Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure Roads Prepared on Behalf of Stantec Consulting

Transcription

1 Municipality of Thames Centre 215 State of the Infrastructure Roads Prepared on Behalf of Stantec Consulting 7 Candle Crescent, Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7

2 7 Candle Crescent, Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7 December 7, 215 The Corporation of the Municipality of Thames Centre 435 Hamilton Road, Dorchester, Ontario, NL 1G3 Attention: Mary Ellen Weatherhead, CPA, CGA, Dipl.M.A., C.M.T.P. Director of Financial Services / Treasurer Subject: Mike LeBlanc, Director of Operations and (Acting) Community Services Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management and Pavement Engineering, Stantec Consulting Thames Centre, State of the Infrastructure Road, prepared on behalf of Stantec Consulting for the Municipality of Thames Centre Dear Ms. Weatherhead, Mr. LeBlanc, and Mr. Dalziel, 4 Roads Management Services Inc. (4 Roads) is pleased to provide this report on the 215 State of the Infrastructure Roads. The 215 project updated the condition data on the road sections, revised asset sectioning and developed costing and analysis on the entire road system database and reports on same. All road sections have been reviewed and have estimated improvement and replacement costs. Calculations for Time of Need, Improvement and Replacement Costs and Performance modeling were developed utilizing WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation Software. We trust that the information provided in this report will be beneficial to the Municipality of Thames Centre in the evolution of their Asset Management Plans. Please do not hesitate to call or if you require any further information or discussion on any aspect of the report. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this report. If 4 Roads Management Services Inc. may be of any further service, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, David Anderson, CET President, 4 Roads Management Services Inc. Dave.anderson@4roads.ca RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

3 Municipality of Thames Centre State of the Infrastructure for Roads 7 Candle Crescent, Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7

4 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Executive Summary In the fall of 212, the Province of Ontario, introduced a requirement for an Asset Management Plan (AMP) as a prerequisite for municipalities seeking funding assistance for capital projects, from the province; effectively creating a conditional grant. To qualify for future infrastructure grants, municipalities were required to develop an AMP that is approved by council by December 213. On April 26, 213 the province announced that it had created a $1 million Infrastructure Fund for small, rural and northern municipalities. Subsequently, the province has introduced further initiatives for infrastructure funding: the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) and the Small Communities Fund (SCF). An Asset Management Plan approved by Council is required as part of the submission for OCIF Applications. Asset Management Plans will be reviewed for comprehensiveness. The Municipality of Thames Centre (MoTC) currently develops an AMP for the various asset groups, roads being one of them. A key component of the AMP is a State of the Infrastructure (SotI) review of the asset or asset group. The following report provides the SotI review of the MoTC road system and also provides recommendations for budgets and road asset management. The scope of this report includes: Review and condition rating on the road assets within the MoTC road system Development of current replacement costs for each road asset Development/review of recommendations for improvement and associated costing on deficient assets Development of recommendations for annual budgets based on current costs for amortization/capital depreciation and major program areas based on updated unit costs provided by the MoTC where available. Where costs were not available, local and engineering experience were used to develop representative costs Development of an analysis on the effect of current and recommended budgets on overall system performance Provision of Level of Service recommendations Provision of Asset Management Strategy recommendations The 215 State of the Infrastructure for Roads Report summarizes the road system survey conducted during the summer of 215. The survey identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction treatment. Further, the report provides an overview of the physical and financial needs of the road system in its entirety as well as by road section. Both information sources are used to develop programming and budgets. However, once a road section reaches the project design stage, further detailed review, investigation, and design will be required to address the specific requirements of the project. This report should not be confused with a road safety audit. A road safety audit is the formal safety performance examination of an existing or future road or intersection, which qualitatively estimates and reports on potential road safety issues, and identifies opportunities for improvements for all road users. Typically, and more predominantly in a lower tier, rural municipality on lower volume road sections, the RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx i

5 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 road system has some deficiencies with the existing horizontal and vertical alignment. Road sections with potentially substandard horizontal and vertical alignments are listed in Appendix D. These section should be reviewed to ensure that signage is in compliance with the Ontario Traffic Manual. MoTC provided updated traffic information and corrected road names which were entered into the database and utilized in the preparation of this report. Accurate and current traffic counts are critical in managing a road system and their importance cannot be overemphasized. Traffic counts establish road maintenance classifications for Minimum Maintenance Standards (MMS) purposes, as per Ontario Regulation 239/2 (Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Roads). Traffic counts are also used to determine appropriate geometry, structure, and cross section when the road is rehabilitated or reconstructed. The MoTC should continue/re instate their traffic counting program and include truck counts and dates. Traffic counts should be updated on a regular cycle, as a risk management exercise. The MoTC staff provided information with respect to their database/network. As 4 Roads reviewed the road sections, some changes were made to the network data, to ensure the road sections were consistent and manageable. Road sections should be reasonably consistent throughout their length, according to roadside environment, surface type, condition, cross section, speed limit, traffic count or a combination of these factors. For example, new sections should be created as surface type, surface condition, cross section, or speed limit changes. Data collection and road ratings were completed generally in accordance with the Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads from 1991 (Inventory Manual or IM). Road conditions were evaluated during the field inspection. The ratings can be used as a standalone value, or incorporated into calculations performed by the software, that then classify the road section as a Now, 1 to 5, or 6 to 1 year need for maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction in six critical areas. The Time of Need is a prediction of the time until the road requires reconstruction, not the time frame until action is required. Generally, the closer the timeline to reconstruction, the greater the deterioration of the road is. For example, a road may be categorized as a 6 to 1 year need with a resurfacing recommendation; this road should be resurfaced as soon as possible to further defer the need to reconstruct. Recommendations are made based on the defects observed and other information available in the database at the time of preparation of the report. Once a road asset reaches the project level, the municipality may end up selecting another alternative based on additional information, asset management strategy, development considerations or available funding. NOW needs represent road sections that require reconstruction or major rehabilitation. NOW needs are the backlog of work required on the road system; however, NOW needs may not necessarily be the priority, depending on funding levels. Construction improvements identified within this time period are representative of roads that have little or no service life left and are in poor condition. Resurfacing treatments are never NOW needs, with the following exceptions; RW (Resurface and Widen) PR1 or PR2 (Pulverize and resurface 1 or 2 lifts of asphalt) When the surface type is inadequate for the traffic volume (gravel road over 4AADT) When the surface is gravel and the roadside environment is Urban or Semi Urban RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx ii

6 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, to 5 identifies road sections where reconstruction is anticipated within the next five years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), deferring the need to reconstruct. 6 to 1 identifies road sections where reconstruction improvements are anticipated within six to ten years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), thus deferring the need to reconstruct. ADEQ identifies road sections that do not have reconstruction or resurfacing needs, although minor maintenance such as crack sealing or spot drainage may be required. This report summarizes the needs identified through a number of tabular appendices. When the Inventory Manual was originally developed, the Province provided funding for municipal road systems; the road systems were measured by their system adequacy. The system adequacy is the percentage of the road system that is not a NOW need. The Inventory Manual provides direction that roads with a traffic volume of less than 5 vehicles per day are deemed to be adequate, even if they have structural, geometric, or drainage deficiencies that would otherwise be identified as being in a Time of Need and were to be corrected within the maintenance budget. This approach is directly parallel to Regulation 239/2, Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Roads, which states that roads with less than 5 vehicles per day, and a speed limit of less than 8 km/hr., are classified as Class 6 with no standard for repair. This factor does have an effect on the system adequacy calculation. However, for the purposes of this report, road sections with a traffic count of less than 5 vehicles per day have been provided with a recommended treatment and associated improvement cost in order to provide a more accurate assessment of the total needs and conditions. (Although, the calculations will rate them as adequate due to the traffic count) The road system currently includes km of road sections that had an actual or estimated traffic count of less than 5 vehicles per day representing approximately 3.82% of the road system. During the field review, and in reviewing the data and the needs for the road network, there were several unique aspects of the network that came to light: The overall condition of the road system is good. However, this is influenced positively to some extent by the following factors: o o The gravel road system was not reviewed during the spring breakup. Field observations and staff input on performance history were considered in the development of the scoring, however, observations could not be made based on the worst case spring thaw conditions. As noted above, 3.82% of the system is deemed adequate due to having a counted or estimated traffic count of less than 5 vehicles per day. Roads with a surface width less than the minimum tolerable standard were identified on km of road sections. Typically these road sections are low volume, however, the RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx iii

7 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 recommended correction would be a reconstruction of the section to produce the required width. As an interim solution, signage would reduce the municipality s exposure. The status and responsibilities as they relate to the boundary roads appears to be uncertain in a number of instances. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed. Material gradation on gravel roads may not be in conformity with applicable OPSS standards and/or the material is being placed in too thin a lift causing a significant amount of float (loose gravel) on the road surface. This was only noticeable on some sections not all gravel road sections. Approximately 1.2% ( km) of the road system requires resurfacing (hot mix asphalt or surface treatment). If not addressed, the resurfacing needs will become major rehabilitation or reconstruction needs at significantly greater cost. Approximately 27.2% (94.659km) of the road system has a structural adequacy score of 15 or 16, indicating that those roads would be an additional resurfacing need in the next 1 to 3 year period (all surface types are included). The budget recommendations in this report appear to be higher than current expenditures; however, the system appears to be performing well. There are a number of factors potentially contributing to this anomaly: o o Reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower volume roads appears to be undertaken by Road Operations staff and it does not appear that municipal equipment is charged against activities in the Operating Budget. The overall condition may have been influenced by unique accounting practices that have not been identified within the annual funding level over the last number of years. o Anecdotal information is that the unit costs for gravel resurfacing is approximately 25% less than the unit costs for gravel in the subdivision construction ($13 vs $1). o It appears that gravel roads are being upgraded to hard surface roads through the capital program, so this would offset, to some extent, the gravel road resurfacing requirement. Based on the current review of the road system, the current system adequacy measure is 89.7% meaning that, 1.3% of the road system is deficient in the NOW time period. The current system adequacy is at an acceptable level. As noted in the foregoing, there are a number of factors influencing the system adequacy. Based on the current unit costs being experienced, the estimated total cost of recommended improvements is $27,733,786. The improvement costs include $14,19,782 for those roads identified as NOW needs and $13,624,4 is for road work required in the '1 to 1' year time period or for maintenance. Included in those amounts is $3,121,821 for work on road sections with a traffic count of less than 5 vehicles per day or require only maintenance. Based on the composition of the road system, budget recommendations have been developed for annual capital and maintenance programs as follows: RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx iv

8 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 $162,758,9 to replace the road system. Annualized, this would be $3,255,2 for the roads capital/depreciation, excluding resurfacing, based upon a 5 year life cycle. This would be similar to the PSAB 315 amortization value using current replacement costs. The annualized value and 5 year life cycle assumes that there will be regular maintenance and resurfacing in addition to the depreciation costs. Section 8 of the report provides additional discussion on this subject. $686,5 for average annual hot mix resurfacing, based upon a 19(18.7) year cycle. This would approximate an average of 3.2km per year. $388,2 for average annual single surface treatment of existing surface treated roads, based on a seven year cycle, not including additional padding or geometric correction. This is approximately 15.7km per year. $1,96,4 for average annual resurfacing gravel roads on a three year cycle (this does not include any additional gravel road conversion costs; nor ditching, re grading, dust control, etc.). $23,7 for average annual crack sealing. *NOTE: All of the above noted budget recommendations could change dependent upon the outcome status of the boundary roads review. For modeling purposes, 4 Roads has created a funding level described as the Preservation Budget. The Preservation Budget is the total of the recommended funding levels for hot mix resurfacing, single surface treatment, gravel road resurfacing and crack sealing. This value has been calculated to be $2,194,8. The premise being that if the preservation and resurfacing programs are adequately funded then the system should be sustained. The performance modeling is discussed in Section 9 of this report. To clarify, the required funding level to sustain or improve the road system is not the total of all of the above recommendations. Sustainable funding has to be between the Preservation Budget and the Capital Depreciation. The preservation budget and performance model thereof are computer derived. Intangible values and decisions and the effects of other external forces cannot be incorporated into the model. As such the preservation model is the theoretical minimum required to maintain the system. From a more pragmatic perspective and to deal with the real life realities of maintaining a road system, this amount should be greater. Municipal pavement and asset management strategies are critical to managing the performance of the road system, more so, if funding is limited. Funding constraints should push the strategy toward those programs that extend the life cycle of the road by providing the correct treatment at the optimum time. Resurfacing, rehabilitation, and preservation projects should be a higher priority than reconstruction projects. The objective is to keep the good roads good. As the municipality advances the development of their Asset Management Plan (AMP), a paradigm shift will be required in the way that it approaches management of assets. Traditionally, municipalities have spent a fixed amount on capital and maintenance each year. As evidenced by Table ES.11, programs are not at a consistent funding level on an annual basis. The annual budget overall is met, however, the distribution of costs between traditional capital and maintenance activities varies. That variance is being driven by the demands of the road system based on condition, and project selection is based on condition and best Return on Investment. This concept has to be applied to all assets. RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx v

9 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Re stated, instead of the traditional capital and maintenance line items, consider the gross budget as the annual re investment level, with program funding levels fluctuating within the gross amounts, but driven by asset condition. The prime goal of any pavement management strategy should be to maintain overall system adequacy. The funding level for road related programming should be set at a sufficient level so as to ensure that overall system adequacy does not decrease over time. In addition to the budgetary recommendations, the following recommendations are provided for the management of the road inventory. 1. The information and budget recommendations included in this report should be used to further develop and evolve the corporate Asset Management Plan. 2. A regular review of the condition of the road system should occur at a maximum four year interval. The review cycle be undertaken at a 4 year interval or segmented annually or biannually. 3. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed. 4. The unit costs, budget recommendations, update history and performance models should be updated annually. 5. The System Adequacy should be maintained at 6% or higher. 6. The weighted average Physical Condition should be at 7 or higher. 7. The Good to Very Good roads should be at 6% or higher. 8. Programming should be reviewed to ensure that resurfacing and preservation programs are optimized. 9. The overall road system should have traffic counts updated on a 3 to 5 year cycle. The counting should include the percentage of truck traffic and the date. 1. The gravel road conversion program should be continued. 11. Roads sections where potentially substandard horizontal and vertical alignment have been identified, should be reviewed to ensure signage is in compliance with the Ontario Traffic Manual. (Listing provided in Appendix D) 12. Road sections with substandard width should be signed accordingly as an interim measure. (Table ES 5 provides a listing.) 13. The results and recommendations for programming within this report should be integrated with the other assets groups to ensure available funding is optimized. 14. Some consideration should be given to calculating equipment costs for activities and projects undertaken by Thames Centre staff to better reflect total project costs and to allow for more direct comparisons of alternate service delivery methodologies. RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx vi

10 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Summary Information All lengths are adjusted for owners share / boundary roads High Class Bit. asphalt % 16.6% Low Class Bit. surface treated % 31.82% Total % of Total 86.24% 86.24% 6.16% 6.16% 7.61% 7.61% Road Class Description Table ES 1: Roadside Environment and Surface Type Roadside Environment Rural Semi Urban Urban Total % of Total Surface Type Cl km Lane km Cl km Lanekm Cl km Lanekm Cl km Lanekm Cl km Lanekm Gravel, Stone, Other Loosetop % 52.12% Table ES 2: Roadside Environment and Functional Class Roadside Environment Rural Semi Urban Urban Total Lane Lanekm km Lane Lane Cl km Cl km Cl km Cl km km km % of Total Lane Cl km km 1 Rural <5AADT % 3.61% 2 Rural AADT % 57.21% 3 Rural AADT % 6.14% 4 Rural AADT % 16.86% Rural AADT % 2.41% C/R Collector Residential %.37% L/R Local Residential % 12.8% LCI Local Commercial industrial % 1.31% Total % of Total 86.24% 86.24% 6.16% 6.16% 7.61% 7.61% Year Table ES 3: Traffic Count Vs Count Year Actual Count (km) Estimated Count (km) TOTAL % OF TOTAL % % TOTAL % OF TOTAL 95.96% 4.4% Traffic data did not include dates RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx vii

11 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Asset ID Table ES 4: Road Sections with Substandard Width CW Asset ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length 13 WHITTAKER LANE CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE WEST END.278 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE LEWIS ROAD EAST END DOAN DRIVE WEST END 15M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD MARR ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE END OF STREET MARR ROAD END OF STREET GLADSTONE DRIVE LACEY LANE CRAMPTON DRIVE NORTH END DONNYBROOK DRIVE 43M EAST OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD CASHEL LANE DONNYBROOK DRIVE CASHEL LANE END OF STREET RATH STREET 29 HAMILTON ROAD MARSHALL STREET MARSHALL STREET 3 PUTNAM ROAD RATH STREET IRWIN ROAD BREEN ROAD SOUTH END FIVE POINTS ROAD BREEN ROAD SOUTH END IRWIN ROAD NORTH END 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE IRWIN ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE IRWIN ROAD 32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE SOUTH END LEWIS ROAD NORTH END 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE LEWIS ROAD 52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE MOSSLEY DRIVE LEWIS ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE GLADSTONE DRIVE BRADY ROAD 42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE MOSSLEY DRIVE COW PATH COW PATH LOWER COW PATH LOWER COW PATH COW PATH 44M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) LOWER COW PATH M EAST OF LOWER COWPATH ROAD.78 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD GREGORY DRIVE WEST END BRIDGE GREGORY DRIVE BRIDGE FAIRVIEW ROAD STOREY DRIVE 122M WEST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD BANKS ROAD 27M SOUTH OF 2 DUNDAS STREET CULVERT BANKS ROAD CULVERT TRAFALGAR STREET SHEILS LANE NORTH END 8M NORTH OF 49 CATHERINE STREET.259 Total RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx viii

12 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Roadside Total AADT Table ES 5: Average Traffic Count by MMS Class MMS Class Totals # Assets Ave AADT Total AADT # Assets Ave AADT Total AADT # Assets Ave AADT Total AADT # Assets Ave AADT Total AADT # Assets R S U Total Average Ave AADT Table ES 6: MMS Class by Lanes and Roadside Environment MMS Class TOTAL % OF TOTAL Lanes Roadside Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km 2 Rural % 86.24% Semi 2 Urban % 6.16% 2 Urban % 7.61% TOTAL % OF TOTAL 2.11% 2.11% 82.41% 82.41% 11.66% 11.66% 3.82% 3.82% RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx ix

13 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table ES 7: Time of Need by Length and MMS Class TOTAL TON Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km NOW % 1.72% 1 to % 41.% 6 to % 47.1% ADEQ % 1.27% TOTAL % OF TOTAL 2.11% 2.11% 82.41% 82.41% 11.66% 11.66% 3.82% 3.82% System Adequacy % Good to Very Good Overall % *Good to Very Good in this table include the TON measure in all six critical areas. Table ES 8: Speed limit Reduction Recommendations Avg Asset ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length AADT Speed Limit Oper Speed Geometrics 114 DONNYBROOK DRIVE 8M WEST OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD 32 DORCHESTER ROAD.8 1, NOW 115 DONNYBROOK DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD 43M EAST OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD NOW 117 DONNYBROOK DRIVE CASHEL LANE END OF STREET NOW 119 CASHEL LANE 33M SOUTH OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD 32 DORCHESTER ROAD NOW 14 PIGRAM ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE NOW % OF TOTAL RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx x

14 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table ES 9: Good to Very Good Roads by Structural Adequacy MMS Class Structural Time of Adequacy Need Length (km) % of System Length 1 NOW % 2 NOW % 3 NOW % 4 NOW % 5 NOW % 6 NOW % 7 NOW % 8 1 to % 9 1 to % 1 1 to % 11 1 to % 12 6 to % 13 6 to % 14 6 to % 15 ADEQ % 16 ADEQ % 17 ADEQ % 18 ADEQ % 19 ADEQ % 2 ADEQ % Grand Total % Good to Very Good *Good to Very Good Measured by Structural Adequacy only not all critical areas RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx xi

15 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Graph ES1: Estimated Remaining Service Life: Structural Adequacy Rating vs. Length Poor Condition Fair to Good Condition Good to Excellent Condition No Remaining Service Life 1 to 1 Yrs Remaining Service life Greater than 1 Yrs Remaining Service life RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx xii

16 Imp. ID Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Imp. Description Table ES 1: Road System Needs Summary Time of Need 1 to 5 6 to 1 ADEQ NOW TOTAL % OF TOTAL Imp. Imp. Class Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Cost Km CRK Crack Sealing Maint 18, , % 2.58% GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel Maint 467, , ,9, % 7.42% GRR2plus 15mm add'l gravel and minor ditching Maint 521, , % 3.26% GRR 75mm of Granular A Maint 81, , , % 8.42% GRRplus Maintenance Gravel and Minor Ditching Maint 362, , , % 5.4% MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation Maint 145, , % 1.23% RSpLimit Reduce Speed limit Maint % SD Spot Drainage Maint % DST Double Surface Treatment Rehab 2, , %.1% PR2 Pulverize and Resurface 2 1mm Rehab 5, , ,42, ,638, % 3.17% PR3 Pulverize and Resurface 3 15mm Rehab 29, , %.11% R1rural R1 Rural Cross Section Rehab 27, , , %.3% R1urban R1 Urban Cross Section Rehab 7, , , %.78% R2urban R2 Urban Cross Section Rehab 244, , %.15% SST Single Surface Treatment Rehab 156, , , % 3.8% SST, Berm Removal, Geometric SSTplus Correction, Minor Ditching Rehab 4, , , % 6.16% BS Base and Surface Const 618, , , ,511, ,438, % 5.38% BSgrav Base and Surface Gravel Const 2,342, , ,514, % 1.62% NONE No Improvement Required Const % REC Reconstruction Rural Const 1,286, ,138, ,53, ,518, ,474, % 29.97% RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewer Const 33, ,113, ,146, % 4.37% RSS Reconstruction with Storm Sewers Const 252, , ,714, ,544, % 2.63% TOTAL 2,557, ,944, ,121, ,19, ,733, RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx xiii

17 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Graph ES.2: Predicted System Performance at Varying Funding Levels *Current Municipal budget does not appear to include equipment and machinery costs for construction work performed by municipal staff. RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx xiv

18 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table ES 11: 1 Year Program Performance Model Output Current Funding Level Imp.Type Year Grand Total BS 11,954 25,558 37,512 BSgrav 696, ,451 CRK 17,792 12,443 1,624 1,674 31,195 2,76 4,56 1,142 4,37 6,762 83,134 DST 2,396 2,396 GRR2 13, , , ,14 18,721 81, ,6 1,15,33 39, ,566 4,482,532 MICRO 2,741 35,569 11,663 3,61 37,592 3,474 54,799 22,271 2, ,559 PR2 25,859 44,11 381, ,588 2,96 136,67 1,142,166 R1 12,15 322,888 91, ,468 1,8,232 2,258,387 R1rural 27,922 17,258 8, ,733 R1urban 7,61 246,62 327,447 27,87 28, ,956 R2urban 244, ,314 RNS 211,75 28,176 24,62 181,372 85,9 SST 177,85 27, ,443 8, , ,54 961, ,58 416,734 9,83 3,217,47 SSTplus 55,73 55,73 GRR2plus 45,78 79, ,647 Grand Total 1,486,68 1,486,545 1,485,384 1,486,364 1,486,361 1,486,16 1,486,427 1,485,953 1,486,555 1,486,422 14,862,797 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx xv

19 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table ES 11: Improvement Type Abbreviation Summary Code R1 R2 RM PR1 PR2 BS RW REC RNS RSS NC SRR SST SST+ SST++ GRR /GRR2 Micro CRK Description Basic Resurfacing Basic Resurfacing Double Lift Major Resurfacing Pulverizing and Resurfacing Pulverizing and Resurfacing Double Lift Tolerable standard for lower volume roads Rural and Semi Urban Cross sections only. Improves drainage and Resurface and Widen Reconstruction Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub drain, Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers, and manholes in addition to the Proposed Road Construction Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement Single Surface Treatment Single Surface Treatment and minor ditching Single Surface Treatment, 1% base repairs and minor ditching Gravel road resurfacing 1 lift or 2 lifts; 75mm or 15mm; Plus includes ditching for 1% of the length Microsurfacing Crack sealing RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx xvi

20 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ASSET CONDITION RATING METHODOLOGY Asset Condition Rating Methodology... 3 Inventory Manual History... 3 Inventory Manual Overview Types of Improvements STATE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE Scope / Asset Type(s) Road System Inventory and Classification Surface Types and Roadside Environment Minimum Maintenance Standard (MMS) Classification Functional / Existing / Design Classifications Horizontal and Vertical Alignment Drainage Drainage Outlet and Master Planning Boundary Roads ROAD SYSTEM CONDITION Road System Condition by Time of Need Road System Adequacy Road System Needs Physical Condition Remaining Service Life Record of Assumptions Time of Need (TON), Improvement and Replacement Costs REPLACEMENT COST VALUATION ASSET CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND PLAN UPDATES Condition Assessment Cycle Recommendation LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Current Level of Service Measurement System Adequacy Physical Condition MPMP Good to Very Good ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Asset Management Overview Priority Rating vs. Condition Rating Cross Asset Integration and Project Prioritization... 3

21 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Gravel Roads Management Strategy PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Overview Capital Depreciation Hot Mix Resurfacing Surface Treatment Resurfacing Gravel Road Resurfacing Crack Sealing Annual Budget Adjustments Inflation Plant Adjustment Performance Modeling Budget Effect on System Performance Asset Management Plan (AMP) and Strategy Analysis Performance Model Overview System Performance at Various Budget Levels Record of Assumptions Performance Modeling Pavement Classification for Modeling Year Program STATE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE ROADS RECOMMENDATIONS... 45

22 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 List of Tables Table 2.1: Road Improvement Types... 5 Table 2.2: Average Improvement Costs per Kilometre by Improvement Type... 6 Table 3.1: Surface Type and Roadside Environment Distribution... 8 Table 3.2: Regulation 239/2 Minimum Maintenance Standard Road Classification... 9 Table 3.3: Minimum Maintenance Standards Class Distribution... 1 Table 3.4: Functional Road Class Distribution... 1 Table 3.5: Posted Speed vs. Minimum Tolerable Operating Speed Table 3.6: Speed Limit Reduction Recommendations Table 3.7: Drainage by Time of Need (Km) Table 3.8: Municipality of Thames Centre Boundary Roads Table 4.1: Roads System by Time of Need and MMS Class Table 4.2: Unit Costs... 2 Table 4.3: Improvement costs by Improvement Type and Time of Need Table 5.1: Average Replacement Costs Table 8.1: Gravel Road Conversion Candidates Table 9.1: Hot Mix Asphalt Roads by Asset Class and Life Cycle Table 9.2: Sample Section Life Cycle... 4 Table 9.3: Road Asset Classes Table 9.4: Performance Model Summary Ten Year Program List of Figures Figure 3.1: Safe Sto ing Distance (Table C2 1 from MTO Geo e ric Design S andards for Ontario Highways) Figure 3.2: Potentially Substandard Vertical and Horizontal Alignment Figure 3.3: OPSS Figure 3.4: Poor Shoulder Drainage Figure 4.1: Remaining Service Life Figure 8.1: Treatment Cost vs. Deterioration Figure 8.2: Pavement Management The Right Treatment at the Right Time Figure 9.1: Performance Modeling at Various Budget Levels... 4 Figure 9.2: Graphical Representation of a Typical Life Cycle and Strategy Cost Differential Figure 9.3: Annual Expenditures Budget to Maintain Figure 9.4: Treatment Selection vs. Condition (Asphalt Surfaces)... 43

23 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 List of Appendices Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Appendix F: Appendix G: Appendix H: Appendix I: Appendix J: Appendix K: Inventory Manual methodology Overview Pavement Structure and Defects Gravel Road Conversion Potential Substandard Alignment Deterioration Curve Detail 1 Year Program Based on Current Budget Critical Deficiencies by Asset ID Needs Sorted by Time of Need and Improvement Category Mapping Roads by Surface Type Mapping Roadside Environment Mapping Roads by Time of Need and Improvement Type

24 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Introduction and Background In the fall of 212, the Province of Ontario, introduced a requirement for an Asset Management Plan (AMP) as a prerequisite for municipalities seeking funding assistance for capital projects, from the province; effectively creating a conditional grant. To qualify for future infrastructure grants, municipalities were required to develop an AMP that is approved by council by December 213. On April 26, 213 the province announced that it had created a $1 million Infrastructure Fund for small, rural and northern municipalities. Subsequently, the province has introduced further initiatives for infrastructure funding: the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) and the Small Communities Fund (SCF). An Asset Management Plan approved by Council is required as part of the submission for OCIF Applications. Asset Management Plans will be reviewed for comprehensiveness. Conditional Grants are not new to Ontario. Until the mid 199 s, Road Needs Studies (RNS) were completed by municipalities and submitted to the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) on an annual basis in order to receive provincial funding for their road programs. The Municipality of Thames Centre (MoTC) currently develops an AMP for the various asset groups, roads being one of them. A key component of the AMP is a State of the Infrastructure (SotI) review of the asset or asset group. This report provides the SotI review of the Municipality of Thames Centre road system and also provides recommendations for budgets and road asset management. To put the language in a more current context, this report is essentially the State of the Infrastructure (SotI) for roads that has evolved into an asset management plan for the road assets. The scope of this report includes: Review and condition rating on the road assets within the MoTC road system Development of current replacement costs for each road asset Development/review of recommendations for improvement and associated costing on deficient assets Development of recommendations for annual budgets based on current costs for amortization/capital depreciation and major program areas based on updated unit costs provided by the municipality where available. Where costs were not available, local and engineering experience were used to develop representative costs. Development of an analysis on the effect of current and recommended budgets on overall system performance. Provision of Level of Service recommendations Provision of Asset Management Strategy recommendations The 215 report summarizes the condition data survey conducted during the summer of 215. The database identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction treatment. Recommendations are made based on the defects observed and other information available in the database at the time of preparation of the report. Once a road asset reaches the project level, the 1 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

25 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 municipality may end up selecting another alternative based on additional information, asset management strategy, development considerations or available funding. Road sections that will not be addressed in the immediate plan should be reviewed for advisory signage as a risk management exercise. 4 Roads believes that the content of this report satisfies the State of the infrastructure requirements and provides a solid foundation to further develop and evolve the Expected Levels of Services, Asset Management and Financing requirements. 4 Roads Management Services Inc. has prepared this report in a format that it believes will readily lend itself to integration with the corporate AMP. The Inventory Manual methodology is discussed further in Section 2 of this report and Appendix A. 2 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

26 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Asset Condition Rating Methodology 2.1 Asset Condition Rating Methodology The provincial requirements for AMP s include asset condition assessment in accordance with standard engineering practices. The road section reviews completed as part of this study follow the methodology of the Ministry of Transportation Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads, Inventory Manual History From the 196 s until the mid 199 s, the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) required the municipalities to regularly update the condition ratings of their road systems in a number of key areas. The process was originally created by the MTO, as a means to distribute conditional funding, on an equitable basis, between municipalities. The report was referred to as a Road Needs Study (RNS) and was required in order to receive a conditional grant to subsidize the municipal road programs. After the introduction in the 196 s by the MTO, the methodology evolved into the current format by the late 197 s. The most current version of the Inventory Manual is dated 1991, and is the methodology used for this report. The practice was discontinued by a number of municipalities, when conditional funding for roads was eliminated in the mid 199 s. Inventory Manual Overview The Inventory Manual Methodology is a sound, consistent, asset management practice that still works well today, and in view of the increasing demands on efficiency and asset management, represents a sound asset management practice that should be repeated on a cyclical basis. The road section review identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended rehabilitation strategy. The MoTC report summarizes the road system survey conducted during the summer 215. The report provides an overview of the overall condition of the road system by road section, including such factors as structural adequacy, drainage, and surface condition. The study also provides an indication of apparent deficiencies in horizontal and vertical alignment elements, as per the Ministry of Transportation s manual, Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways. Further, the report provides an overview of the physical and financial needs of the road system, which may be used for programming and budgeting. However, once a road section reaches the project design stage, further detailed review, investigation, and design will be required to address the specific requirements of the project. Asset Management by its very nature is holistic. Managing a road network based solely on pavement condition would be critically deficient in scope in terms of the information required to make an informed decision as to the improvements required on a road section. 3 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

27 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 The Inventory Manual offers a holistic review of each road section, developing a Time of Need (TON) or an Adequate rating in six areas that are critical to municipal decision making: Geometrics* Surface Type* Surface Width* Capacity* Structural Adequacy Drainage The Inventory Manual describes the standards in four of the areas as Minimum Tolerable Standards. (Identified with an asterisk above) To render an appropriate improvement recommendation, consideration should be given to each of the areas. Given the Minimum Tolerable designation in the manual, 4 Roads has referred to the areas as critical. Evaluations of each road section were completed generally in accordance with the MTO s Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads (1991). Data collected was entered directly into WorkTech s Asset Foundation software. Condition ratings, Time of Need, Priority Ratings, and associated costs were then calculated by the software, in accordance with the Inventory Manual. Unit costs for construction were provided by MoTC staff and through comparative analysis with similar municipalities. Road sections should be reasonably consistent throughout their length, according to roadside environment, surface type, condition, cross section, speed limit, or a combination of these factors. As an example, section changes should occur as surface type, surface condition, cross section, or speed limit changes. Some changes were made during the field review to establish consistency. The Condition Ratings, developed through the scoring in the Inventory Manual, classify roads as NOW, 1 to 5, or 6 to 1 year needs for reconstruction. The Time of Need is a prediction of the time until the road requires reconstruction, not the time frame until action is required. For example, a road may be categorized as a 6 to 1 year need with a resurfacing recommendation. This road should be resurfaced as soon as possible, to further defer the need to reconstruct. Field data is obtained through a visual examination of the road system and includes: structural adequacy, level of service, maintenance demand, horizontal and vertical alignment, surface and shoulder width, surface condition, and drainage. The Condition Rating is calculated based upon a combination of other calculations and data. To best utilize the database information and modern asset management concepts, it has to be understood that the Time of Need (TON) ratings are the estimated time before the road would require reconstruction. NOW needs are still roads that require reconstruction; however, it is not intended that 1 to 5 and 6 to 1 year needs are to be acted on in that timeframe. The 1 to 5 and 6 to 1 year needs are current candidates for resurfacing treatments that will elevate their structural status to ADEQ, and offer the greatest return on investment for a road authority (notwithstanding a drainage or capacity need, etc.). The Time of Need ratings from the Structural Adequacy perspective are described more fully in Appendix A. 4 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

28 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Types of Improvements This report identifies ratings that are resultant from identification of deficiencies on each road section that equate to a TON in one or more of the six critical areas: Geometry, Surface Type, Surface Width, Capacity, Structural Adequacy, or Drainage. Based on the ratings and the deficiencies noted an improvement type recommendation is also provided. The key factor in providing an improvement type recommendation is the visual survey. During the visual survey, a determination is made as to whether the appearance and performance of a road relates to an underlying structural problem, or simply to aged surface materials. A road s structural or drainage problem would tend to result in a reconstruction/ replacement treatment recommendation, whereas aged surface materials would result in a resurfacing/rehabilitation treatment recommendation. A determination of the root cause of the problem or the condition is critical; reconstructing a road that should have had some type of resurfacing treatment would be an ineffective use of available resources. For the purposes of this report, the standard improvement types and associated costing formulae identified in the Inventory Manual have been used. The table below provides a list of road improvements. Table 2.1: Road Improvement Types Code R1 R2 RM PR1 PR2 BS RW REC RNS RSS NC SRR SST SST+ SST++ GRR Micro CRK Description Basic Resurfacing Basic Resurfacing Double Lift Major Resurfacing Pulverizing and Resurfacing Pulverizing and Resurfacing Double Lift Tolerable standard for lower volume roads Rural and Semi Urban Cross sections only. Improves drainage Resurface and Widen Reconstruction Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub drain, Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers, and manholes in addition to the Proposed Road Construction Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement Single Surface Treatment Single Surface Treatment and minor ditching Single Surface Treatment, 1% base repairs and minor ditching Gravel road resurfacing 1 lift or 2 lifts; 75mm or 15mm; Plus includes ditching for 1% of the length Microsurfacing Crack sealing 5 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

29 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table 2.2: Average Improvement Costs per Kilometre by Improvement Type Rural Roadside Environment Semi Urban Urban TOTAL Cost/km Imp. Type Description Imp. Cost Length Imp. Cost Length Imp. Cost Length Imp. Cost Length $$ BS Base and Surface 1,732, , ,438, ,948 BSgrav Base and Surface Gravel 2,514, ,514, ,264 CRK Crack Sealing 1, ,6.8 15, , , DST Double Surface Treatment 2, , ,3 GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel 1,9, ,9, ,869 GRR2plus 15mm add'l gravel and minor ditching 521, , ,226 GRR 75mm of Granular A 56, , ,329 GRRplus Maintenance Gravel and Minor Ditching 414, , ,26 MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation 145, , ,428 No Improvement NONE Required Pulverize and Resurface PR2 2 1mm 2,86, , ,638, ,238 PR3 Pulverize and Resurface 3 15mm 29, , ,576 R1rural R1 Rural Cross Section 115, , , ,726 R1urban R1 Urban Cross Section 943, , ,788 R2urban R2 Urban Cross Section 244, , ,811 REC Reconstruction Rural 7,879, , ,474, ,314 RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewer 33, ,113, ,146, ,598 RSS Reconstruction with Storm Sewers 3,544, ,544, ,657,681 RSpLimit Reduce Speed limit SD Spot Drainage SST Single Surface Treatment 151, , , ,638 SSTplus SST, Berm Removal, Geometric Correction, Minor Ditching 477, , , ,282 TOTAL 17,548, ,723, ,462, ,733, % OF TOTAL 63.27% 86.77% 2.64% 5.91% 16.9% 7.31% Note: length is unadjusted for boundary roads Appendix A includes fuller descriptions of each of the above noted improvements. Appendix B of this report includes a discussion of Pavement Structure and defects. 6 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

30 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, State of the Infrastructure 3.1 Scope / Asset Type(s) This report addresses road assets only. The content will provide review and analysis of the road system from a number of perspectives including condition rating, functional classification, roadside environment, replacement cost and Regulation 239/2 classification. 3.2 Road System Inventory and Classification Road sections within road systems may be classified in a number of ways, to illustrate their roadside environment, surface type, functional classification, and so forth. The classifications provide assistance in developing further information, with respect to the road system, such as replacement costs and performance expectations. 3.3 Surface Types and Roadside Environment Roadside environment and surface type criteria of a road section are useful in characterization of the road section, and in determining costs for replacement, reconstruction and rehabilitation treatments. The Inventory Manual classifies the roadside environment as Rural, Semi Urban or Urban. The classification is determined by length, servicing, and adjacent land use. Rural Roads within areas of sparse development, or where development is less than 5% of the frontage, including developed areas extending less than 3 m on one side or 2 m on both sides, with no curbs and gutters. Semi Urban Roads within areas where development exceeds 5% of the frontage for a minimum of 3 m on one side, or 2 m on both sides, with no curbs and gutters, with or without storm/combination sewers, or for subdivisions where the lot frontages are 3 m or greater. Urban Roads within areas where there are curbs and gutters on both sides, served with storm or combination sewers, or curb and gutter on one side, served with storm or combination sewers, or reversed paved shoulders with, or served by, storm or combination sewers, or for subdivisions with frontages less than 3 m. Table 3.1 identifies the road system by surface type and roadside environment. 7 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

31 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table 3.1: Surface Type and Roadside Environment Distribution Roadside Environment Rural Semi Urban Urban Total % of Total Surface Type Cl km Lane km Cl km Lanekm Cl km Lanekm Cl km Lanekm Cl km Lanekm Gravel, Stone, Other Loosetop % 52.12% High Class Bit. asphalt % 16.6% Low Class Bit. surface treated % 31.82% Total % of Total 86.24% 86.24% 6.16% 6.16% 7.61% 7.61% 3.4 Minimum Maintenance Standard (MMS) Classification In November 22, Regulation 239/2, Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways (MMS) came into effect. Essentially, if a municipality met the standard and documented it, they would not be negligent per Section 44(3)c of the Municipal Act noted above. Regulation 239/2 provided for a review five years after its original implementation. A process to revise Regulation 239/2, chaired by the Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA), culminated in a revised regulation, Regulation 23/1, coming into effect in February 21. In the late fall of 211, a court decision (Giuliani) was rendered that effectively created case law that negated the protection that the MMS afforded, and in particular, Tables 4 and 5 of the regulation (which address Snow Accumulation and Icy Roads). Essentially, the decision created a new standard that went beyond the MMS. The effect on a municipality is that a higher standard of weather monitoring and documentation and response to monitoring is required. OGRA re called the MMS committee to further amend the regulation, to address the outcome of the Giuliani decision. As a result of the committee meetings and discussions with the province, Regulation 47/13 came into effect, amending Regulations 239/2 and 23/1, on January 25, 213. The Minimum Maintenance Standards do not have to be adopted by a municipal council per se. The regulation is provincial, applies to all municipalities, and is available for municipalities to use as a defense if they have met the standard and documented it. The more important issue would be to ensure that a municipality has the appropriate Standard Operating Procedures (SOP s) in place, and that they are followed and documented, rather than trying to reword or parallel the language of the regulation into a document that is municipality specific. Traffic counts are important for a number of decision making purposes, with respect to the road system. Accurate, defensible traffic counts, in conjunction with the posted speed limits, are used in determining the MMS class of the respective road sections. Roads are divided into six service classes by posted speed and traffic count, with Class 1 being the highest service level and Class 6 being the lowest. There are no service standards for Class 6 roads which have less than 5 vehicles per day. Table 3.2 shows Regulation 239/2 s traffic/speed/ classification 8 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

32 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 matrix. Table 3.2: Regulation 239/2 Minimum Maintenance Standard Road Classification Annual Average Daily Traffic (number of motor vehicles per day) Posted or Statutory Speed Limit (kilometres per hour) , or more , 14, , 11, , 9, , 7, , 5, , 4, , 3, , 2, , 1, As per the Regulation, different road classifications require different response times. For example, the response time that is required to remove snow accumulation is 12 hours for a Class 3 road, and 16 hours for a Class 4. Response time is the time from when the municipality becomes aware that a condition exists, until the time that the condition is corrected or brought within the limits specified in the regulation. This may have a significant impact with respect to the equipment and staffing that may be required to meet the standard, particularly in the case of winter control. The implications are that this increased service level may require the municipality to increase the inspection frequency, staff, and machinery to deliver the service beyond the service delivery hours that may currently exist. The distribution of the MMS Classes across the road system is detailed in Table RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

33 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table 3.3: Minimum Maintenance Standards Class Distribution MMS Class TOTAL Lanes Roadside Cl km Lanekm Cl km Lane km Cl km Cl km Lanekm Lanekm Cl km Lane km 2 R S U TOTAL % OF TOTAL 2.11% 2.11% 82.41% 82.41% 11.66% 11.66% 3.82% 3.82% WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation automatically classifies road sections by the MMS once traffic data and speed limits have been entered. Road Class 3.5 Functional / Existing / Design Classifications Roads are further classified within the database by classes such as Local, Collector, or Arterial and Residential or Industrial. Items 33 and 15 in the Inventory Manual provide further direction on determination of the Existing or Design Classes of road. Generally, the classifications are predicated on the existing use, roadside environment, and anticipated growth over either the ten or twenty year planning horizon. The road sections are classified by the rater, at the time of the field review. Table 3.4 identifies the Functional Road Class Distribution from the Inventory Manual Description Table 3.4: Functional Road Class Distribution Roadside Environment Rural Semi Urban Urban Cl km Lane Lanekm Lane Cl km Cl km km km Cl km Total Lanekm % of Total Lane Cl km km 1 Rural <5AADT % 3.61% 2 Rural AADT % 57.21% 3 Rural AADT % 6.14% 4 Rural AADT % 16.86% Rural AADT % 2.41% C/R Collector Residential %.37% L/R Local Residential % 12.8% LCI Local Commercial industrial % 1.31% Total % of Total 86.24% 86.24% 6.16% 6.16% 7.61% 7.61% 1 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

34 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Horizontal and Vertical Alignment The changes in direction and elevation of the road are referred to as the horizontal and vertical alignment. The changes in direction should be designed and constructed such that the posted speed limit of the road section may be safely maintained throughout the section. If maintaining the posted speed in safety cannot be achieved, then the horizontal or vertical curve would be identified as substandard. Lower volume roads that have not been reconstructed, tend to closely follow (or avoid) the existing contours of the land. In southern Ontario, which is relatively flat, there was a greater tendency to follow the alignments of the original Township surveys. However, where these roads were adjacent to larger streams and rivers, there was still a tendency to follow the topography. The result was/is a road alignment that tends to change vertical and horizontal direction frequently; at times without much notice. When a new road is designed, one of the considerations is the Safe Stopping Distance (SSD). The calculation of the distance to stop safely from any given speed is based upon several factors, such as posted speed limit, reaction times, and friction. When road sections are evaluated for a road needs study, the number of vertical and horizontal curves that appear to be deficient are identified. The identification is based on whether there is sufficient SSD for the posted speed limit. The following table is an excerpt from the Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways, and indicates the SSD s required for various design speeds. Figure 3.1: Safe Stopping Distance (Table C2 1 from MTO Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways) On rural roads, one of the effects of substandard alignments is a decrease in the Average Operating Speed through the road section. An Average Operating Speed that is significantly lower than the posted 11 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

35 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 speed will result in a Geometric Need for the road section. The following table from the Inventory Manual identifies the limits that will trigger a geometric need for typical posted speed limits. Table 3.5: Posted Speed vs. Minimum Tolerable Operating Speed Item Speed Legal Speed Limit Minimum Tolerable Operating Speed The following pictures were not taken in MoTC, but provide examples of potentially substandard alignments. Figure 3.2: Potentially Substandard Vertical and Horizontal Alignment 12 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

36 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table 3.6: Speed Limit Reduction Recommendations Avg Asset ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length AADT Speed Limit Oper Speed Geometrics 114 DONNYBROOK DRIVE 8M WEST OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD 32 DORCHESTER ROAD.8 1, NOW 115 DONNYBROOK DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD 43M EAST OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD NOW 117 DONNYBROOK DRIVE CASHEL LANE END OF STREET NOW 119 CASHEL LANE 33M SOUTH OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD 32 DORCHESTER ROAD NOW 14 PIGRAM ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE NOW Appendix D includes a listing of all of the rural road sections with potentially sub standard vertical or horizontal alignments that should be reviewed for signage, speed reduction, or correction. Any signage should be in conformity with the Ontario Traffic Manual. The alignments have been referred to as potentially substandard as the study undertaken is only a visual assessment of existing conditions. Further engineering review would be required to determine if the curves are substandard and if any additional signage or correction is required. 3.7 Drainage Adequate drainage is critical to the performance of a road to maximize its life expectancy. Roads are designed, constructed, and maintained in order to minimize the amount of water that may enter, or flow over, the road structure. In the case of water flowing over the road, assessment must be made of the circumstances on a sitespecific basis. Factors that should be considered include the traffic volumes of the road section, economic impacts to the loss of the use of the road, upgrade costs, and risks. Water in a road base can cause different reactions at different times of the year. In non freezing conditions, the granular road base can become saturated. Too much water displaces the granular material; it removes the material s ability to support the loads for which it was designed. Too much water in the granular material actually acts like a lubricant, and facilitates the displacement of the material under load. In freezing conditions, water in the road structure can cause frost heave, potholes, and pavement break up as the water freezes and expands. Generally, a saturated granular road base results in structural failure of the road. Figure 3.3 provides an example of a rural road, illustrating what the relationship between the gravel road base and the drainage should be. The relationship is the same in an urban system, although not as obvious. Rural road drainage is typically achieved through roadside ditches. Rural road ditches should be a minimum of 5 mm below the granular road base, to ensure that the road base remains free from moisture and maintains its ability to carry loads. 13 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

37 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Urban roads typically have a storm sewer pipe network that carries the minor storm event. The roadway itself is often part of the overland flow route for the major event. The drainage of the granular road base is accomplished through sub drains installed below the curb and gutter, lower than the lowest elevation of the granular base. This satisfies the same purpose as the ditch in a rural cross section, by providing an outlet to ensure that the granular base remains dry. Figure 3.3: OPSS 2.1 Evaluations of the drainage scores were in part predicated upon the structural score. For example where a road section had virtually no ditch, or very minimal ditching but the road structure did not show any signs of failure typically observed when there is inadequate drainage, then generally a rating was between 12 and 14 and a SD (Spot Drainage) improvement noted. Where it was obvious that the inadequate ditch was exacerbating the distress on the road or there was occasional flooding, the score was further reduced, and the recommended improvement type was some type of major rehabilitation or reconstruction dependent upon the traffic volumes. Table 3.7 provides an overview of the drainage needs of the road system by Time of Need. 14 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

38 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table 3.7: Drainage by Time of Need (Km) Roadside Environment 1 to 5 6 to 1 ADEQ TOTAL Rural Semi Urban Urban TOTAL Maintenance of the drainage system(s) is critical to the long term performance of a road system. Low volume rural roads tend to have a winter maintenance program that includes the application of sand to improve traction. Over time, that sand builds up on the edge of the pavement, to a point where it effectively blocks runoff from getting to the ditch. The runoff is trapped at the edge of pavement, where it saturates that area of the road bed, contributing to the early failure of the edge of the pavement. This element of the road cross section is not scored as part of the overall evaluation. Presence or absence of roadside berms is not evaluated during a road review. This is a maintenance issue. However, if roadside berms are not removed, the effect on the overall pavement is similar to not having a ditch. Water cannot drain from the road and it enters into the granular base potentially saturating it. The saturated base cannot support load. Figure 3.4 was not taken in the MoTC, but does illustrate the foregoing discussion. Figure 3.4: Poor Shoulder Drainage 15 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

39 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Drainage Outlet and Master Planning Correcting drainage issues is not quite as simple as digging a ditch or installing a storm sewer. In Ontario, Common Law for drainage is such that water cannot simply be collected and directed. It has to be directed to a legal, adequate outlet. There are two primary methodologies to achieve the legal outlet; a Class Environmental Assessment Process or a petition for a Municipal Drain under the Drainage Act. The adequate component is an engineering function. As MoTC reconstructs/rehabilitates sections of the road network in the urban and semi urban areas, a Master Drainage Plan should be developed as part of a Class Environmental Assessment process prior to the reconstruction process occurring, in order that both minor and major storm events are dealt with appropriately. 3.8 Boundary Roads Boundary roads are roads that a municipality would have in common with the abutting municipality. In order to manage the joint responsibilities, a Boundary Road Agreement that identifies the responsibilities of both agencies is created. The agreements are usually in writing; however, some are informal. The Boundary Road Agreement should identify costs sharing and responsibility arrangements for maintenance or capital works on the road section. From a risk management perspective, the agreement reduces the risk for one of the parties in the event of a claim, depending upon the content of the agreement. Boundary road reporting can be dealt with in one of two ways: the length can be split to provide a more accurate depiction of the road system that is actually maintained by the agency, or they may not be adjusted. When MTO was providing subsidy, the roads were adjusted for reporting and accounting purposes. For the purposes of this report adjustment has been made to the road system sizes to account for the 5% sharing of the length of the boundary roads. When a boundary is reconstructed on a day labour basis by the adjacent municipalities, the project should be treated no differently than if the work were being tendered. The exposure to risk for the municipality is no different. The assignment of the various aspects of the work should be clear and the timing for completion of the tasks clearly identified and adhered to. Table 3.8 identifies the MoTC boundary roads. Unless otherwise noted, tables in this report have been adjusted for boundary length. The status and responsibilities as they relate to the boundary roads appears to be uncertain in a number of instances. There are also additional roads that have not been included in this report that are potentially boundary roads. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed. 16 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

40 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table 3.8: Municipality of Thames Centre Boundary Roads Adjacent Agency Asset ID Street Name TOTAL Township of South West Oxford 137 PIGRAM ROAD.195 Township of South West Oxford 1375 PIGRAM ROAD.3 Township of South West Oxford 138 PIGRAM ROAD.25 Township of South West Oxford 139 PIGRAM ROAD.729 Township of South West Oxford 14 PIGRAM ROAD.371 Township of South West Oxford 141 PIGRAM ROAD Township of South West Oxford 142 PIGRAM ROAD.555 Township of South West Oxford 143 PIGRAM ROAD.92 Township of Zorra 433 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 1.72 Township of Zorra 434 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 2.15 Township of Zorra 436 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 3.82 Township of Zorra 437 COBBLE HILLS ROAD.783 Township of Zorra 438 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 2.33 Township of Zorra 439 COBBLE HILLS ROAD.842 Township of Zorra 44 COBBLE HILLS ROAD Township of Zorra 441 COBBLE HILLS ROAD.51 Township of Zorra 442 COBBLE HILLS ROAD.78 Township of Zorra 445 HUNT ROAD.54 Township of Zorra 446 HUNT ROAD Township of Zorra 447 HUNT ROAD.63 Township of Zorra 448 HUNT ROAD.42 Township of Zorra 449 HUNT ROAD Township of Zorra 45 HUNT ROAD.1 Township of Zorra 452 HUNT ROAD 1.9 Township of Middlesex Centre 286 PROSPECT HILL ROAD.33 Township of Middlesex Centre 287 PROSPECT HILL ROAD.92 Township of Middlesex Centre 288 PROSPECT HILL ROAD Township of Middlesex Centre 289 PROSPECT HILL ROAD.875 Township of Middlesex Centre 29 PROSPECT HILL ROAD.518 Township of Middlesex Centre 291 PROSPECT HILL ROAD.441 Township of Middlesex Centre 292 PROSPECT HILL ROAD.959 Township of Middlesex Centre 293 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 1.33 TOTAL RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

41 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Road System Condition The provincial requirements for AMP s include asset condition assessment in accordance with standard engineering practices. The road section reviews follow the methodology of the Ministry of Transportation Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads, Road System Condition by Time of Need The Inventory Manual methodology results in overall rating of road sections by Time of Need (TON); NOW, 1 to 5, 6 to 1, or Adeq (Adequate). Table 4.1 below provides a breakdown of the road system by time of Need and MMS Class. Table 4.1: Roads System by Time of Need and MMS Class TOTAL TON Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km Cl km Lane km NOW to to ADEQ TOTAL % OF TOTAL 2.11% 2.11% 82.41% 82.41% 11.66% 11.66% 3.82% 3.82% System Adequacy Good to Very Good Overall Road System Adequacy The system adequacy is a measure of the ratio of the NOW needs to the total system, and includes needs from the six critical areas described earlier in the report. The overall TON is the most severe or earliest identified need. For example a road section may appear to be in good condition, but is identified as a NOW need for capacity, indicating that it requires additional lanes. System Adequacy = Total System (km) NOW Deficiencies (km) X 1 Total System (km) The MoTC currently has a road system adequacy measure of 89.7%. The road system currently measures centreline kilometres (adjusted for boundary roads), with kilometres rated as deficient in the NOW time period. Summarizing the system adequacy by surface type yields the following: 18 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

42 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 System adequacy of hard top roads is 89.4 System adequacy of gravel roads is 9. Typically the system adequacy for gravel surface roads is lower. From other studies, it has been observed that if the gravel roads were evaluated during a spring break up period, there could be a reduction in adequacy of 3% or more. The Inventory Manual provides direction that roads with a traffic volume of less than 5 vehicles per day are deemed to be adequate, even if they have structural, geometric, or drainage deficiencies that would otherwise be identified as being in a Time of Need and were to be corrected within the maintenance budget. This approach is directly parallel to Regulation 239/2, Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Roads, which states that roads with less than 5 vehicles per day, and a speed limit of less than 8 km/hr., are classified as Class 6 with no standard for repair. This factor does have an effect on the system adequacy calculation. Class 6 Roads(less than 5 vehicles per day) are adequate. This accounts for km (3.8%) of the road system. The traditional target adequacy for upper tier road systems (Regions and Counties) was 75%, while a lower tier s target adequacy was 6%. Based on these former MTO targets, which were in effect when the municipal grant system was in place, the target adequacy for the MoTC should be 6%, as a minimum. The minimum target adequacies were established by MTO, to reflect the nature and purpose of the road system. The results suggest that the overall condition of the road system is good. However, this is influenced to some extent by the following factors: The gravel road system was not reviewed during the spring breakup which provide a more accurate assessment of the gravel road network which accounts for over have of the total road network in MoTC. Field observations and staff input on performance history were considered in the development of the scoring. The overall condition may have been influenced by Infrastructure Funds and Grants that have not been identified in the annual funding level but may have been received over the last 1 year period. As noted above, 3.8% of the system is deemed adequate due to having a counted or estimated traffic count of less than 5 vehicles per day. 4.3 Road System Needs Based on the unit costs identified in Table 4.2, the improvements costs have been calculated generally in accordance with the Inventory Manual. Table 4.3 identifies the improvement costs by Time of Need and Improvement Type. The estimates provided in this report are in accordance with the formulae in the Inventory Manual, and utilize the unit costs as identified in Table 4.2. These costs include adjustment factors as per the 19 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

43 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Inventory Manual, such as Basic Construction, Terrain, Contingency Roadside Environment, and Engineering. Table 4.2: Unit Costs Item Unit 215 Costs $ Excavation m Hot Mix Asphalt t 15. Single Surface Treatment m Granular A t 13. Granular B t 1 Conc Curb and Gutter place linear m 55. Conc Curb and Gutter removal linear m 12. Subdrains linear m 2 Storm Sewer 525mm linear m 4 Manholes ea 4,7 - manhole removed ea 1, - manholes Adjust ea 5 Catch Basins ea 2,. Catch Basins removed ea 4 Catch Basin Leads Linear m 175. Catchbasins adjust ea 35 Asphalt Planing m Asphalt Pulverizing m 2 2. Crack Sealing m 2. For the purposes of this report, road sections with a traffic count of less than 5 vehicles per day have been provided with recommended treatment and associated improvement cost; although the TON for these sections is defaulted to ADEQ, realistic improvement recommendations were made based on the observed conditions in order to provide a more accurate assessment of the total network needs.. (The calculations will rate them as adequate due to the traffic count) The road system currently includes km of road sections that had an actual or estimated traffic count of less than 5 vehicles per day. This represents approximately 3.8% of the road system. The total value of the needs identified in this report includes $1,894,22 on these roads sections that received an ADEQ rating related to the low traffic counts. 2 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

44 Imp. ID Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Imp. Description Table 4.3: Improvement costs by Improvement Type and Time of Need Time of Need 1 to 5 6 to 1 ADEQ NOW TOTAL % OF TOTAL Imp. Imp. Class Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Cost Km CRK Crack Sealing Maint 18, , % 2.58% GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel Maint 467, , ,9, % 7.42% GRR2plus 15mm add'l gravel and minor ditching Maint 521, , % 3.26% GRR 75mm of Granular A Maint 81, , , % 8.42% GRRplus Maintenance Gravel and Minor Ditching Maint 362, , , % 5.4% MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation Maint 145, , % 1.23% RSpLimit Reduce Speed limit Maint % SD Spot Drainage Maint % DST Double Surface Treatment Rehab 2, , %.1% PR2 Pulverize and Resurface 2 1mm Rehab 5, , ,42, ,638, % 3.17% PR3 Pulverize and Resurface 3 15mm Rehab 29, , %.11% R1rural R1 Rural Cross Section Rehab 27, , , %.3% R1urban R1 Urban Cross Section Rehab 7, , , %.78% R2urban R2 Urban Cross Section Rehab 244, , %.15% SST Single Surface Treatment Rehab 156, , , % 3.8% SST, Berm Removal, Geometric SSTplus Correction, Minor Ditching Rehab 4, , , % 6.16% BS Base and Surface Const 618, , , ,511, ,438, % 5.38% BSgrav Base and Surface Gravel Const 2,342, , ,514, % 1.62% NONE No Improvement Required Const % REC Reconstruction Rural Const 1,286, ,138, ,53, ,518, ,474, % 29.97% RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewer Const 33, ,113, ,146, % 4.37% RSS Reconstruction with Storm Sewers Const 252, , ,714, ,544, % 2.63% TOTAL 2,557, ,944, ,121, ,19, ,733, RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

45 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Physical Condition The Physical Condition is an alternate method of describing the condition of a road section or the average condition of the road system. The value is the structural adequacy converted to be expressed as a value out of 1, instead of 2. This methodology lends itself to modeling and comparators that may be more easily understood. There isn t a 1:1 relationship between the weighted average physical condition and the system adequacy. As noted in the discussion on System Adequacy, that rating is strongly influenced by the newer roads and the roads deemed adequate due to actual or estimated traffic counts of less than 5 AADT. This rating is based purely on the condition of the road surface regardless of traffic count. The Weighted Average Physical Condition of the road system is currently Remaining Service Life As indicated previously, the Time of Need (TON) is really a prediction model in terms of an estimate based on current condition to the time for reconstruction. The TON then also provides an estimate of the remaining life in the road system/section. The following figure summarizes the structural adequacy ratings of the road system and illustrates the estimated remaining service life of the road system. Figure 4.1: Remaining Service Life 22 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

46 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Record of Assumptions Time of Need (TON), Improvement and Replacement Costs The methodology of this report is such that the Inventory Manual itself forms the basis of a large number of assumptions in terms of: Dimensional requirements for the development of improvement and replacement costs Structural requirements based on road classification Time of needs based on the ratings and subsequent calculations Assumptions for deterioration are included in Appendix E 23 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

47 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Replacement Cost Valuation Program funding recommendations are a function of the dimensional information, surface type, roadside environment, and functional class of the individual assets. Recommended funding for the road system should include sufficient capital expenditures that would allow the replacement of infrastructure as the end of design life is approached, in addition to sufficient funding for maintenance, to ensure that that full life expectancy may be realized. Budgetary recommendations in this report do not include items related to development and growth. The MoTC should consider those items as additional to the recommendations in this report. Generally, that type of improvement or expansion to the system would be funded from a different source, such as Development Charges. The budget recommendations bear a direct relationship to the value of the road system. 4 Roads estimates the cost to replace the road system, to its current standard, at $162, 758,9. This estimate is based on the unit costs identified in Table 4.2. All formulae for improvement and replacement costs are as generally per the Inventory Manual Appendix F. Average replacement costs are identified in Table 5.1. Table 5.1: Average Replacement Costs Functional Class Replacement Cost R S U TOTAL Length Replacement Cost Length Replacement Cost Length Replacement Cost Length (km) $$ /km 1 3,322, ,322, , ,984, ,984, , ,61, ,61, , ,839, ,839, , ,151, ,151, ,58 C/R 396, , ,276, ,183 L/R 7,628, ,49, ,118, ,17,249 LCI 1,472, ,99, ,463, ,21 TOTAL 17,899, ,498, ,36, ,758, RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

48 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Asset Condition Assessment and Plan Updates. 6.1 Condition Assessment Cycle Recommendation 4 Roads would recommend that the entire road system be reviewed on a maximum four year cycle. The evaluations may be undertaken annually, bi annually or at the four year interval. The unit costs, budget recommendations, update history and models should be updated annually. 25 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

49 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Level of Service (LOS) Level of Service has a different meaning for different interests. For instance, the cost per unit may not have an impact to a ratepayer whose chief concern may be service delivery. Similarly, cost or expenditure per unit may not illustrate the condition of the asset to the end user. Further, municipalities are required to report on various municipal performance measures (MPMP Municipal Performance Measures Program). LOS is Schedule 8, Statistical Info Section 11, Transportation Services, Line 172 in the FIR report. 4 Roads believes that multiple service measures may be required to adequately relate the condition of an asset to the various user groups; condition, operating costs, and end user. The following sections identify various measurements of service of the road system 7.1 Current Level of Service Measurement System Adequacy As described earlier in the report, the system adequacy is the ratio of the NOW need roads to the total system. This is a holistic measure as, using the Inventory Manual Methodology, needs are identified in six critical areas, not just the distress on the road surface. The current system adequacy is 89.7%. The System Adequacy should be maintained at 6% or higher. Physical Condition Physical condition is the Structural Adequacy rating multiplied by five to produce a rating of between 5 and 1. This is a measure of the amount of distress on the road however the scale is not linear. The current weighted average Physical Condition of the road system is This includes road sections with less than 5 AADT The weighted average Physical Condition should be 6 or higher. MPMP Good to Very Good The province requires annual reporting on the percentage of roads that are rated as good to very good. It has been assumed that the 6 1 and adequate roads are good to very good and this has been expressed as a percentage of the system. Good to very good roads represent 88. % to 9.9% of the road system dependent upon the measures used. This includes road sections with less than 5 AADT. The Good to Very Good roads should be 6% or higher. 26 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

50 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Asset Management Strategy 8.1 Asset Management Overview Asset management has almost as many definitions as there are agencies that manage assets. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) defines asset management as... a strategic approach to managing transportation infrastructure. It focuses on business processes for resource allocation and utilization with the objective of better decision making based upon quality information and well defined objectives. The document entitled Managing Public Infrastructure Assets, 21, prepared by AMSA, AMWA, WEF, and AWWA, defines asset management as: managing infrastructure assets to minimize the total cost of owning and operating them, while continuously delivering the service levels customers desire, at an acceptable level of risk. The Province of Ontario s document Building Together Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans indicates: The asset management strategy is the set of actions that, taken together, has the lowest total cost not the set of actions that each has the lowest cost individually Regardless of the source of the definition, the key themes that keep being repeated are; Managing Strategic Effective Efficient $$$$$!! Service Optimizing asset life cycle Risk Management As an absolute minimum, the objective of any asset management plan, or strategy, should be to ensure that the overall condition of an asset group does not diminish over time. The asset management strategy of an agency is heavily predicated, and inextricably linked, to the available funding. Most agencies are not fully funded, and a large number are not even funded sufficiently as to maintain the current condition of their system. Given those circumstances, the strategy should be twofold: Develop the financial plan in order that there is sufficient funding to maintain the condition of the road system. Focus on a pavement management strategy that utilizes available funding on preservation and resurfacing programs as a priority. Reconstruction and replacement candidates will remain reconstruction and replacement candidates and cost increases will be incremental with 27 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

51 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 inflation. Preservation and resurfacing opportunities that are missed will escalate in cost by several hundred percent depending on site specifics. 8.2 Priority Rating vs. Condition Rating Information in a database may be sorted and analyzed in numerous ways. Understanding what information a data field represents, is key to the analysis. The Inventory Manual has many rated and calculated data fields and thus provides for many ways to sort data. Some commonly used representations, or sorting of information, from the database include: Priority Rating Priority Guide Number Structural Adequacy (Condition) Priority Rating is a calculated field in the Inventory Manual, and is a function of the traffic count and the overall condition rating of the road section. This approach adds weight to the traffic count of the section. Although the word priority is included in the field name, a road section that has a higher calculated Priority Rating is not necessarily a higher priority in the broader sense of asset management. Similarly, a road agency may choose to sort the road sections based on condition and cost per vehicle. The Priority Guide Number data field would assist in providing that analysis, as sorting on that parameter would prioritize road sections that have higher traffic and thus a lower cost per vehicle. Developing a road capital program around the Priority Rating or Priority Guide Number fields will result in programming that would lead to a less efficient expenditure of funds and reduced system performance per budget dollar, as road sections with high traffic and in poor condition would be selected first, as opposed to selecting the best rehabilitation candidates at the appropriate time in their life cycles. The exception to this statement would be cases where rehabilitation funding is at a high enough level to ensure that the preservation program requirements can be met. From a more current asset management perspective, project selection should be predicated by condition. (Structural Adequacy or Physical Condition). Figure 8.1 clearly illustrates the financial advantages of managing the road system by performing the right treatment at the right time of the asset life cycle. If appropriate strategies are not undertaken at the correct time, there is a less effective usage of the available funding. 28 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

52 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Figure 8.1: Treatment Cost vs. Deterioration Ideally, if a road is constructed and maintained with timely appropriate maintenance and resurfacing, the road system will reach a point where the majority of the activities will be preservation and resurfacing. Figure 8.2 clearly illustrates the effect on the life span of a pavement by applying the correct treatment at the correction time in the life cycle. Figure 8.2: Pavement Management The Right Treatment at the Right Time Source: Wirtgen Cold Recycling Manual 29 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

53 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 If an agency s budget is fully funded, the programming will include reconstruction, resurfacing, and preservation programs. Prioritization within the different programs will vary as demands are different. However, within the resurfacing and preservation programs, the pavement condition should drive the decision making. Where funding is limited, resurfacing and preservation programs should be prioritized over the construction program. The effect of this approach will be that NOW need roads will remain NOW needs. However, by virtue of their NOW need condition, NOW need roads will require increased maintenance and likely generate increased complaints from the driving public. To deal with this eventuality, a municipality should create a maintenance paving budget, over and above the resurfacing budget. The purpose of this budget is to defer the reconstruction needs, and reduce maintenance efforts and complaints until the road can be reconstructed. 8.3 Cross Asset Integration and Project Prioritization Prioritizing projects from a purely asset management perspective is a relatively straightforward exercise, regardless of funding level. Complications arise when the specific needs, commitments of the agency, and priorities of other utilities factor into the decision making process. The road system is, in reality, a utility corridor. Multiple utilities in both urban and rural roadside environments will present conflicting demands and priorities in advancing projects. The Road Needs Study provides ratings that deal strictly with the condition of various factors as they relate to the road section. Those factors have to be considered in conjunction with needs and priorities that may exist for other utilities or pending development. In fact, the condition of other infrastructure within the road allowance may be the key element in the prioritization. For example, a road rated as a reconstruction project may have a relatively low priority rating, but a trunk storm sewer servicing a greater area may require immediate installation. The priority of the road is then dictated by the other utility, and should be integrated into the capital plan, to best serve all interests. Less tangible priorities may also be project prioritization tools for some agencies. For example, an agency may want to advance projects that also include bus routes or bike lanes. As a municipal road program is developed, opportunities to complete work on smaller sections adjacent to the main project, at a lesser cost than if completed as a stand alone project, should be considered to realize economies of scale, and complete improvements that may otherwise be passed over. 8.4 Gravel Roads Management Strategy MoTC has a gravel road system of approximately 181 centre line kilometres. The budget recommendation is $1,96,4 annually, for the materials only. Proper maintenance of a gravel road surface is deceptively expensive. Costs include gravel, dust control, and grading. Frequently, budget analysis proves that the per kilometre cost of gravel road maintenance is greater than the per kilometre cost for hard top maintenance. 3 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

54 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Roads understands that the MoTC has aggressively been converting their gravel roads to hard top. This practice should be continued. The gravel road conversion program should be integrated into the overall road asset management plan and further integrated into a maintenance /upgrade strategy that optimizes the existing MoTC resources and contracted services on an as required basis. Road agencies in both Canada and the United States, have conducted studies that have generally indicated that, dependent upon local unit costs, gravel road conversion to hardtop, can be a costeffective strategy. One source indicates that this may be effective management for roads with traffic volumes as low as 1 AADT. Appendix C of this report includes additional information on gravel road conversions including a flow chart to illustrate the decision matrix for conversion. Benefits to converting a gravel road include: Customer satisfaction Reduced maintenance costs for routine maintenance Reduced maintenance costs for winter maintenance Based on the criteria identified in Appendix C, Table 8.1 identifies gravel road conversion candidates that meet the criteria for conversion. 31 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

55 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table 8.1: Gravel Road Conversion Candidates Asset ID CW ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE BOT ROAD LEWIS ROAD DOAN DRIVE BRIDGE PIGRAM ROAD M EAST OF 74 WESTCHESTER THOMPSON DRIVE BOURNE CULVERT THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT CULVERT THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE LEWIS ROAD RAIL TRACKS PIGRAM ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE FIVE POINTS ROAD RAIL TRACKS BREEN ROAD LEWIS ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE RAIL TRACKS HARRIS ROAD 7M SOUTH OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD 39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE TRAFALGAR STREET 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET BANKS ROAD TRAFALGAR STREET BANKS ROAD 17M WEST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD(PVMT WYTON DRIVE CHANGE) 47M WEST OF 27 NISSOURI ROAD WYTON DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD WYTON DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE OLIVER DRIVE 38M EAST OF 27 OLIVER DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD OLIVER DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT OLIVER DRIVE CULVERT RAIL TRACK OLIVER DRIVE RAIL TRACK 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) OLIVER DRIVE 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD OLIVER DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD BRIDGE OLIVER DRIVE BRIDGE CHERRY HILL ROAD OLIVER DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD 49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE VALLEY VIEW ROAD EAST END GREGORY DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD HERITAGE ROAD GREGORY DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD 24M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD VALLEY VIEW ROAD ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE VALLEY VIEW ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD VALLEY VIEW ROAD 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD CENTRE DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD 37M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD STOREY DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD STOREY DRIVE BRIDGE RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

56 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Asset ID CW ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE GREGORY DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD GREGORY DRIVE CULVERT FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD M SOUTH OF 16 PLOVER MILLS FAIRVIEW ROAD ROAD CULVERT FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT OLIVER DRIVE M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE(PVMT FAIRVIEW ROAD OLIVER DRIVE CHANGE) FAIRVIEW ROAD EVELYN DRIVE BRIDGE M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD HERITAGE ROAD ROAD BRIDGE HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE GREGORY DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD GREGORY DRIVE CULVERT AT # HERITAGE ROAD CULVERT AT # PLOVER MILLS ROAD M SOUTH OF 16 PLOVER MILLS PURPLE HILL ROAD ROAD OLIVER DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD OLIVER DRIVE CULVERT PURPLE HILL ROAD CULVERT 44M NORTH OF 28 THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) PURPLE HILL ROAD 56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE) WYTON DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD WYTON DRIVE 4M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE) PURPLE HILL ROAD PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE BRIDGE PURPLE HILL ROAD BRIDGE 49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD CHERRY HILL ROAD ROAD BRIDGE CHERRY HILL ROAD CULVERT BRIDGE CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE RAIL TRACK CHERRY HILL ROAD RAIL TRACK GREGORY DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD GREGORY DRIVE PLOVER MILLS ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD OLIVER DRIVE M SOUTH OF MARION STREET HUNT ROAD 1M NORTH OF CATHERINE STREET Total RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

57 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Program Funding Recommendations 9.1 Overview Program funding recommendations are a function of the dimensional information, surface type, roadside environment, functional class of the individual assets and current unit costing. Recommended funding for the road system should include sufficient capital expenditures that would allow the replacement of infrastructure as the end of design life is approached, in addition to sufficient funding for maintenance, to ensure that that full life expectancy may be realized. Budgetary recommendations in this report do not include items related to development and growth; those should be considered as additional. Generally, that type of improvement or expansion to the system would be funded from a different source, such as Development Charges. The budget recommendations bear a direct relationship to the value of the road system. 4 Roads estimates the cost to replace the road system, to its current standard, at $162,758,9. The budget recommendations provided in this report are based on the constitution of the road system. This represents an opportunity to develop a financial plan in concert with the asset management plan, for a phased implementation. 9.2 Capital Depreciation The estimated replacement/depreciation value of the MoTC road system to the current standard is $162, 758,9. This equates to an annual capital depreciation of $3,255,2 over 5 years. The annual capital depreciation is strictly a function of the replacement cost and the design life, and would best be described as an Accountaneering number. This estimate does not include bridges, culverts, cross culverts less than 3 m, sidewalks, or street lighting. The typical design life for a road structure is 5 years before reconstruction/replacement. If the life span is 5 years, then 2% of the replacement cost should be the annual contribution to the capital reserve, to ensure that it can be reconstructed in that time frame. The estimated replacement/depreciation is based upon the replacement value of the road system over a 5 year life cycle. However, the 5 year life cycle can only be a reality if maintenance and preservation treatments such as crack sealing and hot mix asphalt overlays are delivered at the appropriate time. Inadequate maintenance and preservation will result in premature failure and increased life cycle costs. Analogies to houses and cars sometimes make road maintenance easier to understand. If a house does not have the roof renewed within the correct time frame, there will be damage to the structure, below the roof, and if this is not dealt with, it will result in a rapid deterioration of the house. Similarly, roads require crack sealing and resurfacing at the appropriate time, during the life cycle, in order to maximize the life expectancy of the asset. Preservation and maintenance extend the useful life of the pavement, reducing life cycle costs. 34 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

58 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Hot Mix Resurfacing Roads require major maintenance throughout the life cycle, in order to optimize and maximize the asset life span. Roads require resurfacing at the appropriate interval, for the respective class of road. Different agencies categorize the expense differently, usually dependent upon the dollar value; however, resurfacing is essentially a maintenance activity. Resurfacing schedules are dependent upon traffic loading and the percentage of commercial traffic. Higher traffic volumes and percentages of commercial traffic shorten the interval between resurfacings. Optimal resurfacing intervals will vary from ten to twenty years (or more), depending upon the road function, classification, and quality of design and construction. The Hot Mix Asphalt Resurfacing recommendation in this report is based upon the distribution of the Township s hot mix asphalt inventory. As such, the optimal budget calculation will focus on the 19 year interval (18.7), for hot mix roads. Given the aforementioned, and the information with respect to surface type contained in Table 3.1, the funding for the annual resurfacing program should be $686,5 per year on average, in order to maintain the system at its current adequacy level. This estimate is for the major resurfacing work only, and does not include any estimated costs for other pavement preservation activities or programs. Table 9.1 identifies the distribution of hot asphalt roads by asset class and the basis for the recommendation for the annual program budget recommendation. Table 9.1: Hot Mix Asphalt Roads by Asset Class and Life Cycle Asset Class L.C. Yrs A/C R 2 A/C S 2 A/C U 2 HCB1 R 1 HCB1 S 1 HCB1 U 1 HCB2 R 12 HCB2 S 12 HCB2 U 12 Average Annual Cost Asset Qty. Unit Cost Weighted Average HCB3 R 15 $ $ 8, HCB3 S 15 $ 18, $ 9, HCB3 U 15 $ 63, $ 23, HCB4 R 2 $ 178, $ 6, HCB4 S 2 $ 51, $ 7, HCB4 U 2 $ 373, $ 17, TOTALS RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

59 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, Surface Treatment Resurfacing Most agencies report that the average life of surface treated road is seven years. Similar to the concept applied to the development of the hot mix resurfacing recommendations, the surface treated road network should be completely resurfaced every seven years, or approximately 14% of the surface treated inventory in each calendar year. At a unit cost of $2.75 per square metre, the annual program size should be $388,2, on average, exclusive of hot mix asphalt padding and other preparatory work. 9.5 Gravel Road Resurfacing When MTO was providing maintenance subsidy, the standard practice for gravel road maintenance was to place approximately 75 mm of gravel on each gravel road section, every three years. Since the conditional grant system was discontinued, a large number of municipalities have reduced the amount of gravel that has been placed on gravel roads, to the point where the gravel roads in the system are a major maintenance problem, particularly in the latter part of the winter and early spring. If the granular base is not replenished, the road structure will disappear through normal usage, and the remaining gravel typically becomes contaminated by other materials, such as the native soil and winter sand. MoTC has 181 km of gravel surfaced roads, as per Table 3.1 of this report. Using the Town s benchmark costing, the annual gravel resurfacing program size should be $1,96,4 per year, based on adding 75 mm of gravel, across the entire platform, every three years. This estimate does not include costs for regrading, dust control, or gravel road conversion. 9.6 Crack Sealing Crack sealing is a preservation activity that extends the life of a hot mix asphalt surface. A program estimate is provided based on crack sealing one metre per two lane metre of pavement every five years at the unit cost provided by the MoTC. Based on that premise, the recommended average budget for crack sealing is $23,7 annually. 9.7 Annual Budget Adjustments Inflation The typical approach to annual budget adjustments is to adjust with some reference or consideration to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Public Works Departments have not fared well with this approach, as a large portion of the Public Works Budget is expended on commodities and services that typically vary/increase at a rate significantly higher than the CPI. Public Works Departments annual increases based solely on CPI, will generally result in a continual downward spiral in overall condition of the road system and service levels. Decreasing service levels increase risk. Ontario is becoming much more 36 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

60 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 litigious; therefore, the reduction in service levels increases the risk for a municipality, and the cost of service provision versus the cost of litigation should be considered. In recent years, increases in fuel, asphalt, and salt have been disproportionate to the CPI. As such, consideration should be given to annual increases in road funding, over and above the CPI. Some municipalities provide for such disproportionate increases in their budget process, in order that the specific impacts of a commodity price increase and service delivery are considered. Plant Adjustment Most municipalities experience development related growth. Growth comes at a cost, both in the longer term, with additional resurfacing and replacement requirements, and in the shorter term, with Operational budgets. Operational budgets should be adjusted on a pro rata basis to account for the additional length of road that has to be maintained. Capital budgets and forecasts should also be adjusted annually, to reflect the changes in the system, and integrated into the longer term financial plan. 9.8 Performance Modeling Budget Effect on System Performance Asset Management Plan (AMP) and Strategy Analysis The asset management plan is a function of the strategy and available financing. The development process for all elements is iterative, concurrent and holistic on a number of levels. It is complex. The provincial guidelines for the preparation of an AMP indicate that the following must be considered; Options must be compared on Lifecycle cost the total cost of constructing, maintaining, renewing and operating an infrastructure asset throughout its service life. Future costs must be discounted and inflation must be incorporated. Assessment of all other relevant direct and indirect costs and benefits associated with each option. o Direct benefits and Costs Efficiencies and network effects Investment scheduling to appropriately time expansion in asset lifecycles Safety Environmental Vulnerability to climate change o Indirect Benefits and Costs Municipal wellbeing and costs Amenity values Value of culturally or historically significant sites Municipal image Assessment of Risks associated with all potential options. Each option must be evaluated based on its potential risk, using an approach that allows for comparative analysis. Risks associated with each option can be scored based on quantitative measures when reasonable estimates can be made of the probability of the risk event happening and the cost associated with the risk 37 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

61 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 event. Qualitative measures can be used when reasonable estimates of probability and cost associated with the risk event cannot be made. Significant effort (and expense) will be required to meet all of these requirements. Performance Model Overview A properly developed performance model will satisfy the majority of the requirements identified in the foregoing. Key elements of a Performance Model will include: Deterioration Curves identifying anticipated deterioration of an appropriately constructed asset over the life cycle of the asset Trigger points throughout the deterioration curve identifying appropriate treatments at condition ranges Current costing for all treatments identified To capture the essence of the provincial requirements, development and use of a Performance Model is recommended. Through modeling and the resultant outputs, the following may be addressed: Review of options and lifecycle effects based on a Return on Investment Analysis Efficiencies and network effects Budget requirements to achieve LOS goals It is respectfully suggested that a 1 year AMP can be developed through a Performance model, however, 4 Roads is of the opinion that a number of other requirements that the province has identified should not be addressed until they reach the project stage. Further, a number of those requirements would be addressed through a Class Environmental Assessment process. Through performance modeling appropriate budget levels, programming and associated costs can be determined, delivering key elements of any plan that can be refined or revisited as circumstances change. Once a model is developed, then the effect of any alternatives may also be measured. 9.9 System Performance at Various Budget Levels This report includes budget recommendations for various aspects of the programming that are typical to road departments. System performance can be predicted based on the level of funding. 4 Roads has prepared four different 5 year performance models for the road system. The models have been prepared with the following parameters: Zero budget demonstrates the effect of no work being performed on the road system and how quickly it will deteriorate. Existing budget This budget includes the activities of those identified in the recommended budget to preserve the system: Hot Mix Asphalt resurfacing, surface treatment, crack sealing, and gravel road resurfacing. 38 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

62 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Preservation budget This includes the total dollar value of the budget recommendations for Hot Mix Asphalt resurfacing, surface treatment, crack sealing, and gravel road resurfacing. Capital Depreciation / Amortization budget full replacement cost of the road system annualized. The Weighted Average Physical Condition of the road system is currently The performance model calculations all begin with the current Physical Condition and for purposes of the graphing, the year end Physical Condition is displayed based on the effects that the improvements have had on the overall condition of the road system. In reviewing the results of the performance models, it should be understood that, with the methodology being used, the trigger for a resurfacing activity of a hard surfaced road is a Physical Condition of 7. At appropriate funding levels, the system condition improves over time. However, the improvement in terms of the Physical Condition will typically only increase to approximately the high 7 s to the low 8 s, depending on the system. The initial observation from the graph is that the existing funding level does not appear to be sufficient to sustain the road system in the long term. This would be in conflict with the condition data as it appears that the road system is in relatively good condition overall. Contributing factors to this apparent discrepancy include: The gravel road system was not reviewed during the spring breakup. Field observations and staff input on performance history were considered in the development of the scoring. The overall condition may have been influenced by Infrastructure Funds and Grants that have not been identified in the annual funding level. As noted above, 3.8% of the system is deemed adequate due to having a counted or estimated traffic count of less than 5 vehicles per day. Reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower volume roads appears to be undertaken by Road Operations staff and it does not appear that municipal equipment is charged against activities in the Operating Budget. Anecdotal information is that the unit costs for gravel resurfacing is approximately 25% less than the unit costs for gravel in the subdivision construction ($13 vs $1). It appears that gravel roads are being upgraded to hard surface roads through the capital program, so this would offset, to some extent, the gravel road resurfacing requirement. It should be noted that the Capital depreciation model will typically only expend the full dollar value of that budget in the earlier years of the program. With adequate funding, once a road has been reconstructed, and if it is maintained and resurfaced at the correct condition, it should perform well for several decades. 39 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

63 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Figure 9.1: Performance Modeling at Various Budget Levels *Current Municipal budget does not appear to include equipment and machinery costs for construction work performed by municipal staff. The deterioration curves that have been used consider an average/typical performance for the various road classes. When used in the model at a reasonable funding level, the overall average system condition will remain at a similar level, as the model will treat the pavements as perpetual. This concept is illustrated in Table 9.2 using MoTC Section 1835: Neely Court, as an example. Table 9.2: Sample Section Life Cycle Year Imp. Type Cost Asset ID 1835 Neely Court, 12m North of Durham St. to 29 Hamilton Rd Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Start Value End Value ROI 217 RNS $ 234, , , CRK $ , , MICRO $ 8, , , R1 $ 87, , , CRK $ , , MICRO $ 8, , , R1 $ 87, , , CRK $ , , RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

64 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Figure 9.2: Graphical Representation of a Typical Life Cycle and Strategy Cost Differential (Asphalt Road Surface) Figure 9.3: Annual Expenditures Budget to Maintain 41 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

65 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 For the purposes of a short to mid term plan, considering the pavement as performing as a perpetual pavement does not pose a problem. The aggregate road base will deteriorate over time: however, the time frame where that may be contributory to the road decline would be beyond 5 years. Condition data is collected regularly, and monitoring and analysis would alert the municipality to changes that are occurring. Figure 9.3 illustrates the typical effect on budget requirements by holding the condition of the system at a specified level. If the orange line represented the average annual expense, the budget years above that line would require debt financing or funding from reserves. Conversely, in those years where the funding requirement is less than the annual average, then the unspent funds would accumulate in a reserve. Deterioration curves developed by 4 Roads have been utilized for development of funding and prediction models, and based on our experience with a large cross section of municipalities and resultant feedback, we believe that those deterioration profiles are representative. The models indicate that the overall condition of the road system will continue to increase over time to a point where the average physical condition will be in the high 7 s range. A physical condition beyond that level may be indicating an over expenditure/inefficiency in the programming. An average physical condition above 7 would indicate that the average road only requires maintenance and /or resurfacing. 9.1 Record of Assumptions Performance Modeling Pavement Classification for Modeling In order to develop budget recommendations, 4 Roads adds an additional classification of roads differentiated by surface type, roadside environment and traffic volume. It is anticipated that each road classification will deteriorate at a different rate. Differentiation by roadside environment within a classification permits calculation of the different replacement costs to reflect the servicing and feature differences. Table 9.3: Road Asset Classes Asset Class Subtype Material AADT Low AADT High A/C All A/C 1 1, CM All C/M 1 3, CON All CON 1 1, GST1 All G/S 1 1, HCB1 ART HCB 2, 1, HCB2 ART HCB 1, 2, HCB3 All HCB 1, 1, HCB4 All HCB 1 1, ICB All ICB 1 3, LCB1 All LCB 1 2, 42 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

66 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Figure 9.4 illustrates treatment selection by time and asset classes for hot mix roads. Typical treatments and/or improvements have been superimposed over the deterioration curves, to illustrate the general timelines for implementing the treatments. Other road asset classes have been treated similarly. An important concept to remember is that as a road deteriorates the cost of rehabilitation increases. The deterioration curves, improvement types, current unit costs and current condition ratings are essentially the assumptions used to develop budget and programming recommendations in this report. Appendix E provides detail on the deterioration curves for all road asset classes. Figure 9.4: Treatment Selection vs. Condition (Asphalt Surfaces) Year Program Appendix F includes the results of a 1 Year program based on the ROI Performance model at the current funding level as identified in the following chart extracted from the 1 year Capital Budget. The resultant project selection from the model may vary from the current program and forecast as the model will select projects based on best ROI initially and then expend remaining funds on other projects. The model can be a starting point for program development but has to be metered with decisions than cannot be easily introduced into a model. 43 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

67 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Table 9.4: Performance Model Summary Ten Year Program Imp.Type Year Grand Total BS 11,954 25,558 37,512 BSgrav 696, ,451 CRK 17,792 12,443 1,624 1,674 31,195 2,76 4,56 1,142 4,37 6,762 83,134 DST 2,396 2,396 GRR2 13, , , ,14 18,721 81, ,6 1,15,33 39, ,566 4,482,532 MICRO 2,741 35,569 11,663 3,61 37,592 3,474 54,799 22,271 2, ,559 PR2 25,859 44,11 381, ,588 2,96 136,67 1,142,166 R1 12,15 322,888 91, ,468 1,8,232 2,258,387 R1rural 27,922 17,258 8, ,733 R1urban 7,61 246,62 327,447 27,87 28, ,956 R2urban 244, ,314 RNS 211,75 28,176 24,62 181,372 85,9 SST 177,85 27, ,443 8, , ,54 961, ,58 416,734 9,83 3,217,47 SSTplus 55,73 55,73 GRR2plus 45,78 79, ,647 Grand Total 1,486,68 1,486,545 1,485,384 1,486,364 1,486,361 1,486,16 1,486,427 1,485,953 1,486,555 1,486,422 14,862, RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

68 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, State of the Infrastructure Roads Recommendations In addition to the budgetary recommendations, the following recommendations are provided for the management of the road inventory. 1. The information and budget recommendations included in this report should be used to further develop and evolve the corporate Asset Management Plan. 2. A regular review of the condition of the road system should occur at a maximum four year interval. The review cycle be undertaken at a 4 year interval or segmented annually or biannually. 3. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed. 4. The unit costs, budget recommendations, update history and performance models should be updated annually. 5. The System Adequacy should be maintained at 6% or higher. 6. The weighted average Physical Condition should be at 7 or higher. 7. The Good to Very Good roads should be at 6% or higher. 8. Programming should be reviewed to ensure that resurfacing and preservation programs are optimized. 9. The overall road system should have traffic counts updated on a 3 to 5 year cycle. The counting should include the percentage of truck traffic and the date. 1. The gravel road conversion program should be continued. 11. Roads sections where potentially substandard horizontal and vertical alignment have been identified, should be reviewed to ensure signage is in compliance with the Ontario Traffic Manual. (Listing provided in Appendix D) 12. Road sections with substandard width should be signed accordingly as an interim measure. (Table ES 5 provides a listing.) 13. The results and recommendations for programming within this report should be integrated with the other assets groups to ensure available funding is optimized. 14. Some consideration should be given to calculating equipment costs for activities and projects undertaken by Thames Centre staff to better reflect total project costs and to allow for more direct comparisons of alternate service delivery methodologies. 45 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

69 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix A. Inventory Manual Methodology Overview RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

70 Asset Condition Rating Methodology The provincial requirements for AMP s include asset condition assessment in accordance with standard engineering practices. The road asset reviews generally conform to the methodology of the Ministry of Transportation Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads, Inventory Manual History From the 196 s until the mid 199 s, the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) required municipalities to regularly update the condition ratings of their road systems in a number of key areas. The process was originally created by the MTO as a means to distribute conditional funding, on an equitable basis, between municipalities. The reports were referred to as a Road Need Study (RNS) and were required in order to receive a conditional grant to subsidize municipal road programs. After the introduction in the 196 s by the MTO, the methodology evolved into the current format by the late 197 s. The most current version of the Inventory Manual is dated 1991, and is the methodology used for this report and supported by WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation Software. The practice was discontinued by a number of municipalities when conditional funding for roads was eliminated in the mid 199 s. Inventory Manual Overview The Inventory Manual Methodology is a sound, consistent, asset management practice that still works well today, and in view of the increasing demands on efficiency and asset management, represents a sound road asset inventorying and management system. Road system reviews should be repeated on a cyclical basis. The road section review identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended rehabilitation strategy. To put terminology in a current context, the past Road Needs Study is now The State of the Infrastructure Report (SotI). The SotI analyzes and summarizes the road system survey data collected (or provided) and provides an overview of the overall condition of the road system by road section, including such factors as structural adequacy, drainage, and surface condition. The study also provides an indication of apparent deficiencies in horizontal and vertical alignment elements, as per the Ministry of Transportation s manual, Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways. The report provides an overview of the physical and financial needs of the road system, which may be used for programming and budgeting. However, once a road section reaches the project design stage, further detailed review, investigation, and design will be required to address the specific requirements of the project. Asset Management by its very nature is holistic. Managing a road network based solely on pavement condition would be critically deficient in scope in terms of the information required to make an informed decision as to the improvements required on a road section. Appendix A 1

71 The Inventory Manual offers a holistic review of each road section, developing a Time of Need (TON) or an Adequate rating in six areas that are critical to municipal decision making: Geometrics Surface Type Surface Width Capacity Structural Adequacy Drainage Evaluations of each road section were completed generally in accordance with the MTO s Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads (1991). Data collected was entered directly into WorkTech s Asset Manager Foundation software. Condition ratings, Time of Need, Priority Ratings, and associated costs were then calculated by the software, in accordance with the Inventory Manual. Unit costs for construction are typically provided by municipal staff. Road sections should be reasonably consistent throughout their length, according to roadside environment, surface type, condition, cross section, speed limit, or a combination of these factors. As an example, section changes should occur as surface type, surface condition, cross section, or speed limit changes. The Condition Ratings, developed through the scoring in the Inventory Manual, classify roads as NOW, 1 to 5, or 6 to 1 year needs for reconstruction. The Time of Need is a prediction of the time until the road requires reconstruction, not the time frame until action is required. For example, a road may be categorized as a 6 to 1 year need with a resurfacing recommendation. This road should be resurfaced as soon as possible, to further defer the need to reconstruct. Field data is obtained through a visual examination of the road system and includes: structural adequacy, level of service, maintenance demand, horizontal and vertical alignment, surface and shoulder width, surface condition, and drainage. The Condition Rating is calculated based upon a combination of other calculations and data. To best utilize the database information and modern asset management concepts, it has to be understood that the Time of Need (TON) ratings are the estimated time before the road would require reconstruction. NOW needs are still roads that require reconstruction; however, it is not intended that 1 to 5 and 6 to 1 year needs are to be acted on in that timeframe. The 1 to 5 and 6 to 1 year needs are current candidates for resurfacing treatments that will elevate their structural status to ADEQ, and offer the greatest return on investment for a road authority(notwithstanding a drainage or capacity need, etc.). Appendix A 2

72 NOW Needs NOW needs represent the backlog of work required on the road system. A NOW need is not necessarily the highest priority from asset management or return on investment perspectives. Construction improvements identified within this time period are representative of roads that have little or no service life left and are in poor condition. F Theoretically a resurfacing strategy is never a NOW need, with the exceptions of a PR1 or PR2 treatment recommendation (Pulverize and resurface one or two lifts of asphalt) and where the surface type is inadequate for the traffic volume. If a road with an improvement recommendation of resurface deteriorates too far, it becomes a NOW construction need. A NOW need rating may be triggered by substandard ratings in any of the Structural Adequacy, Surface Type, Surface Width, Capacity, Drainage, or Geometrics data fields. 1 to 5 Year Needs 1 to 5 Identifies road sections where reconstruction is anticipated within the next five years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), thus deferring the need to reconstruct. Appendix A 3

73 6 to 1 Year Needs 6 to 1 Identifies road sections where reconstruction improvements are anticipated within six to ten years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), thus deferring the need to reconstruct. ADEQ An ADEQ rating encompasses a wide range of conditions that include the following: Roads with a traffic volume of less than 5 vehicles per day will be deemed adequate, and deficiencies on those roads are to be corrected with the maintenance budgets Gravel Roads with a structural adequacy rating that is not a NOW need (more than 25% distress) is adequate; there is no further differentiation by time period Roads that do not require improvement other than maintenance Appendix A 4

74 INVENTORY MANUAL TREATMENTS Table A.1: Road Improvement Types Code R1 R2 RM PR1 PR2 BS RW REC RNS RSS NC SRR Micro* SST* SSTplus* DST* Description Basic Resurfacing Basic Resurfacing Double Lift Major Resurfacing Pulverizing and Resurfacing Pulverizing and Resurfacing Double Lift Tolerable standard for lower volume roads Rural and Semi Urban Cross sections only Resurface and Widen Reconstruction Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub drain, remove and replace curb and gutter, granular, and hot mix) Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers and manholes in addition to the above) Proposed Road Construction Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement Microsurfacing (Preservation Activity) Application of a Single Surface Treatment Single Surface Treatment, Geometric Padding/Correction, Ditch improvements Double Surface Treatment *Additional Improvement Types developed by 4 Roads not included in the Inventory Manual Types of Improvements For each Type of Improvement (Item 14), there are a number of specific road improvements that are included in the total cost relative to the Roadside Environment (Item 32) and the Design Class (Item 15). The computer will check a number of Items on the appraisal sheet in order to select the appropriate factors and cross section standards and then calculate the Bench Mark Cost. For example, a Resurfacing and Widening improvement coded under Item 14 is a significantly different road cross section and cost when applied to a rural road vs. an urban arterial. The computer will make all of the necessary checks to arrive at the recommended improvement cost. Described in the following pages are the road improvements and associated construction activities costed for each Type of Improvement listed under Item 14. Please note, that the Codes (CO) Carry Over, (SR) Spot Road, (SI) Spot Intersection and (SD) Spot Drainage are direct cost inputs and are not included in the Bench Mark Cost system. Appendix A 5

75 (R1) BASIC RESURFACING (Single Lift of Hot Mix 5 mm) Rural and Semi Urban Roads (Cross Section A) (a) Hot mix padding for 2% of area to be resurfaced (b) Single life of hot mix (5 mm) (c) Granular material to raise shoulders to new surface grade Urban Roads Granular Base (Cross Section B 1) Concrete Base (Cross Section C 1) (a) Minor base repairs for 1% of area to be resurfaced (b) Hot mix padding for 2% of area to be resurfaced (c) Curb removal and replacement on both sides for 5% of section length (d) Planning 1.m of existing pavement along both curbs (e) Adjust manholes and catch basins to new surface grade (f) Single lift of hot mix (5 mm) (R2) BASIC RESURFACING (Double Lift of Hot Mix 1 mm) Rural and Semi Urban Roads (Cross Section A) (a) Hot mix padding for 2% of area to be resurfaced (b) Double lift of hot mix (1 mm) (c) Granular materials to raise shoulder to new surface grade Urban Roads Granular Base (Cross Section B 1) Concrete Base (Cross Section C 1) (a) Minor base repairs for 1% of area to be resurfaced (b) Hot mix padding for 2% of area to be resurfaced (c) Curb removal and replacement on both sides for 5% of section length (d) Planning 1. m of existing pavement along both curbs (e) Adjust manholes and catch basins to new surface grade (f) Double lift of hot mix (1 mm) (RM) MAJOR RESURFACING (Double Lift of Hot Mix 1 mm) Urban Roads (Arterials and Collectors) Granular Base (Cross Section B 1) Concrete Base (Cross Section C 1) (a) Base repairs for 5% of area to be resurfaced (b) Planning for 5% of area to be resurfaced (c) Curb removal and replacement on both sides for 5% of section length (d) Adjust manholes and catch basins to new surface grade (e) Double lift of hot mix (1 mm) Appendix A 6

76 (PR1) PULVERIZING AND RESURFACING (Single lift of Hot Mix 5 mm) Rural Roads (Cross Section A) (a) Pulverize existing hard top surface (b) Single lift of hot mix (5 mm) (c) Granular material to raise shoulders to new surface grade (PR2) PULVERIZING AND RESURFACING (Double Lift of Hot Mix 1 mm) Rural Roads (Cross Section A) (a) Pulverize existing hard top surface (b) Double lift of hot mix (1 mm) (c) Granular material to raise shoulders to new surface grade (BS) BASE AND SURFACE Rural Roads Tolerable Standard (5 to 1 AADT) (Cross Section D) (a) Granular material for base (b) Granular material for loose top surface (c) Minimal shoulder widening (d) Minor Ditching Rural Roads Design Standard (2 to 399 AADT) (Cross Section D) (a) Placing granular material (b) Minimal shoulder widening (c) Double surface treatment (d) Minor ditching Rural Roads Design Standard (4 plus AADT) (Cross Section D) and Semi Urban Roads Design Standard (Cross Section D) (a) Placing granular material (b) Minimal shoulder widening (c) Hot mix (5/1 mm, see table F 1) (d) Minor ditching (RW) RESURFACE AND WIDEN Rural Roads Tolerable Standard (5 to 199 AADT) (Cross Section E) (a) Excavating for widening (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement (c) Granular material for widening base (d) Granular material for loose top surface Rural Roads Design Standard (2 to 399 AADT) (Cross Section E) (a) Excavating for widening (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement (c) Granular material for widening base (d) Double surface treatment Appendix A 7

77 Rural Road Design Standard (4 plus AADT) (Cross Section E) and Semi Urban Roads Design Standard (Cross Section E) (a) Excavating for widening (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement (c) Granular material for widening base (d) Base Course of hot mix for widening (e) Hot mix Padding for 2% of existing surface area (f) Single life of hot mix (5 mm) Urban Roads Design Standard Granular Base (Cross Section F) (a) Excavating for widening (b) Curb and Gutter removal (c) Catch Basin removal (d) Base repair 1% of existing surface area (e) Granular material for widening (f) Place catch basins and leads (g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub drains (i) Base course of hot mix for widening (j) Hot mix padding for 2% of existing surface area (k) Adjust manholes to new surface grade (l) Single lift of hot mix (5 mm) curb to curb Urban Roads Design Standard Concrete Base (Cross section G) (a) Excavating for widening (b) Curb and gutter removal (c) Catch basin removal (d) Base repair for 1% of existing surface area (e) Place new catch basins and leads (f) Granular material for widening (g) Concrete base for widening (h) New curb and gutter (i) New subdrains (j) Base course of hot mix for widening (k) Hot mix padding for 2% of existing surface area (l) Adjust manholes to new surface grade (m) Single lift of hot mix (5 mm) curb to curb Appendix A 8

78 (REC) RECONSTRUCTION (RURAL and SEMI URBAN) Rural Roads Design Standard (2 to 399 AADT) (Cross Section H) (a) Excavate base material (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement (c) Grading (d) Granular material (e) Double surface treatment Rural Roads Design Standard (4 plus AADT) Cross Section H) and Semi Urban Roads Design Standard (Cross Section H) (a) Excavate base material (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement (c) Grading (d) Granular material (e) Hot mix (5/1 mm, see Table F 1) Rural and Semi Urban Roads Design Standard (Concrete Surface) (Cross Section P) (a) Excavate base material (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement (c) Grading (d) Granular Material (e) Concrete base and surface (RNS) RECONSTRUCTION NOMINAL STORM SEWERS (URBAN) Urban Roads Design Standard Granular Base (Cross Section I) (a) Excavate base material (b) Curb and gutter removal (c) Granular base (d) New curb and gutter (e) New sub drains (f) Adjust manholes and catch basins (g) Hot mix (5/1 mm, see Table F 1) Urban Roads Design Standard Concrete Base (Cross Section J) (a) Excavate base material (b) Curb and gutter removal (c) Granular base (d) Concrete base (e) New curb and gutter (f) New sub drains (g) Adjust manholes and catch basins (h) Hot mix (5/1 mm, see Table H 5) Appendix A 9

79 Urban Roads Design Standard Concrete Surface (Cross Section O) (a) Excavate base material (b) Curb and gutter removal (c) Granular base (d) Concrete base and surface (e) New curb and gutter (f) New sub drains (g) Adjust manholes and catch basins (RSS) RECONSTRUCTION INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF STORM SEWERS Urban Roads Design Standard Granular Base (Cross Section K) (a) Excavate base material (b) Curb and gutter removal (c) Storm sewer removal (d) Manhole and Catch Basin removal including leads (e) New storm sewers (f) New manhole and catch basins including leads (g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub drains (i) Granular base (j) Hot mix (1/15 mm, see Table F 1 Urban Roads Design Standard Concrete Base (Cross Section L) (a) Excavate base material (b) Curb and gutter removal (c) Storm sewer removal (d) Manhole and Catch Basin removal including leads (e) New storm sewers (f) New manhole and catch basins including leads (g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub drains (i) Granular base (j) Concrete base (k) Hot mix (5/1 mm, see Table F 1) Urban Roads Design Standard Concrete Surface (Cross Section Q) (a) Excavate base material (b) Curb and gutter removal (c) Storm sewer removal (d) Manhole and Catch Basin removal including leads (e) New storm sewers (f) New manhole and catch basins including leads (g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub drains (i) Granular base (j) Concrete base and surface Appendix A 1

80 (NC) PROPOSED ROAD CONSTRUCTION Rural Roads Design Standard (2 399 AADT) (Cross Section H) (a) Grading (b) Ditching and cross culverts (c) Granular base (d) Double surface treatment Rural Roads Design Standard (4 plus AADT) (Cross Section H) (a) Grading (b) Ditching and cross culverts (c) Granular base (d) Hot mix (5.1 mm, see Table F 1) Semi Urban Roads New Construction does not apply to semi urban roads as there is no existing frontage development. Urban Roads Design Standard Granular Base (Cross Section K) (a) Grading (b) Storm Sewers (c) Manholes and catch basins including leads (d) Curb and gutter (e) Sub drains (f) Granular base (g) Hot mix (1 mm/15 mm, see Table F 1) Urban Roads Design Standard Concrete Base (Cross Section L) (a) Grading (b) Storm Sewers (c) Manholes and catch basins including leads (d) Curb and gutter (e) Sub drains (f) Granular base (g) Concrete base (h) Hot mix (5 mm/1 mm, see Table F 1) Appendix A 11

81 (SRR) STORM SEWER INSTALLATION AND ROAD REINSTATEMENT (URBAN AND SEMI URBAN) Urban and Semi Urban Roads Granular Base (Cross Section M) (a) Trenching and removal of existing storm sewers (b) New manholes and adjust catch basin leads (c) New storm sewer including bedding (d) Granular materials in trench (e) Hot mix to restore surface grade (1/15 mm, see Table F 1) Urban and Semi Urban Roads Concrete Base (Cross Section N) (a) Trenching and removal of existing storm sewers (b) New manholes and adjust catch basin leads (c) New storm sewers including bedding (d) Granular material in trench (e) Concrete base for trenched area (f) Hot mix to restore surface grade (5/1 mm, See Table F 1) Urban and Semi Urban Roads Concrete Surface (Cross Section R) (a) Trenching and removal of existing storm sewers (b) New manholes and adjust catch basin leads (c) New storm sewers including bedding (d) Granular material in trench (e) Concrete base and surface for trenched area (MICRO) SINGLE LIFT OF MICROSURFACING Urban, Semi Urban and Rural Roads with a HCB (High Class Bituminous) surface type (a) Unit cost per square metre of Microsurfacing (SST) SINGLE LIFT OF SURFACE TREATMENT Urban, Semi Urban and Rural Roads with a LCB (Low Class Bituminous) surface type (a) Unit cost per square metre of Single Surface Treatment (SSTplus) SINGLE LIFT OF SURFACE TREATMENT, GEOMETRIC CORRECTION DITCHING IMPROVEMENTS Semi Urban and Rural Roads with a LCB (Low Class Bituminous) surface type (a) Unit cost per square metre of Single Surface Treatment (b) 2% Surface area padding to 5mm to correct geometric deficiencies (c) Earth Excavation allowance to provide for minor ditch improvements and berm removal Appendix A 12

82 (DST) DOUBLE LIFT OF SURFACE TREATMENT Urban, Semi Urban and Rural Roads with a LCB (Low Class Bituminous) surface type (a) Unit cost per square metre of Double Surface Treatment Appendix A 13

83 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix B. Pavement Structure and Defects RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

84 Pavement Structure To assist in understanding the content and methodology of the report, the following discussion provides an overview of how flexible and rigid pavement structures are designed and function. The majority of municipal roads would be described as having a flexible pavement structure. Hot mix asphalt, surface treatment, and gravel road surfaces are typical flexible pavement road structures. Other pavement structure types include rigid and composite, and are more typically found on 4 series highways, or on arterial roads of larger urban centres. Flexible Pavement Road Structure Load is applied to the pavement structure, and ultimately to the native sub grade, via wheel loads of vehicles. The pavement structure between the native sub grade and the load application point has to be designed such that the load that is transmitted to the sub grade is not greater than the sub grade s ability to support the load. The figure below shows a typical flexible pavement structure and how applied load dissipates. Load Distribution through Pavement Structure From MTO Depth Below Surface Stress (psi) Stress (Kpa) At Surface (2 mm) Below (275 mm) Below (4 mm) Below Surface materials experience the highest loading at the point of contact with the vehicle s tire. Radial truck tires, running from 11 psi to 12 psi, can have an impact 2 times higher at the surface, than at the compacted sub grade. The loading actually occurs in three dimensions, in a conical fashion, dissipating both vertically and horizontally as it passes through the pavement structure. Loading Appendix B 1

85 decreases exponentially as it passes through the road structure. Therefore, materials of lesser strength or lesser quality can be used deeper in the road structure. As a rule of thumb, the closer the road building materials are placed to the surface of the road, the higher the quality required. Similarly, the poorer the sub grade or native material, the deeper/stronger the road structure has to be to carry the same loads. Traffic counts, and the percentage of trucks, are critical to structural design of the pavement. Depending upon the source, the effect of a single truck on the pavement structure can be equivalent to 2, to 8, passenger cars. The effect of farm machinery would be very similar to that of heavy trucks. However, the Highway Traffic does permit certain types of farm machinery and equipment to use the roads even during half load season, so this is an additional consideration when designing rural roads. Pavement evaluation involves a review of each road section and an assessment of the type and extent of the distress(es) observed. Treatment recommendations are predicated by whether the cause of the major distress(es) is structural or non structural. Flexible pavements will have age related distresses and wearing such as thermal cracking and oxidation. These distresses are non structural; however, once a crack develops and water enters the pavement structure, deterioration will accelerate. Poor construction practices, quality control, or materials may produce other non structural surface defects, such as segregation and raveling, which will also result in a reduced life expectancy of the surface asphalt. Fatigue cracking indicates structural failure and can manifest itself in many forms, such as wheel path, alligator, and edge cracking. It can be localized or throughout a road section. When roads that have exhibited fatigue cracking are rehabilitated, there should be particular attention paid to the rehabilitation treatment, to ensure that the upgraded facility has sufficient structure. Wheelpath Fatigue Cracking Appendix B 2

86 Flexible Pavement Road Structure Design There are a number of flexible pavement structural design methodologies and associated software. The simplest way to describe structural design may be the Granular Base Equivalency (GBE) Methodology. This GBE methodology is still used in Ontario, by a number of agencies, and is frequently used as a crosscheck where more sophisticated analysis has been undertaken. The measurement is unit less and relates to the structural value of one millimetre of Granular A material. The relationship of the typical road building materials is expressed in either of the two following ways: Or 1 mm of HMA = 2 mm of Granular A = 3 mm of Granular B HMA = 2, Granular A = 1, Granular B =.67 To gain some perspective on what this means in terms of typical construction activities, the following table indicates a typical subdivision road construction as expressed in GBE. Granular Base Equivalency Material Example 1 Depth Granular Base Equivalency Example 2 Depth Granular Base Equivalency Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Granular A Granular B 3 2 TOTAL When reconstruction and rehabilitation projects are undertaken, and use of alternate materials and/or road structure is contemplated, the GBE concept is important to bear in mind, as different treatments such as Expanded Asphalt and Cold in Place recycling also have a structural value. For design purposes, it may be prudent to use a conservative equivalency of 1.5 for these products (although, some sources indicate GBE s of up to 1.8). As an example, if a 2 mm pavement is replaced with 15 mm of Expanded Asphalt or Cold in Place Recycling, with a 5 mm overlay of Hot Mix asphalt, a pavement structure with a GBE of 4 is replaced by a pavement structure with a GBE of 325; a significant difference. Premature failure will be the result of an under designed pavement structure, wasting resources and available funding. The purpose of this example is to illustrate the different structural values that products have. Expanded Asphalt and Cold in Place recycling are both excellent products to rehabilitate pavement structures when used appropriately. The MTO s Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual is an excellent resource for use in pavement structure design and rehabilitation, and is available from the online MTO Catalog. Appendix B 3

87 Thin Lift Pavements Hot mix asphalt mixes are designed in Ontario either by the Marshall Method or the Superpave Method. Through time, this has resulted in a number of commonly used mixes that are typically sorted by size. One of the parameters used to describe that sizing is the Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size (NMAS). In the Marshall Mix Method, typical mix designations are HL1, HL2, HL3, HL4, and HL8. In the Superpave mix design methodology, mixes are designated by the NMAS. The following table identifies the NMAS for the more commonly used mixes, and indicates recommended minimum lift thicknesses for them. Recommended Minimum Lift Thicknesses Mix Type NMAS (mm) Lift Thickness Range (mm) SP to 4 SP to 5 SP to 8 HL to 55 HL to 65 HL to 8 Thin Lift Pavement *Thin lift with inappropriate aggregate size Appendix B 4

88 Rigid Pavement Structure Rigid Pavements are constructed of concrete, or concrete with an asphalt wearing surface. The fundamental difference between a flexible pavement and a rigid pavement is the method in which the load is transferred. Whereas the flexible pavement disperses load through the pavement structure in a conical fashion, with a higher point load directly beneath the loading point, the rigid pavement structure distributes that load in a beam like fashion, more evenly across the pavement structure. Rigid pavements may have an exposed concrete wearing surface, or they may be covered with an asphaltic concrete wearing surface. The resulting rigid pavement structure is usually thinner overall, when compared to a flexible pavement, designed to accommodate the same traffic loading. This does not necessarily translate into a reduced cost of construction. Any comparison of costs between flexible and rigid pavements should be on a life cycle basis, for the most accurate assessment. Older concrete pavements were prone to failure at joints, as load transfer caused a slight movement in the concrete slab, and with the intrusion of water, a structural failure. Newer concrete pavements are designed with improved load transfer technology. Figure 1 Flexible vs. Rigid Pavement Structure(s) Flexible Pavement Distresses and Treatment Selection Treatment recommendation is dependent upon the condition of the road section at the time of the review. Treatment Selection Critical Area Analysis When using the Inventory Manual methodology all of the holistic needs are considered in the recommendation. For example, a road may appear to require only a resurfacing, however, when the other critical areas are reviewed, there may be a capacity problem which would then result in a recommendation to resurface and widen (RW) that would address both the pavement condition and the need for additional lanes. Another example would be where the pavement is exhibiting some type of Appendix B 5

89 distress but there is also poor drainage. The recommendation would then be to reconstruct (REC if rural, RSS if urban). Treatment Selection for Non Structural Rehabilitation Resurfacing recommendations are predicated upon the type and extent of distress noted. For example, all pavements will develop thermal/transverse cracking as they age. As the age of the pavement increases, the frequency of the cracking increases. If the spacing of he cracks is still greater than 1m, then the R1 resurface with one lift of asphalt treatment will typically be sufficient to restore the road as the treatment provides for overlay and base asphalt repair. However, if the frequency of transverse cracking, which may have become transverse alligator cracking if left unattended too long, then the recommendation will be more extensive, such as a PR2 Pulverize and resurface with 2 lifts of asphalt. The following illustrates transverse cracking. Transverse /Thermal cracking Treatment Selection for Structural Rehabilitation Road sections exhibiting structural failure such as fatigue cracking require a more extensive rehabilitation to restore the performance of the road section. In simple terms, placing a single lift of asphalt over structurally failed asphalt will guarantee the same failure in a very short time period. Unless the single lift overlay is placed knowingly as a holding strategy, it should be avoided on structurally deficient pavements. For pavements that have failed structurally or have too much transverse cracking, the recommendation is typically PR2 as a minimum provided the drainage is adequate or requires only minor improvement. Reflective Cracking Paving over an active crack(s) will result in a crack(s) in the same location with 2 to 3 years. As a rule of thumb, the crack will migrate through at approximately 25mm per year. Therefore it would be Appendix B 6

90 anticipated that if a 5mm overlay is placed, then the cracking would reappear in approximately 2 years. This is not an efficient usage of available funding. Structurally Failed Pavement The above figure illustrates a pavement that has failed both structurally and has very frequent severe transverse cracks. Placement of a 5mm overlay over this type of pavement condition will result in rapid failure is not recommended. The figure below illustrates a newer pavement that already has very frequent transverse cracks appearing, likely the result of paving over a failed pavement. Under normal circumstances, the first transverse cracks generally appear in approximately 4 to 6 years and the cracks are 4m to 5m or more apart. Reflective Transverse Cracking on Newer Pavement Appendix B 7

91 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix C. Gravel Road Conversion RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

92 Gravel Road Conversion Gravel Road Maintenance Overview Gravel roads tend to be the forgotten asset. Gravel roads form a component of the road asset group for the municipality and should be managed as any other asset. One of the difficulties in determining the deterioration of a gravel road is that the wearing surface and the granular layers are one and the same, so the extent of deterioration may not be as obvious until the deterioration is significant. Appropriate gravel road maintenance can be deceptively expensive and frequently, budget analysis proves that the per kilometre cost of gravel road maintenance is greater than the per kilometre cost for hard top maintenance. This is further exacerbated as traffic volume on a gravel road increases. Like other road assets, gravel roads have lifecycle maintenance and rehabilitation costs that should be addressed as part of any asset management plan. Life cycle costs include regular addition of gravel, dust control, grading and labour. Grading will typically include equipment costs for a motor grader. A Net Present Value (NPV) assessment comparing life cycle of a gravel surface vs. hard top surface would be a key element in determining the merit of converting a gravel road to hard top. NPV Analysis Components Process Given the above noted, a Net Present Value (NPV) assessment of the gravel road, in comparison with a surface treated road section or other hard top surface, should be undertaken as it may be more costeffective to convert/upgrade the gravel road to a surface treated road. Road agencies in both Canada and the United States, have conducted studies that have generally indicated that, dependent upon local unit costs, gravel road conversion to hardtop, can be a costeffective strategy. One source indicates that this may be effective management for roads with traffic volumes as low as 1 AADT. It is preferable to address the cost comparisons over a period of time where the life cycles may conclude concurrently. For instance, if the gravel maintenance is on a three year basis and the surface treatment is seven, then the cycles coincide at 21 years. Total life cycle cost over that time period should be considered. Gravel This report provides an annual cost for maintenance costs for 75mm of additional gravel to be added every three years and does not included regular grading or dust control. This was a typical standard that was used in the past by many municipalities. Due to the natural life cycle wear and tear, maintenance and winter control activities, gravel roads require additional gravel on a regular basis to ensure continuing performance. Equipment As part of a holistic review of service delivery, consideration should be given to the equipment hourly rates and replacement. Accurate hourly rates are required to provide a true assessment. Equipment rates should include capital depreciation and operating costs. Appendix C 1

93 One of the factors driving the overall cost is the equipment that is required to properly maintain a gravel road system particularly graders. Part of the gravel road conversion analysis should include: Has the hourly rate for the equipment been calculated properly to include capital depreciation and maintenance costs? A new grader will cost $ $3, and upward. At a 2 year life span, there is a minimum of $15, in capital depreciation, alone, on the grader. What is the current rate for the grader? If there is not full cost recovery on the grader hourly rate, then the cost for gravel road maintenance is not accurate either. Is the grader used for any other purpose/activities? What is the length of the gravel road system? A commonly used length of gravel roads used to justify a grader is 75 kilometres of gravel. How many hours per year is the grader operated? Are there other pieces of equipment that could be used or rented to maintain the gravel roads? Surface Treatment or other hard top Whatever other surface type is being compared with the gravel road surface should include the same factors as for gravel so there is a 1:1 comparison. Additional Factors and Considerations If the argument for conversion may be made from a financial perspective, then there are additional factors that should be considered from physical and risk perspectives. Other factors for consideration include: Platform width Drainage Structural Adequacy Traffic Volume and Type The figure below provides a graphical illustration of the different factors and decision flow that may be considered in developing a case to convert a gravel road to hard top. Benefits to converting a gravel road include: Customer satisfaction Reduced maintenance costs for routine maintenance Reduced maintenance costs for winter maintenance Reduced complaints Appendix C 2

94 Gravel Road Conversion Matrix Appendix C 3

95 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix D. Potential Substandard Alignment RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

96 Geometric Needs by Street Name Current Insp - Rural w/curve Needs Only ID Street Name From Description To Description Length RDSD AADT Limit Op. Speed TON H.Curve H. SSD V. Curve V.SSD 5 AVON DRIVE MUNICIPAL LIMIT 142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL.142 R ADEQ 1 LIMIT (BRIDGE) 122 BREEN ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD 112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON.112 R ADEQ 1 ROAD 128 BREEN ROAD FIVE POINTS ROAD PIGRAM ROAD.892 R ADEQ CASHEL LANE 33M SOUTH OF DORCHESTER ROAD.33 R NOW 1 DORCHESTER ROAD 26 CENTRE DRIVE PROSPECT HILL ROAD VALLEY VIEW ROAD R ADEQ CHERRY HILL ROAD 9M NORTH OF RAILWAY DUNDAS STREET.679 R ADEQ 2 TRACK 436 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD WYTON DRIVE 3.82 R ADEQ 1 22 COW PATH 44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD LOWER COW PATH R ADEQ 3 9 CROMARTY DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE DORCHESTER ROAD R ADEQ DONNYBROOK DRIVE CASHEL LANE END OF STREET 1.26 R NOW DONNYBROOK DRIVE 8M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD.8 R 1, NOW 1 DORCHESTER ROAD 115 DONNYBROOK DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD 43M EAST OF R NOW 1 DORCHESTER ROAD 275 EBENEZER DRIVE 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL VALLEY VIEW ROAD R ADEQ 2 ROAD 276 EBENEZER DRIVE VALLEY VIEW ROAD EAST END 1.1 R ADEQ 2 24 EVELYN DRIVE 27- NISSOURI ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD 1.43 R ADEQ LOWER COW PATH COW PATH 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON 1.58 R ADEQ 2 ROAD 5225 MILL ROAD 25M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE CHRISTIE DRIVE.25 R ADEQ 1 DRIVE 523 MILL ROAD 25M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DONNYBROOK DRIVE R ADEQ 1 DRIVE 137 PIGRAM ROAD BREEN ROAD 3M NORTH OF SALFORD.195 R ADEQ 1 ROAD 14 PIGRAM ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY.371 R NOW 2 DRIVE 141 PIGRAM ROAD 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY EBENEZER ROAD R ADEQ 1 DRIVE 287 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- SIXTEEN MILE ROAD.92 R ADEQ 2 ELGINFIELD ROAD 317 REBECCA ROAD THORNDALE ROAD WYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG 3.85 R ADEQ VALLEY VIEW ROAD CENTRE DRIVE THORNDALE ROAD R ADEQ 2 13 WHITTAKER LANE CONSERVATION AREA WEST END.278 R ADEQ 1 ENTRANCE 12 WHITTAKER LANE AVON DRIVE CONSERVATION AREA.516 R ADEQ 1 ENTRANCE 248 WYTON DRIVE LAKESIDE DRIVE REBECCA ROAD 1.44 R ADEQ WYTON DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD R ADEQ WYTON DRIVE 27- NISSOURI ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD 1.46 R ADEQ WYTON DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD R ADEQ WYTON DRIVE 88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD 47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD R ADEQ 2 Run: DEC 4,215 4:48PM Page: 1

97 Geometric Needs by Street Name Current Insp - Rural w/curve Needs Only ID Street Name From Description To Description Length RDSD AADT Limit Op. Speed TON H.Curve H. SSD V. Curve V.SSD Run: DEC 4,215 4:48PM Page: 2

98 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix E. Deterioration Curve Detail RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

99 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads Asset Classes In order to utilize the Best Practice and Performance Modeling modules of WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation (WT), assets must be defined by an asset class. Table 1 identifies the road asset classes that have been developed for use in WT by 4 Roads Management Services Inc. Table 1: Road Asset Classes Asset Class Subtype Material RDSE Envt AADT Low AADT High A/C R All A/C R 1 1, A/C S All A/C S 1 1, A/C U All A/C U 1 1, CM1 R All C/M R 1 3, CM1 S All C/M S 1 3, CM1 U All C/M U 1 3, CON R All CON R 1 1, CON S All CON S 1 1, CON U All CON U 1 1, GST1 R All G/S R 1 1, GST1 S All G/S S 1 1, HCB1 R ART HCB R 2, 1, HCB1 S ART HCB S 2, 1, HCB1 U ART HCB U 2, 1, HCB2 R ART HCB R 1, 2, HCB2 S ART HCB S 1, 2, HCB2 U ART HCB U 1, 2, HCB3 R All HCB R 1, 1, HCB3 S All HCB S 1, 1, HCB3 U All HCB U 1, 1, HCB4 R All HCB R 1 1, HCB4 S All HCB S 1 1, HCB4 U All HCB U 1 1, ICB S All ICB S 1 3, ICB U All ICB U 1 3, ICB1 R All ICB R 1 3, LCB1 R All LCB R 1 2, LCB1 S All LCB S 1 2, LCB1 U All LCB U 1 2, Appendix E 1

100 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads Conventional wisdom has been to define road assets by their functional classes such as Arterial, Collector or Local and then further differentiate by usage, such as residential or commercial. From a performance modeling perspective, using the functional classification will only work to a point, as the traffic on a functional class will vary between agencies. 4 Roads believes that the performance/deterioration of a road section is more predictable based on surface type and traffic volume rather than by functional class. Based on that philosophy, Table 1 was created identifying Road Asset Classification by Surface Type, Traffic Volume and Roadside Environment. Roadside Environment has been added to permit the calculation of different replacement costs between rural and urban cross sections. Deterioration Curves When using the Inventory Manual (IM) methodology, Structural Adequacy is a measurement of the percentage of the surface of the road that is exhibiting distress. The rater will consider the type of distress as well as the other critical areas (surface width, capacity, geometry, drainage and surface width) in order to provide a recommendation for an improvement. In the IM, any, or multiple of the critical areas, may produce a Time of Need (TON). The overall TON of the road section is the worst of all of the TON s. For example, if five of the TON s are ADEQ, and one is NOW, the section is a NOW need. It would be possible, but very difficult, to develop performance models around all of the critical areas. So for the purposes of the performance modeling, Structural Adequacy (distress) has been selected to be the driver in the decisions with respect to the model. In the early years of the model, if a project is selected that has an identified improvement type, that improvement will be used for the project in the year that it is selected. In the later years, presumably after all current deficiencies have been corrected the model will revert to the assigned asset class for deterioration and project selection based on estimated condition. All deterioration curves relate to the Physical Condition data field in WorkTech. Physical Condition is the Structural Adequacy multiplied by 5 to produce a score from 5 to 1. The Physical Condition deterioration curve is specific to the Inventory Manual and therefore the trigger points and definition of the curve will be different than other methodologies. It should be noted that different evaluation methodologies will produce varying deterioration curves and trigger points. Familiarity with the rating system being utilized is essential. The deterioration curves are the same for each asset class regardless of roadside environment. For urban sections, the improvement is RSS Reconstruction with Storm Sewers, rather than REC Reconstruction Rural. Appendix E 2

101 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads Figure 1: Physical Condition versus Improvement Selection Where the MTO PCI / Inventory Manual Condition Rating format is being used, the PCI data is entered to produce a PCI score from different formulas that represent the defects and weightings by surface type. The PCI score is then used to approximate a Structural Adequacy score (and a Physical Condition). Table 2 identifies the approximations to convert PCI to Structural Adequacy and a Time of Need. Table 2: PCI to Structural Adequacy Approximations Time of Need ASTM 6344 Structural Adequacy Physical Condition MTO PCI Surface Condition Description Approximation PCI to SA NOW to 7 1 to 35 1 to 55 Now Needs Reconstruction or Major Rehabilitation 1 to to to to 75 1 to 5 year Needs R2 /more extensive rehabilitation 6 to to 14 56to 7 76 to 85 6 to 1 year Needs R1 Resurfacing ADEQ to 2 75 to 1 86 to 1 Adequate Maintenance and Preservation Poor to Very Poor to Failed Fair / Passable Good Satisfactory/ Good/ Excellent IF PCI <=55 then, PCI / 8 = SA IF PCI >55<=75 then, PCI / 7 =SA IF PCI >75<=85 then, PCI / 6 =SA If PCI >85 then, PCI /5.4 =SA Once a Structural Adequacy Score has been determined, the TON is also calculated. What this achieves is the detail of PCI data collection and the strength of the holistic evaluation of the Inventory Manual. Appendix E 3

102 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads Improvement Types Effect on the Asset Appendix A of this report includes a summary of the improvement types that are included in the inventory Manual. In WorkTech there is no restriction on what may be developed as an improvement type for a road agency. However, regardless of the improvement types that are used the effect that the improvement has on the asset has to be understood in order to use performance modeling. The following table identifies a number of improvement types and further identifies the effect that they have on a road asset. A similar approach may be taken with other assets. Code Description Effect on the Asset R1 Basic Resurfacing Single Lift Increase Physical Condition to 97 R2 Basic Resurfacing Double Lift Increase Physical Condition to 1 RM Major Resurfacing Increase Physical Condition to 1 PR1 Pulverizing and Resurfacing Single Lift Increase Physical Condition to 95 PR2 Pulverizing and Resurfacing Double Lift Increase Physical Condition to 1 BS Base and Surface Tolerable Tolerable standard for lower volume roads Rural and Semi Urban Cross sections only Increase Physical Condition to 95 RW Resurface and Widen Increase Physical Condition to 97 REC Reconstruction Increase Physical Condition to 1 RNS RSS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub drain, remove and replace curb and gutter, granular, and hot mix) Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers and manholes in addition to the above) Increase Physical Condition to 1 Increase Physical Condition to 1 NC Proposed Road Construction Increase Physical Condition to 1 SRR Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement No effect CRK Crack Sealing Hold Physical Condition for 2 Years MICRO Microsurfacing Hold Physical Condition for 3 years GRR Gravel Road Resurfacing add 75mm Hold Physical Condition for 3 years GRR2 Gravel Road Resurfacing Add 15mm Increase Physical Condition by 2 The effect that a treatment has on an asset is critical to the analysis. Inaccurate determination of the effect of a treatment on an asset will produce an inaccurate and indefensible result. The following chart is a comparison of the deterioration of a road section without any treatment applied versus a road section that has appropriate treatment at the optimal condition, producing a more cost effective life cycle. Appendix E 4

103 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads Figure 2, shown below, illustrates several different aspects of performance model output including the effect of a treatment on an asset and the effect of multiple treatments undertaken at the optimal asset condition to produce a cost effective management strategy. Figure 2: Performance Model Effect of Treatment on Asset New Construction Deterioration Curves by Surface Type and Traffic Volume The following pages includes tables and graphs indicating the anticipated performance of an appropriately constructed road asset and the condition triggers for treatments. The deterioration curves by asset class used in concert with the table indicating the treatment effect on the asset, and the agency s unit costs, will produce a performance model that demonstrates the effect on the system at various budget levels and produce a program based on input parameters. Appendix E 5

104 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads Gravel Roads All Roadsides, all AADT Year Condition Imp Typet Description 1 1 NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required GRR 75mm of Granular A GRR 75mm of Granular A GRR 75mm of Granular A GRR 75mm of Granular A GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel GRR2 15mm of additional Gravel REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural 4 2 REC Reconstruction Rural 45 2 REC Reconstruction Rural 5 2 REC Reconstruction Rural Appendix E 6

105 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads HCB1 All Roadsides AADT > 2,, assumes 1% Commercial >Year Condition Imp. Type Description 1 1 NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required CRK Crack Sealing CRK Crack Sealing CRK Crack Sealing MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural 4 2 REC Reconstruction Rural 5 2 REC Reconstruction Rural Appendix E 7

106 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads HCB 2 All Roadsides AADT >1, <2,, Assumes 1% Commercial >Year Condition Imp. Type Description 1 1 NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required CRK Crack Sealing CRK Crack Sealing CRK Crack Sealing CRK2 Crack Sealing MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural 4 2 REC Reconstruction Rural 5 2 REC Reconstruction Rural Appendix E 8

107 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads HCB 3 All Roadsides AADT 1, < 1,, Assumes 1% Commercial >Year Condition Imp. Type Description 1 1 NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required CRK Crack Sealing CRK Crack Sealing CRK2 Crack Sealing CRK2 Crack Sealing CRK2 Crack Sealing MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural 4 2 REC Reconstruction Rural 45 2 REC Reconstruction Rural 5 2 REC Reconstruction Rural Appendix E 9

108 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads HCB 4 All Roadsides AADT <1,, Assumes 5% Commercial >Year Condition Imp. Type Description 1 1 NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required CRK Crack Sealing CRK Crack Sealing CRK2 Crack Sealing CRK2 Crack Sealing CRK2 Crack Sealing MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation MICRO Microsurfacing Pavement Preservation R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 5mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 1mm REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural 4 2 REC Reconstruction Rural 45 2 REC Reconstruction Rural 5 2 REC Reconstruction Rural Appendix E 1

109 WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves for Roads LCB All roadsides All AADT s Year Condition Imp. Type Description 1 1 NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required NONE No Improvement Required SST Single Surface Treatment SST Single Surface Treatment SST Single Surface Treatment SST Single Surface Treatment SST Single Surface Treatment SST Single Surface Treatment SST Single Surface Treatment SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural REC Reconstruction Rural 45 2 REC Reconstruction Rural 5 2 REC Reconstruction Rural Appendix E 11

110 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix F. 1 Year Program Based on Existing Funding Level RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

111 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to 23M WEST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD BSgrav $ 75, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD to LACEY LANE BSgrav $ 38, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LACEY LANE to 441M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD BSgrav $ 43, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to 196M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD BSgrav $ 52, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) BREEN ROAD to 3M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD BSgrav $ 6, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE to EBENEZER ROAD BSgrav $ 62, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER ROAD to CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav $ 17, TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 18M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD to HUNT ROAD BSgrav $ 86, VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) CENTRE DRIVE to THORNDALE ROAD BSgrav $ 97, CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE to 69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD BSgrav $ 94, BRADY ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to 3M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav $ 33, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 128M EAST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to FORBES ROAD BSgrav $ 49, SHAIN ROAD ( to ) 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE to SOUTH END BSgrav $ 2, EATON ROAD ( to ) NORTH END to 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE BSgrav $ 18, FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to PRIVATE ROAD CRK $ HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) GUEST LANE to EAST END CRK $ OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE to TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK $ BYRON AVENUE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to CANTERBURY DRIVE CRK $ MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET to RAIL TRACK CRK $ OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE to MITCHELL AVENUE CRK $ OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE to RINESS DRIVE CRK $ LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) AMBER DRIVE to EAST END CRK $ FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE to FOREST GROVE CRESCENT CRK $ AMBER DRIVE ( to ) LINWOOD DRIVE to MARION STREET CRK $ THE PARKWAY ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE to CARLETON COURT CRK $ BYRON AVENUE ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE to DORCHESTER ROAD CRK $ FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) FOREST GROVE CRESCENT to FOREST GROVE CRESCENT CRK $ VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to MANLEY PLACE CRK $ VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY PLACE to MANLEY DRIVE CRK $ VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY DRIVE to 61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVE CRK $ MANLEY DRIVE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT to VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT CRK $ MANLEY PLACE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT to END OF STREET CRK $ HUDSON DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE to MOONLIGHT WAY CRK $ 1, GERALD PARKWAY ( to ) WEST END to 27 NISSOURI ROAD CRK $ 1, Page 1 of 23

112 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) MINNIE STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACK to CATHERINE STREET CRK $ LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET to AMBER DRIVE CRK $ BRIDGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET to 29 HAMILTON ROAD CRK $ THE PARKWAY ( to ) CARLETON COURT to DORCHESTER ROAD CRK $ PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE to PINEHURST DRIVE CRK $ PINEHURST DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE to PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK $ PINEHURST DRIVE ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE to PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK $ QUAIL RUN DRIVE ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE to RINESS DRIVE CRK $ RINESS DRIVE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE to LACROIX AVENUE CRK $ FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) PRIVATE ROAD to WOODVALE DRIVE CRK $ PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK to 2 DUNDAS STREET CRK $ 1, BYRON AVENUE ( to ) WEST END to PINEHURST DRIVE CRK $ ANN STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET to 29 HAMILTON ROAD CRK $ PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE to THE PARKWAY CRK $ BYRON AVENUE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE to PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK $ TURNBERRY DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD DRIVE to QUAIL RUN DRIVE CRK $ TURNBERRY DRIVE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE to MITCHELL COURT CRK $ MITCHELL COURT ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE to WOODVALE DRIVE CRK $ MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE (W) to WOODVALE DRIVE (E) CRK $ MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) WEST END to STARDUST DRIVE CRK $ PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 4M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE to EVELYN DRIVE CRK $ BYRON AVENUE ( to ) OAKWOOD DRIVE to CHITTICK CRESCENT CRK $ OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD to HERITAGE ROAD CRK $ THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) WESTCHESTER BOURNE to 66M EAST OF 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE (P DST $ 2, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 $ 13, OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD PLACE to CHITTICK CRESCENT MICRO $ 2, MITCHELL COURT ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to MITCHELL AVENUE R1urban $ 34, MITCHELL COURT ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE to TURNBERRY DRIVE R1urban $ 36, CARL STREET ( to ) ROSS STREET to CATHERINE STREET SST $ 1, PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to ROSS STREET SST $ 2, RUTH STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to ROSS STREET SST $ 2, PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) ROSS STREET to ROSS STREET SST $ 3, LEWIS ROAD ( to ) 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE to CROMARTY DRIV SST $ BREEN ROAD ( to ) 112M EAST OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD to BRIDGE SST $ 37, Page 2 of 23

113 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) MARION STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET to 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHA SST $ 7, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD to 73 ELGIN ROAD SST $ 45, IRWIN ROAD ( to ) 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE to CROMARTY DRI SST $ A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE to 4M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE SST $ 9, A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE to 3M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE SST $ 7, HARRIS STREET ( to ) 49 CATHERINE STREET to RAIL TRACK SST $ 3, GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD to COBBLE HILLS ROAD SST $ 33, ROBINSON ROAD ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to FIVE POINTS ROAD SST $ 21, ROSS STREET ( to ) PATRICIA AVENUE to DAVID STREET SSTplus $ 4, ROSS STREET ( to ) DAVID STREET to RUTH STREET SSTplus $ 7, ROSS STREET ( to ) RUTH STREET to CARL STREET SSTplus $ 6, DAVID STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to ROSS STREET SSTplus $ 7, AVON DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to DORCHESTER ROAD SSTplus $ 58, AVON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to CULVERT SSTplus $ 19, AVON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to 73 ELGIN ROAD SSTplus $ 121, MARION STREET ( to ) 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE) to CLARA STREET SSTplus $ 21, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to LEWIS ROAD SSTplus $ 95, TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY to 21M WEST OF 32 SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHA SSTplus $ 71, AVON DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT to 142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT (BRIDGE) SSTplus $ 5, GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 24M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT to WEST WELLBURN LIMIT SSTplus $ 7, MINNIE STREET ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE to HARRIS STREET SSTplus $ 2, COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to 28 THORNDALE ROAD SSTplus $ 76, $ 1,486,68 Page 3 of 23

114 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET to CLARA STREET CRK $ RICHMOND STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to CHARLES STREET CRK $ RICHMOND STREET ( to ) CHARLES STREET to CATHERINE STREET CRK $ EVA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET to WEST END CRK $ ERIC DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE to NORTH END CRK $ MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE to NORTH END CRK $ MINNIE STREET ( to ) WEST END to MINNIE STREET CRK $ PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) THE PARKWAY to PINEHURST DRIVE CRK $ QUEEN STREET ( to ) GEORGE STREET to BRIDGE STREET CRK $ MITCHELL COURT ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to MITCHELL AVENUE CRK $ MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) HUDSON DRIVE to EAST END CRK $ COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE to CULVERT CRK $ COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to EVELYN DRIVE CRK $ 2, MITCHELL COURT ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE to TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK $ COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) 28 THORNDALE ROAD to WYTON DRIVE CRK $ 3, HUNT ROAD ( to ) 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET to MARION STREET CRK $ HUNT ROAD ( to ) MARION STREET to 42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET CRK $ DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) 8M WEST OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD to 32 DORCHESTER ROAD CRK $ COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) 78M NORTH OF 2 DUNDAS STREET to DUNDAS STREE CRK $ FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 35M NORTH OF 28 THORNDALE ROAD to 28 THORNDALE ROAD CRK $ GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to 22M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD CRK $ REBECCA ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE WEST LEG to WYTON DRIVE EAST LEG CRK $ REBECCA ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE EAST LEG to SCATCHERED LANE CRK $ OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD to COBBLE HILLS ROAD CRK $ CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE to 4M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE CRK $ THAMES STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to CHARLES STREET CRK $ HILL STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to CHARLES STREET CRK $ CHARLES STREET ( to ) THAMES STREET to HILL STREET CRK $ PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE to PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE CRK $ AGNES STREET ( to ) UPPER QUEEN STREET to MAIN STREET CRK $ PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 25M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD to CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 $ 13, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) CRAMPTON DRIVE to MOUNT ELGIN DRIVE GRR2 $ 16, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 379M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD to LEWIS ROAD GRR2 $ 69, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to LEWIS ROAD GRR2 $ 85, Page 4 of 23

115 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) FORBES ROAD to CULVERT GRR2 $ 18, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to 63M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD GRR2 $ 9, HUNT ROAD ( to ) 54M SOUTH OF 25 GORE ROAD to 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (P GRR2plus $ 45, MILL ROAD ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to MILL ROAD MICRO $ 8, MILL ROAD ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE to TINER WALK MICRO $ 12, OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to OAKWOOD PLACE MICRO $ 6, OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) CHITTICK CRESCENT to BYRON AVENUE MICRO $ 3, VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT to WEST END MICRO $ 1, MAPLEWOOD PLACE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE to END OF STREET MICRO $ 2, BRADLEY AVENUE ( to ) 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY to 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE PR2 $ 25, CLARA STREET ( to ) EVA STREET to IDA STREET R1urban $ 6, TINER AVENUE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE to TINER WALK R1urban $ 86, TINER AVENUE ( to ) TINER WALK to CHRISTIE DRIVE R1urban $ 99, PONDVIEW COURT ( to ) QUEEN STREET to SOUTH END R2urban $ 175, IDA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET to WEST END R2urban $ 69, GOLF DRIVE ( to ) WRIGHT STREET to 35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET RNS $ 31, PARK LANE ( to ) COUNTRYSIDE LANE to FAIRVIEW ROAD RNS $ 18, COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE to CULVERT SST $ 9, COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to RAIL TRACK SST $ 19, HUNT ROAD ( to ) 25 GORE ROAD to 54M SOUTH OF 25 GORE ROAD SST $ PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FIFTEEN MILE ROAD to EBENEZER DRIVE SST $ 1, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) IRWIN ROAD to CULVERT SST $ 18, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD to RAIL TRACKS SST $ 33, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD to IRWIN ROAD SST $ 3, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to BRADY ROAD SST $ 45, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to EATON ROAD SST $ 3, BREEN ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE to 3 PUTNAM ROAD SST $ 4, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to RAIL TRACKS SST $ 18, CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE to TINER AVENUE SST $ 2, CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) TINER AVENUE to MILL ROAD SST $ 3, EATON ROAD ( to ) 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE to CROMARTY DRIVE SST $ FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT to WYTON DRIVE SST $ 42, $ 1,486,545 Page 5 of 23

116 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) TINER AVENUE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE to TINER WALK CRK $ CLARA STREET ( to ) EVA STREET to IDA STREET CRK $ TINER AVENUE ( to ) TINER WALK to CHRISTIE DRIVE CRK $ LEWIS ROAD ( to ) 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE to CROMARTY DRIV CRK $ IRWIN ROAD ( to ) 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE to CROMARTY DRI CRK $ HUNT ROAD ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to SOUTH END GRR2 $ 15, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 $ 6, DOAN DRIVE ( to ) 17M EAST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 72, NISSOURI ROAD ( to ) 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD to NORTH END GRR2 $ 48, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to CULVERT GRR2 $ 2, BRADY ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE to CULVERT GRR2 $ 6, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD to CULVERT GRR2 $ 12, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to 34M WEST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD GRR2 $ 34, FORBES ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR2 $ 47, LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 $ 19, HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) 412M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD to BOT ROAD GRR2 $ 45, THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to CULVERT GRR2 $ 43, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD to RAIL TRACKS GRR2 $ 17, HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 7M SOUTH OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD to 39M NORTH GRR2 $ 75, FORBES ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE to CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 $ 4, EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD to VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRR2 $ 43, DOAN DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE to PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 $ 8, THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) 66M EAST OF 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE to CULVERT GRR2 $ 62, CASHEL LANE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE to 33M SOUTH OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD GRR2 $ 3, FIVE POINTS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to BREEN ROAD GRR2 $ 58, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 14, CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK to GREGORY DRIVE GRR2 $ 31, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) MARR ROAD to CULVERT GRR2 $ 19, CALVERT PLACE ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to EAST END MICRO $ 4, WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT to FOXHOLLOW DRIVE MICRO $ 6, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) UPPER QUEEN STREET to MONTEITH AVENUE PR2 $ 36, PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD to 34M SOUTH OF 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD (P PR2 $ 7, MARION STREET ( to ) 32 SHAW ROAD to LUDWIG STREET R1rural $ 27, GUEST LANE ( to ) HILLVIEW DRIVE to EAST END R1urban $ 51, Page 6 of 23

117 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE to VILLAGE GATE DRIVE R1urban $ 97, TINER WALK ( to ) TINER AVENUE to MILL ROAD R1urban $ 29, CHITTICK CRESCENT ( to ) BYRON AVENUE to MITCHELL AVENUE R1urban $ 54, ERIC DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET to ELIZABETH DRIVE R1urban $ 47, MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET to ELIZABETH DRIVE R1urban $ 46, HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to GUEST LANE SST $ 5, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER DRIVE to FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 5, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to SIXTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 1, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) SIXTEEN MILE ROAD to FIFTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 18, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FOURTEEN MILE ROAD to 44 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 5, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 44 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD to THIRTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 11, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) THIRTEEN MILE ROAD to 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD SST $ 15, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE to PIGRAM ROAD SST $ 15, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) EATON ROAD to BRADY ROAD SST $ 14, DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to THOMPSON DRIVE SST $ 36, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to 3 PUTNAM ROAD SST $ 7, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) PUTNAM ROAD to BRIDGE SST $ 5, ALMA STREET ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to TERRENCE AVENUE SST $ 2, ALMA STREET ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE to THAMES CRESCENT SST $ 2, STARDUST DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE to MOONLIGHT WAY SST $ 14, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (5KM/HR ZONE) to DORCHESTER SST $ 11, LANES ROAD ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE to SOUTH END SST $ 4, LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to 52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANG SST $ 1, DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY to 65M WESTOF 74 WESTCHES SST $ 29, LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) WYTON DRIVE to RIVERVIEW DRIVE SST $ 7, LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) RIVERVIEW DRIVE to WYE CREEK DRIVE SST $ 5, BRADY ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to 42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE SST $ BRADY ROAD ( to ) 3M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE to CRAMPTON DRIVE SST $ EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) PROSPECT HILL ROAD to 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD SST $ 1, WYTON DRIVE ( to ) 27 NISSOURI ROAD to FAIRVIEW ROAD SST $ 32, CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 9M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK to DUNDAS STREET SST $ 16, $ 1,485,384 Page 7 of 23

118 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 63M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to PUTNAM ROAD BS $ 11, VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE to VILLAGE GATE DRIVE CRK $ ERIC DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET to ELIZABETH DRIVE CRK $ MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET to ELIZABETH DRIVE CRK $ TINER WALK ( to ) TINER AVENUE to MILL ROAD CRK $ CHITTICK CRESCENT ( to ) BYRON AVENUE to MITCHELL AVENUE CRK $ BREEN ROAD ( to ) 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK to FIVE POINTS ROAD GRR2 $ 46, BREEN ROAD ( to ) FIVE POINTS ROAD to PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 $ 33, WYTON DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD to PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 $ 47, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 38M EAST OF 27 OLIVER DRIVE to FAIRVIEW ROAD GRR2 $ 47, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD to PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 $ 47, HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) GREGORY DRIVE to CULVERT AT #23124 GRR2 $ 86, CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 58, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 37M EASTOF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 28, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE to FORBES ROAD GRR2 $ 23, BOT ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE to PAVEMENT CHANGE GRR2plus $ 42, WYTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE to 38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD GRR2plus $ 37, FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) PRIVATE ROAD to WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO $ 2, PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 4M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE to EVELYN DRIVE MICRO $ HARRISON STREET ( to ) KING STREET LOOP to CUL DE SAC PR2 $ 45, EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD to COBBLE HILLS ROAD PR2 $ 336, VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) MINNIE STREET to VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT R1 $ 12, VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT to VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT R1urban $ 85, ELIZABETH DRIVE ( to ) ERIC DRIVE to MELVIN DRIVE R1urban $ 69, CARLETON COURT ( to ) THE PARKWAY to CARLETON COURT R1urban $ 116, WRIGHT STREET ( to ) 1M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET to GOLF DRIVE RNS $ 28, HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) GUEST LANE to EAST END SST $ 8, $ 1,486,364 Page 8 of 23

119 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 28 THORNDALE ROAD to 49M SOUTH OF 28 THORNDALE ROAD (PVM BS $ 13, PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M NORTH OF 28 THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) to 28 THORND BS $ 12, NEWTON AVENUE ( to ) 32 SHAW ROAD to LUDWIG STREET CRK $ NEWTON AVENUE ( to ) LUDWIG STREET to HAMILTON CRESCENT CRK $ LUDWIG STREET ( to ) MARION STREET to NEWTON AVENUE CRK $ IDEAL DRIVE ( to ) 28 THORNDALE ROAD to SOUTH END CRK $ VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT to VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT CRK $ ELIZABETH DRIVE ( to ) ERIC DRIVE to MELVIN DRIVE CRK $ CARLETON COURT ( to ) THE PARKWAY to CARLETON COURT CRK $ QUAIL RUN DRIVE ( to ) RINESS DRIVE to LACROIX AVENUE CRK $ GOLF DRIVE ( to ) 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE to WRIGHT STREET CRK $ VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) MINNIE STREET to VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT CRK $ QUEEN STREET ( to ) PONDVIEW COURT to GEORGE STREET CRK $ LACROIX AVENUE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE to RINESS DRIVE CRK $ RINESS DRIVE ( to ) LACROIX AVENUE to OAKWOOD DRIVE CRK $ FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) FOREST GROVE CRESCENT to SOUTH END CRK $ ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) 27 NISSOURI ROAD to LEESBORO TRAIL CRK $ ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) LEESBORO TRAIL to BROOKER TRAIL CRK $ ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) BROOKER TRAIL to SLAMMER TRAIL CRK $ ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) SLAMMER TRAIL to BROOKER TRAIL CRK $ SLAMMER TRAIL ( to ) ELLIOTT TRAIL to ELLIOTT TRAIL CRK $ LEESBORO TRAIL ( to ) ELLIOTT TRAIL to WILLIAM COURT CRK $ LEESBORO TRAIL ( to ) WILLIAM COURT to UNNAMED STREET CRK $ WILLIAM COURT ( to ) LEESBORO TRAIL to WEST END CRK $ MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) THORNDALE ROAD to HUESTON DRIVE CRK $ MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) HUESTON DRIVE to COUNTRYSIDE LANE CRK $ MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) COUNTRYSIDE LANE to HUESTON DRIVE CRK $ MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) HUESTON DRIVE to FAIRVIEW ROAD CRK $ HUESTON DRIVE ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE to MONTEITH AVENUE CRK $ TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 21M WEST OF 32 SHAW ROAD to 32 SHAW ROAD CRK $ HAMILTON CRESCENT ( to ) NEWTON AVENUE to MARION STREET CRK $ PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK $ BREEN ROAD ( to ) 3 PUTNAM ROAD to RAIL TRACK CRK $ COUCH ROAD ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to 41M EAST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD (BEND IN R CRK $ Page 9 of 23

120 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) BREEN ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK to 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK CRK $ 1, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 3 PUTNAM ROAD to 62M EAST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANG CRK $ GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 475M EAST OF 27 WELLBURN ROAD to CHERRY HILL ROAD CRK $ 1, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE to PARK LANE CRK $ TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 32 SHAW ROAD to RICHMOND STREET CRK $ 3, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD to 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD CRK $ VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to 41M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK $ CASHEL LANE ( to ) 33M SOUTH OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD to 32 DORCHESTER ROAD CRK $ CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 441M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to 3 PUTNAM ROAD CRK $ HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to 7M SOUTH OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT C CRK $ LOWER COW PATH ( to ) 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD to 29 HAMILTON R CRK $ CHARLES STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET to THAMES STREET CRK $ DOAN DRIVE ( to ) 15M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to PUTNAM ROAD CRK $ DOAN DRIVE ( to ) PUTNAM ROAD to 17M EAST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD CRK $ TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET to 27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANG CRK $ CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 34M NORTH F EVELYN DRIVE to EVELYN DRIVE CRK $ COW PATH ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to 44M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD CRK $ EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD to PURPLE HILL ROAD CRK $ 2, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 23M WEST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD to 73 ELGIN ROAD CRK $ OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 27 NISSOURI ROAD to 38M EAST OF 27 NISSOURI ROAD CRK $ GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) EAST WELLBURN LIMIT to 475M EAST OF 27 WELLBURN ROAD CRK $ MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 34M WEST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD to 73 ELGIN ROAD CRK $ GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 27 WELLBURN ROAD to EAST WELLBURN LIMIT CRK $ HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to 39M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK $ GEORGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET to MAPLE CRESCENT CRK $ BOT ROAD ( to ) 12M NORTH OF AVON DRIVE to AVON DRIVE CRK $ FERRAR ROAD ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to 76M SOUTH OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT C CRK $ FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) PARK LANE to MEADOWBROOK LANE CRK $ CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK $ HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to 412M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD CRK $ UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) FAIRVIEW ROAD to LIONS LANE CRK $ UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) LIONS LANE to MARIA STREET CRK $ UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) MARIA STREET to AGNES STREET CRK $ UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) AGNES STREET to RAILWAY STREET CRK $ Page 1 of 23

121 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) AGNES STREET ( to ) KING STREET to UPPER QUEEN STREET CRK $ AGNES STREET ( to ) MAIN STREET to SOUTH END CRK $ FIVE POINTS ROAD ( to ) ROBINSON ROAD to RAIL TRACKS CRK $ LIONS LANE ( to ) KING STREET to UPPER QUEEN STREET CRK $ MARIA STREET ( to ) KING STREET to UPPER QUEEN STREET CRK $ DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to 43M EAST OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD CRK $ FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to 37M SOUTH OF HY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK $ BANKS ROAD ( to ) 2 DUNDAS STREET to 27M SOUTH OF 2 DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHAN CRK $ MAPLE CRESCENT ( to ) QUEEN STREET to GEORGE STREET CRK $ MAIN STREET ( to ) WEST END to RAILWAY STREET CRK $ MAIN STREET ( to ) RAILWAY STREET to AGNES STREET CRK $ CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 $ 13, VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) 41M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to EBENEZER DRIVE GRR2 $ 135, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 35M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (5 KM/HR ZONE) to RAIL TRACKS GRR2 $ 32, OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE to TURNBERRY DRIVE MICRO $ 3, MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET to CLARA STREET MICRO $ 6, WHEELER AVENUE ( to ) MILL COURT to CHRISTIE DRIVE MICRO $ 12, ELIZABETH STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET to 29 HAMILTON ROAD MICRO $ 3, QUEEN STREET ( to ) ANN STREET to ELIZABETH STREET MICRO $ 4, WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL COURT to MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT MICRO $ 3, WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT to MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT MICRO $ 2, MINNIE STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACK to CATHERINE STREET MICRO $ EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to CHERRY HILL ROAD PR2 $ 247, EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD to CULVERT PR2 $ 63, BRADLEY AVENUE ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY to 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PR2 $ 2, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) MEADOWBROOK LANE to CULVERT PR2 $ 21, BREEN ROAD ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to 112M EAST OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD R1rural $ 14, MARION STREET ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to BRIDGE R1rural $ 92, COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) PARK LANE to MEADOWBROOK LANE RNS $ 78, COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE to PARK LANE RNS $ 125, COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK to 78M NORTH OF 2 DUNDAS STREET SST $ 5, DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) FERRAR ROAD to HUDSON DRIVE SST $ 16, DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) HUDSON DRIVE to HARRIS ROAD SST $ 9, DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) 298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE to 8M WEST OF 32 DORCHESTER RO SST $ 15, Page 11 of 23

122 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) MILL ROAD ( to ) 25M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE to DONNYBROOK DRIVE SST $ 31, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to 73 ELGIN ROAD SST $ 8, MARION STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET to 73 ELGIN ROAD SST $ 48, CATHERINE STREET ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to BRIDGE SST $ 33, CATHERINE STREET ( to ) BRIDGE to HUNT ROAD EAST LEG SST $ 3, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE to CULVERT 822M EAST OF 74 WESTCHE SST $ 19, DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to CRAMPTON DRIVE SST $ 27, DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CRAMPTON DRIVE to 4M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE SST $ 25, DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE to FERRAR ROAD SST $ 39, DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) HARRIS ROAD to 298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE SST $ 11, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT 822M EAST OF 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE to DORCHESTER SST $ 67, DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) THOMPSON DRIVE to CULVERT SST $ 4, TERRENCE AVENUE ( to ) THAMES CRESCENT to ALMA STREET SST $ 3, TERRENCE AVENUE ( to ) ALMA STREET to THAMES CRESCENT SST $ 3, THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE to ALMA STREET SST $ 5, THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) ALMA STREET to TERRENCE AVENUE SST $ 5, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to 35M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (5 KM/HR SST $ 6, HUDSON DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE to MOONLIGHT WAY SST $ 12, THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE to 29 HAMILTON ROAD SST $ 2, THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to TERRENCE AVENUE SST $ 2, WHITTAKER LANE ( to ) AVON DRIVE to CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE SST $ 1, SCOTLAND DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT to WESTCHESTER BOURNE SST $ 47, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE to BRIDGE SST $ 13, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to BRIDGE SST $ 1, THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD to DORCHESTER SST $ WYTON DRIVE ( to ) FAIRVIEW ROAD to 7M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD SST $ 1, HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) 28 THORNDALE ROAD to 51M SOUTH OF 28 THORNDALE ROAD (PVM SST $ 1, TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET to 91M EAST OF RIC SST $ 1, DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY to 971 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY SST $ 21, WYTON DRIVE ( to ) 38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD to COBBLE HILLS ROAD SST $ $ 1,486,361 Page 12 of 23

123 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) MARION STREET ( to ) 32 SHAW ROAD to LUDWIG STREET CRK $ MARION STREET ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to BRIDGE CRK $ 1, BREEN ROAD ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to 112M EAST OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD CRK $ PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M NORTH OF 28 THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) to 28 THORND CRK $ FERRAR ROAD ( to ) 76M SOUTH OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD to 33M NORTH GRR2 $ 7, LEWIS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to CULVERT GRR2 $ 15, HUNT ROAD ( to ) 54M SOUTH OF 25 GORE ROAD to 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (P GRR2 $ 42, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 379M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD to LEWIS ROAD GRR2 $ 69, HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 66, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to LEWIS ROAD GRR2 $ 85, HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) 39M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 18, HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) BOT ROAD to LEWIS ROAD GRR2 $ 2, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) FORBES ROAD to CULVERT GRR2 $ 18, THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD GRR2 $ 1, LEWIS ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE to RAIL TRACKS GRR2 $ 6, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACK to 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD GRR2 $ 13, TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET to BANKS ROAD GRR2 $ 63, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) FAIRVIEW ROAD to CULVERT GRR2 $ 8, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to RAIL TRACK GRR2 $ 2, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) MARR ROAD to CULVERT GRR2 $ 19, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to 63M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD GRR2 $ 9, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 25M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD to CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 $ 27, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) STOREY DRIVE to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 22, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD GRR2 $ 19, PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to 44M NORTH OF 28 THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) GRR2 $ 88, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 37M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to STOREY GRR2 $ 32, TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) BANKS ROAD to 17M WEST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD GRR2 $ 3, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 21M SOUTH OF 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD to CULVERT GRR2 $ 29, PINEHURST DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE to PARKVIEW DRIVE MICRO $ 3, HUNT ROAD ( to ) MARION STREET to 42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET MICRO $ COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE to CULVERT R1 $ 69, MILL ROAD ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to MILL ROAD R1 $ 91, CLARA STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET to EVA STREET R1 $ 56, OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to OAKWOOD PLACE R1 $ 75, Page 13 of 23

124 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD PLACE to CHITTICK CRESCENT R1 $ 29, MITCHELL AVENUE ( to ) SCARLETT CIRCLE to CHITTICK CRESCENT RNS $ 181, BYRON AVENUE ( to ) CHITTICK CRESCENT to 29 HAMILTON ROAD SST $ 3, BYRON AVENUE ( to ) CANTERBURY DRIVE to OAKWOOD DRIVE SST $ 7, RICHMOND STREET ( to ) 25 GORE ROAD to MARION STREET SST $ 33, RICHMOND STREET ( to ) MARION STREET to RAIL TRACKS SST $ 9, RICHMOND STREET ( to ) TRAFALGAR STREET to 25 GORE ROAD SST $ 32, RICHMOND STREET ( to ) 2 DUNDAS STREET to TRAFALGAR STREET SST $ 32, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 3 PUTNAM ROAD to 37M EASTOF 3 PUTNAM ROAD SST $ 8, MILL ROAD ( to ) 25M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE to CHRISTIE DRIVE SST $ 5, WYTON DRIVE ( to ) LAKESIDE DRIVE to REBECCA ROAD SST $ 31, $ 1,486,16 Page 14 of 23

125 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) CLARA STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET to EVA STREET CRK $ IDA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET to WEST END CRK $ PONDVIEW COURT ( to ) QUEEN STREET to SOUTH END CRK $ PARK LANE ( to ) COUNTRYSIDE LANE to FAIRVIEW ROAD CRK $ CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 28 THORNDALE ROAD to 49M SOUTH OF 28 THORNDALE ROAD (PVM CRK $ COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE to CULVERT CRK $ 2, BOT ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE to PAVEMENT CHANGE GRR2 $ 39, WYTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE to 38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD GRR2 $ 34, BREEN ROAD ( to ) 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK to FIVE POINTS ROAD GRR2 $ 46, BREEN ROAD ( to ) FIVE POINTS ROAD to PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 $ 33, WYTON DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD to PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 $ 47, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 35M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (5 KM/HR ZONE) to RAIL TRACKS GRR2 $ 32, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 37M EASTOF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 28, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE to FORBES ROAD GRR2 $ 23, HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE to GREGORY DRIVE GRR2 $ 3, OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE to MITCHELL AVENUE MICRO $ 8, OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE to RINESS DRIVE MICRO $ 3, MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET to RAIL TRACK MICRO $ 1, MILL ROAD ( to ) TINER WALK to CHRISTIE DRIVE MICRO $ 1, FOREST GROVE CRESCENT ( to ) FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (N) to FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S) MICRO $ 11, FOREST GROVE CRESCENT ( to ) FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S) to FOREST GROVE LANE MICRO $ 13, QUEEN STREET ( to ) ELIZABETH STREET to 29 HAMILTON ROAD MICRO $ 5, HUNT ROAD ( to ) 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET to MARION STREET MICRO $ MARION STREET ( to ) MELVIN DRIVE to LINWOOD DRIVE PR2 $ 2, VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT to WEST END R1 $ 16, WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT to FOXHOLLOW DRIVE R1 $ 75, DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 65M WESTOF 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE to WESTCHESTER BOURNE R1rural $ 8, CARLETON COURT ( to ) CARLETON COURT to NORTH END R1urban $ 28, BYRON AVENUE ( to ) OAKWOOD DRIVE to CHITTICK CRESCENT SST $ 8, BROOKER TRAIL ( to ) ELLIOTT TRAIL to KING STREET SST $ 9, GOLF DRIVE ( to ) 35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET to CUL DE SAC SST $ 3, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 3M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD to SALFORD ROAD SST $ 3, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) SALFORD RD to 25M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD SST $ 3, WESTMINSTER DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT to WESTCHESTER BOURNE SST $ 53, Page 15 of 23

126 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) WESTCHESTER BOURNE to SHAIN ROAD SST $ 55, AVON DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to DORCHESTER ROAD SST $ 35, AVON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to CULVERT SST $ 11, AVON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to 73 ELGIN ROAD SST $ 73, BREEN ROAD ( to ) 112M EAST OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD to BRIDGE SST $ 37, MARION STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET to 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHA SST $ 7, MARION STREET ( to ) 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE) to CLARA STREET SST $ 13, HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) SHAIN ROAD to RAIL TRACK SST $ 19, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to LEWIS ROAD SST $ 58, DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SST $ 12, TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY to 21M WEST OF 32 SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHA SST $ 43, AVON DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT to 142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT (BRIDGE) SST $ 3, HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACK to DORCHESTER ROAD SST $ 9, HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to CULVERT 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD SST $ 5, HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD to CULVERT 29M EA SST $ 17, HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT 29M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD to 73 ELGIN ROAD SST $ 18, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD to 73 ELGIN ROAD SST $ 45, DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) 3M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE to RAIL TRACKS SST $ 15, MINNIE STREET ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE to HARRIS STREET SST $ 1, MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) HUDSON DRIVE to EAST END SST $ 4, CARL STREET ( to ) ROSS STREET to CATHERINE STREET SST $ 1, PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to ROSS STREET SST $ 2, ROSS STREET ( to ) PATRICIA AVENUE to DAVID STREET SST $ 2, ROSS STREET ( to ) DAVID STREET to RUTH STREET SST $ 4, ROSS STREET ( to ) RUTH STREET to CARL STREET SST $ 4, RUTH STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to ROSS STREET SST $ 2, DAVID STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to ROSS STREET SST $ 4, PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) ROSS STREET to ROSS STREET SST $ 3, MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) STARDUST DRIVE to STARLIGHT LANE SST $ 3, STARLIGHT LANE ( to ) MOONLIGHT WAY to NORTH END SST $ 7, A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE to 4M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE SST $ 9, A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE to 3M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE SST $ 7, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE to DORCHESTER ROAD SST $ 82, HARRIS STREET ( to ) 49 CATHERINE STREET to RAIL TRACK SST $ 3, Page 16 of 23

127 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) QUEEN STREET ( to ) BRIDGE STREET to DORCHESTER ROAD SST $ 6, FERRAR ROAD ( to ) 33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE to DONNYBROOK DRIVE SST $ THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) WESTCHESTER BOURNE to 66M EAST OF 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE (P SST $ 1, SHAIN ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE to 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SST $ GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 24M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT to WEST WELLBURN LIMIT SST $ 4, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE to EVELYN DRIVE SST $ 69, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE to 2 DUNDAS STREET SST $ 39, COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to 28 THORNDALE ROAD SST $ 46, GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD to COBBLE HILLS ROAD SST $ 33, DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE to 18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SST $ HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE to DONNYBROOK DRIVE SST $ $ 1,486,427 Page 17 of 23

128 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) CARLETON COURT ( to ) CARLETON COURT to NORTH END CRK $ VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT to WEST END CRK $ WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT to FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK $ FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) UPPER QUEEN STREET to MONTEITH AVENUE CRK $ DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 65M WESTOF 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE to WESTCHESTER BOURNE CRK $ PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD to 34M SOUTH OF 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD (P CRK $ DOAN DRIVE ( to ) 17M EAST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 72, SHAIN ROAD ( to ) 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE to SOUTH END GRR2 $ 18, HUNT ROAD ( to ) CATHERINE STREET to SOUTH END GRR2 $ 3, NISSOURI ROAD ( to ) 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD to NORTH END GRR2 $ 48, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to CULVERT GRR2 $ 2, BRADY ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE to CULVERT GRR2 $ 6, BRADY ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to 3M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 $ 32, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD to CULVERT GRR2 $ 12, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to 34M WEST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD GRR2 $ 34, FORBES ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR2 $ 47, LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 $ 19, HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) 412M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD to BOT ROAD GRR2 $ 45, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LACEY LANE to 441M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD GRR2 $ 45, THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to CULVERT GRR2 $ 43, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD to RAIL TRACKS GRR2 $ 17, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 $ 12, VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) CENTRE DRIVE to THORNDALE ROAD GRR2 $ 16, EATON ROAD ( to ) NORTH END to 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 $ 19, HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 7M SOUTH OF 29 HAMILTON ROAD to 39M NORTH GRR2 $ 75, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to 23M WEST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD GRR2 $ 85, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD to LACEY LANE GRR2 $ 43, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to 196M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD GRR2 $ 58, TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 18M EAST OF 73 ELGIN ROAD to HUNT ROAD GRR2 $ 96, MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 128M EAST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to FORBES ROAD GRR2 $ 53, FORBES ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE to CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 $ 4, EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD to VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRR2 $ 43, DOAN DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE to PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 $ 8, CASHEL LANE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE to 33M SOUTH OF 32 DORCHESTER ROAD GRR2 $ 3, Page 18 of 23

129 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) BREEN ROAD to 3M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD GRR2 $ 7, GERALD PARKWAY ( to ) WEST END to 27 NISSOURI ROAD SST $ 23, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD to RAIL TRACKS SST $ 33, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD to IRWIN ROAD SST $ 3, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) IRWIN ROAD to CULVERT SST $ 18, CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to BRADY ROAD SST $ 45, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD to EATON ROAD SST $ 3, BREEN ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE to 3 PUTNAM ROAD SST $ 4, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to RAIL TRACKS SST $ 18, CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE to TINER AVENUE SST $ 2, CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) TINER AVENUE to MILL ROAD SST $ 3, EATON ROAD ( to ) 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE to CROMARTY DRIVE SST $ COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE to CULVERT SST $ 19, COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to RAIL TRACK SST $ 39, HUNT ROAD ( to ) 25 GORE ROAD to 54M SOUTH OF 25 GORE ROAD SST $ 1, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FIFTEEN MILE ROAD to EBENEZER DRIVE SST $ 2, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT to WYTON DRIVE SST $ 42, $ 1,485,953 Page 19 of 23

130 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) MILL ROAD ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to MILL ROAD CRK $ OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to OAKWOOD PLACE CRK $ OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD PLACE to CHITTICK CRESCENT CRK $ EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD to COBBLE HILLS ROAD CRK $ 2, HARRISON STREET ( to ) KING STREET LOOP to CUL DE SAC CRK $ THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) 66M EAST OF 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE to CULVERT GRR2 $ 62, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE to EBENEZER ROAD GRR2 $ 74, PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER ROAD to CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 $ 2, FIVE POINTS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to BREEN ROAD GRR2 $ 58, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 14, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD to PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 $ 47, CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK to GREGORY DRIVE GRR2 $ 31, RICHMOND STREET ( to ) CHARLES STREET to CATHERINE STREET MICRO $ 2, BYRON AVENUE ( to ) WEST END to PINEHURST DRIVE MICRO $ 2, WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLEWOOD PLACE to MITCHELL COURT MICRO $ 3, FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE to FOREST GROVE CRESCENT MICRO $ 2, RICHMOND STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to CHARLES STREET MICRO $ 5, TURNBERRY DRIVE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE to MITCHELL COURT MICRO $ 2, MANLEY PLACE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT to END OF STREET MICRO $ 1, MILL ROAD ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE to TINER WALK R1 $ 142, PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE to PINEHURST DRIVE R1 $ 159, LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET to AMBER DRIVE R1 $ 81, THE PARKWAY ( to ) CARLETON COURT to DORCHESTER ROAD R1 $ 54, CALVERT PLACE ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to EAST END R1 $ 54, OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) CHITTICK CRESCENT to BYRON AVENUE R1 $ 38, BRIDGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET to 29 HAMILTON ROAD R1 $ 34, WHEELER AVENUE ( to ) MILL COURT to CHRISTIE DRIVE R1 $ 142, MAPLEWOOD PLACE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE to END OF STREET R1 $ 25, HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) 73 ELGIN ROAD to GUEST LANE SST $ 5, GUEST LANE ( to ) HILLVIEW DRIVE to EAST END SST $ 4, GOLF DRIVE ( to ) WRIGHT STREET to 35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET SST $ 1, BRADLEY AVENUE ( to ) 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY to 74 WESTCHESTER BOURNE SST $ 2, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE to PIGRAM ROAD SST $ 15, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) EATON ROAD to BRADY ROAD SST $ 14, Page 2 of 23

131 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to THOMPSON DRIVE SST $ 36, CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS to 3 PUTNAM ROAD SST $ 7, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) PUTNAM ROAD to BRIDGE SST $ 5, ALMA STREET ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to TERRENCE AVENUE SST $ 2, ALMA STREET ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE to THAMES CRESCENT SST $ 2, STARDUST DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE to MOONLIGHT WAY SST $ 14, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (5KM/HR ZONE) to DORCHESTER SST $ 11, LANES ROAD ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE to SOUTH END SST $ 4, LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to 52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANG SST $ 1, DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY to 65M WESTOF 74 WESTCHES SST $ 29, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER DRIVE to FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 11, LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) WYTON DRIVE to RIVERVIEW DRIVE SST $ 7, LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) RIVERVIEW DRIVE to WYE CREEK DRIVE SST $ 5, BRADY ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE to 42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE SST $ BRADY ROAD ( to ) 3M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE to CRAMPTON DRIVE SST $ EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) PROSPECT HILL ROAD to 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD SST $ 1, WYTON DRIVE ( to ) 27 NISSOURI ROAD to FAIRVIEW ROAD SST $ 32, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to SIXTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 21, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) SIXTEEN MILE ROAD to FIFTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 37, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FOURTEEN MILE ROAD to 44 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 1, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 44 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD to THIRTEEN MILE ROAD SST $ 22, PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) THIRTEEN MILE ROAD to 16 PLOVER MILLS ROAD SST $ 3, CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 9M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK to DUNDAS STREET SST $ 16, $ 1,486,555 Page 21 of 23

132 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) WHEELER AVENUE ( to ) MILL COURT to CHRISTIE DRIVE CRK $ LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET to AMBER DRIVE CRK $ CALVERT PLACE ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to EAST END CRK $ BRIDGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET to 29 HAMILTON ROAD CRK $ THE PARKWAY ( to ) CARLETON COURT to DORCHESTER ROAD CRK $ PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE to PINEHURST DRIVE CRK $ MAPLEWOOD PLACE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE to END OF STREET CRK $ COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE to PARK LANE CRK $ COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) PARK LANE to MEADOWBROOK LANE CRK $ EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to CHERRY HILL ROAD CRK $ 2, EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD to CULVERT CRK $ FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) MEADOWBROOK LANE to CULVERT CRK $ CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT to PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 $ 13, OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 38M EAST OF 27 OLIVER DRIVE to FAIRVIEW ROAD GRR2 $ 47, HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) GREGORY DRIVE to CULVERT AT #23124 GRR2 $ 86, CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE to 69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD GRR2 $ 117, CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7 ELGINFIELD ROAD to BRIDGE GRR2 $ 58, MILL COURT ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE to END OF STREET MICRO $ 2, FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 28 THORNDALE ROAD to UPPER QUEEN STREET PR2 $ 3, CLARA STREET ( to ) IDA STREET to MARION STREET PR2 $ 16, COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE to CULVERT R1 $ 5, COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT to EVELYN DRIVE R1 $ 148, ELIZABETH STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET to 29 HAMILTON ROAD R1 $ 32, QUEEN STREET ( to ) ANN STREET to ELIZABETH STREET R1 $ 46, WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL COURT to MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT R1 $ 33, WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT to MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT R1 $ 3, FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to PRIVATE ROAD R1 $ 21, BYRON AVENUE ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE to DORCHESTER ROAD R1 $ 75, FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) FOREST GROVE CRESCENT to FOREST GROVE CRESCENT R1 $ 72, VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) 29 HAMILTON ROAD to MANLEY PLACE R1 $ 23, VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY PLACE to MANLEY DRIVE R1 $ 16, VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY DRIVE to 61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVE R1 $ 2, MANLEY DRIVE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT to VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT R1 $ 98, AMBER DRIVE ( to ) LINWOOD DRIVE to MARION STREET R1 $ 59, Page 22 of 23

133 Municipality of Thames Centre 1 Year Performance Model Current Funding Level Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost Start Cond End Cond Yrs Hold Length (Km) ERIC DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE to NORTH END R1 $ 23, MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE to NORTH END R1 $ 29, THE PARKWAY ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE to CARLETON COURT R1 $ 21, EVA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET to WEST END R1 $ 74, FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) PRIVATE ROAD to WOODVALE DRIVE R1 $ 23, LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) AMBER DRIVE to EAST END R1 $ 16, HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) GUEST LANE to EAST END SST $ 8, GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 63M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD to PUTNAM ROAD SST $ 1, $ 1,486,422 Page 23 of 23

134 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix G. Critical Deficiencies by Asset ID RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

135 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 661 AGNES STREET KING STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD AGNES STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET MAIN STREET.17 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD AGNES STREET MAIN STREET SOUTH END.71 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD ALMA STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD TERRENCE AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 548 ALMA STREET TERRENCE AVENUE THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 487 AMBER DRIVE LINWOOD DRIVE MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 527 ANN STREET QUEEN STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD.12 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 3 AVON DRIVE RAIL TRACKS DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus AVON DRIVE 142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT RAIL TRACKS ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ BS 1-5 (BRIDGE) 5 AVON DRIVE CULVERT 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus AVON DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD CULVERT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus AVON DRIVE MUNICIPAL LIMIT 142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus 6-1 (BRIDGE) 45 BANKS ROAD CULVERT TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 44 BANKS ROAD 27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS STREET CULVERT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 43 BANKS ROAD 2- DUNDAS STREET 27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 168 BOT ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE PAVEMENT CHANGE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2pl BOT ROAD 12M NORTH OF AVON DRIVE (PVMT AVON DRIVE.12 5 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ CHANGE) 16 BRADLEY AVENUE 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE.811 1,471 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW BOUNDARY 15 BRADLEY AVENUE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL.91 1,471 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ PR2 1-5 BOUNDARY 174 BRADY ROAD CULVERT 3M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav ADEQ 175 BRADY ROAD 3M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE CRAMPTON DRIVE.3 44 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 172 BRADY ROAD 42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 171 BRADY ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD BRADY ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 123 BREEN ROAD 112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST BREEN ROAD BRIDGE 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 122 BREEN ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD 112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1rural BREEN ROAD FIVE POINTS ROAD PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR BREEN ROAD 3- PUTNAM ROAD RAIL TRACK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 127 BREEN ROAD 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT FIVE POINTS ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 6-1 CHANGE) 126 BREEN ROAD RAIL TRACK 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ CHANGE) 528 BRIDGE STREET QUEEN STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD.11 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 6365 BROOKER TRAIL ELLIOTT TRAIL KING STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 563 BYRON AVENUE CANTERBURY DRIVE OAKWOOD DRIVE.21 1,169 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 562 BYRON AVENUE DORCHESTER ROAD CANTERBURY DRIVE.443 1,169 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 56 BYRON AVENUE PINEHURST DRIVE PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 1

136 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 559 BYRON AVENUE WEST END PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 565 BYRON AVENUE CHITTICK CRESCENT 29- HAMILTON ROAD.139 1,169 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 564 BYRON AVENUE OAKWOOD DRIVE CHITTICK CRESCENT.291 1,169 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 561 BYRON AVENUE PARKVIEW DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 525 CALVERT PLACE 29- HAMILTON ROAD EAST END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 57 CANTERBURY DRIVE HUNTINGTON CRESCENT BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 569 CANTERBURY DRIVE SHERWOOD CRESCENT HUNTINGTON CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 566 CANTERBURY DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD SHERWOOD CRESCENT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ RSS CANTERBURY DRIVE SHERWOOD CRESCENT HUNTINGTON CRESCENT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW 568 CANTERBURY DRIVE HUNTINGTON CRESCENT SHERWOOD CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 54 CARL STREET ROSS STREET CATHERINE STREET.69 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST CARLETON COURT THE PARKWAY CARLETON COURT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban CARLETON COURT CARLETON COURT DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 553 CARLETON COURT CARLETON COURT NORTH END.32 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban CASHEL LANE DONNYBROOK DRIVE 33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD ADEQ ROAD 119 CASHEL LANE 33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER 32- DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ RSpLim ADEQ ROAD 217 CATHERINE STREET 73- ELGIN ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 218 CATHERINE STREET BRIDGE HUNT ROAD EAST LEG ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 479 CHARLES STREET RICHMOND STREET THAMES STREET.99 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 481 CHARLES STREET HILL STREET CATHERINE STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 48 CHARLES STREET THAMES STREET HILL STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 412 CHERRY HILL ROAD RAIL TRACK GREGORY DRIVE.97 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 421 CHERRY HILL ROAD WYTON DRIVE BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 416 CHERRY HILL ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD CHERRY HILL ROAD GREGORY DRIVE PLOVER MILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 49 CHERRY HILL ROAD CULVERT BRIDGE.58 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu CHERRY HILL ROAD 9M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK DUNDAS STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD CHERRY HILL ROAD 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ ROAD 47 CHERRY HILL ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD.44 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 42 CHERRY HILL ROAD 49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ ROAD 419 CHERRY HILL ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD 49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE.49 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW ROAD 422 CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE 34M NORTH F EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 423 CHERRY HILL ROAD 34M NORTH F EVELYN DRIVE EVELYN DRIVE.34 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 425 CHERRY HILL ROAD 4M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE 9M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2pl CHERRY HILL ROAD EVELYN DRIVE 4M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE.4 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 2

137 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 417 CHERRY HILL ROAD OLIVER DRIVE 69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav CHERRY HILL ROAD 69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD.69 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 41 CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE RAIL TRACK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 577 CHITTICK CRESCENT OAKWOOD DRIVE BYRON AVENUE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ RSS CHITTICK CRESCENT BYRON AVENUE MITCHELL AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban CHRISTIE DRIVE TINER AVENUE MILL ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD CHRISTIE DRIVE WHEELER AVENUE TINER AVENUE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD CLARA STREET EVA STREET IDA STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban CLARA STREET MINNIE STREET EVA STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 467 CLARA STREET IDA STREET MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 438 COBBLE HILLS ROAD CULVERT EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 437 COBBLE HILLS ROAD WYTON DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 436 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 433 COBBLE HILLS ROAD OLIVER DRIVE BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 442 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS STREET DUNDAS STREET.78 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ (CULVERT) 439 COBBLE HILLS ROAD EVELYN DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 434 COBBLE HILLS ROAD BRIDGE 28- THORNDALE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus COBBLE HILLS ROAD CULVERT RAIL TRACK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 441 COBBLE HILLS ROAD RAIL TRACK 78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS STREET.51 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 129 COUCH ROAD 41M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR3 NOW (BEND IN ROAD) 1295 COUCH ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD 41M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ (BEND IN ROAD) 667 COUNTRYSIDE LANE MONTEITH AVENUE PARK LANE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 668 COUNTRYSIDE LANE PARK LANE MEADOWBROOK LANE.88 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 221 COW PATH LOWER COW PATH 78M EAST OF LOWER COWPATH ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW ROAD 22 COW PATH 44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD LOWER COW PATH ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 219 COW PATH 73- ELGIN ROAD 44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 56 CRAMPTON DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD LEWIS ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR CRAMPTON DRIVE CULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74- DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ WESTCHESTER BOURNE 63 CRAMPTON DRIVE FORBES ROAD CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 64 CRAMPTON DRIVE CULVERT PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 57 CRAMPTON DRIVE LEWIS ROAD LACEY LANE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav CRAMPTON DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE CULVERT - 822M EAST OF ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ WESTCHESTER BOURNE 52 CRAMPTON DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 53 CRAMPTON DRIVE BRADY ROAD RAIL TRACKS ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 54 CRAMPTON DRIVE RAIL TRACKS 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 3

138 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 62 CRAMPTON DRIVE BRIDGE FORBES ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 58 CRAMPTON DRIVE LACEY LANE 441M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav CRAMPTON DRIVE 441M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD CRAMPTON DRIVE 37M EASTOF 3- PUTNAM ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 6 CRAMPTON DRIVE 3- PUTNAM ROAD 37M EASTOF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 1 CROMARTY DRIVE RAIL TRACKS 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 9 CROMARTY DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 95 CROMARTY DRIVE BRADY ROAD 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST CROMARTY DRIVE EATON ROAD BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 93 CROMARTY DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD EATON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD ADEQ 96 CROMARTY DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus CROMARTY DRIVE LEWIS ROAD IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 13 CROMARTY DRIVE 62M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD FORBES ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW GRR2 NOW 98 CROMARTY DRIVE IRWIN ROAD CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 99 CROMARTY DRIVE CULVERT RAIL TRACKS ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 14 CROMARTY DRIVE FORBES ROAD PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW GRR2 NOW 12 CROMARTY DRIVE 3- PUTNAM ROAD 62M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 486 DALE DRIVE RICHMOND STREET WEST END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ BS DAVID STREET CATHERINE STREET ROSS STREET.24 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus DINGMAN DRIVE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY 971 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ BOUNDARY 68 DINGMAN DRIVE 971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL 65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 BOUNDARY BOURNE 69 DINGMAN DRIVE 65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER WESTCHESTER BOURNE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1rural 6-1 BOURNE 24 DOAN DRIVE WEST END 15M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 25 DOAN DRIVE 15M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 27 DOAN DRIVE 17M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 26 DOAN DRIVE PUTNAM ROAD 17M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 28 DOAN DRIVE BRIDGE PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 19 DONNYBROOK DRIVE FERRAR ROAD HUDSON DRIVE.675 1,616 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 11 DONNYBROOK DRIVE HUDSON DRIVE HARRIS ROAD.376 1,616 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 111 DONNYBROOK DRIVE HARRIS ROAD 298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE.464 1,616 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 116 DONNYBROOK DRIVE 43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER CASHEL LANE.96 7 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW ROAD 115 DONNYBROOK DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD 43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER.43 7 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ RSpLim NOW ROAD 117 DONNYBROOK DRIVE CASHEL LANE END OF STREET ADEQ 6-1 NOW ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 114 DONNYBROOK DRIVE 8M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER 32- DORCHESTER ROAD.8 1,616 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ RSpLim NOW ROAD 18 DONNYBROOK DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE FERRAR ROAD ,616 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 112 DONNYBROOK DRIVE 298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE 8M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER.65 1,616 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 ROAD Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 4

139 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 177 DORCHESTER ROAD 18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE AVON DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2pl 6-1 DRIVE 176 DORCHESTER ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE 18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ DRIVE 1754 DORCHESTER ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD ADEQ 1755 DORCHESTER ROAD THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 1756 DORCHESTER ROAD CULVERT CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 1757 DORCHESTER ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE 4M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 1758 DORCHESTER ROAD 3M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE RAIL TRACKS ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD DORCHESTER ROAD RAIL TRACKS HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 1757A DORCHESTER ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE 4M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE.4 8 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST A DORCHESTER ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE 3M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE.3 8 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST DURHAM STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD NEELY COURT ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW 169 EATON ROAD NORTH END 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav EATON ROAD 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD EBENEZER DRIVE 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ ROAD 274 EBENEZER DRIVE PROSPECT HILL ROAD 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL.57 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 276 EBENEZER DRIVE VALLEY VIEW ROAD EAST END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu ELIZABETH DRIVE ERIC DRIVE MELVIN DRIVE.19 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban ELIZABETH STREET QUEEN STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD.1 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 628 ELLIOTT TRAIL 27- NISSOURI ROAD LEESBORO TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 632 ELLIOTT TRAIL BROOKER TRAIL SLAMMER TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 636 ELLIOTT TRAIL SLAMMER TRAIL BROOKER TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 629 ELLIOTT TRAIL LEESBORO TRAIL BROOKER TRAIL.39 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 488 ERIC DRIVE MARION STREET ELIZABETH DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban ERIC DRIVE ELIZABETH DRIVE NORTH END.72 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 469 EVA STREET CLARA STREET WEST END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 243 EVELYN DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 241 EVELYN DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 24 EVELYN DRIVE 27- NISSOURI ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 245 EVELYN DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD CULVERT.29 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 246 EVELYN DRIVE CULVERT CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 247 EVELYN DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 35 FAIRVIEW ROAD MEADOWBROOK LANE CULVERT.98 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 344 FAIRVIEW ROAD RAIL TRACKS 35M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 ROAD 34 FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 334 FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu FAIRVIEW ROAD STOREY DRIVE BRIDGE.62 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu FAIRVIEW ROAD PARK LANE MEADOWBROOK LANE.14 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 5

140 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 355 FAIRVIEW ROAD EVELYN DRIVE BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 3435 FAIRVIEW ROAD RAIL TRACKS BRIDGE.47 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD FAIRVIEW ROAD OLIVER DRIVE 842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 343 FAIRVIEW ROAD 842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE BRIDGE.6 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 353 FAIRVIEW ROAD WYTON DRIVE EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD ADEQ 339 FAIRVIEW ROAD 21M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS CULVERT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 ROAD 336 FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD FAIRVIEW ROAD 37M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD STOREY DRIVE.85 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 329 FAIRVIEW ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 37M SOUTH OF HY 7- ELGINFIELD.37 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 335 FAIRVIEW ROAD GREGORY DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD FAIRVIEW ROAD 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ BS FAIRVIEW ROAD MONTEITH AVENUE PARK LANE.14 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD FAIRVIEW ROAD UPPER QUEEN STREET MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 346 FAIRVIEW ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ PR FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE 2- DUNDAS STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 345 FAIRVIEW ROAD 35M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE 28- THORNDALE ROAD.35 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 188 FERRAR ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD 76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON.76 5 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 189 FERRAR ROAD 76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON 33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 ROAD DRIVE 19 FERRAR ROAD 33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DONNYBROOK DRIVE.33 5 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ DRIVE 151 FIVE POINTS ROAD BREEN ROAD SOUTH END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 15 FIVE POINTS ROAD RAIL TRACKS BREEN ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD FIVE POINTS ROAD ROBINSON ROAD RAIL TRACKS ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD FORBES ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR FORBES ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 65 FOREST GROVE FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S) FOREST GROVE LANE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ CRESCENT 64 FOREST GROVE FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (N) FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S) ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ CRESCENT 611 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE FOREST GROVE CRESCENT FOREST GROVE CRESCENT.22 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 68 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE 29- HAMILTON ROAD PRIVATE ROAD.54 1,152 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 69 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE PRIVATE ROAD WOODVALE DRIVE.71 1,152 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 612 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE FOREST GROVE CRESCENT SOUTH END.18 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 61 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE WOODVALE DRIVE FOREST GROVE CRESCENT.98 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 529 GEORGE STREET QUEEN STREET MAPLE CRESCENT.89 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD GERALD PARKWAY WEST END 27- NISSOURI ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 4 GLADSTONE DRIVE LEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG MARR ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 6-1 Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 6

141 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 32 GLADSTONE DRIVE 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD (5KM/HR ZONE) 34 GLADSTONE DRIVE 35M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD RAIL TRACKS ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ (5 KM/HR ZONE) 33 GLADSTONE DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD 35M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ (5 KM/HR ZONE) 31 GLADSTONE DRIVE 78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW BOURNE ROAD (5KM/HR ZONE) 3 GLADSTONE DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE 78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW BOURNE 42 GLADSTONE DRIVE CULVERT CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 41 GLADSTONE DRIVE MARR ROAD CULVERT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR GLADSTONE DRIVE PUTNAM ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 46 GLADSTONE DRIVE BRIDGE PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 43 GLADSTONE DRIVE CULVERT 63M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR GLADSTONE DRIVE 63M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 35 GLADSTONE DRIVE RAIL TRACKS 23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav GLADSTONE DRIVE 23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 38 GLADSTONE DRIVE 22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD LEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR GLADSTONE DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD 22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 187 GOLF DRIVE 35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET CUL-DE-SAC ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 186 GOLF DRIVE WRIGHT STREET 35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 185 GOLF DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE WRIGHT STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 278 GREGORY DRIVE BRIDGE FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 277 GREGORY DRIVE WEST END BRIDGE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 283 GREGORY DRIVE 475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 2825 GREGORY DRIVE EAST WELLBURN LIMIT 475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 285 GREGORY DRIVE 24M WEST OF THE WELLBURN WEST WELLBURN LIMIT.24 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus 6-1 LIMIT 281 GREGORY DRIVE WEST WELLBURN LIMIT 27- WELLBURN ROAD.5 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ BS GREGORY DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD 24M WEST OF THE WELLBURN ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 LIMIT 279 GREGORY DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu GREGORY DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST GREGORY DRIVE 27- WELLBURN ROAD EAST WELLBURN LIMIT.22 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD GUEST LANE HILLVIEW DRIVE EAST END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban HAMILTON CRESCENT NEWTON AVENUE MARION STREET.326 1,198 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 21 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE 412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD BOT ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD 412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 7

142 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 17 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD CULVERT M EAST OF ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ DORCHESTER ROAD 19 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE CULVERT - 29M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ DORCHESTER ROAD 18 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE CULVERT M EAST OF CULVERT - 29M EAST OF ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ DORCHESTER ROAD DORCHESTER ROAD 14 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE WESTCHESTER BOURNE SHAIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD ADEQ 23 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE LEWIS ROAD EAST END.58 8 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 16 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE RAIL TRACK DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 15 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SHAIN ROAD RAIL TRACK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 22 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE BOT ROAD LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 193 HARRIS ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD 7M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD HARRIS ROAD 7M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD 39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR 6-1 DRIVE 195 HARRIS ROAD 39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ DRIVE 459 HARRIS STREET RAIL TRACK MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ BS HARRIS STREET 49- CATHERINE STREET RAIL TRACK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST HARRISON STREET KING STREET LOOP KING STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD HARRISON STREET CUL-DE-SAC KING STREET LOOP ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ REC NOW 647 HARRISON STREET KING STREET LOOP CUL-DE-SAC ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 375 HERITAGE ROAD 77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS DUNDAS STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ BS HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE 77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 367 HERITAGE ROAD 51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE CULVERT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2pl 6-1 ROAD 366 HERITAGE ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD 51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE.51 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 ROAD 361 HERITAGE ROAD 39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 36 HERITAGE ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD.39 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 372 HERITAGE ROAD 22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE BRIDGE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2pl HERITAGE ROAD EVELYN DRIVE 22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE.22 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 369 HERITAGE ROAD WYTON DRIVE 35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR HERITAGE ROAD 35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE EVELYN DRIVE.35 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 363 HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 362 HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD HERITAGE ROAD GREGORY DRIVE CULVERT AT # ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 365 HERITAGE ROAD CULVERT AT # PLOVER MILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 368 HERITAGE ROAD CULVERT WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2pl HILL STREET SOUTH END CATHERINE STREET.63 3 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS ADEQ Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 8

143 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 485 HILL STREET CATHERINE STREET CHARLES STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 88 HILLVIEW DRIVE GUEST LANE EAST END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 87 HILLVIEW DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD GUEST LANE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 191 HUDSON DRIVE DONNYBROOK DRIVE MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 673 HUESTON DRIVE MONTEITH AVENUE MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 452 HUNT ROAD CATHERINE STREET SOUTH END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 446 HUNT ROAD 54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2pl HUNT ROAD 25- GORE ROAD 54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 449 HUNT ROAD 42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET 1M NORTH OF CATHERINE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu ADEQ STREET 448 HUNT ROAD MARION STREET 42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 45 HUNT ROAD 1M NORTH OF CATHERINE CATHERINE STREET.1 46 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS ADEQ STREET 447 HUNT ROAD 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 574 HUNTINGTON 175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY CANTERBURY DRIVE (S) ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW CRESCENT DRIVE 573 HUNTINGTON CANTERBURY DRIVE (N) 175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW CRESCENT DRIVE 468 IDA STREET CLARA STREET WEST END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ R2urban IDEAL DRIVE 28- THORNDALE ROAD SOUTH END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 1315 IRWIN ROAD BREEN ROAD SOUTH END.92 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 155 IRWIN ROAD NORTH END 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 156 IRWIN ROAD 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST ADEQ 158 IRWIN ROAD 32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE SOUTH END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW (PVT CHANGE) 157 IRWIN ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 NOW ADEQ REC NOW (PVT CHANGE) 65 LACEY LANE CRAMPTON DRIVE NORTH END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 589 LACROIX AVENUE QUAIL RUN DRIVE RINESS DRIVE.14 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 34 LAKESIDE DRIVE WYTON DRIVE RIVERVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 35 LAKESIDE DRIVE RIVERVIEW DRIVE WYE CREEK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 1995 LANES ROAD DONNYBROOK DRIVE SOUTH END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 639 LEESBORO TRAIL WILLIAM COURT UNNAMED STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 638 LEESBORO TRAIL ELLIOTT TRAIL WILLIAM COURT.25 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 167 LEWIS ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu ADEQ 159 LEWIS ROAD NORTH END 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 16 LEWIS ROAD 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST LEWIS ROAD 52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 9

144 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 161 LEWIS ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 163 LEWIS ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE RAIL TRACKS ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 165 LEWIS ROAD CULVERT CRAMPTON DRIVE.61 6 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR LEWIS ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 164 LEWIS ROAD RAIL TRACKS CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 493 LINWOOD DRIVE MARION STREET AMBER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 494 LINWOOD DRIVE AMBER DRIVE EAST END.45 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 657 LIONS LANE KING STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET.13 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD LOWER COW PATH COW PATH 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC NOW 224 LOWER COW PATH 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD LUDWIG STREET MARION STREET NEWTON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 66 MAIN STREET RAILWAY STREET AGNES STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 659 MAIN STREET WEST END RAILWAY STREET.41 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD ADEQ 62 MANLEY DRIVE VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 621 MANLEY PLACE VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT END OF STREET.6 7 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 531 MAPLE CRESCENT QUEEN STREET GEORGE STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD MAPLERIDGE WOODVALE DRIVE (W) WOODVALE DRIVE (E) ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ CRESCENT 62 MAPLEWOOD PLACE WOODVALE DRIVE END OF STREET.77 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 658 MARIA STREET KING STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET.13 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD MARION STREET RON-ALLEN DRIVE MELVIN DRIVE.166 1,857 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 28 MARION STREET LINWOOD DRIVE AMBER DRIVE.15 1,857 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 27 MARION STREET MELVIN DRIVE LINWOOD DRIVE.85 1,857 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 23 MARION STREET LUDWIG STREET HAMILTON CRESCENT.272 1,857 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 29 MARION STREET AMBER DRIVE RICHMOND STREET.353 1,857 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 212 MARION STREET 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET CLARA STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus 6-1 (SPEED LIMIT CHANGE) 213 MARION STREET CLARA STREET 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD MARION STREET BRIDGE HUNT ROAD,EAST LEG ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ REC MARION STREET 73- ELGIN ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1rural MARION STREET RICHMOND STREET 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST 6-1 (SPEED LIMIT CHANGE) 25 MARION STREET HAMILTON CRESCENT RON-ALLEN DRIVE.351 1,857 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW 22 MARION STREET 32- SHAW ROAD LUDWIG STREET.193 1,857 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ R1rural MARR ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE END OF STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 48 MARR ROAD END OF STREET GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 131 MARSHALL STREET 3- PUTNAM ROAD RATH STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 665 MEADOWBROOK LANE COUNTRYSIDE LANE EAST END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 664 MEADOWBROOK LANE FAIRVIEW ROAD COUNTRYSIDE LANE.23 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 491 MELVIN DRIVE MARION STREET ELIZABETH DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban MELVIN DRIVE ELIZABETH DRIVE NORTH END.89 4 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 1

145 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 514 MILL COURT WHEELER AVENUE END OF STREET.75 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 523 MILL ROAD 25M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 519 MILL ROAD TINER WALK CHRISTIE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 518 MILL ROAD WHEELER AVENUE TINER WALK.48 1,354 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 59 MILL ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD MILL ROAD.261 1,354 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 5225 MILL ROAD 25M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE CHRISTIE DRIVE.25 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 476 MINNIE STREET MINNIE STREET RAIL TRACK.4 1,229 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 478 MINNIE STREET RAIL TRACK CATHERINE STREET.33 1,229 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 473 MINNIE STREET CLARA STREET NORTH STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ BS MINNIE STREET WEST END MINNIE STREET.45 2 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 471 MINNIE STREET MINNIE STREET CLARA STREET.22 1,229 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 474 MINNIE STREET NORTH STREET VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ BS MINNIE STREET VILLAGE GATE DRIVE HARRIS STREET.71 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus MITCHELL AVENUE SCARLETT CIRCLE CHITTICK CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 581 MITCHELL AVENUE OAKWOOD DRIVE SCARLETT CIRCLE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 584 MITCHELL AVENUE CHITTICK CRESCENT MITCHELL COURT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 599 MITCHELL COURT 29- HAMILTON ROAD MITCHELL AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban MITCHELL COURT TURNBERRY DRIVE WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 6 MITCHELL COURT MITCHELL AVENUE TURNBERRY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban MONTEITH AVENUE HUESTON DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD.83 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 67 MONTEITH AVENUE HUESTON DRIVE COUNTRYSIDE LANE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 671 MONTEITH AVENUE COUNTRYSIDE LANE HUESTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 669 MONTEITH AVENUE THORNDALE ROAD HUESTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 197 MOONLIGHT WAY WEST END STARDUST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 198 MOONLIGHT WAY STARDUST DRIVE STARLIGHT LANE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 192 MOONLIGHT WAY HUDSON DRIVE EAST END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 75 MOSSLEY DRIVE BRADY ROAD CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 82 MOSSLEY DRIVE CULVERT 196M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav MOSSLEY DRIVE 196M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 86 MOSSLEY DRIVE 128M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD FORBES ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav MOSSLEY DRIVE 3- PUTNAM ROAD 128M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 8 MOSSLEY DRIVE LEWIS ROAD RAIL TRACKS ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 76 MOSSLEY DRIVE CULVERT 34M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 77 MOSSLEY DRIVE 34M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 79 MOSSLEY DRIVE 379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 78 MOSSLEY DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD 379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ BS MOSSLEY DRIVE RAIL TRACKS CULVERT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR 6-1 Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 11

146 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 1835 NEELY COURT 12M NORTH OF DURHAM STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 183 NEELY COURT DURHAM STREET 12M NORTH OF DURHAM STREET.12 8 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW 497 NEWTON AVENUE LUDWIG STREET HAMILTON CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 496 NEWTON AVENUE 32- SHAW ROAD LUDWIG STREET.21 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 325 NISSOURI ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD NORTH END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD NORTH STREET MINNIE STREET END OF STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 593 OAKWOOD DRIVE 29- HAMILTON ROAD OAKWOOD PLACE.23 1,96 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 595 OAKWOOD DRIVE CHITTICK CRESCENT BYRON AVENUE.116 1,96 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 594 OAKWOOD DRIVE OAKWOOD PLACE CHITTICK CRESCENT.9 1,96 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 596 OAKWOOD DRIVE BYRON AVENUE MITCHELL AVENUE.298 1,829 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 598 OAKWOOD DRIVE TURNBERRY DRIVE RINESS DRIVE.1 1,829 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 597 OAKWOOD DRIVE MITCHELL AVENUE TURNBERRY DRIVE.128 1,829 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 576 OAKWOOD PLACE OAKWOOD DRIVE EAST END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ REC NOW 269 OLIVER DRIVE 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 264 OLIVER DRIVE 38M EAST OF 27- OLIVER DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 263 OLIVER DRIVE 27- NISSOURI ROAD 38M EAST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD.38 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 268 OLIVER DRIVE RAIL TRACK 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 272 OLIVER DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD 49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu OLIVER DRIVE 49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD COBBLE HILLS ROAD.49 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD OLIVER DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD.47 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 2686 OLIVER DRIVE 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD HERITAGE ROAD.88 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 267 OLIVER DRIVE CULVERT RAIL TRACK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 266 OLIVER DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 271 OLIVER DRIVE BRIDGE CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu OLIVER DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 666 PARK LANE COUNTRYSIDE LANE FAIRVIEW ROAD.22 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 554 PARKVIEW DRIVE BYRON AVENUE THE PARKWAY ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 555 PARKVIEW DRIVE THE PARKWAY PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 556 PARKVIEW DRIVE PINEHURST DRIVE PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 57 PATRICIA AVENUE CATHERINE STREET ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST PATRICIA AVENUE ROSS STREET ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST PIGRAM ROAD BREEN ROAD 3M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav PIGRAM ROAD 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY EBENEZER ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav 6-1 DRIVE 142 PIGRAM ROAD EBENEZER ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav PIGRAM ROAD 3M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD SALFORD ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 143 PIGRAM ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE MOUNT ELGIN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 138 PIGRAM ROAD SALFORD RD 25M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 139 PIGRAM ROAD 25M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 12

147 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 14 PIGRAM ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY ADEQ 6-1 NOW ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ RSpLim NOW DRIVE 558 PINEHURST DRIVE PARKVIEW DRIVE PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 557 PINEHURST DRIVE BYRON AVENUE PARKVIEW DRIVE.12 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 533 PONDVIEW COURT QUEEN STREET SOUTH END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ R2urban PROSPECT HILL ROAD SIXTEEN MILE ROAD FIFTEEN MILE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 29 PROSPECT HILL ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE FOURTEEN MILE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 293 PROSPECT HILL ROAD THIRTEEN MILE ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 289 PROSPECT HILL ROAD FIFTEEN MILE ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD ADEQ 291 PROSPECT HILL ROAD FOURTEEN MILE ROAD 44 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 287 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD SIXTEEN MILE ROAD.92 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 286 PROSPECT HILL ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD.33 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 292 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 44 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE THIRTEEN MILE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 396 PURPLE HILL ROAD EVELYN DRIVE PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF.11 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ BRIDGE 3875 PURPLE HILL ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD 34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS.34 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ PR2 NOW ROAD 389 PURPLE HILL ROAD OLIVER DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 398 PURPLE HILL ROAD PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu 6-1 BRIDGE 394 PURPLE HILL ROAD WYTON DRIVE 4M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD PURPLE HILL ROAD 4M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE EVELYN DRIVE.4 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 399 PURPLE HILL ROAD BRIDGE 49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 39 PURPLE HILL ROAD CULVERT 44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) 391 PURPLE HILL ROAD 44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE 28- THORNDALE ROAD.44 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) 393 PURPLE HILL ROAD 56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ (PVT CHANGE) 392 PURPLE HILL ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD 56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD.56 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW (PVT CHANGE) 388 PURPLE HILL ROAD 34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 42 PURPLE HILL ROAD 49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK 2- DUNDAS STREET.61 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 587 QUAIL RUN DRIVE TURNBERRY DRIVE RINESS DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 588 QUAIL RUN DRIVE RINESS DRIVE LACROIX AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 54 QUEEN STREET ELIZABETH STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 539 QUEEN STREET ANN STREET ELIZABETH STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 538 QUEEN STREET DORCHESTER ROAD ANN STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 535 QUEEN STREET PONDVIEW COURT GEORGE STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 532 QUEEN STREET WEST END PONDVIEW COURT.61 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 13

148 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 536 QUEEN STREET GEORGE STREET BRIDGE STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 537 QUEEN STREET BRIDGE STREET DORCHESTER ROAD.243 1,197 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD RAILWAY STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET MAIN STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW 65 RAILWAY STREET KING STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW 13 RATH STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD MARSHALL STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 NOW ADEQ REC NOW 322 REBECCA ROAD RAIL TRACK 163 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ PR REBECCA ROAD SCATCHERED LANE RAIL TRACK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ PR REBECCA ROAD THORNDALE ROAD WYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ REC REBECCA ROAD WYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG WYTON DRIVE - EAST LEG ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 323 REBECCA ROAD 163 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACK ROBINS HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ PR REBECCA ROAD WYTON DRIVE - EAST LEG SCATCHERED LANE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 378 RICHMOND STREET 25- GORE ROAD MARION STREET ,25 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 377 RICHMOND STREET TRAFALGAR STREET 25- GORE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 376 RICHMOND STREET 2- DUNDAS STREET TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD RICHMOND STREET RAIL TRACKS CHARLES STREET.166 1,538 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 38 RICHMOND STREET MARION STREET RAIL TRACKS.419 1,538 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 384 RICHMOND STREET CHARLES STREET CATHERINE STREET.117 1,391 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 385 RICHMOND STREET CATHERINE STREET SOUTH END.83 5 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ RSS RINESS DRIVE QUAIL RUN DRIVE LACROIX AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 591 RINESS DRIVE LACROIX AVENUE OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 133 ROBINSON ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD FIVE POINTS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SST ADEQ 495 RON-ALLEN DRIVE MARION STREET NORTH END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW 5 ROSS STREET PATRICIA AVENUE PATRICIA AVENUE.38 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ BS ROSS STREET PATRICIA AVENUE DAVID STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus ROSS STREET DAVID STREET RUTH STREET.26 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus ROSS STREET RUTH STREET CARL STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus RUTH STREET CATHERINE STREET ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SST SAGE STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ REC NOW 58 SCARLETT CIRCLE MITCHELL AVENUE NORTH END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 324 SCATCHERED LANE REBECCA ROAD WEST END.81 2 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS ADEQ 29 SCOTLAND DRIVE MUNICIPAL LIMIT WESTCHESTER BOURNE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD SHAIN ROAD 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE SOUTH END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav ADEQ DRIVE 179 SHAIN ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ DRIVE 455 SHEILS LANE NORTH END 8M NORTH OF 49- CATHERINE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ STREET 5715 SHERWOOD CRESCENT BEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD SHERWOOD PLACE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW PLACE 572 SHERWOOD CRESCENT SHERWOOD PLACE CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 571 SHERWOOD CRESCENT CANTERBURY DRIVE BEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW PLACE 575 SHERWOOD PLACE END OF STREET SHERWOOD CRESCENT.12 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 637 SLAMMER TRAIL ELLIOTT TRAIL ELLIOTT TRAIL.23 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 14

149 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 12 SLO-PITCH ROAD WEST END 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ REC NOW 196 STARDUST DRIVE DONNYBROOK DRIVE MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 199 STARLIGHT LANE MOONLIGHT WAY NORTH END ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 328 STOREY DRIVE 122M WEST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 646 TEMPERANCE STREET END OF STREET KING STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW 545 TERRENCE AVENUE THAMES CRESCENT ALMA STREET.23 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD TERRENCE AVENUE ALMA STREET THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD THAMES CRESCENT TERRENCE AVENUE 29- HAMILTON ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD THAMES CRESCENT 29- HAMILTON ROAD TERRENCE AVENUE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD THAMES CRESCENT ALMA STREET TERRENCE AVENUE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD THAMES CRESCENT TERRENCE AVENUE ALMA STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD THAMES STREET END OF STREET CATHERINE STREET.65 3 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS ADEQ 483 THAMES STREET CATHERINE STREET CHARLES STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 55 THE PARKWAY PARKVIEW DRIVE CARLETON COURT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 551 THE PARKWAY CARLETON COURT DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 73 THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD ADEQ ROAD 74 THOMPSON DRIVE 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 71 THOMPSON DRIVE 66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ BOURNE 7 THOMPSON DRIVE WESTCHESTER BOURNE 66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 1-5 ADEQ ADEQ DST 1-5 BOURNE 72 THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT CULVERT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ 515 TINER AVENUE WHEELER AVENUE TINER WALK ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban TINER AVENUE TINER WALK CHRISTIE DRIVE.32 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban TINER WALK TINER AVENUE MILL ROAD.89 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban TRAFALGAR STREET 32- SHAW ROAD RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 227 TRAFALGAR STREET MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY 21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD ,289 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus TRAFALGAR STREET 21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD 32- SHAW ROAD.21 1,289 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 2335 TRAFALGAR STREET 27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD TRAFALGAR STREET BANKS ROAD 17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD TRAFALGAR STREET 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET BANKS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 233 TRAFALGAR STREET RICHMOND STREET 27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 237 TRAFALGAR STREET 17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 239 TRAFALGAR STREET 18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD HUNT ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav TRAFALGAR STREET 73- ELGIN ROAD 18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 585 TURNBERRY DRIVE OAKWOOD DRIVE QUAIL RUN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 586 TURNBERRY DRIVE QUAIL RUN DRIVE MITCHELL COURT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ 655 UPPER QUEEN STREET MARIA STREET AGNES STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 15

150 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 656 UPPER QUEEN STREET AGNES STREET RAILWAY STREET.11 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD UPPER QUEEN STREET FAIRVIEW ROAD LIONS LANE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD UPPER QUEEN STREET LIONS LANE MARIA STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD VALLEY VIEW ROAD CENTRE DRIVE THORNDALE ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ BSgrav VALLEY VIEW ROAD 41M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR ADEQ ROAD 31 VALLEY VIEW ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 41M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD.41 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ ROAD 315 VALLEY VIEW ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD CENTRE DRIVE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu VALLEY VIEW ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu VALLEYVIEW MANLEY PLACE MANLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ CRESCENT 615 VALLEYVIEW MANLEY DRIVE 61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ CRESCENT 613 VALLEYVIEW 29- HAMILTON ROAD MANLEY PLACE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ CRK ADEQ CRESCENT 463 VILLAGE GATE VILLAGE GATE DRIVE VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban 6-1 CRESCENT 46 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE MINNIE STREET VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 462 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT WEST END.5 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 461 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ R1urban WESTMINSTER DRIVE MUNICIPAL LIMIT WESTCHESTER BOURNE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD WHEELER AVENUE MILL COURT CHRISTIE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 511 WHEELER AVENUE MILL ROAD TINER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 512 WHEELER AVENUE TINER AVENUE MILL COURT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 517 WHEELER COURT END OF STREET WHEELER AVENUE.32 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 12 WHITTAKER LANE AVON DRIVE CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD WHITTAKER LANE CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE WEST END ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ REC ADEQ 645 WILLIAM COURT LEESBORO TRAIL WEST END.61 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 627 WOODVALE DRIVE MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 623 WOODVALE DRIVE 29- HAMILTON ROAD MAPLEWOOD PLACE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 626 WOODVALE DRIVE MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 624 WOODVALE DRIVE MAPLEWOOD PLACE MITCHELL COURT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 625 WOODVALE DRIVE MITCHELL COURT MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ MICRO ADEQ 184 WRIGHT STREET 1M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET GOLF DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RNS NOW 1845 WRIGHT STREET 1M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET DURHAM STREET ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ RSS NOW 2485 WYTON DRIVE REBECCA ROAD 88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD.88 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW 254 WYTON DRIVE 7M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2pl WYTON DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu WYTON DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu WYTON DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2 ADEQ 251 WYTON DRIVE 27- NISSOURI ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD WYTON DRIVE LAKESIDE DRIVE REBECCA ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD 6-1 Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 16

151 Critical Deficiencies by Street Name Current Inspection Batch ID Street Name From Description To Description Length AADT Cap. Drain Geo SA Width Type Imp Overall TON 252 WYTON DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD 7M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD.7 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NONE ADEQ 258 WYTON DRIVE BRIDGE 38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRR2pl WYTON DRIVE 38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD COBBLE HILLS ROAD.38 1 ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ SD WYTON DRIVE 88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD 47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD ADEQ 6-1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ GRRplu WYTON DRIVE 47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD 27- NISSOURI ROAD.47 1 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ NOW ADEQ ADEQ BS NOW Run: DEC 4,215 2:26PM Page: 17

152 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix H. Needs Sorted By Time of Need and Improvement Category RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

153 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost SSTplus AVON DRIVE RAIL TRACKS DORCHESTER ROAD Rehab SSTplus 58, AVON DRIVE MUNICIPAL LIMIT 142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT Rehab SSTplus 5, (BRIDGE) TRAFALGAR STREET MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY 21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD 1, Rehab SSTplus 71, AVON DRIVE CULVERT 73- ELGIN ROAD Rehab SSTplus 121, MARION STREET 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET CLARA STREET Rehab SSTplus 21, (SPEED LIMIT CHANGE) 2 96 CROMARTY DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD LEWIS ROAD Rehab SSTplus 95, AVON DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD CULVERT Rehab SSTplus 19, MINNIE STREET VILLAGE GATE DRIVE HARRIS STREET Rehab SSTplus 2, ROSS STREET PATRICIA AVENUE DAVID STREET Rehab SSTplus 4, ROSS STREET RUTH STREET CARL STREET Rehab SSTplus 6, ROSS STREET DAVID STREET RUTH STREET Rehab SSTplus 7, DAVID STREET CATHERINE STREET ROSS STREET Rehab SSTplus 7, GREGORY DRIVE 24M WEST OF THE WELLBURN WEST WELLBURN LIMIT Rehab SSTplus 7, LIMIT COBBLE HILLS ROAD BRIDGE 28- THORNDALE ROAD Rehab SSTplus 76, ,73.7 SST CROMARTY DRIVE BRADY ROAD 73- ELGIN ROAD Rehab SST 45, HARRIS STREET 49- CATHERINE STREET RAIL TRACK Rehab SST 3, A DORCHESTER ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE 4M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE Rehab SST 9, A DORCHESTER ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE 3M SOUTH OF GLADTONE Rehab SST 7,425. DRIVE ROBINSON ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD FIVE POINTS ROAD ADEQ Rehab SST 21, BREEN ROAD 112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON BRIDGE Rehab SST 37,86.9 ROAD MARION STREET RICHMOND STREET 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET Rehab SST 7,992.6 (SPEED LIMIT CHANGE) LEWIS ROAD 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE CROMARTY DRIVE Rehab SST RUTH STREET CATHERINE STREET ROSS STREET Rehab SST 2, PATRICIA AVENUE ROSS STREET ROSS STREET Rehab SST 3, CARL STREET ROSS STREET CATHERINE STREET Rehab SST 1, PATRICIA AVENUE CATHERINE STREET ROSS STREET Rehab SST 2, IRWIN ROAD 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ Rehab SST GREGORY DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD COBBLE HILLS ROAD Rehab SST 33, , R2urban IDA STREET CLARA STREET WEST END Rehab R2urban 69, Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 1

154 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost PONDVIEW COURT QUEEN STREET SOUTH END Rehab R2urban 175, , R1urban MITCHELL COURT MITCHELL AVENUE TURNBERRY DRIVE Rehab R1urban 36, MITCHELL COURT 29- HAMILTON ROAD MITCHELL AVENUE Rehab R1urban 34, CLARA STREET EVA STREET IDA STREET Rehab R1urban 6, CARLETON COURT THE PARKWAY CARLETON COURT Rehab R1urban 116, ERIC DRIVE MARION STREET ELIZABETH DRIVE Rehab R1urban 47, CHITTICK CRESCENT BYRON AVENUE MITCHELL AVENUE Rehab R1urban 54, TINER AVENUE WHEELER AVENUE TINER WALK Rehab R1urban 86, TINER AVENUE TINER WALK CHRISTIE DRIVE Rehab R1urban 99, TINER WALK TINER AVENUE MILL ROAD Rehab R1urban 29, MELVIN DRIVE MARION STREET ELIZABETH DRIVE Rehab R1urban 46, GUEST LANE HILLVIEW DRIVE EAST END Rehab R1urban 51, CARLETON COURT CARLETON COURT NORTH END Rehab R1urban 28, VILLAGE GATE DRIVE VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT Rehab R1urban 85, VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT VILLAGE GATE DRIVE VILLAGE GATE DRIVE Rehab R1urban 97, ELIZABETH DRIVE ERIC DRIVE MELVIN DRIVE Rehab R1urban 69, , R1rural MARION STREET 32- SHAW ROAD LUDWIG STREET 1, Rehab R1rural 27, BREEN ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD 112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON Rehab R1rural 14, ROAD MARION STREET 73- ELGIN ROAD BRIDGE Rehab R1rural 92, DINGMAN DRIVE 65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER WESTCHESTER BOURNE Rehab R1rural 8, BOURNE , PR COUCH ROAD 41M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD 3- PUTNAM ROAD NOW Rehab PR3 29, (BEND IN ROAD).41 29, PR MARION STREET LUDWIG STREET HAMILTON CRESCENT 1, NOW Rehab PR2 7, MARION STREET MELVIN DRIVE LINWOOD DRIVE 1, NOW Rehab PR2 2, MARION STREET RON-ALLEN DRIVE MELVIN DRIVE 1, NOW Rehab PR2 4, BRADLEY AVENUE 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE 1, NOW Rehab PR2 25, BOUNDARY MARION STREET AMBER DRIVE RICHMOND STREET 1, NOW Rehab PR2 87, MARION STREET HAMILTON CRESCENT RON-ALLEN DRIVE 1, NOW Rehab PR2 87, BRADLEY AVENUE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL 1, Rehab PR2 2, BOUNDARY MARION STREET LINWOOD DRIVE AMBER DRIVE 1, NOW Rehab PR2 25, Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 2

155 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost CLARA STREET IDA STREET MARION STREET NOW Rehab PR2 16, HARRISON STREET KING STREET LOOP CUL-DE-SAC NOW Rehab PR2 45, FAIRVIEW ROAD UPPER QUEEN STREET MONTEITH AVENUE NOW Rehab PR2 36, EVELYN DRIVE CULVERT CHERRY HILL ROAD NOW Rehab PR2 247, EVELYN DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD COBBLE HILLS ROAD NOW Rehab PR2 336, EVELYN DRIVE 27- NISSOURI ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD NOW Rehab PR2 336, EVELYN DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD CULVERT 1.29 NOW Rehab PR2 63, PURPLE HILL ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD 34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS 1.34 NOW Rehab PR2 7, ROAD EVELYN DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD HERITAGE ROAD NOW Rehab PR2 33, FAIRVIEW ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD UPPER QUEEN STREET Rehab PR2 3, FAIRVIEW ROAD MEADOWBROOK LANE CULVERT 1.98 NOW Rehab PR2 21, REBECCA ROAD 163 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACK ROBINS HILL ROAD Rehab PR2 148, REBECCA ROAD RAIL TRACK 163 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACK Rehab PR2 256, REBECCA ROAD SCATCHERED LANE RAIL TRACK Rehab PR2 139, ,638,13.18 DST THOMPSON DRIVE WESTCHESTER BOURNE 66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER Rehab DST 2,395.8 BOURNE.66 2,395.8 SD NISSOURI ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD NORTH END Maintenance SD CROMARTY DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD EATON ROAD ADEQ Maintenance SD WHITTAKER LANE AVON DRIVE CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE Maintenance SD MARION STREET CLARA STREET 73- ELGIN ROAD Maintenance SD DONNYBROOK DRIVE 298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE 8M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER 1, Maintenance SD ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE 412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD BOT ROAD Maintenance SD EATON ROAD 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE CROMARTY DRIVE Maintenance SD FERRAR ROAD 76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON 33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK Maintenance SD ROAD DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance SD WYTON DRIVE LAKESIDE DRIVE REBECCA ROAD Maintenance SD CENTRE DRIVE PROSPECT HILL ROAD VALLEY VIEW ROAD Maintenance SD CASHEL LANE DONNYBROOK DRIVE 33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER ADEQ Maintenance SD ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD 9M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK DUNDAS STREET Maintenance SD HARRISON STREET KING STREET LOOP KING STREET Maintenance SD QUEEN STREET BRIDGE STREET DORCHESTER ROAD 1, Maintenance SD FIVE POINTS ROAD RAIL TRACKS BREEN ROAD Maintenance SD SCOTLAND DRIVE MUNICIPAL LIMIT WESTCHESTER BOURNE Maintenance SD CHRISTIE DRIVE TINER AVENUE MILL ROAD Maintenance SD Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 3

156 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost CHRISTIE DRIVE WHEELER AVENUE TINER AVENUE Maintenance SD DINGMAN DRIVE 971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL 65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER Maintenance SD BOUNDARY BOURNE FAIRVIEW ROAD 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT WYTON DRIVE Maintenance SD FAIRVIEW ROAD STOREY DRIVE BRIDGE Maintenance SD THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ADEQ Maintenance SD ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD Maintenance SD HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE Maintenance SD TRAFALGAR STREET BANKS ROAD 17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD Maintenance SD TERRENCE AVENUE THAMES CRESCENT ALMA STREET Maintenance SD TERRENCE AVENUE ALMA STREET THAMES CRESCENT Maintenance SD THAMES CRESCENT TERRENCE AVENUE 29- HAMILTON ROAD Maintenance SD DORCHESTER ROAD 3M SOUTH OF GLADTONE RAIL TRACKS Maintenance SD DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD 51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE Maintenance SD ROAD WYTON DRIVE 27- NISSOURI ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD Maintenance SD OLIVER DRIVE 49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD COBBLE HILLS ROAD Maintenance SD FAIRVIEW ROAD GREGORY DRIVE CULVERT Maintenance SD RICHMOND STREET 2- DUNDAS STREET TRAFALGAR STREET Maintenance SD FAIRVIEW ROAD RAIL TRACKS 35M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE Maintenance SD ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD RAIL TRACKS BRIDGE Maintenance SD CHERRY HILL ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD OLIVER DRIVE Maintenance SD BRADY ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE Maintenance SD PURPLE HILL ROAD CULVERT 44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE Maintenance SD ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) MAPLE CRESCENT QUEEN STREET GEORGE STREET Maintenance SD PROSPECT HILL ROAD FIFTEEN MILE ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance SD GEORGE STREET QUEEN STREET MAPLE CRESCENT Maintenance SD THAMES CRESCENT ALMA STREET TERRENCE AVENUE Maintenance SD THAMES CRESCENT TERRENCE AVENUE ALMA STREET Maintenance SD FAIRVIEW ROAD 21M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS CULVERT Maintenance SD ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD WYTON DRIVE 4M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE Maintenance SD 1 59 CRAMPTON DRIVE 441M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD 3- PUTNAM ROAD Maintenance SD TRAFALGAR STREET 27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET Maintenance SD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE WESTCHESTER BOURNE SHAIN ROAD ADEQ Maintenance SD THAMES CRESCENT 29- HAMILTON ROAD TERRENCE AVENUE Maintenance SD UPPER QUEEN STREET AGNES STREET RAILWAY STREET Maintenance SD AGNES STREET KING STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET Maintenance SD UPPER QUEEN STREET MARIA STREET AGNES STREET Maintenance SD Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 4

157 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost AGNES STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET MAIN STREET Maintenance SD AGNES STREET MAIN STREET SOUTH END Maintenance SD LIONS LANE KING STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET Maintenance SD UPPER QUEEN STREET FAIRVIEW ROAD LIONS LANE Maintenance SD UPPER QUEEN STREET LIONS LANE MARIA STREET Maintenance SD MARIA STREET KING STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET Maintenance SD WESTMINSTER DRIVE MUNICIPAL LIMIT WESTCHESTER BOURNE Maintenance SD 9. 2 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD 412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD Maintenance SD GREGORY DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD 24M WEST OF THE WELLBURN Maintenance SD LIMIT WYTON DRIVE 38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD COBBLE HILLS ROAD Maintenance SD FAIRVIEW ROAD MONTEITH AVENUE PARK LANE Maintenance SD GREGORY DRIVE 27- WELLBURN ROAD EAST WELLBURN LIMIT Maintenance SD MAIN STREET WEST END RAILWAY STREET 1.41 ADEQ Maintenance SD FIVE POINTS ROAD ROBINSON ROAD RAIL TRACKS Maintenance SD LOWER COW PATH 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD Maintenance SD HARRIS ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD 7M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON Maintenance SD ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD PARK LANE MEADOWBROOK LANE Maintenance SD FAIRVIEW ROAD WYTON DRIVE EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance SD RSpLimit DONNYBROOK DRIVE 8M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER 32- DORCHESTER ROAD 1,616.8 NOW Maintenance RSpLimit ROAD PIGRAM ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY NOW Maintenance RSpLimit DRIVE DONNYBROOK DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD 43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER 7.43 NOW Maintenance RSpLimit ROAD CASHEL LANE 33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER 32- DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ Maintenance RSpLimit ROAD.527 MICRO MILL ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD MILL ROAD 1, ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 8, MILL ROAD WHEELER AVENUE TINER WALK 1, ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 12, OAKWOOD DRIVE 29- HAMILTON ROAD OAKWOOD PLACE 1,96.23 ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 6, OAKWOOD DRIVE OAKWOOD PLACE CHITTICK CRESCENT 1,96.9 ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 2, OAKWOOD DRIVE CHITTICK CRESCENT BYRON AVENUE 1, ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 3, WHEELER AVENUE MILL ROAD TINER AVENUE ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 7, WHEELER AVENUE MILL COURT CHRISTIE DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 12, WHEELER AVENUE TINER AVENUE MILL COURT ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 4, QUEEN STREET DORCHESTER ROAD ANN STREET ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 5, QUEEN STREET ELIZABETH STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 5,481. Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 5

158 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost QUEEN STREET ANN STREET ELIZABETH STREET ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 4, WOODVALE DRIVE MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 6, MILL ROAD TINER WALK CHRISTIE DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 1, WOODVALE DRIVE 29- HAMILTON ROAD MAPLEWOOD PLACE ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 3, WOODVALE DRIVE MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 2, WOODVALE DRIVE MITCHELL COURT MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 3, WOODVALE DRIVE MAPLEWOOD PLACE MITCHELL COURT ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 3, MILL COURT WHEELER AVENUE END OF STREET 1.75 ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 2, WHEELER COURT END OF STREET WHEELER AVENUE 1.32 ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 3, MAPLEWOOD PLACE WOODVALE DRIVE END OF STREET 1.77 ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 2, ELIZABETH STREET QUEEN STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD 1.1 ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 3, CALVERT PLACE 29- HAMILTON ROAD EAST END ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 4, FOREST GROVE CRESCENT FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (N) FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S) ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 11, FOREST GROVE CRESCENT FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S) FOREST GROVE LANE ADEQ Maintenance MICRO 13, , GRRplus FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE Maintenance GRRplus 1, FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE Maintenance GRRplus 7, WYTON DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD Maintenance GRRplus 28, WYTON DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE Maintenance GRRplus 7, EBENEZER DRIVE VALLEY VIEW ROAD EAST END Maintenance GRRplus 2, WYTON DRIVE 88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD 47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD Maintenance GRRplus 25, FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE GREGORY DRIVE Maintenance GRRplus 2, LEWIS ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance GRRplus 26, OLIVER DRIVE BRIDGE CHERRY HILL ROAD Maintenance GRRplus 22, HUNT ROAD 42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET 1M NORTH OF CATHERINE ADEQ Maintenance GRRplus 25, STREET OLIVER DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD 49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD Maintenance GRRplus 31, VALLEY VIEW ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD CENTRE DRIVE Maintenance GRRplus 65, GREGORY DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD HERITAGE ROAD Maintenance GRRplus 3, VALLEY VIEW ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD Maintenance GRRplus 7, CHERRY HILL ROAD CULVERT BRIDGE Maintenance GRRplus 11, PURPLE HILL ROAD PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE Maintenance GRRplus 9,899.1 BRIDGE ,66.72 GRR2plus BOT ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE PAVEMENT CHANGE Maintenance GRR2plus 42, HUNT ROAD 54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET Maintenance GRR2plus 45, WYTON DRIVE BRIDGE 38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD Maintenance GRR2plus 37, HERITAGE ROAD 22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE BRIDGE Maintenance GRR2plus 54, Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 6

159 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost HERITAGE ROAD 51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE CULVERT Maintenance GRR2plus 97,47.72 ROAD DORCHESTER ROAD 18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE AVON DRIVE Maintenance GRR2plus 55, DRIVE WYTON DRIVE 7M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD HERITAGE ROAD Maintenance GRR2plus 53, CHERRY HILL ROAD 4M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE 9M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK Maintenance GRR2plus 13, HERITAGE ROAD CULVERT WYTON DRIVE Maintenance GRR2plus 31, ,49.46 GRR BREEN ROAD 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT FIVE POINTS ROAD Maintenance GRR2 46, CHANGE) BREEN ROAD FIVE POINTS ROAD PIGRAM ROAD Maintenance GRR2 33, CRAMPTON DRIVE CULVERT PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 13, CRAMPTON DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD LEWIS ROAD Maintenance GRR2 85, PIGRAM ROAD 25M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 27, WYTON DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 47, CRAMPTON DRIVE FORBES ROAD CULVERT ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 18, CRAMPTON DRIVE 37M EASTOF 3- PUTNAM ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 28, CRAMPTON DRIVE BRIDGE FORBES ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 23, GLADSTONE DRIVE CULVERT 63M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD Maintenance GRR2 9, GLADSTONE DRIVE CULVERT CULVERT ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 38, GLADSTONE DRIVE 35M EAST OF DORCHESTER RAIL TRACKS ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 32,292. ROAD (5 KM/HR ZONE) MOSSLEY DRIVE 379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD LEWIS ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 69, GLADSTONE DRIVE MARR ROAD CULVERT Maintenance GRR2 19, GLADSTONE DRIVE 22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD LEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG Maintenance GRR2 12, GLADSTONE DRIVE LEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG MARR ROAD Maintenance GRR2 49, PIGRAM ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE MOUNT ELGIN DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 33, HERITAGE ROAD WYTON DRIVE 35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE Maintenance GRR2 121, CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE 34M NORTH F EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 1, CHERRY HILL ROAD 49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE WYTON DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 12, ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD WYTON DRIVE BRIDGE ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 2, HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE 77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS ADEQ Maintenance GRR2 49, ,9, GRR LEWIS ROAD CULVERT CRAMPTON DRIVE Maintenance GRR 9, Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 7

160 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost DOAN DRIVE 17M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ Maintenance GRR 36, HUNT ROAD CATHERINE STREET SOUTH END ADEQ Maintenance GRR 15, FORBES ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE MOSSLEY DRIVE Maintenance GRR 23, MOSSLEY DRIVE RAIL TRACKS CULVERT Maintenance GRR 1, EBENEZER DRIVE 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR 21,73.97 ROAD HARRIS ROAD 7M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON 39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK Maintenance GRR 37, ROAD DRIVE THOMPSON DRIVE 66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER CULVERT ADEQ Maintenance GRR 31,4.46 BOURNE THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT CULVERT ADEQ Maintenance GRR 21, FORBES ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance GRR 2, BRADY ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ Maintenance GRR 3, OLIVER DRIVE 38M EAST OF 27- OLIVER DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR 23, MOSSLEY DRIVE LEWIS ROAD RAIL TRACKS ADEQ Maintenance GRR 8, CHERRY HILL ROAD RAIL TRACK GREGORY DRIVE 1.97 ADEQ Maintenance GRR 15, OLIVER DRIVE 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR 23, CHERRY HILL ROAD 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- BRIDGE ADEQ Maintenance GRR 29,5.7 ELGINFIELD ROAD DOAN DRIVE BRIDGE PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR 4, HERITAGE ROAD GREGORY DRIVE CULVERT AT # ADEQ Maintenance GRR 43, HERITAGE ROAD CULVERT AT # PLOVER MILLS ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR 12, CHERRY HILL ROAD GREGORY DRIVE PLOVER MILLS ROAD ADEQ Maintenance GRR 59, VALLEY VIEW ROAD 41M SOUTH OF HWY 7- EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance GRR 67, ELGINFIELD ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD BRIDGE 49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK ADEQ Maintenance GRR 4, , CRK MINNIE STREET RAIL TRACK CATHERINE STREET 1, ADEQ Maintenance CRK HUDSON DRIVE DONNYBROOK DRIVE MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ Maintenance CRK 1, MOONLIGHT WAY HUDSON DRIVE EAST END ADEQ Maintenance CRK THE PARKWAY CARLETON COURT DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ Maintenance CRK OAKWOOD DRIVE MITCHELL AVENUE TURNBERRY DRIVE 1, ADEQ Maintenance CRK OAKWOOD DRIVE BYRON AVENUE MITCHELL AVENUE 1, ADEQ Maintenance CRK FOXHOLLOW DRIVE PRIVATE ROAD WOODVALE DRIVE 1, ADEQ Maintenance CRK FOXHOLLOW DRIVE 29- HAMILTON ROAD PRIVATE ROAD 1, ADEQ Maintenance CRK PURPLE HILL ROAD 4M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE EVELYN DRIVE 1.4 ADEQ Maintenance CRK OAKWOOD DRIVE TURNBERRY DRIVE RINESS DRIVE 1,829.1 ADEQ Maintenance CRK VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT MANLEY PLACE MANLEY DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK MOONLIGHT WAY WEST END STARDUST DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK BYRON AVENUE PARKVIEW DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ Maintenance CRK 456. Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 8

161 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost THE PARKWAY PARKVIEW DRIVE CARLETON COURT ADEQ Maintenance CRK VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT MANLEY DRIVE 61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT 29- HAMILTON ROAD MANLEY PLACE ADEQ Maintenance CRK BYRON AVENUE DORCHESTER ROAD CANTERBURY DRIVE 1, ADEQ Maintenance CRK BYRON AVENUE OAKWOOD DRIVE CHITTICK CRESCENT 1, ADEQ Maintenance CRK MINNIE STREET MINNIE STREET RAIL TRACK 1,229.4 ADEQ Maintenance CRK BYRON AVENUE PINEHURST DRIVE PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK HILLVIEW DRIVE GUEST LANE EAST END ADEQ Maintenance CRK LINWOOD DRIVE MARION STREET AMBER DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK AMBER DRIVE LINWOOD DRIVE MARION STREET ADEQ Maintenance CRK BYRON AVENUE WEST END PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK PINEHURST DRIVE BYRON AVENUE PARKVIEW DRIVE 1.12 ADEQ Maintenance CRK PARKVIEW DRIVE PINEHURST DRIVE PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK TURNBERRY DRIVE OAKWOOD DRIVE QUAIL RUN DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK MITCHELL COURT TURNBERRY DRIVE WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK TURNBERRY DRIVE QUAIL RUN DRIVE MITCHELL COURT ADEQ Maintenance CRK PURPLE HILL ROAD 49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK 2- DUNDAS STREET 1.61 ADEQ Maintenance CRK 1, BRIDGE STREET QUEEN STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD 1.11 ADEQ Maintenance CRK OLIVER DRIVE 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD HERITAGE ROAD 1.88 ADEQ Maintenance CRK FOXHOLLOW DRIVE FOREST GROVE CRESCENT FOREST GROVE CRESCENT 1.22 ADEQ Maintenance CRK MANLEY PLACE VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT END OF STREET 7.6 ADEQ Maintenance CRK FOXHOLLOW DRIVE WOODVALE DRIVE FOREST GROVE CRESCENT 1.98 ADEQ Maintenance CRK MANLEY DRIVE VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ADEQ Maintenance CRK LINWOOD DRIVE AMBER DRIVE EAST END 1.45 ADEQ Maintenance CRK PARKVIEW DRIVE BYRON AVENUE THE PARKWAY ADEQ Maintenance CRK MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT WOODVALE DRIVE (W) WOODVALE DRIVE (E) ADEQ Maintenance CRK ANN STREET QUEEN STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD 1.12 ADEQ Maintenance CRK QUAIL RUN DRIVE TURNBERRY DRIVE RINESS DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK RINESS DRIVE QUAIL RUN DRIVE LACROIX AVENUE ADEQ Maintenance CRK PINEHURST DRIVE PARKVIEW DRIVE PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ Maintenance CRK GERALD PARKWAY WEST END 27- NISSOURI ROAD ADEQ Maintenance CRK 1, ,192. RSS RON-ALLEN DRIVE MARION STREET NORTH END NOW Const RSS 478, DURHAM STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD NEELY COURT NOW Const RSS 188, CANTERBURY DRIVE SHERWOOD CRESCENT HUNTINGTON CRESCENT NOW Const RSS 427, WRIGHT STREET 1M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET DURHAM STREET NOW Const RSS 163, HUNTINGTON CRESCENT CANTERBURY DRIVE (N) 175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY NOW Const RSS 286,471.3 DRIVE NEELY COURT DURHAM STREET 12M NORTH OF DURHAM STREET 8.12 NOW Const RSS 196, RAILWAY STREET KING STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET NOW Const RSS 238, Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 9

162 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost RAILWAY STREET UPPER QUEEN STREET MAIN STREET NOW Const RSS 189, CANTERBURY DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD SHERWOOD CRESCENT Const RSS 116, TEMPERANCE STREET END OF STREET KING STREET NOW Const RSS 238, SHERWOOD CRESCENT CANTERBURY DRIVE BEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD NOW Const RSS 36, PLACE RICHMOND STREET CATHERINE STREET SOUTH END Const RSS 135, CHITTICK CRESCENT OAKWOOD DRIVE BYRON AVENUE Const RSS 577, ,544, RNS CANTERBURY DRIVE SHERWOOD CRESCENT HUNTINGTON CRESCENT NOW Const RNS 121, CANTERBURY DRIVE HUNTINGTON CRESCENT SHERWOOD CRESCENT NOW Const RNS 67, CANTERBURY DRIVE HUNTINGTON CRESCENT BYRON AVENUE NOW Const RNS 93, MITCHELL AVENUE SCARLETT CIRCLE CHITTICK CRESCENT NOW Const RNS 181, MITCHELL AVENUE OAKWOOD DRIVE SCARLETT CIRCLE NOW Const RNS 13, CARLETON COURT CARLETON COURT DORCHESTER ROAD NOW Const RNS 146, MITCHELL AVENUE CHITTICK CRESCENT MITCHELL COURT NOW Const RNS 176, GOLF DRIVE WRIGHT STREET 35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET NOW Const RNS 31, HILL STREET SOUTH END CATHERINE STREET 3.63 ADEQ Const RNS 33, WRIGHT STREET 1M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET GOLF DRIVE NOW Const RNS 28, PARK LANE COUNTRYSIDE LANE FAIRVIEW ROAD 1.22 NOW Const RNS 18, COUNTRYSIDE LANE PARK LANE MEADOWBROOK LANE 1.88 NOW Const RNS 78, SCARLETT CIRCLE MITCHELL AVENUE NORTH END NOW Const RNS 166, MEADOWBROOK LANE FAIRVIEW ROAD COUNTRYSIDE LANE 1.23 NOW Const RNS 25, HUNTINGTON CRESCENT 175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY CANTERBURY DRIVE (S) NOW Const RNS 35, DRIVE NEELY COURT 12M NORTH OF DURHAM STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD NOW Const RNS 234, MEADOWBROOK LANE COUNTRYSIDE LANE EAST END NOW Const RNS 176, COUNTRYSIDE LANE MONTEITH AVENUE PARK LANE NOW Const RNS 125, SHERWOOD PLACE END OF STREET SHERWOOD CRESCENT 1.12 NOW Const RNS 17, SHERWOOD CRESCENT SHERWOOD PLACE CANTERBURY DRIVE NOW Const RNS 177, QUEEN STREET WEST END PONDVIEW COURT 1.61 NOW Const RNS 56, SHERWOOD CRESCENT BEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD SHERWOOD PLACE NOW Const RNS 14, PLACE ,146, REC IRWIN ROAD 32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE SOUTH END NOW Const REC 232, (PVT CHANGE) SLO-PITCH ROAD WEST END 73- ELGIN ROAD NOW Const REC 226, GREGORY DRIVE BRIDGE FAIRVIEW ROAD NOW Const REC 187, COW PATH 44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD LOWER COW PATH NOW Const REC 571, DONNYBROOK DRIVE 43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD CASHEL LANE 7.96 NOW Const REC 29, Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 1

163 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost SAGE STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE NOW Const REC 16, LEWIS ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE GLADSTONE DRIVE NOW Const REC 436, LOWER COW PATH COW PATH 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD NOW Const REC 29, COW PATH LOWER COW PATH 78M EAST OF LOWER COWPATH NOW Const REC 263, ROAD WHITTAKER LANE CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE WEST END ADEQ Const REC 84, DONNYBROOK DRIVE CASHEL LANE END OF STREET NOW Const REC 281, RATH STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD MARSHALL STREET NOW Const REC 54, LEWIS ROAD 52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE MOSSLEY DRIVE NOW Const REC 435, IRWIN ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE NOW Const REC 1, (PVT CHANGE) BRADY ROAD 42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE MOSSLEY DRIVE NOW Const REC 419, SHEILS LANE NORTH END 8M NORTH OF 49- CATHERINE ADEQ Const REC 78, STREET MARSHALL STREET 3- PUTNAM ROAD RATH STREET ADEQ Const REC 4, GREGORY DRIVE WEST END BRIDGE ADEQ Const REC 18, BANKS ROAD CULVERT TRAFALGAR STREET NOW Const REC 169, BANKS ROAD 27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS CULVERT NOW Const REC 197,997.5 STREET STOREY DRIVE 122M WEST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ Const REC 371, DOAN DRIVE WEST END 15M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ Const REC 456, HARRISON STREET CUL-DE-SAC KING STREET LOOP NOW Const REC 116, LEWIS ROAD NORTH END 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE NOW Const REC 277, MARR ROAD END OF STREET GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ Const REC 32, OAKWOOD PLACE OAKWOOD DRIVE EAST END NOW Const REC 5, IRWIN ROAD NORTH END 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ Const REC 155, MARION STREET BRIDGE HUNT ROAD,EAST LEG Const REC 1,286, HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE LEWIS ROAD EAST END 8.58 NOW Const REC 159, MARR ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE END OF STREET ADEQ Const REC 49, IRWIN ROAD BREEN ROAD SOUTH END 1.92 ADEQ Const REC 25, LACEY LANE CRAMPTON DRIVE NORTH END ADEQ Const REC 46, REBECCA ROAD THORNDALE ROAD WYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG Const REC 1,138, FIVE POINTS ROAD BREEN ROAD SOUTH END ADEQ Const REC 8, ,474, NONE MOSSLEY DRIVE BRADY ROAD CULVERT ADEQ Const NONE CROMARTY DRIVE IRWIN ROAD CULVERT ADEQ Const NONE GLADSTONE DRIVE BRIDGE PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ Const NONE CROMARTY DRIVE EATON ROAD BRADY ROAD ADEQ Const NONE CROMARTY DRIVE LEWIS ROAD IRWIN ROAD ADEQ Const NONE Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 11

164 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost DONNYBROOK DRIVE FERRAR ROAD HUDSON DRIVE 1, ADEQ Const NONE MILL ROAD 25M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE MOSSLEY DRIVE CULVERT 34M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD ADEQ Const NONE DONNYBROOK DRIVE HUDSON DRIVE HARRIS ROAD 1, ADEQ Const NONE DONNYBROOK DRIVE HARRIS ROAD 298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE 1, ADEQ Const NONE CROMARTY DRIVE CULVERT RAIL TRACKS ADEQ Const NONE DONNYBROOK DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE FERRAR ROAD 1, ADEQ Const NONE CROMARTY DRIVE RAIL TRACKS 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ Const NONE CRAMPTON DRIVE RAIL TRACKS 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ Const NONE DORCHESTER ROAD THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ Const NONE DORCHESTER ROAD CULVERT CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE CATHERINE STREET 73- ELGIN ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ Const NONE PIGRAM ROAD 3M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD SALFORD ROAD ADEQ Const NONE MILL ROAD 25M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE CHRISTIE DRIVE 1.25 ADEQ Const NONE CRAMPTON DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD BRADY ROAD ADEQ Const NONE RICHMOND STREET MARION STREET RAIL TRACKS 1, ADEQ Const NONE BREEN ROAD BRIDGE 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ Const NONE CATHERINE STREET BRIDGE HUNT ROAD EAST LEG ADEQ Const NONE GLADSTONE DRIVE PUTNAM ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ Const NONE CRAMPTON DRIVE BRADY ROAD RAIL TRACKS ADEQ Const NONE BREEN ROAD RAIL TRACK 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT ADEQ Const NONE CHANGE) OLIVER DRIVE RAIL TRACK 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ Const NONE TRAFALGAR STREET 21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD 32- SHAW ROAD 1, ADEQ Const NONE ALMA STREET TERRENCE AVENUE THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ Const NONE PROSPECT HILL ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE FOURTEEN MILE ROAD ADEQ Const NONE ALMA STREET 29- HAMILTON ROAD TERRENCE AVENUE ADEQ Const NONE CHARLES STREET HILL STREET CATHERINE STREET ADEQ Const NONE HUNT ROAD 25- GORE ROAD 54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD ADEQ Const NONE CRAMPTON DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE CULVERT - 822M EAST OF ADEQ Const NONE WESTCHESTER BOURNE DORCHESTER ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE 4M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE LEWIS ROAD RAIL TRACKS CULVERT ADEQ Const NONE OLIVER DRIVE CULVERT RAIL TRACK ADEQ Const NONE OLIVER DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT ADEQ Const NONE CRAMPTON DRIVE CULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74- DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ Const NONE WESTCHESTER BOURNE GLADSTONE DRIVE 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ Const NONE ROAD (5KM/HR ZONE) HUNT ROAD 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET MARION STREET ADEQ Const NONE Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 12

165 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost HUNT ROAD MARION STREET 42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET ADEQ Const NONE HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE BOT ROAD LEWIS ROAD ADEQ Const NONE LEWIS ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE RAIL TRACKS ADEQ Const NONE FAIRVIEW ROAD 35M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE 28- THORNDALE ROAD 1.35 ADEQ Const NONE ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE RAIL TRACK DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ Const NONE CHARLES STREET THAMES STREET HILL STREET ADEQ Const NONE THAMES STREET CATHERINE STREET CHARLES STREET ADEQ Const NONE HILL STREET CATHERINE STREET CHARLES STREET ADEQ Const NONE LAKESIDE DRIVE RIVERVIEW DRIVE WYE CREEK DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE TRAFALGAR STREET 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET BANKS ROAD ADEQ Const NONE BANKS ROAD 2- DUNDAS STREET 27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS ADEQ Const NONE STREET HERITAGE ROAD 39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- BRIDGE ADEQ Const NONE ELGINFIELD ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD 35M EAST OF DORCHESTER ADEQ Const NONE ROAD (5 KM/HR ZONE) DINGMAN DRIVE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY 971 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL ADEQ Const NONE BOUNDARY OLIVER DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD BRIDGE ADEQ Const NONE COUCH ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD 41M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ Const NONE (BEND IN ROAD) RICHMOND STREET 25- GORE ROAD MARION STREET 1, ADEQ Const NONE REBECCA ROAD WYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG WYTON DRIVE - EAST LEG ADEQ Const NONE COBBLE HILLS ROAD CULVERT EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE COBBLE HILLS ROAD WYTON DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ Const NONE COBBLE HILLS ROAD OLIVER DRIVE BRIDGE ADEQ Const NONE 1 17 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD CULVERT M EAST OF ADEQ Const NONE DORCHESTER ROAD COBBLE HILLS ROAD EVELYN DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ Const NONE EBENEZER DRIVE PROSPECT HILL ROAD 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL 1.57 ADEQ Const NONE ROAD 1 34 LAKESIDE DRIVE WYTON DRIVE RIVERVIEW DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE MINNIE STREET MINNIE STREET CLARA STREET 1, ADEQ Const NONE 1 44 COBBLE HILLS ROAD CULVERT RAIL TRACK ADEQ Const NONE LEWIS ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE 1 15 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SHAIN ROAD RAIL TRACK ADEQ Const NONE CLARA STREET MINNIE STREET EVA STREET ADEQ Const NONE PROSPECT HILL ROAD SIXTEEN MILE ROAD FIFTEEN MILE ROAD ADEQ Const NONE PROSPECT HILL ROAD THIRTEEN MILE ROAD 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD ADEQ Const NONE BRADY ROAD 3M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE CRAMPTON DRIVE 44.3 ADEQ Const NONE 9. 6 CRAMPTON DRIVE 3- PUTNAM ROAD 37M EASTOF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ Const NONE Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 13

166 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost MOSSLEY DRIVE 34M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ Const NONE PROSPECT HILL ROAD 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- SIXTEEN MILE ROAD 1.92 ADEQ Const NONE ELGINFIELD ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD 37M SOUTH OF HWY 7- STOREY DRIVE 1.85 ADEQ Const NONE ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) PROSPECT HILL ROAD 44 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE THIRTEEN MILE ROAD ADEQ Const NONE ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD EVELYN DRIVE 4M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE 1.4 ADEQ Const NONE FERRAR ROAD 33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DONNYBROOK DRIVE 5.33 ADEQ Const NONE DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD 56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE WYTON DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE ROAD (PVT CHANGE) HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE LANES ROAD DONNYBROOK DRIVE SOUTH END ADEQ Const NONE RICHMOND STREET TRAFALGAR STREET 25- GORE ROAD ADEQ Const NONE PROSPECT HILL ROAD FOURTEEN MILE ROAD 44 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ADEQ Const NONE ROAD WYTON DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD 7M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD 1.7 ADEQ Const NONE DORCHESTER ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE 18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE ADEQ Const NONE DRIVE COBBLE HILLS ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD WYTON DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE REBECCA ROAD WYTON DRIVE - EAST LEG SCATCHERED LANE ADEQ Const NONE FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE CULVERT - 29M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ Const NONE DORCHESTER ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE CULVERT M EAST OF CULVERT - 29M EAST OF ADEQ Const NONE DORCHESTER ROAD DORCHESTER ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD OLIVER DRIVE CULVERT ADEQ Const NONE HARRIS ROAD 39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE DRIVE THOMPSON DRIVE 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ Const NONE ROAD PIGRAM ROAD SALFORD RD 25M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD ADEQ Const NONE FAIRVIEW ROAD OLIVER DRIVE 842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE HAMILTON CRESCENT NEWTON AVENUE MARION STREET 1, ADEQ Const NONE CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE RAIL TRACK ADEQ Const NONE STARDUST DRIVE DONNYBROOK DRIVE MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ Const NONE MAIN STREET RAILWAY STREET AGNES STREET ADEQ Const NONE CHARLES STREET RICHMOND STREET THAMES STREET 1.99 ADEQ Const NONE 8. 9 CROMARTY DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ Const NONE GLADSTONE DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD 22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ Const NONE OLIVER DRIVE 27- NISSOURI ROAD 38M EAST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD 1.38 ADEQ Const NONE Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 14

167 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost VILLAGE GATE DRIVE VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT WEST END 1.5 ADEQ Const NONE VILLAGE GATE DRIVE MINNIE STREET VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT ADEQ Const NONE PURPLE HILL ROAD 34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD 842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE BRIDGE 1.6 ADEQ Const NONE TRAFALGAR STREET RICHMOND STREET 27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET ADEQ Const NONE COBBLE HILLS ROAD 78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS DUNDAS STREET 1.78 ADEQ Const NONE STREET (CULVERT) DORCHESTER ROAD RAIL TRACKS HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE PURPLE HILL ROAD EVELYN DRIVE PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF 1.11 ADEQ Const NONE BRIDGE BOT ROAD 12M NORTH OF AVON DRIVE AVON DRIVE 5.12 ADEQ Const NONE HILLVIEW DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD GUEST LANE ADEQ Const NONE FAIRVIEW ROAD EVELYN DRIVE BRIDGE ADEQ Const NONE OLIVER DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD 1.47 ADEQ Const NONE GREGORY DRIVE EAST WELLBURN LIMIT 475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN ADEQ Const NONE ROAD EVELYN DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ Const NONE GREGORY DRIVE 475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ Const NONE ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD 34M NORTH F EVELYN DRIVE EVELYN DRIVE 1.34 ADEQ Const NONE EVA STREET CLARA STREET WEST END ADEQ Const NONE TRAFALGAR STREET 32- SHAW ROAD RICHMOND STREET ADEQ Const NONE FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE 2- DUNDAS STREET ADEQ Const NONE COBBLE HILLS ROAD RAIL TRACK 78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS 1.51 ADEQ Const NONE STREET BREEN ROAD 3- PUTNAM ROAD RAIL TRACK ADEQ Const NONE GLADSTONE DRIVE 23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ Const NONE COW PATH 73- ELGIN ROAD 44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD ADEQ Const NONE RICHMOND STREET RAIL TRACKS CHARLES STREET 1, ADEQ Const NONE CROMARTY DRIVE 3- PUTNAM ROAD 62M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ Const NONE SHAIN ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE ADEQ Const NONE DRIVE DOAN DRIVE 15M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ Const NONE DOAN DRIVE PUTNAM ROAD 17M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD ADEQ Const NONE VALLEY VIEW ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 41M SOUTH OF HWY ADEQ Const NONE ELGINFIELD ROAD BYRON AVENUE CANTERBURY DRIVE OAKWOOD DRIVE 1, ADEQ Const NONE MINNIE STREET WEST END MINNIE STREET 2.45 ADEQ Const NONE Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 15

168 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost RICHMOND STREET CHARLES STREET CATHERINE STREET 1, ADEQ Const NONE ERIC DRIVE ELIZABETH DRIVE NORTH END 1.72 ADEQ Const NONE MELVIN DRIVE ELIZABETH DRIVE NORTH END 4.89 ADEQ Const NONE BYRON AVENUE CHITTICK CRESCENT 29- HAMILTON ROAD 1, ADEQ Const NONE PARKVIEW DRIVE THE PARKWAY PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE FERRAR ROAD 29- HAMILTON ROAD 76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON 5.76 ADEQ Const NONE ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 44M SOUTH OF HWY ADEQ Const NONE ELGINFIELD ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 37M SOUTH OF HY 7- ELGINFIELD 1.37 ADEQ Const NONE ROAD PROSPECT HILL ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 33M SOUTH OF HWY ADEQ Const NONE ELGINFIELD ROAD HERITAGE ROAD HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD 39M SOUTH OF HWY ADEQ Const NONE ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) BROOKER TRAIL ELLIOTT TRAIL KING STREET ADEQ Const NONE GOLF DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE WRIGHT STREET ADEQ Const NONE FOXHOLLOW DRIVE FOREST GROVE CRESCENT SOUTH END 1.18 ADEQ Const NONE QUEEN STREET GEORGE STREET BRIDGE STREET ADEQ Const NONE QUEEN STREET PONDVIEW COURT GEORGE STREET ADEQ Const NONE GOLF DRIVE 35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET CUL-DE-SAC ADEQ Const NONE STARLIGHT LANE MOONLIGHT WAY NORTH END ADEQ Const NONE MOONLIGHT WAY STARDUST DRIVE STARLIGHT LANE ADEQ Const NONE ELLIOTT TRAIL 27- NISSOURI ROAD LEESBORO TRAIL ADEQ Const NONE ELLIOTT TRAIL LEESBORO TRAIL BROOKER TRAIL 1.39 ADEQ Const NONE LEESBORO TRAIL ELLIOTT TRAIL WILLIAM COURT 1.25 ADEQ Const NONE MONTEITH AVENUE THORNDALE ROAD HUESTON DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE MONTEITH AVENUE HUESTON DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD 1.83 ADEQ Const NONE HUESTON DRIVE MONTEITH AVENUE MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ Const NONE MONTEITH AVENUE HUESTON DRIVE COUNTRYSIDE LANE ADEQ Const NONE MONTEITH AVENUE COUNTRYSIDE LANE HUESTON DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE LACROIX AVENUE QUAIL RUN DRIVE RINESS DRIVE 1.14 ADEQ Const NONE RINESS DRIVE LACROIX AVENUE OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ Const NONE QUAIL RUN DRIVE RINESS DRIVE LACROIX AVENUE ADEQ Const NONE 639 LEESBORO TRAIL WILLIAM COURT UNNAMED STREET ADEQ Const NONE 645 WILLIAM COURT LEESBORO TRAIL WEST END 1.61 ADEQ Const NONE 632 ELLIOTT TRAIL BROOKER TRAIL SLAMMER TRAIL ADEQ Const NONE 636 ELLIOTT TRAIL SLAMMER TRAIL BROOKER TRAIL ADEQ Const NONE 637 SLAMMER TRAIL ELLIOTT TRAIL ELLIOTT TRAIL 1.23 ADEQ Const NONE 499 LUDWIG STREET MARION STREET NEWTON AVENUE ADEQ Const NONE 497 NEWTON AVENUE LUDWIG STREET HAMILTON CRESCENT ADEQ Const NONE 496 NEWTON AVENUE 32- SHAW ROAD LUDWIG STREET 1.21 ADEQ Const NONE Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 16

169 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost 675 IDEAL DRIVE 28- THORNDALE ROAD SOUTH END ADEQ Const NONE BSgrav SHAIN ROAD 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE SOUTH END ADEQ Const BSgrav 63,9.2 DRIVE PIGRAM ROAD BREEN ROAD 3M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD Const BSgrav 24, EATON ROAD NORTH END 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE Const BSgrav 59, CRAMPTON DRIVE LACEY LANE 441M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD Const BSgrav 15, CRAMPTON DRIVE LEWIS ROAD LACEY LANE Const BSgrav 14, GLADSTONE DRIVE RAIL TRACKS 23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD Const BSgrav 275, MOSSLEY DRIVE 128M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD FORBES ROAD Const BSgrav 166, BRADY ROAD CULVERT 3M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ Const BSgrav 19, PIGRAM ROAD 37 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY EBENEZER ROAD Const BSgrav 237, DRIVE VALLEY VIEW ROAD CENTRE DRIVE THORNDALE ROAD Const BSgrav 348, TRAFALGAR STREET 18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD HUNT ROAD Const BSgrav 312, PIGRAM ROAD EBENEZER ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE Const BSgrav 66, MOSSLEY DRIVE CULVERT 196M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD Const BSgrav 189, CHERRY HILL ROAD OLIVER DRIVE 69M NORTH O Const BSgrav 37, THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE) ,514,936.4 BS CROMARTY DRIVE FORBES ROAD PIGRAM ROAD NOW Const BS 212, NORTH STREET MINNIE STREET END OF STREET NOW Const BS 115, CROMARTY DRIVE 62M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD FORBES ROAD NOW Const BS 494, GLADSTONE DRIVE 63M WEST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD PUTNAM ROAD NOW Const BS 11, PURPLE HILL ROAD 44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE 28- THORNDALE ROAD 1.44 NOW Const BS 12, ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) TRAFALGAR STREET 73- ELGIN ROAD 18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD NOW Const BS 4, GLADSTONE DRIVE 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE 78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER NOW Const BS 2, BOURNE SCATCHERED LANE REBECCA ROAD WEST END 2.81 ADEQ Const BS 21, CHERRY HILL ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD 49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE 1.49 NOW Const BS 13,86.47 ROAD PURPLE HILL ROAD 28- THORNDALE ROAD 56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE 1.56 NOW Const BS 15,72.96 ROAD (PVT CHANGE) CHERRY HILL ROAD 69M NORTH O THORNDALE ROAD 1.69 NOW Const BS 18, THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE) TRAFALGAR STREET 17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD 73- ELGIN ROAD NOW Const BS 4,4.86 Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 17

170 Total Needs Summary by Improvement Type Current Inspection Batch Priority # Asset ID Street Name From To AADT Length TON Imp. Class Imp Imp. Cost THAMES STREET END OF STREET CATHERINE STREET 3.65 ADEQ Const BS 17, AVON DRIVE 142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT RAIL TRACKS Const BS 92,1.26 (BRIDGE) HARRIS STREET RAIL TRACK MINNIE STREET Const BS 32, GLADSTONE DRIVE 78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER NOW Const BS 452, BOURNE ROAD (5KM/HR ZONE) 2 25 WYTON DRIVE 47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD 27- NISSOURI ROAD 1.47 NOW Const BS 12, MOSSLEY DRIVE 196M WEST OF 3 PUTNAM ROAD 3- PUTNAM ROAD NOW Const BS 51, MINNIE STREET NORTH STREET VILLAGE GATE DRIVE Const BS 19, HERITAGE ROAD EVELYN DRIVE 22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE 1.22 NOW Const BS 5, HERITAGE ROAD 77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS DUNDAS STREET Const BS 117, HERITAGE ROAD 35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE EVELYN DRIVE 1.35 NOW Const BS 8, MOSSLEY DRIVE 3- PUTNAM ROAD 128M EAST OF 3- PUTNAM ROAD NOW Const BS 33, HUNT ROAD 1M NORTH OF CATHERINE CATHERINE STREET 46.1 ADEQ Const BS 7,991.5 STREET ROSS STREET PATRICIA AVENUE PATRICIA AVENUE Const BS 86, WYTON DRIVE REBECCA ROAD 88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD 1.88 NOW Const BS 22, MINNIE STREET CLARA STREET NORTH STREET Const BS 39, DALE DRIVE RICHMOND STREET WEST END Const BS 35, MOSSLEY DRIVE 73- ELGIN ROAD 379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD Const BS 14, GREGORY DRIVE WEST WELLBURN LIMIT 27- WELLBURN ROAD Const BS 142, FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT Const BS 119, ,438, ,733, ,733, Run: DEC 4,215 5:14PM Page: 18

171 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix I. Mapping Roads by Surface Type RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

172 NORTH STREET ENT NE EL 183 Y CO UR T 647 NE LA K BR O O DO W HIGH CLASS BITUMINOUS ASPHALT M EA RAILWAY STREET 187 GRAVEL, STONE OR OTHER LOOSETOP LOW CLASS BITUMINOUS SURFACE TREATED 35 Road_Section 351 OTHER FEATURES ROADS COUNTY BOUNDARY LE COBB 438 ROAD HILLS GLADSTONE DRIVE 3 5 AVON DRIVE PUTNAM ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE PROJECT PIGRAM ROAD Road Needs Study 141 FORBES ROAD Newall Drain BOT ROAD 4 Crampton Harrietsville Fitzpatrick Drain PUTNAM ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE Piney Creek 1758A WESTCHESTER BOURNE A Gladstone 49 WESTMINSTER DRIVE BREEN ROAD 166 LEWIS ROAD Mud Lakes 76 Mossley IRWIN ROAD 156 HWY 41 WEST 96 ELGIN ROAD 169 DORCHESTER ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE 223 LOWER C OW PATH OAKWOOD DRIVE MILL ROAD 194 HARRIS ROAD Derwent Dorchester Swamp 94 Thames Centre 13 HWY 41 EAST 93 CROMARTY DRIVE 69 Putnam D SLO-PITCH ROAD N ROA Reynolds Creek 149 HAMILT O E W DRIV COW PATH Caddy Creek 1295 Mill Pond LLO FOXHO 189 FERRAR ROAD 452 ROAD HUNT EET E STR ERIN CATH Dorchester CLIENT QUEEN STREET TINER AVENUE ROAD HUNT TREET THOMPSON DRIVE REET T S ION MAR 213 Beattie Pond Foster Ponds AD E RO GOR ND S RICHMO 192 D 235 MINN IE ST REET 111 ROA HUNT T STREE OND RICHM ROAD SHAW NOTES: This drawing has been prepared for the use of Stantec's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by Stantec and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. Stantec accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without Stantec's express written consent. Three Bridges EET S STR ROSS STR EET ET 18 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ROAD E HILL PURPL A DUND E D RIV YN EVEL OAD U RI R NISSO 322 AD CA RO REBEC E DRIV SIDE LAKE Evelyn Nilestown 29 SCOTLAND DRIVE Meters ENUE ON AV NEWT DRIVE GOLF ET STRE GAR 15 T WATERCOURSE AL TRAF CAT E STRE AD AD E E STR HERIN Meters 184 Cobble Hill D O HILL R 65 CEN T 612 CRES OVE ST GR FORE 611 DRIVE LO W FOXHOL E RO 32 'S ROBIN HT WRIG Legend N E A KL R PA SURFACE TYPE UE 671 VEN HA T I 2 E 67 NT MO EE 655 R QU PE UP T 654 TREE NS AD RO EET STR 653 D OA RI R OU N DAL THOR RIVE D N O WYT D 181 ET SAGE STRE D OA ER E 673 D RIV N TO S E HU AL ND OR TH ET TRE S NIS 34 AD W RO G KIN SS 661 NE AG IE FAIRV 315 ER OLIV 621 NILESTOWN 523 EW RVI FAI 658 T EET 646 TR ES NC RA ANE L NS LIO TREE NS IS O RR HA 638 TRAIL O OR SB LIOTT EL 629 IL A TR IL 637 TRA ER MM PE TEM 636 SLA LEE ROAD T 645 OUR MC A I L L I W Wye Creek L RY HIL CHER 3875 AD LS R O OA NDO R OLALO 248 E N DRIV WYTO D A RN RO OAD AGE R HERIT R MIL E DR IV Thorndale AD BU WELL ROAD 292 AD Meters THORNDALE 285 E DRIV Y OR GREG Belton Friendly Corners T TR AIL ELLIOT ET STRE KING E RO R ROA E 3 U 58 EN AV L EL 1 E 58 TCH IV I 5 D R M 58 RY ER 59 NB R TU STREET B O MILL R VIEW 291 Y VALLE IVE R D E R CENT N DAL THOR JANE STREET THA MES CRE SC T EE TR E HEST DORC N UE N AVE BYRO Plover Mills Fanshawe Lake DRIVE URST PINEH ENUE VE DRI 556 EW KVI PAR UE AVEN E PLOV St. Ives Salmonville D RIVE EZER EBEN HE CAT ES RIN Wellburn Gregory Creek RINESS DRIVE E NTR ANC ARENA E OAD 287 HILL R PECT PROS Cherry Grove QUEEN ST REET AV TINER RIVE D Y E STOR LER WHEE ROAD HARRIS 47 ROAD FIELD ELGIN T W COU R PONDVIE HAMILTON ROAD ANE SL QUEEN STREET 52 5 E IL SH EET 459 STR RIS HAR T EE TR ES REET ST IDG BR ID DAV MINN IE STREET LINW 469 ET TRE S EVA 46 IV E E DR E OOD DRIV D OA IN R GAT 461 AGE VILL DRIVE LE N T REE H ST RUT NT L N-A RO 499 D OA WR SHA CE 498 RES NC ILTO HAM 497 UE EN AV 496 WTON NE EET STR RA CLA ET TRE 212 T EE STR ELG N RIO MA DS ON HM RIC NORTH 378 DORCHESTER DRAWING SURFACE TYPE INVENTORY North Branch Drain 27 DOAN DRIVE 28 PROJECT No. Avon SCALE: 2 Kilometers DATE: DECEMBER DRAWING No. 1

173 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix J. Mapping Roadside Environment RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

174 NORTH STREET ENT NE EL 183 Y CO UR T 647 NE LA DO W BR O O K RURAL SEMI-URBAN M EA RAILWAY STREET ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENT 35 URBAN 351 ROADS Meters COUNTY BOUNDARY LE COBB 438 ROAD HILLS GLADSTONE DRIVE 3 5 AVON DRIVE PUTNAM ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE PROJECT PIGRAM ROAD Road Needs Study 141 FORBES ROAD Newall Drain BOT ROAD 4 Crampton Harrietsville Fitzpatrick Drain PUTNAM ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE 1758A WESTCHESTER BOURNE A Gladstone 49 WESTMINSTER DRIVE Piney Creek Mossley 127 BREEN ROAD 166 LEWIS ROAD ELGIN ROAD 172 Mud Lakes IRWIN ROAD 156 HWY 41 WEST DORCHESTER ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE 223 LOWER C OW PATH OAKWOOD DRIVE MILL ROAD 194 HARRIS ROAD Derwent Dorchester Swamp 94 Thames Centre 13 HWY 41 EAST 93 CROMARTY DRIVE 69 Putnam D SLO-PITCH ROAD N ROA Reynolds Creek 149 HAMILT O E W DRIV COW PATH Caddy Creek 1295 Mill Pond LLO FOXHO 189 FERRAR ROAD 452 ROAD HUNT EET E STR ERIN CATH Dorchester CLIENT QUEEN STREET TINER AVENUE ROAD HUNT TREET THOMPSON DRIVE REET T S ION MAR 213 Beattie Pond Foster Ponds AD E RO GOR ND S RICHMO 192 D 235 MINN IE ST REET 111 ROA HUNT T STREE OND RICHM ROAD SHAW NOTES: This drawing has been prepared for the use of Stantec's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by Stantec and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. Stantec accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without Stantec's express written consent. Three Bridges EET S STR ROSS STR EET ET 18 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ROAD E HILL PURPL A DUND E D RIV YN EVEL Nilestown 29 SCOTLAND DRIVE ENUE ON AV NEWT OAD U RI R NISSO 322 AD CA RO REBEC ET STRE GAR 15 Meters Evelyn AL TRAF CAT 185 DRIVE GOLF WATERCOURSE AD E E STR HERIN T E STRE E DRIV SIDE LAKE O HILL R 65 CEN T 612 CRES OVE ST GR FORE 611 DRIVE LO W FOXHOL 669 AD RO N E A KL R PA HT WRIG Legend UE 671 VEN HA T I 2 E 67 NT MO AD 32 'S ROBIN EW RVI FAI 659 T 654 TREE NS EE 655 R QU PE UP E RO RIVE D N O WYT D EET STR Cobble Hill Wye Creek OTHER FEATURES D 248 E N DRIV WYTO ET SAGE STRE D OA ER E 673 D RIV N TO S E HU D OA RI R OU 34 AD W RO 268 N DAL THOR Thorndale 621 NILESTOWN AL ND OR TH ET TRE S NIS IE FAIRV ER OLIV G KIN SS 661 NE AG ANE L NS LIO T TREE NS 632 EET 646 TR ES NC RA 638 TRAIL O OR SB LIOTT EL 629 IL A TR PE TEM 636 LEE ROAD 3875 SLA IL 637 TRA ER MM IS O RR HA L RY HIL CHER T 645 OUR MC A I L L I W OA NDO R OLALO D 365 AD LS R O A RN RO OAD AGE R HERIT AD AD BU WELL ROAD 292 E RO R ROA E 3 U 58 EN AV L EL 1 E 58 TCH IV I 5 D R M 58 RY ER 59 NB R TU STREET B O MILL R VIEW 291 Y VALLE 29 R MIL 267 T TR AIL ELLIOT ET STRE KING N DAL THOR JANE STREET THA MES CRE SC T EE TR Meters THORNDALE 285 E DRIV Y OR GREG Belton Friendly Corners 266 E DR IV 26 D RIVE Fanshawe Lake 561 E HEST DORC N UE N AVE BYRO Plover Mills RE CENT DRIVE URST PINEH ENUE VE DRI 556 EW KVI PAR UE AVEN E PLOV St. Ives Salmonville D RIVE EZER EBEN HE CAT ES RIN Wellburn Gregory Creek RINESS DRIVE E NTR ANC ARENA E OAD 287 HILL R PECT PROS Cherry Grove QUEEN ST REET AV TINER RIVE D Y E STOR LER WHEE ROAD HARRIS 47 ROAD FIELD ELGIN T W COU R PONDVIE HAMILTON ROAD ANE SL QUEEN STREET 52 5 E IL SH EET 459 STR RIS HAR T EE TR ES REET ST IDG BR ID DAV MINN IE STREET LINW 469 ET TRE S EVA 46 IV E E DR E OOD DRIV D OA IN R GAT 461 AGE VILL DRIVE LE N T REE H ST RUT NT L N-A RO 499 D OA WR SHA CE 498 RES NC ILTO HAM 497 UE EN AV 496 WTON NE EET STR RA CLA ET TRE 212 T EE STR ELG N RIO MA DS ON HM RIC NORTH 378 DORCHESTER DRAWING ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENT North Branch Drain 27 DOAN DRIVE 28 PROJECT No. Avon SCALE: 2 Kilometers DATE: DECEMBER DRAWING No. 2

175 Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 215 Appendix K. Mapping Roads by Improvement Time of Need and Type RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_ docx

176 NORTH STREET ENT NE EL 183 Y CO UR T NE LA K BR O O DO W 1 TO 5 YEAR CONSTRUCTION NEED M EA RAILWAY STREET 186 Meters NOW CONSTRUCTION NEED 35 6 TO 1 YEAR CONSTRUCTION NEED NOW RESURFACING NEED TO 5 YEAR RESURFACING NEED 6 TO 1 YEAR RESURFACING NEED ADEQUATE 6 TO 1 YEAR MAINTENANCE NEED 436 ROADS COUNTY BOUNDARY LE COBB 438 ROAD HILLS GLADSTONE DRIVE 3 5 AVON DRIVE PUTNAM ROAD HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE PROJECT PIGRAM ROAD Road Needs Study 141 FORBES ROAD Newall Drain BOT ROAD 4 Crampton Harrietsville Fitzpatrick Drain PUTNAM ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE 1758A WESTCHESTER BOURNE A Gladstone 49 WESTMINSTER DRIVE Piney Creek Mossley 127 BREEN ROAD 166 LEWIS ROAD ELGIN ROAD 172 Mud Lakes IRWIN ROAD 156 HWY 41 WEST DORCHESTER ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE 223 LOWER C OW PATH OAKWOOD DRIVE MILL ROAD 194 HARRIS ROAD Derwent Dorchester Swamp 94 Thames Centre 13 HWY 41 EAST 93 CROMARTY DRIVE 69 Putnam D SLO-PITCH ROAD N ROA Reynolds Creek 149 HAMILT O E W DRIV COW PATH Caddy Creek 1295 Mill Pond LLO FOXHO 189 FERRAR ROAD 452 ROAD HUNT EET E STR ERIN CATH Dorchester CLIENT QUEEN STREET TINER AVENUE ROAD HUNT TREET THOMPSON DRIVE REET T S ION MAR 213 Beattie Pond Foster Ponds AD E RO GOR ND S RICHMO 192 D 235 MINN IE ST REET 111 ROA HUNT T STREE OND RICHM ROAD SHAW NOTES: This drawing has been prepared for the use of Stantec's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by Stantec and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. Stantec accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without Stantec's express written consent. Three Bridges EET S STR ROSS STR EET ET 18 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ROAD E HILL PURPL A DUND E D RIV YN EVEL Nilestown 29 SCOTLAND DRIVE 185 DRIVE GOLF TIME OF NEED ENUE ON AV NEWT OAD U RI R NISSO 322 AD CA RO REBEC ET STRE GAR 15 T NOW MAINTENANCE NEED AL TRAF CAT E STRE WATERCOURSE Evelyn AD E E STR HERIN Meters O HILL R 65 CEN T 612 CRES OVE ST GR FORE 611 DRIVE LO W FOXHOL E DRIV SIDE LAKE 32 'S ROBIN AD RO 664 HT WRIG OTHER FEATURES RIVE D N O WYT D 523 EW RVI FAI N E A KL R PA Legend Cobble Hill Wye Creek UE 671 VEN HA T I 2 E 67 NT MO 659 T 654 TREE S EN E 5 U 65 RQ PE UP ET STRE KING 317 D 248 E N DRIV WYTO ET SAGE STRE D OA ER E 673 D RIV N TO S E HU ET TRE D OA RI R OU AD E RO N DAL THOR TR AIL 621 NILESTOWN AL ND OR TH SS 661 NE AG 656 EET TR GS N I K S NIS 34 AD W RO 266 E DR IV R E OLIV 657 ANE L NS LIO T TREE NS IE FAIRV OA NDO R OLALO EET 646 TR ES NC RA 638 TRAIL O OR SB LIOTT EL 629 IL A TR IS O RR HA LEE 636 SLA IL 637 TRA ER MM PE TEM T 645 OUR MC A I L L I W ROAD AD LS R O 639 L RY HIL CHER R MIL Friendly Corners Thorndale D Belton AD AD A RN RO OAD AGE R HERIT E RO R ROA E 3 U 58 EN AV L EL 1 E 58 TCH IV I 5 D R M 58 RY ER 59 NB R TU STREET B Meters THORNDALE 285 E DRIV Y OR GREG BU WELL ROAD 292 T ELLIOT N DAL THOR JANE STREET THA MES CRE SC T O MILL R EE TR VIEW 291 Y VALLE D RIVE Fanshawe Lake 561 E HEST DORC N UE N AVE BYRO Plover Mills RE CENT DRIVE URST PINEH ENUE VE DRI 556 EW KVI PAR UE AVEN E PLOV St. Ives Salmonville D RIVE EZER EBEN HE CAT ES RIN Wellburn Gregory Creek RINESS DRIVE E NTR ANC ARENA E OAD 287 HILL R PECT PROS Cherry Grove QUEEN ST REET AV TINER RIVE D Y E STOR LER WHEE ROAD HARRIS 47 ROAD FIELD ELGIN T W COU R PONDVIE HAMILTON ROAD ANE SL QUEEN STREET 52 5 E IL SH EET 459 STR RIS HAR T EE TR ES REET ST IDG BR ID DAV MINN IE STREET LINW 469 ET TRE S EVA 46 IV E E DR E OOD DRIV D OA IN R GAT 461 AGE VILL DRIVE LE N T REE H ST RUT NT L N-A RO 499 D OA WR SHA CE 498 RES NC ILTO HAM 497 UE EN AV 496 WTON NE EET STR RA CLA ET TRE 212 T EE STR ELG N RIO MA DS ON HM RIC NORTH 378 DORCHESTER DRAWING TYPE AND TIME OF IMPROVEMENT North Branch Drain 27 DOAN DRIVE 28 PROJECT No. Avon SCALE: 2 Kilometers DATE: DECEMBER DRAWING No. 3