Guidelines TITLE for the A CTS implementation. CTL ITR Sapienza University of Rome

Transcription

1 Guidelines TITLE for the A CTS implementation FOR THE of CityMobil2-type NEW ROME systems EXHIBITION Carlos Gabriele Holguin Giustiniani, - Daniele Stam CTL ITR Sapienza University of Rome

2 State of the Art in 2012 Google car had steering wheel (Prius) No SAE automation levels The vehicles outside didn t exist Expert cities: La Rochelle, EPFL New coming cities: Trikala, Oristano

3 CityMobil, INRIA, 2011

4 System Operation Infrastructure Vehicle Vehicle capacity Examples

5 What is (and is not) a CityMobil2 Automated Road Transport/Transit System? Public transport system 2 fleets of 6 road vehicles each 10 passengers Automated - NOT autonomous Centrally managed fleet Driving on Shared, segregated or dedicated road infrastructure 5

6 Trikala 6

7 The CityMobil2 Cities selection process WP1 (CTL): Study methodology Applied by the cities Result: city studies City selection (CTL) Technical, legal and "practical" audits

8 ARTS Demonstrations: the tip of the iceberg ARTS public operation Staff training System operational tests System/vehicle setup Infrastructure building/adaptation Legal authorization Risk assessment/certification Infrastructure design System design Transport study 8

9 12-15 Months ARTS Demonstrations: the tip of the iceberg ARTS public operation Staff training System operational tests System/vehicle setup Infrastructure building/adaptation Legal authorization Risk assessment/certification Infrastructure design System/route design Transport study

10 ARTS Demonstrations: the tip of the iceberg ARTS public operation Staff training System operational tests System/vehicle setup Infrastructure building/adaptation Legal authorization Risk assessment/certification Infrastructure design System/route design Transport study 10

11 Where to implement ARTS Diagnosis, definition of the objectives and potential impacts Intra-city site selection Pre-design of the ARTS

12 Diagnosis, definition of the objectives and potential impacts Diagnosis and definition of the objectives: description of the city and its local transport situation, definition of the automated road transport system (ARTS) objectives Potential impacts: impacts expected on each potential implementation site

13 Intra-city site selection First quantitative demand estimation for all the potential sites Pre-design of the transport system on the selected site Initial assessment based on experts feedback on the pre-design Initial practical feasibility analyses: technical, legal, population and governance promptness to carry out the demonstration

14 How to design and implement ARTS Potential demand analysis Supply dimensioning Urban Integration

15 Potential demand analysis Daily demand foreseen in the selected site: Design of a stated preference survey Discrete choice model estimation on the basis of the stated preference data collected (Possibility of using different models)

16 La Rochelle route design Saint-Nicolas Tower Media Library visitors/year Old Harbour Tourist office Aquarium visitors/year Ville en bois Mixed housing, University Train station 300 m 1000 ft LES MINIMES 7000 inhabitants 16

17 Trikala route design Post office Main sq. City hall - Pedestrian areas Regional bus station 100 m 500 ft School and cultural centre

18 Supply dimensioning Four different methods available (according to network complexity): Calculations (on the basis of the initial O/D matrix) Dial-A-Ride-Problem (DARP) solution algorithms DARP simulation tool (software developed University of Rome, based on a DARP algorithm) Micro-simulation (using modelling systems)

19 DARP simulation tool screenshot

20 ARTS Demonstrations: the tip of the iceberg ARTS public operation Staff training System operational tests System/vehicle setup Infrastructure building/adaptation Legal authorization Risk assessment/certification Infrastructure design System/route design Transport study 20

21 Trikala route design and urban integration Bike lane (temp.) removed Lane created by reducing lane width Lane created in pedestrian area 100 m 500 ft Road-side parking removed

22 La Rochelle - Crossing Motte Rouge Sud 22

23 La Rochelle - Crossing Motte Rouge South 23

24 La Rochelle - Crossing Motte Rouge South Connected tramway traffic light 20 m 50 ft 24

25 La Rochelle - Crossing Motte Rouge South 20 m 50 ft Connected tramway traffic light 25

26 La Rochelle - Crossing Motte Rouge South Connected traffic light for cars 20 m 50 ft 26

27 La Rochelle - Crossing Motte Rouge South 20 m 50 ft Upstream road sign warning of the special lights 27

28 La Rochelle - Crossing Motte Rouge South 20 m 50 ft Traffic road sign warning of the special lights 28

29 La Rochelle - Crossing Motte Rouge South 20 m 50 ft 4 removable bollards to prevent cars from entering the pedestrian area out of CityMobil2 operation timeframe 29

30 The BOTTOM of the iceberg ARTS public operation Staff training System operational tests System/vehicle setup Infrastructure building/adaptation Legal authorization Risk assessment/certification Infrastructure design System/route design Transport study Transport/Mobility Policy 30

31 What have we learned so far? Automated transport/transit system are feasible with TODAY s technologies Testing the technology is the first-to-last step design is everything Especially, the design of local mobility policies Local public transport authorities education on technologies capabilities is crucial 31

32 Thank TITLE you A CTS for your FOR THE attention NEW ROME EXHIBITION Carlos Holguin CTL Gabriele University Giustiniani, of Rome carlos.holguin@ctl.uniroma1.it ITR