The State of New Hampshire DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner. October 1, 2009

Transcription

1 The State of New Hampshire DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner October 1, 2009 Mr. Russell Dowd Plant Manager Pinetree Power - Tamworth, Inc. P.O. Box 233 West Ossipee, NH RE: Inspection Report for Pinetree Power - Tamworth Dear Mr. Dowd: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division co.nducted an Off-site Full Compliance Evaluation of Pinetree Power-Tamworth (PPT) on September 29, DES identified the following deficiencies during the inspection: PPT is not attaching the "Certification of Accuracy Statement" as outlined in Section XXLB of the Title V Permit (TV-OP-018) to the stack test report submittals. PPT should attach the statement to all submittals to DES. PPT did not calculate the emissions from the cooling tower, fire pump and insignificant activities and did not pay the fees associated with those emissions from PPT should calculate the emissions from the cooling tower, fire pump and insignificant activities for the years 2004 through 2008 and pay the associated fees for those emissions. See Table below for applicable fees per year. Year Emission Fee Rate ($/ton) PPT is not providing the annual NOx Reporting Requirements as required by Table 8, Item 4 of the Title V Permit. PPT should include the required information by April. 15 following the year of emissions. DES Web site: P.O. Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire Telephone: (603) Fax: (603) TDD Access: Relay NH

2 Pinetree Power- Tamworth Page 2 Off-site Full Compliance Evaluation Enclosed is a copy of the Inspection Report for your records. If you have any questions regarding the inspection or the final report, please feel free to call me at (603) Sincerely, Greg Helve Senior Compliance Assessment Engineer Air. Resources Division Enclosure: Pinetree Power- Tamworth Off-site Full Compliance Evaluation cc: Town of Ossipee - Board of Selectmen

3 NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF WEnvironmental Services OFF-SITE FULL COMPLIANCE EVALUATION Pinetree Power-Tamworth, Inc. 469 Plains Road, Route 41,P.O. Box 233 West Ossipee, New Hampshire Carrol County (603) AFS # Inspection Date: September 29, 2009 Final Report: September 29, 2009 Inspected and Prepared by: New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Air Resources Division 29 Hazen Dr., P.O. Box 95 Concord, New Hampshire rx~ ~ 4, 4 ' e, ~ _, Greg4lelve / Sr. Compliance Assessment Engineer

4 Pinetree Power- Tamworth Inspection Date.' Tamworth Report Date.' Inspection On September 29, 2009, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division (DES) completed an Off-Site Full Compliance Evaluation of Pinetree Power- Tamworth. Inc.(PPT), located in Tamworth, NH. PPT was targeted for inspection based on DES inspection criteria, which specifies that a major source with a Title V Permit to Operate be inspected once every two years. Date/Time of Inspection: September 29, 2009, Type of Inspection: Off-Site Full Compliance Evaluation Inspected by: Greg Helve, Senior Compliance Engineer Weather: N/A Source Contacts: Russell Dowd, Plant Manager Last Inspection: September 06, 2007 Inspection Result: No deficiencies were observed during that inspection Permit Numbers: TV-OP-0 18: Expires October 31, 2010 TP-B-0543: Expires September 30, 2009 (app. Shield applies) Facility Description PPT burns whole tree wood chips in a boiler producing steam to spin a turbine. The Zurndesigned, spreader stoker, waterwall boiler uses 15 screw feeders to distribute wood chips across the grated floor of the boiler. The boiler is rated at a maximum of million British thermal units per hour ("MMBtu/hr") and can produce approximately 220,000 lb/hr of steam at 700 psig and 900 F while burning approximately 47.5 tons/hr of wood chips with an average heating value of 4,250 Btu/lb (assuming a 50% moisture content of the chips). PPT controls its particulate matter ("PM") emissions from the boiler using a multiclone and an electrostatic precipitator ("ESP"). In March 2008, PPT installed a selective non-catalytic reduction system and a selective catalytic reduction system to control nitrogen oxide ("NOx") emissions. The SNCR and SCR require the use of ammonia (in this case, urea, a form of ammonia). PPT has a 745 horsepower ("hp") emergency generator, which can fire diesel fuel at a maximum rate of 39.9 gallons/hr in the event of a Public Service of New Hampshire ("PSNH") blackout or when the boiler is shutdown for maintenance purposes. It also has a 187 hp diesel fire pump to be used in the event of a fire emergency. In addition, PPT has a 26,000 gallonlminute cooling tower. The tower lets the water which flows through the tubes of the main condenser lose the heat it has gained from the condensation of the primary side steam. The steam, after spinning the blades of the turbine, is condensed back to liquid on the shell side of the condenser and then fed back to the boiler tubes by the feedwater pumps. The entrainment of water treatment chemicals in the water mist that evaporates from the cooling tower is also a source of particulate emissions from the facility. Table 1 lists the significant emission units, Table 2 lists the pollution control equipment and Table 3 lists the Page 2 of 13

5 Pinetree Power- Tamworth Inspection Date Tamworth Report Date stack information. Emission Unit Identification and Operating Conditions Table 1 -Sk,nificant Emission Unit Identification Description oflemisslon Emissions Unit Maximum Permitted Reported Operating and Fuel Use Unit Capacity Data Zurn Two Drum The maximum operating rate of the boiler is 2008: 283,847 tons Waterwall Wood-fired limited to MMBTU/hr of heat input, Boiler which is equivalent to 47.5 tons/hour of wood chips with a heating value of 4, : 320,334 tons Model No: 2-Drum Open BTU/lb, assuming approximately 50 /o ass moisture. This is equivalent to 220,000 Type of Burner: Spreader lbs/hr of steam production as averaged over Stoker any consecutive 24-hour period at 900 F and 700 PSIG, assuming a boiler efficiency Date of installation. July of7l.47% and boiler feedwater temperature 1987 of 405 F. 745 hp Caterpillar All emergency generators including the fire 2008: gal-4iesel, 17 hrs Emergency Diesel pump, are limited to operate less than 500 Generator, Model #3412 hours each during any consecutive 12 Date of installation: month-period and the combined theoretical 2007: gal-diesel, 24.5 hrs November 1987 potential emissions of NOx from all such generators are limited to less than 25 tons for any consecutive 12-month period. 187 hp Fire P'P No data reported Cooling Tower Drift Factor = 0.002% (Manufacturer's data) No data reported Date of installation: 1987 Circulation Rate = 26,000 gallons/minute Control Eiuipment Table 2 - Pollution Control Equipment Identification Pollution Control Description of Equipment Activity Equipment # Emission Unit # PCE1 Multiclone Primary particulate mattercontrol EUO I Secondary particulate matter EUO 1 PCE2 Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) control PCE3 (new) PCE4 (new) Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) System Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) System Control of nitrogen oxides Control of nitrogen oxides EUO I EUO I Page3 ofl3

6 Pinetree Power- Tamworth InspectiOn Date; Tamworth Report Date: Stack Criteria Table 3- Stack Criteria L Compliance with Permitting Requirements CHAPTER ENV-A Ambient Air Quality Standards ("AAQS") PPT is in compliance. Reference DES modeling memo dated July 8, 1986 that demonstrated compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards ("NAAQS). CHAPTER ENV-A Standards Applicable to Certain New or Modified Facilities and Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants PPT is subject to the New Source Performance Standard ("NSPS") specified in Env-A , 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units. PPT is in compliance with the particulate requirements of 40 CFR Subpart Db of 0.1 Ib/MMBtu. In the 2009 stack test, PPT showed that its particulate matter emissions were less than lb PM/MMBtu heat input. PPT is not subject to any of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ("NESHAP") specified in Env-A or any of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories (Maximum Achievable Control Technology, or MACT, Standards) specified in Env- A Based on emission testing for hydrochloric acid at PPT in June 2004, and similar testing at Bridgewater Power Company's wood-fired boiler on June 10, 2004, for benzene, acrolein and styrene, DES concluded that PPT is a true minor source of hazardous air pollutants. Therefore, PPT is not subject to NESHAP (40 CFR 61 and 63). CHAPTER ENV-A Statewide Permit System USEPA Region 1 issued Prevention of Significant Deterioration ("PSD") Permit No NH06 ("the PSD Permit") to PPT on November 15, A PSD permit was necessary, because PPT's emissions typically exceed 275 tons per year ("tpy") of nitrogen oxides ("NOx") and 200 tpy of carbon monoxide ("CO"). The limits of the PSD Permit are incorporated into Title V Operating Permit TV-OP-018 ("the Permit"), which DES originally issued to PPT on September 15, The Permit was renewed on October 17, The renewal of the Permit in 2005 incorporated the requirements of 40 CFR 64 Compliance Assurance Monitoring ("CAM"). CAM provides reasonable assurance, by the source's monitoring of operational and maintenance parameters of air pollution control devices, that it is complying with emissions limits. CAM applies to Title V sources with pollution control equipment whose pre-controlled emissions exceed the major source threshold. PPT has pre-controlled emissions of particulate matter ("PM") greater than 100 tpy. It uses a multiclone in series with an electrostatic precipitator to control PM emissions. Hence, the CAM rule is applicable to PM emissions from the wood-fired boiler and the Permit contains CAM requirements for the multiclone and ESP. Page 4 of 13

7 Pin etree Power-Tamworth Inspection Date Tamworth Report Date PPT is also a major source of NOx and CO. However, it also has continuous emissions monitoring ("CEM") system to constantly monitor its actual emissions of NOx and CO, therefore, CAM is not required for NOx and CO. DES granted PPT a Temporary Permit (TP-B dated March 17, 2008) for the installation of Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems to reduce NOx emissions from the wood boiler; ThisPerrnit is setto expireseptember 30, PPT has filed forrenewal of both the Temporary Permit and the Title V Permit and qualifies for Appliéation Shield. These Permits will be combined into a final Title V Permit. Annual emissions for the facility are calculated and submitted by PPT from CEM data, from the amount of fuel combusted with EPA's AP-42 Emission Factors or stack test-derived emission factors. The annual emissions for the last 2 years are listed in Table 4 below. Table 4 - Facility Wide Emissions (Tons per Year) Year PM SO 2 NO CO VOCs Total The total emissions in Table 4 only include the wood boiler (EU01) and the emergency generator (EUO2). PPT has not reported the emissions for the other significant (i.e., cooling tower and fire pump) and insignificant activities for 2004 thru The Permit also contains short-term emission limits which are listed in Table 5. Table 5 CEM data and stack test results Pollutants Emission Limits NO (24-hr avg) lb/hr 93.3 lb/hr lb/hr' NO (24-hr avg) lb/mmbtu lb/mmbtu' lb/mmbtu' CO (24-hr avg steady lbs/hr lb/hr lb/hr' state) CO (24-hr avg steady state) 0.5 lb/mmbtu lb/mmbtu 1 ' lb/mmbtu" 2 PM lb/hr 0.95 lb/hr (2009 stack test result) PM lb/mmbtu lb/mmbtu (2009 stack test result) SO2 40tpy See Table 4. VOCs lb/hr No emissions data VOCs lb/mmbtu No emissions data Ammonia NH3 20 ppm 3.8 ppm (2009 stack test result) Opacity (steady state) 15 % 6.54 % %' 1 Highest 24-hr value during the year 2 Occurred during startup/shutdown. Exceedance is acceptable as long as the CO lb/hr limit is not violated. Page 5 ofl3

8 Pinetree Power- Tarnworth inspection Date Tamworth Report Date: Compliance with some of the limits in Table 5 is determined by CEM and/or periodic stack emissions tests. In some cases, PPT has reported 24-hour average emissions which exceed the limits in Table 2. Typically, exceedances of lb/mmbtu limits occur during periods when the boiler is in start up mode and boiler oxygen levels are higher than normal. The calculation for lb/mmbtü does not give accurate emissions data in these circumstances, which causes the daily average to be erroneously high. Other exceedances of the 24-hour average emission limit have been reported to DES as permit deviations. Most were due to CEM malfunctions or infrequent boiler upsets. All deviations and appropriate actions have been reviewed and accepted by DES. Env-A 606 -Modeling Air dispersion modeling was conducted at the time of PSD application review and is described in the preliminary BACT determination dated February 14,1990. Compliance with Permit Fee System CHAPTER ENV-A Permit Fee System Env-A Payment of Emission-Based Fee Emission-based fees are due by April 15 of the year following the emissions year. PPT has demonstrated compliance by timely submission of fees. PPT has not reported (orpaidfeesfor) the emissions from the other sign jficant (i.e., cooling tower andfire pump) and insigncant activities for 2004 thru Source Testing and Monitoring CHAPTER ENV-A Testing and Monitoring Procedures Env-A Testing and Monitoring for Stationary Sources PPT last conducted compliance stack emissions testing for hydrogen chloride on May 9, PPT last conducted compliance stack emissions testing for PM, NH3, S02, NOx and CO on May20 and 21, PPT has demonstrated compliance with Permit requiremônts. Part Env-A Continuous Emission Monitoring PPT continuously monitors emissions of NOx, CO, 02, volumetric stack flow rate and opacity. The facility actually has 2 gaseous pollutant CEM systems. The primary CEM is the newer SICK Maihak multi-component monitoring system which was last certified on June 1, PPT also maintains its prior TECO cem system which serves as a backup, if necessary, for either PPT or the similar PP Bethlehem facility in Bethlehem, NH. PPT is using EPA test method 6C for the determination of sulfur dioxide emissions in lieu of the AP-42 emission factors. Page 6 of 13

9 Pinetree Power- Tamworth Inspection Date: Tamworth Report Date: PPT is required to have a minimum data availability of 90% per quarter and 75% per month for its CEM system. PT Tamworth reports this data in its quarterly excess emission reports. Data availability falls within this required range. See the Full Compliance Evaluation Records Review in Appendix A attached to this report for all Relative Accuracy Test Audits ("RATAs"); quarterly Opacity Audits ("OPA5"), Cylinder Gas Audits ("CGAs") and Relative Accuracy Audits ("RAAs"); 7 Day Drift tests ("7DDs"); and quarterly Excess EmissiOn Reports ("EERs") submitted by PPT. IX. Compliance with Recordkeeping and Reporting CHAPTER ENV-A Owner or Operator Recordkeeping and Reporting Obligations Since this is an off-site inspection, PPT's compliance with recordkeeping obligations could not be verified. Env-A General Reporting Requirements PPT submits to DES the reports required by the Permits. The Full Compliance Evaluation Records Review is included in Appendix A to this report. The appendix lists all the reports that were reviewed in order to complete this compliance evaluation. The appendix includes a determination of each report's timeliness with regard to the required submittal date, and if the report was acceptable in terms of its content. PPT is not attaching the "Certification ofaccuracy Statement" as outlined in Section XXLB of the Permit to the stack test report submittals. PPT has not been calculating the emissions from the cooling tower andfire pump or paying the fees associated with those emissions from PPT is not providing the annual NOx emissions statement as required by Table 8, Item 4 of the Permit. Env-A Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Permit Deviations PPT has demonstrated compliance by reporting deviations within 24 hours of discovery, sending detailed reports within 10 days and summarizing the deviations in the Semi-Annual Deviation and Monitoring Reports. So far in 2009 through June, there have been 12 reported deviations: 4- opacity exceedances, 4-startup time exceedances, 3-CEM related problems and 1-CO lb/mmbtu exceedance during startup. In 2008 there were 26 deviations reported: 1 0-opacity exceedances, 8-startup time exceedances, 7-CEM related problems and 1 -ESP related problem. In 2007 there were 17 deviations reported: 3-opacity exceedances, 1-CEM related problem, 4-startup time exceedances, 7-CO lb/mmbtu exceedances during startup, I -NOx exceedance during startup and 1-equipment failure. Page 7 of 13

10 Pinetree Power-Tamworth Inspection Date Tamworth Report Date: Compliance with RACT CHAPTER ENV-A Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Stationary Source Air Pollution Env-A Stationary Sources of VOCs PPT has no devices or processes that are subject to Reasonably Available Control Technology ("RACT") requirements for VOCs. Env-A Nitrogen Oxides Env-A (d) is applicable to EUO 1., but the PSD limit is more stringent. The RACT limit is 0.33 lb/mmbtu, whereas the more stringent PSD Permit limit is lb/mmbtu, averaged over any consecutive 24-hour period and lb/hr averaged over any consecutive 24-hour period. PPT is in compliance with the NOx RACT limit and PSD limit. The emergency generator and fire pump are exempt from NOx RACT provisions as long as the operating hours of each device are limited to 500 operating hours per year and the combined theoretical potential NOx emissions of these devices is less than 25 tons per any consecutive 12- month period. PPTfailed to submit operating hours and NOx emissions for the fire pump, as required by the Permit, therefore, compliance cannot be assessed Compliance with Toxics Regulations CHAPTER ENV-A Regulated Toxic Air Pollutants ("RTAPs") The combustion of virgin fuels is exempt from Env-A PPT uses water additives, including sulfuric acid and sodium hypochiorite, in the cooling tower. Sulfuric acid and sodium hypochiorite are RTAPs. PPT demonstrated compliance with these RTAPs using the de minimis emission method as noted in the Engineering Calculation Sheet dated June 20, 2005 for the Permit. From the usage of urea and ammonia in the SNCR or SCR systems, ammonia emissions (ammonia slip) will occur. Ammonia is an RTAP. PPTdemonstrated compliance with the ammonia ambient air limits using the adjusted in-stack concentration method as noted in the Engineering Calculation Sheet dated February 06, 2008 for the Temporary Permit No. TP-B Compliance with Process/Particulate/Opacity Regulations CHAPTER ENV-A Fuel Burning Devices Env-A Visible Emission Standard for Fuel Burning Devices Installed After May 13, 1970 Page 8 of 0

11 Pinetree Power- Tamworth Inspection Date.' Tamworth Report Date,' The PSD Permit limits the wood boiler to 20% opacity (6-minute average) during startup/shutdown conditions except for one 6-minute average per hour of not more than 27% opacity. The PSD Permit also limits the wood boiler to 15% opacity (6-minute average) during steady state operating conditions except for one 6-minute average per hour of not more than 27% opacity. PPT continuously monitors the opacity on the wood boiler with a continuous opacity monitor and reports exceedances in permit deviations. Pinetree must not exceed 20% opacity for any continuous 6-minute period from the emergency generator and fire pump. The PSD Permit also limits facility-wide fugitive emissions to 5% opacity at any time. This offsite evaluation does not include observations of opacity; however, PPT reports exceedances in permit deviation reports and has certified compliance with the opacity limitation for the emergency generator, fire pump, and facility-wide. The FPT boiler exceeded the opacity limitation 4 times so far in 2009 during start ups. PFT is modifying startup procedures to minimize the occurrences. In 2008, PPT had problems with the opacity monitor, method 9 was used and no exceedances were noted. The monitor has been replaced. There were 3 instances of exceedance reported in Env-A Particulate Emission Standards for Fuel Burning Devices Installed on or After January 1, 1985 The wood boiler (EUO 1) at PPT is required to meet a PM limit of 0.10 lb /MMBtu according to Env-A (c)(3). The New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) for Industrial- Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Subpart Db) requires the wood boiler at PPT to meet a PM limit of 0.10 lb /MMBtu. The PSD permit limit of lb/mmbtu and lb/hr at all times is the most stringent PM emission limitation. PPT conducted a stack test on May 21, 2009 which shows that the PM emissions are less than lb/mmbtu and 0.95 lb/hr. For the wood boiler, PPT is in compliance with the PM emission standards. The emergency generator and fire pump must meet 0.3 lb PM/MMBtu. Compliance can only be determined by stack testing, and no stack testing has been required. Env-A 2100 Particulate Matter and Visible Emission Standards Fugitive emissions from the cooling tower at PPT are limited to 20 percent opacity for any continuous 6-minute period in any 60-minute period. Compliance could not be verified in this off-site records review. XIII. Compliance With Applicable Federal Rules 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db - Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial- Institutional Steam Generating Units. PPT is subject to the requirements of this NSPS, which can also apply to similarly-sized units that burn coal, oil and/or natural gas. Specifically, PPT is subject to the Subpart Db emission limit for PM of 0.1 lb/mmbtu. However, the PSD limit for PM in the Permit is more stringent. In addition, the subpart requires PPT to maintain daily records of the amount of fuel combusted in the boiler, which is also required by Env-A 900. Page 9 of 13

12 Pinetree Power-Tamworth Inspection Date.' Tamworth Report Date.' CFR 64 - Compliance Assurance.Monitoring. Tables 6A and 6B of the Permit stipulate the monitoring and recordkeeping requirements to be met by PPT in order to comply with CAM. Each table lists the parameters (i.e. Indicators) to be monitored, including the acceptable indicator range, QAIQC practices and criteria, monitoring frequency, and data to be recorded for the respective pollution control device. For the ESP, the Secondary Voltage reading is Indicator No. 1, and InspectionlMaintenance of the ESP is Indicator No. 2. For the Multiclone, the Pressure Differential across the device is Indicator No. 1, and InspectionlMaintenance is Indicator No. 2. The data listed in the 2 tables is the minimum deemed necessary to provide reasonable assurance that the emissions limits for PM are being continuously achieved. Enforcement History and Status There are no past or ongoing enforcement actions against PPT. Conclusions & Recommendations DES believes that PPT is in compliance with the requirements stated in the Permit, however, the following deficiencies were identified during the inspection: PPT is not attaching the "Cert?fication ofaccuracy Statement" as outlined in Section XXLB the Title V Permit (TV-OP-018) to the stack test report submittals. PPT should attach the statement to all submittals to DES. of PPT did not calculate the emissions from the cooling tower, fire pump and insignificant activities and did not pay the fees associated with those emissions from PPT should calculate the emissions from the cooling tower,fire pump and insigncant activities for the years 2004 through 2008 and pay the associated fees for those emissions. See Table below for applicable fees per year. Year Ernision.Eee Rate ($/ton) PPTis not providing the annual NOx emission statement as required by Table 8, Item 4of the Title V Permit. PPT should include the required information by April 15 following the year of emissions. Page 10 of 13

13 Pinetree Power-Tamworth Inspection Date: Thinworth Revort Date Appendix A Page 11 ofl3

14 Pinetree Power-Tamworth Inspection Date Tamworth Report Date, Full Compliance Evaluation Records Review Facility: Pinetree Power-Tamworth Date of FCE: September 29, 2009 Reviewer: Greg Helve Annual Emission Renorts (mci. NOx. VOC etc.'): 'RpbriingPeñod. WinRecd' eportk JnDatabase:: /30/2009 Yes Yes /2008 Yes Yes I Annual Emissions-Based Fee Payments: AN/I en/i.ecd :JIáte:: /06/2009 Yes, in DES Emission Section's Spreadsheet / Yes, in DES Emission Section's Spreadsheet TV Annual Comnlianne Certifications: WliëhReTi1 ReortOTK 'in'datbasé 2008 ' 04/15/2009 Yes Yes /14/2008 Yes Yes TV Semi-Annual Permit Deviation and Monitorin2 Renorts: ReportmgPeriod WhenRec'd Report OK 'In Database st 07/30/2009 Yes Yes '' 02/02/2009 Yes Yes st 08/01/2008 Yes Yes nd 01/ Yes Yes st 07/31/2007 Yes Yes Quarterly Continuous Emission Monitoring Excess Emission Renorts (CEM EERs'): ReortffigEéi'io.d VlhenRed':'d n Dataláse id 07/20/2009 Yes Yes 2009 Pt 04/28/2009 Yes Yes /02/2009 Yes Yes d 10/29/2008 Yes Yes /01/2008 Yes Yes st 04/29/2008 Yes Yes th 01/31/2008 Yes Yes rd 10/11/2007 Yes Yes /18/2007 Yes Yes st 04/30/2007 Yes Yes CPM Audits (flpas CGAs RAAS RATAs'): Re)ortin JReportTvpe \VhenRecd L Report OK J.Dätabase enod RATA,OPA,7day,Fuel 07/20/2009 Yes Yes st RATA,OPA,7day,Fuel 04/28/2009 Yes Yes th RATA,OPA,7day,Fuel 02/02/2009 Yes Yes RATA,OPA,7day,FueI 10/29/2008 Yes Yes RATA,OPA,7day,Fuel 08/01/2008 Yes Yes st RATA,OPA,7day,Fuel 04/29/2008 Yes Yes Page 12 of 13

15 Pinetree Power-Tamworth Inspection Date: Tamworth Report Date.' th RATA,OPA,7day,Fuel 01/31/2008 Yes Yes rd RATA,OPA,7day,Fuel 10/11/2007 Yes Yes nd RATA,OPA,7day,Fuel 07/18/2007 Yes Yes st RATA,OPA,7day,Fuel 04/30/2007 Yes Yes C+..-.L, STkTë'st DëVidëTdte1 When Ree d Reort OK Jn Datäbase Date 05/2 1/2009 Wood boiler 07/20/2009 Yes yes 06/06/2008 Wood boiler 08/01/2008 Yes Yes 04/18/2008 Wood boiler 06/06/2008 Yes Yes 06/01/2007 Wood boiler 07/18/2007 Yes Yes Other renorts: Reportrng Period N/R Report Type When Rec d Report OK In Database h,ah,;,-1,1 P,rmt fl ihifn PArtc Reporting Period When Rec d Report OK In Database See Section IX. Of Report Yes Yes Page 13 ofl3