ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG. ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG. London 2012 / Dr. R. Schilder / Dr. G. Punz

Transcription

1

2 Overview of responsibility electrical energy supply at ÖBB Infrastructure AG Status of LCC considerations (focus overhead contact line at ÖBB) 2

3 ÖBB-Infrastructure AG Corporate Services Vienna Main Station General Project Management Operations Infrastructure/Finance Project Management/ Engineering Network Access Infrastructure Development Project Management Network Operation Asset Management Brenner Access Line Energy Integrated Track Management Engineering Services Shunting Controlling / Accounting Responsibility in the field of Energy 16.7 Hz traction power supply Energy supply of operational facilities Energy services Inspection, maintenance and troubleshooting for power Station Inspection, maintenance and troubleshooting on and around the electrical power supply system (excluding power Station). Invest/Reinvest desition (including LCC Management) for all components of the 15kV, 16,7Hz and 50 Hz Systems System Design for all components of the 15kV, 16,7Hz and 50 Hz Systems 3

4 Overview of responsibility electrical energy supply at ÖBB Infrastructure AG Status of LCC considerations (focus overhead contact line at ÖBB) 4

5 Overall LCC Considerations Process level Inspection Maintenance Interference suppression Repair Renewal Development/ new construction Technical level Inspection requirements Functionality State Substance Legal/Norm requirements specified deadlines Short term limitations due to disturbances Inspection results (Visual assessment and measured values) State analysis of railway routes Remaining life expectancy Inspection results Long term limitations due to disturbances and inspections results LCC Analysis of railway route sections Network development strategy 5

6 Key Considerations for State Analysis of Railway Routes Criteria for deriving Measures Substance Functionality State singalling permanent way electrotechnology Maßnahmenplan Maßnahmenplan Plan of measures Variante 1 Variante 2 Variante n Variante 1 Variante 2 Variante n Model 1 Model 2 Model n Clearance with permantent way, signaling, 6

7 Deriving Measures Substance criteria Functionality criteria State criteria Remaining life expectancy Electrical requirements of the section (present) Electrical requirements of the section (target network 2025) Disturbance of the components System availability Inspection results Measured values Visuall assessment 7

8 Analysis of actual situation, example substance criteria Electrical requirements of the line (actual situation) 8

9 Analysis of actual situation, example functionality Disturbance of the components Numbers of Malfunction versus cause of Malfunction 9

10 Analysis of actual situation Example state criteria Inspection 10

11 State criteria Category Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Description State of the system very good, no limitations. State of the system good, no limitations. The System has small defects. For the longer term (> 12 Years) repairs required. State of the system poor, no limitations. The System has gross defects. Medium term (5 12 Years) are limitations and/or substance damage to expecte repairs required in the next few years. Category 4 State of the system very poor, no limitations. The System has gross defects. Repairs are due to technical/economical reasons not possible or the System does no longer live up to the technical development standards of the route Renewal or Repair of the System required (1-5 Years). Category 5 State of the system very poor, limitations present. The System has gross defects. Repairs are due to technical/economical reasons not possible or the System does no longer live up to the technical development standards of the route Renewal of the System required (1 Year). 11

12 Evaluation matrix Substace Function State category Remaining life expectancy Electrical requirements of the section (present) Electrical requirements of the section (target network 2025) System availability Inspection 1 >30 Years <60% <60% >99,9% Very good Years <60% >60% <90% 99,7%-99,9% good Years <60% >90% 99,5%-99,7% poor 4 <6 Years >60% <90% 5 <1 Year >90% >90% <98% >90% 98%-99,5% Very poor Very poor (operating limitations) 12

13 Output LCC Analysis Electrificated rail track versus age of facility and categorie Zustandsklasse 5 Zustandsklasse km 1233 km 2% 10% 49% 55% km 2359 km Zustandsklasse 3 Zustandsklasse 2 Zustandsklasse % 35% 4% Über 40/50 Jahre 31 Jahre bis 40/50 Jahre 16 bis 30 Jahre Bis 15 jahre The systems within the categories 4 and 5 are in the master plan scheduled for renewal, only in special cases are repairs intended. 13

14 14