HOUSING VOUCHERS FUNDED IN PENNSYLVANIA UNDER PENDING PROPOSALS

Transcription

1 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC Tel: Fax: November 1, HOUSING VOUCHERS FUNDED IN PENNSYLVANIA UNDER PENDING PROPOSALS Due largely to the flaws in the formula for distributing Section 8 housing voucher funding, the share of vouchers in use in Pennsylvania has fallen over the past few years, from 91 percent in 2004 to a projected 90 percent in. In other words, 739 vouchers have already been cut in Pennsylvania over the past two years. For 2007, Congress will have to choose among three funding approaches that have been put forward. Each provides the same new funding for the program nationally in 2007, but uses a different method for distributing the money among the 2,400 state and local housing agencies. Here is the impact that each of the three formulas would have on Pennsylvania. Under the formula in the Section 8 Voucher Reform Act (or SEVRA), a bill passed by the House Financial Services Committee on June 14,, all vouchers in use in Pennsylvania in would be funded. Moreover, agencies in Pennsylvania would receive enough funding to restore vouchers that have been cut in recent years. Overall, 97 percent of Pennsylvania s currently authorized vouchers would be funded under the SEVRA formula. The formula in the Senate appropriations bill would also renew funding for all vouchers in use in Pennsylvania in. Overall, 93 percent of Pennsylvania s currently authorized vouchers would be funded under the Senate appropriations formula. Under the formula in the House appropriations bill, 45 housing agencies in Pennsylvania would be forced to cut assistance to 1,729 low-income families in percent of Pennsylvania s currently authorized vouchers would be funded under the House appropriations formula. For a description of the pending proposals for distribution of renewal funding to state and local agencies and an analysis of their national impact, see "Fixing the Housing Voucher Formula: A No-Cost Way to Strengthen the Section 8 Program," The paper's Technical Appendix explains the sources and methods for the data in this table.

2 Agency Estimates Adams Allegheny * Funded in 2007 PA PA006 5,278 4,955 5,278 5,054 5,053 0 in Allentown PA004 1, ,003 1,151 0 Altoona PA Armstrong Beaver Bedford Berks PA PA PA PA Bethlehem PA Blair PA Bradford PA Bradford PA Bucks PA051 3,399 3,011 3,399 3,070 2, Butler Carbon PA010 1,291 1,142 1,291 1,164 1, PA Carbondale PA Centre PA

3 Funded in 2007 in Chester PA046 1,521 1,414 1,521 1,442 1, Chester * PA007 1,564 1,381 1,564 1,408 1,550 0 Clarion Clearfield Columbia PA PA PA Corry PA Cumberland PA075 1,331 1,180 1,331 1,203 1, Dauphin * Delaware PA035 1,040 1,029 1,040 1, PA023 2,753 2,576 2,753 2,627 2,716 0 Dubois PA Easton PA Elk PA Erie City PA013 1, , Erie PA Fayette * PA015 1, , ,082 0 Franklin City PA Franklin PA

4 Funded in 2007 in Fulton Greene PA PA Harrisburg PA Hazleton PA Huntingdon Indiana Jefferson PA PA PA Johnstown PA Lackawanna * Lancaster City Lancaster PA PA PA Lawrence PA Lebanon PA Lehigh Luzerne Lycoming PA081 1,652 1,579 1,652 1,610 1,608 0 PA057 1,115 1,006 1,006 1,026 1,076 0 PA McKean PA

5 Funded in 2007 in McKeesport PA Meadville PA Mercer PA Mifflin PA Monroe Montgomery Montour PA PA012 2,772 2,561 2,772 2,612 2,693 0 PA Nanticoke PA Northampton PA Northumberland PA Oil City PA Philadelphia pa002 17,979 16,213 17,979 17,979 17,979 0 Pittsburgh * pa001 6,799 6,186 5,854 5,854 5, Pittston PA Potter PA Pottsville PA Reading PA Schuykill PA Scranton PA

6 Funded in 2007 in Shamokin PA Snyder Somerset Sullivan PA PA PA Sunbury Housing PA Susquehanna Tioga PA PA Titusville PA Union * Venango Warren Washington Wayne Westmoreland * PA PA PA PA PA PA018 1,754 1,749 1,754 1,754 1, Wilkes-Barre PA Williamsport PA Wyoming PA

7 Funded in 2007 in York PA022 1,452 1,365 1,452 1,393 1,441 0 Total 82,856 74,963 80,503 77,321 76,745 1,729 *Agency received new "tenant protection" vouchers from in 2005 to replace demolished public housing units or privatelyowned units that no longer receive project-based federal housing assistance. Incomplete information was available to estimate the additional funding due these agencies in 2007 to renew these vouchers under each of the approaches. As a result, estimates for these agencies may be too low, and under the House approach may be too low or too high. **Agency took over administration of additional vouchers from another agency in 2005 or early. Our estimates may not fully account for the effect of the consolidation on the agency's likely funding in 2007.