Pohjoismainen yhteistyö NER-rahoituksella

Transcription

1 Pohjoismainen yhteistyö NER-rahoituksella Sähköautohankkeet: INTELECT RekkEVidde Juhani Laurikko, VTT

2 " Incentives and actual cost calculations for electric transport in the Nordic countries INTELECT

3 Objectives & Tasks Map all available incentives in the Nordic countries and make them accessible to the public Build a calculator so that people can actually understand directly the benefit of acquiring a zero emission vehicle Create a tool where policy makers and organisations can attract OEM s to launch new ZEV into the Nordic market

4 Project Partners Icelandic New Energy Ltd. (Iceland) Coordinator VTT (Finland), a government R&D institute Nukissiorfiit (Greenland), largest energy provider Grönn Bil (Norway), a service centre for BEV in Norway SEV (Faroe Islands), main electric provider Orkusetur (Iceland) (part of the Icelandic Energy Authority) Dansk Energi (Denmark), insight into the Danish energy system & current energy policy AF consulting (Sweden), insight into energy situation in Sweden

5 Vehicle Taxation Across Nordic Countries Denmark Faroe Island Finland Greenland Iceland Norway Sweden Gasoline/diesel vehicles Import taxes dkr/g % % NOK per g/km (2012) CO grams/km 20 5, The duty CO grams/km 20 10, consist of a CO grams/km 20 14, Registration fixed amount of No taxes for CO grams/km 20 19, tax: 105% of % vehicles CO grams/km 20 20, taxable value of the part of produced in CO grams/km , under 10266, the invoice Europe - 10 % CO grams/km , % of taxable amount import tax for CO grams/km , value over exceeding vehicles outside CO grams/km , , but not EU. CO grams/km , % CO grams/km , of the rest. CO2 >250 grams/km , Other import fees VAT 25% 25% 23 N.A. 25,5 25% 25% ( % ( > 75% of invoice Bio methane gas vehicles Registration tax N.A. N.A. CO2 - tax CO2 - tax 0 VAT 25% N.A. acc. CO 2 N.A. 25, Subsidy N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A N.A. N.A. Natural gas vehicles Registration tax N.A. acc. CO 2 N.A. CO2-tax CO2 - tax 0 VAT 25% N.A. 23 N.A. 25, Ethanol vehicles Registration tax N.A. acc. CO 2 N.A. CO2 - tax CO2 - tax 0 VAT 25% N.A. 23 N.A. 25, Hybrid vehicles Registration tax N.A. acc. CO 2 N.A. CO2 - tax CO2 - tax 0 VAT 25% N.A. 23 N.A. 25, Subsidy N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 10% reduction in calculation weight N.A. Hybrid plug-in Registration tax N.A. acc. CO 2 N.A. CO2 - tax CO2 - tax 0 VAT 25% N.A. 23 N.A. 25, Subsidy N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 10% reduction in calculation weight N.A. Battery vehicles 0 0 5% (C0 2 =0 g/km) Temporary zero No CO2 tax No CO2 tax 0 VAT 25% Zero until Temporary zero 25, Hydrogen vehicles 0 0 5% (C0 2 =0 g/km) Temporary zero No CO2 tax No CO2 tax 0 VAT 25% Zero until Temporary zero

6 Costs of Some Example Vehicles Denmark Faroe Island Finland Greenland Iceland Norway Sweden Gasoline Vehicle factory cost/inc. shipping CO2 emission 119 g/km ,9 % Vehicles weighing up to 900 kg: Other import taxes VAT % TOTAL Vehicle factory cost/inc. shipping CO2 emission 199 g/km ,0 % ehicles from kg to kg: Other import taxes VAT % TOTAL Diesel Vehicle factory cost/inc. shipping CO2 emission 159 g/km ,5 % Vehicles from 901 kg to kg: Other import taxes VAT % TOTAL Battery Vehicle factory cost/inc. shipping Other import taxes 0 5,0 % VAT % TOTAL Vehicle factory cost/inc. shipping Other import taxes 0 5,0 % VAT % TOTAL Hydrogen Vehicle factory cost/inc. shipping Other import taxes 0 5,0 % VAT % TOTAL Vehicle factory cost/inc. shipping Other import taxes 0 5,0 % VAT % TOTAL

7

8 Nettilaskuri A - Suomi

9 Nettilaskuri A - Suomi

10 Nettilaskuri B - Suomi

11 the RekkEVidde Assessing Range and Performance of Electric Vehicles in Nordic Driving Conditions

12 the RekkEVidde Objectives Produce realistic performance figures for EVs attributed to Nordic driving and weather conditions Agree what kind of additional testing is necessary for EV s apart from the regulatory test (ECE-R No. 101) Ensure market acceptance for EV s

13 Consortium Coordination Laboratory testing Field testing Associate partners

14 Project Contents WP0 Coordination and Dissemination WP1 Duty cycle analysis WP2 Test protocol tools WP3 Application of the laboratory test protocol on 3 EV types WP4 Field test of EVs Finding during project: Energy labeling for EV s will be studied

15 WP1 Duty cycle analysis Study of the Driving Cycles Temperature &road condition variations Typical trips&loads TSS: Bilrörelse

16 WP2 Test protocol tools Field-test input from regular ICE-vehicles will be logged (mainly in Sweden) Test temperature and charging Cabin heating & auxiliary energy use included Preheating of cabin during charge allowed at test protocol? Vehicle load? Useful range criteria? Climb home range?

17 WP3 Application of the laboratory test protocol on three EV types Citroën C-Zero on in test cell at VTT

18 WP4 Field test of EV pool

19 Assessing range and performance of electric vehicles in Nordic driving conditions Project RekkEVidde by Juhani Laurikko (VTT, FI), Robert Granström (TSS North, S), Arto Haakana (GreenNetFinland, FI) GREAT MINDS THINK ELECTRIC /

20 Paper Reference No. F2012- IMPROVEMENTS IN TEST PROTOCOLS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES TO DETERMINE RANGE AND TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION LAURIKKO, Juhani NUOTTIMÄKI, Jukka NYLUND, Nils-Olof VTT Technical Research Centre Finland

21 Conclusions

22 Test Results - Summary Estimated range With heater +23 C -20 C -20 C +23 vs. -20 cycle km km km w.heater NEDC % Helsinki City % Artemis Urban % Road, FIN % Artemis Road, EV* % Artemis Motorway, EV* % average, all cycles % *EV denotes that warm-up part of the cycle is omitted

23