Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power Transmission System Impact Study

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power Transmission System Impact Study"

Transcription

1 Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power Transmission System Impact Study CLPT-G10 80 MW Solar Plant Interconnecting near the South Cheyenne 115 kv Substation Agreement No Laramie County, Wyoming February 12, 2018

2 This page is intentionally left blank.

3 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary Background Definitions Interconnection Customer s Interconnection Facilities Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities Network Upgrades Point of Change of Ownership Point of Interconnection Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities Project Approach Studies to be Performed Assumptions and Modeling Load Assumptions Generation and Intertie Flow Assumptions Study Process HS Dispatch Case Scenarios LS Dispatch Case Scenarios Facility Ratings Shunt Elements Facility Assumptions Monitored Study Area Power Flow Contingencies Transient Stability Contingencies Criteria Methodology Power Flow Analysis Reactive Power Requirement February 12, 2018 i

4 6.3. Transient Stability Analysis Examination of Results Steady State Results Voltage Issues Summer Peak Base Dispatch Thermal Results Summer Peak Stressed Dispatch Thermal Results Light Summer Base Dispatch Thermal Results Light Summer Stressed Dispatch Thermal Results Unsolved Contingencies in Steady State Analysis Reactive Power Requirement Transient Stability Analysis Results Conclusions Interconnection Customer Interconnection Facilities Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities Appendix A: Thermal Results Appendix B: Simulated Contingencies Appendix C: Transient Stability Results Appendix D: Reference Guide for Plots Appendix E: System Diagrams Tables Table 1: Generation for Modeled Cases (MW)... 9 Table 2: Simulated Transient Stability Disturbances Table 3: Outage: TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT Table 4: Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities Table 5: Network Upgrades February 12, 2018 ii

5 1. Executive Summary Black Hills Corporation tasked HDR with analyzing the impact on the Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power (CLFP) transmission system from the interconnection of a PV-solar powered generation facility with a maximum output of 80 MW AC, at a requested Point of Interconnection (POI) near the South Cheyenne 115 kv substation. This study evaluated a valid request from an Interconnection Customer (IC) to provide interconnection service for a proposed generation facility under the guidance of the Cheyenne Light Power Transmission (CLPT) OATT Large Generator Interconnection Procedures (LGIP). This interconnection, CLPT-G10, is located in the CLFP service territory near Cheyenne, WY. The requested commercial operation date is December 31, A 2019 summer peak case and 2019 light summer case were modified to create the 2020 power flow cases used for evaluation. Facility assumptions in the CLFP s 10-Year Transmission Plan were included in this assessment. Figure 1 below shows the CLPT- G10 plant and interconnection details superimposed upon maps of the area. Figure 1: CLPT-G10 Project Layout Relative to the POI February 12,

6 Four alternative cases were created with different dispatch scenarios and evaluated in this analysis. Two scenarios were considered base dispatch and the other two were stressed dispatch. The proposed project was evaluated for impacts assuming Network Resource (NR) interconnection service. The difference in generation assumptions between the scenarios is listed in Table 1. A power flow system intact and N-1 condition analysis was performed on all cases described above. Appendix B lists the set of contingencies that were looked at. The analysis identified thermal overloads with more than 2% distribution factor in the stressed dispatch scenario on non-clfp owned facilities. This included an overload on the Ault Nunn Rockport Owl Creek 115 kv line for the loss of the Archer Ault 230 kv line and the Ault - Terry Ranch 230 kv lines for the light summer stressed scenario. Since this is a third party constraint, the Interconnection Customer must work with the facility owner to identify mitigation measures to eliminate the above listed facility overloads attributed to the proposed generator interconnection. The change in voltage of the area transmission facilities was also monitored. Changes in voltage drops of more than 1% were not encountered in the post-contingent base case voltages verses the post-contingent change case voltages in any scenario. In addition, this analysis included a review of the reactive power requirements to maintain a composite power delivery within a power factor range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging across the entire region of continuous real power output levels at the high side of the generator substation. The results of the reactive power requirement showed that no additional reactors are needed for meeting the 0.95 leading power factor requirements as measured at the 115 kv substation. The results also showed that no additional capacitors are needed to meet the 0.95 lagging power factor requirement as measured at the 115 kv substation. This study included a transient stability analysis. Disturbances listed in Table 2 were simulated with and without the CLPT-G10 project for the 2020 summer peak stressed dispatch and 2020 light summer stressed dispatch scenarios. Parameters plotted for transient stability simulations included rotor angles, bus voltage, and real and reactive power output for a representative set of buses in the study area. No transient stability issues were observed for the proposed project. Detailed results for power flow and stability analyses are included in Section 7. The proposed CLPT-G10 generation project can be accommodated as a Network Resource contingent on completion of the interconnection facilities at an estimated cost of $1,139,535. The lead time for implementing the required upgrades is months. Detailed cost estimates are in Section 8. The associated cost of these upgrades will be the Interconnection Customer s responsibility. February 12,

7 2. Background The CLPT-G10 interconnection represents a new PV-solar generator with a maximum output of 80 MW AC at a POI near the South Cheyenne 115 kv substation. CLPT-G10 is requesting Network Resource (NR) status. 3. Definitions This section includes definitions from the Transmission Provider s Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) and pertains to terms used in this report Interconnection Customer s Interconnection Facilities Interconnection Customer s Interconnection Facilities shall mean all facilities and equipment, as identified in Appendix A of the Standard Large Generator Interconnection Agreement, that are located between the Generating Facility and the Point of Change of Ownership, including any modification, addition, or upgrades to such facilities and equipment necessary to physically and electrically interconnect the Generating Facility to the Transmission Provider s Transmission System. Interconnection Customer s Interconnection Facilities are sole use facilities Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities shall mean all facilities and equipment owned, controlled, or operated by the Transmission Provider from the Point of Change of Ownership to the Point of Interconnection as identified in Appendix A to the Standard Large Generator Interconnection Agreement, including any modifications, additions, or upgrades to such facilities and equipment. Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities are sole use facilities Network Upgrades Network Upgrades shall mean the additions, modifications, and upgrades to the Transmission Provider s Transmission System required at or beyond the point at which the Interconnection Facilities connect to the Transmission Provider s Transmission System to accommodate the interconnection of the Large Generating Facility to the Transmission Provider s Transmission System Point of Change of Ownership Point of Change of Ownership shall mean the point, as set forth in Appendix A to the Standard Large Generator Interconnection Agreement, where the Interconnection Customer s Interconnection Facilities connect to the Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities. February 12,

8 3.5. Point of Interconnection Point of Interconnection shall mean the point, as set forth in Appendix A to the Standard Large Generator Interconnection Agreement, where the Interconnection Facilities connect to the Transmission Provider s Transmission System Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities shall mean all facilities and equipment owned, controlled, or operated by the Transmission Provider from the Point of Change of Ownership to the Point of Interconnection as identified in Appendix A to the Standard Large Generator Interconnection Agreement, including any modifications, additions, or upgrades to such facilities and equipment. Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities are sole use facilities and shall not include Distribution Upgrades, Stand Alone Network Upgrades, or Network Upgrades. 4. Project Approach 4.1. Studies to be Performed The analysis performed to evaluate the proposed project included: Power Flow Analysis (Category P0, P1, P4, P6, and P7 as defined in NERC Standard TPL-001-4). o As part of the power flow analysis, verification that reactive power requirements are met. Transient stability analysis (Category P0, P1, P4, P6, and P7 as defined in NERC Standard TPL-001-4) Assumptions and Modeling The study timeframe for the CLPT-G10 interconnection in the Black Hills service territory is the summer of The 2019 summer peak case and the 2019 light summer case were used as the starting cases for the summer evaluation, and were each modified to reflect a stressed scenario that were considered for this study. Requested Project Assumptions The scope of work prepared by Black Hills Corporation provided the following project assumptions: The 80 MW solar facility will consist of 76 individual inverter step-up stations rated at MW (1.32 MVA) each with a total plant power factor of 0.80 lead/lag. The facility was set to regulate the 115 kv voltage at the collector substation to 1.01 per unit. February 12,

9 3 mile radial 115 kv interconnection transmission line consisting of 795 ACSR (DRAKE) overhead conductor, rated at 199 MVA between the solar facilities and the POI was assumed. The station transformer high side voltage was set to kv. Dynamic analysis was performed using solar inverter models GEPVG and GEPVE as provided by the customer to represent CLPT-G Load Assumptions The CLFP system load for 2020 study scenarios will be scaled to 2020 peak summer levels and 2020 light summer levels Generation and Intertie Flow Assumptions Generation in the base cases was dispatched using a typical value for the area generators. Refer to Table 1 below for specific generation dispatch levels for each power flow model Study Process Power flow simulations were performed with a base case that had CLPT-G10 in the model, but not in-service. Comparisons were made by turning CLPT-G10 on, and dispatching the 80 MW as a NR against the Wygen generators. Reactive Power Requirement analysis was performed with CLPT-G10 at 100% output (80 MW) and at 20% of output (16 MW). The 16 MW as NR was also dispatched against the Wygen generators HS Dispatch Case Scenarios Figure 2 shows the 2020 heavy summer dispatch scenario comparisons that were evaluated. Wygen units 2 and 3 were reduced to offset the addition of CLPT-G10 as either 20 MW NR or an 80 MW NR. DC ties and other regional dispatch scenarios can influence the results of the analysis. A dispatch scenario was created that reduced TOT3 (as defined in the 2016 WECC Path Rating Catalogue) to 852 MW (N S). For specific changes to dispatch, refer to Table 1. TOT3 was not maintained at 852 after the addition of CLPT-G10. February 12,

10 2020HS Case Base D ispatch Without CLPT Interconnection With CLPT Interconnection Network Resource Unstressed TOT3 Stressed TOT3 B3 Scenario Figure 2: 2020HS Base Dispatch Scenarios LS Dispatch Case Scenarios Figure 3 shows the 2020 light summer dispatch scenario comparisons that were evaluated. Wygen units 1 and 2 were reduced to offset the addition of CLPT-G10 as either 20 MW NR or an 80 MW NR. DC ties and other regional dispatch scenarios can influence the results of the analysis. A dispatch scenario was created that increased TOT3 to 1658 MW (N S). For specific changes to dispatch, refer to Table 1. TOT3 was not maintained at 1658 after the addition of CLPT-G LS Case Base D ispatch Without CLPT Interconnection With CLPT Interconnection Network Resource Unstressed TOT3 Stressed TOT3 A1 Scenario Figure 3: 2020LS Dispatch Case Scenarios February 12,

11 Table 1 provides specific generation dispatch levels of notable generators in Black Hills region for each power flow case used for this study. Table 1: Generation for Modeled Cases (MW) 2020 LS w/ G10 as NR with Stressed TOT LS w/o G10 as NR with Stressed TOT LS w/ G10 as NR 2020 LS w/o G10 as NR 2020 HS w/ G10 as NR with Stressed TOT HS w/o G10 as NR with Stressed TOT HS w/ CLPT-G HS w/o CLPT-G10 CLPT-G CPGS Block CPGS Block CPGS Block Wygen Wygen # Wygen # CLPT-G CLPT-G CLPT-G Happy Jack Silver Sage Glen Rock Seven Mile Hi Plane Threb Top of the World Comanche Comanche # Comanche # Comanche PV LRS Unit LRS Unit # Dave Johnston Unit Dave Johnston Unit # Dave Johnston Unit # Dave Johnston Unit # February 12,

12 2020 LS w/ G10 as NR with Stressed TOT LS w/o G10 as NR with Stressed TOT LS w/ G10 as NR 2020 LS w/o G10 as NR 2020 HS w/ G10 as NR with Stressed TOT HS w/o G10 as NR with Stressed TOT HS w/ CLPT-G HS w/o CLPT-G10 CPP (Brush) Rawhide Rawhide solar DNLP Pawnee Manchief RMEC Craig Hayden Spring Canyon Wind Ridgecrest Wind Peetz-Logan Wind St. Vrain Unit St. Vrain Unit # St. Vrain Unit # St. Vrain Unit # St. Vrain Unit # St. Vrain Unit # Rapid City DC tie Stegall DC tie Sidney DC tie TOT3 Flow (N-S) Facility Ratings Continuous and short-term facility ratings were observed as requested by the affected transmission owners throughout the analysis. BHCE observes Rate A for all events, with the exception of transformers, which have a 30-min rating of 125% of the continuous rating following contingencies. Delta Voltage changes of less than 1% from base model to CLPT-G10 model were neglected. Distribution factors (DF) of less than 2% of CLPT- G10 output on any given branch were also neglected. February 12,

13 4.7. Shunt Elements All in-service and planned switched shunt elements were modeled in the case. Shunt devices that are automatically switched were modeled as such and allowed to operate following contingencies. All manually switched shunt devices were allowed to switch prior to a disturbance and fixed at that pre-disturbance level following contingencies Facility Assumptions The following project assumptions in CLFP 10-Year Transmission Plan were applied to the 2020 scenario assessment: King Ranch 115 kv substation is in-service. Corlett 115 kv substation upgrades are completed. CLPT-G7 was modeled online at 102 MW. CLPT-G8 was modeled online at 150 MW. CLPT-G9 was modeled online at 75 MW. King Ranch West Cheyenne Swan Ranch South Cheyenne 115 kv line was modeled as reconductored to 1103 ACCC as required for CLPT-G8. TSGT s Wayne Child project was not modeled. CLPT-G6 was not modeled Monitored Study Area The subsystem of interest for the analyses consisted of all 115 kv and above buses in an area bound by Miracle Mile to the west, Dave Johnston to the north, Sidney to the east, and Ault to the south. All TOT3 elements were monitored. A file including these buses was provided by Black Hills Engineering Power Flow Contingencies The NERC Standard TPL Category P0, P1, P4, P6, and P7 events to be simulated, as part of the power flow analysis, were provided by Black Hills Engineering: Category P0 is system intact, so no files were required, and Category P1, P4, P6, and P7 events were defined and provided in a file. The contingencies are listed in Appendix B: Simulated Contingencies Transient Stability Contingencies The events that were simulated as part of the transient stability analysis are listed in Table 2. If the simulation of a 3-phase disturbance results in performance that does not meet performance criteria, the appropriate single line-to-ground (SLG) disturbance will be simulated to verify acceptable performance per TPL-001-WECC-CRT-3 and NERC TPL February 12,

14 5. Criteria The "NERC TPL" Standards criteria regarding loss of load and system instability were observed in all cases. Additionally, the criteria specified in the System Performance TPL-001- WECC-CRT-3 WECC Criterion were observed. The minimum first-swing voltage for transient stability simulations in the study area is 0.70 per unit. The P1 contingency voltage deviation limit is 8%. Relative steady state voltage change was limited to 3% of the nominal voltage for system intact conditions, and was limited to 5% under outage conditions. The relative steady state voltage change is the difference in voltage before and after an event, such as capacitor switching, load switching, transmission line tripping, or large motor starting. The steady-state voltages at all applicable Bulk Electric System (BES) buses shall stay within each of the following limits: 95 percent to 105 percent of nominal for P0 events. 90 percent to 110 percent of nominal for P1-P7 events. For determination of the effect CLPT-G10 will have on voltage change (delta V), only degradation of the delta V was listed as a violation. For example, the delta V in some base case simulations was greater than 5%; so no remedy would be called out in the case of delta V being less than 7% in the base case and less than 6% in the change case. In this analysis, and for this example contingency, only a delta V greater than 7% with CLPT-G10 would be considered as a violation. The CLPT-G10 is required to maintain a composite reactive delivery at continuous rated power output at the generator substation high side at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, across the range of near 0% to 100% of facility MW rating, with the magnitude of reactive power calculated on the basis of nominal POI voltage (1.0. p.u.). The design shall consider the effects of the step-up transformer reactance and voltage taps/turns ratios, and bus-fed auxiliary load. The disturbances that were evaluated in the transient stability analysis are listed on Table 2. The transient stability simulations were run to 15 seconds to ensure a sufficient damping response. All events assumed a 3-phase fault with normal clearing. In the event that acceptable performance was not achieved, the reduced impedance SLG fault would be applied as required in TPL Methodology 6.1. Power Flow Analysis Examination of Table 1 above details how the area generation was dispatched for each case. All the cases were subjected to outages as defined in the contingency file. The results were compared between the base cases and the post project cases where CLPT- G10 was in-service for analysis. The results of the steady state analysis are described in Section 7. February 12,

15 6.2. Reactive Power Requirement Proposed projects requesting interconnection are required to maintain a composite reactive delivery at continuous rated power output at the generator substation high side at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging. This must be across the range of near 0% to 100% of facility MW rating, with the magnitude of reactive power calculated on the basis of nominal POI voltage (1.0 p.u.). The project design will consider the effects of step-up transformer reactance and voltage taps/turn ratios, and bus-fed auxiliary load. To analyze this requirement, CLPT-G10 s output was set to ensure to maximum capacity limit of CLPT-G10 to produce reactive power (Qmax) onto the system would be reached. Any corresponding deficiency in VAR flow from the 115 kv substation toward the solar plant would be augmented with a capacitor on CLPT-G kv substation to meet the 0.95 lagging power factor requirement. This analysis was performed with CLPT-G10 at an output of 20% (16 MW) and at an output of 100% (80 MW). In a similar fashion, CLPT-G10 was analyzed at a range of output for CLPT-G10 to absorb reactive power (Qmin). Any corresponding deficiency in VAR flow from the 115 kv substation toward the solar plant would be augmented with a reactor on CLPT-G kv substation to meet the 0.95 leading power factor requirement. This analysis was performed with CLPT-G10 at an output of 20% (16 MW) and at an output of 100% (80 MW). The reactive capabilities for the proposed project was modeled in the power flow cases assuming 0.8 leading and 0.8 lagging power factor based on the information provided by the Interconnection Customer. The results of reactive power analysis are examined in Section Transient Stability Analysis Transient stability is the ability of generators to remain in synchronism with one another by surviving the first swing of a disturbance such as a 3-phase fault or SLG fault. Transient stability also simulates the ability of the power system to return to a steadystate equilibrium under small signal or large signal transient disturbances. The purpose of this report is to present the results of the stability analysis performed to evaluate the impact of the proposed CLPT-G10 project on Black Hill s transmission system dynamic performance. The following stability modeling changes were applied to the original dynamic model: Due to the proximity of Happy Jack wind farm and Silver Sage wind farm to CLPT- G10, as shown via system diagrams in Appendix E, these units were added to the snap shot as generic type 2 wind turbines. Add CLPT-G7 dynamic model to the snapshot due to its proximity to CLPT-G10. Add CLPT-G8 dynamic model to the snapshot due to its proximity to CLPT-G10. February 12,

16 Add CLPT-G9 dynamic model to the snapshot due to its proximity to CLPT-G10. Turn off out of step relay models for offline transmission lines. Turn off Belle Creek DVAR model per Black Hills Engineers recommendation because it was deemed far enough away from the project area to not affect the results. The disturbances to be evaluated in the transient stability analysis are identified in Table 2. These disturbances were simulated out to 15 seconds to ensure a sufficient damping response from the system. All events, unless specifically identified, assumed a 3-phase fault with normal clearing. In the event that acceptable performance was not achieved, the reduced impedance SLG fault would be applied as required in NERC Reliability Standard TPL Parameters to be plotted for transient stability simulations included rotor angles, bus voltages, real and reactive output for a representative set of buses in the study area. The list of parameters that were explicitly plotted for this analysis are in Appendix D. The transient stability results are examined in Section 7.2. Table 2: Simulated Transient Stability Disturbances Disturbance Description 3Ф Faulted Bus Cleared Element Fault Duration (cy) System Intact None None NA Archer-Cheyenne 115 Archer 115 CPGS-Archer 115 CPGS 115 CPGS-Archer 115 1&2 CPGS 115 CPGS-East Business Park 115 CPGS 115 Happy Jack-Cheyenne 115 Happy Jack 115 Happy Jack-Happy Jack Wind 115 Happy Jack 115 Happy Jack-North Range 115 Happy Jack 115 HJK-NRG 115 PO + SCH 230/115 XFMR South Cheyenne 115 Archer-Cheyenne 115 kv line CPGS-Archer 115 kv line CPGS-Archer + CPGS- EBP 115 kv lines CPGS-East Business Park 115 kv line Happy Jack-Cheyenne 115 kv line Happy Jack-Happy Jack Wind 115 kv line Happy Jack-NCAR 115 kv line South Cheyenne 230/115 kv XFMR South Cheyenne-Swan Ranch 115 South Cheyenne 115 South Cheyenne-Swan Ranch 115 kv line 5 SCH-COR 115 PO + SCH-SWR 115 South Cheyenne 115 South Cheyenne-Swan Ranch 115 kv line 5 South Cheyenne-Corlett-North Range 115 South Cheyenne 115 South Cheyenne-Corlett- North Range 115kV line 5 Archer-Ault 230 Archer 230 Archer-Ault 230 kv line 5 Archer-Terry Ranch 230 Archer 230 ACH-TR 230 PO + ARH 230/115 XFMR Archer 230 Archer-Terry Ranch 230 kv line Archer 230/115 kv XFMR 5 5 February 12,

17 Disturbance Description 3Ф Faulted Bus Cleared Element Fault Duration (cy) ACH-TR 230 PO + ARH-CHY 115 Line Archer 230 ACH-TR 230 PO + ARH-CPGS 115 Line Archer 230 Archer-Stegall 230 Archer 230 Cheyenne-Terry Ranch 230 Cheyenne 230 Cheyenne-Snowy Range 230 Cheyenne 230 Archer-Cheyenne 115 kv line Archer-CPGS 115 kv line Archer-Stegall 230 kv line Cheyenne-Terry Ranch 230 kv line Cheyenne-Snowy Range 230 kv line Snowy Range-Miracle Mile 230 Snowy Range 230 Snowy Range-Miracle Mile 230 kv line 5 Terry Ranch-Ault 230 Terry Ranch 230 Terry Ranch-North Park 230 Terry Ranch 230 Laramie River Station-Ault 345 Laramie River Stn. 345 Archer-Wayne Child 230 Archer 230 Terry Ranch-Ault 230 kv line Terry Ranch-North Park 230 kv line Laramie River Station- Ault 345 kv line Archer-W. Child 230 kv line LRS-Keota 345 (No WC PH2) LRS LRS-Keota 345 kv 4 Cheyenne 230/115 XFMR Cheyenne 230 Archer 230/115 XFMR Archer 230 Cheyenne 230/115 XFMR Archer 230/115 XFMR Examination of Results 7.1. Steady State Results Voltage Issues No pre- or post-contingent voltage impacts with a change in voltage between the base case and change case was greater than 1% were found in any scenario Summer Peak Base Dispatch Thermal Results There were no thermal loading issues identified for system intact and N-1 conditions in this scenario Summer Peak Stressed Dispatch Thermal Results There were no thermal loading issues identified for system intact and N-1 conditions in this scenario. System diagrams of system intact conditions with CLPT-G10 offline and online can be found in Appendix E for this scenario. February 12,

18 Light Summer Base Dispatch Thermal Results There were no thermal loading issues identified for system intact and N-1 conditions in this scenario Light Summer Stressed Dispatch Thermal Results There were no system intact thermal loading issues identified in this scenario. An overload was identified on the Ault Nunn - Rockport Owl Creek 115 kv line for the outage of the Archer Ault Terry Ranch 230 kv line as shown in Table 3. This is a non-clpf owned line, the Interconnection Customer must work with the facility owner in order to identify mitigation measures to eliminate the facility overloads. System diagrams of system intact conditions with CLPT-G10 offline and online can be found in Appendix E for this scenario. Table 3: Outage: TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 1 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [TERRY_RANCH ] CKT 1 TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT Case Rating Post Contingent Loading Base Load Pre CLPT- G10 Change Load Post CLPT- G10 Nunn - Ault 115 kv ckt LS 1658TOTs NR Nunn - Rockport 115 kv ckt LS 1658TOTs NR Rockport - Owl Creek 115 kv ckt LS 1658TOTs NR More complete tables, showing facility loadings above 80% for the base dispatch scenarios and stressed dispatch scenarios, are provided in Appendix A Unsolved Contingencies in Steady State Analysis There were no unsolved contingencies identified in the steady state analysis Reactive Power Requirement Based on data supplied by the Transmission Owner, Black Hills, and the results of this analysis, the proposed project does not need supplemental reactive voltage support equipment to meet these requirements. The results showed that CLPT-G10 could meet the 0.95 leading power factor requirement as measured at the 115 kv substation at both an output of 20% (16 MW) and at an output of 100% (80 MW). CLPT-G10 was also able to meet the 0.95 lagging power factor requirement as measured at the 115 kv substation at both an output of 20% (16 MW) and at an output of 100% (80 MW). If the Transmission Provider requires additional reactive power support or voltage regulation to mitigate known system weaknesses, the Transmission Provider will February 12,

19 negotiate with the generator owner for any additional capability beyond the minimum requirements stated above Transient Stability Analysis Results Disturbances listed in Table 2 were simulated out to 15 seconds with and without the CLPT-G10 project for the 2020 summer peak stressed dispatch scenario and 2020 light summer stressed dispatch scenario. Transient Stability Analysis was not performed on the base dispatch scenarios. Parameters that were plotted for transient stability simulations included rotor angles, bus voltage, and real and reactive power output for a representative set of buses in the study area. The list of parameters that were explicitly plotted for this analysis are identified in Appendix D. No transient stability issues were observed due to the proposed project. Detailed results are listed in Appendix C of the report. 8. Conclusions The CLPT-G10 solar project can be operated at the requested additional capacity of 80 MW as a Network Resource contingent upon the following. There were no identified voltage violations as a result of the proposed project interconnection in any of the scenarios studied. In the 2020 light summer stressed dispatch scenario, an overload was identified on the Ault Nunn - Rockport Owl Creek 115 kv line. Since this is a non-clfp owned facility, the Interconnection Customer must work with the facility owner in order to identify mitigation measures to eliminate the overloads attributed to the proposed generator interconnection. The results of the reactive power requirement showed that no additional reactors are needed for meeting the 0.95 leading power factor requirements as measured at the 115 kv substation. The results also showed that no additional capacitors are needed for meeting the 0.95 lagging power factor requirement as measured at the 115 kv substation. No transient stability issues were observed due to the proposed project Interconnection Customer Interconnection Facilities The IC Generation Facility collector substation shall be designed to include one 115 kv breakered line position to accommodate the generator tie line between the collector substation and the South Cheyenne 115 kv substation designated as the POI. The generation tie line was assumed to be 3 miles long and constructed using 795 ACSR Drake conductor on single circuit structures for this study. These facilities are the responsibility of the IC, and no additional facilities are specified here. February 12,

20 8.2. Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities Transmission Provider Interconnection Facility costs apply to facilities and equipment required by the TP and owned and operated by the TP. This equipment is typically located between the Point of Change of Ownership and the Point of Interconnection. The costs for these facilities are paid by Customer. Table 4: Transmission Provider s Interconnection Facilities Facility Upgrade Description Cost Estimate South Cheyenne 115 kv substation terminal New equipment includes 1 disconnect switch, 1 dead end, 3 primary metering instrument transformers and associated metering, site work, miscellaneous structural steel & cable trenching, etc. Implementation Timeframe $736, months South Cheyenne 115 kv substation New phasor data concentrator $60, months Total: $796, months 8.3. Network Upgrades Network Upgrades shall mean the additions, modifications, and upgrades to the Transmission Provider s Transmission System required at or beyond the point at which the Interconnection Facilities connect to the Transmission Provider s Transmission System to accommodate the interconnection of the Generating Facility to the Transmission Provider s Transmission System. Black Hills would design and construct one (1) 115 kv, 2000 Amp transmission line terminal addition onto the existing South Cheyenne substation 115 kv bus. This terminal addition would be added onto the south end of the existing substation 115 kv bus arrangement, orientated in the same layout and direction as the existing transmission line terminals. The 115 kv terminal addition would include 2 substation breakers, 4 group operated disconnect switches, transmission line A-frame takeoff structure, equipment support structures, terminal lightning arresters, overhead shielding, bus work, revenue-grade metering, and terminal control & protection systems. Necessary modifications to the substation common equipment, cable trench, grounding system, and yard finish are included. February 12,

21 Table 5: Network Upgrades Facility Upgrade Description Cost Estimate Implementation Timeframe South Cheyenne 115 kv substation Additional bay consists of kv circuit breakers, 4 disconnect switches, miscellaneous structural steel & cable $1,249, months trenching, etc. 1 Total: $1,249, Months Note: It was assumed that network upgrades associated with prior queued requests were in place for this analysis. In the event that those prior queued requests are not constructed, additional network upgrades are needed to accommodate this request. 1 All upgrade costs related to civil work and transmission line relocations are not included for and remain to be determined pending the customers civil work analysis. February 12,

22 Appendix A: Thermal Results Facilities with a loading above 80% and with distribution factor over 2% are listed below. There were no voltage violations G7WNDHI G7WNDMID WD CH-HJ+CH-SNOWY DBLCKT 2.39% 88.84% G7WNDHI G7WNDMID WD GEMCTYTP SNOWYRNG % 87.86% G7WNDHI G7WNDMID WD CHEY-TR+CHEY-OWL DBLCKT 2.06% 87.65% G7WNDHI G7WNDMID WD G7WNDHI G7WNDMID WD WARRENLM NORTHRNG CHEYENNE HAPPYJCK CHEYENNE TERRY_RANCH CHEY_S CORLETT CHEYENNE HAPPYJCK WARRENLM NTHRNGE % 87.32% 2.05% 86.86% 15.91% 85.74% 29.06% 84.31% 2020HS Base Case Compared to Change Case with CLPT-G10 in-service at 80 MW dispatched as NR. No Change to TOT3. CLPT-G10 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- 80 MW Project Contingency G10 G10 MVA Loading MVA Loading Distribution Factor Loading % 2020HS Base Case Compared to Change Case with CLPT-G10 in-service at 80 MW dispatched as NR. TOT3 at 852 MW (N S) CLPT-G10 Without With CLPT- CLPT- 80 MW Project Facility Rating G10 G10 Contingency MVA Loading MVA Loading WARRENLM NORTHRNG CHEYENNE HAPPYJCK CHEYENNE HAPPYJCK WARRENLM NTHRNGE Distribution Factor Loading % 15.95% 90.29% 29.30% 89.07% February 12,

23 2020LS Base Case Compared to Change Case with CLPT-G10 in-service at 80 MW dispatched as NR. No Change to TOT3. Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor CHEYENNE HAPPYJCK SCHEY-LGIRG7 115 DBLCKT 63.71% 89.91% W.CHEY KINGRNCH CHEY_S SWANRNCH Loading % 97.05% 89.33% W.CHEY KINGRNCH SCHEY-LGIRG7 115 DBLCKT 97.00% 89.21% G7WNDHI G7WNDMID WD TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT 2.60% 86.83% G7WNDHI G7WNDMID WD CHEYENNE HAPPYJCK % 86.06% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI G7_GEN G % 85.40% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI LGIR-G CHEY_W % 85.25% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI LGIR-G % 85.25% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI SNOWYRNG SNOWYRNG SNG_LV B #2 HAPPYJCK HJWIND SSWIND HJWIND % 85.22% 98.23% 85.20% 98.23% 85.19% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI SS_GEN % 85.19% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CLR_ % 85.18% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI G HJWIND % 85.18% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI WELD_PS WELD LM GEMCTYTP SPRINGCK ALCOVA FREMONT COBBLKTP COBBLAKE ROUNDTOP SENTINEL LARAMIE SNOWYRNG SEMINOE SMNOE WINDSOR WINDSORT % 85.18% 98.22% 85.17% 98.22% 85.17% 98.22% 85.17% 98.22% 85.17% 98.21% 85.17% 98.22% 85.17% 98.22% 85.17% February 12,

24 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AULT WELD LM % 85.17% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AULT WELD LM # % 85.17% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI FLATIRON POLEHILL DIXON CK HRSTHTAP Loading % 98.22% 85.17% 98.22% 85.17% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI FREMONT % 85.17% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI FREMONT % 85.17% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI FREMONT FREMONT FREMONT FREMONT BERTHOUD LONTRETP WELD LM WHITNEY % 85.17% 98.22% 85.17% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI BOYD LONTRETP W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI HARVARD LNGMNTNW LYONS DOWE FLATS W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI SEMINOE W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI SMNOE W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI SMNOE W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI SEMINOE SEMINOE HARMONY TIMBERLN RICHARDS WAVER PV DEL CTAP LONGPEAK STEGALL LINGLETP DOWE FLATS ROCKMTCM ALCOVA ALCOVA February 12,

25 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ALCOVA W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI LYMANTP WHTROCK KORTES KORTES KORTES KORTES KORTES KORTES Loading % W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI KORTES W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI KORTES W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI KORTES W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI HORSESHO LOVE W FLATIRON HRSTHTAP BERTHOUD LONETREE DAVEJOHN DAVEJTPN W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ALCOVA W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ALCOVA ALCOVA HRSTHTAP TRILBY W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI GLENDO W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI DAVEJOHN BIXBY DAVEJTPN WAGHN NT BIXBY DAVEJTPS W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI GLENDO W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI STEGALL LYMANTP GLENDO GLENDO W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI GLENDO GLENDO February 12,

26 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI SLATERTS DEL CTAP GLENDO WAGHN ST DAVEJTPS WAGHN ST GLENDO WHTROCK LOVE W LOVEWTAP SLATERTS DELCAMIN GLENDO WAGHN NT CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor Loading % CPGSTN_1 CPGSTN_2 GUERNTAP WHTROCK MYERS MYERS TP GLENDO GUERNTAP HYGIENE LNGMNTNW LINGLE LINGLETP LINGLETP WHTROCK HYGIENE LYONS CASPERLM DAVEJTPN DELCAMIN RINNVALL DRAKE RD TIMBERLN LONGPEAK CNTYLINE DEL CTAP MEADOW February 12,

27 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading SPRINGCK FTSANDER TIMNATH RICHRDTP TERRY CNTYLINE MIRACLEM MIRACLEM MM_LV A MIRACLEM MIRACLEM MM_LV B #2 DAVEJTPS REFNRYTP CASPERPP REFNRYTP LAR.RIVR LAR.RIVR TIMNATH BOXELDER LNGMNTNW GLDNPNDS DERBYHIL DERBHILT LONGPEAK LONGPEAK LONGPEAK LONGPEAK #2 WHEATLND LAR.RIVR ALCOVA MIRACLEM ALCOVA MIRACLEM #2 HRSTHTAP MASONVIL DIXON CK POUDRE CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor Loading % KELIM AIRPORT WINDSOR AULT KORTESTP SEMINOE LINDEN RICHARDS February 12,

28 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor BOYD LOVE E CARR DRA BARBERCK Loading % TERRY ERIE SW MED BOW MEDBOWTP MARYLKSB MARYLKTP RAWHIDEC RAWHIDE #UC LAR.RIVR LAR.RIVR LAR.RIVR LAR.RIVR #2 MARYLKSB MARYLKSB BASE CASE ESTES MARYLKSB ESTES MARYLKTP TERRY GLDNPNDS MEDBOWHS MEDBOWTP PUMPKIN BARBERCK RAWHIDEA RAWHIDE #UA RAWHIDEF RAWHIDE #UF RAWHIDED RAWHIDE #UD RAWHIDEB RAWHIDE #UB BOYD DERBHILT KODAK WHITNEY KODAK WHITNEY #2 February 12,

29 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading BRACEWLL WHITNEY BRACEWLL WHITNEY #2 HORSESHO HORSESHO HORSESHO HORSESHO #2 BRIGHTNW ERIE SW BELLEVUE BELLVUTP BELLVUTP RIPPLE VALLEYLM DERBHILT RINNVALL DACONO TIMBERLN TIMBERLN #3 BRIGHTNW SANDCRK WELD LM BOOMERNG EMIGRNT EMI TAP CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor Loading % BOYD VALLEYLM LAPORTE BELLVUTP DIXON CK DRAKE RD LNGMNTNW MEADOW KORTES MIRACLEM CASPERPP CASPER_TP GUERNSY GUERNSY GUERNTAP GUERNRRL February 12,

30 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading WINDSORT WHITNEY ROGERSRD GLDNPNDS FORDHAM ROGERSRD KORTES KORTESTP FORDHAM FORDHAM #2 FORDHAM FORDHAM ARCHER WAYNECHILD CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor Loading % BOYD BOYD WINDSTAR PUMPKIN ESTES POLEHILL TEKLA PUMPKIN BOYD BOYD #2 LIMESTON LIMESTON GUERNTAP LIMESTON MCKENZIE MARYLKSB WHTROCK WHTROCK NTHRNGE CORLETT SNOWYRNG SNOWYRNG SNG_LV A MAY OASISTAP DIXON CK DIXON CK DIXON CK DIXON CK #2 SEMINOE SEMINOTP February 12,

31 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading MARYLKPP MARYLKTP MARYLKPP MARYLKPP MIRACLEM SEMINOTP W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI FORDHAM TERRY W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI GLENDO PODOLAK W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI KORTESTP MIRACLEM W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI JACKLOPE WARMSPGS W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI WARMSPGS EMI TAP W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI POLE CK QUALLS W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI OASISTAP MEDBOWTP W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI WELD LM WELD LM W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI WAGNHNDS WAGHN NT W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI WAGNHNDS EMI TAP CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor Loading % 98.24% 85.16% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI FLATIRN W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI MIRACLEM MEDBOWTP LOVE E CROSSRDS TIMBERLN TIMBERLN # W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ESTES ESTES W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ESTES ESTES W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ESTES ESTES W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI HORSESHO CROSSRDS POLEHILL POLEHILL February 12,

32 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI POLEHILL W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI DACONO ERIE SW ALCOVA CASPERLM ALCOVA CASPERLM #2 LYMAN LYMANTP WELD_PS WELD LM LYONS WAGONWHL BOYD LONGPEAK ESTES WAGONWHL Loading % W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ARCH-CHEY N&S % 85.16% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI LOVEWTAP VALLEYLM AIRPORT WINDSORT W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AULT AULT # W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI BOYD PORTNER W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI POUDRE RICHRDTP DIXON CK COLLEGLK LINDEN TIMBERLN LAPORTE TIMBERLN W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AULT AULT W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CHEYENNE CROWCRK LAPORTE RAWHIDE W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI FLATIRN February 12,

33 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI FLATIRN W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI BLKHLWTP AULT W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CARTERLK LOVEWTAP LAPORTE COLLEGLK HARMONY PORTNER BLKHLWTP COBBLKTP FLATIRON FLATIRN ST.VRAIN LONGPEAK Loading % 98.22% 85.15% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AULT AULT # % 85.15% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CARTERLK FLATIRON LAR.RIVR MBPP FLATIRON FLATIRN LAPORTE RAWHIDE #2 ALCOVA RADERVIL CASPER_TP CASPERLM % 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AULT AULT % 85.15% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI MBPP % 85.15% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AIRPORT BOYD % 85.15% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ARCHER CHEYENNE RAWHIDE TIMBERLN DIXON CK HORSESHO ARCHER CROWCRK % 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% February 12,

34 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI PONNEQUI OWL_CRK W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI POLE CK ROUNDTOP W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI COBBLKTP TIMNATH W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ARCHER ARCHER ARH_LVB # W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CHEY_S CORLETT W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ST.VRAIN FORDHAM W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ARCHER PINEBLUF W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CHEYENNE CHEYENNE CH 13.8B # W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CHEYENNE CHEYENNE CH 13.8A W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CHEYENNE PONNEQUI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI LARAMIE OASISTAP CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor Loading % 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.23% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AULT RAWHIDE % 85.15% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ARCHER TERRY_RANCH GEMCTYTP SNOWYRNG WARRENLM NTHRNGE BUSHNLTP PINEBLUF ARCHER MYERS TP LAR.RIVR STEGALL ARCHER ARCHER ARH 13.8A LAGRANGE ROUNDTOP MYERS TP POLE CK % 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.20% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.23% 85.15% 98.22% 85.15% 98.22% 85.14% 98.22% 85.14% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI DAVEJOHN LAR.RIVR % 85.14% February 12,

35 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor Loading % W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI KEOTA STORY % 85.14% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI LAGRANGE STEGALL LAR.RIVR MBPP % 85.14% 98.23% 85.14% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI MBPP % 85.14% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI NUNN AULT % 85.13% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI NUNN ROCKPRTP ROCKPRTP OWL_CRK CPGSTN EB PARK CHEY_S TERRY_RANCH CHEYENNE SNOWYRNG TERRY_RANCH NORTH PARK CHEY_S SWANRNCH CHEYENNE TERRY_RANCH ARCHER STEGALL ARCHER CPGSTN % 85.13% 98.22% 85.13% 98.22% 85.13% 98.22% 85.13% 98.24% 85.13% 98.23% 85.13% 98.22% 85.13% 98.23% 85.13% 98.23% 85.12% 98.23% 85.12% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI ARCHER AULT % 85.12% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CHEY-TR+CHEY-OWL DBLCKT 98.22% 85.11% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AULT CRAIG % 85.11% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI AULT LAR.RIVR % 85.10% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI SNOWYRNG MIRACLEM AULT TERRY_RANCH RAWHIDE RAWHIDE #U % 85.10% 98.22% 85.10% 98.25% 85.09% February 12,

36 CLPT-G10 80 MW Project Distribution Factor W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI CH-HJ+CH-SNOWY DBLCKT 98.24% 85.09% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI SCHEY-LGIRG7 115 DBLCKT 98.20% 85.09% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI HAPPYJCK NORTH RANGE CHEYENNE HAPPYJCK Loading % 98.18% 85.07% 98.18% 85.05% W.CHEY CL-G8_G9_POI TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT 98.22% 85.03% ROCKPRTP OWL_CRK TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT 14.83% 81.16% NUNN ROCKPRTP TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT 15.03% 80.48% Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- G10 G10 Contingency MVA MVA Loading Loading 2020LS Base Case Compared to Change Case with CLPT-G10 in-service at 80 MW dispatched as NR. TOT3 at 1657 MW (N-S). CLPT- G10 Without With Facility Rating CLPT- CLPT- Contingency 80 MW Project G10 G10 MVA Loading MVA Loading Distribution Factor ROCKPRTP OWL_CRK TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT 13.46% % NUNN ROCKPRTP TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT 13.61% % NUNN AULT TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT 13.93% % ROCKPRTP OWL_CRK AULT TERRY_RANCH % 85.25% NUNN ROCKPRTP AULT TERRY_RANCH % 84.41% CHEYENNE HAPPYJCK WARRENLM NTHRNGE % 83.84% BASE CASE CONTINGENCY Appendix B: Simulated Contingencies EVENTS BASE CASE KEOTA STORY OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KEOTA ] TO BUS [STORY ] CKT 1 Loading % February 12,

37 CONTINGENCY EVENTS CARR DRA BARBERCK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CARR DRA ] TO BUS [BARBERCK ] CKT 1 CASPERPP CASPERLM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CASPERPP ] TO BUS [CASPERLM ] CKT 1 CASPERPP REFNRYTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CASPERPP ] TO BUS [REFNRYTP ] CKT 1 DAVEJOHN LAR.RIVR OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DAVEJOHN ] TO BUS [LAR.RIVR ] CKT 1 DAVEJOHN DAVEJTPN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DAVEJOHN ] TO BUS [DAVEJTPN ] CKT 1 DAVEJOHN BIXBY OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DAVEJOHN ] TO BUS [BIXBY ] CKT 1 BIXBY DAVEJTPS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BIXBY ] TO BUS [DAVEJTPS ] CKT 1 WINDSTAR PUMPKIN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WINDSTAR ] TO BUS [PUMPKIN_BTS ] CKT 1 KELIM AIRPORT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KELIM ] TO BUS [AIRPORT ] CKT 1 ST.VRAIN LONGPEAK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ST.VRAIN ] TO BUS [LONGPEAK ] CKT 1 ST.VRAIN FORDHAM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ST.VRAIN ] TO BUS [FORDHAM ] CKT 1 WELD_PS WELD LM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WELD_PS ] TO BUS [WELD LM ] CKT 1 WELD_PS WELD LM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WELD_PS ] TO BUS [WELD LM ] CKT 1 WINDSOR AULT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WINDSOR ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 1 BERTHOUD LONETREE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BERTHOUD ] TO BUS [LONETREE ] CKT 1 BERTHOUD LONTRETP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BERTHOUD ] TO BUS [LONTRETP ] CKT 1 SLATERTS DEL CTAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SLATERTS ] TO BUS [DEL CTAP ] CKT 1 SLATERTS DELCAMIN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SLATERTS ] TO BUS [DELCAMIN ] CKT 1 AIRPORT BOYD OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AIRPORT ] TO BUS [BOYD ] CKT 1 AIRPORT WINDSORT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AIRPORT ] TO BUS [WINDSORT ] CKT 1 ALCOVA CASPERLM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] TO BUS [CASPERLM ] CKT 1 ALCOVA CASPERLM #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] TO BUS [CASPERLM ] CKT 2 ALCOVA FREMONT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] TO BUS [FREMONT ] CKT 1 ALCOVA MIRACLEM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] TO BUS [MIRACLEM ] CKT 1 ALCOVA MIRACLEM #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] TO BUS [MIRACLEM ] CKT 2 ALCOVA RADERVIL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] TO BUS [RADERVIL ] CKT 1 ARCHER CHEYENNE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [CHEYENNE ] CKT 1 ARCHER CROWCRK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [CROWCRK ] CKT 1 ARCHER MYERS TP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [MYERS TP ] CKT 1 ARCHER PINEBLUF OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [PINEBLUF ] CKT 1 ARCHER CPGSTN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [CPGSTN ] CKT 1 CPGSTN EB PARK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CPGSTN ] TO BUS [EB PARK ] CKT 1 ARCHER AULT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 1 ARCHER STEGALL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [STEGALL ] CKT 1 ARCHER TERRY_RANCH OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [TERRY_RANCH ] CKT 1 ARCHER WAYNECHILD OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [WL_CHILD ] CKT 1 February 12,

38 CONTINGENCY EVENTS TERRY_RANCH NORTH PARK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [TERRY_RANCH ] TO BUS [NORTH PARK ] CKT 1 AULT RAWHIDE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [RAWHIDE ] CKT 1 RAWHIDE TIMBERLN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [RAWHIDE ] TO BUS [TIMBERLN ] CKT 1 AULT WELD LM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [WELD LM ] CKT 1 AULT WELD LM #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [WELD LM ] CKT 2 AULT TERRY_RANCH OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [TERRY_RANCH ] CKT 1 AULT LAR.RIVR OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [LAR.RIVR ] CKT 1 AULT CRAIG OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [CRAIG ] CKT 1 BLKHLWTP COBBLKTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BLKHLWTP ] TO BUS [COBBLKTP ] CKT 1 BLKHLWTP AULT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BLKHLWTP ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 1 BOYD LOVE E OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BOYD ] TO BUS [LOVE E ] CKT 1 BOYD VALLEYLM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BOYD ] TO BUS [VALLEYLM ] CKT 1 BOYD LONTRETP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BOYD ] TO BUS [LONTRETP ] CKT 1 BOYD DERBHILT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BOYD ] TO BUS [DERBHILT ] CKT 1 BOYD LONGPEAK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BOYD ] TO BUS [LONGPEAK ] CKT 1 BOYD PORTNER OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BOYD ] TO BUS [PORTNER ] CKT 1 BRIGHTNW SANDCRK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BRIGHTNW ] TO BUS [SANDCRK ] CKT 1 BRIGHTNW ERIE SW OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BRIGHTNW ] TO BUS [ERIE SW ] CKT 1 BUSHNLTP PINEBLUF OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BUSHNLTP ] TO BUS [PINEBLUF ] CKT 1 CARTERLK FLATIRON OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CARTERLK TAP115.00] TO BUS [FLATIRON ] CKT 1 CARTERLK LOVEWTAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CARTERLK TAP115.00] TO BUS [LOVEWTAP ] CKT 1 CASPERLM DAVEJTPN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CASPERLM ] TO BUS [DAVEJTPN ] CKT 1 CHEYENNE HAPPYJCK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [HAPPYJCK ] CKT 1 CHEYENNE CROWCRK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [CROWCRK ] CKT 1 CHEYENNE PONNEQUI OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [PONNEQUI ] CKT 1 COBBLKTP TIMNATH OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [COBBLKTP ] TO BUS [TIMNATH ] CKT 1 COBBLKTP COBBLAKE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [COBBLKTP ] TO BUS [COBBLAKE ] CKT 1 DEL CTAP LONGPEAK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DEL CTAP ] TO BUS [LONGPEAK ] CKT 1 DEL CTAP MEADOW OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DEL CTAP ] TO BUS [MEADOW ] CKT 1 DELCAMIN RINNVALL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DELCAMIN ] TO BUS [RINNVALL ] CKT 1 DERBYHIL DERBHILT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DERBYHIL ] TO BUS [DERBHILT ] CKT 1 DIXON CK DRAKE RD OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DIXON CK ] TO BUS [DRAKE RD ] CKT 1 DIXON CK HRSTHTAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DIXON CK ] TO BUS [HRSTHTAP ] CKT 1 DIXON CK POUDRE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DIXON CK ] TO BUS [POUDRE ] CKT 1 DRAKE RD TIMBERLN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DRAKE RD ] TO BUS [TIMBERLN ] CKT 1 ESTES POLEHILL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ESTES ] TO BUS [POLEHILL ] CKT 1 February 12,

39 CONTINGENCY EVENTS ESTES MARYLKSB OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ESTES ] TO BUS [MARYLKSB ] CKT 1 ESTES MARYLKTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ESTES ] TO BUS [MARYLKTP ] CKT 1 ESTES WAGONWHL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ESTES ] TO BUS [WAGONWHL ] CKT 1 FLATIRON HRSTHTAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FLATIRON ] TO BUS [HRSTHTAP ] CKT 1 FLATIRON POLEHILL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FLATIRON ] TO BUS [POLEHILL ] CKT 1 FORDHAM TERRY OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FORDHAM ] TO BUS [TERRY ] CKT 1 FORDHAM ROGERSRD OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FORDHAM ] TO BUS [ROGERSRD ] CKT 1 GEMCTYTP SPRINGCK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GEMCTYTP ] TO BUS [SPRINGCK ] CKT 1 GEMCTYTP SNOWYRNG OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GEMCTYTP ] TO BUS [SNOWYRNG ] CKT 1 GLENDO GUERNTAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GLENDO ] TO BUS [GUERNTAP ] CKT 1 GLENDO PODOLAK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GLENDO ] TO BUS [PODOLAK ] CKT 1 GLENDO WHTROCK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GLENDO ] TO BUS [WHTROCK ] CKT 1 GLENDO WAGHN NT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GLENDO ] TO BUS [WAGHN NT ] CKT 1 GLENDO WAGHN ST OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GLENDO ] TO BUS [WAGHN ST ] CKT 1 DAVEJTPN WAGHN NT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DAVEJTPN ] TO BUS [WAGHN NT ] CKT 1 DAVEJTPS REFNRYTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DAVEJTPS ] TO BUS [REFNRYTP ] CKT 1 DAVEJTPS WAGHN ST OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DAVEJTPS ] TO BUS [WAGHN ST ] CKT 1 GUERNTAP LIMESTON OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GUERNTAP ] TO BUS [LIMESTON ] CKT 1 GUERNTAP GUERNRRL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GUERNTAP ] TO BUS [GUERNRRL ] CKT 1 GUERNTAP WHTROCK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GUERNTAP ] TO BUS [WHTROCK ] CKT 1 HAPPYJCK NORTH RANGE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HAPPYJCK ] TO BUS [NORTHRNG ] CKT 1 HAPPYJCK HJWIND OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HAPPYJCK ] TO BUS [HJWIND ] CKT 1 HARMONY TIMBERLN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HARMONY ] TO BUS [TIMBERLN ] CKT 1 HARMONY PORTNER OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HARMONY ] TO BUS [PORTNER ] CKT 1 HARVARD LNGMNTNW OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HARVARD ] TO BUS [LNGMNTNW ] CKT 1 HORSESHO LOVE W OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HORSESHO ] TO BUS [LOVE W ] CKT 1 HORSESHO CROSSRDS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HORSESHO ] TO BUS [CROSSRDS ] CKT 1 HRSTHTAP TRILBY OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HRSTHTAP ] TO BUS [TRILBY ] CKT 1 HRSTHTAP MASONVIL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HRSTHTAP ] TO BUS [MASONVIL ] CKT 1 HYGIENE LNGMNTNW OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HYGIENE ] TO BUS [LNGMNTNW ] CKT 1 HYGIENE LYONS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HYGIENE ] TO BUS [LYONS ] CKT 1 KODAK WHITNEY OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KODAK ] TO BUS [WHITNEY ] CKT 1 KODAK WHITNEY #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KODAK ] TO BUS [WHITNEY ] CKT 2 KORTES KORTESTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KORTES ] TO BUS [KORTESTP ] CKT 1 KORTES MIRACLEM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KORTES ] TO BUS [MIRACLEM ] CKT 1 KORTESTP MIRACLEM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KORTESTP ] TO BUS [MIRACLEM ] CKT 1 February 12,

40 CONTINGENCY EVENTS KORTESTP SEMINOE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KORTESTP ] TO BUS [SEMINOE ] CKT 1 LAGRANGE ROUNDTOP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAGRANGE ] TO BUS [ROUNDTOP ] CKT 1 LAGRANGE STEGALL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAGRANGE ] TO BUS [STEGALL ] CKT 1 LAPORTE BELLVUTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAPORTE ] TO BUS [BELLVUTP ] CKT 1 LAPORTE RAWHIDE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAPORTE ] TO BUS [RAWHIDE ] CKT 1 LAPORTE RAWHIDE #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAPORTE ] TO BUS [RAWHIDE ] CKT 2 LAPORTE TIMBERLN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAPORTE ] TO BUS [TIMBERLN ] CKT 1 LAPORTE COLLEGLK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAPORTE ] TO BUS [COLLEGLK ] CKT 1 LAR.RIVR STEGALL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAR.RIVR ] TO BUS [STEGALL ] CKT 1 LARAMIE OASISTAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LARAMIE ] TO BUS [OASISTAP ] CKT 1 LARAMIE SNOWYRNG OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LARAMIE ] TO BUS [SNOWYRNG ] CKT 1 LINDEN RICHARDS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LINDEN ] TO BUS [RICHARDS ] CKT 1 LINDEN TIMBERLN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LINDEN ] TO BUS [TIMBERLN ] CKT 1 LINGLE LINGLETP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LINGLE ] TO BUS [LINGLETP ] CKT 1 LNGMNTNW MEADOW OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LNGMNTNW ] TO BUS [MEADOW ] CKT 1 LNGMNTNW GLDNPNDS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LNGMNTNW ] TO BUS [GLDNPNDS ] CKT 1 LONGPEAK CNTYLINE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LONGPEAK ] TO BUS [CNTYLINE ] CKT 1 LOVE E CROSSRDS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LOVE E ] TO BUS [CROSSRDS ] CKT 1 LOVE W LOVEWTAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LOVE W ] TO BUS [LOVEWTAP ] CKT 1 LOVEWTAP VALLEYLM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LOVEWTAP ] TO BUS [VALLEYLM ] CKT 1 LYMAN LYMANTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LYMAN ] TO BUS [LYMANTP ] CKT 1 LYONS DOWE FLATS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LYONS ] TO BUS [DOWEFLAT ] CKT 1 DOWE FLATS ROCKMTCM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DOWEFLAT ] TO BUS [ROCKMTCM ] CKT 1 LYONS WAGONWHL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LYONS ] TO BUS [WAGONWHL ] CKT 1 MAY OASISTAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MAY ] TO BUS [OASISTAP ] CKT 1 MCKENZIE MARYLKSB OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MCKENZIE ] TO BUS [MARYLKSB ] CKT 1 MED BOW MEDBOWTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MED BOW ] TO BUS [MEDBOWTP ] CKT 1 MIRACLEM SEMINOTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MIRACLEM ] TO BUS [SEMINOTP ] CKT 1 MIRACLEM MEDBOWTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MIRACLEM ] TO BUS [MEDBOWTP ] CKT 1 MYERS MYERS TP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MYERS ] TO BUS [MYERS TP ] CKT 1 MYERS TP POLE CK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MYERS TP ] TO BUS [POLE CK ] CKT 1 NUNN ROCKPRTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [NUNN ] TO BUS [ROCKPRTP ] CKT 1 NUNN AULT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [NUNN ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 1 OASISTAP MEDBOWTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [OASISTAP ] TO BUS [MEDBOWTP ] CKT 1 POLE CK QUALLS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [POLE CK ] TO BUS [QUALLS ] CKT 1 POLE CK ROUNDTOP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [POLE CK ] TO BUS [ROUNDTOP ] CKT 1 February 12,

41 CONTINGENCY EVENTS POUDRE RICHRDTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [POUDRE ] TO BUS [RICHRDTP ] CKT 1 RICHARDS WAVER PV OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [RICHARDS ] TO BUS [WAVER PV ] CKT 1 ROCKPRTP OWL_CRK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ROCKPRTP ] TO BUS [OWL_CRK ] CKT 1 ROUNDTOP SENTINEL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ROUNDTOP ] TO BUS [SENTINEL ] CKT 1 SEMINOE SEMINOTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SEMINOE ] TO BUS [SEMINOTP ] CKT 1 SPRINGCK FTSANDER OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SPRINGCK ] TO BUS [FTSANDER ] CKT 1 STEGALL LINGLETP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [STEGALL ] TO BUS [LINGLETP ] CKT 1 STEGALL LYMANTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [STEGALL ] TO BUS [LYMANTP ] CKT 1 TERRY CNTYLINE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [TERRY ] TO BUS [CNTYLINE ] CKT 1 TERRY ERIE SW OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [TERRY ] TO BUS [ERIE SW ] CKT 1 TERRY GLDNPNDS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [TERRY ] TO BUS [GLDNPNDS ] CKT 1 TIMNATH RICHRDTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [TIMNATH ] TO BUS [RICHRDTP ] CKT 1 TIMNATH BOXELDER OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [TIMNATH ] TO BUS [BOXELDER ] CKT 1 WELD LM BOOMERNG OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WELD LM ] TO BUS [BOOMERNG ] CKT 1 WELD LM WHITNEY OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WELD LM ] TO BUS [WHITNEY ] CKT 1 WINDSOR WINDSORT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WINDSOR ] TO BUS [WINDSORT ] CKT 1 MARYLKPP MARYLKTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MARYLKPP ] TO BUS [MARYLKTP ] CKT 1 MARYLKSB MARYLKTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MARYLKSB ] TO BUS [MARYLKTP ] CKT 1 LINGLETP WHTROCK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LINGLETP ] TO BUS [WHTROCK ] CKT 1 LYMANTP WHTROCK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LYMANTP ] TO BUS [WHTROCK ] CKT 1 TEKLA PUMPKIN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [TEKLA ] TO BUS [PUMPKIN_BTS ] CKT 1 BELLEVUE BELLVUTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BELLEVUE ] TO BUS [BELLVUTP ] CKT 1 BELLVUTP RIPPLE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BELLVUTP ] TO BUS [RIPPLE ] CKT 1 JACKLOPE WARMSPGS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [JACKLOPE ] TO BUS [WARMSPGS ] CKT 1 MEDBOWHS MEDBOWTP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MEDBOWHS ] TO BUS [MEDBOWTP ] CKT 1 WARMSPGS EMI TAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WARMSPGS ] TO BUS [EMI TAP ] CKT 1 WAGNHNDS WAGHN NT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WAGNHNDS ] TO BUS [WAGHN NT ] CKT 1 WAGNHNDS EMI TAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WAGNHNDS ] TO BUS [EMI TAP ] CKT 1 VALLEYLM DERBHILT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [VALLEYLM ] TO BUS [DERBHILT ] CKT 1 WARRENLM NTHRNGE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WARRENLM ] TO BUS [NORTHRNG ] CKT 1 WINDSORT WHITNEY OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WINDSORT ] TO BUS [WHITNEY ] CKT 1 ROGERSRD GLDNPNDS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ROGERSRD ] TO BUS [GLDNPNDS ] CKT 1 DIXON CK COLLEGLK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DIXON CK ] TO BUS [COLLEGLK ] CKT 1 DIXON CK HORSESHO OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DIXON CK ] TO BUS [HORSESHO ] CKT 1 RINNVALL DACONO OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [RINNVALL ] TO BUS [DACONO ] CKT 1 DACONO ERIE SW OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DACONO ] TO BUS [ERIE SW ] CKT 1 February 12,

42 CONTINGENCY EVENTS PONNEQUI OWL_CRK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [PONNEQUI ] TO BUS [OWL_CRK ] CKT 1 CHEYENNE SNOWYRNG OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [SNOWYRNG ] CKT 1 CHEYENNE TERRY_RANCH OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [TERRY_RANCH ] CKT 1 BRACEWLL WHITNEY OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BRACEWLL ] TO BUS [WHITNEY ] CKT 1 BRACEWLL WHITNEY #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BRACEWLL ] TO BUS [WHITNEY ] CKT 2 SNOWYRNG MIRACLEM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SNOWYRNG ] TO BUS [MIRACLEM ] CKT 1 WHEATLND LAR.RIVR OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WHEATLND ] TO BUS [LAR.RIVR ] CKT 1 EMIGRNT EMI TAP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [EMIGRNT ] TO BUS [EMI TAP ] CKT 1 CHEY_S SWANRNCH OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEY_S ] TO BUS [SWANRNCH ] CKT 1 LGIR-G CHEY_W OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [G7WNDHI ] TO BUS [W.CHEY ] CKT 1 LGIR-G CHEY_W OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CL-G8_G9_POI115.00] TO BUS [W.CHEY ] CKT 1 PUMPKIN BARBERCK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [PUMPKIN_BTS ] TO BUS [BARBERCK ] CKT 1 CHEY_S CORLETT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEY_S ] TO BUS [CORLETT ] CKT 1 NTHRNGE CORLETT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [NORTHRNG ] TO BUS [CORLETT ] CKT 1 TRR-AULT+ARH-AULT DBLCKT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 1 RAWHIDE RAWHIDE #U1 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [RAWHIDE ] TO BUS [RAWHIDE ] CKT U1 RAWHIDEA RAWHIDE #UA OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [RAWHIDEA ] TO BUS [RAWHIDE ] CKT UA RAWHIDEF RAWHIDE #UF OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [RAWHIDEF ] TO BUS [RAWHIDE ] CKT UF RAWHIDED RAWHIDE #UD OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [RAWHIDED ] TO BUS [RAWHIDE ] CKT UD RAWHIDEB RAWHIDE #UB OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [RAWHIDEB ] TO BUS [RAWHIDE ] CKT UB RAWHIDEC RAWHIDE #UC OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [RAWHIDEC ] TO BUS [RAWHIDE ] CKT UC ALCOVA ALCOVA OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] TO BUS [ALCOVA ] CKT 1 ALCOVA ALCOVA OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] TO BUS [ALCOVA ] CKT 1 AULT AULT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 1 AULT AULT #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 2 AULT AULT #3 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 3 BOYD BOYD OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BOYD ] TO BUS [BOYD ] CKT 1 BOYD BOYD #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [BOYD ] TO BUS [BOYD ] CKT 2 DIXON CK DIXON CK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DIXON CK ] TO BUS [DIXON CK ] CKT 1 DIXON CK DIXON CK #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [DIXON CK ] TO BUS [DIXON CK ] CKT 2 ESTES ESTES OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ESTES ] TO BUS [ESTES ] CKT 1 ESTES ESTES OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ESTES ] TO BUS [ESTES ] CKT 1 ESTES ESTES OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ESTES ] TO BUS [ESTES ] CKT 1 FLATIRON FLATIRN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FLATIRON ] TO BUS [FLATIRN ] CKT 1 FLATIRON FLATIRN OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FLATIRON ] TO BUS [FLATIRN ] CKT 1 FORDHAM FORDHAM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FORDHAM ] TO BUS [FORDHAM ] CKT 1 February 12,

43 CONTINGENCY EVENTS FORDHAM FORDHAM #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FORDHAM ] TO BUS [FORDHAM ] CKT 2 FREMONT FREMONT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FREMONT ] TO BUS [FREMONT ] CKT 1 FREMONT FREMONT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [FREMONT ] TO BUS [FREMONT ] CKT 1 GLENDO GLENDO OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GLENDO ] TO BUS [GLENDO ] CKT 1 GLENDO GLENDO OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [GLENDO ] TO BUS [GLENDO ] CKT 1 HORSESHO HORSESHO OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HORSESHO ] TO BUS [HORSESHO ] CKT 1 HORSESHO HORSESHO #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [HORSESHO ] TO BUS [HORSESHO ] CKT 2 KORTES KORTES OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KORTES ] TO BUS [KORTES ] CKT 1 KORTES KORTES OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KORTES ] TO BUS [KORTES ] CKT 1 KORTES KORTES OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [KORTES ] TO BUS [KORTES ] CKT 1 LAR.RIVR LAR.RIVR OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAR.RIVR ] TO BUS [LAR.RIVR ] CKT 1 LAR.RIVR LAR.RIVR #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAR.RIVR ] TO BUS [LAR.RIVR ] CKT 2 LAR.RIVR LAR.RIVR OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAR.RIVR ] TO BUS [LAR.RIVR ] CKT 1 LAR.RIVR MBPP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAR.RIVR ] TO BUS [MBPP ] CKT 1 LAR.RIVR MBPP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LAR.RIVR ] TO BUS [MBPP ] CKT 1 LONGPEAK LONGPEAK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LONGPEAK ] TO BUS [LONGPEAK ] CKT 1 LONGPEAK LONGPEAK #2 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LONGPEAK ] TO BUS [LONGPEAK ] CKT 2 POLEHILL POLEHILL OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [POLEHILL ] TO BUS [POLEHILL ] CKT 1 SEMINOE SMNOE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SEMINOE ] TO BUS [SEMINOE ] CKT 1 SEMINOE SEMINOE OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SEMINOE ] TO BUS [SEMINOE ] CKT 1 TIMBERLN TIMBERLN #3 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [TIMBERLN ] TO BUS [TIMBERLN ] CKT 3 TIMBERLN TIMBERLN #4 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [TIMBERLN ] TO BUS [TIMBERLN ] CKT 4 WELD LM WELD LM OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WELD LM ] TO BUS [WELD LM ] CKT 1 MARYLKPP MARYLKPP OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MARYLKPP ] TO BUS [MARYLKPP ] CKT 1 MARYLKSB MARYLKSB OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MARYLKSB ] TO BUS [MARYLKSB ] CKT 1 LIMESTON LIMESTON OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [LIMESTON ] TO BUS [LIMESTON ] CKT 1 WHTROCK WHTROCK OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [WHTROCK ] TO BUS [WHTROCK ] CKT 1 CHEY_S TERRY_RANCH OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEY_S ] TO BUS [TERRY_RANCH ] CKT G HJWIND OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [2004-G ] TO BUS [HJWIND ] CKT 1 SSWIND HJWIND OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SSWIND ] TO BUS [HJWIND ] CKT 1 ARCHER ARCHER ARH 13.8A OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [ARH 13.8A ] CKT 1 ARCHER ARCHER ARH_LVB OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [ARH 13.8B # ] CKT 2 AULT AULT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [AULT ] TO BUS [AULT ] CKT 1 SNOWYRNG SNOWYRNG OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SNOWYRNG ] TO BUS [SNOWYRNG ] TO BUS [SNG_LV SNG_LV A A ] CKT 1 February 12,

44 CONTINGENCY EVENTS SNOWYRNG SNOWYRNG OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [SNOWYRNG ] TO BUS [SNOWYRNG ] TO BUS [SNG_LV SNG_LV B #2 B ] CKT 2 MIRACLEM MIRACLEM MM_LV OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MIRACLEM ] TO BUS [MIRACLEM ] TO BUS [MM_LV A A ] CKT 1 MIRACLEM MIRACLEM MM_LV OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [MIRACLEM ] TO BUS [MIRACLEM ] TO BUS [MM_LV B B # ] CKT 2 CHEYENNE CHEYENNE CH OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [CH 13.8A 13.8A ] CKT 1 CHEYENNE CHEYENNE CH OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [CH 13.8B 13.8B # ] CKT 2 MBPP REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [MBPP ] MBPP REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [MBPP ] POLEHILL REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [POLEHILL ] ALCOVA REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] FREMONT REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [FREMONT ] FREMONT REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [FREMONT ] GLENDO REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [GLENDO ] GLENDO REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [GLENDO ] GUERNSY REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [GUERNSY ] KORTES REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [KORTES ] KORTES REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [KORTES ] KORTES REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [KORTES ] SMNOE REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [SEMINOE ] SMNOE REMOVE UNIT 2 FROM BUS [SEMINOE ] ALCOVA REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [ALCOVA ] SEMINOE REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [SEMINOE ] GUERNSY REMOVE UNIT 2 FROM BUS [GUERNSY ] FLATIRN REMOVE UNIT 2 FROM BUS [FLATIRN ] FLATIRN REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [FLATIRN ] FLATIRN REMOVE UNIT 3 FROM BUS [FLATIRN ] CLR_ REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [CLR_ ] SS_GEN REMOVE UNIT 1 FROM BUS [SS_GEN ] G7_GEN G1 REMOVE UNIT G1 FROM BUS [G7WNDLO ] G8_GEN G1 REMOVE UNIT W FROM BUS [CLPT-G9_GEN ] CHEY-TR+CHEY-OWL DBLCKT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [TERRY_RANCH ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [PONNEQUI ] TO BUS [OWL_CRK ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [PONNEQUI ] TO BUS [CHEYENNE ] CKT 1 CH-HJ+CH-SNOWY DBLCKT OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [TERRY_RANCH ] CKT 1 February 12,

45 CONTINGENCY EVENTS OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [CHEYENNE ] TO BUS [SNOWYRNG ] CKT 1 SCHEY-LGIRG7 115 DBLCKT OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CORLETT ] TO BUS [CHEY_S ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CORLETT ] TO BUS [NORTHRNG ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [SWANRNCH ] TO BUS [W.CHEY ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [SWANRNCH ] TO BUS [CHEY_S ] CKT 1 ARCH-CHEY N&S 115 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS [ARCHER ] TO BUS [CHEYENNE ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CROWCRK ] TO BUS [ARCHER ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CROWCRK ] TO BUS [CHEYENNE ] CKT 1 LGIR-G7 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [G7WNDLO ] TO BUS [G7WNDMI ] CKT WD OPEN LINE FROM BUS [G7WNDMI ] TO BUS [G7WNDMID ] CKT 1 LGIR-G8 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [G7WNDMID ] TO BUS [G7WNDHI ] CKT WD OPEN LINE FROM BUS [G7WNDHI ] TO BUS [W.CHEY ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CL-G8_G9_POI115.00] TO BUS [CLPT-G9_SOL ] CKT WD OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CL-G8_G9_POI115.00] TO BUS [CLPT-G9_SOL ] CKT WD OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CL-G8_G9_POI115.00] TO BUS [W.CHEY ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CLPT-G9_SOL ] TO BUS [CLPT-G9_CYS ] CKT 1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CLPT-G9_CYS ] TO BUS [CLPT-G9_GEN ] CKT WD CPGSTN_1 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CPGSTN_ ] TO BUS [CPGSTN ] CKT U1 CPGSTN_2 OPEN LINE FROM BUS [CPGSTN_ ] TO BUS [CPGSTN ] CKT U1 February 12,

46 Appendix C: Transient Stability Results Transient Stability plots provided as a separate document. 2020HS Stressed 2020LS Stressed Disturbance Description Without CLPT-G10 With CLPT- G10 Without CLPT-G10 With CLPT- G10 System Intact Stable Stable Stable Stable Archer-Cheyenne 115 Stable Stable Stable Stable CPGS-Archer 115 Stable Stable Stable Stable CPGS-Archer 115 1&2 Stable Stable Stable Stable CPGS-East Business Park 115 Stable Stable Stable Stable Happy Jack-Cheyenne 115 Stable Stable Stable Stable Happy Jack-Happy Jack Wind 115 Stable Stable Stable Stable Happy Jack-North Range 115 Stable Stable Stable Stable HJK-NRG 115 PO + SCH 230/115 XFMR Stable Stable Stable Stable South Cheyenne-Swan Ranch 115 Stable Stable Stable Stable SCH-COR 115 PO + SCH-SWR 115 Stable Stable Stable Stable South Cheyenne-Corlett-North Range 115 Stable Stable Stable Stable Archer-Ault 230 Stable Stable Stable Stable Archer-Terry Ranch 230 Stable Stable Stable Stable ACH-TR 230 PO + ARH 230/115 XFMR Stable Stable Stable Stable ACH-TR 230 PO + ARH-CHY 115 Line Stable Stable Stable Stable ACH-TR 230 PO + ARH-CPGS 115 Line Stable Stable Stable Stable Archer-Stegall 230 Stable Stable Stable Stable Cheyenne-Terry Ranch 230 Stable Stable Stable Stable Cheyenne-Snowy Range 230 Stable Stable Stable Stable Snowy Range-Miracle Mile 230 Stable Stable Stable Stable Terry Ranch-Ault 230 Stable Stable Stable Stable Terry Ranch-North Park 230 Stable Stable Stable Stable Laramie River Station-Ault 345 Stable Stable Stable Stable Archer-Wayne Child 230 Stable Stable Stable Stable LRS-Keota 345 (No WC PH2) Stable Stable Stable Stable Cheyenne 230/115 XFMR (delayed clearing) Stable Stable Stable Stable Archer 230/115 XFMR (delayed clearing) Stable Stable Stable Stable February 12,

47 Appendix D: Reference Guide for Plots The list of channels below identify the parameters that were analyzed, and thus can be found in the transient stability plots (provided separately). The order matches the order of the plots from top to bottom, left to right. This list of channels consists of a subset of the total channels included in the snapshot; the full list of channels is available per request. Left Side (Top to Bottom) Right Side (Top to Bottom) Channel # Channel Name Channel # Channel Name VOLTAGES2 VOLTAGES PONNEQUI 115. VOLT 735 AULT 230. VOLT 1150 OWL_CRK 115. VOLT 724 WL_CHILD 230. VOLT 1088 CROWCRK 115. VOLT 1093 TERRY_RANCH 230. VOLT 1202 CPGSTN 115. VOLT 1142 SNOWYRNG 230. VOLT 1201 KINGRANCH 115. VOLT 1125 CHEYENNE 230. VOLT 733 ARCHER 230. VOLT VOLTAGES1 VOLTAGES CORLETT 115. VOLT 901 STORY 345 VOLT 1197 HJWIND 115. VOLT 736 AULT 345 VOLT 1196 EB PARK 115. VOLT 680 KEOTA 345. VOLT 1195 SWANRNCH 115. VOLT 825 LRS 345 VOLT 1194 NORTHRNG 115. VOLT 1192 CHEY_S 115. VOLT VOLTAGES6 ANGLES WYGEN VOLT 19 DAVEJON1 ANGLE 1438 WYGEN VOLT 18 DAVEJON2 ANGLE 1437 WYGEN 13.8 VOLT 17 DAVEJON4 ANGLE 1435 CPGSTN_ VOLT 4 PAWNEE ANGLE 1434 CPGSTN_ VOLT 2 MANCHEF1 ANGLE 1 MANCHEF2 ANGLE VOLTAGES5 VOLTAGES7 785 GEM CITY 115 VOLT 1440 CLR_ VOLT 1207 CLPT_G10 POI115. VOLT 1206 CLPT-G VOLT 1193 W.CHEY 115. VOLT 1205 CLPT-G VOLT 764 CHEYENNE 115 VOLT 1203 CLPT-G VOLT 1025 WARREN 115 VOLT 1189 CLPT-G VOLT 891 SKYLINE 115 VOLT ANGLES4 PELEC1 138 SS_GEN1 ANGLE 165 CPGSTN2 G1 PELEC 137 CLR_1 ANGLE 164 CPGSTN1 S1 PELEC 142 CPGSTN_2 ANGLE 163 CPGSTN1 G2 PELEC 141 CPGSTN_1 S1 ANGLE 162 CPGSTN1 G1 PELEC 140 CPGSTN_1 G2 ANGLE 160 YELOW1 PELEC 139 CPGSTN_1 G1 ANGLE 159 WYODAK PELEC February 12,

48 Left Side (Top to Bottom) Right Side (Top to Bottom) Channel # Channel Name Channel # Channel Name ANGLES3 ANGLES5 21 RAWHIDEA ANGLE 1431 CLPT-G10 ANGLE 27 ST.VRAIN ANGLE 144 CLPT-G9 ANGLE 26 ST.VR_4 ANGLE 143 CLPT-G9 ANGLE 25 ST.VR_3 ANGLE 136 CLPT-G7 ANGLE 24 ST.VR_2 ANGLE 20 RAWHIDE ANGLE QELEC1 178 CPGSTN2 G1 QELEC 177 CPGSTN1 S1 QELEC 176 CPGSTN1 G2 QELEC 175 CPGSTN1 G1 QELEC 173 YELOW1 QELEC 172 WYODAK QELEC PELEC2 QELEC CLPT-G10 PV PELEC 1433 CLPT-G10 PV QELEC 167 CLPT-G9 W PELEC 180 CLPT-G9 W QELEC 166 CLPT-G9 W PELEC 179 CLPT-G9 WQELEC 161 CLPT-G7 G1 PELEC 174 CLPT-G7 G1 QELEC February 12,

49 Appendix E: System Diagrams February 12,

50 2020LS Stressed Scenario (CLPT-G10 offline) February 12,

51 2020LS Stressed Scenario (CLPT-G10 online) February 12,

52 2020HS Stressed Scenario (CLPT-G10 offline) February 12,

53 2020HS Stressed Scenario (CLPT-G10 online) February 12,

Interconnection System Impact Study Final Report February 19, 2018

Interconnection System Impact Study Final Report February 19, 2018 Interconnection System Impact Study Final Report February 19, 2018 Generator Interconnection Request No. TI-17-0225 248.4 MW (Alternate Project Output of 217.35 MW) Wind Energy Generating Facility In Goshen

More information

Interconnection System Impact Study Report Request # GI

Interconnection System Impact Study Report Request # GI Executive Summary Interconnection System Impact Study Report Request # GI-2008-23 34 MW Solar Generation Ranch at Hartsel, Colorado Public Service Company of Colorado Transmission Planning August 19, 2010

More information

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI Draft Report 600 MW Wind Generating Facility Missile Site 230 kv Substation, Colorado

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI Draft Report 600 MW Wind Generating Facility Missile Site 230 kv Substation, Colorado Executive Summary Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI-2016-6 Draft Report 600 MW Wind Generating Facility Missile Site 230 kv Substation, Colorado Public Service Company of Colorado Transmission

More information

THE NECESSITY OF THE 500 KV SYSTEM IN NWE S TRANSMISSION SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN RELIABLE SERVICE TO MONTANA CUSTOMERS

THE NECESSITY OF THE 500 KV SYSTEM IN NWE S TRANSMISSION SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN RELIABLE SERVICE TO MONTANA CUSTOMERS THE NECESSITY OF THE 500 KV SYSTEM IN NWE S TRANSMISSION SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN RELIABLE SERVICE TO MONTANA CUSTOMERS 2/27/2018 ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION PLANNING Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Executive

More information

Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2016 Q4 Stakeholder Meeting

Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2016 Q4 Stakeholder Meeting Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2016 Q4 Stakeholder Meeting BHE Wyoming Q4 Stakeholder Meeting November 17, 2016 @ 1:00PM MT Black Hills Energy Service Center 409 Deadwood Avenue, Rapid

More information

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-226-FEAS-R3

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-226-FEAS-R3 Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-226-FEAS-R3 System Interconnection Request #226 70 MW Wind Generating Facility Kings County (L-6013) 2010 07 21 Control Centre Operations Nova Scotia Power

More information

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (RAV-4SD) Docket No Witness: Rick A. Vail BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (RAV-4SD) Docket No Witness: Rick A. Vail BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (RAV-4SD) Docket No. 17-035-40 Witness: Rick A. Vail BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Exhibit Accompanying Supplemental Direct

More information

Elbert County 500 MW Generation Addition Interconnection Feasibility Study Report OASIS POSTING # GI

Elbert County 500 MW Generation Addition Interconnection Feasibility Study Report OASIS POSTING # GI Executive Summary Elbert County 500 MW Generation Addition Interconnection Feasibility Study Report OASIS POSTING # GI-2003-2 Xcel Energy Transmission Planning January 2004 This Interconnection Feasibility

More information

Generator Interconnection System Impact Study For

Generator Interconnection System Impact Study For Generator Interconnection System Impact Study For Prepared for: January 15, 2015 Prepared by: SCE&G Transmission Planning Table of Contents General Discussion... Page 3 I. Generator Interconnection Specifications...

More information

GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED

GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED DATE: June 28, 2011 STAFF: Brian Janonis Brian Moeck, PRPA Pre-taped staff presentation: none WORK SESSION ITEM FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Electric Transmission Update. EXECUTIVE

More information

SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY EC300W ERIS FINAL REPORT. El Paso Electric Company

SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY EC300W ERIS FINAL REPORT. El Paso Electric Company SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY EC300W ERIS FINAL REPORT Prepared for: El Paso Electric Company Prepared by: Engineers, LLC 1526 Cole Boulevard Building 3, Suite 150 Lakewood, CO 80401 (303) 395-4018 FOREWORD This

More information

System Impact Study Report

System Impact Study Report Report For: NTE Carolinas II, LLC ( Customer ) Queue #: 42432-01 Service Location: Rockingham County, NC Total Output: 477 MW (summer) / 540 MW (winter) Commercial Operation Date: 12/1/2020 42432-01 SIS

More information

Western Area Power Administration Rocky Mountain Region (LAPT) Network Integrated Transmission Service. Designated Network Resources

Western Area Power Administration Rocky Mountain Region (LAPT) Network Integrated Transmission Service. Designated Network Resources Customer Name Basin Electric Cheyenne Power and Light City of Fort Morgan & Estimated Maximum Resource MW Point of Receipt Delivering Party & Voltage Antelope Valley 2 Yellowtail Basin Electric 115 kv

More information

Project #148. Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report

Project #148. Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report Project #148 Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report June 05, 2012 Electric Transmission Planning Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Executive Summary... 3 Energy Resource Interconnection

More information

Foothills Joint Queue Study T19: Ron Carey 2008-T1: Gateway 2008-T3: Timnath2

Foothills Joint Queue Study T19: Ron Carey 2008-T1: Gateway 2008-T3: Timnath2 Foothills Joint Queue Study 2007-T19: Ron Carey 2008-T1: Gateway 2008-T3: Timnath2 Studies Performed by: Joseph Liberatore December 2008 Rocky Mountain Region Index Executive Summary...3 I. Introduction...4

More information

System Impact Study Report Request # T MW Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service Request from Wyoming to Colorado

System Impact Study Report Request # T MW Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service Request from Wyoming to Colorado System Impact Study T-2007-3 Final.doc System Impact Study Report Request # T-2007-3 900 MW Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service Request from Wyoming to Colorado Executive Summary PSCo Transmission

More information

Project #94. Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report Revision

Project #94. Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report Revision Project #94 Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report Revision October 2, 2009 Electric Transmission Planning Table of Contents Table of Contents...2 Executive Summary...3 Energy Resource Interconnection

More information

SYSTEM IMPACT RESTUDY H252W ERIS REPORT. El Paso Electric Company

SYSTEM IMPACT RESTUDY H252W ERIS REPORT. El Paso Electric Company SYSTEM IMPACT RESTUDY H252W ERIS REPORT Prepared for: El Paso Electric Company Prepared by: Engineers, LLC 1526 Cole Boulevard Building 3, Suite 150 Lakewood, CO 80401 (303) 395-4018 FOREWORD This report

More information

Generator Interconnection Facilities Study For SCE&G Two Combustion Turbine Generators at Hagood

Generator Interconnection Facilities Study For SCE&G Two Combustion Turbine Generators at Hagood Generator Interconnection Facilities Study For SCE&G Two Combustion Turbine Generators at Hagood Prepared for: SCE&G Fossil/Hydro June 30, 2008 Prepared by: SCE&G Transmission Planning Table of Contents

More information

Gateway South Transmission Project

Gateway South Transmission Project Phase 1 Comprehensive Progress Report Volume 1 - Technical Report Report Prepared by PacifiCorp Transmission Planning Department November 21, 2008 WECC1-V4 Phase 1 Comprehensive Progress Report Executive

More information

100 MW Wind Generation Project

100 MW Wind Generation Project A subsidiary of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation 100 MW Wind Generation Project CUSTOMER FINAL Feasibility Study Results By Transmission Planning, APS December 21, 2007 Executive Summary This Feasibility

More information

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-222-FEAS-R3

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-222-FEAS-R3 Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-222-FEAS-R3 System Interconnection Request #222 48 MW Steam Generating Facility Pictou County (53N) 2010 07 30 Control Centre Operations Nova Scotia Power Inc.

More information

Falcon-Midway 115 kv Line Uprate Project Report

Falcon-Midway 115 kv Line Uprate Project Report Falcon-Midway 115 kv Line Uprate Project Report 12/1/2008 1 Background The function of this project is to uprate the 26.7 miles of Tri-State s 115 kv line between Midway and Falcon substations from 50

More information

Stability Study for the Mt. Olive Hartburg 500 kv Line

Stability Study for the Mt. Olive Hartburg 500 kv Line Stability Study for the Mt. Olive Hartburg 500 kv Line Peng Yu Sharma Kolluri Transmission & Distribution Planning Group Energy Delivery Organization Entergy Sevices Inc April, 2011 New Orleans, LA 1.

More information

Feasibility Study Report

Feasibility Study Report Generator Interconnection Request Feasibility Study Report For: Customer --- Service Location: Rutherford County Total Output: 79.2 MW Commercial Operation Date: 9/1/2014 In-Service Date (if given): 9/1/2014

More information

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI A. Executive Summary Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI-2011-04 587 MW Combined Cycle 2x1 Generators Cherokee Station, Denver, Colorado Public Service Company of Colorado Transmission

More information

System Impact Study 2009 T1 Transformer Replacement at Badwater Substation

System Impact Study 2009 T1 Transformer Replacement at Badwater Substation System Impact Study 2009 T1 Transformer Replacement at Badwater Substation July 2010 Rocky Mountain Region Index Executive Summary...3 I. Introduction...4 II. Methodology...4 A. Monitored Paths...4 III.

More information

MILLIGAN SOLAR PROJECT

MILLIGAN SOLAR PROJECT February 16, 2009 Page 1 of 18 A subsidiary of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation MILLIGAN SOLAR PROJECT FINAL Feasibility Study Report APS Contract 52115 Prepared by: Arizona Public Service Company Transmission

More information

Service Requested 150 MW, Firm. Table ES.1: Summary Details for TSR #

Service Requested 150 MW, Firm. Table ES.1: Summary Details for TSR # Executive Summary Firm point to point transmission service has been requested by Transmission Service Request (TSR) #75669514, under the SaskPower Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT). The TSR consists

More information

Q217 Generator Interconnection Project

Q217 Generator Interconnection Project Q217 Generator Interconnection System Impact Study APS Contract No. 52588 By Arizona Public Service Company Transmission Planning November 25, 2013 Version 2.0 Prepared by Utility System Efficiencies,

More information

PJM Generator Interconnection Request Queue #R60 Robison Park-Convoy 345kV Impact Study September 2008

PJM Generator Interconnection Request Queue #R60 Robison Park-Convoy 345kV Impact Study September 2008 PJM enerator Interconnection Request Queue #R60 Robison Park-Convoy 345kV Impact Study 504744 September 2008 PJM Interconnection 2008. All rights reserved R60 Robison Park-Convoy 345kV Impact Study eneral

More information

Feasibility Study for the Q MW Solar Project

Feasibility Study for the Q MW Solar Project Feasibility Study for the Q171 74.5 MW Solar Project August 2018 Bulk Transmission Planning, Florida i This document and any attachments hereto ( document ) is made available by Duke Energy Florida, LLC

More information

Midway/Monument Area TTC Study

Midway/Monument Area TTC Study Midway/Monument Area TTC Study (includes the following lines: Midway Geesen 115 kv, Geesen Falcon 115 kv, Falcon Fuller 115 kv, Fuller Black Squirrel 115 kv, and Black Squirrel Monument 115 kv) Johnny

More information

CUSTOMER/ TWIN ARROWS PROJECT

CUSTOMER/ TWIN ARROWS PROJECT A subsidiary of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation CUSTOMER/ TWIN ARROWS PROJECT V1 Facility Study Report APS Contract 52149 Prepared by: Arizona Public Service Company Transmission & Distribution Asset

More information

GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION REQUEST. BHCT-G11 Interconnection System Impact Restudy PREPARED BY BLACK HILLS CORPORATION TRANSMISSION PLANNING

GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION REQUEST. BHCT-G11 Interconnection System Impact Restudy PREPARED BY BLACK HILLS CORPORATION TRANSMISSION PLANNING GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION REQUEST BHCT-G11 Interconnection System Impact Restudy PREPARED BY BLACK HILLS CORPORATION TRANSMISSION PLANNING May 28, 201 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 6 1.1. Study

More information

Q95 Vicksburg 69kV. System Impact Study. APS Contract No Arizona Public Service Company Transmission Planning.

Q95 Vicksburg 69kV. System Impact Study. APS Contract No Arizona Public Service Company Transmission Planning. A subsidiary of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Q95 Vicksburg 69kV System Impact Study APS Contract No. 52246 By Arizona Public Service Company Transmission Planning December 1, 2010 Version 2.6 Final

More information

Consulting Agreement Study. Completed for Transmission Customer

Consulting Agreement Study. Completed for Transmission Customer Completed for Transmission Customer Proposed Resource & Transmission Carbon County, MT & 230 kv Transmission in North Wyoming August 2016 Table of Contents 1.0 Description... 1 2.0 Overall Assumptions...

More information

Feasibility Study Report

Feasibility Study Report Report For: Fresh Air Energy II, LLC ( Customer ) Queue #: Service Location: Chester County, SC Total Output Requested By Customer: 74.5 MW Commercial Operation Date Requested By Customer: 1/7/2019 Feasibility

More information

SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY REPORT LA450S GENERATION STUDY. El Paso Electric Company

SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY REPORT LA450S GENERATION STUDY. El Paso Electric Company SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY REPORT LA450S GENERATION STUDY Prepared for: El Paso Electric Company Prepared by: Engineers, LLC 1526 Cole Boulevard Building 3, Suite 150 Lakewood, CO 80401 (303) 395-4018 FOREWORD

More information

Feasibility Study for the Q MW Solar Project

Feasibility Study for the Q MW Solar Project Feasibility Study for the Q174 74.5 MW Solar Project August 2018 Bulk Transmission Planning, Florida i This document and any attachments hereto ( document ) is made available by Duke Energy Florida, LLC

More information

Feasibility Study Report

Feasibility Study Report Report For: Orion Renewable Resources LLC ( Customer ) Queue #: Service Location: Rockingham County, NC Total Output Requested By Customer: 100 MW Commercial Operation Date Requested By Customer: 11/1/2019

More information

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) FACILITIES STUDY FOR PROPOSED HVDC TERMINAL INTERCONNECTION AT NEW ARTESIA 345 KV BUS

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) FACILITIES STUDY FOR PROPOSED HVDC TERMINAL INTERCONNECTION AT NEW ARTESIA 345 KV BUS EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) FACILITIES STUDY FOR PROPOSED HVDC TERMINAL INTERCONNECTION AT NEW ARTESIA 345 KV BUS El Paso Electric Company System Operations Department System Planning Section May 2004

More information

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PLANNING SUMMARY

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PLANNING SUMMARY DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PLANNING SUMMARY Transmission Department Transmission Planning Duke Energy Progress TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SCOPE 3 II. TRANSMISSION PLANNING OBJECTIVES 3 III. TRANSMISSION

More information

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-369-FEAS-R1

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-369-FEAS-R1 Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-369-FEAS-R1 System Interconnection Request #369 50 MW Wind Generating Facility Cumberland County (L-6513) 2012-02-09 Control Centre Operations Nova Scotia Power

More information

Transmission Competitive Solicitation Questions Log Question / Answer Matrix Harry Allen to Eldorado 2015

Transmission Competitive Solicitation Questions Log Question / Answer Matrix Harry Allen to Eldorado 2015 No. Comment Submitted ISO Response Date Q&A Posted 1 Will the ISO consider proposals that are not within the impedance range specified? Yes. However, the benefits estimated and studies performed by the

More information

PID 274 Feasibility Study Report 13.7 MW Distribution Inter-Connection Buras Substation

PID 274 Feasibility Study Report 13.7 MW Distribution Inter-Connection Buras Substation PID 274 Feasibility Study Report 13.7 MW Distribution Inter-Connection Buras Substation Prepared by: Entergy Services, Inc. T & D Planning L-ENT-17A 639 Loyola Avenue New Orleans, LA 70113 Rev Issue Date

More information

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-084-FEAS-R2

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-084-FEAS-R2 Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-084-FEAS-R2 System Interconnection Request #84 50 MW Wind Generating Facility Pictou County (L-7004) August 17, 2007 Control Centre Operations Nova Scotia Power

More information

TRANSMISSION PLANNING CRITERIA

TRANSMISSION PLANNING CRITERIA CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. 4 IRVING PLACE NEW YORK, NY 10003-3502 Effective Date: TRANSMISSION PLANNING CRITERIA PURPOSE This specification describes Con Edison s Criteria for assessing

More information

2012 LOCAL TRANSMISSION PLAN:

2012 LOCAL TRANSMISSION PLAN: Colorado PUC E-Filings System 2012 LOCAL TRANSMISSION PLAN: TRANSMISSION COORDINATION AND PLANNING COMMITTEE ANNUAL TRANSMISSION ASSESSMENT FOR BLACK HILLS/COLORADO ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY, L.P., D/B/A

More information

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 2017 FILING FERC FORM 715 ANNUAL TRANSMISSION PLANNING AND EVALUATION REPORT PART 4 TRANSMISSION PLANNING RELIABILITY CRITERIA

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 2017 FILING FERC FORM 715 ANNUAL TRANSMISSION PLANNING AND EVALUATION REPORT PART 4 TRANSMISSION PLANNING RELIABILITY CRITERIA AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 2017 FILING FERC FORM 715 ANNUAL TRANSMISSION PLANNING AND EVALUATION REPORT PART 4 TRANSMISSION PLANNING RELIABILITY CRITERIA AEP Texas (comprised of its Central and North Divisions

More information

Burlington Lamar 345/230 kv Impact and 2013 Post TPL Assessment Study

Burlington Lamar 345/230 kv Impact and 2013 Post TPL Assessment Study Burlington Lamar 345/230 kv Impact and 2013 Post TPL Assessment Study Vince Leung May 1, 2014 Reviewed by: Chris Pink (edited July 8, 2014) Table of Contents Page Background... 4 Objectives... 5 Study

More information

Generation Interconnection Facilities Study For

Generation Interconnection Facilities Study For Generation Interconnection Facilities Study For Prepared for: Prepared by: SCE&G Transmission Planning May 27, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS General Discussion... Page 3 Generator Interconnection Specifications...

More information

Feasibility Study. Customer Kingman Area Photovoltaic Generation Project Interconnection

Feasibility Study. Customer Kingman Area Photovoltaic Generation Project Interconnection Feasibility Study Customer Kingman Area Photovoltaic Generation Project Interconnection October, 2009 October 2009 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONCLUSION Customer has requested network resource interconnection

More information

SPS Planning Criteria and Study Methodology

SPS Planning Criteria and Study Methodology SPS Planning Criteria and Study Methodology SPS subscribes to the Southwest Power Pool ("SPP") Reliability Criteria, which incorporates compliance with the appropriate North American Electric Reliability

More information

ENERGY RESOURCE INTERCONNECTION SERVICE STUDY DRAFT REPORT

ENERGY RESOURCE INTERCONNECTION SERVICE STUDY DRAFT REPORT ENERGY RESOURCE INTERCONNECTION SERVICE STUDY DRAFT REPORT ART320W 320 MW Wind Powered Project Prepared for: El Paso Electric Company Prepared by: TRC Engineers, LLC 249 Western Avenue Augusta, ME 04330

More information

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-IR373-FEAS-R1

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-IR373-FEAS-R1 Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-IR373-FEAS-R1 Generator Interconnection Request 373 109.5 MW Wind Generating Facility South Canoe Lake, NS Mar. 2, 2012 Control Centre Operations Nova Scotia

More information

PJM Generator Interconnection R81 Emilie (Fords Mill) MW Impact Study Re-Study

PJM Generator Interconnection R81 Emilie (Fords Mill) MW Impact Study Re-Study PJM Generator Interconnection R81 Emilie (Fords Mill) 100.9 MW Impact Study Re-Study August 2008 DMS # 498781 General Queue R81 Emilie (Fords Mills) is a Fairless Energy, LLC request to obtain an additional

More information

El Paso Electric Company

El Paso Electric Company Feasibility Study XXXXXX Solar Generation Prepared for El Paso Electric Company Prepared by TRC Engineers, LLC 249 Eastern Avenues Augusta, ME 04330 (207) 621-7000 Project Number: 202327 May 2013 FOREWORD

More information

ATTACHMENT Y STUDY REPORT

ATTACHMENT Y STUDY REPORT Attachment Y Study Edwards Unit 1: 90 MW Coal Retirement December 31, 2012 ATTACHMENT Y STUDY REPORT 7/5/2013 PUBLIC / EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MISO received an Attachment Y Notification of Potential Generation

More information

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-157-FEAS-R2

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-157-FEAS-R2 Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-157-FEAS-R2 System Interconnection Request #157 100.5 MW Wind Generating Facility Guysborough County (L-6515) 2009 09 14 Control Centre Operations Nova Scotia

More information

Georgia Transmission Corporation Georgia Systems Operations Corporation

Georgia Transmission Corporation Georgia Systems Operations Corporation Georgia Transmission Corporation Georgia Systems Operations Corporation Reactive Power Requirements for Generating Facilities Interconnecting to the Georgia Integrated Transmission System with Georgia

More information

ABB POWER SYSTEMS CONSULTING

ABB POWER SYSTEMS CONSULTING ABB POWER SYSTEMS CONSULTING DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Offshore Wind Interconnection Study 2011-E7406-1 R1 Summary Report Prepared for: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Report No.: 2011-E7406-1 R1 Date: 29 February

More information

SMUD 2014 Ten-Year Transmission Assessment Plan. Final. December 18, 2014

SMUD 2014 Ten-Year Transmission Assessment Plan. Final. December 18, 2014 SMUD 2014 Ten-Year Transmission Assessment Plan Final December 18, 2014 I CONTENTS Executive Summary... III 1 Introduction... 2 1.1 Reliability Criteria and Guidelines... 2 1.2 Load Forecast... 2 1.3 Demand

More information

APPENDIX F: Project Need and Description

APPENDIX F: Project Need and Description APPENDIX F: Project Need and Description California ISO/MID F-1 Intentionally left blank California ISO/MID F-2 Name Brief Description Type Lugo Victorville 500 kv Upgrade (SCE portion) The project was

More information

Supplemental Report on the NCTPC Collaborative Transmission Plan

Supplemental Report on the NCTPC Collaborative Transmission Plan Supplemental Report on the NCTPC 2007-2017 Collaborative Transmission Plan May 16, 2008 1 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary...1 II. Richmond-Fort Bragg Woodruff Street 230 kv Line...2 II.A. Need for

More information

DETOUR GOLD CORPORATION SYSTEM IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR DETOUR LAKE PROJECT

DETOUR GOLD CORPORATION SYSTEM IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR DETOUR LAKE PROJECT DETOUR GOLD CORPORATION SYSTEM IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR DETOUR LAKE PROJECT Report No.: RP-160388-02-141-0001 CAA ID No. 2010-380 Rev. 01 Prepared by: AMEC Americas Limited Energy and Mining Division Power

More information

PES Cook Islands KEMA Grid Study Final Report

PES Cook Islands KEMA Grid Study Final Report Integrating PV Solar and Wind generation with the TAU electric system Te Aponga Uira O Tumu-Te_Varovaro Contents 1. Executive summary... 2 2. Introduction... 5 2.1 Proposed wind turbine sites... 6 2.2

More information

March 2017 to June 2017 Preliminary Interconnection Cluster Window System Impact Study 49.9 MW IA-PNM May 2018

March 2017 to June 2017 Preliminary Interconnection Cluster Window System Impact Study 49.9 MW IA-PNM May 2018 March 2017 to June 2017 Preliminary Interconnection Cluster Window System Impact Study 49.9 MW IA-PNM-2017-11 May 2018 Prepared by: Public Service Company of New Mexico Foreword This report is prepared

More information

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: AESO Project # 1674

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: AESO Project # 1674 APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: AESO Project # 1674 Executive Summary Project Overview FortisAlberta Inc. (FortisAlberta) submitted a System

More information

Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q4 Stakeholder Meeting. December 18, 2014

Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q4 Stakeholder Meeting. December 18, 2014 Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q4 Stakeholder Meeting December 18, 2014 Agenda 1. Introductions 2. TCPC Policies 3. BHCE Planning Department Update 4. 2014 LTP Study Results 5. Stakeholder

More information

Merchant Transmission Interconnection PJM Impact Study Report. PJM Merchant Transmission Request Queue Position X3-028.

Merchant Transmission Interconnection PJM Impact Study Report. PJM Merchant Transmission Request Queue Position X3-028. Merchant Transmission Interconnection PJM Impact Study Report For PJM Merchant Transmission Request Queue Position X3-028 Breed 345 kv October/2014 System Impact Study Breed 345 kv Merchant Transmission

More information

TransWest Express Project

TransWest Express Project TransWest Express Project Phase One--Feasibility Study Final Study Report November 2006 A subsidiary of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Executive Summary On October 21, 2005 Arizona Public Service Company

More information

Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study For XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MW generator at new Western Refinary Substation

Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study For XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MW generator at new Western Refinary Substation Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study For XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 131-250 MW generator at new Western Refinary Substation System Planning Section April, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENT 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

More information

XXXX. Knob Hill Wind Farm Project. Interconnection System Impact Study

XXXX. Knob Hill Wind Farm Project. Interconnection System Impact Study XXXX Knob Hill Wind Farm Project Report No. August 2010 British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority 2010. All rights reserved.. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY, LIMITATION

More information

TOLTEC POWER PARTNERSHIP TOLTEC POWER PROJECT INTERCONNECTION STUDY SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY

TOLTEC POWER PARTNERSHIP TOLTEC POWER PROJECT INTERCONNECTION STUDY SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY TOLTEC POWER PARTNERSHIP TOLTEC POWER PROJECT INTERCONNECTION STUDY SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY January 7, 2002 Prepared by Jorge Chacon (Consultant) Tucson Electric Power Company Ed Beck ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

More information

Final System Impact Study for. Sierra Pacific Industries 31 MW Generation Project. Mount Vernon, WA. November 16, 2006

Final System Impact Study for. Sierra Pacific Industries 31 MW Generation Project. Mount Vernon, WA. November 16, 2006 Final System Impact Study for Sierra Pacific Industries 31 MW Generation Project Mount Vernon, WA November 16, 2006 Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Electric Transmission Department 1 1. Introduction On October

More information

DFO STATEMENT OF NEED REPORT

DFO STATEMENT OF NEED REPORT APPENDIX E DFO STATEMENT OF NEED REPORT Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary... 1 2.0 Description of the Area... 2 2.1 Geographic Study Area... 2 2.2 2016 System Configuration... 2 3.0 Area Loading

More information

El PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY 2014 BULK ELECTRIC SYSTEM TRANSMISSION ASSESSMENT FOR YEARS

El PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY 2014 BULK ELECTRIC SYSTEM TRANSMISSION ASSESSMENT FOR YEARS El Paso Electric Company El PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY 2014 BULK ELECTRIC SYSTEM TRANSMISSION ASSESSMENT FOR YEARS 2015 2024 A Review on System Performance Following Extreme Bulk Electric System Events of the

More information

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY FOR PROPOSED XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX GENERATION ON THE AMRAD-ARTESIA 345 KV

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY FOR PROPOSED XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX GENERATION ON THE AMRAD-ARTESIA 345 KV EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY FOR PROPOSED XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX GENERATION ON THE AMRAD-ARTESIA 345 KV LINE El Paso Electric Company System Planning Department

More information

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-023-FEAS-R1. Generator Interconnection Request # MW Wind Generating Facility Inverness (L6549), NS

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-023-FEAS-R1. Generator Interconnection Request # MW Wind Generating Facility Inverness (L6549), NS Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-023-FEAS-R1 Generator Interconnection Request # 23 100 MW Wind Generating Facility Inverness (L6549), NS February 16, 2006 Control Centre Operations Nova Scotia

More information

APPENDIX E: Project Need and Description

APPENDIX E: Project Need and Description APPENDIX E: Project Need and California ISO/MID E-1 Intentionally left blank California ISO/MID E-2 Lakeville 115 kv Bus Upgrade Installation of a sectionalizing breaker to be installed on 115 kv bus section

More information

Q85 Generation Interconnection

Q85 Generation Interconnection A subsidiary of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Q85 Generation Interconnection Interconnection Facilities Study AMENDED APS Contract No. 52386 By Arizona Public Service Company Transmission Planning

More information

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Informational Report Meeting Date: 1/25/2016 Summary Title: Update on Second Transmission Line Title: Update on Progress Towards Building

More information

Q87 Generation Interconnection

Q87 Generation Interconnection A subsidiary of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Version 1.0 Q87 Generation Interconnection Interconnection Facilities Study APS Contract No. 52365 By Arizona Public Service Company Transmission Planning

More information

QP 311 Kingdom Community Wind Project Interconnection Feasibility Study. July, 2010 FINAL REPORT. Prepared by:

QP 311 Kingdom Community Wind Project Interconnection Feasibility Study. July, 2010 FINAL REPORT. Prepared by: FINAL REPORT QP 311 Kingdom Community Wind Project Interconnection Feasibility Study July, 2010 Prepared by: i For ISO New England and Vermont Electric Power Company Table of Contents Executive Summary...

More information

APPENDIX E: Project Need and Description

APPENDIX E: Project Need and Description APPENDIX E: Project Need and California ISO/MID E-1 Intentionally left blank California ISO/MID E-2 Tyler 60 kv Shunt Capacitor Installation of a 2x10 MVAR capacitor bank at Tyler 60 kv bus Objectives

More information

Dunvegan Hydroelectric Project. For Glacier Power Limited. Preliminary Interconnection Study

Dunvegan Hydroelectric Project. For Glacier Power Limited. Preliminary Interconnection Study ` Dunvegan Hydroelectric Project For Glacier Power Limited Preliminary Interconnection Study Prepared by Pung Toy, P. Eng. and Ata Rehman, P. Eng. September 24, 2004 Table of Contents Table of Contents...

More information

XXXX. Kokish River Hydroelectric Project. Interconnection System Impact Study

XXXX. Kokish River Hydroelectric Project. Interconnection System Impact Study XXXX Kokish River Hydroelectric Project Report No. August 2010 British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority 2010. All rights reserved.. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY,

More information

Emera Maine Representative: Jeffrey Fenn, P.E., SGC Engineering LLC

Emera Maine Representative: Jeffrey Fenn, P.E., SGC Engineering LLC OCTOBER 22, 2014 Emera Maine s Local System Plan Bangor Hydro District Needs Assessment/Potential Solutions Local Planning Advisory Committee Meeting E M i R t ti Emera Maine Representative: Jeffrey Fenn,

More information

Wheeler Ridge Junction Substation Project Description and Functional Specifications for Competitive Solicitation

Wheeler Ridge Junction Substation Project Description and Functional Specifications for Competitive Solicitation Wheeler Ridge Junction Substation Project Description and Functional Specifications for Competitive Solicitation 1. Description In the 2013-2014 Transmission Planning Cycle, the ISO approved the construction

More information

Public Service Company of Colorado System Impact Study Load Interconnection Request for a 50 MVA Load Near Collbran

Public Service Company of Colorado System Impact Study Load Interconnection Request for a 50 MVA Load Near Collbran System Impact Study_50 MVA Load Interconnnection Request Near Collbran.doc Public Service Company of Colorado System Impact Study Load Interconnection Request for a 50 MVA Load Near Collbran PSCo Transmission

More information

Appendix D Black Hills Project Summary

Appendix D Black Hills Project Summary Page 1 of 28 Appendix D Black Hills Project Summary Table of Contents Black Hills Project Summary... D-1 Boone-Nyberg 115 kv Project... D-3 Rattlesnake Butte 115 kv Substation Terminal... D-6 Fountain

More information

System Impact Study 2009 T12 Badwater (Moneta)

System Impact Study 2009 T12 Badwater (Moneta) System Impact Study 2009 T12 Badwater (Moneta) Studies Performed by: Joseph Liberatore March 2010 Rocky Mountain Region Index Executive Summary...3 I. Introduction...4 II. Methodology...5 A. TOT Description...5

More information

PUD ELECTRIC SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION

PUD ELECTRIC SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION APPENDIX A PROCEDURES & REQUIREMENTS for OKANOGAN PUD ELECTRIC SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION Version 4.0 December 2011 Version 4.0 12/28/2011 Page 1 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Procedures

More information

Verde Transmission, LLC. Verde Project. System Impact Study Report

Verde Transmission, LLC. Verde Project. System Impact Study Report Verde Transmission, LLC Verde Project System Impact Study Report March 2017 Prepared by: Public Service Company of New Mexico Foreword This report was prepared for Verde Transmission, LLC by the PNM Transmission/

More information

OCTOBER 17, Emera Maine Representative: Jeffrey Fenn, P.E., LR/SGC Engineering LLC

OCTOBER 17, Emera Maine Representative: Jeffrey Fenn, P.E., LR/SGC Engineering LLC OCTOBER 17, 2018 Emera Maine s Local System Plan Bangor Hydro District Needs Assessment/Potential Solutions Local Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Emera Maine Representative: Jeffrey Fenn, P.E., LR/SGC

More information

Western Area Power Administration Sierra Nevada Region

Western Area Power Administration Sierra Nevada Region Western Area Power Administration Sierra Nevada Region 2014 Annual Ten-Year Transmission Plan Assessment Report November 20, 2014 For information or questions regarding this Transmission Assessment Report,

More information

Guide. Services Document No: GD-1401 v1.0. Issue Date: Title: WIND ISLANDING. Previous Date: N/A. Author: Heather Andrew.

Guide. Services Document No: GD-1401 v1.0. Issue Date: Title: WIND ISLANDING. Previous Date: N/A. Author: Heather Andrew. Guide Department: Interconnection Services Document No: GD-1401 v1.0 Title: WIND ISLANDING Issue Date: 11-24-2014 Previous Date: N/A Contents 1 PURPOSE... 2 2 SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY... 2 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES...

More information

Western Area Power Administration Rocky Mountain Region Annual Progress Report. Projects. Weld Substation Stage 04

Western Area Power Administration Rocky Mountain Region Annual Progress Report. Projects. Weld Substation Stage 04 Western Area Power Administration Rocky Mountain Region 2014 Annual Progress Report Projects Weld Substation Stage 04 Lovell Yellowtail 115-kV rebuild Curecanti 230/115-kV 150 MVA transformer Terry Ranch

More information

Rogers Road to Clubhouse 230kV New Transmission Line April 1, 2016

Rogers Road to Clubhouse 230kV New Transmission Line April 1, 2016 New Transmission Line April 1, 2016 The enclosed information is proprietary to PSE&G and is provided solely for your use. It should not be copied, reproduced, or shared with others without PSE&G s prior

More information