FUEL BURN REDUCTION. Fuel consumption improvement 20 % 5 % 20 to 30% 1 Direction Technique YD 20 juin first generation

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "FUEL BURN REDUCTION. Fuel consumption improvement 20 % 5 % 20 to 30% 1 Direction Technique YD 20 juin first generation"

Hilary Butler
5 years ago
Views:

1 Environmental Constraints and Future Engine Architectures 0 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008 Jacques Renvier Senior VP System Engineering

2 FUEL BURN REDUCTION B / JT8D first generation 20 % offers 20% gain A320 / CFM56-5A Fuel consumption improvement 5 % Further 6% with 6 next % generation A320 / CFM56-5B Y1 / LEAP56 B737 CL / CFM56-3B B737 NG / CFM56-7B A30X / LEAP56 Year of Entry Into Service 20 to 30% Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

SILENCE IN PROGRESS Annoyance lowered by a factor of 2 B737-200 / JT8D 8 db A320 / CFM56-5A Noise improvement 1.

3 SILENCE IN PROGRESS Annoyance lowered by a factor of 2 B / JT8D 8 db A320 / CFM56-5A Noise improvement 1.5 db A320 / CFM56-5B B737 CL / CFM56-3B B737 NG / CFM56-7B 6 to 8 db Y1 / LEAP56 Year of Entry Into Service A30X / LEAP Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

4 GREENER B / JT8D First CFM offered 60% gain A320 / CFM56-5A Further 35% gain with DAC Average gain in NOx level at ICAO point LP multipoint show 50% benefits CFM56-5B LEAP56 Year of Entry Into Service Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

Engine Contribution to Environmental Objectives ACARE 2020 OBJECTIVES (reference : 2000 aircraft) To reduce perceived noise by half To reduce NOx by 80% and other emissions To reduce CO2 by 50%

5 Engine Contribution to Environmental Objectives ACARE 2020 OBJECTIVES (reference : 2000 aircraft) To reduce perceived noise by half To reduce NOx by 80% and other emissions To reduce CO2 by 50% European Industry has committed on ACARE objectives for a drastic reduction of noise, Nox, and CO2 ATM Contribution Aircraft Contribution Engine Contribution To reduce noise by 6dB per operation To reduce NOx by 60 to 80% To reduce specific fuel consumption by 20% 4 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

6 Design Decisions Must Balance Requirements AIRCRAFT Requirements Thrust Weight Installation.. Environment Noise,local rules included Emissions FAA and EASA Regulation TIMING For Entry into service Reliability Maintenance Start and run no surprise D s and C s On wing life ECONOMICS Market Cash EROC Maintenance cost Manufacturing cost Resale value.. A market driven by «ownership cost» and more and more Environmental Factors 5 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

Physical Principles Driving Environmental Tradeoffs Increased Engine Pressure Ratio - Reduced Fuel Burn / CO 2 by improving thermal efficiency - Reduces lower power emissions (HC and CO) - Increases

7 Physical Principles Driving Environmental Tradeoffs Increased Engine Pressure Ratio - Reduced Fuel Burn / CO 2 by improving thermal efficiency - Reduces lower power emissions (HC and CO) - Increases NO x by increasing combustion temperature - Increase Maintenance cost Increased engine bypass ratio at current architecture - Reduced Fuel Burn / CO 2 by improving propulsive efficiency -Reduces Noise by reducing fan Tip speed, pressure ratio and exhaust velocity -Increase Maintenance cost -Increase powerplant weight, Drag Improved efficiency Already high level efficiency achieved - Reduces CO 2 by improving fuel efficiency and reducing required thrust - Reduces NO x by reducing combustion temperature - Increase maintenance cost Requires Optimization of Multiple and Sometimes Conflicting Factors Priorities must be right for the entire life of the Product 6 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

8 Noise breakthrough Fuel Burn 500Nm Ref CFM56-5B/P HBPR BPR10 BPR10 Contra rotative fans VHBR Better Noise Noise Cumulative Margin Break through technology required to meet ACARE Goals 7 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

9 Fuel Burn breakthrough Fuel Burn 500Nm Ref CFM56-5B/P EIS % HBPR BPR10 Practical limits Contra rotative fans VHBR BPR10-25% EIS Challenging noise -30% BPR40-15db Open Rotors Better Noise Noise Cumulative Margin Break through technology required to meet ACARE Goals 8 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

10 Narrow body engine architectures vs. Current engines LEAP56 Balanced solution 50% lower Nox emission LEAP56 Noise solution Open Rotor Fuel burn optimized High Bypass Ratio Contra rotative 2 stages fan Contra rotative low speed rotors Fuel Burn (%) Maint. Cost (%) Noise (db) -40 Fuel Burn (%) Maint. Cost (%) Noise (db) -40 Fuel Burn (%) Maint. Cost (%) Noise (db) 9 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

11 Not so easy to make it simple LOW NOISE Small Big Hot Cold Cold BIG Big LIGHT SMALL LOW FUEL LOW CO 2 BURN LOW SPECIFIC FUEL CONSUMPTION Low CO, unburn HC BIG HOT COLD LOW MAINTENANCE COST HIGH ON WING LIFE LOW NOx COLD Optimization and compromise Technology required for overall optimization 11 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

12 Technologies for tomorrow LP spool technologies Performances/noise/Eroc/Weight HP spool technologies Performances/emission/Eroc System technologies Integrated powerplant Intelligent engine Direction Technique YD 20 juin

13 April P. 21 Fuel burn technologies Weight reduction & aerodynamic improvement Highly loaded compressor Next-gen RTM composite fan Novel alloys EIS 2020 Composite fan case Light weight Composite mixer Ceramic-matrix composite Highly loaded Contra rotative turbines Bling Ceramic matrix composites have 1/3 the density of nickel-based alloys 13 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

14 Acoustics technologies Quieter engines Counter-rotating fan 2018 Splice-less inlet Chevron Nozzles Fluidic / variable geometry chevrons Quiet Technology Demonstrator 2008 Turbomachinery source noise reduction Direction Technique YD 20 juin

WIN EMISSION CHALLENGE Traditional Combustor Twin-Annular, Pre-Swirl Combustor Shortened design NOx reduced 50% CMC combustor Higher temperature capability Optimize cooling flow

15 WIN EMISSION CHALLENGE Traditional Combustor Twin-Annular, Pre-Swirl Combustor Shortened design NOx reduced 50% CMC combustor Higher temperature capability Optimize cooling flow to reduce NOx (More fuel, less air hotter temperatures more NOx) Lean burning Combustor (Less fuel, more air cooler temperatures less NOx) 15 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

16 Laying the foundation for the future Evaluating the requirements Environment : noise, emissions Engine performance :fuel, CO2 high priority Maintenance costs and reliability: start and run, on wing life, no surprise. Health monitoring, intelligent engine, prognostic, diagnostic Assessing game-changing architectures Noise, aircraft integration, technology to develop. Maturing the technology to unlock the future System optimization Pioneer and mature new technologies? Heavy Technology Programs required laying the technology foundation for the future. 16 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008 CFM, CFM56, LEAP56, and the CFM logo are trademarks of CFM International, a 50/50 joint company between Snecma and General Electric Company

17 17 Direction Technique YD 20 juin 2008

CFM Technology. realizing the promise 50% LOWER NOX EMISSIONS. ANOTHER LEAP FORWARD FOR LEAP TECHNOLOGY.

CFM Technology. realizing the promise 50% LOWER NOX EMISSIONS. ANOTHER LEAP FORWARD FOR LEAP TECHNOLOGY. 50% LOWER NOX EMISSIONS. CFM Technology realizing the promise ANOTHER LEAP FORWARD FOR LEAP TECHNOLOGY. Bill Brown General Manger CFM Marketing June 2010 CFM International Proprietary Information The information