Example Airshed. Sample January 2019 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Example Airshed. Sample January 2019 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report"

Transcription

1 Example Airshed Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report 28 February 219 DISCLAIMER: This sample monthly report is provided as guidance only. The structure, look and layout of monthly and annual reports are not mandated. Airsheds are free to include additional or alternative content to that presented here, provided the requirements of the Air Monitoring Directive (AMD) are met. Users of this sample report must consult Chapter 9 Reporting of the AMD for requirements, as the AMD takes precedence. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 1 of 94

2 Pages may be left blank for double-sided printing Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 2 of 94

3 Table of Contents List of Acronyms... 4 Cover Letter... 5 Listing of Facilities... 6 Listing of Continuous Monitoring Stations... 6 Calibration and Data Submission... 6 Noted Events during the Month of January... 6 Station A... 6 Station B... 7 Station C... 7 Station D... 8 Air Incidents... 8 Special Studies... 8 Deviations from Authorized Monitoring Methods... 1 Certification Continuous Network Equipment and Results Summary Station A Station B Station C Station D Charts of Recorded Data Station A Station B Station C Station D End of Report Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 3 of 94

4 List of Acronyms AAAQO AMD CH 4 CO EPEA H 2S NMHC NO NO 2 NO X O 3 PM 2.5 ppb ppm SO 2 THC TRS W/m 2 µg/m 3 Alberta Ambient Air Quality Objective Air Monitoring Directive Methane Carbon Monoxide Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act Hydrogen Sulphide Non-methane hydrocarbons Nitric oxide Nitrogen dioxide Total oxides of nitrogen Ozone Fine particulate matter Parts per billion Parts per million Sulphur Dioxide Total hydrocarbons Total reduced sulphur Watts per square meter Micrograms per cubic meter Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 4 of 94

5 Cover Letter Example Airshed Street Address City, AB Postal Code Phone Number Website 28 February 219 Alberta Environment and Parks 11 th Floor, Oxbridge Place Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 ed to: RE: January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Example Airshed Enclosed is the January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report for the continuous ambient air quality monitoring stations of the Example Airshed regional air quality monitoring network, as operated in the month of January 219. The representative of the Person Responsible for this monitoring program is: Example Airshed Joe Smith, Executive Director Street Address City, AB Postal Code Phone Number Address This report is submitted by Joe Smith, Executive Director, Example Airshed (as above). This report was prepared by John Bee of Monitoring Co., and reviewed by Jane Dee of Example Airshed. Example Airshed has retained the services of Monitoring Co. to conduct continuous ambient monitoring and reporting functions on its behalf. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 5 of 94

6 Listing of Facilities Facilities whose Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA) approval ambient monitoring and/or reporting requirements are fulfilled by this monitoring program include those identified in Table 1 below. Table 1: List of Industrial Operations Participating in Airshed Company Name Industrial Operation Name Approval Number Company A Facility 1 -- Yes Facility 2 -- Yes Facility 3 -- Yes Company B Facility 4 -- Yes Company C Facility 5 -- No Company D Facility 6 -- Yes Company E Facility 7 -- Yes This report being submitted on behalf of facility? Listing of Continuous Monitoring Stations The continuous ambient air quality monitoring network stations are: Station A at Beaver Creek Station B at Moose Lodge Station C at Mountain Pass Station D at Greens Hill Calibration and Data Submission Hourly data and calibration reports for January 219 were submitted to Alberta s Ambient Air Data Warehouse for Station A, Station B, Station C and Station D. Noted Events during the Month of January Station A: The following exceedances of Alberta Ambient Air Quality Objectives (AAAQOs) were observed at Station A: Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 6 of 94

7 Table 2: AAAQO Exceedances at Station A Date Time Parameter Avg. Period AAAQO Actual Reading Wind Speed Wind Direction Reference # 7-Jan 7: PM2.5 1-hr 8 µg/m 3 89 µg/m km/h Jan 8: PM2.5 1-hr 8 µg/m 3 18 µg/m km/h Jan 9: PM2.5 1-hr 8 µg/m 3 11 µg/m km/h Jan 1: PM2.5 1-hr 8 µg/m 3 93 µg/m km/h Jan - PM hr 3 µg/m 3 31 µg/m Jan 9: NO2 1-hr 159 ppb ppb 6.8 km/h Jan - PM hr 3 µg/m 3 34 µg/m The possible source of the exceedances of the PM 2.5 guideline and objective on 7-Jan is unknown, but must be localized in nature as only Station A recorded exceedances. The exceedance of the NO 2 objective on 16-Jan is believed to have been caused by large construction equipment idling in closea proximity to Station A. This was observed by station technicians. The exceedance of the PM 2.5 objective on 22-Jan is believed to be the result of local buildup of emissions, given the low wind speeds recorded at the time. All analyzers and sensors at Station A had an operational uptime greater than 9% for the month of January. Station B: The measured ambient air quality for Station B was within the AAAQOs for all monitored parameters. The sulphur dioxide (SO 2) analyzer at Station B operated less than 9% of the time in January 219. A component failure occurred on January 12 following the daily zero/span sequence. Daily system checks indicated that the analyzer performance was within AMD criteria throughout this time period. Upon site investigation on January 16 it was determined that due to a failed solenoid control relay, the analyzer was sampling through the zero/span lines rather than the ambient air sample line. The solenoid control was repaired and the analyzer was returned to normal operation. During the data validation process, the SO 2 data were invalidated for a total of 144 hours between January 11 and 17, 219. This resulted in the THC analyzer data at Station B being available for 8% of the month of January. This incident was reported to Alberta Environment and Parks on January 16, 217 (Reference #222222). Non-standard conditions were experienced at Station B on 15-Jan when a spider in the nephelometer of the PM 2.5 analyzer disrupted normal operation. 2 hours of instrument operation time were lost in this event. All other analyzers and sensors at Station B had an operational uptime greater than 9% for the month of January. Station C: The following exceedances of AAAQOs were observed at Station C: Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 7 of 94

8 Table 3: AAAQO Exceedances at Station C Date Time Parameter Avg. Period AAAQO Actual Reading Wind Wind Reference # Speed Direction 25-12: PM2.5 1-hr 8 µg/m µg/m km/h Jan 25-13: PM2.5 1-hr 8 µg/m µg/m km/h 132 Jan 25- Jan 14: PM2.5 1-hr 8 µg/m µg/m km/h 139 The exceedances of the PM 2.5 guideline on 25-Jan are believed to be the result of smoke from a known nearby structure fire, in the direction of wind flow. Readings for two of the three hours (13: and 14:) exceeded the instrument quantification limits, with the actual readings presented being reported as equal to the quantification limit. During a station audit on 17-Jan, it was discovered that the wind sensor was loose and misaligned. At this time, the sensor was removed from the met tower, recalibrated, and reinstalled. It is not known at what point the sampler became loose, so all wind speed and direction data collected since the last audit (24-Mar-218) must be discarded. For this reason, these data were removed from Alberta s Ambient Air Data Warehouse on 18-Jan. Station D: The measured ambient air quality for Station D was within the AAAQOs for all monitored parameters. The THC analyzer was due to be calibrated on 27-Jan. However, the temperature and relative humidity analyzer issues at Station A required the attendance of the technician, and this calibration had to be rescheduled to 2-Feb. Passive Stations: There were no exceedances of the AAAQOs for all monitored parameters at any of the passive stations during this month. Air Incidents Example Airshed was made aware of an upset at Company D, Facility 6 which Company D reported to the response centre on 13-Jan (Reference #444444). This involved the release of an odorous compound. While there were odour reports from the public to the facility, wind conditions were such that this was not detected at permanent monitoring locations in Example Airshed. Special Studies A PM 2.5 speciation study was initiated in January 219 at Station A. 24-hour samples of PM 2.5 were collected on 17-Jan, 23-Jan, and 29-Jan. This sampling was performed in accordance with AMD criteria. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 8 of 94

9 Analysis of these samples will be performed by ACME Laboratories. Results will be forwarded to Environment and Parks when they are available. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 9 of 94

10 Deviations from Authorized Monitoring Methods A tree nearby to Station B exceeds the height allowed under section 2.3 of the siting criteria in Chapter 3 of the AMD. This variance was authorized in writing by the director on September 3, 218. Certification I certify that I have reviewed and verified this report and that the information is complete, accurate and representative of the monitoring results, reporting timeframe and the specified analysis, summarization and reporting requirements. Joe Smith, Executive Director, Example Airshed February 28, 219 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 1 of 94

11 1 Continuous Network Equipment and Results Summary 1.1 Station A Table 4: Equipment Operation Summary for Station A Parameter Make Model Notes SO 2 TEI 43x No operational issues observed. NO/NO 2/NO X TEI 42x No operational issues observed. O 3 TEI 49x Instrument malfunction on 1- and 11-Jan led to 25 hours of lost operational time. These hours were flagged as X for machine malfunction. Operational time and valid data remained above 9%. CO TEI 48x No operational issues observed. CH 4/NMHC/THC TEI 55x No operational issues observed. H2S TEI 45x No operational issues observed. PM 2.5 SHARP 53 No operational issues observed. Rel. Humidity Met One 83D Instrument malfunctions on 12-, 25-, and 27-Jan led to a total of 6 hours of lost operational time. These hours were flagged as X for machine malfunction. Operational time and valid data remained above 9%. Ext. Temp. Met One 83D Instrument malfunctions on 12-, 25-, and 27-Jan led to a total of 6 hours of lost operational time. These hours were flagged as X for machine malfunction. Operational time and valid data remained above 9%. Wind S/D Met One 1C/2C No operational issues observed. Table 5: Monitored Data Summary for Station A Parameter (units) Objective/Guideline Exceedances Monthly Statistics 1H 8H 24H 3D 1H 8H 24H 3D Min. Avg. Max 1H Date- Time Max 24H Date Operational time Valid Data Calibration Date SO2 (ppb) Jan 15: 2 3-Jan 1.% 95.4% 12-Jan NO (ppb) Jan 1: Jan 1.% 95.2% 13-Jan NO2 (ppb) Jan 9: Jan 1.% 95.2% 13-Jan NOX (ppb) Jan 1: Jan 1.% 95.2% 13-Jan O3 (ppb) Jan 17: 4 28-Jan 96.6% 92.1% 13-Jan CO(ppm) Jan 5:.6 2-Jan 1.% 95.3% 1-Jan CH4 (ppm) Jan 17: Jan 1.% 95.3% 1-Jan NMHC (ppm) Jan 6:.1 7-Jan 1.% 95.3% 1-Jan THC (ppm) Jan 17: Jan 1.% 95.3% 1-Jan H2S (ppb) Jan 18: 1 12-Jan 1.% 95.4% 12-Jan PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Jan 8: Jan 1.% 99.7% 13-Jan Rel Humidity (%) Jan 6: Jan 99.2% 99.2% - Ext. Temp. ( C) Jan 13: 8 17-Jan 99.2% 99.2% - W. Speed (km/h) Jan 19: Jan 1.% 1.% 12-Jun W. Direction ( ) Jan 15: % 1.% 12-Jun Date given is the most recent time the instrument was calibrated. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 11 of 94

12 1.2 Station B Table 6: Equipment Operation Summary for Station B Parameter Make Model Notes SO 2 TEI 43x An equipment failure on 12-Jan led to 144 hours of lost operational time from 11- to 17-Jan. These hours were flagged as X for machine malfunction. Operational time and valid data were less than 9% for the month of January, at 8.% and 78.5% respectively. NO/NO 2/NO X TEI 42x See note below. O 3 TEI 49x See note below. CO TEI 48x See note below. CH 4/NMHC/THC TEI 55x See note below. A machine malfunction led to 1 hour of lost data on 27-Jan. This hour was flagged as X for machine malfunction. H2S TEI 45x See note below. PM 2.5 SHARP 53 A spider in the nephelometer on 15-Jan led to 8 hours of lost operational time. 2 of these hours were flagged as X for machine malfunction, 6 were flagged as Y for Maintenance. Operational time and valid data remained above 9%. Rel. Humidity Met One 83D See note below. Ext. Temp. Met One 83D See note below. Wind S/D Met One 1C/2C See note below. Note: A recording system failure led to 5 hours of lost data on all channels on 3-Jan. These hours were flagged as K for recording system failure. All instruments appear to have been operational through this period; however the monitored data could not be recovered. Table 7: Monitored Data Summary for Station B Parameter (units) Objective/Guideline Exceedances Monthly Statistics 1H 8H 24H 3D 1H 8H 24H 3D Min. Avg. Max 1H Date Time Max 24H Date Operational time Valid Data Calibration Date SO2 (ppb) Jan 14: 3 24-Jan 8.% 78.5% 25-Jan NO (ppb) Jan 13: Jan 99.3% 98.% 25-Jan NO2 (ppb) Jan 18: Jan 99.3% 98.% 25-Jan NOX (ppb) Jan 13: Jan 99.3% 98.% 25-Jan O3 (ppb) Jan 18: 35 3-Jan 99.3% 97.2% 26-Jan CO(ppm) Jan 18:.5 17-Jan 99.3% 98.3% 25-Jan CH4 (ppm) Jan 3: Jan 99.2% 98.1% 25-Jan NMHC (ppm) Jan 2:.2 21-Jan 99.2% 98.1% 25-Jan THC (ppm) Jan 3: Jan 99.2% 98.1% 25-Jan H2S (ppb) Jan 1: 1 17-Jan 99.3% 98.9% 12-Jan PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Jan 12: Jan 99.1% 96.5% - Rel Humidity (%) Jan 18: 9 21-Jan 99.3% 98.7% - Ext. Temp. ( C) Jan 13: 6 18-Jan 99.3% 98.7% - W. Speed (km/h) Jan 18: 22 3-Jan 99.3% 99.3% 23-Jul W. Direction ( ) Jan 14: % 99.3% 23-Jul Date given is the most recent time the instrument was calibrated. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 12 of 94

13 1.3 Station C Table 8: Equipment Operation Summary for Station C Parameter Make Model Notes SO 2 TEI 43x No operational issues observed. NO/NO 2/NO X TEI 42x No operational issues observed. O 3 TEI 49x No operational issues observed. CO TEI 48x No operational issues observed. CH 4/NMHC/THC TEI 55x No operational issues observed. TRS TEI 45x No operational issues observed. PM 2.5 BAM 12 A nearby structure fire resulted in three hours of PM 2.5 in excess of the 1-hour Guideline on 25-Jan. Two of these hours exceeded instrument quantification limits. This also resulted in an exceedance of the 24-hour Objective on the same date. Rel. Humidity Met One 83D No operational issues observed. Ext. Temp. Met One 83D No operational issues observed. Wind S/D Met One 1C/2C An audit on 17-Jan revealed that the wind sampler was misaligned. This was corrected and the instrument recalibrated on that date. Due to this issue, 398 hours of data were lost in the month of January; these hours were flagged as X for machine malfunction. As a result of the data loss, both operational time and valid data were below 9%, at 46.5%. Table 9: Monitored Data Summary for Station C Parameter (units) Objective/Guideline Exceedances Monthly Statistics 1H 8H 24H 3D 1H 8H 24H 3D Min. Avg. Max 1H Date Time Max 24H Date Operational time Valid Data Calibration Date SO2 (ppb) Jan 1: 6 19-Jan 1.% 95.2% 5-Jan NO (ppb) Jan 1: Jan 1.% 94.9% 5-Jan NO2 (ppb) Jan 16: Jan 1.% 94.9% 5-Jan NOX (ppb) Jan 17: Jan 1.% 94.9% 5-Jan O3 (ppb) Jan 11: Jan 1.% 95.3% 3-Jan CO(ppm) Jan 17:.3 13-Jan 1.% 95.4% 6-Jan CH4 (ppm) Jan 4: Jan 1.% 95.2% 5-Jan NMHC (ppm).4 2-Jan 5:.2 2-Jan 1.% 95.2% 5-Jan THC (ppm) Jan 4: Jan 1.% 95.2% 5-Jan TRS (ppb) Jan 6: 1 19-Jan 1.% 95.3% 3-Jan PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Jan 13: Jan 1.% 1.% - Rel Humidity (%) Jan 22: Jan 1.% 1.% - Ext. Temp. ( C) Jan 16: Jan 1.% 1.% - W. Speed (km/h) Jan 1: Jan 46.5% 46.5% 17-Jan W. Direction ( ) Jan 9: Jan 46.5% 46.5% 17-Jan Date given is the most recent time the instrument was calibrated. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 13 of 94

14 1.4 Station D Table 1: Equipment Operation Summary for Station D Parameter Make Model Notes SO2 TEI 43x No operational issues observed. NO/NO2/NOX TEI 42x No operational issues observed. O3 TEI 49x No operational issues observed. THC TEI 55x A calibration scheduled for 27-Jan had to be rescheduled for 2-Feb to address the recording system issue at Station A. PM2.5 R&P 14AB Analyzer replaced with SHARP 53 on 16-Jan. Monitoring was unavailable for 4 hours during equipment change and setup. These hours were flagged as N for not in service. Operational time and valid data remained above 9%. Rel. Humidity Met One 83D No operational issues observed. Ext. Temp. Met One 83D No operational issues observed. Solar Rad. Met One 96-1 No operational issues observed. Table 11: Monitored Data Summary for Station D Parameter (units) Objective/Guideline Exceedances Monthly Statistics 1H 8H 24H 3D 1H 8H 24H 3D Min. Avg. Max 1H Date Time Max 24H Date Operational time Valid Data Calibration Date SO2 (ppb) Jan : 4 23-Jan 1.% 95.3% 2-Jan NO (ppb) Jan : Jan 1.% 95.2% 2-Jan NO2 (ppb) Jan 18: 9 13-Jan 1.% 95.2% 2-Jan NOX (ppb) Jan : Jan 1.% 95.2% 2-Jan O3 (ppb) Jan 22: 42 3-Jan 1.% 95.3% 2-Jan THC (ppm) Jan 17: Jan 1.% 95.8% 28-Dec PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Jan 14: Jan 1.% 99.5% 16-Jan Rel Humidity (%) Jan 19: Jan 1.% 1.% - Ext. Temp. ( C) Jan 15: Jan 1.% 1.% - Sol. Rad. (W/m 2 ) Jan 14: Jan 1.% 1.% - 1 Calibration scheduled for 27-Jan had to be rescheduled into February; date given is the most recent time the instrument was calibrated. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 14 of 94

15 2 Charts of Recorded Data 2.1 Station A Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for SO₂ - Station A 2 18 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 71 (95.4%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Value (N=71) AAAQO (172 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 15 of 94

16 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 16 of 94

17 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NO - Station A Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) 14 Concentration (ppb) Value (N=78) Note: Elevated NO recorded on 18-Jan, however instrument appears to have been operating properly. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 17 of 94

18 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NO₂ - Station A Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Concentration (ppb) Value (N=78) AAAQO (159 ppb) Note: Exceedance of 1-hour Objective on 16-Jan likely due to construction equipment idling near station. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 18 of 94

19 Histogram of Hourly NO₂ Readings - Station A Percentiles: 1st: 3.4 ppb 5th: 5.3 ppb 1th: 7.5 ppb 25th: 13.4 ppb 5th: 26.1 ppb 75th: 44.3 ppb 9th: ppb 95th: 79.8 ppb 99th: ppb Number of Hours >159 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 19 of 94

20 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NOx - Station A Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) 14 Concentration (ppb) Value (N=78) Note: Elevated NO recorded on 18-Jan, mainly due to NO component, however instrument appears to have been operating properly. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 2 of 94

21 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for O₃ - Station A 9 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 719 (96.6%) Hours of Valid Data: 685 (92.1%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (3 hours) X* - Machine Malfunction (25 hours) Y - Maintenance (1 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=685) AAAQO (82 ppb) Note: 25 hours of lost data on 1- and 11-Jan. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 21 of 94

22 Histogram of Hourly O₃ Readings - Station A Percentiles: 1st: 1 ppb 5th: 3 ppb 1th: 5 ppb 25th: 9 ppb 5th: 17 ppb 75th: 26 ppb 9th: 35.1 ppb 95th: 39 ppb 99th: 44 ppb Number of Hours >82 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 22 of 94

23 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for CO - Station A Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 79 (95.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (4 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Concentration (ppm) Value (N=79) AAAQO (13 ppm) Note: Short spike on 24-Jan. Instrument appears to have been operating correctly. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 23 of 94

24 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 24 of 94

25 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for CH₄ - Station A Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 79 (95.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (4 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Concentration (ppm) Value (N=79) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 25 of 94

26 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NMHC - Station A Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 79 (95.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (4 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours).8 Concentration (ppm) Value (N=79) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 26 of 94

27 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for THC - Station A Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 79 (95.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (4 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) 3 Concentration (ppm) Value (N=79) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 27 of 94

28 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for H₂S - Station A 12 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 71 (95.4%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Value (N=71) AAAQO (1 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 28 of 94

29 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 29 of 94

30 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for PM₂.₅ - Station A 12 1 Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 742 (99.7%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (2 hours) Concentration (µg/m³) Value (N=742) AAAQO (8 µg/m³) Note: 4 hours in exceedance of 1-hour Guideline on 7-Jan. 24-hour Objective exceeded on 7-Jan and 22-Jan. Cause is unknown. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 3 of 94

31 Histogram of Hourly PM₂.₅ Readings - Station A Percentiles: 1st: 1 µg/m³ 5th: 1 µg/m³ 1th: 2 µg/m³ 25th: 3 µg/m³ 5th: 5 µg/m³ 75th: 1 µg/m³ 9th: 24 µg/m³ 95th: 29 µg/m³ 99th: µg/m³ Number of Hours >8 Concentration (µg/m³) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 31 of 94

32 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Rel. Humidity - Station A Humidity (%) Hours Operational: 738 (99.2%) Hours of Valid Data: 738 (99.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: X* - Machine Malfunction (6 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=738) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 32 of 94

33 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Ext. Temp. - Station A Hours Operational: 738 (99.2%) Hours of Valid Data: 738 (99.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: X* - Machine Malfunction (6 hours) *Non-operational hours Temperature ( C) Value (N=738) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 33 of 94

34 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for W. Speed - Station A 35 3 Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report 25 Wind Speed (km/h) Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 34 of 94

35 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for W. Direction - Station A Wind Direction ( ) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 35 of 94

36 Windrose - Station A NW (315 ) NNW N ( ) 35% 3% 25% NNE NE (45 ) 2% WNW W (27 ) 15% 1% 5% % ENE E (9 ) km/hr km/hr 8-11 km/hr 5-8 km/hr 3-5 km/hr WSW ESE -3 km/hr SW (225 ) SE (135 ) SSW SSE S (18 ) Note: Wind instrument last calibrated on 12-Jun-218. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 36 of 94

37 2.2 Station B Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for SO₂ - Station B 2 18 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 595 (8.%) Hours of Valid Data: 584 (78.5%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (8 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) X* - Machine Malfunction (144 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=584) AAAQO (172 ppb) Note: Instrument malfunction led to 144 hours of lost data from 11- to 17-Jan. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 37 of 94

38 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 38 of 94

39 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NO - Station B Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 729 (98.%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (7 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Concentration (ppb) Value (N=729) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 39 of 94

40 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NO₂ - Station B Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 729 (98.%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (7 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=729) AAAQO (159 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 4 of 94

41 Histogram of Hourly NO₂ Readings - Station B Percentiles: 1st: 4.4 ppb 5th: 6.4 ppb 1th: 8.6 ppb 25th: 13.3 ppb 5th: 21.9 ppb 75th: ppb 9th: 35.6 ppb 95th: 38.4 ppb 99th: ppb Number of Hours >159 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 41 of 94

42 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NOx - Station B Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 729 (98.%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (7 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Concentration (ppb) Value (N=729) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 42 of 94

43 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for O₃ - Station B 9 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 723 (97.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (7 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) Y - Maintenance (9 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=723) AAAQO (82 ppb) Note: Loss of available data on 26-Jan during calibration was coincident with an increase in ambient ozone concentrations, giving spurious appearance of a baseline shift, however instrument operation was normal before and after calibration. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 43 of 94

44 Histogram of Hourly O₃ Readings - Station B Percentiles: 1st: 1 ppb 5th: 1.5 ppb 1th: 4 ppb 25th: 1 ppb 5th: 17 ppb 75th: 23 ppb 9th: 3 ppb 95th: 34 ppb 99th: 37 ppb Number of Hours >82 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 44 of 94

45 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for CO - Station B 14 Concentration (ppm) Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 731 (98.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=731) AAAQO (13 ppm) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 45 of 94

46 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 46 of 94

47 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for CH₄ - Station B Concentration (ppm) Hours Operational: 738 (99.2%) Hours of Valid Data: 73 (98.1%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (9 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) X* - Machine Malfunction (1 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=73) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 47 of 94

48 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NMHC - Station B Hours Operational: 738 (99.2%) Hours of Valid Data: 73 (98.1%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (9 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) X* - Machine Malfunction (1 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Concentration (ppm) Value (N=73) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 48 of 94

49 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for THC - Station B Concentration (ppm) Hours Operational: 738 (99.2%) Hours of Valid Data: 73 (98.1%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (9 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) X* - Machine Malfunction (1 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=73) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 49 of 94

50 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for H₂S - Station B 12 1 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 736 (98.9%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=736) AAAQO (1 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 5 of 94

51 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 51 of 94

52 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for PM₂.₅ - Station B 9 8 Concentration (µg/m³) Hours Operational: 731 (98.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 729 (98.%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) Q - Quality Assurance (2 hours) X* - Machine Malfunction (2 hours) Y* - Maintenance (6 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=729) AAAQO (8 µg/m³) Note: 6 hours total lost on 15-Jan due to spider in nephelometer. Data from 3- to 31-Jan appears flat, but instrument is believed to have been operating correctly. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 52 of 94

53 Histogram of Hourly PM₂.₅ Readings - Station B Percentiles: 1st: 1 µg/m³ 5th: 1 µg/m³ 1th: 2 µg/m³ 25th: 4 µg/m³ 5th: 7 µg/m³ 75th: 1 µg/m³ 9th: 17 µg/m³ 95th: 22 µg/m³ 99th: 3.8 µg/m³ Number of Hours >8 Concentration (µg/m³) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 53 of 94

54 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Rel. Humidity - Station B Humidity (%) Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 734 (98.7%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) Q - Quality Assurance (2 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=734) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 54 of 94

55 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for W. Speed - Station B Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 739 (99.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) *Non-operational hours Wind Speed (km/h) Value (N=739) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 55 of 94

56 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for W. Speed - Station B Wind Direction ( ) Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 739 (99.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=739) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 56 of 94

57 Windrose - Station B NNW N ( ) 25% NNE NW (315 ) 2% NE (45 ) 15% WNW 1% ENE km/hr W (27 ) 5% % E (9 ) km/hr 1-12 km/hr 7-1 km/hr 5-7 km/hr WSW ESE -5 km/hr SW (225 ) SE (135 ) SSW S (18 ) SSE Note: Wind instrument last calibrated on 23-Jul-218. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 57 of 94

58 2.3 Station C Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for SO₂ - Station C 2 18 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Value (N=78) AAAQO (172 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 58 of 94

59 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 59 of 94

60 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NO - Station C Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 76 (94.9%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Y - Maintenance (2 hours) Concentration (ppb) Value (N=76) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 6 of 94

61 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NO₂ - Station C Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 76 (94.9%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Y - Maintenance (2 hours) Value (N=76) AAAQO (159 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 61 of 94

62 Histogram of Hourly NO₂ Readings - Station C Percentiles: 1st: 1.5 ppb 5th: 2.7 ppb 1th: 3.6 ppb 25th: 6.48 ppb 5th: 11.3 ppb 75th: 15.7 ppb 9th: 21.3 ppb 95th: ppb 99th: 3.81 ppb Number of Hours >159 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 62 of 94

63 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NOx - Station C 12 1 Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 76 (94.9%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Y - Maintenance (2 hours) 8 Concentration (ppb) Value (N=75) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 63 of 94

64 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for O₃ - Station C 9 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 79 (95.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Y - Maintenance (1 hours) Value (N=79) AAAQO (82 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 64 of 94

65 Histogram of Hourly O₃ Readings - Station C Number of Hours Percentiles: 1st: 4 ppb 5th: 6 ppb 1th: 8 ppb 25th: 15 ppb 5th: 22 ppb 75th: 29 ppb 9th: 33 ppb 95th: 36 ppb 99th: 39 ppb >82 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 65 of 94

66 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for CO - Station C Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 71 (95.4%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (3 hours) Y - Maintenance (1 hours) Concentration (ppm) Value (N=71) AAAQO (13 ppm) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 66 of 94

67 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 67 of 94

68 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for CH₄ - Station C Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) 2.5 Concentration (ppm) Value (N=78) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 68 of 94

69 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NMHC - Station C Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours).3 Concentration (ppm) Value (N=78) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 69 of 94

70 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for THC - Station C Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) 2.5 Concentration (ppm) Value (N=78) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 7 of 94

71 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for TRS - Station C Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 79 (95.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Y - Maintenance (1 hours) Concentration (ppb) Value (N=79) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 71 of 94

72 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for PM₂.₅ - Station C 25 2 Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report Concentration (µg/m³) Value (N=744) AAAQO (8 µg/m³) Note: Spike on 25-Jan exceeded instrument quantification limits, and AAAQO, for 2 hours. This is believed to be the result of smoke from a nearby structure fire. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 72 of 94

73 Histogram of Hourly PM₂.₅ Readings - Station C Percentiles: 1st: 1 µg/m³ 5th: 2 µg/m³ 1th: 2 µg/m³ 25th: 3 µg/m³ 5th: 5 µg/m³ 75th: 8 µg/m³ 9th: 13 µg/m³ 95th: 16 µg/m³ 99th: µg/m³ Number of Hours >8 Concentration (µg/m³) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 73 of 94

74 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Rel. Humidity - Station C 12 1 Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report 8 Humidity (%) Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 74 of 94

75 1 5 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Ext. Temp. - Station C Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report Temperature ( C) Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 75 of 94

76 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Wind Spd. - Station C 35 3 Hours Operational: 346 (46.5%) Hours of Valid Data: 346 (46.5%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: X* - Machine Malfunction (398 hours) *Non-operational hours 25 Speed (km/h) Value (N=346) Note: Timeseries plot generated with 346 hours of available wind data (46.5%) following realignment of wind sampler on 17-Jan. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 76 of 94

77 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Wind Direction - Station C Hours Operational: 346 (46.5%) Hours of Valid Data: 346 (46.5%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: X* - Machine Malfunction (398 hours) *Non-operational hours Wind Direction ( ) Value (N=346) Note: Timeseries plot generated with 346 hours of available wind data (46.5%) following realignment of wind sampler on 17-Jan. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 77 of 94

78 Windrose - Station C NNW N ( ) 2% NNE NW (315 ) 15% NE (45 ) WNW 1% 5% ENE 16-3 km/hr 1-16 km/hr W (27 ) % E (9 ) 6-1 km/hr 4-6 km/hr 3-4 km/hr WSW ESE -3 km/hr SW (225 ) SE (135 ) SSW S (18 ) SSE Note: Windrose generated with 346 hours of available wind data (46.5%) following realignment of wind sampler on 17-Jan. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 78 of 94

79 2.4 Station D Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for SO₂ - Station D 2 18 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 79 (95.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (4 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Value (N=79) AAAQO (172 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 79 of 94

80 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 8 of 94

81 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NO - Station D Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) 7 Concentration (ppb) Value (N=78) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 81 of 94

82 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NO₂ - Station D Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Concentration (ppb) Value (N=78) AAAQO (159 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 82 of 94

83 Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 83 of 94

84 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for NOx - Station D 25 2 Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Concentration (ppb) Value (N=78) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 84 of 94

85 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for O₃ - Station D Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 79 (95.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (4 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Concentration (ppb) Value (N=79) AAAQO (82 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 85 of 94

86 Histogram of Hourly O₃ Readings - Station D Percentiles: 1st: 9.8 ppb 5th: 15 ppb 1th: 18 ppb 25th: 25 ppb 5th: 31 ppb 75th: 37 ppb 9th: 41 ppb 95th: 43 ppb 99th: ppb Number of Hours >82 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 86 of 94

87 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for THC - Station D Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 713 (95.8%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (8 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) 6 Concentration (ppm) Value (N=713) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 87 of 94

88 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for PM₂.₅ - Station D 9 Concentration (µg/m³) Hours Operational: 74 (99.5%) Hours of Valid Data: 74 (99.5%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: N* - Not in Service (4 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=74) AAAQO (8 µg/m³) Note: TEOM analyzer replaced with SHARP 53 on 16-Jan. Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 88 of 94

89 Histogram of Hourly PM₂.₅ Readings - Station D Percentiles: 1st: µg/m³ 5th: µg/m³ 1th: 1 µg/m³ 25th: 2 µg/m³ 5th: 4 µg/m³ 75th: 8 µg/m³ 9th: 11 µg/m³ 95th: 13 µg/m³ 99th: µg/m³ Number of Hours >8 Concentration (µg/m³) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 89 of 94

90 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Rel. Humidity - Station D 12 1 Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report 8 Humidity (%) Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 9 of 94

91 15 1 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Ext. Temp. - Station D Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report 5 Temperature ( C) Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report Page 91 of 94

Palliser Airshed Society

Palliser Airshed Society Palliser Airshed Society Ambient Air Monitoring Network Summary March 2004 Prepared By: TABLE OF CONTENTS Airshed Zone Association March PASZA Ambient Air Report...2 Figure 1. PAS Crescent Heights O 3

More information

1st Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations

1st Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations 1st Quarter 2014 Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations Steven A. Root Digitally signed by Steven A. Root DN: cn=steven A. Root, o=weatherbank,

More information

3 rd Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations. Prepared for:

3 rd Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations. Prepared for: 3 rd Quarter 2018 Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations Prepared for: Prepared by: Mr. Bryce C. Bird Director Division of Air Quality 195 North

More information

1 st Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations. Prepared for:

1 st Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations. Prepared for: 1 st Quarter 2018 Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations Prepared for: Prepared by: Mr. Bryce C. Bird Director Division of Air Quality 195 North

More information

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT REPORT N O 171-00556-00 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT DECEMBER 2017 DECEMBER 2017 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT DECEMBER 2017 Lafarge Canada Inc. Project no: 171-00556-00 Date: December 2017

More information

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2017

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2017 REPORT N O 171-00556-00 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2017 MAY 2017 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2017 Lafarge Canada Inc. Project no: 171-00556-00 Date: May 2017 WSP Canada Inc. 150-12791

More information

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017 REPORT N O 171-00556-00 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017 JUNE 2017 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017 Lafarge Canada Inc. Project no: 171-00556-00 Date: June 2017 WSP Canada Inc.

More information

4th Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations

4th Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations 4th Quarter 2016 Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations Steven Root Digitally signed by Steven Root DN: cn=steven Root, o=weatherbank, Inc., ou,

More information

4th Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations

4th Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations 4th Quarter 2013 Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations Steven A. Root Digitally signed by Steven A. Root DN: cn=steven A. Root, o=weatherbank,

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CITY OF LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS VAUXHALL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 2013 ANNUAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2014 Vauxhall Wastewater Treatment Plant 2013

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data OKLAHOMA CITY OK Latitude = 35.4 N WMO No. 72353 Longitude = 97.6 W Elevation = 133 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 28.62 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data MEDFORD/JACKSON CO. OR Latitude = 42.37 N WMO No. 72597 Longitude =122.8 W Elevation = 1329 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 28.61 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data DES MOINES IA Latitude = 41.53 N WMO No. 72546 Longitude = 93.65 W Elevation = 965 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 28.96 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data LAS VEGAS/MCCARRAN NV Latitude = 36.8 N WMO No. 72386 Longitude =115.1 W Elevation = 2179 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 27.67 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data PHOENIX/SKY HARBOR AZ Latitude = 33.43 N WMO No. 72278 Longitude =112. W Elevation = 116 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 28.72 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data RAPID CITY SD Latitude = 44.5 N WMO No. 72662 Longitude =3. W Elevation = 3169 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 26.67 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data PIERRE SD Latitude = 44.38 N WMO No. 726686 Longitude =1.2 W Elevation = 1742 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 28.1 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Monthly data generated on Wednesday, July 31, 2013 at 13:04 UTC

Monthly data generated on Wednesday, July 31, 2013 at 13:04 UTC MESONET CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA SUMMARY May 2013 Time Zone: Midnight-Midnight CST 1 82 40 63.9 NA 4 0 NA NA NA 0.01 28.18 29.90 N 19.2 46.3 24.90 66.6 71.4 77 66 2 54 36 43.5 NA 20 0 NA NA NA 0.05 28.67 30.42

More information

MONTHLY CLIMATOLOGICAL SUMMARY for JAN NAME: WMREC CITY: STATE: ELEV: 600 ft LAT: 39 38' 31" N LONG: 77 44' 00" W

MONTHLY CLIMATOLOGICAL SUMMARY for JAN NAME: WMREC CITY: STATE: ELEV: 600 ft LAT: 39 38' 31 N LONG: 77 44' 00 W MONTHLY CLIMATOLOGICAL SUMMARY for JAN. 2015 1 34.8 45.2 3:30p 22.1 5:30a 30.2 0.0 0.00 4.8 24.0 4:00p WSW 2 34.9 44.3 3:00p 24.0 12:00m 30.1 0.0 0.00 2.4 17.0 10:30a W 3 33.0 37.8 12:00m 23.3 1:00a 32.0

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data ANCHORAGE AK Latitude = 61.17 N WMO No. 7273 Longitude =15. W Elevation = 131 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.6 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data BURLINGTON VT Latitude = 44.47 N WMO No. 72617 Longitude = 73.15 W Elevation = 341 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.61 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data PHILADELPHIA PA Latitude = 39.88 N WMO No. 7248 Longitude = 75.25 W Elevation = 3 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.98 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data MACON/LEWIS WILSON GA Latitude = 32.7 N WMO No. 72217 Longitude = 83.65 W Elevation = 361 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.66 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data COLUMBIA SC Latitude = 33.95 N WMO No. 7231 Longitude = 81.12 W Elevation = 226 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.8 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data HONOLULU/OAHU HI Latitude = 21.35 N WMO No. 91182 Longitude =157.9 W Elevation = 16 feet Period of Record = 1967 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.96 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data INDIANAPOLIS IN Latitude = 39.73 N WMO No. 72438 Longitude = 86.27 W Elevation = 87 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.15 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data DENVER/STAPLETON CO Latitude = 39.75 N WMO No. 72469 Longitude =14.8 W Elevation = 5332 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1995 Average Pressure = 24.66 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data SPOKANE WA Latitude = 47.63 N WMO No. 72785 Longitude =117.5 W Elevation = 2366 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 27.5 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data JACKSONVILLE FL Latitude = 3.5 N WMO No. 7226 Longitude = 81.7 W Elevation = 3 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 3.1 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data LOUISVILLE/STANDIFORD KY Latitude = 38.18 N WMO No. 72423 Longitude = 85.73 W Elevation = 489 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.49 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data DAYTON/JAMES M COX OH Latitude = 39.9 N WMO No. 72429 Longitude = 84.2 W Elevation = 14 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 28.95 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data SPRINGFLD MO Latitude = 37.23 N WMO No. 7244 Longitude = 93.38 W Elevation = 127 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 28.66 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data BOSTON/LOGAN MA Latitude = 42.37 N WMO No. 7259 Longitude = 71.3 W Elevation = 3 feet Period of Record = 1967 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.95 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data BIRMINGHAM AL Latitude = 33.57 N WMO No. 72228 Longitude = 86.75 W Elevation = 63 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.36 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data MINNEAPOLIS-ST PAUL MN Latitude = 44.88 N WMO No. 72658 Longitude = 93.22 W Elevation = 837 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.7 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data WASHINGTON/DULLES VA Latitude = 38.95 N WMO No. 7243 Longitude = 77.45 W Elevation = 322 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.68 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data MIDLAND TX Latitude = 31.95 N WMO No. 72265 Longitude =2. W Elevation = 2861 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 27.3 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data NEW YORK/JOHN F KENNEDY NY Latitude = 4.65 N WMO No. 74486 Longitude = 73.78 W Elevation = 23 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.98 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data LANDER/HUNT WY Latitude = 42.82 N WMO No. 72576 Longitude =18.7 W Elevation = 5558 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 24.44 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data DULUTH MN Latitude = 46.83 N WMO No. 72745 Longitude = 92.18 W Elevation = 1417 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 28.43 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average) Values

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data ALBUQUERQUE NM Latitude = 35.5 N WMO No. 72365 Longitude =16.6 W Elevation = 5315 feet Period of Record = 1967 to 1996 Average Pressure = 24.72 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data MINOT AFB ND Latitude = 48.42 N WMO No. 727675 Longitude =11.3 W Elevation = 1667 feet Period of Record = 1967 to 1996 Average Pressure = 28.16 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data CHARLESTON/KANAWHA WV Latitude = 38.37 N WMO No. 72414 Longitude = 81.6 W Elevation = 981 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29. inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data CHICAGO/O HARE IL Latitude = 41.98 N WMO No. 7253 Longitude = 87.9 W Elevation = 673 feet Period of Record = 1967 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.27 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data MADISON/DANE CO. RGNL WI Latitude = 43.13 N WMO No. 72641 Longitude = 89.33 W Elevation = 866 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 29.5 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident

More information

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data RENO/CANNON INTL NV Latitude = 39.5 N WMO No. 72488 Longitude =119.7 W Elevation = 44 feet Period of Record = 1973 to 1996 Average Pressure = 25.57 inches Hg Design Criteria Data Mean Coincident (Average)

More information

Georgia Pacific Crossett Operations Hydrogen Sulfide and Meteorological Monitoring Program

Georgia Pacific Crossett Operations Hydrogen Sulfide and Meteorological Monitoring Program Results you can rely on Georgia Pacific Crossett Operations Hydrogen Sulfide and Meteorological Monitoring Program 6-Month Report for October 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 TRC Project Number: 222437.0000.0000

More information

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

This is a new permit condition titled, 2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP) This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)" Note to Permit Writer: This condition is for existing engines (commenced

More information

PATENTED TECHNOLOGY» PROVEN RESULTS» PAYBACK

PATENTED TECHNOLOGY» PROVEN RESULTS» PAYBACK 2328 Bellfort Ave. Houston, Texas 77051 Main 713-821-9600 Fax 713-821-9601 EFFECTS OF ENVIROFUELS DFC ON A LAND DRILLING RIG Oil and Gas Land Drilling Rig PUBLIC VERSION Revision Date February 18, 2008

More information

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary April 2012

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary April 2012 Deg. Days Precip Ty Precip Wind Solar Hu- Adj. to Sea Level mid- ity Avg Res Res Peak Minute 1 fog 2 hvy fog 3 thunder 4 ice plt 5 hail 6 glaze 7 duststm 8 smk, hz 9 blw snw 1 2 3 4A 4B 5 6 7 8 9 11 12

More information

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary April 2015

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary April 2015 Deg. Days Precip Ty Precip Wind Solar Hu- Adj. to Sea Level mid- ity Avg Res Res Peak 2 Minute 1 fog 2 hvy fog 3 thunder 4 ice plt 5 hail 6 glaze 7 duststm 8 smk, hz 9 blw snw 1 2 3 4A 4B 5 6 7 8 9 11

More information

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary April 2017

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary April 2017 Deg. Days Precip Ty Precip Wind Solar Hu- Adj. to Sea Level mid- ity Avg Res Res Peak 2 Minute 1 fog 2 hvy fog 3 thunder 4 ice plt 5 hail 6 glaze 7 duststm 8 smk, hz 9 blw snw 1 2 3 4A 4B 5 6 7 8 9 11

More information

SASKATOON STATION

SASKATOON STATION SRC CLIMATE REFERENCE STATION DAILY DATA REPORT SASKATOON STATION 45718 Saskatchewan 52 9' N 6 36' W 497 m asl Estab. 1963 JULY Preliminary 16 Day Temperature Degree-days Precipitation Relative Humidity

More information

Prepared for: Prepared by: 4005 Port Chicago Highway Concord, California

Prepared for: Prepared by: 4005 Port Chicago Highway Concord, California AIR MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT Time-Critical Removal Action for the Experimental Ship Shielding Range, Parcel E-2 Hunters Point Naval Shipyard San Francisco, California Contract Number N62473-10-D-0807

More information

Regulatory and Permitting Requirements of Stationary Generators In Delaware

Regulatory and Permitting Requirements of Stationary Generators In Delaware Regulatory and Permitting Requirements of Stationary Generators In Delaware Delaware - DNREC Air Quality Management February 7, 2006 Mark A. Prettyman and Guadalupe J. Reynolds Outline Regulation No. 1144

More information

Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre

Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre Waste Management of Canada Corporation Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATE MATTER EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Prepared

More information

Bilaga 3B - Skuggor. Layout B. 16 st Gamesa G128, 4,5 MW Totalhöjd 150 meter

Bilaga 3B - Skuggor. Layout B. 16 st Gamesa G128, 4,5 MW Totalhöjd 150 meter Bilaga 3B_Skuggberäkning och skuggkalender_layout B_150 m Kompletteringar Bilaga 3B - Skuggor Layout B 16 st Gamesa G128, 4,5 MW Totalhöjd 150 meter Bilaga 3B_Skuggberäkning och skuggkalender_layout B_150

More information

Houston Regional Monitoring. Air Quality Update to RAQPAC

Houston Regional Monitoring. Air Quality Update to RAQPAC Air Quality Update to RAQPAC September 27, 2017 Presented by: Steve Hansen Technical Advisory Committee s Purpose is a voluntary industry-funded technical resource dedicated to performing ambient air monitoring

More information

9/17/2013 OVERVIEW WHAT RICE UNITS ARE IMPACTED? WHAT IS A RICE UNIT? EXAMPLES OF RICE UNITS WHY IS THE EPA REGULATING RICE?

9/17/2013 OVERVIEW WHAT RICE UNITS ARE IMPACTED? WHAT IS A RICE UNIT? EXAMPLES OF RICE UNITS WHY IS THE EPA REGULATING RICE? OVERVIEW Compliance Webinar Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines RICE September 16, 2013 Jesse Zahn, CHMM Jesse.zahn@hrpassociates.com HRP Associates, Inc. Clifton Park, NY 12065 What is RICE Unit

More information

Appendix F. Ship Drift Analysis West Coast of North America: Alaska to Southern California HAZMAT Report ; April 2000

Appendix F. Ship Drift Analysis West Coast of North America: Alaska to Southern California HAZMAT Report ; April 2000 Appendix F Ship Drift Analysis West Coast of North America: Alaska to Southern California HAZMAT Report 2000-2; April 2000 2.2 Drift Factors When its propulsion or steering device fails, a ship will drift

More information

The Premcor Refining Group, Inc. Delaware City Refinery 4550 Wrangle Hill Rd. EXHIBIT A Delaware City, DE 19706

The Premcor Refining Group, Inc. Delaware City Refinery 4550 Wrangle Hill Rd. EXHIBIT A Delaware City, DE 19706 DRAFT Permit: APC-2004/0721-CONSTRUCTION (NSPS) Two Package Boilers The Premcor Refining Group, Inc. Delaware City Refinery 4550 Wrangle Hill Rd. EXHIBIT A Delaware City, DE 19706 ATTENTION: Andrew Kenner

More information

Board Administration and Regulatory Coordination Unit. Division 3. Air Resources Board

Board Administration and Regulatory Coordination Unit. Division 3. Air Resources Board 2423. Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures--Heavy-Duty Off-Road Diesel Cycle Engines. (a) This section shall be applicable to new heavy-duty off-road compression-ignition engines, produced on

More information

PA RACT 2. Reasonably Available Control Technology. Presented by Suzanne Dibert

PA RACT 2. Reasonably Available Control Technology. Presented by Suzanne Dibert PA RACT 2 Reasonably Available Control Technology Presented by Suzanne Dibert Affected Facilities Facilities with potential emissions that exceed 100 tons per year (tpy) for NOx (nitrogen oxide) and 50

More information

Daily Trends and Source Apportionment of Ultrafine Particulate Mass (PM 0.1 ) Over an Annual Cycle in a Typical California City

Daily Trends and Source Apportionment of Ultrafine Particulate Mass (PM 0.1 ) Over an Annual Cycle in a Typical California City Daily Trends and Source Apportionment of Ultrafine Particulate Mass (PM 0.1 ) Over an Annual Cycle in a Typical California City Toshihiro Kuwayama, Chris R. Ruehl, and Michael J. Kleeman* Department of

More information

2014 Meteorological and Oceanographic Summary for the Bocas del Toro Research Station. Prepared by: Steven Paton

2014 Meteorological and Oceanographic Summary for the Bocas del Toro Research Station. Prepared by: Steven Paton 0 2014 Meteorological and Oceanographic Summary for the Bocas del Toro Research Station Prepared by: Steven Paton 1 Introduction This is the second of a series of yearly reports summarising the past year

More information

1 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 2 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 3 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 4 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 5 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 6 NRG #40 Anem. m/s. 30 m. 40 m. 30 m. m/s.

1 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 2 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 3 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 4 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 5 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 6 NRG #40 Anem. m/s. 30 m. 40 m. 30 m. m/s. 1 Site Information: Sensor Information: 1 2 3 4 6 7 #0P Wind Vane 8 #0P Wind Vane 9 NRG #1S Temp C BP- Barom. mb 11 No SCM Installed 12 No SCM Installed Summary Report Channel 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 Height 0

More information

DRINKING WATER SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT Reporting Period: January 1 st to December 31 st, 2016

DRINKING WATER SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT Reporting Period: January 1 st to December 31 st, 2016 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT Reporting Period: January 1 st to December 31 st, 2016 Water System: Coal Harbour Water System Water System Owner Regional District of Mount Waddington Primary Contact

More information

METROPOLITAN COAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LICENCE MONITORING SUMMARY

METROPOLITAN COAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LICENCE MONITORING SUMMARY Introduction The Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO Act) requires that holders of an environment protection licence make their pollution monitoring data publicly available in a timely

More information

This rule shall apply to any stationary source which is a major source of regulated air pollutants or of hazardous air pollutants.

This rule shall apply to any stationary source which is a major source of regulated air pollutants or of hazardous air pollutants. RULE 2530 FEDERALLY ENFORCEABLE POTENTIAL TO EMIT (Adopted June 15, 1995; Amended April 25, 2002; Amended December 18, 2008, but not in effect until June 10, 2010) 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this rule

More information

AIR QUALITY PERMIT. Kennesaw State University - Marietta Campus

AIR QUALITY PERMIT. Kennesaw State University - Marietta Campus AIR QUALITY PERMIT Permit No. Effective Date February 11, 2016 In accordance with the provisions of the Georgia Air Quality Act, O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-1, et seq and the Rules, Chapter 391-3-1, adopted

More information

INDIA EMISSION REGULATIONS SUMMARY

INDIA EMISSION REGULATIONS SUMMARY INDIA EMISSION REGULATIONS SUMMARY Ramesh Pasarija Chairman, Technical Committee IDEMA Important Note The norms informed here are for reference only and there may be some errors. For precise norms and

More information

Ambient PM 10 Monitoring Sechelt, B.C Update

Ambient PM 10 Monitoring Sechelt, B.C Update Ministry of Environment LOWER MAINLAND REGION Ambient PM 10 Monitoring Sechelt, B.C. 2004-2005 Update E N V I R O N M E N T A L Q U A L I T Y Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data

More information

Science Applications International Corporation

Science Applications International Corporation February 7, 2011 Ms. Sharon R. Fisher 1425 Eden Road York, PA 17402 Re: 2010 Summary of Operation for North Building 4 Soil Vapor Extraction System SAIC Project 4501020172 / 5000 / 100 Dear Sharon: Science

More information

Continuous Efficiency Improvement Loop

Continuous Efficiency Improvement Loop Make Data Driven, Continuous Efficiency Improvements as Standard Practice: Technical Loop Lessons Learned & Databases Update Building(s) Benchmarking (Fleet Databases) Energy Use & Performance Deviation

More information

2017 Meteorological and Oceanographic Summary for the Bocas del Toro Research Station. Prepared by: Steven Paton

2017 Meteorological and Oceanographic Summary for the Bocas del Toro Research Station. Prepared by: Steven Paton 0 2017 Meteorological and Oceanographic Summary for the Bocas del Toro Research Station Prepared by: Steven Paton 1 Introduction This is the 5 th of a series of yearly reports summarising the past year

More information

ANCR CRU Statistics February 2007 to December 2007

ANCR CRU Statistics February 2007 to December 2007 ANCR CRU Statistics February 2007 to December 2007 o Jan/07 Feb/07* Mar/07 Apr/07 May/07 Jun/07 Jul/07 Aug/07 Sep/07 Oct/07 Nov/07 Dec/07 Total notes data from Perimeter phone system unavailable prior

More information

2016 Meteorological and Oceanographic Summary for the Bocas del Toro Research Station. Prepared by: Steven Paton

2016 Meteorological and Oceanographic Summary for the Bocas del Toro Research Station. Prepared by: Steven Paton 0 2016 Meteorological and Oceanographic Summary for the Bocas del Toro Research Station Prepared by: Steven Paton 1 Introduction This is the forth of a series of yearly reports summarising the past year

More information

Test Procedure for Measuring Fuel Economy and Emissions of Trucks Equipped with Aftermarket Devices

Test Procedure for Measuring Fuel Economy and Emissions of Trucks Equipped with Aftermarket Devices Test Procedure for Measuring Fuel Economy and Emissions of Trucks Equipped with Aftermarket Devices 1 SCOPE This document sets out an accurate, reproducible and representative procedure for simulating

More information

Summary of Reprocessing 2016 IMPROVE Data with New Integration Threshold

Summary of Reprocessing 2016 IMPROVE Data with New Integration Threshold Summary of Reprocessing 216 IMPROVE Data with New Integration Threshold Prepared by Xiaoliang Wang Steven B. Gronstal Dana L. Trimble Judith C. Chow John G. Watson Desert Research Institute Reno, NV Prepared

More information

MARAMA 2015 SCIENCE MEETING JULY 29-30, 2015 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

MARAMA 2015 SCIENCE MEETING JULY 29-30, 2015 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA Air Permitting of Sources at Natural gas Production, Compression and Processing Facilities MARAMA 2015 SCIENCE MEETING JULY 29-30, 2015 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA Tom Wolf, Governor John Quigley, Secretary Overview

More information

STATISTICS BOTSWANA ELECTRICITY GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION 2016/2 STATS BRIEF, FIRST QUARTER Copyrights Statistics Botswana 2016

STATISTICS BOTSWANA ELECTRICITY GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION 2016/2 STATS BRIEF, FIRST QUARTER Copyrights Statistics Botswana 2016 2016/2 ELECTRICITY GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION STATS BRIEF, FIRST QUARTER 2016 Copyrights Statistics Botswana 2016 Statistics Botswana. Private Bag 0024 Botswana Tel: (267) 367 1300. Fax: (267) 395 2201.

More information

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK retby usiness Park Ashby Road Stanhope urton upon Trent Staffordshire DE15 0YZ Contact: Mr R M Allen Tel: +44 (0)1283 216334 Fax: +44 (0)1283

More information

Shadow Flicker Briefing

Shadow Flicker Briefing Wind Farm Measurements and Modeling Shadow Flicker Briefing Subject: Customer: Project type: Prepared by: Distribution: Shadow-Flicker Modeling Clayton, NY. PPM Atlantic Renewable 330 Province Line Road

More information

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT In order to understand the vehicle classes and groupings, the MnDOT Vehicle Classification Scheme and the Vehicle Classification

More information

COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF AVL S 1065 COMPLIANT GASEOUS PEMS

COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF AVL S 1065 COMPLIANT GASEOUS PEMS COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF AVL S 1065 COMPLIANT GASEOUS PEMS 22 th CRC Real World Emissions Workshop March 25-28 Presented By: Kent Johnson Co-Authors: Tanfeng Cao, Thomas D. Durbin, Karl Oberguggenberger,

More information

SCHOOLYARD WETLANDS: CREATING AQUATIC SPACES FOR LEARNING. C. A. Cole Penn State University

SCHOOLYARD WETLANDS: CREATING AQUATIC SPACES FOR LEARNING. C. A. Cole Penn State University SCHOOLYARD WETLANDS: CREATING AQUATIC SPACES FOR LEARNING C. A. Cole Penn State University cac13@psu.edu PA Academic Standards Environment and Ecology Environment and Ecology is grounded in the complexity

More information

Permit Holder. Permitted Equipment

Permit Holder. Permitted Equipment Air Quality Registration Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engine (Less than 400 Brake Horsepower) Permit No. Project No. Description Date Testing No Plant Number: Under the Direction of the

More information

2016 Meteorological Summary for the Galeta Marine Island Laboratory. Prepared by: Steven Paton

2016 Meteorological Summary for the Galeta Marine Island Laboratory. Prepared by: Steven Paton 0 2016 Meteorological Summary for the Galeta Marine Island Laboratory Prepared by: Steven Paton 1 Introduction This is the fourth in a series of yearly reports summarising the past year s Smithsonian Tropical

More information

2017 Meteorological Summary for the Galeta Marine Island Laboratory. Prepared by: Steven Paton

2017 Meteorological Summary for the Galeta Marine Island Laboratory. Prepared by: Steven Paton 0 2017 Meteorological Summary for the Galeta Marine Island Laboratory Prepared by: Steven Paton 1 Introduction This is the 5 th in a series of yearly reports summarising the past year s Smithsonian Tropical

More information

Appendix K. Final DOC Conditions

Appendix K. Final DOC Conditions Appendix K Final DOC Conditions Puente Power Project 262 MW (net nominal) GE 7HA.01 Combustion Turbine Generator (CTG) The CTG is simultaneously subject to the emission limits, monitoring requirements,

More information

Low Emission Zones in Germany

Low Emission Zones in Germany Martin Lambrecht Umweltbundesamt (UBA) Federal Environment Agency Germany Section I 3.1 Environment and Transport 1 Outline 1. EU: Air Quality Targets 2. Implementation in Germany 3. Experiences in Berlin

More information

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers at Area Source Facilities (Boiler GACT) Final Reconsidered Rule Requirements Summary

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers at Area Source Facilities (Boiler GACT) Final Reconsidered Rule Requirements Summary Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers at Area Facilities (Boiler GACT) Final Reconsidered Rule Requirements Summary Federal Regulation NESHAP, 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJJ Proposed rule published

More information

Table 0.1 Summary Pollutant Discharge Test Results Engine Manufacturer. Number 24652

Table 0.1 Summary Pollutant Discharge Test Results Engine Manufacturer. Number 24652 Summary Commissioned by XMILE Europe B.V., SGS Nederland BV, Environmental Services, executed emission measurements on the propulsion engine of the. XMILE Europe B.V. wants to reduce the emission of engines.

More information

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data. SEPTEMBER 2016 WIM Site Location WIM #37 is located on I-94 near Otsego in Wright county. The WIM is located only on the westbound (WB) side of I-94, meaning that all data mentioned in this report pertains

More information

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc Copyright Statement All rights reserved. All material in this document is, unless otherwise stated, the property of FPC International, Inc. Copyright and other intellectual property laws protect these

More information

Recent and current developments in the regulation of air pollution from ships

Recent and current developments in the regulation of air pollution from ships Recent and current developments in the regulation of air pollution from ships Christiana Ntouni, Regulatory Affairs Working together for a safer world Contents International Maritime Organization (IMO)

More information

Overview. Mercury Monitoring. Regulatory drivers Technology Overview Pros and Cons Alternative Hybrid Approach

Overview. Mercury Monitoring. Regulatory drivers Technology Overview Pros and Cons Alternative Hybrid Approach Mercury Compliance Monitoring in 2015 and Beyond Volker Schmid Clean Air Engineering March 28, 2013 Overview Mercury Monitoring Regulatory drivers Technology Overview Pros and Cons Alternative Hybrid Approach

More information

United States Stove Company Project # Model: KP60 AKA: AP60, VG60 Type: Pellet-Fired Room Heater May 31, 2018

United States Stove Company Project # Model: KP60 AKA: AP60, VG60 Type: Pellet-Fired Room Heater May 31, 2018 United States Stove Company Project # 18-409 AKA: AP60, VG60 Type: Pellet-Fired Room Heater May 31, 2018 ASTM E2779 Standard Test Method for Determining Particulate Matter Emissions from Pellet Heaters

More information

Meteorology of Monteverde, Costa Rica 2005

Meteorology of Monteverde, Costa Rica 2005 Meteorology of Monteverde, Costa Rica 2005 Technical Report submitted to the Monteverde Institute Andrew J. Guswa, Asst Professor, Picker Engineering Program Amy L. Rhodes, Asst Professor, Department of

More information

Variation Notice with introductory note

Variation Notice with introductory note Variation Notice with introductory note Pollution Prevention and Control Regulations 2000 Dudley Energy from Waste Facility MES Environmental Ltd Lister Road Dudley West Midlands DY2 8JT. Variation Notice

More information