USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service Livestock Humane Handling. Egregious Event Enforcement Actions

Transcription

1 USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service Livestock Humane Handling Egregious Event Enforcement Actions

2 Livestock Humane Handling Enforcement Actions for Egregious Inhumane Events Notice of Intended Enforcement (NOIE) Warning notice issued by FSIS district offices Notifies a plant that, although the violations do not pose an imminent threat to public health, FSIS may either withhold the marks of inspection or suspend the plant unless the plant responds to FSIS within 3 business days to demonstrate how it has or will achieve compliance

3 Livestock Humane Handling Enforcement Actions for Egregious Inhumane Events Suspension: FSIS district offices withdraw inspectors from their duties Plants cease production The length of suspension is determined by how long it takes the plant to correct the problem and come up with a plan to prevent it Reinstatement of Suspension: Egregious event recurs during the Suspension Abeyance period

4 Fiscal Years 2011, 12, 13 Suspensions/NOIE and Reinstatements Fiscal Year: October 1 to September 30 Fiscal Years 2011, 2012, 2013 Fiscal Year NOIE Suspension Reinstatement Total FY FY 2012* FY *Fiscal Year 2012 Directive Rev 2: NOIE for Robust Plan Released August 2011

5 Suspensions/NOIE

6 Fiscal Year 2013 Fiscal Year 2013: October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013 FY 2013 NOIE 15 Suspension 57 Reinstatement 11

7 Robust Systematic Approach FY 2013 Livestock Plants with: Robust Systematic Approach Non-Robust Systematic Approach No Systematic Approach Robust Non-Robust No Sys Approach NOIE Suspension Reinstatement 2 3 6

8 Suspensions/NOIE

9 FY 2013 Enforcements by District District Total Plants NOIE SUSPENSION Reinstatement Alameda Denver Des Moines Springdale Dallas Chicago Philadelphia Raleigh Atlanta Jackson

10 Suspensions/NOIE

11 Suspensions/NOIE

12 % Enforcements by District FY 2013, % Enforcements by District District Total Plants NOIE SUSPENSION Reinstatement Alameda 39 0% 13% 3% Denver 122 1% 3% 1% Des Moines % 14.1% 3.8% Springdale % 10.9% 0.0% Dallas % 7.8% 2.0% Chicago % 7.3% 0.0% Philadelphia % 5.0% 0.7% Raleigh % 6.9% 2.3% Atlanta % 5.9% 0.0% Jackson % 7.0% 3.5%

13 Suspensions/NOIE

14 % Enforcements in District by Head Slaughtered FY 2013, % Enforcements by head slaughtered for each District District Head Slaughtered Enforcement Actions % per 1000 Head Alameda 5,198, % Denver 19,195, % Des Moines 50,001, % Springdale 14,889, % Dallas 12,052, % Chicago 22,178, % Philadelphia 4,324, % Raleigh 14,968, % Atlanta 1,522, % Jackson 3,351, %

15 Enforcements by Plant Size Establishment size Based on establishment HACCP Defined by number of employees: Large > 500 Employees Small >10 but < 500 Very Small <10 employees (or annual sales of less than $2.5 million)

16 Enforcements by Plant Size Large - 61 Small Very Small FY 2013, Enforcements by Plant Size NOIE Suspension Reinstated 3 3 5

17 % Enforcements by Plant Size Large - 61 Small Very Small NOIE 10% 3% 1% Suspension 7% 9% 7% Reinstatement 5% 2% 1%

18 Enforcements by Regulation FY 2013, Enforcements by Regulation Handling in Pens (inc. Unloading, Prod Use) CO2 Stunning Captive Bolt Gunshot Electric Stunning / NOIE Suspension Reinstatement

19 Suspensions/NOIE

20 Enforcements by Species FY 2013, Enforcements by Species Swine includes sows, market hogs Beef includes beef cows, bulls, steers, heifers, dairy cows Sheep includes lamb, adult sheep, ram Swine Beef Veal Goat Sheep NOIE Suspension Reinstatement

21

22 Close Up Des Moines District Des Moines District 78 Livestock Slaughter Plants 20 Enforcement Actions Total Des Moines NOIE SUSPENSION REINSTATEMENT FY enforcements out of 78 Livestock Slaughter Plants = 26% Enforcement Actions for FY 2013

23 Close Up Des Moines District Plants Incident statistics: 20 Enforcement Actions, involving 16 Plants SIZE NOIE SUSPENSION REINSTATE Plant 1 Large 1 Plant 2 Small 2 Plant 3 Small 1 Plant 4 Large 1 Plant 5 Large 1 Plant 6 Large 1 2 Plant 7 Large 1 1 Plant 8 Small 1 Plant 9 Very Small 1 Plant 10 Very Small 1 Plant 11 Very Small 1 Plant 12 Very Small 1 Plant 13 Small 1 Plant 14 Small 1 Plant 15 Small 1 Plant 16 Large 1

24 Close Up Des Moines District Plants Incident statistics: Robust Systematic Approach/Suspensions SIZE Robust App Sys App NOIE SUSPENSION REINSTATE Plant 1 Large Yes Yes 1 Plant 2 Small Yes Yes 2 Plant 3 Small No Yes 1 Plant 4 Large Yes Yes 1 Plant 5 Large Yes Yes 1 Plant 6 Large No No 1 2 Plant 7 Large Yes Yes 1 1 Plant 8 Small Yes Yes 1 Plant 9 Very Small No No 1 Plant 10 Very Small No Yes 1 Plant 11 Very Small No No 1 Plant 12 Very Small No No 1 Plant 13 Small No No 1 Plant 14 Small No No 1 Plant 15 Small No Yes 1 Plant 16 Large Yes Yes 1

25 Close Up Des Moines District Plants Incident statistics: Regulation, Species NOIE SUSPENSION REINSTATE SPECIES Plant 1 Captive Bolt Beef Plant 2 Gunshot (2) Beef Plant 3 Electric Pork Plant 4 Captive Bolt/Electric Pork Plant 5 Captive Bolt Pork Plant 6 Captive Bolt Captive Bolt (1), Prod Use (1) Beef Plant 7 Rail Rail Pork Plant 8 Rail Beef Plant 9 Captive Bolt Beef Plant 10 Captive Bolt Beef Plant 11 Captive Bolt Pork Plant 12 Gunshot Beef Plant 13 Handling Beef Plant 14 Gunshot Beef Plant 15 Captive Bolt Pork Plant 16 Captive Bolt Beef

26 Noncompliance Records FY 2013, April 1, 2013 to August 31, 2013 Total NRs, Total Establishments 187 NRs, 125 Establishments Repeated NRs; 31 Establishments (Range 2-6 NR in Est.) NRS, size of Establishment, Systematic Approach Status Size Establishment Total NRs WITH SYS APP NO SYS APP UNKNOWN Large Small Very Small

27 Noncompliance Records HATS Categories (General subject of regulation) HATs CATEGORY NRs I. WEATHER 0 II. TRUCK 1 III. WATER/FEED/PEN DENSITY 39 IV. HANDLING 9 IV. FACILITIES 46 V. SUSPECT 3 VI. PROD 2 VII. SLIP/FALL 19 VIII. STUNNING 68 IX. RAIL 0

28 Noncompliance Records Stunning; Types CAPTIVE BOLT GUNSHOT ELECTRIC BOLT/ GUNSHOT 68 NRs for Stunning Stunning; Plant Size CAPTIVE BOLT GUNSHOT ELECTRIC BOLT/ GUNSHOT Large Small Very Small

29 Systematic Approach Current to September 30, % of all 771 Slaughter Establishments have a systematic approach Total Plants With Systematic Approach Without Systematic Approach Issues from prior measurements Plants opening, plants closing not accounted Updated only on plant visit by DVMS

30 Systematic Approach Current to September 30, % of all Large Plants have a Systematic Approach 78% of all Small Plants 45% of all Very Small Plants Plant Size With Systematic Approach Without Systematic Approach Large Small Very Small

31 Robust Systematic Approach Current to September 30, % of all Large Plants have a Robust Approach 46% of all Small Plants 13% of all Very Small Plants Plant Size Robust Systematic Approach Large % Small % Very Small % Only 13% of Very Small Plants have a Robust Approach

32 Systematic Approach Compliance Guide Scheduled release: October 2013

33 Systematic Approach Compliance Guide Scheduled release: October 2013

34 Systematic Approach Compliance Guide

35 Systematic Approach Compliance Guide

36 Humane Handling Enforcement Coordinator Any questions on data analysis or FSIS humane handling enforcements: Dr. Lucy Anthenill