NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NASA s Student Launch Initiative :"

Transcription

1 NASA s Student Launch Initiative : Critical Design Review Payload: Fragile Material Protection 1

2 Agenda 1. Design Overview 2. Payload 3. Recovery I. Sub-Scale Predictions II. Sub-Scale Test III. Full Scale Predictions I. Requirement Compliance II. Schedule 6. III. Budget 2

3 Overview 3

4 Final Launch Vehicle and Payload Dimensions 4

5 Key Design Features Carbon Fiber Airframe Fragile Materials Handling Middle-Out Dual Deployment L850W 5

6 Weight Breakdown Launch Weight 34.6 Recovery % Aerodynami cs % Electronic Payload % Burnout Weight 30.1 Propulsion % Main Payload % Misc % 6

7 Final Motor Choice & Retention System Manufacturer Make Total Impulse Type Max Thrust Weight (Empty) AeroTech L850W 3695Ns Reloadable 1185 N 3.54 lbs Using the AeroPack 75mm P Retention System 7

8 Main Payload 8

9 Decision Matrix Payload Option Cost Force Reduction Acceleration Reduction Parallel Spring System Single Mounted Cylinder with Support Material Series and Parallel Spring System Δ X O O X X Δ O O 9

10 Conceptual Design Concentric cylinder design Series and Parallel spring design Wire rope isolators for 360 vibration coverage Easily removable Variable fill design 10

11 Mathematical Design Payload M 3 x 3 k 2 c 1 Housing M 2 x 2 k 1 c 2 Rocket M 1 x 1 F 11

12 ሶ ሶ ሶ Design Overview Payload Recovery k 1 x 2 k 1 x 2 c 1 x 1 ሶ c 1 x 2 k 2 x 2 w 3 c 2 x 2 M 1 M 3 ΣF y = 0 = M 1 xሷ 1 = F + k 1 x 2 x 1 F k 1 x 2 w 2 + c 1 ( xሶ 2 ሶ c 1 x 2 x 1 ൯ k 2 x 3 c 2 xሶ 3 ΣF y = 0 = M 3 xሷ 3 = w 3 + k 2 x 2 x 3 + c 2 ( xሶ 2 ሶ x 3 ൯ M 2 k 1 x 1 ΣF y = 0 = M 2 xሷ 2 = w 2 + k x 2 x 1 c 1 xሶ 2 xሶ 1 + k 2 x 3 x 2 + c 2 ( xሶ 3 ሶ c 1 xሶ 1 x 2 ൯ 12

13 Mathematical Model Inputs Thrust curve Impact force Parachute deployment force Spring constant (k) values Damping coefficient (c) values Outputs Relative position graph Relative velocity graph Relative acceleration graph Relative force calculation 13

14 Shifting Mass Situation Center of Mass of Payload (From Recovery Plate) Stability of Rocket Springs Compressed Springs at Free Length Springs Extended

15 Final System Values of Inner Cylinder/Fragile Material Constants Value (N/m) Spring Constant for vibration (k v ) Output (worst case, initial thrust from engine curve) Value % Reduction from Original Damping Coefficient for vibration (c v ) 7.6 Maximum Inner Cylinder Displacement.59 in N/A Spring Constant for Shock (k s ) Maximum Inner Cylinder Acceleration 82 ft s % Damping Coefficient for Shock (c s ) Maximum Inner Cylinder Force Worst 8.37 ft lb 99.37% 15

16 Recovery Dual-deployment Coupling tube houses recovery electronics Drogue above, main below 16

17 Recovery Drogue Parachute Model Fruity Chutes CFC-24 Shape Elliptical Diameter 24 in Deployment Altitude Apogee Deployment Velocity 0 ft/s Descent Velocity 72.4 ft/s _systems/classic_elliptical_chutes.htm 17

18 Recovery Main Parachute Model Fruity Chutes IFC-96 Shape Iris Diameter 96 in Deployment Altitude 750 ft Deployment Velocity 72.4 ft/s Descent Velocity 15.3 ft/s _systems/iris_ultra_parachutes.htm 18

19 Recovery Recovery Harness Manufacturer OneBadHawk Material Tubular Nylon Size 1 in Length 35 ft Minimum Breaking Force 4000 lb 19

20 Recovery Mounting Hardware 5/16 steel U-bolt center-to-center 5.5 -diameter aluminum bulkhead 0.25 thickness Steel hex nuts and lock washers Epoxied to body tube/coupling tube G5000 RocketPoxy 20

21 Recovery - Electronics Altimeter PerfectFlite Stratologger CF Battery 9-Volt Lithium Ion Switch Connectors Ejection Charge Igniter Rotary Locking 4-Pin Molex Terminal Blocks QuickBurst QBECS 21

22 PRIMARY CIRCUIT Primary Battery On/Off Switch Primary Altimeter Primary Main Igniter Primary Drogue Igniter Primary Main Charge Primary Drogue Charge BACKUP CIRCUIT Backup Battery On/Off Switch Backup Altimeter Backup Drogue Igniter Backup Main Igniter Backup Drogue Charge Backup Main Charge Drogue Parachute Main Parachute 22

23 Recovery Drift Distance Wind Speed (mph) Lateral Distance (ft)

24 Recovery Kinetic Energy (ft-lbf) Bow Body Tube Coupling Tube Aft Body Tube Descent Under Drogue Descent Under Main

25 Sub Scale Predictions Scaling Method Prediction Reyold s Number Length Scale: 5.5 / 3 Equal Thrust Scale Apogee of prediction determined by thrust scale (2500 ft.) OpenRocket: 2492 ft. Rocksim: 2527 ft. 25

26 Sub Scale Test Launch Day Conditions Actual Flight Data 30 Calm wind conditions (0-2 mph) 1 atm Sunny Flight 1: 2592 ft. Flight 2: 2498 ft. 26

27 Sub Scale Test Ejection Tests Multiple successful ejection tests for each body tube Black powder mass calculated with NASSA tool First Flight Main Parachute Deployment Failure Insufficient Ejection Charge Second Flight - Success Flown without competition altimeter 27

28 Altitude (ft) Design Overview Payload Recovery Sub Scale Test 3000 Predicted versus Actual Time (sec) OpenRocket Flight 1 Flight 2 28

29 Altitude (ft) Design Overview Payload Recovery Sub Scale Test Best Fit Curve Time (sec) Best Fit Altitude (ft) Simulation Altitude (ft) 29

30 Altitude (ft) Percent Error Design Overview Payload Recovery Sub Scale Test % % 4% % % 2% % % 1% % Time (sec) Simulation Altitude (ft) Percent Error 30

31 Altitude (ft) Percent Error Design Overview Payload Recovery Sub Scale Test Initial Launch Low Level Recovery Initial 3 seconds Up to 35% error Final 10 seconds % 35% 30% 25% 20% Up to 24% error % 10% Remaining Flight Below 5% error % 0% Time (sec) Flight 2 Actual Altitude (ft) Percent Error 31

32 Sub Scale Test Error Sources Systematic Random Best Fit Curve Modeling Software Impact On Full Scale Validated mission performance predictions Increased ejection charge mass Gained efficiency in build phase 32

33 Fin Change Model Predicted Altitude (ft) Program Goal Trials Program Altitude (ft) Stability Trial 1 Difference from Original (ft) OpenRocket Rocksim Full-scale 5174 OpenRocket Rocksim 5200 Trial 2 OpenRocket Rocksim Trial 3 OpenRocket Rocksim

34 Ballast Plan to add ballast No Ballast 1 lbs 2 lbs 3.2 lbs OpenRocket 5648 ft 5464 ft 5283 ft 5069 ft Rocksim 5385 ft 5235 ft 5091 ft 4594 ft 34

35 Altitude (ft) Altitude (ft) Design Overview Payload Recovery Predicted Altitude Time (s) Time (s) OpenRocket 5648 ft Percent Difference 4.7% Rocksim 5385 ft 35

36 Rocket Information Thrust to Weight Ratio 5.59 :1 Rail Exit Velocity 67 ft/s 36

37 Stability (cal) Design Overview Payload Recovery Stability Parachute deployment Stability (No ballast) Off Rail: 2.11 Static: 2.71 Stability (2 lbs) Off Rail: 2.67 Static: Time (sec) 37

38 Testing Plan Parachute Ejection Testing Parachute Testing Payload Wind Tunnel Sub-Scale Test Bulkhead Altimeter Full Scale Test 38

39 Testing Parachutes Ejection Test Ensures working electronics and enough force to shear the shear pins Horizontally mount the rocket body Padding to catch the end being tested 5 successful tests in a row needed to be acceptable Testing showed 0.35 grams were needed for the aft body tube 39

40 Testing Half-Scale Model Ensures all components work as a system, not just individually Two flights were done to test the model Main parachute did not deploy on Flight 1 More black powder for Flight 2, and a successful landing 40

41 Testing - Parachutes Determine force upon main parachute deployment Create apparatus for simulated deployment conditions Mount parachute to electronic force meter Pack parachute into tube segment Mount apparatus to vehicle, accelerate to 50 mph Deploy parachute and analyze force data 41

42 Testing - Bulkheads Determine maximum force allowed by mounting hardware Create apparatus for simulated deployment conditions Assemble bulkhead with U-bolts and nuts Epoxy bulkhead to spare body tube segment Use tensile testing machine to stress the hardware until failure Analyze force response to determine acceptable stress 42

43 Testing - Payload Determine filler material for the inner cylinder Payload will be subjected to drop tests and charpy impact tests Force gauges and accelerometers attach to the payload and the container The payload along with the filler material will be varied Using the results with the decision matrix will help us select a final filler material 43

44 Testing - Payload Testing Materials Weight # To be Tested Egg 1.75 oz 2 Glass Stir Rod 0.2 oz 1 Glass Sheet N/A N/ A Light Bulb 1.1 oz 3 Small Ceramic/Porcelain China N/A N/A Contact Support Materials (within Cylinder 1) Weight per cubic ft. Density Aerogel N/A N/A Packing Peanuts 0.2 lb N/A Styrofoam Pellets 0.2 lb N/A Non-Newtonian Fluid N/A N/A High Density Foam (Cubes/sheets) Varies 0.93 g/cm^3 Spray in High Density Foam (Injection system) Varies 3 lb/ft^3 44

45 Testing - Altimeter Ensure the GPS works on the main scoring altimeter The altimeter will be attached to a drone and flown around Allows us to check the GPS location, and the live feed Recovery altimeters were also tested to check deployment altitude 45

46 Testing Wind Tunnel 3D printed model will be tested Held in place by a cantilever beam with an attached strain gauge Coefficients of drag found from the force exerted on the model The Wind Tunnel validates CFD and Open Rocket 46

47 Safety Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment Hazard Identification Effect Consideration Impact and Likelihood Evaluation Risk Control and Mitigation Review of Hazard 47

48 Personnel Hazard Analysis Black Powder Fire Rocket Propellant Major Severity Low Likelihood Electrical Shock Improper Work Attire *Full Analysis can be seen in CDR Report* Debris Fly Into Team Members Eyes Craft/Exacto Knives Heavy Machinery Misusage Minor Severity Fractured Particles During Testing Tripping Hazards Handheld Tool Misusage Epoxy Fumes Dust Particles High Likelihood 48

49 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Motor Mishandling/ Accidental Ignition Launch Failure Main Parachute Deployment Failure Major Severity Excessively Tight Coupler Low Likelihood Drogue Parachute Deployment Failure Instability During Flight Inability to Secure Payload High Likelihood Testing Apparatus Over Usage Payload not Secured Properly Altimeter/Electronics Malfunction Improper Storage of Materials/Equipment Minor Severity *Full Analysis can be seen in CDR Report* 49

50 Environmental Consideration Analysis Rocket Motor Ignition Major Severity Water Low Likelihood Debris from Rocket Strong Winds High Likelihood Low Visibility Humidity Minor Severity Improper Disposal of Epoxy Epoxy Fumes Dust Particles *Full Analysis can be seen in CDR Report* 50

51 General Risk Assessment Major Severity Limited Resources Tight/Minimal Budget Low Likelihood Mismanagement of Time Increase in Safety Regulations Underestimation of Scope of Work High Likelihood Minor Severity *Full Analysis can be seen in CDR Report* 51

52 Education Engagement Outreach Activities Students Reached Age Groups Reached % 31% 51% 50 NTI STEMFest UExplores Engineering Remaining Engineering Rocks Private Event Elementary (K-5) Middle School (6-8) High School (9-12) 52

53 Requirement Compliance Requirement Verification Method Description of Verification Method Status Electronics must operate in cold temperatures Demonstration Testing Temperature sensitive components will be identified then tested in a 0-10 F environment Batteries were found to be sensitive to temperature; batteries replaced with Lithium version. Tested OK. Mach number must remain less than 0.6 Simulation Testing OpenRocket and Rocksim will be used for simulation, full scale test will confirm. Both OpenRocket & Rocksim show Mach numbers of less than 0.6. Will be confirmed February 12 th. Reach an altitude between 5,200 and 5,400 feet Simulation Testing OpenRocket and Rocksim will show an apogee as desired, will be confirmed with Full- Scale Testing OpenRocket & Rocksim Simulations show feasibility. Test February 12 th. 53

54 Requirement Compliance Requirement Verification Method Description of Verification Method Status Payload must reduce force felt by object(s) by 50 % Demonstration Testing MATLAB model will show theoretical results, payload testing to prove MATLAB model shows a 99.3% reduction. Testing in progress. Altimeter must transmit location to ground station Testing Sub-Scale & Full-Scale test will confirm that location transmits from location. Successful Sub-Scale Test. Determined altimeter must be vertical. Full-Scale confirmation February 12 th. Have a Factor of Safety above 2 for the Combustion Analysis and Shear Stress Analysis Demonstration Analytically determine the F.O.S. Both were found to be >15 54

55 Design Design Overview Payload Recovery Schedule Design Phase Period Highlight: 20 Plan Duration Actual Start % Complete Actual (beyond plan) % Complete (beyond plan) Motor Type Selection Motor Mount Design Rocksim Model Body Component Selection 3D Rocket Model CFD Model Payload A Design Payload B Design Data Acquisition Design Data Transmission Design Design of Recovery System Design Tracking System Design Education Activity 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 55

56 Construction Design Overview Payload Recovery Schedule Construction Phase Period Highlight: 20 Plan Duration Actual Start % Complete Actual (beyond plan) % Complete (beyond plan) Propulsion Construction Body Construction Payload A Construction Payload B Construction Recovery System Construction Data Systems Construction Scale Model Construction 100% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 100% 56

57 Budget Item Forecasted Amount Amount Spent Amount Remaining Operating $ $ $10.00 Travel / Lodging $2, Launch Pad $ $ $22.41 Aerodynamics (Body) $1, $ $ Propulsion $2, $1, $ Main Payload $ $ $64.34 Electronic Payload $ $ $15.14 Recovery $1, $ $ Scale Model $1, $ $6.95 Educational Engagement $ $0 $ Total ($) $10, $6,247.00* $1,553.00* Total (%) 100% 80.1%* 19.9%* 57 * Indicates a figure where Travel/Lodging was neglected

58 Thank you for your time! Questions? 58

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel 1 Agenda Launch Vehicle Overview Nose Cone Section Payload Section Lower Avionic Bay Section Booster Section Motor Selection

More information

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry 2017-2018 AGENDA 1. Launch Vehicle 2. Recovery 3. Testing 4. Subscale Vehicle 5. Payload 6. Educational Outreach 7.

More information

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS LAUNCH VEHICLE AND PAYLOAD DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Vehicle Diameter 4 Upper Airframe Length 40 Lower Airframe Length 46 Coupler Band Length 1.5 Coupler Length 12 Nose

More information

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken University of Evansville Student Launch Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review Submitted by: 2016 2017 Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken Submission Date: November 04, 2016 Payload: Fragile Material Protection

More information

GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017

GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017 GIT LIT 07-08 NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER TH, 07 AGENDA. Team Overview (5 Min). Educational Outreach ( Min). Safety ( Min) 4. Project Budget ( Min) 5. Launch Vehicle (0 min)

More information

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch. Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight Roll Induction and Counter Roll 2016-2017 NASA University Student Launch 27 March 2017 Propulsion Research Center, 301 Sparkman Dr. NW, Huntsville

More information

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device Jordan High School Rocketry Team A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device Mission Success Criteria No damage done to any person or property. The recovery system deploys as expected.

More information

Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review Critical Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Illinois Space Society 1 Overview Illinois Space Society 2 Launch Vehicle Summary Javier Brown Illinois Space

More information

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016 Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2015-2016 March 30, 2016 Team Managers Project Manager: Ian Charter Structures and Recovery Manager:

More information

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES 1 Agenda 1. Team Overview (1 Min) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Changes Since Proposal (1 Min) Educational Outreach (1 Min)

More information

Flight Readiness Review

Flight Readiness Review Flight Readiness Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Illinois Space Society 1 Overview Illinois Space Society 2 Launch Vehicle Summary Javier Brown Illinois

More information

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1 NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013 2013 USLI CDR 1 Final design Key features Final motor choice Flight profile Stability Mass Drift Parachute Kinetic Energy Staged recovery Payload Integration Interface

More information

Presentation Outline. # Title # Title

Presentation Outline. # Title # Title CDR Presentation 1 Presentation Outline # Title # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Team Introduction Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Payload

More information

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum Vehicle Requirements Requirement Success Criteria Verification 1.1 No specific design requirement exists for the altitude. The altitude is a

More information

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR Auburn University Project Wall-Eagle FRR Rocket Design Rocket Model Mass Estimates Booster Section Mass(lb.) Estimated Upper Section Mass(lb.) Actual Component Mass(lb.) Estimated Mass(lb.) Actual Component

More information

University Student Launch Initiative

University Student Launch Initiative University Student Launch Initiative HARDING UNIVERSITY Flight Readiness Review March 31, 2008 Launch Vehicle Summary Size: 97.7 (2.5 meters long), 3.1 diameter Motor: Contrail Rockets 54mm J-234 Recovery

More information

Presentation Outline. # Title

Presentation Outline. # Title FRR Presentation 1 Presentation Outline # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Team Introduction Mission Summary Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Elliptical

More information

NASA SL Critical Design Review

NASA SL Critical Design Review NASA SL Critical Design Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 LAUNCH VEHICLE 2 Vehicle Summary Launch Vehicle Dimensions Fairing Diameter: 6 in. Body Tube Diameter: 4 in. Mass at lift off: 43.8

More information

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017 Preliminary Design Review California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017 System Overview Launch Vehicle Dimensions Total Length 108in Airframe OD 6.17in. ID 6.00in. Couplers OD 5.998in.

More information

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S. Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S. Benjamin Russell Jublain Wohler Mohamed Moustafa Tarun Bandemagala Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Introduction Vehicle Overview Mission Predictions Payload Design Requirement

More information

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team NASA USLI 2012-13 PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team OUTLINE School Information Launch Vehicle Summary Motor Selection Mission Performance and Predictions Structures

More information

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015 Auburn University Student Launch PDR Presentation November 16, 2015 Project Aquila Vehicle Dimensions Total Length of 69.125 inches Inner Diameter of 5 inches Outer Diameter of 5.25 inches Estimated mass

More information

Project NOVA

Project NOVA Project NOVA 2017-2018 Our Mission Design a Rocket Capable of: Apogee of 5280 ft Deploying an autonomous Rover Vehicle REILLY B. Vehicle Dimensions Total Length of 108 inches Inner Diameter of 6 inches

More information

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2018 Agenda California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Agenda 1.0 Changes made Since CDR 2.0 Launch Vehicle Criteria 3.0 Mission

More information

Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix

Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix 1 Outline Structures Nosecone Body tubes Bulkheads Fins Tailcone Recovery System Layout Testing Propulsion Ox Tank Plumbing Injector Chamber Nozzle Testing Hydrostatic

More information

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA LAUNCH SOCIETY BILL BROWN, BEECHER FAUST, ROCKWELL GARRIDO, CARSON SCHAFF, MICHAEL WIESNETH, MATTHEW WOJCIECHOWSKI ADVISOR: CARLOS MONTALVO MENTOR:

More information

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access Agenda Airframe Propulsion Payload Recovery Safety Outreach Project Plan Airframe

More information

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch 2017-2018 Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017 Illinois Space Society 104 S. Wright Street Room 18C Urbana, Illinois

More information

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016 University of Evansville Student Launch Enclosed: Proposal Submitted by: 2016 2017 Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken Submission Date: September 30, 2016 Payload: Fragile Material Protection Submitted

More information

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review NASA SL Flight Readiness Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 LAUNCH VEHICLE 2 Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Diameter: 6 fairing/4 aft Length: 106 inches Wet Mass: 41.1 lbs. Center of Pressure:

More information

Critical Design Review Report

Critical Design Review Report Critical Design Review Report I) Summary of PDR report Team Name: The Rocket Men Mailing Address: Spring Grove Area High School 1490 Roth s Church Road Spring Grove, PA 17362 Mentor: Tom Aument NAR Number

More information

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL 36849 POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW APRIL 29, 2016 Motor Specifications The team originally planned to use an Aerotech L-1520T motor and attempted four full

More information

Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review Cyclone Student Launch Initiative Overview Team Overview Mission Statement Vehicle Overview Avionics Overview Safety Overview Payload Overview Requirements Compliance Plan Team

More information

University of Notre Dame

University of Notre Dame University of Notre Dame 2016-2017 Notre Dame Rocketry Team Critical Design Review NASA Student Launch Competition Roll Control and Fragile Object Protection Payloads Submitted January 13, 2017 365 Fitzpatrick

More information

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST Notre Dame Rocketry Team Flight Readiness Review March 8, 2018 2:00 PM CST Contents Overview Vehicle Design Recovery Subsystem Experimental Payloads Deployable Rover Payload Air Braking System Safety and

More information

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review High-Powered Rocketry Team 911 Oval Drive Raleigh NC, 27695 January 13, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Figures:... 8 Table of Appendices:...

More information

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review 2014-2015 Space Grant Midwest High-Power Rocket Competition UAH Space Hardware Club Huntsville, AL Top: Will Hill, Davis Hunter, Beth Dutour, Bradley Henderson,

More information

University Student Launch Initiative

University Student Launch Initiative University Student Launch Initiative HARDING UNIVERSITY Critical Design Review February 4, 2008 The Team Dr. Edmond Wilson Brett Keller Team Official Project Leader, Safety Officer Professor of Chemistry

More information

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW 1 1 Team Structure - Team Leader: Michael Blackwood NAR #101098L2 Certified - Safety Officer: Jay Nagy - Team Mentor: Art Upton NAR #26255L3 Certified - NAR Section: Jackson Model

More information

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management MIT ROCKET TEAM Overview Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management Purpose and Mission Statement Our Mission: Use a rocket to rapidly deploy a UAV capable of completing search

More information

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge CNY Rocket Team Challenge Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge RockSim 9 Basics 2 Table of Contents A. Introduction.p. 3 B. Designing Your Rocket.p.

More information

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review High-Powered Rocketry Team 911 Oval Drive Raleigh NC, 27695 March 6, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Figures... 9 Table of Appendices... 11

More information

Post Launch Assessment Review

Post Launch Assessment Review AIAA Orange County Section Student Launch Initiative 2011-2012 Post Launch Assessment Review Rocket Deployment of a Bendable Wing Micro-UAV for Data Collection Submitted by: AIAA Orange County Section

More information

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University NUMAV AIAA at Northeastern University Team Officials Andrew Buggee, President, Northeastern AIAA chapter Dr. Andrew Goldstone, Faculty Advisor John Hume, Safety Officer Rob DeHate, Team Mentor Team Roster

More information

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016 First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016 Competition Date April 21-22, 2016 Carthage College Kenosha, WI April 23, 2016 Richard Bong Recreational Park Kansasville, WI Meet the Team Wisconsin Space

More information

The University of Toledo

The University of Toledo The University of Toledo Project Kronos Preliminary Design Review 11/03/2017 University of Toledo UT Rocketry Club 2801 W Bancroft St. MS 105 Toledo, OH 43606 Contents 1 Summary of Proposal... 6 1.1 Team

More information

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL 36849 CDR January 10, 2019 Contents List of Tables...7 List of Figures...9 1 CDR Report Summary...12 1.1 Payload Deployable Rover...12

More information

Pre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III

Pre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III Advanced Planning 1 Schedule a Check that waivers are available at the intended launch site and date. b Check weather forecast for wind and temperature conditions at the site. c Have TAP members approved

More information

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati 2009-2010 Grant Schaffner, Ph.D. (Advisor) Rob Charvat (Student) 17 September 2010 1 Spacecraft Design Course Objectives Students gain experience

More information

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH Project Nova 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL 36849 Post Launch Assessment Review April 19, 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents...2 List of Tables...3 Section 1: Launch Vehicle

More information

Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review Critical Design Review 1/27/2017 NASA Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 1/27/2017 California State Polytechnic University,

More information

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY POST-LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY USLI TEAM APRIL 27TH 2018 Table of Contents 1. Summary 2 1.1 Team Summary 2 1.2 Launch Summary 2 2. Launch Vehicle Assessment

More information

Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt

Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt Kevin O Classen 1101 Dutton Brook Road Goshen, VT 05733 (802) 247-4205 kevin@back2bed.com Doctor Fill Doctor Fill General Specifications Airframe:

More information

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review 2012-2013 Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review Table of Contents, Tables, and Figures I.0 CDR Report Summary... 1 I.1 Team Summary... 1 I.2 Launch Vehicle Summary... 1 I.2a

More information

Post Launch Assessment Review

Post Launch Assessment Review Post Launch Assessment Review University of South Alabama Launch Society Conner Denton, John Faulk, Nghia Huynh, Kent Lino, Phillip Ruschmyer, Andrew Tindell Department of Mechanical Engineering 150 Jaguar

More information

NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS) 2016-2017 NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 110 8th St Troy, NY 12180 Project Name: Andromeda Task 3.3: Roll Induction and Counter

More information

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014 Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch 2014-2015 Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014 Illinois Space Society 104 S. Wright Street Room 321D Urbana,

More information

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review 2017-2018 NASA Student Launch College and University Preliminary Design Review Institution: United States Naval Academy Mailing Address: Aerospace Engineering Department United States Naval Academy ATTN:

More information

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Critical Design Review Report 2014-2015 NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Florida International University Engineering Center College

More information

Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review Harding University University Student Launch Initiative Team Critical Design Review January 29, 2007 The Flying Bison Sarah Christensen Project Leader Dr. Ed Wilson Faculty Supervisor Dr. James Mackey

More information

Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review AIAA Orange County Section Student Launch Initiative 2011-2012 Critical Design Review Rocket Deployment of a Bendable Wing Micro-UAV for Data Collection Submitted by: AIAA Orange County Section NASA Student

More information

Preliminary Design Review

Preliminary Design Review Preliminary Design Review November 16, 2016 11/2016 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 1 Agenda 1.0 General Information

More information

HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick

HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick Complex Rocket Design Considerations HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick 1. Tripoli Safety Code 2. Technical Considerations 3. Clusters/Air Starts 4. Staging 5. Summary 2 1. Complex High Power Rocket.

More information

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review 2017 2018 NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Review 1000 W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA 91741 Artemis Deployable Rover November 3rd, 2017 Table of Contents General Information... 9 1. School Information...

More information

The University of Toledo

The University of Toledo The University of Toledo Project Cairo Preliminary Design Review 10/08/2016 University of Toledo UT Rocketry Club 2801 W Bancroft St. MS 105 Toledo, OH 43606 Contents 1 Summary of Preliminary Design Review...

More information

NASA SL Preliminary Design Review

NASA SL Preliminary Design Review NASA SL Preliminary Design Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 Mission Summary Design, fabricate, test and fly a rocket and payload to 1 mile in altitude Deploy a rover upon landing to autonomously

More information

Pegasus II. Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation. Brian Wheeler

Pegasus II. Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation. Brian Wheeler Pegasus II Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation Brian Wheeler Contents: A. Design Overview B. Booster Construction C. Electronics Bay (Mechanical) Construction D. Nose Cone Construction E. Recovery System

More information

Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Preliminary Design Review November 15, 2017 Agenda California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Agenda 1.0 General Information 2.0 Launch Vehicle System Overview

More information

Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010

Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010 Rocket Design Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick February 2010 Purpose Focus is on designing aerodynamically stable rockets not drag optimization nor construction techniques! Copyright 2010 by Gary Stroick

More information

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works. Rover Delivery 2017-2018 NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review Charger Rocket Works April 27 th, 2018 Propulsion Research Center 1030 John Wright Drive NW, Huntsville,

More information

USLI Critical Design Report

USLI Critical Design Report UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2011 2012 USLI Critical Design Report University Of Minnesota Team Artemis 1/23/2012 Critical Design Report by University of Minnesota Team Artemis for 2011-2012 NASA

More information

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review 2012-2013 Table of Contents I. Team Summary... 1 Team Name: Northwest Indian College RPGs... 1 II. Launch Vehicle Summary... 1

More information

LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD. Dan Schwartz

LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD. Dan Schwartz LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD Dan Schwartz This entire rocket is built using the same techniques I use for my nose cones, a central airframe tube for compression strength and rings of high compression styrofoam

More information

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review Florida A & M University Flight Readiness Review 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review 1 Overview Team Summary ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ Vehicle Criteria ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~

More information

Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017

Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017 Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Department

More information

Madison West High School Green Team

Madison West High School Green Team Madison West High School Green Team The Effect of Gravitational Forces on Arabidopsis Thaliana Development Flight Readiness Review The Vehicle Mission Performance Criteria Successful two stage flight Altitude

More information

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics 16.00 Introduction to Aerospace and Design Problem Set #4 Issued: February 28, 2002 Due: March 19, 2002 ROCKET PERFORMANCE

More information

USLI Flight Readiness Review

USLI Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2011 2012 USLI Flight Readiness Review University Of Minnesota Team Artemis 3/26/2012 Flight Readiness Report prepared by University of Minnesota Team Artemis for 2011-2012

More information

Cornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM

Cornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM 2015-2016 CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM Presentation Centennial Challenge MAV Participant NASA Student Launch Competition LAUNCH VEHICLE GENERAL DIMENSIONS Airframe Tubing: OD = 3.98 in ID = 3.9 in Couplers: OD

More information

University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review

University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2012 2013 University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics 3/18/2013 2012-2013 University of Minnesota

More information

NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements

NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements On April 18, 2017, we were on two airplanes to Milwaukee, Wisconsin by 6:30 am for a long flight. There were 12 students, 3 mentors, 2 toddlers

More information

First Nation Launch Competition Handbook

First Nation Launch Competition Handbook 2018 First Nation Launch Competition Handbook Funded through National Space Grant Foundation Cooperative Agreement 2017 HESS-05 NASA Grant #NNX13E43A 9-11-17 Table of Contents 1 Competition Objectives...

More information

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Flight Readiness Review Report 2014-2015 NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Florida International University Engineering Center College

More information

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review S A M U E L G I N N C O L L E G E O F E N G I N E E R I N G Auburn University Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review 2 Engineering Dr. Auburn, AL 36849 January 6th, 205 Table of Contents SECTION

More information

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review S A M U E L G I N N C O L L E G E O F E N G I N E E R I N G Auburn University Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review 2 Engineering Dr. Auburn, AL 36849 March 6th, 205 Table of Contents Section

More information

First Nation Launch Competition Handbook

First Nation Launch Competition Handbook 2018 First Nation Launch Competition Handbook Funded through National Space Grant Foundation Cooperative Agreement 2017 HESS-05 NASA Grant #NNX13E43A 9-11-17 1 Table of Contents Contents 2 Competition

More information

This Week. Next Week 4/7/15

This Week. Next Week 4/7/15 E80 Spring 2015 This Week! Transfer breadboard circuit to PC board.! Verify everything still works.! Get data logger working.! Pass off consists of: " Power PC board with data logger & start logging. "

More information

ISS Space Grant Team Exocoetidae

ISS Space Grant Team Exocoetidae ISS Space Grant Team Exocoetidae Illinois Space Society University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana March 9, 2018 Faculty Advisor: Diane Jeffers (dejeffer@illinois.edu, 217-898-5888) Team Lead: Shivani

More information

Table of Content 1) General Information ) Summary of PDR Report ) Changes Made Since Proposal ) Safety... 8

Table of Content 1) General Information ) Summary of PDR Report ) Changes Made Since Proposal ) Safety... 8 Table of Content 1) General Information... 3 1.1 Student Leader... 3 1.2 Safety Officer... 3 1.3 Team Structure... 3 1.4 NAR/TRA Sections... 4 2) Summary of PDR Report... 5 2.1 Team Summary... 5 2.2 Launch

More information

Public Missiles, Ltd.

Public Missiles, Ltd. Public Missiles, Ltd. Co-Pilot Dual-Deployment Recovery Altimeter SYSTEM OVERVIEW...2 SPECIFICATIONS...2 HANDLING PRECAUTIONS...2 OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW...3 FIGURE 1 - GENERAL COMPONENT LAYOUT OF THE PML

More information

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle The SpaceLoft XL is UP Aerospace s workhorse space launch vehicle -- ideal for significant-size payloads and multiple, simultaneous-customer operations. SpaceLoft

More information

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon 1 Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon Kazuhiko Yamada, Takashi Abe (JAXA/ISAS) Kojiro Suzuki, Naohiko Honma, Yasunori Nagata, Masashi Koyama (The

More information

Rocketry, the student way

Rocketry, the student way Rocketry, the student way Overview Student organization Based at TU Delft About 90 members > 100 rockets flown Design, Construction, Test, Launch All done by students Goal Design, build, and fly rockets

More information

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON College of Engineering 302 E Buchtel Ave Akron, OH 44325 September 20, 2017 NASA Student Launch Initiative Table of Contents 1. Adult Educators and Advisors... 4 2. Team Officials...

More information

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket AIAA ADS Conference 2011 in Dublin 1 Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket Kazuhiko Yamada, Takashi Abe (JAXA/ISAS) Kojiro Suzuki

More information

Information Pack for Mid Power Rockets

Information Pack for Mid Power Rockets Information Pack for Mid Power Rockets www.qldrocketry.com Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Terminology... 3 3. Rocket Flight Phases... 4 4. Igniters... 5 5. Motors... 6 5.1 Key Components...

More information

Tuskegee University Rocketry Club

Tuskegee University Rocketry Club Tuskegee University Rocketry Club National Aeronautics and Space Administration Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review Atmospheric Measurement and Aerodynamic Analysis TURC 2015-2016 NASA

More information

EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD

EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD STANDARD #H-004 EFFECTIVE 06-30-09 REVISED 7-20-17 PURPOSE This standard is intended to provide the permit requirements and safety directives for the

More information

Subsonic Parachutes for Future Mars Missions

Subsonic Parachutes for Future Mars Missions Subsonic Parachutes for Future Mars Missions John C. Underwood, Arrun Saunders, Steven B. Rogers, J. Stephen Lingard Vorticity Ltd Lionel Marraffa, Luca Ferracina European Space Agency 1 Mars Parachutes

More information

Innovating the future of disaster relief

Innovating the future of disaster relief Innovating the future of disaster relief American Helicopter Society International 33rd Annual Student Design Competition Graduate Student Team Submission VEHICLE OVERVIEW FOUR VIEW DRAWING INTERNAL COMPONENTS

More information