Regular Meeting of the Measure V East Side Regional Projects Committee

Transcription

1 Regular Meeting of the Measure V East Side Regional Projects Committee LOCATION City of Atwater Community Center, Frago Room 760 E. Bellevue Road Atwater, CA DATE Wednesday, February 7, 2018 TIME 10:00am East Side Regional Projects Committee Members City of Livingston City of Atwater City of Merced County of Merced, District 1 County of Merced, District 2 County of Merced, District 3 County of Merced, District 4 County of Merced, District 5 Alex McCabe, Councilman Jim Price, Mayor Mike Murphy, Mayor Vice Chair Rodrigo Espinoza, Supervisor Lee Lor, Supervisor Daron McDaniel, Supervisor - Chair Lloyd Pareira, Supervisor Jerry O Banion, Supervisor Packet Page 1

2 Welcome to the Measure V East Side Regional Projects Committee Meeting AGENDA At least 72 hours prior to each regular Measure V East Side Regional Projects Committee meeting, a complete agenda packet is available for review on the Measure V website at and at the MCAG office, 369 W. 18 th Street, Merced, CA All public records relating to an open session item and copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to items of business referred to on the agenda are on file at MCAG. Persons with questions concerning agenda items may call MCAG to make an inquiry regarding the nature of items described on the agenda. TRANSLATION SERVICES Translation Services are not provided at MCAG s public meeting unless requested at least three (3) business days in advance. Please contact Eva Garibay at (209) x 108 during regular business hours to request translation services. Servicios de interpreté no son ofrecidos en las juntas públicas de MCAG al menos de que se soliciten tres (3) días de negoción en anticipación. Para solicitas estos servicios por favor contacte a Eva Garibay al (209) x 108 durante horas de oficina. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES Representatives or individuals with disabilities should contact MCAG at (209) at least three (3) days in advance of the meeting to request auxiliary aids or other accommodations necessary to participate in the public meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS Members of the public wishing to address agenda items or comment on any item not on the agenda may do so during agenda item 2 Public Comment. Persons may also address any item on the agenda during consideration of that item. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per person. Please state your name and city or community of residence for the record. For items not on the agenda, no action will be taken. If it requires action, the item will be referred to staff and/or placed on the next agenda. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Measure V Merced County Association of Governments Packet Page 2

3 1. Roll Call 2. Public Comment Regular Meeting of the Measure V East Side Regional Projects Committee Wednesday, February 7, :00am City of Atwater Community Center, Frago Room 760 E. Bellevue Road Atwater, CA AGENDA 3. Approval of Agenda Action 4. Approval of Minutes from November 8, 2017 East Side Regional Projects Committee Meeting* Action p Revenue Update* Info Nav Bagri p Discuss Regional Projects ACE Project Candidate Forms* Development of the Implementation Plan Technical Committee Workshop with Financial Advisor Info Patrick Pittenger p Measure V Schedule Info Stacie Dabbs 8. Other program updates Local Projects Funding Agreements Quarterly Reporting and Citizens Oversight Committee Stacie Dabbs 9. Adjourn *Attachment Packet Page 3

4 DRAFT MINUTES MCAG Measure V Eastside Regional Projects Committee Meeting November 8, :00 AM Guests Present: Patrick Pittenger, Executive Director, MCAG Matt Fell, Senior Planner, MCAG Nav Bagri, Finance Director, MCAG Eva Garibay, Public Program Specialist II Emily Haden, MCAG Counsel Kendall Flint, RGS Steve Flint, RGS Item 1: Roll Call City of Atwater City of Merced County of Merced, District 1 County of Merced, District 2 County of Merced, District 3 County of Merced, District 4 County of Merced, District 5 Absent: City of Livingston Jim Price, Mayor Mike Murphy, Mayor (Vice-Chair) Rodrigo Espinoza, Supervisor Lee Lor, Supervisor Daron McDaniel, Supervisor (Chair) Lloyd Pareira, Supervisor Jerry O Banion, Supervisor Alex McCabe, Councilman Item 2: Public Comment No comments were made. Item 3: Approval of Agenda Chairman McDaniel called for a motion to approve the agenda. Motion by Vice-Chair Murphy, seconded by Member Pareira. Motion approved. Item 4: Approval of Minutes from August 17, 2017 Chairman McDaniel called for a motion to approve the minutes. Motion by Member O Banion, seconded by Vice-Chair Murphy. Motion approved. Packet Page 4

5 MCAG Eastside Regional Projects Committee Meeting 08 November 2017 Item 5: Governing Procedures Patrick Pittenger responded to a question about whether Committee members were bound by the Governing Board s procedures. The member was advised that the procedures have already been adopted by the Governing Board and serve to guide the actions of the advisory committees, but if any member wished to comment on those procedures they were welcomed to submit them. No comments have been submitted and that concludes staff s comments on this item. Item 6: Revenue Update Nav Bagri, MCAG Finance Director reported that to date $1.5 mil for Eastside projects. Each month s payments are estimates and the actual true-up revenues will be provided quarterly. Mr. Pittenger added that revenues were consistent with projections. Local monies are flowing to the jurisdictions, regional monies are being collected in an account with the County Treasurer. Vice-Chair Murphy asked if other jurisdictions are experiencing the same dip in revenues. Finance Director Bagri said yes, but these are estimates and the quarterly true-up will show actual revenue which is right on target with projections. Item 7: Draft Project Evaluation/Selection Criteria Kendall Flint directed the committee to page 13 of the agenda packet, which lists potential criteria by which projects may be prioritized. Based on today s discussion these criteria will be incorporated into a future projects summary report, so along with funding sources these criteria will be used to determine which projects go forward. For projects to be considered for regional funds, staff will need to fill out a form that lists the criteria and the funding sources, such as federal grants, SB 1 funds, and Measure V funds. When this committee reconvenes in February 2018 the committee will be able to compare each project to the others. Not all projects will meet all criteria. Once Eastside and Westside committees finish their deliberations in the spring of 2018, their recommendations go to the Governing Board for a final decision as part of the development of the draft Implementation Plan. It was suggested that the list be reduced. After some discussion, the Committee decided on the following criteria: Funding Safety Connectivity Reduce congestion/emissions (Increased mobility as a subset) Readiness, and Economic development (Goods movement as a subset) Other considerations: SB 1 funds (of all different pots of money some can be used for projects), Bonding, Cap & Trade, etc. Measure V requires that projects to be funded must be in the RTP, which is updated every four years. An Implementation Plan could reference far-future projects that are not in the Packet Page 5

6 MCAG Eastside Regional Projects Committee Meeting 08 November 2017 RTP, but they would not be eligible for funding until they were included in the RTP. The Implementation Plan is updated every two years. When the committee reconvenes in February, the near-term projects will discussed based on what project forms are provided with the criteria and funding sources identified. The Implementation Plan describes what projects will be done in the next 5 years. The Committee decided that criteria do not need to be weighted. The elected officials in each jurisdiction should consider projects and criteria for feedback to the Committee. In response to a question, staff clarified that the Citizens Oversight Committee is involved in auditing only, and won t make recommendations on projects. Staff will provide the Committee with a breakdown of funding (about $126 mil) over 30 years, which will be useful in determining when projects may be implemented. Item 8: Draft Regional Projects List The consensus of the Committee was that it does not need to decide what projects are on the list now, but each jurisdiction will by January 15, 2018 complete the forms that detail the proposed funding for projects that meet the criteria. In response to a question from the Committee, staff said where multi-jurisdictional projects are involved, the Lead Agency will be responsible for determining project priority and criteria. As a related matter, Patrick Pittenger advised that the MCAG Board retreat on November 17 will include KNN financial advisors for a discussion on funding options. Staff will provide more information on the topic at the February Committee meeting. Also, Mr. Pittenger attended the Self-Help Counties conference in San Francisco and learned that most other counties are not engaged in this prioritization process and commended the Committee for its involvement. Item 9: Meeting Schedule The Committee decided that its next meeting will be Wednesday, February 7, 10:00 AM at the County Administration Building. Item 10: Next Steps Closing Comments: Mr. Pittenger provided more information about the Self-Help Counties conference in San Francisco and revenues associated with SB 1. Meeting adjourned at 11:00 AM Packet Page 6

7 MCAG MEASURE V: ALLOCATED REVENUES TO DATE COMPARED TO ESTIMATED AMOUNTS (FIRST EIGHT MONTHS OF COLLECTIONS: APRIL NOVEMBER 2017) Category of Funding Yearly Allocation Budget Allocation Monthly Allocation Eight month Allocation Allocation Percentage Actual Allocation of Sales Tax First Six Months (April-September) October November Total Budget vs. Actual Variance over (under) Overall Total $ 15,000,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 10,000, % $ 8,440,716 $ 920,900 $ 920,900 $ 10,282,516 $ 282,516 Funding Directly to Local Jurisdictions Atwater-General Transportation 80% $ 498,000 $ 41,500 $ 332, % $ 276,565 $ 31,857 $ 31,857 $ 340,279 $ 8,278 Atwater Alt Modes 20% $ 124,500 $ 10,375 $ 83, % $ 69,141 $ 7,964 $ 7,964 $ 85,070 $ 2,070 Atwater Total $ 622,501 $ 51,875 $ 415, % $ 345,707 $ 39,821 $ 39,821 $ 425,348 $ 10,348 Dos Palos-General Transportation 80% $ 197,522 $ 16,460 $ 131, % $ 104,414 $ 14,482 $ 14,482 $ 133,379 $ 1,698 Dos Palos Alt Modes-20% $ 49,380 $ 4,115 $ 32, % $ 26,104 $ 3,621 $ 3,621 $ 33,345 $ 424 Dos Palos Total $ 246,902 $ 20,575 $ 164, % $ 130,518 $ 18,103 $ 18,103 $ 166,724 $ 2,122 Gustine-General Transportation-80% $ 198,101 $ 16,508 $ 132, % $ 104,746 $ 14,516 $ 14,516 $ 133,778 $ 1,710 Gustine Alt Modes-20% $ 49,525 $ 4,127 $ 33, % $ 26,186 $ 3,629 $ 3,629 $ 33,444 $ 428 Gustine Total $ 247,626 $ 20,635 $ 165, % $ 130,932 $ 18,145 $ 18,145 $ 167,222 $ 2,138 Livingston-General Transportation-80% $ 292,210 $ 24,351 $ 194, % $ 158,663 $ 19,957 $ 19,957 $ 198,578 $ 3,771 Livingston Alt Modes-20% $ 73,052 $ 6,088 $ 48, % $ 39,666 $ 4,989 $ 4,989 $ 49,644 $ 943 Livingston Total $ 365,262 $ 30,439 $ 243, % $ 198,329 $ 24,947 $ 24,947 $ 248,222 $ 4,714 Los Banos- General Transportation-80% $ 630,814 $ 52,568 $ 420, % $ 352,657 $ 39,536 $ 39,536 $ 431,730 $ 11,187 Los Banos Alt Modes-20% $ 157,703 $ 13,142 $ 105, % $ 88,164 $ 9,884 $ 9,884 $ 107,932 $ 2,797 Los Banos Total $ 788,517 $ 65,710 $ 525, % $ 440,822 $ 49,420 $ 49,420 $ 539,662 $ 13,984 Merced City-General Transporation-80% $ 1,248,132 $ 104,011 $ 832, % $ 706,334 $ 75,231 $ 75,231 $ 856,795 $ 24,707 Merced City-Alt Modes-20% $ 312,033 $ 26,003 $ 208, % $ 176,583 $ 18,808 $ 18,808 $ 214,199 $ 6,177 City of Merced Total $ 1,560,165 $ 130,014 $ 1,040, % $ 882,917 $ 94,038 $ 94,038 $ 1,070,994 $ 30,883 Merced County-General Transportation-80% $ 2,935,221 $ 244,602 $ 1,956, % $ 1,672, , ,781 $ 2,018,469 $ 61,655 County Alt Modes-20% $ 733,805 $ 61,150 $ 489, % $ 418,227 43,195 43,195 $ 504,617 $ 15,414 Merced County Total $ 3,669,027 $ 305,752 $ 2,446, % $ 2,091,134 $ 215,976 $ 215,976 $ 2,523,086 $ 77,068 Total Funding Directly to Jurisdictions $ 7,500,000 $ 625,000 $ 5,000, % $ 4,220,358 $ 460,450 $ 460,450 $ 5,141,258 $ 141,258 Funding for Regional Projects - Eastside Regional $ 4,050,000 $ 337,500 $ 2,700,000 27% $ 2,278,993 $ 248,643 $ 248,643 $ 2,776,279 $ 76,279 Westside Regional $ 2,550,000 $ 212,500 $ 1,700,000 17% $ 1,434,922 $ 156,553 $ 156,553 $ 1,748,028 $ 48,028 Regional Total $ 6,600,000 $ 550,000 $ 4,400,000 44% $ 3,713,915 $ 405,196 $ 405,196 $ 4,524,307 $ 124,307 Transit $ 750,000 $ 62,500 $ 500,000 5% $ 422,036 $ 46,045 $ 46,045 $ 514,126 $ 14,126 Administration $ 150,000 $ 12,500 $ 100,000 1% $ 84,407 $ 9,209 $ 9,209 $ 102,825 $ 2,825 Total $ 15,000,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 10,000, % $ 8,440,716 $ 920,900 $ 920,900 $ 10,282,516 $ 282, /26/2018 Packet Page 7

8 EAST SIDE REGIONAL CANDIDATE PROJECTS Lead Agency Project Name Total Project Cost City of Livingston Livingston Transit Center $2,900,000 City of Livingston B Street Corridor Improvements $3,900,000 City of Livingston Main Street Corridor Improvements $13,000,000 City of Livingston SR 99/Winton Parkway On Ramp Widening $1,240,000 County of Merced Highway 140/Plainsburg Road Roundabout Project $4,750,000 County of Merced AME Phase 1B (from Green Sands Rd to Santa Fe Ave) $62,000,000 County of Merced Bellevue Rd (from 500 ft N of Parade St to Grove Ave) Road Project $3,350,000 County of Merced Bradbury Rd (from Hwy 165 to Hwy 99) Road Project $950,000 County of Merced McKee Road Pedestrian Bridge Project $2,800,000 County of Merced Mission Road (from Hwy 99 to Hwy 59) Road Project $5,250,000 County of Merced Sandy Mush Road (from Hwy 59 to Turner Island Rd) Road Project $3,530,000 County of Merced Sandy Mush Road (from Hwy 99 to Hwy 59) Road Project $2,010,000 County of Merced Washington Road (from Indiana Rd to Hwy 59) Road Project $1,510,000 City of Merced SR 59 from Olive Ave to Bellevue Rd $38,537,923 City of Merced Bellevue Widening from SR 59 to Lake Road $41,374,909 City of Merced Mission Ave Road Widening $27,772,300 City of Merced Parson Avenue Bridge Widening over Bear Creek $2,850,000 City of Merced Black Rascal Bridge Replacement and Widening $4,090,000 Total $221,815,132 As of Packet Page 8

9 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Livingston Transit Center City of Livingston PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): The City of Livingston (City) proposes to build a transit center on Main St at the rail road tracks. The transit center will be a transit hub for commuter rail, regional busing, and local busing. The project will include parking area improvements, a rail platform, transit center building, and busing facilities. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction Jan 2020 Jun ,000 May 2020 Aug ,000 Jun 2020 Dec ,000 Oct 2020 Apr ,000 Jun 2021 Dec ,900,000 Total Cost 2,900,000 Page 1 Packet Page 9

10 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. The City is actively seeking funds for the proposed project improvements from a variety of public and private funding sources. At this time the City has not yet secured funds for this project. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections The proposed Transit Center will connect local and nearby residents to regional transportation services. These transportation services will be a combination of commuter rail and busing transportation that will transport individuals to locations locally, within Merced County, and to locations in the Bay area, with future connections to counties South of the City possible. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Emission reductions generated from the construction of this project will be due to reduced commuter vehicle use as rail and busing transportation is utilized in place of personal vehicles. SAFETY Safety will be improved for those who utilize the alternative transportation methods available. READINESS For Construction The City is currently developing a conceptual plan that can be expanded into facility design and construction. Additionally, the City has reached out to rail services to discuss the potential for offering passenger services to the City. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement Offering alternate modes of transportation such as rail travel to residents will spur economic growth by creating the additional need for industrial and commercial growth in the City to support a growing populous. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 10

11 SWAN STREET PROJECT AREA SR-99 B STREET SELMA HERNDON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL F STREET MAIN STREET LIVINGSTON HIGH SCHOOL PEACH AVENUE Jan 12, :01pm V:\COL\misc\measure_v\62501-Exb.dwg City of Livingston - Transit Center - Project Location LOC NORTH SCALE IN FEET Packet Page 11

12 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: B Street Corridor Improvements City of Livingston PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): The City of Livingston (City) is proposing to improve the B Street corridor by incorporating the improvements outlined in the Nelson Nygaard Transportation Plan for the Main Street and B Street corridors. These improvements include the widening of B Street to its full build-out width, construction of separating median, curb, gutter, and walk on both sides of the roadway, incorporation of complete streets components, and construction of a roundabout at Briarwood Drive. The project limits are B St between Winton Parkway and 1st Street. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction May 2013 Aug ,000 Jan 2020 Jun ,000 Jan 2020 Aug ,000 Aug 2020 Jan ,000 Mar 2021 Oct ,000,000 Total Cost 3,900,000 Page 1 Packet Page 12

13 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. The City is actively seeking funds for the proposed project from a variety of public and private funding sources. At this time the City has not yet secured funds for this project. In the future the City intends to pursue funding for corridor components such as the roundabout from federal funding sources. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections The proposed improvements include the incorporation of complete streets components within the B St Corridor. B Street connects Winton Parkway to Main Street providing a route for traffic traveling from SR-99 to SR-140. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use A Roundabout is proposed as part of the corridor improvements for B St. The construction of a roundabout will provide emissions reductions for the project. These emissions reductions will be PM2.5 and PM10 reductions. SAFETY Currently the corridor is not pedestrian or bicyclist friendly. B Street lacks bike lanes and continuous sidewalks that connect the downtown area to the shopping center located on Winton Parkway. Both bike lanes and sidewalks are proposed as part of the project improvements improving the B St corridor. The proposed center median also improves safety by providing a buffer between traffic traveling in opposing directions. READINESS For Construction The City tasked Nelson Nygaard to evaluate the corridor and propose improvements for the B St corridor. A transportation plan was generated from these efforts. Once funding can be secured for the next phase of the project the City will move forward with environmental clearance and design. As additional funding is made available further progress will be made toward completing the project. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement This portion of B St, between Winton Pkwy and Main St is used by trucks moving goods to the downtown merchants and the main access to the Livingston Community Health Complex. It is also a corridor that is used when traveling through the City from SR-99 to SR-140. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 13

14 Jan 12, :49pm V:\COL\misc\measure_v\62501-Exb.dwg SR-99 WINTON PARKWAY LIVINGSTON COMMONS PROJECT AREA B ST BRIARWOOD DR SIKH TEMPLE SELMA HERNDON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1st ST MAIN ST SCALE IN FEET NORTH City of Livingston - B Street Corridor Improvements - Project Location Map Packet Page 14 LOC

15 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Main Street Corridor Improvements City of Livingston PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): The City of Livingston (City) is proposing to improve the Main Street corridor by incorporating the improvements outlined in the Nelson Nygaard Transportation Plan for the Main Street and B Street corridors. The proposed project improvements will include the rehabilitation of the existing roadway, rehabilitation of the existing sidewalks, construction of infill sidewalk components, reconfiguration of roadway stripping to accommodate non-motorized travel, and lighting improvements. The project improvements extend from Swan St at the North to Peach Avenue to the South. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) May 2013 Aug ,000 Jan 2014 Jun ,000 Jan 2014 Aug ,000 Acquire Right-of-Way Construction May 2016 May ,545,000 Total Cost 13,000,000 Page 1 Packet Page 15

16 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. The City has completed the first phase of this corridor improvements project which improved the section of Main St starting at D St and stopping South of the railroad tracks costing approx $2M. The City is actively seeking funds for the remainder of the proposed project improvements from a variety of public and private funding sources. At this time the City has not yet secured funds for the remaining project. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections The proposed improvements include the incorporation of complete streets components within the Main St Corridor. Main Street connects the City to SR-140 to the South and B St providing a connection to SR-99. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use The Main St corridor improvement components include the construction of the roundabout at B St and bike lanes that provide emissions reductions. These emissions reductions will be PM2.5 and PM10 reductions. SAFETY Currently the corridor is not pedestrian or bicyclist friendly. Main Street lacks bike lanes that connect the downtown area to a variety of activity centers in the City. Bike lanes, sidewalk improvements, and crossing improvements are proposed as part of the project improvements increasing bike and pedestrian safety. READINESS For Construction A planning document was created by Nelson Nygaard for proposed improvements for the Main St corridor. The City has designed and constructed the first phase of project improvements in the downtown area. The roundabout at B St is currently being designed and will be constructed in late The remainder of the corridor improvements will be constructed as funding becomes available. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement This portion of Main St is used by residents to access health services and by trucks moving goods to the downtown merchants. It is also a corridor that is used when traveling through the City from SR-99 to SR-140. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 16

17 SWAN STREET SR-99 B STREET SELMA HERNDON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT AREA F STREET MAIN STREET LIVINGSTON HIGH SCHOOL PEACH AVENUE Jan 12, :58pm V:\COL\misc\measure_v\62501-Exb.dwg City of Livingston - Main St Corridor Improvements - Project Location LOC NORTH SCALE IN FEET Packet Page 17

18 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: SR-99/Winton Parkway On Ramp Widening City of Livingston PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): The City of Livingston (City) proposes to widen Winton Parkway at the Southbound SR-99 on-ramp to reduce congestion due primarily to a bottleneck at the approach to the on-ramp, and improve turning movements at this location. The proposed project improvements will include widening Winton Parkway to provide a dedicated right turn lane to access the southbound on-ramp. Pedestrian crossing improvements will also be included at this location. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Jan 2019 Jun ,000 Mar 2019 Aug ,000 Acquire Right-of-Way Construction Oct 2019 Mar ,000,000 Total Cost 1,240,000 Page 1 Packet Page 18

19 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. The City is actively seeking funds for the proposed project improvements from a variety of public and private funding sources. At this time the City has not yet secured funds for this project. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections The proposed project provides improved connection to southbound SR-99 by removing the existing bottleneck at this intersection. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use The construction of this project will result in emissions reductions for this intersection. Reduced wait time at the stop sign will reduce PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. SAFETY The lack of a full width designated turn lane with proper pedestrian crossing improvements poses a variety of safety issues. The construction of this project will provide proper crossing facilities as well as reduce turning related collisions. READINESS For Construction The project is currently in the conceptual phase, an initial estimated project cost and scope have been developed, project presentations have been made to the City Council, and the City has met with CalTrans to discuss the project. The City is moving forward with this project as funding is made available. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement The Winton Parkway exit is home to a number of truck stops frequented by long haul trucking companies moving goods up and down SR-99. As these truckers continue South after stopping at the truck stops they are confronted with longer wait times than necessary to get back on SR-99. The construction of this project will alleviate that and improve the movement of good through the region. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 19

20 PROJECT AREA SR-99 TA TRAVEL CENTER WINTON PARKWAY LIVINGSTON COMMONS B STREET LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH COMPLEX F STREET Jan 12, :07pm V:\COL\misc\measure_v\62501-Exb.dwg NORTH SCALE IN FEET City of Livingston - SR-99/Winton Parkway On Ramp Widening - Project Location LOC Packet Page 20

21 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Highway 140/Plainsburg Road Roundabout Project Merced County PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Plainsburg Road and the Highway 140 intersection is located in the Town of Planada in the southeast part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway intersection widening, installation of a roundabout and the installation of traffic signs, pavement striping and markings. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction 01/16/ /31/2018 $50, /01/ /30/2019 $200, * 10/01/ /30/2020 $250, * 06/01/ /31/2021 $250, /01/ /31/2021 $4,000, Total Cost $4,750, Page 1 Packet Page 21

22 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. The project could however qualify for CMAQ or ATP funds. Merced County has committed local funds toward this project. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections Highway 140 serves as an important route from Highway 99 to Mariposa County. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Improved traffic circulation through the roundabout and the elimination of the stop intersection will reduce emissions. SAFETY The roundabout should reduce traffic speed towards the Town of Planada, which will increase traffic and pedestrian safety. READINESS For Construction Not ready for construction. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement The project will improve the movement of goods by eliminating the stop intersection. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 22

23 Packet Page 23

24 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: AME Phase 1B (From Green Sands Road to Santa Fe Avenue) Merced County PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): AME Phase 1B (from Green Sands Road to Santa Fe Avenue) is approximately 1.50 miles and is located between Merced and Atwater. The project will involve the construction of the Atwater Merced Expressway (AME) Phase 1B that will connect Highway 99 to Santa Fe Avenue. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction 12/01/ /31/2018 $ /01/ /31/2022 $3,500, * 01/01/ /31/2024 $10,000, * 01/01/ /31/2025 $7,000, /01/ /31/2027 $40,750, Total Cost $62,000, Page 1 Packet Page 24

25 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. MCAG has funded the PSR on this project in the amount of $520, CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections This project will connect Castle Airforce Base Industrial Park directly to Highway 99. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Reduction in vehicle miles traveled is achieved by having a more efficient route from the Castle Airforce Base to Highway 99. Emissions will be reduced through traffic congestion relief. SAFETY Reduced vehicle and truck traffic towards the local streets in the Franklin/Beachwood area of Merced County will increase traffic and pedestrian safety. READINESS For Construction Not ready for construction. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing a more efficient route from the Castle Airforce Base to Highway 99. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 25

26 Packet Page 26

27 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Bellevue Road (From 500 ft N of Parade Street to Grove Avenue) Road Project Merced County PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Bellevue Road (From 500 ft N of Parade Street to Grove Avenue) is approximately 1.35 miles and is located in the northern center of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulder work and the installation of pavement striping and markings. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report $0.00 Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction 09/01/ /30/2019 $50, * 10/01/ /30/2020 $100, * 06/01/ /31/2021 $500, /01/ /31/2021 $2,700, Total Cost $3,350, Page 1 Packet Page 27

28 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections This project will provide the City of Atwater with a more efficient route to access Highway 99 from Bellevue Road to Highway 99. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving traffic congestion and associated emissions on other roadways. SAFETY The new roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road. READINESS For Construction Not ready for construction. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route from the City of Atwater to Highway 99. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 28

29 Packet Page 29

30 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Bradbury Road (From Highway 165 to Highway 99) Road Project Merced County PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Bradbury Road (from Highway 165 to Highway 99) is approximately 2.75 miles and is located on the northwest part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulder work and the installation of pavement striping and markings. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report $0.00 Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits $0.00 Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction 03/01/ /30/2018 $100, * $150, * 06/01/ /31/2018 $700, * Total Cost $950, Page 1 Packet Page 30

31 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their local share of Measure V funds for use on this project. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections This project will provide an improved route from Highway 99 to Highway 165. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving traffic congestion and associated emissions on other roadways. SAFETY The new roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road. READINESS For Construction Not ready for construction. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 31

32 Packet Page 32

33 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: McKee Road Pedestrian Bridge Project Merced County PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): The proposed pedestrian bridge will be located on the west side of McKee Road at Bear Creek. The work will involve a steel pedestrian bridge to connect the pedestrian paths on the North and South sides of Bear Creek. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction 01/16/ /31/2018 $ /01/ /31/2020 $100, * 08/01/ /31/2021 $150, * 12/01/ /31/2021 $50, /01/ /31/2021 $2,500, Total Cost $2,800, Page 1 Packet Page 33

34 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted local Measure V funds for use on this project. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections This project will connect the pedestrian & bicycle paths on North Bear Creek Drive & South Bear Creek Drive. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use This project will reduce the current emissions by improving the traffic flow over the Bear Creek bridge by reducing the amount of pedestrians on the bridge. SAFETY This project will reduce the number of pedestrians/bicycles crossing the Bear Creek bridge and ultimately increase safety by reducing contact with vehicles and pedestrians. READINESS For Construction Not ready for construction. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement This project will improve the efficiency of the Bear Creek bridge by a reduction in pedestrian traffic; thus improving the movement of goods. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 34

35 Packet Page 35

36 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Mission Road (From Hwy 99 to Hwy 59) Road Project Merced County/ City of Merced PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Mission Road (from Highway 99 to Highway 59) is approximately 2.65 miles and is located in the southeast part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction and the installation of pavement striping and markings. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction 01/16/ /31/2018 $ /01/ /15/2019 $250, * 03/16/ /31/2019 $400, * 10/01/ /31/2020 $500, /01/ /30/2020 $4,100, Total Cost $5,250, Page 1 Packet Page 36

37 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their local share of Measure V funds for use on this project from Tyler to Highway 99. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections This project will relieve the traffic congestion on Highway 59 towards Merced by providing an alternate route from Highway 59 to Highway 99. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Reduced emissions will be achieved by bypassing the signalized stretch of Highway 59 towards the City of Merced and creating a more efficient route to Highway 99 from Highway 59. SAFETY Reduced vehicular traffic towards the City of Merced will increase traffic and pedestrian safety. READINESS For Construction Nor ready for construction. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 37

38 Packet Page 38

39 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Sandy Mush Road (From Hwy 59 to Turner Island Road) Road Project Merced County PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Sandy Mush Road (From Hwy 59 to Turner Island Road)is approximately miles and is located on the southwest part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulder work and the installation of pavement striping and markings. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report $0.00 Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits $0.00 Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction 03/01/ /30/2018 $20, * $ /01/ /31/2018 $3,500, * Total Cost $3,520, Page 1 Packet Page 39

40 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their local share of Measure V funds for use on this project. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections This project will relieve the traffic congestion on Highway 59 towards Merced by providing an improved route to Highway 99. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving traffic congestion and associated emissions on other roadways. SAFETY The improved roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road. READINESS For Construction Ready for construction. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 40

41 Packet Page 41

42 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Sandy Mush Road (From Hwy 99 to Hwy 59) Road Project Merced County PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Sandy Mush Road (from Highway 99 to Highway 59) is approximately 8.75 miles and is located in the southeast part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulder work and the installation of pavement striping and markings. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report $0.00 Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits $0.00 Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction 03/01/ /30/2018 $10, * $ /01/ /31/2018 $2,000, * Total Cost $2,010, Page 1 Packet Page 42

43 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their local share of Measure V funds for use on this project. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections This project will relieve the traffic congestion on Highway 59 towards Merced by providing an improved route to Highway 99. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving traffic congestion and associated emissions on other roadways. SAFETY The improved roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road. READINESS For Construction Not ready for construction. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 43

44 Packet Page 44

45 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Washington Road (From Indiana Road to Highway 59) Road Project Merced County PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Washington Road (From Indiana Road to Highway 59.) is approximately 5.75 miles and is located on the southwest part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulder work and the installation of pavement striping and markings. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report $0.00 Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits $0.00 Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction 03/01/ /30/2018 $10, * $ /01/ /31/2018 $1,500, * Total Cost $1,510, Page 1 Packet Page 45

46 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their local share of Measure V funds for use on this project. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections This project will serve as an improved alternate route from Highway 59 to Indiana Road. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving traffic congestion and associated emissions on other roadways. SAFETY The new roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road. READINESS For Construction Ready for construction. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 46

47 Packet Page 47

48 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: SR 59 from Olive Ave to Bellevue Rd City of Merced PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Construct a 4 lane road with a center median and landscaping from Olive to Bellevue. As a part of the project 3 traffic signal will be installed. The traffic signals will be installed at the intersection of SR 59 and Bellevue, SR 59 and Yosemite and SR 59 and Olive will be upgraded. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction Summer 2018 Spring ,000 Summer 2018 Spring ,489,480 Summer 2018 Summer ,978,960 Spring 2019 Spring ,229,885 Summer 2021 Winter ,789,598 Total Cost $38,537,923 Page 1 Packet Page 48

49 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. The project will be going after Federal and State funding for the majority of this project. The regional Measure V will be utilized as a match for the grant CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections The project will install a bike lane on either side of the street to provide north/south connectivity. The sidewalk will be installed as a condition of the development along SR 59 from Olive to Bellevue REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use The project will not directly reduce vehicle miles. The project will have a significant impact to vehicle exhaust reduction since the commuter has a direct access to UC Merced instead of having to go through town. SAFETY The road will allow more direct access to UC Merced and reduce the number of vehicle through town. READINESS For Construction N/A ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement The road widening will have a significant impact to the economy because it will provide a easier north/south access for movement of goods. Also the widening of the road will provide opportunity for developers to build on the west side of the City. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 49

50 PROJECT NAME: LEAD AGENCY: Bellevue Widening from SR 59 to Lake Road City of Merced PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Widen Bellevue Road from SR 59 to Lake Road from the existing 2 lane road to a 4 lane road with center median with landscape and traffic signal at SR 59/Bellevue and and Lake/Bellevue. (Please attach a map of the project location) PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE: Phase / Component Start Completion Cost Project Study Report Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits Design (PS & E) Acquire Right-of-Way Construction Fall 2018 Summer ,000 Spring 2019 Winter ,396 Fall 2018 Winter ,159,256 Spring 2019 Spring ,403,737 Spring 2023 Fall ,846,520 Total Cost $41,374,909 Page 1 Packet Page 50

51 Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria: FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants. Will be applying for Federal funding for the majority of the project cost. The matching fund will be provided by the City and the County out of the Measure V Regional funding CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections Bellevue Road will provide a major east/west thorough way to access UC Merced from SR 59. REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use The construction of Bellevue Road will help reduce vehicle emission within the limits of the City because it will help alleviate vehicle idling throughout the City that is trying to get to UC Merced. Because Bellevue would be the most direct rought for the public, it will help reduce traffic congestion within the city limits. SAFETY The road widening will increase public safety because it will widen an existing narrow County road. The center median will prevent possible vehicle drifting to the opposing traffic. READINESS For Construction The project has not been designed nor has the right-of-way acquisition started at this time. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement The road widening will provide direct access to UC Merced. This will also allow possible development to occur along Bellevue Road which will encourage economic growth within the County. OTHER INFORMATION Page 2 Packet Page 51

52 Bellevue Road Widening SR 59 to Lake Road QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT COST COST 1 1 LS Mobilize $200, $200, LS Demolition $350, $350, LS Clear and Grub $150, $150, LS SWPPP $50, $50, LS Survey $100, $100, EA Catch basin/sd inlet $8, $224, ,700 LF 24" SD pipe $80.00 $1,656, ,800 LF 24" Sewer $80.00 $704, ,800 LF 16" Water $70.00 $616, LS Utility coordination $20, $20, ,349 LF 6" Curb and gutter $50.00 $2,167, ,800 LF 6" median curb $50.00 $2,240, LS Box Culvert $300, $300, ,190 LF Saw cut $5.00 $5, ,433,052 SQ. FT. Compaction/Grading $2.00 $2,866, ,238 TON (10") AB $50.00 $4,761, ,667 TON (7") AC $85.00 $5,666, LS Traffic Signal at SR 59 $500, $500, LS Traffic Signal at Lake $350, $350, LS Median Landscape $250, $250, LS Median Irrigation $500, $500, LS Signing and Striping $50, $50,000 Sub total Contingency (15%) Construction Inspection (15%) Total Construction Cost Project Study Report Environmental (3% of the construction cost) Design (7% of the construction cost) Total Land Acquisition Cost TOTAL PROJECT COST $23,728,092 $3,559,214 $3,559,214 $30,846,520 $40,000 $925,396 $2,159,256 $7,403,737 $41,374,909 Right of way acquisition 1 48 Acres Acquisition of the right of way $80, $3,840, Acres Acquisition of the basin necessary for the project $80, $1,600, ,134 Cu. Yd Excavation of the basin (10' deep) $5.00 $1,290,670 Land acquisition Cost Land acquisition Agent (Assuming 10% of the land) $6,730,670 $673,067 Total Land Acquisition Cost $7,403,737 Packet Page 52