AGRONOMY PROGRESS REPORT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "AGRONOMY PROGRESS REPORT"

Transcription

1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS AGRONOMY PROGRESS REPORT Agricultural Experiment Station Cooperative Extension No. 288 October REGIONAL BARLEY, COMMON AND DURUM WHEAT, TRITICALE, AND OAT PERFORMANCE TESTS IN CALIFORNIA1 L. F. Jackson 2, C. O. Qualset S, Y. P. PurlS, R. L. WennigA, H. Vogt", L. K. Gibbs 4, M. CampbelJfi, A. Fulton 6, T. Kearney6, P. Mauk 6, D. Munier 6, M. Smith 6, B. Weir 6, C. Wick 6, J. Williams 6, and s. Wright 6 University of California Cooperative Extension regional cereal evaluation tests were conducted in the Sacramento, San Joaquin, and Imperial Valleys and in the south central coastal region in Entries in the tests included standard cultivars, new and soon-to-be released cultivars, and advanced breeding lines from both public (primarily, the University of California) and private cereal breeding programs. Barleys (41 entries for irrigated sites and 44 entries for rainfed sites) were evaluated at 8 locations; common wheats (40 entries), at 10 locations; durum wheats (35 entries), at 3 locations; triticales (8 entries), at 4 locations; and oats (13 entries), at 4 locations. A cereal hay/forage test (15 entries) was evaluated at 2 locations. Tests were conducted at University of California Field Stations or in fields of cooperating growers. Nurseries were planted at a seeding rate of 1.2 million seeds per acre for common and durum wheat tests if irrigation was planned (requiring from 82 to 135 lb/acre for common wheat and from 76 to 168 lb/acre for durum wheat, depending on the entry) and at million seeds per acre for rainfed wheat and all barley, triticale and oat tests (requiring from 69 to 112 lb/acre for common wheat, 69 to 117 lb/acre for barley, 73 to 102lb/acre for triticale, and 56 to 97 lb/acre for oat, depending on the entry). Randomized complete block designs with four replications were used. Each plot was six drill rows wide (6-inch row spacing) and 25 feet long, except at the UC Desert Research and Extension Center where plots consisted of five rows, 16 feet long. Grain was harvested with a Wintersteiger Seedmaster Universal 150 plot combine. Foliar diseases were assessed at the soft-to-medium dough stage of growth by estimating the percentages of areas of second leaves (flag-ilea!) affected. BYD assessments, however, were based on the percentage of plants showing symptoms. Black point and yellowberry of wheat were assessed on grain samples after harvest. Yield, test weight, kernel weight, plant height, days to heading and maturity, lodging, shattering, disease reaction, and grain quality were determined as indicated in the tables. Information Qocation, planting date, soil type, previous crop, fertilization, irrigation, rainfall) regarding each site is given in Table 1. IThese tests were conducted by the UC Davis Department of Agronomy and Range Science Department and Cooperative Extension. Land for the tests, the grain produced and other facilities were contributed by cooperating growers identified in Table 1. Quality evaluations were provided by General Mills, Inc., Vallejo, CA; the Hard Red Spring and Durum Wheat Quality Laboratory, USDA, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND; and the California Wheat Commission. The assistance of growers and quality laboratories is acknowledged with appreciation. The regional testing program is supported in part by funds provided by the California Crop Improvement Association and the California Wheat Commission. 2Extension Agronomist, 3Agronomist, 4StaffResearch Associates, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, UC Davis, and fluc Cooperative Extension Farm Advisors in Stanislaus, Kings, Yolo, Sacramento, Kern, San Luis Obispo, Merced, Butte, Sutter, and Tulare counties, respectively. In. with appli",blc S_ ond Feclctal Ia. ond Univ<o,.ity policy, tho Uni""..ity of Calil'omia don DOl dlscrimlna", in any of ita poiiciea, prooedwa, or pract. OIl tho booia of.z, ",Iigk<\, oolor, nou-, origin, sex, marital It.tUl, sexual orienta lion. a,c, velcran statul t medical condition, or handicap. tnquiric'1'o,arding this policy ma), be add1'oiacd to the A(firmative Acdon Director, University of California, A,riculturc and NatWIII_, JOO La Drive, 6tb Float, Oakland, CA (415) '187.f» 1. um""nity of Califomla and the Unioed sw ofa&ricul""'" """""tinc.

2 The 6:mall grain acreage lor California in 1991/92 was substantially above that of 1990/91. Common wheat was planted. on 600,000 acres, SS% :more than last year, while durum wheat, at 57,000 acres, mostly in the Imperial Valley, was 62% more. The California Wheat Commission conducted a wheat cultivar survey, and reported a.crea.ge of as different wheat eultivars. Despite this diversity, a few cultivars dornm""kcl h" "'''''''''''8''- VOC01l"G. RoO, W'ith 21'7,000 acres (60% olthe San Joaquin Valley acreage), Anza, with 137,000 acres (2nd in both the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys), Yolo, with 127,000 acres (lst in the Sacramento Valley), and the hard white spring cultivar Klasic, with 42,000 acres, together accounted for 87% ofthe common wheat acreage. Barley acreage was down slightly this year to 230,000 planted acres, compared to 240,000 acres last year. Oats were planted on 400,000 acres (35,000 acres for grain), compared to 380,000 acres last year. Diseases were much more severe this year than in the past 5 years because offavorable temperatures and rainfall during the early spring. Considerable rain from January through March, and a few isolated showers in an otherwise dry April (except for S. California where flooding occurred) brought S. California, the south-central coast, the San Joaquin valley and the southern half of the Sacramento Valley to near normal or above normal rainfall totals. Areas that were dryer than normal included the northern half of the Sacramento Valley, the north coast and the NE corner ofthe state. Yields in general were average to slightly below average. Many growers in the Sacramento Valley did not irrigate because of the favorable winter moisture, and ended up stressing the crop when average temperatures for the month of May (the main portion of the grain-fill period) were the highest ever recorded. As a result of the high temperatures in May, test weights and kernel sizes were lower than normal. Diseases were damaging. The most widespread disease was leafrust-both on wheat and barley. Leaf rust was most damaging on wheat in the San Joaquin Valley since the bulk of the acreage there is Yecora Rojo, a susceptible cultivar, while less damaging in the Sacramento Valley where Yolo, the predominant cultivar, is moderately resistant. A yield loss ofabout 5% is estimated for wheat in the San Joaquin Valley. Septoria tritici blotch was severe in the Sacramento Valley, more so on Klasic and Anza than on Yolo. BYD was severe in some areas as well On barley. the common foliar diseases scald, net blotch, leaf rust, powdery mildew, and BYD were severe in some areas of the state. BARLEY The UC Regional barley nursery contained 41 entries (3 additional entries were tested at rainfed sites only), including 11 released cultivars and the remainder advanced breeding lines from 5 programs (University ofcalifornia, Western PlantBreeders, Farmers MarketingCorporation, Arizona Plant Breeders, and Busch Agricultural Resources Inc.). Two of the entries were 2-row spring malting barleys (2B and 2B ), two were 6-row spring malting barleys (6B and B1614), while the remainder were 6-row spring feed barleys. Disease pressure was high for scald, net blotch, BYD, powdery mildew, and leaf rust at various sites. Thirty entries showed high susceptibility to scald (3 entries, UC 603, Max, and APB 96, had very good resistance); 20, to powdery mildew; 18, to leafrust (3 entries, 8690/14, UCD , and B1614, had very good resistance); 12, to net blotch; and 13, to BYD (7 had good resistance). Average yields ranged from 3160 Ib/acre ( lb/acre) at the rainfed Yolo site to 5420 lb/acre ( lb/acre) at Butte (Tables 2-10). Entries UCD , DA , UCD , and 8690/14 were the highest yielding in the Sacramento Valley; UCD , in the San Joaquin Valley, and UC 337, DA , and UCD , in rainfed areas. In the three-year period , entries Sunbar 458, 8690/14 and Madera were the highest yielding in the Sacramento Valley; Madera and UC 337, in the San Joaquin Valley; and UC 337, in the rainfed areas. Yields, especially for later maturing barleys, were affected by moisture stress at Butte, Sutter, and Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

3 UC Davis, sites that ere not irristod. thie year, and at Yolo, a rainfed site. Lodging was severe on some entries at each site except for the Tulare rainfed site. Entries most susceptible to lodging included Solum, CM 72, Seeo, Briggfl, UCD , and Prato. Entries with the best lodging resistance included FMC 8146, N1{ DD Q!:Ul, QOO/H" UCD S , Sunbw 45S, \10 G03, FMC '7025-1, and APB 6B-2. Bushel weishts and kernel weights were very low, with average bushel weights ranging from 43.5 lhlbu at UC Davis to 51.4 lhlbu at the rainfed Tulare site, and average kernel weights ranging from 31.9 mg at the rainfed Yolo site to 41.6 mg at the rainfed Tulare site. Entries Fiesta, B1614, DA , 2B , DA , and PH had high average bushel weights, while entries , UCD , Seco and Solum had high average kernel weights. COMMON WHEAT The UC Regional common wheat nursery consisted of 40 entries, including 9 released cultivars and the remainder advanced breeding lines from 5 programs (University of California, Western Plant Breeders, Farmers Marketing Corporation, Arizona Plant Breeders, Pioneer Hi-Bred International). Twenty-nine of the entries were hard red spring wheats; 8, hard white spring; two, hard white winter; and one, hard red winter. Disease pressure was high for Septoria tritici blotch, BYD, and leaf rust at various sites. Septoria tritici blotch was severe on 14 entries; leafrust was severe on 21 entries (the most severe leafrust in many years; 14 entries were not affected), BYD was severe on 15 entries (2 entries had excellent resistance, Serra and the advanced line DA from Western Plant Breeders), Stripe rust was observed in significant amounts at the San Luis Obispo Co. nursery; 8 entries were affected. Average yields ranged from 3050 lb/acre ( lb/acre) at the rainfed Yolo site to 7350 lb/acre ( lb/acre) at Imperial (Tables 11-21). Entries Pio. var. RBI0106 and UC 896 were the highest yielding in the Sacramento Valley; Klasic and FMC 5144, in the San Joaquin Valley; APB W10 8 and PH , in the Imperial Valley; and PH , PH , CONT BR 5702, and Yecora Rojo, at rainfed sites. In the three year period , entries Pio. var. RBI0104 and Klasic were the highest yielding in the Sacramento Valley; Klasic, Serra, and FMC 5144, in the San Joaquin Valley; CONT BR 5702 and Klasic, in the Imperial Valley; and Yecora Rojo, in rainfed areas. Wheat yields were affected by moisture stress at Sutter and Butte, which were not irrigated, and at the rainfed Yolo site. Yields were reduced by a severe wild oat infestation and lodging at Kings. Lodging also was severe on some entries at the Kern site. Entries particularly susceptible to lodging included Serra, Tanori 87W, and PH Fusarium crown and root rot was moderately severe and non-uniformly distributed at the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta site. Bushel weights and kernel weights were very low at some locations (Yolo, San Luis Obispo, and Merced) but average to above average at the other locations. Average bushel weights ranged from 56.6 lblbu at the rainfed Yolo site to 62.81blbu at the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta. Average kernel weights ranged from 29.0 mg at Yolo to 44.9 mg at the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta. Entries Klasic, Pio var RBJ0035P, and APB had high average bushel weights, while entries APB W10-8, Yecora Rojo, PH , Baker, Klasic, CONT BR 5702, and APB H-8 had high average kernel weights. Grain protein levels varied widely among sites. Levels for six of the sites are given in Table 22, and averages range from 10.0% (12% moisture basis) at Butte to 14.1% at Kings, Entries DA , PH , CONT BR 5738, FMC BR 7076, Yecora Blanco 90W, and FMC BR had high average grain protein content. Agronomy Prograss Report No October 1992

4 ,. Results of quality QnalY6 performed by the California Wheat Commission quality laboratory on &"c:un. BliUln.ples :.o the Butte Qnd Kinefl flite5 are given in Table 23. Excellent overall bread baking scores were given to 29 entrieb from the King5 5ite (where grain protein content ranged from %) while only one entry (CONT BR 5702) received as much as a satisfactory overall bread baking score from the llutt.. sit.. (.h..r.. grain. protein content rqnged from %). DURUM WHEAT The UC Regional durum wheat nursery consisted of 35 entries, including 10 released cultivars and the remainder advanced breeding lines from 5 programs (University ofcalifornia, Western Plant Breeders, Farmers Marketing Corporation, Arizona Plant Breeders, and Northrup-King Co.). Average yields ranged from 4910 lb/acre ( lb/acre) at Kings to 7920 lb/acre ( lb/acre) at Imperial (Tables 24-27). Westbred Turbo was the highest yielding at Imperial, while entries APB D03-5, UC 908, UC 909, and WPB 8004 were the highest yielding overall in Westbred Turbo was the highest yielding in the three-year period Grain yields at the Kings site were affected by a severe, nonuniform infestation of wild oats and lodging. In addition, portions of the durum nursery were stressed for moisture because of nonuniform irrigation. Lodging was severe on most entries at the Imperial site, but only on a few entries at UC Davis. Entries rated extremely susceptible to lodging included UC 909 and APB D03-4. Most of the other entries ranged from moderately susceptible to susceptible, with only CONT D5456 and UC 907 showing moderate resistance. Bushel weights were below average, ranging from 59.3 lb/bu at Kings to 6 lb/bu at UC Davis. Average kernel weights ranged from 42.5 mg at Kings to 48.8 mg at UC Davis. Entries Yavaros 79, UC 910, and APB D03-5 had high average bushel weights, while entries Nudura, UC 908 and UC 907 had high average kernel weights. Results of quality analyses of grain samples from the 1991 tests at UC Davis, Kings, and Imperial are given in Table 28. Average grain protein content ranged from % (12% moisture basis) at UC Davis to % at Imperial. Eleven entries had grain protein contents of 14% or more at Imperial. Entries Nudura and FMC D had high grain protein at each location. Entries WPB 8003, FMC D5171-1, and Nudura had the highest overall quality, followed by UC 909, Durex, CONT D5456, and CONT D8869. TRITICALE Average yields of the triticale tests ranged from 5040 lb/acre ( lb/acre) at Kings to 6880 Ib/acre ( Ib/acre) at Sutter (Tables 29-33). Entry Stier was the highest yielding in 1992, while Stier and Juan were the highest yielding in the three-year period Entry Juan has yielded 127% of Yolo wheat from Lodging was moderate at Imperial and severe at Kings, where a wild oat infestation also affected yields. Diseases, except for BYD, were not important on triticale in Average bushel weights ranged from 54.8 lb/bu at Imperial to 58.7 lb/bu at Sutter. Average kernel weights ranged from 36.9 mg at Imperial to 42.4 mg at Sutter. Entries Rhino "s" and EPB 16-1 had high average bushel weights, while Juan had high average kernel weight. Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

5 OAT Average yielda of the oat grain te5t5 ranged from 860 lb/acre ( lb/acre) at Butte I to >/al;1"e ( Ib/acre) at Butte II (Table ). Yields were extremely poor. Drought stress was S<>v."" at the V olo rai.n ed. lgt. Qrwwy weed competition WaB very high at both Yolo and Butte I, while very severe early lodging affected yields at UC Davis. Only Ogle showed adequate resistance to lodging at UC Davis. Crown rust was severe on entries Montezuma, Kanota, and Swan at UC Davis. Entries Don, 75Q D, and Kanota were the highest yielding in 1992, while Swan and 75Q D were the highest yielding in the three-year period Average bushel weights ranged from 28.11blbu at UC Davis to 42.81blbu at Butte II. Average kernel weights ranged from 26.5 mg at the rainfed Yolo site to 28.9 mg at Butte II. Entries Kanota and Swan had high average bushel weights, while entries Montezuma, Swan, and Sierra had high average kernel weights. Forage yields (expressed at 70% moisture) of the cereal hay tests at Kings and Stanislaus are given in Table 39. Entries 75Q D (harvested at water-ripe), Dirkwin wheat (harvested at heading) and Don (harvested at flowering) were the highest yielding at Stanislaus, while Swan (harvested at soft dough), Juan triticale (harvested at soft dough), Ogle (harvested at milk stage), and 89T-10 triticale (harvested at soft dough) were the highest yielding at Kings. TDN (percent total digestible nutrients) levels at Kings were highest for Dirkwin wheat. Montezuma and Dirkwin were rated best for stem fineness. Forage yields for several cultivars ofoat and Dirkwin wheat in tests conducted in Stanislaus, Kings, and Tulare counties during the four-year period are given in Table 40. During that period, 75Q D was the highest yielding at Tulare; Dirkwin wheat and 75Q D, at Stanislaus; and Swan, at Kings. Agronomy Progress Reporl No October 1992

6 #I TABLE 1. eltg CHAMCTGRIGTIG fon U nqional CE;nE;AL fvaluation TfSTS, 1992 PLANTING SOIL 1991 RAINFALL LOCATION Tr;:n OArr; TYPc CROP FERTILIZA TION IRRIGATION YR/AFTER PLANT U/4/1 farwell clav Beans f'replant: None 17.64"/16.S8" M&.T Ranch "/"/' 1"lIm 100*/(lCr8 N M /17.64 M Dayton (anhydrous ammonia) With seed: 90#/acre Topdressed: 200#/acre NH 3 S0 4 'Buti;"c:""""""""'o;t'iir'--""'''17n79T''''''''''L8ti(j;:'i'y.... Fii;;.. with.. i,';(j';ok.-- -N n;. f7 :6 4;:7f:r64;:.. Thompson and 90#/acre Hope Ranch Butte City 'Butt;"c:""""""""'o;t'ii'ii''''''''''i'27479'''''''''''''''si'ki;;'n'i;y"'''Wh;8i''''with''';;;d';'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''N;;;''''''.....' 7 :64;:71'6 :9 8:;-. Fenn Farms adobe hay SOl/acre Durham ip8;ii c;; :. Wh; t.. :r2i24 i9 '... M;ii;;;d i;y.. Aif;ii.. p;;j;i;t;.... Fi;; d..4x :94;'i5: 94;: UC IVREC Triticale loam 100#/acre urea, (16" total) EI Centro 60#/acre P 2 0 S Topdress: SOl/acre urea at tillering; SOt/acre urea at boot Ke..C'i,':.. Whe; i' i9t... -Sacr;;;;;iit;;.. ct ioii.. Prej;iat: j:i;; od..4x.. 7:0"7ii: J.G. Boswell Co. clay 100#/acre 11 -S2-0 (24" total) Kern Lake Ranch ls0#/acre N (NH 3 ) Old River Topdress: 3S#/acre N (NH 3 ) (water run on 4/17) Kfiig; c;;:..... Wh;8t.. i 2H'oi9T.. G;ca ; ti(j cottoii.. P;;j;iant: j:i'i,'od..3 X... :7':82 ;. 1;-:; 4".. Hansen Ranch Triticale Goldberg loam SOOt/acre (18" total" Corcoran Topdress: 200#/acre N (urea) prior to first irrigation 4S# N/acre (water run NH 3 ) Kings Co. Berley 12/18/91 Vanguard Safflower Preplant: Preirrigation 7.82wn.14" R.A. Rowan & sandy loam 150#/acre N (low) Co. (anhydrous ammonia) Flood 1 X (8") Lemoore Kings Co. Cereal hay 12/10/91 Nord sandy Cotton 200#/acre N (urea) prior Flood 3X 7.82"n.14" Basmajian Ranch loam to first irrigation (18" total) Hanford M;;rc;;d C :.. Wheai'..T172079T.. T;;;;pI8 ci8v... c;;it;;;;.. i 20iiiar; N..iu i;ai'.... Fi'i,'od..2 X '7:'4"i7:'4 San Juan Ranch Barley loam (12" total) Dos Palos S; ;;;iito c'i,':.. Wh; t., Egb;ri';;;u k......c o;;-.. with..;;;;e.. N;;';;"'". i 5 :8 i1t:6;; Lewallen Ranch 90#/acre Tyler Island ouuuuuh u. San Luis Obispo Wheat n.'u+..onun..uno..,unuh 11127/91 Pico fine Fallow 150#lacre (5)-..UUHu..uu.. None "'13.34" Co. Barley sandy loam 1(Fe, Zn. Mg) White Ranch Co. Shandon si8i;;ia ; c : C;; i h8v M;;d8 ;; a iidy. B;a,; s.. 400#i;r; 8n:io;;i-,:;; Bordar chi,'ck '3 :29"i'f3':2'g".. Foster Dairy loam. highly sulfate (preplant) flood (2-3X) Farm modified (no Hickman hard pan) Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

7 TABLE 1. SITE CHARACTERISTICS for UC REGIONAL CEREAL EVALUATION TESTS, 1992 PLANTING SOIL 1991 RAINFALL LOCATION TEST DATE TYPE CROP FERTILIZATI ON IRRIGATION VR/AFTER PLANT uttor Co. Whoat 11/2.5/31 Clear lake Safflower Preplant: None 17"/14.0" Novvhan t..end Tri\;"..lo I110y 1 O'/IJCr8 N (aqua) and Fornlins a..,t1oy Topdro:>l!: Meridian SO#lacre N (ammonium nitrate) 'Tuia'r;;"C':"""""""'B;j;y'"''''''T271''i'iij'i'''''''''''i5ucor"iidb;'''''''Fii'i,';';''''Wlth'';;;;r:''''''''''''''''-'''''''N';;;; B;;78;;.._. Changala Farms clay 90#lacre 11-S2-0-2(S) Ducor 'ljc..d ;;.... wh;;;i..t172'i i9 i.. yi..fi B;;;;;s.. Wh;;;tiT ritr ;I'j; P;;pjat:.. C;;;m Wh;at : Tritic;;i; :.. Agronomy Farm Barley 12/6/91 sandy loam SOli/acre N (aqua) wheatltriticale: Oat: Davis Triticale 11/21/91 Baney Preplant: Flood 1 X 17.1S"/16.4S" Oat O#lacre N (aqua) (6" total) Barley: With seed: Durum wheat: 17.1S"/16.44" 90#lacre 11-S2-0-2{S) Rood 2X Topdress at tillering: (12" total) 30#lacre N (NH 4 NO s ) Topdress at anthesis (wheat only): 3Stllacre N (NH s S0 4 ) yi c :.. Wh ;;t l 275'i9,.. S;h ;..;;i;;y.... Fir;;;,; wlth.. ;;;;d ; N ;;; '7 :8 6;;i'i 1':1 6:; Horgan Ranch Barley 90#lacre Volo Oat Topdress: 100#lacre NH 4 NO s Agronomy Progress Htljlort No October 1992

8 ,. ;; = II>.!!.." ;; I 21-3 II> ::l z!". l::l CDI TABLE BUTTE BARLEY TEST THOUSAND LODGING LODGING TEST KERNEL PLANT ON AT LEAF ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT HEIGHT 5/1 HARVEST BYDV RUST (lbslacrel (lbslbul igramsl linchesl 2 BRIGGS 4600 (37) CM (21) PRATO 5330 (24) UC (8) UC (38) NK BB (9) UC (15) GUSTOE 5270 (26) SUNBAR (7) FIESTA 5270 (27) / (3) PH (17) MADERA 4920 (33) MAX 5180 (29) UCD (2) UCD ( UCD (14) UCD (19) DA ( FMC ( FMC (28) UCD (11) UCD (36) UCD (22) UCD (16) UCD (1) UCD (32) DA ( DA (6) DA (5) FMC ( FMC ( (13) B ( B ( B (18) APB F ( APB ( APB ( APB 6B (35) APB ( l.o NET BLOTCH SCALD POWDERY MILDEW CI!l II> ID G>. MEAN CV LSD ( NS NS Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected), lodging: - 0-3%; %: 3 = 15-29%; %; %; %; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %. Numbers in parentheses indioate relative rank in oolumn. BYDV ratings (see soale above) were based on peroentage of plants showing foliar symptoms

9 TABLE SUTTER BARLEY TEST ". THOUSAND ;; LODGING LODGING.. '" TEST KERNEL PLANT ON AT LEAF NET POWDERY :I ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT SHAnER HEIGHT 4/28 HARVEST BYDV RUST BLOTCH SCALD MILDEW." a Ubs/acre) Ubs/bu) (grams) (Inches) i 2 BRIGGS 3320 (41) ::0 191 CM (38) ::l 316 PRATO 5050 (26) z!" 337 UC ( 6) UC (17) NK BB ( 9) UC (13) GUSTOE 4810 (31) SUNBAR (11) FIESTA 5530 (18) / (10) PH (4) MADERA 5320 (20) MAX 3900 (37) UCD (1) UCD ( 8) UCD ( 5) UCD (19) DA (22) FMC (36) FMC (28) ""I 857 UCD ( 2) UCD (29) UCD ( 7) UCD ( 3) UCD (16) UCD (32) DA (15) DA (12) DA (14) FMC (35) FMC (39) B (34) B (33) B (25) B (24) APB F (21) APB (23) APB (30) APB (27) APB (40) MEAN CV LSD (.05) Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected), lodging, shatter: 1 :: 0-3%; 2 = 4-14%; %; 4 == 30-49%; 5 = 50-69%; 6 := ṇ '%; or 7 == 85-95%; 8 = %.. -" CD CD N BYDV ratings (see scale above) were based on percentage of plants showing foliar symptoms.

10 :>00 a.! '" TABLE UC DAVIS BARLEY TEST 1 TEST ::07.. ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT ilb8j"",.i liblil&ii ;:I. '" 3800 (27) 43.4 z 2 BRIGGS!" 191 CM 72 N w 316 PRATO SI THOUSAND KERNEl PLANT [ODGING ON [ODGING AT DAYS TO HEADING DAYS To MATURITY LEAF NET POWDERY WEIGHT SHATTER HEIGHT 6/4 HARVEST FROM 3/1 FROM 3/1 BYDV RUST BLOTCH SCALD MILDEW igr..i iiooh88l (33) (29) UC (19) UC (9) NK (18) UC (7) GUSTOE 3520 (32) SUNBAR (22) FIESTA 4480 (20) / ( 2) PH (3) MADERA ) MAX 3620 (30) UCD (8) UCD ( UCD ( UCD ( DA ( FMC FMC UCD UCD (10) 3620 (31) UCD (21) UCD (16) UCD UCD (12) DA (13) DA DA III FMC FMC ( B (26) B ( ( B (15) APB F ( APB APB ( APB 6B (35) APB ( I s: cd CD N MEAN CV LSD (.05) Rating acale for diseasea iarea of flag l leaf affected), lodging, ahatter: 1 =0-3%: 2 =4 14%: %: 4, %; :69%; 6, %; 7.. 8&:95%; 'li>. Numbers In parentheaea indicate relative rank in column. BYDV ratinga (aee acale abow) were baaed on percentage of planta ahowing foliar symptoms.

11 ,.. =.. "" iil co i ::D.., TABLE MERCED BARLEY TEST TEST THOUSAND KERNEL PLANT DAYS TO HEADING LODGING ON LODGING AT LEAF NET POWDERY ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT SHATTER HEIGHT FROM 3/1 5/6 HARVEST BYDV RUST BLOTCH SCALD MILDEW Ubs/acre) (Ibs/bu) (grams) (inches) 2 BRIGGS 2800 (38) CM (5) ::I z 316 PRATO 4620 (27) " UC (7) w 476 UC (6) NK B (25) UC (10) GUSTOE 4850 (26) SUNBAR (18) FIESTA 5250 (17) / (9) PH (20) MADERA 5640 (8) MAX 4990 (23) UCD ( UCD (13) UCD (19) UCD (21) DA (29) FMC (30) FMC (24) :::1 857 UCD (2) UCD (22) UCD (16) UCD (31) UCD (14) UCD (12) DA (4) DA (11) DA (3) FMC ( FMC (39) (32) B (36) B (35) ( APB F (15) APB (28) APB (40) APB ( APB ( MEAN CV LSD (.05) NS So Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected), lodging, shatter: 1-0-3%, %; %; 4 == 30-49%; %; %; %;!II 8 = %... CD Numbers in parentheses indicate relative rank in column CD.. BYDV ratings (see scale abovel were based on percentage of plants showing foliar symptoms.

12 ,.. a,.... a i..,.. ::a.. z? 0::;1 TABLE KINGS BARLEY TEST THOUSAND lodging TEST KERNEL PLANT AT LEAF NET POWDERY ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT SHATTER HEIGHT LODGING HARVEST BYDV RUST BLOTCH MILDEW (lbsfacrel (lbs{bu) (grams) (inches) 2 BRIGGS 4050 (26) CM (22) PRATO 3970 (27) UC (16) UC (15) NK BB ( 9) UC (14) GUSTOE 4170 (20) SUNBAR (5) FIESTA 4780 (11) / (13) PH ( 1) MADERA 4980 ( 7) MAX 3720 (32) UCD (12) UCD (23) UCD (10) UCD (21) DA (18) FMC (38) FMC (30) UCD ( 8) UCD (35) UCD (28) UCD (24) UCD (19) UCD (17) DA ( 6) DA ( 2) DA ( 4) FMC (39) FMC (41) (33) B (31) SO B (36) B (25) APB F ( 3) APB (34) APB (40) APB 6B (29) APB 2B (37) Q!l. c0 s: - CD a>, MEAN CV LSD (.05) NS NS 0.6 Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected) and lodging: 1-0-3%; %; %; %; 5,., 50-69%; 6 = 70-84%; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: net blotch, scald Numbers in parentheses indicata relative rank in column. BYDV ratings (see scale above) were based on percentage of plants showing foliar symptoms.

13 TABLE VOLO RAINFED BARLEV TEST THOUSAND LODGING TEST KERNEL PLANT AT LEAF NET ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT SHAnER HEIGHT HARVEST RUST BLOTCH SCALD (lbalacre' Ubalbu' igrems' tinch 1 1 ARIVAT BRIGGS CM PRATO 3410( UC (3) UC (28) NK B ( UC ( GUSTOE 2780( SUNBAR (30) SECO 3840 (5) SOLUM 4110 (2) FIESTA 3340(22) ' (6) PH MADERA 2910( MAX 2240(41) UCD (14) UCD (16) UCD (9) UCD (20) DA ( FMC (38) FMC ( UCD ( 4) UCD (23) UCD (11) UCD (24) UCD (8) UCD (18) DA (21) DA (1 5) DA (12) FMC (42) FMC (43) B (13) B (34) B (37) B (35) APB F (26) APB ( APB (39) APB 6B (36) APB 2B (44) MEAN CV LSD 5) Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected). lodging. shatter: = 0-3%; 2 = 4-14%; %; 4 = 30 49%; 5 = 50-69%; 6 = 70-84%; 7 = 85-95%; %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: BYDV. powdery mildew. Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

14 TABLE a TULARE RAINFED BARLEY TEST THOUSAND LODGING TEST KERNEL PLANT AT NET ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT HEIGHT HARVEST BLOTCH SCALD (Illa/acrel (Ibllbu) (gr&ml) linch, ARIVAT 4330 (10) BRIGGS 4810 (3) CM (18) PRATO 3960 (24) UC (2) UC (41) NK BB (27) UC (35) GUSTOE 4510 ( 5) SUNBAR (20) SECO 4130 (16) SOLUM 4440 (7) FIESTA 3600 (31) / (28) PH (17) MADERA 4100 (19) MAX 3440 (38) UCD (12) UCD (23) UCD (39) UCD (29) DA (1) FMC (37) FMC (36) UCD (4) UCD (9) UCD (14) UCD (11) UCD (32) UCD (6) DA (15) DA (22) DA (33) FMC (40) FMC (44) B (8) B (21) B (43) B (30) APB F (25) APB (26) APB (13) APB 6B (34) APB (42) MEAN CV LSD (.05) NS Rating scale for diseases (area of flag l leaf affected) and lodging: 1-0-3%, %; 3 = 15-29%; 4 = 30-49%; 5 = 50-69%; 6 = 70-84%; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: leaf rust, powdery mildew. Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

15 :»0 Cl.. '".i Cl i :u... ::lo z l" Ṇ. 0\1 TABLE SAN LUIS OBISPO RAINFED BARLEY TEST THOUSAND TEST KERNEL PLANT ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT SHATTER HEIGHT (1boI"",..) (lboibu) (gr..) (inct..) 1 ARIVAT RIGGS CM PRATO 4570 { UC UC NK ( UC GUSTOE 3570 (29) SUN8AR ( SECO 2890 ( SOLUM FIESTA 3560 (30) / ( PH (15) MADERA 3980 (25) MAX 3390 ( UCD (13) UCD (22) UCD (5) UCD / DA ( 4) FMC ( FMC (38) UCD / UCD ( UCD ( UCD (21) UCD ( UCD DA (19) DA (18) DA (17) FMC (41) FMC ( (26) (39) (35) (37) AP8 F ( AP (24) AP (36) AP (31) AP (43) lodging lodging ON AT LEAF NET POWDERY 5/5 HARVEST 8YDV RUST 8LOTCH SCALD MIlDEW ' CO" 0!1. s:. a:! MEAN CV LSD / Rating scale for diseases (area offlag-l leaieffectedl.lodging. shetter: 1 = 0-3%; 2 =4-14%; %; 4 = 30049%; Ii 50-69%; '*';, "" 85-95%; 8 = %. 8YDV ratings (Bee scale abovel were b..ed on pereentage of planta ahowlng foliar symptoms.

16 TABLE; AND BARLEY YIELD SUMMARY (LB/ACRE) SACRAMENTo VALLEY SAN JOAQUIN vxclev RAINED ()' ()' ()'92 ENTRY 3LDCIYR 8LDCIYR g LOCIYR 2 LOCNR.. LOCNR e locnr 3l0CNR 4l0CNR I> LOc{yR 1 AfUVAT 3630 (29) RIGG (35) 4730 (21) 4220 (14) 3420 (33) I I ( 41 11'1 M1i. otl;}q, (loi 4270 ( ( {12) 38SO I 6) 3300 ( 21 ;no fftato 4(90127) 5410 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 3) 337 UC I I 61 1)120 ( ( ( ( I ( UC ( ( ( I ( ( (13) 584 NK ( ( ( ( (13) 5340 ( ( (10) 3070 ( UC ( ( ( 7) 5100 ( ( (21) 3380 (12) 3080 { GUSTOE 4530 { ( (19) 5030 ( ( (18) 2850 ( SUNDAR ( ( 4) 5650 { ( I ( { { (11) 701 SECO 3620 (30) 3180 {l SOLUM 3640 ( FIESTA ) 5340 ( ( (14) 5670 ( ( 7) 3500 ( ( ( / { ( ( ( { I I I ( PH ( ( I I I ( (16) I MADERA ( I ( ( 1) 6060 ( (26) ( MAX 4240 ( {t (t ( {l ( ( {l UCD ( I ( ( ( ( UCD ( I ( ( ( ( UCD ( I { ( UCD (21) 5730 ( ( ( DA ( ( I ( ( FMC { ( ( { ( FMC (32) 5500 { { ( ( ( UCO I 5) 6440 I ( UCO I UCD ( ( UCD ( ( ( UCO I {t UCO ( ( ( DA {t ( ( DA ( ( ( DA ( ( ( FMC ( ( ( FMC { ( ( (26) 3510 ( { B ( ( ( B ( ( B {t (38) APB F ( ( APB ( (29) 3630 (28) 874 APB (33) ( APB ( APB 2B (41) ) 2080 (431 Mean CV LSD@5% Agronomy Progress RBpon No October 1992

17 TABLE BUTTE COMMON WHEAT TEST THOUSAND lodging TEST KERNEL PLANT AT YELLOW BLACK ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT HEIGHT HARVEST BERRY SEPTaRIA POINT (lbslecre) ubslbul (gramai (.nchesl 20 ANZA ) YECORA RaJa 6220 ( 9) YOLO 5830 (20) KLASIC 6060 (14) TADINIA 5070 (40) SERRA 6090 (11) BAKER 6380 ( 4) EXPRESS 5450 (33) FMC BR (36) CaNT BR ( 3) CaNT BR (34) UC (18) UC (32) Pia VAR RBI (19) PIa VAR RBI ( 8) PH ( 1) TANORI87W 5580 (29) UC ( 2) PH ( 6) CaNT BR (25) YECORA ROJO 90W 5760 (24) YECORA BLANCO 90W 6070 (13) PH (10) PH ( 5) DA ( 7) DA (26) PH (27) FMC BR (16) FMC BR (37) FMC BR (23) APB Wl (31) APB H (21) APB (28) APB H (30) APB H-2B 5220 (38) SUNSTAR \I 5340 (35) UC (39) UC (22) PIO VAR RBI (17) Pia VAR RBJ0035P 6030 ( 15) MEAN CV LSD (.05) NS Rating scale for diseeses (area of flag-1 leaf affected). lodging, shatter: 1-0-3%; %; %; %; 5 = 50-69%; 6 = 70-84%; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: BYDV. leaf rust. stripe rust. powdery mildew. Agronomy Prollress Report No October 1992

18 TABLE SUTTER COMMON WHEAT TEST TEST THOUSAND KERNEL PLANT YELLOW LEAF ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT HEIGHT BERRY RUST SEPTORIA (Ibelacre) Ilbelbu) Igrams) linch ) 20 ANZA 5860 ( 4) YECORA ROJO 5460 (11) YOLO 5180 (21) KLASIC 4780 (35) TADINIA 5540 ( 9) SERRA 5040 (25) BAKER 5390 (14) EXPRESS 5040 (24) FMC BR (28) CONT BR (12) CONT BR (37) UC ( 3) UC (16) PIO VAR RBI ( 6) PIO VAR RBI (29) PH (26) TANORI87W 5510 (10) UC ( 7) PH ( 8) CONT BR (13) YECORA ROJO 90W 4880 (31) YECORA BLANCO 90W 5180 (20) PH ( 5) PH (23) DA (15) DA (39) PH (27) FMC BR (22) FMC BR (33) FMC BR (17) APB Wl (40) APB H (38) APB (36) APB H (19) APB H-2B ) SUNSTAR \I ) UC (30) UC (32) PIO VAR RBI (1) PIO VAR RBJ0035P 6080 (2) MEAN CV LSD (.05) NS 0.7 Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected), yellowberry:.. 0-3%; %; %; %; 5 = 50 69%; %; %; %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: BYDV, stripe rust, powdery mildew, black point. Allronomy Prollress Report No Octob 1002

19 .., a..=.i if > TABLE UC DAVIS COMMON WHEAT TEST THOUSAND LODGING LODGING DAYS TO DAYS TO TEST KERNEL PLANT ON AT HEADING MATURITY LEAF ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT HEIGHT 4/21 HARVEST FROM 3/1 FROM 3/1 RUST SEPTORIA IIbSJacre) IIbs/bul igrams) (,ncheaj i ::a 20 ANZA 59BO (24) ::I. '" 112 YECORA ROJO 6380 (14) z 1" 353 YOLO 6090 ( N 415 KLASIC 6640 ( 8) TADINIA 5570 (35) SERRA 6260 (17) BAKER 6820 ( 4) EXPRESS 6970 ( 3) FMC BR (27) CONT BR ( 6) 59.B CONT BR (29) UC (13) B44 UC (38) PIO VAR RBI ( 5) PIO VAR RBI ( 7) PH (28) T ANORI 87W 6300 (15) UC ( PH (19) CONT BR (36) iiol 920 YECORA ROJO 90W 5600 (33) 59.B YECORA BLANCO 90W 5680 (31) PH (11) PH (34) DA (26) 5B.l DA (12) PH ( 2) FMC BR (22) FMC BR (23) FMC BR B (16) APB Wl (37) APB H (39) APB (32) APB H (20) APB H-2B 4780 (40) SUNSTAR II 5920 (25) UC (30) UC ( PIO VAR RBI ( PIO VAR RBJ0035P 6250 (1 B) MEAN CV LSD (.05) c::i Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected), lodging: 1-0-3%; 2 = 4-14%; 3 = 15-29%; %; 5 = 50-69%; 6 = 70-84%; 7 = 85-95%; Sl '" or 8 = %.!!ḻ CI> Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: BYDV, stripe rust, powdery mildew, black point. ::

20 >.. ;; -<.... i :D co ;::I. z p.., I TABLE SACRAMENTO DELTA COMMON WHEAT TEST " THOUSAND LODGING TEST KERNEL PLANT AT YELLOW- LEAF POWDERY ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT SHATTER HEIGHT HARVEST BERRY RUST SEPTORIA MILDEW {lbiijecrel Ubs/bul {gramsl {,ndl.sl 20 ANZA 7660 ( 5) YECORA ROJO 6600 (32) YOLO 7320 ( 9) KLASIC 7660 ( 4) _8 544 TADINIA 6920 (22) SERRA 7700 ( 3) BAKER 6750 (28) EXPRESS 6620 (31 ) FMC BR ( 6) CONT BR (25) CONT BR (33) S UC (18) UC (14) PIO VAR RBI (19) PIO VAR RBI (35) PH (16) TANORI87W 6920 (21) UC (10) PH (1) CONT BR (12) YECORA ROJO 90W 6930 (20) YECORA BLANCO 90W 7070 (15) PH (11 ) PH (26) DA ( 8) DA (29) PH (13) FMC BR (27) FMC BR (39) FMC BR (30) S APB Wl (40) S APB H (36) S APB (38) APB H (34) APB H-2B 6060 (37) SUNSTAR II 6980 (17) UC (23) UC (24) PIO VAR RBI ( 2) PIO VAR RBJOO35P 7420 ( 7) MEAN CV LSD (.05) NS C) Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected), lodging, shatter, and yellowberry: 1 0 3%, 2 = 4-14%; %; 4 = 30 49%; 5 - S0 $!... CD or 69%; %; %; % Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: BYDV, stripe rust, black point

21 " TAgLE MERCED COMMON WHEAT TEST THOUSAND DAYS TO TEST KERNEL PLANT HEADING YELLOW LEAF fntry YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT HEIGHT FROM 311 BERRY BYDV RUST (Ibalacr.) (lbs/buj (gramsl (inchesl &0 HZ'" 4;'::;0 12.0) ::;a.1 za.l S YIilCOR ROJO 4S<tO 17) YOLO 4720 (10) KLASIC 5160 (2) TADINIA 2980 (40) SERRA 4860 ( 6) BAKER ) EXPRESS 4320 (22) FMC BR (8) CONT BR ( 3) CONT BR (33) UC (28) UC (36) PIO VAR RBI (23) PIO VAR RBI (4) PH (18) TANORI87W 3820 (32) UC (14) PH ( 5) CONT BR (21) YECORA ROJO 90W 4430 (17) YECORA BLANCO 90W 4360 (19) PH (35) PH (24) DA ) DA ) PH ) FMC BR FMC BR (38) FMC BR I 1) APB Wl ) APB H (25) APB ) APB H (13) APB H-2B 3330 (39) SUNSTAR II 3600 (37) UC UC ) PIO VAR RBI (34) PIO VAR RBJ0035P 4430 (16) MEAN CV LSD (.05) Rating scale for diseases larea of flag-l leaf affected): 1 = 0-3%, 2 = 4-14%; %; %; %; %; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: stripe rust, Septoria leaf blotch, powdery mildew, black point. BYDV ratings (see scale above) were based on percentage of plants showing foliar symptoms. Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

22 TABLE KINGS COMMON WHEAT TEST THOUsAND LODGiNG LODGiNG TEST KERNEL PLANT ON AT LEAF ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT HEIGHT 5/14 HARVEST RUST Ubl/_e' Uba/bIll Igramsl linch.al 20 ANZA 4570 (30) YECORA ROJO 5500 ( 9) YOLO 5150 (23) KLASIC 6130 (1) TADINIA 4310 (37) SERRA 5310 (18) BAKER 5330 (16) EXPRESS 5070 (25) FMC BR ( 4) CONT BR ( 6) CONT BR (26) UC (29) UC (34) PIO VAR RBI (17) PIO VAR RBI (19) PH (15) TANORI87W 3970 (39) UC (11) PH (5) CONT BR (12) YECORA ROJO 90W 4380 (35) YECORA BLANCO 90W 4670 (28) PH ( 2) PH (27) DA (38) DA (14) PH ( 8) FMC BR (20) FMC BR (31) FMC BR (7) APB Wl (24) APB H (32) APB (33) APB H (36) APB H-2B 3870 (40) SUNSTAR II 5230 (21) UC (22) UC (13) PIO VAR RBI (10) PIO VAR RBJ0035P 5700 ( 3) MEAN CV LSD (.05) Rating scale for diseases (araa of flag-l leaf affected) and lodging: 1-0-3%, %; %; 4 = 30-49%; 5 "" 50 69%; 6 "" 70-84%; 7 "" 85-95%; 8, %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: BYDV, stripe rust, Septaria leaf blotch, powdery mildew, black point. Agronomy Progl1l$$ Report No October 1992

23 TABLE KERN COMMON WHEAT TEST THOUSAND LODGING TEST KERNEL PLANT AT YELLOW LEAF BLACK ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT HEIGHT HARVEST BERRY RUST POINT (Ibis/acre) (lbs/bu) Igrams) linch.s) 20 ANZA 6800 (20) YECORA ROJO 6060 (34) YOLO 7640 (3) KLASIC 6900 (12) TADINIA 6550 (26) SERRA 6750 (22) BAKER 6160 (32) EXPRESS 6870 (15) FMC BR ( 4) CONT BR (25) CONT BR (36) UC (35) UC (38) PIO VAR RBI ( 2) PIO VAR RBI (13) PH (10) TANORI87W 6330 (30) UC (16) PH (23) CONT BR ( 6) YECORA ROJO 90W 6670 (24) YECORA BLANCO 90W 6350 (29) PH ( 8) PH ( 9) DA (28) DA (11) PH ( 5) FMC BR (37) FMC BR (33) FMC BR (19) APB W (18) APB H (17) APB (39) APB H (31) APB H-2B 5680 (40) SUNSTAR II 6540 (27) UC (21) UC (14) PIO VAR RBI ( 1) PIO VAR RBJ0035P 7180 ( 7) MEAN CV LSD (.05) Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-1 leaf affected), lodging, and yellowberry: 1-0-3%, %; %; 4 = 30-49%; 5 = 50-69%; 6 = 70-84%; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: BYDV, stripe rust, Septoria leaf blotch, powdery mildew. Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

24 .. :0 TABLE IMPERIAL COMMON WHEAT TEST a ::0 0 THOUSAND LODGING DAYS TO DAYS TO -< = TEST KERNEL PLANT AT HEADING MATURITY YELLOW- ELACK ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT SHATTER HEIGHT HARVEST FROM 1/1 FROM 1/1 BERRY BYDV POINT (lbs/acre) (lbs/bu) (grams) (inches) 1 ::II ANZA 6680 (31) :::l 112 YECORA ROJO 7820 (12) z? 353 YOLO 7460 (19) N Co> 415 KLASIC 7540 (17) Co> 544 TADINIA 6570 (33) SERRA 7790 (15) BAKER 8130 ( 7) EXPRESS 7260 (24) FMC BR (14) CONT BR ( 4) CONT BR (34) UC (30) UC (39) PIO VAR RBI (13) PIO VAR RBI (20) PH ( 5) TANORI87W 4900 (40) UC (16) PH ( 2) CONT BR ( 8) YECORA ROJO 90W 6590 (32) I 921 YECORA BLANCO 90W 6330 (37) PH ( 3) PH (18) DA (29) DA (23) PH ( 9) FMC BR (25) FMC BR (28) FMC BR (10) APB Wl (1) APB H ( 6) APB (21) APB H (27) APB H-2B 6160 (38) SUNSTAR II 6350 (36) UC (35) UC (26) PIO VAR RBI (11) PIO VAR RBJ0035P 7400 (22) MEAN CV LSD (.05) Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected), lodging, shatter, and yellowberry: = 0-3%; 2 = 4-14%; 3 = 15-29%; 4 = 30-49%; 5 = SO-69%; 6 = 70 t1. 0 or 84%; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %.!II <D BYDV ratings (see scale above) were based on percentage of plants showing foliar symptoms. -<D N

25 1. TABLE YOLO RAINFED COMMON WHEAT TEST THOUSAND TEST KERNEL ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT ubijacr.1 flbalbul igramal PLANT HEIGHT hnche.' BYDV LEAF RUST 20 ANZA 2810 (28) YECORA ROJO 4120 (1) YOLO 2280 (39) KLASIC 3310 (12) TADINIA 1950 (40) SERRA 2710 (32) BAKER 3380 ( 9) EXPRESS 3220 (17) FMC BR (30) CONT BR ( 3) CONT BR (13) UC (33) UC (35) PIO VAR RBI (16) PIO VAR RBI (15) PH ( 5) TANORI87W 2780 (29) UC (14) PH ( 2) CONT BR (34) YECORA ROJO 90W 3010 (21 ) YECORA BLANCO 90W 3150 (19) PH (38) PH (11 ) DA (25) DA (10) PH ( 7) FMC BR ( 8) FMC BR (23) FMC BR (4) APB Wl (22) APBH (18) APB ( 6) APB H (26) APB H-2B 2420 (37) SUNSTAR II 2840 (27) UC ) UC ) PIO VAR RBI ) PIO VAR RBJ0035P ) MEAN CV LSD 5) NS Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affected): == 0-3%; 2 == 4-14%; 3 == 15-29%; 4 == 30-49%; 5 == 50-69%; 6 == 70-84%; 7 == 85-95%; 8 == %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: stripe rust, Septoria leaf blotch, powdery mildew. black point. BYDV ratings Isee scale above) were based on percentage of plants showing foliar symptoms NS Agronomv Progress Report No Oclob8l' 1992

26 TABLE SAN LUIS OBISPO RAINFED COMMON WHEAT TEST THOUSAND TEST KERNEL PLANT STRIPE ENTRY YIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT SHATTER HEIGHT BYDV RUST Uba/acre' (Ibalbul (grams' (inche.' 20 ANZA 4230 ( YECORA ROJO 4750 (10) YOLO 4560 (20) KLASIC 3950 ( TADINIA 3540 (36) SERRA 4730 (12) BAKER 4610 (18) EXPRESS 4640 (17) FMC BR (19) CONT BR ( 3) CONT BR (25) UC (30) UC (33) PIO VAR RBI (21 ) PIO VAR RBI ( 6) PH ( 1) TANORI87W 3230 ( UC ( 8) PH ( 4) CONT BR (15) YECORA ROJO 90W 4750 ( 11) YECORA BLANCO 90W 4420 (22) PH ( 5) PH (7) DA (26) DA (34) PH (2) FMC BR (23) FMC BR (9) FMC BR (14) APB Wl (40) APB H (16) APB (37) APB H (27) APB H-2B 4020 (31) SUNSTAR II 3810 (35) UC (29) UC (13) PIO VAR RBI (24) PIO VAR RBJ0035P 3300 (38) MEAN CV LSD (.05) NS 0.4 Rating scale for diseases larea of flag-l leaf affected), shatter: 1-0-3%; %; 3 = 15-29%; 4 = 30-49%; 5 == 50-69%; %; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %. Diseases assessed but occurring in trace or less amounts: leaf rust, Septoria leaf blotch, powdery mildew, black point. BYDV ratings (see scale above) were based on percentage of plants showing foliar symptoms. Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

27 ,.. Cl '" c!ii "< ;r "" i TABLE AND COMMON WHEAT YIELD SUMMARY (LB/ACRE) :III SACRAMENTO VALLEY SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY IMPERIAL VALLEY RAfNFED ::::I ENTRY 4 LOC/yR 8 LOC/YR 12 LOC/YR 3 LOC/yR 6 LOC/yR 9 LOC/YR 1 LOC 2 LOC 3 LOC 2 LOc/yR z 3 LOCNR 4 LOCNR? gl 20 ANZA 6390 I ( I ( ( ( I ( ( YECORA ROJO I ( ( I ( ( I I I ( YOLO 6100 (16) 6610(11) 6530 I ( 5) 6170 ( I 5) (10) 8720 ( 8) 3420 (31) (13, 415 KLASIC 6280 ( I ( 2) 6060 ( I ( I I 2) 3630 (23) I TADINIA 5780 ( (20) ( (21) ( (16) 638 SERRA 6270 (12) 6880 ( 4) 6620 I 4) ( I ( (20) 3090 (10) 2730 ( AKER 6340 ( 9) 6700 I (24, 6790 ( ( I I (10) 3260 I 6) 2870 ( 6' 788 EXPRESS 6020 (21) (19) ' ' 7090 ( I 8' 2820 ( 6) 804 FMC BR ( ( 5) 5990 I I ( ( ( (13) 2600 ( CONT BR I ( 5) 6650 ( I I ( ( ( I ( 3) 3670 I 3) 3160 I CONT BR ( (22) ( (19' 5530 ( (34) ( 5) 3800 (18) 3050( UC (10) 6590 (12) 6490 ( 8) 4910 (33) ( ( ( ( ( UC ( (39) 4920 (22) 5070 (16) 6120 (39) 7460 (19) (20) 2370 ( PIO VAR RB ( ( 1) 6820 ( I) 5760 ( ( 6) 6180 ( ( (13) ( I ( PlO VAR RBI I ( I ( (11) 4070 ( 8) 3270 ( I 4) 867 PH I I I 6) ( ( I ( 3) 894 TANORI87W 6080 (18) (36) (40) 6810 (22) ( UC I ( (13) 6030 I ( (17) 4060 I I PH I I I 8) 6150 I 7) 8850 I ( I ( 21 I 902 CONT BR (16) ( ( 2) 3650 ( YECORA ROJO 90W (18) (16) I ( YECORA BLANCO 90W (28) ( ( ( PH I I PH ( DA , ' 3660 (26' 932 DA ' 3690 ( PH ( I I I FMC BR ( FMC BR FMC BR I ( I APB Wl (16) 8860 ( ( APB H ( ( ( 8) 3900 ( APB ( ( APB H ( (28) 941 APB H 2B ( ( ( SUNSTAR II 5870 ( ( ( ( UC ( ( ( UC ( ( ( PIO VAR RBI I ( PIO VAR RBJOO36P 6450 ( 5) 5770 I 6) (371 II.. I CI c0 cd '" N Mean cv LSD@ 5% Numbe,. in parentheses indicate relative rank in column.

28 TABLE COMMON WHEAT TESTS, % GRAIN PROTEIN (12% MOISTURE BASIS) ENTRY BUTTE SUTTER SAC DELTA MERCED KINGS KERN MEAN 20 ANZA YECORA ROJO YOLO KLASIC TADINIA SERRA BAKER EXPRESS FMCBR CONT BR CONT BR UC UC PIO VAR RBI PIO VAR RBI PH TANORI87W UC PH CONT BR YECORA ROJO 90W YECORA BLANCO 90W PH PH DA DA PH FMC BR FMC BR FMC BR APB Wl APB H APB APB H APB H-2B SUNSTAR II UC UC PIO VAR RBI PIO VAR RBJ0035P MEAN Agronomy Progl1lSll Report No October 1992

29 ,.... iii < ạ. a i., ::li.. ::l I t:ll!i TABLE BUTTE AND KINGS COMMON WHEAT TESTS, QUALITY EVALUATION* WHEAT FLOUR FARINOGRAPH BREAD WHT WHT FLR FLR FALL WET MIX ENTRY PROT HARD YIELD ASH NO GLUT ABSORP ARR PK MT MTI VOL TEXTURE SCORE KINGS 20 ANZA 112 YECORA ROJO Q S S YOLO S KLASIC S TADINIA S SERRA S BAKER S EXPRESS S FMC BR S CONT BR S CONT BR S UC S UC S PIO VAR RBI S PIO VAR RBI S PH S TANORI87W E UC PH CONT BR S YECORA ROJO 90W S YECORA BLANCO 90W S PH S PH S DA S DA S PH S FMC BR S FMC BR S FMC BR S APB W S APB H S APB S APB H S APB H-2B S SUNSTAR II S UC S UC S PIO VAR RBI s-a PIO VAR RBJ0035P s a 3 BUTTE 20 ANZA U 112 YECORA ROJO U E S 4 5

30 ,.. a,. co '<. a "" i., ::0, = I I..I It cd U> N TABLE BUTTE AND KINGS COMMON WHEAT TESTS, QUALITY EVALUATION* WHEAT FLOUR FAl!iifiloGRAi5j:j WHT WHT FLR FLR FALL WET MIX ENTRY PROT HARD YIELD ASH NO GLUT ABSORP ARR PK MT MTI VOL 353 YOLO 415 KLASIC 544 TADINIA BREAD TEXTURE 638 SERRA U BAKER s-a EXPRESS s-a FMC BR a CONT BR s-a CONT BR s-a UC UC s-a PIO VAR RBI U PIO VAR RBIOl U PH s-a TANORI 87W U UC U PH U CONT BR U YECORA ROJO 90W U YECORA BLANCO 90W U PH U PH U DA U DA s-a PH U FMC BR U FMC BR s-a FMC BR U APB Wl U APB H U APB U APB H s-a APB H-2B U SUNSTAR II s-a UC U UC U PIO VAR RBI U PIO VAR RBJ0035P U 1 *WHT PROT = wheat protein % (12% M.B.I; WHT HARD = wheat hardness (NIRI; FLR YIELD=flour yield (%1; FLR ASH=flour ash (%); FALL NO =falling number (sec); WET GLUT=wet gluten % (14% M.B.I; ABSORP..absorption (%1; ARR=arrival (min): MIX PEAK"mixing peak (mini; MT=mixing tolerance (mini; MTI=mixing tolerance index (Brabender units); VOL..loaf volume (cc); TEXTURE=a.. questionable, S satisfactory, U = unsatisfactory, E.. excellent; SCORE=5 = excellent, 4 satisfactory; 3 = satisfactory-questionable; 2.. questionable; 1 = unsatisfactory. *auality analyses performed by California Wheat Commission, Woodland, CA s-a s-a U SCORE 2 3 1

31 ,.. a.. '" ::p., i ::a TABLE UC DAVIS DURUM WHEAT TEST..., THOUSAND LODGING LODGING DAYS TO DAYS TO ::l TEST KERNEL PlANT ON AT HEADING MATURITY STRIPE POWDERY BLACK z!" ENTRY VIELD WEIGHT WEIGHT HEIGHT 5/11 HARVEST FROM 3/1 FROM 3/1 BVOV RUST SEPTORIA MILDEW POINT. II""'"",,,) 1I""lbul (gram.) lincmsj 169 MEXICAU (29, ALOURA 6640 (24, YAVAROS , WESTSRED (20' WESTSREO TURBO 7410 (10' ALTAR (23, UC (25, NUOURA 6660 (26' REVA 7400 (II, DUREX 6270 ( CONT D (22' CONT (18, UC (7, UC (3' UC (30, UC {16' WPB (19) WPB (17) I 913 WPB } CONT ' CONT (9) ALOENTE } WPB (2) WPB (6) WPB (27) WPB , WPB ) FMC (28) ' FMC D (33) FMC ' APB (1) APB (4, APB (8) APB D# ( APB (35) !l (:).. III U; CD. I MEAN CV LSD (.05' NS Rating scale for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affect.. d,. lodging; 1 = 0-3; ; ; 4 = 30-49: 6 '" 50-69; 6 = 70-64; 7 = 85 95; 8 = 96-1 OO. Oi..e8 a58eas..d but occurring in trace or I. amounts: leaf Nst. Numbel'1l in parenthes.. s indicate relative rank in column. BVDV ratings (.. Icale above' ware based on percentage of plant. showing foliar symptoms.

32 TABLE KINGS DURUM WHEAT TEST THOUSAND LODGING LODGING TEST KERNEL ON AT BLACK ENTRY YIEl.O WEIGHT WEIGHT 5/14 HARVEST POINT Ubs/lICrel (ibl/bill Igram.) 169 MEXICAl.I (12) ALOURA 4640 (23) YAVAROS (20) WESTBREO (1l) WESTBREO TURBO 5060 (17) ALTAR (33) UC (2l) NUOURA 4210 (28) REVA 3940 (30) OUREX 4330 (27) CONT ( 2) CONT (22) UC ( 7) UC ( 8) UC (16) UC (l0) WPB (15) WPB (3l) WPB (34) CONT (29) CONT (14) Al.OENTE 4980 (18) WPB ( 3) WPB (l) WPB (35) WPB (13) WPB (19) FMC ( 6) FMC ( 9) FMC (25) APB (24) APB ( 4) APB ( 5) APB 0# (26) APB (32) MEAN CV l.so (.05) NS Rating scale for lodging: 1-0-3%. 2 =: 4-14%; 3 = 15-29%; 4 = 30-49%; 5 = 50-69%; %; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %. Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

33 ,..,. Cl c 3 -< Cl 1.. "'" c :::l Z!" gl TABLE IMPERIAL OURUM WHEAT TEST ENTRY YIELD (lbs/.cr.) TEST WEIGHT (l60/bu) THOUSAND KERNEL WEIGHT tgramsi PLANT HEIGHT bnchesl LODGING AT HARVEST DAYS TO HEADING FROM 111 DAYS TO MATURITY FROM 1/1 YELLOW BERRY 169 MEXICALI ALOURA 8080 ( ( YAVAROS ( WESTBREO ( WESTBREO TURBO 9280 ( ALTAR ( UC ( NUOURA 7630 ( REVA 8610 ( OUREX 7950 ( CONT ( CONT ( UC ( UC ( UC ( UC ( WPB ( I 912 WPB ( WPB ( CONT ( CONT ( ALDENTE 8830 ( WPB ( WPB ( WPB ( WPB ( WPB ( FMC ( FMC (21) FMC ( APB ( APB ( APB ( APB 0# ( APB ( MEAN CV LSD ( NS 0.8 Rating scala for diseases (area of flag-l leaf affectedl. lodging. yellowberry: - 0-3%; %; 3 = 15 29%; %; %; 6 = 70 84%; 7 = 85-95%; 8 = %. I BYDV ratings (see scale above I were based on percentaga of plants showing foliar symptoms. jg '" BYDV BLACK POINT

34 TABLE AND DURUM WHEAT YIELD SUMMARY (lb/acre) ENTRY 3 LOC/YR 6 LOC/YR 9 LOC/YR 169 MEXICALI (20) 7460 (18) 7050 (12) 410 ALDURA 6340 (25) 7840 (13) 7800 ( 6) 496 YAVAROS (15) 8050 ( 9) 7940 ( 4) 522 WESTBREO (16) 7760 (14) 7400 ( 9) 674 WESTBREO TURBO 7250 ( 6) 8630 ( ( 1) 714 ALTAR (34) 7730 (15) 7560 ( 7) 781 UC (24) 8140 ( 6) 7850 ( 5) 795 NUOURA 6170 (30) 7300 (20) 7250 (10) 798 REVA 6650 (21) 7680 (16) 7460 ( 8) 809 OUREX 6180 (29) 7300 (19) 7170 (11) 878 CONT (11) 8340 ( 4) 8080 ( 3) 881 CONT (17) 8420 ( 3) 8160 ( 2) 907 UC ( 3) 8040 (10) 908 UC ) 8040 (11) 909 UC (26) 7120 (22) 910 UC ( 7) 7600 (17) 911 WPB (18) 8130 ( 7) 912 WPB (28) 7960 (12) 913 WPB (32) 7270 (21) 914 CONT (19) 8180 ( 5) 915 CONT (10) 8080 ( 8) 918 ALOENTE 7060 ( 9) 8460 ( 2) 943 WPB ( 4) 944 WPB ( 5) 945 WPB (33) 946 WPB (14) 947 WPB (22) 948 FMC (12) 949 FMC (23) 950 FMC (31) 951 APB ( 8) 952 APB ( 1) 953 APB (13) 954 APBO# (27) 955 APB (35) Mean CV LSO@5% Agronomy Progress Report No October 1992

35 li> 1.. co!." a 1 TABLE UC DAVIS, KINGS, AND IMPERIAL DURUM WHEAT TESTS, QUALITY EVALUATION ::u (lbo/bill (gl 'lb -= co ::l. Z 1000 HARD fan TOT SEMO SEMO COOK ENTRY BU WT K.WT ASH PRO NESS NO EXT EXT SPK OUS MX PRO VI WT FIRM SCORE UC DAVIS l" 169 MEXICALI B N 410 ALOURA Co> U'I 496 YAVAROS WESTBREO BBI A WESTBREO TUR ALTAR B B Bl UC 7Bl lib NUOURA REVA B09 OUREX B.l B19 FMC B B20 FMC 056Bl PH B B70 PH B7B CaNT B B BBl CONT UC UC B UC UC B B WPB ".B WPB B WPB B B CONT CONT FMC B FMC l.bl B ALOENTE KINGS 169 MEXlCALI ALOURA YAVAROS B Bl WESTBREO B BB WESTBREO TURBO Bl ALTAR B Bl UC NUOURA REVA OUREX B19 FMC B FMC 056Bl PH B70 PH 8B ".B B CONT B CaNT B B.O UC B !! co 90B UC 90B 64.B B.O !Ii 909 UC

36 :.., a '".!l 1 '".. TABLE UC DAVIS, KINGS, AND IMPERIAL DURUM WHEAT TESTS, QUALITY EVALUATlON* 1000 HARD- FAll TOT SEMO SEMO COOK ENTRY BUWT K.WT ASH PRO NESS NO EXT EXT SPK DUS MX PRO VI WT FIRM SCORE llbslbul 19l % co :::. 910 UC z 911 WPB WPB "-> , 913 WPB CONT CONT S FMC ' FMC AlDENTE IMPERIAL 169 MEXICALI AlDURA YAVAROS WESTBRED WESTBRED TURBO ALTAR UC NUDURA REVA ourex l!ll 819 FMC FMC PH PH CONT CONT UC UC UC UC WPB WPB WPB CONT CONT FMC FMC ALDENTE WHT PRO =wheat protein percentage, 14% m.b.; FAll NO..Semolina tailing number value(seconds); TOT EXT =total extraction parcentage; SEMO EXT.. Semolina extraction percentage; SPK =Semolina spack count; DUS.. Semolina dust color score (high score desirable); MX..mlxograph acore (higher number.. stronger curve); SEMO PRO..Semoline protein percentage; VI=8paghettillisual color score (higher acore Is more desirable): FIRM =cooked spaghetti flrmne.. score B.50.. desirable); SCORE: 1 =no proml.., 2=little promise, 3=sorne promise, 4=,,00<1 promise.., 0!l or II ;; 00 N I "Quality analy.es were performed by the Hard Rad Spring and ourum Wheat Quality laboratory, USDA, North Dakota State University, Fargo, NO.

AGRONOMY PROGRESS REPORT

AGRONOMY PROGRESS REPORT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DA VIS AGRONOMY PROGRESS REPORT Agricultural Experiment Station Cooperative Extension No. 229 October 1991 1991 REGIONAL BARLEY, COMMON AND DURUM WHEAT, TRITICALE, AND OAT PERFORMANCE

More information

Small Grain News Tulare County

Small Grain News Tulare County Small Grain News Tulare County Vol. 7, Issue 2, October 2010 Kings and Tulare Small Grain Variety Performance Trials Steve Wright, Jorge Dubcovsky, Lalo Banuelos, Phil Mayo, Diane Prato, Sara Avila Small

More information

Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A

Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A bstract Spring wheat breeding lines from the Oregon State University (OSU) and other regional breeding

More information

2013 REGIONAL BARLEY, COMMON WHEAT AND TRITICALE, AND DURUM WHEAT PERFORMANCE TESTS IN CALIFORNIA

2013 REGIONAL BARLEY, COMMON WHEAT AND TRITICALE, AND DURUM WHEAT PERFORMANCE TESTS IN CALIFORNIA 2013 REGIONAL BARLEY, COMMON WHEAT AND TRITICALE, AND DURUM WHEAT PERFORMANCE TESTS IN CALIFORNIA1 P. Mayo 1, D. Prato 3, J. Fraser 1, L. Jackson 4, L.W. Gallagher 2, O. Chicaiza 2, A. del Blanco 2, F.T.

More information

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Oat Tifton, Georgia: An oat variety grain trial was planted at this location on September 23, 2015. However, crown rust disease and lodging during the growing season resulted in some very low grain yields

More information

Section 4: Wheat Varieties

Section 4: Wheat Varieties Section 4: Wheat Varieties 49 Wheat trials were planted in seven-inch rows at Blackstone, Orange, Holland, Painter, and Shenandoah Valley. They were planted in six-inch rows at Blacksburg. They were planted

More information

2015 California Almond Acreage Report

2015 California Almond Acreage Report 2015 California Almond Acreage Report California Department of Food and Agriculture Cooperating with the USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Pacific Regional Office Pacific Regional Office

More information

2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 2009 VARIETAL RECOMMENDATION

2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 2009 VARIETAL RECOMMENDATION 2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 1) A motion to remove AgriPro Norpro from the spring wheat variety recommendation list, effective February 2009. Mr. Joe Smith of AgriPro has asked us to

More information

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Spring wheat varieties are compared in trial plots at Waseca, Lamberton, Morris, Crookston, Stephen,

More information

Varietal Trials Results

Varietal Trials Results Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Wheat, Hard Red Spring Jim Anderson, Jochum Wiersma, Gary Linkert, Catherine Springer and Susan Reynolds differ for their response to each of those diseases, the rating

More information

Triticale. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale Grain Performance, Data 3-Year Average. Head Date bu/acre Wt Ht Lodg.

Triticale. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale Grain Performance, Data 3-Year Average. Head Date bu/acre Wt Ht Lodg. Triticale Tifton, Georgia: Rank Test Trical 342 98.5 107.5 4 137.5. 50 0 100 04/02 Sunland 91.3 107.0 2 138.0. 43 0 100 04/01 Trical 314 89.7 105.4 3 137.5. 36 0 100 03/30 Fleming* 70.4 79.3 8 101.5. 33

More information

2001 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials Experimental Methods Figure 1. Region 2000 Location Cooperator Crop Tested

2001 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials Experimental Methods Figure 1. Region 2000 Location Cooperator Crop Tested PR-448 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials C.R. Tutt, C.S. Swanson, J. Connelly, D. Call, and D.A. Van Sanford In, Kentucky farmers harvested 21.1 million bushels of soft red winter wheat produced on 340,000

More information

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 Erik B.G. Feibert, Clinton C. Shock, Peter Sexton, Lamont D. Saunders, and Rhonda Bafus Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon Introduction

More information

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT LEADER: PROJECT PERSONNEL: Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred D. M. Wichman, Agronomist,

More information

AFNS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5

AFNS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5 REQUEST FOR SUPPORT TO REGISTER PT769 CROP KIND: Wheat TYPE: Canada Western Red Spring PROPOSER: D. Spaner AS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5 TEST NUMBERS:

More information

PROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS

PROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS PROJECT TITLE: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Dr. Michael Giroux, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: mgiroux@montana.edu Phone: (406) 994-7877 Andy Hogg, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: ahogg@montana.edu

More information

2011 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey. Final

2011 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey. Final 2011 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey Final Survey Overview Illinois Indiana U.S. Wheat Class Production Areas Gulf Tributary SRW States and Areas Surveyed East Coast Tributary Weather and Harvest:

More information

Lavina (MT981397) Lavina (MT981397) is a two rowed hooded spring barley and is a cross between Haybet

Lavina (MT981397) Lavina (MT981397) is a two rowed hooded spring barley and is a cross between Haybet Lavina (MT981397) Lavina (MT981397) is a two rowed hooded spring barley and is a cross between Haybet and Baronesse. Haybet (P.I.533600) was developed by USDA-ARS and the Montana Experiment Station and

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 111 Title: Corn - Soybean - Wheat Response to Rotation: Nrate Experiment: 09CSW Trial ID: 5950 Year: 2015 Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn, Location: Supported By: Site Information Field:

More information

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1 Tifton, Georgia: Average Average Rank Wt Ht Lodg. Survival Date Horizon 201 139.9 132.2 1 155.9 30.5 54 0 100 04/11 Horizon 270 128.8 119.4 4 138.0 32.2 42 0 100 04/13 Plot Spike LA9339 124.4 115.5 9 127.3

More information

Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana.

Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana. Project Title: Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. Project Leader: D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana. Project Personnel: P.L. Bruckner MAES

More information

Triticale and Rye Forage

Triticale and Rye Forage Brand-Variety 12/21/15 1/20/16 2/19/16 3/11/16 3/31/16 2016 2-Yr Avg -------------------------------------------- lb/acre -------------------------------------------- Triticale 154 1143 556 1460 2200 1154

More information

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide NDSU EXTENSION A1105-18 North Dakota Flax Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide Hans Kandel (NDSU Main Station); Greg Endres, Mike Ostlie, Blaine Schatz and Steve Zwinger (Carrington Research

More information

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1 Oat Tifton, Georgia: Average Average Rank Wt Ht Lodg. Survival Date Horizon 474 117.5 105.5 7 135.3 33.4 47 31. 03/25 Horizon 321 111.5 115.9 6 137.9 33.2 45 20. 03/30 TAMO 405 100.2 115.3 8 132.3 31.6

More information

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013 Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013 Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 331 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station William Batchelor, Director Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, November

More information

Title: 2011 Off-Station Spring Wheat evaluations in the Western Triangle Area

Title: 2011 Off-Station Spring Wheat evaluations in the Western Triangle Area Title: 2011 Off-Station Spring Wheat evaluations in the Western Triangle Area Principal Investigators: John Miller, Western Triangle Ag. Research Center, Conrad, MT. Dave Wichman, Central Ag. Research

More information

Triticale and Rye. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale and Rye Grain Performance,

Triticale and Rye. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale and Rye Grain Performance, Rank Test Winter Survival bu/acre lb/bu in % mo/day % Triticale Trical 342 85.0 78.3 1 79.7 47.5 48 0 03/15 100 FL01008. 64.7 2 67.9 48.6 54 0 03/02 100 FL01143. 53.2 5 60.7 48.6 51 0 02/26 100 Monarch..

More information

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results 01 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial

More information

2016 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

2016 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Performance Testing (CPT) Director Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Kevin Kirby Ag Research Manager, Brookings Bruce Swan Ag Research Manager, Rapid

More information

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee

Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee 2005 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy 2013-2014 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2013-2014 wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Humboldt,

More information

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Nomini Nomini Nomini Nomini

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Nomini Nomini Nomini Nomini Revised 1994 SMALL GRAINS IN 1994 The following are the small grain variety recommendations for Virginia in 1994. The recommendations are based on the agronomic performance in barley and wheat variety

More information

UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2002

UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2002 Project Title: UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2002 Project Leaders: Mike Murray Enrique Herrero Farm Advisor & County Director Post-graduate

More information

Evaluation of spring wheat cultivar performance under continuous-crop and crop-crop-fallow systems in central Montana

Evaluation of spring wheat cultivar performance under continuous-crop and crop-crop-fallow systems in central Montana Project Title: Evaluation of spring wheat cultivar performance under continuous-crop and crop-crop-fallow systems in central Montana Project Leader: D. M. Wichman Research Agronomist, Moccasin, MT Project

More information

Virginia Corn & Small Grain Management. Small Grains in 2007

Virginia Corn & Small Grain Management. Small Grains in 2007 Virginia Corn & Small Grain Management Small Grains in 2007 Table of Contents Recommended Small Grain Varieties... 1 Barley and Wheat Entries... 3 Introduction... 4 The Season... 4 Section 1: Barley Varieties

More information

"Double Colored Man Tou" steamed buns, photo by Roy Chung Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey

Double Colored Man Tou steamed buns, photo by Roy Chung Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey "Double Colored Man Tou" steamed buns, photo by Roy Chung 2014 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey Survey Overview Hard Red Winter Hard Red Spring Soft White Hard White U.S. Wheat Class Production Areas

More information

Recommendations and summary of results 2010

Recommendations and summary of results 2010 ecommendations and summary of results 2010 The most promising cultivars of all institutions involved in the small grain industry are annually included in the National Small Grain Cultivar Programme of

More information

The 2010 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with

The 2010 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, LEXINGTON, KY, 40546 PR-604 2010 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Performance Test B. Bruening, C. Tutt, S. Swanson, J. Connelley,

More information

J. LaDon Day, Anton E. Coy and John D. Gassett Editors

J. LaDon Day, Anton E. Coy and John D. Gassett Editors The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations Annual Publication 100-5 College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences July 2013 The University of Georgia Georgia 2012-2013 Small Grain Performance Tests

More information

2015 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2015 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

Intrastate, Early Yield, and Malt Barley Variety Performance

Intrastate, Early Yield, and Malt Barley Variety Performance PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT LEADER: PROJECT PERSONNEL: Intrastate, Early Yield, and Malt Barley Variety Performance D. M. Wichman, Agronomist, Moccasin, MT S. Mickelson, Barley Breeder, Bozeman, MT P. F. Hensleigh,

More information

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials 2015 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials Data collected 2011-2015 www.gocereals.ca Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee V2 Current as of December 25, 2015 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance

More information

2008 Performance of spring wheat varieties in central Montana. By Dave Wichman

2008 Performance of spring wheat varieties in central Montana. By Dave Wichman 2008 Performance of spring wheat varieties in central Montana. By Dave Wichman 2008 will be remembered as a severe sawfly year in many wheat growing areas of Montana. There were even instances of severe

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 007 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017 Page 26 revised data as of Nov. 29, 2017. Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017 Quality Factors 1 Dry Matter Yield Milk Production

More information

The 2016 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with.

The 2016 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with. PR-707 University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Agricultural Experiment Station 2016 Kentucky Small Grain PERFORMANCE TEST B. Bruening, B. Mijatovic, S. Swanson, J. Connelley,

More information

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012 A3868 Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012 Shawn Conley, Adam Roth, John Gaska, and Mark Martinka The Wisconsin Winter Wheat Performance Tests are conducted each year to give growers information

More information

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Data 2-Year Average 3 Rank Yield 1 Wt Ht Lodg.

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Data 2-Year Average 3 Rank Yield 1 Wt Ht Lodg. Oat Brand-Variety Tifton, Georgia: 2 Test 3 Rank Horizon 201 104.5 100.5 16 71.0 27.2 46 14 03/31 SS 76-50 100.4 96.6 9 79.9 28.0 37 3 04/05 Gerard 224 96.9 97.8 8 81.1 29.8 42 1 04/04 Horizon 306 94.5

More information

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Oat Tifton, Georgia: Brand-Variety 2 2 Horizon 270 156.9 119.6 109.5 34.8 47 6 03/25 SCLA 0100214 154.3.. 33.2 42 0 04/04 Horizon 720 153.4.. 33.4 52 6 04/04 LA07007SBSBSB-18 150.0.. 34.9 43 0 03/23 NC12-3578

More information

Project Title: UCCE Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2003

Project Title: UCCE Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2003 Project Title: UCCE Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation ials, 2003 Project Leader: Cooperating DANR Personnel: Scott Stoddard Farm Advisor UCCE Merced & Madera Counties 2145 Wardrobe Rd. Merced,

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season:

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season: 2017-2018 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2017-2018 soft red winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Tenton,

More information

2015 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

2015 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Performance Testing (CPT) Director Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Shaukat Ali SDSU Small Grains Pathologist, Brookings Kevin Kirby Ag Research

More information

Virginia Small Grain Forage Variety Testing Report: Long-Term Summary ( )

Virginia Small Grain Forage Variety Testing Report: Long-Term Summary ( ) publication 48-09 Virginia Small Grain Forage Variety Testing Report: Long-Term Summary (994-2004) www.ext.vt.edu Produced by Communications and Marketing, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia

More information

Wheat, Barley, and Oat Performance Tests in Tennessee

Wheat, Barley, and Oat Performance Tests in Tennessee Wheat, Barley, and Oat Performance Tests in Tennessee 2004 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing

More information

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials 2018 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials Data collected 2014-2018 www.gocereals.ca Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee Current as of August 27, 2018 (version 1) Ontario Winter Wheat Performance

More information

Control of diseases in different cultivars

Control of diseases in different cultivars Applied Crop Protection 2014 III Control of diseases in different cultivars Lise Nistrup Jørgensen, Helene Saltoft Kristjansen, Sidsel Kirkegaard & Anders Almskou- Dahlgaard Control strategies in 6 wheat

More information

North Georgia Region

North Georgia Region North Georgia Region Short-Season Corn Performance, 2009, Nonirrigated s/ Croplan Genetics 7131VT3 175.9.. 107 0.47 2.0 21.2 21236 NK N77P3000GT 155.7.. 0.42 2.0 21.5 22216 DynaGro V5373VT3 154.5.. 103

More information

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Md. Rasel Parvej, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech David L. Holshouser, Extension

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 006 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee 1992 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Conducted in 1989-91 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE This organization is made up of representatives

More information

KERN FIELD CROPS. Kern County 1031 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue Bakersfield, CA

KERN FIELD CROPS. Kern County 1031 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue Bakersfield, CA University of California Cooperative Extension KERN FIELD CROPS Kern County 1031 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93307 661-868-6218 Forage Harvester Evaluation Brian Marsh, Farm Advisor October 2011

More information

Summary of Dryland Soybean Variety Performance at Four Locations, 2014

Summary of Dryland Soybean Variety Performance at Four Locations, 2014 Griffin 2 Midville Plains Tifton Statewide Avg Company/Brand Variety 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg 2014 2-Yr Avg ---------------------------------------------------- bu/acre ----------------------------------------------------

More information

Soft White Wheat Quality Report

Soft White Wheat Quality Report Marketing Center thanks the many individuals and organizations that provided samples for the 217 Annual Pacific Northwest Crop Quality Survey, and recognizes with gratitude the project s funding partners:

More information

Title: 2012 Off-Station Spring Barley evaluations in the Western Triangle Area

Title: 2012 Off-Station Spring Barley evaluations in the Western Triangle Area Title: 2012 Off-Station Spring Barley evaluations in the Western Triangle Area Personnel: John Miller and Gadi V.P. Reddy, Western Triangle Ag. Research Center, Conrad, MT. Dave Wichman, Central Ag. Research

More information

SORGHUM FOR SILAGE. Tifton, Georgia: Evaluation of Sorghum Hybrids for Silage, 2016, Nonirrigated Company or Brand Name

SORGHUM FOR SILAGE. Tifton, Georgia: Evaluation of Sorghum Hybrids for Silage, 2016, Nonirrigated Company or Brand Name SORGHUM FOR SILAGE Tifton, Georgia: Hybrid Name or Number Forage Yields Dry Green --- tons/acre --- Plant Dry 2-Yr. Avg Height Matter 1 Dry Yield in % tons/acre Sorghum Partners SS405 6.2 31.9 105.5 19.

More information

HARVEST U.S. PACIFIC NORTHWEST. Soft White Wheat Quality Report

HARVEST U.S. PACIFIC NORTHWEST. Soft White Wheat Quality Report Marketing Center thanks the many individuals and organizations that provided samples for the 216 Annual Pacific Northwest Crop Quality Survey, and recognizes with gratitude the project s funding partners:

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results 2014-2015 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2014-2015 winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Auburn, Kentucky; Humboldt, Tennessee;

More information

Forage Harvester Evaluation

Forage Harvester Evaluation Forage Harvester Evaluation November 2011 Brian Marsh, Farm Advisor Kern County Forage harvester efficiency is one of the factors to be considered in obtaining a unit. Harvester capacity needs to be matched

More information

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Table 1. Corn Hybrid Performance for Silage, Combined Sites (Adair and Mason counties), KY, 2010 Beck's 5675 HXR 22.9 3380 27000 0.81 0.55 7.4 21 37

More information

AGR APPENDIX. Barley (Hordeum vu/gare L.) Two-row malting. Crop: Type:

AGR APPENDIX. Barley (Hordeum vu/gare L.) Two-row malting. Crop: Type: AGR-05768 APPENDIX A VARIETY DESCRIPTION - TR06294 (Two-Row Malting Barley) Crop: Type: Proposers: Barley (Hordeum vu/gare L.) Two-row malting w.g. Legge Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Brandon Research

More information

AGRONOMY PROGRESS REPORT

AGRONOMY PROGRESS REPORT AGRONOMY PROGRESS REPORT Agricultural Experiment Station Cooperative Extension 2004 CALIFORNIA ALFALFA VARIETY TRIALS: YIELD AND FALL DORMANCY RESULTS and ROUNDUP READY YIELD AND QUALITY RESULTS December

More information

2017 South Dakota Field Pea Variety Trial Results

2017 South Dakota Field Pea Variety Trial Results Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Production Associate, Brookings Bruce Swan Senior Ag Research Manager, Rapid City Kevin Kirby Senior Ag Research

More information

Hard Red Winter Wheat

Hard Red Winter Wheat Crop Quality Survey 2000 Oklahoma Hard Red Winter Wheat Oklahoma State University Oklahoma Wheat Commission Contents Oklahoma Agricultural Districts Map... 2 Oklahoma wheat production forecast and final

More information

2017 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

2017 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,

More information

2016 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials

2016 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials 2016 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials Lee Siler, Matthew Graham, Andrew Wiersma, Linda Brown, Kyle McCarthy, Amber Hoffstetter, Jeff Kovach, Dennis Pennington, Eric Olson August 1, 2016 Favorable

More information

REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF REGISTRATION OF BW423

REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF REGISTRATION OF BW423 REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF REGISTRATION OF BW423 CROP KIND: Wheat TYPE: Canada Western Red Spring PROPOSERS: P. Hucl; C. Briggs, C. McCartney and C. Pozniak CDC, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8

More information

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1 PP310 2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1 Darcy E. P. Telenko, John Atkins, Nick Dufault, 2 This report includes a summary of the 2013 in-furrow

More information

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2016 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name

More information

UCCE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ASPARAGUS RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT, 2013

UCCE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ASPARAGUS RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT, 2013 UCCE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ASPARAGUS RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT, 2013 Principal Investigator: Cooperating Personnel: Collaborators: Brenna Aegerter, Farm Advisor, UCCE San Joaquin County Jacob Loogman, Cheryl

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1-5 RESEARCH PRESENTATION...6-15 I. OBJECTIVE ONE Measure Each Entry s Main and Ratoon Crop Yield and Milling Response With and Without Fungicide Under Intense and

More information

Test Weight. Plant Height**

Test Weight. Plant Height** Introduction In ten short years sunflowers have become an important crop in eastern Colorado with acreage surpassing a record 300,000 acres in 1999 and a crop value of over $30 million. Statewide, sunflowers

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014 Company or Brand Name Hybrid Name Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 lbs/ton

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 173 Title: Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, E. Cullen, P.J. Flannery, and K.D. Kohn Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Corn Rootworm Hybrid Comparison Trial Experiment: 10 Corn

More information

KANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH SPRING SMALL GRAINS

KANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH SPRING SMALL GRAINS 04 KANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH SPRING SMALL GRAINS R E P O R T O F P R O G R E S S 9 3 1 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION

More information

Performance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, ii/

Performance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, ii/ ii/ W'm Performance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, 1988-89 Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 136 September 1989 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Auburn University Lowell T. Frobish,

More information

The 2004 wheat growing season ended with Kentucky farmers

The 2004 wheat growing season ended with Kentucky farmers PR-500 2004 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials C. Tutt, C.S. Swanson, J. Connelley, R. Green, and D.A. Van Sanford The 2004 wheat growing season ended with Kentucky farmers harvesting 370,000 acres of

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 24 Title: Personnel: Location: Supported By: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Corn Hybrid Growth and Development Experiment: 01GD Trial ID: 6048 Year: 2016

More information

Vital Earth Resources 706 East Broadway, Gladewater, Texas (903) FAX: (903) Crop Results

Vital Earth Resources 706 East Broadway, Gladewater, Texas (903) FAX: (903) Crop Results Vital Earth Resources 706 East Broadway, Gladewater, Texas 75647 (903) 845-2163 FAX: (903) 845-2262 2004 Crop Results Vitazyme on Potatoes Farmer: Jim Echeverria Researcher: Jon Gilley, Agro-Engineering,

More information

The following motion and supporting documentation is presented for consideration at the 2007 Cultivar Release and Recommendation Meeting in Bozeman:

The following motion and supporting documentation is presented for consideration at the 2007 Cultivar Release and Recommendation Meeting in Bozeman: Phil L. Bruckner, Professor Department of Plant Sciences & Plant Pathology Montana State University Bozeman, MT 59715-3140 bruckner@montana.edu PHONE 406-994-5127, FAX 406-994-1848 MEMORANDUM TO: Wheat

More information

Forage Harvester Evaluation

Forage Harvester Evaluation Forage Harvester Evaluation November 2012 Brian Marsh, Farm Advisor Kern County Forage harvester efficiency is one of the factors to be considered in obtaining a unit. Harvester capacity needs to be matched

More information

2012 Kentucky Small Grain VARIETY PERFORMANCE TEST

2012 Kentucky Small Grain VARIETY PERFORMANCE TEST AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, LEXINGTON, KY, 40546 PR-640 2012 Kentucky Small Grain PERFORMANCE TEST B. Bruening, S. Swanson, J. Connelley, G. Olson, and

More information

World Wheat Supply and Demand Situation March 2018

World Wheat Supply and Demand Situation March 2018 World Wheat Supply and Demand Situation March 218 Major data source: USDA World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates released March 8, 218. Projections will change over the course of the year depending

More information

Project Title UC Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials

Project Title UC Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials Project Title UC Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials Project Leaders: Mike Murray, Farm Advisor & County Director UCCE, Colusa County P. O. Box 180 142-A Garden Highway Colusa, CA 95932

More information

2016 Idaho Spring Wheat Variety Performance Tests and Yield Summaries

2016 Idaho Spring Wheat Variety Performance Tests and Yield Summaries USDA assessed HRW planted area at 23.3 million acres (9.43 million hectares), down 12 percent from 2016. Planted area in Kansas, the number one U.S. HRW-producing state at 7.40 million acres (3.00 million

More information

2004 Spring Barley Variety Release and Recommendation Motions

2004 Spring Barley Variety Release and Recommendation Motions 2004 Spring Barley Variety Release and Recommendation Motions submitted by Dr. Tom Blake and Patrick Hensleigh motion supported by data in tables 1-9 1. A motion that "Eslick" be recommended as a feed

More information

Trial seeding dates, locations, average yields, and average test weights are as follows:

Trial seeding dates, locations, average yields, and average test weights are as follows: Irrigated Wheat Grain Variety Trial Results, Southwest South Plains 2005-2009 Five-Year Results, Gaines-Yoakum Cos., Texas Calvin Trostle, Texas AgriLife Extension Service agronomist, Lubbock (806) 746-6101,

More information

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials 2011 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials Data collected 2007-2011 www.gocereals.ca Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee Current as of August 29, 2011 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials

More information

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Wheat

SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Wheat Revised 1995 SMALL GRAINS IN 1995 The following are the small grain variety recommendations for Virginia in 1995. The recommendations are based on the agronomic performance in barley and wheat variety

More information