Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007
|
|
|
- Richard Brown
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007
2 Transit Technologies
3 Technologies Considered Bus Light Rail Commuter Rail
4 Bus Standard or articulated high-capacity vehicles Special lanes or signal priority Bus Rapid Transit Advantage of flexible service Congestion problem
5 Commuter Rail Locomotive pulling passenger cars Shares freight tracks Flexible capacity Peak hour service Long haul or suburb to city Needs to run flat and straight
6 Light Rail Powered from above by electric wires Has its own tracks Frequent service All day service Suburb to city and urban area travel Quick acceleration Can climb and turn
7 Study Summary
8 MPO Transit Study Process Identify Needs And Opportunities June Analyze Transit Concepts August Recommend Transit Concept For 2050 October
9 Transit Needs & Opportunities
10 Concept A: Diagram
11 Concept B: Diagram
12 Concept C: Diagram
13 Getting to the 2050 Concept Serving existing and emerging activity centers Serving growing and redeveloping areas Measuring the potential for station area development Respecting community character and land use policies Grounding ourselves in reality Appropriate transit technology Rights of way Costs
14 Transit Concept for 2050
15 Transit Concept for 2050 Basis of Concept Improve Mobility Support Economic Vitality Growth Management Transit Service Characteristics Destinations Transit for All Service (Distance, Frequency, Time, Capacity) Optimized by Benefits Maximize ability to serve largest concentrations of (existing & future) residential and employment areas with optimal balance of service
16 Concept Selection Process Evaluated current capacity of transit corridors to accommodate development Applied transit station area prototypes (type, size, character) Determined projected growth (jobs & housing) for the concept vs. trend for 2050 Identified appropriate technology to best serve destinations and range of riders (ie. balance time vs. distance) Evaluated overall order of magnitude cost to select technology and service type
17 Light Rail New Tampa- Westshore USF Brandon-Westchase South Tampa- Downtown Commuter Rail Westshore Downtown Tampa Brandon Lutz SouthShore Plant City Bus Complementary Bus Network
18 Light Rail New Tampa- Westshore Brandon-Westchase South Tampa- Downtown Commuter Rail Lutz SouthShore Plant City Bus Complementary Bus Network
19 Connects major activity centers Continuous all-day service Closely spaced station 30 miles 26 Stations Serves urban living, transit dependent, choice riders & special event Capacity to supports future growth Westshore USF Downtown Tampa Red Line (Light Rail): New Tampa/USF Westshore
20 Connects housing & employment Brandon as regional center Infill east of CBD Closely spaced station 27 miles 27 Stations Serves urban living, transit dependent, choice riders & special event Westchase Downtown Tampa Blue Line (Light Rail): Westchase Brandon Brandon
21 Serves densely populated area and activity centers Closely spaced station 8 miles 9 Stations Serves urban living, transit dependent, choice riders & special event MacDill Downtown Tampa Green Line (Light Rail): South Tampa Downtown Tampa Brandon
22 Lutz Commuter rail service to north Hillsborough and Pasco counties Peak period travel & transfer stations to light rail Express service 17 miles 6 Stations Provides alternative to commuters, transit dependent & underserved areas Added capacity alternatives to major road investments USF Downtown Tampa Magenta Line (Commuter Rail): Lutz Downtown Tampa
23 Commuter rail service to Plant City, Brandon and Polk County Peak period travel & transfer stations to Brandon light rail Express service 26 miles 5 Stations Provides alternative to commuters, transit dependent & underserved areas Added capacity alternatives to major road investments Downtown Tampa Brandon Purple Line (Commuter Rail): Plant City/Brandon Downtown Tampa Plant City
24 Commuter rail service to SouthShore and Sarasota/Manatee counties Peak period travel & transfer stations to light rail Express service 26 miles 7 Stations Provides alternative to commuters, transit dependent & underserved areas Added capacity alternatives to major road investments Downtown Tampa SouthShore Orange Line (Commuter Rail): SouthShore Downtown Tampa
25 Commuter rail service to Plant City along I-4 and East Central Florida Peak period travel to Tampa Express service 26 miles 5 Stations Provides alternative to commuters, transit dependent & underserved areas Added capacity alternatives to major highway investments Downtown Red Line (Commuter/Regional Rail): Plant City/I-4 Downtown Tampa Plant City
26 Transit Concept Characteristics Light Rail (Average 1 mile station spacing) New Tampa-Westshore (Red Line) 30 miles 26 stations Brandon-Westchase (Blue Line) 27 miles 27 stations South Tampa-Downtown (Green Line) 8 miles 9 stations Commuter Rail (Avg. 3-5 mile station spacing) Lutz (Magenta Line) 17 miles 6 stations SouthShore (Orange Line) 26 miles 7 stations Plant City/Brandon (Purple Line) 26 miles 5 stations Plant City/I-4 (Red Line) 26 miles 5 stations
27 Station Types Regional DU/Ac Jobs/Ac Community DU/Ac Jobs/Ac Neighborhood DU/Ac 2-15 Jobs/Ac
28 HH Density Transit Concept < > 16 DU/Acre (2050) Projected Transit Growth Increment
29 HH Density Current < > 16 DU/Acre (2000)
30 HH Density Transit Concept < > 16 DU/Acre (2050) Projected Total With Transit
31 HH Density Trend < > 16 DU/Acre (2050) Projected Total Without Transit
32 Jobs Density Transit Concept < > 50 Jobs/Acre (2050) Projected Transit Growth Increment
33 Jobs Density Current < > 50 Jobs/Acre (2000)
34 Jobs Density Transit Concept < > 50 Jobs/Acre (2050) Projected Total With Transit
35 Jobs Density Trend < > 50 Jobs/Acre (2050) Projected Total Without Transit
36 HH Density By Station < > 16 DU/Acre (2050) Generalized Station Intensity
37 Jobs Density By Station < > 50 Jobs/Acre (2050) Generalized Station Intensity
38 700, , , , , , ,000 0 Households & Jobs Within ¼ mile of Stations HH 1/4 Mile Jobs 1/4 Mile Total (*removes duplication at transfer stations) 85,000 HH and 300,000 Jobs Transit Supported Growth (Projected Avg.) DU/Ac and Jobs/Ac South Tampa - Downtown Lutz - Downtown SouthShore - Downtown Plant City/Brandon - Downtown Plant City/I4 - Downtown New Tampa - Westshore Brandon - Westchase
39 700, , , , , , ,000 0 Households & Jobs Within Station Areas (up to 1 mile) HH Total Jobs Total South Tampa - Downtown Lutz - Downtown SouthShore - Downtown Plant City/Brandon - Downtown Plant City/I4 - Downtown Total (*removes duplication at transfer stations) 350,000 HH and 930,000 Jobs Transit Supported Growth (Projected Avg.) 6-12 DU/Ac and Jobs/Ac New Tampa - Westshore Brandon - Westchase
40 Total Households & Jobs Within Station Areas (1/4 & 1 mile) Light Rail ¼ Mile ( 000s) up to 1 Mile ( 000s) New Tampa-Westshore 35k HH & 170k Jobs 165k HH & 625k Jobs Brandon-Westchase 40k HH & 200k Jobs 170k HH & 685k Jobs South Tampa-Downtown 15k HH & 70k Jobs 40k HH & 110k Jobs Commuter Rail Lutz-Downtown 10k HH & 50k Jobs 35k HH & 85k Jobs South Shore-Downtown 10k HH & 50k Jobs 50k HH & 75k Jobs Plant City-Downtown 10k HH & 50k Jobs 40k HH & 90k Jobs Plant City/I-4-Downtown 5k HH & 10k Jobs 10k HH & 25k Jobs Total 85k HH & 300k Jobs 350k HH & 930k Jobs (*removes duplication at transfer stations) Transit Supported Growth DU/Ac 6-12 DU/Ac (*Projected Gross Avg Density) Jobs/Ac Jobs/Ac
41 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Transit Served Households & Jobs (% of Projected 2050 Growth ) HH/2050 HH EMP/2050 EMP South Tampa - Downtown Lutz - Downtown SouthShore - Downtown Plant City/Brandon - Downtown Plant City/I4 - Downtown System Total 2050 New Tampa - Westshore Brandon - Westchase
42 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Transit Served Households & Jobs (% of 2000 to 2050 Growth Increment) HH/ HH EMP/ EMP South Tampa - Downtown Lutz - Downtown SouthShore - Downtown Plant City/Brandon - Downtown Plant City/I4 - Downtown System Total Δ Brandon - Westchase New Tampa - Westshore
43 Transit Served Population & Jobs (% of 2050 Total & Growth Increment) Light Rail 2050 Δ New Tampa-Westshore 16% HH & 33% Jobs 31% HH & 62% Jobs Brandon-Westchase 17% HH & 36% Jobs 32% HH & 69% Jobs South Tampa-Downtown 3 % HH & 6 % Jobs 7 % HH & 11% Jobs Commuter Rail Lutz-Downtown 3 % HH & 5 % Jobs 6% HH & 9% Jobs South Shore-Downtown 5 % HH & 4 % Jobs 9% HH & 8% Jobs Plant City-Downtown 4 % HH & 5 % Jobs 8% HH & 9% Jobs Plant City/I-4-Downtown 1 % HH & 1 % Jobs 2% HH & 2% Jobs Total 34 % HH & 49% Jobs 65% HH & 93% Jobs * based on 1 mile radius
44 Transit Ridership Light Rail New Tampa-Westshore (Red Line) 10-25,000 Trips Per Day Brandon-Westchase (Blue Line) 20-30,000 Trips Per Day South Tampa-Downtown (Green Line) 5-10,000 Trips Per Day Commuter Rail Lutz-Downtown (Magenta Line) 1-8,000 Trips Per Day SouthShore-Downtown (Ornage Line) 2-8,000 Trips Per Day Plant City/Brandon-Downtown (Purple Line) 1-8,000 Trips Per Day Plant City/I-4-Downtown (Red Line) 1-2,500 Trips Per Day Total 40-90,000 Trips Per Day
45 Transit Ridership Per Mile Light Rail New Tampa-Westshore (Red Line) 1000 Trips/Mile Brandon-Westchase (Blue Line) 1100 Trips/Mile South Tampa-Downtown (Green Line) 1250 Trips/Mile Commuter Rail Lutz-Downtown (Magenta Line) 475 Trips/Mile South Shore-Downtown (Orange Line) 300 Trips/Mile Plant City/Brandon-Downtown (Purple Line) 300 Trips/Mile Plant City/I-4-Downtown (Red Line) 100 Trips/Mile
46 Light Rail New Tampa- Westshore Brandon-Westchase South Tampa- Downtown Commuter Rail Lutz SouthShore Plant City Bus Complementary Bus Network
MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies
Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, 2007 Transit Technologies 1 Technologies Considered Bus Light Rail Commuter Rail Bus Standard or articulated high-capacity vehicles
ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently? Transportation Planning Board (TPB) Travel Forecasting Subcommittee July 17, 2015 1 Alternatives
TOD for HSR Success along the Northeast Corridor
TOD for HSR Success along the Northeast Corridor David Kooris, Vice President and CT Director Regional Plan Association With Support From: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy October 17 th, 2011 Possible
THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner
THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner December 13 th, 2012 Overview Characteristics of Wilshire Boulevard Overview of the
Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.
Public Meeting June 15, 2017 5:30 7:30 p.m. Welcome 2015 Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study 2015 Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study 2017 Norfolk Westside Transit Study HRT and the
Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1
Executive Summary Introduction The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project is a vital public transit infrastructure investment that would provide a transit connection to the existing Metro Gold Line
West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015
West Broadway Transit Study Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015 Introductions Community Engagement Summer Outreach Fall Outreach Technical Analysis Process Update Alternatives Review Economic
PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)
PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL) October 2003 The Philadelphia commuter rail service area consists of 5.1 million people, spread over 1,800 square miles at an average population
Leadership NC. November 8, 2018
v Leadership NC November 8, 2018 Planning for our region s growth The Triangle is one of the fastestgrowing regions in the nation. More than 2 million people are already part of the equation, and the
Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study
Florida Department of Transportation District Six Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study What
Green Line Long-Term Investments
Enhancements Short-term improvements to keep Austin moving. Investments Long-term projects to support our future. Mobility Hubs MetroRapid MetroRail MetroExpress Connectors Circulators Project Connect
NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)
NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL) October 2003 New York: The New York commuter rail service area consists of 20.3 million people, spread over 4,700 square miles at an average
The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.
CORPORATE REPORT NO: R161 COUNCIL DATE: July 23, 2018 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: July 19, 2018 FROM: General Manager, Engineering FILE: 8740-01 SUBJECT: Surrey Long-Range Rapid Transit Vision
METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options
METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options Bloomington City Council Work Session November 18, 2013 Christina Morrison BRT/Small Starts Project Office Coordinating Planning and Design AMERICAN
Maryland Gets to Work
I-695/Leeds Avenue Interchange Reconstruction Baltimore County Reconstruction of the I-695/Leeds Avenue interchange including replacing the I-695 Inner Loop bridges over Benson Avenue, Amtrak s Northeast
A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan
A Transit Plan for the Future Draft Network Plan Project Overview and Status Completed Market Analysis and Service Evaluation. Developed Plan Framework and Guiding Principles. Developed a draft Five Year
Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)
Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM) Commuter Rail #147925 November 6, 2009 1 Guidance of KRM Commuter Rail Studies Intergovernmental Partnership Technical Steering Committee Temporary and Limited Authority
PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation
PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation August 2, 2017 LYNX Central Station Open Area 1 Modes Screening 2 Trunk vs Feeder Trunk Modes High peak capacity Direct routes Feeder Modes Routing may be flexible Serve
Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017
Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017 Master Plan Overview Phase 1 Community Vision and Existing Transit Conditions Phase 2 Scenario Development Phase 3 Transit Master
CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD Item 12 CLRP Financially Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region 2014 Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP
WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018
WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018 Planning for growth WAKE COUNTY s population already exceeds ONE MILLION and grows by more than 60 people a day. That s 23,000 people a year or basically another Morrisville.
Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop
Fresno County Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop Project Background Senate Bill 375 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Greenhouse gas emission reduction through integrated transportation
PROJECT BACKGROUND 3
AGENDA 1. Welcome & Introductions 2. Project Background 3. Project Approach & Schedule 4. Draft Long List of Options 5. Evaluation Process 6. Next Steps 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND 3 OUR RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK
Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study
Florida Department of Transportation District Six Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From
TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017
TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017 THE TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (TDP) WILL IDENTIFY: TRANSIT NEEDS AND DESIRES OF THE COMMUNITY COMMUNITY AND AGENCY STAKEHOLDER S
UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018
UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis Board Workshop January 6, 2018 1 Executive Summary UTA ranks DART 6 th out of top 20 Transit Agencies in the country for ridership. UTA Study confirms
Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis
Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis Prepared for: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Planning and Project Development May 2005 Prepared by: in conjunction
The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects
The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects UTC 2018 Seminar Series March 15, 2018 Claire Bozic Martin Menninger ON TO 2050 CMAP is the Region s MPO, seven county region Land use and
Transit in Bay Area Blueprint
Rail~Volution 2010 Click to edit Master title style Transit in Bay Area Blueprint October 21, 2010 0 Bottom Line State-of-Good Repair essential for reliable transit service large funding shortfalls BART
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 2018 What is the More MARTA Atlanta program? The More MARTA Atlanta program is a collaborative partnership between MARTA and the City of Atlanta to develop and implement a program
QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N
QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT UN I O N S TAT I O N T R AV E L by TR A I N Published September 2017 2015 PROGRESS MAP This document reports FasTracks progress through 2015 BACKGROUND RTD The
I-35W Past, Present, and Future: METRO Orange Line
I-35W Past, Present, and Future: METRO Orange Line 2018 State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Charles Carlson Director, BRT Projects Metro Transit Charles.Carlson@metrotransit.org Metro Transit:
August 2, 2010 Public Meeting
Public Meeting LYMMO Expansion Alternatives Analysis Study Purpose of study is to provide a fresh look at potential LYMMO expansion, following Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Alternatives Analysis
GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan
GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan GO Transit s 2020 Service Plan describes GO s commitment to customers, existing and new, to provide a dramatically expanded interregional transit option
Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.
Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009 Background As the Treasure Valley continues to grow, high-quality transportation connections
TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS
TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS This document reviews the methodologies and tools used to calculate the projected ridership and parking space needs from the proposed Texas City Park & Ride to
Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office
Jeff s House Downtown Charlottesville PEC Office Year 2000 US Census Data Employed persons over 16 Percentage of Employed Persons Locality Avg Commute (in minutes) Drove Public Transit Walk/Bike Other
Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development
Public Meeting City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development Funded by Regional Transportation Authority September 12, 2011 In partnership with Presentation
Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017
Transportation 2040: Plan Performance Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017 Today Background Plan Performance Today s Meeting Background Board and Committee Direction 2016-2017 Transportation
Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary
Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary Wake County, growth and transit The Triangle is one of the fastest-growing regions in the nation. Wake County
Making Mobility Better, Together
Making Mobility Better, Together Austin Transportation Department Gordon Derr, P.E., for Robert J. Spillar, P.E Director, Austin Transportation Department 1 AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Our Mission
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: October 24, 2012 SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN RAPID TRANSIT EXPANSION STUDY (DRTES) PHASE 1 STRATEGIC PLAN ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS
Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017
Metro Reimagined Project Overview October 2017 Reimagining Metro Transit Continuing our Commitment to: Provide mobility based on existing and future needs Value the role of personal mobility in the quality
RTSP Phase II Update
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority RTSP Phase II Update Presentation to the Technical Advisory Group July 18, 2013 Meeting 1 Presentation Outline RTSP Integration with Momentum RTSP Process
US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017
US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing February 16, 2017 Project Goals Improve the quality of transit service Improve mobility opportunities and choices Enhance quality of life Support master
10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
October 6, 2016 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 WELCOME 2 Item #4 TRAC ROADWAY RECOMMENDATIONS UPDATE Item #4 Completed Jurisdiction Presentations Boulder City August
Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor
Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Past, Present, and Future Arun Rao, Passenger Rail Manager Wisconsin Department of Transportation Elliot Ramos, Passenger Rail Engineer Illinois Department
Click to edit Master title style
Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates SERVICE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES September 22, 2015 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW & WORK TO DATE 1. Extensive stakeholder involvement Throughout 2. System and market assessment
Travel Time Savings Memorandum
04-05-2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Background 3 Methodology 3 Inputs and Calculation 3 Assumptions 4 Light Rail Transit (LRT) Travel Times 5 Auto Travel Times 5 Bus Travel Times 6 Findings 7 Generalized Cost
Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
Feasibility Study Community Meeting March, 2017 1 Agenda 1. Welcome / Introductions 2. Background / Meeting Purpose 3. Progress to Date Options Evaluated Capital/Operating Costs Ridership 4. Financial
What is the Connector?
What is the Connector? The Connector is a plan for a high-capacity transit system from northeast to south Ann Arbor, connecting major destinations including downtown, commercial, and residential areas,
DRIVING INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY Tampa Bay is ready to connect to Autonomous Vehicle Technology
DRIVING INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY Tampa Bay is ready to connect to Autonomous Vehicle Technology CONTENTS Testing autonomous vehicle technologies in a real-world environment...2 All roads lead to Tampa
Parking Management Element
Parking Management Element The State Transportation Planning Rule, adopted in 1991, requires that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) area implement, through its member jurisdictions, a parking
Technology Evaluation Scorecard Suitability
Technology Evaluation Scorecard Suitability Does the mode meet the MOE? Measure of Effectiveness Length of Typical Station Operating Technology Commute Spacing Speed Automated Guideway Bus Rapid Commuter
BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY
BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY FM # 42802411201 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2012 GOBROWARD Broward Boulevard Corridor Transit Study FM # 42802411201 Executive Summary Prepared For: Ms. Khalilah Ffrench,
Needs and Community Characteristics
Needs and Community Characteristics Anticipate Population and Job Growth in the City Strongest density of population and jobs in Ann Arbor are within the Study Area Population expected to grow 8.4% by
2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS
2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS In the Study Area, as in most of the Metro Transit network, there are two distinct route structures. The base service structure operates all day and the peak
Why Light Rail Was Selected for the Durham- Orange Corridor. Orange County Board of County Commissioners February 16, 2017
Why Light Rail Was Selected for the Durham- Orange Corridor Orange County Board of County Commissioners February 16, 2017 Presentation Overview Matching Transit Technology to a Particular Corridor Key
Shared Mobility and Transit It is The Road to Economic
Shared Mobility and Transit It is The Road to Economic Mobility? February 20, 2018 Todd Plesko VP Planning & Development Dallas Area Rapid Transit 1 DART Transit Riders Are Disproportionately From Low
Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate
Breakout Session The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate Why is our suburban and sprawling development pattern a challenge
MetroExpress Improvements
Improvements Enhancements Short-term improvements to keep Austin moving. Investments Long-term projects to support our future. Mobility Hubs MetroRapid MetroRail Commuters Connectors Circulators Project
Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY
Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY 2016-2017 H T t ti C itt House Transportation Committee February 4, 2015 Transit connects us to the places that matter Transportation Needs Grow as the Region Grows
Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study
Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study Feb. 7-9, 2012 Agenda Review project background Progress summary Recommended alternatives for
Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study
Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study previously known as railyard alternatives & i-280 boulevard study June 5, 2018 CONNECTING CALIFORNIA 4,300 lane miles + 115 Airport gates would be needed to create
2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT
2 VALUE PROPOSITION The purpose of the Value Proposition is to define a number of metrics or interesting facts that clearly demonstrate the value of the existing Xpress system to external audiences including
V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT
V03 APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August 2016 Green Line LRT 2 Presentation Outline Past Present Future 3 16/03/2016 RouteAhead Update 4 4 16/03/2016 RouteAhead Update 5 5 16/03/2016 6 6
Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP
Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio Keith T. Parker, AICP President/CEO Presentation Overview Charlotte Agency and Customer Profile San Antonio Agency and Customer Profile Attracting New Customers
Draft Results and Open House
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study Draft Results and Open House Chris Evilia, Director of Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Allen Hunter, General Manager Waco Transit System Jimi
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study Chris Evilia, Director of Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Allen Hunter, General Manager Waco Transit System Jimi Mitchell, Project Manager AECOM
Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality
City of Charlotte Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality Transportation Oversight Committee Carolyn Flowers CEO Charlotte Area Transit System April 29, 2010 Charlotte Region Statistics Mecklenburg
Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner
Metro Transit Update Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner Metro Transit Service Development May 16, 2013 1 Transit Planning
Strategic Plan
2005-2015 Strategic Plan SUMMARY OF THE REVISED PLAN IN 2011 A decade focused on developing mass transit in the Outaouais A updated vision of mass transit in the region The STO is embracing the future
PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ROLES
PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ROLES Outline 1. Range of Modes and Services 2. Modal Descriptions 3. Modal Comparisons and Performance Characteristics 4. Simple Capacity Analysis Nigel H.M.
San Francisco Transportation Plan Update
San Francisco Transportation Plan Update SPUR August 1, 2011 www.sfcta.org/movesmartsf twitter.com/sanfranciscota www.facebook.com/movesmartsf How does the RTP relate to the SFTP? Regional Transportation
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016 Shift Rapid Transit Initiative Largest infrastructure project in the city s history. Rapid Transit initiative will transform London s public transit
APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS
APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS Jung Seo, Hsi-Hwa Hu, Frank Wen, Simon Choi, Cheol-Ho Lee Research & Analysis Southern California Association of Governments 2012
Navigating in Different Rivers
Navigating in Different Rivers Suburban TOD Julie Jones, Planning Manager, City of Fridley Julie Farnham, Senior Planner, City of Bloomington Kersten Elverum, Director of Planning & Development, City of
Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study
Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study previously known as railyard alternatives & i-280 boulevard study May 22, 2018 CONNECTING CALIFORNIA 4,300 lane miles + 115 Airport gates would be needed to create
Scarborough Transit Planning
Scarborough Transit Planning April 23, 2016 Transportation Planning Section City Planning Division Overview 1. Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan 2. Scarborough Transit Planning 1. Minutes of last
Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts
DMU Implementation on Existing Commuter Rail Corridors: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons Learned Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner Boston, Massachusetts
An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics. Date April 30, 2009
An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics Date April 30, 2009 Land Use and Transportation Is there a link? Streetcar Suburbs were the result of land developers creating streetcar lines in order
UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010
BART Click to Capacity edit Master Overview title style for UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference October 18, 2010 0 BART Basics 360,000 daily riders 104 miles 43 stations 1.3 billion annual passenger miles 1
6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
June 7, 2018 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 TRAC GOALS, FRAMEWORK & AGENDA REVIEW 2 COMMITTEE GOALS Learn about Southern Nevada s mobility challenges, new developments
Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.
Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 1 Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 2 Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 3 Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 4 Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 5 Transit Service right. service
I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis
I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis Steering & Technical Advisory Committees Joint Meeting January 15, 2016 @ 10:00 AM SC/TAC Meeting Winter 2016 Agenda I. Welcome & Introductions II. III. Project
Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics
Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics Yonah Freemark February 18, 2016 Metropolitan Planning Council Chicagoland s growth over time 1950 Population density Fewer than 2,000 ppl/sq. mi.
Autonomous Vehicles and Land Use
Autonomous Vehicles and Land Use Makeover Montgomery 3: Balancing Change in America s Suburbs May 6, 2016 Adam Ducker, Managing Director AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES ARE COMING Multiple sources say they will be
Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation. Chapter 1. Purpose and Need
Chapter 1 Purpose and Need December 2016 This page intentionally left blank. December 2016 1 PURPOSE AND NEED 1.1 Introduction The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation
Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms
Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance
Leveraging Land Use Changes through Transportation Funding
Leveraging Land Use Changes through Transportation Funding Railvolution 2005 September 10, 2005 James Corless Senior Planner What is the MTC region? 9 7 101 26 San Francisco Bay Area counties Million people;
Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS
Making the Case for Transit: the Transit Competitiveness Index Title William E. Walter, GISP Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS Understanding Conditions in Each Travel Market
ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment
ITEM 9 Information October 19, 2016 Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment Staff Recommendation: Issues: Background: Receive briefing None The board will be briefed on a
Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms
Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration Legislative Committee on Urban Growth and Infrastructure Carolyn Flowers CEO Charlotte Area Transit System March 23, 2010 Charlotte Region
Community Meetings June 2018
Community Meetings June 2018 1 Welcome and Agenda Thank you for joining us! 6:00 pm Open House 6:30 pm Welcome & Presentation 7:00 pm Q&A 7:15 pm Open House Resumes 8:00 pm Meeting Concludes 2 Purpose
Welcome and Agenda. Thank you for joining us! 6:00 pm Open House. 6:30 pm Welcome & Presentation. 7:00 pm Q&A. 7:15 pm Open House Resumes
1 Welcome and Agenda Thank you for joining us! 6:00 pm Open House 6:30 pm Welcome & Presentation 7:00 pm Q&A 7:15 pm Open House Resumes 8:00 pm Meeting Concludes 2 Purpose of this Meeting Introduce project
Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #DisruptiveTransportation
Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org tweet about this event: @SPUR_Urbanist #DisruptiveTransportation TNCs & AVs The Future Is Uncertain The Future Is Uncertain U.S. Dept of Transportation
DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit
DRAFT Evaluation s The criteria for evaluating applications for new funding commitments are used to measure how well they advance the six goals identified for the MTP. Through transportation: Reduce per
Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS
Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS Annie Nam Southern California Association of Governments September 24, 2012 The Goods Movement
3.1 Introduction Transportation Elements and Study Area Meeting the Need for the Project
Chapter 3 Transportation Environment and Consequences 3. Introduction This chapter summarizes the characteristics of the transportation system in the East Link Project vicinity and discusses potential