City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

Transcription

1 City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update 2018 Mobility Fee 7 February 2018 Mobility Working Group Carnival Cruise lines photo credit

2 Modal Projects - Needs Goals & Objectives Data Priority Projects Avg. Length of Trip Trips per Land Use Vary by Development Area ITE daily trip rates Vary by Zone TDM trip reduction Cost / Growth (VMT) = VMT Fee VMT Fee Citywide Vary by Zone Updated Costs and Designs VMT growth forecast (Model) Mobility Fee 2

3 Modal Projects - Needs Goals & Objectives Data Priority Projects Avg. Length of Trip Trips per Land Use Vary by Development Area ITE daily trip rates Vary by Zone TDM trip reduction Cost / Growth (VMT) = VMT Fee VMT Fee Citywide Vary by Zone Updated Costs and Designs VMT growth forecast (Model) Mobility Fee 3

4 Cost per Vehicle Mile Traveled The average cost to construct new capacity to accommodate (at a similar standard of service as today) new vehicle miles traveled (VMT) of demand. Cost of New Capacity Growth in VMT = Average Cost per VMT We can start working in this equation in a different order Cost of New Capacity = Cost per VMT x Growth in VMT Derived Derived Given 4

5 Varying the Fee by Zone Mobility Zone VMT Change ( ) Base Fee per VMT Mobility Funding Limit 1 2,455,454 $33.69 $82,734, ,503,002 $30.46 $45,777, ,366,930 $38.72 $52,931, ,398,132 $30.80 $43,067, ,289,728 $33.92 $43,751, ,381,704 $25.71 $35,528, ,767 $22.56 $18,810, ,273,865 $27.39 $34,894, ,029,427 $23.21 $23,887, ,084 $22.42 $12,603,246 13,094,093 $393,987,280 5

6 6

7 Proposed Base Mobility Fee Mobility Zone Zonal Fee Development Area Avg. Trip Lengths (Short) Avg. Trip Lengths (Long) Single Family Dwelling Dev Area: Short Trips Dev Area: Long Trips 1 $ $3,298 $3,936 2 $ $2,981 $3,558 3 $ $3,790 $4,523 4 $ $3,015 $3,598 5 $ $3,320 $3,963 6 $ $2,516 $3,004 7 $ $1,985 $2,208 8 $ $2,410 $2,681 9 $ $2,041 $2, $ $1,940 $1,940 Avg: $2,729 $3,168 Min $1,940 $1,940 Max $3,790 $4,523 Spread $1,849 $2,583 7

8 Comparison Table: Single Family Dwelling NFTPO jurisdictions in Florida Low High Date of Fee St. Johns $ 4,105 $ 5, Clay $ 3,461 7/1/2018 City of Jacksonville $ 2,104 $ 2,840 current $ 1,940 $ 4,523 Proposed East Nassau $ 2,200 3/14/2015 Nassau $ 1,150 $ 1,168 8/25/2014 Soon to be updated Soon to be updated Assumptions: 2,000 square foot single family dwelling Source: Compiled by RSG with additional input from Impactfees.com (Duncan Associates) from 2015 National Impact Fee Survey. National Average: $3,256 Florida Average: $3,307 (as of 2015) 8

9 Infrastructure Mobility Fee Credit The current policy is NOT to provide Mobility Fee credits for requirements identified in the Land Development Procedure. (Section in the Handbook) Option A) - If Infrastructure is identified in the Mobility Plan and also required as part of local review or the Land Dev Procedure. The Mobility Fee can be reduced by the anticipated cost to construct the identified project up to the value of the Mobility Fees that would have otherwise been paid. Option B) - Maintain existing rule. Requirements per local review and Land Development Procedures would be constructed in addition to paying for Mobility Fee. 9

10 Trip Credit Process Expedited: no trip reduction Trip Generation Effects (ITE guidance) use Citywide for any land use - Internal mix of uses (ITE & NCHRP 684) - Pass-by & Diverted trips - Existing uses Additional Considerations: Land Use Effects - Density bonuses (more able to use active modes, transit, shorter trips, etc.) - Adjacent land uses (regional internal trip making, shorter trips) - Income sensitive housing and other land uses with special or waived fees 10

11 Density Urbemis Reductions Compact development cannot reduce driving very much on its own, but we cannot reduce driving very much without it, If we are going to get people to drive less, we first need to make it possible to drive less. Compact development does that. A California planner, unidentified 11

12 Households per Acre Census blocks 12

13 Land use Focused Goals of Urbemis Density - Density drives most of the collective transportation benefits we are looking to achieve. - Overall less VMT is beneficial for congestion, emissions, energy, - Active modes (walking, biking, etc.) are more likely due to closer proximity of Generators of Trips and Attractions Multi-modal options - Proximity to land uses enables greater walking, biking (active modes), and proximity to transit to enable use of available transit 13

14 Other Fee Considerations Policy Incentives - Focused Mobility Fee reductions in specific locations in City for a myriad of reasons (i.e. encourage development, support public safety, etc.) Equality and Equity concerns Demographic adjustments, including housing sizes, income. - Trip adjustments based on the provision of a certain percentage of housing being offered below market rate (BMR) dwelling units. 14

15 Fee Collection and Expenditure Process Mobility Zone VMT Change ( ) Fee Mobility Funding Limit Corridor Projects Standalone Bike Standalone Ped JTA DIA 1 2,455,454 $33.69 $82,734,786 $72,310,580 $9,041,114 $1,383, ,503,002 $30.46 $45,777,514 $38,540,280 $2,381,022 $1,481,213 $3,375, ,366,930 $38.72 $52,931,368 $39,867,524 $10,468,537 $1,345,308 $1,250, ,398,132 $30.80 $43,067,118 $37,678,508 $4,625,428 $763, ,289,728 $33.92 $43,751,560 $34,090,827 $7,468,097 $2,192, ,381,704 $25.71 $35,528,520 $21,918,983 $12,460,038 $1,149, ,767 $22.56 $18,810,703 $2,374,000 $14,791,117 $1,645,586 $0 8 1,273,865 $27.39 $34,894,472 $13,357,551 $9,964,537 $1,172,383 $10,400, ,029,427 $23.21 $23,887,993 $3,210,511 $14,469,662 $4,207,820 $2,000, ,084 $22.42 $12,603,246 $6,407,364 $993,310 $1,800,000 $3,402,573 13,094,093 $393,987,280 $263,348,764 $92,076,916 $16,334,028 $18,825,000 $3,402,573 Incrementally as fees are collected, what is the process to identify how and what projects are funded first? - Should there be a priority between modes within each zone? - Should a set % be set aside for specific modes? - What flexibility should the City have in making timing decisions? 15

16 Next Steps

17 Contacts Jonathan Slason, PE Senior Engineer