APPLICATION OF SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT INDEX ( S U T I ) IN SURABAYA

Transcription

1 APPLICATION OF SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT INDEX ( S U T I ) IN SURABAYA Wahju Herijanto Lecturer Civil Engineering Department INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI SEPULUH NOPEMBER (ITS)

2 SURABAYA, 2nd of Indonesia Land use. Source: Surabaya C map

3 Gate of Surabaya: Purabaya Bus Terminal and Railway Station Intermodal Bus Terminal with Airport Quality : City Bus; Intercity Bus and Airport Bus The busiest in South East Asia Source: losbp in skyscrapercity.com

4 City Bus: Damri and others

5 Minibus Angkot

6 N S : April 2018 E W : September 2018 Ticket purchasing : by plastic bottles NEW Low Floor Bus: Suroboyo Bus

7 Indicator 1: Transport plan of public transport, intermoda and active transport facilities. Aspects Explanation Score I) walking networks II) cycling networks III) intermodal transfer facilities From 2010 more than 60 km new diffable friendly sidewalk and widespread pelican crossing at city center streets and main corridor arterials. The city is very aggresive in planning and implementation of sidewalk and pelican crossing. Surabaya is regional leader at sidewalk and pelican crossing development. Bike lane at left and right side of some one-way streets at city center and at frontage road of southern arterial. Bike lane is also developed at ITS campus. While bike lane plan is moderate, Surabaya still more advance in regional Purabaya bus terminal with airport management quality is the busiest intermodal station in South East Asia with more than 1 million buses and more than 32 million passengers annually. The plan shows future intermodality between bus and tram (have been tendered), tram and LRT, and LRT with intercity / commuter train, as well as park and ride facilities IV) public transport Current public transport comprise of 16 standard bus line and 58 tiny bus (angkot) line. The newest 2018) is the line of standard low floor bus with exchange waste mineral water bottle/cup for ticket, as one of the 16 trunk line and 35 feeder line. The public transport plan includes one line N-S tram and one line of E-W LRT. Whether the development of the plan is not very aggresive, Surabaya is the only city using standard bus and especially Total (sum) 14 In Planning since 2011 and aplication of the planning until recent time, Surabaya get index It is consistent with appearance and functional of current intermodal facilities, dissable friendly sidewalk and occurence of bicycle lane in city center. Public transport reformed plan also applied in 2017 by purchasing low floor bus and operate it since April Tram is rather late because of shifting budget responsibility from national government to city government. By August 2018 city did many thing about tender preparation. 3

8 Indicator 2: Shared of public transport in commuting Modal share of public and active transport index is very low (1.46). This is 2011 condition, but currently still consistent since only small part of the reformed public transport is applied start in This condition started with easy financing of motorcycle since 2000, and more severe when online taxi and on line motorcycle occure in The cure of it is a modern reformed public transport with on line and cashless transaction that provide less expensive fare, scheduled, comfortable, and safe. PURPOSE COMMUTING (WORK AND EDUCATION) MODE # subtotals a. Scheduled bus and minibus b. Train, metro, tram c. Ferry d. Other public e. Public transport (a+b+c+d) f. Walking g. Bicycle h. Active transport (f+g) 0 i. Passenger car j. Taxi k. Motorcycle l. Scooter/moped m. Para transit (unscheduled) n. Other motorized (trucks,etc) o. Individual motorized (i+j+k+l+m+n) p. Total (e+h+o) q. Public and active (e+h) r. Modal share of active and public transport

9 Indicator 3 : Convenient access to public transport Source: Dinas Perhubungan kota Surabaya Surabaya population density (Ambarwati et al, 2016) density a andpopulation density b in each zone of the city_fig3_ Convenient acces to public transport index is very high (90.74), as we can see the map of minibus transport almost cover the whole cities until periphery area and small aisle in kampong. The low density area (High income) need to open access of the housing complex, therefore can get public transitaccess (high quality one)

10 Indicator 4: Perception on Public Transport Dissatisfied Neithe r Satisfied Very Partly Nor Partly Very Dimension Frequency of the service Punctuality (delay) Comfort and cleanliness of Safety of vehicles Convenience of stops/stations Availability of information Personnel courtesy Fare level responses On the other hand public transport quality and reliability index is very low (1.00). This is based on 2013 survey, which is still consistent with 2017 condition. The new low floor dissable friendly bus is 2018 application. If there is more high quality bus and tram applied, the situation will be better. More frequent or time table is another key of reliability. The Data is before the new low floor bus

11 Indicator 5: Accident Fatality Fatalities # Road transport 195 Railway transport 0 Tram 0 Ferryboats 0 Other 0 Total 195 Inhabitants 3,057,776 Fatalities/100,000 inh 6.38 Traffic fatality index is high (80) [GOOD] means that it should be maintained. It is a possibility that unpopularity of alcoholic drink (on behalf of religion) is one of the positive cause. Surabaya Traffic Police in Statistical Office Publication

12 Indicator 6: Affordability Affordability index is rather high (84) while wage used in this calculation is minimum wage, not the mean. It indicates that if there is higher quality public transport, people will want to pay higher price for it. There is opportunity to attract average income to public transport if the city provide a high quality servive, such as: LRT, Tram, BRT and BHLS Bus

13 Indicator 7: Operational Cost Services Market shares (estimated) Fare Revenues Transport Operating expenses Farebox ratio Bus ,893,980, % Angkot ,270,540,000 59,560,717, % Total 100 Weighted Operational cost index is rather low (54) means that the system need more passengers and higher fare price. It is possible to rise the price as discussed in affordability. This unhealthy situation can be solved if the city provide High Quality T t hil l d t l titi h

14 Indicator 8: Investment in Public Transport source: detik.com source: idntimes City and National Investment in Transport Budget 2018 Developing sustainable transportation, terminal maintenance 71,000,000,000 Developing park and ride, sign, marking, pelican crossing 290,000,000,000 Pedestrian sidewalk 69,000,000,000 Road and Bridge construction and management 175,500,000,000 The index of Investment in public transport is high (142). That is 2018 condition. We need data of previous years. However the city is consistent in develope facilities for public transport and active transport since 2010 when pedestrian sidewalk project is started. City should continue the budget for the application of all the plan faster INVESTMENTS BY THE CITY 2018 PUBLIC TRANSPORT FACILITIES 430,000,000,000 TOTAL TRANSPORT 605,500,000,000 SHARE (%) 71

15 Indicator 9 : Air Quality Index PM10 (ug/m3) 24 hour mean PM10 20 μg/m3 annual mean 50 μg/m3 24-hour mean Embong Malang 149 Dr. Moestopo 174 Diponegoro 149 Gemblongan 232 Mayjend Soengkono 127 Oerip Soemoharjo 94 PM10 Population Population Location yearly mean in area percentage 1 jl. Embong Malang jl. Dr. Mustopo jl. Diponegoro jl. Gemblongan jl. Mayjen Sungkono jl Urip Sumoharjo Total city population Population weighted concentration Air quality index is rather low (60). It is a possibility that the measurement point is on busy streets and apply it for whole area. Other possibilities is either there is no regulation for old vehicle, there is no cumpolsary vehicle annual emission test, or low share of public transport. More measurement station is needed including at periphery area

16 Indicator 10 : Greenhouse Gas Emission Litres sold CO2 factor Emissions Population Emission/capita kg/l tons/year GASOLINE/PETROL 2,220, , DIESEL 240, TOTAL 5, ,057, Greenhouse gas emission from transport index is high (99) [GOOD]. It is a possibility that car ownership is still low. Maintain car ownership keep low, reduce motorcycle ownership, and promote public transport and active transport

17 SUTI Index Extent to which transport plans cover 1public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes 87,50 Modal share of active and public 2 transport in commuting 1,46 Convenient access to public transport 3 service 90,74 4Public transport quality and reliability 1,00 5 Traffic fatalities per inhabitants 81,78 Affordability travel costs as part of 6 income 84,51 Operational costs of the public 7 transport system 57,58 Investment in public transportation 8 systems 100,00 9Air quality (pm10) 60,03 Greenhouse gas emissions from 10 transport 99,93

18 Interpretation In Planning since 2011 and aplication of the planning until recent time, Surabaya get index It is consistent with appearance and functional of current intermodal facilities, dissable friendly sidewalk and occurence of bicycle lane in city center. Public transport reformed plan also applied in 2017 by purchasing low floor bus and operate it since April Tram is rather late because of shifting budget responsibility from national government to city government. By August 2018 city did many thing about tender preparation. Modal share of public and active transport index is very low 11.6%, (normalized 1.46). This is 2011 condition, but currently still consistent since only small part of the reformed public transport is applied start in This condition started with easy financing of motorcycle since 2000, and more severe when on line taxi and on line motorcycle occure in The cure of it is a modern reformed public transport with on line and cashless transaction that provide less expensive fare, scheduled, comfortable, and safe. Convenient acces to public transport index is very high (90.74), as we can see the map of minibus transport almost cover the whole cities until periphery area and small aisle in kampong. On the other hand public transport quality and reliability index is very low (30.6%), Normalized value 1%. This is based on 2013 survey, which is still consistent with 2017 condition. The new low floor dissable friendly bus is 2018 application. If there is more high quality bus and tram applied, the situation will be better. More frequent or time table is another key of reliability. Traffic fatality index is high (80) means that it should be maintained. It is a possibility that unpopularity of alcoholic drink (on behalf of religion) is one of the positive cause. Affordability index is rather high (84) while wage used in this calculation is minimum wage, not the mean. It indicates that if there is higher quality public transport, people will want to pay higher price for it. Operational cost index is rather low (54) means that the system need more passengers and higher fare price. It is possible to rise the price as discussed in affordability. The index of Investment in public transport is high (100). That is 2018 condition. We need data of previous years. However the city is consistent in develope facilities for public transport and active transport since 2010 when pedestrian sidewalk project is started. Air quality index is rather low (60). It is a possibility that the measurement point is on busy streets. Other possibilities is either there is no regulation for old vehicle, there is no cumpolsary vehicle annual emission test, or low share of public transport. Greenhouse gas emission from transport index is high (99). It is a possibility that car ownership is still low.

19 THANK YOU Wahju Herijanto Lecturer of Civil Engineering Department INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI SEPULUH NOPEMBER herijanto@ce.its.ac.id