CRIME IN MARYLAND 2011 UNIFORM CRIME REPORT GOVERNOR MARTIN O'MALLEY LT. GOVERNOR ANTHONY G. BROWN COLONEL MARCUS L. BROWN, SUPERINTENDENT

Transcription

1 RIME IN MARYLAND 2011 UNIFORM RIME REPORT GOVERNOR MARTIN O'MALLEY LT. GOVERNOR ANTHONY G. BROWN OLONEL MARUS L. BROWN, SUPERINTENDENT MARYLAND STATE POLIE

2 MARTIN O'MALLEY GOVERNOR ANTHONY G. BROWN LT. GOVERNOR STATE OF MARYLAND MARYLAND STATE POLIE 1201 REISTERSTOWN ROAD PIKESVILLE, MARYLAND TOLL FREE: TTY: June 20,2012 OLONEL MARUS L. BROWN SUPERINTENDENT Te Honorable Martin 09Malley Governor State House Annapolis MD Dear Governor 0' Malley: In accordance wit Public Safety Article, Section 2, Subsection 307 and 308, of te Annotated ode of Maryland, te Maryland Department of State Police is pleased to submit te 2011 Uniform rime Report, rime in Marvland. Tis publication represents te 37t annual rime in Mawland report. Te 2011 rime in Mawland publication provides valuable information to law enforcement personnel, policy makers and interested parties to include tose in academic, civic and researc organizations. Te statistics presented in tis release are an indication of crime and criminal activities known to, and reported by, law enforcement agencies for Te information presented focuses on te incidence of crime and provides an indicator over time of variations in crime trends. Maryland law enforcement agencies contribute crime data to te Maryland Uniform rime Reporting Program. Statistics pertaining to crime trends could not ave been compiled witout te dedication and cooperation of all police agencies, seriff's offices and specialized law enforcement agencies trougout te State of Maryland. ontributions by Maryland law enforcement agencies to te Uniform rime Reporting Program provide te Maryland Department of State Police te opportunity to develop and present a compreensive picture of crime in Maryland. Sincerely, Marcus L. Brown Superintendent timaryland 's Fin est "

3 ENTRAL REORDS DIVISION IDA J. WILLIAMS, DIVISION DIRETOR UNIFORM RIME REPORTING PROGRAM DENISE VIDI SHERER, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFIER KENNETH G. DEGEN, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFIER

4 Executive Summary An annual release since 1975, rime in Maryland reports crime statistics provided by Maryland Law Enforcement agencies to te Statef s Uniform rime Reporting (UR) Program. crime in Maryland details crime incidents, clearance rates, arrests, law enforcement officers killed and assaulted, and law enforcement employee data. Statewide, county, municipality, and reporting agency perspectives are presented witin te report. Te statewide UR Program was developed to report crime in Maryland to te National UR Program administered by te Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Te Maryland program as evolved to collect and report data on domestic violence, ate bias and carjacking incidents and arrests. Reports and statistics pertaining to ate bias and teir associated arrests are released in a separate publication to facilitate detailed reporting. Te Uniform rime Reporting Program collects information on crimes tat were selected as an index to represent crime in te United States. Tese index crimes are murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, breaking or entering, larceny-teft and motor veicle teft. Altoug not an index crime, data pertaining to te crime of arson is also collected, analyzed and reported troug tis report. rime in Maryland decreased five percent in 2011, wen compared to Tere were 195,517 total crime incidents reported in 2011 compared to 204,916 in Violent crime decreased nine percent. Te violent crime group consists of murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Property crime decreased four percent during te same period. Te composition of te property crime group is breaking or entering, larcenyteft and motor veicle teft. Te 2011 percent increase or decrease of te index crime breakdown is as follows: Murder - 6.4% Breaking or Entering - 2.5% Rape - 2.6% Larceny-Teft - 3.1% Robbery - 6.5% Motor Veicle Teft % Aggravated Assault % Arson - 7.1% Arrests in Maryland decreased tree percent in 2011, wen compared to Tere were 263,093 arrests reported in 2011 compared to 270,798 in Of te total arrests, 227,583 or 87 percent were adults. Tis is a decrease of one percent over Juvenile arrests accounted for 35,510 or 13 percent of arrests in Tis is an 11 percent decrease over Arrests for drug offenses totaled 48,246 in Tis is a one percent increase over similar arrests reported in In 2011, 21,046 persons were arrested for driving wile intoxicated. Tis is a decrease of tree percent over similar arrests reported in Tere were two Maryland law enforcement officers wo died in te line of duty during Tere were 3,503 Maryland law enforcement officers assaulted in Tis represents a decrease of five percent over similar assaults reported in 2010 and equates to 23 percent of full time law enforcement officers employed in Maryland. In 2011, tere was a less tan one percent decrease in te number of full-time law enforcement officers in Maryland. Tere were 15,558 fulltime law enforcement officers in 2011 compared to 15,604 in In 2011, tere were 2.7 full-time law enforcement officers per 1,000 population.

5 TABLE OF ONTENTS Introduction... 1 rime Factors... 7 rime Index Offenses... 9 Murder Rape Robbery Aggravated Assault Breaking or Entering Larceny-Teft Motor Veicle Teft Arson Domestic Violence arjacking Index Offense Data Maryland UR rime Index Report by Region. ounty & Agency Municipality rime Rate Maryland Arrest Data Drug Arrest ounty art Arrests. Sex & Race Arrests. Age Maryland Arrest Report by Region. ounty & Agency Law Enforcement Officers Killed & Assaulted Law Enforcement Officers Killed Law Enforcement Officers Assaulted Law Enforcement Officers Assaulted by Region. ounty & Agency Law Enforcement Employee Data Law Enforcement Employee Rates Law Enforcement Employee Data by Region. ounty & Agency Ten Year rime Index art

6 INTRODUTION BAKGROUND Te Maryland Uniform rime Reporting (UR) Program is one measure tat as been taken in te establisment of an effective riminal Justice Information System (JIS) for te State. Tis particular pase focuses on te incidence of crime and law enforcement. It establises a metod to collect, evaluate and process uniform statistical data on crime statewide., Te Maryland UR Program provides te means to forward valid data to te Federal Bureau of Investigation from a single agency and also to consolidate it into an annual report entitled rime in Maryland. NATIONAL UNIFORM RLME IRIEPORTUVG PROGRAM Te counterpart of te Maryland UR Program is te National UR Program wic is under te direction of te Federal Bureau of Investigation. Te National Program resulted from a need for a uniform compilation of crime statistics nationwide. Uniform rime Reports were first collected in 1930 after being developed by a committee of te International Association of iefs' of Police. Te IAP continues to serve in an advisory capacity to te FBI in te current operation of te program. rime statistics voluntarily submitted by individual law enforcement agencies from all 50 states are presented annually in te FBI's publication entitled rime in te United States. MARYLAND UNIFORM RIME REPORTING PROGRAM Te FBI as actively assisted individual states in te development of State UR Programs compatible wit te National Program. Maryland took advantage of tis assistance in 1972 and was able to develop its own program by Te Maryland Uniform rime Reporting Program became operational January 1, Tis program consists of te uniform classification, review, compilation and analysis of crime statistics reported by all law enforcement agencies of te State pursuant to te guidelines and regulations prescribed by law. Te responsibility -and autority for- te collection and dissemination of UR data is assigned to te Department of State Police in accordance wit Public Safety Article, Section 2, Subsection 307 and 308, of te Annotated ode of Maryland.

7 PURPOSE AND OBJETIVES In keeping wit te recommendation of te President's ommission on Law Enforcement and te Administration of Justice, te Maryland UR Program was planned for eventual growt into a complete and integrated offender based riminal Justice Information System. Under tis program, eac offender arrested in Maryland is tracked troug te entire criminal justice system from time of arrest, troug te courts, to te correctional system were teir exit (parole, expiration of sentence, etc.) will be recorded. In tis manner, a complete "criminal istory" on individual offenders will be available for use by te police, courts and correctional agencies in Maryland. In addition, statistical data derived from te JIS Program will provide assistance in determining te overall efficiency of te riminal Justice System in Maryland and will make effective management studies possible. Te fundamental objectives of te Maryland UR Program are: Inform te Governor, legislature, oter governmental officials and te public as to te nature, magnitude and trends of te crime problem in Maryland. Provide law enforcement administrators wit criminal statistics for administrative and operational use. Determine wo commits crimes by age, sex, race and oter attributes in order to find te proper focus for crime prevention and enforcement. Provide base data and statistics to measure te workload and effectiveness of Marylandr s riminal Justice System. Provide base data and statistics to measure te effects of prevention and deterrence programs. Provide base data and statistics for researc to improve te effi-ciency, effectiveness and performance of criminal justice agencies. Provide base data to assist in te assessment of social and oter causes of crime for te development of teories of criminal beavior. Provide te FBI wit complete UR data to be included in te national crime reports.

8 REPORTING PROEDURES Under te Maryland UR Program, law enforcement agencies submit specified Uniform rime Reports. Te necessary information for eac of te required reports is gatered from eac agency's record of complaints, investigations and arrests. rime data and information is submitted montly by state, county and municipal law enforcement agencies on te number of offenses known to tem in te following crime categories: (1) riminal Homicide (2) Forcible Rape (3) Robbery q (4) Assault (5) Breaking or Entering ( 6) Larceny-teft (7) Motor Veicle Teft (8) Arson Te count of offenses is taken from te record of complaints received by law enforcement agencies. Tis information comes from victims, witnesses, oter sources or discovered by law enforcement during teir own operation. omplaints determined by subsequent investigation to be unfounded are eliminated from te count. Te resulting number of "actual offenses known to law enforcement agencies" in tese crime categories are reported witout regard for weter anyone is arrested, stolen property is recovered, local prosecution policies or any oter consideration. Reported offenses are recorded by te municipality and county in wic tey occur. Municipal law enforcement agencies report tose crimes wic occur witin te cities and state. ounty agencies report tose crimes wic occur in te counties outside te cities. A supplemental report is also submitted eac mont sowing te value of stolen and recovered property, te type of property and te type of offense witin a crime category in wic it was taken. Tis report also sows te number of stolen veicles recovered locally and by oter jurisdictions. In addition, eac agency reports te number of persons arrested by tem or oter agencies for crimes wic ave occurred witin teir jurisdiction. Te arrest report also sows te age, sex and race of tose arrested and te disposition of juveniles by te arresting agency. Wen applicable, supplemental reports are submitted regarding te persons, weapons and circumstances, etc., involved in omicides, domestic violence incidents, officer assaults and "carjackings." In addition, police employee data is collected on an annual basis. Montly arson reports are submitted for law enforcement agencies by te State Fire Marsal's Office and designated county agencies.

9 REVIEW PROESS A major concern in te collection of crime statistics for law en'forcement agencies trougout te state is te uniformity and accuracy of data received. Program aides, suc as guides and instructional classes, do not necessarily guarantee te accuracy of te reports submitted by te contributorr s, teref ore, additional controls are necessary. Eac report received by te UR section is recorded, examined and reviewed for matematical accuracy and possibly, more importantly, for reasonableness. Te review process includes numerous cecks to ensure te validity of information. Te elimination of duplicate reporting by individual contributors receives particular attention. Minor errors are corrected by telepone contact wit te contributors. Substantial variations and errors are adjusted troug personal contacts. Te personal contacts are invaluable to te accuracy and quality of reporting. Field Records Representatives are engaged in a constant educational effort, and as suc, provide a vital link between te UR Program and te contributor. POPULATION DATA Te computation of crime rates, as tey appear in tis report by municipality, county and state are based on te latest available population estimates for te year. Tese population estimates are provided by te Federal Bureau of Investigation troug te cooperation and assistance of te United States Bureau of ensus. LIMITATIONS OF A UNIFORM MME REPORTING PROGRAM Information currently collected by te Maryland Program is generally te same as tat gatered by te National System, and te metods of classifying and scoring offenses and arrests are te same. Tis readily enables comparisons wit oter states and wit te nation, as a wole. However, tere are limitations to te information collected wic sould be clearly understood before any conclusions are drawn from te UR data presented in tis report. Te main goal of te UR Program is to furnis police administrators wit a measure of teir activities and operational problems as indicated by te number of reported offenses, arrests, clearances, etc. A first step in te control of crime is to ascertain te true dimensions of te problem. However, present statistics, as gatered by te UR Program, measure neiter te real incidence of

10 crime or te full amount of economic loss to victims. Information regarding number of offenses, clearances, value and type of property stolen and recovered property are collected only for te eigt Part I offenses. For Part 11 offenses, te only information submitted is te number of arrests for tese crimes. onsequently, tere is no record of te actual number of tese offenses occurring, or is tere a calculation made for property loss. Te rime Index does not explicitly take into account te varying degrees of seriousness of its seven components (excluding arson). Eac crime receives te same weigt as it is added to te index; consequently, an auto teft is counted te same as a murder and an aggravated assault is weiged equally wit an attempted breaking or entering. Any review of crime must consider te volume, rate and trend of eac offense tat comprises te index and te relationsip between tese seven crimes. Te Maryland and National Uniform rime Reporting Programs are designed to measure offenses committed and persons arrested. Difficulties can arise if tis distinction is not kept clearly in mind. rimes relate to events, arrests relate to persons. Unlike traffic violations were tere is usually one event, violation and offender, a single criminal act can involve several crimes, offenders and victims. Relating specific crimes to a criminal or offense to evaluate caracteristics of tose arrested is generally beyond te scope of te present Uniform rime Reporting Program. Juvenile crime and arrest statistics, because of. teir nature, are anoter area of misunderstanding. Many juvenile offenders are andled informally. As a consequence, inaccurate or incomplete recording of te event or action may result. Procedures for andling juveniles vary between departments more so tan te andling of adult offenders. Furtermore, te degree of juvenile involvement in cleared offenses is probably seriously misunderstood because te juvenile clearance indicator is recorded only wen juveniles are exclusively involved. Wen bot adults and juveniles are subjects in a clearance, te juvenile participation is not reported. Te preceding comments sould not be viewed as an indictment of te Uniform rime Reporting Program wic, admittedly, is designed for te operational requirements of law enforcement agencies. Wile te current metod of gatering and reporting crime and arrest data provide a less tan complete picture of criminality in our society, te FBI as designed te National Incident Based Reporting System to address tese limitations. Arson is not used at tis time in computing te rime Index.

11 RIME FATORS Statistics' compiled under te Uniform rime Reporting Program from data submitted by Maryland law enforcement agencies projects a statewide view of crime. Awareness of te presence of certain crime factors, wic may influence te resulting volume and type of statistics presented, is necessary if fair and equitable conclusions are to be drawn. Tese crime influencing factors are present to some degree in every community. Teir presence affects in varying degrees te crime experience of tat community. Attempts at comparison of crime figures between communities sould not be made witout first considering te individual factors present in eac community. rime, as an outgrowt of society, remains a social problem of grave concern. Te police are limited in teir role to its suppression and detection. As stated by te President's ommission on Law Enforcement and Administration of riminal Justice in teir report "Te allenge of rime in a Free Society" ( Page 92): "But te fact tat te police deal daily wit crime does not mean tat tey ave unlimited power to prevent it, or reduce it, or deter it. Te police did not create and cannot resolve te social conditions tat stimulate crime. Tey did not start and cannot stop te convulsive social canges tat are taking place in America. Tey do not enact te laws tat tey are required to enforce, nor do tey dispose of te criminals tey arrest. Te police are only one part of te criminal justice system; te criminal justice system is only one part of te government; and te government is only one part of society. In so far as crime is a social penomenon, crime prevention is te responsibility of every part of society. Te criminal process is limited to case by case operations, one criminal or one crime at a time." Listed below are some of te conditions wic affect te type and volume of crime tat occurs from place to place: Density and size of te community population and te metropolitan area of wic it is a part. omposition of te population wit particular reference to age, sex and race.

12 Economic status of te population. Relative stability of te population including number and ratio of seasonal visitors, residents, commuters and oter transients. limate and seasonal weater conditions. Educational, recreational and religious caracteristics, Standards governing appointments to te police force. Policies of te prosecuting officials and te courts. Attitude of te public toward law enforcement problems. Te administrative and investigative efficiency of te local law enforcement agency, including te degree of aderence to crime reporting standards, Organization and cooperation of ad j oining and overlapping police jurisdictions.

13 RIME INDEX OFFENSES Te crime counts listed in tis publication are actual offenses establised by police investigation. Wen police receive a complaint of a crime and te follow-up investigation discloses no crime occurred, it is "unfounded." In 2011, police investigations tat were "unfounded" represented one percent of te complaints concerning index offenses. Wen comparing individual index offenses to te number reported, "unfounded" offenses ranged from one percent in te aggravated assault category to 15 percent in te rape category. In 2010, tere were one percent "unfounded" in te aggravated assault category and 20 percent in te rape category. A total of 195,517 actual Index Offenses were reported to law enforcement agencies in Maryland during te calendar year Tis represents a decrease of five percent wen compared to te 2010 total of 204,916 rime Index Offenses. In tis publication, te calculations for averages may not add to te total due to rounding. An analysis of Index Offenses by mont in 2011 sows tat July ad te igest frequency of occurrence, and February ad te lowest. In 2010, August ad te igest frequency of occurrence and February te lowest. Te rime Index Offenses represent te most common problem to law enforcement. Tey are serious crimes by teir nature, volume, or frequency of occurrence. Tey are categorized as Violent rimes, wic includes Murder, Forcible Rape, Robbery and Aggravated Assault, or as Property rimes, wic includes Breaking or ~ntering, Larceny-Teft and Motor Veicle Teft. VIOLENT RIME Violent rimes involve te element of personal confrontation between te perpetrator and te victim; consequently, tey are considered more serious tan Property rimes because of teir very nature. Tese offenses accounted for 15 percent of te total rime Index for 2011 te same as in Violent rime decreased nine percent wen compared to PROPERTY RIME Te number of Property rimes reported during 2011 was more tan five times greater tan te number of Violent rimes reported. As a group, Property crimes made up 85 percent of te total rime Index in 2011 te same as in Property rime decreasedafour percent wen compared to 2010.

14 RATES rime Rates relate te incidence of crime to te resident population. Many oter factors, wic may contribute to te volume and type of crime in a given jurisdiction, are not incorporated ere, but are sown in te section entitled, "rime Factors." In 2011, te rime Rate for Maryland was 3,354.6 victims for every 100,000 population. Tis represents a five percent decease in te crime rate wen compared to te 2010 rate of 3, Te 2011 rime Rate for te Violent rime group was victims per 100,000 inabitants, a ten percent decrease compared wit te 2010 rate of Te Property rime group ad a rate of victims, a five percent decrease wen compared to te 2010 rate of 3,001.8 LEARANES For Uniform rime Reporting purposes', a crime is cleared wen police ave identified te offender, ave evidence to carge im and actually take im into custody. Solutions of crimes are also recorded in exceptional instances were some element beyond police control precludes formal carges against te offender, suc as te victim's refusal to prosecute or local prosecution is declined because te subject is being prosecuted elsewere for a crime committed in anoter jurisdiction. Te arrest of one person can clear several crimes or several persons may be arrested in te process of solving one crime. Maryland Law Enforcement Agencies cleared 26 percent of all Index Offenses reported to tem in 2011 compared to a 25 percent clearance rate in Violent rimes recorded a 57 percent clearance rate in 2011, compared to a 56 percent clearance rate in Te Property rime group experienced a 20 percent clearance rate in 2011, compared to a 19 percent clearance rate in onsidered individually, te 2011 Violent rime clearance rate was determined to be 62 percent of te Murders, 50 percent of te Rapes, 36 percent of te Robberies and 69 percent of te Aggravated Assaults. Te Property rime clearance rates were 16 percent for Breaking or Entering, 23 percent for Larceny-Teft and 10 percent for Motor Veicle Teft. Te relatively ig clearance rate for Violent rimes as compared to Non-Violent Property rimes is in part attributable to te volume difference between te two. Property rime volume is muc greater tan tat of Violent rime, and police investigation of Violent rime is usually more intense.

15 JUVENILE LEARANES A Juvenile learance is te clearance of an offense in wic all of te offenders involved were under te age of 18. If one of te offenders was over 17 years of age, te clearance of tat offense is not considered a Juvenile learance. In 2011, suc Juvenile learances represented 15 percent of all clearances, compared to 17 percent in Juvenile learances in te Violent rime category represented 11 percent of te total cleared in 2011, compared to 12 percent in Te clearance rates in Violent rimes are: Homicide two percent, Rape six percent, Robbery 15 percent and Aggravated Assault ten percent. In te Property rime category, clearances involving Juvenile offenders represented 17 percent of te total cases cleared in 2011, compared to 20 percent in Te clearance rates in Property crimes are: Burglary 13 percent, Larceny-Teft 18 percent and Motor Veicle Teft 19 percent. STOLEN PROPERTY VALUES Te total value of Property Stolen during 2011 was $261,239,736 wic represents a two percent decrease from Recovered Property amounted to $68,322,900 wic is 26 percent of te total stolen, resulting in a $192,916,836 property loss to victims in te State of Maryland during Tis property loss represents an increase of two percent wen compared to te property loss in 2010.

16 MURDER

17 MURDER Murder and non-negligent manslaugter is te willful (nonnegligent) killing of one uman being by anoter. VOLUME AND RATE During 2011, a total of 398 murders were reported. Tis represents a six percent decrease over Murder accounted for one percent of all violent crime and less tan one percent of te crime index. In 2011, tere were 6.8 murders per 100,000 of population. ANALYSIS OF MURDER In 2011, 245 murders were cleared wit two percent of tese clearances involving only juvenile offenders. A total of 248 persons were arrested for murder during A breakdown of persons arrested for murder was 94 percent male, six percent female, four percent juvenile, 79 percent Black, 19 percent Wite and one percent American Indian and Asian. During 2011, 187 of te murder victims were in te 18 to 29 age group, representing 47 percent of te total. Tere were 32 juvenile victims of murder, accounting for eigt percent of te total murder victims. Handguns were used in 67 percent of te reported murders in Tis represents - a four percent - decrease in teir use wen compared to te andgun use in Te next most used weapon was a knife, accounting for 19 percent of te reported murders in In 2010, knife accounted for 14 percent of te reported murders. Oter or Unknow n Weapons, Brsonal 5% Murder Weapons Blunt Object, 3% \m Firearm, 68%. Drug related murders accounted for tree percent of te total in In,2010, Drug related murders accounted for two percent of te total. Family members, as offenders, accounted for 11 percent of te total murders, a increase of five percent from Of te family members, as offenders, usband and wife or boyfriend and girlfriend (tose wo ad coabitated) reflects six percent of te total murders reported.

18 Additionally, an acquaintance is listed in 23 percent of te murders reported in Strangers and unknown relationsips accounted for two oter large categories, 17 percent and 68 percent respectively. In 39 percent of te murders, te offenders are unknown and not described. Wen te race of te victim and offender is known, te offender is most often someone of te same race. WHITE BLAK AS IAN VITIM, DESRIBED OFFENDER RAE RELATIONS VITIM TOTAL DESRIBED SaME RAE PERENT MURDERS OFFENDER OFFENDER DISTRIBUTION AMERIAN INDIAN UNKNOWN MURDER Total Number of Murders MURDER Rate per 400,000 Population

19 Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. An additional omicide occurred in 2007 wic was not reported until In 2009, two omicides tat occurred in Baltimore ity were inadvertently reported by A.A. o. PD and Baltimore o. In 2010, a omicide reported by A. A. o. PD was removed after being ruled Justifiable. PD.

20 POPULATION: PERIOD1: 5,773,552 PERIOD2: 5,828,289 MURDER BREAKDOWN REPORT STATE OF MARYLAND OMPARISON PERIODS: PERIOD 1 (P.1): 01/10 TO 12/10 PERIOD 2 (P.2): 01/11 TO 12/11 PERIOD 1 PERIOD 2 -ri-m-t-ii~ii ini~ii~iin % HANGE TOTAL OUNTS RATE OUNT RATE OUNT OF OUNT ++++a ATUAL %- JUSTIFIABLE %+ BREAKDOWN BY RAE VITIMS OFFENDERS. iinininini~1igi~ii~iiiii~i~ niiiiiinini--iii~ii~ii~il~ # OF % OF 8 t OF % OF % RATE ATUALS TOTAL HANGE RATE ATUALS TOTAL HANGE WHf TE P.l % % P % 27.7% % 3.2%+ BLAK. P % % P % 1.8% % 8.5%- WEAPON USED FIREARMS P. 1 I?. 2 A.TYPE P. 1 UNKNOWN P.2 # OF % OF % RATE ATUALS TOTAL HANGE ASIAN P.l P.2 D. SHOTGUN P.1 P. 2 AMERIAN P.l INDIAN P.2 E.OTHER P.l GUN P. 2 UNKNOWN P.1..P.2 KNIFE P.1 P. 2 BREAKDOWN BY AGE GROUPS UNDER 18 P.l P.2 VITIMS ininininin--n~-ni-nin # OF % OF % RATE ATUALS TOTAL HANGE % % 5.7%+ OFGENDERS 7n-ninininini7ininilii # OF % OF % RATE ATUALS TOTAL HANGE % % 14.3%- BLUNT P.1 OBJET P.2 PERSONAL P. 1 WEAPON P.2 POISON P.l P.2 EXPLOSIVES P,1 P. 2 FIRE P. 1 P.2 30 & OVER P.l P. 2 NAROTIS P.l P.2 UNKNOWN P.l P. 2 DROWNING P. 1 e.2 STRANGU- P.l LATION P.2 ASPHYX- P.l IATION P.2 NOTE: "RATE" = NUMBER OF MURDERS PER 100,000 POPULATION. OTHER P. 1 WEAPONS P.2

21 POPULATION: PERIOD 1 : 5,773,552 PERIOD 2: 5,820,289 MURDER BREAKDOWN REPORT STATE OF MARYLAND ' OMPARISON PERIODS : PERIOD 1 (P.l): 01/10 TO 12/10 PERIOD 2 (P.2): 01/11 TO 12/11 IRUMSTANE... RAPE ROBBERY RATE # ATUALS % OF TOTAL % HPiNGE ni- Y-~I~-I-I~-IT ni-mi-mi-~ iini-ni-~ % % 0.0% IRUMSTANE HILD KILLED BY P. 1 BABYSITTER 'P.2 BRAWL DUE TO INFLU- P.l ENE OF ALOHOL P. 2 RATE # OF ATUAL % OF % TOTAL HANGE 17lllll % 0.0% 0.0% BURGLARY BRAWL DUE TO INFLU- P.l ENE OF NAROTIS P LARENY. P.l P.2 ARGUMENT OVER MONEY P.l OR PROPERTY P MOTOR VEHILE THEFT P.l P.2 OTHER ARGUMENTS P.l P ARSON GANGLAND KILLINGS P.l P PROSTITUTION OR P. 1 OMMERIAL VIE P.2 JUVENILE GANG P. 1 KILLINGS I? OTHER SEX OFFENE P. 1 P.2 INSTITUTIONAL P.l KILL1 NGS P NAROTI DRUG LAW P. 1 P.2 SNIPER ATTAK P.l P GAMBLING P.l %, P % 0.0% OTHER OTHER - NOT SPEIFIED P.l % P % 66.7%- ALL SUSPETED P. 1 FELONY TYPE P ABORT ION NOT ENOUGH INFORMA- P.1 TION TO DETERMINE P LOVERS" TRIANGLE P.l % P % 0.0% NOTE: "RATE" = NUMBER OF MURDERS PER 100,000 POPULATION.

22 r~ -Iraws dp w r q o I- 4 O W w B c Z u tcw O Q E.w fio: 2 cs XO I) mw 3 2 x OX I HH X BB W AU z F A ~ N W do mo 4~ m o MN 00 mm mm oo NO od oo o,+ rlm 2 F "" rl 4 ij a O W Z B Gtw a: ok; 4 ao 2 H XO w cng A EwE E-cw Frl AU A H A W> a R lz

23

24 MURDER BREAKDOWN REPORT STATE OF MARYLAND OMPARISON PERIODS : PERIOD 1 (P.l): 01/10 TO 12/10 PERIOD 2 (P.2): 01/11 TO 12/11 RELATIVE VITIM-OFFENDER DISTRIBUTION BY RAE tt PERIOD 1 PERIOD 2 PERIOD 1 PERIOD 2 1~1-rl1ninii ~ii~iiii-ini % in-iniiiii -n-1-1-r1iilii17~% VITIM OFFENDER(S) OUNT % TOTAL OUNT % TOTAL HANGE VITIM OFFENDER(S) OUNT % TOTAL OUNT % TOTAL HANGE nini lnlllll~lltl7 inii nini- ni7i 1-ii-ni ASIAN WHITE MALE WHITE FEMALE BLAK MALE P. 1 ' BLAK FEMALE ' 2 ASIAN MALE ASIAN FEMALE MULTIPLE WHITE P.2 MULT. BLAK 5 MULTIPLE ASIAN MULTIPLE MIXED. OTHER, UNKNOWN % % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% i 50.0% o 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0, 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% ' 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % iniii-n iii-ii~iinin iiiii 77ini-1 AMERIAN WHITE MALE INDIAN WHITE FEMALE BLAK MALE P. 1 BLAK FEMALE 0 ASIAN MALE ASIAN FEMALE MULTIPLE WHITE P.2 MULT. BLAK 0 MULTIPLE ASIAN MULTIPLE MIXED OTHER UNKNOWN 0 0.'O% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% iiin VITIM ASIAN MALE PERIOD 1 iiniiii-ni-ii OFFENDER(S) OUNT % TOTAL ~1-n-rm-m-i-m llnl?-ni-ni WHITE MALE % WHITE FEMALE ' 0 0.0% BLAK MALE 0 0: 0% BLAK FEMALE 0 0.0% ASIAN MALE 0 0.0% ASIAN FEMALE 0 0.0% MULTIPLE WHITE 0 0.0% MULT. BLAK 0 0.0% MULTIPLE ASIAN 0 0.0% MULTIPLE MIXED 0 0.0% OTHER 0 0.0% UNKNOWN 0 0.0% PERIOD 2 PERIOD 1 i~inini-iii % iiiiiiininiy OUNT % TOTAL HANGE VITIM OFFENDER(S) OUNT % TOTAL liiii iinin ii-liiiii 0 0.0% 100.0% % 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% ' % 'N/A ' 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% % N/A i-rnni-l ini-miiiiiiii in17 ~iiiiii AMERIAN WHITE MALE 0 0.0% INDIAN WHITE FEMALE 0 0.o% MALE BLAK MALE 0 0.0%., P. 1 BLAK FEMALE- o 0.0% 0 ASIAN MALE 0 0.0% ASIAN FEMALE 0 0.0% MULTIPLE WHITE 0 0.0% P.2 MULT. BLAK 0 0.0% 0 MULTIPLE ASIAN 0 0.0% MULTIPLE MIXED 0 0.0% OTHER % UNKNOWN 0 0.0% PERIOD 2 -lnll-4llltlll-l OUNT % TOTAL % HANGE VITIM nil11 ASIAN FEMALE PERIOD 1 iiii-m-n-vl- OFFENDER(S) OUNT % TOTAL -miiniiiinii inii iiinil WHITE MALE 0 0.0% WHITE FEMALE 0 0.0% BLAK MALE % BLAK FEMALE 0 0.0% ASIAN MALE 0 0.0% ASIAN FEMALE 0 0.0% MULTIPLE WHITE 0 0.0% MULT. BLAK 0 0.0% MULTIPLE ASIAN 0 0.0% MULTIPLE MIXED 0 0.0% OTHER 0 0.0% UNKNOWN % PERIOD 2 PERIOD 1 li~t1777--t111 % ~ -mtni-niinii OUNT % TOTAL HANGE VITIM OFFENDER(S1 OUNT % TOTAL niii iiiini i-tiin1-l % N/A 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0% % 0.0% % N/A 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% ni-nin ni-~iiii-~iiili nin 17n-n AMERIAN WHITE MALE o 0.0% INDIAN WHITEFEMALE 0 0.0% FEMALE BLAKMALE 0 0.0% P. 1 BLAK FEMALE 0 0.0% 0 ASIAN MALE 0 0.0% ASIAN FEMALE 0 0.0% MULTIPLE WHITE 0 0.0% P.2 MULT. BLAK 0 0.0% 0 MULTIPLE ASIAN 0 0.0% MULTIPLE MIXED 0 0.0% OTHER 0 0.0% UNKNOWN 0 0.0% NOTE: "OUNT" = # OF OFFENSES. PERIOD 2 OUNT % TOTAL % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 HANGE iin % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

25 RAPE

26 RAPE Forcible rape is defined as te carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against er will. VOLUR-IIE AND RATE During 2011, 1,196 actual forcible rapes were reported. Tis represents a tree percent decrease over Rape accounted for four percent of te violent crime and one percent of te crime index. In 2011, tere were 20.5 rapes per 100,000 of population. ANALYSIS OF RAPE Rape by force accounted for 88 percent of all forcible rapes and 12 percent were attempt to rape. Nature of Forcible Rape In 2011, 594 forcible rapes were cleared wit six percent of tese clearances involving only juvenile offenders. A total of 350 persons were arrested for forcible rape during A breakdown of persons arrested for forcible rape was, 12 percent juvenile, 59 percent Black and 40 percent Wite and less tan one percent consisting of American Indian and Asian. 5 YEAR TREND OFFENSE AND RIME RATE Force 1,034 1,053 1,074 1, ,048 Attempt a TOTAL rime Rate Rapes per 100,000 population

27 2,0001 RAPE Total Number of Rapes 40.0~ RAPE Rate per 100,000 Population

28 p-ppp p--pp pp Rape by ounty Allegany Anne Arundel Year Average Baltimore 147 ' Baltimore ity alvert aroline arroll ecil arles Dorcester Frederick Garrett Harford Howard Kent Montgomery Prince George's Queen Anne's 5 1 I 12 St. Mary's Somerset, Talbot Wasington Wicomico Worcester Statewide Agencies State Totd 1,196 1,228 1, ,127 1,179 1,177 Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence.

29 ROBBERY

30 ROBBERY Robbery is te taking or attempting to take anyting of value from te care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or treat of force or violence and/or by putting te victim in fear. VOLUlMlE AND RATE During 2011, tere were 10,338 robbery offenses reported. Tis represents a six percent decrease over Robbery accounted for 36 percent.of te violent crime and five percent of te crime index. In 2011, tere were robberies per 100,000 of population. ANALYSIS OF ROBBERY Robbery Weapons During 2011, 51 percent of te robberies were committed on te street, wile only two percent were bank robberies. Of te total number of robberies committed, firearms accounted for 45 percent, wile robberies committed wit no weapon accounted for 40 percent of te total. Oter / Knife or Instrument 9% 1 Firearm 45% In 2011, 3,743 robberies were cleared wit 15 percent of tese clearances involving only juvenile offenders. A total of 3,402 persons were arrested for robbery during A breakdown of persons arrested for robbery was 90 percent male, ten percent female, 31 percent juvenile, 75 percent Black, 25 percent Wite and less tan one percent consisting of American '~ndian and Asian. DISTRIBUTION BY NATURE - lassification Number of Percent of Total Value Offenses Distribution Higway ' ommercial House Service Station onvenience Store Residence Bank Miscellaneous Total 10, % $ 10,222,579

31 ROBBERY Total Number of Robberies ROBBERY Rate per 100,000 Population

32 ppppp Robbery by ounty Allegany Anne Arundel Baltimore 1,457 1,341 Baltimore ity 3,485 3,361 alvert 3 1 ' 33 aroline arroll ecil arles Dorcester ,730 4, ,787 3, ' Year Average ,557 3, Frederick Garrett Harford Howard Kent Montgomery ,192 1,189 1,059 Prince George's 2,545 3,126, ,765 3,831 3,318 Queen Anne's St. Mary's Somerset Talbot Wasington Wicomico Worcester Statewide Agencies State Total 10,338 11,053 12,007 13,203 Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identi@ county of occurrence. 13,258 11,972

33 I 1 AGGRAVATED I ASSAULT

34 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT Aggravated assault is an unlawful attack by one person upon anoter for te purpose of inflicting severe or aggravated bodily injury. VOLUME AND RATE During 2011, a total of 16,866 aggravated assaults were reported. Tis represents an 11 percent decrease over Aggravated assaults accounted for 59 percent of te violent crime category and nine percent of te crime index. In 2011, tere were aggravated assaults per 100,000 of population. Tere were 55,480 simple assaults reported in 2011 for a total of 72,346 aggravated and simple assaults. ANALYSIS OF ASSAULT Personal During,2011, 14 percent of te Weapons -, aggravated assaults were wit firearms, 26 percent wit a knife or cutting instrument, 38 percent wit oter weapon and 21 percent wit personal weapons ; ands, fist, feet, etc. Aggravated Assault Weapons Oter Weapon 1 38% Firearm f 14% Knife or utting Instrument 26% In 2011, 11,712 aggravated assaults were cleared wit ten percent of tese clearances involving only juvenile offenders. A total of 7,059 persons were arrested for aggravated assault during A breakdown of persons arrested for aggravated assault was 76 percent male, 24 percent female, 16 percent juvenile, 59 percent Black, 40 percent Wite and one percent consisting of American Indian and Asian. Firearm Knife Oter Hands, etc. 5. Year Average Total 19,486 16,866 18,898 20,022 20,571 21,074

35 AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS Total Nunber af Aggravated Assaults AGGFNVATED ASAUTS Rate per 100,000 Pqxrlaticxl

36 Aggravated Assault by ounty c Year Average 1 Anne del 1 1,9721 Baltimore 1 2,654 1 Baltimore ity aroline arroll ecil arles Dorcester Frederick Garrett Harford Howard Kent Montgomery Queen Anne's St. Mary's Somerset 58 Talbot 56 1 Wasington Wicomico Worcester State Total 1 16, , , , ,074 1 Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence.

37 BREAKINGOR ENTERING

38 BREAKING OR ENTERING Breaking or entering is defined as te unlawful entry of a structure to commit a felony or a teft. VOLUW3 AND RATE During 2011, a total of 35,781 breaking or entering's were reported. Tis represents a tree percent decrease over Breaking or entering accounted for 21 percent of te property crime category and 18 percent of te crime index. In 2011, tere were breaking or entering offenses per 100,000 of population. ANALYSIS OF BlRlEAKING OR ENTERING During 2011, 66 percent of te breaking or entering offenses involved forcible entry, 24 percent were unlawful entry witout force and ten percent were recorded as attempted forcible entry. Residential offenses accounted for 77 Nan Forclble, 24% Type of Breaking or Entering Attempted, 10% percent of te total offenses, wile 23 66% percent were nonresidential. In 2011, 5,704 breaking or entering offenses were cleared wit 13 percent of tese clearances involving only juvenile offenders. A total of 7,067 persons were arrested for breaking or entering during A breakdown of persons arrested for breaking or entering was 85 percent male, 15 percent female, 23 percent juvenile, 50 percent Black, 49 percent Wite and one percent consisting of American Indian and Asian. PLAE AND TIME OF OURRENE lassification Number of Percent of Total Value Offenses Distribution Residence Total Nigt 6 PM - 6 AM Day Unknown 6 AM - 6 PM Non ~esidence Total Nigt 6 PM - 6 AM Day Unknown 6AM-6PM GRAND TOTAL 35, % $ 73,070,777 Forclble,

39 BREAKING OR ENTERING Total Number of Breaking or Enterings BREAKING OR ENTERING Rate per 100,000 Population

40 ppppp ppp-p ppppp Allegany Breaking or Entering by ounty Year Average 573 Anne Arundel 2,259 2,860 3,067 3,419 3,412 3,003 B a1 t imore 4,295 4,119 4,3 16 4,448 4,949 4,425 Baltimore ity 8,649 7,646 7,856 7,880 7,43 I 7,892 alvert aroline arroll ecil ,187 1,001 1,006 arles Dorcester Frederick Garrett Harfiord.Howad Kent Montgomery Prince George's Queen Anne's St. Mary's Somerset Talbot Wasington Wicomico Worcester ,110 1, ,203 6, , ,155 1, ,376 1,242 1, ,486 8, ,124. 3,142 8, ,285 3,760 8, ,036 3,708 7, ,070 3,460 7, , Statewide Agencies 25, State Total 35,781 36,700 36,905 38,849 Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 37,095 37,066

41 LARENY- THEFT

42 LARENY-THEFT Larceny-teft is te unlawful taking, carrying, leading, or riding away of property from te possession or ~~nstructive possession of anoter. VOLUME AND RATE During 2011, a total of 114,871 larceny-tefts were reported. Tis represents a decrease of tree percent over Larceny-teft accounted for 69 percent of te property crime total and 59 percent of te crime index. In 2011, tere were 1,970.9 larceny-tefts per 100,000 of population. ANALYSIS OF LARENY-THEFT Te igest percentage of te larceny-tefts reported was for teft from automobiles wit 28 percent. From coin operated macines accounted for te lowest percentage, less tan one percent. oin Macines, Nature of Larceny-Teft All Oter, 19% Buildings, 17% r Bicycles, 3%... \ AU~O Parts, 13% Pocket Plckin~. 0% I /Soplifting. 19% From Auto, 28% Purse Snatcing, 1% In 2011, 26,412 larceny-teft offenses were cleared, wit 18 percent of tese clearances involving only juvenile offenders. A total of 24,263 persons were arrested for larceny-tefts during Te breakdown of persons arrested for larceny-teft was 59 percent male, 41 percent female, 27 percent juvenile, 51 percent Black, 48 percent Wite and one percent consisting of American Indian and Asian. NATURE OF LARENY-THEFTS lassification Number of Percent Offenses Distribution Total Value Pocket-Picking Purse Snatcing Soplifting From Auto Auto Parts & Access. Bicycles From Building oin Operated Macine All 'Oter 21,970 19% 36,098,497 GRAND TOTAL 114, %, $ 93,282,200

43 LARENY-THEFT Total Number of Larceny-Tefts LARENY-THEFT Rate per 100,000 Population

44 Larceny-Teft by ounty Year Average Allegany 1 1,8661 1,9211 1,6221 1,6571 1,6311 1,739 1 Anne Arundel 1 11, ,7321 Baltimore 1 18, ,129 1 Baltimore ity 1 17, ,6261 calvert 1 1,424 1 aroline arroll ecil 2,368 2,263 2,439 2,3 14 2,14 1 2,305 arles Dorcester Frederick Garrett I Howard 5,094 5,023 5,418 6,346 5,444 5,465 Kent Montgomery 1 14, ,830 1 Prince George's 1 20, ,1161 Queen Anne's St. Mary's 1 1,841 1 Somerset Talbot Wasington Wicomico Worcester 1,905 1,788 1,830 'Statewide Agencies State Total 114, , , , , ,103 Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify countj of occurrence.

45 MOTOR VEHILE THEFT

46 MOTOR VEHILE THEFT Motor veicle teft is defined as te teft or attempted teft of a motor veicle. VOLUME AND RATE During 2011, tere were 16,067 motor veicle tefts reported. Tis represents an 11 percent decrease over Motor veicle tefts accounted for ten percent of te property crime and eigt percent of te crime index. In 2011, tere were motor veicle tefts per 100,000. of population. ANALYSIS OF MOTOR VEHILE TTHIEFT During 2011, 70 percent of te motor veicle tefts were automobiles, 18 percent were trucks and buses and 12 percent were oter motor veicles. Tere were 10,870 recovered veicles accounting for 68 percent of te total reported stolen. In 2011, 1,641 motor veicle tefts were cleared, wit 19 percent of tese clearances involving only juvenile offenders. Trucks and Buses, 18% Oter Motor Veicle Teft Automobiles 70% A total of 1,900 persons were arrested for motor veicle teft during A breakdown of persons arrested for motor veicle teft was 86 percent male, 14 percent female, 33 percent juvenile, 70 percent Black, 30 percent Wite and less tan one percent consisting of American Indian and Asian. Law enf orcernent agencies reported a total value of $90,718,707 stolen in motor veicle tefts. Te value of recovered motor veicles was $ 56,099,374, resulting in a loss of $34,619, YIEAR TREND 5 YEAR AVERAGE Auto 15,385 11,291 12,848 14,079 17,995 20,712 Truck & Buses 3,982 ' 2,818. 3,065 3,625 4,983 5,417 Oter 2,123 1,958 2,116 1,915 2,362 2,264 Total 21,490 16,067 18,029 19,619,, 25,340 28,393

47 50,000/ MOTOR VEHILE THEFT Total Number of Motor Veicle Tefts MOTOR VEHILE THEFT Rate per 100,000 Population

48 pppp pppp Motor Veicle Teft by ounty Year Average Alleg an y Anne Arundel 832 1,236 1,134 1,581. 1,667 1,290 Baltimore 1,710 1,880 2,443 2,940 3,372 2,469 Baltimore ity 4,207 4;42 1 4,632 5,518 5,821 4,920 alvert aroline arroll ecil arles Dorcester Frederick Garrett Harford Howard Kent Montgomery 1,278 1,530 1,824 2,3 84 2,634 1,930 Prince George's 5,943 6,700 7,266 9, ,646 8,260 Queen Anne's St. Mary's Somerset Talbot Wasington 153 ' Wicornico Worcester Statewide Agencies State Total 16,067 18,029 19,619 25,340 28,393 21,490 Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 1

49 ARSON

50 ARSON Arson is any willful or malicious burning or attempt to burn, wit or witout intent to defraud, a dwelling ouse,.public building, motor veicle or aircraft, personal property of anoter, etc. VOLUME AND RATE During 2011 tere were 1,481 arsons reported. Tis represents a seven percent decrease over In 2011, tere were 25.4 arsons per 100,000 of population. Structures accounted for 38 percent, mobile accounted for 38 percent of te total number of arsons, wile oter property accounted for 24 percent. Residential comprised 63 percent of te structures at wic arson was directed, wit 13 percent of all targeted structural property being. uninabited. Te estimated value of property damage was approximately 10 million dollars. Type of Arsons Oter Property, 24% 7 Structures, ' In 2011, 284 arsons were cleared, wit 42 percent of tese clearances involving only juvenile offenders. A total of 406 persons were arrested for arson during A breakdown of persons arrested for arson was 83 percent male, 17 percent female, 43 percent juvenile, 43 percent Black, 56 percent Wite and one percent consisting of American Indian and Asian. lassification TOTAL STRUTURAL Single'Occupancy Residence Oter Residential Storage Industrial/Mfgr. Oter ommercial ommunity/public All Oter Structures TOTAL MOBILE Motor Veicle Oter Mobile Property OTHER DISTRIBUTION OF TYPE OF PROPERTY Number of Percent Average Percent Offenses Distrib. Value leared

51 ARSON Total Number of Arsons ARSON Rate per 100,000 Population

52 P Arson by ounty Year Average Allegany Anne del Baltimore pp Baltimore ity pppp alvert aroline arroll ' 24 ecil arles Dorcester. I Frederick Garrett Harford Howard Kent Montgomery Prince George's Queen Anne's St. Mary's Somerset Talbot w asingt on Wicomico Worcester Statewide Agencies State Total 1,481 1,594 1,758 2,279 2,227 1,868 Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence.

53 DOMESTI VIOLENE

54 DOMESTI VIOLENE Te Domestic Violence Act of 1994 'mandated tat all law enforcement agencies in Maryland submit copies of teir police reports of incidences involving domestic violence to te Maryland State Police. Troug te Maryland Uniform rime Reporting Program, a revised Battered Spouse data collection form was created. Tis new form allowed for te collection of more data, wic is based upon a revised definition of a domestic violence incident under te guidelines of te Maryland Uniform rime Reporting Program. Under te Maryland Uniform rime Reporting Program te definition for a domestic violence incident is considered any crime were "An individual wo as received deliberate pysical injury or is in fear of imminent deliberate pysical injury from a current or former spouse or a current or former coabitant. Tis includes a omosexual re1 a ti onsip. " In addition, a domestic violence incident in te Maryland Uniform rime Reporting Program is considered to be any crime against: A married person living wit teir spouse. A married person estranged from teir spouse. A male and female in an intimate relationsip wo are not married to eac oter and wo are. coabi ting or ad coabi ted. Individuals of te same sex in an intimate rela tionsip wo are coabi ting or ad coabi ted. It sould be noted tat prior to 1996, te statistical information collected was only on assaults to a domestic partner and did not include individuals of te same sex in an intimate relationsip wo are coabiting or ad coabited. Te following information gives a more compreensive report.

55 DOMESTI VIOLENE RIMES Tere are limitations to te information collected wic sould be clearly understood before any conclusions are drawn from te data presented in tis report. Procedures for andling domestic violence crimes vary between law enforcement agencies and counties of occurrence. Te current metod of collecting domestic violence information for tis report provides less tan a complete picture. Tere is at present no oter statewide informational system in general use gatering tese statistics from law enforcement agencies tat will more accurately perform tis task. Tere were a total of 18,209 domestic violence crimes reported in 2011, as compared to 17,931 crimes in 2010, resulting in a 2 percent increase. Te breakdown is as follows: rime Homicide Rape Robbery Assaults Burglary Larceny-Teft Motor Veicle Teft Arson Forgery Fraud Embezzlement Malicious Destruction Of Property Illegal Weapons Sex Offenses Drug Abuse Violation Offenses Against Family & ildren Disorderly onduct All Oter Offenses TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209

56 ASSAULTS Assault is te most frequent domestic incident reported. During 2011, tere were 16,846 domestic assaults, representing a two percent increase over 2010 domestic violence assaults. Tere were 3,017 domestic assaults reported as aggravated. Aggravated assaults were 18 percent of te total reported domestic assaults in Domestic Violence Assaults Firearm. _Knife, Oter Weapon. 6% Non Aggravate Aggravated Strong-arm, 82% 6% Aggravated Firearm Knife Oter Weapons No Weapons Non Aggravated Simple Stalking TOTAL 17,995 17,634 17,343 16,513 16,846 b MONTHLY OURRENES January 1,582 1,575 1,371 1,355 1,261 February 1,372 1,426 1,305 1,184 1,294 Marc 1,533 1,487 1,579 1,497 1,456 April, 1,563 1,507 1,489 1,495 1,515 May June 1,827 1,848 1,657 1,775 1,612 1,722 1,584 1,576 1,753 1,662 July 1,763 1,686 1,676 1,623 1,683 August 1,708 1,659 1,611 1,678 1,589 September 1,648 1,528 1,602 1,585 1,522 October 1,572 1,524 1,577 1,609 1,576 November 1,377 1,533 1,473 1,258 1,482 December 1,598 1,569 1,539 1,487 1,416 TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209

57 HOUR OF DAY ' 12:00 A.M. 1:00 A.M. 2:00 A.M. 3:00 A.M. 4:00 AbM. 5:00 A.M. 6:00 A.M. 7:00 A.M. 8:00 AbM. 9:00 A.M. 10:OO A.M. 11:OO A.M. 12:00 Noon 1:00 P.M. 2:00 P.M. 3:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. 6:00 P.Mb 7:00 P.M. 8:00 P.M. 9:00 P.M. 10:OO P.M. 11:00 P.M. TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209 Analysis In 2011, 51 percent of all domestic violence crimes reported occurred between te ours of 6:00 P.Mb and 1:00 A.M., inclusive. Tirty-six percent of domestic violent crimes reported occurred on Saturday and Sunday. Wen combining tese two categories, tis would indicate tat an intensive period for domestic violence crimes occurs between 6:00 P.M. and 1:00 A.M. on Saturday and Sunday.

58 DAY OF WEEK Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Tursday Friday Saturday TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209 VITIMS Sex Female, Male ' TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209 Race American Indian Asian Black Wite Oter TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209 Fifty-eigt percent of te victims of domestic violence are between225 to 44 years of age, inclusive.

59 RELATIONSHIPS Te domestic violence report collects five victim relationsips, eiter current or former. Te breakdown is as follows: Husband Wife oabitant Male Female Homosexual TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209 HOUSEHOLD STATUS Living Togeter Estranged Unknown TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209 ALOHOL AND DRUG INVOLVEMENT In domestic violence, reporting te use of alcool, drugs or bot by eiter te offender or victim are captured. Alcool Drugs, Alcool 6L None Unknown Drugs TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209

60 IRUMSTANES Alcool Drug Food or ooking Friends Gambling Houseold ores Infidelity Job or Lack of Job Mental Imbalance Money Off spring Property Relatives Sex Sports or Hobby Television Separation Divorce Reconciliation Staying Out Late Oter Unknown TOTAL 19,391 18,926 18,556 17,931 18,209 LEARANES Tere are two ways of clearing a case. One is by making an arrest and carging te person (s) wit te offense. Te second is known as an exceptional clearance. Exceptional clearance means te police know te identity and location of te person (s) wo committed te offense and ave enoug information to arrest tem. However, tere is some reason beyond teir control tat prevents tem from making te arrest. Te arrest and exceptional clearances reported reflect te disposition at te time te domestic violence report form was forwarded to te Uniform rime Reporting Program. Tese reports are not updated; terefore, oter arrests and exceptional clearances may occur, but would not be reflected in te following totals.

61 Arrest Exceptional Unknown During 2011, 78 percent of all domestic violence cases were cleared. A breakdown of te clearances in 2011, were 47 percent by arrest, 31 percent by exceptional and 22 percent unknown, compared to 48 percent by arrest, 30 percent by exceptional and 22 percent unknown in DOMESTI VIOLENE Total Number of Domestic Violence Incidences

62 Domestic Vio lence by ounty I I Allegan y Year Average Anne Arundel 1 1,4841 1,394 Baltimore 1 4, ,060 Baltimore ity alvert aroline arroll ecil arles Dorces ter Frederick Garrett Harford Howard Kent Montgomery Prince George's Queen Anne's St. Mary's Somerset Talbot -- Wasington Wicomico Worcester Statewide Agencies State Total 18,209 17, ,556 18,926 19,391 18,603 Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence.

63 orl mm 4m 4m dm mm ow moo mm WLD ow tnd mw +KV a~ ad' r l \ V ) \ rlm rl N mu, rim m r m IDN Z Z rt 4 -I0 OO 4 mc7 MW -. qm ~ V t-~m rl rl d~ mg 4d <g 4m am ON dm mm mm om me md mw mm 10 QS d \d' \ rl 4 Od Pd' mm ma OO LD 03 Z Z Z rl rl tnm om,-i mm KYP wm ~ V ri rl b.- dm moo u,m dm <: dm rnm 04 oo od' NO on orl mr dm cnm d'g N \dr \ v' d' d W W d dm 04 ad' Q\ Z B Z FV om ri ee el. b b b.. d' drm rlm d rl

64 RIME BREAKDOWN OF DOMESTI VIOLENE BY VITIM TYPE lassification of Offenses Victim Sex No Weapon Non Aggravated Subtotal Simple Stalking Burglary Total Forcible Non Forcible Attempt Larceny-Teft T otal Motor Veicle Teft Total Automobiles Trucks and Buses All Oter Veicles

65 lassification Of Offenses RIME BIREAKDOWN OF DOMESTI VIOLENE BY VITIM TYPE Victim Sex Arson Embezzlement Forgery Fraud, Bad ecks, False Pretense Malicious Destruction Of Property Illegal Weapons Sex Offense (Except Rape) Drugs Total Offense Against Family (Desertion, Non-Support, etc.) M F Disorderly onduct All Oter Offenses (Not specified above)

66 ARJAKING

67 ARJAKING Since 1992, te UR Program as collected data on a type of robbery popularly called "car j acking". A definition was developed to identify te term "carjacking". Te definition is : "arjacking" is a robbery or attempted robbery were te primary objective is to obtain te victim's motor veicle and te victim is in te veicle or in very close proximity to te veicle". In 2011, tere were 435 carjackings representing a 19 percent decrease over te 537 carj ackings reported in Additionally, 82 Motor veicle robberies were reported tat did not meet te carjacking definition, including 4 unfounded carjackings. VITIMS Tere were 480 victims of carjackings reported in BY gender, te 480 victims of carjackings were made up of 73 percent male and 26 percent female. Tis report only captures details on four victims per carjacking. Blacks accounted for 66 percent of te carjacking victims, 29 percent wite and all oter races combined equaled six percent. Te following reflects te sex, race, age and injures of te reported victims; Sex Female Male Unknown TOTAL Race American Indian Asian Black Wite Unknown

68 Te ages of te victims ranged from 7 to 91, wit 59 percent being from 18 to 40 years of.age. In juries Homicide Serious Sligt None Unknown TOTAL OFFENDERS Tis report only captures details on four offenders per carjacking. In 2011, tere were 761 detailed of fenders involved in carjackings. In 6 of te carjackings tere were more tan four offenders, tus leaving 8 offenders witout details to report. By gender, te detailed perpetrators of carjackings were 93 percent male, tree percent female and four percent unknown. Te carjacking offenders were 89 percent black, five percent wite, and five percent for all oter races combined wit te unknown. Te following reflects te sex, race and age of te reported offenders; Sex Female Male Unknown TOTAL 1,465 1, Race American Indian Asian Black Wite Unknown TOTAL 1,465 1,496 1,

69 Te ages of te offenders ranged from 8 to 55, wit 47 percent being between 16 to 25 years of age inclusive. WEAPONS Handgun Rifle Sotgun Unknown Firearm Gun Treats BB/Air Gun Pellet,Gun Knife Sarp Object Blunt Instrument Oter None Unknown TOTAL arjackings in wic firearms were used accounted for 63 percent or 276 offenses. Te andgun was te predominant coice of firearm, accounting for 61 percent or 267 of all carjackings. AOSTING SITUATION Tis element was designed to capture te situation at te point of te confrontation, ar Malfunction Ruse Hitciking Passenger Parked Staged Accident Stopped for Pedestrian Stopped for Traffic Stopped for Traffic Device Stopped for Hitciker Oter Unknown TOTAL

70 LOATION Location describes te type of area were te veicle was at te time of te robbery. Te robberies occurred at te following location type: Gas Station Intersection Not Intersection Parking Lot-Apartment Parking Lot-urc Parking Lot-Public Parking Lot - Sopping enter Parking Lot - Oter Garage Public Parking Residential Driveway Oter Unknown TOTAL MONTHLY OURRENES January February Marc April May June July August September October November December TOTAL

71 DAY OF MTEEK Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Tursday Friday Saturday TOTAL HOUR OF DAY 12:OO A.M. 1:00 A.M. 2:OO A.M. 3:00 A.M. 4:00 A.M. 5:00 A.M. 6:00 A.M. 7:00 A.M. 8:00 A.M. 9:00 A.M. 10:OO A.M. 11:OO A.M. 12:OO Noon 1:00 P.M. 2:00 P.M. 3:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 8:00 P.M. 9:00 P.M. 10:OO P.M. 11:OO P.M. TOTAL

72 Analysis In 2011, 52 percent of all carjacking crimes occurred between te ours of 6:00 P.M. to 1:00 A.M., inclusive. Tirty-tree percent of carjacking crimes occurred during Saturday and Sunday. Wen combining tese two categories, tis would indicate tat an intensive period for carjacking crimes occurs between 6:00 P.M. and 1:00 A.M. on Saturday and Sunday. LEARANES An offense is cleared or solved for crime reporting purposes by eiter arrest or exceptional means. As wit te domestic violence offenses, te carjacking clearances are not updated. Te totals in te "None" category appear iger due to collection limitations as ongoing investigations are continuing and may clear a carjacking offense at a later time. Arrest Exceptional None Unknown -' TOTAL ARJAKINGS Total Number of arjackings