Portrait of parking use

Transcription

1 Portrait of parking use 26 May 2015 Jean-Simon Bourdeau Research Associate 1

2 Plan Background Methodology Portrait of parking use Temporal analysis Estimation of indicators: VAP, parking hours, etc. Findings and discussion Conclusion 2

3 Background Parking in Montréal has always been a subject of interest : 1 : Inventaire des espaces de stationnement dans la grande région de Mo tréal, MTQ 2008 : the city of Montreal transportation plan : To a age parki g as a strategic tool to reduce car use [free tra slatio ] : the city of Montréal has been elaborating its parking policy (in progress) 3

4 Methodology Construction of Vehicle Accumulation Profiles (VAPs) : Using the information on the trips, it is possible to follow the driver and his vehicle in time and space, also to determine the number of parked cars in a spatial zone at a given time. 4

5 Methodology Questions regarding the parking type at the end of the car trip were asked since 1998 : 1998 : center of the island of Montreal 2003 and 2008 : whole island of Montréal What about the rest of the territory? 5

6 Methodology Left at 7:00 Trip time = 30 minutes Arrived at 7:30 Home : 0:00 to 7:00 and 18:50 to 24:00 Trip destination (ex. work) : 7:30 to 17:00 Arrived at 18:50 Left at 17:00 Trip time = 20 minutes Left at 18:30 Trip time = 15 minutes Shopping : 17:15 to 18:30 Arrived à 17:15 Images :

7 Methodology assumptions Trip time : unknown, default value of the trip time is the Euclidean distance trip time at the speed of 50 km/h; Vehicles not moving : It is impossible to know the exact percentage of vehicles used by a persons in a household; an minimization of the vehicles use is supposed; Origin and destination location : different from the parking location, but they are supposed to be close enough, therefore the distance is neglected. 7

8 Results Application of the method to 75 of the 100 municipal sectors of the OD surveys of 1998, 2003 and

9 The average parking durations have increased between 1998 and 2008 A. True B. False. 9

10 Average parking durations Distribution of the municipal sectors based on the average parking duration, for the work purpose Number of municipal sectors less than 7.5 hours 7.5 to 8 hours 8 to 8.5 hours 3 5 more than 8.5 hours 10

11 Average parking durations by purpose Work 7.79 h 8.01 h 8.09 h Study 7.30 h 7.45 h 7.80 h Leisure 5.40 h 5.60 h 5.98 h Shopping 4.55 h 4.83 h 5.06 h Other 3.97 h 3.84 h 4.31 h 11

12 Vehicle-hours of parking by purpose % % 63 % 61 4% 9 58 %

13 What type of parking is the most frequently used (in terms of vehicle-hours)? A. B. C. D. E. Free Subsidized Paid Incentive parking Residential parking permit 13

14 Vehicle-hours of parking (sector 101 to 112) Vehicle-hours of parking by parking type , , % 5% 17% 15% 0, % 0, % free free paying paying subsidized subsidized Residential permit parking Transit incentive parking 14

15 Known parking capacities Center of the island of Montréal : Free on-street Free outdoor Paid on-street Paid outdoor Paid indoor Subsidized outdoor Subsidized indoor Incentive parking Residential parking Permit Free indoor 15

16 Known parking capacities Center of the island of Montréal : Free Paid Subsidized Incentive parking Residential parking permit 16

17 Longitudinal VAP Vehicle Accumulation Profile of the sector Plateau-Mont-Royal :00 03:00 05:00 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00 21:00 23:00 25:00 27:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 24:00 26: :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 24:00 26:00 Number of vehicles Still Free on-street 2003 Paying on-street Residential Permit Parking 2008 Home Off-street Other 17

18 Proven parking capacities Total, by region : Region Island of Montréal Longueuil Laval South Shore North Shore Total 18

19 What is the percentage of vehicles not moving? A. B. C. D. E. F. Less than 20 % % % % % More than 40 % 19

20 Vehicles not moving Year Number of vehicles Number of vehicles not moving Percentage of vehicles not moving % 22.9% 28.8% 20

21 Findings and conclusions «Surprinsing» evolution of the percentage of vehicles not moving between 2003 and 2008 Many similarities between 1998 and 2008 compared to 2003 Increase in the number of vehicles (moving and not moving) and of parking use Next step : analysis of the 2013 OD survey, to confirm or reject the previous findings 21

22 Thank you for your attention Any questions? 22