NASA SL Critical Design Review
|
|
- Meagan Bailey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NASA SL Critical Design Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1
2 LAUNCH VEHICLE 2
3 Vehicle Summary Launch Vehicle Dimensions Fairing Diameter: 6 in. Body Tube Diameter: 4 in. Mass at lift off: 43.8 lbm. Length: 103 in. Concept L-Class Solid Commercial Motor Rover Delivery Electronic Dual Deployment Fiberglass Airframe 3
4 Vehicle CONOPS Deploy Drogue: 19 seconds 5,429 ft. Powered Ascent: seconds 0 1,190 ft. Deploy Main: 62 seconds 600 ft. Landing: 121 seconds 0 ft. Deploy Rover: Team Command 11/3/2017 USLI PDR 4
5 Vehicle Summary Tracking/Rover Deployment Avionics Rover Piston Main Parachute Recovery Avionics Drogue Parachute Fins (x4) CG 56 in. CP 69 in. Payload Fairing 36 in. Forward Airframe 30 in. Coupler 12 in. Aft Airframe 42 in. 5
6 Upper Airframe Overview Upper Airframe houses the rover, piston ejection system, and GPS tracker 6
7 Nose Cone 6 in. elliptical shape; 6.17 in. OD; ABS Plastic; 3-D printed in-house 1.75 in. shoulder; shear pinned to fairing 0.25 in. Aluminum bulkhead 7
8 Fairing Houses payload and deployment device Fiberglass; 6.17 in. OD, 6 in. ID Shear pinned to nose cone; bolt connection to transition 1/14/2018 8
9 Transition Three piece design, two 3D printed ABS plastic, one 0.5 in. thick aluminum bulkhead Each piece has holes for threaded inserts Held together using ¼-20 and bolts Forward Insert Aft 9
10 Transition Three piece design allows for a 57% reduction in weight Max stress on aluminum bulkhead: ksi Yield stress: 42 ksi 10
11 Transition Coupler Connects 4 in. body tube to the 6 in. fairing U-bolt for recovery harness attachment point Shear pins connect to 4 in. body tube Threaded rod with hex nuts for connection to fairing 11
12 Piston Overview CO 2 Powered 12 gram cartridge Spring driven spike used to release stored gas 60 lbf. test monofilament fishing line used as arming tether for spring Hot wire cuts tether to release spring Two main components: piston head and CO 2 housing 12
13 Piston Head Ejects rover and nose cone Fiberglass coupler with aluminum bulkhead 13
14 CO 2 Housing Houses CO 2 cartridge and release mechanism 3D printed ABS Plastic Allows for easy and quick modification upon testing results 14
15 Piston Configuration CO 2 housing positioned in transition shoulder Mounted to side using 3-D printed brackets and 4-40 bolts Keeps housing fixed during flight 15
16 Aft Subsystem Overview Aft Subsystem Components Fin Can Fin(s) Thrust Plate Recovery Bulkhead & U-Bolt Motor/Motor Case Motor Retention Ring 16
17 Fins Trapezoidal Fin Set (4) Maintain stability G10 Fiberglass Great strength/weight ratio 3/16 thickness Flutter Speed Calculated to be Mach ( ft./sec) 17
18 Fin Interface 4 bolts perpendicular to fin face 6 bolts normal to body tube to hold shape Also used to hold fin can in vehicle Entire assembly can be removed 18
19 Fin Can Assembly Overview Consists of: Fin Can, Motor Retention Ring, Thrust Plate, and Rail Button Press fit nut 19
20 Exploded View of the Fin Can Assembly 20
21 Fin Can 3D Printed in house Material: ABS plastic Purpose: Fin retention and centering of the motor Attached to the body tube using 4-40 bolts which maintain the shape of the Body tube 21
22 Fin Can Dimensions 22
23 Thrust Plate Machined in house Material: 6061 Aluminum Purpose: Transfer motor thrust to the airframe Attached to the fin can using the motor retention bolts Part was added due to concern of shearing the Fin Can while during motor burn 23
24 Thrust Plate Dimensions 24
25 Motor Retention Ring 3D printed in house Material: ABS plastic Purpose: Motor retention Attached to the fin can using the motor retention bolts Aft retention was chosen due to the difficulty of disassembling the forward retention system 25
26 Motor Retention Ring Dimensions 26
27 Motor Selection Aerotech L1420R-PS Best met altitude target Avg. Thrust: lbf. Burn Time: 3.2 sec Motor Aerotech L2200 Aerotech L1420 Aerotech L1520 Altitude 6107 ft ft ft. 27
28 Dimensions OpenRocket Flight Simulation Total length 103 in. Wet mass lbm. CP location in. CG location in inches inches 28
29 Stability Margin Motor Burnout (3.28 cal.) Apogee Initial Stability (2.22 cal.) 29
30 OpenRocket Flight Simulation Attribute Value Apogee (ft.) 5429 Length (in.) 103 Max. Mach Number 0.60 Rail Exit Velocity (ft./s) 60.6 Static Stability (cal.) 2.22 Motor Designation AT L1420R P Thrust-to-Weight Ratio /3/2017 CG 56 in. CP 69 in. USLI PDR 30
31 OpenRocket Flight Simulation Apogee (18.62 sec.) Motor Burnout (3.27 sec.) Main Deploy (62.39 sec.) 31
32 Full Scale Monte Carlo Simulation 1-D method used to verify OpenRocket sim Goal: Determine uncertainty in projected altitude Randomly varies conditions by a percentage drag coeff., vehicle mass, propellant mass, case mass Varied between ±6.25% and ±2.5% Use drag coefficient from subscale flight C d = ,000 flights per simulation 32
33 Full Scale Monte Carlo Simulation Mean: feet Median: feet Std. Deviation: feet Max Altitude: feet Min. Altitude: feet 33
34 Central Subsystem Overview Central Subsystem responsibilities: Coupler between airframes Flight Avionics Ejection System Tracking and Ground Station Recovery System 34
35 Drift Analysis Monte Carlo Drift Model Assumes: Apogee is directly above the launch rail The parachute does not open immediately The drift distance stops once a component lands Horizontal acceleration is solely based on relative velocity Drogue parachute is negligible once the main is fully deployed V wind V relative Wind Speed (mph) OpenRocket Drift Distance (ft) CRW Model Drift Distance (ft)
36 Recovery System Calculations Requirement: No individual section will have a kinetic energy greater than 75 ft.-lbf. upon landing Terminal velocity under drogue: ft./sec. Terminal velocity under main: ft./sec. Vehicle Section Mass (lbm.) Fairing Coupler Aft KE (ft.-lbf.) 36
37 Recovery System Drogue Parachute Deployment: Deployment at apogee Fruity Chute CFC-18 (Cd = 1.5) Shock Cords: 1 inch Nylon (50 ft) Connected between forward motor retention bulkhead in lower airframe and avionics bay housing. Descent speed under drogue: ft/s Main Parachute Deployment: Deployment at 600 ft above ground level Fruity Chute 96 Iris Ultra (Cd = 2.2) Shock Cords: 1 inch Nylon (50 ft) Connected between fairing bulkhead and avionics bay housing. Descent speed under main: ft/s 37
38 Avionics Recovery Avionics Subsystem 2 PerfectFlite StratoLoggerCF altimeters; each with an independent 9V battery and pull pin + SPDT momentary activation switch 4 Safe Touch terminals, e-matches, and black powder charges Full redundancy in avionics and ignition 38
39 Coupler Batteries RBF Switches Screw Terminal Strip Flight Computer Charge Well U-Bolt 12 in. 39
40 Recovery Deployment Avionics Normally Closed SPDT Pull Pin Microswitch Prevents ignition during assembly Helps preserve battery life Primary Drogue charge fired at apogee Secondary fired one second after Primary Main charge fired at 600 ft. Secondary fired at 550 ft. Primary charges contain 4 g. of black powder Secondary charges are 2 g. larger than primary 40
41 System GPS Tracking & Rover Deployment Subsystem CRW will use a custom PCB that contains an Xbee Pro-PRO 900HP RF module, Teensy LC, and MTK3339 GPS Chip Xbee transmits GPS coordinates to a receiver connected to the ground station laptop GPS sentences are parsed and written to file for flight data Rover Deployment Electronics operated via XBee Structure Integration 3D printed mount to secure tracker and deployment electronics PCB within transition section of the rocket Three axis security and battery retention to ensure components are kept intact 41
42 Subscale Design Scaling Factors: Geometry of the design Average Thrust of Motor and Thrust Curve Kinetic Energy 42
43 Subscale Flight Results Successful recovery of all three subscale flights Altimeters ignited the black powder charges at the correct altitudes 43
44 Subscale Flight Results Flight 1- Apogee 2884 ft., some weathercocking Flight 2- Apogee 2323 ft., severe coning Flight 3- Apogee 3165 ft., vertical flight 44
45 Subscale Drag Coefficient Using data gathered from the altimeters, the drag force and coefficient for the vehicle were found A = Area of the exposed section, ft 2 ρ = density of the air, lbm/ft 3 C d = Coefficient of Drag u = Velocity, ft/s m = mass, lbm A = acceleration of the vehicle, ft/s 2 g = acceleration of gravity, ft/s 2 Using a weight of 6.33 lbs, an acceleration of ft/s, an A of ft 2, a ρ of lb/ft 3, and a velocity of ft/s: C d =
46 Payload Diameter: Deployed 16.2 in., Integrated 5.7 in. Rover Length: 14.6 in., Chassis Length: 12 in. 46
47 Payload Integration Rover fits inside the piston, which ejects it from the fairing CO 2 cannister pushes rover through nose cone 47
48 Payload CONOPS 1. The rover is ejected from the rocket 2. Wheels deploy and rover moves 10 ft. 3. Rover stops and deploys solar panels
49 Chassis Stores and protects tray of rover electronics 12 in. x 4 in. x 3 in., Aluminum 6061-T6 Machined from single Aluminum block Connects to motors, electronics tray, and solar panel lid 49
50 Wheel Spokes pulled by springs to expand wheel Wheel hub and spokes CNC milled aluminum Integrated Diameter: 5.7 in. Deployed Diameter: 16.2 in. Spoke 6 in. x 0.5 in. x 0.25 in. 50
51 Stabilizing Arm Used to keep chassis upright during deployment 3D printed ABS 11 in. x 0.25 in. x 0.5 in. Mounts to chassis using a hinge Torsion spring pushes out after deployment 51
52 Strength Check Notes This table details the normal load cases for each structural component The wheel hub is the weakest component but can withstand a 73% load increase Part Load Case Safety Margin Chassis 210 lbf (sidewall) Chassis 210 lbf (base) Wheel Hub 210 lbf (sidewall) Wheel Hinge 105 lbf (each) Spoke 210 lbf (lengthwise force) Spoke 7 lbf (Drive force)
53 Electronics Tray Rover electronics contained inside chassis Tray designed to wire and organize electronics outside chassis Tray lowered into top of chassis once assembled 53
54 Electronics Tray Designed to avoid interference with motors Tray Assembly: 11.6 in. x 3.8 in. x 2 in. 54
55 Rover Lid with Mechanism Lid is closed during rover travel for protection Gear slides top lid out to reveal solar panel in chassis 3D printed ABS lid, gear bought from McMaster-Carr 12 in. x 4 in. x in. when closed 12 in. x 7.25 in. x 0.5 in. when open 55
56 Rover Mass Budget The mass of all components totaled 6.6 lbm. A 6% margin was added to the total weight to account for fasteners and adhesives Component Mass (lbm.) Chassis 2.0 Wheel Assembly 2.4 Lid/Solar Deployment 0.7 Tail 0.2 Electronics 1.3 6% Margin 0.4 Total
57 Payload Power Budget Part Name Current (ma) Voltage (V) Adj Current Duty Cycle (%) Time (hr) Total (mwh) Arduino Mega Camera GPS IMU Pressure/Temp Wheel Motors Lid Motors Radio transmit Radio idle Datalogger Power required Part Name Current (ma) Voltage (V) Adj Current Duty Cycle (%) Time (hr) Total (mwh) Li-Ion Battery N/A Power Supplied Power Supplied mhr Power required mhr Factor of Safety mhr 57
58 Electronics Block Diagram 58
59 Electronics Failure Path Emphasizes dependence of each lower level component on the component above it 59
60 SAFETY 60
61 Safety Overview Training and communication are key to maintain safety and avoid mishaps Priorities in CRW safety program (in order of importance): 1. Safety to personnel 2. Safety to facilities & permanent systems 3. Safety to flight hardware & objective success Established SOP and regulations to maintain safety practices Team is transitioning from designing to manufacturing and testing 61
62 Communication CRW team meets twice weekly Safety briefings are held to update the team with pertinent information All conducted tests have documentation of results and lessons learned Documents and test results are recorded to the team s server for ease of access 62
63 Standard Operating Procedures Philosophy Standardization of processes Address risks and hazards with proper method Creation Based on previous versions In collaboration with team leads to adapt SOP steps to the features and mission needs of the Vehicle and Payload Approval Reviewed and approved by Red team members and faculty advisor Implementation: Use latest version Safety Monitor to ensure strict adherence to steps and safety aspects 63
64 Launch and Assembly Procedures Final rocket assembly procedures for the Full Scale have been developed to fit the design concept Minimum assembly or modification of airframe at field Field operations are limited to subsystem integration and loading of energetics Simulated runs of launch procedures will take place at least one week prior to any launch 64
65 Environmental Factors Factors affecting launch vehicle and payload Sudden high winds Humidity Extreme temperatures Terrain Mitigations established: Minimum exposure to environment Constant monitor of the weather 65
66 Environmental Factors Factors affecting the Environment and Local communities Hot exhaust Landing in trees, difficult terrains Landing on infrastructure and private properties Waste from manufacturing and launches Mitigations Established: Inspection and understanding of launch field Waste collection and proper disposal Constant monitor of wind conditions 66
67 Upcoming Trainings Training Activity Date Red Cross First Aid CPR/AED/FA Completed Basic Emergency Procedures Completed Process Hazard Analysis Completed Safe Testing Procedures Completed Root-Cause Analysis Completed Outreach Safety Procedures Completed Sub-scale Launch Safety Procedures Completed Hazardous Material Handling/Disposal Completed Fire Extinguisher training Completed Workshop Safety Briefings 1/23/2018 System Ground Tests Briefings 1/30/2018 TBD TBD Safety Briefings are held based to relevant safety topics. 67
68 Test Plan Test Plan changes since PDR Completed tests includes the subscale launch and subscale charge test. New tests planned for Rover and Launch Vehicle fairing systems. GPS test is on going to ensure constant compatibility. 68
69 Test Plan Test Number Test Type Test Status T1 Subscale Ejection Charge Test Test has been conducted prior to the subscale flight on Test shows that rocket has to go drogue-less and use only one shear pin on both main and drogue for successful recovery. T2 Subscale Flight Successful launch and recovery Vehicle did not reach initial altitude prediction T3 GPS tracker range and capability/telemetry Tracker currently Exhibit poor performances. Team is currently learning how to trouble shoot issues with tracker. Telemetry test is planned for Feb T4 Fin Can Load Test Test will be planned for the end of January to the early February before the full scale launch. 69
70 Test Plan T5 Rover Piston Deployment test Test will be scheduled in February when the piston is manufactured. T6 Fairing Vibration Test Test is planned for middle to end of February once test articles arrive T7 Faring Drop Test Test is planned for middle to end of February once test articles arrive T8 Fairing Transition Compression test Test will be conducted once FEA results shows doubts in the structures. T9 Rover Operational Test Test will be planned and carried out when rover is constructed. T10 Full Scale Charge Test Test will be conducted approximately one week before the first full scale launch date T11 Full Scale Flight Flight will be held on Feb 17 and 18 70
71 TESTING AND REQUIREMENTS VERIFICATION 71
72 Verification Reports Document template for tracking requirements verification Allows for all 4 methods to be tracked Place to record test procedures, personnel, and results Template is in Critical Design Review Appendix 72
73 General Requirements Verification Expected/In-Progress Verification Reports Review of project plan and procedures Review of all submitted documents, website, and teleconference setup Review of Educational Outreach Reports Demonstration of reusability through full-scale flight 73
74 Test Plan Test Number Test Type Description Test Status T1 GPS tracker o The GPS tracker of the launch vehicle and the Tracker currently range and payload will be tested inside of their respective Exhibit poor capability fairing/compartment. This is to ensure that the GPS performances. can reliable transmit and receive signals. Team is currently o The test will also be conducted in obstacles such as learning how to trees and buildings to reveal the limits of the GPS. trouble shoot o The full test of GPS system performance and reliability will be the subscale launch issues with tracker. o Single component tests (radio, GPS receiver), can be done by a team member without supervision. o Subscale launch tests will adhere to SOP. T2 Electrical Charge on E-matches o o o o Spectrum analysis will be conducted to determine if transmission waves will enter into the avionics coupler and affect the electronic components The tracker can be placed inside the coupler to determine how much transmission power exits. The idea is if excessive power exits the coupler, an excessive amount can enter. Shielding can then be implemented based on the results. This test will require more than one team member. However, Red team members and the mentor will not be required for this type of test. Test is has not been planned. 74
75 Test Plan T3 Altimeter Test o The functionality of the altimeter will be evaluated with Test will be scheduled the Charger Rocket Works altimeter testing container. when altimeter has o Only applied for in-house made altimeters. Third party altimeters like Statologger will not require testing. been created. T4 Ejection Charge Test o This is to experimentally verify the correct amount of black powder to be used in the ejection of the drogue and main parachutes. o o An SOP has to be developed for this test This test is dangerous and only Red Team with the presence of the mentor can conduct the test. Test has been conducted prior to the subscale flight on Test shows that rocket has to go drogue-less and use only one shear pin on both main and drogue for successful recovery. T5 Rover Piston Deployment test o Experimentally verify the functionality of the rover deployment mechanism. o The test requires no pyrotechnics so anyone in CRW can conduct the test. Test will be scheduled in February when the piston is manufactured. T6 Fairing Transition Compression test o Experimentally verify the compression strength of the fairing transition o Only the section in doubt from the FEA results shall printed for test. o Currently planned to be a destructive test T7 Rover Terrain Test o The Rover, once constructed, shall be put through its paces in different terrain conditions (except water and mud). o Test is to verify the spoke wheel design. Test will be conducted once FEA results shows doubts in the structures. Test will be planned and carried out when rover is constructed. 75
76 Full Scale Budget Budget Summary Airframe $ Electronics $ Recovery $ Motors $ Rover Structure $ Rover Electronics $ Total Cost $
77 On the Pad Budget Launch Vehicle Airframe $ Electronics $ Recovery $ Motor $ Rover $ Total $
78 11/3/2017 USLI PDR 78
NASA SL Flight Readiness Review
NASA SL Flight Readiness Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 LAUNCH VEHICLE 2 Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Diameter: 6 fairing/4 aft Length: 106 inches Wet Mass: 41.1 lbs. Center of Pressure:
More informationCRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry 2017-2018 AGENDA 1. Launch Vehicle 2. Recovery 3. Testing 4. Subscale Vehicle 5. Payload 6. Educational Outreach 7.
More informationCritical Design Review
Critical Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Illinois Space Society 1 Overview Illinois Space Society 2 Launch Vehicle Summary Javier Brown Illinois Space
More informationFLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS
FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS LAUNCH VEHICLE AND PAYLOAD DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Vehicle Diameter 4 Upper Airframe Length 40 Lower Airframe Length 46 Coupler Band Length 1.5 Coupler Length 12 Nose
More informationNASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel
NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel 1 Agenda Launch Vehicle Overview Nose Cone Section Payload Section Lower Avionic Bay Section Booster Section Motor Selection
More informationIllinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016
Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2015-2016 March 30, 2016 Team Managers Project Manager: Ian Charter Structures and Recovery Manager:
More informationFlight Readiness Review
Flight Readiness Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Illinois Space Society 1 Overview Illinois Space Society 2 Launch Vehicle Summary Javier Brown Illinois
More informationNASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1
NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013 2013 USLI CDR 1 Final design Key features Final motor choice Flight profile Stability Mass Drift Parachute Kinetic Energy Staged recovery Payload Integration Interface
More informationCRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION
CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA LAUNCH SOCIETY BILL BROWN, BEECHER FAUST, ROCKWELL GARRIDO, CARSON SCHAFF, MICHAEL WIESNETH, MATTHEW WOJCIECHOWSKI ADVISOR: CARLOS MONTALVO MENTOR:
More informationAuburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR
Auburn University Project Wall-Eagle FRR Rocket Design Rocket Model Mass Estimates Booster Section Mass(lb.) Estimated Upper Section Mass(lb.) Actual Component Mass(lb.) Estimated Mass(lb.) Actual Component
More informationPresentation Outline. # Title # Title
CDR Presentation 1 Presentation Outline # Title # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Team Introduction Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Payload
More informationNASA SL Preliminary Design Review
NASA SL Preliminary Design Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 Mission Summary Design, fabricate, test and fly a rocket and payload to 1 mile in altitude Deploy a rover upon landing to autonomously
More informationJordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device
Jordan High School Rocketry Team A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device Mission Success Criteria No damage done to any person or property. The recovery system deploys as expected.
More informationFlight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.
Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight Roll Induction and Counter Roll 2016-2017 NASA University Student Launch 27 March 2017 Propulsion Research Center, 301 Sparkman Dr. NW, Huntsville
More informationPresentation Outline. # Title
FRR Presentation 1 Presentation Outline # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Team Introduction Mission Summary Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Elliptical
More informationGeorgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES
Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES 1 Agenda 1. Team Overview (1 Min) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Changes Since Proposal (1 Min) Educational Outreach (1 Min)
More informationWichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.
Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S. Benjamin Russell Jublain Wohler Mohamed Moustafa Tarun Bandemagala Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Introduction Vehicle Overview Mission Predictions Payload Design Requirement
More informationGIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017
GIT LIT 07-08 NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER TH, 07 AGENDA. Team Overview (5 Min). Educational Outreach ( Min). Safety ( Min) 4. Project Budget ( Min) 5. Launch Vehicle (0 min)
More informationProject NOVA
Project NOVA 2017-2018 Our Mission Design a Rocket Capable of: Apogee of 5280 ft Deploying an autonomous Rover Vehicle REILLY B. Vehicle Dimensions Total Length of 108 inches Inner Diameter of 6 inches
More informationUC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access
UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access Agenda Airframe Propulsion Payload Recovery Safety Outreach Project Plan Airframe
More informationAuburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015
Auburn University Student Launch PDR Presentation November 16, 2015 Project Aquila Vehicle Dimensions Total Length of 69.125 inches Inner Diameter of 5 inches Outer Diameter of 5.25 inches Estimated mass
More informationPreliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017
Preliminary Design Review California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017 System Overview Launch Vehicle Dimensions Total Length 108in Airframe OD 6.17in. ID 6.00in. Couplers OD 5.998in.
More informationNASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team
NASA USLI 2012-13 PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team OUTLINE School Information Launch Vehicle Summary Motor Selection Mission Performance and Predictions Structures
More informationNASA s Student Launch Initiative :
NASA s Student Launch Initiative : Critical Design Review Payload: Fragile Material Protection 1 Agenda 1. Design Overview 2. Payload 3. Recovery 4. 5. I. Sub-Scale Predictions II. Sub-Scale Test III.
More informationStatement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum
Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum Vehicle Requirements Requirement Success Criteria Verification 1.1 No specific design requirement exists for the altitude. The altitude is a
More informationTeam Air Mail Preliminary Design Review
Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review 2014-2015 Space Grant Midwest High-Power Rocket Competition UAH Space Hardware Club Huntsville, AL Top: Will Hill, Davis Hunter, Beth Dutour, Bradley Henderson,
More informationTacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review
Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review High-Powered Rocketry Team 911 Oval Drive Raleigh NC, 27695 January 13, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Figures:... 8 Table of Appendices:...
More informationFlight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768
Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2018 Agenda California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Agenda 1.0 Changes made Since CDR 2.0 Launch Vehicle Criteria 3.0 Mission
More informationPRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW 1 1 Team Structure - Team Leader: Michael Blackwood NAR #101098L2 Certified - Safety Officer: Jay Nagy - Team Mentor: Art Upton NAR #26255L3 Certified - NAR Section: Jackson Model
More informationOverview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management
MIT ROCKET TEAM Overview Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management Purpose and Mission Statement Our Mission: Use a rocket to rapidly deploy a UAV capable of completing search
More informationUniversity of Notre Dame
University of Notre Dame 2016-2017 Notre Dame Rocketry Team Critical Design Review NASA Student Launch Competition Roll Control and Fragile Object Protection Payloads Submitted January 13, 2017 365 Fitzpatrick
More informationCritical Design Review Report
Critical Design Review Report I) Summary of PDR report Team Name: The Rocket Men Mailing Address: Spring Grove Area High School 1490 Roth s Church Road Spring Grove, PA 17362 Mentor: Tom Aument NAR Number
More informationRover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.
Rover Delivery 2017-2018 NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review Charger Rocket Works April 27 th, 2018 Propulsion Research Center 1030 John Wright Drive NW, Huntsville,
More informationNotre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST
Notre Dame Rocketry Team Flight Readiness Review March 8, 2018 2:00 PM CST Contents Overview Vehicle Design Recovery Subsystem Experimental Payloads Deployable Rover Payload Air Braking System Safety and
More informationTacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review
Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review High-Powered Rocketry Team 911 Oval Drive Raleigh NC, 27695 March 6, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Figures... 9 Table of Appendices... 11
More informationPreliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative
Preliminary Design Review Cyclone Student Launch Initiative Overview Team Overview Mission Statement Vehicle Overview Avionics Overview Safety Overview Payload Overview Requirements Compliance Plan Team
More informationUniversity Student Launch Initiative
University Student Launch Initiative HARDING UNIVERSITY Flight Readiness Review March 31, 2008 Launch Vehicle Summary Size: 97.7 (2.5 meters long), 3.1 diameter Motor: Contrail Rockets 54mm J-234 Recovery
More informationUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch 2017-2018 Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017 Illinois Space Society 104 S. Wright Street Room 18C Urbana, Illinois
More informationPresentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix
Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix 1 Outline Structures Nosecone Body tubes Bulkheads Fins Tailcone Recovery System Layout Testing Propulsion Ox Tank Plumbing Injector Chamber Nozzle Testing Hydrostatic
More informationNUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University
NUMAV AIAA at Northeastern University Team Officials Andrew Buggee, President, Northeastern AIAA chapter Dr. Andrew Goldstone, Faculty Advisor John Hume, Safety Officer Rob DeHate, Team Mentor Team Roster
More informationPROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW
PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL 36849 POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW APRIL 29, 2016 Motor Specifications The team originally planned to use an Aerotech L-1520T motor and attempted four full
More informationStudent Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken
University of Evansville Student Launch Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review Submitted by: 2016 2017 Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken Submission Date: November 04, 2016 Payload: Fragile Material Protection
More informationAUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR
AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL 36849 CDR January 10, 2019 Contents List of Tables...7 List of Figures...9 1 CDR Report Summary...12 1.1 Payload Deployable Rover...12
More informationThe University of Toledo
The University of Toledo Project Kronos Preliminary Design Review 11/03/2017 University of Toledo UT Rocketry Club 2801 W Bancroft St. MS 105 Toledo, OH 43606 Contents 1 Summary of Proposal... 6 1.1 Team
More informationCNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge
CNY Rocket Team Challenge Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge RockSim 9 Basics 2 Table of Contents A. Introduction.p. 3 B. Designing Your Rocket.p.
More informationRocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010
Rocket Design Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick February 2010 Purpose Focus is on designing aerodynamically stable rockets not drag optimization nor construction techniques! Copyright 2010 by Gary Stroick
More informationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY POST-LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY USLI TEAM APRIL 27TH 2018 Table of Contents 1. Summary 2 1.1 Team Summary 2 1.2 Launch Summary 2 2. Launch Vehicle Assessment
More informationPreliminary Design Review
Preliminary Design Review November 16, 2016 11/2016 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 1 Agenda 1.0 General Information
More informationCritical Design Review
Critical Design Review 1/27/2017 NASA Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 1/27/2017 California State Polytechnic University,
More informationNASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review
2017 2018 NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Review 1000 W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA 91741 Artemis Deployable Rover November 3rd, 2017 Table of Contents General Information... 9 1. School Information...
More informationAUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review
AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH Project Nova 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL 36849 Post Launch Assessment Review April 19, 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents...2 List of Tables...3 Section 1: Launch Vehicle
More informationFlorida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review
Florida A & M University Flight Readiness Review 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review 1 Overview Team Summary ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ Vehicle Criteria ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~
More informationUniversity Student Launch Initiative
University Student Launch Initiative HARDING UNIVERSITY Critical Design Review February 4, 2008 The Team Dr. Edmond Wilson Brett Keller Team Official Project Leader, Safety Officer Professor of Chemistry
More informationUSLI Flight Readiness Review
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2011 2012 USLI Flight Readiness Review University Of Minnesota Team Artemis 3/26/2012 Flight Readiness Report prepared by University of Minnesota Team Artemis for 2011-2012
More informationNorthwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review
2012-2013 Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review Table of Contents, Tables, and Figures I.0 CDR Report Summary... 1 I.1 Team Summary... 1 I.2 Launch Vehicle Summary... 1 I.2a
More informationCritical Design Review
AIAA Orange County Section Student Launch Initiative 2011-2012 Critical Design Review Rocket Deployment of a Bendable Wing Micro-UAV for Data Collection Submitted by: AIAA Orange County Section NASA Student
More informationNASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)
2016-2017 NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 110 8th St Troy, NY 12180 Project Name: Andromeda Task 3.3: Roll Induction and Counter
More informationIllinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014
Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch 2014-2015 Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014 Illinois Space Society 104 S. Wright Street Room 321D Urbana,
More informationUSLI Critical Design Report
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2011 2012 USLI Critical Design Report University Of Minnesota Team Artemis 1/23/2012 Critical Design Report by University of Minnesota Team Artemis for 2011-2012 NASA
More informationThe University of Toledo
The University of Toledo Project Cairo Preliminary Design Review 10/08/2016 University of Toledo UT Rocketry Club 2801 W Bancroft St. MS 105 Toledo, OH 43606 Contents 1 Summary of Preliminary Design Review...
More informationNASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review
2017-2018 NASA Student Launch College and University Preliminary Design Review Institution: United States Naval Academy Mailing Address: Aerospace Engineering Department United States Naval Academy ATTN:
More informationPost Launch Assessment Review
AIAA Orange County Section Student Launch Initiative 2011-2012 Post Launch Assessment Review Rocket Deployment of a Bendable Wing Micro-UAV for Data Collection Submitted by: AIAA Orange County Section
More informationPre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III
Advanced Planning 1 Schedule a Check that waivers are available at the intended launch site and date. b Check weather forecast for wind and temperature conditions at the site. c Have TAP members approved
More informationPreliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768
Preliminary Design Review November 15, 2017 Agenda California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Agenda 1.0 General Information 2.0 Launch Vehicle System Overview
More informationPegasus II. Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation. Brian Wheeler
Pegasus II Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation Brian Wheeler Contents: A. Design Overview B. Booster Construction C. Electronics Bay (Mechanical) Construction D. Nose Cone Construction E. Recovery System
More informationCritical Design Review
Harding University University Student Launch Initiative Team Critical Design Review January 29, 2007 The Flying Bison Sarah Christensen Project Leader Dr. Ed Wilson Faculty Supervisor Dr. James Mackey
More informationSpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle
SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle The SpaceLoft XL is UP Aerospace s workhorse space launch vehicle -- ideal for significant-size payloads and multiple, simultaneous-customer operations. SpaceLoft
More informationUniversity Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2012 2013 University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics 3/18/2013 2012-2013 University of Minnesota
More informationRocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati
Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati 2009-2010 Grant Schaffner, Ph.D. (Advisor) Rob Charvat (Student) 17 September 2010 1 Spacecraft Design Course Objectives Students gain experience
More informationCornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM
2015-2016 CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM Presentation Centennial Challenge MAV Participant NASA Student Launch Competition LAUNCH VEHICLE GENERAL DIMENSIONS Airframe Tubing: OD = 3.98 in ID = 3.9 in Couplers: OD
More informationTripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt
Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt Kevin O Classen 1101 Dutton Brook Road Goshen, VT 05733 (802) 247-4205 kevin@back2bed.com Doctor Fill Doctor Fill General Specifications Airframe:
More informationStudent Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016
University of Evansville Student Launch Enclosed: Proposal Submitted by: 2016 2017 Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken Submission Date: September 30, 2016 Payload: Fragile Material Protection Submitted
More informationPost Launch Assessment Review
Post Launch Assessment Review University of South Alabama Launch Society Conner Denton, John Faulk, Nghia Huynh, Kent Lino, Phillip Ruschmyer, Andrew Tindell Department of Mechanical Engineering 150 Jaguar
More informationNorthwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review
Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review 2012-2013 Table of Contents I. Team Summary... 1 Team Name: Northwest Indian College RPGs... 1 II. Launch Vehicle Summary... 1
More informationTable of Content 1) General Information ) Summary of PDR Report ) Changes Made Since Proposal ) Safety... 8
Table of Content 1) General Information... 3 1.1 Student Leader... 3 1.2 Safety Officer... 3 1.3 Team Structure... 3 1.4 NAR/TRA Sections... 4 2) Summary of PDR Report... 5 2.1 Team Summary... 5 2.2 Launch
More informationCritical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)
Critical Design Review Report 2014-2015 NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Florida International University Engineering Center College
More informationUniversity of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team
University of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team NASA Student Launch Initiative Flight Readiness Review - Report Submitted by: The University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rocketry
More informationDemoSat-B User s Guide
January 5, 2013 Authors: Chris Koehler & Shawn Carroll Revisions Revision Description Date Approval DRAFT Initial release 7/31/2009 1 Updated for 2011 2012 program dates, added revision page 9/27/11 LEM
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics 16.00 Introduction to Aerospace and Design Problem Set #4 Issued: February 28, 2002 Due: March 19, 2002 ROCKET PERFORMANCE
More informationTuskegee University Rocketry Club
Tuskegee University Rocketry Club National Aeronautics and Space Administration Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review Atmospheric Measurement and Aerodynamic Analysis TURC 2015-2016 NASA
More informationFirst Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016
First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016 Competition Date April 21-22, 2016 Carthage College Kenosha, WI April 23, 2016 Richard Bong Recreational Park Kansasville, WI Meet the Team Wisconsin Space
More informationLEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD. Dan Schwartz
LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD Dan Schwartz This entire rocket is built using the same techniques I use for my nose cones, a central airframe tube for compression strength and rings of high compression styrofoam
More informationCal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017
Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Department
More informationHPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick
Complex Rocket Design Considerations HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick 1. Tripoli Safety Code 2. Technical Considerations 3. Clusters/Air Starts 4. Staging 5. Summary 2 1. Complex High Power Rocket.
More informationMadison West High School Green Team
Madison West High School Green Team The Effect of Gravitational Forces on Arabidopsis Thaliana Development Flight Readiness Review The Vehicle Mission Performance Criteria Successful two stage flight Altitude
More informationNASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review. Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S.
NASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S. CPE496-01 Computer Engineering Design II Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of
More informationFlight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)
Flight Readiness Review Report 2014-2015 NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Florida International University Engineering Center College
More informationThis Week. Next Week 4/7/15
E80 Spring 2015 This Week! Transfer breadboard circuit to PC board.! Verify everything still works.! Get data logger working.! Pass off consists of: " Power PC board with data logger & start logging. "
More informationProject WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review
S A M U E L G I N N C O L L E G E O F E N G I N E E R I N G Auburn University Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review 2 Engineering Dr. Auburn, AL 36849 March 6th, 205 Table of Contents Section
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON
THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON College of Engineering 302 E Buchtel Ave Akron, OH 44325 September 20, 2017 NASA Student Launch Initiative Table of Contents 1. Adult Educators and Advisors... 4 2. Team Officials...
More informationUC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry NASA Student Launch Proposal Project Arktos. 432 Eshleman Hall, MC 4500 Berkeley, CA
UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry NASA Student Launch Proposal Project Arktos 432 Eshleman Hall, MC 4500 Berkeley, CA 94720-4500 September 20, 2017 Contents 1 General Team Information 3 1.1 Key
More informationAKRONAUTS. P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w. The University of Akron College of Engineering. Akron, OH 44325
AKRONAUTS Rocket Design Team Project P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w The University of Akron College of Engineering 302 E Buchtel Ave Akron, OH 44325 NASA Student Launch Initiative April
More informationProject WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review
S A M U E L G I N N C O L L E G E O F E N G I N E E R I N G Auburn University Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review 2 Engineering Dr. Auburn, AL 36849 January 6th, 205 Table of Contents SECTION
More informationCYCLONE STUDENT LAUNCH INITIATIVE
NSL PROPOSAL September 19, 2018 CYCLONE STUDENT LAUNCH INITIATIVE 2018-19 Iowa State University 537 Bissell Rd. 1200 Howe Hall Ames, IA 50011 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Table of Figures...
More informationReentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket
AIAA ADS Conference 2011 in Dublin 1 Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket Kazuhiko Yamada, Takashi Abe (JAXA/ISAS) Kojiro Suzuki
More informationOMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)
SLS EM-1 secondary payload OMOTENASHI (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor) The smallest moon lander launched by the most powerful rocket in the world * Omotenashi
More informationBy: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA,
By: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA, 30332 Project Name: Hermes MAXI-MAV Competition Friday,
More informationCanSat 2018 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Version 1.2
CanSat 2018 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Version 1.2 Team 5278 B.U.T.T.E.R 1 Table of Contents Introduction: Alex Schneider..........1 Systems Overview: Alex Schneider..............5 Sensor Subsystem
More informationNWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements
NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements On April 18, 2017, we were on two airplanes to Milwaukee, Wisconsin by 6:30 am for a long flight. There were 12 students, 3 mentors, 2 toddlers
More informationPre-Launch Procedures
Pre-Launch Procedures Integration and test phase This phase of operations takes place about 3 months before launch, at the TsSKB-Progress factory in Samara, where Foton and its launch vehicle are built.
More information