Need, Strategy and Implementation of ERTMS

Transcription

1 Need, Strategy and Implementation of ERTMS A contribution to interoperability, capacity enhancement and safety in Switzerland Jan Richard Strategy Manager ERTMS SBB Infrastructure

2 UIC ERTMS Platform Plenary, March 2008 Topics: 1. Background and History 2. Status and Experience 3. Future 4. Summary

3 Background and History The reasons for ETCS in Switzrland The concept Bahn 2000 and other new lines need speeds >= 200 km/h. The law for railway traffic dictate a CAB signalling system for speeds > 160 km/h. An evaluation in the 90 s of different CAB signalling systems proposes to use ERTMS (ETCS Level 2) as CAB signalling system for Switzerland. Strategy 2002 foresees the implementation of ETCS L2 till 2015 for the core network. Planned investments of about MCHF 830. Strategy 2006 foresees a network wide implementation of ETCS till Planned investment of about MCHF 300 ETCS L1 Limited Supvervision! 3

4 Background and History Key Driving Factors for the Strategy 2006 Renewal RU benefit Interoperability Operation ETCS The former ATP systems are getting obsolete and have to be replaced respecting signalling philosophy and investments Fastest possible transition to «ETCSonly» onboard equipment (avoiding STM s / double equipment) Interoperability on the North-/South corridor Rotterdam-Genua to be achieved until 2012 / Higher speed, shorter headways and need for capacity increase requires cab-signalling and traffic management systems. 4

5 UIC ERTMS Platform Plenary, March 2008 Topics: 1. Background and History 2. Status and Experience 3. Future 4. Summary

6 Status and Experience Berne Olten, ETCS Level km km double double track track commissioned commissioned fall fall back back optical optical signalling signalling 1 RBC RBC (Alstom) (Alstom) up up to to trains trains a day, day, mixed mixed traffic traffic 1 IXL IXL (Thales) (Thales) based based on on SRS SRS headway headway sec. 200km/h 200km/h caused delay ~ 0.5min / train / week 6 caused delay ~ 0.5min / train / week

7 Status and Experience Frutigen - Visp, ETCS Level 2 (Tunnel) km km single single track track (~12 (~12 km km double) double) up up to to trains trains a day, day, mixed mixed traffic traffic 1 RBC RBC (Thales) (Thales) headway headway sec. 250km/h 250km/h based based on on SRS SRS no no fall fall back back system system 2 IXLs IXLs (Thales) (Thales) commissioned commissioned

8 Status and Experience ERTMS Interoperability ~ 580 vehicles 20 20loco types 644 ERTMS Systems 3 OBU suppliers EXTRA EFFORT lines 136km + Italy 3 TRK suppliers 8

9 UIC ERTMS Platform Plenary, March 2008 Topics: 1. Background and History 2. Status and Experience 3. Future 4. Summary

10 Future Situation ETCS Targets until 2012 ETCS only access given on the Swiss branch 1 of Corridor A (Rotterdam Genova). Rollout in coordination with infrastructure company and RU s (cargo). Technical interoperability to be the main focus. National ATP s SIGNUM and ZUB ETCS Level 1 Limited Supervision ETCS Level 2 10

11 Future Situation ~ 2017 ETCS Targets until 2017 Commissioning of ETCS Level 2 on new Gotthard Base Tunnel (GBT, 53km) and Ceneri Base Tunnel (CBT) Replacement of legacy system ZUB/SIGNUM on entire network by ETCS Level 1 Limited Supervision Further analysis and studies for more need of ETCS Level 2 ETCS ETCS Level 1 Limited Supervision ETCS Level 2 possible ETCS Level 2 11

12 Future New ETCS L2 lines, North-South Corridor, Tunnels GBT GBT 57km 57kmdouble track track tunnel tunnel up up to to trains trainsper per day day (1/4 (1/4 P, P, 3/4 3/4 C) C) Headway sec. 250km/h SRS SRS?.?.??.?.? Planned commissioning CBT CBT 15km 15kmdouble track track tunnel tunnel up up to to trains trainsper per day day (1/3 (1/3 P, P, 2/3 2/3 C) C) Headway sec. 250km/h SRS SRS?.?.??.?.? Planned commissioning

13 Future Current activities and future challenges Developing Limited Supervision (CR 637) Pilot line and proof of concept for L1 LS Network wide rollout planning according to the needs (Corridors, etc.) Coordinated implementations with the neighbours Planning of future Level 2 projects (concept phase) Operational requirements vs. specifications Investments, how do ETCS LCC evolve? Scales of economy vs. safety 13

14 UIC ERTMS Platform Plenary, March 2008 Topics: 1. Background and History 2. Status and Experience 3. Future 4. Summary

15 Summary ETCS in Switzerland ETCS Level 2 did confirm it s operational fitness and performance by 2007 Switzerland provide references in ERTMS applications (headway km/h) for conventional rail The key investments (almost 600 vehicles fitted) have been done. Customer oriented migration strategy with the mode Level 1 Limited Supervision enables at least technical interoperability SBB gained significant know-how about ERTMS and is committed to the future development of the system Regarding operational harmonisation and functioinality a next baseline will be needed. 15

16 UIC ERTMS Platform, March 2008 Thank you! Jan Richard Strategy Manager ERTMS