APPENDIX A EVALUATION MATRIX. Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Exhibit 29: Recommended Layout for Black Creek Stop

Transcription

1 Exhibit 29: Recoended Layout for Black Creek Stop REVISED FINAL REPORT Toronto Transit Coission (TTC) ECLRT - JANE STREET TO KEELE STREET - VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OPTIONS March 2 Page 8 March 2 APPENDIX A EVALUATION MATRIX REVISED FINAL REPORT Toronto Transit Coission (TTC) ECLRT - JANE STREET TO KEELE STREET - VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OPTIONS

2 BLACK CREEK M&S FACILITY CONNECTION EVALUATION OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF STUDY AREA To develop and assess concept alternatives for the LRT connection to the proposed M&S Facility and to recoend a preferred alignent alternative for the intersection of Eglinton Avenue at Black Creek Drive that can: Provide high quality connection to proposed M&S Facility (loading/unloading capacity); Provide high quality transit service (speed, reliability and interodal connectivity); Miniize ipacts (traffic operations, property, environent and construction ipacts); and Miniize costs. Six conceptual LRT interface alternatives were developed: Interface Alternative Alignent Connection to Proposed M&S Facility Alternative At-grade alignent Three at-grade tracks with one secondary (eergency) at-grade track on Photography Drive Alternative 2 Elevated north side alignent Three elevated tracks and one below-grade track Alternative Elevated south side alignent One elevated track and one below-grade track Alternative Below-grade alignent Two below-grade tracks Alternative 5 Elevated north side alternate alignent Two elevated tracks and two below-grade tracks Alternative Hybrid alignent Three at-grade tracks with one secondary (eergency) elevated track For each alternative, a score between to is given for each criteria where is least preferred, and is ost preferred. The score is not a rank, i.e. ore than one alternative ay be given the sae score under the sae criteria. The exception to this is the scoring for Capital Cost, where alternatives are scored on a scale of to 2 where: <$7M 2; $7M-$85M ; $85M-$M ; $M - $5M 9; $5M $M 8; $M-$5M 7; $5M-$M ; $M-$75M 5; $75M-$9M ; $9-$25 ; $25-$22 2; >$22M. At the conclusion of the evaluation process, the alternative with the highest total score is the ost preferred. EVALUATION CRITERIA OBJECTIVE CRITERIA INDICATOR Alternative At- Grade Alternative 2 Alternative Elevated South Side Alternative Underground Alternative 5 Alternate Alternative Hybrid. Ensure a high quality connection to the proposed M&S Facility Quality of connection to M&S Facility # Connection tracks (Note: all tracks have bidirectional capability) tracks tracks 2 tracks 2 tracks tracks tracks # connection tracks available for noral operation 5 5 tracks (2 outbound, inbound) tracks (2 outbound, inbound) 2 tracks (requires bi-directional operation under noral conditions) 2 tracks (requires bi-directional operation under noral conditions) tracks (2 outbound, 2 inbound) tracks (2 outbound, inbound) Interaction of LRT with roadway traffic under noral operation Yes No No No No Yes Page of

3 BLACK CREEK M&S FACILITY CONNECTION EVALUATION OBJECTIVE CRITERIA INDICATOR Alternative At- Grade Alternative 2 Alternative Elevated South Side Alternative Underground Alternative 5 Alternate Alternative Hybrid Ipact of connection on M&S Facility layout Ability to overcoe grade differential 5 2 run-out tracks long run-out track long run-out track 2 long run-out tracks 2 long run-out tracks run-out tracks 2. Ensure an attractive transit service relative to the private auto LRT speed and reliability Ability to aintain planned headways Interaction with traffic, sall profile changes No interaction with traffic, long profile changes No interaction with traffic, long profile changes No ipedients, sall profile changes No interaction with traffic, long profile changes Interaction with traffic, sall profile changes Connections to other transit Proxiity of LRT stops/stations to potential future GO Station location Close to potential future station, vertical level separation 2 vertical level separations 2 vertical level separations Close to potential future station, 2 vertical level separations Very close to future potential station, 2 vertical level separations Close to potential future station, vertical level separation Proxiity of LRT stops/stations to TTC bus stops on Weston Road and Black Creek Drive At-grade stops at both Weston Road and Black Creek Drive Elevated station at Black Creek Drive & below-grade station at Weston Road Elevated station at Black Creek Drive & below-grade station at Weston Road One below-grade station between Weston Road & Black Creek Drive Elevated station at Black Creek Drive & below-grade station at Weston Road At-grade stops at both Weston Road and Black Creek Drive. Ensure safe and reasonable traffic operations Ipact on traffic operations Vehicle turning oveent restrictions due to LRT Traffic signal coordination at intersections can iniize ipact on traffic on traffic on traffic on traffic Traffic signal coordination at intersections can iniize ipact. Respect the environent and adjacent properties Property ipact Ipact on large developent opportunities Soe ipact on traffic due to at-grade LRT Ipact on developent opportunity of reaining Metrus property Ipacts high potential developent of property south of Eglinton ( No Frills ) Ipact on developent opportunity of reaining Metrus property Soe ipact on traffic due to at-grade LRT Environental ipact Ipact on natural environent Pier construction in Black Creek Valley lands north of Eglinton Pier construction in Black Creek Valley lands south of Eglinton Pier construction in Black Creek Valley lands north of Eglinton Page 2 of

4 BLACK CREEK M&S FACILITY CONNECTION EVALUATION OBJECTIVE CRITERIA INDICATOR Alternative At- Grade Alternative 2 Alternative Elevated South Side Alternative Underground Alternative 5 Alternate Alternative Hybrid Level of visual intrusion by ECLRT structure Level of expected noise and vibration fro ECLRT Preservation of potential heritage Kodak building At-grade LRT in urban environent At-grade LRT, urban environent, no significant increase in noise and vibration and portals and portals, increased noise and vibration over roadway and portals over roadway and portals, increased noise and vibration Below-grade Below-grade and portals and portals, increased noise and vibration At-grade LRT with elevated eergency track in urban environent At-grade LRT, urban environent, no significant increase in noise and vibration Preserved Not preserved Not preserved Not preserved Not preserved Preserved Construction ipact Traffic ipact during construction (Assues TMB construction for tunnel sections) Natural environent ipact during construction 5 5 All at-grade, staged construction Cut & cover station, no at-grade construction Ipacts northeast quadrant of Eglinton Ave and Black Creek Drive (Black Creek flood plain) Cut & cover station, no at-grade construction, overhead structure Ipacts southeast quadrant of Eglinton Ave and Black Creek Drive Cut & cover station, no at-grade construction Cut & cover station, no at-grade construction Ipacts northeast quadrant of Eglinton Ave and Black Creek Drive (Black Creek flood plain) All at-grade, staged construction Support the city s urban structure Official Plan land use copatibility Provision of bicycle lanes Possible alternatives to provide bicycle lanes Bicycle lanes provided Bicycle lanes provided Bicycle lanes provided Bicycle lanes provided Possible alternatives to provide bicycle lanes # pedestrian crossings with LRT at-grade (Pedestrian transfers to stops/stations are considered under a previous criteria) crossings across Eglinton Ave crossings crossings crossings crossings crossings across Eglinton Ave Page of

5 BLACK CREEK M&S FACILITY CONNECTION EVALUATION OBJECTIVE CRITERIA INDICATOR Alternative At- Grade Alternative 2 Alternative Elevated South Side Alternative Underground Alternative 5 Alternate Alternative Hybrid. Ensure affordability Cost Capital cost (Using a scale of -2 where: <$7M 2; $7M-$85M ; $85M-$M ; $M - $5M 9; $5M $M 8; $M-$5M 7; $5M- $M ; $M-$75M 5; $75M-$9M ; $9- $25 ; $25-$22 2; >$22M.) 2 2 $5M $95M $2M $25M $8M $7M Maintenance cost (Maintenance of structures) 2 5 At-grade throughout and tunnel segents and tunnel segents Tunnel structure throughout and tunnel segents At-grade throughout with elevated eergency track TOTAL SCORE RANK First Fifth Sixth Third Fourth Second \\STO892FS\ibishare\29_trnst_cityEA\5. Design (Work) Phase\Black Creek Yard Connection\M&S Facility Connection Options Study\Evaluation atrix docx\29--5\A Page of

6 REVISED FINAL REPORT Toronto Transit Coission (TTC) ECLRT - JANE STREET TO KEELE STREET - VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OPTIONS APPENDIX B ALIGNMENT OPTION DRAWINGS March 2

7 PVI STA = 2+9 PVI ELEV = 22.8 BVCS: BVCE: 22.2 EVCS: +.75 EVCE: BVCS: +8.5 BVCE: 2.98 EVCS: +.5 EVCE: BVCS: +9.9 BVCE: 2.22 EVCS: EVCE: BVCS: +9.5 BVCE: 7. EVCS: EVCE: BVCS: +72. BVCE: 5.8 EVCS: +78. EVCE:.9 BVCS: BVCE: 2.87 EVCS: EVCE: PLAN SCALE : V=:2 V=:2 V=:2 V=:2 TCG Transit City Group 2 ALTERNATIVE

8 29.7 SCALE : Transit City Group V=:2 PLAN TCG ALTERNATIVE V=: V=: BVCE: BVCS: +255 EVCE: 22.9 EVCS: BVCE: 2.8 BVCS: 5+8. EVCE: 9.75 EVCS: EVCE: 2.82 EVCS: EVCE: 2.9 EVCS: BVCE: BVCS: EVCE: EVCS: BVCE: BVCS: EVCE: EVCS: BVCE: BVCS: BVCE: BVCS:

9 V=: V=: V=: PVI STA = +27. PVI ELEV = BVCS: BVCE: 9. EVCS: EVCE:.9 BVCS: BVCE: EVCS: EVCE: BVCS: BVCE: 8. EVCS: EVCE:.8 BLACK CREEK DR WESTON RD BLACK CREEK BVCS: BVCE: BVCS: +.99 BVCE:. BVCS: BVCE: 2.2 EVCS: EVCE: 8.7 EVCS: EVCE: PLAN SCALE : TCG Transit City Group 2 ALTERNATIVE

10 V=: V=: V=: BVCS: BVCE:.9 EVCS: EVCE:.829 BVCS: +2.2 BVCE: EVCS: +2.2 EVCE: 2.57 BVCS: BVCE: 8.25 EVCS: EVCE: BVCS: BVCE:.598 EVCS: EVCE: BVCS: +28 BVCE: 98. EVCS: + EVCE: PLAN SCALE : TCG Transit City Group 2 ALTERNATIVE

11 V=: V=: V=: BVCS: BVCE:. EVCS: EVCE: 2.2 BVCS: +9. BVCE: 22.8 EVCS: +79. EVCE: BVCS: BVCE:.87 EVCS: EVCE: BVCS: BVCE: EVCS: EVCE: BVCS: BVCE:.5 EVCS: EVCE: 2.78 BVCS: BVCE: 2.9 EVCS: +7.8 EVCE: 22. BVCS: +255 BVCE: EVCS: +5 EVCE: PLAN SCALE : TCG Transit City Group 2 ALTERNATIVE 5

12 TCG Transit City Group ALTERNATIVE