NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM"

Transcription

1 NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in the United States and Canada. Test results can be used by national companies and plant breeders to determine the broad picture of the adaptation of a cultivar. Results can also be used to determine if a cultivar is well adapted to a local area or level of turf maintenance. Briefly, the NTEP is a self-supporting, non-profit program, sponsored by the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center and the National Turfgrass Federation, Inc. Program policy is made by a policy committee consisting of one member from each of the four (4) Regional Turfgrass Research Committees in the United States, one member from the Lawn Seed Division of the American Seed Trade Association, one member from the United States Golf Association (USGA) Green Section, one member from the Golf Course Superintendents Assoc. of America (GCSAA), one member for the Turfgrass Producers International (TPI), one member from the Turfgrass Breeders Association and an executive director. The program does not make variety recommendations. However, the data from tests can be used by extension specialists and others for making recommendations. The policy committee is responsible for determining program policy including, (1) requirements for submission of entries, (2) scheduling tests, (3) evaluation methods, (4) selecting standard or control test entries, (5) setting entry fees, (6) coordinating tests in their respective regions, (7) establishing guidelines for publication and data distribution and (8) scheduling committee meetings. Executive Director - Kevin N. Morris, National Turfgrass Evaluation Program, Inc. CURRENT POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Mr. Bill Dunn, Seed Research of Oregon, Inc. Mr. Ryan Jeffries, Columbia Seeds, Inc. Dr. Mike Kenna, USGA Green Section Dr. Jason Kruse, University of Florida Dr. David Kopec, University of Arizona Mr. Gary Wilbur, Oakwood Sod Farms Mr. Mark Johnson, Golf Course Superintendents Assoc. of America Dr. Eric Watkins, University of Minnesota Mr. Steve Reid, DLF Pickseed USA Dr. Scott Ebdon, University of Massachusetts FOR ADDITIONAL REPORTS OR INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Morris, Executive Director National Turfgrass Evaluation Program Beltsville Agricultural Research Center-West Building 005, Room 307 Beltsville, Maryland kmorris@ntep.org i

2 CONTENTS 2014 National Fineleaf Fescue Test data LOCATIONS SUBMITTING DATA FOR NATIONAL FINELEAF FESCUE TEST, 2014 Entries and Sponsors...2 Table A Locations, Site Descriptions and Management Practices in the 2014 National Fineleaf Fescue Test...3 Table B - Locations and Data Collected in Table 1A - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Fineleaf Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 1B - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Chewings Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 1C - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 1D - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Hard and Sheep Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 1E - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 2A - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Fineleaf Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 2B - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Chewings Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 2C - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 2D - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Hard and Sheep Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 2E - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 3A - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Fineleaf Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 3B - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Chewings Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 3C - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 3D - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Hard and Sheep Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 3E - Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Cultivars Grown in Location Performance Index (LPI) Group Table 4A - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars Grown under Traffic Stress at Amherst, MA...19 ii

3 CONTENTS (Continued) Table 4B - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars Grown under Traffic Stress at Amherst, MA...20 Table 4C - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown under Traffic Stress at Amherst, MA...21 Table 4D - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars Grown under Traffic Stress at Amherst, MA...22 Table 4E - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown under Traffic Stress at Amherst, MA...22 Table 5A - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars Grown under Shade at Carbondale, IL...23 Table 5B - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars Grown under Shade at Carbondale, IL...24 Table 5C - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown under Shade at Carbondale, IL...25 Table 5D - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars Grown under Shade at Carbondale, IL...26 Table 5E - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown under Shade at Carbondale, IL...26 Table 6A - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars Grown under No Mowing At Riverside, CA...27 Table 6B - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars Grown under No Mowing At Riverside, CA...28 Table 6C - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown under No Mowing At Riverside, CA...29 Table 6D - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars Grown under No Mowing At Riverside, CA...30 Table 6E - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown under No Mowing At Riverside, CA...30 Table 7A - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars Grown at San Francisco (California Golf Club Of San Francisco),CA...31 iii

4 CONTENTS (Continued) Table 7B - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars Grown at San Francisco (California Golf Club Of San Francisco),CA...32 Table 7C - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown at San Francisco (California Golf Club Of San Francisco),CA...33 Table 7D - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars Grown at San Francisco (California Golf Club Of San Francisco),CA...34 Table 7E - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown at San Francisco (California Golf Club Of San Francisco),CA...34 Table 8A - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars Grown under Fairway Mowing Height At West Lafayette, IN...35 Table 8B - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars Grown under Fairway Mowing Height At West Lafayette, IN...36 Table 8C - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown under Fairway Mowing Height At West Lafayette, IN...37 Table 8D - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars Grown under Fairway Mowing Height At West Lafayette, IN...38 Table 8E - Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Grown under Fairway Mowing Height At West Lafayette, IN...38 Table 9A - Genetic Color Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...39 Table 9B - Genetic Color Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...40 Table 9C - Genetic Color Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...41 Table 9D - Genetic Color Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...42 Table 9E - Genetic Color Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...42 Table 10A- Spring Greenup Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...43 Table 10B- Spring Greenup Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...44 Table 10C- Spring Greenup Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...45 Table 10D- Spring Greenup Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...46 Table 10E- Spring Greenup Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...46 Table 11A- Leaf Texture Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...47 Table 11B- Leaf Texture Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...48 Table 11C- Leaf Texture Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...49 iv

5 CONTENTS (Continued) Table 11D- Leaf Texture Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...50 Table 11E- Leaf Texture Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...50 Table 12A- Seedling Vigor Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...51 Table 12B- Seedling Vigor Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...52 Table 12C- Seedling Vigor Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...53 Table 12D- Seedling Vigor Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...54 Table 12E- Seedling Vigor Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...54 Table 13A- Spring Density Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...55 Table 13B- Spring Density Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...56 Table 13C- Spring Density Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...57 Table 13D- Spring Density Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...58 Table 13E- Spring Density Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...58 Table 14A- Spring Density Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...59 Table 14B- Spring Density Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...60 Table 14C- Spring Density Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...61 Table 14D- Spring Density Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...62 Table 14E- Spring Density Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...62 Table 15A- Fall Density Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...63 Table 15B- Fall Density Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...64 Table 15C- Fall Density Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...65 Table 15D- Fall Density Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...66 Table 15E- Fall Density Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...66 Table 16A- Percent Living Ground Cover (Spring) Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...67 Table 16B- Percent Living Ground Cover (Spring) Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...68 Table 16C- Percent Living Ground Cover (Spring) Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...69 Table 16D- Percent Living Ground Cover (Spring) Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...70 Table 16E- Percent Living Ground Cover (Spring) Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...70 Table 17A- Percent Living Ground Cover (Summer) Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...71 v

6 CONTENTS (Continued) Table 17B- Percent Living Ground Cover (Summer) Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...72 Table 17C- Percent Living Ground Cover (Summer) Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...73 Table 17D- Percent Living Ground Cover (Summer) Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...74 Table 17E- Percent Living Ground Cover (Summer) Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...74 Table 18A- Percent Living Ground Cover (Fall) Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...75 Table 18B- Percent Living Ground Cover (Fall) Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...76 Table 18C- Percent Living Ground Cover (Fall) Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...77 Table 18D- Percent Living Ground Cover (Fall) Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...78 Table 18E- Percent Living Ground Cover (Fall) Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...78 Table 19A- Winter Color Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...79 Table 19B- Winter Color Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...80 Table 19C- Winter Color Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...81 Table 19D- Winter Color Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...82 Table 19E- Winter Color Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...82 Table 20A- Leaf Spot Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...83 Table 20B- Leaf Spot Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...84 Table 20C- Leaf Spot Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...85 Table 20D- Leaf Spot Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...86 Table 20E- Leaf Spot Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...86 Table 21A- Dollar Spot Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...87 Table 21B- Dollar Spot Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...88 Table 21C- Dollar Spot Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...89 Table 21D- Dollar Spot Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...90 Table 21E- Dollar Spot Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...90 Table 22A- Red Thread Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...91 Table 22B- Red Thread Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...92 Table 22C- Red Thread Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...93 vi

7 CONTENTS (Continued) Table 22D- Red Thread Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...94 Table 22E- Red Thread Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...94 Table 23A- Fall Color (December) Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...95 Table 23B- Fall Color (December) Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars...96 Table 23C- Fall Color (December) Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars...97 Table 23D- Fall Color (December) Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars...98 Table 23E- Fall Color (December) Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars...98 Table 24A- Percent Establishment Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars...99 Table 24B- Percent Establishment Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars Table 24C- Percent Establishment Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Table 24D- Percent Establishment Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars Table 24E- Percent Establishment Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars Table 25A- Melting-out Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars Table 25B- Melting-out Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars Table 25C- Melting-out Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Table 25D- Melting-out Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars Table 25E- Melting-out Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars Table 26A- Growth Vigor Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars Table 26B- Growth Vigor Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars Table 26C- Growth Vigor Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars Table 26D- Growth Vigor Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars Table 26E- Growth Vigor Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cutivars Table 27A- Percent Establishment Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue Cultivars at Raleigh, NC Table 27B- Percent Establishment Ratings of Chewings Fescue Cultivars at Raleigh, NC Table 27C- Percent Establishment Ratings of Strong Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars at Raleigh, NC Table 27D- Percent Establishment Ratings of Hard and Sheep Fescue Cultivars at Raleigh, NC vii

8 CONTENTS (Continued) Table 27E- Percent Establishment Ratings of Slender Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars at Raleigh, NC Appendix Table- Summary of Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Fineleaf Fescue viii

9 A Guide to NTEP Turfgrass Ratings Introduction The quality and scientific merit of NTEP data is extremely important. However, the evaluation of turfgrass species and cultivars is a difficult and complex issue. Furthermore, turfgrass evaluation is generally a subjective process based on visual estimates of factors, like genetic color, stand density, leaf texture, uniformity and quality. These factors can not be measured in the same way as other agricultural crops. Turfgrass quality is not a measure of yield or nutritive value. Turfgrass quality is a measure of aesthetics (i.e. density, uniformity, texture, smoothness, growth habit and color), and functional use. The most common way of assessing turfgrass quality is a visual rating system that is based on the turfgrass evaluator's judgement. General Considerations Most visual ratings collected on NTEP trials are based on a 1 to 9 rating scale. One is the poorest or lowest and 9 is the best or highest rating. However, a few characteristics, such as winter kill or percent living ground cover, are rated on a percentage basis, again by using the evaluator s judgement. Most disease ratings found in NTEP reports will use the 1-9 scale, 9=no disease except where the evaluator made a judgement of the percentage of disease in each plot. Percent disease data will be found in separate tables and will normally not be included with disease data using the 1-9 scale. Turfgrass Quality Turfgrass Quality is based on 9 being outstanding or ideal turf and 1 being poorest or dead. A rating of 6 or above is generally considered acceptable. A quality rating value of 9 is reserved for a perfect or ideal grass, but it also can reflect an absolutely outstanding treatment plot. The NTEP requires quality ratings on a monthly basis. Quality ratings take into account the aesthetic and functional aspects of the turf. Quality ratings are not based on color alone, but on a combination of color, density, uniformity, texture, and disease or environmental stress. Turfgrass quality ratings are grouped and presented by region, management level, a particular stress (shade, traffic, etc.) and in some cases, by individual location (starting with 2001 data, data from each location will be posted separately as well on the NTEP web site, Also available now is a summary table (Appendix) in the back of this report. This summary table includes various statistical measures not previously compiled for NTEP reports. For an explanation of this table and these changes, please go to the NTEP web site at Other Ratings More detailed information on the ratings of specific characteristics can be found on the NTEP web site at ix

10 2014 NATIONAL FINELEAF FESCUE TEST LOCATIONS SUBMITTING DATA FOR 2015 State Location Code California Riverside (No Mowing) CA3 California San Francisco (California Golf Club) CA5 Connecticut Storrs CT1 Illinois Urbana IL1 Illinois Carbondale (Shade) IL2 Indiana West Lafayette (Fairway Mowing) IN1 Massachusetts Amherst (Traffic Study) MA1 Maryland College Park MD1 Michigan East Lansing MI1 Michigan East Lansing MI2 Minnesota St. Paul MN1 Minnesota St. Paul MN2 Missouri Columbia MO1 New Jersey North Brunswick NJ1 New Jersey Adelphia NJ2 North Carolina Raleigh NC1 North Dakota Fargo ND1 Oregon Corvallis OR1 Quebec Quebec City QE1 Washington Pullman WA1 1

11 Entry No 2014 NATIONAL FINELEAF FESCUE TEST Entries and Sponsors Name Species Sponsor 1 Minimus Hard Fescue Landmark Turf & Native Seed *2 Marvel Strong Creeping Red Landmark Turf & Native Seed 3 7C34 Strong Creeping Red Brett Young Seeds Ltd 4 DLFPS-FL/3066 Hard Fescue DLF Pickseed USA 5 DLFPS-FRC/3060 Chewings Fescue DLF Pickseed USA 6 DLFPS-FL/3060 Hard Fescue DLF Pickseed USA 7 DLFPS-FRR/3069 Strong Creeping Red DLF Pickseed USA 8 MNHD-14 Hard Fescue University of Minnesota 9 DLFPS-FRR/3068 Strong Creeping Red DLF Pickseed USA *10 Quatro Sheep Fescue Standard *11 Boreal Strong Creeping Red Standard *12 Gladiator (TH456) Hard Fescue Columbia River Seed 13 Resolute (7H7) Hard Fescue SiteOne Landscape Supply *14 Sword Hard Fescue Columbia River Seed *15 Seabreeze GT Slender Creeping Red Standard *16 Radar Chewings Fescue Standard *17 Beacon Hard Fescue Standard *18 Navigator II Strong Creeping Red Standard 19 Jetty (PPG-FL 106) Hard Fescue Mountain View Seeds 20 PPG-FRC 114 Chewings Fescue The Scotts Company 21 PPG-FRT 101 Slender Creeping Red Mountain View Seeds 22 PPG-FRR 111 Strong Creeping Red Mountain View Seeds 23 PPG-FRC 113 Chewings Fescue Mountain View Seeds *24 Kent Strong Creeping Red Columbia Seeds 25 RAD-FC32 Chewings Fescue Columbia Seeds 26 BAR FRT 5002 Slender Creeping Red Barenburg USA 27 BAR VV-VP3-CT Chewings Fescue Barenburg USA 28 BAR 6FR 126 Chewings Fescue Barenburg USA 29 C14-OS3 Strong Creeping Red The Scotts Company 30 RAD-FR33R Strong Creeping Red Brett Young Seed LTD *31 RAD-FC44 Chewings Fescue Bailey Seed Company *32 RAD-FR47 Creeping Red Fescue Bailey Seed Company 33 PST-4DR4 Creeping Red Fescue Pure Seed Testing Inc. 34 PST-4RUE Creeping Red Fescue Pure Seed Testing Inc. 35 PST-4BEN Creeping Red Fescue Pure Seed Testing Inc. 36 PST-4BND Hard Fescue Pure Seed Testing Inc. 37 PST-4ED4 Creeping Red Fescue Pure Seed Testing Inc. 38 DLFPS-FRC/3057 Chewings Fescue DLF Pickseed USA *39 Cascade Chewings Fescue Standard 40 DLF-FRC 3338 Chewings Fescue DLF Pickseed USA 41 DLF-FRR 6162 Creeping Red Fescue DLF Pickseed USA *42 Beudin Hard Fescue DLF Pickseed USA * Commercially Available in the USA in

12 TABLE A LOCATIONS, SITE DESCRIPTIONS AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN THE 2014 NATIONAL FINELEAF FESCUE TEST SOIL SOIL SUN MOWING SOIL SOIL PHOSPHOROUS POTASSIUM NITROGEN OR HEIGHT IRRIGATION LOCATION TEXTURE PH (LBS/ACRE) (LBS/ACRE) (LBS/1000 SQ FT) SHADE (IN) PRACTICED CA3 SANDY LOAM FULL SUN 4.1+ TO PREVENT STRESS CA5 SANDY LOAM PARTIAL SHADE ONLY DURING SEVERE STRESS CT1 SANDY LOAM FULL SUN TO PREVENT STRESS IL1 SILT LOAM AND SILT FULL SUN NO IRRIGATION IL2 SILTY CLAY LOAM UNIFORM SHADE NO IRRIGATION IN1 SILT LOAM AND SILT FULL SUN ONLY DURING SEVERE STRESS MA1 LOAM FULL SUN TO PREVENT STRESS MD1 SILT LOAM AND SILT FULL SUN ONLY DURING SEVERE STRESS MI MI MN1 SILTY CLAY LOAM FULL SUN NO IRRIGATION MN2 SILTY CLAY LOAM FULL SUN NO IRRIGATION MO1 SILT LOAM AND SILT FULL SUN ONLY DURING SEVERE STRESS NC1 SILTY CLAY LOAM FULL SUN TO PREVENT STRESS ND1 SILTY CLAY AND CLAY FULL SUN TO PREVENT DORMANCY NJ1 LOAM PARTIAL SHADE TO PREVENT STRESS NJ2 SANDY LOAM FULL SUN TO PREVENT STRESS OR1 SILTY CLAY LOAM FULL SUN TO PREVENT STRESS QE WA1 SILT LOAM AND SILT FULL SUN ONLY DURING SEVERE STRESS 3

13 TABLE B. LOCATIONS AND DATA COLLECTED IN 2015 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY GENETIC SPRING LEAF LOCATION RATING RATING RATING RATING RATING RATING RATING RATING RATING RATING RATING RATING COLOR GREENUP TEXTURE CA3 X X X X X X X X X X X X X CA5 X X X X X X X X X X X X X CT1 X X X X X X X X IL1 X X X X X X X X IL2 X X X X X X X X X IN1 X X X X X X X X MA1 X X X X MD1 X X X X X X X MI1 X X X X X X X X MI2 X X X X X X X MN1 X X X X X X X MN2 X X X X X X X MO1 X X X X X X X X X NC1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ND1 X X X X X X NJ1 X X X X X X X X X NJ2 X X X X X X X X OR1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X QE1 X X X X X X X X WA1 X X X X X X 4

14 TABLE B. (CONT'D) LOCATIONS AND DATA COLLECTED IN 2015 PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PINK SPRING SUMMER FALL COVER COVER COVER WINTER LEAF DOLLAR RED PYTHIUM SNOW LOCATION SEEDLVIG DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY SPRING SUMMER FALL COLOR SPOT SPOT THREAD BLIGHT MOLD CA3 X X X X CA5 X X X CT1 IL1 X IL2 X X X IN1 X MA1 MD1 MI1 X X MI2 MN1 MN2 X MO1 X X X X X X NC1 X X X X X X X X X ND1 X X X X X X NJ1 X X NJ2 X X X OR1 X QE1 X WA1 X X 5

15 TABLE B. (CONT'D) LOCATIONS AND DATA COLLECTED IN 2015 FALL PERCENT MELTINT- GROWTH PERCENT ESTABLISHMENT COLOR ESTABLISH- OUT VIGOR MESOTRIONE WEAR TOLERANCE NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY LOCATION DECEMBER MENT RATINGS RATINGS INJURY AUG SEP OCT CA3 CA5 CT1 IL1 IL2 IN1 X X X MA1 X X X X MD1 X MI1 X MI2 MN1 MN2 X X X MO1 X X NC1 X X X ND1 NJ1 NJ2 OR1 X QE1 WA1 6

16 TABLE 1A. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF FINELEAF FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 1 **/ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME CT1 NJ1 NC1 IL1 MN1 MO1 MEAN PPG-FRC PPG-FRC C14-OS DLF-FRC DLFPS-FRC/ * RADAR PPG-FRT C DLFPS-FRC/ * RAD-FC DLFPS-FRR/ BAR 6FR BAR VV-VP3-CT DLF-FRR RAD-FC DLFPS-FRR/ * MARVEL PPG-FRR * RAD-FR PST-4BEN RAD-FR33R * NAVIGATOR II PST-4ED * CASCADE * BEACON PST-4DR * KENT BAR FRT * RESOLUTE (7H7) MINIMUS DLFPS-FL/ MNHD * GLADIATOR (TH456) PST-4RUE * QUATRO DLFPS-FL/ * BEUDIN * JETTY (PPG-FL 106) PST-4BND * SEABREEZE GT * BOREAL * SWORD LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE IN THE USA IN 2016 **/ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS LPI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE A LPI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON LPI, GO TO 7

17 TABLE 1B. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 1 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME CT1 NJ1 NC1 IL1 MN1 MO1 MEAN PPG-FRC PPG-FRC DLF-FRC DLFPS-FRC/ RADAR DLFPS-FRC/ RAD-FC BAR 6FR BAR VV-VP3-CT RAD-FC CASCADE LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 8

18 TABLE 1C. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF STRONG CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 1 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME CT1 NJ1 NC1 IL1 MN1 MO1 MEAN C14-OS C DLFPS-FRR/ DLF-FRR DLFPS-FRR/ MARVEL PPG-FRR RAD-FR PST-4BEN RAD-FR33R NAVIGATOR II PST-4ED PST-4DR KENT PST-4RUE BOREAL LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 9

19 TABLE 1D. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF HARD AND SHEEP FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 1 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME CT1 NJ1 NC1 IL1 MN1 MO1 MEAN BEACON RESOLUTE (7H7) MINIMUS DLFPS-FL/ MNHD GLADIATOR (TH456) QUATRO DLFPS-FL/ BEUDIN JETTY (PPG-FL 106) PST-4BND SWORD LSD VALUE C.V. (%) TABLE 1E. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF SLENDER CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 1 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME CT1 NJ1 NC1 IL1 MN1 MO1 MEAN PPG-FRT BAR FRT SEABREEZE GT LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 10

20 TABLE 2A. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF FINELEAF FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 2 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME MI1 MI2 MN2 ND1 WA1 MEAN BEUDIN BAR FRT GLADIATOR (TH456) RESOLUTE (7H7) DLF-FRC PPG-FRC RAD-FC RADAR BAR VV-VP3-CT PPG-FRT PPG-FRC RAD-FC DLFPS-FL/ C14-OS DLFPS-FRC/ BAR 6FR DLFPS-FL/ MINIMUS DLF-FRR PST-4BEN BEACON DLFPS-FRC/ C DLFPS-FRR/ SWORD PST-4BND JETTY (PPG-FL 106) NAVIGATOR II PPG-FRR MNHD RAD-FR33R RAD-FR MARVEL SEABREEZE GT KENT PST-4RUE PST-4DR QUATRO DLFPS-FRR/ PST-4ED CASCADE BOREAL LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 11

21 TABLE 2B. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 2 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME MI1 MI2 MN2 ND1 WA1 MEAN DLF-FRC PPG-FRC RAD-FC RADAR BAR VV-VP3-CT PPG-FRC RAD-FC DLFPS-FRC/ BAR 6FR DLFPS-FRC/ CASCADE LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 12

22 TABLE 2C. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF STRONG CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 2 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME MI1 MI2 MN2 ND1 WA1 MEAN C14-OS DLF-FRR PST-4BEN C DLFPS-FRR/ NAVIGATOR II PPG-FRR RAD-FR33R RAD-FR MARVEL KENT PST-4RUE PST-4DR DLFPS-FRR/ PST-4ED BOREAL LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 13

23 TABLE 2D. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF HARD AND SHEEP FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 2 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME MI1 MI2 MN2 ND1 WA1 MEAN BEUDIN GLADIATOR (TH456) RESOLUTE (7H7) DLFPS-FL/ DLFPS-FL/ MINIMUS BEACON SWORD PST-4BND JETTY (PPG-FL 106) MNHD QUATRO LSD VALUE C.V. (%) TABLE 2E. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF SLENDER CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 2 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME MI1 MI2 MN2 ND1 WA1 MEAN BAR FRT PPG-FRT SEABREEZE GT LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 14

24 TABLE 3A. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF FINELEAF FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 3 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME NJ2 MD1 OR1 QE1 MEAN MINIMUS RESOLUTE (7H7) BEACON DLFPS-FL/ DLFPS-FL/ JETTY (PPG-FL 106) GLADIATOR (TH456) MNHD C14-OS PPG-FRC PPG-FRT DLF-FRC DLFPS-FRC/ DLFPS-FRC/ PST-4BND RADAR PPG-FRC SWORD BAR VV-VP3-CT RAD-FC RAD-FC QUATRO BAR 6FR DLFPS-FRR/ C PST-4BEN DLF-FRR PST-4DR CASCADE PPG-FRR MARVEL NAVIGATOR II DLFPS-FRR/ PST-4RUE RAD-FR33R RAD-FR BAR FRT PST-4ED BEUDIN SEABREEZE GT KENT BOREAL LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 15

25 TABLE 3B. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 3 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME NJ2 MD1 OR1 QE1 MEAN PPG-FRC DLF-FRC DLFPS-FRC/ DLFPS-FRC/ RADAR PPG-FRC BAR VV-VP3-CT RAD-FC RAD-FC BAR 6FR CASCADE LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 16

26 TABLE 3C. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF STRONG CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 3 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME NJ2 MD1 OR1 QE1 MEAN C14-OS DLFPS-FRR/ C PST-4BEN DLF-FRR PST-4DR PPG-FRR MARVEL NAVIGATOR II DLFPS-FRR/ PST-4RUE RAD-FR33R RAD-FR PST-4ED KENT BOREAL LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 17

27 TABLE 3D. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF HARD AND SHEEP FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 3 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME NJ2 MD1 OR1 QE1 MEAN MINIMUS RESOLUTE (7H7) BEACON DLFPS-FL/ DLFPS-FL/ JETTY (PPG-FL 106) GLADIATOR (TH456) MNHD PST-4BND SWORD QUATRO BEUDIN LSD VALUE C.V. (%) TABLE 3E. TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF SLENDER CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN IN LOCATIONS PERFORMANCE INDEX (LPI) GROUP 3 */ TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME NJ2 MD1 OR1 QE1 MEAN PPG-FRT BAR FRT SEABREEZE GT LSD VALUE C.V. (%) */ ENTRIES WITHIN THIS TABLE ARE ORDERED BY THE OVERALL MEAN AND HAVE SIMILAR TURF QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN ALL TEST LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN THIS AMMI GROUP. IF YOUR STATE IS NOT REPRESENTED, THEN CHOOSE AN AMMI GROUP THAT CONTAINS A LOCATION AND MANAGEMENT SIMILAR TO YOUR PLANTING CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AMMI, GO TO 18

28 TABLE 4A. MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS OF FINELEAF FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN UNDER TRAFFIC STRESS AT AMHERST, MA 1/ TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS 1-9; 9=BEST 2/ PERCENT PYTHIUM ESTABLISH- MESOTRIONE WEAR TOLERANCE RATINGS QUALITY RATINGS NAME BLIGHT MENT INJURY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER AUG SEP OCT NOV MEAN BAR FRT PPG-FRT RAD-FC BEUDIN RAD-FC BAR VV-VP3-CT PPG-FRR RADAR DLFPS-FRC/ PST-4BEN PST-4DR CASCADE DLFPS-FRC/ MARVEL NAVIGATOR II PPG-FRC C BAR 6FR DLF-FRR DLFPS-FRR/ DLFPS-FRR/ KENT PST-4ED RAD-FR BOREAL DLF-FRC PPG-FRC RAD-FR33R JETTY (PPG-FL 106) SEABREEZE GT BEACON C14-OS PST-4BND PST-4RUE RESOLUTE (7H7) QUATRO MINIMUS DLFPS-FL/ MNHD DLFPS-FL/ GLADIATOR (TH456) SWORD LSD VALUE C.V. (%)

29 TABLE 4B. MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN UNDER TRAFFIC STRESS AT AMHERST, MA 1/ TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS 1-9; 9=BEST 2/ PERCENT PYTHIUM ESTABLISH- MESOTRIONE WEAR TOLERANCE RATINGS QUALITY RATINGS NAME BLIGHT MENT INJURY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER AUG SEP OCT NOV MEAN RAD-FC RAD-FC BAR VV-VP3-CT RADAR DLFPS-FRC/ CASCADE DLFPS-FRC/ PPG-FRC BAR 6FR DLF-FRC PPG-FRC LSD VALUE C.V. (%)

30 TABLE 4C. MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS OF STRONG CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN UNDER TRAFFIC STRESS AT AMHERST, MA 1/ TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS 1-9; 9=BEST 2/ PERCENT PYTHIUM ESTABLISH- MESOTRIONE WEAR TOLERANCE RATINGS QUALITY RATINGS NAME BLIGHT MENT INJURY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER AUG SEP OCT NOV MEAN PPG-FRR PST-4BEN PST-4DR MARVEL NAVIGATOR II C DLF-FRR DLFPS-FRR/ DLFPS-FRR/ KENT PST-4ED RAD-FR BOREAL RAD-FR33R C14-OS PST-4RUE LSD VALUE C.V. (%)

31 TABLE 4D. MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS OF HARD AND SHEEP FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN UNDER TRAFFIC STRESS AT AMHERST, MA 1/ TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS 1-9; 9=BEST 2/ PERCENT PYTHIUM ESTABLISH- MESOTRIONE WEAR TOLERANCE RATINGS QUALITY RATINGS NAME BLIGHT MENT INJURY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER AUG SEP OCT NOV MEAN BEUDIN JETTY (PPG-FL 106) BEACON PST-4BND RESOLUTE (7H7) QUATRO MINIMUS DLFPS-FL/ MNHD DLFPS-FL/ GLADIATOR (TH456) SWORD LSD VALUE C.V. (%) TABLE 4E. MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS OF SLENDER CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN UNDER TRAFFIC STRESS AT AMHERST, MA 1/ TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS 1-9; 9=BEST 2/ PERCENT PYTHIUM ESTABLISH- MESOTRIONE WEAR TOLERANCE RATINGS QUALITY RATINGS NAME BLIGHT MENT INJURY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER AUG SEP OCT NOV MEAN BAR FRT PPG-FRT SEABREEZE GT LSD VALUE C.V. (%)

32 TABLE 5A. MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS OF FINELEAF FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN UNDER SHADE AT CARBONDALE, IL 1/ TURFGRASS QUALITY AND OTHER RATINGS 1-9; 9=BEST 2/ PERCENT PERCENT SPRING SEEDLING COVER COVER QUALITY RATINGS NAME GREENUP VIGOR SUMMER FALL APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV MEAN 7C DLF-FRR NAVIGATOR II PPG-FRT JETTY (PPG-FL 106) SEABREEZE GT BAR FRT DLFPS-FRR/ SWORD DLF-FRC PPG-FRC DLFPS-FRC/ DLFPS-FRC/ MARVEL MINIMUS PST-4BEN RAD-FC RAD-FR33R RADAR C14-OS DLFPS-FL/ RAD-FC BEACON PPG-FRR PST-4RUE BAR VV-VP3-CT BEUDIN GLADIATOR (TH456) PPG-FRC PST-4BND PST-4DR RAD-FR KENT PST-4ED DLFPS-FRR/ CASCADE BOREAL QUATRO DLFPS-FL/ MNHD RESOLUTE (7H7) BAR 6FR LSD VALUE C.V. (%)

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

To evaluate 120 commercial and experimental varieties of perennial ryegrass under low mowing height, high maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

To evaluate 120 commercial and experimental varieties of perennial ryegrass under low mowing height, high maintenance conditions in central Indiana. 2004 NTEP Perennial Ryegrass Test 2005 Results Glenn Hardebeck and Cale Bigelow Objective Rationale To evaluate 120 commercial and experimental varieties of perennial ryegrass under low mowing height,

More information

Performance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections ( )

Performance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections ( ) Performance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections (993-96) P.J. Landschoot, B.S. Park, A.S. McNitt, and D. Livingston Funding Sources: National Turfgrass Evaluation Program, The Pennsylvania Turfgrass

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

2016 Turfgrass Proceedings

2016 Turfgrass Proceedings 2016 Turfgrass Proceedings The New Jersey Turfgrass Association In Cooperation with Rutgers Center for Turfgrass Science Rutgers Cooperative Extension 2016 RUTGERS TURFGRASS PROCEEDINGS of the GREEN EXPO

More information

2001 NTEP Tall Fescue Test 2002 Results Dan Weisenberger. Objective

2001 NTEP Tall Fescue Test 2002 Results Dan Weisenberger. Objective 2001 NTEP Tall Fescue Test 2002 Results Dan Weisenberger Objective Rationale How It Was Done To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of turf-type tall fescue under high maintenance conditions

More information

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS Page 1 U. S. Department Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office Highway Policy Information TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS September Travel on all roads and streets changed by +2.5 (5.8 billion vehicle

More information

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS July 2002

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS July 2002 TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS July 2002 Travel on all roads and streets changed by +2.3 percent for July 2002 as compared to July 2001. Estimated Vehicle-Miles of Travel by Region - July 2002 - (in Billions) West

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The Nation al Tur fgrass Evaluation Pr ogram (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of tu rfgrass varieties an d pr omising selections

More information

2012 Turfgrass Proceedings

2012 Turfgrass Proceedings 2012 Turfgrass Proceedings The New Jersey Turfgrass Association In Cooperation with Rutgers Center for Turfgrass Science Rutgers Cooperative Extension 2012 RUTGERS TURFGRASS PROCEEDINGS of the GREEN EXPO

More information

Monthly Biodiesel Production Report

Monthly Biodiesel Production Report Monthly Biodiesel Production Report With data for June 2017 August 2017 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S.

More information

BLACK KNIGHT HPI REPORT

BLACK KNIGHT HPI REPORT CONTENTS 1 OVERVIEW 2 NATIONAL OVERVIEW 3 LARGEST STATES AND METROS 4 MARCH S BIGGEST MOVERS 5 20 LARGEST STATES 6 40 LARGEST METROS 7 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OVERVIEW Each month, the Data & Analytics division

More information

2015 Turfgrass Proceedings

2015 Turfgrass Proceedings 2015 Turfgrass Proceedings The New Jersey Turfgrass Association In Cooperation with Rutgers Center for Turfgrass Science Rutgers Cooperative Extension 2015 RUTGERS TURFGRASS PROCEEDINGS of the GREEN EXPO

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

2013 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province

2013 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province Interstate and Cross-Border 2013 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province Based on 77,308 Interstate Household Goods Moves from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 YUKON TERRITORY 0 0 BC

More information

2016 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province

2016 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province Interstate and Cross-Border 2016 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province Based on 75,427 Interstate Household Goods Moves from January 1, 2016 through December 15, 2016 NL 8 13 YUKON TERRITORY

More information

Our objective was to determine which of the 134 cultivars of perennial ryegrass were best adapted to Indiana growing conditions.

Our objective was to determine which of the 134 cultivars of perennial ryegrass were best adapted to Indiana growing conditions. 1999 NTEP Perennial Ryegrass Test 2002 Results Dan Weisenberger Objective Rationale How It Was Done Our objective was to determine which of the 134 cultivars of perennial ryegrass were best adapted to

More information

EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: SPONSORED BY: AND

EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: SPONSORED BY: AND EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: Robert Green Richard Autio Grant Klein Francisco Merino SPONSORED BY: CEDAR CHEMICAL

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of turf-type tall fescue under high maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of turf-type tall fescue under high maintenance conditions in central Indiana. 2001 NTEP Tall Fescue Test 2004 Results Glenn Hardebeck and Cale Bigelow Objective Rationale To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of turf-type tall fescue under high maintenance conditions

More information

Acknowledgments This research was supported by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program and The Midwest Regional Turf Foundation.

Acknowledgments This research was supported by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program and The Midwest Regional Turf Foundation. 2001 NTEP Tall Fescue Test 2005 Results Glenn Hardebeck and Cale Bigelow Objective Rationale To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of turf-type tall fescue under high maintenance conditions

More information

Solar Power: State-level Issues and Perspectives

Solar Power: State-level Issues and Perspectives Solar Power: State-level Issues and Perspectives Sean Gallagher Vice-President, State Affairs Solar Energy Industries Association National Conference of State Legislators Solar Boot Camp August 24, 2016

More information

National Routing Number Administration p-ani Activity and Projected Exhaust Report

National Routing Number Administration p-ani Activity and Projected Exhaust Report National Routing Number Administration 2016 p-ani Activity and Projected Exhaust Report The ATIS Industry Numbering Committee developed the P-ANI Administration Guidelines, which contain the following

More information

GoToBermuda.com. Q3 Arrivals and Statistics at September 30 th 2015

GoToBermuda.com. Q3 Arrivals and Statistics at September 30 th 2015 Q3 Arrivals and Statistics at September 30 th 2015 1 Q3 Total Vacation Visitor Arrivals Q3 Arrivals 2014 2015 YTD 2014 YTD 2015 Air - Vacation 54,305 54,473 0.31% 168 117,639 116,700-0.80% (939) Cruise

More information

To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of Kentucky bluegrass under low maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of Kentucky bluegrass under low maintenance conditions in central Indiana. 2000 NTEP Kentucky Bluegrass Test 2004 Results Glenn Hardebeck and Cale Bigelow Objective Rationale To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of Kentucky bluegrass under low maintenance conditions

More information

CONTENTS National Tall Fescue Test data LOCATIONS SUBMITTING DATA FOR

CONTENTS National Tall Fescue Test data LOCATIONS SUBMITTING DATA FOR CONTENTS 2006 National Tall Fescue Test - 2007-11 data LOCATIONS SUBMITTING DATA FOR 2007-11...1 NATIONAL TALL FESCUE TEST, 2006 Entries and Sponsors...2 Table A - 2007-11 Locations, Site Descriptions

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

Kentucky bluegrass Varietal Trial National Turfgrass Evaluation Program - Final Report 2000 C.E. Miluch

Kentucky bluegrass Varietal Trial National Turfgrass Evaluation Program - Final Report 2000 C.E. Miluch Kentucky bluegrass Varietal Trial National Turfgrass Evaluation Program - Final Report 2000 C.E. Miluch Abstract The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) trial

More information

JOB CUT ANNOUNCEMENTS SURGE 45 PERCENT TO 76,835, HIGHEST MONTHLY TOTAL IN OVER THREE YEARS

JOB CUT ANNOUNCEMENTS SURGE 45 PERCENT TO 76,835, HIGHEST MONTHLY TOTAL IN OVER THREE YEARS CONTACT Colleen Madden, Director of Public Relations Office: 312-422-5074 Mobile: 314-807-1568 colleenmadden@challengergray.com **EMBARGOED COPY** FOR RELEASE AT 7:30 A.M. ET, MARCH 7, 2019 JOB CUT ANNOUNCEMENTS

More information

EPA REGULATORY UPDATE PEI Convention at the NACS Show October 8, 2018 Las Vegas, NV

EPA REGULATORY UPDATE PEI Convention at the NACS Show October 8, 2018 Las Vegas, NV EPA REGULATORY UPDATE 2018 PEI Convention at the NACS Show October 8, 2018 Las Vegas, NV 1 Periodic Operations and Maintenance Walkthrough Inspections - beginning no later than October 13, 2018 (40 CFR

More information

U.S. Ethanol Production, Imports and Stocks

U.S. Ethanol Production, Imports and Stocks U.S. Ethanol Production, Imports and Stocks Daniel O Brien and Mike Woolverton, Extension Agricultural Economists K-State Research and Extension January 12, 29 Trends in production, imports and ending

More information

RETURN ON INVESTMENT LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS PIVOTAL LNG TRUCK MARKET LNG TO DIESEL COMPARISON

RETURN ON INVESTMENT LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS PIVOTAL LNG TRUCK MARKET LNG TO DIESEL COMPARISON RETURN ON INVESTMENT LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS PIVOTAL LNG TRUCK MARKET LNG TO DIESEL COMPARISON Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 RETAIL BREAK EVEN AND IRR EXAMPLE FOR

More information

Performance Testing of Tall Fescue Turfgrasses at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater

Performance Testing of Tall Fescue Turfgrasses at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Current Report CR-6602 0902 Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets are also available on our website at: http://osufacts.okstate.edu 1988-1992 Performance Testing

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

Year to Date Summary. Average and Median Sale Prices

Year to Date Summary. Average and Median Sale Prices A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community Residential Review: Southwest Washington September 2018 Reporting Period September Residential Highlights Southwest Washington

More information

The Economic Downturn Lessons on the Correlation between Economic Growth and Energy

The Economic Downturn Lessons on the Correlation between Economic Growth and Energy The Economic Downturn Lessons on the Correlation between Economic Growth and Energy Demand presented to Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Spring Seminar April 9, 2010 presented by Doug Gotham State

More information

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is designed to develop and coordinate uniform evaluation trials of turfgrass varieties and promising selections in

More information

UPPER MIDWEST DAIRY NEWS

UPPER MIDWEST DAIRY NEWS Federal Milk Market Administrator U.S. Department of Agriculture UPPER MIDWEST DAIRY NEWS H. Paul Kyburz, Market Administrator Volume 8, Issue 2 Upper Midwest Marketing Area, Federal Order No. 30 February

More information

Final Report: Segway X2 Traffic Study (2007)

Final Report: Segway X2 Traffic Study (2007) Final Report: Segway X2 Traffic Study (2007) Doug Karcher & John Sorochan University of Arkansas University of Tennessee submitted to Segway, Inc. March 31, 2009 Introduction: Objective: Methods: Regular

More information

Total Production by Month (Acre Feet)

Total Production by Month (Acre Feet) Production by Month (acre-feet) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 January 25 339.10 228.90 249.50 297.99 243.06 327.14 247.66 212.37 February 234.00 218.80 212.10 241.52 245.82 279.08 234.16

More information

Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends

Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends K. Carey, A.J. Porter, K.S. Jordan and E.M. Lyons Department of Plant Agriculture and the Guelph Turfgrass Institute, University of Guelph, Ontario.

More information

State Policy Trends in Biomass

State Policy Trends in Biomass State Policy Trends in Biomass Biomass 2010 March 30, 2010 Glen Andersen National lconference of State Legislatures Overview of State Policies Renewable Fuel Standards Renewable Portfolio Standards Reducing/Eliminating

More information

Alaska (AK) Passenger vehicles, motorcycles 1959 and newer require a title ATV s, boats and snowmobiles do not require a title

Alaska (AK) Passenger vehicles, motorcycles 1959 and newer require a title ATV s, boats and snowmobiles do not require a title Alabama (AL) Passenger vehicles 1975 and newer require a Motorcycles, mopeds and trailers 1975 and newer require a ATVs, snowmobiles and boats do not require a Alaska (AK) Passenger vehicles, motorcycles

More information

Wheat Marketing Situation

Wheat Marketing Situation Wheat Marketing Situation Prepared by: Darrell L. Hanavan Executive Director Colorado Wheat Administrative Committee If you would like to receive an email when this report is updated, email gmostek@coloradowheat.org

More information

Thirty Years of Climatological Data: 1969 to 1998

Thirty Years of Climatological Data: 1969 to 1998 Thirty Years of Climatological Data: 1969 to 1998 NMSU's Agricultural Science Center at Farmington, New Mexico Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 744 College of Agriculture and Home Economics

More information

, NAS!?r-s~~if.{" WOQi2AN PIGS: FINAt:. EST'IHATES (STATISTICAL,,,", BULLETIN.) NATIONAL ' AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE,, ':-'-"'-'-,,

, NAS!?r-s~~if.{ WOQi2AN PIGS: FINAt:. EST'IHATES (STATISTICAL,,,, BULLETIN.) NATIONAL ' AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE,, ':-'-'-'-,, , NAS!?r-s~~if.{" WOQi2AN PIGS: FINAt:. EST'IHATES 1988-92. (STATISTICAL,,,", BULLETIN.) NATIONAL ' AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE,, ':-'-"'-'-,, WASHINGTOH, DC. DEC 9 57P' ~ alii Association for Informat

More information

All Applicants - By HS GPA Run Date: Thursday, September 06, Applicants GPA Count % of Total

All Applicants - By HS GPA Run Date: Thursday, September 06, Applicants GPA Count % of Total All Freshmen: 3 Year Comparison of Fall Applications Received, Degree, Net s and Net s GPA All - By HS GPA Net s 3.900-4.000 1932 44.3 1840 55.8 441 57.0 24.0 35 1395 3.800-3.899 301 6.9 267 8.1 54 7.0

More information

2017 Adjusted Count Report February 12, 2018

2017 Adjusted Count Report February 12, 2018 A statewide multi-use trail user study and volunteer data collection program 2017 Adjusted Count Report February 12, 2018 The following report includes the final adjusted infrared (IR) counter data at

More information

I. 22. Price. Technical Report Documentation Page

I. 22. Price. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. TX-00/1914-5 1 2. Government Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle THE 1995 PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR SLOPE PROTECTION PRODUCTS, HYDRAULIC MULCHES, AND FLEXIBLE CHANNEL LINERS Technical Report

More information

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in 2012. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Steve Reiter, and Brent Breitenbach The objective of this trial was to

More information

US Rt. 12/20/45 at US Rt. 20 <Westbound and Southbound>

US Rt. 12/20/45 at US Rt. 20 <Westbound and Southbound> US Rt. 12/20/45 at US Rt. 20 Village of Stone Park, Illinois R L R F o l l o w - U p E v a l u a t i o n R e p o r t Reference No: 016-43280 December 2010 Table of Contents

More information

Sprinkler System Waiver Application Packet

Sprinkler System Waiver Application Packet Sprinkler System Waiver Application Packet According to the City s municipal code, use of sprinklers is conditional upon use of a water budget and the City continues to discourage customers from irrigating

More information

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service St. Augustinegrass Cultivar Tolerance to (sulfosulfuron) Herbicide Trial ID: HerbTol 01-06 Study Director: Bennett & Evans Location: Griffin Investigator: Clint Waltz General Trial Information Investigator:

More information

2004 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

2004 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings 2004 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings Rutgers University THE NEW JERSEY TURFGRASS ASSOCIATION In Cooperation With RUTGERS COOPERATIVE RESEARCH & EXTENSION NEW JERSEY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION RUTGERS,

More information

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data. SEPTEMBER 2016 WIM Site Location WIM #37 is located on I-94 near Otsego in Wright county. The WIM is located only on the westbound (WB) side of I-94, meaning that all data mentioned in this report pertains

More information

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs Washington, D.C. Quarterly Hogs and Pigs Released March 26, 2010, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on call Nick Streff at 202-720-3,

More information

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs Quarterly Hogs and Pigs ISSN: 949-92 Released September 27, 208, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). United

More information

Honda Accord theft losses an update

Honda Accord theft losses an update Highway Loss Data Institute Bulletin Vol. 34, No. 20 : September 2017 Honda Accord theft losses an update Executive Summary Thefts of tires and rims have become a significant problem for some vehicles.

More information

2009 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province

2009 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province Interstate and Cross-Border 2009 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province Based on 71,474 Interstate Household Goods Moves from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 UNITED STATES ALABAMA

More information

2010 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province

2010 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province Interstate and Cross-Border 2010 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province Based on 74,541 Interstate Household Goods Moves from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 UNITED STATES ALABAMA

More information

September 2016 Water Production & Consumption Data

September 2016 Water Production & Consumption Data September 2016 Water Production & Consumption Data September 2016 monthly water production (288.48 AF) was lowest in at least 17 years. Monthly water production has increased slightly each month since

More information

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015 Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015 Behnken, Lisa M., Fritz R. Breitenbach, Dillon Welter and Brent Breitenbach The objective of this trial was to evaluate

More information

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs Quarterly Hogs and Pigs ISSN: 19-11 Released September 26, 2014, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). United

More information

Manufactured Home Shipments by Product Mix ( )

Manufactured Home Shipments by Product Mix ( ) Manufactured Home Shipments by Product Mix (1990-2014) Data Source: Institute for Building Technology and Safety (IBTS) * "Destination Pending" represents month-end finished home inventory at a plant.

More information

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015. Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ellen Sheehan, and Brent Breitenbach

More information

Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers: Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Department of Labor

Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers: Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Department of Labor Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers: 2012 Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Department of Labor February 26, 2013 In 2012, 75.3 million in the United States age 16 and over were paid at, representing

More information

MAGAZINE Publisher s Statement 6 months ended December 31, 2014 Subject to Audit

MAGAZINE Publisher s Statement 6 months ended December 31, 2014 Subject to Audit MAGAZINE Publisher s Statement 6 months ended December 31, 2014 Subject to Audit Field Served: The 164-year old monthly journal of politics, economics, society, travel, culture and nature, as well as essays

More information

Date Event or Holiday :Sun, 2:Mon North Orchard Delong Preschool North Orchard Delong Preschool

Date Event or Holiday :Sun, 2:Mon North Orchard Delong Preschool North Orchard Delong Preschool 2018 6 1 1:Sun, 2:Mon 2018-2019 Date Event or Holiday Aug 16 Board Meeting 6pm Aug 23 Open House June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 Sep 06 Board Meeting 6pm Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th

More information

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Article No. 7761 Available on www.roymorgan.com Roy Morgan Unemployment Profile Monday, 8 October 2018 Unemployment down to 9.4% in September off two-year high Australian employment has grown solidly over

More information

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Article No. 7353 Available on www.roymorgan.com Roy Morgan Unemployment Profile Wednesday, 11 October 2017 2.498 million Australians (18.9%) now unemployed or under-employed In September 1.202 million

More information

CLIMATOLOGICAL SUMMARY

CLIMATOLOGICAL SUMMARY DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION CTATP OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY DIVISION URBANA, ILLINOIS ISWS MP-19 Archive ISWS Illinois State Water Survey )CAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA MP-19 LOCAL

More information

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service Reps: 4 Plots: 1 by 2 feet Spray vol: 25 gal/ac Mix size: 2 liters (min.01738) Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Amt Product Plot No. By Rep No. Name Conc Type Description Rate Unit to Measure 1 2 3 4 1 Nontreated

More information

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs Quarterly Hogs and Pigs ISSN: 19-1921 Released December 28, 2012, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). United

More information

2016 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

2016 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Performance Testing (CPT) Director Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Kevin Kirby Ag Research Manager, Brookings Bruce Swan Ag Research Manager, Rapid

More information

Regional Feedstock Partnership 2010 Switchgrass Report

Regional Feedstock Partnership 2010 Switchgrass Report Regional Feedstock Partnership 21 Switchgrass Report Vance Owens South Dakota State University Knoxville, TN 15-17 February 211 Field trial PIs: D. Bransby and C. Hopkings (AL), E. Heaton (IA), R. Farris

More information

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center General Trial Information Investigator: Daniel A Ball Title: Professor Affiliation: Columbia Basin Ag. Research Postal Code: 97801 E-mail: daniel.ball@oregonstate.edu Trial Location City: Pendleton Trial

More information

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY DIVISION URBANA, ILLINOIS ISWS MP-21 Archive SWS0964 Illinois State Water Survey LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA FDR HILLSBORO, IL. 1901-1962 LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA 1901-1962 HILLSBORO

More information

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida 2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida Libbie Johnson and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2017 field corn small plot replicated variety trial (OVT) and large plot demonstration

More information

Energy Markets in Turmoil The Consumer Perspective

Energy Markets in Turmoil The Consumer Perspective Energy Markets in Turmoil The Consumer Perspective Sonny Popowsky Consumer Advocate of Pennsylvania Illinois State University Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies 63682 Springfield, IL May 17, 2001

More information

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment Evaluation of the Impact of Herbicide Tank Mix Partners with MON76980 (Xtendimax) herbicide in Xtend Soybeans at Rochester, MN in 2017. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Amelia Welter and Matthew

More information

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date). Comparison of PRE/POST and POST only Weed Control Systems in Liberty Link Soybeans at Rochester, MN, in 2011. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Adam Hazel and Bo Beyer The objective

More information

MMWR 1 Expanded Table 1. Persons living with diagnosed. Persons living with undiagnosed HIV infection

MMWR 1 Expanded Table 1. Persons living with diagnosed. Persons living with undiagnosed HIV infection MMWR 1 Expanded Table 1 Expanded Table 1. Estimated* number of persons aged 13 years with (diagnosed and undiagnosed), and percentage of those with diagnosed, by jurisdiction and year United States, 2008

More information

Presented by Eric Englert Puget Sound Energy September 11, 2002

Presented by Eric Englert Puget Sound Energy September 11, 2002 Results from PSE s First Year of Time of Use Program Presented by Eric Englert Puget Sound Energy September 11, 2002 Puget Sound Energy Overview 973,489 Total Electric Customers 908,949 are AMR Capable

More information

Monthly Hog Market Update United States Hog Production

Monthly Hog Market Update United States Hog Production This information is provided as a resource by Saskatchewan Agriculture staff All prices are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. Please use this information at your own risk. Monthly Hog Market

More information

SEP 2016 JUL 2016 JUN 2016 AUG 2016 HOEP*

SEP 2016 JUL 2016 JUN 2016 AUG 2016 HOEP* Ontario Energy Report Q1 Electricity January March Electricity Prices Commodity Commodity cost comprises of two components, the wholesale price (the Hourly Ontario Energy Price) and the Global Adjustment.

More information

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009 Georgia-Pacific s Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) and Blends of Nfusion (25-0-0) Steady- Delivery Nitrogen Soluble Fertilizer Compared to UMAXX (47-0-0) StabilizedNitrogen Fertilizer on a Perennial Ryegrass Lawn

More information

DEAL ER DATAVI EW. Digital Marketing Index October 2017

DEAL ER DATAVI EW. Digital Marketing Index October 2017 DEAL ER DATAVI EW Digital Marketing Index October 2017 DATA DRIVES STRATEGY. Dealer DataView is a monthly automotive digital marketing index, based on Dealer.com s proprietary data, research and analytics.

More information

Price Category Breakdown - February 2010

Price Category Breakdown - February 2010 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BREAKDOWN ruary 21 ruary Sales and Average Price Increase Annually TORONTO - Wednesday, March 3, 21 7.3 % 24.6 % 1.8 % 7.3%.2%.1 % Greater Toronto REALTORS reported 7,291 sales

More information

Appendix E Water Supply Modeling

Appendix E Water Supply Modeling Supply Modeling Modesto Irrigation District Treatment Plant Expansion Project Modeling I. Introduction The Modesto Irrigation District (MID) is situated adjacent to and north of the Tuolumne River. Over

More information

Turfgrass Association of Australia (ACT Incorporated) Perennial Rye, Seeded Couch and Tall Fescue evaluation Trials

Turfgrass Association of Australia (ACT Incorporated) Perennial Rye, Seeded Couch and Tall Fescue evaluation Trials Turfgrass Association of Australia (ACT Incorporated) Perennial Rye, Seeded Couch and Tall Fescue evaluation Trials Bruce Davies Canberra Institute of Technology Project Number: TU00006 TU00006 This report

More information