Environmental friendly and cost effective design. mobile:

Transcription

1 Environmental friendly and cost effective design high speed line

2 Problem and solutions It is expensive to build railways and time consuming. Why is it importent to build new high speed lines? How does construction design and production philosphy reduce cost protect environment give more value for money Disadvatages is posible advantages with new railway design

3 Conventional Railway Embankment 3 meter Volume 100 % Weight 139 ton/m

4 High Speed Railway Embankment 5 meter Volume 200 % Weight 278 ton/m

5 High Speed Railway on bridge Volume 28 % Weight 57 ton/m

6 Embankment or bridge?

7 Embankment or bridge? Embankment Settlement Barrier effect Need repairing resources Slab track is not applicable on embankment Bridge High stability Crossing all obsticle Envrionmental friendly Less CO2 Wildlife crossing

8 Environmental friendly and cost effective EMBANKMENT Construction 20 years Cost 170 bn SEK Savings 0 bn SEK 7000 new jobs BRIDGES Construction 5 years Cost 145 bn SEK Saving 25 bn SEK new jobs

9 variables are analysed

10

11 Japanese construction philosophy and Swedish construction philosophy 2013 The Bothnia Line

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19 High Speed Railway Embankment 6,50 3,50 2,50 0,50 Rail Sleeper Inforsment layer Sub-ballast Ballast layer Frost isolation 3,00 5,00 Frost isolation Embankment 16,00 22,00 Frost isolation 10,00

20 Stop embankments and go for bridges for HSR! 350 Km/h ERTMS

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Ktl Aerodynamic protection Evacuation path Service road Protection agains introdurs Protection for wildlife Noice reduction Snow protection Catinary foundation included No level crossings Preservation of agricultur and forest land 6000

29 PREFABRICATED BRIDGE ELEMENT

30 TRANSPORT OF BRIDGE ELEMENT 900 TONS

31 POSITIONING OF BRIDGE ELEMENT

32 TRANSPORT THROUGH TUNNELS 12,8 meter Ktl

33

34 Catinary system 0 SEK Conventionel Railway High speed Railway

35 SignalIing system SEK/spm Conventionel Railway High speed Railway

36 Railway Track System 5000 SEK/spm Conventionel Railway High speed Railway

37 Embankment 3 m SEK/spm SEK/spm 13 m 26 m Conventionel Railway 6 m High speed Railway

38 Use of land 3 m 13 m 26 m SEK/spm 6 m 100 SEK/spm Conventionel Railway High speed Railway

39 Land use Conventionel Railway High speed Railway

40 Use of money System Conventional rail High speed rail Comment Electrification system SEK/m SEK/m No fundaments Signalling system SEK/m No signalls Track system SEK/m SEK/m Sleepers in slab Ballast SEK/m In bridge Substructure SEK/m In bridge Drainage system 600 SEK/m In bridge Noice, service road, snow SEK/m In bridge Ground preparation SEK/m SEK/m Land use cost SEK/m 100 SEK/m Bridge and slabb track SEK/m Project managment SEK/m SEK/m

41 Cost POST Conventionel railway High speed line railway Railway system kr/spm kr/spm Distannce 2 x 600 km 122,4 mdr 109 mdr Construction time 12 år 4 år Intrest 4 % 59 mdr 17 mdr Investment cost 181,4 mdr 125,0 mdr Speed / Time > 250 km/h 4.00 hrs 400 km/h 2.00 hrs Market 5 million trips 9 million trips Market value per year 2,5 mdr 4,5 mdr Repayment time 73 år 28 år

42 Summary High speed lines on prefabricated bridge elements are extremly efficient. Reduction of material fron 139 ton/m to 57 ton/m Less ground preparation work with 98% Fast construction time 500 km = 5 years 12% lower cost compared to embankments Less CO2 prints Less barrier effects for animals and nature Higher safety and security

43 Thank You TACK!