Tulsa Transportation Management Area. Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program
|
|
- Lora Little
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Tulsa Transportation Management Area Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program FFY 2022 Application Information Sponsor Location Description STP Request Other Funds Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 $3,000,000 $3,400,000 $6,400,000 Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility $90,000 $30,000 $120,000 $320,98 $80,239 $401,197 $407,038 $101,741 $08,779 $1,841,000 $614,000 $2,4,000 Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street $2,079,000 $693,000 $2,772,000 Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave $97,000 $39,000 $1,32,000 Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T $1,764,308 $31,297 $2,29,60 Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. $3,000,000 $,900,000 $8,900,000 City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan $2,970,000 $1,70,000 $4,40,000 City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection $2,900,000 $730,000 $3,630, s $19,329,304 $14,04,277 $33,374,81 Final Application Data FY2022 Proj. Info Page 1 of 12
2 Eligibility Screening (1) Representative (2) TMA Region (3) Federally Classified (4) Eligible Sponsor () Resolution (6) Engineer's Estimate Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 A Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St E Yes Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street A Yes Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T E Yes Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH- 1. City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan E Yes City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection E Yes A E A E A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Principal Principal Major Collector Major Collector Minor Minor Minor Major Collector Principal Principal Principal/ Minor 11 s In order for a project to be eligible for Tulsa Urbanized Area STP funds, it must meet the following criteria: 1) The proposed project must represent at least one of the following: A) An implementation of actions from the 204 LRTP Update, B) A transportation system management (including congestion management) project, C) Transportation control measures from the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality, D) A safety or transportation enhancement project, or E) System preservation of a transportation facility (i.e., reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration and operational improvements). 2) s must be located within the Tulsa Transportation Management Area (TMA) (Attachment C). 3) Funds must be used for roads classified as Urban Collectors/s or Rural Collectors(Major)/s under the Highway Functional Classification System. (Bridges are exempt from this rule). 4) 4) The local project sponsor must be a local unit of government or instrumentality thereof (such as the Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority or ), within the Tulsa Urbanized Area (Creek County, Osage County, Rogers County, Tulsa County, Wagoner County, City of Bixby, City of Broken Arrow, City of Catoosa, City of Coweta, City of, City of Sand Springs, City of Sapulpa, or City of Tulsa) or within the Tulsa Transportation Management Area (City of Claremore, City of, City of Glenpool, City of Owasso, or the Town of Skiatook.) ) The local project sponsor must provide to an STP Resolution (Attachment A), adopted by the governing body at a public meeting, which describes the project, including the type of improvement, project location, total project cost, and source(s) of matching funds. The sample resolution may be modified to reflect specific agreements between the project sponsor and ODOT, to reflect participation in the ODOT Certification Acceptance (CA) Program, or to meet local city charter requirements. 6) The local project sponsor must provide to a preliminary cost estimate adjusted for inflation using a rate of 4% per year over four years, and with a contingency of approximately 1%,(+ or %). Cost estimates for construction projects must be submitted by a registered professional engineer, architect, or landscape architect as appropriate, licensed in the State of Oklahoma. Final Application Data FY2022 Screen Page 2 of 12
3 A. Travel Time Improvement All Add s receive a maximum of 30 Points; All Non- Add projects receive a maximum of 12 Points. Count Count Date Current # of Lanes Count/ Lane STP Cost/ Traffic Ratio V/C Ratio Intersection. Cost. V/C.. Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 18, , Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 13, , No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 7,200 Feb , No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 7,200 Feb , No 8,302 Mar , No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 8,302 Mar , No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 24, , No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 4,260 Nov , No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1.,200 Jan , Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 16, , No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 44, , No 11 s (1). For corridor improvements, will determine if the proposed project provides relief for an existing/future congested corridor location, using volume to capacity (V/C) ratio where Level of Service C capacity is greater than V/C Ratio 1.0 or greater - 18 points V/C Ratio 1.20 to points V/C Ratio 1.00 to points V/C Ratio 0.80 to points V/C Ratio less than points (2). will calculate the STP dollar cost per daily traffic ratio. The projects will be divided into quartiles and the first quartile will receive 4 points, the second quartile 3 points, the third quartile 2 points and the fourth quartile 1 point. 1st Quartile point < X < nd Quartile points < X < rd Quartile points < X < th Quartile points X < 0.6 (3). For intersection projects or corridor projects that include intersection improvements to reduce congestion add 6 points. Final Application Data FY2022 A. Travel Time Page 3 of 12
4 B. Safety Improvements All projects receive a maximum of 30 Points Modal Safety Roadway Safety Rail Crossing Safety No. of Crashes Date Crash Index Crash Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection No 11 s The projects will be divided into quartiles based on the Accident Severity Index and the first quartile will receive 16 points, the second quartile 12 points, the third quartile 8 points and the fourth quartile 4 points. 4th Quartile X<17 3rd Quartile <X<76 2nd Quartile <X<124. 1st Quartile <X<21 Evaluation Criteria s targeting to include transit, pedestrian, bicycle & wheelchair traffic safety. Ex: signalized crossings, high visibility markings, signage, crosswalk upgrades, sidewalk extensions, pedestrian ramps, lighting, barriers separating vehicle/person conflicts. (List each item that is a part of the design separately to receive 1 point each, up to 4 points total.) s to improve roadway safety and/or address Traffic Incident management. Ex: pavement markings, lighting, signage, barriers or increase skid resistance, responder safety, equipment, communication systems, design features such as incident detection/synchronized signals (List each item that is a part of the design separately to receive 1 point each, up to 4 points total.) Points 4 4 increases safety through rail crossing improvements. 4 Final Application Data FY2022 B. Safety Page 4 of 12
5 C. System Maintenance and Management All Add s receive a maximum of Zero (0) Points; All Non- Add projects receive a Maximum of 20 points. Substantial Maintenance Improvements TIM and ITS Bridge CMP and Higher Class Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection No 11 s Evaluation Criteria includes either resurfacing or rehabilitation of a majority of the extent, substantial drainage improvements, improvement of signalization, and/or installation or replacement of signage on existing road. aids in the detection and clearance of non-recurring traffic incidents, the rapid clearing of road obstructions, or otherwise contributes to or utilizes ITS technology or incident management elements. includes replacement or rehabilitation of a functionally obsolete or structurally deficient bridge. Points is derived from or related to the Congestion Management System and reduces congestion on streets or intersections functionally classified by the FHWA as arterials in incorporated areas or as a major rural collectors in unincorporated areas. Final Application Data FY2022 C. System Maintenance Page of 12
6 D. Preparation projects receive max of 20 points & Non- projects receive a maximum of 8 points Env. Review Design Status RoW Status Utility Relocation Matching Funds Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection No 11 s s will receive one negative point for each year and for each project the sponsor has a previously-selected project that has not been scheduled to let to bid. Evaluation Criteria What is the status of the environmental review process? Environmental clearance completed and federal approval obtained Environmental clearance in process in compliance with federal requirements Environmental clearance has not been initiated EIS likely to be required What is the status of proposed project design/ engineering/ planning? Final Design/ Engineering/ planning completed and approved by ODOT Preliminary Design/ Engineering 0% plans completed. Preliminary Design/ Engineering/ Planning design consultant selected per ODOT approved What is the status of right-of-way acquisition? Right-of-way acquisition completed or not required per ODOT approved plans. Right-of-way acquisition based on area is 0% complete Right-of-way has not been initiated What is the status of utility relocation Utility relocation completed or not required per ODOT approved plans. Utility relocation is 0% complete Utility relocation has not been initiated What is the amount of matching funds? More than 0% (6pts), 2-0% (4pts) Pt to 6 Final Application Data FY2022 D. Preparation Page 6 of 12
7 E. Livability All Add s receive a maximum of Zero (0) Points; All Non- Add projects receive a Maximum of 10 points. Alternative Mode Bus Operations Bicycle & Pedestrian Component Higher Density Displacements Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility No No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection No 11 s Evaluation Criteria Points Main purpose of project is transit facility/hardware improvement, pedestrian or bicycle components 20 If main purpose of project is not alternative mode, but it does include complementary features, please fill in below. allows for bus operations (i.e., turning radii, bus stop pad, etc ) includes pedestrian components (bumpouts, sidewalks, shelters, etc ), includes provisions for bicycles (wide shoulders, dedicated lanes, paths/trails) count each item (not a limited access facility) is primarily located in a district zoned as Commercial, Office, High-Density Single-Family Residential, or Medium-Density Multi- Family. displaces one or more homes, businesses, schools, churches or recreational areas. -2 Final Application Data FY2022 E. Livability Page 7 of 12
8 F. Freight Movement and Intermodal Linkages All projects receive a maximum of 10 Points Intermodal Terminal Access Truck Volume Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 0 0 No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 0 0 No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 0 10 No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection No 11 s Evaluation Criteria facilitates the exchange of passengers and goods from private to public modes or between transportation modes. improves access to existing or proposed terminal facility improves road component(s) with % or more heavy duty trucks by traffic volume Points Final Application Data FY2022 F. Freight and Intermodal Page 8 of 12
9 G. Regional Economic Benefits All projects receive a maximum of 10 Points Multi- Jurisdictional System Goals Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 0 Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 10 No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 0 No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 10 No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 0 Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 0 No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 0 No 11 s Evaluation Criteria is multi-jurisdictional, and is a part of a regional funding program or economic development strategy that benefits more than one community and/or county will fulfill the goal of (a) Intelligent Transportation System; (b) Incident Management; (c) Traffic flow improvement; (d) System preservation funding goal Points Final Application Data FY2022 G. Regl Econ Benefits Page 9 of 12
10 Point s Maximum of 100 Points G. Reg'l Economic Benefits F. Freight and Intermodal E. Livability D. Preparation C. System Maintenance B. Safety Improvements A. Travel Time Improvements Possible Points (Add Cap) Possible Points (Non Cap) Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection s Final Application Data FY2022 s Page 10 of 12
11 Ranking Rank Sponsor Points STP Request Cumulative STP Funds Set Asides 1 Gilcrease West Expressway Edison to I-44: Approved for Garvee funding by Board GARVEE $6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 Requested s 1 City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 60 $2,900,000 $8,900,000 2 Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 9 $3,000,000 $11,900,000 3 City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 8 $2,970,000 $14,870,000 4 Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 7 $90,000 $14,960,000 Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 6 $97,000 $1,917,000 6 Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 6 $3,000,000 $18,917,000 7 Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 0 $1,841,000 $20,78,000 8 Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 0 $2,079,000 $22,837,000 9 Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 42 $1,764,308 $24,601, Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 39 $320,98 $24,922, Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) 38 $407,038 $2,329,304 Final Application Data FY2022 Ranking Page 11 of 12
12 Proposed Program for FFY 2022 Sponsor Description Federal Local Federal Cumulative Gilcrease West Expressway Engineering design, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and construction from Edison Street to I- 44 $6,000,000 $1,00,000 $7,00,000 $6,000,000 City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection Intersection Rehabilitation $2,900,000 $730,000 $3,630,000 $8,900,000 Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH- 1 Widen Elm Place and Rehabilitation of Intersection $3,000,000 $3,400,000 $6,400,000 $11,900,000 Bixby Highway 67 Corridor Traffic Study Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study $90,000 $30,000 $120,000 $11,990,000 Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave Street Rehabiliation $97,000 $39,000 $1,32,000 $12,947,000 Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. $3,000,000 $,900,000 $8,900,000 $1,947,000 Elwood Phase 2 Reconstruct from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility $1,841,000 $614,000 $2,4,000 $17,788,000 $17,788,000 $6,0,000 $19,002,000 Notes: All STP projects selected above are capped for federal funding. Any future phases or increased costs must be approved through subsequent competitive application processes. Final Application Data FY2022 Schedule Page 12 of 12
Dixie Transportation Planning Office
A project must be given a yes rating on items 1 & 2 in order to be prioritized. Sponsor: St. George City Project: Pioneer Parkway Type: Road Widening and Reconstruction Rev. 9/17/2010 Dixie Transportation
More informationEXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT
EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND NEED The project is located in Section 6, Township 23 North, Range 9 East and Section 31 Township 24 North, Range 9 East, in the Town of Stockton,
More informationTransportation. Background. Transportation Planning Goals. Level of Service Analysis 5-1
Transportation portion of the city s stormwater utility, and state road and fuel taxes. Background The transportation needs of the City of Lacey and its planning areas are met by a growing multimodal network
More information2016 PSRC REGIONAL & KING COUNTYWIDE EASTSIDE FUNDING AWARDS. Eastside Transportation Partnership September 9, 2016
2016 PSRC REGIONAL & KING COUNTYWIDE EASTSIDE FUNDING AWARDS Eastside Transportation Partnership September 9, 2016 1 2 PSRC 2016 Project Selection Process 2018-2020 Estimated FHWA Funds Available: (Summary)
More informationOpen House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition
Welcome Meetings 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. - Open House Why is Highway 212 Project Important? Important Arterial Route Local Support Highway 212
More informationRocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation
2020 Transportation Plan Developed by the Transportation Planning Division of the Virginia Department of Transportation in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
More informationParking Management Element
Parking Management Element The State Transportation Planning Rule, adopted in 1991, requires that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) area implement, through its member jurisdictions, a parking
More informationHarlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th
Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th Public Meeting #2 March 13, 2018 Summit Park District Welcome to the second Public Meeting for the preliminary engineering and environmental studies of Illinois 43
More informationCAPITAL FUND 9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS
9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2019-2023 9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - 01 STREET AND SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM $1,250,000 $0 $1,250,000
More informationUtilizing GIS Models in Prioritizing and Selecting Transportation Projects
Utilizing GIS Models in Prioritizing and Selecting Transportation Projects GIS-T Conference Raleigh, NC April 7, 2016 Tyler Meyer, AICP Tram Truong, GISP Outline Case Studies: 1. MPO project selection
More informationSFY Call for Projects MPO Staff Recommendation All Projects Submitted for Funding Funds Available: $57,075,000
SFY 2022-2023 Call for Projects MPO Staff Recommendation All Projects Submitted for Funding Funds Available: $57,075,000 DES NUM LPA PROJECT TITLE TYPE TOTAL SCORE FUND TYPE SFY FEDERAL COST LOCAL COST
More informationITEM 13 - NOTICE May 20, 2009
ITEM 13 - NOTICE May 20, 2009 Notice of Proposed Amendment to the 2009 CLRP and FY 2010-2015 TIP to include the Closure of the I-395 Southbound Exit Ramp to 3rd Street NW, the Reconfiguration of the Southbound
More informationCity of University Place
City of University Place City Engineering Department Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan Amended November 10, 2008 Resolution No. 604 City of University Place, Washington SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN
More informationArt Griffith, Capital Projects Manager, ,
Part 1 Base Information 1. Project Title Broadway & Highlands Ranch Pkwy. Intersection Capacity and Safety Improvement Project 2. Project Start/End points or Geographic Area Provide a map with submittal,
More informationHarlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th
Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th Community Advisory Group Meeting #3 December 1, 2017 Bedford Park Public Library 1 Meeting Agenda 1. Welcome/Introductions (3 mins) 2. Project Overview and Re-Cap
More informationBrigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction
Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction 550 North to 650 North $ 1,750,000 $ 1,582,113 To widen an existing bridge on 1200 West over Box Elder Creek that will
More informationWentzville Parkway South Phase 2 & 2A
Wentzville Parkway South Phase 2 & 2A Sponsor Wentzville Project No. RB18-000034 Project Type New Road TOTAL FUNDING Phase 2 Total County Sponsor Federal $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 Phase 2A Total
More informationRevised Evaluation Scores. System Preservation
Revised Evaluation s System Preservation This page provides a summary of any revisions made to the draft scores presented at the October th Attributable Funds mmittee meeting. The information below highlights
More informationTRANSPORTATION PLANNING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT USING GIS
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT USING GIS TYLER MEYER, AICP 2015 AMPO Conference Clark County, NV October 2015 Overview Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) overview MPO TAP Scoring
More informationTransportation Improvement Program
FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CITY OF FLAGSTAFF COCONINO COUNTY ARIZONA DOT Office: 100 West Birch Avenue Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Mail: 211 West Aspen Avenue Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Phone:
More informationPublic Information Packet FY Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Public Information Packet FY - Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Form Annual Element TIP Projects - TIP Projects Year - Metropolitan Transportation Improvement
More informationBusiness Advisory Committee. November 3, 2015
Business Advisory Committee November 3, 2015 1 Today s Topics DEIS Cost Estimate 2 Assumptions Revised Cost Estimate Revised Project Scope Cost Estimate Overview Position Statement Discussion Municipal
More informationRecommended Transportation. Capital Improvement Program
Recommended 2018-2022 Transportation Capital Improvement Program 1 Overview 2017 Review 2018-2022 Considerations 2018-2022 Recommended CIP 2 Limited Resources are Directed to the Highest Priority Number
More informationELMORE COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Adopted 11/27/06 Effective 2/1/07 Amended 4/10/08 ELMORE COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 155 County Shop Road Wetumpka, Alabama 36092 Phone (334) 567-1162 Fax (334) 567-1100 Access Management Policy The Elmore
More informationCITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE
CITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2017 1 DISCUSSION TOPICS Update of Infrastructure Action Plan (IAP) o Sidewalk and Roadway projects
More informationThe Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future
The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future In late 2006, Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville jointly initiated the Eastern Connector Corridor Study. The Project Team
More informationTransportation Committee Revised Project Scope and Cost Estimate. November 23, 2015
Transportation Committee Revised Project Scope and Cost Estimate November 23, 2015 1 Today s Topics Revised Project Scope Revised Cost Estimate Municipal Approval Action 2 3 Revised Project Scope Project
More informationTurnpike Mitigation Program Application
Ohio Department of Transportation & Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission Turnpike Mitigation Program Application Please note the following eligibility criteria: 1) Projects must be sponsored by
More informationWaco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study Chris Evilia, Director of Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Allen Hunter, General Manager Waco Transit System Jimi Mitchell, Project Manager AECOM
More informationSOUTH TEXAS COMMISSION MEETING
SOUTH TEXAS COMMISSION MEETING September 26, 2013 Pharr District Commission Meeting Pharr District: Overview The Pharr District plans, designs, builds, operates and maintains the state transportation system
More information800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design
Table of Contents 801 Access Control... 8-1 801.1 Access Control Directives... 8-1 801.2 Access Control Policies... 8-1 801.2.1 Interstate Limited Access... 8-1 801.2.2 Limited Access... 8-1 801.2.3 Controlled
More informationTransportation Improvement Program (TIP) Candidate Project List for Public Review
2011-2014 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Candidate List for Public Review Table 1 Annual Listing Of Federal Aid Obligation For Federal Fiscal Year 2010 North Dakota s Number Transit 410083 Transit
More informationMajor Widening/New Roadway
Revised Evaluation s Major Widening/New Roadway This page provides a summary of any revisions made to the draft scores presented at the October th Attributable Funds Committee meeting. The information
More information2030 Multimodal Transportation Study
2030 Multimodal Transportation Study City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department Prepared by Ghyabi & Associates April 29,2010 Introduction Presentation Components 1. Study Basis 2. Study
More informationTRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROGRAM BASICS Mount Pleasant Transportation Department 100 Ann Edwards Lane Mt. Pleasant, SC 29465 Tel: 843-856-3080 www.tompsc.com The Town of Mount Pleasant has adopted a traffic
More informationMarch 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming
COORDINATION WITH VDOT DISTRICTS TO DELIVER IMPLEMENTABLE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming PRESENTATION OUTLINE What
More informationINDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Planning the transportation future for the Indianapolis region MEMORANDUM
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Planning the transportation future for the Indianapolis region MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Indianapolis Regional Transportation Council Policy Committee Anna M.
More informationBuilding our future, together. Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update April 23, 2013
Building our future, together Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update April 23, 2013 Vision In 2030, the City of Tyler will be nationally known for its commitment to community,
More informationTRAFFIC SIMULATION IN REGIONAL MODELING: APPLICATION TO THE INTERSTATEE INFRASTRUCTURE NEAR THE TOLEDO SEA PORT
MICHIGAN OHIO UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER Alternate energy and system mobility to stimulate economic development. Report No: MIOH UTC TS41p1-2 2012-Final TRAFFIC SIMULATION IN REGIONAL MODELING: APPLICATION
More informationCOUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i
Table of Contents COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS Policy 817.1 PURPOSE... 2.2 APPLICABILITY... 2.3 DEFINITIONS... 2.4 STATE ENABLING LEGISLATION... 3.5 SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY ROADS (CCC 11.04)... 3.6 ESTABLISHING
More informationDIXIE TIP CONCEPT REPORT APPLICATION FY 2015 (Due November 6, 2013) PROJECT INFORMATION
DIXIE TIP CONCEPT REPORT APPLICATION FY 2015 (Due November 6, 2013) PROJECT INFORMATION 1) TITLE: Old Hwy 91 (Swiss Village, Santa Clara to 200 East, Ivins) 2) DESCRIPTION: This joint Ivins/Santa Clara
More informationresidents of data near walking. related to bicycling and Safety According available. available. 2.2 Land adopted by
2. Assessment of Current Conditions and Needs In order to prepare a plan to reach the vision desired by the residents of Texarkana, it is first necessary to ascertain the current situation. Since there
More informationChallenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007
EAST-WEST CORRIDOR Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007 Presentation Agenda Project Overview / Purpose and Need Highway Component Transit Component
More informationApril 27, FHWA/FTA Approval of an Amendment to the Kansas STIP to include WAMPO s April 14, 2009 TIP Amendment 6
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration 901 Locust Street, Suite 404 6111 SW 29 th Street, Suite 100 Kansas City, MO 64106 Topeka, KS 66614-4271
More informationIntroduction. Assumptions. Jeff Holstein, P.E., City of Brooklyn Park Steve Wilson, Principal Tim Babich, Associate Krista Anderson, Engineer
SRF No. 10482 To: From: Jeff Holstein, P.E., City of Brooklyn Park Steve Wilson, Principal Tim Babich, Associate Krista Anderson, Engineer Date: May 16, 2018 Subject: City of Brooklyn Park Year 2040 Forecasts
More informationWilliamson County Projects
Williamson Projects SR-6/ US-31/ Franklin Road TIP # 2006-408 Road Widening TDOT Williamson Length 2.30 Regional Plan ID 1062-160 Air Quality Status Non-Exempt TDOT PIN 105717.00 $38,000,000.00 SR-31/Franklin
More informationACTION TRANSMITTAL No
Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities DATE: January 4, 2016 TO: ACTION TRANSMITTAL No. 2016-19 TAC Funding and Programming Committee PREPARED BY: Joe Barbeau, Senior
More informationBasic Project Information
FY 2015-16 PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM (7B) Submitting Agency: Fairfax County Basic Project Information Project Title: South Van Dorn Street and Franconia Road Interchange 7B Project Type (check one): Roadway
More informationKendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study
Florida Department of Transportation District Six Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study What
More informationPublic Information Workshop
Public Information Workshop Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO - Meeting Rooms A and B March 29, 2018 Welcome to the Public Information Workshop for Harborview Road Project Development and Environment (PD&E)
More informationI-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange
I-820 (East) Project Description Fort Worth District Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange I-820 from approximately 2,000 feet north of Pipeline Road/Glenview Drive to approximately 3,200 feet
More informationBY-ELECTION SIGN GUIDELINES
BY-ELECTION SIGN GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR THE PLACEMENT OF FREE STANDING BY-ELECTION SIGNS ON CITY OF LETHBRIDGE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY Election Sign Definition: An election sign is a temporary sign announcing
More informationSection III Transportation and Stormwater Projects Receiving Additional Funding Project Detail Sheets Alphabetical Listing by Project Name Five Year
Section III Transportation and Stormwater Projects Receiving Additional Funding Project Detail Sheets Alphabetical Listing by Project Name Five Year Capital Improvement Plan FY2015/2016 through FY2020
More informationUS 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017
US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing February 16, 2017 Project Goals Improve the quality of transit service Improve mobility opportunities and choices Enhance quality of life Support master
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
THE PROJECT Last updated on 9/8/16 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What s happening on Highway 169? The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning to rebuild and repair the infrastructure on
More informationSTH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report
#233087 v3 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report Washington County Public Works Committee Meeting September 28, 2016 1 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Hartford Area Development
More informationBroward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA
Project Development & Environment Study Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA Background P D & E Study Regional
More informationSTATE LOOP 195 PUBLIC MEETING. Footer Text
STATE LOOP 195 PUBLIC MEETING STATE LOOP 195 From FM 755 to 1 mile west of Loma Blanca Rd Public Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Octavio Saenz TxDOT Public Information Officer Technical Overview
More informationCOUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i
Table of Contents COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS Policy 817.1 PURPOSE... 1.2 APPLICABILITY... 1.3 DEFINITIONS... 1.4 STATE ENABLING LEGISLATION... 2.5 SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY ROADS (CCC 11.04)... 2.6 ESTABLISHING
More informationSPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS
SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT SPEED CUSHION INSTALLATION POLICY A. GENERAL Speed cushions are an effective
More informationTurnpike Mitigation Program Application
Ohio Department of Transportation - Ohio Turnpike Infrastructure Commission Turnpike Mitigation Program Application The application has been improved to enable project sponsors to save the application
More informationS.M. Wright Project (I-45, US 175, SH 310) and Road to Work Opportunity Program. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee May 23, 2016
635 S.M. Wright Project (I-45, US 175, SH 310) and Road to Work Opportunity Program Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee May 23, 2016 Project Scope Increase safety by removing the existing
More informationHouse Committee on Transportation Policy Public Hearing HB April 5, 2017
REPRESENTATIVE RICH VIAL OREGON HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE DISTRICT 26 House Committee on Transportation Policy Public Hearing HB 3231 April 5, 2017 Background House District 26 Wilsonville Sherwood
More informationBINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY
BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY ANNUAL LISTING OF FEDERAL AID PROJECT OBLIGATIONS FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR Federal regulations require an annual listing of transportation projects, including investments
More informationsystem performance I-820 East Loop FM 156 TxDOT is working to expand its busiest metropolitan corridors.
system performance TxDOT is working to expand its busiest metropolitan corridors. Nine of the state s 100 most congested highways are located in Tarrant County. Six of these highways will be expanded and
More information2016 Congestion Report
2016 Congestion Report Metropolitan Freeway System May 2017 2016 Congestion Report 1 Table of Contents Purpose and Need...3 Introduction...3 Methodology...4 2016 Results...5 Explanation of Percentage Miles
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
THE PROJECT Last updated on 2/19/16 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What s happening on Highway 169? The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning to rebuild and repair the infrastructure on
More informationCity of Salem. Transportation Systems Development Charge Update
Final Report City of Salem Transportation Systems Development Charge Update June 2, 2008 Public Works Department Transportation Services Division Transportation System Development Charge Update Project
More informationMetropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report
Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report Metro District Office of Operations and Maintenance Regional Transportation Management Center May 2014 Table of Contents PURPOSE AND NEED... 1 INTRODUCTION...
More informationEUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT
EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT (BRIEF) Table of Contents EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON (USA)... 1 COUNTY CONTEXT AND SYSTEM DESCRIPTION... 1 SYSTEM OVERVIEW... 1 PLANNING
More informationMaryland Gets to Work
I-695/Leeds Avenue Interchange Reconstruction Baltimore County Reconstruction of the I-695/Leeds Avenue interchange including replacing the I-695 Inner Loop bridges over Benson Avenue, Amtrak s Northeast
More informationPUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FM 664 / OVILLA ROAD WIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS FM 664 / OVILLA ROAD CONNECTS US 287 WITH I-45 (SOURCE: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 2016 FM 664 / OVILLA ROAD WIDENING
More informationCHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards
9.00 Introduction and Goals 9.01 Administration 9.02 Standards 9.1 9.00 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS City streets serve two purposes that are often in conflict moving traffic and accessing property. The higher
More informationFFY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Development
FFY 2016-2019 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Development MAY 18, 2015 CAPE COD METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Highway Funding Regional s Year STP HSIP CMAQ FFY 2016 2019 TOTAL Regional with
More informationWELCOME PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FOR US-64 FROM THE SH-18 INTERSECTION EAST 6.5 MILES JANUARY 10TH, 2017 PAWNEE CITY HALL, 5:30 PM
WELCOME PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FOR US-64 FROM THE SH-18 INTERSECTION EAST 6.5 MILES JANUARY 10TH, 2017 PAWNEE CITY HALL, 5:30 PM 1 PURPOSE OF THIS OPEN HOUSE Present information about the proposed improvements
More informationNorth Whitfield County Roadway Corridor Study
North Whitfield County Roadway Corridor Study Report #3: Summary and Implementation Plan MA Project 11501 September 22, 2011 Prepared For: Greater Dalton Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared By:
More informationHighway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary
Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County Executive Summary October 2014 Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County Executive Summary October 2014 Prepared
More informationCharacterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment
Department of Public Works Inyo County, California Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment Segment Name: _Lone Pine No. 1_ Purpose: Which of the following does the combined-use segment
More informationPacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis
Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis Transit Coalition September 26, 2012 2 Study Area Pacific Electric Rightof-Way/West Santa Ana Branch (PEROW/ WSAB) extends
More informationI-4 Beyond the Ultimate. Florida Transportation Builders Association January 18, 2019
I-4 Beyond the Ultimate Florida Transportation Builders Association January 18, 2019 FDOT District 5 Improving Mobility & Safety in Central Florida FDOT District 5 is: Designing and building a better Interstate
More informationRECOMMENDATIONS. 7-1 Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions
RECOMMENDATIONS 7-1 Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan 7-2 A Call to Action 7-3 Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions 2035 Metropolitan
More informationNASHVILLE AREA MPO FY TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER
WILLIAMSON/ MAURY NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY -2017 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 11, 2013 SR-247 (Duplex Road) Widening TIP # 2004-051 Road Widening Spring Hill Williamson Length 3.10 Regional Plan ID 1062-170 Air
More informationSubchapter 20 Transportation
Subchapter 20 Transportation Sections: 35.20.1 Purpose. 35.20.2 Street Standards. 35.20.3 Pedestrian / Bicycle Facility Standards. 35.20.4 Driveway Standards. 35.20.5 Public Transit Standards. 35.20.1
More information2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street
IV.J TRANSPORTATION 1. INTRODUCTION This section presents an overview of the existing traffic and circulation system in and surrounding the project site. This section also discusses the potential impacts
More informationIH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY
IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY COOKE COUNTY, TEXAS February 1, 2007 Prepared by: Carter & Burgess, Inc. For: The Wichita Falls District of the Texas Department of Transportation INDEX I. INTRODUCTION. 3 II. PURPOSE
More informationNortheast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont. Rhode Island DOT
Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont Rhode Island DOT April 8, 2014 SHRP2 R26 (Preservation of High-Traffic Volume Roadways) and MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management David
More informationMaking Mobility Better, Together
Making Mobility Better, Together Austin Transportation Department Gordon Derr, P.E., for Robert J. Spillar, P.E Director, Austin Transportation Department 1 AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Our Mission
More informationState Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Moving Forward Incrementally April 2010 State Ave. BRT Update Bus Rapid Transit Overview State Ave. Alternatives Analysis Results What s Coming Up Right Away!
More informationNational Road Safety Action Plan in China
Sixth SHRP 2 Safety Research Symposium National Road Safety Action Plan in China Dr. Yan Wang July 14, 2011 Washington DC, USA Outline 1 Initiative of Road Safety Action Plan 2 Phase I 3 For Next Phase?
More informationDempster Street Road Improvements. Preparing for Construction
Dempster Street Road Improvements Preparing for Construction November 9, 2009 1 Purpose of Tonight s Presentation To inform and update the Village Board, business owners and residents about... 1) Final
More informationEGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)
WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) Preliminary Planning for a Transit Project Assessment Open House Martin Grove Road to Pearson International Airport September
More informationCEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update
CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update EECUTIVE SUMMARY DECEMBER 2015 Executive Summary In 2013, the Twin Cities metropolitan area s first bus rapid transit (BRT) line, the METRO Red Line,
More informationCorridor Sketch Summary
Corridor Sketch Summary SR 241: I-82 Jct (Sunnyside) to SR 24 Jct Corridor Highway No. 241 Mileposts: 7.53 to 25.21 Length: 17.65 miles Corridor Description The seventeen and one-half mile corridor begins
More informationCity of Grand Forks Staff Report
City of Grand Forks Staff Report Service/Safety Committee December 15, 2015 City Council December 21, 2015 Agenda Item: Amendment No. 1 to Engineering Services Agreement with CPS for City Project No. 7143,
More informationSlow Down! Why speed is important in realizing your Vision Zero goals and how to achieve the speeds you need
Slow Down! Why speed is important in realizing your Vision Zero goals and how to achieve the speeds you need Lake McTighe, METRO Joel McCarroll, ODOT Jenna Marmon, ODOT Matt Ferris-Smith, PBOT Oregon Active
More information2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Your RTC. Our Community. 1] 2040 Regional Adopted Transportation May Plan 18, 2017 The 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) identifies the long-term transportation
More informationGTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1
GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1 Draft Development Strategy Presentation to Peel Goods Movement Task Force April 8 2011 Study Areas 2 Unique Approach Unprecedented two-stage EA process:
More informationPlan Check Policies and Guidelines
Plan Check Policies and Guidelines VII. A. INTRODUCTION Traffic signing and striping plans are required for all General Plan Roads and any roadway that is 56-foot wide curb-to-curb (78 R/W) or wider. Transportation
More informationSH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014
SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY Open House April 3, 2014 Meeting Agenda Purpose of Meeting Today: Review the purpose and need for the SH 249 Grimes County project Review the proposed project and alternatives Discuss
More informationUnified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report
Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report REVISIONS 1. Table 39: New Public Investments for Operation and Maintenance Costs 2. Appendix A-10: Passenger Rail Service - Operations
More information