12/7/2016. December 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Transcription

1 December 1, 2016 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1

2 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 OVERVIEW OF TRAC AGENDA 2

3 GO-NV SUMMIT Save the Date: Tuesday, Jan. 3, a.m. - noon Committee Goals Learn about the RTC transit system, as well as transit systems of other western regions. Provide input on RTC transit priorities, projects, and new technologies. Determine if additional funding is necessary and if so, provide recommendations on short and long term funding mechanisms for projects. 3

4 TRANSIT FRAMEWORK October 2016 Value of transit globally, evolution of transit locally November 2016 Transit 101 (2012 Present) December 2016 Transit funding & regional comparisons January 2017 Transit wrap-up & next steps Item #4 RECEIVE A PRESENTATION ON REGIONAL COMPARISONS 4

5 Investing in Rail Paul Jablonski Chief Executive Officer Metropolitan Transit System 9 Trolley History 1981: First Modern LRT system in U.S. Exceeded 100% fare box recovery Used as a model throughout U.S. Incremental Expansion Blue Line to Old Town Orange Line is several expansions to El Cajon Green Line in two major construction efforts in 1990s, 2000s Still Highly Successful 40 million riders 50% fare box recovery systemwide 10 5

6 Reasons for Success Build it where riders are Early success drives future expansion World s busiest border 30 million/yr come into US there South Bay region is transit rich Existing Right of Way San Ysidro to Downtown (and north) Downtown to East County Original Blue Line built w/o Federal capital 11 Countywide Ballot Measure 40-year, ½ Cent Sales Tax Extension One-third split between freeways, roads and transit Key to Success Multi-modal approach to appeal to widest possible audience MTS Rapid Network 12 6

7 11.5 miles 20,000+ new riders UC San Diego 60,000 students, faculty and staff Major Employment Dense Residential One-seat ride from border Direct link to downtown and Trolley network Mid-Coast LRT Extension 13 Economic Impacts of Transit Investment 14 7

8 15 Naming Rights Trolley Wraps (6) Station Names (3) Freeway/Street Bridges (3) Station Activations (6) Station Signage Destination Line Designation Route Maps System Maps On-Board Signage Route Maps System Maps Printed/Web/Digital Timetable Pocket Guide One-way Tickets WiFi and Digital Ads 16 8

9 17 Emerging Technologies Mobile Ticketing Smart Phone Apps Real Time Information Last Mile Partnerships 18 9

10 Measure A New ½-cent Sales Tax Roads, Transit, Open Space, City Discretionary Projects, Bike Lanes Needed 66%, got 57% Reasons for defeat: Crowded ballot Opposition from environmentalists Not enough for transit! Opposition from some cities Not enough for roads!

11 Transportation Resource Advisory Committee December 1, 2016 Multi-Modal Transit Network Every transit mode serves a certain purpose and market. Many modes working in concert create a successful transportation network. We have to continue to invest in transportation infrastructure

12 Valley Metro Services Local and commuter bus Light rail Neighborhood circulators Rural route Dial-a-Ride Vanpool Commuting alternatives Customer service & marketing 24 System Facts Operates 365 days a year 62 local routes 21 Express/RAPID routes 18 circulator routes 26 miles of light rail 432 vanpools 37.4 million revenue miles operated 72 million passenger boardings 91% of the fleet is alternatively fueled From FY15 Transit Performance Report; numbers include the vanpool program

13 System Map 26 Transit Ridership 27 13

14 System-wide Financial Information Expenses (in millions) $35.8 $3.4 $31.3 Bus Rail DAR Vanpool $ % Revenues 22% Fares Federal, state, local funds From FY15 Transit Performance Report 28 Valley Metro Organization Chief Executive Officer RPTA Board of Directors Rail Management Committee VMR Board of Directors Transit Management Committee Audit & Finance Subcommittee RPTA & VMR Board Subcommittee Regional Transit Advisory Group Intergovernmental Representatives Regional Marketing Committee Financial Working Group Service Planning Working Group Security Steering Committee East Valley Dial-a- Ride Working Group TOD Working Group Risk Management Committee Service Standards Working Group Regional Fare Working Group Valley Metro Governance and Policy Structure Standing Member Agency Staff Committees Ad Hoc Member Agency Staff Committees 29 14

15 Major Milestones 1985 Proposition 300 approved 1986 Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) is established 1989 Valtrans is presented to voters but fails 1996 Tempe voters approve a dedicated transit tax 2000 Phoenix voters approve a dedicated transit tax 2001 Glendale voters approve transportation tax 2002 Valley Metro Rail, Inc. was established 2004 Maricopa County voters approve Proposition 400 half-cent sales tax (1/3 dedicated to transit) 2012 Valley Metro RPTA and Valley Metro Rail Boards of Directors select a single CEO for both agencies East Valley bus service is unified with one transit service provider Phoenix voters approve increase and extension of dedicated transit tax 32 Local Transit Funding Agency Amount* Source Avondale $846,000 General Fund Buckeye - Chandler - El Mirage - Gilbert - Glendale $5,677,000 Transportation Sales Tax Goodyear - Guadalupe - Mesa $7,808,000 General Fund Paradise Valley - Peoria - Phoenix $160,946,000 Transit Sales Tax/General Fund Scottsdale $5,433,000 Transportation Sales Tax Surprise $284,000 Tempe $24,457,000 Transit Sales Tax Tolleson $118,000 Youngtown - *Estimated from MAG Transit Service Inventory data, excluding PTF, LTAF and federal funds (e.g., Section 5307, Section 5311, CMAQ, New Freedom) 35 15

16 Rail/High-Capacity Transit Program 37 16

17 Scott Smith Chief Executive Officer Item #5 DISCUSS PREVIOUS TRANSIT STUDIES 17

18 Transit System Development Plan Regional Fixed Guideway Study Transit Studies Transportation Investment Business Plan (TIBP) High-Capacity Transit Plan TRANSIT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PLAN Sahara Avenue Boulder Highway Maryland Parkway Flamingo Road Summerlin Parkway/US 95 18

19 REGIONAL FIXED GUIDEWAY 35-mile system (Henderson- Resort Corridor- North Las Vegas) Feasibility Study Alternatives Analysis Environmental Assessment TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT BUSINESS PLAN 19

20 High-Capacity Transit Pedestrian Improvements PUBLIC POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Surface Streets/ Roadways Freeway Improvements WHAT HAVE WE DONE SO FAR? Express Routes SX DVX CX WAX 202 SDX BHX HDX 20

21 COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR LIGHTRAIL 6,000 Responses 55.5% 7,000 Responses 76% 1,500 Responses WHAT S NEXT? Maryland Parkway Alternatives Analysis SNS Implementation Strategy Report Environmental Assessment 21

22 HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT PLAN Item #6 RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON MAJOR PROJECTS AND TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE 22

23 Harmon / Valley View / UPRR Estimated Cost: $42M Construction: 2016/

24 Harmon / Valley View / Union Pacific Railroad Interchange 90% Design Animation Convention Center Drive Contract Award: $ 6.1M Construction Completion: August

25 Howard Hughes Extension Estimated Cost: $500K Feasibility Study 2016 FLAMINGO ROAD TROPICANA AVENUE Las Vegas Boulevard Sidewalks Estimated Cost: $13M

26 Koval Lane, Tropicana to Sands Estimated Cost: $5.4M Construction Anticipated: 2016/2017 Widen & Reconstruct 1.5 Miles Koval / Reno / Giles Estimated Cost: $1.7M Construction: 2017/

27 Airport Express Routes Estimated Cost: $200M Airport Express Routes Overall Animation 27

28 Airport Express Routes Paradise Road Northbound Estimated Cost: $92M Airport Express Routes Paradise Road Northbound Animation 28

29 Airport Express Routes Koval Lane Southbound Estimated Cost: $108M Airport Express Routes Koval Lane Southbound Animation 29

30 Airport Express Routes Travel Time Comparison Airport Express Routes Travel Time Comparison 30

31 Item #7 RECEIVE A PRESENTATION ON THE LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF EXTRAORDINARY INNOVATION 31

32 METRO OVERVIEW 3 rd largest transit agency in US 1,433 sq. mile service area across 88 cities 1.4 million boardings a day, 2/3 on bus In addition to transit service, we also provide highway congestion management and bike share. Funding agency for local transport improvements. MARKET DRIVERS 25% projected population growth by 2050 Los Angeles Rams Olympic Bid Regional redevelopment Advances in technology Public desire for change Political leadership Passage of Measure M 78 32

33 THE FUTURE OF MOBILITY Revolutionize mobility services: Optimize operations and integrate new mobility services Remove mobility barriers to expose economic opportunity Adapt mobility system to individual lifestyle travel patterns Provide world-class user experience 79 OVERVIEW OF OEI Improve mobility, environment, customer experience and transportation safety Improve internal processes to create a more effective public agency 33

34 PROMOTING METRO INNOVATION Incubator and implementer of innovative ideas Establish an environment of innovation, openness, and experimentation Identify, encourage, and facilitate potential P3 infrastructure projects Develop and introduce innovation pilots that can demonstrate value and be scale for wider implementation Draft and deploy an Agency-wide strategic plan for Metro Bridge between internal silos OEI OEI FUNCTIONS Strategic Planning Private Sector Partnerships Vision, Goals, Performance Measures Improved Internal Approaches P3 Capital/ Technology Innovation Pilots 34

35 METRO STRATEGIC PLAN DEFINE OUR VISION for what it means to be a world-class transportation organization ESTABLISH THE GOALS that will allow us to achieve that vision ALIGN AGENCY-WIDE STRATEGIES to guide regional, multimodal mobility plans and investments DRIVE ACHIEVEMENT: benchmark, demonstrate and communicate Metro s performance UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL POLICY Open door for ideas, innovation, and experimentation Venue by which the private sector can bring ideas for improving service and performance to Metro Allows the market to work for Metro customers and LA residents Expands our capacity to quickly explore, test, and pilot new ideas 35

36 WHAT IS AN UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL? Innovative and pragmatic Independently originated and developed by the proposer Prepared without Metro's supervision, endorsement, direction, or direct involvement; and Sufficiently detailed that its benefits in support of Metro's mission and responsibilities are readily apparent WHAT IS NOT AN UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL? An offer responding to Metro's previously published expression of need or RFPs An advance proposal for property or services that Metro could acquire through competitive methods (submitted within the budget year before release of a published request for proposal) A replacement for an existing contract that is already in effect. 36

37 PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS Unsolicited Proposal (UP) Submitted to Procurement Phase I Evaluation OEI Requests Phase II Phase II Evaluation Develop Request for Proposal or Sole Source OFF PEAK IS ON AIR Metro s podcast about transportation in Los Angeles Six episodes Available on itunes, GooglePlay, SoundCloud, YouTube and Stitcher Please Like us! 37

38 THANK YOU! VISIT US ONLINE: metro.net/oei Nadine Lee, P.E. Deputy Chief Innovation Officer Los Angeles County Metro Ballot Measure Overview In June, Metro Board approved placing a No Sunset measure on the November ballot New ½ cent sales tax starting in July 2017 Increases to 1-cent in 2039 when current ½ cent Measure R expires Continues until voters decide to repeal it Through an initiative or Metro-sponsored measure Needs two-thirds approval by voters 90 38

39 Elements of the Measure New rail and bus rapid transit projects New highway projects Enhanced bus and rail service Local street, signal, bike/pedestrian improvements Affordable fares for seniors, students and persons with disabilities Maintenance/replacement of aging system Bike and pedestrian connections to transit facilities 91 Public Input General themes from the public: Accelerate projects, especially rail Provide more reliable bus service and BRT lines Increase/don t increase funding for Local Return Increase funding for Active Transportation Increase funding for senior, disabled and student programs Increase funding for Metrolink Build in funding for safety, security and technology Continue part of the tax to keep the system in good working condition 92 39

40 A Collaborative Regional Process Metro conducted a collaborative process with regional partners for the past three years to identify major projects for future implementation Metro staff has maintained an open dialogue with stakeholders throughout plan development 93 Current System (incl. under construction) 40

41 Planned New Investment (ballot measure) OPERATION SHOVEL READY: HIGHWAYS Project Estimated Cost Current Phase High Desert Corridor $8.8 billion PA & ED SR-138 Northwest $780 million PA & ED I-5 North HOV/HOT Lanes $726 million PS & E I-710 (South) Up to $8.0 billion PA & ED I-710 (South) Early Action Projects $400 million Var. I-710/SR-91 Interchange $430 million PSR-PDS I-605/I-5 Interchange $1.2 billion PA & ED I-605/SR-91 Interchange $130 million PA & ED I-605/SR-60 Interchange $1.2 billion PA & ED Total $21.67 billion 41

42 OPERATION SHOVEL READY: TRANSIT Project Est. Cost Current Phase Airport Metro Connector $300 million Environmental East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor $2.5 billion Environmental West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor $4.5 billion Planning South Bay Green Line Extension $600 million Environmental Gold Line Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 $2.5 billion Environmental Westside Purple Line Extension Section 3 $2.2 billion Pre. Eng. Sepulveda Pass Transit Corridor $6.8 billion Planning Total $19.4 billion JOINT DEVELOPMENT Sepulveda Duarte Vermont/Santa Monica 1 st /Central 42

43 METRO S MANAGED LANES State Owned Metro plans, develops, and oversees operations 2015 Trips I-110: 1.9 million monthly trips I-10: 1.1 million monthly trips Challenges: Tech, enforcement, mgmt TECHNOLOGY OPPORTUNITIES 43

44 Goals of the Measure Improve freeway traffic flow Expand rail and enhance bus service Repave local streets and fix potholes Keep fares affordable for seniors, students and persons with disabilities Embrace technology and innovation Create jobs and more quality of life Keep the system in good working condition Provide accountability and transparency 101 Thank You! For complete information about Measure M, please visit: metro.net/theplan Nadine Lee, P.E. Deputy Chief Innovation Officer Los Angeles Metro

45 Item #8 OPEN DISCUSSION Item #9 FINAL CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 45

46 46