenberg Seeds (Kaltenberg) PO Box 278, Waunakee, WI ksfseeds@chorus.net Kruger Seed Company (Kruger) th Ave., Box A, Dike, IA info@krugerseeds.com Latham Farms (Latham) th St., Alexander, IA markg@lathamseeds.com KSC/Challenger (KSC/Challenger) th Ave., Box A, Dike, IA info@krugerseeds.com Latham Seed Company (Latham) th St., Alexander, IA markg@lathamseeds.com

4 Contact addresses and brand names for varieties entered in 2006 (continued). Legend Seeds (Legend) PO Box 241,De Smet, SD LG Seeds (LG Seeds) N th St, River Falls, WI Monsanto (Asgrow/Dekalb) 800 N. Lindberg Blvd, St. Louis, MO Mustang Seeds (Mustang) PO Box 466, Madison, SD Northland Seed & Grain Corp (Northland Organic Foods Corp.) 495 Portland Ave, St Paul, MN North Star Genetics PO Box 40, Wanamingo, MN Nutech Seed (Nutech Seed) 6131 North Fork Rd, Ames, IA NK Brand Seed ( NK) 7500 Olson Memorial Highway, Golden Valley, MN gary.prescher@syngenta.com Peterson Farm Seed (PFS) th Ave SE, Harwood, ND jerad@greatsoybeans.com Pioneer HiBred International, Inc. (Pioneer) 99 Navaho Ave. Suite 101A, Mankato MN alan.scott@pioneer.com Prairie Brand Research (PBR) 15 X Ave., Story City, IA mike@prairiebrandseed.com Prairie Brand Seed Company (Prairie Brand) 15 X Ave., Story City, IA mike@prairiebrandseed.com Proseed (Proseed) 705 E Brewster, Harvey, ND proseed@ndak.net Renk Seed Co. (Renk) 6800 Wilburn Rd., Sun Prairie, WI arenk@renkseed.com Richland Organics (Richland Organics) 100N 10th St, Breckenridge, MN andy@richlandorganics.com Sand Seed Service, Inc. (Sands) PO Box 648, Marcus, IA soi@midlands.net Sansgaard Seed Farms, Inc. (Sansgaard) 15 X Avenue, Story City, IA mike@prairiebrandseed.com Seeds 2000 (Seeds 2000) PO Box 200, Breckenridge, MN info@seeds2000.net Sodak Genetics (Sodak Genetics) Box 2207A, SDSU, Brookings, SD neal.toster@sdstate.edu Star Brand Researc (Star) PO Box 648, Marcus IA soi@midlands.net Syngenta Seeds (NK Brand) Anna Lake Rd, Underwood, MN jay.stroh@syngenta.com gary.prescher@syngenta.com Terning Seeds (Terning) th st SW, Cokato, MN dterning@hotmail.com Thompson Seeds (Thompson Seeds) th Ave. (Thompson), Leland, IA Thunder Seed (Thunder) th St. N, Hawley, MN mpetermann@yahoo.com Trelay Seeds (Trelay) State Road 80, Livingston, WI jasonb@trelay.com Wensman Seed Company (Wensman) P.O. Box 190, Wadena, MN wensman@wensmanseed.com Ziller Seed Co., Inc. (Ziller) th St, Bird Island, MN zscsales@zillerseed.com Table 1. Performance and characteristics of public and private soybean varieties, northern zone; Crookston, Moorhead and Shelly, MN0071 Minn.AES Rps1 4.3 Bravado Earthwise S 3.9 Atwood Earthwise S 4.0 Traill N.D. AES Rps1 3.5 Jim N.D. AES S 3.9 Colibri Earthwise S 3.9 MN0101 Minn.AES Rps1 4.0 MN0105 Minn.AES Rps1c 4.3 MN0304 Minn.AES Rps1k 3.6 MN0201 Minn.AES Rps1 3.8 Kamichis Earthwise S 4.6 MN0302 Minn.AES Rps1k 4.0 Lambert Minn.AES Rps1 4.0 Mean bu/a 44.2 bu/a 43.9 bu/a 34.1% 19.1% LSD 20% 5% 6% 6% Table 2. Performance and characteristics of public and private soybean varieties, central zone; Becker, Morris and Rosemount, MN0302 Minn. AES Rps1k 2.6 Lambert Minn. AES Rps1 3.1 Panther Earthwise S 3.7 MN1005 Minn. AES Rps1k 3.6 MN1009 Minn. AES Rps1k 3.1 Kato Minn. AES Rps1 2.8 MN1302 Minn. AES Rps1k 3.5 MN1410 Minn. AES Rps1k

5 Table 2. Performance and characteristics of public and private soybean varieties, central zone; Becker, Morris and Rosemount, (continued). NT-140 NuTech S 3.6 Minori Earthwise Rps1k 3.8 MN1401 Minn. AES Rps1 3.0 NT-176 NuTech S 3.7 Parker Minn. AES Rps1 3.6 Mean bu/a 55.3 bu/a 45.8 bu/a 37.4% 16.6% LSD 20% 4% 6% 8% Table 3. Performance and characteristics of public and private soybean varieties, southern zone; Jackson, Lamberton and Waseca, Surge Minn. & S.D AES Rps1 4.0 MN1302 Minn. AES Rps1k 3.6 Parker Minn. AES Rps1 4.5 MN1410 Minn. AES Rps1k 4.4 IA1006 Iowa AES S 4.2 MN1801 Minn. AES Rps1c 4.4 IA1008 Iowa AES S 4.1 IA2050 Iowa AES S 4.4 NT-211 NuTech S 4.3 NT-222 NuTech S 4.4 NT-242 SCN NuTech S CN Viking S 3.8 NT-233 NuTech S 3.9 IA2008R Iowa AES Rps1k 4.1 L2400 Brand Latham S 4.4 Mean bu/a 58.8 bu/a 53.3 bu/a 35.3% 17.8% LSD 20% 5% 6% 7% Table 4. Performance and characteristics of conventional and Roundup Ready public and private soybean varieties, far northern zone; Crookston, Roseau and Thief River Falls, K-003RR KSC/Challenger S 3.7 NS0011RR NorthStar Genetics S B04 Dyna-Gro Rps1k 3.3 NS0041RR NorthStar Genetics S 3.4 MN0071 Minn.AES Rps1 3.9 Jim N.D. AES S 3.6 NT-0066RR NuTech Rps1k RR PFS Rps1k 3.7 Kamichis Earthwise S RR Gold Country Rps1k RR Thunder Rps6 3.7 LS0036RR Legend S 3.0 W20051RR Wensman Rps1k 3.3 PB-00425RR Prairie Brand Rps1k 3.2 K-006RR Kruger Rps1k 3.6 S00-K5 NK Brand Rps1c 3.9 DSR-C900/RR Dairyland S 3.7 AG00603 Asgrow Rps1 3.2 Colibri Earthwise S 3.8 W20074RR Wensman Rps1k 3.3 K-007RR KSC/Challenger Rps1k 3.3 K-005RR KSC/Challenger S 3.5 RR50-04 Proseed Rps1k RR PFS Rps1k

6 Table 4. Performance and characteristics of conventional and Roundup Ready public and private soybean varieties, far northern zone; Crookston, Roseau and Thief River Falls, (con t) RR PFS Rps1k 3.0 EXP5007ARR Monsanto Rps1k 3.5 W20091RR Wensman Rps1k 3.3 PB-00736RR PBR S 3.8 NT-0055RR NuTech S 3.6 RR60-06 Proseed Rps1k 3.4 PB-00576RR PBR S 3.5 NS0031RR NorthStar Genetics S A06 Dyna-Gro Rps1k 3.1 RR Ramsey Hyland Seeds S RR Thunder Rps1k 3.6 RR50-07 Proseed Rps1k 3.7 PB-00845RR Prairie Brand S 3.6 M-0096RR Mustang Rps RR Thunder Rps6 3.5 RR60-05 Proseed S 3.8 PB-00645RR Prairie Brand S RR Thunder Rps6 3.8 PB-00965RR Prairie Brand S M09 Dyna-Gro S 3.6 DSR-C700/RRSTS Dairyland S 3.9 LS0065RR Legend Rps1k 3.4 T-0090RR Thompson Seeds S RR PFS S 3.8 K-009+RR Kruger S 3.5 W20092RR Wensman S 3.3 Traill N.D. AES Rps1 3.4 Atwood Earthwise S 3.9 K-008RR Kruger S 3.3 S01-T5 NK Brand Rps1c 4.1 RG200 RoughRider Genetics S 3.6 M-0087RR Mustang Rps6 4.0 RR Royal Hyland Seeds S RR Garst Seed S 3.7 MN0101 Minn.AES Rps1 3.8 NT-0220RR NuTech Rps1k 4.1 NT-0088RR NuTech S 3.9 DSR-C800/RR Dairyland S M20 Pioneer Brand Rps1k 4.0 Bravado Earthwise S 4.6 MK0205 Richland Organics S 3.2 T-0252+RR Thompson Seeds S M01 Pioneer Brand Rps1k 3.4 NS0021RR NorthStar Genetics Rps1k 4.2 Mean bu/a 42.7 bu/a 49.5 bu/a 34.7% 18.4% LSD 20% 5% 6% 8% Table 5. Performance and characteristics of Roundup Ready soybean varieties, northern zone; Crookston, Moorhead and Shelly, K-003RR KSC/Challenger S 3.5 NS0011RR NorthStar Genetics S 2.8 LS0094RR Legend Rps1 4.3 W20051RR Wensman Rps1k 3.2 K-006RR Kruger Rps1k 2.9 W20091RR Wensman Rps1k M01 Pioneer Brand Rps1k 3.3 K-007RR KSC/Challenger Rps1k

7 Table 5. Performance and characteristics of Roundup Ready soybean varieties, northern zone; Crookston, Moorhead and Shelly, (continued). 0081RR Seeds Rps1k 3.4 PB-00845RR Prairie Brand Rps1k Thunder Rps6 3.3 K-005RR KSC/Challenger S 3.5 NS0031RR NorthStar Genetics S F02 Dyna-Gro S 3.6 PB-00965RR Prairie Brand S 3.5 K-009+RR Kruger S 3.6 DKB Dekalb Rps1k 3.8 W20092RR Wensman S RR Thunder S 3.7 RR Ridgeway Hyland Seeds S 3.6 RG200 Rough Rider Genetics Rps1 3.4 LS0255RR Legend S 3.4 RR Royal Hyland Seeds S 3.6 K-008RR Kruger S 3.3 DSR-0501/RRSTS Dairyland S M20 Pioneer Brand Rps1k 3.5 RR50-30 Proseed Rps1k RR Garst Seed S 3.9 RR60-20 Proseed S 3.9 AG0301 Asgrow Rps1k RR Garst Seed S K02 Dyna-Gro Rps1k 4.0 PB-0216RR PBR Rps1k 4.0 PB-0554RR Prairie Brand S RR PFS Rps6 3.8 RR Reliant Hyland Seeds S 3.7 M-036RR Mustang Rps1 3.9 RS035RR Renk Seed S 3.7 T-0304RR Thompson Seeds S 3.9 SOI0660RR Sands of Iowa Rps1k 3.3 DSR-0401/RR Dairyland S 3.8 DST05-000/RR Dairyland S 3.9 T-0525RR Thompson Seeds S 3.4 NS0062RR NorthStar Genetics S 3.5 RR Rugged Hyland Seeds S 4.2 PB-0436RR PBR Rps RR Thunder Rps6 3.9 W2030RR Wensman Rps1 3.1 RR60-40 Proseed Rps1 3.2 M-047RR Mustang Rps RR Thunder S T03 Dyna-Gro Rps1 3.3 NT-0660RR NuTech S 3.5 NT-0636RR NuTech S 3.9 NS0021RR NorthStar Genetics Rps1k 3.8 PB-0636RR PBR S 4.0 NT-0330RR NuTech Rps1 3.4 DSR-0701/RR Dairyland Rps1k 3.5 T-0701RR Thompson Seeds Rps1k 3.8 K-042RR Kruger Rps1 3.0 T-0706RR Thompson Seeds Rps1c 3.4 MN0401RR Minn. A.E.S Rps RR PFS Rps1k RR Gold Country Rps1 3.0 PB-0356RR PBR Rps1 3.6 AG0604 Asgrow Rps1k 4.0 SOI0547RR Sands of Iowa S 4.2 MN0305RR Minnesota A.E.S Rps1k

8 Table 5. Performance and characteristics of Roundup Ready soybean varieties, northern zone; Crookston, Moorhead and Shelly, (continued). or Brand Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Gene ScoreSOI0766RR Sands of Iowa S 3.3 SOI0579RR Sands of Iowa Rps RR PFS S 3.7 RR20-40 Proseed Rps1k 4.3 NT-0616RR NuTech Rps1 3.8 PB-0565RR Prairie Brand S RR Garst Seed S 3.8 MN0206RR Minnesota A.E.S Rps1k 4.0 Mean bu/a 49.4 bu/a 49.1bu/a 32.8% 19.2% LSD 20% 5% 6% 8% Table 6. Performance and characteristics of Roundup Ready soybean varieties, central zone; Becker, Rosemount and Morris, AG0604 Asgrow Rps1k 3.8 RR Reliant Hyland Seeds S Farm Advantage S 4.0 DSR-0903/RR Dairyland S 3.8 NS0810RR NorthStar Genetics S 3.8 K-042RR Kruger Rps1 3.1 PB-0636RR PBR S 3.3 RS076RR Renk Seed Rps1 3.8 PB-0796RR PBR Rps1c 2.8 K-072RR Kruger S 3.9 RR40-70 Proseed Rps N05 Dyna-Gro S 3.3 DSR-0902/RRSTS Dairyland Rps1k 3.3 K-056RR KSC/Challenger Rps RR Thunder Rps1k 3.8 PB-0923RR Prairie Brand Rps1k 4.2 RR Richwood Hyland Seeds S 3.5 RR50-90 Proseed S 3.8 K-086RR KSC/Challenger S 3.5 NS0911RR NorthStar Genetics Rps1k 3.4 RR60-95 Proseed Rps1c 2.8 PB-0954RR PBR S 3.9 MN0904RR Minn. AES Rps1k RR Seeds S 3.8 RR50-91 Proseed Rps1k 3.7 SD1092RR Sodak Genetics Rps1k 3.5 MN0401RR Minn. AES Rps1 3.6 PB-0856RR PBR Rps1k RR Gold Country S 3.8 W2108RR Wensman S 3.6 PB-0936RR Prairie Brand S 3.3 TS5099RR Terning Seeds Rps6 3.4 W2090RR Wensman S 3.9 SOI0969RR Sands of Iowa Rps1k 3.7 AG1002 Asgrow Rps1c Farm Advantage S 3.4 K-157RR KSC/Challenger Rps1k 3.3 RG405RR RoughRider Genetics Rps6 3.9 M-096RR Mustang Rps D11 Dyna-Gro S 3.4 M-097RR Mustang Rps1c 2.6 K-120RR KSC/Challenger Rps1k 3.7 T-0990RR Thompson Seeds S 3.5 S12-P4 NK Brand Rps1c

9 Table 6. Performance and characteristics of Roundup Ready soybean varieties, central zone; Becker, Rosemount and Morris, (continued). 91M30 Pioneer Brand Rps1k 3.5 SD1111RR Sodak Genetics Rps Trelay Rps1c 3.2 RS124NRR Renk Seed Rps1k 3.3 W2121RR Wensman Rps1c M51 Pioneer Brand Rps1k 3.5 K-156RR Kruger Rps1k 3.8 XR1460 NK Brand Rps1k RR Seeds Rps1k RR Thunder Rps1k RR Thunder Rps1k 3.2 C1401RR LG Seeds Rps1k 3.7 M-095RR Mustang Rps6 3.8 DSR-1500/RRSTS Dairyland S 3.9 BT7156NR Ziller S 3.1 KB135RR Kaltenberg Rps1c 4.3 BT7124R Ziller Rps1k Farm Advantage Rps1k Trelay Rps1k RR Gold Country Rps1k 3.8 PB-1256RR Prairie Brand S 3.6 RS115RR Renk Seed Rps1k 3.9 M-115RR Mustang S 3.4 DSR-1301/RR Dairyland S G14 Dyna-Gro Rps1k 3.4 NT-1127RR NuTech Rps1k RR Viking Rps1c 3.4 SOI1534RR Sands of Iowa Rps1k 3.6 NS1311RR NorthStar Genetics S 3.6 SOI1430RR Sands of Iowa Rps1k 3.3 NT-1330RR NuTech Rps1k Farm Advantage Rps1k 3.8 K-100RR Kruger Rps1k 3.8 TS5104RR Terning Seeds Rps1k 3.5 RR Rockport Hyland Seeds S 3.6 W2142RR Wensman Rps1k 3.6 NT-1514RR/SCN NuTech S 3.3 S15-E3 NK Brand S M61 Pioneer Brand Rps1kRps6 3.5 TS5156NRR Terning Seeds Rps6 3.3 KB155RR Kaltenberg Rps1k 3.8 NT-1400RR NuTech Rps1k 3.5 L1553R Brand Latham Rps1k 3.4 MN1504RR Minn. AES Rps1k 3.9 RS156RR Renk Seed Rps1k 3.7 PB-1525RR Prairie Brand Rps1k 3.9 T-1717RR/SCN Thompson Seeds Rps1k 3.6 T-1777RR Thompson Seeds Rps1k 3.4 SOI1540RR Sands of Iowa S 3.9 NS1120RR NorthStar Genetics Rps1k 3.7 T-1766RR Thompson Seeds S RR Thunder Rps1k 3.6 Mean bu/a 54.4 bu/a 50.8 bu/a 34.7% 18.4% LSD 20% 6% 7% 8% 62

10 Table 7. Performance and characteristics of Roundup Ready soybean varieties, southern zone; Jackson, Lamberton and Waseca, AG1602 Asgrow Rps1k 3.7 BT7156NR Ziller S CNR Anderson Seeds S 3.2 SD1151RR Sodak Genetics Rps1k 4.0 ADV171EX Advantage S 3.5 MN1504RR Minn AES Rps1k 4.0 DKB18-51 Dekalb Rps1k 3.6 M-176RR Mustang Rps1 3.7 AG1702 Asgrow Rps1k 4.0 C1661NRR LG Seeds S 3.1 W2163RR Wensman Rps1 3.6 RS166NRR Renk Seed S 3.6 ADV1550CR Advantage Premium S CNR Anderson Seeds Rps1k RR Gold Country Rps1k R17 Dyna-Gro Rps1k 3.5 PB-1725RR PBR Rps1k 3.6 DSR-1520/RR Dairyland S N Farm Advantage Rps1c Trelay Rps1k 3.6 S19-R5 NK Brand Rps M01 Pioneer Brand S 3.6 TS5200NRR Terning Seeds Rps1k 3.6 ADV2020CR Advantage Premium Rps1k 3.2 PB-1954RR PBR Rps1 3.7 PB-1885NRR Prairie Brand Rps1k 3.7 K-195+RR/SCN Kruger Rps1k 3.3 K-188RR/SCN Kruger Rps1k 3.4 MN1803RR Minn. AES Rps1 3.7 DKB20-52 Dekalb ADV1740CR Advantage Premium Rps1k RR Viking Rps1k 3.4 K-177RR KSC/Challenger Rps1k 3.7 PB-2056NRR PBR Rps1c 3.6 N23-Z3 NK Brand Rps M33 Pioneer Brand S 3.9 PB-2183NRR Prairie Brand Rps1k CNR Anderson Seeds Rps1k 3.1 NT-1991RR NuTech Rps1k 4.3 DSR-199/RRSTS Dairyland Rps1k 3.8 M-207RR Mustang Rps1k 3.8 RS204NRR Renk Seed Rps1k 3.5 ADV1916 Advantage Premium Rps1k 3.4 E1950R Latham Rps1k N Farm Advantage Rps1k M02 Pioneer Brand Rps1k 3.8 DKB22-52 Dekalb Rps1c 3.1 PB-1916RR Sansgaard Rps1k RR Viking Rps1k 3.6 KB206RR Kaltenberg Rps1k Trelay Rps1k 3.1 S21-N6 NK Brand Rps1k 3.4 K-194RR KSC/Challenger Rps1k 3.9 S23-H2 NK Brand Rps1 3.8 RS223RR Renk Seed Rps1k B38 Pioneer S 3.7 K-210RR/SCN KSC/Challenger Rps1k 4.0 DSR-1701/RRSTS Dairyland S 3.8 E2253R Latham Rps1 4.0 KB187RR Kaltenberg S

11 Table 7. Performance and characteristics of Roundup Ready soybean varieties, southern zone; Jackson, Lamberton and Waseca, (continued). SOI2141ARR Sands of Iowa S 3.7 NT-7205+RR NuTech Rps1k 3.5 K-234RR Kruger S 3.5 RS185RR Renk Seed S 3.2 T-2213RR Thompson Seeds Rps1 3.5 M-227RR Mustang Rps C23 Dyna-Gro Rps Farm Advantage S M32 Pioneer Brand Rps1k Farm Advantage Rps1 4.2 KB236RR Kaltenberg S 3.8 PB-2236NRR PBR Rps1k 3.2 ADV2214R Advantage Rps1k 3.2 PB-2243RR Prairie Brand Rps1k 3.5 PB-2141RR Prairie Brand Rps1k 3.2 BT7227NR Ziller Rps1k 3.6 NT-2121RR/SCN NuTech Rps1k 3.7 C2159RR LG Seeds Rps1 3.6 E2337R Latham S P22 Dyna-Gro Rps1k 3.3 DSR-234/RR Dairyland Rps1k 4.1 SOI2143RR Sands of Iowa Rps1k 3.6 ADV2260CR Advantage Rps1 3.3 W2226RR Wensman Rps1 3.7 T-2444RR/SCN Thompson Seeds S 3.5 T-2220+RR Thompson Seeds S 3.5 W2253RR Wensman Rps1c 3.7 K-235RR/SCN Kruger Rps1c 3.8 T-2424RR/SCN Thompson Seeds S 3.8 PB-2216RR Sansgaard S 4.3 ADV2135R Advantage Rps1k 3.6 K-237RR/SCN KSC/Challenger Rps1c 3.5 NT-2232RR NuTech Rps1 3.7 SOI2442 Sands of Iowa Rps1 4.1 Mean bu/a 62.8 bu/a 54.6 bu/a 34.3% 18.0% LSD 20% 5% 7% 8% Table 8. Performance and characteristics of soybean varieties, central zone; at soybean-cystnematode infested (Atwater, Gaylord, & Hector) and non-infested (Becker, Morris and Rosemount) sites, Yield, Percent of Mean Phytoph- Variety Maturity Infested Sites Non-infested Sites Percent of Mean Maturity thora Chlorosis SCN or Brand Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Gene Score Rating S08-M8 NK Brand S 4.1 R Lambert Minn. AES Rps1 3.0 S AG0803 Asgrow Rps1k 3.3 R MN1011CN Minn. AES Rps1 2.2 R MN0902CN Minn. AES S 2.8 R PB-0885NRR Prairie Brand Rps1k 3.3 R Surge Minn.& S.D. AES Rps1 3.1 S MN0602CN Minn. AES N 2.5 R MN0904RR Minn. AES Rps1k 3.6 R XR1561 NK Brand Rps1k 3.4 R XR1563 NK Brand S 3.3 R 91M61 Pioneer Brand Rps1c 3.3 R T-1303RR/STS Thompson Seeds S 2.8 R NT-1514RR/SCN NuTech S 3.4 R S15-E3 NK Brand S 4.2 R 1824RR/N Garst Seed Rps1c 3.2 R 64

12 Table 8. Performance and characteristics of soybean varieties, central zone; at soybean-cystnematode infested (Atwater, Gaylord, & Hector) and non-infested (Becker, Morris and Rosemount) sites, (continued). Table 9. Performance and characteristics of soybean varieties, southern zone; at soybean-cyst nematode-infested (Hayward, Lamberton, Madelia, Otisco and Waseca) and non-infested (Jackson, Lamberton, and Waseca) Sites, Yield, Percent of Mean Phytoph- Variety Maturity Infested Sites Non-infested Sites Percent of Mean Maturity thora Chlorosis SCN or Brand Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Gene Score Rating M-177NRR Mustang Rps1k 3.7 R T-1717RR/SCN Thompson Seeds Rps1k 3.2 R MN1410 Minn. AES Rps1k 3.4 S 6714NRR Gold Country S 3.4 R PB-1585NRR Prairie Brand S 3.4 R K-166RR/SCN Kruger S 3.5 R Parker Minn. AES Rps1 4.1 S PB-1694NRR Prairie Brand Rps1c 3.1 R T-7193RR/SCN Thompson Seeds Rps1k 3.4 R K-188RR/SCN Kruger Rps1k 3.8 R PB-1885NRR Prairie Brand Rps1k 3.4 R NT-1413RR/SCN NuTech Rps1 2.9 R K-146RR/SCN Kruger Rps1c 3.1 R T-1817RR/SCN Thompson Seeds Rps1c 3.6 R AG2002 Asgrow Rps1c 3.9 R NT-1888RR/SCN NuTech S 4.3 R NT-1808RR/SCN NuTech Rps1c 3.9 R Mean bu/a 43.1 bu/a 37.9 bu/a 51.0 bu/a 56.9 bu/a 51.0 bu/a 37.1% 16.8% LSD 20% 6% 7% 8% 6% 7% 8% Yield, Percent of Mean Phytoph- Variety Maturity Infested Sites Non-infested Sites Percent of Mean Maturity thora Chlorosis SCN or Brand Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Gene Score Rating MN1011CN Minn. AES Rps1 2.8 R AG1402 Asgrow Rps1k 2.8 R MN1302 Minn. AES Rps1k 4.1 S K-166RR/SCN Kruger S 3.8 R Freeborn Minn. AES Rps1 3.8 R Parker Minn. AES Rps1 3.8 S 2156 Trelay S 3.6 R 152CNR Anderson Seeds N 3.4 R S15-E3 NK Brand S 4.3 R SOI1771NRR Sands of Iowa N 3.7 R MN1410 Minn. AES Rps1k 3.4 S W2168NRR Wensman S 3.6 R 1974N Garst Seed S 3.0 R IA1008 Iowa AES S 4.2 R K-188RR/SCN Kruger Rps1k 3.3 R 181CNR Anderson Seeds Rps1k 3.5 R PB-1885NRR Prairie Brand Rps1k 3.3 R S19-L7 NK Brand S 3.4 R E2085R Latham Rps1c 4.0 R K-195+RR/SCN Kruger Rps1k 3.3 R SOI1874NRR Sands of Iowa Rps1k 3.8 R W2172NRR Wensman Rps1k 3.3 R 1908CNRR Viking S 3.3 R 92M01 Pioneer Brand S 4.6 R 2717NRR Gold Country Rps1k 3.4 R PB-1936NRR Prairie Brand Rps1c 3.4 R 191CNR Anderson Seeds Rps1k 3.4 R 33X19 Dyna-Gro Rps1k 3.3 R 65

13 Table 9. Performance and characteristics of soybean varieties, southern zone; at soybean-cyst nematode-infested (Hayward, Lamberton, Madelia, Otisco and Waseca) and non-infested (Jackson, Lamberton, and Waseca) Sites, (continued). Yield, Percent of Mean Phytoph- Variety Maturity Infested Sites Non-infested Sites Percent of Mean Maturity thora Chlorosis SCN or Brand Originator Date Protein Oil Rating Gene Score Rating SOI2151NRR Sands of Iowa Rps1k 3.5 R W2195NRR Wensman Rps1k 2.9 R NT-2222RR/SCN NuTech Rps1k 3.2 R PB-2183NRR Prairie Brand Rps1k 3.3 R M-194NRR Mustang Rps1k 3.4 R AG2107 Asgrow N 3.3 R NT-1808RR/SCN NuTech Rps1c 4.0 R T-7193RR/SCN Thompson Seeds Rps1k 3.3 R 2202 Trelay Rps1k 3.0 R W2200NRR Wensman Rps1c 4.3 R M-217NRR Mustang Rps1c 3.3 R 92M33 Pioneer Brand S 3.4 R PB-2056NRR PBR Rps1c 4.1 R 1938CBR Viking Rps1k 3.8 R 1978CBR Viking Rps1c 4.0 R IA2050 Iowa AES S 3.4 S E2158R Latham Rps1k 3.1 R K-210RR/SCN KSC/Challenger Rps1k 3.9 R NT-2121RR/SCN NuTech Rps1k 3.8 R IA2068 Iowa AES S 3.2 R S22-F5 NK Brand Rps1 3.3 R K-227RR/SCN KSC/Challenger Rps1c 4.2 R 34K22 Dyna-Gro Rps1k 3.3 R K-222RR/SCN KSC/Challenger Rps1k 3.8 R PB-2316NRR PBR Rps1k 3.7 R IA2068 (SCN) Iowa AES S 3.4 R 92M40 Pioneer Brand Rps1c 4.3 R E2283R Latham Rps1k 3.1 R M-246NRR Mustang Rps6 4.2 R PB-2236NRR PBR Rps1k 4.2 R 2251RR/N Garst Seed S 3.0 R Turner S.D. AES S 4.0 R 31D20 Dyna-Gro Rps1c 2.9 R SOI2467NRR Sands of Iowa Rps1c 3.8 R NT-2324RR/SCN NuTech Rps1c 3.3 R T-2444RR/SCN Thompson Seeds S 3.0 R M-247NRR Mustang Rps6 3.5 R T-2444aRR/SCN Thompson Seeds S 3.8 R K-235RR/SCN Kruger Rps1c 3.4 R K-237RR/SCN KSC/Challenger Rps1c 4.3 S T-2424RR/SCN Thompson Seeds S 3.0 R Mean bu/a 47.0 bu/a 41.4 bu/a 58.8 bu/a 63.5 bu/a 56.4 bu/a 35.0% 17.3% LSD 20% 6% 7% 9% 5% 6% 8% Table 10a. Characteristics of special-use soybean varieties, north zone; Crookston, Moorhead and Shelly, Variety Maturity Special Hilum Phytophthora Chlorosis or Brand Originator Rating Characteristics Color Gene Score Seeds/Lb. MN0071 Minn.AES 00.7 General Purpose Brown Rps ,892 Bravado Earthwise 00.8 Food Yellow S 3.9 3,266 Atwood Earthwise 00.6 Food Yellow S 4.0 2,752 Traill N.D. AES 0.0 General Purpose Yellow Rps ,702 Jim N.D. AES 00.8 General Purpose Yellow S 3.9 2,640 MN0082SP Minn.AES 00.8 Small Seed Yellow Rps ,394 Colibri Earthwise 00.3 Food Yellow S 4.2 6,486 MN0101 Minn.AES 0.1 General Purpose Yellow Rps ,603 66

14 Table 10a. Characteristics of special-use soybean varieties, north zone; Crookston, Moorhead and Shelly, 2006 (continued). Variety Maturity Special Hilum Phytophthora Chlorosis or Brand Originator Rating Characteristics Color Gene Score Seeds/Lb. MN0105 Minn.AES 0.1 General Purpose Yellow Rps1c 3.9 2,735 MN0103SP Minn.AES 0.1 Small Seed Yellow Rps ,989 MN0202SP Minn. AES 0.2 Small Seed Yellow Rps ,882 UM3 Minn. AES 00.9 Small Seed Yellow Rps ,821 MN0304 Minn.AES 0.3 General Purpose Imperfect Black Rps1k 3.6 2,580 MN0201 Minn.AES 0.2 General Purpose Yellow Rps ,910 MK0205 Richland Organics 0.1 Small Seed Yellow S 3.7 4,830 Bygland Gold Country 0.3 Food Yellow Rps ,735 Nannonatto N.D. AES 0.3 Small Seed Yellow Rps ,880 Kamichis Earthwise 00.3 Food Yellow S 4.7 2,441 Norpro N.D. AES 0.4 Higher Protein Yellow S 4.3 2,536 MK0649 Richland Organics 0.3 Small Seed Yellow S 3.9 4,989 MN0306SP Minn.AES 0.3 Lipoxygenase Null Black Rps ,281 MN0303SP Minn. AES 0.3 Small Seed Yellow Rps ,935 MN0302 Minn.AES 0.3 General Purpose Buff Rps1k 4.0 2,702 MN0102SP Minn.AES 0.1 Small Seed Yellow Rps ,633 Lambert Minn.AES 0.8 General Purpose Buff Rps ,580 Table 10b. Performance of special-use soybean varieties, northern zone; Crookston, Moorhead and Shelly, Variety Maturity Yield, Percent of Mean Percent of Mean or Brand Originator Date Protein Oil MN0071 Minn.AES Bravado Earthwise Atwood Earthwise Traill N.D. AES Jim N.D. AES MN0082SP Minn.AES Colibri Earthwise MN0101 Minn.AES MN0105 Minn.AES MN0103SP Minn.AES MN0202SP Minn. AES UM3 Minn. AES MN0304 Minn.AES MN0201 Minn.AES MK0205 Richland Organics Bygland Gold Country Nannonatto N.D. AES Kamichis Earthwise Norpro N.D. AES MK0649 Richland Organics MN0306SP Minn.AES MN0303SP Minn. AES MN0302 Minn.AES MN0102SP Minn.AES Lambert Minn.AES Mean bu/a 41.8 bu/a 43.6 bu/a 34.2% 18.7% LSD 20% 5% 7% 10% 67

Varietal Trials Results January 2008

Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Soybean Jim Orf, Seth Naeve, Phil Schaus and Art Killam Minnesota Experiment Station scientists conduct tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties annually.

More information

Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam

Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Soybean J.H. Orf, S.L. Naeve, P.J. Schaus and A. Killam Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Each year Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists conduct tests of adapted public and private

More information

SOYBEAN. Soybean maturity zones. Far Northern. Zone. Northern. Zone. Central. Zone. Southern. Zone. Roseau Kennedy Thief River Falls

SOYBEAN. Soybean maturity zones. Far Northern. Zone. Northern. Zone. Central. Zone. Southern. Zone. Roseau Kennedy Thief River Falls Each year Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists conduct tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties. Companies are charged a fee for each variety they enter; these fees partially

More information

To better understand and use the data provided in these tables, please read the following additional information very carefully:

To better understand and use the data provided in these tables, please read the following additional information very carefully: Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists annually conduct these tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties. Companies are charged a fee for each variety they enter and these fees

More information

SOYBEAN. Soybean Maturity Zones.

SOYBEAN. Soybean Maturity Zones. Northern Central Southern Soybean Maturity Zones. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists annually conduct these tests of adapted public and private soybean varieties. Companies are charged

More information

LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE

LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE 2004 Minnesota Hybrid Corn Performance Trials Tom Hoverstad, Dale Hicks, George Nelson, and Steve Quiring (University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station) Results of the Minnesota Corn Hybrid

More information

2014 Soybean Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Soybean Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Each year Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station scientists conduct

More information

Wilson Genetics, LLC, P.O. Box 391, Harlan IA 51537

Wilson Genetics, LLC, P.O. Box 391, Harlan IA 51537 The Minnesota Corn Hybrid Evaluation Program is conducted by the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station to provide unbiased information for use by corn growers when they choose hybrids

More information

Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003

Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003 107 Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003 R. Jay Goos and Brian Johnson, Department of Soil Science, NDSU, Fargo, ND 58105 e-mail: rj.goos@ndsu.nodak.edu Field studies were

More information

Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance Results

Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance Results South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange SDSU Extension Circulars SDSU Extension 12-2006 Soybeans: 2006 Crop Performance

More information

2017 Corn Grain Field Crop Trials Results

2017 Corn Grain Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences The Minnesota Corn Evaluation Program was conducted by the University

More information

Corn Grain T.R. Hoverstad, D.R. Hicks, G.A. Nelson and S.R. Quiring Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

Corn Grain T.R. Hoverstad, D.R. Hicks, G.A. Nelson and S.R. Quiring Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Corn Grain T.R. Hoverstad, D.R. Hicks, G.A. Nelson and S.R. Quiring Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 The Minnesota Corn Hybrid Evaluation Program is conducted by the University of Minnesota Agricultural

More information

CORN GRAIN. Test zones, locations and maturities are: Companies participating in the 2000 hybrid corn grain trials.

CORN GRAIN. Test zones, locations and maturities are: Companies participating in the 2000 hybrid corn grain trials. Test zones, locations and maturities are: Southern Zone: Lamberton, Waseca, and Plainview. Early Maturity Trial - 105 Relative Maturity (RM) and earlier. Late Maturity Trial - 110 and 115 RM. Central Zone:

More information

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Matthew Hankinson, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION

More information

Varietal Trials Results January 2011

Varietal Trials Results January 2011 Varietal Trials Results January 2011 Corn Grain Tom Hoverstad, Jeff Coulter, George Nelson, Steve Quiring and Mark Hanson Corn Planting Rate and Date Bushel Weight, Pounds...56 Planting Rate, Seeds/Acre...33,000

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 006 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

Soybeans Iowa Crop Performance Test. Iowa Crop Improvement Association

Soybeans Iowa Crop Performance Test. Iowa Crop Improvement Association 2007 Iowa Crop Performance Test Soybeans Photo by Rich Pope, Corn and Soybean Initiative location (see Table 1). Planting-time soybean cyst nematode egg counts at all locations were less than 1,000 eggs

More information

2013 MINNESOTA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

2013 MINNESOTA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS 2013 MINNESOTA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS Prepared by Tom Hoverstad, Matt Bickell, Jeff Coulter, George Nelson, Steve Quiring and Mark Hanson University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Minnesota

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 007 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials

2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials 2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials Prepared by: Tom Hoverstad, Matt Bickell, Jeff Coulter, George Nelson, Steve Quiring and Mark Hanson University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Results

More information

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Spring wheat varieties are compared in trial plots at Waseca, Lamberton, Morris, Crookston, Stephen,

More information

Varietal Trials Results

Varietal Trials Results Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Wheat, Hard Red Spring Jim Anderson, Jochum Wiersma, Gary Linkert, Catherine Springer and Susan Reynolds differ for their response to each of those diseases, the rating

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] TRACY Brian Hicks, Lyon County, MN 56175 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Harness, Halex GT Early-Season Test

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.5-1.8 Top 30 of 42 S2017MNSCa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee 1992 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Conducted in 1989-91 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE This organization is made up of representatives

More information

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Extension Series No. E-10-2 November, 2010 2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences NYS

More information

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 Erik B.G. Feibert, Clinton C. Shock, Peter Sexton, Lamont D. Saunders, and Rhonda Bafus Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon Introduction

More information

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT The 2011 Shelby County State Bank Corn Plot was a replicated trial with each variety planted three times. Each variety had six rows and the rows were approximately

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WABASSO Leon Plaetz, Redwood County, MN 56293

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WABASSO Leon Plaetz, Redwood County, MN 56293 2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WABASSO Leon Plaetz, Redwood County, MN 56293 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / TripleFlex, atrazine, Laudis,

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South [ MNSO ] JEFFERS Rick Quade, Cottonwood County, MN 56083 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / SureStart Early-Season Test SOIL

More information

Canola P.M. Porter and D.G. LeGare Varietal Trials Results, January 2006

Canola P.M. Porter and D.G. LeGare Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Canola P.M. Porter and D.G. LeGare Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Canola (Brassica napus and B. rapa) is a crop developed from oilseed rape by Canadian plant breeders; the first canola variety was

More information

2000 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Tables Methods Web site Feature: Yield Lodging Maturity date Location of the 2000 Kentucky Soybean Tests

2000 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Tables Methods Web site Feature: Yield Lodging Maturity date Location of the 2000 Kentucky Soybean Tests 1. Location, Planting, and Climatic Data for the Soybean Performance Tests...2 2. Soybean Planting Guide...3 3. Company Disease-Resistance Specifications...6 4. Summary: Variety Test Tables 5-10...8 5.

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South [ MNSO ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South [ MNSO ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Minnesota South [ MNSO ] Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.6-1.9 Top 30 of 48 S2017MNSOa For Gross Income (Sorted by Yield),

More information

North Dakota Corn Hybrid Trial Results for 2015

North Dakota Corn Hybrid Trial Results for 2015 A793-15 North Dakota Corn Hybrid Trial Results for 2015 Joel Ransom and Grant Mehring (NDSU Main Station); Blaine Schatz, Mike Ostlie and Tim Indergaard (Carrington Research Extension Center); Bryan Hanson,

More information

2003 UNIFORM SOYBEAN TESTS REGIONAL SUMMARIES

2003 UNIFORM SOYBEAN TESTS REGIONAL SUMMARIES 2003 UNIFORM SOYBEAN TESTS REGIONAL SUMMARIES Data Complied by: Wad D. Crochet Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907-1150 Office phone 765-583-2952 FAX 765-496-3452

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.3-2.7 Top 30 of 45 S2017IASCa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa South Central [ IASC ] ANAMOSA Jim & Jeremy Baker, Linn County, IA 52205 Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Roundup, atrazine,

More information

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University   Web: Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org First of of all, all, let s let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Genetic modification of corn has been

More information

Selecting Hybrids Wisely

Selecting Hybrids Wisely First of of all, let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org Genetic modification of corn has been occurring

More information

Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee

Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION Soybean Disease Ratings for Frogeye Leaf Spot, SDS & Stem Canker with Yields Maturity Group V (Late) 2003 Trial ID: 03SBFE5L Investigator: Dr. Melvin Newman Crop

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa South Central [ IASC ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. CCB, Inc., Elizabeth, IL Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.3-2.7 Top 30 of 45 S2018IASCa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

OILSEED CROPS CANOLA. Canola Variety Name Changes. Canola Planting Rate and Date

OILSEED CROPS CANOLA. Canola Variety Name Changes. Canola Planting Rate and Date OILSEED CROPS Canola (Brassica napus and B. rapa) is a crop developed from oilseed rape by Canadian plant breeders; the first canola variety was licensed in 1974. Canola is used for edible oil extraction

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North Central [ IANC ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North Central [ IANC ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North Central [ IANC ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.1-2.5 Top 30 of 60 S2018IANCa For Gross Income

More information

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.1-2.4 Top 30 of 54 S2017IANWa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ]

2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] 2017 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.7-2.1 Top 30 of 54 S2017IANOa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results 01 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 2.1-2.4 Top 30 of 54 S2018IANWa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

Company Brand Variety Herb Trait MG SCN PRR Seed Trt Hilum Color Agventure 38E8LL LL C CMXVI BL Agventure 38H4R RR 3.

Company Brand Variety Herb Trait MG SCN PRR Seed Trt Hilum Color Agventure 38E8LL LL C CMXVI BL Agventure 38H4R RR 3. Company Brand Variety Herb Trait MG 1 2 3 4 5 SCN PRR Seed Trt Hilum Color Agventure 38E8LL LL 3.8 4 5 2 C CMXVI BL Agventure 38H4R RR 3.8 4 5 0 U CMXVI BL Agventure 38W5X RRX 3.8 4 5 0 C CMXVI Ib Agventure

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Iowa North [ IANO ] Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA Early-Season Test Maturity Group 1.7-2.1 Top 30 of 60 S2018IANOa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

1998 Crop Performance Trials: Corn

1998 Crop Performance Trials: Corn South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Agricultural Experiment Station Circulars SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station

More information

Corn Yield Trials 2012

Corn Yield Trials 2012 Corn Trials 2012 Central Lakes College Agricultural & Energy Center Central Lakes College 1830 Airport Rd. Staples MN 56479 218-894-5160 Date Planted: May 2, 2012 Tillage: Fall plowed, spring disked, 1x

More information

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013 Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013 Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 331 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station William Batchelor, Director Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, November

More information

2017 SOYBEAN VARIETY GUIDE

2017 SOYBEAN VARIETY GUIDE 2017 SOYBEAN VARIETY GUIDE This publication features the results from MPSG-sponsored trials. Contents of this publication can only be reproduced with the permission of MPSG. KEY FOR SOYBEAN VARIETY TABLES

More information

CORN BRAND DEMONSTRATION REPORT Central Lakes College Agricultural and Energy Center *** LISTED AS PLANTED ***

CORN BRAND DEMONSTRATION REPORT Central Lakes College Agricultural and Energy Center *** LISTED AS PLANTED *** Date Planted: May 5 & 6, 2014 Previous Crop: Corn Date Harvested: October 28 & 29, 2014 Tillage: Spring plowed, spring disked, 1x Starter Fertilizer: 35-15-35-10 at 175#/acre Irrigated: 5.1" Linear System

More information

Table 10. South Central Zone - Late Maturity Grain Trial. (page 1 of 2)

Table 10. South Central Zone - Late Maturity Grain Trial. (page 1 of 2) Table 10. South Central Zone - Late Maturity Grain Trial. (page 1 of 2) 101 DAY RELATIVE MATURITY OR LATER, BASED ON COMPANY RATING (FOND DU LAC = FON, GALESVILLE = GAL, HANCOCK = HAN) Yield P.I. Moist

More information

Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri

Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center Pengyin Chen University of Missouri Facility Improvement With New Challenges New Cold Storage With New Challenges The Master and Legend Pengyin Chen Chenpe@missouri.edu

More information

2015 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2015 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

2017 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2017 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

2005 Precision Planted Performance Trials

2005 Precision Planted Performance Trials C 253 Revised Annually 2005 Precision Planted Performance Trials South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service U.S. Department of Agriculture The crop performance trials are available at

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Corvus Early-Season Test SOIL

More information

FUNDED BY GROWERS FOR GROWERS SMALL PLOT AND FIELD SCALE DATA

FUNDED BY GROWERS FOR GROWERS SMALL PLOT AND FIELD SCALE DATA FUNDED BY GROWERS FOR GROWERS SMALL PLOT AND FIELD SCALE DATA For more information visit canolaperformancetrials.ca THE NEXT GENERATION IN VARIETY EVALUATION Canola Performance Trials (CPT) represent the

More information

2017 South Dakota Conventional Soybean Variety Trial Results

2017 South Dakota Conventional Soybean Variety Trial Results Beresford Location: Cooperator: Soil Type: Fertilizer: Previous crop: Tillage: Row spacing: Seeding Rate: Herbicide: Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Production Associate Kevin Kirby Agricultural

More information

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Table 1. Corn Hybrid Performance for Silage, Combined Sites (Adair and Mason counties), KY, 2010 Beck's 5675 HXR 22.9 3380 27000 0.81 0.55 7.4 21 37

More information

North Dakota Corn Hybrid Trial Results for 2014

North Dakota Corn Hybrid Trial Results for 2014 A793-14 North Dakota Corn Hybrid Trial Results for 2014 Joel Ransom and Grant Mehring (NDSU Main Station); Blaine Schatz, Mike Ostlie and Tim Indergaard (Carrington Research Extension Center); Bryan Hanson,

More information

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126

2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126 2016 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] IOWA FALLS Mike Aldinger, Hardin County, IA 50126 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / SureStart, Callisto

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy 2013-2014 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2013-2014 wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Humboldt,

More information

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2017

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2017 A supplement to Iowa Farmer Today. Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2017 View of the northeast Iowa location. Gregory L. Tylka, Gregory D. Gebhart, Christopher

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025 2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Tom Andresen, Ida County, IA 51025 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Surpass, atrazine, Impact SOIL

More information

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN INDIANA, 2005

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN INDIANA, 2005 Bulletin Number B-17835 December 2005 SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN INDIANA, 2005 Department of Agronomy Agricultural Research Programs Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana Contents Introduction... 3 Performance

More information

1999 Crop Performance Trials: Corn

1999 Crop Performance Trials: Corn South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Agricultural Experiment Station Circulars SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station

More information

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM.................................................... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA.............................................. 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES............................

More information

PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL DENT CORN HYBRIDS IN INDIANA, 2001

PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL DENT CORN HYBRIDS IN INDIANA, 2001 November 2001 Bulletin No. B-806 PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL DENT CORN HYBRIDS IN INDIANA, 2001 Department of Agronomy Agricultural Research Programs Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] NEW HAMPTON Mark Bruening, Chickasaw County, IA 50659

2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] NEW HAMPTON Mark Bruening, Chickasaw County, IA 50659 2018 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] NEW HAMPTON Mark Bruening, Chickasaw County, IA 50659 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Acuron, Halex GT SOIL

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North [ IANO ] OSAGE Dale Hemann, Mitchell County, IA 50461 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Acuron, atrazine SOIL DESCRIPTION:

More information

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ]

2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ] 2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. MSR, Inc., Columbia, MO Early-Season Test Maturity Group 3.2-3.8 Top 30 of 42 S2018MONOa For Gross Income (Sorted

More information

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials C253 Revised Annually 2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials Agricultural Experiment Station South Dakota State University U.S. Department of Agriculture This report is available on the World-Wide-Web

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 22 Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, P.J. Flannery, and K.D. Kohn Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity Experiment: 01 Growth and Development

More information

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... 2014 2014 CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM.................................................... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA.............................................. 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES............................

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results 2014-2015 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2014-2015 winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Auburn, Kentucky; Humboldt, Tennessee;

More information

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide NDSU EXTENSION A1105-18 North Dakota Flax Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide Hans Kandel (NDSU Main Station); Greg Endres, Mike Ostlie, Blaine Schatz and Steve Zwinger (Carrington Research

More information

1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests

1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Progress Report 394 1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests Eugene Lacefield, Charles Tutt, J.M. Wood, and Todd Pfeiffer Tables 1. Location, Planting Date, and Climatic Data for the 1996 Soybean Performance

More information

INFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS.

INFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS. 2016 PERFORMANCE TRIALS INFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS. 2016 Small Plot and Field Scale Data This version has been revised to include both small plot and field scale data. For more information visit www.canolaperformancetrials.ca

More information

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes Victor M. Green 302-275-1445 vmgreen@udel.edu Special thanks and appreciation is extended to the following people for whom this research would not have

More information

Ohio Soybean Performance Trials

Ohio Soybean Performance Trials Horticulture and Crop Science Department Ohio Soybean Performance Trials 2003 l Series 212 AGDEX 141 December 2003 OAR C L BRA DtC 9 2003 Wooster, OH 44691 T H E 01-ITO SfA1E UNIVERSITY Ohio State University

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Klint Cork, Ida County, IA 51020

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Klint Cork, Ida County, IA 51020 2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa Northwest [ IANW ] GALVA Klint Cork, Ida County, IA 51020 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Halex GT SOIL DESCRIPTION: Galva

More information

North Dakota Corn Hybrid Trial Results for 2017

North Dakota Corn Hybrid Trial Results for 2017 A793-17 North Dakota Corn Hybrid Trial Results for 2017 Joel Ransom and Darin Eisinger (NDSU Main Station); Blaine Schatz, Mike Ostlie and Tim Indergaard (Carrington Research Extension Center); Bryan Hanson,

More information

2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley Central [ RRCE ] GEORGETOWN WCD Brendemuhl Farms, Curtis Brendemuhl, Clay County, MN 56560

2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley Central [ RRCE ] GEORGETOWN WCD Brendemuhl Farms, Curtis Brendemuhl, Clay County, MN 56560 2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley Central [ RRCE ] GEORGETOWN WCD Brendemuhl Farms, Curtis Brendemuhl, Clay County, MN 56560 Test by: Northland F.I.R.S.T., LLC, Moorhead, MN PREV.

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name

More information

2004 Precision Planted Performance Trials: Corn

2004 Precision Planted Performance Trials: Corn South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Agricultural Experiment Station Circulars SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station

More information

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] WATERLOO Rottinghaus Farms, Black Hawk County, IA 50703

2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] WATERLOO Rottinghaus Farms, Black Hawk County, IA 50703 2017 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Iowa North Central [ IANC ] WATERLOO Rottinghaus Farms, Black Hawk County, IA 50703 Test by: North Iowa F.I.R.S.T., Inc, Sanborn, IA PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Corvus, atrazine,

More information

Section 4: Wheat Varieties

Section 4: Wheat Varieties Section 4: Wheat Varieties 49 Wheat trials were planted in seven-inch rows at Blackstone, Orange, Holland, Painter, and Shenandoah Valley. They were planted in six-inch rows at Blacksburg. They were planted

More information

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley Central [ RRCE ] HUNTER Henry Burchill, Cass County, ND 58048

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley Central [ RRCE ] HUNTER Henry Burchill, Cass County, ND 58048 2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Red River Valley Central [ RRCE ] HUNTER Henry Burchill, Cass County, ND 58048 Test by: Brendemuhl Seed Research, LLC, Moorhead, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Soybean / Roundup,

More information

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Md. Rasel Parvej, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech David L. Holshouser, Extension

More information

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL...

CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES TEST FIELDS GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... 2018 2018 CONTENTS TEST PROGRAM... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA... 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPARING ENTRIES... 2 2018 TEST FIELDS... 3 2018 GROWING SEASON RAINFALL... 4 SOURCES OF SEED... 4 2018 SOYBEAN VARIETIES...

More information

F.I.R.S.T. in Iowa North Central [IANC]

F.I.R.S.T. in Iowa North Central [IANC] F.I.R.S.T. in Iowa North Central [IANC] Galva Iowa Falls Klint Cork Mike Aldinger Lehigh Manchester John Crock Todd Lundgren F.I.R.S.T. in Iowa North Central [IANC] Soybean Entry List - 2008 VARIETY SCN

More information

Summary of Dryland Soybean Variety Performance at Four Locations, 2014

Summary of Dryland Soybean Variety Performance at Four Locations, 2014 Griffin 2 Midville Plains Tifton Statewide Avg Company/Brand Variety 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg ---------------------------------------------------- bu/acre ----------------------------------------------------

More information

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date). Comparison of PRE/POST and POST only Weed Control Systems in Liberty Link Soybeans at Rochester, MN, in 2011. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Adam Hazel and Bo Beyer The objective

More information

(Table 1, Continued) Grain Grain Yield: Lodging, Stay Yield, Mois- Moisture Green, Hybrid Brand bu/a ture, % Ratio Stalk Root 1 to 5 MEAN S.D. C.V.

(Table 1, Continued) Grain Grain Yield: Lodging, Stay Yield, Mois- Moisture Green, Hybrid Brand bu/a ture, % Ratio Stalk Root 1 to 5 MEAN S.D. C.V. Table 1. 2016 performance of early maturity corn hybrids evaluated at both Chazy, Clinton County, and Madrid, St. Lawrence County, in Northern New York. 182-62VT2P Channel 181.7 17.9 10.3 6 0 2.0 P7632AM

More information

2015 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

2015 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Performance Testing (CPT) Director Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Shaukat Ali SDSU Small Grains Pathologist, Brookings Kevin Kirby Ag Research

More information