Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative
|
|
- Antony Fitzgerald
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Preliminary Design Review Cyclone Student Launch Initiative
2 Overview Team Overview Mission Statement Vehicle Overview Avionics Overview Safety Overview Payload Overview Requirements Compliance Plan
3 Team Structure
4 Team Organization
5 Website & Social Facebook: ISUcysli Instagram: cyclonestudentlaunchinitiative
6 Mission Statement Cyclone Student Launch Initiative s mission is to successfully design, build, test, launch, and recover a reusable high-powered model rocket while meeting and exceeding the safety standard set by the competition. The rocket will reach an apogee of 4750 feet and, upon landing, will deploy an autonomous rover which will travel a minimum of ten feet and collect a minimum of 10 ml soil sample. Additionally, CySLI has set out to educate and inspire the engineers of tomorrow through demonstrations and hands on activities for all ages.
7 Vehicle Overview
8 Vehicle Mission Success Criteria Ability to launch again without modifications after recovery Retention of rover during flight Deployment of the rover safely upon RSO approval Ability to reach an apogee between 4650 feet and 4850 feet.
9 Vehicle Dimensions 11 feet 2 inches long lbs with motor (20.7 lbs without) 4 Outer Diameter
10 OpenRocket Diagram Main Parachute Bay Nose Cone & Fore Altimeter Bay Payload Bay Aft Altimeter Bay Drogue Bay Motor Mount Avionics Bay
11 Stability CG: 90.4 from nose cone CP: 102 from nose cone Stability Margin: 2.8 cal
12 Mass Statement Independent Sections under Drogue: Independent Sections under Main: Motor Mount: 8.47 lbs Motor Mount: 8.47 lbs Rest of Rocket: lbs Nose Cone and Main: 4.74 lbs Rest of Rocket: 7.45 lbs Section: (without motor) Nose Cone Main Bay Payload Bay Aft Altimeter Bay Drogue Bay Avionics Bay Motor Mount Mass: (lb)
13 Performance Predictions Rail exit velocity 99.6 fps Maximum velocity 756 fps Maximum acceleration 614 ft/s^2 Apogee: 5641 ft
14 Minimum Diameter Reduces weight, cost, and build time significantly Decreases strength of fins Airframe experiences higher temperatures Motor Retention: Internal Less cross-sectional area 75mm vs 98mm 75 is too small for rover 98 has less motor selections
15 Fin Strengthening Tip-to-tip fiberglassing Fin Can Greatly increases strength without additional drag Low heat resistance Removable High Heat resistance Heavy Complex to manufacture More drag Using TTTF for strength Moving fins forward 2 to reduce thermal load
16 Material Selections Carbon Fiber Airframe Blue Tube Coupler Strong and light Will need antenna openings Easy to work with Light and thin Fiberglass Reinforced Motor Mount Heat resistant Strong
17 Nose Cone 5.5:1 Filament Wound Von Karman Nose Cone 22 long Aluminum tip Von Karman vs Ogive vs Parabolic Ogive has a smaller fineness ratio Parabolic manufacturing difficulty
18 Motor Selection AeroTech K1999N-P Average Thrust: lb Total Impulse: 571 lb-s Launch Mass: 6.59 lb Empty Mass: 3.96 lb Thrust to Weight: 17.7 Burn Time: 1.38 seconds
19 Recovery Subsystem Drogueless 55 inch annular main parachute Separation at apogee Main event at 600 feet Piston Ejection System Starting with 60 inch, resize two gores Less black powder Eliminates parachute protection More complex build Drift Calculations Descent time: 86 seconds Section Kinetic Energy (ft*lb) Nose Cone 40.7 Payload and Drogue 63.4 Motor Mount 72.1 Wind Speed Drift Distance (ft) 5 mph mph mph mph 2495
20 Recovery Subsystem Two altimeter bays inside vehicle Four altimeters, two per bay Shielded by carbon fiber, copper tape Altimeters: Stratologger and AIM USB Each powered independently by 9V batteries Activated by external key switches Two in-flight separation points Apogee separation between airbrake bay and drogue bay Main parachute deployment between nose cone and main parachute bay
21 Airbrake Subsystem External Internal 2 bars, 4 panels, & 2 hinges each Mostly straight to Diamond shape Straight would not open Panels held on w/ screw Servo w/ cage and wire Strong Simple Bar Splits into internal and external Parts screw together Wire connected by wire collar
22 Airbrake analysis through CFD Four models analyzed during retraction and deployment Two with wind-redirectors Two without wind-redirectors Four without wind-redirectors Two with a covering plate
23 Avionics Overview
24 Avionics: Apogee Control Method Systems considered: Ballasting, PID Controller, Apogee Prediction Dynamically Deployable Air Brake System (DDABS) Less maintenance and assumption on launch day Reduced error Microcontroller predicts apogee continuously during flight Computer controls brakes through servo motor Brakes increase drag of the vehicle during coast phase Process repeats until desired apogee is predicted Brake actuation restricted using software
25 DDABS: Electrical Hardware
26 DDABS: Flight Computer Comparison Results Teensy Raspberry Pi 3 B Arduino Mega Criteria Processor Speed Physical Size Ease of Use All Consistency Indices are below the.1 standard
27 DDABS: Flight Computer Hardware Teensy Mhz ARM Processor 192KB of RAM Runs Arduino-compatible software 2.5 x 0.7 x 0.2 inches Integrated SD card slot for data logging Acceleration, altitude, launch events, brake action
28 DDABS: Hardware Configuration
29 DDABS: Battery and Requirements Component Maximum Current Draw (ma) Current Draw after 4 hours (mah) Teensy BMP BNO Micro SD Card (onboard Teensy) Total Battery: Lithium-Ion Polymer More compact and dense compared to NiMH Rated capacity: 1200 mah
30 DDABS: Software
31 DDABS: Interior Bay Rail-Sled system will be implemented instead of metal rods Avionics sled will hold all electronic components and batteries for DDABS Materials: plywood, aluminum rails, assorted Ease of access plastics, epoxy glue Batteries mounted on bottom, flight computer mounted on top Total Dimensions of sled: 1.47 inches tall, 3.37 inches wide, and a depth of 5 inches
32 Safety Overview
33 Safety Team Safety Officer Alex Sommers Responsibilities Compilation and maintenance of records of material safety data sheets hazard analysis risk mitigation methods Ensuring completion of safety and lab trainings Compliance with laws, policies, regulations
34 Personnel Hazard Analysis Analyzes the all possible risks to personnel Includes severity ranking and planned mitigation
35 Environmental Hazard Analysis Examines How the rocket can affect the environment How the environment can affect the rocket. Same format as PHA
36 Failure Modes and Effects Analyses Analyses to recognize and evaluate possible failures in order to mitigate all possible risks to acceptable probability levels. Conducted FMEA for rocket, payload, and avionics subsystems
37 Safety Manual Separate document containing: Build procedures Safety Guidelines NRA/TRA, FAA, and EPA regulations Local, state, and federal laws for high-powered rocketry Launch procedures Lab safety manual MSDS
38 Payload Overview
39 Payload Mission Success Criteria Handle in-flight forces during launch Handle landing impact forces with no damage to mechanical or electronic components Deploy from payload bay upon the receipt of manual trigger from base Drive ten feet (or more) from landing site Collect ten milliliters (or more) of soil after driving ten feet from landing site
40 Payload Deployment Subsystem Servo w/ disk and pins Minimum of six 4-40 Nylon Shear Pins as backup retention Black Powder Piston Ejection System Stiff, flexible material
41 Preliminary Payload Design Unique, side-oriented design Expanding drive train that doubles as orientation mechanism Aluminum chassis design that conforms to existing mechanism No component exists beyond a 1.75 in radius of the center of the rover Tentative weight: 2.16 lb
42 Soil Collection Mechanism consists of an scoop attached to a Servo Scoop made of aluminum Micro Servo MG90S Servo will lower scoop into ground Soil will be collected via driving forward Scoop will also double also double as the soil container Scoop will be raised into a cap within the chassis Tentative weight estimate:.107 lbs or 1.71 oz
43 Drivetrain Small rocket diameter limits drivetrain size Treads fold out to support rover and orient Two sided timing belt used for grip Powered by HiTEC HS - 485HB servos and 12V DC Motor Electronic components protected by triangular aluminum support Tentative weight: 1.32 lb
44 Drivetrain Rigid support system for servos and treads Pulleys attached to treads are free spinning on shaft Motors are free spinning as well; attached to pulleys Supports only attached to servo Solves problem of stationary treads and moving motor on same shaft
45 Chassis The chassis will be made of 6061 aluminum The chassis will hold all the electrical components of the rover The pieces of the chassis will be machined and then fastened together Triangular design Tentative weight: 0.51 lb
46 Payload Electronics Pixhawk 4 GPS Rangefinder Transmitter and receiver Motor Servo Power rail Battery
47 Pixhawk 4 Open-hardware controller Contains enough ports for all electronic connections Capable of providing autopilot to the rover Utilizes the ArduRover software User-friendly interface Reliable results Open source
48 GPS Pixhawk 4 GPS Module Specifically designed for compatibility with the Pixhawk 4 Combined GPS and compass Embedded safety switch
49 Rangefinder TFMini - Micro LiDAR Module 12in to 39ft range detection Wide angle of view Time of Flight LiDAR
50 Transmitter and Receiver Micro Transceiver Telemetry Radio Set Used to start the rover after the rocket lands Ground control transmitter and rover receiver Configurable through ArduRover Mission Planner
51 Motor Brushless DC Motor with Encoder Used to move the treads Build-in motor driver Directional control, pulse-width modulation speed control and speed feedback output Small in size
52 Servo Drivetrain HiTEC HS-485HB Capable of supplying enough torque to control the folding tread system Soil Collection Micro Servo - MG90S High Torque Metal Gear Capable of supplying enough torque to control the scoop
53 Power Rail HobbyKing Matek Micro PDB w/bec (5V and 12V) Used to distribute power from the battery to the motors and servos Contains four ESC
54 Payload: Deployment Adafruit Feather M0 with RFM95 Radio Adafruit Ultimate GPS selected for our design. Used to communicate to ground station Receive commands for rover deployment License free signal (920MHz): does not require amateur radio certification. Small size: Will report the current coordinates at a rate of 1Hz Stacks with Feather Dual radio deployment for rover Deactivate failsafe servo for payload housing Deploy rover using controlled charge?
55 Payload Battery Budget Rover Battery Budget Estimation Mission Stage Component Pixhawk 4 Standby Max Current Draw (ma) Run Time (hr) Quantity Power Density (mah) GPS Rangefinder Motor Servo Power Rail Receiver
56 Payload Battery Budget (cont.) Rover Battery Budget Estimation Mission Stage Component Pixhawk 4 System Boot Max Current Draw (ma) Run Time (hr) Quantity Power Density (mah) GPS Rangefinder Motor Servo Power Rail Receiver
57 Payload Battery Budget (cont.) Rover Battery Budget Estimation Mission Stage Component Pixhawk 4 Mission Execution Max Current Draw (ma) Run Time (hr) Quantity Power Density (mah) GPS Rangefinder Motor Servo Power Rail Total 1, Receiver
58 Battery Blomiky 11.1V 3S 2200mAh LiPo Battery Easily capable of powering all the electronics in case of launch delays Pixhawk recommends LiPo batteries for power Rechargeable
59 Payload Preliminary Weight Buildup
60 Requirements Compliance Plan
61 Requirements Compliance Plan List of all NASA requirements for SLI competition and how we plan to achieve them. Table is included in PDR and each verification plan Is classified with a verification method.
62 Requirements Compliance Plan (cont.) List of team derived requirement List for each sub-team
63 Questions?
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry 2017-2018 AGENDA 1. Launch Vehicle 2. Recovery 3. Testing 4. Subscale Vehicle 5. Payload 6. Educational Outreach 7.
More informationNASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel
NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel 1 Agenda Launch Vehicle Overview Nose Cone Section Payload Section Lower Avionic Bay Section Booster Section Motor Selection
More informationCritical Design Review
Critical Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Illinois Space Society 1 Overview Illinois Space Society 2 Launch Vehicle Summary Javier Brown Illinois Space
More informationFLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS
FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS LAUNCH VEHICLE AND PAYLOAD DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Vehicle Diameter 4 Upper Airframe Length 40 Lower Airframe Length 46 Coupler Band Length 1.5 Coupler Length 12 Nose
More informationAuburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR
Auburn University Project Wall-Eagle FRR Rocket Design Rocket Model Mass Estimates Booster Section Mass(lb.) Estimated Upper Section Mass(lb.) Actual Component Mass(lb.) Estimated Mass(lb.) Actual Component
More informationIllinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016
Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2015-2016 March 30, 2016 Team Managers Project Manager: Ian Charter Structures and Recovery Manager:
More informationAuburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015
Auburn University Student Launch PDR Presentation November 16, 2015 Project Aquila Vehicle Dimensions Total Length of 69.125 inches Inner Diameter of 5 inches Outer Diameter of 5.25 inches Estimated mass
More informationCRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION
CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA LAUNCH SOCIETY BILL BROWN, BEECHER FAUST, ROCKWELL GARRIDO, CARSON SCHAFF, MICHAEL WIESNETH, MATTHEW WOJCIECHOWSKI ADVISOR: CARLOS MONTALVO MENTOR:
More informationPresentation Outline. # Title
FRR Presentation 1 Presentation Outline # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Team Introduction Mission Summary Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Elliptical
More informationJordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device
Jordan High School Rocketry Team A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device Mission Success Criteria No damage done to any person or property. The recovery system deploys as expected.
More informationNASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1
NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013 2013 USLI CDR 1 Final design Key features Final motor choice Flight profile Stability Mass Drift Parachute Kinetic Energy Staged recovery Payload Integration Interface
More informationPreliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017
Preliminary Design Review California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017 System Overview Launch Vehicle Dimensions Total Length 108in Airframe OD 6.17in. ID 6.00in. Couplers OD 5.998in.
More informationFlight Readiness Review
Flight Readiness Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Illinois Space Society 1 Overview Illinois Space Society 2 Launch Vehicle Summary Javier Brown Illinois
More informationGIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017
GIT LIT 07-08 NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER TH, 07 AGENDA. Team Overview (5 Min). Educational Outreach ( Min). Safety ( Min) 4. Project Budget ( Min) 5. Launch Vehicle (0 min)
More informationUC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access
UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access Agenda Airframe Propulsion Payload Recovery Safety Outreach Project Plan Airframe
More informationGeorgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES
Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES 1 Agenda 1. Team Overview (1 Min) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Changes Since Proposal (1 Min) Educational Outreach (1 Min)
More informationNASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team
NASA USLI 2012-13 PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team OUTLINE School Information Launch Vehicle Summary Motor Selection Mission Performance and Predictions Structures
More informationPRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW 1 1 Team Structure - Team Leader: Michael Blackwood NAR #101098L2 Certified - Safety Officer: Jay Nagy - Team Mentor: Art Upton NAR #26255L3 Certified - NAR Section: Jackson Model
More informationNotre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST
Notre Dame Rocketry Team Flight Readiness Review March 8, 2018 2:00 PM CST Contents Overview Vehicle Design Recovery Subsystem Experimental Payloads Deployable Rover Payload Air Braking System Safety and
More informationProject NOVA
Project NOVA 2017-2018 Our Mission Design a Rocket Capable of: Apogee of 5280 ft Deploying an autonomous Rover Vehicle REILLY B. Vehicle Dimensions Total Length of 108 inches Inner Diameter of 6 inches
More informationOverview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management
MIT ROCKET TEAM Overview Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management Purpose and Mission Statement Our Mission: Use a rocket to rapidly deploy a UAV capable of completing search
More informationPresentation Outline. # Title # Title
CDR Presentation 1 Presentation Outline # Title # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Team Introduction Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Payload
More informationWichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.
Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S. Benjamin Russell Jublain Wohler Mohamed Moustafa Tarun Bandemagala Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Introduction Vehicle Overview Mission Predictions Payload Design Requirement
More informationFlight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768
Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2018 Agenda California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Agenda 1.0 Changes made Since CDR 2.0 Launch Vehicle Criteria 3.0 Mission
More informationNASA SL Critical Design Review
NASA SL Critical Design Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 LAUNCH VEHICLE 2 Vehicle Summary Launch Vehicle Dimensions Fairing Diameter: 6 in. Body Tube Diameter: 4 in. Mass at lift off: 43.8
More informationStatement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum
Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum Vehicle Requirements Requirement Success Criteria Verification 1.1 No specific design requirement exists for the altitude. The altitude is a
More informationTacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review
Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review High-Powered Rocketry Team 911 Oval Drive Raleigh NC, 27695 January 13, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Figures:... 8 Table of Appendices:...
More informationUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch 2017-2018 Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017 Illinois Space Society 104 S. Wright Street Room 18C Urbana, Illinois
More informationThe University of Toledo
The University of Toledo Project Kronos Preliminary Design Review 11/03/2017 University of Toledo UT Rocketry Club 2801 W Bancroft St. MS 105 Toledo, OH 43606 Contents 1 Summary of Proposal... 6 1.1 Team
More informationTacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review
Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review High-Powered Rocketry Team 911 Oval Drive Raleigh NC, 27695 March 6, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Figures... 9 Table of Appendices... 11
More informationNASA s Student Launch Initiative :
NASA s Student Launch Initiative : Critical Design Review Payload: Fragile Material Protection 1 Agenda 1. Design Overview 2. Payload 3. Recovery 4. 5. I. Sub-Scale Predictions II. Sub-Scale Test III.
More informationPROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW
PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL 36849 POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW APRIL 29, 2016 Motor Specifications The team originally planned to use an Aerotech L-1520T motor and attempted four full
More informationFlight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.
Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight Roll Induction and Counter Roll 2016-2017 NASA University Student Launch 27 March 2017 Propulsion Research Center, 301 Sparkman Dr. NW, Huntsville
More informationUniversity Student Launch Initiative
University Student Launch Initiative HARDING UNIVERSITY Flight Readiness Review March 31, 2008 Launch Vehicle Summary Size: 97.7 (2.5 meters long), 3.1 diameter Motor: Contrail Rockets 54mm J-234 Recovery
More informationNASA SL Flight Readiness Review
NASA SL Flight Readiness Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 LAUNCH VEHICLE 2 Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Diameter: 6 fairing/4 aft Length: 106 inches Wet Mass: 41.1 lbs. Center of Pressure:
More informationUniversity of Notre Dame
University of Notre Dame 2016-2017 Notre Dame Rocketry Team Critical Design Review NASA Student Launch Competition Roll Control and Fragile Object Protection Payloads Submitted January 13, 2017 365 Fitzpatrick
More informationCritical Design Review Report
Critical Design Review Report I) Summary of PDR report Team Name: The Rocket Men Mailing Address: Spring Grove Area High School 1490 Roth s Church Road Spring Grove, PA 17362 Mentor: Tom Aument NAR Number
More informationTeam Air Mail Preliminary Design Review
Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review 2014-2015 Space Grant Midwest High-Power Rocket Competition UAH Space Hardware Club Huntsville, AL Top: Will Hill, Davis Hunter, Beth Dutour, Bradley Henderson,
More informationNUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University
NUMAV AIAA at Northeastern University Team Officials Andrew Buggee, President, Northeastern AIAA chapter Dr. Andrew Goldstone, Faculty Advisor John Hume, Safety Officer Rob DeHate, Team Mentor Team Roster
More informationAUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review
AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH Project Nova 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL 36849 Post Launch Assessment Review April 19, 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents...2 List of Tables...3 Section 1: Launch Vehicle
More informationUniversity Student Launch Initiative
University Student Launch Initiative HARDING UNIVERSITY Critical Design Review February 4, 2008 The Team Dr. Edmond Wilson Brett Keller Team Official Project Leader, Safety Officer Professor of Chemistry
More informationIllinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014
Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch 2014-2015 Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014 Illinois Space Society 104 S. Wright Street Room 321D Urbana,
More informationRocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati
Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati 2009-2010 Grant Schaffner, Ph.D. (Advisor) Rob Charvat (Student) 17 September 2010 1 Spacecraft Design Course Objectives Students gain experience
More informationCritical Design Review
Critical Design Review 1/27/2017 NASA Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 1/27/2017 California State Polytechnic University,
More informationAUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR
AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL 36849 CDR January 10, 2019 Contents List of Tables...7 List of Figures...9 1 CDR Report Summary...12 1.1 Payload Deployable Rover...12
More informationNASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review
2017-2018 NASA Student Launch College and University Preliminary Design Review Institution: United States Naval Academy Mailing Address: Aerospace Engineering Department United States Naval Academy ATTN:
More informationTripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt
Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt Kevin O Classen 1101 Dutton Brook Road Goshen, VT 05733 (802) 247-4205 kevin@back2bed.com Doctor Fill Doctor Fill General Specifications Airframe:
More informationCYCLONE STUDENT LAUNCH INITIATIVE
NSL PROPOSAL September 19, 2018 CYCLONE STUDENT LAUNCH INITIATIVE 2018-19 Iowa State University 537 Bissell Rd. 1200 Howe Hall Ames, IA 50011 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Table of Figures...
More informationPreliminary Design Review
Preliminary Design Review November 16, 2016 11/2016 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 1 Agenda 1.0 General Information
More informationNASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review
2017 2018 NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Review 1000 W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA 91741 Artemis Deployable Rover November 3rd, 2017 Table of Contents General Information... 9 1. School Information...
More informationCritical Design Review
AIAA Orange County Section Student Launch Initiative 2011-2012 Critical Design Review Rocket Deployment of a Bendable Wing Micro-UAV for Data Collection Submitted by: AIAA Orange County Section NASA Student
More informationPreliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768
Preliminary Design Review November 15, 2017 Agenda California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Agenda 1.0 General Information 2.0 Launch Vehicle System Overview
More informationNASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review. Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S.
NASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S. CPE496-01 Computer Engineering Design II Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of
More informationStudent Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken
University of Evansville Student Launch Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review Submitted by: 2016 2017 Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken Submission Date: November 04, 2016 Payload: Fragile Material Protection
More informationNASA SL Preliminary Design Review
NASA SL Preliminary Design Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 Mission Summary Design, fabricate, test and fly a rocket and payload to 1 mile in altitude Deploy a rover upon landing to autonomously
More informationNASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)
2016-2017 NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 110 8th St Troy, NY 12180 Project Name: Andromeda Task 3.3: Roll Induction and Counter
More informationThe University of Toledo
The University of Toledo Project Cairo Preliminary Design Review 10/08/2016 University of Toledo UT Rocketry Club 2801 W Bancroft St. MS 105 Toledo, OH 43606 Contents 1 Summary of Preliminary Design Review...
More informationTuskegee University Rocketry Club
Tuskegee University Rocketry Club National Aeronautics and Space Administration Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review Atmospheric Measurement and Aerodynamic Analysis TURC 2015-2016 NASA
More informationUSLI Critical Design Report
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2011 2012 USLI Critical Design Report University Of Minnesota Team Artemis 1/23/2012 Critical Design Report by University of Minnesota Team Artemis for 2011-2012 NASA
More informationCritical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)
Critical Design Review Report 2014-2015 NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Florida International University Engineering Center College
More informationLEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD. Dan Schwartz
LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD Dan Schwartz This entire rocket is built using the same techniques I use for my nose cones, a central airframe tube for compression strength and rings of high compression styrofoam
More informationProject WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review
S A M U E L G I N N C O L L E G E O F E N G I N E E R I N G Auburn University Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review 2 Engineering Dr. Auburn, AL 36849 March 6th, 205 Table of Contents Section
More informationPalos Verdes High School 1
Abstract: The Palos Verdes High School Institute of Technology (PVIT) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle team is proud to present Condor. Condor is a hexacopter weighing in at 1664g including the 4 cell 11.1 volt,
More informationMercury VTOL suas Testing and Measurement Plan
Mercury VTOL suas Testing and Measurement Plan Introduction Mercury is a small VTOL (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) aircraft that is building off of a quadrotor design. The end goal of the project is for
More informationNorthwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review
2012-2013 Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review Table of Contents, Tables, and Figures I.0 CDR Report Summary... 1 I.1 Team Summary... 1 I.2 Launch Vehicle Summary... 1 I.2a
More informationFlorida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review
Florida A & M University Flight Readiness Review 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review 1 Overview Team Summary ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ Vehicle Criteria ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~
More informationCal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017
Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Department
More informationPost Launch Assessment Review
AIAA Orange County Section Student Launch Initiative 2011-2012 Post Launch Assessment Review Rocket Deployment of a Bendable Wing Micro-UAV for Data Collection Submitted by: AIAA Orange County Section
More informationFirst Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016
First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016 Competition Date April 21-22, 2016 Carthage College Kenosha, WI April 23, 2016 Richard Bong Recreational Park Kansasville, WI Meet the Team Wisconsin Space
More informationPegasus II. Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation. Brian Wheeler
Pegasus II Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation Brian Wheeler Contents: A. Design Overview B. Booster Construction C. Electronics Bay (Mechanical) Construction D. Nose Cone Construction E. Recovery System
More informationRocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010
Rocket Design Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick February 2010 Purpose Focus is on designing aerodynamically stable rockets not drag optimization nor construction techniques! Copyright 2010 by Gary Stroick
More informationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY POST-LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY USLI TEAM APRIL 27TH 2018 Table of Contents 1. Summary 2 1.1 Team Summary 2 1.2 Launch Summary 2 2. Launch Vehicle Assessment
More informationInnovating the future of disaster relief
Innovating the future of disaster relief American Helicopter Society International 33rd Annual Student Design Competition Graduate Student Team Submission VEHICLE OVERVIEW FOUR VIEW DRAWING INTERNAL COMPONENTS
More informationCNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge
CNY Rocket Team Challenge Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge RockSim 9 Basics 2 Table of Contents A. Introduction.p. 3 B. Designing Your Rocket.p.
More informationNorthwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review
Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review 2012-2013 Table of Contents I. Team Summary... 1 Team Name: Northwest Indian College RPGs... 1 II. Launch Vehicle Summary... 1
More informationProject WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review
S A M U E L G I N N C O L L E G E O F E N G I N E E R I N G Auburn University Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review 2 Engineering Dr. Auburn, AL 36849 January 6th, 205 Table of Contents SECTION
More informationHPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick
Complex Rocket Design Considerations HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick 1. Tripoli Safety Code 2. Technical Considerations 3. Clusters/Air Starts 4. Staging 5. Summary 2 1. Complex High Power Rocket.
More informationUniversity Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2012 2013 University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics 3/18/2013 2012-2013 University of Minnesota
More informationRover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.
Rover Delivery 2017-2018 NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review Charger Rocket Works April 27 th, 2018 Propulsion Research Center 1030 John Wright Drive NW, Huntsville,
More informationUSLI Flight Readiness Review
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2011 2012 USLI Flight Readiness Review University Of Minnesota Team Artemis 3/26/2012 Flight Readiness Report prepared by University of Minnesota Team Artemis for 2011-2012
More informationStudent Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016
University of Evansville Student Launch Enclosed: Proposal Submitted by: 2016 2017 Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken Submission Date: September 30, 2016 Payload: Fragile Material Protection Submitted
More informationPre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III
Advanced Planning 1 Schedule a Check that waivers are available at the intended launch site and date. b Check weather forecast for wind and temperature conditions at the site. c Have TAP members approved
More informationUniversity of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team
University of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team NASA Student Launch Initiative Flight Readiness Review - Report Submitted by: The University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rocketry
More informationFlight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)
Flight Readiness Review Report 2014-2015 NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Florida International University Engineering Center College
More informationTable of Content 1) General Information ) Summary of PDR Report ) Changes Made Since Proposal ) Safety... 8
Table of Content 1) General Information... 3 1.1 Student Leader... 3 1.2 Safety Officer... 3 1.3 Team Structure... 3 1.4 NAR/TRA Sections... 4 2) Summary of PDR Report... 5 2.1 Team Summary... 5 2.2 Launch
More informationPresentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix
Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix 1 Outline Structures Nosecone Body tubes Bulkheads Fins Tailcone Recovery System Layout Testing Propulsion Ox Tank Plumbing Injector Chamber Nozzle Testing Hydrostatic
More informationPost Launch Assessment Review
Post Launch Assessment Review University of South Alabama Launch Society Conner Denton, John Faulk, Nghia Huynh, Kent Lino, Phillip Ruschmyer, Andrew Tindell Department of Mechanical Engineering 150 Jaguar
More informationSpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle
SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle The SpaceLoft XL is UP Aerospace s workhorse space launch vehicle -- ideal for significant-size payloads and multiple, simultaneous-customer operations. SpaceLoft
More informationFormation Flying Experiments on the Orion-Emerald Mission. Introduction
Formation Flying Experiments on the Orion-Emerald Mission Philip Ferguson Jonathan P. How Space Systems Lab Massachusetts Institute of Technology Present updated Orion mission operations Goals & timelines
More informationModified shock-cord mount and cables (cables are shown pushed into motor mount here)
Building the Ariel Builder: Ray Wilkinson This is Ray Wilkinson's own rocket, but will mostly reside at UH, and will be used for display purposes as well as being flown. It's built from a kit made by PML
More informationElectric Penguin s philosophy:
UNMANNED PLATFORMS AND SUBSYSTEMS Datasheet v 1.1 Penguin BE Electric Unmanned Platform Up to 110 minutes of endurance 2 with 2.8 kg payload 23 liters of payload volume Quick replaceable battery cartridge
More informationSSC Swedish Space Corporation
SSC Swedish Space Corporation Platforms for in-flight tests Gunnar Florin, SSC Presentation outline SSC and Esrange Space Center Mission case: Sounding rocket platform, dedicated to drop tests Satellite
More informationCritical Design Review
Harding University University Student Launch Initiative Team Critical Design Review January 29, 2007 The Flying Bison Sarah Christensen Project Leader Dr. Ed Wilson Faculty Supervisor Dr. James Mackey
More informationSuper Squadron technical paper for. International Aerial Robotics Competition Team Reconnaissance. C. Aasish (M.
Super Squadron technical paper for International Aerial Robotics Competition 2017 Team Reconnaissance C. Aasish (M.Tech Avionics) S. Jayadeep (B.Tech Avionics) N. Gowri (B.Tech Aerospace) ABSTRACT The
More informationUHABS-5 Mission Zeppelin
UHABS-5 Mission Zeppelin Team Members: Likeke Aipa, Drex Arine, Andrew Bui, Karen Calaro, Kanekahekilinuinanaueikalani Clark, Ka Chon Liu, Cyrus Noveloso, Reagan Paz, Yun Feng Tan, Jake Torigoe, Emanuel
More informationDeployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon
1 Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon Kazuhiko Yamada, Takashi Abe (JAXA/ISAS) Kojiro Suzuki, Naohiko Honma, Yasunori Nagata, Masashi Koyama (The
More informationFirst Nation Launch Competition Handbook
2018 First Nation Launch Competition Handbook Funded through National Space Grant Foundation Cooperative Agreement 2017 HESS-05 NASA Grant #NNX13E43A 9-11-17 1 Table of Contents Contents 2 Competition
More informationThis Week. Next Week 4/7/15
E80 Spring 2015 This Week! Transfer breadboard circuit to PC board.! Verify everything still works.! Get data logger working.! Pass off consists of: " Power PC board with data logger & start logging. "
More informationLecture 1: Basic Ideas, Safety and Administration.
Lecture 1: Basic Ideas, Safety and Administration Lecture 1 Page: 1 Basic Ideas Safety Administration colintan@nus.edu.sg Lecture 1: Basic Ideas, Safety and Administration Page: 2 WELCOME TO SINGAPORE
More informationFirst Nation Launch Competition Handbook
2018 First Nation Launch Competition Handbook Funded through National Space Grant Foundation Cooperative Agreement 2017 HESS-05 NASA Grant #NNX13E43A 9-11-17 Table of Contents 1 Competition Objectives...
More information