Section 4: Wheat Varieties

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Section 4: Wheat Varieties"

Transcription

1 Section 4: Wheat Varieties 49 Wheat trials were planted in seven-inch rows at Blackstone, Orange, Holland, Painter, and Shenandoah Valley. They were planted in six-inch rows at Blacksburg. They were planted in seven and one-half-inch rows at the Warsaw No-Till location. All no-till locations (Holland and Warsaw No-Till) and Shenandoah Valley were planted at 28 seeds per row foot. All other locations were planted at 22 seeds per row foot. Selecting the best wheat varieties is challenging but becomes easier with adequate information on performance over multiple environments. Past seasons across Virginia have provided the opportunity to evaluate day length sensitivity, spring freeze damage, glume blotch, scab (Fusarium head blight), and general plant health. Many newer wheat varieties and lines performed well in all environments tested. The future for wheat varieties adapted to Virginia conditions is very positive. Dr. Carl Griffey, Virginia Tech's small grains breeder, has many lines starting with "VA" shown in the by- and overlocation tables that are in the top-yielding group and that display good disease resistance. The released varieties that yielded significantly higher than the statewide mean in 2013 were USG 3404, Pioneer 25R40, USG 3013, USG 3523, USG 3438, Pioneer 26R10, AgriMaxx 434, SY Harrison, SY 474, AgriMAXX 415, Steyer Hunker, USG 3251, Progeny 357, and Pioneer 26R41. SY 474, AgriMAXX 415, and USG 3251 also had test weight that was significantly higher than the mean of all lines tested. Average yield of all lines tested in was 74 bu/ac. USG 3251 had the highest two-year average yield. USG 3612, USG 3438, Shirley, and Pioneer 26R41 all had grain yield significantly above the mean over the 2012 and 2013 harvests. USG 3251 also had test weight that was significantly higher than the two-year mean of all lines tested. The twoyear average grain yield over all locations and varieties was 76 bu/ac. Producers who grow large acreages of wheat should plant two or more varieties having significantly different maturity dates in order to ensure harvest of high quality grain having high test weight and no sprouting. In Virginia it is typical for sporadic or consistent rain showers to interrupt harvest. These wetting and drying cycles and subsequent delays and significantly reduce grain test weight and quality. Growers can circumvent this problem by planting varieties that differ significantly in maturity. Early maturing varieties often can be harvested first and prior to significant rain showers, and later maturing varieties harvested subsequently will suffer less damage and losses in test weight and quality due to exposure to such a rain event.

2 Summary of wheat management practices for the 2013 harvest season (All rates are given on a per acre basis.) 50 Blacksburg - Planted September 24, Preplant fertilizer was September 21, Site was sprayed with.75 oz Harmony Extra SG on November 30, Site was fertilized with 45 lb N plus 0.6 oz Harmony Extra SG on February 21, 2013 and with 60 lb N on March 22, Harvest occurred July 10, Blackstone - Planted October 19, Preplant fertilizer was 300 lb on October 17, Site was top-dressed with 60 lb N using on February 6, 2013 and again on March 22, Site was sprayed with 4 oz Harmony Extra SG on February 6, Harvest occurred July 9, Warsaw - Planted no-till October 12, Preplant fertilizer was applied October 11, 2012 after one ton of lime was applied on October 2, Site was fertilized using at 25 lb on December 14, 2012 and at 50 lb using on March 10, Site was treated with 1.5 qt Brandt EDTA Zinc (9% chelated zinc) on March 15, Site was treated with 6.5 oz Starane and.75 oz Harmony Extra SG on December 17, The fungicide-treated plots were sprayed with 4 oz Tilt on April 25, 2013 and with 8 oz Prosaro on May 2, Harvest occurred June 24-26, Painter - Planted October 23, Preplant fertilizer was 30 lb N using 30% UAN on October 22, Site was fertilized with 60 lb N using 30%UAN and 0.75 oz Harmony Extra SG March 5, Site was fertilized with 60 lb N using 30% UAN March 30, Harvest occurred June 23, Holland - Planted no-till October 22, Preplant fertilizer was 1.5 ton lime on October 12, 2012 and 300 lb on October 17, Site was sprayed with 4.75 oz Osprey December 4, Site received 60 lb N and 1.5 lb Mn plus 0.6 oz Harmony Extra SG on February 21, Site was fertilized with 60 lb N on March 15, 2013 using and 1 lb of Mn. Site was treated with 2 oz Baythroid on May 4, 2013 for cereal leaf beetle control. Harvest occurred July 10, Orange - Planted October 11, Preplant fertilizer was September 26, Sixty lb N and 0.4 oz Harmony Extra SG were applied March 15, Harvest occurred June 24-25, Shenandoah Valley - Planted on November 9, Sixty lb N were applied February 21 and March 29, Site was abandoned before harvest.

3 Table 28. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, 2013 harvest. 51 Test Date Early Leaf Powdery Barley Yellow Hessian Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Lodging 1 Rust Mildew Dwarf Virus Fly (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) Resistance (6) (5) (2) (3) (5) (1) (2) (2) (1) (Biotype) 2 Awns 3 VA10W TA USG BCDOL A Pioneer 25R O A SY BC TA USG TA AgriMAXX A Pioneer 26R BCDOL A VA11W BCD A USG N/A N/A TA USG A Progeny PGX A VA11W C A VA11W AL Steyer Hunker BCDOL TA Pioneer 26R BCDOL A SY Harrison A USG A AgriMAXX C A VA11W AL SS A USG C A Mercer Brand 11-V CO TA Featherstone VA CO TA VA10W A VA11W A VA10W TA AgriMAXX TA Progeny CDO TA VA07W-415* BCDOL TA VA11W BCDOL A

4 Table 28. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, 2013 harvest, continued. 52 Test Date Early Leaf Powdery Barley Yellow Hessian Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Lodging 1 Rust Mildew Dwarf Virus Fly (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) Resistance (6) (5) (2) (3) (5) (1) (2) (2) (1) (Biotype) 2 Awns 3 Progeny A Progeny O A VA10W TA Dyna-Gro C A USG C A Dyna-Gro TA AgriMAXX C A VA09W-73* TA Dyna-Gro O TA Steyer Heilman BCDOL TA Progeny TA Pioneer 26R A SS TA NC C TA Shirley C AL VA10W A VA11W O A SS TA AgriMAXX Exp A AgriMAXX TA ARS B A Pioneer XW11G A Steyer Pierson CDO TA Progeny TA Yorktown TA VA10W BCD A VA09W O TA Mercer Brand 12-W TA Oakes TA VA10W CD A SS CO A

5 Table 28. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, 2013 harvest, continued. 53 Test Date Early Leaf Powdery Barley Yellow Hessian Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Lodging 1 Rust Mildew Dwarf Virus Fly (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) Resistance (6) (5) (2) (3) (5) (1) (2) (2) (1) (Biotype) 2 Awns 3 USG A Progeny A USG TA VA08MAS AL VA10W BCDOL A SS CO A VA09W-188WS* O A VA11W BCDOL AL Pioneer 26R B A USG AL Pioneer 26R CO A GA E BCDOL A NC-Cape Fear TA VA11W A Mercer Brand 12-V C TA Dyna-Gro TA SS TA Mercer Brand 12-W TA VA11W-323WS AL SS A VA10W TA VA09W-75* TA MD04W A Pioneer 26R C A VA10W A VA09W TA SS A GA E A Pioneer 25R BCDOL A Merl TA

6 Table 28. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, 2013 harvest, continued. 54 Yield Test Weight Date Headed Height Lodging Early Lodging 1 Leaf Rust Powdery Mildew Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus Hessian Fly (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) Resistance (6) (5) (2) (3) (5) (1) (2) (2) (1) (Biotype) 2 Awns 3 NC-Yadkin AL NC TA VA10W BCDO A SS CO A Jamestown BCD A VA08W TA SY TA GA LE A NC AL Massey B AL Average LSD (O.05) C.V Released cultivars are shown in bold print. Varieties are ordered by descending yield averages. A plus or minus sign indicates a performance significantly above or below the test average. The 0-9 ratings indicate a genotype's response to disease or lodging, where 0 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible. The number in parentheses below column headings indicates the number of locations on which data are based. * Released line yet to be named. 1 Entries noted as lodging very early when assessed at the end of April were injured by spring freeze. 2 Seedlings of all lines were tested for resistance to biotypes B, C, D, O, and L of Hessian Fly. Letter in column indicates varietal resistance. s lacking letter were susceptible. 3 A=awned, AL=awnletted, TA=tip awned. N/A indicates that data was not available.

7 Table 29. Two year average summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Tests, 2012 and 2013 harvests. Test Date Leaf Powdery Barley Yellow Early Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rust Mildew Dwarf Virus Height 1 (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (In) (12) (11) (4) (6) (8) (4) (6) (4) (2) VA10W USG VA10W USG SS Pioneer 26R USG VA10W Featherstone VA Shirley USG Pioneer 26R SY Harrison USG VA09W-188WS* Progeny Progeny VA09W-73* AgriMAXX AgriMAXX VA07W-415* Progeny SS SS AgriMAXX Yorktown Dyna-Gro

8 Table 29. Two year average summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Tests, 2012 and 2013 harvests, continued. Test Date Leaf Powdery Barley Yellow Early Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rust Mildew Dwarf Virus Height 1 (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (In) (12) (11) (4) (6) (8) (4) (6) (4) (2) Pioneer 26R VA09W USG Progeny Mercer Brand 12-V Merl SS Dyna-Gro VA09W Progeny VA10W Oakes Dyna-Gro SS VA09W-75* Pioneer 26R NC-Cape Fear VA08MAS SS Pioneer 25R Jamestown VA10W NC-Yadkin Progeny SS Pioneer 26R

9 Table 29. Two year average summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Tests, 2012 and 2013 harvests, continued. Test Date Leaf Powdery Barley Yellow Early Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rust Mildew Dwarf Virus Height 1 (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (In) (12) (11) (4) (6) (8) (4) (6) (4) (2) Pioneer 26R SS Massey Average LSD (O.05) C.V Released cultivars are shown in bold print. The number in parentheses below column headings indicates the number of location-years on which data are based. Varieties are ordered by descending yield averages. A plus or minus sign indicates a performance significantly above or below the test average. The 0-9 ratings indicate a genotype's response to disease or lodging where 0 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible. * Released line yet to be named. 1 Early plant height, assessed in early spring when wheat begins to elongate, provides information related to photoperiod sensitivity. 57

10 Table 30. Three year average summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Tests, 2011, 2012, and 2013 harvests. Test Date Leaf Powdery Barley Yellow Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rust Mildew Dwarf Virus (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (20) (19) (8) (10) (15) (8) (10) (6) Featherstone VA VA07W-415* Pioneer 26R Shirley USG USG SS SS Dyna-Gro USG Progeny SS USG Mercer Brand 12-V VA09W-188WS* Yorktown SS VA09W Merl VA08MAS USG Pioneer 26R VA09W-73* Progeny VA10W Progeny Progeny Jamestown

11 Table 30. Three year average summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Tests, 2011, 2012, and 2013 harvests, continued. Test Date Leaf Powdery Barley Yellow Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rust Mildew Dwarf Virus (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (20) (19) (8) (10) (15) (8) (10) (6) Pioneer 25R VA09W Progeny NC-Cape Fear VA09W-75* SS Oakes SS NC-Yadkin Pioneer 26R Pioneer 26R SS Massey Average LSD (O.05) C.V Released cultivars are shown in bold print. The number in parentheses below column headings indicates the number of location-years on which data are based. Varieties are ordered by descending yield averages. A plus or minus sign indicates a performance significantly above or below the test average. The 0-9 ratings indicate a genotype's response to disease or lodging where 0 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible. * Released line yet to be named. 59

12 Table 31. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test planted No-Till at Warsaw, 2013 harvest year 2-year Test Date FHB White Glume Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rating Heads Blotch (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (%) 1 (%) 2 (0-9) USG USG Steyer Hunker AgriMAXX VA10W VA10W Pioneer 26R VA08MAS Mercer Brand 11-V Progeny SY USG AgriMAXX Progeny PGX SY Harrison AgriMAXX VA07W-415* AgriMAXX VA11W Mercer Brand 12-V USG AgriMAXX SS Pioneer XW11G USG Dyna-Gro Pioneer 26R Progeny VA10W VA09W

13 Table 31. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test planted No-Till at Warsaw, 2013 harvest, continued year 2-year Test Date FHB White Glume Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rating Heads Blotch (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (%) 1 (%) 2 (0-9) VA11W VA10W Pioneer 26R VA11W Dyna-Gro Featherstone VA USG VA09W-75* VA11W SS VA11W VA09W-73* MD04W GA E Shirley Pioneer 25R VA10W ARS NC Dyna-Gro SY VA10W Progeny Mercer Brand 12-W VA09W-188WS* NC AgriMAXX Exp VA11W-323WS VA09W VA11W Progeny

14 Table 31. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test planted No-Till at Warsaw, 2013 harvest, continued year 2-year Test Date FHB White Glume Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rating Heads Blotch (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (%) 1 (%) 2 (0-9) VA08W SS USG VA11W Pioneer 26R NC-Cape Fear Steyer Heilman Pioneer 25R VA10W Yorktown Progeny Progeny SS VA10W SS USG SS Steyer Pierson Pioneer 26R Mercer Brand 12-W USG VA11W Dyna-Gro SS SS Jamestown VA11W VA10W NC-Yadkin SS

15 Table 31. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test planted No-Till at Warsaw, 2013 harvest, continued year 2-year Test Date FHB White Glume Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rating Heads Blotch (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (%) 1 (%) 2 (0-9) Merl NC Oakes Pioneer 26R Massey GA E VA10W VA10W GA LE Average LSD (O.05) C.V Released cultivars are shown in bold print. Varieties are ordered by descending yield averages. A plus or minus sign indicates a performance significantly above or below the test average. The 0-9 ratings indicate a genotype's response to disease or lodging, where 0 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible. * Released line yet to be named. 1 Rating takes into account FHB incidence and severity on May White heads: While % of visible white heads on May 30 are predominantly due to scab, some lines also had white heads due to freeze injury or saw fly.

16 Table 32. Summary of performance of fungicide-treated entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test planted No-Till at Warsaw, 2013 harvest year Test Date FHB White Glume Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rating Heads Blotch (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (%) 1 (%) 2 (0-9) VA07W-415* USG AgriMAXX AgriMAXX AgriMAXX Steyer Hunker Progeny SS VA10W VA10W Dyna-Gro Merl Pioneer 26R USG Mercer Brand 12-V SS Progeny PGX VA09W-73* USG VA11W-323WS AgriMAXX Mercer Brand 11-V Featherstone VA USG Pioneer XW11G AgriMAXX Dyna-Gro VA09W VA11W

17 Table 32. Summary of performance of fungicide-treated entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test planted No-Till at Warsaw, 2013 harvest, continued year Test Date FHB White Glume Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rating Heads Blotch (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (%) 1 (%) 2 (0-9) Jamestown Dyna-Gro VA11W Steyer Pierson Pioneer 25R VA10W USG SY VA10W MD04W USG VA11W ARS Mercer Brand 12-W VA10W SY SY Harrison Shirley SS VA10W Progeny VA08W VA10W GA E VA10W NC Pioneer 26R USG VA10W USG

18 Table 32. Summary of performance of fungicide-treated entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test planted No-Till at Warsaw, 2013 harvest, continued year Test Date FHB White Glume Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rating Heads Blotch (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (%) 1 (%) 2 (0-9) SS VA09W Pioneer 26R VA11W VA09W-188WS* Pioneer 26R Pioneer 26R VA09W-75* VA11W NC VA11W GA E VA11W Progeny Dyna-Gro SS Progeny Yorktown AgriMAXX Exp Progeny NC-Cape Fear VA10W Progeny Oakes VA08MAS VA11W VA11W SS SS VA10W

19 Table 32. Summary of performance of fungicide-treated entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test planted No-Till at Warsaw, 2013 harvest, continued year Test Date FHB White Glume Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rating Heads Blotch (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (%) 1 (%) 2 (0-9) USG SS SS Pioneer 25R Steyer Heilman NC-Yadkin Massey GA LE Mercer Brand 12-W NC Pioneer 26R Average LSD (O.05) C.V Released cultivars are shown in bold print. Varieties are ordered by descending yield averages. A plus or minus sign indicates a performance significantly above or below the test average. The 0-9 ratings indicate a genotype's response to disease or lodging, where 0 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible. * Released line yet to be named. 1 Rating takes into account FHB incidence and severity on May White heads: While % of visible white heads on May 30 are predominantly due to scab, some lines also had white heads due to freeze injury or saw fly.

20 Table 33. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Eastern Shore AREC, Painter, VA, 2013 harvest. Test Leaf Powdery Yield Weight Rust Mildew (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (0-9) (0-9) VA10W Progeny VA10W VA07W-415* VA11W VA11W VA11W USG VA10W Pioneer 25R AgriMAXX Steyer Pierson NC VA10W Pioneer 26R USG VA10W Yorktown SS Pioneer 26R VA11W VA09W Dyna-Gro NC-Cape Fear SY Progeny PGX VA11W Mercer Brand 12-V SS Dyna-Gro Featherstone VA MD04W VA10W SS Mercer Brand 11-V ARS VA09W VA10W Oakes VA11W VA11W AgriMAXX AgriMAXX

21 Table 33. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Eastern Shore AREC, Painter, VA, 2013 harvest, continued. Test Leaf Powdery Yield Weight Rust Mildew (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (0-9) (0-9) Pioneer 26R USG USG Pioneer 26R VA10W Steyer Hunker VA09W-73* Dyna-Gro VA11W USG USG VA11W-323WS SS Shirley Jamestown USG Progeny GA E Mercer Brand 12-W Pioneer XW11G Pioneer 26R NC VA11W VA08MAS SS Progeny SS VA10W SY Harrison VA09W-188WS* VA10W VA09W-75* USG USG SY GA E AgriMAXX Exp VA10W NC-Yadkin AgriMAXX SS SS

22 Table 33. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Eastern Shore AREC, Painter, VA, 2013 harvest, continued. 70 Test Leaf Powdery Yield Weight Rust Mildew (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (0-9) (0-9) Dyna-Gro Steyer Heilman GA LE Progeny USG Progeny AgriMAXX SS Merl Mercer Brand 12-W NC VA08W Progeny Pioneer 25R Pioneer 26R Massey Average LSD (O.05) C.V Released cultivars are shown in bold print. Varieties are ordered by descending yield averages. A plus or minus sign indicates a performance significantly above or below the test average. The 0-9 ratings indicate a genotype's response to disease or lodging, where 0 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible. * Released line yet to be named.

23 Table 34. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Southern Piedmont AREC, Blackstone, VA, 2013 harvest year 2-year Test Barley Yellow Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Lodging Dwarf Virus (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (0-9) (0-9) USG VA07W-415* USG Featherstone VA SY Harrison USG Progeny VA09W-73* USG AgriMAXX VA10W Pioneer 26R AgriMAXX AgriMAXX Exp Pioneer 25R VA10W AgriMAXX VA10W Oakes USG Shirley USG SY Mercer Brand 12-W VA11W VA11W SS USG VA11W VA11W VA11W SS Steyer Pierson Pioneer 26R SS VA11W NC-Yadkin NC-Cape Fear Progeny PGX SS SS USG

24 Table 34. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Southern Piedmont AREC, Blackstone, VA, 2013 harvest, continued year 2-year Test Barley Yellow Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Lodging Dwarf Virus (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (0-9) (0-9) VA10W VA11W VA10W Progeny Pioneer 26R VA09W Progeny Dyna-Gro VA11W Pioneer 26R Mercer Brand 11-V USG VA09W Merl Pioneer 25R GA LE SS NC AgriMAXX Pioneer 26R SY VA11W-323WS Steyer Heilman AgriMAXX VA10W Dyna-Gro NC Jamestown Steyer Hunker VA10W Progeny Dyna-Gro Yorktown VA08MAS Pioneer XW11G Progeny VA11W ARS SS Mercer Brand 12-W Progeny Dyna-Gro Pioneer 26R NC

25 Table 34. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Southern Piedmont AREC, Blackstone, VA, 2013 harvest, continued year 2-year Test Barley Yellow Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Lodging Dwarf Virus (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (0-9) (0-9) USG Massey VA10W SS VA09W-75* VA10W MD04W GA E VA10W GA E VA10W VA09W-188WS* VA08W Mercer Brand 12-V SS Average LSD (O.05) C.V Released cultivars are shown in bold print. Varieties are ordered by descending yield averages. A plus or minus sign indicates a performance significantly above or below the test average. The 0-9 ratings indicate a genotype's response to disease or lodging, where 0 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible. * Released line yet to be named.

26 Table 35. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Northern Piedmont Center, Orange, VA, 2013 harvest. 3-year 2-year Test Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Height (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (In) VA10W Steyer Hunker USG USG Progeny NC Pioneer 26R USG VA11W USG VA09W-188WS* Dyna-Gro Featherstone VA ARS Dyna-Gro Progeny PGX Progeny Steyer Pierson SY Harrison Mercer Brand 11-V SS VA10W VA11W Pioneer 25R USG VA10W Oakes Pioneer 26R AgriMAXX NC SY SS Yorktown VA11W USG AgriMAXX VA09W-73* VA10W VA08W VA11W Dyna-Gro VA11W

27 Table 35. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Northern Piedmont Center, Orange, VA, 2013 harvest, continued. 3-year 2-year Test Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Height (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (In) VA11W SS VA09W Mercer Brand 12-W USG Pioneer XW11G VA10W VA10W Progeny VA10W USG AgriMAXX Exp VA11W SS AgriMAXX VA10W NC-Cape Fear USG GA E Pioneer 26R AgriMAXX USG Mercer Brand 12-V AgriMAXX Progeny Steyer Heilman VA11W Pioneer 26R SS Progeny Merl SS Pioneer 26R VA10W Progeny Dyna-Gro Shirley VA09W-75* VA10W GA LE SS VA11W

28 Table 35. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Northern Piedmont Center, Orange, VA, 2013 harvest, continued year 2-year Test Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Height (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (In) GA E VA11W-323WS Pioneer 25R NC MD04W Mercer Brand 12-W VA09W Jamestown SS VA08MAS VA07W-415* NC-Yadkin SS VA10W SY Massey Pioneer 26R Average LSD (O.05) C.V Released cultivars are shown in bold print. Varieties are ordered by descending yield averages. A plus or minus sign indicates a performance significantly above or below the test average. The 0-9 ratings indicate a genotype's response to disease or lodging, where 0 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible. * Released line yet to be named.

29 Table 36. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Kentland farm, Blacksburg, VA, 2013 harvest year 2-year Test Date Leaf Powdery Early Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rust Mildew Lodging 1 (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) Pioneer 26R Pioneer 25R USG SY VA11W SS Progeny Steyer Heilman AgriMAXX Pioneer 26R Progeny PGX VA11W Mercer Brand 12-W Progeny VA11W Progeny USG VA10W Pioneer 26R VA11W Dyna-Gro Progeny SY Harrison AgriMAXX Pioneer 26R AgriMAXX SS VA11W

30 Table 36. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Kentland farm, Blacksburg, VA, 2013 harvest, continued year 2-year Test Date Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rust (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) Leaf Powdery Early Mildew Lodging 1 (0-9) (0-9) Dyna-Gro Mercer Brand 11-V USG Steyer Hunker VA10W VA11W USG USG SS VA10W AgriMAXX VA10W GA E VA08MAS VA10W Pioneer XW11G Shirley SS VA11W USG VA10W SS GA E Progeny Pioneer 25R USG VA11W VA10W VA10W AgriMAXX

31 Table 36. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Kentland farm, Blacksburg, VA, 2013 harvest, continued year 2-year Test Date Leaf Powdery Early Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rust Mildew Lodging 1 (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) Dyna-Gro AgriMAXX Exp SS VA09W-188WS* SS Mercer Brand 12-W Pioneer 26R Dyna-Gro Oakes ARS VA10W VA11W VA09W-75* SS Merl Mercer Brand 12-V Pioneer 26R SS USG VA11W-323WS MD04W VA07W-415* VA10W NC-Yadkin Yorktown Featherstone VA VA09W-73* Progeny VA10W NC-Cape Fear VA09W

32 Table 36. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, Kentland farm, Blacksburg, VA, 2013 harvest, continued year 2-year Test Date Leaf Powdery Early Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Headed Height Lodging Rust Mildew Lodging 1 (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (Julian) (In) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) (0-9) USG SY Steyer Pierson Jamestown VA08W NC VA09W NC GA LE NC Massey Average LSD (O.05) C.V Released cultivars are shown in bold print. Varieties are ordered by descending yield averages. A plus or minus sign indicates a performance significantly above or below the test average. 1 Entries noted as lodging very early when assessed at the end of April were injured by spring freeze. The 0-9 ratings indicate a genotype's response to disease or lodging, where 0 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible. * Released line yet to be named.

33 Table 37. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, planted No-Till at Tidewater AREC, Holland, VA, 2013 harvest. 3-year 2-year Test Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Lodging (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (0-9) Progeny USG USG Pioneer 26R USG VA11W AgriMAXX SY Harrison USG USG Pioneer 25R Pioneer 26R VA11W Progeny PGX Pioneer 26R AgriMAXX Shirley SS Pioneer 26R SS Dyna-Gro SS USG VA11W Pioneer 26R SY VA11W Pioneer XW11G VA10W AgriMAXX Exp Progeny VA10W USG NC MD04W VA10W VA11W GA LE Pioneer 26R GA E VA11W SS

34 Table 37. Summary of performance of entries in the Virginia Tech Wheat Test, planted No-Till at Tidewater AREC, Holland, VA, 2013 harvest, continued. 3-year 2-year Test Average Yield Average Yield Yield Weight Lodging (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Bu/a) (Lb/bu) (0-9) SS Steyer Hunker VA11W USG VA09W SY Progeny AgriMAXX Pioneer 25R SS Progeny GA E VA10W VA11W Massey VA10W ARS Dyna-Gro SS VA11W VA10W VA08W USG Progeny NC AgriMAXX VA10W SS NC-Yadkin Oakes VA10W Progeny Jamestown VA10W VA08MAS Mercer Brand 12-W SS Merl NC-Cape Fear VA09W-188WS* VA07W-415* VA09W

Virginia Corn & Small Grain Management. Small Grains in 2007

Virginia Corn & Small Grain Management. Small Grains in 2007 Virginia Corn & Small Grain Management Small Grains in 2007 Table of Contents Recommended Small Grain Varieties... 1 Barley and Wheat Entries... 3 Introduction... 4 The Season... 4 Section 1: Barley Varieties

More information

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research 67 Section 5: Wheat Scab Research One of the primary research objectives of the Virginia Tech wheat breeding program is to identify and develop cultivars possessing resistance to Fusarium Head Blight ()

More information

Discussion of barley varieties and summary of barley management practices for the harvest season

Discussion of barley varieties and summary of barley management practices for the harvest season Small Grains in 2017 Table of Contents Recommended Small Grain Varieties... 1 Barley and Wheat Entries... 4 Introduction... 6 The Season... 6 Section 1: Barley Varieties Discussion of barley varieties

More information

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research Section 5: Wheat Scab Research One of the primary research objectives of the Virginia Tech wheat breeding program is to identify and develop cultivars possessing resistance to Fusarium Head Blight (FHB)

More information

Small Grains in 2018

Small Grains in 2018 Small Grains in 2018 2018 Virginia Tech SPES-46NP Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of age, color, disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression,

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy 2013-2014 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2013-2014 wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Humboldt,

More information

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity. Barley. Callao Callao Callao Callao. Nomini Nomini Nomini Nomini

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity. Barley. Callao Callao Callao Callao. Nomini Nomini Nomini Nomini Revised 2000 SMALL GRAINS IN 2000 The following are the small grain variety recommendations for Virginia in 2000. The recommendations are based on the agronomic performance in barley and wheat variety

More information

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Nomini Nomini Nomini Nomini

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Nomini Nomini Nomini Nomini Revised 1994 SMALL GRAINS IN 1994 The following are the small grain variety recommendations for Virginia in 1994. The recommendations are based on the agronomic performance in barley and wheat variety

More information

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Wheat

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Wheat Revised 1995 SMALL GRAINS IN 1995 The following are the small grain variety recommendations for Virginia in 1995. The recommendations are based on the agronomic performance in barley and wheat variety

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results 2014-2015 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2014-2015 winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Auburn, Kentucky; Humboldt, Tennessee;

More information

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Wheat

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Wheat Revised 1997 SMALL GRAINS IN 1997 The following are the small grain variety recommendations for Virginia in 1997. The recommendations are based on the agronomic performance in barley and wheat variety

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season:

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season: 2017-2018 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2017-2018 soft red winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Tenton,

More information

The 2016 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with.

The 2016 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with. PR-707 University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Agricultural Experiment Station 2016 Kentucky Small Grain PERFORMANCE TEST B. Bruening, B. Mijatovic, S. Swanson, J. Connelley,

More information

2017 Kentucky Small Grain

2017 Kentucky Small Grain PR-724 University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Agricultural Experiment Station 2017 Kentucky Small Grain PERFORMANCE TEST B. Bruening, B. Roberts, S. Swanson, J. Connelley,

More information

Arkansas Wheat Cultivar Performance Tests

Arkansas Wheat Cultivar Performance Tests Arkansas Wheat Cultivar Performance Tests 2016-2017 R.E. Mason R.G. Miller D.E. Moon J.P. Kelley ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION August 2017 Research Series 645 This publication is available on

More information

The 2010 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with

The 2010 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, LEXINGTON, KY, 40546 PR-604 2010 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Performance Test B. Bruening, C. Tutt, S. Swanson, J. Connelley,

More information

2012 Kentucky Small Grain VARIETY PERFORMANCE TEST

2012 Kentucky Small Grain VARIETY PERFORMANCE TEST AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, LEXINGTON, KY, 40546 PR-640 2012 Kentucky Small Grain PERFORMANCE TEST B. Bruening, S. Swanson, J. Connelley, G. Olson, and

More information

J. LaDon Day, Anton E. Coy and John D. Gassett Editors

J. LaDon Day, Anton E. Coy and John D. Gassett Editors The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations Annual Publication 100-5 College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences July 2013 The University of Georgia Georgia 2012-2013 Small Grain Performance Tests

More information

2009 Kentucky Small Grain VARIETY PERFORMANCE TEST

2009 Kentucky Small Grain VARIETY PERFORMANCE TEST AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, LEXINGTON, KY, 40546 PR-586 Kentucky Small Grain VARIETY PERFORMANCE TEST B. Bruening, C. Tutt, S. Swanson, J. Connelley,

More information

WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS 2018

WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS 2018 WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS 2018 Crop Sciences Special Report 2018-01 Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois July 2018 WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS - 2018 Crop Sciences Special

More information

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Oat Tifton, Georgia: An oat variety grain trial was planted at this location on September 23, 2015. However, crown rust disease and lodging during the growing season resulted in some very low grain yields

More information

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012 A3868 Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012 Shawn Conley, Adam Roth, John Gaska, and Mark Martinka The Wisconsin Winter Wheat Performance Tests are conducted each year to give growers information

More information

2001 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials Experimental Methods Figure 1. Region 2000 Location Cooperator Crop Tested

2001 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials Experimental Methods Figure 1. Region 2000 Location Cooperator Crop Tested PR-448 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials C.R. Tutt, C.S. Swanson, J. Connelly, D. Call, and D.A. Van Sanford In, Kentucky farmers harvested 21.1 million bushels of soft red winter wheat produced on 340,000

More information

Southwest Virginia Blacksburg Blackstone Holland

Southwest Virginia Blacksburg Blackstone Holland Shenandoah Valley Orange Mt. Holly Southwest Virginia Blacksburg Blackstone Holland Publication 424-031 Revised 2004 INDEX TO VIRGINIA CORN HYBRID AND MANAGEMENT TRIALS 2004 Companies participating in

More information

SOUTHERN UNIFORM WINTER WHEAT SCAB NURSERY 2014 NURSERY REPORT. J. P. Murphy S. Petersen

SOUTHERN UNIFORM WINTER WHEAT SCAB NURSERY 2014 NURSERY REPORT. J. P. Murphy S. Petersen SOUTHERN UNIFORM WINTER WHEAT SCAB NURSERY 2014 NURSERY REPORT J. P. Murphy S. Petersen This is a progress report of cooperative investigations underway and funded by the U. S. Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative,

More information

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown*** Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown*** Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp May 2.47 67.4 1.24 66.5 2.56 66.3 1.59 67.4 June 5.9 73.5 6.58 73.1 4.45 72.8 12.24

More information

2016 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials

2016 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials 2016 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials Lee Siler, Matthew Graham, Andrew Wiersma, Linda Brown, Kyle McCarthy, Amber Hoffstetter, Jeff Kovach, Dennis Pennington, Eric Olson August 1, 2016 Favorable

More information

2017 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials

2017 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials 2017 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials Lee Siler, Matthew Graham, Amber Hoffstetter Andrew Wiersma, Linda Brown, Kyle McCarthy, Jeff Kovach, Jonathan Turkus, Tara Watkins, Eric Olson July 31, 2017

More information

Arkansas Wheat Cultivar Performance Tests R.E. Mason, R.G. Miller, J.P. Kelley, and E.A. Milus

Arkansas Wheat Cultivar Performance Tests R.E. Mason, R.G. Miller, J.P. Kelley, and E.A. Milus Arkansas Wheat Cultivar Performance Tests 2011-2012 R.E. Mason, R.G. Miller, J.P. Kelley, and E.A. Milus ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION September 2012 Research Series 603 This publication is

More information

Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee

Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee 2005 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing

More information

Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, veteran status, national

Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, veteran status, national Publication 424-031 Revised 2003 Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, veteran status, national origin, disability, or political

More information

Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana.

Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana. Project Title: Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. Project Leader: D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana. Project Personnel: P.L. Bruckner MAES

More information

Wheat, Barley, and Oat Performance Tests in Tennessee

Wheat, Barley, and Oat Performance Tests in Tennessee Wheat, Barley, and Oat Performance Tests in Tennessee 2004 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing

More information

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida 2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida Libbie Johnson and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2017 field corn small plot replicated variety trial (OVT) and large plot demonstration

More information

The 2004 wheat growing season ended with Kentucky farmers

The 2004 wheat growing season ended with Kentucky farmers PR-500 2004 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials C. Tutt, C.S. Swanson, J. Connelley, R. Green, and D.A. Van Sanford The 2004 wheat growing season ended with Kentucky farmers harvesting 370,000 acres of

More information

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida 2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida Libbie Johnson and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2015 field corn small plot replicated variety trial (OVT) and large plot demonstration

More information

2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results

2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results 2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy Research and Development Division www.wheattech.com 270-586-1776 Data provided by Wheat Tech Agronomy R&D Division 270-586-1776 Table of

More information

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2009

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2009 VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2009 David L. Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Patsy Lewis, & Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 657

More information

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Spring wheat varieties are compared in trial plots at Waseca, Lamberton, Morris, Crookston, Stephen,

More information

2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results

2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results 2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy Research and Development Division www.wheattech.com 270-586-1776 Data provided by Wheat Tech Agronomy R&D Division 270-586-1776 Table of

More information

INDEX TO VIRGINIA CORN HYBRID AND MANAGEMENT TRIALS 2002

INDEX TO VIRGINIA CORN HYBRID AND MANAGEMENT TRIALS 2002 Publication 424-031 Revised 2003 INDEX TO VIRGINIA CORN HYBRID AND MANAGEMENT TRIALS 2002 SECTION I. VIRGINIA CORN HYBRID TRIALS IN 2002. Companies participating in the 2002 Corn Hybrid Trials 2 2002 Virginia

More information

VIRGINIA CORN HYBRID AND MANAGEMENT TRIALS IN 2011

VIRGINIA CORN HYBRID AND MANAGEMENT TRIALS IN 2011 VIRGINIA CORN HYBRID AND MANAGEMENT TRIALS IN 2011 Coordinators of Virginia Corn Hybrid Trials in 2011 Wade Thomason, Extension Specialist, Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia

More information

Soybean Variety Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research & Development Division

Soybean Variety Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research & Development Division 2015 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Research & Development Division Table of Contents General & Growing Season Information. 1 Growing Season Information & Data Interpretation. 2 Acknowledgements.

More information

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials 2015 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials Data collected 2011-2015 www.gocereals.ca Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee V2 Current as of December 25, 2015 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance

More information

Varietal Trials Results

Varietal Trials Results Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Wheat, Hard Red Spring Jim Anderson, Jochum Wiersma, Gary Linkert, Catherine Springer and Susan Reynolds differ for their response to each of those diseases, the rating

More information

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT LEADER: PROJECT PERSONNEL: Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred D. M. Wichman, Agronomist,

More information

2016 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

2016 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Performance Testing (CPT) Director Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Kevin Kirby Ag Research Manager, Brookings Bruce Swan Ag Research Manager, Rapid

More information

2017 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2017 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results 01 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial

More information

Evaluation of spring wheat cultivar performance under continuous-crop and crop-crop-fallow systems in central Montana

Evaluation of spring wheat cultivar performance under continuous-crop and crop-crop-fallow systems in central Montana Project Title: Evaluation of spring wheat cultivar performance under continuous-crop and crop-crop-fallow systems in central Montana Project Leader: D. M. Wichman Research Agronomist, Moccasin, MT Project

More information

2008 Performance of spring wheat varieties in central Montana. By Dave Wichman

2008 Performance of spring wheat varieties in central Montana. By Dave Wichman 2008 Performance of spring wheat varieties in central Montana. By Dave Wichman 2008 will be remembered as a severe sawfly year in many wheat growing areas of Montana. There were even instances of severe

More information

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2010

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2010 VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2010 David L. Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Patsy Lewis, & Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 657

More information

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2015

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2015 VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2015 David Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Billy Taylor, & Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 657-6450

More information

2015 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

2015 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Performance Testing (CPT) Director Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Shaukat Ali SDSU Small Grains Pathologist, Brookings Kevin Kirby Ag Research

More information

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

Wheat and Oat Variety Performance Tests

Wheat and Oat Variety Performance Tests Research Report 12-01 Wheat and Oat Variety Performance Tests 2011 in Tennessee Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic

More information

Virginia Small Grain Forage Variety Testing Report: Long-Term Summary ( )

Virginia Small Grain Forage Variety Testing Report: Long-Term Summary ( ) publication 48-09 Virginia Small Grain Forage Variety Testing Report: Long-Term Summary (994-2004) www.ext.vt.edu Produced by Communications and Marketing, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia

More information

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013 Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013 Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 331 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station William Batchelor, Director Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, November

More information

Wisconsin Winter Wheat Performance Trials 2018

Wisconsin Winter Wheat Performance Trials 2018 A3868 Wisconsin Winter Wheat Performance Trials 2018 Shawn Conley, Adam Roth, John Gaska, Brian Mueller and Damon Smith Departments of Agronomy and Plant Pathology College of Agricultural and Life Science

More information

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Extension Series No. E-10-2 November, 2010 2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences NYS

More information

Triticale. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale Grain Performance, Data 3-Year Average. Head Date bu/acre Wt Ht Lodg.

Triticale. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale Grain Performance, Data 3-Year Average. Head Date bu/acre Wt Ht Lodg. Triticale Tifton, Georgia: Rank Test Trical 342 98.5 107.5 4 137.5. 50 0 100 04/02 Sunland 91.3 107.0 2 138.0. 43 0 100 04/01 Trical 314 89.7 105.4 3 137.5. 36 0 100 03/30 Fleming* 70.4 79.3 8 101.5. 33

More information

Control of diseases in different cultivars

Control of diseases in different cultivars Applied Crop Protection 2014 III Control of diseases in different cultivars Lise Nistrup Jørgensen, Helene Saltoft Kristjansen, Sidsel Kirkegaard & Anders Almskou- Dahlgaard Control strategies in 6 wheat

More information

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1 Tifton, Georgia: Average Average Rank Wt Ht Lodg. Survival Date Horizon 201 139.9 132.2 1 155.9 30.5 54 0 100 04/11 Horizon 270 128.8 119.4 4 138.0 32.2 42 0 100 04/13 Plot Spike LA9339 124.4 115.5 9 127.3

More information

PROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS

PROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS PROJECT TITLE: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Dr. Michael Giroux, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: mgiroux@montana.edu Phone: (406) 994-7877 Andy Hogg, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: ahogg@montana.edu

More information

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Oat Tifton, Georgia: Brand-Variety 2 2 Horizon 270 156.9 119.6 109.5 34.8 47 6 03/25 SCLA 0100214 154.3.. 33.2 42 0 04/04 Horizon 720 153.4.. 33.4 52 6 04/04 LA07007SBSBSB-18 150.0.. 34.9 43 0 03/23 NC12-3578

More information

2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 2009 VARIETAL RECOMMENDATION

2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 2009 VARIETAL RECOMMENDATION 2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 1) A motion to remove AgriPro Norpro from the spring wheat variety recommendation list, effective February 2009. Mr. Joe Smith of AgriPro has asked us to

More information

Triticale and Rye Forage

Triticale and Rye Forage Brand-Variety 12/21/15 1/20/16 2/19/16 3/11/16 3/31/16 2016 2-Yr Avg -------------------------------------------- lb/acre -------------------------------------------- Triticale 154 1143 556 1460 2200 1154

More information

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE. 2018 University of Delaware Spring and Fall Beet Trials Gordon Johnson and Emmalea Ernest University of Delaware Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE 19947 (302) 856-7303

More information

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1 PP310 2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1 Darcy E. P. Telenko, John Atkins, Nick Dufault, 2 This report includes a summary of the 2013 in-furrow

More information

Wheat Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee

Wheat Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee Wheat Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee 2012 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations

More information

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Matthew Hankinson, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION

More information

2015 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2015 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

Report on the Northern Uniform Winter Wheat Scab Nurseries (NUWWSN and PNUWWSN)

Report on the Northern Uniform Winter Wheat Scab Nurseries (NUWWSN and PNUWWSN) Report on the 2015-2016 Northern Uniform Winter Wheat Scab Nurseries (NUWWSN and PNUWWSN) C. Sneller 1 *, P. Paul 2, and C. Sewell 1 Dept. of Horticulture and Crop Science 1, Dept. Plant Pathology 2, The

More information

2010 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials

2010 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials 2010 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials Plant Breeding and Genetics 2011-1 Margaret E. Smith Phone: 607-255-1654 Professor Fax: 607-255-6683 Email: mes25@cornell.edu Department of Plant Breeding

More information

2018 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials

2018 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials 2018 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials 2018 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials Dennis Pennington, Eric Olson, Jonathan Turkus, Sam Martin July 25, 2018 Fall planting conditions were excellent

More information

2004 Spring Barley Variety Release and Recommendation Motions

2004 Spring Barley Variety Release and Recommendation Motions 2004 Spring Barley Variety Release and Recommendation Motions submitted by Dr. Tom Blake and Patrick Hensleigh motion supported by data in tables 1-9 1. A motion that "Eslick" be recommended as a feed

More information

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes Victor M. Green 302-275-1445 vmgreen@udel.edu Special thanks and appreciation is extended to the following people for whom this research would not have

More information

2017 Corn Hybrid Performance Trial Results

2017 Corn Hybrid Performance Trial Results 2017 Corn Hybrid Performance Trial Results WHEAT TECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Table of Contents General & Growing Season Information. 1 Data Interpretation & Acknowledgements. 2 Caldwell County

More information

2018 Corn Hybrid Performance Trial Results WHEAT TECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

2018 Corn Hybrid Performance Trial Results WHEAT TECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 2018 Corn Hybrid Performance Trial Results WHEAT TECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Table of Contents General, Growing Season Information, and Data interpretation. 1 & 2 Acknowledgements. 3 Caldwell

More information

Virginia Tech Corn Silage Testing 2010

Virginia Tech Corn Silage Testing 2010 Virginia Tech Corn Silage Testing 2010 2010 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 3011-1518 Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of race, color,

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Information DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 - (301) 405-6244 Agronomy Facts No. 32 MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS Maryland soybean variety tests are conducted

More information

Virginia Soybean Variety Evaluation Tests 2004

Virginia Soybean Variety Evaluation Tests 2004 Virginia Soybean Evaluation Tests 2004 Virginia Soybean Evaluation Tests 2004 David L. Holshouser, Soybean Specialist, Virginia Tech Michael Ellis, Agricultural Technician, Virginia Tech Patsy Lewis,

More information

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center General Trial Information Investigator: Daniel A Ball Title: Professor Affiliation: Columbia Basin Ag. Research Postal Code: 97801 E-mail: daniel.ball@oregonstate.edu Trial Location City: Pendleton Trial

More information

Triticale and Rye. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale and Rye Grain Performance,

Triticale and Rye. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale and Rye Grain Performance, Rank Test Winter Survival bu/acre lb/bu in % mo/day % Triticale Trical 342 85.0 78.3 1 79.7 47.5 48 0 03/15 100 FL01008. 64.7 2 67.9 48.6 54 0 03/02 100 FL01143. 53.2 5 60.7 48.6 51 0 02/26 100 Monarch..

More information

Corn Hybrid Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research and Development Division

Corn Hybrid Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research and Development Division 2015 Corn Hybrid Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Research and Development Division Table of Contents General & Growing Season Information. 1 Data Interpretation & Acknowledgements. 2 Logan County (Adairville,

More information

Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee

Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION Soybean Disease Ratings for Frogeye Leaf Spot, SDS & Stem Canker with Yields Maturity Group V (Late) 2003 Trial ID: 03SBFE5L Investigator: Dr. Melvin Newman Crop

More information

2012 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials

2012 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials 2012 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials Plant Breeding and Genetics 2013-1 Margaret E. Smith Phone: 607-255-1654 Professor Fax: 607-255-6683 Email: mes25@cornell.edu Department of Plant Breeding

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name

More information

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2017

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2017 VIRGINIA SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS 2017 David Holshouser, Michael Ellis, Billy Taylor, Ed Seymore Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center 6321 Holland Road Suffolk, VA 23437 (757) 807-6541

More information

Recommendations and summary of results 2010

Recommendations and summary of results 2010 ecommendations and summary of results 2010 The most promising cultivars of all institutions involved in the small grain industry are annually included in the National Small Grain Cultivar Programme of

More information

2016 Wheat, Barley, and Oat Variety Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report

2016 Wheat, Barley, and Oat Variety Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report 2016 Wheat, Barley, and Oat Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report Higher hopes in early spring of a greater upward pricing potential for corn relative to other commodities, a wetter and slightly

More information

Wheat and Oat Variety Performance Tests

Wheat and Oat Variety Performance Tests Research Report 11-01 Wheat and Oat Variety Performance Tests 2010 in Tennessee Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic

More information

Wheat Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee

Wheat Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee Wheat Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee 2017 Dennis West, Professor, Plant Science Department David Kincer, Research Associate, Plant Science Department Ryan Blair, Extension Area Grains & Cotton

More information

KANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH SPRING SMALL GRAINS

KANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH SPRING SMALL GRAINS 04 KANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH SPRING SMALL GRAINS R E P O R T O F P R O G R E S S 9 3 1 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION

More information

EVALUATION OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN CENTRAL OREGON, Marvin Butler and Neysa Farris. Abstract

EVALUATION OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN CENTRAL OREGON, Marvin Butler and Neysa Farris. Abstract EVALUATION OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN CENTRAL OREGON, 1998 Marvin Butler and Neysa Farris Abstract Evaluation of sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris) in central Oregon was conducted in commercial fields

More information

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2016 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 111 Title: Corn - Soybean - Wheat Response to Rotation: Nrate Experiment: 09CSW Trial ID: 5950 Year: 2015 Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn, Location: Supported By: Site Information Field:

More information

2015 Wheat, Barley, and Oats Variety Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report

2015 Wheat, Barley, and Oats Variety Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report Page 84 2015 Wheat, Barley, and Oats Variety Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report Both the cash prices and futures for all commodities continued their decline that started in second half of 2013.

More information

Title: 2011 Off-Station Spring Wheat evaluations in the Western Triangle Area

Title: 2011 Off-Station Spring Wheat evaluations in the Western Triangle Area Title: 2011 Off-Station Spring Wheat evaluations in the Western Triangle Area Principal Investigators: John Miller, Western Triangle Ag. Research Center, Conrad, MT. Dave Wichman, Central Ag. Research

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017 Page 26 revised data as of Nov. 29, 2017. Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017 Quality Factors 1 Dry Matter Yield Milk Production

More information