Ontario Spring Cereal Performance Trials
|
|
- Christopher Lang
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2019 Ontario Spring Cereal Performance Trials Data collected Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee Current as of November 18, 2018
2 Ontario Spring Cereal Performance Trials This report has been prepared by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee and contains the most recent varietal information on spring cereals that were planted and harvested in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Additional information is available at including - Map with area and individual locations - Head to Head comparisons which also provide multi-year data - Historical Performance reports For more information contact: Ellen Sparry Trial Coordinator C&M Seeds esparry@redwheat.com Joanna Follings Cereals Specialist, OMAFRA 63 Lorne Avenue East-Suite 2B, Stratford, ON N5A 6S4 joanna.follings@ontario.ca Office: Cell: Page 2
3 Ontario Spring Cereal Performance Trials Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee Table# 1 (hyperlink) Tables Page# 1 Spring Wheat Cumulative Yield Index Summary 4 1a Spring Wheat Cumulative Yield Index Summary - Intensive Trials, Area 2 5 1b Spring Wheat Cumulative Yield Index Summary - Intensive Trials, Area 3 6 1c Spring Wheat Cumulative Yield Index Summary - Intensive Trials, Area 5 7 2a Spring Wheat Varietal Characteristics - Area 2 8 2b Spring Wheat Varietal Characteristics - Area 3 9 2c Spring Wheat Varietal Characteristics - Area Spring Barley Cumulative Yield Index Summary 11 4a Spring Barley Varietal Characteristics - Area b Spring Barley Varietal Characteristics - Area c Spring Barley Varietal Characteristics - Area Oat Cumulative Yield Index Summary 15 5a Oat Cumulative Yield Index Summary - Intensive Trials, Area b Oat Cumulative Yield Index Summary - Intensive Trials, Area c Oat Cumulative Yield Index Summary - Intensive Trials, Area a Oat Varietal Characteristics - Area b Oat Varietal Characteristics - Area c Oat Varietal Characteristics - Area a Ontario Spring Wheat Distributors 22 7b Ontario Spring Barley Distributors 23 7c Ontario Oat Distributors 24 7d Distributor Contact Information 25 Page 3
4 Table Spring Wheat Performance Trial Cumulative Yield Index 1 Summary Area II 2 Area III 2 Area V 2 Cultivar Class 3 5 yr 4 4 yr 3 yr 2 yr yr 4 4 yr 3 yr 2 yr yr 4 4 yr 3 yr 2 yr 2018 Furano HRS MAJOR HRS Fuzion HRS Wilkin HRS AAC Scotia HRS-a TOPAZE HRS-a AAC Brandon HRS-a 98 Easton HRS-a Dakosta HRS-a Moka HRS RGT Presidio HRS Raven HRS-a Ventry HRS DS206HRS HRS AAC Synox HRS-a Toundra HRS-a Hoffman EFS-a Bangor EFS-a Dagon EFS-a Means (t/ha) Means (bu/ac) Locations Values differing by less than 3 within a column may not represent true differences in yield. Yield Indices are Heritability Adjusted Relative Values (HARV), which favour results from trial locations with high repeatability. For more information, see: Yan, W. Use of HARV in Variety Trial Summaries. 2. See area map on GoCereals.ca website. 3. HRS = hard red spring, EFS = eastern feed spring, -a = awned 4. Cultivar yield ranking may vary from year to year. Decisions are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years Page 4
5 Table 1a - Ontario Performance Trial; Spring Wheat 2018 Cumulative Yield Index 1 Intensive Trials Summary for Area II 2, OCCC, November Year Index 3-Year Index 2-Year Index 2017 Index Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Class 3 Variety No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes hrs Sable (awned) 99⁴ HY 124-HRS (awned) Wilkin AAC Scotia (awned) Easton (awned) AAC Fairwind (awned) Dakosta (awned) SS Blomidon Raven (awned) Ventry DS206HRS other Pasteur efs HY 162-HRF (awned) Hoffman (awned) Dagon (awned) trit Sonika (awned) Means (t/ha) Means (bu/ac) Location-Years Values differing by less than 3 within a column may not represent true differences in yield. Yield Indices are Heritability Adjusted Relative Values (HARV), which favour results from trial locations with high repeatability. For more information, see: Yan, W. Use of HARV in Variety Trial Summaries. 2 Area 2: see map of areas on 3 hrs = hard red spring, efs = eastern feed spring, trit = triticale, other = does not meet quality standards for CEHRS. 4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of Fungicide treatments included a T1 application of foliar fungicide at Zadoks Growth Stage 30 to 31, followed by a T3 application of fusarium fungicide during flowering. The OCCC is thankful to the Grain Farmers of Ontario, BASF, Bayer and Syngenta for their financial support towards the PBR Status; indicates varieties protected under PBR 91 or PBR 78. Visit pbrfacts.ca to learn more. Page 5
6 Table 1b - Ontario Performance Trial; Spring Wheat 2018 Cumulative Yield Index 1 Intensive Trials Summary for Area III 2, OCCC, November Year Index 4-Year Index 3-Year Index 2-Year Index 2018 Index Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Class 3 Variety No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes hrs Furano 99⁴ MAJOR Fuzion Wilkin AAC Scotia (awned) TOPAZE (awned) Easton (awned) Moka RGT Presidio Raven (awned) Ventry DS206HRS AAC Synox (awned) Toundra (awned) efs Hoffman (awned) Bangor (awned) Dagon (awned) Means (t/ha) Means (bu/ac) Location-Years Values differing by less than 3 within a column may not represent true differences in yield. Yield Indices are Heritability Adjusted Relative Values (HARV), which favour results from trial locations with high repeatability. For more information, see: Yan, W. Use of HARV in Variety Trial Summaries. 2 Area 3: see map of areas on 3 hrs = hard red spring, efs = eastern feed spring. 4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years. Fungicide treatments included a T1 application of foliar fungicide at Zadoks Growth Stage 30 to 31, followed by a T3 application of fusarium fungicide during flowering. The OCCC is thankful to the Grain Farmers of Ontario, BASF, Bayer and Syngenta for their financial support towards the intensive PBR Status; indicates varieties protected under PBR 91 or PBR 78. Visit pbrfacts.ca to learn more. Page 6
7 Table 1c - Ontario Performance Trial; Spring Wheat 2018 Cumulative Yield Index 1 Intensive Trials Summary for Area V 2, OCCC, November Year Index 4-Year Index 3-Year Index 2-Year Index 2018 Index Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Class 3 Variety No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes hrs Furano 99⁴ MAJOR Fuzion Wilkin AAC Scotia (awned) AAC Brandon (awned) Easton (awned) Dakosta (awned) Moka RGT Presidio Raven (awned) Ventry AAC Synox (awned) Toundra (awned) efs Hoffman (awned) Bangor (awned) Dagon (awned) Means (t/ha) Means (bu/ac) Location-Years Values differing by less than 3 within a column may not represent true differences in yield. Yield Indices are Heritability Adjusted Relative Values (HARV), which favour results from trial locations with high repeatability. For more information, see: Yan, W. Use of HARV in Variety Trial Summaries. 2 Area 5: see map of areas on 3 hrs = hard red spring, efs = eastern feed spring, trit = triticale, other = does not meet quality standards for CEHRS. 4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years. Fungicide treatments included a T1 application of foliar fungicide at Zadoks Growth Stage 30 to 31, followed by a T3 application of fusarium fungicide during flowering. The OCCC is thankful to the Grain Farmers of Ontario, BASF, Bayer and Syngenta for their financial support towards the intensive trials. PBR Status; indicates varieties protected under PBR 91 or PBR 78. Visit pbrfacts.ca to learn more. Page 7
8 Table 2a - Ontario Spring Wheat Varietal Characteristics Based on Data from Area 2, 2018 ** Fusarium Data 1000 Combined Test Kernel Cultivar Class 1 Fusarium Rating 2 DON Rating 2 Years Weight (kg/hl) Weight (g) Height (cm) Heading 4 (days) Maturity 4 (days) Wilkin HRS S S AAC Scotia HRS-a MR MR Easton HRS-a MS MS Moka HRS MS MS Raven HRS-a MS S Ventry HRS MS MS DS206HRS HRS MS MS Toundra HRS-a MR MR Hoffman EFS-a S HS Bangor EFS-a MR MS Dagon EFS-a MS S Means Locations HRS = hard red spring, EFS = eastern feed spring, -a = awned 2. Combined Fusarium Ratings are based on BOTH Fusarium head blight ratings and deoxynivalenol (DON) levels from inoculated provincial trials. DON Ratings are based only on DON levels from inoculated provincial trials. MR=moderately resistant (best); MS=moderately susceptible; S=susceptible; HS=highly susceptible (worst) ** These columns will be updated when the 2018 data are available. 3. For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable. 4. Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be used to indicate relative differences. Page 8
9 Table 2b - Ontario Spring Wheat Varietal Characteristics Based on Data from Area 3, 2018 ** Fusarium Data 1000 Test Weight Kernel Weight Combined Fusarium Rating 2 Cultivar Class 1 DON Rating 2 Years (kg/hl) Protein (%) (g) Lodging (0-9) 3 Height (cm) Heading 4 (days) Maturity 4 (days) Index Furano HRS MR MR MAJOR HRS MR MR Fuzion HRS MS MS Wilkin HRS S S AAC Scotia HRS-a MR MR TOPAZE HRS-a MR MS Easton HRS-a MS MS Moka HRS MS MS RGT Presidio HRS S HS Raven HRS-a MS S Ventry HRS MS MS DS206HRS HRS MS MS AAC Synox HRS-a Toundra HRS-a MR MR Hoffman EFS-a S HS Bangor EFS-a MR MS Dagon EFS-a MS S Means t/ha Locations HRS = hard red spring, EFS = eastern feed spring, TRIT = triticale, Other = does not meet quality standards for CEHRS, -a = awned 2. Combined Fusarium Ratings are based on BOTH Fusarium head blight ratings and deoxynivalenol (DON) levels from inoculated provincial trials. DON Ratings are based only on DON levels from inoculated provincial trials. MR=moderately resistant (best); MS=moderately susceptible; S=susceptible; HS=highly susceptible (worst) ** These columns will be updated when the 2018 data are available. 3. For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable. 4. Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be used to indicate relative Straw Yield Page 9
10 Means Locations Table 2c - Ontario Spring Wheat Varietal Characteristics Based on Data from Area 5, 2018 ** Fusarium Data Combined Fusarium DON Rating 2 Rating 2 Test Weight 1000 Kernel Weight Protein Height Heading 4 Maturity 4 Cultivar Class 1 Years (kg/hl) (%) (g) (cm) (days) (days) Index Furano HRS MR MR MAJOR HRS MR MR Fuzion HRS MS MS Wilkin HRS S S AAC Scotia HRS-a MR MR AAC Brandon HRS-a Easton HRS-a MS MS Dakosta HRS-a MR MR Moka HRS MS MS RGT Presidio HRS S HS Raven HRS-a MS S Ventry HRS MS MS AAC Synox HRS-a Toundra HRS-a MR MR Hoffman EFS-a S HS Bangor EFS-a MR MS Dagon EFS-a MS S t/ha HRS = hard red spring, EFS = eastern feed spring, -a = awned 2. Combined Fusarium Ratings are based on BOTH Fusarium head blight ratings and deoxynivalenol (DON) levels from inoculated provincial trials. DON Ratings are based only on DON levels from inoculated provincial trials. MR=moderately resistant (best); MS=moderately susceptible; S=susceptible; HS=highly susceptible (worst) ** These columns will be updated when the 2018 data are available. 3. For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable. 4. Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be used to indicate relative differences. Straw Yield Page 10
11 Table Spring Barley Performance Trial Cumulative Yield Index 1 Summary Area II 2 Area III 2 Area V 2 Cultivar 5 yr 3 4 yr 3 yr 2 yr yr 3 4 yr 3 yr 2 yr yr 3 4 yr 3 yr 2 yr Rowed AC Kings Bornholm Conestogo AAC Purpose Dundee Champion AAC Bell AAC Ling AAC Synergy Newport Rowed Cyane Dignity OCEANIK OAC Laverne Harmony Synasolis Amberly HY 621-6R Alyssa AAC Mirabel OAC Belwood Boroe Masky Chambly AAC Vitality DS7176RB AAC Montrose Marden Baden DS8126RB Sagamie 94 6 Rowed Hulless Bastile Means (t/ha) Means (bu/ac) Locations Values differing by less than 3 within a column may not represent true differences in yield. Yield Indices are Heritability Adjusted Relative Values (HARV), which favour results from trial locations with high repeatability. For more information, see: Yan, W. Use of HARV in Variety Trial Summaries. 2. See area map on GoCereals.ca website. 3. Cultivar yield ranking may vary from year to year. Decisions are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years Page 11
12 Table 4a - Ontario Spring Barley Varietal Characteristics Based on Data from Area 2, 2018 Test Weight (kg/hl) 1000 Kernel Weight (g) Straw Yield Index Height Lodging Heading 3 Maturity 3 Cultivar Class 1 (cm) (0-9) 2 (days) (days) AC Kings 2R Bornholm 2R Conestogo 2R AAC Purpose 2R Dundee 2R Champion 2R AAC Synergy 2R Newport 2R Cyane 6R Dignity 6R OAC Laverne 6R Amberly 6R HY 621-6R 6R OAC Belwood 6R AAC Vitality 6R DS7176RB 6R Marden 6R Baden 6R DS8126RB 6R Means Locations 1. 2R = 2 Row, 6R = 6 Row 2. For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable t/ha Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be used to indicate relative differences. Page 12
13 Table 4b - Ontario Spring Barley Varietal Characteristics Based on Data from Area 3, 2018 Test Weight (kg/hl) 1000 Kernel Weight (g) Straw Yield Index Height Heading 3 Maturity 3 Cultivar Class 1 (cm) (days) (days) Bornholm 2R Conestogo 2R AAC Purpose 2R Dundee 2R Champion 2R AAC Bell 2R AAC Ling 2R AAC Synergy 2R Newport 2R Cyane 6R Dignity 6R OCEANIK 6R OAC Laverne 6R Harmony 6R Amberly 6R HY 621-6R 6R AAC Mirabel 6R OAC Belwood 6R Masky 6R Chambly 6R AAC Vitality 6R DS7176RB 6R Marden 6R Baden 6R DS8126RB 6R Sagamie 6R Bastile 6R hulless Means Locations t/ha R = 2 Row, 6R = 6 Row 2. For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable. 3. Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be used to indicate relative differences. Page 13
14 Table 4c - Ontario Spring Barley Varietal Characteristics Based on Data from Area 5, 2018 Test Weight (kg/hl) 1000 Kernel Weight (g) Height Lodging Heading 3 Maturity 3 Cultivar Class 1 (cm) (0-9) 2 (days) (days) AAC Purpose 2R Dundee 2R AAC Bell 2R AAC Ling 2R OCEANIK 6R Harmony 6R Synasolis 6R Amberly 6R Alyssa 6R AAC Mirabel 6R Boroe 6R Masky 6R Chambly 6R AAC Vitality 6R AAC Montrose 6R Marden 6R Baden 6R Bastile 6R hulless Means Locations Straw Yield Index t/ha R = 2 Row, 6R = 6 Row 2. For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable. 3. Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be used to indicate Page 14
15 Table Oat Performance Trial Cumulative Yield Index 1 Summary Area II 2 Area III 2 Area V 2 Cultivar 5 yr 3 4 yr 3 yr 2 yr yr 3 4 yr 3 yr 2 yr yr 3 4 yr 3 yr 2 yr 2018 Hulled OAC Markdale RC Amaze Dieter Avatar Hidalgo Vitality AAC Bullet AAC Roskens Nice AAC Almonte CDC Orrin AAC Richmond AAC Oaklin Kara Akina AAC Nicolas AAC Kolosse AAC Noranda AAC Blake AAC Banner AAC Torrent Means (t/ha) Means (bu/ac) Locations Values differing by less than 3 within a column may not represent true differences in yield. Yield Indices are Heritability Adjusted Relative Values (HARV), which favour results from trial locations with high repeatability. For more information, see: Yan, W. Use of HARV in Variety Trial Summaries. 2. See area map on GoCereals.ca website. 3. Cultivar yield ranking may vary from year to year. Decisions are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years Rust races have overcome genetic resistance in the past 10 years, with some varieties being significantly impacted. Page 15
16 Table 5a - Ontario Performance Trial; Oat 2018 Cumulative Yield Index 1 Intensive Trials Summary for Area II 2, OCCC, November Year Index 4-Year Index 3-Year Index 2-Year Index 2018 Index Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Class 3 Variety No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes yellow AAC Kolosse 102⁴ AAC Torrent white OAC Markdale RC Amaze AAC Bullet CDC Orrin AAC Richmond AAC Oaklin AAC Noranda AAC Blake AAC Banner tan AAC Roskens AAC Almonte Means (t/ha) Means (bu/ac) Location-Years Values differing by less than 3 within a column may not represent true differences in yield. Yield Indices are Heritability Adjusted Relative Values (HARV), which favour results from trial locations with high repeatability. For more information, see: Yan, W. Use of HARV in Variety Trial Summaries. 2 Area 2: see map of areas on 3 hull colour. 4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of Fungicide treatments included a T1 application of foliar fungicide at Zadoks Growth Stage 30 to 31, followed by a T3 application of fusarium fungicide during flowering. The OCCC is thankful to the Grain Farmers of Ontario, BASF, Bayer and Syngenta for their financial support towards the Page 16
17 Table 5b - Ontario Performance Trial; Oat 2018 Cumulative Yield Index 1 Intensive Trials Summary for Area III 2, OCCC, November Year Index 3-Year Index 2-Year Index 2018 Index Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Class 3 Variety No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes yellow AAC Kolosse 107⁴ AAC Torrent white OAC Markdale RC Amaze Dieter Avatar Vitality AAC Bullet CDC Orrin AAC Richmond AAC Oaklin AAC Nicolas AAC Noranda AAC Banner tan AAC Almonte Means (t/ha) Means (bu/ac) Location-Years Values differing by less than 3 within a column may not represent true differences in yield. Yield Indices are Heritability Adjusted Relative Values (HARV), which favour results from trial locations with high repeatability. For more information, see: Yan, W. Use of HARV in Variety Trial Summaries. 2 Area 3: see map of areas on 3 hull colour. 4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions are therefore best made using data with the greatest number Fungicide treatments included a T1 application of foliar fungicide at Zadoks Growth Stage 30 to 31, followed by a T3 application of fusarium fungicide during flowering. The OCCC is thankful to the Grain Farmers of Ontario, BASF, Bayer and Syngenta for their financial support towards the Page 17
18 Table 5c - Ontario Performance Trial; Oat 2018 Cumulative Yield Index 1 Intensive Trials Summary for Area V 2, OCCC, November Year Index 4-Year Index 3-Year Index 2-Year Index 2018 Index Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Fungicides Class 3 Variety No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes yellow AAC Kolosse 101⁴ AAC Torrent white RC Amaze Dieter Hidalgo Vitality Nice CDC Orrin AAC Richmond AAC Oaklin Kara Akina AAC Nicolas AAC Noranda AAC Banner tan AAC Almonte Means (t/ha) Means (bu/ac) Location-Years Values differing by less than 3 within a column may not represent true differences in yield. Yield Indices are Heritability Adjusted Relative Values (HARV), which favour results from trial locations with high repeatability. For more information, see: Yan, W. Use of HARV in Variety Trial Summaries. 2 Area 5: see map of areas on 3 hull colour. 4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years. Fungicide treatments included a T1 application of foliar fungicide at Zadoks Growth Stage 30 to 31, followed by a T3 application of fusarium fungicide during flowering. The OCCC is thankful to the Grain Farmers of Ontario, BASF, Bayer and Syngenta for their financial support towards the intensive trials. Page 18
19 Test Weight (kg/hl) 1000 Kernel Weight (g) Crown Rust (0-9) 2 Straw Yield Index Heading 3 Maturity 3 Height Lodging Cultivar Class 1 (days) (days) (cm) (0-9) 2 OAC Markdale white RC Amaze white AAC Bullet white AAC Roskens tan AAC Almonte tan CDC Orrin white AAC Richmond white AAC Oaklin white AAC Kolosse yellow AAC Noranda white AAC Blake white AAC Banner white AAC Torrent yellow Means Locations Table 6a - Ontario Oat Varietal Characteristics Based on Data from Area 2, t/ha hull colour 2. For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable. 3. Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be used to indicate relative differences. Page 19
20 Test Weight (kg/hl) 1000 Kernel Weight (g) Crown Rust (0-9) 2 Leaf Septoria (0-9) 2 Heading 3 Maturity 3 Height Lodging Cultivar Class 1 (days) (days) (cm) (0-9) 2 OAC Markdale white RC Amaze white Dieter white Avatar white Vitality white AAC Bullet white AAC Almonte tan CDC Orrin white AAC Richmond white AAC Oaklin white AAC Nicolas white AAC Kolosse yellow AAC Noranda white AAC Banner white AAC Torrent yellow Means Locations Table 6b - Ontario Oat Varietal Characteristics Based on Data from Area 3, 2018 Straw Yield Index t/ha hull colour 2. For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable. 3. Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be used to indicate relative differences. Page 20
21 Table 6c - Ontario Oat Varietal Characteristics Based on Data from Area 5, 2018 Test Weight (kg/hl) 1000 Kernel Weight (g) Heading 3 Maturity 3 Height Cultivar Class 1 (days) (days) (cm) RC Amaze white Dieter white Hidalgo white Vitality white Nice white AAC Almonte tan CDC Orrin white AAC Richmond white AAC Oaklin white Kara white Akina white AAC Nicolas white AAC Kolosse yellow AAC Noranda white AAC Banner white AAC Torrent yellow Means Locations Straw Yield Index t/ha hull colour 2. For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable. 3. Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be used Page 21
22 Table 7a - Ontario Spring Wheat Distributors 2018 Class 1 Variety Distributor hrs Furano C & M Seeds MAJOR Synagri Fuzion Semences Prograin Inc Wilkin C & M Seeds AAC Scotia (awned) Semican Inc TOPAZE (awned) Pedigrain AAC Brandon (awned) Easton (awned) C & M Seeds Dakosta (awned) Elite Seeds Moka Semican Inc RGT Presidio Synagri Raven (awned) C & M Seeds Ventry DS206HRS Alliance Agri-Turf/Beatty Seeds/Snobelen Farms AAC Synox (awned) Synagri Toundra (awned) Semican Inc efs Hoffman (awned) Elite Seeds Bangor (awned) Semican Inc Dagon (awned) Elite Seeds 1. hrs = hard red spring, efs = eastern feed spring. Page 22
23 Table 7b - Ontario Barley Distributors 2018 Class 1 Variety Distributor 2r AC Kings Bramhill Seeds Bornholm Alliance Agri-Turf/Beatty Seeds/Snobelen Farms Conestogo AAC Purpose Bramhill Seeds Dundee Champion Semican Inc AAC Bell AAC Ling AAC Synergy Semican Inc Newport Semican Inc 6r Cyane Elite Seeds Dignity OCEANIK Synagri OAC Laverne Bramhill Seeds Harmony Synagri Synasolis Synagri Amberly Rosebank Seed Farms Ltd. HY 621-6R Alliance Agri-Turf/Beatty Seeds/Snobelen Farms Alyssa Elite Seeds AAC Mirabel OAC Belwood Boroe Elite Seeds Masky Synagri Chambly Semences Prograin Inc AAC Vitality Advantage Seed Growers DS7176RB Alliance Agri-Turf/Beatty Seeds/Snobelen Farms AAC Montrose Marden Baden DS8126RB Alliance Agri-Turf/Beatty Seeds/Snobelen Farms Sagamie Pedigrain 6r hulless Bastile Synagri 1. 2r = 2 Row, 6r = 6 Row Page 23
24 Table 7c - Ontario Oat Distributors 2018 Class Variety Distributor hulled OAC Markdale Rosebank Seed Farms Ltd. RC Amaze Rosebank Seed Farms Ltd. Dieter Avatar Pedigrain Hidalgo Synagri Vitality Synagri AAC Bullet AAC Roskens Nice Elite Seeds AAC Almonte Alliance Agri-Turf/Beatty Seeds/Snobelen Farms CDC Orrin Semican Inc AAC Richmond Semican Inc AAC Oaklin C & M Seeds Kara Elite Seeds Akina Elite Seeds AAC Nicolas AAC Kolosse William Houde Ltd AAC Noranda Semican Inc AAC Blake AAC Banner AAC Torrent Advantage Seed Growers Page 24
25 Table 7d - Distributor Contact Information Distributor Advantage Seed Growers Alliance Agri-Turf Beatty Seeds Ltd Bramhill Seeds C&M Seeds Elite Seeds Pedigrain Rosebank Seed Farms Ltd SeCan Semences Prograin Semican Inc Snobelen Farms Ltd Synagri William Houde Ltd. Address P.O. Box 351, Lucknow, ON, N0G 2H0 Tel: Fax: Website: th Line, RR3 Thornton, Ontario, L0L 2N0 Tel: Fax: Website: County Road 12, PO Box 358, Bloomfield, Ontario, K0K 1G0 Tel: Fax: Hwy 23, RR#2, Palmerston, ON, N0G 2P0 Tel: Fax: Website: th Line, Palmerston, ON, N0G 2P0 Tel: Fax: Website: Available through your local Agromart Tel: Website: Boul. Laurier Est, St Hyacinthe, QC, J2R 2B4 Tel: Fax: Perth Line, Staffa, ON, N0K 1Y0 Tel: Terry Fox Drive, Kanata, ON, K2K 0E3 Tel: Fas: Website: Bas Rivière Nord, St Césaire, QC, J0L 1T0 Tel: Fax: Website: 366, Rang 10, Plessisville, QC, G6L 2Y2 Tel: Fax: Website: Havelock Street, Lucknow, Ontario, N0G 2H0 Tel: Fax: Website: Boul. Laurier Est, St Hyacinthe, QC, J2R 2B4 Tel: Fax: Website: 8, 3ieme Rang Ouest, St Simon, QC, J0H 1Y0 Phone: Fax: Website: Page 25
Ontario Spring Cereal Performance Trials
2018 Ontario Spring Cereal Performance Trials Data collected 2013-2017 www.gocereals.ca Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee Current as of March 11, 2018 Ontario Spring Cereal Performance Trials
More informationOntario Winter Wheat Performance Trials
2015 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials Data collected 2011-2015 www.gocereals.ca Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee V2 Current as of December 25, 2015 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance
More informationOntario Winter Wheat Performance Trials
2018 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials Data collected 2014-2018 www.gocereals.ca Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee Current as of August 27, 2018 (version 1) Ontario Winter Wheat Performance
More informationOntario Winter Wheat Performance Trials
2011 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials Data collected 2007-2011 www.gocereals.ca Conducted by the Ontario Cereal Crop Committee Current as of August 29, 2011 Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials
More information2016 PEI Cereal Guide
2016 PEI Cereal Guide Oats: 2015 Oats Cumulative Yield Index Summary 4 years 3 years 2 years 2015 Distributor Hulled Oats % * (t/ac) % * (t/ac) % * (t/ac) % * (t/ac) AC DIETER SeCan, Yeo Seeds, Justin
More informationMARITIME CEREAL CULTIVARS PERFORMANCE TRIALS ( ) PERFORMANCE DES CULTIVARS DE CÉRÉALES AUX MARITIMES ( )
2018 MARITIME CEREAL CULTIVARS PERFORMANCE TRIALS (2014-2017) PERFORMANCE DES CULTIVARS DE CÉRÉALES AUX MARITIMES (2014-2017) Barley Orge.. 3 Oats Avoine. 5 Spring Wheat & Triticale Blé & Triticale de
More informationVariety Performance Trial Data & Growers Source Guide
www.seedontario.ca VITY FMN TIL DT & GW U GUID D NTI 2019 2019 Variety erformance Trial Data & Growers ource Guide www.seedontario.ca INTIID GU 28 MIIN: TT N YILD ND QULITY UT ND LIMINT TGT INT TGT QUID
More informationNew Liskeard Agricultural Research Station Report 15 1 April John Kobler, Agronomy Technician TBA, RSO Manager, U of G
Verner Site New Liskeard Agricultural Research Station Report 15 1 April 2015 John Kobler, Agronomy Technician TBA, RSO Manager, U of G New Liskeard Agricultural Research Station Box 6007 New Liskeard
More informationREQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF REGISTRATION OF BW423
REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF REGISTRATION OF BW423 CROP KIND: Wheat TYPE: Canada Western Red Spring PROPOSERS: P. Hucl; C. Briggs, C. McCartney and C. Pozniak CDC, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8
More informationREPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee. Web Site:
0022 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Conducted in 1999-2001 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE This organization is made up of representatives
More informationSection 4: Wheat Varieties
Section 4: Wheat Varieties 49 Wheat trials were planted in seven-inch rows at Blackstone, Orange, Holland, Painter, and Shenandoah Valley. They were planted in six-inch rows at Blacksburg. They were planted
More informationOA (Avena sativa L) OA Covered Spring Oat
OA1228-1 (Avena sativa L) Dr. Weikai Yan, Oat breeder Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre (ECORC) 960 Carling Ave., Neatby Building, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0C6 Phone: 613-759-1304 yanw@agr.gc.ca
More information2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results
Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,
More information2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results
01 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial
More informationHard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma
Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Spring wheat varieties are compared in trial plots at Waseca, Lamberton, Morris, Crookston, Stephen,
More informationREPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee
1992 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Conducted in 1989-91 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE This organization is made up of representatives
More informationAGR APPENDIX. Barley (Hordeum vu/gare L.) Two-row malting. Crop: Type:
AGR-05768 APPENDIX A VARIETY DESCRIPTION - TR06294 (Two-Row Malting Barley) Crop: Type: Proposers: Barley (Hordeum vu/gare L.) Two-row malting w.g. Legge Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Brandon Research
More informationREPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials
1997 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Conducted in 1994-96 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE This organization is made up of representatives
More information2012 Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Data Collected Conducted by the Ontario Oil and Protein Seed Crop Committee
2012 Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Data Collected 2010-2012 Conducted by the Ontario Oil and Protein Seed Crop Committee www.gosoy.ca Research conducted and reported by: Grain Farmers of Ontario www.gfo.ca
More informationVarietal Trials Results
Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Wheat, Hard Red Spring Jim Anderson, Jochum Wiersma, Gary Linkert, Catherine Springer and Susan Reynolds differ for their response to each of those diseases, the rating
More information2015 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results
Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,
More information2016 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials
2016 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials Lee Siler, Matthew Graham, Andrew Wiersma, Linda Brown, Kyle McCarthy, Amber Hoffstetter, Jeff Kovach, Dennis Pennington, Eric Olson August 1, 2016 Favorable
More informationWheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results
Wheat Tech Agronomy 2013-2014 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2013-2014 wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Humboldt,
More informationRequest for Support for Registration of SR420
Crop: Type: Request for Support for Registration of SR420 Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Spring, Six-Row, Hulled, Malting Proposers: Test # s: Pedigree: B. Harvey, B. Rossnagel, and T. Zatorski Department
More information2015 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results
Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Performance Testing (CPT) Director Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Shaukat Ali SDSU Small Grains Pathologist, Brookings Kevin Kirby Ag Research
More informationAFNS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5
REQUEST FOR SUPPORT TO REGISTER PT769 CROP KIND: Wheat TYPE: Canada Western Red Spring PROPOSER: D. Spaner AS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5 TEST NUMBERS:
More informationPreliminary Report Wheat, Barley, and Oats Variety Performance in Minnesota Preliminary Report. Preface
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION SERVICE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE COLLEGE OF FOOD, AGRICULTURAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55108 Preliminary Report
More informationWHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS 2018
WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS 2018 Crop Sciences Special Report 2018-01 Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois July 2018 WHEAT PERFORMANCE IN ILLINOIS TRIALS - 2018 Crop Sciences Special
More informationThe 2016 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with.
PR-707 University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Agricultural Experiment Station 2016 Kentucky Small Grain PERFORMANCE TEST B. Bruening, B. Mijatovic, S. Swanson, J. Connelley,
More informationWheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results
2014-2015 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2014-2015 winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Auburn, Kentucky; Humboldt, Tennessee;
More information2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 2009 VARIETAL RECOMMENDATION
2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 1) A motion to remove AgriPro Norpro from the spring wheat variety recommendation list, effective February 2009. Mr. Joe Smith of AgriPro has asked us to
More informationPredicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia
Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Md. Rasel Parvej, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech David L. Holshouser, Extension
More information2016 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results
Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Extension Crop Performance Testing (CPT) Director Chris Graham SDSU Extension Agronomist, Rapid City Kevin Kirby Ag Research Manager, Brookings Bruce Swan Ag Research Manager, Rapid
More informationThe 2010 soft red winter wheat growing season ended with
AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, LEXINGTON, KY, 40546 PR-604 2010 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Performance Test B. Bruening, C. Tutt, S. Swanson, J. Connelley,
More informationVariety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide
NDSU EXTENSION A1105-18 North Dakota Flax Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide Hans Kandel (NDSU Main Station); Greg Endres, Mike Ostlie, Blaine Schatz and Steve Zwinger (Carrington Research
More information2001 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials Experimental Methods Figure 1. Region 2000 Location Cooperator Crop Tested
PR-448 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials C.R. Tutt, C.S. Swanson, J. Connelly, D. Call, and D.A. Van Sanford In, Kentucky farmers harvested 21.1 million bushels of soft red winter wheat produced on 340,000
More informationThe 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green
The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes Victor M. Green 302-275-1445 vmgreen@udel.edu Special thanks and appreciation is extended to the following people for whom this research would not have
More informationData collected Conducted by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee Research conducted and reported by:
2010 Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Data collected 2008-2010 Conducted by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee www.gosoy.ca Research conducted and reported by: 1987 Ontario Oil & Protein Seed
More informationSmall Grains in 2018
Small Grains in 2018 2018 Virginia Tech SPES-46NP Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of age, color, disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression,
More informationDiscussion of barley varieties and summary of barley management practices for the harvest season
Small Grains in 2017 Table of Contents Recommended Small Grain Varieties... 1 Barley and Wheat Entries... 4 Introduction... 6 The Season... 6 Section 1: Barley Varieties Discussion of barley varieties
More informationRecommendations and summary of results 2010
ecommendations and summary of results 2010 The most promising cultivars of all institutions involved in the small grain industry are annually included in the National Small Grain Cultivar Programme of
More information2017 MARITIME SOYBEAN VARIETY TRIALS Table 1: Yield Data Roundup Ready Soybean Trials HU Canning,NS Truro,NS Hartland,NB Charlottetown,PEI
Table 1: Yield Data Roundup Ready Soybean Trials 2200-2500 HU Seed Company Heat Units 4 years 3 years 2 years 2017 % (mt/ac) % (mt/ac) % (mt/ac) % (mt/ac) Nocoma R2 ELITE 2150 73% 0.96 Akras R2 ELITE 2250
More information2017 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results
Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat varieties were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,
More informationWinter Wheat 2017/18 (nabim Groups 1-3 and Soft Group 4)
Winter Wheat 2017/18 (nabim Groups 1-3 and Soft Group 4) MARKET OPTIONS, YIELD AND GRAIN QUALITY NEW C - C* * - - * C * NEW NEW NEW NEW NEW NEW - - - - KWS Zyatt Skyfall KWS Trinity RGT Illustrious Crusoe
More informationPreliminary Report Wheat, Barley and Oat Variety Performance in Minnesota Preliminary Report
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION SERVICE 2 0 UNIVERSITY OF R MINNESOTA E S E A U.S. R DEPARTMENT C H R OF AGRICULTURE E P O R T S COLLEGE OF FOOD, AGRICULTURAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES ST. PAUL,
More information2017 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials
2017 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials Lee Siler, Matthew Graham, Amber Hoffstetter Andrew Wiersma, Linda Brown, Kyle McCarthy, Jeff Kovach, Jonathan Turkus, Tara Watkins, Eric Olson July 31, 2017
More information2015 Wheat, Barley, and Oats Variety Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report
Page 84 2015 Wheat, Barley, and Oats Variety Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report Both the cash prices and futures for all commodities continued their decline that started in second half of 2013.
More informationWheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season:
2017-2018 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2017-2018 soft red winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Tenton,
More informationHigh Plains Root-Knot Nematode Variety Trial Results, 2016
High Plains Nematode Variety Trial Results, 2016 Dr. Terry Wheeler, Research Plant Pathologist Texas A&M AgriLife Research Lubbock Mr. Kerry Siders, County Extension Agent - IPM Texas A&M AgriLife Extension
More informationSection 5: Wheat Scab Research
67 Section 5: Wheat Scab Research One of the primary research objectives of the Virginia Tech wheat breeding program is to identify and develop cultivars possessing resistance to Fusarium Head Blight ()
More informationSMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Nomini Nomini Nomini Nomini
Revised 1994 SMALL GRAINS IN 1994 The following are the small grain variety recommendations for Virginia in 1994. The recommendations are based on the agronomic performance in barley and wheat variety
More informationOat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,
Oat Tifton, Georgia: An oat variety grain trial was planted at this location on September 23, 2015. However, crown rust disease and lodging during the growing season resulted in some very low grain yields
More informationTHE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS
THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Matthew Hankinson, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION
More informationVirginia Corn & Small Grain Management. Small Grains in 2007
Virginia Corn & Small Grain Management Small Grains in 2007 Table of Contents Recommended Small Grain Varieties... 1 Barley and Wheat Entries... 3 Introduction... 4 The Season... 4 Section 1: Barley Varieties
More informationSMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity. Barley. Callao Callao Callao Callao. Nomini Nomini Nomini Nomini
Revised 2000 SMALL GRAINS IN 2000 The following are the small grain variety recommendations for Virginia in 2000. The recommendations are based on the agronomic performance in barley and wheat variety
More informationSection 5: Wheat Scab Research
Section 5: Wheat Scab Research One of the primary research objectives of the Virginia Tech wheat breeding program is to identify and develop cultivars possessing resistance to Fusarium Head Blight (FHB)
More informationWheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee
Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee 2005 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing
More information2017 Kentucky Small Grain
PR-724 University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Agricultural Experiment Station 2017 Kentucky Small Grain PERFORMANCE TEST B. Bruening, B. Roberts, S. Swanson, J. Connelley,
More informationWisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012
A3868 Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012 Shawn Conley, Adam Roth, John Gaska, and Mark Martinka The Wisconsin Winter Wheat Performance Tests are conducted each year to give growers information
More information2014 Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Data Collected Conducted by the Ontario Soybean and Canola Committee
2014 Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Data Collected 2012-2014 Conducted by the Ontario Soybean and Canola Committee www.gosoy.ca Research conducted and reported by: Grain Farmers of Ontario www.gfo.ca 1987
More informationGoSoy.ca REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials For by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee. Research conducted and reported by
2010 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials For 2007-2009 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee Research conducted and reported by Ontario Agricultural College Ridgetown Campus Kemptville Campus
More information2016 Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Data Collected
2016 Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Data Collected 2014-2016 Conducted by the Ontario Soybean And Canola Committee www.gosoy.ca Research conducted and reported by: Grain Farmers of Ontario www.gfo.ca 1987
More information2015 Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Data Collected
2015 Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Data Collected 2013-2015 Conducted by the Ontario Soybean And Canola Committee www.gosoy.ca Research conducted and reported by: Grain Farmers of Ontario www.gfo.ca 1987
More informationGeorgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***
Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown*** Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp Rainfall Avg temp May 2.47 67.4 1.24 66.5 2.56 66.3 1.59 67.4 June 5.9 73.5 6.58 73.1 4.45 72.8 12.24
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety.
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1-5 RESEARCH PRESENTATION...6-15 I. OBJECTIVE ONE Measure Each Entry s Main and Ratoon Crop Yield and Milling Response With and Without Fungicide Under Intense and
More informationControl of diseases in different cultivars
Applied Crop Protection 2014 III Control of diseases in different cultivars Lise Nistrup Jørgensen, Helene Saltoft Kristjansen, Sidsel Kirkegaard & Anders Almskou- Dahlgaard Control strategies in 6 wheat
More informationEconomics and Yield of Dry Bean Market Classes
Economics and of Dry Bean Market Classes Purpose: To evaluate the relative yield, seed quality, maturity and economics of different market classes of dry beans. To test a select number of promising commercial
More informationScottish Recommended List for Cereals 2015 Tables. Data from HGCA Recommended List Trials
Tables Data from HGCA Recommended List Trials Spring barley Yield of 100 = 6.8 t/ha Control if Use Brewing, Distilling, Distilling IBD Malting Approval
More information2007 Crop Variety Highlights and Insect Pest Updates
2007 Crop Variety Highlights and Insect Pest Updates 1 Regional Testing of Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Cultivars 2007 S.J. Dueck and G.J. Moskal Cultivars are tested regionally to determine their adaptation
More informationWinter Cereal Varieties
Winter Cereal Varieties John Joe Byrne 11 th September 2018 National Crops Forum, Kilashee. www.agriculture.gov.ie @agriculture_ie Overview Weather Winter Wheat Winter Barley Winter Oats Weather 2018 Not
More informationREPORT. for by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials
2006 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials for 2003-2005 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee 1987 ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE Research conducted and reported by Ontario Agricultural
More informationScottish Recommended Lists for Cereals Tables. Data from AHDB Recommended List Trials. Version F v1
Tables Data from AHDB Recommended List Trials Version F v1 Spring barley Yield of 100 = 7.4 t/ha yield as Control if use: Brewing, Distilling or Distilling MBC Approval (See footnotes) Feed use (See footnote)
More informationLavina (MT981397) Lavina (MT981397) is a two rowed hooded spring barley and is a cross between Haybet
Lavina (MT981397) Lavina (MT981397) is a two rowed hooded spring barley and is a cross between Haybet and Baronesse. Haybet (P.I.533600) was developed by USDA-ARS and the Montana Experiment Station and
More informationPROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS
PROJECT TITLE: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Dr. Michael Giroux, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: mgiroux@montana.edu Phone: (406) 994-7877 Andy Hogg, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: ahogg@montana.edu
More informationThe following motion and supporting documentation is presented for consideration at the 2007 Cultivar Release and Recommendation Meeting in Bozeman:
Phil L. Bruckner, Professor Department of Plant Sciences & Plant Pathology Montana State University Bozeman, MT 59715-3140 bruckner@montana.edu PHONE 406-994-5127, FAX 406-994-1848 MEMORANDUM TO: Wheat
More informationScottish Recommended List for Cereals Tables. Data from AHDB Recommended List Trials. Version 1.2
Scottish Recommended List for Cereals 2016 Tables Data from AHDB Recommended List Trials Version 1.2 Scottish Recommended List for Cereals 2016 Spring barley Yield of 100 = 7.0 t/ha Control if use Brewing,
More informationSMALL GRAIN VARIETIES RECOMMENDED Arranged in Order of Maturity COASTAL PLAIN PIEDMONT WEST OF BLUE RIDGE. Barley. Wheat
Revised 1995 SMALL GRAINS IN 1995 The following are the small grain variety recommendations for Virginia in 1995. The recommendations are based on the agronomic performance in barley and wheat variety
More informationOff-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana.
Project Title: Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. Project Leader: D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana. Project Personnel: P.L. Bruckner MAES
More information2016 Idaho Spring Wheat Variety Performance Tests and Yield Summaries
USDA assessed HRW planted area at 23.3 million acres (9.43 million hectares), down 12 percent from 2016. Planted area in Kansas, the number one U.S. HRW-producing state at 7.40 million acres (3.00 million
More informationSpring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A
Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A bstract Spring wheat breeding lines from the Oregon State University (OSU) and other regional breeding
More information2018 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials
2018 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials 2018 Michigan State Wheat Performance Trials Dennis Pennington, Eric Olson, Jonathan Turkus, Sam Martin July 25, 2018 Fall planting conditions were excellent
More informationReport of the 2017 Uniform Regional Scab Nursery for Spring Wheat Parents
Report of the 2017 Uniform Regional Scab Nursery for Spring Wheat Parents Prepared by: David F. Garvin Research Geneticist and Nursery Coordinator USDA-ARS, Plant Science Research Unit 411 Borlaug Hall,
More informationThe 2004 wheat growing season ended with Kentucky farmers
PR-500 2004 Kentucky Small Grain Variety Trials C. Tutt, C.S. Swanson, J. Connelley, R. Green, and D.A. Van Sanford The 2004 wheat growing season ended with Kentucky farmers harvesting 370,000 acres of
More informationTable 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee
Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION Soybean Disease Ratings for Frogeye Leaf Spot, SDS & Stem Canker with Yields Maturity Group V (Late) 2003 Trial ID: 03SBFE5L Investigator: Dr. Melvin Newman Crop
More information2016 Wheat, Barley, and Oat Variety Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report
2016 Wheat, Barley, and Oat Performance in Minnesota - Preliminary Report Higher hopes in early spring of a greater upward pricing potential for corn relative to other commodities, a wetter and slightly
More informationOntario Hybrid Corn Performance Trials
2016 Ontario Hybrid Corn Performance Trials Data collected 2015-2016 Conducted by the Ontario Corn Committee www.gocorn.net Go to www.gocorn.net PDF files of this report Sortable on-line tables x ure Content
More informationSelecting Hybrids Wisely
First of of all, let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org Genetic modification of corn has been occurring
More informationREPORT. for by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials
2005 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials for 2002-2004 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee 1987 ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE Research conducted and reported by Ontario Agricultural
More informationCROP. While you re working through your yearly routine of EASTERN TRAITS AND STEWARDSHIP GUIDE 2018 MANAGER
TOP CROP MANAGER SUPPLEMENT TO TOP CROP MANAGER EAST OCTOBER 2018 topcropmanager.com EASTERN TRAITS AND STEWARDSHIP GUIDE 2018 While you re working through your yearly routine of planting, fertilizing,
More information2012 Kentucky Small Grain VARIETY PERFORMANCE TEST
AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, LEXINGTON, KY, 40546 PR-640 2012 Kentucky Small Grain PERFORMANCE TEST B. Bruening, S. Swanson, J. Connelley, G. Olson, and
More informationSOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999
SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 Erik B.G. Feibert, Clinton C. Shock, Peter Sexton, Lamont D. Saunders, and Rhonda Bafus Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon Introduction
More information2004 Spring Barley Variety Release and Recommendation Motions
2004 Spring Barley Variety Release and Recommendation Motions submitted by Dr. Tom Blake and Patrick Hensleigh motion supported by data in tables 1-9 1. A motion that "Eslick" be recommended as a feed
More informationINFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS.
2016 PERFORMANCE TRIALS INFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS. 2016 Small Plot and Field Scale Data This version has been revised to include both small plot and field scale data. For more information visit www.canolaperformancetrials.ca
More information2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ]
2018 Soybean Top 30 Performance Summary for Missouri North [ MONO ] Test by: F.I.R.S.T. MSR, Inc., Columbia, MO Early-Season Test Maturity Group 3.2-3.8 Top 30 of 42 S2018MONOa For Gross Income (Sorted
More informationScottish Recommended Lists for Cereals Tables. Data from AHDB Recommended List Trials. Version f2
Scottish Recommended Lists for Cereals 2017 Tables Data from AHDB Recommended List Trials Version f2 Spring barley Yield of 100 = 7.2 t/ha yield as % of Control un use: Brewing, Distilling or Distilling
More informationSelecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:
Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org First of of all, all, let s let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Genetic modification of corn has been
More informationMark E. Sorrells Professor of Plant Breeding & Genetics
Plant Breeding & Genetics Section School of Integrative Plant Science 240 Emerson Hall, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853-1902 Telephone: (607) 255-1665 Fax (Dept.): (607) 255-6683 E-Mail: mes12@cornell.edu Web Page:
More informationArkansas Wheat Cultivar Performance Tests
Arkansas Wheat Cultivar Performance Tests 2016-2017 R.E. Mason R.G. Miller D.E. Moon J.P. Kelley ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION August 2017 Research Series 645 This publication is available on
More information2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1
PP310 2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1 Darcy E. P. Telenko, John Atkins, Nick Dufault, 2 This report includes a summary of the 2013 in-furrow
More informationFCDC Malting Barley Breeding Program. Patricia Juskiw Field Crop Development Centre Lacombe AB
FCDC Malting Barley Breeding Program Patricia Juskiw Field Crop Development Centre Lacombe AB patricia.juskiw@gov.ab.ca 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1st Qtr 3rd Qtr East West North Breeding Methodology
More information